Written By:
Guest post - Date published:
2:40 pm, June 3rd, 2009 - 3 comments
Categories: Environment, national -
Tags: nick smith, rma
Here’s an exert from Nick Smith’s speech to the 2009 New Zealand Planning Institute Conference:
I acknowledge, that while the bulk of submissions have been supportive of the Bill, there is considerable debate over the provisions that remove the non-complying activity class, that restrict blanket urban tree protection, that limit plan appeal rights and which change the decision maker over designations. The Government will be carefully considering these issues over the next couple of months, as we finalise the amendments to the Act.
The matters he lists there are the substance of the bill, and what he is saying is that by listening to over 600 different submissions telling him how his rushed RMA amendment is crap legislation that will slow down the resource consent process and remove legal rights.*
A cynic might say that Nick Smith is just making pains to be appearing to listen and the legislation will not actually be changed to reflect submitters’ concerns. But I’m an optimist. I like to believe that Smith may have learnt the value of parliamentary process and the reforms will be improved for it.
Now, if only he could share his new-found wisdom with Rodney Hide!
* [The irony is that small to medium businesses, which National ‘represents’ would lose more legal rights that anyone else under the new bill as they would be removed from planning processes by the new trade competition regulations! Perhaps this realisation is what he is referring to?]
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
That is good news. Those are pretty much the exact issues with the RMA amendments that I pointed out in my submission. Thanks to the Green Party for assisting people in making submissions.
The real test will be what comes out of the select committee. And if the govt actually significantly changes the bill
That is very true lprent. The select committee should be reporting back on this pretty soon?