Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:46 pm, September 11th, 2014 - 15 comments
Categories: election 2014 -
Tags: Electoral Commission, photos, selfies, spoilsports
The Electoral Commission has distributed a warning to parties which seems worth distributing widely:
The increased interest in voters taking ‘selfies’ inside voting places is raising concerns about congestion and disturbance in voting places and potential non-compliance with rules in the Electoral Act regarding campaigning on election day and protecting the secrecy of voting.
While the Electoral Commission encourages people to take and share photos of themselves with their ‘I’ve voted’ sticker once they’re outside the voting place and unlikely to interrupt or inconvenience other voters, we have decided to put up ‘No photos inside the voting place’ posters inside all voting places and advance voting places as soon as it can be arranged. A copy of the poster is attached.
Voting Place Managers have to ensure that voting proceeds smoothly, that voters are not impeded, and that order is maintained in voting places. Voting places are for the purpose of voting and people should not remain in the voting place for other purposes.
Publishing anything on election day that could potentially influence another voter is strictly prohibited, and photos taken earlier in the voting period that are shared, re-shared or reposted on election day could fall foul of the Electoral Act.
If a person posts an image of their completed ballot paper on social media on election day or in the three days prior to election day this is likely to be an offence under section 197 of the Act, which carries a potential penalty of a fine not exceeding $20,000. Section 197 of the Act prohibits a range of activities including:
It also potentially exposes the voter’s friends to the risk of breaching the rules if they share, re-share or repost the voter’s ‘selfie’ on election day.
Returning Officers will still be able to give permission to candidates for media or campaign managers to organise filming in voting places. Permission will be given on the condition that there is no filming behind voting screens, no filming of completed or uncompleted voting papers, and no activities that disrupt voting in the voting place.
Where candidates and supporters have already posted images of completed ballot papers we would ask that they take them down. Publishing a photo of a completed ballot paper at this stage of the advance voting period would not appear to be a breach of the Electoral Act 1993. It does however, appear to be contrary to the spirit and purpose of the secrecy provisions and provisions forbidding the distribution of imitation ballot papers.
The Commission would advise parties and candidates to exercise caution when it comes to publishing or distributing material that includes a ballot paper, particularly in a medium where material will continue to be published.
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
It’s a pity they’re strictly enforcing this, so we won’t be able to see if John Key really did vote for Goldsmith like he says he will, or he ends up voting for Seymour (Key is a carpetbagger who lives in Epsom).
I think Key has probably decided to leave NZ asap for USA after this election and will secretly vote for Labour!
He’s also the number one selfie addict.
Off topic, but if Key is the MP for Helensville and is a voter in Epsom, does he get two votes? Anyone? How does it work?
He does get two votes, but that’s because he’s the Prime Minister and therefore more important than us, not because he lives in a different electorate.
There’s a picture on Wikipedia of John Key voting in Epsom:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/John_Key_voting_in_Epsom_cropped.jpg
You can see that he voted two ticks, i.e. for National Party and the National candidate (Richard Worth), when he wanted the rest of us to vote for Rodney Hide.
lol
Do as I say, not as I do.
So, to clarify, it’s okay to post a selfie on Sunday the 21st showing the voting paper?
Or is it now illegal to even take a picture of the voting paper, even if you only show what you voted, and not the entire paper?
I was kind of looking forward to posting something on facebook just to piss off the Nat voters.
Wasn’t it Key in his pre-election in 2008 said we want to have less laws/rules red tape we want to simplify the lives all all Kiwi’s. Ha ha ha ha another lie?
Oh jeebus. I’m losing count now disturbed.
Everyone should take a selfie voting & put it online, then watch them struggle to take everyone to court…..lol
‘
If only the State Services Commission was as proactive and thorough in protecting public servants as the Electoral Commission is in peotecting the election. Seems incongruous that the election is being run by the book but the provision and protection of the public services it enables is imperilled. Its a bit like having a stern police officer working front of house for a Mafia shares pump and dump boiler room.
I see that its ok for the media to take photos and promulgate them if given prior approval. (in small print)
Trevor Mallard has even posted a pic of his completed ballot paper on his Facebook page.