Farrar fudging ACE figures

Written By: - Date published: 8:05 am, February 24th, 2010 - 45 comments
Categories: dpf, Economy, education - Tags:

National have made a big mistake cutting funding for Adult and Community Education (ACE). For a trifling sum of money, and giving lie to their pre election rhetoric, they have killed off a decades old public institution. People are angry.

One of the stupidest aspects of this anti-education policy is its financial incompetence. Spending on ACE has a huge return. According to this report from Price Waterhouse Coopers Economic Evaluation of Adult and Community Education Outcomes :

Based on the available data, including the survey responses, the estimated economic impact of the ACE sector is between $4.8 and $6.3 billion annually. This equates to a return on investment of $54 – $72 for each dollar of funding. Each dollar of government funding generates a return of $16 – $22, but this is further leveraged through private contributions to the sector, including those voluntarily added such as unpaid volunteer labour. …

Not even National’s most dedicated apologists can defend the foolishness of killing off such returns, so their only alternative is to strap on their ideological blinkers and try and discredit the PWC analysis. Farrar summarises a recent rash of blog posts (here, here, here) attempting to do just that.

You know Farrar has little to go on when he gets in to the ad hominem attacks: “Remind me to never get PWC to do a report, if I want it taken credibly” (this despite citing PWC as an authoritative source on previous occasions). But the main substance of Farrar’s attack (quoting Nolan) is the argument that most of the benefits of ACE spending don’t count. From the list of benefits in the PWC report (Table 7.1 p47), Farrar / Nolan rule out almost all of them:

Increase in direct income: No
Savings in government benefits: No
Marginal increase in individual income: No
Increase in income from self-confidence: No
Reduction in family violence: No
Savings for health: No
Savings from crime reduction: Potentially, partially
Increased community involvement by individual: No
Higher [government] income [from] taxes: No

The reason that these benefits “don’t count” is that they are “private benefits” not “public benefits”. Private benefits (and “fiscal externalities” such as increased government income from taxes) are not “policy-relevant”. Farrar comments: “If a firm makes basic mistakes like counting private benefits as public benefits and vice-versa with costs, then they do not deserve to be taken seriously”.

I’ll try and limit myself to two points in reply to this arrant nonsense. First, we don’t need the bizarre Farrar / Nolan checklist of what is and isn’t a public benefit, because that too is covered by the PWC analysis. They assess (Table 7.2 p48) the total benefit ($4,902 – $6,429 million) as being composed of $3,759 – $4,903 million private benefit, and $1,142 – $1,526 million Government/public benefit. Even if we accept that only public benefits are relevant, the return on ACE spending is huge ($16 to $22 on every dollar spent).

But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? According to Farrar, governments should not have policy that tries to increase our income, decrease our use of benefits, reduce family violence, reduce our use of the health system, and so on. This will be news to government. National say they want us to be a “high-skill high-wage” economy. National say they want us to get off the benefit. National say they are concerned about the relationship between income and health. And so on, and so on. If Farrar believed his own post on ACE he would get on the red phone pronto and let Key know the error of his ways…

So here we have sublime idiocy on two levels. At the government level, the idiocy of killing off the ACE programme which so clearly contributes such good value for money to so many of the government’s supposedly core policy goals. It’s not just that National have no idea how to achieve a high-wage economy, they are actively killing off a programme that did actually help. And at the level of Farrar and the other apologists, the idiocy of running this bizarre attack on the credibility of PWC, a transparent attempt to shout down a message that they cannot bear to hear.

45 comments on “Farrar fudging ACE figures”

  1. Hi Rob,

    Just a few quick things I would like to say. I am in the middle of forecasts at the moment, so I’m not sure if I’ll have time to come back to this post very soon – if there is anything you really want to raise with me feel free to comment on my post, or drop me an email.

    “They assess (Table 7.2 p48) the total benefit ($4,902 $6,429 million) as being composed of $3,759 $4,903 million private benefit, and $1,142 $1,526 million Government/public benefit. Even if we accept that only public benefits are relevant, the return on ACE spending is huge ($16 to $22 on every dollar spent).”

    This isn’t a split between “public and private” though – it is between social and private, this is about looking at what optimal policy is in the absense of government right. In the post I ignored the direct issues with the numbers (which tended to use rather excessive estimates), and just focused on “what is a social benefit”. The justifiable social benefits are a lot lower than these estimates.

    Furthermore, they used the “average social benefit” as the “marginal social benefit” (which is what you look at when deciding whether to change funding) – which exaggerates matters.

    Trust me, we could do this sort of study with virtually ever industry in New Zealand – and we wold find that the “return on investment” was enormous. However, the benefits tend to be overplayed and the costs are always underplayed – which is a pity.

    “But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? ”

    Yes for this sort of policy – as voluntary trade exists. If we move it into the public realm these “benefits” are canceled out by the “opportunity cost” of the movement.

    Now, I’m fine with NZ funding ACE because the electorate WANTS people to have private benefits – hell that is the reason we fund universities and the such to such a high as far as I can tell.

    But the inference of this report that it was allocatively efficient to do this was wrong, which was the sole point I was raising. My issue was with the inference taken from the reports figures – in terms of actual policy society can do what it wants.

    • r0b 1.1

      Hi Matt

      Thanks for dropping in, and for a very politely worded reply!

      This isn’t a split between “public and private’ though

      That’s what it’s labelled as, but in any case this dancing on the head of a pin is hardly relevant given the below.

      In the post I ignored the direct issues with the numbers (which tended to use rather excessive estimates), and just focused on “what is a social benefit’. The justifiable social benefits are a lot lower than these estimates.

      And you know this because of – gut instinct? PWC did the actual study.

      Trust me, we could do this sort of study with virtually ever industry in New Zealand and we wold find that the “return on investment’ was enormous.

      I very much doubt it. Look around you at all the trappings of our “advanced civilisation”. None of it would exist without education. In every study an educated population is more productive, is healthier, has less crime, and so on and so on. Every captain of industry, and every productive worker that they employ, is a product of education. Education is the centre of everything. In my opinion the PWC report under-estimates the value of education!

      r0b: “But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? ‘

      Matt: My issue was with the inference taken from the reports figures in terms of actual policy society can do what it wants.

      So the short answer is, in no real world are private benefits not relevant to policy. Matt, I’m not an economist (I’m sure that’s obvious). But I can tell you as a layperson that this is the sort of nonsense (sorry) that gives economics a bad name. You construct a language and a theory of costs and benefits that is completely abstract (private benefits are not policy relevant), and then you admit that it doesn’t apply to the real world. I have nothing against abstract theoretical games, knock yourself out, but don’t let them out of the lab to make claims about a real world to which they don’t apply. Which is what Farrar has done. Farrar tries to argue bizarre conclusions in the real world, and combines it with ad hominem attacks on the competence of PWC, because he’s trying to discredit a report that shows the huge economic value of the ACE courses that National has mindlessly slashed.

  2. Santi 2

    How much is Farrar being paid for his spin? Number 2 spin doctor must be making a killing at taxpayer’s expense.

    • lukas 2.1

      Have you not heard? There is a team of us operating out of the ninth floor. We submit tender documents each week. Because the amount is under 10K each time, it does not go out to public tender. 9.9K per week isn’t bad though.

  3. Gosman 3

    Any report which claims a return in the realms of what the PWC claims for Adult Education is got to be suspect. The way in which they have quntified things seem to be as Matt Nolan has pointed out, (overplaying the benefits and underplaying the costs).

    Also what people here fail to comprehend is that if it provided such a great benefit then people would be lining up to pay for this themselves instead of relying on other people (i.e. Taxpayers) to do it for them.

    • DeeDub 3.1

      I like not this news! Bring me some other news!

    • Clarke 3.2

      Also what people here fail to comprehend is that if it provided such a great benefit then people would be lining up to pay for this themselves instead of relying on other people (i.e. Taxpayers) to do it for them.

      …. assuming, of course, that they have the discretionary income to pay for the additional education. Or do poor people not deserve educating?

  4. Clarke 4

    Underlining the monumental financial illiteracy of National in general and Farrar in particular, the result of a tax cut is an increase in private benefit and a decrease in public benefit. By the same (il)logic he has deployed in the argument about ACE, he would be against tax cuts for the rich.

    What a blithering moron.

  5. Gosman 5

    “Education is the centre of everything. In my opinion the PWC report under-estimates the value of education!”

    What a load of nonsense.

    How about someone who is ‘educated’ in Astrology r0b? Or how about Reiki healing? Do you think that sort of ‘education’ is particularly beneficial in terms of the well being of the overall economy ?

    • A Nonny Moose 5.1

      That sounds suspiciously like Tolley’s spin about “Golf Lessons and Painting Classes”, as if continuing education is the sole providence of the upper classes.

      • Gosman 5.1.1

        The reason a student loan scheme was set up was to help people of all socio-economic groups to make the economic decision whether or not to undertake higher education. If the benefits accrued to the indiciduals are as per the PWC report then it is a no-brainer. People would be flocking to course like this to improve their lot.

        • Clarke 5.1.1.1

          Isn’t it a pity, then, that student loans aren’t available for ACE courses – which does rather invalidate your argument.

          • Gosman 5.1.1.1.1

            Anyone interested in bettering themselves can find a wealth of Educational opportunities that are covered by Student loans. Just check out the following link.

            http://www2.careers.govt.nz/education_training_info.html

            If you think ACE is so beneficial then you should be campaigning for it to be included then.

            • lprent 5.1.1.1.1.1

              Why? Night classes have been running very well for over a century effectively using existing infrastructure at times that they are not in use, and doing it on a small budget $18 million per year servicing hundreds of thousands of people. They aren’t directly vocational – they’re designed to allow people to get used to learning.

              Now explain why they should radically change the behaviour to a model that would cost the country more because you have a flawed economic model that you think they should conform to.

              Face it – the biggest problem with ACE as far as you were concerned was that business people were not making money out of it.

  6. Hi Rob
    You also linked to my blog on this issue. This debate is really about preferences – ACE is, overall, worthwhile, but is it preferred for funding over another area? Anne Tolley talked down the value of ACE (repetitive mentions of Moroccan cooking) to defend her core decision that there were better uses of the money while the ACE lobby has talked up the value of ACE (PWC’s figures are unreasonably high and shouldn’t be relied on) because they support the spending. This government has decided to spend the money elsewhere and has worn criticism over it. They will probably lose some votes and it has affected people but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut, especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.

    • lprent 6.1

      but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut,

      Yes they will. But this is a short-term cut that removes a long-term benefit to society. It allows people to have a second chance at getting into education. The effects of that are enormous going down the generations. What it allows is people and society to lift themselves up.

      especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.

      Lets look at the ‘private benefit’ of the state supporting private schools – which is where the money appears to have gone…

      As far as I’m concerned there is little or no public benefit from such schools. We need to cut them off from being supported by the public purse. Next election….

    • Draco T Bastard 6.2

      This government has decided to spend the money elsewhere and has worn criticism over it.

      Yeah, the criticism is because the decided to give the money to their mates in the private education sector for a negative return.

  7. Gosman 7

    “They will probably lose some votes and it has affected people but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut, especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.”

    Exactly.

    The trouble with many on the Left is that they usually don’t see any opportunity to spend tax payer money more wisely or to cut unnecessary expenditure. The standard answer from the left is to tax the rich and spend more money which just ignores economic fundamentals. That sort of logic leads to what happened in Zimbabwe.

    • IrishBill 7.1

      What an absurd strawman argument. Returns on spending are not going to be equal across the education sector. In fact I’d suggest that a dollar spent on subsidising already well-funded private schools is likely to generate fewer gains than a dollar spent on ACE due to the law of diminishing returns.

      • Gosman 7.1.1

        Excellent, then you would agree that we shouldn’t just increase spending on ‘Education’ because ‘Education’ is always beneficial.

        • IrishBill 7.1.1.1

          No I’m arguing that we should be putting education dollars into the parts of the education system where they are most beneficial and basic economic theory would suggest that is extremely unlikely to be subsidies for private schools and highly likely to be ACE funding. What part of diminishing returns don’t you understand?

          • gitmo 7.1.1.1.1

            The most bang for buck is primary education (and the last year of early childhood) followed closely by secondary…….. so why do we throw so much money at tertiary education ?

            • lprent 7.1.1.1.1.1

              So why is Tolley wasting money tossing it at ‘national standards’ when there is a *lot* of evidence that the damn things don’t work. Why aren’t they testing the program out.

              Point out what the expected benefits are. Delineate the public benefits from it (personally I can’t see any).

              Look at the ACE program and contemplate the benefits for kids in having their parents slightly more literate and supportive of education. In my case having one parent going off and doing night classes to get her UE was the basis of our whole family getting much more highly educated.

              Frankly Farrar (and Nolan) clearly don’t know what they’re talking about. Any teacher will tell you that it is the attitude of the parents that makes a overwhelming difference to how well kids do at school.

              • Gosman

                It is called Democracy. The National Party campainged on introducing National Standards into schools and they are fulfilling that election promise.

                You may well prefer Government policy dictated by State technocrats but I prefer to live in a society where people can influence decisions via the ballot box.

                IrishBill: Did they also campaign on axing ACE?

              • lprent

                Ah the empty response.
                Show me where National promised to kill ACE?
                Show me where they promised to increase funds to private schools?

                They did promise national standards – it was a paragraph left over from the 2002 (?) election made before people saw how much of a screwup these types of programmes had been in the UK and the US. Are you saying that the nats are so stupid that they didn’t look at that and want to check it first?

                Duh – ok so it is Anne Tolley – she is that stupid.

              • Gosman

                They campaigned on reining in the massive increase in Government spending that happened under the last Government and cutting the size of the Government sector in the overall economy by cutting taxes.

                This is what Political parties on the right of the political spectrum do. They cut the fat that parties on the left build up when they are in power and reduce the size of the state.

                When the Conservative party gets back into power in the UK they too will be cutting Government spending. They will be forced to do so because of the huge deficit built up under Labour.

                Why do you guy’s have trouble understanding this?

                IrishBill: because you’re wrong. We went into the recession with one of the smallest debt to GDP ratios in the OECD. National are also not “cutting fat” they are cutting productive economically forward-thinking projects like ACE, FastForward, the training allowance, Super Fund payments and Kiwisaver contributions and then wasting billions of dollars on projects like subsidising private schools, PR for national standards, subsiding polution and tax cuts for the rich. Political parties on the right don’t cut fat. Every one of them, Reagan, Bush, Shipley, Bolger, Thatcher, you name it, have increased the size of government. They’ve just done so at the expense of most of their citizens and in benefit of their economic elite.

                You need to check your facts.

              • Clarke

                When the Conservative party gets back into power in the UK they too will be cutting Government spending. They will be forced to do so because of the huge deficit built up under Labour.

                Why do you guy’s have trouble understanding this?

                And herein lies the difficulty.

                The essential disconnect between Left and Right comes because the Right choose to believe that budget deficits are a problem – thanks largely to the work of the Chicago School economists – despite all the real-world evidence that government deficits are a normal and necessary part of a modern economy.

                If deficits were an actual – rather than theoretical – problem, then the United States would have gone broke more than 100 years ago. The evidence that this has not occurred tends to rather undermine the economists on the Right who think that deficits are somehow bad, but that has not stopped this particularly dangerous meme that “deficits must be repaid at all costs!” from spreading.

                So the simple version:

                – Governments are not households. The economics that drive households bear no resemblance to the economics of countries, and the analogies that the Right draws between the two are worse than useless.
                – Where a government has a fiat non-convertible currency with a floating exchange rate (like New Zealand), running a deficit is a normal part of effective monetary policy.
                – Governments are not primarily funded by taxation or by selling bonds to the private sector; rather, their spending is primarily based on how much fiat currency is required to operate the government sector, which is then created by the central bank.
                – Where the government decides not to run a deficit (i.e. a surplus) due to capture by delusional economists, a recession inevitably results. Likewise, tightening monetary policy in a recession will always make it worse.

                So your contention that a government is forced to cut back any form of expenditure due to the deficit is completely incorrect. The government of the day may well decide to cut expenditure for political reasons, but this should never be confused with economic necessity.

              • Gosman

                “Every one of them, Reagan, Bush, Shipley, Bolger, Thatcher, you name it, have increased the size of government. ”

                What was the size of the Government sector as a percentage of GDP prior to 1990 and what was it in 1999?

                I think you will find that not many economists would agree with you that it was higher at the end of that decade than at the beginning.

          • Gosman 7.1.1.1.2

            I completely agree that we shouldn’t spend Taxpayers money on Private education. It makes a nonsense of the term Private.

            If the benefits of ACE are as great as made out in the PWC report then I also don’t see why Private individuals should get support from the Taxpayer to attend them.

            • Draco T Bastard 7.1.1.1.2.1

              Because such private benefits also benefit the whole of society.

            • lprent 7.1.1.1.2.2

              It is clear that you haven’t bothered to look at the program.

              It is designed to second chance people for whom the education system FAILED miserably.

              You have people without limited money or assets getting into education on what is almost a casual basis. There are few barriers to entry. There is no expectation that it will lead to a career. It is done at their local school. There isn’t a bureaucracy. You don’t have to do much more than turn up and enjoy learning new things. It is done as part of your local community, which means that you’ll have people around you with similar background and learning difficulties – so it isn’t competitive.

              The idea is to get people to understand that learning is fun. Then they’ll teach that to their kids and are more likely to go on to do the types of vocational training that you’re thinking about.

              It has been quietly working away as second chance education for over a hundred years delivering vast benefits both to people, their kids, and generally to society. Then you have a moron minister coming along and destroying it because she clearly didn’t understand what it was for… Mind you it isn’t surprising – she doesn’t appear to understand much.

              Now as for you….

              Personally I’d suggest that you don’t have the faintest idea about what the intent of the program was. In fact I’d say that you are a MISERABLE FAILURE because you clearly haven’t bothered to examine it yourself.

              • Gosman

                So where is the evidence support the view that the people taking up these courses are the ones who the education system failed?

                I suppose you have some facts and figures to back that claim up?

  8. tc 8

    Australia waits for the next wave of kiwis being driven out by the banker and his mates….it truly is 21st Century muldoonism.
    Choose a brighter future eh.

  9. JD 9

    If ACE does return $54-72 per dollar spend doesn’t this strengthen the case for participants to pay the cost themselves? If I was able to invest a dollar to get another dollar back then I’d jump at the opportunity. The only conclusions I can gather is that either the numbers are fudged or ACE particiapnts don’t value their course enough to pay a small amount extra with this enourmous return on investment.

    • IrishBill 9.1

      The people with the most to gain from ACE courses can’t afford to pay the hundreds of dollars these courses cost.

      I’d rather the government paid a little upfront for people to get a foot on the employment ladder than paid for them to remain unskilled and jobless or to subsidise their minimum wage employment.

      Of course I’m an economically rational man rather than a blind ideologue.

  10. the sprout 10

    the political management skills of this administration are laughable.
    should give a lot of heart to the opposition.
    these plonkers are EASY MEAT

    • Gosman 10.1

      And hence why they are so far behind in the opinion polls………oh wait a minute.

      • r0b 10.1.1

        Ahh, polls, the last refuge of the incompetent…

        • Gosman 10.1.1.1

          I’m just replying to an unintelligent post with one of my own.

          The point is the Opposition has yet to get any sort of traction on these topics. If the Government was such easy meat as so laughably claimed by the sprout why hasn’t this happened?

          • Clarke 10.1.1.1.1

            Given that only 28% of respondents in the Roy Morgan poll think that their economic prospects will improve in the coming year, I would suggest that the sense of poor economic management by this government is definitely on the increase.

  11. richgraham 11

    I am doing an ACE-funded course in Italian at the local polytech, costs $40 per term. There is no economic benefit in it. I’m quite happy to pay for the course’s real cost, but ACE is subsidising it and all I pay is $40. Neat eh ? And you thought ACE funding had all gone ?
    The report that assigned huge economic benefits to night classes (” $54 $72 for each dollar of funding.”)is obviously seriously in error, as Mr Kiwiblog et al pointed out. Your inability to accept the obvious does no credit to you at all Mr.Rob. Come on Labour wake up !

    • kaplan 11.1

      You can’t extrapolate the economic benefits of ACE to society from your opinion of it’s economic benefits to you as an individual.
      That’s just a step away from statements like. “I’ve only ever been to my doctor for a cough and a sore throat and there was no real benefit in doing so. I’d gladly have paid the full cost of my visit myself so the government should stop subsidising GP’s”

  12. Paul Williams 12

    I’m concerned with the government cuts to ACE, they disrupt a pathway for a cohort students that is not well served elsewhere. That said, I’m in the education business and, a while back, I managed a project to estimate the economic benefits of vocational education and training. The clear advice, at the time, from key stakeholders (funders specifically) was that to be credible and to help frame funding decisions, the analysis had to take into account second round effects i.e. be based on econometric modelling. We did this, commissioned it from an independent body in fact, which resulted in a much more modest but defensible figure. My criticism of the PWC report is that they didn’t think about the audience which is as much policy and funding bodies as it is the public.

    Ultimately, however as others have commented, this is a simple matter of priorities and National have clearly indicated there’s are elsewhere and they’ll be judged accordingly.

  13. Puddleglum 13

    There’s a pretty deep irony in economists arguing that private benefits should be teased apart from public benefits given that modern (market) economics is based on the supposedly profound insight that pursuit of self-interest actually, and inevitably, produces positive increments in the ‘common good’ (Adam Smith, et al.).

    In fact, Adam Smith was fully aware that the notion of a fully, privatised individual is a nonsense He subscribed to the social theory that humans are fundamentally ‘sympathetic’ creatures – in the technical, philosophical sense of the word. In that sense, and to bowdlerise Thatcher, there actually is no such thing as the (private) individual – there are only various forms of social interaction.

    The political and policy question is not that of how much (or how little) individuals ‘privately’ benefit from government policies but, rather, whether public benefits are optimised through the actions of governments and, more significantly, what are, in fact, the public benefits that matter.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • CTU speech – DPM
    Ladies and gentlemen, NZCTU President Richard Wagstaff, members of respective unions – thank you for the invitation to speak to you today. This might be preaching to the choir, but the importance of trade unions in New Zealand’s historical arch is difficult to understate. And it is my belief that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • Police Association Annual Conference
    "Let’s start by acknowledging that it has been a huge year. " Police Association Annual Conference James Cook Grand Chancellor Hotel Wellington Nau mai, haere mai. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, ka nui te mihi, ki a koutou katoa. President of the Police Association, Chris Cahill; Members of the Association and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • New Zealand announces a further P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark have announced the New Zealand Government’s decision to again deploy a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea. New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • New Zealand deeply concerned at developments in north-east Syria
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says New Zealand continues to have serious concerns for peace and stability in north-east Syria. “Recent reports that hundreds of ISIS-affiliated families have fled from a camp are deeply concerning from a humanitarian and security perspective”, Mr Peters says. “While we acknowledge Turkey’s domestic security ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • Government on high alert for stink bugs
    Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor is warning travelling Kiwis to be vigilant as the high-season for the crop-eating brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) is under way. “We’re on high alert to stop BMSB arriving in NZ. The high season runs until April 30 and we’ve strengthened our measures to stop stink ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Better protections for students in halls of residence
    The Government is moving swiftly to change the law to improve the welfare and pastoral care of students living in university halls of residence and other tertiary hostels. Cabinet has agreed to several changes, including creating a new mandatory Code of Practice that sets out the duty of pastoral care ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New trapping guide for community and expert trappers alike
    The Minister for Conservation Eugenie Sage has launched a new comprehensive trapping guide for community trappers to help them protect our native birds, plants and other wildlife, at Zealandia in Wellington today. ‘A practical guide to trapping’, has been developed by the Department of Conservation (DOC), and was launched during ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Widening Access to Contraceptives Welcomed
    Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter welcomes PHARMAC’s move to improve access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARCs). PHARMAC has today announced it will fund the full cost of Mirena and Jaydess for anyone seeking long term contraception, lifting previous restrictions on access to Mirena. “I welcome women having greater choices ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Major upgrade for Taranaki Base Hospital
    The Government has approved the next stage of a major redevelopment of Taranaki Base Hospital, which will deliver new and improved facilities for patients. Health Minister Dr David Clark has announced details of a $300 million dollar project to build a new East Wing at the New Plymouth hospital. It ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Extra support for rural families
    Extra funding will allow Rural Support Trusts to help farming families, says Minister for Rural Communities and Agriculture Damien O’Connor. “I know that rural families are worried about some of the challenges facing them, including the ongoing uncertainty created by the Mycoplasma bovis outbreak. “Those concerns sit alongside ongoing worries ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Howard Leaque Beekeeper programme graduation
    Thank you for the opportunity to be here to present certificates to the 16 graduates who have completed a beekeeping course delivered by the Howard League.  Let us start by acknowledging Auckland Prison’s Deputy Prison Director Tom Sherlock, and Acting Assistant Regional Commissioner of Corrections Northern Region Scott Walker - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Finance Minister to attend APEC meetings
    Finance Minister Grant Robertson leaves this weekend to attend the APEC Finance Ministers meeting in Santiago, Chile. Discussions between APEC Finance Ministers at the meeting will include the effects of the current global economic uncertainty, risks for APEC economies and sustainable development of the region. While at APEC Grant Robertson ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pacific languages are a source of strength, they ground us and build confidence
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says for Pacific people, language can be a source of strength. It can help ground us and give us confidence. When we speak them, our languages provide us with an immediate and intimate access to our identity and our story - and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Major boost to support disabled people in sport and recreation
    The Coalition Government has announced an action plan to improve the wellbeing of disabled New Zealanders by addressing inequalities in play, active recreation and sport. The initiative includes training to develop a workforce that understands the needs of children and young people with a range of impairments, advocacy for fit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • More prefab homes to be built as red tape cut
    The construction sector is being freed up to allow more homes to be built more quickly as the Government cuts through some of the red tape of the Building Act.  “Every New Zealander deserves a warm, dry, safe home and old inefficiencies in the Building Act make building slow and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Further details of Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall visit to New Zealand
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has welcomed further details on the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall’s visit to New Zealand next month. Their Royal Highnesses will visit New Zealand from 17-23 November – their third joint visit to New Zealand and first in four years. They arrive in Auckland ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • O’Connor in Thailand to push for RCEP deal
    Minister of State for Trade and Export Growth and Minister of Agriculture, Damien O’Connor, heads to Thailand today to attend the final Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Ministerial meeting, as negotiations enter their final stages. “The RCEP Agreement would anchor New Zealand in a regional agreement that covers 16 countries, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Young Pacific people can access earning and learning opportunities in Hawke’s Bay, Otago and South...
    Pacific young people living in the Hawke’s Bay, Southland and Otago regions will have access to support services that have proved successful in helping young people find new earning and learning opportunities. “Tupu Aotearoa is about changing Pacific young peoples’ lives. Our young people are talented, they are smart, they ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Protecting wellbeing – ACC HQSC Trauma Forum
    Introduction As the Minister for ACC I thank you all for the work that you do supporting New Zealanders in their literally most vulnerable moments. From those who hold people’s lives in their hands, to the people who research technique, technology and trends, your work is highly valued. A special ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ economy in good shape – notes prepared for speeches in Christchurch
    Notes prepared for speeches in Christchurch – Wednesday 9 October 2019 Today’s topic, “trends and opportunities for the New Zealand economy,” is certainly one getting a great deal of commentary at the moment. Looking across the media landscape lately you’ll notice we aren’t the only ones having this discussion. There ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • World Mental Health Day a reminder of the importance of mental health work
    Minister of Health Dr David Clark and Associate Minister of Health Peeni Henare say this year’s World Mental Health Day theme is a reminder of why the Government’s work on mental health is so important. “This year the World Federation for Mental Health has made suicide prevention the main theme ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Cultural Ministers Meeting
    Associate Arts, Culture and Heritage Minister Carmel Sepuloni will represent the government at Australia’s Meeting of Cultural Ministers in Adelaide this week. “This year’s meeting is special because New Zealand is expected to become an International Member of the Meeting of Cultural Ministers at this Australian forum,” Carmel Sepuloni said. “The meeting is an opportunity to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • 608 claims resolved by GCCRS in first year
    The Greater Christchurch Claims Resolution Service has resolved 608 insurance and EQC claims in its first year in operation, Minister Megan Woods has announced. The government service, which celebrates its first birthday today, provides a one stop shop to help Cantabrians still battling to get their homes repaired or rebuilt ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NZ economy in good shape
    Today’s topic, “trends and opportunities for the New Zealand economy,” is certainly one getting a great deal of commentary at the moment. Looking across the media landscape lately you’ll notice we aren’t the only ones having this discussion. There has been an increasing amount of attention paid to the outlook ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • NZTA to refocus on safety following review
    The Government is acting swiftly to strengthen NZTA’s regulatory role following a review into the Transport Agency, and Ministry of Transport’s performance as its monitor, Transport Minister Phil Twyford said today. An independent review by Martin Jenkins has found NZTA failed to properly regulate the transport sector under the previous ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Joint Cooperation Statement on Climate Change between the Netherlands and New Zealand
    The Netherlands and New Zealand have a long-standing and close relationship based on many shared interests and values. We value the rule of law, our democracies, and multilateralism.  And we value our environment – at home and globally. Right now there are major global challenges in all of these areas – ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government putting right Holidays Act underpayment in Health
    The Government is putting right a decade’s worth of underpayment to nurses, doctors and other health workers, says Health Minister Dr David Clark.  Initial sampling of District Health Boards payroll records has found that around $550-$650 million is owed to DHB staff to comply with the Holidays Act. It’s expected ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government accounts show strong economy
    A strong surplus and low debt show the economy is performing well, and means the Government is in a good position to meet the challenges of global economic uncertainty. “The surplus and low levels of debt show the economy is in good shape. This allows the Government to spend more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Ministers approve application to expand Waihi mine
    New applications from mining company OceanaGold to purchase land in Waihi for new tailings ponds associated with its gold mines have been approved. Minister of Finance Grant Robertson and Associate Minister of Finance David Parker considered the applications under the Overseas Investment Act. Earlier this year, applications from OceanaGold to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Tuia 250 Voyage flotilla launches with tribute to tangata whenua
    New Zealanders in Tūranganui-a-Kiwa / Poverty Bay will witness Māori, Pākehā and Pacific voyaging traditions come together today as the Tuia 250 Voyage flotilla assembles for the first time, Māori Crown Relations: Te Arawhiti Minister Kelvin Davis says. “Tuia 250 is a national commemoration and an opportunity for honest conversations ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Visit to advance trade agenda with Europe and the Commonwealth
    Minister for Trade and Export Growth David Parker leaves tomorrow for Dubai, London and Berlin for a series of meetings to advance New Zealand’s trade interests.  In Dubai he will visit New Zealand’s Pavilion at Expo 2020 where construction is underway.  There he will meet Minister of State for International Cooperation, Her ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • More cancer drugs confirmed – even more on horizon
    Confirmation that PHARMAC will fund two new cancer drugs is further evidence of the good progress the Government is making to improve the treatment of New Zealand’s leading cause of death, Health Minister David Clark says. From 1 December PHARMAC will fund alectinib (Alecensa) for ALK positive advanced non-small cell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Boost for women in high performance sport
    An additional $2.7 million has been announced for the Government Strategy for Women and Girls in Sport and Active Recreation on the first anniversary of the strategy’s launch. Sport and Recreation Minister Grant Robertson gave the opening address to the first Sport NZ Women + Girls Summit in Wellington today, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Parent support to help retain skilled migrants
    As part of its work to ensure businesses can get the skilled workers they need, the Coalition Government is re-opening and re-setting the Parent Category visa programme, Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway says. The move will: support skilled migrants who help fill New Zealand’s skills gaps by providing a pathway for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Senior NZDF Officer to lead Peacekeeping Mission in the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt
    Minister of Defence Ron Mark has today announced Major General Evan Williams of the New Zealand Defence Force has been selected as the commander of a significant, longstanding peacekeeping mission in the Middle East. In December, Major General Williams takes over as Force Commander for the Multinational Force and Observers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Nurses star as Govt rebuilds health workforces
    A record number of nurses are now working to deliver health services to New Zealanders as the Government’s increased funding and new initiatives rebuild key workforces start to show results, Health Minister Dr David Clark says. •    1458 more DHB nurses since the Government took office •    106 more midwives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New agricultural trade envoy appointed
    Farmer and former Nuffield scholar Mel Poulton has been appointed New Zealand’s Special Agricultural Trade Envoy, Minister for Trade and Export Growth, David Parker, and Minister of Agriculture, Damien O’Connor, announced today. The position supports key Government objectives, including raising the value of New Zealand agricultural goods and services. Mel is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pacific and Māori voyaging heritage celebrated for Tuia 250
    New Zealand’s Pacific and Māori voyaging heritage is acknowledged and celebrated today as waka of the Tuia 250 voyage flotilla arrive in Tūranga / Gisborne. “Today we celebrate Tangata Whenua, the first people of Aotearoa, and the triumphs of the voyaging tradition that brought our ancestors here from Polynesia 1000 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pacific languages are a root from which prosperity will grow
    “Fijian Language Week starts on Sunday and the theme reminds us how important it is that we each have something to anchor ourselves to, something that can help us pause and feel in control in a rapidly changing world,” says Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio. “Family, culture, faith, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • NZ Government establishes innovative, industry-focused Airspace Integration Trials Programme
    The Government is establishing an Airspace Integration Trials Programme to support the safe testing and development of advanced unmanned aircraft and accelerate their integration into the aviation system, Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods announced today. The Government will work with leading, innovative aviation industry partners to test and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago