web analytics

Open Mike 26/05/2017

Written By: - Date published: 6:00 am, May 26th, 2017 - 60 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:

Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose. The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step up to the mike …

60 comments on “Open Mike 26/05/2017 ”

  1. chris73 1

    Well on the one hand National will win a fourth term but on the other WFF has been strengthened

    Not entirely sure how i feel about this

  2. Adrian Thornton 2

    “What if All Victims of War Received the Media Attention of Manchester Victims?”

    • Tautoko Mangō Mata 2.1

      This video needs to be viewed widely.

      Note the use of the words “collateral damage” in the brief report of the deaths of more than 100 civilians killed by the US in Mosul in the last month on RNZ this morning.
      Listen from 5:26 for the brief report.

      http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=201845240

    • ianmac 2.2

      Heartbreakingly so true Adrian.
      “They” are Terrorists. “We” are Freedom Fighters.
      “They” are Snipers. “We” are Sharpshooters.
      Our Innocents are victims of Vicious Cowardly Terrorist Attacks. Their Innocents are just Anonymous Collateral Damage. (Operation Burnham?)

    • Molly 2.3

      Thanks Adrian. Well worth the watch, just to know that some media do point out the anomalies in reporting violence and the effect that has.

  3. Sanctuary 3

    Joyce on RNZ this morning said they’d basically spent the lot on their middle class tax cut election bribe. They will have a few hundred mill stashed away for fire-fighting and electioneering hullabaloo, but nothing significant. So DOC, health, housing, PT in Auckland? Yeah… Nah.

    Both the Greens and NZ First have apparently signed up to support the government tax cuts. NZ First, fair enough. But the Greens??? WTF have they been smoking??? DOC funding was cut AGAIN. Nothing for PT. Under James Shaw they’ve drifted down in the polls and are probably going to end up third, which on this decision is about one place above what they deserve. I’m picking they won’t be bothering double figures in September. The stupidity of Shaw astounds me. He behaves like he is a 1990s Blairite – shit on your base because you think it has nowhere else to go and get into bed with the enemy for the sake of power as an end unto itself. Amazing. Amazing because the Greens have no game on the ground to speak of to mobilise their base of new agers, stoners, apathetic students and forest dwelling troglodytes so they need to be aspirational as hell to get them to the polls. The Green base HAS got somewhere else to go – they’ll just go to bed. Someone in the Greens needs to tell Shaw it is 2017 not 1997 and he is leader of a smaller party in an MMP environment, not the fricking UK Labour party under FPP.

    So that means that leaves Labour as the only party which isn’t committed to automatically locking in this governments spending commitments into the medium term. If you want change, you are going to have to vote Labour.

    • saveNZ 3.1

      @Sanctuary – the Greens and Labour are trying to win probably by taking the wind out of Natz budget by agreeing it. If they say they don’t agree, and want to tax more, harder for them to win. Will be like last time, Labour and Greens promised tax increases but did not make the numbers they should off. Nobody likes Austerity.

      I’d like to see a new bracket of zero tax under $10k – that would help the minimum wage workers and unemployed boost their incomes – that would be fairer.

    • DoublePlusGood 3.2

      Wait, is it confirmed that the Greens supporting the government tax cuts?
      Because if they are, I’m swapping to Labour until the Greens sort their shit out.

      • weka 3.2.1

        they’re not supporting the tax cuts. They’re opposed to what National are doing. They’re voting for the bill because they want the people doing the hardest to have the small amount that National are throwing their way instead of nothing, but they are very clearly criticising the tax cuts and the way that National has mis-targeted the budget. There is a post up now about the Greens response to the budget.

        Sanctuary’s comment was a piece of anti-Green/pro-Labour propaganda.

        • Sanctuary 3.2.1.1

          Riiiiight…. so they are opposed to the bill that are voting for, and they support the tax cuts they are criticising?

          Christ on a bicycle, what sort of genius thought that up?

          Lets be clear. Voting for something you say you oppose is trying to have both ways and it amounts to arrant bullshit.

          Saying you are criticising something you are supporting so that makes it OK and doing it with a straight face is just lala land nonsense, Alice in Wonderland stuff that those out voter land and away from the land of Castalia where the Greens seem to think they are playing their glass bead game of politics will rightly scoff at.

          • weka 3.2.1.1.1

            I don’t know why political parties do that, the voting for bills they oppose. Labour does it too. But you said the Greens support the tax cuts with the implication that they agree with what National are doing, and that’s a lie. They don’t support the tax cuts, and they’ve said so clearly.

            Maybe I misunderstood. Maybe you didn’t really mean to mislead people about where the Greens stand on the budget and instead meant to just say that voting for the bill while being opposed to the package and its intent and direction as a whole is a mistake politically. But let’s not forget that the bill will pass without the Greens, so this is about something else.

    • weka 3.3

      “Both the Greens and NZ First have apparently signed up to support the government tax cuts.”

      Shaw said the Taxation (Budget Measures: Family Incomes Package) Bill is flawed and taking things in the wrong direction but that because families are doing it so hard they need the pittance that National is giving them, hence the Greens voting for the bill.

      https://www.parliament.nz/en/watch-parliament/ondemand?itemId=181918

      The Greens are still to the left of Labour on most things, including taxation. Pretty much everything I’ve seen from them in the past day is them saying that they want govt resources via the budget to be targeted to people in need instead of giving tax cuts to the middle classes, and they’ve directly addressed DOC funding as well as most of the things their membership and voting base would want them to. I suggest you go look that up.

      I also liked this from Shaw, in response to one of the National MPs telling porkies about the Greens in parliament yesterday,

      Now, this is a debating chamber, so Mr Hudson is largely entitled to say what he wants, but he should try and stick to things that have some factual basis rather than just making crap up just because he’s gotten hot under the collar and has a political point to make.

      • DoublePlusGood 3.3.1

        I know that theoretically the Greens are to the left of Labour, but if they go around voting in favour of shitty legislation in the house, how am I supposed to have confidence in them?

        • weka 3.3.1.1

          What you are concerned about? Is it the principle? Because the bill will pass without the Greens, right? So them voting for it isn’t about enabling the bill, it’s about sending a message to people affected by the bill i.e. poor people. I’m still in two minds about that as a strategy, but it is an entirely different thing than the Greens agreeing with National. They simply don’t and Sanctuary is lying about that, for pretty obvious reasons.

          Is the lack of confidence because you think that the Greens will support a National govt? (they won’t). And what will you do the next time Labour does something that you think is wrong? There is literally no-one else in this election to party vote for if we want to change the govt. It’s Labour or the Greens.

          Labour also vote for bad legislation btw, so when it comes down to it, it’s about policy and competency. I look forward to a L/G govt but I think it will be a better one of the Greens have more MPs than they do now. The more support they have the more they will follow up on what their polices intend.

          • DoublePlusGood 3.3.1.1.1

            Yes, it’s principle. Don’t vote for bad legislation. Ever.
            And it’s about having confidence in the message – they go around rightly bagging the budget, but then they vote for it? Wait, so it was ok? What bits were good about the budget then? Oh, so it was bad?

            • weka 3.3.1.1.1.1

              pop over to the Green budget post and read Marama Davidson’s blog post on it. I hear what you are saying, and like I say I’m not convinced it’s a good thing to do when either the Greens or Labour do it. But I also think that what they are doing makes sense, and I’m curious about where that comes from. They may feel that compassion trumps politics in this instance.

              edit, makes sense for them i.e. it’s coherent with their kaupapa.

    • Labour, whilst having made plenty of mistakes and having many problems, I do not think actually deserve entirely the bad rap that they are getting. I think they will pick up more seats than anyone is willing to admit.

      Labour needs to stick to Labourite principles: supporting railways, partially buying back the electricity generating assets – these are the kind of things that would make me vote Labour.

  4. Wayne 4

    Sanctuary,

    I think you mean Greens on fourth, being overtaken by Winston. I am pretty sure that would have happened with or without James Shaw.

    Winston is on fire at the moment. Pike River, Auditor General just to mention two things that he has led in recent weeks. But it matters less about the specific issue, and more about the fact that Winston is often leading the political news, and has been for some time.

    So I do expect NZF to be the third party, and perhaps surprisingly close to Labour. I am am picking NZF being north of 15%, which would mean Labour under 30%. Winston will pick up most of the vote that went to Craig last time.

    So picking up your last line. Voting Labour won’t actually change much, not unless you expect Labour to get 40%.

    The key changes of the Budget (tax thresholds and WFF) are now locked in with the vote of the Greens and NZF, and that uses up most of the available money.

    • Jason Warrington 4.1

      Speaking of Winston we fully expect more to come of this;

      “If you think there is no drug and gang problem in Northland, you haven’t been talking to police, teachers, health workers, social workers, forestry workers, local contractors, prison warders or rental owners. So Mr Reti, you seriously need to get out more.”

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503447&objectid=11814421

      One nasty guy is Reti. The columnist got fired after this recent opinion piece was published in the local paper. Very inconvenient a columnist having a crack at you closing in on a general election. Plenty of local tories whispering about this latest incident. Cannon fodder for opposing candidates, be watching with interest what develops given he has prior form.

      • Jason Warrington 4.1.1

        And with stinging cracks against the National Party like these gems appears panic mode set in;

        “You always know when you’re dealing with OWG muck-ups when they roll out the doyenne of the National Party machine. Ponytail pulling? No problem.”

        “A housing misstep with Bill English or an embarrassing Saudi sheep farm that no one but the guys we gave it to thought they needed?”

        “Michelle will wave her magic wand of wonderful words and soothe it into a palatable paste of the master plan of happiness and good times for all.”

        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503450&objectid=11780488

      • ianmac 4.1.2

        Was she fired – really Jason? That would be akin to whistleblower mistreatment.

        • Jason Warrington 4.1.2.1

          Yip she got dismissed.

          Over 100k in spending in a small local paper struggling in the new digital world of media wields a lot of power in what is scribed and by whom.

          A first term MP that hasn’t really fired by living up to expectations, under siege already by a strong local Labour voice and the speculation Shane Jones will soon enter the race. A risky call given Muir’s popularity. Timing as a result is bad luck with Alfie threatening Jackson not long after the dismissal. I doubt any other media will dare take the issue on, it acts as a clear message ‘don’t bite the hand that feeds you’. One could expect RNZ to tone things down with being critical of the Govt since they were big winners (muzzled) in the budget.

    • Bearded Git 4.2

      @Wayne You are forgetting what is actually happening. My rolling average of the last 4 Roy Morgan’s from a month ago showed:

      Lab/Gr 41.3
      Lab/Gr/NZF 50.0
      Nats 45.1
      Nats/ACT/MP 47.8
      Nats/ACT/MP/NZF 56.5

      If Winnie goes as part of the 4-headed monster it’s 56.5 versus 41.3

      If Winnie goes with the Lab/Gr bloc it’s 50.0 versus 47.8

      Both would give safe majorities, especially as Hone will probably win TTT.

      • ianmac 4.2.1

        Or if NZF went with Nats but refused to accept MP or Act. Over 50%. Would give Winston much greater clout.

      • Treetop 4.2.2

        You have not factored in Morgan, he just might take some of the marijuana party votes.

        • Bearded Git 4.2.2.1

          agreed…..TOP could get say 3%, most of this coming from the Left, and hand the election to the Nats.

          • Treetop 4.2.2.1.1

            See my comment on Open Mike 6 June 2017 @9.

            Do you think your 3% could get to 5%?

            Handing the election to the Nats would put me in a spin….

  5. swordfish 5

    First poll since Manchester terror attack on Monday – shows Tory lead cut by 4 points to just a five point gap (43% CON – 38% LAB).

    This compares to the previous YouGov poll – for last weekend’s Sunday Times – that showed the Tories on 44% and Labour on 35% (9 point gap) and the first post- election-announcement YouGov (18–19 Apr 2017) which suggested a whopping 24 point lead to the Tories

    To put this in context – it’s the smallest gap since July last year (in any poll) and since April last year (in a YouGov poll)
    and
    Cameron won his majority in 2015 with a 6.5% lead over LAB.

    • weka 5.1

      Would the Manchester attack have influenced that poll?

      • mauī 5.1.1

        Should have done. The poll was conducted on 24-25 May a couple of days after the attack.

        • AB 5.1.1.1

          Also Corbyn is due to give a speech on the Manchester bombing on Friday UK time.
          The “IRA-supporting friend of terrorists” smears on him in the Tory press are in overdrive.

        • weka 5.1.1.2

          My understanding is that changes in voting intention take a couple of weeks to show up after an influencing factor. I’m not sure if that applies to something like a terrorist attack though.

    • james 5.2

      Got to say – I always enjoy and appreciate your commentary on the polls swordfish.

    • Stunned Mullet 5.3

      How do you rate the YouGov polling Swordfish ?

      I was under the impression they used similar methodology to the likes of Horizon in NZ.

      • swordfish 5.3.1

        SM

        YouGov = highly reputable – one of the UK’s leading Pollsters

        Thing is – most Brit Pollsters now use Opt-in web panel methodology (not just YouGov)
        – YouGov
        – Survation
        – Opinium
        – Populus
        – Panelbase
        – TNS

        Phone Pollsters in minority
        – ICM
        – ComRes
        – Ipsos-MORI

        On-line Panel-based Polls were closest in EU Ref
        and
        YouGov pretty much spot-on with very-difficult-to-sample LAB leadership contest

        Oh and … cheers james

        • McFlock 5.3.1.1

          and interestingly enough, looking at the wikipedia graph of polls, UKLab were on such a steep slope up that the yougov thing is high, but not outlandish.

          Tragedies aside, this election really is quite interesting.

    • Bill 5.4

      Maybe – just maybe, people have had a gutsfull of the “tough on terror” bullshit. Maybe – just maybe, people are realising, that not only doesn’t it work, but that it’s counterproductive.

      If that’s the case (and I’ve commented to that effect on the post I just put up) then May’s finished.

      Corbyn’s speech is going to be very interesting on that front. Is May scheduled to be coming down off her scripted, tele-prompter podium any time soon?

      • swordfish 5.4.1

        Quite worried about Jezza’s up-coming speech … I largely agree with his reasoning … but that doesn’t mean most Brits will …

        … potential for backlash and plunge in polls if he handles it badly – eg … with tin ear to almost inevitable heightened popular hawkishness on combating terrorism

        • AB 5.4.1.1

          Yep – particularly given that anything he says will be deliberately distorted by the popular press to reinforce the “soft on terrorism” and “friend of Britain’s enemies” hogwash they are peddling.
          He needs to unconditionally condemn all acts of terror and political violence and all those who commit them – from the outset.
          Very risky and high-stakes.

          • swordfish 5.4.1.1.1

            Precisely … ruthless, systematic “soft on terror” smears inevitable … highly emotionally charged atmosphere … young girls have, after all, died horribly, senselessly …

            MSM – Tories = “He’s too spineless to defend us … stockholm syndrome !!! …
            Cowardly Corbyn !!! … blaming us !!! … blaming the victims !!!
            Just like he did with the IRA !!!” …

            not too difficult to imagine the cold calculated ruthlessly-delivered spin

            • AB 5.4.1.1.1.1

              If Corbyn was a really cynical political operator he’d use it as a chance to outflank the Tories on the right – promise more resources for the security services and police (blame Tory cost-cutting), implement some form of preventative detention for terror suspects (quietly hedged around with the need for judicial sign-offs) and a review of immigration policy for the post-Brexit world. Then throw in support for the local military forces who actually have a record of defeating ISIS on the ground (rather then direct British intervention), beefed up anti-radicalisation programmes at home, etc.
              If his prime objective is ending Tory austerity, he needs to be in power and so has to think about swallowing this dead rat in the least painful way (head-first, quickly and without looking too closely).

        • swordfish 5.4.1.2

          From the same post-Manchester-attack YouGov Poll …

          How much, if at all, would you trust Theresa May
          to make the right decisions about
          keeping Britain safe from terrorism?

          TRUST … 55%
          NOT TRUST … 30%

          Jeremy Corbyn

          TRUST … 33%
          NOT TRUST … 51%

          _________________________________________________________________________

          Banning British citizens who have visited Syria
          without offical permission from returning to the
          UK

          Would be the right thing to do … 66%
          Would be an over-reaction … 15%

          ______________________________________________________________________

          Introducing internment – that is, imprisoning
          people who are suspected of having extremist
          sympathies but who have not committed any
          crime

          Would be the right thing to do … 41%
          Would be an over-reaction … 36%

          _________________________________________________________________________

          Introducing the death penalty for people
          committing murder for the purpose of terrorism

          Would be the right thing to do … 56%
          Would be an over-reaction … 30%

          ________________________________________________________________________

          Thinking about how the rest of the world deals
          with the threat from ISIS/Islamic State,
          which of the following best reflects your view?

          Ultimately, the threat from ISIS/Islamic State is
          more likely to be solved through the use of military force
          than through dialogue and peace talks … 46%

          Ultimately, the threat from ISIS/Islamic State is
          more likely to be solved through dialogue and
          peace talks
          than through the use of military force … 18%

          ______________________________________________________________________

          Thinking about the rise of extremist threats like
          ISIS/Islamic State in recent decades, do you
          think this is mainly the result of western
          countries interfering in the Middle East, or
          mainly the result of social, religious or political
          issues in the Middle East itself?

          Is mostly the result of western countries interfering
          in the Middle East … 18%

          Is mostly the result of with social, religious or
          political issues in the Middle East itself … 25%

          Both equally … 41%

          _______________________________________________________________________

          The latter provides at least some sort of encouragement I guess … # nuanced

        • Sanctuary 5.4.1.3

          What is there to worry about? Labour entered the campaign 24 points behind, riven with a PLP neo liberal fifth column, led by a man subjected to the worst media smear campaign since the war and completely written off. On the back of a return to roots, nothing to lose manifesto,old fashioned campaigning and an offer of hope they’ve surged to within striking distance of power. There is nothing for Corbyn to lose by laying out his alternative to endless imperialist wars and terror, because it also holds out what the current electorate craves – hope of change for the better.

  6. esoteric pineapples 6

    Something to keep in mind in regards to Britain and terrorism

    “Britain is now the second biggest arms dealer in the world, official government figures show – with most of the weapons fuelling deadly conflicts in the Middle East.

    Since 2010 Britain has also sold arms to 39 of the 51 countries ranked “not free” on the Freedom House “Freedom in the world” report, and 22 of the 30 countries on the UK Government’s own human rights watch list.

    A full two-thirds of UK weapons over this period were sold to Middle Eastern countries, where instability has fed into increased risk of terror threats to Britain and across the West.”

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/britain-is-now-the-second-biggest-arms-dealer-in-the-world-a7225351.html

  7. mauī 7

    It’s messed up:

    The British government operated an “open door” policy that allowed Libyan exiles and British-Libyan citizens to join the 2011 uprising that toppled Muammar Gaddafi even though some had been subject to counter-terrorism control orders, Middle East Eye can reveal.

    Several former rebel fighters now back in the UK told MEE that they had been able to travel to Libya with “no questions asked” as authorities continued to investigate the background of a British-Libyan suicide bomber who killed 22 people in Monday’s attack in Manchester.

    http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/sorted-mi5-how-uk-government-sent-british-libyans-fight-gaddafi-1219906488

    • Bill 7.1

      It’s reported that the father of Salman Abedi fled Libya in the 1990s. He got political asylum in the UK because the Gaddafi government was ‘after him’ for leaking operational matters to fanatics who were the subject of state investigations.

      He went back to Libya after Gaddafi’s death and is now high up in the UN supported alternative government or some such.

      Anyway. My point is that in the ’90s, no-one would have given much of a second thought to offering asylum to the likes of Ramadan Abedi (the father), but…

      well, all this extremism was ‘contained’ by the security forces in countries like Libya, Iraq and Syria. They were the ones with skin in the game who kept tabs on shit, and western governments used their intel.

      What I can’t figure is why ‘the west’ chose to overthrow the governments of those countries and bomb them back to the stone-age. They absolutely were (how to say?) providing a service – no matter how unintentionally. Fuck, when the US were using ‘black sites’ off the back of their rendition stuff, which countries were people sent to for interrogation? Libya and Syria and possibly Iraq. Why? Because the authorities in those countries knew the lie of the land – knew their shit. They had to insofar as they were defending their secular states against the very same forces we now see running riot all over Libya, Iraq and Syria.

      I’d be thinking that Saudi Arabia has played a not insignificant role in shifting western policy in the region. And yes, Israel too.

  8. Exactly fucked up PEOPLE not headchopper not subhuman not nonpeople. People who are fucked up.

    [TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]

    • Fair enough yet it exactly pertains to the point of the post where blame is attached to groups for no good reason just ignorance. And that blame which is attached to groups supports tgem getting unfairly treated because of labelling and othering.

    • Bill 9.2

      Sorry marty. But if you want to ride your hobby horse against me on the basis you simply don’t like some of the things that I say, then you’re doing it over here.

      We’ve been through this and you’ve singularly failed to rise above the level of personal abuse.

      If you don’t like people being ascribed a label based on what they do, then offer up some reasonable argument as to why. If you think chopping peoples heads off is sub-human or indicative of being a non-person, then fine. I can’t follow why that would lead to objections over them being called by what they either do or condone. Maybe you could enlighten me on that front?

      • marty mars 9.2.1

        I havent abused you. I have put up a reason as to why using that term could be counter productive. You ignored that reason and didn’t offer up any alternative apart from ‘coz I wanna’ . The only reason I raised it again is because I thought it pertained to your comment. I am very happy to consider the subject closed – as to your final question – you answer it yourself – what people do is not what people are.

        Edit anyway I don’t want you to have to waste time with me so I’ll pull my horns in.

        • Bill 9.2.1.1

          I haven’t said it encapsulates all that they are.

          But just like (as I explained yesterday) “Jones the postman” allowed the particular Jones to be identified in a community awash with the surname Jones, so “headchopper” allows identification in a region awash with warring factions.

          edit – the term “daesh”, widely used in the region, plays a similar role insofar as it robs those identified as “daesh” of any respectable veneer of religion they try to construct.

  9. North 10

    My reading of Marty’s comment says he supports the view of the post from which his comment was moved. I’m assuming that post to be “Islam Incidental”.

  10. NoRightTurn: I/S writes:
    “There’s been a landmark decision from the Court of Appeal today, one which lawyers are saying changes the New Zealand constitution. The decision? The Court has ruled that the High Court was right to declare that National’s 2010 prisoner voting restrictions (the ones which were so shabby and shoddily passed that they brought Parliament into disrepute) were inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act.”

    This tawdry stuff grinds on and on. National’s disgraceful actions are hidden from view only by the lag it takes to have them officially exposed.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago