I'm beginning to think the US will not seek to bring the Russia-Ukraine war to any end soon – most usefully Russia will be weakened down by sanctions for several years to give breathing room to then focus hard on China (Not sure what that means from November when the Republicans likely run Congress and Senate majorities).
But it means that for years this is a world in which food and oil prices are high, some food commodities are scarce, and inflation and interest rates stay really high. I'd be interested to hear opinion on local impact from sustained supply chain disruption.
I can't remember that kind of world since the late 1970s and early 1980s. It's Muldoonist in tone.
New Zealand faces that kind of context quite differently to that time.
We are now more unequal, with a much smaller state. But we also have a much stronger and larger economy delivering higher-value products and services than we did then. We are far more mobile, less able to be isolated. We rely on exports and imports, supported by a net of trade deals. And we start 2022 off with exceedingly low unemployment and many unfilled positions.
With both the Carbon plan and the Budget due out in weeks, and also the Australian Federal election, we will also see the limit that politics can have on any of this.
It's a more enduring crisis than the GFC – it feels more like the start of a long recession.
If only Zelensky had accepted that Ukraine didn't need to be in NATO, and instead had negotiated an "understanding" with the West, this carnage could have been avoided.
If only countries could act freely to do what they wanted as long as it didn't materially affect others.
If only years ago Russia had attacked Ukraine for Ukraine becoming part of the UN. I mean if a country wants to tell a neighbour what it can and can't do, which others it can forge relationships with, why not?
If only things were that simple. It's all a bit like the Killa Wasps talking to the Hills Angles, the Headmunters not liking that and invading their house
The world is changing so rapidly now it's going to be hard to keep up, and the ripples from the war are spreading far and wide. It's no longer a simple case of 'east European instability', it will be world-wide on many fronts. The USA is going to fight tooth and nail to prevent itself losing dollar hegemony but that is a possible outcome. How a small trading nation such as NZ position themselves is going to be a huge balancing act. 'When Elephants Fight, the Grass Gets Trampled'
Are approaching the point where Xi, perhaps the last rational leader on the world stage, will become convinced that Putin, Biden, Johnson and Zelensky are mad men, fully capable of blustering and blundering into a nuclear war, which–even if survivable–won’t be good for business. Who else has the power to bring them back from the brink?
The world's new monetary system, underpinned by a digital currency, will be backed by a basket of new foreign currencies and natural resources. And it will liberate the Global South from both western debt and IMF-induced austerity.
More delusional nonsense. Russia is an political and economic pariah and the ruble is worthless in the long run. It is only being propped up short-term by a number of manipulations:
The Russian Central Bank has been using what foreign reserves it can still access to to buy rubles.
They have effectively bribed people holding rubles not to sell by jacking up internal interest rates to something like 20%.
Those Russian entities that still earn or hold Euros and Dollars have been forced to convert 80% of their holdings or more into rubles.
Ban people from selling the ruble with things like massive commission fees or low limits on how much people can take out of the country.
And generate so much revulsion at your orc-like behaviour that the rest of the world sanctions the shit out of your economy and imports crater.
All measures that increase the demand for rubles and reduce selling pressure – but none of them remotely sustainable – the ruble is a zombie currency. Even if the war stopped tomorrow as long as the current Kremlin regime is in power their political and economic isolation will tighten. Over time their impact will escalate as the Europeans find ways to turn off the gas and secondary sanctions slowly start to bite. The impact of this will last decades – if not all but ensure that which Putin feared most of all – the end of Russia as a functional nation.
"I'm beginning to think the US will not seek to bring the Russia-Ukraine war to any end soon" you think….I mean seriously, hasn't that been plain as day light to you from the beginning?
As far as Western Super powers are concerned the Ukrainians are the least important component in the conflict, and anyone who thinks that the USA/UK give even the slightest fuck about the lives of Ukrainian civilians are just deluded…and personally by extension I believe anyone who supports the extending of this stupid pointless war by mindlessly swallowing the western propaganda fantasy world belief that the Ukrainians can win are only helping to prolong the awful suffering of the Ukrainians.
Sorry I should have clarified my previous comment, I meant that it has been obvious that the US (to a lesser extent the UK) have been dictating the terms of negotiations from the Ukrainian end of the Russian/Ukrainians negotiations from 2014…or to be more precise it would be better described as deliberate 'Non-Negotiations' on the part of the Zelensky and the Ukrainians. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoW75J5bnnE
Zelensky has been a disaster for the Ukrainians and Europe…but good for the Imperialist West and the arms industries of the world.
Isn't it interesting how the geo-politics of the Western Liberal class has meshed so seamlessly with that the US foreign policy over the past decade or so…I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that if the Iraq war were to happen today the same useful idiots who have backed every US/UK led intervention of late would be pushing that one just as hard today…it just shows quite dramatically how effective propaganda actually works.
No, Zelensky should have, when he had the chance, negotiated a neutrality that not only Russia felt comfortable with, but a huge majority of Ukrainians wanted themselves, not to mention also fully supported by France and Germany..however it is plainly obvious now that neutrality was never going to happen for the Ukraine while the USA and the Nationalist in the Ukraine had the direction of the country in their hands..which did and still do.
This same 'neutrality' had already seen Russia tear up the 1994 Belgrade Agreement and occupy by one means or another large swaths of their territory. Why would Ukraine believe anything Putin said when prior agreements had already been proven worthless?
True that…bleed those poor Ukrainians out nice and slow seems to be the US strategy, though for some reason that doesn't seem to bother their English speaking supporters one bit.
We have been watching the geographically largest country in Europe, with a population of more than 40 million, struggle over a period of decades to transform into a European liberal democracy. These people are nobody’s pawns.
So why treat them this way? Why indulge the fantasy that everything is really being run out of Washington, DC, or maybe Brussels? Denying the agency and choice of the Ukrainians is an authoritarian outlook, because that is precisely how a strongman leader views the people whose lives he presumed to dispose of.
Not sure that Quillette is the most reliable source Red. From Wikipedia:
"In an article for The Outline, writer Gaby Del Valle classifies Quillette as "libertarian-leaning", "academia-focused" and "a hub for reactionary thought"
I'm posting from "the safety of my keyboard on the far side of the world" – your words. I just don't share the blind, irrational hatred of Russia that you seem to be harbouring.
I could start to dismantle that ridiculous article but I have to go and do some work now..but as an example of the flawed logic that permeates that piece …on the one hand he is bemoaning the stance of the 'anti-interventionists' with statements like…."So why treat them this way? Why indulge the fantasy that everything is really being run out of Washington, DC, or maybe Brussels?" …I mean is he serious…if it wasn't for the intervention of the West the Ukraine would have lost this war weeks ago..that is a plain fact, so what the fuck is he talking about?…
If a country can only conduct a war solely through the constant supply of weapons from outside of that country by various world Superpowers (not to mention nearly all repair and maintenance) and we are meant to believe that those same Superpowers are now (and have been) and will not in the future dictate the politics of that country for their own Geo-Political ends would be naive in the extreme.
btw, thanks for this link, I am seeing for myself where you have been getting your lack of balance and rage at any one who pushes back to your point of view from…
"One suspects much of this is a dodge by those who have long been sympathetic to Putin’s regime" etc and so forth…where have I heard that one before…..
Hiding behind a blatantly one-sided 'neutrality' to cover your constant cheerleading for Putin is wearing thin. To quote an article joe90 referenced below:
‘Berlin’s preachy pontifications about democracy, decency, and human rights are customarily aimed at NATO allies, seldom at Moscow.’
" your constant cheerleading for Putin is wearing thin"
Listen RedLogix..for the last time…either paste up one time when I have said anything positive about Putin or his politics…or if you can't, then how about you and all your warmongering friends around here that always all immediately resort to ad hominem name calling when confronted with logic just shut the fuck up.
I have only ever advocated for a negotiated peace..like all sane people who care about human suffering should do.
And yes I care about the Russian soldiers lives as much as I care about the Ukrainian lives, I make no apologies for that…all I see when I see those poor boys of both sides dying and being maimed pointlessly are the faces of my own boys…I find the whole stupid thing heartbreaking.
Every single comment from you is some preachy nonsense about how evil the West is and how we should roll over and let the poor misunderstood Russians have their Soviet Empire back.
Early next week the UN Secretary General is visiting both Putin and Zelensky. There is your chance for a negotiated peace – but the open question remains on what terms and who will guarantee it?
Because Putin's word has been repeatedly proven to be worthless.
Russia has never given any indication that they "wanted their empire back". Wars in Chechnya, South Assetia, and now Ukraine, have been and are defensive moves on their part. Aggressive moves against Russia have come from the West, with NATO moving as close to Russia's borders as they can manage.
Russia has never given any indication that they "wanted their empire back".
Quacks like colonialism…
A senior Russian military commander has said the goal of Russia’s new offensive is to seize control of southern Ukraine and form a land bridge to Crimea, indicating that Russia plans a permanent occupation of Ukrainian territory taken in the war.
Rustam Minnekayev, acting commander of the central military district, also told members of a defence industry forum on Friday that control over southern Ukraine would give Russia access to Transnistria, a pro-Russian breakaway region of Moldova, indicating that Russia may attack the port city of Odesa or launch an economic blockade of the area.
"A senior Russian military commander has said the goal of Russia’s new offensive is to seize control of southern Ukraine and form a land bridge to Crimea, indicating that Russia plans a permanent occupation of Ukrainian territory taken in the war."
A defensive move, as I said. It would be a catastrophe for Russia if it lost Crimea, and the two naval bases on the Western seaboard of Crimea fell into the hands of the Americans.
.come on man…try and at least feign some sort of seriousness.
What exactly do you think is happening on the ground right now if it is not a war of extermination.
What we are seeing is the Russian military resorting to about the only thing they are good at – endless, indiscriminate barrages of artillery that completely level everything – murdering thousands, rendering the place uninhabitable and forcing the survivors to flee. Captured civilians get transported to slave camps in Siberia – also something the Russians are good at.
Putin inherits a wasteland pitted with mass graves. And you think this is not serious?
I think..no actually I know that you are not a serious interpreter of Geo-Politics RedLogix, how could you be, you, by your own admission have "picked a side" therefore there is never any attempt at any sort of balanced detailed examination of any event related to the war in the Ukraine from you..no just this sort of thing….
"Hiding behind a blatantly one-sided 'neutrality' to cover your constant cheerleading for Putin"
"Every comment from you demands Ukrainian people roll over and allow the Russian army to exterminate them"
"your desired outcome is a Ukrainian surrender"
"Every single comment from you is some preachy nonsense"
"How about just coming clean and saying that you support Putin and want to see Ukraine defeated?"
"yet you cheer on their invasion and extermination"
" Yet as with all totalitarian thinkers you deny them their agency"
..and that is just from today!!!!…talk about wearing thin.
Yet in this entire thread today you have done nothing but provide cover for Putin – even while pretending otherwise.
Yes I have picked a side. The side that doesn't pretend that NATO planned to invade Russia and that this sickening war Putin has launched – along with the unforgiveable, city-killer first-strike nuclear threats – are somehow entirely justified 'defensive measures'.
I don't believe backing negotiated peace would be considered by any sane human to be backing Putin/Russians….except of course in your demented world.
So no I haven’t “picked a side” …that is what you really believe, because ironically, it turns out that it is you who are the closest to that authoritarian Putin around here…everyone who doesn’t agree with you and your views is your enemy and must be pushed down and silenced…which everyone here knows you would do if you could.
Putin and his totalitarian thugs have no more reliable supporter than Adrian.
Ukrainians aren't entitled to democracy – they must roll over for the tyrant – sez Adrian.
Oh, and WW2 was a mistake too – should've just let Hitler win.
[Looks like another blatant and deliberate attempt at starting another flame war. I hope for your sake as well as his that Adrian is not going to take the bait this time – Incognito]
The side that doesn't pretend that NATO planned to invade Russia
It is Ukrainian government policy to recover Crimea. However, since Russia is unlikely to ever relinquish Crimea voluntarily, that can only mean an invasion is on the cards. And Ukraine is, at least, a de facto member of NATO.
"If a country can only conduct a war solely through the constant supply of weapons from outside of that country"
I guess from that remark we have to assume that Russia (or the USSR as it was then) has been run by the USA ever since 1941. There was an enormous quantity of war material supplied by the US during WW2 that was essential for the USSR to be able to keep fighting during that war. Did the USA gain from this? Certainly. It kept the Russians fighting. There was no way they could have survived without Lend/Lease, even if it was help yourself for the Soviet Union.
For example "Most visibly, the United States provided the Soviet Union with more than 400,000 jeeps and trucks, 14,000 aircraft, 8,000 tractors and construction vehicles, and 13,000 battle tanks."
"Under Lend-Lease, the United States provided more than one-third of all the explosives used by the Soviet Union during the war. The United States and the British Commonwealth provided 55 percent of all the aluminum the Soviet Union used during the war and more than 80 percent of the copper."
You will find many apologists for the Soviet Union who will say that is was nothing but I will settle for one quote from Khrushchev
""If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war," he wrote in his memoirs "One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war. No one talks about this officially, and Stalin never, I think, left any written traces of his opinion, but I can say that he expressed this view several times in conversations with me."
He clearly thought they couldn't have survived without foreign supplies. Do you?
Good try, except you don't take into account that Russia was a Superpower and the only reason they suppied them was to lessen their own losses…also post war, the Russian militarily was fully mobilized, manufacturing at huge volumes some of the most feared weapon systems in the world, and had just proved that they had a fighting force that could and would sustain a level of total war that no other Western country was (rightly) prepared to test …though we know now Churcill and other warmongering Imperialists dearly wanted too…there obviously no way that any foreign power was ever going to dictate terms to the Russians just because they supplied that equipment…your comparison just doesn't hold any water sorry.
George S. Patton
"We may have been fighting the wrong enemy all along. But while we're here, we should go after the bastards now, 'cause we're gonna have to fight 'em eventually"
"I'll say this; the 3rd Army alone with very little help and with damned few casualties, could lick what is left of the Russians in six weeks. You mark my words"
You really are a complete idiot. Are you for a moment suggesting that the West should have meekly surrendered to Stalin rolling his military machine across the whole of Europe? It was of course blindingly obvious that the USA despite its massive manufacturing capacity was not going to directly confront the Red Army in Europe. The supply lines were simply too long and both France and Germany lay in ruins unable to assist. Despite Patton’s idiotic boast – there was simply no conceivable way the 3rd Army was going to invade all the way across Russia and Siberia to the extent necessary to achieve any sane political goal.
The answer they came up with was Bretton Woods, the Marshall Plan an the Cold War containment of Stalin. This plan worked brilliantly, averting a direct confrontation between the West and Russia all the way up until about 60 days ago when your hero Poots fucked it all up.
(And sometime you might want to ask a Polish woman about the experience of that generation – the Germans murdered going east, while the Russians raped going west. Yet here you are again cheerleading for the orcs.)
Why would I criticize Belarus for that; and why would you use a pejorative word like "craven". Why not, instead, criticize the West for supplying the Ukrainians with weapons. An appropriate word for that might be "venal".
You consistently advocate actions that would ensure Ukraine's defeat – such as not supplying them with weapons. Or suing for a ceasefire and surrendering to a murdering tyrant whose word has proven worthless.
All these are consistent with you supporting Putin and the defeat of Ukraine.
And yet like mike you remain silent on the state of the Belarus govt – who are without any doubt at all an absolute puppet of the Kremlin.
At every point the Ukrainian people chose to move closer to Europe and away from Putin's dysfunctional shit-hole. Yet as with all totalitarian thinkers you deny them their agency and demand that the only permissible fate is for them to forever be enslaved as an impoverished 'buffer state' to a paranoid regime.
Weird how you characterise a government wanting to become closer to a liberal, democractic west as being 'pawns' – yet you cheer on their invasion and extermination by a totalitarian Russia as a good thing.
At every point the Ukrainian people chose to move closer to Europe and away from Putin's dysfunctional shit-hole.
I don't think we can be sure of that. I think a "silent majority", to use Nixon's term, was actually happy with the status quo until the invasion; after all they voted for the pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovich prior to the fascist takeover in 2014. I think the maidan protestors were just a small vociferous minority. I could of course be wrong, but that is my belief.
That is what Putin thought as well, yet this belief stands is belied by the huge numbers of Ukrainian men laying their lives on the line for what they truly believe in.
If Zelensky was not authentically backed by a solid majority of his people – his government would not have lasted even the first Russian assaults. Instead we have seen the Ukrainian military and people astonish the entire world with their determined and effective resistance.
That is what Putin thought as well, yet this belief stands is belied by the huge numbers of Ukrainian men laying their lives on the line for what they truly believe in.
Obviously the invasion would have turned the Ukranian people against Russia, but I was thinking about the situation prior to the invasion.
The war would stop in a moment if Putin decided to. I am really underwhelmed at how many left wingers have been sucked into the 'look at what she was wearing, she was gagging for it' victim-blaming game here.
History is only at best an analogy, but they are our closest approximations to how we will react to similar crises in future. They are at their most useful when – as now – forecasting the future is exceedingly hard. It's the primary reason we have old people.
History is of limited use as the starting points are different…..consider the conditions of the NZ and world economies when the 70s recession hit and the responses…..the same options are no longer available.
There was both excess liquidity in all economies,and excessive wealth expectations in housing and share prices especially in the real value of shares in the service sector ( a lot of it unrealistic.)
Housing here became a substantive problem with unrealistic expectations (over valued inventory) FOMO and low bank interest rates,where savers looked for higher returns.
There was a lot of media beatup in the housing,fuelled by excessive demands by those on house detention over covid,binge watching the Block and grand designs.
Inflation is being fuelled by housing costs (rents,large mortgages,interest rates and utilities) and excessive trade costs.
The central bank policies that are now entrenched,are for the removal of wealth expectations at the top end of town such as the sharemarket,especially in the non productive sectors.So expect significant depreciation in the share portfolios, pension funds and sovereign wealth funds.
Historically during the oil shock forced depression,a sense of hoplessness on the part of the elected, and was a reason we ended up with with Thatcher,Reagan et al.
An inability to take ownership by the Government now,with some clear messaging on Fiscal responsibility,will see the arrival of the Wreckers.
That Lawrence Summers graph on Average Gas Price Per Mile seems less interesting than I wanted.
Do we have graphs showing the degree of petroleum density in our GDP?
Are we making more of our exports with more petroleum inputs than say 1979?
Are we more reliant as a society and as an economy on petroleum products than we were in say 1979?
If our higher-input and higher-value economy is more indebted to petroleum products, does this make us more vulnerable to price changes in petroleum price than we were in 1979?
I have only an inkling that our world-leading car ownership rates and massively expanding Auckland has made us more vulnerable rather than less.
I think this is the kind of debate we need to start having.
Well its not a gasoline shortage that prevails,its a lack of refined distallates such as av gas and diesel.The later being the product that does connect the economy,harvests the food and transfers the food to market,wether by train or truck.
the car in Auckland brings nothing to the NZ economy.Would be a good time to have a spare refinery,with diesel and avgas capacity,with conversion rates at 40$us bbl.
Just as well the pension funds,got out of refining and into investments like Netflix.
And the book was published before Muldoon was a major figure in New Zealand politics. He was at the time, 1971, Minister of Finance but was not yet a dominant figure in the National Party.
Former Cabinet Minister Hugh Templeton argued Muldoon's lack of "strategic vision" denied New Zealand a careful, measured economic restructuring that paved the way for Rogernomics.
I can see the comparison here. The Governments lack of "strategic vision" in regards to anything other than the initial COVID response has denied Aotearoa New Zealand any strong or socialist restructuring out of the 40 year disaster of Rogernomics.
The NZ state within COVID is at its most interventionist point in my lifetime, but its power is receding quickly as it should.
Muldoon and Kirk before him were very strong socialists in stabilising prices, retaining tariffs, retaining and advancing state owned business, and controlling many aspects of society we would consider just weird now. Templeton just didn't fit that.
I'm skeptical about "vision" or whatever. We've gone through a decent crisis every two years for nearly a decade now, and are more resilient in our responses after each one. Wasn't much need for any such "vision" through any of them. Just good specific coordinated action.
I see the importance of "vision" or "values" in producing leadership that isn't almost entirely reactive; it stops being leadership at that point, it is crisis management; This is laudable in and of itself, but it has come at a cost; It has led to some poorly thought out and publicly rationalised policies and a real lack of action on the larger, existential crises of our time, including on winding down failed neoliberalism and addressing the nuclear-free moment of a generation. This can convince the public that despite all their successes this Government is incapable of meeting their own rhetoric, which is dangerous electorally.
Either way, as I do, I will quibble regarding the conflation socialism with interventionist government. Keynesianism is still capitalism.
Muldoon believed in Keynesianism. However, the RBNZ in his time was not independent, so he was able to control the reserve ratio himself, and kept it at around 20 to 25 percent. He should have imposed a 100 percent ratio. If he had put a stop to fractional reserve banking we might still be using Keynesian economics today.
As I see it his 2 main problems were (personality aside) the rapid decrease in the price of oil and the fact he was rowing against the OECD tide…..the powers that be had decided globalisation was to be the paradigm.
Inflation started to increase in the late sixties (in NZ), probably as a result of the two devaluations of the NZ dollar that had occurred earlier. The first I think was in sympathy with a British devaluation, and then we did another one later. This was before the "oil shocks",
Another factor was America's departure from the gold standard in the early seventies. The abandonment of Bretton Woods, and Britain’s ill advised entry into the EEC, left NZ rather exposed.
Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan is one of a small number of rational voices amongst the councils grappling with ( mostly opposing) the Three Waters Reforms, and doesn't hold much back again in this article.
There have been calls to “Stop 3 Waters”, which is problematic to say the least. Virtually all ratepayers are taxpayers.
Councils have already received, and no doubt spent, the half billion dollar three waters “stimulus funding” offered last year, and are now applying for the $500 million second tranche funding from the Government.
As a nation do we really want the situation of having paid for the reforms only to stop proceedings, inflict more unnecessary pain on ratepayers, and still have to solve the problems sometime in the very near future. There could be no sillier scenario than this.
Sadly, I still expect councils that have been blowing their tin whistles to grab the money on offer with one hand, will continue to bludgeon the provider with the other. This only adds to the publics confusion and angst, and Clutha along with all but one council in the south remains committed to working constructively to establish the best outcomes for our collective wellbeing.
Ah, so we can't/ shouldn’t't reconsider/debate/inform properly/convince and maybe generally just take some more time to get the tax payer on board of the ship called 3 waters, because some of the councils would like to have that next lot of several hundreds of millions extracted from the tax payers to spend on stuff, even if the tax payer disagrees with us.
sounds solid and democratic.
How much does this persons wage depend on getting that money that is extracted from the tax payer? And how much will his future depend on it? He maybe hoping for a nice cushy " you are very polite and accommodating " 6 figure job somewhere in that mess? Or would that be rude to speculate? Surely this guy only has the best of the country and himself in mind.
There is a phrase that says: throwing good money after bad; but then i guess the life and wages of this person is depend on getting good money from the tax payer to throw after something many don't want and even more are suspicious about.
Clutha District is fairly competent and their Mayor can at least see who prints the money.
It is an impressively resolute opposition to 3 Waters from Selwyn Council given that they still have Boil Water notices that have been dragging on in some areas since 2019 and in many areas continue.
"Question: Will the Three Waters Reforms take private water supplies / take back water allocations
Answer: No. The Three Waters Reforms aim to reform council-owned services only. This discussion is not about taking over operation of privately-owned supplies. However, the Government is working with a Rural Supplies Technical Working Group to understand how the proposed entities may support private supplies who currently receive assistance from councils The proposed entities will continue to operate within the resource management system – the Three Waters Reforms will not alter resource consents, allocations, or address ownership of freshwater. This is subject to work of the Ministry for the Environment"
I fear a lot of opposition comes from it being fronted by Nanaia Mahuta. How dare such a policy be fronted by a Māori woman. You don't have to move much around certain circles in the south to pick this up.
That is some fine sexist and racist malebovine poo poo you are throwing at a hole lot a people.
a. Firstly define the word women.
b. Has Nanaia Mahuta self ided as a women and statee their preferred pronouns as she/her, if not be careful that you don't accidentally misgender someone – even in good faith.
c. most of us have had very little information from anyone including Nanaia Mahuta other what is peddled every now and then on the MSM which we all know we can't trust because maybe they received part of that 55 million dollar package or because they are rightwingers or or or.
d. most of us would like some more information on how exactly this will work out for the USER of these services in the future. I.e. how much will it cost to use water, discharge used water, recycle used water and how will it be charged? And will there be any safeguarding to assure access to people who may not be able to pay for water in the future. Maybe a televised roundtable with a highly educated panel and a moderator who is not a breakfast host but maybe with someone who knows a bit about water and how it gets into our glasses and cups.
Personally i have nothing against a better/fairer model, but in this case the government has failed to make its case by simply not making a case to the public.
That has nothing to do with Nanaia Mahuta, but rather with a government policy of 'no debate' 'we know better' 'do as yer told' and 'shut up if you don't agree'. Non which reflects well on this government.
And non which is the fault of Nanaia Mahuta, irrespective of the fact that they are born in a female body and are Maori, and may or may not have a gender identity that goes hand in had with their female sexed body.
But yeah the easiest solution to the fact that people don't like what government is doing must be the fact that the messanger arrives in a female body and is Maori.
My definition of the term female:
Of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes.
And "can bear offspring" does not mean they will, plan to, or want to bear offspring, or have not lost that 'can' to illness, genetic defects, or surgery/medication.
Deleted post by pro-Kremlin media outlet Readovka.
Readovka 15 minutes ago ?
At a closed briefing, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced data on losses during a special operation on the territory of Ukraine. Irretrievable losses on the Russian side amount to 13,414 soldiers. About 7,000 more people are considered missing. Figures for the cruiser Moskva were also announced: 116 dead were confirmed, more than 100 people are considered missing. The Deputy Minister of Defense noted that at the moment the calculation of the number of dead is difficult due to the intensity of hostilities and inaccessibility to the bodies at the battlefield.
Czechs know a thing or two about appeasers. And Russia.
The German army has largely exhausted the possibilities of supplying additional weapons to Ukraine, says Scholz. He wants to prevent NATO's conflict with Russia.
The United States is once again pulling hot chestnuts out of the fire for Europe, and then we will criticize them for being too militarily involved in the world. Cowardice and disgrace of Germany.
Yes – Putin has really thrown Germany under the bus in this war. Led by the German Greens and dominating figures like Merkel, the Germans pursued the idea that nations who trade with each other do not go to war. The reasoning was that if the EU was able to prevent war in Western Europe, then the same principle might work in across the whole of Eurasia.
I would argue that while open trade and the movement of people and ideas is a necessary condition – it turned out not to be a sufficient one.
To their credit the Germans have pivoted against Russia pretty hard, yet clearly have yet to fully let go of the old dream. I can only wonder for example if anyone has interviewed Merkel herself recently and how betrayed she must now feel.
More than a few national security types called Merkel and her government on their obeisance to Poots.
Yesterday, Bild ran the sensational story “Former spy chiefs settle accounts with Merkel,” which revealed to the public for the first time just how subservient Germany’s chancellor has been to Moscow. Several retired spy bosses took Merkel to task, denouncing her conduct towards the Kremlin with harsh words: “Obsequiousness” and “Cowardice” were cited, while one former spy chief stated that the chancellor “blamed her own intelligence services” rather than Putin for problems in the bilateral relationship.
Bernd Schmidbauer, who served as the cabinet-level coordinator of Germany’s intelligence and security agencies (a position roughly equivalent to the U.S. Director of National Intelligence), denounced Merkel’s handling of German security vis-à-vis Russia as “worse than bad,” adding it is “a disgrace to our country” how weakly Berlin responded to Khangoshvili’s brazen assassination. This cannot be dismissed as partisan grousing. Schmidbauer, a lifelong member of Merkel’s own party, termed the expulsion of two Russian spies “laughable” given the gravity of the crime perpetrated by the Kremlin in Berlin.
Interesting – that goes a lot deeper than I had imagined. The other very weak EU response was to the 2014 invasion of Crimea – something must have surely played into Putin's delusion that he could take the whole of Ukraine with impunity.
I guess you think that Putin should relinquish Crimea and hand its two naval bases over to the Americans. After all that is what would have happened if Crimea had remained Ukranian, and the Crimean people had not wanted Crimea to become a Russian oblast once again, and made application to Putin accept them back.
Ah yes – that 2014 referendum overseen by Russian troops and widely rejected by most countries.
And widely boycotted by the indigenous Tartars.
And why would the US possibly want a naval base in Crimea? The most stupid place on earth to have one, totally vulnerable to enemy missiles and no-where to escape. As the Russian navy knows only too well.
And why would the US possibly want a naval base in Crimea? The most stupid place on earth to have one, totally vulnerable to enemy missiles and no-where to escape.
On 25 April 1915, 16,000 Australians and New Zealanders, together with British, French and Indian troops, landed on the Gallipoli peninsula. The invasion was part of a campaign to:
capture the peninsula and help naval operations in the Dardanelles straits
relieve pressure on Russian forces who were fighting Turkish forces on the Caucasus front
British forces landed at Cape Helles on the southern tip of the peninsula while French troops carried out a feint landing at Kum Kale on the Dardanelles' Asian shore. Units became separated as they moved through the tangle of complex spurs and ravines in the darkness.
Turkish resistance was fierce. By mid-morning, Turkish reinforcements had arrived under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Mustafa Kemal.
In the evening, Major-General William Bridges, commander of the 1st Australian Division, and Lieutenant-General Sir William Birdwood, commander of ANZAC, both advised General Sir Ian Hamilton, Commander-in-Chief, to withdraw the Allies from Gallipoli.
Ah yes – that 2014 referendum overseen by Russian troops and widely rejected by most countries.
Just because it was supervised by Russian troops doesn't mean the result wasn't kosher; and of course it was rejected by most countries. Its rejection suited the west's anti Russian narrative.
And widely boycotted by the indigenous Tartars
Natuarally, but the Tatars were only a small minority.
And why would the US possibly want a naval base in Crimea? The most stupid place on earth to have one, totally vulnerable to enemy missiles and no-where to escape. As the Russian navy knows only too well.
The naval bases give the Russians better access to the Black Sea than they would have without them. From the Black Sea they have access to the Mediterranean via the Bosphorus and the Dardenelles.
My trusted insider source – sadly I cannot reference – has claimed that the German Greens opposition to nuclear energy was heavily driven by pro-Russian influencers who saw it as a means to make Germany dependent on the Kremlin.
After all no rational person can justify shutting down six perfectly good nuclear power plants this year – while at the same time claiming it would be too traumatic to stop Russian gas. The logical answer must lie elsewhere.
Up to her eyeballs in Russian debt with plans to ditch the EU and pull France out of NATO's command structure.
She'll do whats she's told.
PARIS—The far-right party of French presidential candidate Marine Le Pen has begun paying a settlement of 12 million euros—equivalent to $12.94 million—to a Russian military contractor under U.S. sanctions, part of a debt restructuring that granted her party more time to repay a loan it took from a Russian bank, according to Russian and French government records.
Aviazapchast JSC—a Moscow-based company that supplies Russian military aircraft and parts across the Middle East, Africa and Asia—took over the €9.4 million loan in 2016 after the bank that originated it, Moscow-based First Czech-Russian Bank, went bankrupt, the records show. Holding loans is well outside of Aviazapchast’s normal line of business, according to the company’s corporate reports, which contain no mention of the transaction.
Yes. The German energy gambit was never going to work with France as they were in a very different context. So they went for the reliable old 'put money in the pollies pocket' approach instead.
In May 1944 Stalin's regime started deporting Crimea's indigenous people. It took 3 days to remove every Crimean Tatar on the peninsula. Deportation and inhuman conditions killed nearly half of them.
The deportation officially was intended as collective punishment[15] for the perceived collaboration of some Crimean Tatars with Nazi Germany; modern sources theorize that the deportation was part of the Soviet plan to gain access to the Dardanelles and acquire territory in Turkey where the Tatars had Turkic ethnic kin.
Nearly 8,000 Crimean Tatars died during the deportation, while tens of thousands perished subsequently due to the harsh exile conditions.[4] The Crimean Tatar exile resulted in the abandonment of 80,000 households and 360,000 acres of land.
Don't forget to remind us all of the terrible atrocities carried out by ALL the other players in the Ukriane war will you….of course I know you will, as you are so well known around these parts for your fairness and balance in your comments…
Again no mention of Stalin's Holomodor, Great Terror or even the gulags. No mention of the Maoist tyrannies that killed uncountable millions and crippled that great culture for decades.
And why limit yourself to the past 200 years – I could easily go back millennia cataloguing one historic disaster after another. Yet this would add nothing more to the conversation than your self-righteous preaching.
All you have is yet another tiresome bunch of whattaboustism – carefully curated to emphasise the catastrophes of one side and whitewash another. And yet you still pretend to be neutral when every comment you make betrays that claim as bullshit.
Well of course I didn't mention them Redlogix…because Joe90 already has you idiot ..but wait there is more…aaahhh now he pulls out the 'ol whattaboustism trope….this guy can't write a single comment without dragging out some sort of tired old deflection.
Once more….I support peace through negotiation..something you obviously do not want, which of course comes as no surprise to anyone…Imperialists like you only know dominance and war as a means to achieve their aims….just like people like you have always done…..yuk.
aaahhh now he pulls out the 'ol whattaboustism trope
Your comment above was literally a list of seven different deflections – a textbook instance of whataboutism.
You cannot even manage two comments in a row without contradicting yourself. From the wiki link above:
The philosopher Merold Westphal said that only people who know themselves to be guilty of something "can find comfort in finding others to be just as bad or worse.
What kind of peace negotiations do you have in mind? For example, who initiates it and why (e.g. what might trigger it and when), who brokers or mediates it, what would be some of the key terms, et cetera?
I’m not asking for myself, but I do want to steer it in a different direction and away from the increasing acrimony between RedLogix (as well as a few others) and you, again
And right now in the world there is but one truly dangerous hot war of conquest going on, a brutal attempt by Russia to reclaim one of its old colonies. A recrudescent imperialism if there ever was – yet AT pretends he is not defending it and then has the unmitigated gall to call me an warmongering imperialist.
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
I find it interesting that many think Russia should not be concerned about NATO /U.S on its border,but are very worried about Chinese influence in…the Solomon's!
I find it very interesting that many who provide apology for Putin's invasion of Ukraine saying that it is all NATO's fault, completely overlook the fact that Putin's invasion has had the opposite effect to that which he intended. Rather than dividing NATO, this war has only strengthened its resolve and prompted two other bordering countries, Finland and Sweden to apply for immediate membership of NATO.
Maybe if China was governed by a democratic polity, or was not in the process of one of the most rapid military expansions in all of human history, nor prone to expansionist territorial claims that piss off all their neighbours – then maybe we would not be so concerned at all.
And here is the blatantly stupid thing about these claims that Russia was justified in being concerned about NATO aggression. For a start there was never any evidence that NATO nor any member country was in the slightest bit interested in invading Russia. Indeed Europe had embarked on a decades long project to normalise the relationship and build trade on the basis this would prevent conflict.
But assuming even this was a lie and NATO secretly harboured the desire to crush Russia all along. Yet right now with the invasion of Ukraine providing the perfect pretext to launch a fatal attack on Russia no-one has done so – and have even had to be dragged with some reluctance into supporting Ukraine's defense once the horrors of Poots invasion became the undeniable reality.
Over 70% of the worlds population regard America as the 'Great Satan'.
You can back up that claim with verifiable evidence?
Ukraine is not a democracy,even Trump said it is one of the most corrupt countries in the world.
Well Trump is certainly an authority of corruption – but hardly an authority on Ukraine. He couldn't even point to it on the map! So another load of bollocks from you
The US was the overwhelming choice (24% of respondents) for the country that represents the greatest threat to peace in the world today.
So no; that doesn't return an over 70% of the world's population.
You know – repeating a lie, doesn't make the lie true. Anything Trump has to say is simply bullshit mixed up in a word salad, and to quote Faux News! Well that's laughable.
Maybe you should try adding up the populations of non english speaking nations in Asia ,Africa,Sth America and compare it to the total world population.
If you were to look at the "brilliant map" you linked to above you would see that India, and Afganistan thought Pakistan was the greatest threat. Almost the whole of Africa had no opinion whatsoever and only 3 countries in Africa considered the USA to be the Greatest threat. Japan considered Russia to be the greatest threat. The USA, Canada, UK, Turkey, considered Iraq. Nigeria the 6th most populous country was not surveyed. Bangladesh the 8th most popular country thought Israel to be the greatest threat.
So a large proportion of the most populous countries did not hold the US as the greatest threat and I'm sorry but you cannot extrapolate the 24% of 66,000 respondents surveyed out to the whole of the world population.
I'm sure if a similar survey was conducted today there would be a very different out come – particularly in western Europe.
What you are proposing that the US is the most dangerous nation on earth – yet in the post WW2 era during the world order they have dominated has been remarkably peaceful by comparison to any era before. In 2020 your chances of dying in a war were lower than at any time in all of human history.
You can of course claim that ideally no-one would ever die in state conflict, but given humans have never been able to sustain such a state of affairs for any extended period this is an unreasonable benchmark.
You might want to claim that if Hitler had prevailed in WW2, or Stalin and his successors ruled the world in a glorious workers paradise that all would have been much better – but these claims are untestable. As are all other counterfactual versions of history.
What we can know is that the US dominated period since WW2 has seen the lowest comparative levels of state violence since forever. No-one is claiming their record is close to ideal – but you might want to pause and think what might replace them if the hated Yanks really did go home and left the rest of the world to marinate in it's own toxic juices.
You might even want to think about what the US almost accidentally achieved – and think how we might more consciously improve on it future.
We could do a quick post-WW2 tally of what different kinds of colonial takeover are like:
USA: Marshall Islands still a protectorate – new military base, tribalised democratic state. Guam – military base, limited representation. Philippines – no more military bases and a fully fledged if slightly imperfect democracy. American Samoa – developing state with some democratic representation. South Korea – US military bases, fully fledged democracy now. Marshall Islands – military bases, Free Association with USA. Japan – Okinawa base, fully operating democracy. Australia – Roberston Barracks+Pine Gap+Other key comms+full interoperability, fully fledged democracy.
China: Multiple new military bases in South China Sea, hostile to democracy. North Korea – defence treaty, hostile to democracy. Hong Kong – fully takeover and democracy rapidly degraded. Taiwan – prepared to defend against hostile mainland takeover – currently a strong democracy.
USA is by no means a good colonial power, but on balance …
Thankfully there are whole institutions devoted to evaluating kinds of democracy, and the elements that go into them, and don't decry against the world with foolish absolutes like you just did.
By contrast no-one pretends the liberal democratic order is perfect – quite the opposite, we spend much time here finding fault with it and sometimes having constructive debates on how to improve it. (A privilege you do not have in the totalitarian nations – protest being frequently rewarded with long prison sentences or worse.
What I do not tolerate is lazy idiots who rather than put the work into building on what we have already achieved – argue that everything is corrupt, vile and hopeless and therefore the system must be torn down. And imply somehow magically out of the rubble will appear a new utopia that will solve all problems. Vaguely specified always.
So what have we already achieved….that say Singapore has…not?
The U.S is supposedly the benchmark for liberal democracy.
Look at the ghetto the U.S really is…low wages,40 million on food stamps,highest incarceration rate in the world,horrific homelessness,weekly shootings of civilians because of their gun laws…and aggressive foreign policy to promote U.S interests.
Throw in the Assange travesty , look at the incumbent Dem president and his Rep predecessor and… what have you got!!!!!
The U.S is supposedly the benchmark for liberal democracy.
Who said that? Most people here recognise the US as something of an outlier in democratic norms. It is well understood that their democratic sausage has many ingredients and not all of them wholesome.
As for Assange – I spent the best part of a decade here defending him from many on the left who constantly libeled him with false allegations and told us that the US desire to extradict him was a silly fantasy. Those relative few of us who saw through the bullshit all along have been proven right, but as events have turned out it has been a pyrrhic victory and a bitter disappointment. Those on the left who should have supported Assange early when it might have made a difference can now only hang their heads in shame on this.
And I can only imagine that events in Ukraine have only stacked the cards against Assange even more than they were already.
Yet right now with the invasion of Ukraine providing the perfect pretext to launch a fatal attack on Russia
Of course not. Nobody wants to start a nuclear war. But without 'mutually assured destruction' you can be pretty certain American would be in the Ukraine, boots and all, fighting on the side of the Ukranians. But without ‘MAD’ they need a more indirect means of getting at Russia.
Looks like another blatant and deliberate attempt at starting another flame war
Is that all you think is going on?
You have a real life fascist running rampant all over the site – how much of this shit are we supposed to put up with?
I cannot believe it.
What public good is served by circulating Putin's disinformation – because make no mistake, that is ultimately Adrian's only source – and it is not ever factual – there are Russian sources out there that are, and they never run the unadulterated Kremlin line.
You will have noted that you got no reply from AT to your 8.1.1.1.2 request. Crickets.
Unlike AT I have lived and worked in Russia and retain a respect and fondness for the people. I have written to this many time over the past decade. Every wrecked Russian tank we see in the media represents a handful of incinerated young men and this is heartbreaking at a human level. No mature person can look at the images of this war unmoved – for all the losses.
Yet AT exploits this legitimate human response as cover for a fake neutrality, and insisting Ukraine negotiate for peace – when he knows dam well this means nothing more than a surrender to a tyrant whose word is worthless. And the surety that within years Poots would simply leverage the same strategy again.
In an ideal world we would have political and global mechanisms to prevent a nation going rogue and a legitimate means to prevent conflict – but for the moment we do not. By analogy AT is suggesting that the only method of dealing with crime is to disband the police and require the victims of rape, theft and assault to 'negotiate' terms with those who prey upon them. Yet for some reason Ukraine is meant negotiate 'peace terms' with those would are offending against them – an absurdist perversion of justice if there ever was.
It is this contradiction AT cannot resolve – he knows full well the moment he attempts to outline any concrete details of a peace settlement under the terms he has in mind – the rank injustice of it would be laid bare.
Yes, I know your long record here, which is not in question as far as I am concerned.
Yes, I tend to agree that Adrian Thornton is stretching our imagination and challenging our intelligence with his alleged stance of neutrality.
Indeed, Adrian Thornton has failed to respond to and answer my probing questions in the past. However, that is his prerogative if I submitted these as a commenter rather than as a Mod. Nonetheless, his refusal to engage when challenged is telling. If all we hear is crickets I or maybe another Mod will act.
As I just mentioned in my reply to Stuart Munro, I don’t want to get dragged into this particular discussion about the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It is something for and between commenters who are interested in debating these issues; they should be asking the probing questions, et cetera. If you think that resolving the contradiction is the key then focus on that and nothing else till it has been resolved, one way or another. In other words, sharpen the questions and turn up the heat.
I loathe to silence one of you because it would instantly kill off any chance of robust debate. Thus, silencing a voice is a (the) last resort.
Unlike AT I have lived and worked in Russia and retain a respect and fondness for the people. I have written to this many time over the past decade. Every wrecked Russian tank we see in the media represents a handful of incinerated young men and this is heartbreaking at a human level. No mature person can look at the images of this war unmoved – for all the losses.
Well said Sir @10.1
My father – a former British soldier- spent some time in Northern Russia in the 1920s. He lived with a Russian family and he came to respect and admire the Russian people. He never lost that respect and went to some trouble to bring us up with an understanding that the Soviet government of the time and the Russian people were not one and the same thing. Thus, I never grew up with a notion that all Russians were evil. After all, countless millions of them lost their lives at the hand (directly and indirectly) of the tyrannical despot, Stalin.
That is why we should grieve for the loss of these young Russian men as much as we grieve for the Ukrainians who have lost their lives or had their lives torn apart in some cases forever. They are both the victims of serial psychopaths at the top of the Russian political tree.
Ok, let’s assume for argument’s sake that there’s indeed a fascist running rampant here on TS. Do you think it us up to the Mods to judge and reach this verdict and then ban this person? If yes, for violation of which TS policy? Or do you think it is up to commenters such as you to attack this person for their beliefs & opinions? Or do you think the commentariat should counter this person’s reckons with facts and sound arguments that show the person is wrong about (certain) things? If you pick the third option, and there might be more, what do you expect to happen if this person does not budge? Is that a free invitation to launch personal attacks to bully the other person into submission or to shut them up? In other words, the second option, which is a violation of TS policy especially in the absence of any points of substance that can be debated.
I took your comment in isolation and it contained nothing (!) of substance, and you made quite specific allegations and accusations.
The bigger picture is that you all fail to take the debate to the next level and just keep going around in circles in very predictable ways. Find a way to pull specific information or opinion or whatever out of the other one. If you think they’re so wrong give them enough rope to hang themselves and show their true colours. However, and obviously, you cannot force other commenters to give the replies you want them to give, in fact, you cannot force them to reply at all. However, if they continue to refuse to engage in genuine debate a Moderator might step in and call them out for trolling, for example. The more specific it is, the clearer it is that someone is trolling and not interested in genuine debate.
Calling another commenter names is hardly a good debating strategy and after a while it is getting tiresome.
I’m keen to have a serious discussion about this because something has to give. Actually, I’m frustrated that I have to spend time on trying to sort out something that a bunch of you cannot or won’t sort out yourselves.
Do you think it us up to the Mods to judge and reach this verdict and then ban this person?
Moderation has on many occasions in the past determined that a line of argument was out of bounds and no longer tolerable. I can think of quite a few examples over the years. Starting with climate change deniers back around 2013 for instance.
I do appreciate the very difficult balancing act this creates. TS has a long and proud tradition of robust and open debate despite what I have said above. For the moment I am not advocating AT should be banned – but as far as I am concerned he is fair game.
Fair point. For this to occur there has to be a clearconsensus, so that a line can be drawn or some touchstone developed to which we can hold commenters accountable. And even then it can be hard to make a fair and proper judgement. I also note that in OM, for example, we still tolerate CC sceptics or even deniers, as long as they make some debatable comment. In other words, it is not TS policy to ban (cancel) all CC deniers outright, at least not that I’m aware of. And not all Mods are the same, as you know; I wasn’t around here in 2013.
I’m going to have a few drinks now, as I’m thirsty.
Anyone else notice that hard-right and hard-left are barely distinguishable from each other these days. The rhetoric, methods, inability to compromise or reason… Shaved head or fly bitten feral they're just clowns parading their own version of the same hateful bullshit. (tear it all down, me and my commune/club have better ideas).
Sure they've got different (versions of) flags and symbols. And let's not forget different (versions of) the same religious nonsense. 6% on the far right and 8% on the far left drowning out moderate voices. They're all wannabe killers.
The fact I spend most of my time on ecological subjects has many folk insist on classifying me here in TS as hard left. Not bloody likely. Though I'm personally against people victimising others, skinhead or feral twat, that's a result of being a human with PTSD, I know what it's like and I stop bullies with zero compunction. But this craven cancel culture posing circle jerk of cunts who think they're the holders of all that is correct… it's just mob rule and bullying en masse – disgraceful bullshit.
And playing the victim. Goddamn what a pack of whingers the fringes are. They call for or justify violence, and the minute you call them on it they claim they've been joking, misunderstood, and there we go again victimising the poor wee dears.
The fringe groups are coalescing over incomprehensible conspiracies. And they're getting religio-frenzied over it all. The binary (which really exists only as a construct) is being forced into conversations everywhere:
Pick a side they say. Join us in our idiotic blathering. Gush over grief porn, be outraged by the deaths. Pick a side, and wreak death upon the other. After all, isn't thinking soooo confusing lately!
Pick a side – where the sides stretch out, curve round and coalesce into a murderous merging of fuckwits, left and right wing villainy and extremist ideology none of which we'd give time of day for in any other circumstance.
Pick a side, they demand. We're going to execute the press.
Pick a side, they say. We've victims of unreasonable people.
Pick a side!
AT has laid out a pattern of calling everyone else stupid and incapable of reading/researching themselves – and the moment he's called on it he claims he's a victim, and then goes so far as to pretend he's the only adult in the room.
I got no time for such BS. Hence instead of debating the same drivel day in day out I declare – a twat.
My aspie superpower is assimilating huge volumes of text to gain pattern recognition.
Anyone else notice that hard-right and hard-left are barely distinguishable from each other these days.
Yes – extremists are people who fail to recognise boundaries. They all believe their cause is so important that any means is justified to promote it. Which is why they all wind up 'barely distinguishable'.
"The centre is perhaps better conceived as that political space which is the sum of those ideas and agendas that all sides will concede legitimacy to."
Yes, legitimate ideas!
Not these climate denying, science bashing, extreme fucking idiots and all the garbage they've picked up along the way. The 'health food' fad industry and their army of idiot influencers: those vacant fucking lots. God botherers of various Gods, drumming up their believers. Then the social justice warrior armed with their lists of historical grievances, looking to set the rest of us straight. And who could miss those celebrity fools with more followers than facts or fucks given, in the media sowing discord for clicks, trained by the algorithms to be shit.
6% on the right, 8% on the left. Joined forces to throw feces at parliament. Met each other on social media. The elites and the bottom feeders, best pals (while it's convenient to the rich).
These people are not sitting at the table, they want to cut the table up for firewood for their silly camps.
There's a long history of not taking the village idiot seriously, and for good reason. Thanks to the internet they're now a village of idiots. Their ideas are nonsense, their intent is deadly serious. They want to be avenged for all the petty shit they carry about as facts. They want to die on their own respective hill of beans and be martyred because immaturity, insecurity, etc.
Yes that's a bit of a rant, but to be fair I've held back.
Speaking from personal experience, your aspie superpower has let you down and your PTSD has clouded your judgement before here. I do agree that trolling is not limited to one side only, as some of the comments here on TS can attest. But trolling is at least something that can give clear guidance to Mods because it is a behavioural pattern and not just an opinion – we don’t ban just opinions.
You know what to do to expose a troll and drive them into the sunlight – simply pointing the finger and labelling them a troll or calling them names is not sufficient and can even backfire on you if it is a lazy and repeated attempt to cancel another commenter with whom you disagree.
Actually, there's a half dozen here I called out years ago and they've not changed one bit. Not at all.
Making mistakes, well, we all do that. Getting het up is not when I am losing an argument it is when the other side is not acting in good faith. Aint got no time for that it's nonsense, time wasting – call it what you will.
I say trolling.
you refute bad links and nonsense sentences – I see multiple instances in one statement that show the person's talking shit in order to win. At that point I've lost all interest in spending energy on that person other than to tell them to fuck off.
Exposing a troll for content and consistent troll behaviour is good. To expect a troll to change because you called them out is wishful thinking at best. Mods can ban trolls without too much trouble; if they were to ban commenters just for talking shit TS would become a deserted wasteland in no time. The bar for banning is deliberately set high here and in my view this is fine albeit extremely frustrating at times.
If you have tried dozens of times and failed it proves that your way is ineffective and that you’ve reached the end of the line by resorting to telling them to fuck off, et cetera. All this reinforces the futility and creates a bad vibe.
So, either you sharpen up or leave it to others with more patience and cooler heads to smoke out the trolls from their dingy holes.
Do you think it us up to the Mods to judge and reach this verdict and then ban this person? If yes, for violation of which TS policy? Or do you think it is up to commenters such as you to attack this person for their beliefs & opinions? Or do you think the commentariat should counter this person’s reckons with facts and sound arguments that show the person is wrong about (certain) things?
There's a real can of worms there – but – is it up to the Mods?
I would expect that on a progressive site, fascist trolling would be no more welcome than far-right trolling. The boot was long on the other foot however, and some of my encounters with Bill ended badly for me.
up to commenters such as you to attack this person for their beliefs & opinions
That is the way many RW trolls have been handled, the process being generously described as 'robust debate'. Though robust, it was often not much like debate, and the imposition of sourcing requirements went some way to improving the comments of both sides.
Or do you think the commentariat should counter this person’s reckons with facts and sound arguments that show the person is wrong about (certain) things? If you pick the third option, and there might be more, what do you expect to happen if this person does not budge?
My feeling is that the Putin dupes have had the benefit of this process already, and are presently not budging.
what do you expect to happen
Let me answer a question with a question – would Mods find it difficult to deal with a more familiar species of fascist, a neoNazi for example?
There is a reasonably strong international consensus that the Putin regime is objectionable – sufficient to get them thrown off the UN Human Rights Council.
The duty could be imposed on the Putin dupes, to explain how their views, whenever they intrude them upon public discourse here, are in some way consistent with a progressive or enlightened politics – because it is a fair presumption that in general they are not.
Huh! A bit tipsy and seem to have deleted my comment. More about NZ culture (specifically music) than politics anyway. Irritating!
Basically, I was pre-ANZAC day watching the Pogues "& the band Played Waltzing Matilda" on YouTube, and left it on autoplay while Irishing up some coffee. Turned into (NZ{ish} band{ish}) The Cake Kitchen by the time I got back. I had thought that Maxine Fleming (keys/ vox on Messages for the CK) was the same musician as the bassist/ vocalist for the early couple of CK albums – turns out that was Rachael King!
Peter was always the more front-manish of the two Jeffries brothers (NP, TKP etc), but to me it always felt like he was singing on top of the music rather than inside it. Graeme was (and is still) just so good in his own understated way.
But however authentic GJ is, Fleming/ Jeffries' Prisoner of a Single Passion is simply one of the best songs to come out of this country. Though very melancholy (and that's compared to &TBPWM!). Compare with Tomorrow came Today off the World of Sand LP – which I love in itself for having almost two parallel yet interleaved choruses "I remember that you bet me a million dollars on the outcome of a TV show – how am I going to pay you back now?" & "I thought we were different, we're exactly the same: Must have had sun in my eyes – wish you hadn't left me there, why'd you have to leave me that way?". Versus "There's a pleasure that we rarely find, but when we do we pride ourselves to keep it", on top of those (fragile and almost broken, yet somehow cohesive) instrumental lines.
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...
Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading → ...
Barrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...
Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...
Peter Dunne writes – The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...
Ele Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...
We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...
This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...
It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious: we live in a troubled ...
1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
…it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisitionNOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes – The High Court ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same?Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the RuleIf you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...
Mazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...
Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...
Car registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...
Zoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...
Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi, and Mema Paremata mō Tāmaki-Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, will travel to the Gold Coast to strengthen ties with Māori in Australia next week (15-21 April). The visit, in the lead-up to the 9th Australian National Kapa haka Festival, will be an opportunity for both ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Asia Pacific Report From France to Australia, university pro-Palestine protests in the United States have now spread to several countries with students pitching on-campus camps. And students at Columbia and other US universities remain defiant as campuses have witnessed the biggest protests since the anti-Vietnam war and anti-apartheid eras in ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards, Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)New Zealand Government’s Fast Track legislation. Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government ...
Tara Ward talks to presenter Naomi Toilalo about the new TV show that turns food waste into a three course feast. Naomi Toilalo is standing in the warehouse at Good Neighbour Tauranga, helping unpack the two-and-a-half tonnes of rejected food that will arrive at the community support hub that day. ...
Scout is our latest Dog of the Month. This feature was offered as a reward during our What’s Eating Aotearoa PledgeMe campaign. Thank you to Scout’s human, Avril, for her support. Dog name: Scout (named after the little girl in To Kill a Mockingbird – she inherited the independent spirit ...
Megan Alatini takes us through her life in TV, including ‘terrible’ daytime TV, the class of Carol Hirschfeld and her most embarrassing TrueBliss moment. When she responded to a vague newspaper ad asking “do you have what it takes to be a popstar?” 25 years ago, Megan Alatini never guessed ...
A new exhibition in Wellington showcases the faces behind your local goods and services. Back in 1977, when I was a fine arts student at the University of Canterbury, I took a series of photographs of Christchurch shopkeepers. The photos were for a calendar – a project for my end ...
Toomaj and his resistance to tyranny through his songs have become an icon for the youth of Iran, so his sentence has hit the nation hard. Toomaj Salehi is not the first artist to pay the price for standing with the people. ...
My cousin Dylan and I spotted these big eels under the bridge that summer. We watched them lounging under the dark weed, facing into the flow of water, their mouths frozen open. Dylan and I couldn’t stop thinking about those eels. The night we went down to the creek, we ...
Newsroom, home of satire. My long-running weekly satirical series The Secret Diary has moved to Newsroom and will appear every Saturday, with Victor Billot’s wildly popular satirical Odes continuing to appear every Sunday. Diaries, Odes – while serious political columnists toil at meaningful opinions and stroke their chins to an ...
Tara Ward unravels the many nuanced layers of a cartoon about talking dogs.This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. It’s not often an episode of a children’s cartoon has adults sobbing into their sleeves, but that’s exactly what happened this week when ...
Working as a doctor in developing countries to help communities achieve better health outcomes is nothing short of a life goal for Jessica Tater. The University of Otago medical student has her sights firmly set on joining the international humanitarian organisation Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) when she qualifies ...
There’s an island in the far reaches of Auckland’s territory, sitting off the tip of the Coromandel Peninsula, 30 minutes by air from the city or four hours on the slow boat. Aotea Great Barrier is off-grid, it has a population of fewer than a thousand people … and most ...
Asia Pacific Report An Australian author and advocate, Jim Aubrey, today led a national symbolic one minute’s silence to mark the “blood debt” owed to Papuan allies during the Second World War indigenous resistance against the invading Japanese forces. “A promise to most people is a promise,” Aubrey said in ...
Asia Pacific Report The Freedom Flotilla is ready to sail to Gaza, reports Kia Ora Gaza. All the required paperwork has been submitted to the port authority, and the cargo has been loaded and prepared for the humanitarian trip to the besieged enclave. However, organisers received word of an “administrative ...
Pacific Media Watch Palestine solidarity protesters today demonstrated at the Auckland headquarters of Television New Zealand, accusing the country’s major TV network of broadcasting “propaganda” backing Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. About 50 protesters targeted the main entrance to the TVNZ building near Sky Tower and also picketed a side ...
Opinion by Lynley Hood. Forty years on from my 1985 Fulbright Grant, my disquiet over the war in Gaza evoked some troubling questions. The answer to my first question – What is the primary purpose of the Fulbright Programme? – was on the Fulbright NZ website. It says: US Senator, ...
The ministers responsible for green-lighting major projects need to be open about potential conflicts of interest, says Transparency International. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anastasia Powell, Professor, Family and Sexual Violence, RMIT University It has been a particularly distressing start to the year. There is little that can ease the current grief of individuals, families and communities who have needlessly lost a loved one to men’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Lichen, the first described example of symbiosis.AdeJ Artventure/Shutterstock Once known only to those studying biology, the word symbiosis is now widely used. Symbiosis is the intimate ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kim Hemsley, Head, Childhood Dementia Research Group, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University Olena Ivanova/Shutterstock “Childhood” and “dementia” are two words we wish we didn’t have to use together. But sadly, around 1,400 ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Whiteford, Professor, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University The government’s Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee has just published its second report. It was set up by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Minister for Social Services Amanda Rishworth in 2022 to provide: ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne The Queensland state election will be held in October. A YouGov poll for The Courier Mail, conducted April 9–17 from a sample ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Naeni, PhD candidate at Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation, Deakin University There’s been much talk in recent months about what a possible second Donald Trump presidency in the United States could mean for Europe, Russia’s war in Ukraine, the ...
A brief round-up of submissions on the controversial proposed law. This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. Last week, submissions on the controversial Fast-track Approvals Bill closed just hours after the government released a list of stakeholder organisations who were sent letters advising how they could ...
A poem from Robin Peace’s new collection Detritus of Empire: feather / grass / rock. Cereal giving I see a woman’s hands, see her curious hands break a stalk as she walks through the tall prairie, the savannah, the steppe, wherever it was. See her idly bite the grass that ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Hemingway’s Goblet by Dermot Ross (Mary Egan Publishing, $38)A handsomely produced (debossed cover, lovely ...
The Commissioner's decision validates the longstanding efforts of the local community and ensures that Awataha Marae will be managed to serve the needs of the local community, particularly for hosting tangihanga. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tristan Salles, Associate professor, University of Sydney Examples of Australian landscapes.Unsplash Seventy thousand years ago, the sea level was much lower than today. Australia, along with New Guinea and Tasmania, formed a connected landmass known as Sahul. Around this time – ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Felicity Castagna, Lecturer, Creative Writing, Western Sydney University Day Day Market, ParramattaPhoto: Garry Trinh I live on the edge of Parramatta, Australia’s fastest-growing city, on the kind of old-fashioned suburban street that has 1950s fibros constructed in the post-war housing boom, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Ryan, Teaching Fellow in Economics, University of Waikato GettyImagesfatido/Getty Images There is an ongoing global debate over whether the high inflation seen in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic can be lowered without a recession. New Zealand is not ...
The ‘Wicked Game’ heartthrob is in his late 60s now. That didn’t stop him putting on a lively, goofy and very sparkly show. Apart from ‘Wicked Game’, which graces a sultry playlist of mine simply called 💋, my last sustained Chris Isaak listening session took place when I was about ...
Analysis - Two ministers were stripped of portfolios in a warning to Cabinet, drama broke out at the Waitangi Tribunal, and the gang patch ban bill ran into opposition. ...
Tara Ward makes an impassioned plea for some vital pop culture merch. In April 1999, I became obsessed with a new reality television show called Popstars. Every Tuesday night, five strangers transformed into music royalty before my very eyes as Joe, Keri, Carly, Erika and Megan were chosen to form ...
PNG Post-Courier In the early hours of ANZAC Day, aerial photographs captured an impressive gathering of Australians and Papua New Guineans at Isurava in the Northern (Oro) Province. The solemn dawn service yesterday was held at a site steeped in history, where some of the fiercest battles of World War ...
The PSA is shocked that Oranga Tamariki has used the cost cutting drive to downgrade its commitment to Te Ao Māori and remove many specialist Māori roles. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Kemish, Adjunct Professor, School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, The University of Queensland There can be no more powerful symbol of the relationship between Australia and Papua New Guinea than the prime ministers of these neighbouring countries walking together on the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sharon Robinson, Distinguished Professor and Deputy Director of ARC Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, University of Wollongong Andrew Netherwood Over the last 25 years, the ozone hole which forming over Antarctica each spring has started to shrink. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Viktoria Kahui, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Economics, University of Otago Getty Images/Amy Toensing Biodiversity is declining at rates unprecedented in human history. This suggests the ways we currently use to manage our natural environment are failing. One emerging concept focuses on ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Colin Bednall, Associate Professor in Management, Swinburne University of Technology marvent/Shutterstock Finding the best person to fill a position can be tough, from drafting a job ad to producing a shortlist of top interview candidates. Employers typically consider information from ...
Wondering where to host your next BYO? Whether its a small gathering or a massive party, we’ve got some recommendations. I was first introduced to the concept of BYOs at Dunedin’s India Gardens, a legendary but sadly defunct establishment, which purveyed enormous quantities of mango chicken to Aotearoa’s drunkest future ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julien Cooper, Honorary Lecturer, Department of History and Archaeology, Macquarie University Julien Cooper The hyper-arid desert of Eastern Sudan, the Atbai Desert, seems like an unlikely place to find evidence of ancient cattle herders. But in this dry environment, my new ...
The sector says it’s hopeful her replacement Paul Goldsmith will be able to throw it a lifeline, after six months with a minister deemed missing in action, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign ...
The government can't just rely on axing public sector jobs and has to do more to cut spending, says the chief economist at a free market think tank. ...
Rock The Vote NZ, known for its advocacy for minor party unity and its role within the Freedoms NZ Coalition during the 2023 General Election, celebrates this merger as a strategic enhancement of its operational strength and outreach. ...
Nearly everyone has experienced the frustration of something you use breaking and being difficult or expensive to fix. Proposed legislation could change that. It’s been raining on and off all Sunday afternoon but people are lining up outside a building in a corner of Gribblehirst Park in Sandringham, Auckland. In ...
What does a forever relationship look like when you don’t believe in marriage? And how do you celebrate it? This essay is part of our Sunday Essay series, made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand.I’m going to do it, right now. I’m going to say ...
The Prime Minister has committed to resuming direct flights to Thailand. But it’s not a promise he will be able to deliver on anytime soon. The post Prime Minister jumps the gun in Thailand appeared first on Newsroom. ...
It’s not that long ago Eliza McCartney was seriously wondering if the Paris Olympics would be her pole vaulting swansong. After years of being hounded by injury after injury, the Rio Olympics bronze medallist was still confident she would compete at her second Olympics in Paris in July, unless something ...
FICTION 1 Take Two by Danielle Hawkins (Allen & Unwin, $36.99) There’s commercial fiction, like this book, and then there’s quality fiction, quality writers, quality literature; the forthcoming Auckland Writers Festival is full of quality, and ReadingRoom has two tickets to give away to the following events: Paul Lynch (Dublin ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 26 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
You can’t have missed the Gallipoli story as the movies, documentaries, essays and books capture what it was like for New Zealand troops in their eight-month campaign on the Peninsula. But this Anzac Day the Auckland War Memorial Museum has published a book that sheds light on a little-known aspect of the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra In the free-for-all between the Australian government and Big Tech boss Elon Musk this week, the government had to be on a winner. Most people would have little sympathy with Musk’s vociferous opposition to ...
I'm beginning to think the US will not seek to bring the Russia-Ukraine war to any end soon – most usefully Russia will be weakened down by sanctions for several years to give breathing room to then focus hard on China (Not sure what that means from November when the Republicans likely run Congress and Senate majorities).
But it means that for years this is a world in which food and oil prices are high, some food commodities are scarce, and inflation and interest rates stay really high. I'd be interested to hear opinion on local impact from sustained supply chain disruption.
I can't remember that kind of world since the late 1970s and early 1980s. It's Muldoonist in tone.
New Zealand faces that kind of context quite differently to that time.
We are now more unequal, with a much smaller state. But we also have a much stronger and larger economy delivering higher-value products and services than we did then. We are far more mobile, less able to be isolated. We rely on exports and imports, supported by a net of trade deals. And we start 2022 off with exceedingly low unemployment and many unfilled positions.
With both the Carbon plan and the Budget due out in weeks, and also the Australian Federal election, we will also see the limit that politics can have on any of this.
It's a more enduring crisis than the GFC – it feels more like the start of a long recession.
If only Zelensky had accepted that Ukraine didn't need to be in NATO, and instead had negotiated an "understanding" with the West, this carnage could have been avoided.
But then he is a comedian.
There are always lots of 'if onlys.'
If only countries could act freely to do what they wanted as long as it didn't materially affect others.
If only years ago Russia had attacked Ukraine for Ukraine becoming part of the UN. I mean if a country wants to tell a neighbour what it can and can't do, which others it can forge relationships with, why not?
If only things were that simple. It's all a bit like the Killa Wasps talking to the Hills Angles, the Headmunters not liking that and invading their house
The more useful question is the impact of multi-year east European instability on New Zealand.
The world is changing so rapidly now it's going to be hard to keep up, and the ripples from the war are spreading far and wide. It's no longer a simple case of 'east European instability', it will be world-wide on many fronts. The USA is going to fight tooth and nail to prevent itself losing dollar hegemony but that is a possible outcome. How a small trading nation such as NZ position themselves is going to be a huge balancing act. 'When Elephants Fight, the Grass Gets Trampled'
Are approaching the point where Xi, perhaps the last rational leader on the world stage, will become convinced that Putin, Biden, Johnson and Zelensky are mad men, fully capable of blustering and blundering into a nuclear war, which–even if survivable–won’t be good for business. Who else has the power to bring them back from the brink?
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/EU-Can-Pay-for-Russian-Gas-Without-Violation-Sanctions.html
More delusional nonsense. Russia is an political and economic pariah and the ruble is worthless in the long run. It is only being propped up short-term by a number of manipulations:
The Russian Central Bank has been using what foreign reserves it can still access to to buy rubles.
They have effectively bribed people holding rubles not to sell by jacking up internal interest rates to something like 20%.
Those Russian entities that still earn or hold Euros and Dollars have been forced to convert 80% of their holdings or more into rubles.
Ban people from selling the ruble with things like massive commission fees or low limits on how much people can take out of the country.
And generate so much revulsion at your orc-like behaviour that the rest of the world sanctions the shit out of your economy and imports crater.
All measures that increase the demand for rubles and reduce selling pressure – but none of them remotely sustainable – the ruble is a zombie currency. Even if the war stopped tomorrow as long as the current Kremlin regime is in power their political and economic isolation will tighten. Over time their impact will escalate as the Europeans find ways to turn off the gas and secondary sanctions slowly start to bite. The impact of this will last decades – if not all but ensure that which Putin feared most of all – the end of Russia as a functional nation.
"I'm beginning to think the US will not seek to bring the Russia-Ukraine war to any end soon" you think….I mean seriously, hasn't that been plain as day light to you from the beginning?
As far as Western Super powers are concerned the Ukrainians are the least important component in the conflict, and anyone who thinks that the USA/UK give even the slightest fuck about the lives of Ukrainian civilians are just deluded…and personally by extension I believe anyone who supports the extending of this stupid pointless war by mindlessly swallowing the western propaganda fantasy world belief that the Ukrainians can win are only helping to prolong the awful suffering of the Ukrainians.
It's been going since 2014 but this more intense form has only been on for 2 months.
So I'm happy for patterns to reveal themselves rather than jump to conclusions.
It's the impact on New Zealand of multi-year east European instability that needs our thinking.
Sorry I should have clarified my previous comment, I meant that it has been obvious that the US (to a lesser extent the UK) have been dictating the terms of negotiations from the Ukrainian end of the Russian/Ukrainians negotiations from 2014…or to be more precise it would be better described as deliberate 'Non-Negotiations' on the part of the Zelensky and the Ukrainians.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoW75J5bnnE
Zelensky has been a disaster for the Ukrainians and Europe…but good for the Imperialist West and the arms industries of the world.
Isn't it interesting how the geo-politics of the Western Liberal class has meshed so seamlessly with that the US foreign policy over the past decade or so…I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that if the Iraq war were to happen today the same useful idiots who have backed every US/UK led intervention of late would be pushing that one just as hard today…it just shows quite dramatically how effective propaganda actually works.
So your preferred response to Putin's invasion of Eastern Europe is to surrender?
Over and over?
No, Zelensky should have, when he had the chance, negotiated a neutrality that not only Russia felt comfortable with, but a huge majority of Ukrainians wanted themselves, not to mention also fully supported by France and Germany..however it is plainly obvious now that neutrality was never going to happen for the Ukraine while the USA and the Nationalist in the Ukraine had the direction of the country in their hands..which did and still do.
This same 'neutrality' had already seen Russia tear up the 1994 Belgrade Agreement and occupy by one means or another large swaths of their territory. Why would Ukraine believe anything Putin said when prior agreements had already been proven worthless?
Yep the Ukranians are canon fodder for the West.
Biden happy to announce $800 million of military aid this week as though this is a big deal…that will be gone in a week.
True that…bleed those poor Ukrainians out nice and slow seems to be the US strategy, though for some reason that doesn't seem to bother their English speaking supporters one bit.
It is blindingly obvious the Ukrainians are nobodys pawns.
Not sure that Quillette is the most reliable source Red. From Wikipedia:
"In an article for The Outline, writer Gaby Del Valle classifies Quillette as "libertarian-leaning", "academia-focused" and "a hub for reactionary thought"
So you are telling us that the Ukrainians are all mindless pawns?
Only a "mindless pawn" would fight in a proxy war on behalf of Uncle Sam.
Easy to type that from behind the safety of your keyboard while on the far side of the world.
Are you posting from the Ukraine?
Are you posting from the Kremlin?
I'm posting from "the safety of my keyboard on the far side of the world" – your words. I just don't share the blind, irrational hatred of Russia that you seem to be harbouring.
I could start to dismantle that ridiculous article but I have to go and do some work now..but as an example of the flawed logic that permeates that piece …on the one hand he is bemoaning the stance of the 'anti-interventionists' with statements like…."So why treat them this way? Why indulge the fantasy that everything is really being run out of Washington, DC, or maybe Brussels?" …I mean is he serious…if it wasn't for the intervention of the West the Ukraine would have lost this war weeks ago..that is a plain fact, so what the fuck is he talking about?…
If a country can only conduct a war solely through the constant supply of weapons from outside of that country by various world Superpowers (not to mention nearly all repair and maintenance) and we are meant to believe that those same Superpowers are now (and have been) and will not in the future dictate the politics of that country for their own Geo-Political ends would be naive in the extreme.
btw, thanks for this link, I am seeing for myself where you have been getting your lack of balance and rage at any one who pushes back to your point of view from…
"One suspects much of this is a dodge by those who have long been sympathetic to Putin’s regime" etc and so forth…where have I heard that one before…..
Hiding behind a blatantly one-sided 'neutrality' to cover your constant cheerleading for Putin is wearing thin. To quote an article joe90 referenced below:
‘Berlin’s preachy pontifications about democracy, decency, and human rights are customarily aimed at NATO allies, seldom at Moscow.’
" your constant cheerleading for Putin is wearing thin"
Listen RedLogix..for the last time…either paste up one time when I have said anything positive about Putin or his politics…or if you can't, then how about you and all your warmongering friends around here that always all immediately resort to ad hominem name calling when confronted with logic just shut the fuck up.
I have only ever advocated for a negotiated peace..like all sane people who care about human suffering should do.
And yes I care about the Russian soldiers lives as much as I care about the Ukrainian lives, I make no apologies for that…all I see when I see those poor boys of both sides dying and being maimed pointlessly are the faces of my own boys…I find the whole stupid thing heartbreaking.
Every single comment from you is some preachy nonsense about how evil the West is and how we should roll over and let the poor misunderstood Russians have their Soviet Empire back.
Early next week the UN Secretary General is visiting both Putin and Zelensky. There is your chance for a negotiated peace – but the open question remains on what terms and who will guarantee it?
Because Putin's word has been repeatedly proven to be worthless.
Russia has never given any indication that they "wanted their empire back". Wars in Chechnya, South Assetia, and now Ukraine, have been and are defensive moves on their part. Aggressive moves against Russia have come from the West, with NATO moving as close to Russia's borders as they can manage.
have been and are defensive moves on their part.
Exactly who ever proposed to invade Russia?
Quacks like colonialism…
A senior Russian military commander has said the goal of Russia’s new offensive is to seize control of southern Ukraine and form a land bridge to Crimea, indicating that Russia plans a permanent occupation of Ukrainian territory taken in the war.
Rustam Minnekayev, acting commander of the central military district, also told members of a defence industry forum on Friday that control over southern Ukraine would give Russia access to Transnistria, a pro-Russian breakaway region of Moldova, indicating that Russia may attack the port city of Odesa or launch an economic blockade of the area.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/22/ukraine-south-occupation-russian-military-chief-rustam-minnekayev
"A senior Russian military commander has said the goal of Russia’s new offensive is to seize control of southern Ukraine and form a land bridge to Crimea, indicating that Russia plans a permanent occupation of Ukrainian territory taken in the war."
A defensive move, as I said. It would be a catastrophe for Russia if it lost Crimea, and the two naval bases on the Western seaboard of Crimea fell into the hands of the Americans.
And the deliberate targeting of civilians in their homes 500/1000 kilometres from the Western seaboard of Crimea. Is that a defensive move, too?
if it wasn't for the intervention of the West the Ukraine would have lost this war weeks ago..that is a plain fact,
Without a shred of doubt this means your desired outcome is a Ukrainian surrender.
Got it.
Grow up.
Every comment from you demands Ukrainian people roll over and allow the Russian army to exterminate them.
You need to be honest about this.
"Ukrainian people roll over and allow the Russian army to exterminate them"…..come on man…try and at least feign some sort of seriousness.
.come on man…try and at least feign some sort of seriousness.
What exactly do you think is happening on the ground right now if it is not a war of extermination.
What we are seeing is the Russian military resorting to about the only thing they are good at – endless, indiscriminate barrages of artillery that completely level everything – murdering thousands, rendering the place uninhabitable and forcing the survivors to flee. Captured civilians get transported to slave camps in Siberia – also something the Russians are good at.
Putin inherits a wasteland pitted with mass graves. And you think this is not serious?
I think..no actually I know that you are not a serious interpreter of Geo-Politics RedLogix, how could you be, you, by your own admission have "picked a side" therefore there is never any attempt at any sort of balanced detailed examination of any event related to the war in the Ukraine from you..no just this sort of thing….
"Hiding behind a blatantly one-sided 'neutrality' to cover your constant cheerleading for Putin"
"Every comment from you demands Ukrainian people roll over and allow the Russian army to exterminate them"
"your desired outcome is a Ukrainian surrender"
"Every single comment from you is some preachy nonsense"
"How about just coming clean and saying that you support Putin and want to see Ukraine defeated?"
"yet you cheer on their invasion and extermination"
" Yet as with all totalitarian thinkers you deny them their agency"
..and that is just from today!!!!…talk about wearing thin.
Yet in this entire thread today you have done nothing but provide cover for Putin – even while pretending otherwise.
Yes I have picked a side. The side that doesn't pretend that NATO planned to invade Russia and that this sickening war Putin has launched – along with the unforgiveable, city-killer first-strike nuclear threats – are somehow entirely justified 'defensive measures'.
I don't believe backing negotiated peace would be considered by any sane human to be backing Putin/Russians….except of course in your demented world.
So no I haven’t “picked a side” …that is what you really believe, because ironically, it turns out that it is you who are the closest to that authoritarian Putin around here…everyone who doesn’t agree with you and your views is your enemy and must be pushed down and silenced…which everyone here knows you would do if you could.
Putin and his totalitarian thugs have no more reliable supporter than Adrian.
Ukrainians aren't entitled to democracy – they must roll over for the tyrant – sez Adrian.
Oh, and WW2 was a mistake too – should've just let Hitler win.
[Looks like another blatant and deliberate attempt at starting another flame war. I hope for your sake as well as his that Adrian is not going to take the bait this time – Incognito]
Mod note
The side that doesn't pretend that NATO planned to invade Russia
It is Ukrainian government policy to recover Crimea. However, since Russia is unlikely to ever relinquish Crimea voluntarily, that can only mean an invasion is on the cards. And Ukraine is, at least, a de facto member of NATO.
"If a country can only conduct a war solely through the constant supply of weapons from outside of that country"
I guess from that remark we have to assume that Russia (or the USSR as it was then) has been run by the USA ever since 1941. There was an enormous quantity of war material supplied by the US during WW2 that was essential for the USSR to be able to keep fighting during that war. Did the USA gain from this? Certainly. It kept the Russians fighting. There was no way they could have survived without Lend/Lease, even if it was help yourself for the Soviet Union.
For example "Most visibly, the United States provided the Soviet Union with more than 400,000 jeeps and trucks, 14,000 aircraft, 8,000 tractors and construction vehicles, and 13,000 battle tanks."
"Under Lend-Lease, the United States provided more than one-third of all the explosives used by the Soviet Union during the war. The United States and the British Commonwealth provided 55 percent of all the aluminum the Soviet Union used during the war and more than 80 percent of the copper."
You will find many apologists for the Soviet Union who will say that is was nothing but I will settle for one quote from Khrushchev
""If the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war," he wrote in his memoirs "One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war. No one talks about this officially, and Stalin never, I think, left any written traces of his opinion, but I can say that he expressed this view several times in conversations with me."
He clearly thought they couldn't have survived without foreign supplies. Do you?
https://www.rferl.org/a/did-us-lend-lease-aid-tip-the-balance-in-soviet-fight-against-nazi-germany/30599486.html
Good try, except you don't take into account that Russia was a Superpower and the only reason they suppied them was to lessen their own losses…also post war, the Russian militarily was fully mobilized, manufacturing at huge volumes some of the most feared weapon systems in the world, and had just proved that they had a fighting force that could and would sustain a level of total war that no other Western country was (rightly) prepared to test …though we know now Churcill and other warmongering Imperialists dearly wanted too…there obviously no way that any foreign power was ever going to dictate terms to the Russians just because they supplied that equipment…your comparison just doesn't hold any water sorry.
The British planned to start World War III by invading Russia with the German army
https://www.businessinsider.com/churchill-world-war-iii-invade-russia-german-army-2016-12
George S. Patton
"We may have been fighting the wrong enemy all along. But while we're here, we should go after the bastards now, 'cause we're gonna have to fight 'em eventually"
"I'll say this; the 3rd Army alone with very little help and with damned few casualties, could lick what is left of the Russians in six weeks. You mark my words"
From 1945-49 the US and UK planned to bomb Russia into the Stone Age
https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/from-1945-49-the-us-and-uk-planned-to-bomb-russia-into-the-stone-age#:~:text=Winston%20Churchill's%20Operation%20Unthinkable,States%20and%20the%20British%20Empire.
You really are a complete idiot. Are you for a moment suggesting that the West should have meekly surrendered to Stalin rolling his military machine across the whole of Europe? It was of course blindingly obvious that the USA despite its massive manufacturing capacity was not going to directly confront the Red Army in Europe. The supply lines were simply too long and both France and Germany lay in ruins unable to assist. Despite Patton’s idiotic boast – there was simply no conceivable way the 3rd Army was going to invade all the way across Russia and Siberia to the extent necessary to achieve any sane political goal.
The answer they came up with was Bretton Woods, the Marshall Plan an the Cold War containment of Stalin. This plan worked brilliantly, averting a direct confrontation between the West and Russia all the way up until about 60 days ago when your hero Poots fucked it all up.
(And sometime you might want to ask a Polish woman about the experience of that generation – the Germans murdered going east, while the Russians raped going west. Yet here you are again cheerleading for the orcs.)
It is blindingly obvious the Ukrainians are nobodys pawns.
True. It is just a pity the same thing cannot be said about the Ukranian government.
It is amazing how you would never criticise the Belarus government who have cravenly allowed Putin to use their territory to invade another nation.
Silence on this.
Why would I criticize Belarus for that; and why would you use a pejorative word like "craven". Why not, instead, criticize the West for supplying the Ukrainians with weapons. An appropriate word for that might be "venal".
Why not, instead, criticize the West for supplying the Ukrainians with weapons
How about just coming clean and saying that you support Putin and want to see Ukraine defeated?
Why don't you "come clean" and admit to being a Russomyse.
You consistently advocate actions that would ensure Ukraine's defeat – such as not supplying them with weapons. Or suing for a ceasefire and surrendering to a murdering tyrant whose word has proven worthless.
All these are consistent with you supporting Putin and the defeat of Ukraine.
“It is blindingly obvious the Ukrainians are nobodys pawns.
True. It is just a pity the same thing cannot be said about the Ukranian government.”
Well put, +1
And yet like mike you remain silent on the state of the Belarus govt – who are without any doubt at all an absolute puppet of the Kremlin.
At every point the Ukrainian people chose to move closer to Europe and away from Putin's dysfunctional shit-hole. Yet as with all totalitarian thinkers you deny them their agency and demand that the only permissible fate is for them to forever be enslaved as an impoverished 'buffer state' to a paranoid regime.
Weird how you characterise a government wanting to become closer to a liberal, democractic west as being 'pawns' – yet you cheer on their invasion and extermination by a totalitarian Russia as a good thing.
At every point the Ukrainian people chose to move closer to Europe and away from Putin's dysfunctional shit-hole.
I don't think we can be sure of that. I think a "silent majority", to use Nixon's term, was actually happy with the status quo until the invasion; after all they voted for the pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovich prior to the fascist takeover in 2014. I think the maidan protestors were just a small vociferous minority. I could of course be wrong, but that is my belief.
That is what Putin thought as well, yet this belief stands is belied by the huge numbers of Ukrainian men laying their lives on the line for what they truly believe in.
If Zelensky was not authentically backed by a solid majority of his people – his government would not have lasted even the first Russian assaults. Instead we have seen the Ukrainian military and people astonish the entire world with their determined and effective resistance.
Now we are in what – Day 59 of Poots 3 Day War?
That is what Putin thought as well, yet this belief stands is belied by the huge numbers of Ukrainian men laying their lives on the line for what they truly believe in.
Obviously the invasion would have turned the Ukranian people against Russia, but I was thinking about the situation prior to the invasion.
The war would stop in a moment if Putin decided to. I am really underwhelmed at how many left wingers have been sucked into the 'look at what she was wearing, she was gagging for it' victim-blaming game here.
As for the wider global impact – start here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atCXhFiveeg
(Note the date – the Ukraine war has yet to factor into much of this.)
Muldoonist?
You can look him up.
It's a combination of recession+international instability+strong government+socialist state+low value narrow economy
Big night last night?
I looked it up and it appears to be one those terms that means whatever the espouser wants it to mean…..I was curious as to what it meant to you.
That's what the term I used means to me. You can see it in the first quarter of Smith's Dream.
Which the author stated wasnt modelled on Muldoon.
Facts and beliefs.
If you like I'll do a post comparing the Muldoon recession to the coming one.
History is often best read through fiction.
Go for it….if you are the owner of a crystal ball.
History is only at best an analogy, but they are our closest approximations to how we will react to similar crises in future. They are at their most useful when – as now – forecasting the future is exceedingly hard. It's the primary reason we have old people.
History is of limited use as the starting points are different…..consider the conditions of the NZ and world economies when the 70s recession hit and the responses…..the same options are no longer available.
History is a useful analogue,however there are differences.
Underlying inflation was present before the war shock,and even with it historically the prices are still low by comparison.
https://twitter.com/LHSummers/status/1501911663301345280?cxt=HHwWgIC-8eis7tcpAAAA
There was both excess liquidity in all economies,and excessive wealth expectations in housing and share prices especially in the real value of shares in the service sector ( a lot of it unrealistic.)
Housing here became a substantive problem with unrealistic expectations (over valued inventory) FOMO and low bank interest rates,where savers looked for higher returns.
There was a lot of media beatup in the housing,fuelled by excessive demands by those on house detention over covid,binge watching the Block and grand designs.
Inflation is being fuelled by housing costs (rents,large mortgages,interest rates and utilities) and excessive trade costs.
The central bank policies that are now entrenched,are for the removal of wealth expectations at the top end of town such as the sharemarket,especially in the non productive sectors.So expect significant depreciation in the share portfolios, pension funds and sovereign wealth funds.
https://twitter.com/biancoresearch/status/1517954168018939907
Historically during the oil shock forced depression,a sense of hoplessness on the part of the elected, and was a reason we ended up with with Thatcher,Reagan et al.
An inability to take ownership by the Government now,with some clear messaging on Fiscal responsibility,will see the arrival of the Wreckers.
That Lawrence Summers graph on Average Gas Price Per Mile seems less interesting than I wanted.
Do we have graphs showing the degree of petroleum density in our GDP?
Are we making more of our exports with more petroleum inputs than say 1979?
Are we more reliant as a society and as an economy on petroleum products than we were in say 1979?
If our higher-input and higher-value economy is more indebted to petroleum products, does this make us more vulnerable to price changes in petroleum price than we were in 1979?
I have only an inkling that our world-leading car ownership rates and massively expanding Auckland has made us more vulnerable rather than less.
I think this is the kind of debate we need to start having.
Well its not a gasoline shortage that prevails,its a lack of refined distallates such as av gas and diesel.The later being the product that does connect the economy,harvests the food and transfers the food to market,wether by train or truck.
the car in Auckland brings nothing to the NZ economy.Would be a good time to have a spare refinery,with diesel and avgas capacity,with conversion rates at 40$us bbl.
Just as well the pension funds,got out of refining and into investments like Netflix.
https://twitter.com/JavierBlas/status/1517260406502350848?cxt=HHwWgICzlaGTso4qAAAA
And the book was published before Muldoon was a major figure in New Zealand politics. He was at the time, 1971, Minister of Finance but was not yet a dominant figure in the National Party.
Sorry to intrude alwyn but @Poission you mean JetA-1 (parraffin/kerosine) Avgas is for combustion engines.
I can see the comparison here. The Governments lack of "strategic vision" in regards to anything other than the initial COVID response has denied Aotearoa New Zealand any strong or socialist restructuring out of the 40 year disaster of Rogernomics.
The NZ state within COVID is at its most interventionist point in my lifetime, but its power is receding quickly as it should.
Muldoon and Kirk before him were very strong socialists in stabilising prices, retaining tariffs, retaining and advancing state owned business, and controlling many aspects of society we would consider just weird now. Templeton just didn't fit that.
I'm skeptical about "vision" or whatever. We've gone through a decent crisis every two years for nearly a decade now, and are more resilient in our responses after each one. Wasn't much need for any such "vision" through any of them. Just good specific coordinated action.
I see the importance of "vision" or "values" in producing leadership that isn't almost entirely reactive; it stops being leadership at that point, it is crisis management; This is laudable in and of itself, but it has come at a cost; It has led to some poorly thought out and publicly rationalised policies and a real lack of action on the larger, existential crises of our time, including on winding down failed neoliberalism and addressing the nuclear-free moment of a generation. This can convince the public that despite all their successes this Government is incapable of meeting their own rhetoric, which is dangerous electorally.
Either way, as I do, I will quibble regarding the conflation socialism with interventionist government. Keynesianism is still capitalism.
Thats a curious position ….if theres one thing Id suggest Muldoon had, rightly or wrongly it was a 'strategic vision' for NZ…it was called 'Think Big'
The question is the timing and implementation.
Muldoon believed in Keynesianism. However, the RBNZ in his time was not independent, so he was able to control the reserve ratio himself, and kept it at around 20 to 25 percent. He should have imposed a 100 percent ratio. If he had put a stop to fractional reserve banking we might still be using Keynesian economics today.
As I see it his 2 main problems were (personality aside) the rapid decrease in the price of oil and the fact he was rowing against the OECD tide…..the powers that be had decided globalisation was to be the paradigm.
Inflation started to increase in the late sixties (in NZ), probably as a result of the two devaluations of the NZ dollar that had occurred earlier. The first I think was in sympathy with a British devaluation, and then we did another one later. This was before the "oil shocks",
Another factor was America's departure from the gold standard in the early seventies. The abandonment of Bretton Woods, and Britain’s ill advised entry into the EEC, left NZ rather exposed.
Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan is one of a small number of rational voices amongst the councils grappling with ( mostly opposing) the Three Waters Reforms, and doesn't hold much back again in this article.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/local-government/128425173/the-longer-we-wait-the-greater-the-pain
Ah, so we can't/ shouldn’t't reconsider/debate/inform properly/convince and maybe generally just take some more time to get the tax payer on board of the ship called 3 waters, because some of the councils would like to have that next lot of several hundreds of millions extracted from the tax payers to spend on stuff, even if the tax payer disagrees with us.
sounds solid and democratic.
How much does this persons wage depend on getting that money that is extracted from the tax payer? And how much will his future depend on it? He maybe hoping for a nice cushy " you are very polite and accommodating " 6 figure job somewhere in that mess? Or would that be rude to speculate? Surely this guy only has the best of the country and himself in mind.
There is a phrase that says: throwing good money after bad; but then i guess the life and wages of this person is depend on getting good money from the tax payer to throw after something many don't want and even more are suspicious about.
Clutha District is fairly competent and their Mayor can at least see who prints the money.
It is an impressively resolute opposition to 3 Waters from Selwyn Council given that they still have Boil Water notices that have been dragging on in some areas since 2019 and in many areas continue.
E coli boil water notice for Selwyn to last 'several days' | RNZ News
That, together with one of the highest colon cancer rates in the world, ought to give them a moment in front of the mirror.
"Question: Will the Three Waters Reforms take private water supplies / take back water allocations
Answer: No. The Three Waters Reforms aim to reform council-owned services only. This discussion is not about taking over operation of privately-owned supplies. However, the Government is working with a Rural Supplies Technical Working Group to understand how the proposed entities may support private supplies who currently receive assistance from councils The proposed entities will continue to operate within the resource management system – the Three Waters Reforms will not alter resource consents, allocations, or address ownership of freshwater. This is subject to work of the Ministry for the Environment"
https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/Three-waters-reform-programme-2022/$file/Three-Waters-Reform-boiled-down-1.pdf
Worth tracking with interest.
Where do the hydro electricity dam owners sit with these entities?
So the Selwyn District Council are Anti 3 Waters despite all there problems ? WOW ?
Possibly because the issues Selwyn District face with their water are not addressed by 3 Waters
I have met and talked with Bryan. He's a clear-thinker. I support his position on 3 Waters.
I fear a lot of opposition comes from it being fronted by Nanaia Mahuta. How dare such a policy be fronted by a Māori woman. You don't have to move much around certain circles in the south to pick this up.
That is some fine sexist and racist malebovine poo poo you are throwing at a hole lot a people.
a. Firstly define the word women.
b. Has Nanaia Mahuta self ided as a women and statee their preferred pronouns as she/her, if not be careful that you don't accidentally misgender someone – even in good faith.
c. most of us have had very little information from anyone including Nanaia Mahuta other what is peddled every now and then on the MSM which we all know we can't trust because maybe they received part of that 55 million dollar package or because they are rightwingers or or or.
d. most of us would like some more information on how exactly this will work out for the USER of these services in the future. I.e. how much will it cost to use water, discharge used water, recycle used water and how will it be charged? And will there be any safeguarding to assure access to people who may not be able to pay for water in the future. Maybe a televised roundtable with a highly educated panel and a moderator who is not a breakfast host but maybe with someone who knows a bit about water and how it gets into our glasses and cups.
Personally i have nothing against a better/fairer model, but in this case the government has failed to make its case by simply not making a case to the public.
That has nothing to do with Nanaia Mahuta, but rather with a government policy of 'no debate' 'we know better' 'do as yer told' and 'shut up if you don't agree'. Non which reflects well on this government.
And non which is the fault of Nanaia Mahuta, irrespective of the fact that they are born in a female body and are Maori, and may or may not have a gender identity that goes hand in had with their female sexed body.
But yeah the easiest solution to the fact that people don't like what government is doing must be the fact that the messanger arrives in a female body and is Maori.
My definition of the term female:
Of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes.
And "can bear offspring" does not mean they will, plan to, or want to bear offspring, or have not lost that 'can' to illness, genetic defects, or surgery/medication.
A way out of the 3 Waters crisis is to do with water what they did with health:
merge all the regions and effectively nationalise water into one state controlled entity.
Wouldn't help Ardern's Maori caucus but it would reassure the majority.
Might be a bit late now.
Deleted post by pro-Kremlin media outlet Readovka.
Readovka 15 minutes ago ?
At a closed briefing, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced data on losses during a special operation on the territory of Ukraine. Irretrievable losses on the Russian side amount to 13,414 soldiers. About 7,000 more people are considered missing. Figures for the cruiser Moskva were also announced: 116 dead were confirmed, more than 100 people are considered missing. The Deputy Minister of Defense noted that at the moment the calculation of the number of dead is difficult due to the intensity of hostilities and inaccessibility to the bodies at the battlefield.
google translate
https://web.archive.org/web/20220421195045/vk.com/wall-163061027_2109268
Which adds up very closely to the 20,600 that the Ukrainians are currently claiming.
Czechs know a thing or two about appeasers. And Russia.
The German army has largely exhausted the possibilities of supplying additional weapons to Ukraine, says Scholz. He wants to prevent NATO's conflict with Russia.
https://twitter.com/CT24zive/status/1517434051958910976
The United States is once again pulling hot chestnuts out of the fire for Europe, and then we will criticize them for being too militarily involved in the world. Cowardice and disgrace of Germany.
https://twitter.com/PaliceJiri/status/1517447903392018432
Yes – Putin has really thrown Germany under the bus in this war. Led by the German Greens and dominating figures like Merkel, the Germans pursued the idea that nations who trade with each other do not go to war. The reasoning was that if the EU was able to prevent war in Western Europe, then the same principle might work in across the whole of Eurasia.
I would argue that while open trade and the movement of people and ideas is a necessary condition – it turned out not to be a sufficient one.
To their credit the Germans have pivoted against Russia pretty hard, yet clearly have yet to fully let go of the old dream. I can only wonder for example if anyone has interviewed Merkel herself recently and how betrayed she must now feel.
As for supporting Ukraine with weapons – that is not necessarily a simple matter. I have just finished this excellent clip that does a really excellent deep dive into the logistics and economics of doing this for an extended period.
More than a few national security types called Merkel and her government on their obeisance to Poots.
Yesterday, Bild ran the sensational story “Former spy chiefs settle accounts with Merkel,” which revealed to the public for the first time just how subservient Germany’s chancellor has been to Moscow. Several retired spy bosses took Merkel to task, denouncing her conduct towards the Kremlin with harsh words: “Obsequiousness” and “Cowardice” were cited, while one former spy chief stated that the chancellor “blamed her own intelligence services” rather than Putin for problems in the bilateral relationship.
Bernd Schmidbauer, who served as the cabinet-level coordinator of Germany’s intelligence and security agencies (a position roughly equivalent to the U.S. Director of National Intelligence), denounced Merkel’s handling of German security vis-à-vis Russia as “worse than bad,” adding it is “a disgrace to our country” how weakly Berlin responded to Khangoshvili’s brazen assassination. This cannot be dismissed as partisan grousing. Schmidbauer, a lifelong member of Merkel’s own party, termed the expulsion of two Russian spies “laughable” given the gravity of the crime perpetrated by the Kremlin in Berlin.
https://web.archive.org/web/20191219082429/https://20committee.com/2019/12/17/top-german-spies-unload-on-merkels-kowtowing-to-putin/
Interesting – that goes a lot deeper than I had imagined. The other very weak EU response was to the 2014 invasion of Crimea – something must have surely played into Putin's delusion that he could take the whole of Ukraine with impunity.
I guess you think that Putin should relinquish Crimea and hand its two naval bases over to the Americans. After all that is what would have happened if Crimea had remained Ukranian, and the Crimean people had not wanted Crimea to become a Russian oblast once again, and made application to Putin accept them back.
Ah yes – that 2014 referendum overseen by Russian troops and widely rejected by most countries.
And widely boycotted by the indigenous Tartars.
And why would the US possibly want a naval base in Crimea? The most stupid place on earth to have one, totally vulnerable to enemy missiles and no-where to escape. As the Russian navy knows only too well.
Long remembered.
https://twitter.com/IAPonomarenko/status/1517398931306594306
QFT. Seems that some people have never learnt from history. Just as we are about to commemorate an abortive invasion by allied troops 107 years ago in support of Russia!
Ah yes – that 2014 referendum overseen by Russian troops and widely rejected by most countries.
Just because it was supervised by Russian troops doesn't mean the result wasn't kosher; and of course it was rejected by most countries. Its rejection suited the west's anti Russian narrative.
And widely boycotted by the indigenous Tartars
Natuarally, but the Tatars were only a small minority.
And why would the US possibly want a naval base in Crimea? The most stupid place on earth to have one, totally vulnerable to enemy missiles and no-where to escape. As the Russian navy knows only too well.
The naval bases give the Russians better access to the Black Sea than they would have without them. From the Black Sea they have access to the Mediterranean via the Bosphorus and the Dardenelles.
Same for Schroeder still deep in there with the Russian gas company.
Perhaps unsurprising that German Federal politics replicates the German economic addiction to Russian gas.
My trusted insider source – sadly I cannot reference – has claimed that the German Greens opposition to nuclear energy was heavily driven by pro-Russian influencers who saw it as a means to make Germany dependent on the Kremlin.
After all no rational person can justify shutting down six perfectly good nuclear power plants this year – while at the same time claiming it would be too traumatic to stop Russian gas. The logical answer must lie elsewhere.
That's a Pierce Brosnan-era Bond film right there.
Does Le Pen have a policy on nuclear energy generation?
Up to her eyeballs in Russian debt with plans to ditch the EU and pull France out of NATO's command structure.
She'll do whats she's told.
PARIS—The far-right party of French presidential candidate Marine Le Pen has begun paying a settlement of 12 million euros—equivalent to $12.94 million—to a Russian military contractor under U.S. sanctions, part of a debt restructuring that granted her party more time to repay a loan it took from a Russian bank, according to Russian and French government records.
Aviazapchast JSC—a Moscow-based company that supplies Russian military aircraft and parts across the Middle East, Africa and Asia—took over the €9.4 million loan in 2016 after the bank that originated it, Moscow-based First Czech-Russian Bank, went bankrupt, the records show. Holding loans is well outside of Aviazapchast’s normal line of business, according to the company’s corporate reports, which contain no mention of the transaction.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/marine-le-pens-far-right-french-party-to-pay-nearly-13-million-to-russian-military-contractor-11650644840
Yes. The German energy gambit was never going to work with France as they were in a very different context. So they went for the reliable old 'put money in the pollies pocket' approach instead.
Obviously good for Russia, but so what.
All the world's a stage and all men and women simply players, they have their exits and entrances.
Testing, testing, 123
Germany is by no means nuclear free, it buys all of its shortfall from closing its own nuclear plants by buying power from French nuclear providers.
In May 1944 Stalin's regime started deporting Crimea's indigenous people. It took 3 days to remove every Crimean Tatar on the peninsula. Deportation and inhuman conditions killed nearly half of them.
Stalin's heirs are at it again.
https://twitter.com/OlenaHalushka/status/1517822391279394816
https://twitter.com/OlenaHalushka/status/1516686928770437124
The deportation officially was intended as collective punishment[15] for the perceived collaboration of some Crimean Tatars with Nazi Germany; modern sources theorize that the deportation was part of the Soviet plan to gain access to the Dardanelles and acquire territory in Turkey where the Tatars had Turkic ethnic kin.
Nearly 8,000 Crimean Tatars died during the deportation, while tens of thousands perished subsequently due to the harsh exile conditions.[4] The Crimean Tatar exile resulted in the abandonment of 80,000 households and 360,000 acres of land.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_the_Crimean_Tatars
Don't forget to remind us all of the terrible atrocities carried out by ALL the other players in the Ukriane war will you….of course I know you will, as you are so well known around these parts for your fairness and balance in your comments…
The English
The Great Irish Famine and the Holocaust caused by the English….
https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/irishhistorylive/IrishHistoryResources/Articlesandlecturesbyourteachingstaff/TheGreatIrishFamineandtheHolocaust/#:~:text=The%20genocide%20of%20the%20Great,Irish%20of%20even%20the%20least
Belgium
How Belgium cut off hands and arms, and killed over 15 million in Africa
https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/wiseup-news/how-belgium-cut-off-hands-and-arms-and-killed-over-15-million-in-africa/
The hidden holocaust
https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/1999/may/13/features11.g22
The Germans
INTRODUCTION TO THE HOLOCAUST
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/introduction-to-the-holocaust
The French
France’s silence over colonial crimes
https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/france-s-silence-over-colonial-crimes-ensures-confrontation-with-algeria-50756
The USA
The American Genocide of the Indians
https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202203/t20220302_10647120.html
And finally the Ukrainians…
Ukraine’s part in the Holocaust
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ukraines-part-in-the-holocaust/2019/05/31/9922ad8e-8259-11e9-b585-e36b16a531aa_story.html
Ukraine is where the Holocaust began. It should properly memorialize the victims.
Again no mention of Stalin's Holomodor, Great Terror or even the gulags. No mention of the Maoist tyrannies that killed uncountable millions and crippled that great culture for decades.
And why limit yourself to the past 200 years – I could easily go back millennia cataloguing one historic disaster after another. Yet this would add nothing more to the conversation than your self-righteous preaching.
All you have is yet another tiresome bunch of whattaboustism – carefully curated to emphasise the catastrophes of one side and whitewash another. And yet you still pretend to be neutral when every comment you make betrays that claim as bullshit.
Well of course I didn't mention them Redlogix…because Joe90 already has you idiot ..but wait there is more…aaahhh now he pulls out the 'ol whattaboustism trope….this guy can't write a single comment without dragging out some sort of tired old deflection.
Once more….I support peace through negotiation..something you obviously do not want, which of course comes as no surprise to anyone…Imperialists like you only know dominance and war as a means to achieve their aims….just like people like you have always done…..yuk.
aaahhh now he pulls out the 'ol whattaboustism trope
Your comment above was literally a list of seven different deflections – a textbook instance of whataboutism.
You cannot even manage two comments in a row without contradicting yourself. From the wiki link above:
What kind of peace negotiations do you have in mind? For example, who initiates it and why (e.g. what might trigger it and when), who brokers or mediates it, what would be some of the key terms, et cetera?
I’m not asking for myself, but I do want to steer it in a different direction and away from the increasing acrimony between RedLogix (as well as a few others) and you, again
Imperialists like you only know dominance and war as a means to achieve their aims
Unlike AT I can point to a long track record here of advocating for a concrete path forward to making war obsolete. But crickets.
And right now in the world there is but one truly dangerous hot war of conquest going on, a brutal attempt by Russia to reclaim one of its old colonies. A recrudescent imperialism if there ever was – yet AT pretends he is not defending it and then has the unmitigated gall to call me an warmongering imperialist.
Ticking the boxes.
/
https://twitter.com/thereidout/status/1512962087471009796
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml
I find it interesting that many think Russia should not be concerned about NATO /U.S on its border,but are very worried about Chinese influence in…the Solomon's!
I find it very interesting that many who provide apology for Putin's invasion of Ukraine saying that it is all NATO's fault, completely overlook the fact that Putin's invasion has had the opposite effect to that which he intended. Rather than dividing NATO, this war has only strengthened its resolve and prompted two other bordering countries, Finland and Sweden to apply for immediate membership of NATO.
I guess it depends on what you perceive the intention to be.
I can't see anything pointing to it being to…'divide NATO'.
Maybe if China was governed by a democratic polity, or was not in the process of one of the most rapid military expansions in all of human history, nor prone to expansionist territorial claims that piss off all their neighbours – then maybe we would not be so concerned at all.
And here is the blatantly stupid thing about these claims that Russia was justified in being concerned about NATO aggression. For a start there was never any evidence that NATO nor any member country was in the slightest bit interested in invading Russia. Indeed Europe had embarked on a decades long project to normalise the relationship and build trade on the basis this would prevent conflict.
But assuming even this was a lie and NATO secretly harboured the desire to crush Russia all along. Yet right now with the invasion of Ukraine providing the perfect pretext to launch a fatal attack on Russia no-one has done so – and have even had to be dragged with some reluctance into supporting Ukraine's defense once the horrors of Poots invasion became the undeniable reality.
Over 70% of the worlds population regard America as the 'Great Satan'.
This war in the Ukraine is a proxy vs Russia.
America cares not about ukrainians.The real agenda is Russia challenging U.S hegemony.
Ukraine is not a democracy,even Trump said it is one of the most corrupt countries in the world.
American democracy is an illusion.American style freedom,a …delusion.
China does not have a record of military expansion in the last 100 years.
You can back up that claim with verifiable evidence?
Well Trump is certainly an authority of corruption – but hardly an authority on Ukraine. He couldn't even point to it on the map! So another load of bollocks from you
Comprehension is not your forte.
Which Country Is The Greatest Threat to World Peace? – Brilliant Maps
' an interview Trump gave last November with "Fox and Friends" where he called Ukraine the "third-most corrupt country" in the world.
Zelensky: Donald Trump's claims of Ukrainian corruption are 'not true' (usatoday.com)
Where's the…bollocks?
I think comprehension is not your forte.
From your link (a pre 2013 survey BTW)
So no; that doesn't return an over 70% of the world's population.
You know – repeating a lie, doesn't make the lie true. Anything Trump has to say is simply bullshit mixed up in a word salad, and to quote Faux News! Well that's laughable.
Maybe you should try adding up the populations of non english speaking nations in Asia ,Africa,Sth America and compare it to the total world population.
«An end-of-the-year WIN/Gallup International survey found that people in 65 countries believe the United States is the greatest threat to world peace», as the N.Y.
There is video evidence of Trump saying what I quoted.
Oh look 2014
My guess is that it is more emphatic in 2022.
If you were to look at the "brilliant map" you linked to above you would see that India, and Afganistan thought Pakistan was the greatest threat. Almost the whole of Africa had no opinion whatsoever and only 3 countries in Africa considered the USA to be the Greatest threat. Japan considered Russia to be the greatest threat. The USA, Canada, UK, Turkey, considered Iraq. Nigeria the 6th most populous country was not surveyed. Bangladesh the 8th most popular country thought Israel to be the greatest threat.
So a large proportion of the most populous countries did not hold the US as the greatest threat and I'm sorry but you cannot extrapolate the 24% of 66,000 respondents surveyed out to the whole of the world population.
I'm sure if a similar survey was conducted today there would be a very different out come – particularly in western Europe.
India and other countries look at it as 'domestic' threats ,not on a macro level.
Population of China,India and Indonesia would be over 1/2 the worlds population.
None of those countries are condemning …Russia.
No they are not. World population in 2014 was 7.2 billion
China + India + Indonesia population totaled around 2.9 billion in 2014.
They were not all condemning the US either – India for example. Check your map.
My bad…I overestimated Indonesia.
Still maintain the U.S is seen as the biggest threat to world peace…and with good reason.
You might want to look at the data.
What you are proposing that the US is the most dangerous nation on earth – yet in the post WW2 era during the world order they have dominated has been remarkably peaceful by comparison to any era before. In 2020 your chances of dying in a war were lower than at any time in all of human history.
You can of course claim that ideally no-one would ever die in state conflict, but given humans have never been able to sustain such a state of affairs for any extended period this is an unreasonable benchmark.
You might want to claim that if Hitler had prevailed in WW2, or Stalin and his successors ruled the world in a glorious workers paradise that all would have been much better – but these claims are untestable. As are all other counterfactual versions of history.
What we can know is that the US dominated period since WW2 has seen the lowest comparative levels of state violence since forever. No-one is claiming their record is close to ideal – but you might want to pause and think what might replace them if the hated Yanks really did go home and left the rest of the world to marinate in it's own toxic juices.
You might even want to think about what the US almost accidentally achieved – and think how we might more consciously improve on it future.
@Red,White & Blue logic….do behave!
The merkins have invaded 37 countries since WW2…killed millions.
Try ex State dept man John Perkins…or Noam Chomsky…and learn the…reality.
Evades the careful point I was making.
@Red…have you looked at your link?
God knows what 'careful point' you think that…makes!
You need to scroll through the pages.
Yet perversely enough this war will create a Ukrainian state with more legitimacy and democratic capacity than ever before:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDf6Zf0JrPE
We could do a quick post-WW2 tally of what different kinds of colonial takeover are like:
USA: Marshall Islands still a protectorate – new military base, tribalised democratic state. Guam – military base, limited representation. Philippines – no more military bases and a fully fledged if slightly imperfect democracy. American Samoa – developing state with some democratic representation. South Korea – US military bases, fully fledged democracy now. Marshall Islands – military bases, Free Association with USA. Japan – Okinawa base, fully operating democracy. Australia – Roberston Barracks+Pine Gap+Other key comms+full interoperability, fully fledged democracy.
China: Multiple new military bases in South China Sea, hostile to democracy. North Korea – defence treaty, hostile to democracy. Hong Kong – fully takeover and democracy rapidly degraded. Taiwan – prepared to defend against hostile mainland takeover – currently a strong democracy.
USA is by no means a good colonial power, but on balance …
Democracy/Merriam/Webster-'
Definition of democracy
1a: government by the people especially : rule of the majority
From what I can see western democracy is usually a choice between left and right,or blue and red.
In effect tweedle dee or tweedle dum.
It functions o.k provided the wishes of the corporation/banking sector are met.
If they are not,the non complying democratic regime is discarded and replaced with…a new one.
It is very,very rarely a majority govt when all eligible voters are considered.
An illusion.
Thankfully there are whole institutions devoted to evaluating kinds of democracy, and the elements that go into them, and don't decry against the world with foolish absolutes like you just did.
Home | Democracy Matrix
'there are whole institutions devoted to evaluating kinds of democracy, and the elements that go into them'
Well if it's that complex….I wonder if the average Joe Lunchbox …even understands it!
Can't see anything 'foolish' at all in my post.
If they are not,the non complying democratic regime is discarded and replaced with…a new one.
It is very,very rarely a majority govt when all eligible voters are considered.
An illusion.
You seem very prone to the Perfectionist Fallacy.
By contrast no-one pretends the liberal democratic order is perfect – quite the opposite, we spend much time here finding fault with it and sometimes having constructive debates on how to improve it. (A privilege you do not have in the totalitarian nations – protest being frequently rewarded with long prison sentences or worse.
What I do not tolerate is lazy idiots who rather than put the work into building on what we have already achieved – argue that everything is corrupt, vile and hopeless and therefore the system must be torn down. And imply somehow magically out of the rubble will appear a new utopia that will solve all problems. Vaguely specified always.
So what have we already achieved….that say Singapore has…not?
The U.S is supposedly the benchmark for liberal democracy.
Look at the ghetto the U.S really is…low wages,40 million on food stamps,highest incarceration rate in the world,horrific homelessness,weekly shootings of civilians because of their gun laws…and aggressive foreign policy to promote U.S interests.
Throw in the Assange travesty , look at the incumbent Dem president and his Rep predecessor and… what have you got!!!!!
The U.S is supposedly the benchmark for liberal democracy.
Who said that? Most people here recognise the US as something of an outlier in democratic norms. It is well understood that their democratic sausage has many ingredients and not all of them wholesome.
As for Assange – I spent the best part of a decade here defending him from many on the left who constantly libeled him with false allegations and told us that the US desire to extradict him was a silly fantasy. Those relative few of us who saw through the bullshit all along have been proven right, but as events have turned out it has been a pyrrhic victory and a bitter disappointment. Those on the left who should have supported Assange early when it might have made a difference can now only hang their heads in shame on this.
And I can only imagine that events in Ukraine have only stacked the cards against Assange even more than they were already.
Yet right now with the invasion of Ukraine providing the perfect pretext to launch a fatal attack on Russia
Of course not. Nobody wants to start a nuclear war. But without 'mutually assured destruction' you can be pretty certain American would be in the Ukraine, boots and all, fighting on the side of the Ukranians. But without ‘MAD’ they need a more indirect means of getting at Russia.
You could have just stopped at 'of course not'.
You could have just stopped at 'of course not'.
That of course would have suited you since you are unable to find a rebuttal to the rest of my comment.
@Incognito – no reply option on your comment.
Looks like another blatant and deliberate attempt at starting another flame war
Is that all you think is going on?
You have a real life fascist running rampant all over the site – how much of this shit are we supposed to put up with?
I cannot believe it.
What public good is served by circulating Putin's disinformation – because make no mistake, that is ultimately Adrian's only source – and it is not ever factual – there are Russian sources out there that are, and they never run the unadulterated Kremlin line.
@Incognito
You will have noted that you got no reply from AT to your 8.1.1.1.2 request. Crickets.
Unlike AT I have lived and worked in Russia and retain a respect and fondness for the people. I have written to this many time over the past decade. Every wrecked Russian tank we see in the media represents a handful of incinerated young men and this is heartbreaking at a human level. No mature person can look at the images of this war unmoved – for all the losses.
Yet AT exploits this legitimate human response as cover for a fake neutrality, and insisting Ukraine negotiate for peace – when he knows dam well this means nothing more than a surrender to a tyrant whose word is worthless. And the surety that within years Poots would simply leverage the same strategy again.
In an ideal world we would have political and global mechanisms to prevent a nation going rogue and a legitimate means to prevent conflict – but for the moment we do not. By analogy AT is suggesting that the only method of dealing with crime is to disband the police and require the victims of rape, theft and assault to 'negotiate' terms with those who prey upon them. Yet for some reason Ukraine is meant negotiate 'peace terms' with those would are offending against them – an absurdist perversion of justice if there ever was.
It is this contradiction AT cannot resolve – he knows full well the moment he attempts to outline any concrete details of a peace settlement under the terms he has in mind – the rank injustice of it would be laid bare.
Yes, I know your long record here, which is not in question as far as I am concerned.
Yes, I tend to agree that Adrian Thornton is stretching our imagination and challenging our intelligence with his alleged stance of neutrality.
Indeed, Adrian Thornton has failed to respond to and answer my probing questions in the past. However, that is his prerogative if I submitted these as a commenter rather than as a Mod. Nonetheless, his refusal to engage when challenged is telling. If all we hear is crickets I or maybe another Mod will act.
As I just mentioned in my reply to Stuart Munro, I don’t want to get dragged into this particular discussion about the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It is something for and between commenters who are interested in debating these issues; they should be asking the probing questions, et cetera. If you think that resolving the contradiction is the key then focus on that and nothing else till it has been resolved, one way or another. In other words, sharpen the questions and turn up the heat.
I loathe to silence one of you because it would instantly kill off any chance of robust debate. Thus, silencing a voice is a (the) last resort.
Well said Sir @10.1
My father – a former British soldier- spent some time in Northern Russia in the 1920s. He lived with a Russian family and he came to respect and admire the Russian people. He never lost that respect and went to some trouble to bring us up with an understanding that the Soviet government of the time and the Russian people were not one and the same thing. Thus, I never grew up with a notion that all Russians were evil. After all, countless millions of them lost their lives at the hand (directly and indirectly) of the tyrannical despot, Stalin.
That is why we should grieve for the loss of these young Russian men as much as we grieve for the Ukrainians who have lost their lives or had their lives torn apart in some cases forever. They are both the victims of serial psychopaths at the top of the Russian political tree.
Ok, let’s assume for argument’s sake that there’s indeed a fascist running rampant here on TS. Do you think it us up to the Mods to judge and reach this verdict and then ban this person? If yes, for violation of which TS policy? Or do you think it is up to commenters such as you to attack this person for their beliefs & opinions? Or do you think the commentariat should counter this person’s reckons with facts and sound arguments that show the person is wrong about (certain) things? If you pick the third option, and there might be more, what do you expect to happen if this person does not budge? Is that a free invitation to launch personal attacks to bully the other person into submission or to shut them up? In other words, the second option, which is a violation of TS policy especially in the absence of any points of substance that can be debated.
I took your comment in isolation and it contained nothing (!) of substance, and you made quite specific allegations and accusations.
The bigger picture is that you all fail to take the debate to the next level and just keep going around in circles in very predictable ways. Find a way to pull specific information or opinion or whatever out of the other one. If you think they’re so wrong give them enough rope to hang themselves and show their true colours. However, and obviously, you cannot force other commenters to give the replies you want them to give, in fact, you cannot force them to reply at all. However, if they continue to refuse to engage in genuine debate a Moderator might step in and call them out for trolling, for example. The more specific it is, the clearer it is that someone is trolling and not interested in genuine debate.
Calling another commenter names is hardly a good debating strategy and after a while it is getting tiresome.
I’m keen to have a serious discussion about this because something has to give. Actually, I’m frustrated that I have to spend time on trying to sort out something that a bunch of you cannot or won’t sort out yourselves.
Do you think it us up to the Mods to judge and reach this verdict and then ban this person?
Moderation has on many occasions in the past determined that a line of argument was out of bounds and no longer tolerable. I can think of quite a few examples over the years. Starting with climate change deniers back around 2013 for instance.
I do appreciate the very difficult balancing act this creates. TS has a long and proud tradition of robust and open debate despite what I have said above. For the moment I am not advocating AT should be banned – but as far as I am concerned he is fair game.
Fair point. For this to occur there has to be a clear consensus, so that a line can be drawn or some touchstone developed to which we can hold commenters accountable. And even then it can be hard to make a fair and proper judgement. I also note that in OM, for example, we still tolerate CC sceptics or even deniers, as long as they make some debatable comment. In other words, it is not TS policy to ban (cancel) all CC deniers outright, at least not that I’m aware of. And not all Mods are the same, as you know; I wasn’t around here in 2013.
I’m going to have a few drinks now, as I’m thirsty.
Earned it
Anyone else notice that hard-right and hard-left are barely distinguishable from each other these days. The rhetoric, methods, inability to compromise or reason… Shaved head or fly bitten feral they're just clowns parading their own version of the same hateful bullshit. (tear it all down, me and my commune/club have better ideas).
Sure they've got different (versions of) flags and symbols. And let's not forget different (versions of) the same religious nonsense. 6% on the far right and 8% on the far left drowning out moderate voices. They're all wannabe killers.
The fact I spend most of my time on ecological subjects has many folk insist on classifying me here in TS as hard left. Not bloody likely. Though I'm personally against people victimising others, skinhead or feral twat, that's a result of being a human with PTSD, I know what it's like and I stop bullies with zero compunction. But this craven cancel culture posing circle jerk of cunts who think they're the holders of all that is correct… it's just mob rule and bullying en masse – disgraceful bullshit.
And playing the victim. Goddamn what a pack of whingers the fringes are. They call for or justify violence, and the minute you call them on it they claim they've been joking, misunderstood, and there we go again victimising the poor wee dears.
The fringe groups are coalescing over incomprehensible conspiracies. And they're getting religio-frenzied over it all. The binary (which really exists only as a construct) is being forced into conversations everywhere:
Pick a side they say. Join us in our idiotic blathering. Gush over grief porn, be outraged by the deaths. Pick a side, and wreak death upon the other. After all, isn't thinking soooo confusing lately!
Pick a side – where the sides stretch out, curve round and coalesce into a murderous merging of fuckwits, left and right wing villainy and extremist ideology none of which we'd give time of day for in any other circumstance.
Pick a side, they demand. We're going to execute the press.
Pick a side, they say. We've victims of unreasonable people.
Pick a side!
AT has laid out a pattern of calling everyone else stupid and incapable of reading/researching themselves – and the moment he's called on it he claims he's a victim, and then goes so far as to pretend he's the only adult in the room.
I got no time for such BS. Hence instead of debating the same drivel day in day out I declare – a twat.
My aspie superpower is assimilating huge volumes of text to gain pattern recognition.
A complete twat.
Anyone else notice that hard-right and hard-left are barely distinguishable from each other these days.
Yes – extremists are people who fail to recognise boundaries. They all believe their cause is so important that any means is justified to promote it. Which is why they all wind up 'barely distinguishable'.
I attempted to write to this a while back.
"The centre is perhaps better conceived as that political space which is the sum of those ideas and agendas that all sides will concede legitimacy to."
Yes, legitimate ideas!
Not these climate denying, science bashing, extreme fucking idiots and all the garbage they've picked up along the way. The 'health food' fad industry and their army of idiot influencers: those vacant fucking lots. God botherers of various Gods, drumming up their believers. Then the social justice warrior armed with their lists of historical grievances, looking to set the rest of us straight. And who could miss those celebrity fools with more followers than facts or fucks given, in the media sowing discord for clicks, trained by the algorithms to be shit.
6% on the right, 8% on the left. Joined forces to throw feces at parliament. Met each other on social media. The elites and the bottom feeders, best pals (while it's convenient to the rich).
These people are not sitting at the table, they want to cut the table up for firewood for their silly camps.
There's a long history of not taking the village idiot seriously, and for good reason. Thanks to the internet they're now a village of idiots. Their ideas are nonsense, their intent is deadly serious. They want to be avenged for all the petty shit they carry about as facts. They want to die on their own respective hill of beans and be martyred because immaturity, insecurity, etc.
Yes that's a bit of a rant, but to be fair I've held back.
Speaking from personal experience, your aspie superpower has let you down and your PTSD has clouded your judgement before here. I do agree that trolling is not limited to one side only, as some of the comments here on TS can attest. But trolling is at least something that can give clear guidance to Mods because it is a behavioural pattern and not just an opinion – we don’t ban just opinions.
You know what to do to expose a troll and drive them into the sunlight – simply pointing the finger and labelling them a troll or calling them names is not sufficient and can even backfire on you if it is a lazy and repeated attempt to cancel another commenter with whom you disagree.
HTH
Actually, there's a half dozen here I called out years ago and they've not changed one bit. Not at all.
Making mistakes, well, we all do that. Getting het up is not when I am losing an argument it is when the other side is not acting in good faith. Aint got no time for that it's nonsense, time wasting – call it what you will.
I say trolling.
you refute bad links and nonsense sentences – I see multiple instances in one statement that show the person's talking shit in order to win. At that point I've lost all interest in spending energy on that person other than to tell them to fuck off.
Exposing a troll for content and consistent troll behaviour is good. To expect a troll to change because you called them out is wishful thinking at best. Mods can ban trolls without too much trouble; if they were to ban commenters just for talking shit TS would become a deserted wasteland in no time. The bar for banning is deliberately set high here and in my view this is fine albeit extremely frustrating at times.
If you have tried dozens of times and failed it proves that your way is ineffective and that you’ve reached the end of the line by resorting to telling them to fuck off, et cetera. All this reinforces the futility and creates a bad vibe.
So, either you sharpen up or leave it to others with more patience and cooler heads to smoke out the trolls from their dingy holes.
Edit: permanent bans are not the default.
Do you think it us up to the Mods to judge and reach this verdict and then ban this person? If yes, for violation of which TS policy? Or do you think it is up to commenters such as you to attack this person for their beliefs & opinions? Or do you think the commentariat should counter this person’s reckons with facts and sound arguments that show the person is wrong about (certain) things?
There's a real can of worms there – but – is it up to the Mods?
I would expect that on a progressive site, fascist trolling would be no more welcome than far-right trolling. The boot was long on the other foot however, and some of my encounters with Bill ended badly for me.
up to commenters such as you to attack this person for their beliefs & opinions
That is the way many RW trolls have been handled, the process being generously described as 'robust debate'. Though robust, it was often not much like debate, and the imposition of sourcing requirements went some way to improving the comments of both sides.
Or do you think the commentariat should counter this person’s reckons with facts and sound arguments that show the person is wrong about (certain) things? If you pick the third option, and there might be more, what do you expect to happen if this person does not budge?
My feeling is that the Putin dupes have had the benefit of this process already, and are presently not budging.
what do you expect to happen
Let me answer a question with a question – would Mods find it difficult to deal with a more familiar species of fascist, a neoNazi for example?
There is a reasonably strong international consensus that the Putin regime is objectionable – sufficient to get them thrown off the UN Human Rights Council.
The duty could be imposed on the Putin dupes, to explain how their views, whenever they intrude them upon public discourse here, are in some way consistent with a progressive or enlightened politics – because it is a fair presumption that in general they are not.
Huh! A bit tipsy and seem to have deleted my comment. More about NZ culture (specifically music) than politics anyway. Irritating!
Basically, I was pre-ANZAC day watching the Pogues "& the band Played Waltzing Matilda" on YouTube, and left it on autoplay while Irishing up some coffee. Turned into (NZ{ish} band{ish}) The Cake Kitchen by the time I got back. I had thought that Maxine Fleming (keys/ vox on Messages for the CK) was the same musician as the bassist/ vocalist for the early couple of CK albums – turns out that was Rachael King!
Peter was always the more front-manish of the two Jeffries brothers (NP, TKP etc), but to me it always felt like he was singing on top of the music rather than inside it. Graeme was (and is still) just so good in his own understated way.
But however authentic GJ is, Fleming/ Jeffries' Prisoner of a Single Passion is simply one of the best songs to come out of this country. Though very melancholy (and that's compared to &TBPWM!). Compare with Tomorrow came Today off the World of Sand LP – which I love in itself for having almost two parallel yet interleaved choruses "I remember that you bet me a million dollars on the outcome of a TV show – how am I going to pay you back now?" & "I thought we were different, we're exactly the same: Must have had sun in my eyes – wish you hadn't left me there, why'd you have to leave me that way?". Versus "There's a pleasure that we rarely find, but when we do we pride ourselves to keep it", on top of those (fragile and almost broken, yet somehow cohesive) instrumental lines.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUg6FE8lA_I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFUQRhnWkLc