web analytics

Farrar fudging ACE figures

Written By: - Date published: 8:05 am, February 24th, 2010 - 45 comments
Categories: dpf, Economy, education - Tags:

National have made a big mistake cutting funding for Adult and Community Education (ACE). For a trifling sum of money, and giving lie to their pre election rhetoric, they have killed off a decades old public institution. People are angry.

One of the stupidest aspects of this anti-education policy is its financial incompetence. Spending on ACE has a huge return. According to this report from Price Waterhouse Coopers Economic Evaluation of Adult and Community Education Outcomes :

Based on the available data, including the survey responses, the estimated economic impact of the ACE sector is between $4.8 and $6.3 billion annually. This equates to a return on investment of $54 – $72 for each dollar of funding. Each dollar of government funding generates a return of $16 – $22, but this is further leveraged through private contributions to the sector, including those voluntarily added such as unpaid volunteer labour. …

Not even National’s most dedicated apologists can defend the foolishness of killing off such returns, so their only alternative is to strap on their ideological blinkers and try and discredit the PWC analysis. Farrar summarises a recent rash of blog posts (here, here, here) attempting to do just that.

You know Farrar has little to go on when he gets in to the ad hominem attacks: “Remind me to never get PWC to do a report, if I want it taken credibly” (this despite citing PWC as an authoritative source on previous occasions). But the main substance of Farrar’s attack (quoting Nolan) is the argument that most of the benefits of ACE spending don’t count. From the list of benefits in the PWC report (Table 7.1 p47), Farrar / Nolan rule out almost all of them:

Increase in direct income: No
Savings in government benefits: No
Marginal increase in individual income: No
Increase in income from self-confidence: No
Reduction in family violence: No
Savings for health: No
Savings from crime reduction: Potentially, partially
Increased community involvement by individual: No
Higher [government] income [from] taxes: No

The reason that these benefits “don’t count” is that they are “private benefits” not “public benefits”. Private benefits (and “fiscal externalities” such as increased government income from taxes) are not “policy-relevant”. Farrar comments: “If a firm makes basic mistakes like counting private benefits as public benefits and vice-versa with costs, then they do not deserve to be taken seriously”.

I’ll try and limit myself to two points in reply to this arrant nonsense. First, we don’t need the bizarre Farrar / Nolan checklist of what is and isn’t a public benefit, because that too is covered by the PWC analysis. They assess (Table 7.2 p48) the total benefit ($4,902 – $6,429 million) as being composed of $3,759 – $4,903 million private benefit, and $1,142 – $1,526 million Government/public benefit. Even if we accept that only public benefits are relevant, the return on ACE spending is huge ($16 to $22 on every dollar spent).

But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? According to Farrar, governments should not have policy that tries to increase our income, decrease our use of benefits, reduce family violence, reduce our use of the health system, and so on. This will be news to government. National say they want us to be a “high-skill high-wage” economy. National say they want us to get off the benefit. National say they are concerned about the relationship between income and health. And so on, and so on. If Farrar believed his own post on ACE he would get on the red phone pronto and let Key know the error of his ways…

So here we have sublime idiocy on two levels. At the government level, the idiocy of killing off the ACE programme which so clearly contributes such good value for money to so many of the government’s supposedly core policy goals. It’s not just that National have no idea how to achieve a high-wage economy, they are actively killing off a programme that did actually help. And at the level of Farrar and the other apologists, the idiocy of running this bizarre attack on the credibility of PWC, a transparent attempt to shout down a message that they cannot bear to hear.

45 comments on “Farrar fudging ACE figures ”

  1. Hi Rob,

    Just a few quick things I would like to say. I am in the middle of forecasts at the moment, so I’m not sure if I’ll have time to come back to this post very soon – if there is anything you really want to raise with me feel free to comment on my post, or drop me an email.

    “They assess (Table 7.2 p48) the total benefit ($4,902 $6,429 million) as being composed of $3,759 $4,903 million private benefit, and $1,142 $1,526 million Government/public benefit. Even if we accept that only public benefits are relevant, the return on ACE spending is huge ($16 to $22 on every dollar spent).”

    This isn’t a split between “public and private” though – it is between social and private, this is about looking at what optimal policy is in the absense of government right. In the post I ignored the direct issues with the numbers (which tended to use rather excessive estimates), and just focused on “what is a social benefit”. The justifiable social benefits are a lot lower than these estimates.

    Furthermore, they used the “average social benefit” as the “marginal social benefit” (which is what you look at when deciding whether to change funding) – which exaggerates matters.

    Trust me, we could do this sort of study with virtually ever industry in New Zealand – and we wold find that the “return on investment” was enormous. However, the benefits tend to be overplayed and the costs are always underplayed – which is a pity.

    “But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? ”

    Yes for this sort of policy – as voluntary trade exists. If we move it into the public realm these “benefits” are canceled out by the “opportunity cost” of the movement.

    Now, I’m fine with NZ funding ACE because the electorate WANTS people to have private benefits – hell that is the reason we fund universities and the such to such a high as far as I can tell.

    But the inference of this report that it was allocatively efficient to do this was wrong, which was the sole point I was raising. My issue was with the inference taken from the reports figures – in terms of actual policy society can do what it wants.

    • r0b 1.1

      Hi Matt

      Thanks for dropping in, and for a very politely worded reply!

      This isn’t a split between “public and private’ though

      That’s what it’s labelled as, but in any case this dancing on the head of a pin is hardly relevant given the below.

      In the post I ignored the direct issues with the numbers (which tended to use rather excessive estimates), and just focused on “what is a social benefit’. The justifiable social benefits are a lot lower than these estimates.

      And you know this because of – gut instinct? PWC did the actual study.

      Trust me, we could do this sort of study with virtually ever industry in New Zealand and we wold find that the “return on investment’ was enormous.

      I very much doubt it. Look around you at all the trappings of our “advanced civilisation”. None of it would exist without education. In every study an educated population is more productive, is healthier, has less crime, and so on and so on. Every captain of industry, and every productive worker that they employ, is a product of education. Education is the centre of everything. In my opinion the PWC report under-estimates the value of education!

      r0b: “But secondly, and more importantly, in what real world are private benefits not relevant to policy? ‘

      Matt: My issue was with the inference taken from the reports figures in terms of actual policy society can do what it wants.

      So the short answer is, in no real world are private benefits not relevant to policy. Matt, I’m not an economist (I’m sure that’s obvious). But I can tell you as a layperson that this is the sort of nonsense (sorry) that gives economics a bad name. You construct a language and a theory of costs and benefits that is completely abstract (private benefits are not policy relevant), and then you admit that it doesn’t apply to the real world. I have nothing against abstract theoretical games, knock yourself out, but don’t let them out of the lab to make claims about a real world to which they don’t apply. Which is what Farrar has done. Farrar tries to argue bizarre conclusions in the real world, and combines it with ad hominem attacks on the competence of PWC, because he’s trying to discredit a report that shows the huge economic value of the ACE courses that National has mindlessly slashed.

  2. Santi 2

    How much is Farrar being paid for his spin? Number 2 spin doctor must be making a killing at taxpayer’s expense.

    • lukas 2.1

      Have you not heard? There is a team of us operating out of the ninth floor. We submit tender documents each week. Because the amount is under 10K each time, it does not go out to public tender. 9.9K per week isn’t bad though.

  3. Gosman 3

    Any report which claims a return in the realms of what the PWC claims for Adult Education is got to be suspect. The way in which they have quntified things seem to be as Matt Nolan has pointed out, (overplaying the benefits and underplaying the costs).

    Also what people here fail to comprehend is that if it provided such a great benefit then people would be lining up to pay for this themselves instead of relying on other people (i.e. Taxpayers) to do it for them.

    • DeeDub 3.1

      I like not this news! Bring me some other news!

    • Clarke 3.2

      Also what people here fail to comprehend is that if it provided such a great benefit then people would be lining up to pay for this themselves instead of relying on other people (i.e. Taxpayers) to do it for them.

      …. assuming, of course, that they have the discretionary income to pay for the additional education. Or do poor people not deserve educating?

  4. Clarke 4

    Underlining the monumental financial illiteracy of National in general and Farrar in particular, the result of a tax cut is an increase in private benefit and a decrease in public benefit. By the same (il)logic he has deployed in the argument about ACE, he would be against tax cuts for the rich.

    What a blithering moron.

  5. Gosman 5

    “Education is the centre of everything. In my opinion the PWC report under-estimates the value of education!”

    What a load of nonsense.

    How about someone who is ‘educated’ in Astrology r0b? Or how about Reiki healing? Do you think that sort of ‘education’ is particularly beneficial in terms of the well being of the overall economy ?

    • A Nonny Moose 5.1

      That sounds suspiciously like Tolley’s spin about “Golf Lessons and Painting Classes”, as if continuing education is the sole providence of the upper classes.

      • Gosman 5.1.1

        The reason a student loan scheme was set up was to help people of all socio-economic groups to make the economic decision whether or not to undertake higher education. If the benefits accrued to the indiciduals are as per the PWC report then it is a no-brainer. People would be flocking to course like this to improve their lot.

        • Clarke 5.1.1.1

          Isn’t it a pity, then, that student loans aren’t available for ACE courses – which does rather invalidate your argument.

          • Gosman 5.1.1.1.1

            Anyone interested in bettering themselves can find a wealth of Educational opportunities that are covered by Student loans. Just check out the following link.

            http://www2.careers.govt.nz/education_training_info.html

            If you think ACE is so beneficial then you should be campaigning for it to be included then.

            • lprent 5.1.1.1.1.1

              Why? Night classes have been running very well for over a century effectively using existing infrastructure at times that they are not in use, and doing it on a small budget $18 million per year servicing hundreds of thousands of people. They aren’t directly vocational – they’re designed to allow people to get used to learning.

              Now explain why they should radically change the behaviour to a model that would cost the country more because you have a flawed economic model that you think they should conform to.

              Face it – the biggest problem with ACE as far as you were concerned was that business people were not making money out of it.

  6. Hi Rob
    You also linked to my blog on this issue. This debate is really about preferences – ACE is, overall, worthwhile, but is it preferred for funding over another area? Anne Tolley talked down the value of ACE (repetitive mentions of Moroccan cooking) to defend her core decision that there were better uses of the money while the ACE lobby has talked up the value of ACE (PWC’s figures are unreasonably high and shouldn’t be relied on) because they support the spending. This government has decided to spend the money elsewhere and has worn criticism over it. They will probably lose some votes and it has affected people but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut, especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.

    • lprent 6.1

      but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut,

      Yes they will. But this is a short-term cut that removes a long-term benefit to society. It allows people to have a second chance at getting into education. The effects of that are enormous going down the generations. What it allows is people and society to lift themselves up.

      especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.

      Lets look at the ‘private benefit’ of the state supporting private schools – which is where the money appears to have gone…

      As far as I’m concerned there is little or no public benefit from such schools. We need to cut them off from being supported by the public purse. Next election….

    • Draco T Bastard 6.2

      This government has decided to spend the money elsewhere and has worn criticism over it.

      Yeah, the criticism is because the decided to give the money to their mates in the private education sector for a negative return.

  7. Gosman 7

    “They will probably lose some votes and it has affected people but the economy won’t lose hundreds of millions in output because of the funding cut, especially since the money went to elsewhere in education.”

    Exactly.

    The trouble with many on the Left is that they usually don’t see any opportunity to spend tax payer money more wisely or to cut unnecessary expenditure. The standard answer from the left is to tax the rich and spend more money which just ignores economic fundamentals. That sort of logic leads to what happened in Zimbabwe.

    • IrishBill 7.1

      What an absurd strawman argument. Returns on spending are not going to be equal across the education sector. In fact I’d suggest that a dollar spent on subsidising already well-funded private schools is likely to generate fewer gains than a dollar spent on ACE due to the law of diminishing returns.

      • Gosman 7.1.1

        Excellent, then you would agree that we shouldn’t just increase spending on ‘Education’ because ‘Education’ is always beneficial.

        • IrishBill 7.1.1.1

          No I’m arguing that we should be putting education dollars into the parts of the education system where they are most beneficial and basic economic theory would suggest that is extremely unlikely to be subsidies for private schools and highly likely to be ACE funding. What part of diminishing returns don’t you understand?

          • gitmo 7.1.1.1.1

            The most bang for buck is primary education (and the last year of early childhood) followed closely by secondary…….. so why do we throw so much money at tertiary education ?

            • lprent 7.1.1.1.1.1

              So why is Tolley wasting money tossing it at ‘national standards’ when there is a *lot* of evidence that the damn things don’t work. Why aren’t they testing the program out.

              Point out what the expected benefits are. Delineate the public benefits from it (personally I can’t see any).

              Look at the ACE program and contemplate the benefits for kids in having their parents slightly more literate and supportive of education. In my case having one parent going off and doing night classes to get her UE was the basis of our whole family getting much more highly educated.

              Frankly Farrar (and Nolan) clearly don’t know what they’re talking about. Any teacher will tell you that it is the attitude of the parents that makes a overwhelming difference to how well kids do at school.

              • Gosman

                It is called Democracy. The National Party campainged on introducing National Standards into schools and they are fulfilling that election promise.

                You may well prefer Government policy dictated by State technocrats but I prefer to live in a society where people can influence decisions via the ballot box.

                IrishBill: Did they also campaign on axing ACE?

              • lprent

                Ah the empty response.
                Show me where National promised to kill ACE?
                Show me where they promised to increase funds to private schools?

                They did promise national standards – it was a paragraph left over from the 2002 (?) election made before people saw how much of a screwup these types of programmes had been in the UK and the US. Are you saying that the nats are so stupid that they didn’t look at that and want to check it first?

                Duh – ok so it is Anne Tolley – she is that stupid.

              • Gosman

                They campaigned on reining in the massive increase in Government spending that happened under the last Government and cutting the size of the Government sector in the overall economy by cutting taxes.

                This is what Political parties on the right of the political spectrum do. They cut the fat that parties on the left build up when they are in power and reduce the size of the state.

                When the Conservative party gets back into power in the UK they too will be cutting Government spending. They will be forced to do so because of the huge deficit built up under Labour.

                Why do you guy’s have trouble understanding this?

                IrishBill: because you’re wrong. We went into the recession with one of the smallest debt to GDP ratios in the OECD. National are also not “cutting fat” they are cutting productive economically forward-thinking projects like ACE, FastForward, the training allowance, Super Fund payments and Kiwisaver contributions and then wasting billions of dollars on projects like subsidising private schools, PR for national standards, subsiding polution and tax cuts for the rich. Political parties on the right don’t cut fat. Every one of them, Reagan, Bush, Shipley, Bolger, Thatcher, you name it, have increased the size of government. They’ve just done so at the expense of most of their citizens and in benefit of their economic elite.

                You need to check your facts.

              • Clarke

                When the Conservative party gets back into power in the UK they too will be cutting Government spending. They will be forced to do so because of the huge deficit built up under Labour.

                Why do you guy’s have trouble understanding this?

                And herein lies the difficulty.

                The essential disconnect between Left and Right comes because the Right choose to believe that budget deficits are a problem – thanks largely to the work of the Chicago School economists – despite all the real-world evidence that government deficits are a normal and necessary part of a modern economy.

                If deficits were an actual – rather than theoretical – problem, then the United States would have gone broke more than 100 years ago. The evidence that this has not occurred tends to rather undermine the economists on the Right who think that deficits are somehow bad, but that has not stopped this particularly dangerous meme that “deficits must be repaid at all costs!” from spreading.

                So the simple version:

                – Governments are not households. The economics that drive households bear no resemblance to the economics of countries, and the analogies that the Right draws between the two are worse than useless.
                – Where a government has a fiat non-convertible currency with a floating exchange rate (like New Zealand), running a deficit is a normal part of effective monetary policy.
                – Governments are not primarily funded by taxation or by selling bonds to the private sector; rather, their spending is primarily based on how much fiat currency is required to operate the government sector, which is then created by the central bank.
                – Where the government decides not to run a deficit (i.e. a surplus) due to capture by delusional economists, a recession inevitably results. Likewise, tightening monetary policy in a recession will always make it worse.

                So your contention that a government is forced to cut back any form of expenditure due to the deficit is completely incorrect. The government of the day may well decide to cut expenditure for political reasons, but this should never be confused with economic necessity.

              • Gosman

                “Every one of them, Reagan, Bush, Shipley, Bolger, Thatcher, you name it, have increased the size of government. ”

                What was the size of the Government sector as a percentage of GDP prior to 1990 and what was it in 1999?

                I think you will find that not many economists would agree with you that it was higher at the end of that decade than at the beginning.

          • Gosman 7.1.1.1.2

            I completely agree that we shouldn’t spend Taxpayers money on Private education. It makes a nonsense of the term Private.

            If the benefits of ACE are as great as made out in the PWC report then I also don’t see why Private individuals should get support from the Taxpayer to attend them.

            • Draco T Bastard 7.1.1.1.2.1

              Because such private benefits also benefit the whole of society.

            • lprent 7.1.1.1.2.2

              It is clear that you haven’t bothered to look at the program.

              It is designed to second chance people for whom the education system FAILED miserably.

              You have people without limited money or assets getting into education on what is almost a casual basis. There are few barriers to entry. There is no expectation that it will lead to a career. It is done at their local school. There isn’t a bureaucracy. You don’t have to do much more than turn up and enjoy learning new things. It is done as part of your local community, which means that you’ll have people around you with similar background and learning difficulties – so it isn’t competitive.

              The idea is to get people to understand that learning is fun. Then they’ll teach that to their kids and are more likely to go on to do the types of vocational training that you’re thinking about.

              It has been quietly working away as second chance education for over a hundred years delivering vast benefits both to people, their kids, and generally to society. Then you have a moron minister coming along and destroying it because she clearly didn’t understand what it was for… Mind you it isn’t surprising – she doesn’t appear to understand much.

              Now as for you….

              Personally I’d suggest that you don’t have the faintest idea about what the intent of the program was. In fact I’d say that you are a MISERABLE FAILURE because you clearly haven’t bothered to examine it yourself.

              • Gosman

                So where is the evidence support the view that the people taking up these courses are the ones who the education system failed?

                I suppose you have some facts and figures to back that claim up?

  8. tc 8

    Australia waits for the next wave of kiwis being driven out by the banker and his mates….it truly is 21st Century muldoonism.
    Choose a brighter future eh.

  9. JD 9

    If ACE does return $54-72 per dollar spend doesn’t this strengthen the case for participants to pay the cost themselves? If I was able to invest a dollar to get another dollar back then I’d jump at the opportunity. The only conclusions I can gather is that either the numbers are fudged or ACE particiapnts don’t value their course enough to pay a small amount extra with this enourmous return on investment.

    • IrishBill 9.1

      The people with the most to gain from ACE courses can’t afford to pay the hundreds of dollars these courses cost.

      I’d rather the government paid a little upfront for people to get a foot on the employment ladder than paid for them to remain unskilled and jobless or to subsidise their minimum wage employment.

      Of course I’m an economically rational man rather than a blind ideologue.

  10. the sprout 10

    the political management skills of this administration are laughable.
    should give a lot of heart to the opposition.
    these plonkers are EASY MEAT

    • Gosman 10.1

      And hence why they are so far behind in the opinion polls………oh wait a minute.

      • r0b 10.1.1

        Ahh, polls, the last refuge of the incompetent…

        • Gosman 10.1.1.1

          I’m just replying to an unintelligent post with one of my own.

          The point is the Opposition has yet to get any sort of traction on these topics. If the Government was such easy meat as so laughably claimed by the sprout why hasn’t this happened?

          • Clarke 10.1.1.1.1

            Given that only 28% of respondents in the Roy Morgan poll think that their economic prospects will improve in the coming year, I would suggest that the sense of poor economic management by this government is definitely on the increase.

  11. richgraham 11

    I am doing an ACE-funded course in Italian at the local polytech, costs $40 per term. There is no economic benefit in it. I’m quite happy to pay for the course’s real cost, but ACE is subsidising it and all I pay is $40. Neat eh ? And you thought ACE funding had all gone ?
    The report that assigned huge economic benefits to night classes (” $54 $72 for each dollar of funding.”)is obviously seriously in error, as Mr Kiwiblog et al pointed out. Your inability to accept the obvious does no credit to you at all Mr.Rob. Come on Labour wake up !

    • kaplan 11.1

      You can’t extrapolate the economic benefits of ACE to society from your opinion of it’s economic benefits to you as an individual.
      That’s just a step away from statements like. “I’ve only ever been to my doctor for a cough and a sore throat and there was no real benefit in doing so. I’d gladly have paid the full cost of my visit myself so the government should stop subsidising GP’s”

  12. Paul Williams 12

    I’m concerned with the government cuts to ACE, they disrupt a pathway for a cohort students that is not well served elsewhere. That said, I’m in the education business and, a while back, I managed a project to estimate the economic benefits of vocational education and training. The clear advice, at the time, from key stakeholders (funders specifically) was that to be credible and to help frame funding decisions, the analysis had to take into account second round effects i.e. be based on econometric modelling. We did this, commissioned it from an independent body in fact, which resulted in a much more modest but defensible figure. My criticism of the PWC report is that they didn’t think about the audience which is as much policy and funding bodies as it is the public.

    Ultimately, however as others have commented, this is a simple matter of priorities and National have clearly indicated there’s are elsewhere and they’ll be judged accordingly.

  13. Puddleglum 13

    There’s a pretty deep irony in economists arguing that private benefits should be teased apart from public benefits given that modern (market) economics is based on the supposedly profound insight that pursuit of self-interest actually, and inevitably, produces positive increments in the ‘common good’ (Adam Smith, et al.).

    In fact, Adam Smith was fully aware that the notion of a fully, privatised individual is a nonsense He subscribed to the social theory that humans are fundamentally ‘sympathetic’ creatures – in the technical, philosophical sense of the word. In that sense, and to bowdlerise Thatcher, there actually is no such thing as the (private) individual – there are only various forms of social interaction.

    The political and policy question is not that of how much (or how little) individuals ‘privately’ benefit from government policies but, rather, whether public benefits are optimised through the actions of governments and, more significantly, what are, in fact, the public benefits that matter.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand provides support to Timor-Leste for flooding and COVID-19 surge
    New Zealand is providing further support to Timor-Leste following severe flooding and the recent surge in COVID-19 cases, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. “Our thoughts are with the people of Timor-Leste who have been impacted by the severe flooding and landslides at a time when the country is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • WHANAU OF MĀORI BATTALION SOLDIERS REUNITED WITH MEDALS
    A ceremony has been held today in Gisborne where the unclaimed medals of 28 (Māori) Battalion C Company soldiers were presented to their families.   After the Second World War, returning service personnel needed to apply for their medals and then they would be posted out to them.  While most medals ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    24 hours ago
  • SolarWinds compromise attributed to Russian state actor
    New Zealand has today added its voice to the international condemnation of the malicious compromise and exploitation of the SolarWinds Orion platform. The Minister Responsible for the Government Communications Security Bureau, Andrew Little, says that New Zealand's international partners have analysed the compromise of the SolarWinds Orion platform and attributed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Queenstown roading project given fast track approval
    An expert consenting panel has approved the Queenstown Arterials Project, which will significantly improve transport links and reduce congestion for locals and visitors in the tourism hotspot.   Environment Minister David Parker welcomed the approval for the project that will construct, operate and maintain a new urban road around Queenstown’s town ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Screen industry secures landmark project
    Economic and Regional Development Minister Stuart Nash says a landmark deal has been agreed with Amazon for The Lord of the Rings TV series, currently being filmed in New Zealand. Mr Nash says the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) secures multi-year economic and tourism benefits to New Zealand, outside the screen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Report into review of health response to lead contamination released
    The Government welcomes the findings from a rapid review into the health system response to lead contamination in Waikouaiti’s drinking water supply. Sample results from the town’s drinking-water supply showed intermittent spikes in lead levels above the maximum acceptable value. The source of the contamination is still under investigation by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ Upgrade Programme revs up economic recovery
    Transport Minister Michael Wood today marked the start of construction on the New Zealand Upgrade Programme’s Papakura to Drury South project on Auckland’s Southern Motorway, which will create hundreds of jobs and support Auckland’s economic recovery. The SH1 Papakura to Drury South project will give more transport choices by providing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Speech releasing the Digital Council's report 'Towards Trustworthy and Trusted Automated D...
    CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY  E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā karanga maha o te wa, tēnā koutou, tēna koutou, tēna tātou katoa. Ki ngā mana whenua, ko Ngāi Tahu, ko Waitaha, ko Kāti Māmoe  anō nei aku mihi ki a koutou. Nōku te hōnore kia haere mai ki te ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Green light for 10 minute e-bus to Auckland Airport
    Transport Minister Michael Wood today marked the completion of upgrades to State Highway 20B which will give Aucklanders quick electric bus trips to and from the airport. The State Highway 20B Early Improvements project has added new lanes in each direction between Pukaki Creek Bridge and SH20 for buses and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Review into greyhound racing announced
    The Government is putting in place a review of the work being done on animal welfare and safety in the greyhound racing industry, Grant Robertson announced today. “While Greyhound Racing NZ has reported some progress in implementing the recommendations of the Hansen Report, recent incidents show the industry still has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Road safety boosted by increased penalty for mobile use while driving
    The infringement fee for using a mobile phone while driving will increase from $80 to $150 from 30 April 2021 to encourage safer driving, Transport Minister Michael Wood announced today. Michael Wood said too many people are still picking up the phone while driving. “Police issued over 40,000 infringement notices ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Pacific mental wellbeing supported across Auckland and Wellington
    Pacific people in New Zealand will be better supported with new mental health and addiction services rolling out across the Auckland and Wellington regions, says Aupito William Sio.  “One size does not fit all when it comes to supporting the mental wellbeing of our Pacific peoples. We need a by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Fresh approach proposed to Smokefree 2025
    New measures are being proposed to accelerate progress towards becoming a smokefree nation by 2025, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced. “Smoking or exposure to second-hand smoke kills around 12 people a day in New Zealand. Recent data tells us New Zealand’s smoking rates continue to decrease, but ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Govt expands Mana Ake to provide more school-based mental wellbeing support
    More children will be able to access mental wellbeing support with the Government expansion of Mana Ake services to five new District Health Board areas, Health Minister Andrew Little says. The Health Minister made the announcement while visiting Homai School in Counties Manukau alongside Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Associate ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Record Number of People Move Into Work
    The Government’s COVID-19 response has meant a record number of people moved off a Benefit and into employment in the March Quarter, with 32,880 moving into work in the first three months of 2021. “More people moved into work last quarter than any time since the Ministry of Social Development ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Significant global progress made under Christchurch Call
    A stocktake undertaken by France and New Zealand shows significant global progress under the Christchurch Call towards its goal to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online.  The findings of the report released today reinforce the importance of a multi-stakeholder approach, with countries, companies and civil society working together to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New chair of interim TAB NZ Board appointed
    Racing Minister Grant Robertson has announced he is appointing Elizabeth Dawson (Liz) as the Chair of the interim TAB NZ Board. Liz Dawson is an existing Board Director of the interim TAB NZ Board and Chair of the TAB NZ Board Selection Panel and will continue in her role as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government to phase out live exports by sea
    The Government has announced that the export of livestock by sea will cease following a transition period of up to two years, said Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. “At the heart of our decision is upholding New Zealand’s reputation for high standards of animal welfare. We must stay ahead of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Workshop on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems – opening remarks
    WORKSHOP ON LETHAL AUTONOMOUS WEAPONS SYSTEMS Wednesday 14 April 2021 MINISTER FOR DISARMAMENT AND ARMS CONTROL OPENING REMARKS Good morning, I am so pleased to be able to join you for part of this workshop, which I’m confident will help us along the path to developing New Zealand’s national policy on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Inter-prison kapa haka competition launched
    For the first time, all 18 prisons in New Zealand will be invited to participate in an inter-prison kapa haka competition, Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. The 2021 Hōkai Rangi Whakataetae Kapa Haka will see groups prepare and perform kapa haka for experienced judges who visit each prison and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government takes step forward on counter terrorism laws
    The Government has introduced the Counter-Terrorism Legislation Bill, designed to boost New Zealand's ability to respond to a wider range of terrorist activities. The Bill strengthens New Zealand’s counter-terrorism legislation and ensures that the right legislative tools are available to intervene early and prevent harm. “This is the Government’s first ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Carbon neutral government a step closer
    Coal boiler replacements at a further ten schools, saving an estimated 7,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide over the next ten years Fossil fuel boiler replacements at Southern Institute of Technology and Taranaki DHB, saving nearly 14,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide over the next ten years Projects to achieve a total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Appointment of Chief Parliamentary Counsel
    Attorney-General David Parker today announced the appointment of Cassie Nicholson as Chief Parliamentary Counsel for a term of five years. The Chief Parliamentary Counsel is the principal advisor and Chief Executive of the Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO).  She is responsible for ensuring PCO, which drafts most of New Zealand’s legislation, provides ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Emissions report shows urgent action needed
    Every part of Government will need to take urgent action to bring down emissions, the Minister for Climate Change, James Shaw said today in response to the recent rise in New Zealand’s greenhouse emissions. The latest annual inventory of New Zealand’s greenhouse gas emissions shows that both gross and net ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ becomes first in world for climate reporting
    Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister David Clark says Aotearoa New Zealand has become the first country in the world to introduce a law that requires the financial sector to disclose the impacts of climate change on their business and explain how they will manage climate-related risks and opportunities. The Financial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Awards celebrate the food and fibre sector employer excellence
    Exceptional employment practices in the primary industries have been celebrated at the Good Employer Awards, held this evening at Parliament. “Tonight’s awards provided the opportunity to celebrate and thank those employers in the food and fibres sector who have gone beyond business-as-usual in creating productive, safe, supportive, and healthy work ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Tourism Infrastructure Fund now open
    Applications are now invited from all councils for a slice of government funding aimed at improving tourism infrastructure, especially in areas under pressure given the size of their rating bases. Tourism Minister Stuart Nash has already signalled that five South Island regions will be given priority to reflect that jobs ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Electricity Networks Association (ENA) Annual Cocktail Speech 2021
    Tēnā koutou e ngā maata waka Tenā koutou te hau kāinga ngā iwi o Te Whanganui ā TaraTēnā koutou i runga i te kaupapa o te Rā. No reira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā tatou katoa.  It is a pleasure to be here tonight.  Thank you Graeme (Peters, ENA Chief ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Construction Skills Action Plan delivering early on targets
    The Construction Skills Action Plan has delivered early on its overall target of supporting an additional 4,000 people into construction-related education and employment, says Minister for Building and Construction Poto Williams. Since the Plan was launched in 2018, more than 9,300 people have taken up education or employment opportunities in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Youth Justice residence offers new pathway
    An innovative new Youth Justice residence designed in partnership with Māori will provide prevention, healing, and rehabilitation services for both young people and their whānau, Children’s Minister Kelvin Davis announced today.  Whakatakapokai is located in South Auckland and will provide care and support for up to 15 rangatahi remanded or ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • The Duke of Edinburgh
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern today expressed New Zealand’s sorrow at the death of His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. “Our thoughts are with Her Majesty The Queen at this profoundly sad time.  On behalf of the New Zealand people and the Government, I would like to express ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Five Country Ministerial Communiqué
    We, the Home Affairs, Interior, Security and Immigration Ministers of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States of America (the ‘Five Countries’) met via video conference on 7/8 April 2021, just over a year after the outbreak of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Guided by our shared ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Inspiring creativity through cultural installations and events
    Arts, Culture and Heritage Minister Carmel Sepuloni has today announced the opening of the first round of Ngā Puninga Toi ā-Ahurea me ngā Kaupapa Cultural Installations and Events. “Creating jobs and helping the arts sector rebuild and recover continues to be a key part of the Government’s COVID-19 response,” Carmel ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Drug-testing law to be made permanent
    Interim legislation that is already proving to keep people safer from drugs will be made permanent, Health Minister Andrew Little says. Research by Victoria University, on behalf of the Ministry of Health, shows that the Government’s decision in December to make it legal for drug-checking services to operate at festivals ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Better rules proposed for freedom camping
    Public consultation launched on ways to improve behaviour and reduce damage Tighter rules proposed for either camping vehicles or camping locations Increased penalties proposed, such as $1,000 fines or vehicle confiscation Rental companies may be required to collect fines from campers who hire vehicles Public feedback is sought on proposals ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government backs Air New Zealand as Trans-Tasman bubble opens
    The Government is continuing to support Air New Zealand while aviation markets stabilise and the world moves towards more normal border operations. The Crown loan facility made available to Air New Zealand in March 2020 has been extended to a debt facility of up to $1.5 billion (an additional $600 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Building gifted for new community hub in Richmond red zone
    Christchurch’s Richmond suburb will soon have a new community hub, following the gifting of a red-zoned property by Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) to the Richmond Community Gardens Trust. The Minister for Land Information, Damien O’Connor said that LINZ, on behalf of the Crown, will gift a Vogel Street house ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pacific languages funding reopens
      Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says the reopening of the Ministry for Pacific Peoples’ (MPP) Languages Funding in 2021 will make sure there is a future for Pacific languages. “Language is the key to the wellbeing for Pacific people. It affirms our identity as Pasifika and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • ERANZ speech April 2021
    It is a pleasure to be here tonight.  Thank you Cameron for the introduction and thank you for ERANZ for also hosting this event. Last week in fact, we had one of the largest gatherings in our sector, Downstream 2021. I have heard from my officials that the discussion on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Strengthening Māori knowledge in science and innovation
    Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods has today announced the 16 projects that will together get $3.9 million through the 2021 round of Te Pūnaha Hihiko: Vision Mātauranga Capability Fund, further strengthening the Government’s commitment to Māori knowledge in science and innovation.  “We received 78 proposals - the highest ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago