web analytics

Farrar fudging ACE figures

Written By: - Date published: 8:05 am, February 24th, 2010 - 45 comments
Categories: dpf, Economy, education - Tags:

National have made a big mistake cutting funding for Adult and Community Education (ACE). For a trifling sum of money, and giving lie to their pre election rhetoric, they have killed off a decades old public institution. People are angry.

One of the stupidest aspects of this anti-education policy is its financial incompetence. Spending on ACE has a huge return. According to this report from Price Waterhouse Coopers Economic Evaluation of Adult and Community Education Outcomes :

Based on the available data, including the survey responses, the estimated economic impact of the ACE sector is between $4.8 and $6.3 billion annually. This equates to a return on investment of $54 – $72 for each dollar of funding. Each dollar of government funding generates a return of $16 – $22, but this is further leveraged through private contributions to the sector, including those voluntarily added such as unpaid volunteer labour. …

Not even National’s most dedicated apologists can defend the foolishness of killing off such returns, so their only alternative is to strap on their ideological blinkers and try and discredit the PWC analysis. Farrar summarises a recent rash of blog posts (here, here, here) attempting to do just that.

You know Farrar has little to go on when he gets in to the ad hominem attacks: “Remind me to never get PWC to do a report, if I want it taken credibly” (this despite citing PWC as an authoritative source on previous occasions). But the main substance of Farrar’s attack (quoting Nolan) is the argument that most of the benefits of ACE spending don’t count. From the list of benefits in the PWC report (Table 7.1 p47), Farrar / Nolan rule out almost all of them:

Increase in direct income: No
Savings in government benefits: No
Marginal increase in individual income: No
Increase in income from self-confidence: No
Reduction in family violence: No
Savings for health: No
Savings from crime reduction: Potentially, partially
Increased community involvement by individual: No
Higher [government] income [from] taxes: No

The reason that these benefits “don’t count” is that they are “private benefits” not “public benefits”. Private benefits (and “fiscal externalities” such as increased government income from taxes) are not “policy-relevant”. Farrar comments: “If a firm makes basic mistakes like counting private benefits as public benefits and vice-versa with costs, then they do not deserve to be taken seriously”.

I’ll try and limit myself to two points in reply to this arrant nonsense. First, we don’t need the bizarre Farrar / Nolan checklist of what is and isn’t a public benefit, because that too is covered by the PWC analysis. They assess (Table 7.2 p48) the total benefit ($4,902 – $6,429 million) as being composed of $3,759 – $4,903 million private benefit, and $1,142 – $1,526 million Government/public benefit. Even if we accept that only public benefits are relevant, the return on ACE spending is huge ($16 to $22 on every dollar spent).

But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? According to Farrar, governments should not have policy that tries to increase our income, decrease our use of benefits, reduce family violence, reduce our use of the health system, and so on. This will be news to government. National say they want us to be a “high-skill high-wage” economy. National say they want us to get off the benefit. National say they are concerned about the relationship between income and health. And so on, and so on. If Farrar believed his own post on ACE he would get on the red phone pronto and let Key know the error of his ways…

So here we have sublime idiocy on two levels. At the government level, the idiocy of killing off the ACE programme which so clearly contributes such good value for money to so many of the government’s supposedly core policy goals. It’s not just that National have no idea how to achieve a high-wage economy, they are actively killing off a programme that did actually help. And at the level of Farrar and the other apologists, the idiocy of running this bizarre attack on the credibility of PWC, a transparent attempt to shout down a message that they cannot bear to hear.

45 comments on “Farrar fudging ACE figures ”

  1. Hi Rob,

    Just a few quick things I would like to say. I am in the middle of forecasts at the moment, so I’m not sure if I’ll have time to come back to this post very soon – if there is anything you really want to raise with me feel free to comment on my post, or drop me an email.

    “They assess (Table 7.2 p48) the total benefit ($4,902 $6,429 million) as being composed of $3,759 $4,903 million private benefit, and $1,142 $1,526 million Government/public benefit. Even if we accept that only public benefits are relevant, the return on ACE spending is huge ($16 to $22 on every dollar spent).”

    This isn’t a split between “public and private” though – it is between social and private, this is about looking at what optimal policy is in the absense of government right. In the post I ignored the direct issues with the numbers (which tended to use rather excessive estimates), and just focused on “what is a social benefit”. The justifiable social benefits are a lot lower than these estimates.

    Furthermore, they used the “average social benefit” as the “marginal social benefit” (which is what you look at when deciding whether to change funding) – which exaggerates matters.

    Trust me, we could do this sort of study with virtually ever industry in New Zealand – and we wold find that the “return on investment” was enormous. However, the benefits tend to be overplayed and the costs are always underplayed – which is a pity.

    “But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? ”

    Yes for this sort of policy – as voluntary trade exists. If we move it into the public realm these “benefits” are canceled out by the “opportunity cost” of the movement.

    Now, I’m fine with NZ funding ACE because the electorate WANTS people to have private benefits – hell that is the reason we fund universities and the such to such a high as far as I can tell.

    But the inference of this report that it was allocatively efficient to do this was wrong, which was the sole point I was raising. My issue was with the inference taken from the reports figures – in terms of actual policy society can do what it wants.

    • r0b 1.1

      Hi Matt

      Thanks for dropping in, and for a very politely worded reply!

      This isn’t a split between “public and private’ though

      That’s what it’s labelled as, but in any case this dancing on the head of a pin is hardly relevant given the below.

      In the post I ignored the direct issues with the numbers (which tended to use rather excessive estimates), and just focused on “what is a social benefit’. The justifiable social benefits are a lot lower than these estimates.

      And you know this because of – gut instinct? PWC did the actual study.

      Trust me, we could do this sort of study with virtually ever industry in New Zealand and we wold find that the “return on investment’ was enormous.

      I very much doubt it. Look around you at all the trappings of our “advanced civilisation”. None of it would exist without education. In every study an educated population is more productive, is healthier, has less crime, and so on and so on. Every captain of industry, and every productive worker that they employ, is a product of education. Education is the centre of everything. In my opinion the PWC report under-estimates the value of education!

      r0b: “But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? ‘

      Matt: My issue was with the inference taken from the reports figures in terms of actual policy society can do what it wants.

      So the short answer is, in no real world are private benefits not relevant to policy. Matt, I’m not an economist (I’m sure that’s obvious). But I can tell you as a layperson that this is the sort of nonsense (sorry) that gives economics a bad name. You construct a language and a theory of costs and benefits that is completely abstract (private benefits are not policy relevant), and then you admit that it doesn’t apply to the real world. I have nothing against abstract theoretical games, knock yourself out, but don’t let them out of the lab to make claims about a real world to which they don’t apply. Which is what Farrar has done. Farrar tries to argue bizarre conclusions in the real world, and combines it with ad hominem attacks on the competence of PWC, because he’s trying to discredit a report that shows the huge economic value of the ACE courses that National has mindlessly slashed.

  2. Santi 2

    How much is Farrar being paid for his spin? Number 2 spin doctor must be making a killing at taxpayer’s expense.

    • lukas 2.1

      Have you not heard? There is a team of us operating out of the ninth floor. We submit tender documents each week. Because the amount is under 10K each time, it does not go out to public tender. 9.9K per week isn’t bad though.

  3. Gosman 3

    Any report which claims a return in the realms of what the PWC claims for Adult Education is got to be suspect. The way in which they have quntified things seem to be as Matt Nolan has pointed out, (overplaying the benefits and underplaying the costs).

    Also what people here fail to comprehend is that if it provided such a great benefit then people would be lining up to pay for this themselves instead of relying on other people (i.e. Taxpayers) to do it for them.

    • DeeDub 3.1

      I like not this news! Bring me some other news!

    • Clarke 3.2

      Also what people here fail to comprehend is that if it provided such a great benefit then people would be lining up to pay for this themselves instead of relying on other people (i.e. Taxpayers) to do it for them.

      …. assuming, of course, that they have the discretionary income to pay for the additional education. Or do poor people not deserve educating?

  4. Clarke 4

    Underlining the monumental financial illiteracy of National in general and Farrar in particular, the result of a tax cut is an increase in private benefit and a decrease in public benefit. By the same (il)logic he has deployed in the argument about ACE, he would be against tax cuts for the rich.

    What a blithering moron.

  5. Gosman 5

    “Education is the centre of everything. In my opinion the PWC report under-estimates the value of education!”

    What a load of nonsense.

    How about someone who is ‘educated’ in Astrology r0b? Or how about Reiki healing? Do you think that sort of ‘education’ is particularly beneficial in terms of the well being of the overall economy ?

    • A Nonny Moose 5.1

      That sounds suspiciously like Tolley’s spin about “Golf Lessons and Painting Classes”, as if continuing education is the sole providence of the upper classes.

      • Gosman 5.1.1

        The reason a student loan scheme was set up was to help people of all socio-economic groups to make the economic decision whether or not to undertake higher education. If the benefits accrued to the indiciduals are as per the PWC report then it is a no-brainer. People would be flocking to course like this to improve their lot.

        • Clarke 5.1.1.1

          Isn’t it a pity, then, that student loans aren’t available for ACE courses – which does rather invalidate your argument.

          • Gosman 5.1.1.1.1

            Anyone interested in bettering themselves can find a wealth of Educational opportunities that are covered by Student loans. Just check out the following link.

            http://www2.careers.govt.nz/education_training_info.html

            If you think ACE is so beneficial then you should be campaigning for it to be included then.

            • lprent 5.1.1.1.1.1

              Why? Night classes have been running very well for over a century effectively using existing infrastructure at times that they are not in use, and doing it on a small budget $18 million per year servicing hundreds of thousands of people. They aren’t directly vocational – they’re designed to allow people to get used to learning.

              Now explain why they should radically change the behaviour to a model that would cost the country more because you have a flawed economic model that you think they should conform to.

              Face it – the biggest problem with ACE as far as you were concerned was that business people were not making money out of it.

  6. Hi Rob
    You also linked to my blog on this issue. This debate is really about preferences – ACE is, overall, worthwhile, but is it preferred for funding over another area? Anne Tolley talked down the value of ACE (repetitive mentions of Moroccan cooking) to defend her core decision that there were better uses of the money while the ACE lobby has talked up the value of ACE (PWC’s figures are unreasonably high and shouldn’t be relied on) because they support the spending. This government has decided to spend the money elsewhere and has worn criticism over it. They will probably lose some votes and it has affected people but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut, especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.

    • lprent 6.1

      but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut,

      Yes they will. But this is a short-term cut that removes a long-term benefit to society. It allows people to have a second chance at getting into education. The effects of that are enormous going down the generations. What it allows is people and society to lift themselves up.

      especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.

      Lets look at the ‘private benefit’ of the state supporting private schools – which is where the money appears to have gone…

      As far as I’m concerned there is little or no public benefit from such schools. We need to cut them off from being supported by the public purse. Next election….

    • Draco T Bastard 6.2

      This government has decided to spend the money elsewhere and has worn criticism over it.

      Yeah, the criticism is because the decided to give the money to their mates in the private education sector for a negative return.

  7. Gosman 7

    “They will probably lose some votes and it has affected people but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut, especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.”

    Exactly.

    The trouble with many on the Left is that they usually don’t see any opportunity to spend tax payer money more wisely or to cut unnecessary expenditure. The standard answer from the left is to tax the rich and spend more money which just ignores economic fundamentals. That sort of logic leads to what happened in Zimbabwe.

    • IrishBill 7.1

      What an absurd strawman argument. Returns on spending are not going to be equal across the education sector. In fact I’d suggest that a dollar spent on subsidising already well-funded private schools is likely to generate fewer gains than a dollar spent on ACE due to the law of diminishing returns.

      • Gosman 7.1.1

        Excellent, then you would agree that we shouldn’t just increase spending on ‘Education’ because ‘Education’ is always beneficial.

        • IrishBill 7.1.1.1

          No I’m arguing that we should be putting education dollars into the parts of the education system where they are most beneficial and basic economic theory would suggest that is extremely unlikely to be subsidies for private schools and highly likely to be ACE funding. What part of diminishing returns don’t you understand?

          • gitmo 7.1.1.1.1

            The most bang for buck is primary education (and the last year of early childhood) followed closely by secondary…….. so why do we throw so much money at tertiary education ?

            • lprent 7.1.1.1.1.1

              So why is Tolley wasting money tossing it at ‘national standards’ when there is a *lot* of evidence that the damn things don’t work. Why aren’t they testing the program out.

              Point out what the expected benefits are. Delineate the public benefits from it (personally I can’t see any).

              Look at the ACE program and contemplate the benefits for kids in having their parents slightly more literate and supportive of education. In my case having one parent going off and doing night classes to get her UE was the basis of our whole family getting much more highly educated.

              Frankly Farrar (and Nolan) clearly don’t know what they’re talking about. Any teacher will tell you that it is the attitude of the parents that makes a overwhelming difference to how well kids do at school.

              • Gosman

                It is called Democracy. The National Party campainged on introducing National Standards into schools and they are fulfilling that election promise.

                You may well prefer Government policy dictated by State technocrats but I prefer to live in a society where people can influence decisions via the ballot box.

                IrishBill: Did they also campaign on axing ACE?

              • lprent

                Ah the empty response.
                Show me where National promised to kill ACE?
                Show me where they promised to increase funds to private schools?

                They did promise national standards – it was a paragraph left over from the 2002 (?) election made before people saw how much of a screwup these types of programmes had been in the UK and the US. Are you saying that the nats are so stupid that they didn’t look at that and want to check it first?

                Duh – ok so it is Anne Tolley – she is that stupid.

              • Gosman

                They campaigned on reining in the massive increase in Government spending that happened under the last Government and cutting the size of the Government sector in the overall economy by cutting taxes.

                This is what Political parties on the right of the political spectrum do. They cut the fat that parties on the left build up when they are in power and reduce the size of the state.

                When the Conservative party gets back into power in the UK they too will be cutting Government spending. They will be forced to do so because of the huge deficit built up under Labour.

                Why do you guy’s have trouble understanding this?

                IrishBill: because you’re wrong. We went into the recession with one of the smallest debt to GDP ratios in the OECD. National are also not “cutting fat” they are cutting productive economically forward-thinking projects like ACE, FastForward, the training allowance, Super Fund payments and Kiwisaver contributions and then wasting billions of dollars on projects like subsidising private schools, PR for national standards, subsiding polution and tax cuts for the rich. Political parties on the right don’t cut fat. Every one of them, Reagan, Bush, Shipley, Bolger, Thatcher, you name it, have increased the size of government. They’ve just done so at the expense of most of their citizens and in benefit of their economic elite.

                You need to check your facts.

              • Clarke

                When the Conservative party gets back into power in the UK they too will be cutting Government spending. They will be forced to do so because of the huge deficit built up under Labour.

                Why do you guy’s have trouble understanding this?

                And herein lies the difficulty.

                The essential disconnect between Left and Right comes because the Right choose to believe that budget deficits are a problem – thanks largely to the work of the Chicago School economists – despite all the real-world evidence that government deficits are a normal and necessary part of a modern economy.

                If deficits were an actual – rather than theoretical – problem, then the United States would have gone broke more than 100 years ago. The evidence that this has not occurred tends to rather undermine the economists on the Right who think that deficits are somehow bad, but that has not stopped this particularly dangerous meme that “deficits must be repaid at all costs!” from spreading.

                So the simple version:

                – Governments are not households. The economics that drive households bear no resemblance to the economics of countries, and the analogies that the Right draws between the two are worse than useless.
                – Where a government has a fiat non-convertible currency with a floating exchange rate (like New Zealand), running a deficit is a normal part of effective monetary policy.
                – Governments are not primarily funded by taxation or by selling bonds to the private sector; rather, their spending is primarily based on how much fiat currency is required to operate the government sector, which is then created by the central bank.
                – Where the government decides not to run a deficit (i.e. a surplus) due to capture by delusional economists, a recession inevitably results. Likewise, tightening monetary policy in a recession will always make it worse.

                So your contention that a government is forced to cut back any form of expenditure due to the deficit is completely incorrect. The government of the day may well decide to cut expenditure for political reasons, but this should never be confused with economic necessity.

              • Gosman

                “Every one of them, Reagan, Bush, Shipley, Bolger, Thatcher, you name it, have increased the size of government. ”

                What was the size of the Government sector as a percentage of GDP prior to 1990 and what was it in 1999?

                I think you will find that not many economists would agree with you that it was higher at the end of that decade than at the beginning.

          • Gosman 7.1.1.1.2

            I completely agree that we shouldn’t spend Taxpayers money on Private education. It makes a nonsense of the term Private.

            If the benefits of ACE are as great as made out in the PWC report then I also don’t see why Private individuals should get support from the Taxpayer to attend them.

            • Draco T Bastard 7.1.1.1.2.1

              Because such private benefits also benefit the whole of society.

            • lprent 7.1.1.1.2.2

              It is clear that you haven’t bothered to look at the program.

              It is designed to second chance people for whom the education system FAILED miserably.

              You have people without limited money or assets getting into education on what is almost a casual basis. There are few barriers to entry. There is no expectation that it will lead to a career. It is done at their local school. There isn’t a bureaucracy. You don’t have to do much more than turn up and enjoy learning new things. It is done as part of your local community, which means that you’ll have people around you with similar background and learning difficulties – so it isn’t competitive.

              The idea is to get people to understand that learning is fun. Then they’ll teach that to their kids and are more likely to go on to do the types of vocational training that you’re thinking about.

              It has been quietly working away as second chance education for over a hundred years delivering vast benefits both to people, their kids, and generally to society. Then you have a moron minister coming along and destroying it because she clearly didn’t understand what it was for… Mind you it isn’t surprising – she doesn’t appear to understand much.

              Now as for you….

              Personally I’d suggest that you don’t have the faintest idea about what the intent of the program was. In fact I’d say that you are a MISERABLE FAILURE because you clearly haven’t bothered to examine it yourself.

              • Gosman

                So where is the evidence support the view that the people taking up these courses are the ones who the education system failed?

                I suppose you have some facts and figures to back that claim up?

  8. tc 8

    Australia waits for the next wave of kiwis being driven out by the banker and his mates….it truly is 21st Century muldoonism.
    Choose a brighter future eh.

  9. JD 9

    If ACE does return $54-72 per dollar spend doesn’t this strengthen the case for participants to pay the cost themselves? If I was able to invest a dollar to get another dollar back then I’d jump at the opportunity. The only conclusions I can gather is that either the numbers are fudged or ACE particiapnts don’t value their course enough to pay a small amount extra with this enourmous return on investment.

    • IrishBill 9.1

      The people with the most to gain from ACE courses can’t afford to pay the hundreds of dollars these courses cost.

      I’d rather the government paid a little upfront for people to get a foot on the employment ladder than paid for them to remain unskilled and jobless or to subsidise their minimum wage employment.

      Of course I’m an economically rational man rather than a blind ideologue.

  10. the sprout 10

    the political management skills of this administration are laughable.
    should give a lot of heart to the opposition.
    these plonkers are EASY MEAT

    • Gosman 10.1

      And hence why they are so far behind in the opinion polls………oh wait a minute.

      • r0b 10.1.1

        Ahh, polls, the last refuge of the incompetent…

        • Gosman 10.1.1.1

          I’m just replying to an unintelligent post with one of my own.

          The point is the Opposition has yet to get any sort of traction on these topics. If the Government was such easy meat as so laughably claimed by the sprout why hasn’t this happened?

          • Clarke 10.1.1.1.1

            Given that only 28% of respondents in the Roy Morgan poll think that their economic prospects will improve in the coming year, I would suggest that the sense of poor economic management by this government is definitely on the increase.

  11. richgraham 11

    I am doing an ACE-funded course in Italian at the local polytech, costs $40 per term. There is no economic benefit in it. I’m quite happy to pay for the course’s real cost, but ACE is subsidising it and all I pay is $40. Neat eh ? And you thought ACE funding had all gone ?
    The report that assigned huge economic benefits to night classes (” $54 $72 for each dollar of funding.”)is obviously seriously in error, as Mr Kiwiblog et al pointed out. Your inability to accept the obvious does no credit to you at all Mr.Rob. Come on Labour wake up !

    • kaplan 11.1

      You can’t extrapolate the economic benefits of ACE to society from your opinion of it’s economic benefits to you as an individual.
      That’s just a step away from statements like. “I’ve only ever been to my doctor for a cough and a sore throat and there was no real benefit in doing so. I’d gladly have paid the full cost of my visit myself so the government should stop subsidising GP’s”

  12. Paul Williams 12

    I’m concerned with the government cuts to ACE, they disrupt a pathway for a cohort students that is not well served elsewhere. That said, I’m in the education business and, a while back, I managed a project to estimate the economic benefits of vocational education and training. The clear advice, at the time, from key stakeholders (funders specifically) was that to be credible and to help frame funding decisions, the analysis had to take into account second round effects i.e. be based on econometric modelling. We did this, commissioned it from an independent body in fact, which resulted in a much more modest but defensible figure. My criticism of the PWC report is that they didn’t think about the audience which is as much policy and funding bodies as it is the public.

    Ultimately, however as others have commented, this is a simple matter of priorities and National have clearly indicated there’s are elsewhere and they’ll be judged accordingly.

  13. Puddleglum 13

    There’s a pretty deep irony in economists arguing that private benefits should be teased apart from public benefits given that modern (market) economics is based on the supposedly profound insight that pursuit of self-interest actually, and inevitably, produces positive increments in the ‘common good’ (Adam Smith, et al.).

    In fact, Adam Smith was fully aware that the notion of a fully, privatised individual is a nonsense He subscribed to the social theory that humans are fundamentally ‘sympathetic’ creatures – in the technical, philosophical sense of the word. In that sense, and to bowdlerise Thatcher, there actually is no such thing as the (private) individual – there are only various forms of social interaction.

    The political and policy question is not that of how much (or how little) individuals ‘privately’ benefit from government policies but, rather, whether public benefits are optimised through the actions of governments and, more significantly, what are, in fact, the public benefits that matter.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Trans-Tasman travel window to close at midnight tomorrow
    A further 500 MIQ rooms released for managed returnees from NSW Further Government actions announced today are balanced to provide more certainty for Kiwis wanting to return from Australia, while continuing to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, acting Minister for COVID-19 Response Ayesha Verrall says. The actions were foreshadowed last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Govt investing millions in Hawke's Bay and Tairāwhiti schools
    Napier Boys’ and Girls’ High Schools are among those set to benefit from a $16.5 million investment in the Hawke's Bay and Tairāwhiti region, Economic and Regional Development Minister Stuart Nash announced today. The Government has set aside money in Budget 2021 to accelerate five projects in Napier, Hastings, Havelock North ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Game changing Jobs for Nature investment for Northland
    Conservation Minister Kiri Allan has announced Jobs for Nature funding for a portfolio of projects that will create ‘game changing’ gains for nature and communities across Northland/Te Tai Tokerau as part of the Government’s acceleration of the economic recovery from COVID. “This portfolio of 12 projects will see over $20 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Third COVID-19 vaccine receives provisional approval
    New Zealand’s regulatory authority Medsafe has granted provisional approval of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine for individuals 18 years of age and older, Acting Minister for COVID-19 Response Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. New Zealand secured 7.6 million doses (enough for 3.8 million people) of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine through an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Bowel-cancer screening programme is saving lives
    More than 1000 New Zealanders have had bowel cancer – New Zealand’s second-most-common cause of death from cancer - detected under the Government’s National Bowel Screening Programme, Health Minister Andrew Little said today. More than 1200 New Zealanders died from bowel cancer in 2017. The screening programme aims to save ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Govt welcomes draft report on the retail grocery sector
    The Commerce Commission’s draft report into the retail grocery sector is being welcomed by Government as a major milestone. “I asked the Commerce Commission to look at whether this sector is as competitive as it could be and today it has released its draft report for consultation,” Commerce and Consumer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • Christchurch’s Youth Hub ‘set to go’ thanks to further Government funding
    Construction of New Zealand’s first, purpose-built centre for youth well-being is ready to get underway thanks to an extra $2.5 million of COVID-19 response funding, Housing Minister and Associate Minister of Finance, Megan Woods announced today.  “The Christchurch Youth Hub is about bringing together all the things young people need ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Next step to protect Milford Sound Piopiotahi
    Expert group lays out plan to better protect iconic UNESCO World Heritage site Milford Sound Piopiotahi and its surrounds Funding confirmed for dedicated unit and Establishment Board to assess the recommendations and provide oversight of the process from here Milford Opportunities Project a test case for transformational change in tourism ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Funding for projects to reduce waste from construction and demolition
    The Government has announced funding for projects in Auckland and the lower North Island to help reduce construction and demolition waste. “Construction is the main source of waste sent to landfill, and much of this could be reduced, reused and recovered,” Environment Minister David Parker said. “The Government is funding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Plan to eliminate hepatitis C as a major health threat by 2030
    A plan to eliminate hepatitis C in New Zealand, reducing liver cancer and the need for liver transplants, has been released today by Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall. “Around 45,000 New Zealanders have hepatitis C, but only around half know they have it,” said Ayesha Verrall. “Symptoms often ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • School upgrades and new classrooms for West Coast, Tasman and Canterbury
    A funding injection from Budget 2021 to complete four shovel ready projects and new classrooms at six schools and kura will provide a real boost to local communities, Minister Dr Megan Woods announced today. “This Government has committed to providing quality fit for purpose learning environments and 100,000 new student ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Warmer Kiwi Homes smashes annual target
    The Government's highly successful insulation and heating programme, Warmer Kiwi Homes, is celebrating a key milestone with the completion of more than 38,000 insulation and efficient heater installs in the year to the end of June, smashing its target of 25,000 installs for the year. “The Warmer Kiwi Homes scheme ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Exemption granted for Wallabies to enter NZ
    Bledisloe Cup rugby will be played in New Zealand after the Australian rugby team received an economic exemption to enter New Zealand. Travel between Australia and New Zealand was suspended on Friday for at least eight weeks following the worsening of the COVID outbreak across the Tasman. New Zealanders have ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Minister of Foreign Affairs makes three diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced three New Zealand Head of Mission appointments. They are: Mike Walsh as Ambassador to Iran Michael Upton as Ambassador to Ethiopia and the African Union Kevin Burnett as Ambassador to Indonesia Iran “Aotearoa New Zealand has a long-standing and constructive relationship with Iran, despite a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Enhanced Task Force Green Approved for West Coast and Marlborough
    The Government has activated Enhanced Task Force Green (ETFG) in response to the West Coast and Marlborough floods, Social Development and Employment Minister Carmel Sepuloni announced today. “To assist with the clean-up, up to $500,000 will be made available to support the recovery in Buller and Marlborough which has experienced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Govt support for upgrade of Eden Park players facilities
    Minister for Sport and Recreation Hon Grant Robertson has announced funding to upgrade the players facilities at Eden Park ahead of upcoming Women’s World Cup events. Eden Park is a confirmed venue for the Rugby World Cup 2021, the ICC Women’s Cricket World Cup 2022, and a proposed venue for matches of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • More jobs and quicker public transport motoring towards West Auckland
    Work to improve public transport for West Aucklanders and support the region’s economic recovery by creating hundreds of jobs has officially kicked off, Transport Minister Michael Wood announced today. Michael Wood and Auckland Mayor Phil Goff this morning marked the start of construction on the Northwestern Bus Improvements project. It ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government backs critical health research
    Research into some of New Zealanders’ biggest health concerns including cancer, diabetes, and heart disease is getting crucial support in the latest round of health research funding, Health Minister Andrew Little announced today. The funding, awarded through the Health Research Council of New Zealand, covers 31 General Project grants ($36.64 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Bay of Islands hospital facilities to bring services closer to home
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Health Minister Andrew Little have joined a ceremony to bless the site and workers for Phase Two of the redevelopment of the Bay of Islands Hospital in Kawakawa today. The new building will house outpatients and primary care facilities, as well as expanded renal care ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Raukokore re-imagined with ‘smart’ relocatable rent to own housing
    Iwi, Crown Partnership Relocatable, fully insulated housing, connected to a new solar plant Provides a pathway to home ownership New housing in the remote eastern Bay of Plenty community of Raukokore shows how iwi and Crown agencies can work together effectively to provide warm, dry, energy efficient homes in a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Cabinet accepts Turkish authorities’ request for the managed return of three NZ citizens
    Cabinet has agreed to the managed return of a New Zealand citizen and her two young children from Turkey, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. The three have been in immigration detention in Turkey since crossing the border from Syria earlier this year. Turkey has requested that New Zealand repatriate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt delivers more classrooms so children can focus on learning
    Extra Government investment in classrooms and school building projects will enable students and teachers to focus on education rather than overcrowding as school rolls grow across the country, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis say. The pair visited Ruakākā School in Whangārei today to announce $100 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New station a platform for AirportLink to take off
    Every Aucklander with access to the rail network will now have a quick and convenient trip to the airport, Transport Minister Michael Wood and Auckland Mayor Phil Goff said during the official opening of the new Puhinui Interchange today. The new interchange links the rail platform with a new bus ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • 10 days sick leave for employees delivered
    Legislation doubling employees’ minimum sick leave entitlement to 10 days comes into effect today, bringing benefits to both businesses and employees, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Michael Wood announced today. “Our Government is delivering on a key manifesto commitment to help Kiwis and workplaces stay healthy,” Michael Wood said. “COVID-19 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Prime Minister congratulates Fiame Naomi Mata’afa on Election Win
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern tonight congratulated Prime Minister-elect Fiame Naomi Mata’afa on her victory in the Samoa’s general election. “New Zealand has a special relationship with Samoa, anchored in the Treaty of Friendship. We look forward to working with Samoa’s new government in the spirit of partnership that characterises this ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Quarantine Free Travel with Australia suspended
    Quarantine Free Travel from all Australian states and territories to New Zealand is being suspended as the Covid situation there worsens, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. From 11.59pm today Australians will no longer be able to enter New Zealand quarantine-free. This will be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Growing conservation efforts in Gisborne
    A big injection of Jobs for Nature funding will create much-needed jobs and financial security for families in TeTairāwhiti, and has exciting prospects for conservation in the region, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “The projects target local communities most affected by the economic consequences of COVID 19 and are designed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Flood recovery given further assistance
    The Government is contributing a further $1 million to help the flood battered Buller community, Acting Emergency Management Minister Kris Faafoi announced today. “Buller is a small community which has found itself suddenly facing significant and ongoing welfare costs. While many emergency welfare costs are reimbursed by Government, this money ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Funding for five projects to reduce food waste
    The Government is funding five projects to help address the growing problem of food waste, Environment Minister David Parker announced today. “New Zealand households throw away nearly 300,000 tonnes of food every year, half of which could still be eaten. By supporting these initiatives, we’re taking steps to reduce this ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Temporary Accommodation Service activated for West Coast flooding event
    The Temporary Accommodation Service (TAS) has been activated today - meaning residents on the West Coast of the South Island and in the Marlborough region hit by flooding over the weekend can now access help finding temporary accommodation, announced Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing) Poto Williams in Westport today. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pause to Quarantine Free Travel from South Australia to New Zealand
    Quarantine Free Travel from South Australia to New Zealand will be paused from 11.59am (NZT) tonight, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins has announced. However, people currently in the state who ordinarily live in New Zealand will be able to return on “managed return” flights starting with the next available flight, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand condemns malicious cyber activity by Chinese state-sponsored actors
    New Zealand has established links between Chinese state-sponsored actors known as Advanced Persistent Threat 40 (APT40) and malicious cyber activity in New Zealand. “The GCSB has worked through a robust technical attribution process in relation to this activity. New Zealand is today joining other countries in strongly condemning this malicious ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Remarks to Diplomatic Corps
    It is a pleasure to be with you all this evening. Some of you may have been surprised when you received an invitation from the Minister of Disarmament and Arms Control, and I would forgive you if you were. New Zealand is unique in having established a Ministerial portfolio ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Early Pfizer shipment boosts vaccine schedule
    The largest shipment of the Pfizer vaccine to date has arrived into New Zealand two days ahead of schedule, and doses are already being delivered to vaccination centres around the country, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. “The shipment of more than 370,000 doses reached New Zealand yesterday, following a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Backing for Bay of Islands predator free effort
    The Government is throwing its support behind an ambitious project to restore native biodiversity and build long-term conservation careers, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. Predator Free Bay of Islands aims to eradicate predators from the three main peninsulas in the region, and significantly reduce their impact throughout the wider 80,000-plus ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government commits $600,000 to flood recovery
    The Government is contributing $600,000 to help residents affected by the weekend’s violent weather with recovery efforts. Acting Minister for Emergency Management Kris Faafoi and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor have been in the Buller district this afternoon to assess flood damage and support the local response effort. They have announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government assisting local responses to heavy rainfall and high wind
    Acting Minister of Emergency Management Kris Faafoi says Central Government is monitoring the severe weather across the country, and is ready to provide further support to those affected if necessary. “My thoughts are with everyone who has been affected by this latest event, particularly communities on the West Coast and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • PM Ardern chairs APEC Leaders’ meeting on COVID-19
    New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has chaired a meeting of Leaders representing the 21 APEC economies overnight. “For the first time in APEC’s history Leaders have come together for an extraordinary meeting focused exclusively on COVID-19, and how our region can navigate out of the worst health and economic ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health Minister welcomes progress on nurses’ pay
    The New Zealand Nurses Organisation’s decision to take the Government’s improved pay offer to members and to lift strike notices is a positive move towards settling district health board nurses’ pay claims, Health Minister Andrew Little said. “It’s encouraging that the discussions between NZNO and DHBs over the nurses’ employment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Boost for Pacific regional business
    Pacific businesses will get a much-needed financial boost as they recover from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic thanks to the new Pacific Aotearoa Regional Enterprise Fund, said Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio.  The new $2 million fund will co-invest in Pacific business projects and initiatives to create ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago