Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:30 pm, September 14th, 2023 - 15 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Could we have more pictures of Labour members? Just for balance lol.
There is no conflict of interest in the Natz plans to ramp up property places..O.K!
'These gains were largely driven by Luxon’s family home in Remuera and his family beach house on Waiheke Island, which are worth $7.68m and $7.35m respectively. Capital gains on both this year amount to $3m. He also owns three investment properties in a block in Onehunga, the Wellington apartment, and a building he uses as an electoral office in Botany (because it is a commercial building, it is excluded from capital gain calculations).'
Christopher Luxon's property gains soar as National promises to tackle housing crisis | Stuff.co.nz
I do not understand the comment"(because it is a commercial building, it is excluded from capital gain calculations)" It was my understanding that the current 2 year bright line test (and the previous 10 year version) related to residential hises used for that purpose. If a company decides to move operations to another place (or a new building) they have owned the building for commercial proposes and my understanding is that capital gains would form taxable income for the owning entity – whether that is an individual or a business. Can we get this clarified. There is astange perception that we do not have capital gains in New Zealand, but this is not true – gains from share investments and fixed interest investments may have tax payable on realised capital gains – this affects most Kiwisaver accounts (AI am not aware of any Kiwisaver manager investing in direct property – that gives too much of a liquidity risk of a lot of customers transfer to another provider – the tax handout for property investors was only intended to benefit the wealthy
TVNZ live online this evening starting 7pm. Grant Robertson, Nicole Willis, David Seymour and Winston Peters in Queenstown for the "Finance Debate". I think Jessica Mutch McKay is hosting so expect his nibs, Mr Snake Oil Luxon will probably get a fairly easy ride. We'll wait and see.
James Shaw too I think. Jack Tame is hosting.
I put up a post if people want to discuss during the debate.
https://thestandard.org.nz/livestream-7pm-asb-finance-debate/
Yes it is Shaw not Peters and Tane is hosting. Muddled it with another item from Mutch McKay. 😕
it's been weirdly difficult to find the details of who and where the livestream is.
Indeed it was. Shaw and Robertson stood out as the most sensible, stable and intelligent among them. Seymour talked gobbledygook most of the time and Willis was so out of her depth she had to resort to shrieks and silly lies.
Call me a conspiracist, but I have to wonder whether the lack of publicity was deliberate.
Very good easy way to explain to people who struggle with reading / understanding policies https://electionscorecards.org.nz/
"Willis told TVNZ that those who have worked with foreign purchasers in the past and who work at that luxury end of the market think there is demand"
OK. So I now want not only the detailed costings made public, but also the content of these conversations with the real estate industry. Were any of these conversations with known large donors? Did these donors request the restoring of access for foreign buyers? How can we know that this is not a policy for cash deal?
It is not just real estate, but also land bankers and property developers – transfer of building capacity to the high end foreign buyer.
Not all the property development companies will be New Zealand owned, nor their sources of finance.
Thanks SPC – that makes sense.
She's given the game away! Policy for cash deal indeed. Now we know how they managed to accrue an $8 million campaign find. They have bought the election by way of subterfuge and dishonesty.
Labour and the Greens should run with it for the next four weeks.
It looks like someone in Auckland is looking to trade a vehicle for one in Christchurch.
a green Toyota SR5 Hilux cruiser owned by Scott Barrett
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby-world-cup-2023/300952803/all-blacks-forward-scott-barrett-seeks-stolen-ute-as-he-heads-to-rugby-world-cup
for a black Toyota Hilux (type not identified, so probably not GR sport) owned by Andrew Mulligan?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/300970616/radio-host-andrew-mulligans-ute-has-been-nicked
There seems to be a market for a near new ute (new ones come with a $5000 tax for high fuel consumption).
Was a factor in ute thefts a few years ago into Middle East, current bingle has had a affect on ute / 4WD market in Europe, so wouldn't be surprised if that's extending to our parts.
[image resized]