Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, July 25th, 2010 - 8 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
It’s open for discussing topics of interest, making announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.
Comment on whatever takes your fancy.
The usual good behaviour rules apply (see the link to Policy in the banner).
Step right up to the mike…
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Remember when John Key used to talk about the “underclass”.
Much recently of course John Key’s policy direction has been more about pandering to the wealthy elite, so you don’t hear so much from John Key about his concerns for the underclass anymore.
But worries about the underclass still concern some people.
The last week’s issue of New Scientist, 17 July 2010, has this to say:
According to New Scientist:
Right wing critics of this approach often cite studies that crime and anti-social behaviour and the feelings of alienation that accompany them, are often much less experienced in conditions of absolute poverty.
As New Scientist explains “it is all relative”:
Surely there couldn’t be a more apt description of this government especially in it’s approach to social decay and inequality.
That and building more prisons to house all the projected victims of their proposed policies, expose this government for what it is, a government for the rich.
For the full report go to:
In sickness and in wealth
Rest assured !
Bill English has a plan to rescue the Pasifikan underclass in Auckland and close the inequality gap for young Pasifikans in education and employment. In essense, it is a trial of privatisation of social services, a pilot programme that can, if successful, hopefully be replicated and franchised to other individuals around the country.
So far, it has involved handing 4.8 million over to a dodgy backroom private company of good ol’ brown boys with little experience and no accountability, then washing his hands of it and turning his back on the whole affair in letting one of his junior ministers deal with the fallout.
The best of british to them i say…whut whut !
http://pacificeyewitness.com/2010/07/18/no-conclusion-reached-on-peda-investigation-report-should-have-been-classified-budget-secret/
…and then of course we have the mothership of culturally appropriate initiatives. Crewed by Navigators of Whanau Ora and specifically trained to deal with the Maori underclass sector of Pasifikans in NZ.
To them i say, live long and prosper…nanu nanu !
Been listening with barely containable frustration to this mornings RNZ interviews on worker cooperatives. I’ll skip Laidlaw’s asinine pronouncement that NZ has cooperatives too…Fontera, PSIS etc. These companies are not meaningful expressions of cooperatives.
On the meaningful expressions of worker cooperatives, every single instance the programme mentioned has protected and maintained the vertical division of labour and then wonders why participation rates in the democratic systems of decision making are so low! (As low as 30% in the Emilia Romagna region according to Stefano Zamagni of Bologna University.)
Why do people have a blind spot to mixed job complexes?
You cannot nurture democracy in an environment where some people are more empowered and informed than others. The only way that I know around that problem is what has been termed mixed job complexes. Which means that whereas the roles of managers and manual labourers are maintained, the positions are not.
Everyone assumes a mixed bag of tasks. No-one gets to work exclusively at a cushy number. And no-one gets to work only doing the crap but necessary stuff that nobody really wants to do. So, you might do the accounts. But you don’t only do the accounts. You do something less desirable and less empowering. Toilet cleaning for example.
And the breakup of the workplace hierarchy means that information is spread wider as well as nobody being engaged in activity that sees them more empowered than others.
Then we get participation, because information is widely available, no ‘gate keeper’ positions exist and democracy becomes immediate and meaningful, rather than a vacuous vote to further empower some-one already disproportionately empowered.
I cannot help but see the present socio-economic inequality as another round of colonisation; something which the English-speaking world seems to do relentlessly. In favour of Nettle’s thesis is the fact that the behaviours associated with poor people are not different from those of colonised peoples – and I include in this previous generations of Scottish and Irish. Note too how the term “underclass” effectively excludes a group from public debate – it is a term that can only be said seriously in the third person.
Great to see Greenpeace showing that they will protest deep water drilling here.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10661137
Is the fact that this government is desperate to spin this activity as safe evidence that they are now desperate?
BP accused of trying to buy top scientists
More corporate obfuscation of their responsibility. Same as what we saw from the tobacco industry.