Written By:
Guest post - Date published:
1:41 pm, August 12th, 2024 - 27 comments
Categories: Japan, nuclear-free, Pacific, Peace, Peace -
Tags:
Guest post by Mick Hall, cross-posted from his Substack site Mick Hall in Context
A leading peace campaigner is calling New Zealand’s decision to stay away from an event in Nagasaki paying tribute to victims of the city’s 1945 nuclear bombing outrageous.
Former trade union leader Robert Reid said New Zealand could have acted as a strong independent Pacific voice by attending the Friday, August 9 peace gathering, held annually to commemorate the estimated 70,000 people killed in a US nuclear attack on the Japanese city at the end of World War II.
“New Zealand has missed an opportunity to demarcate itself from the cheerleaders of the Gaza genocide, from the US and the UK and other Western countries, and in a way has turned its back on Japan, which was an ally with us in the anti-nuclear position that New Zealand has held for many years,” the ex-First Union president said.
His comments come after a Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Mfat) spokesperson confirmed to In Context neither New Zealand’s ambassador to Japan Hamish Cooper or any other consulate official would be attending the peace ceremony, stressing the move was due to “resourcing” and unrelated to a boycott by Western nations following the city’s decision not to invite Israel.
The US and its Western allies have refused to attend the peace ceremony because Nagasaki’s Mayor Shiro Suzuki declined to send an invite to Israel to attend over events in the Middle East and to avoid possible protests at the event.
In a statement a Mfat spokesperson said: “The New Zealand Government will not be represented at the commemorations at Nagasaki on 9 August 2024. This decision reflects limited resourcing of the Embassy in Tokyo, and is not associated with attendance of other countries.”
However, it is understood New Zealand was represented at a commemoration event at head of mission level in Hiroshima on Tuesday. Nagasaki is located south of Hiroshima and a journey three-and-a-half hours by train.
The Nagasaki commemoration was cancelled last year due to a typhoon warning. New Zealand had been represented at both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki events in recent years, at head of mission level in 2022 and 2021.
It only attended the Hiroshima commemoration in 2020, a period when Covid-19 lockdowns and travel restrictions were widespread.
New Zealand’s absence comes after envoys of the United States, Canada, Germany, France, the UK and other Western nations sent a letter to Nagasaki organisers expressing concern over the city not inviting Israel.
The letter, dated July 19, warned that if Israel was excluded, “it would become difficult for us to have high-level participation” in the event as it would “result in placing Israel on the same level as countries such as Russia and Belarus,” both having been excluded from the ceremony since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Australia, New Zealand’s closest Five Eyes security partner, also refused to attend the event.
In a statement on July 31 outlining the reasons for excluding Israel, Suzuki said officials feared protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza would take away the ceremony’s solemnity. He added he made the decision based on “various developments in the international community in response to the ongoing situation in the Middle East”.
An International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinion on July 19 ruled Israel’s occupation of Palestine illegal and that Israel was administering a system of apartheid through discriminatory laws and policies. Apartheid is a crime against humanity.
In a 14-1 ruling, the ICJ directed Israel to immediately cease all settlement activity, evacuate settlers from occupied Palestinian territories, and pay reparations to Palestinians. It also voted 12-3 that UN states not render aid or assistance to Israel to continue the illegal occupation.
On July 30, the UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner said in light of the ruling: “States must immediately review all diplomatic, political, and economic ties with Israel, inclusive of business and finance, pension funds, academia and charities.”
There were protests on Wednesday following a decision by the Hiroshima municipality to allow Israeli representation at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park event the day before, while not inviting a Palestinian envoy on the basis the occupied country was not a United Nations member and Japan did not recognise it as a state.
“I understand New Zealand is not calling its absence a boycott, but just that it’s too busy, but it has attended in the past,” Reid said.
“I think we’re just playing with words here. This was a chance for New Zealand to stand with the people of Palestine, to stand with the Japanese people, who have had bombs dropped on them and they have perhaps taken a weak way out by not attending.”
The Disarmament and Security Centre Aotearoa is holding a Hiroshima and Nagasaki commemoration event on Sunday, August 11 at Christchurch’s Botanic Gardens at 11am.
The non-profit organisation is a virtual centre connecting disarmament experts, lawyers, political scientists, academics, teachers, students and disarmament proponents.
Dr Marcus Coll and Disarmament and Security Centre (DSC) co-founder Kate Dewes in July 2021. (Photo: DSC)
Its spokesperson Dr Marcus Coll said he was shocked New Zealand would not be attending the Nagasaki event this year.
“These sorts of things should never be about resources because it’s the symbolism of it that is so important and actually showing solidarity with the victims of Nagasaki,” he said.
“In the Pacific region especially, we’ve really felt the effects of nuclear testing throughout the decades and then in Japan, there still are a lot of the survivors and their families are affected because of the intergenerational effects.”
Coll spent seven years studying and working in Japan. His doctoral research involved interviewing and researching survivors of the atomic bombings, as well as indigenous rights activists, religious and military leaders, peace campaigners, and others who were instrumental in shaping New Zealand’s nuclear free identity.
He said Japan’s survivors had expressed awe at a small country in the Pacific taking a strong stand against nuclear weapons.
“New Zealand has really been a kind of a beacon of hope for a lot of those people,” he said.
New Zealand became a nuclear-free country in 1987, with a Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament and Arms Control Act that effectively banned US nuclear vessels from its waters.
It led to New Zealand being frozen out of the ANZUS security treaty and allowed the country to develop a more independent policy engagement with the Pacific and the rest of the world.
“That came from the government level as well,” Coll said.
“It was a groundswell from the public, which changed our policy, but governments of all stripes up until recently have really not contested that legacy and actually been kind of proud of it. It really is something that sets us apart, especially internationally and we’re respected for it… So, it seems like a real let down that our own government can’t even show up.”
Coll said New Zealand had nurtured a significant link with Nagasaki, being the last place to suffer a nuclear attack in warfare.
“Our former director used to go to Nagasaki. She had very strong connections with the mayor there. There’s actually a sculpture in the Nagasaki Peace Park, given to the city on behalf of New Zealand cities and the New Zealand government back in 2000s, forging that strong connection. It’s called the Korowai of Peace. Phil Goff as foreign minister, the New Zealand ambassador and other civil society people were there… This decision I suspect is a kind of PR and not to attend is a blow to our heritage of promoting disarmament and being anti-nuclear.”
The US envoy to Japan Rahm Emanuel is expected to attend a peace ceremony at the Zojoji Temple in Tokyo on Friday instead.
Nagasaki was bombed by the United States on August 9, 1945, after Hiroshima had been hit by atomic bomb on August 6. The two attacks at the end of World War II killed up to 250,000 people.
Mick Hall is an independent journalist based in New Zealand. He is a former digital journalist at Radio New Zealand (RNZ) and former Australian Associated Press (AAP) staffer, having also written investigative stories for various newspapers, including the New Zealand Herald.
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Step by tiny step, we edge closer to doing the bidding of the USA!
Luxon really needs to have a few stern words (ha ha!) with his foreign minister!
If Winnie takes us too far into the political orbit of AUKUS, it might have ramifications for our trade with China.
China could close the door on NZ and not even notice! Not so our exporters!
Another mis-step by the Coalition of Chaos. Bring on October 2026 so we can make them a one term government.
A bit of a snub, considering NZ had 12,000 Defense Force personnel in Japan after WWII. A bit of a courtesy, and also a great time to take a political stand on the use of nuclear irradiation as a weapon, as Russia attacks the surroundings of Chernobyl again in the Ukraine.
K Force sent rugby teams to Japan in the 50's – the non (nuclear weapons) proliferation agreement breaches by North Korea and their firing missiles off at Japan.
Anyone who doesn't support the Palestinians at this stage is morally bankrupt. Accounts for this action by the NZ Govt.
This is the first significant evidence of a lack of independence in our foreign policy under the C of C.
It undermines our nuclear free South Pacific position and undermines our position on nuclear weapon disarmament (esp as per North Korea).
And to do so because Israel is not invited while – it has nuclear weapons post the non proliferation agreement and is involved in ICC matters, well it signals total capitulation to power (right or wrong) rather than a principled position is becoming our new norm – as at home, abroad, I suppose for the C of C.
Lying bunch of bastards. I would have more respect for them if they told the truth. Of course it is not in their make-up to tell the truth so they wouldn't even know how.
Well I guess it’s par for the course for New Zealand, we didn’t send an official representative to the memorial marking the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau.
Luxon has just returned from a business junket (as he has described previous such trips) to Japan but can't even generate the courtesy to pay respect to the mass destruction of life in Nagasaki. For lack of resources??! How many died again? but oh sorry we just cant afford the train ticket from Tokyo??! Oh but by the way, we're kinda desperate to trade with you. What with China likely to rethink their trade position and all…
Good letter. I'd have preferred it if our govt had decided to be a signatory to it rather than trying to pretend it doesn't have anyone it can send.
Israel is not compliant with an ICC directive (even two the Israeli judge on it agreed with – aid delivery and incitement and the Israeli Security Minister is still in breach) and there is the non proliferation matter as well.
The excess as per loss of civilian life has led reservists to say they would rather go to prison than serve in that way again.
People have opinions, yes.
The snubbing of the Nagasaki bombing commemoration by this country because of Israel's exclusion, follows the NZDF attending war training with Israel's inclusion in the RIMPAC military exercise concluded last week.
The death toll from the Israeli bombing campaign in Gaza is approaching the 40.000 killed in Nagasaki, by the atomic bomb blast.
Ever since the end of the Cold War the superpowers have been practicing and training to explore to fight a global war against each other without resorting to nuclear weapons.
This is the sort of valuable experience the Israeli military brought to the other RIMPAC military forces, including the NZDF.
Of course many more were killed by radiation poisoning than the initial atomic blast. The Israelis may well achieve the same death toll through famine and disease, by systematically destroying all medical facilities, all water and sewerage treatment, all agriculture and blocking food aid.
The value of the Israeli expertise in killing such large numbers of civilians with out resorting to nuclear weapons will not be lost on the other RIMPAC members.
NZ checks our morality at the door, in Nagasaki, and our legality at the door in RIMPAC
The obvious lie over a lack of resources being behind our snubbing of the Nagasaki atomic bombing commemoration, is probably motivated by a desire by this government to hide our complicity in the genocide being conducted by Israel in Gaza.
Are we complicit?
You can wish the NZ Govt would back the wrong side in Gaza all you like, it isn't going to, no matter which party's running things (unless the Greens become the govt, I guess, but that isn't likely). The propaganda about "genocide" only works on people who are either ignorant of the situation or already ideologically hostile to Israel's existence.
I don’t think the USA, UK or NZ needs any tips from Israel on killing large numbers of civilians. We did that on a daily or nightly basis to Nazi Germany during World War Two. I believe the bombing of Dresden in 1945 killed about 25,000 to 30,000 in one night. However the real experts in mass killings and getting away with it must be the Soviet Union and China.
Modern rival superpowers are exploring ways to fight World War III without resorting to the use of nuclear weapons to avoid the threat of M.A.D. which nuclear weapons pose to both sides..
In a departure from usual practice the RIMPAC war games had a big disaster relief training component.
This should not come as a surprise, – Russia's war against Ukraine and Israel's war against Gaza with the total destruction of civilian infrastructure as a tactic is demonstrating how World War III will be fought.
Addressing and remediating man made disaster on the scale Mariupol and Gaza will have to be part of the plan, if you want to keep your country in the fight.
Personally I think we should not turn our back on the lesson of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, Nuclear weapons still pose a threat. Even the best laid plans for fighting the next global war could escalate out of control, and nuclear weapons either in desperation in the heat of battle, or unintentionally by human error could be resorted to.
Lest We Remember
Questions our mainstream media journalists won't be asking our PM
Will New Zealand be boycotting any other World War II commemorations if Israel is not invited?
Might the same question, (framed more diplomatically) be a suitable query for a Green or Labour Party opposition MP to put to the government during parliamentary 'Question Time'.
I doubt you'll get any takers for that question, because the answer would be "This govt hasn't and won't 'boycott' WW2 commemorations" and the questioner doesn't really have any follow-up from there.
Can the Minister give an assurance to the house, ‘That New Zealand will not boycott World War II commemorations, that exclude Israel?
That's the answer we want.
The point of the question, Psycho, is to get the government on the record as saying they won't pull any shifty stunts like this again.
That's the answer we want…..
To which I might add, I would expect a completely different answer to this question, if it were put to the US and Canadian governments, who openly admitted to boycotting the Nagasaki commemoration because Israel wasn't invited.
I think, if they were pressed, their answer would be, 'Yes we will boycott any future World War Two commemorations tat exclude Israel'
Maybe Psycho, you could tell us what you think these two governments, answer would be, to whether they will be boycotting any future WW2 commemorations that exclude Israel?
It's a remarkably silly question.
The 'boycott' is an operational decision for the embassy concerned. They chose not to attend (as many other embassies choose not to attend local or even international memorial events).
It's a storm in a teacup. And not one that anyone in NZ is interested in wasting the limited bandwidth of the public attention span on.
Really, with the alarm being expressed at the changes to social support systems, education and health in NZ – you want the GP (or any other party) to waste time expressing indignation about something which has zero impact on New Zealanders?
You asked me;
My answer;
Apartheid in South Africa had zero impact on New Zealanders. But tens of thousands of New Zealanders didn't think it was a waste of time expressing their indignation.
Prime Minister Ardern on the importance of standing up against injustice and human rights abuses wherever they occur in the world, then, now and always.
Yes, I do want the GP (or any other party) expressing indignation about something which has zero impact on New Zealanders. 'No man is an island' as the metaphor goes. Metaphorically not even an island country is an island.
Based on the response rate to your posts, you're pretty much alone in your expectations.
New Zealand the embarrassing Claytons country
The boycott you join, without joining the boycott.
Not having the courage to stand with the G7 boycott openly, New Zealand humiliates itself on the world stage by inventing a feeble excuse for our diplomats to join the G7 boycott surreptitiously.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
surreptitiously
adverb
"Mary surreptitiously slipped from the room"