web analytics

The three big fails in the budget

Written By: - Date published: 7:02 am, May 26th, 2017 - 72 comments
Categories: budget 2017, class war, national - Tags: , , , , , , ,

It was National’s best budget. Which means there are only three critical areas of failure.

The first is health. Craig Hoyle at Stuff:

Frustration, disappointment over health funding in Budget 2017

Patients and healthcare workers say they have been left frustrated and disappointed by “inadequate” funding for health in the 2017 Budget.

They said the Government’s announcements on Thursday would not go nearly far enough in addressing concerns about overworked staff, access to new medicines, and access to mental health treatment.

The Government said total health spending would be a record $16.77 billion in 2017/18 – an increase of $879 million, with an overall increase of $3.9b over the next four years.

However, the record claim does not take inflation into account, and sidesteps the fact that almost half the spending will go toward mandated wage increases as part of the pay equity settlement. …

Jenna Lynch at Newshub:

Revealed: Govt shortchanged health system by $250m

Just over a year ago the health sector went cap in hand asking for funding to deal with rising immigration – but the Government shortchanged them to the tune of quarter of a billion dollars.

The shortfall is revealed in a briefing from the Ministry of Health to the Health Minister, which says to deal with immigration, as well as wage and cost increases, it needed an extra $644.8 million.

The information was forced out by the ombudsman, realeased to the yeswecare.nz campaign after a year-long battle with the ministry.

“DHBs face significant pressure in Budget 2016, due to the additional impact of net migration on population growth and aging, and anticipated wage pressure,” it said.

It calculated a $379 million need for population pressure, $190.5 million to cope with wage increases, and $75.3 million to fund rising costs. All up – $644.8 million.

But in Budget 2016, they were given $400 million – a more than $250 million shortfall.

The ministry even warns that without the full funding, access to healthcare is on the line. …

The second major failure is housing. Much of the money that is going into housing is in the form of the accommodation supplement. The supplement is desperately needed because of our insane rental market, but unless we fix the underlying problem of affordable housing the supplement just fuels the fire. Stacey Kirk and Vernon Small on Stuff:

The Government has re-written the rules of the accommodation supplement, creating some big winners

The top rate has been $225 per week and covered only central and northern Auckland. Now, it covers virtually the whole city, as well as property hotspots, Tauranga, Queenstown, Wanaka and Arrowtown, and the maximum payment has risen to $305 a week.

It sounds like a dramatic increase but this is the first time the accommodation supplement has been adjusted since 2008.

The $2b package is a stark admission by the Government that rising house and rent prices have costs beyond the reach of many.

Labour leader Andrew Little said the total package meant it would be the top income earners that would benefit the most. The problem with the Accommodation Supplement was that it tended to be a subsidy to landlords.

“And actually, there’s a pretty good consensus – even amongst National Party MPs – we are going to have to do something about it, because it’s fuelling the wrong kind of response as a solution.” …

Shamubeel Eaqub on The Spinoff:

‘A classic election year budget’

There was more money for the accommodation supplement and emergency housing. Both bottom of cliff stuff. There is no material and aspirational investment in significantly boosting housing supply. …

See also ‘Not enough’ for Auckland house hunters.

The third area of failure is equity. As usual most of the budget largess goes to the already wealthy. OneNews:

‘The One Dollar Bill Budget’ – Andrew Little blasts $1 tax cut for cleaner on minimum wage

It’s the “One Dollar Bill Budget”, says Labour leader Andrew Little who claims a single cleaner on a minimum wage will get just $1 a week extra from tax cuts announced today. …

(The working for that is in a tweet below.) Breanna Barraclough on Newshub:

Political reactions to ‘election bribe’

Kiwis earning more than $52,000 will be in line for an extra $1000 a year with the changes.

But Labour leader Andrew Little has criticised it as an “irresponsible election bribe”, saying the Budget “does nothing to address to shortfalls in health, housing and education, and in fact makes them worse”.

He’s calling it the “One Dollar Bill Budget”.

“For all National’s talk about tax cuts, the reality is that a single cleaner on a minimum wage will get just $1 a week extra,” Mr Little said.

“The big winners of this Budget are the top earners who take home most of the tax benefits.”

His thoughts are echoed by Green Party co-leader James Shaw, who says it’s a “tax cut for the rich in disguise”.

“Those on the highest incomes will get the bulk of the benefit. Families on the highest incomes receive a tax cut of $33.22 while those in the bottom quintile get just $5 a week,” he said.

“This is not what low and middle income earners need.” …

Labour claims that “The 50% of New Zealanders on the lowest incomes get just 20% of the money from National’s Budget tax cuts”.

When Labour had surpluses they built critical infrastructure like KiwiSaver and KiwiBank, and the created major programs like Working for Families. National tries to fool us all that catching up is generosity, and fails to address the biggest issues. Time to change the government.


In other generally luke-warm reaction:
Max Rashbrooke: A Government trying to make up for past neglect
Budget 2017: NZ working hard to stand still
‘Anything extra is a bonus’ but some others say tax relief in Budget is a drop in the bucket


72 comments on “The three big fails in the budget ”

  1. Incognito 1

    With billions of Taxpayers’ money spent on warships, infrastructure, and prisons this Budget is not only a cynical and pathetically obvious election bribe but above all it is an inhumane budget that puts people second, the environment third but the economy & voters first.

    • left_forward 1.1

      Don’t agree that it puts the economy first – its the usual hands off, do not intervene, neoliberal style of economic non-management.

    • Nick 1.2

      Everyone. EVERYONE questioned on a little vox-pop on Backbenchers on Wednesday night, opined that they wanted to seem more spent not on things that profited just them or even at all them. Everyone spoke for more money for education, the environment and health. That is the natural province of the Left. I think many of us are beginning to get sick of the old “What’s in it for Me?”

      Some people need more. But smart policies are just as worthwhile as “generous” policies.

      And a bit, QUITE a bit, more appeal to altruism. If we don’t have a massive altruist streak, we have no business calling ourselves Left.

  2. Keith 2

    Unaffordable tax cuts paying for increased rental supplements going straight to housing investors/speculators pockets, yet dishonestly posing as largesse for the less well off.

    Joyce, hang your head in shame, you are an areshole!

    • mpledger 2.1

      And it fuels average rental increases. Landlords can afford to raise rents because people have more money to spend on rents. And if a particular rentor doesn’t have the money to afford an increase then they can be tossed as there are plenty of people waiting in the wings for accommodation.

    • UncookedSelachimorpha 2.2

      Yep, simply throwing more fuel on the housing fire, while doing nothing to fix the regulatory and structural problems causing the crisis.

    • Nick 2.3

      When there is enough housing, there will be no need for accommodation supplements.

      However, in the first instance, as house prices level off, before they start to slide, landlords, with no capital gains in view will first try to jack up rents. Although smart ones might try to sell before prices suffer a real correction. Both will exacerbate the rental situation. It’s going to get worse before it gets better.

      Ironically, and counter-intuitively, a real Province-Based policy for work, infrastructure and housing, will ultimately make prices in our largest city more attainable for the less affluent.

      A focus uniquely on Auckland, were it ever to work, will just attract more Kiwis there and make matters worse.

      It’s like motorways. You build better roads, you get more cars and the roads become even more clogged.

      What is needed is alternatives.

  3. Bearded Git 3

    Joyce on RNZ this morning saying the limited goodies offered to a small portion of the less well off in the budget (while the environment, housing, public transport, education, health etc miss out) could only be achieved now the books were in shape.

    He conveniently forgets the $1 billion plus tax package the Nats gave mostly to the better off when they were elected in 2008 that has cost the state $10 billion so far.

    This was not a time for tax cuts at all; it was a time to increase public spending on the areas listed above.

    Also most of the media seem to have missed that the Independent Earner Tax Credit of $520 per annum has been taken away from low earners .

    • millsy 3.1

      He said that only a third eligible were claiming it, but that is a lie — those who dont claim it, get is when they get their tax refund in June this year. And $520 in June is a welcome payment for some. That is pretty much going to be chopped.

      • left_forward 3.1.1

        …which snuffs out the small tax cut for low earners – thus only the high earners benefit.

  4. Bearded Git 4

    Despite the links above I can’t find the “$1 dollar bill” budget workings. Can someone help me here.

  5. Johnr 5

    I would add a further three FAILS.
    NO analysis of what has failed.
    NO plan or future vision to aspire to.
    NO leadership to achieve the plan/vision

    • Nick 5.1

      They have no plan because at heart they neither like plans nor believe in an aspirational future, or not one for which the government has any role.
      It is in their DNA.
      They can’t fake it.

  6. Craig H 6

    Another fun fact: Beneficiaries don’t get the tax cuts because of how the Social Security Act is worded.

    • Nick 6.1

      “Well, they’ve had their $25.00. Don’t know what they’re complaining about.
      They should be licking our hand.

      “Do you know, that’s the first increase they’ve had since……(and it will be the last)”.

  7. Whispering Kate 7

    These supposed goodies are going to happen after the election and Humpty has already given himself an out that they may not happen by saying on the AM Show today that if an unexpected crisis should happen like an earthquake, economic down turn etc then yes, it was possible that they wouldn’t be implemented.

    If this budget is based on trust that its proposed lollie scramble will occur – then pigs might fly as well. I wouldn’t trust these slimy bottom crawlers one second.

    • infused 7.1

      He said pretty much nothing would change this. Except if there was a major event. Nice try.

  8. infused 8

    Well. We will all look forward to Labours alternative budget.

  9. Treetop 9

    What really surprised me regarding the accommodation supplement (AS) was that some in area 4 are now in area 2. In area 1 temporary addition support (TAS) is just going to be reduced with the increase of the AS. Every 13 weeks a person has to reapply for TAS, this needs to be changed to every 26 weeks.

    Can anyone confirm if a single person does not get an increase in the AS, I heard Joyce say 2 or more people?

    To think that people have to wait until April 1 2018 and not July 1 2017 for an increase in AS is stingey, winter heating is not cheap either.

  10. Nick 10

    If you like the headline spends of this budget, you will vote for a party that believes in this kind of thing.

    This is not an especially good or bad National Budget. It is a typical National Budget.

    Like every other budget this government has produced it asks only one question:
    “What is the LEAST we can do to keep the horses calm, and let the party continue?”

    Maybe Joyce has concluded that the horses are getting a bit more restless than usual. But we are still confronted by a work from an administration that clearly does not think the government has any real role in national affairs, dealing with a population that does.

    Hence a minimalist lolly scramble. What more can you expect from a government with neither ideas nor ambition? They have no ideas BECAUSE they have no ambition.

    If you don’t think you can do anything to create a better country, you are likely to achieve your ambition.

    But if you want and can imagine a better outcome, you have to strive to achieve it.

    More money for some families is okay, so far as it goes, but if we want to improve LIVES it is not just about money. It is about opportunity, empowerment and respect.

    Money may be a part of that but ambition, system, orientation, focus and planning are just as important. As is a fundamental respect for those whose lives you hope to improve.

    That isn’t in this National Budget. Because in almost every instance, it is totally absent from the National Psyche and the National Heart.

    • heman 10.1

      agree with all of that.

      Just a thought from there perspective is that they can do all that in the future.
      Now they are about making them hard decisions so they can do all them things in the future.

      • Nick 10.1.1

        Don’t be silly.
        This is the ultimate budget to cling to power. They’ve had 9 years to do stuff in the future.

        This IS the future.

        They are overtly declaring that they have absolutely no ambition but to stay in power.

        You want a party that actually think things can, and should, be better than they are, for the local environment, struggling families, out international contribution, our kids, sick people, future generations here and overseas…..?

        Two seconds’ thought Herman, will tell you both who are worth voting for and who are NOT worth voting for.

  11. DH 11

    This is classic National self serving. They’re cementing in place most of the recent housing inflation by raising the accommodation supplement which even the productivity commission agree underpins rents and investment yields. No way are those bastards giving up their capital gains.

    I don’t know all the rules here but my initial observation is the accommodation supplement is cynically designed to snare people in the rental trap. I tried the calculator and discovered if a single person has $9000 in cash or non-cash assets they don’t qualify for the accommodation supplement. A couple fails with $17,000. So it appears you can’t save a house deposit because if you do you lose the supplement.

    Here’s the reply I got from the calculator, interesting to see it’s already updated with the new rates;

    Calculator here;
    https://www.workingforfamilies.govt.nz/calculator/index.jsp
    ________________________________________

    Accommodation Supplement estimate today

    You may not qualify as your combined cash and non-cash assets of $17,000.00 are over the limit.

    (Cash assets and non-cash assets assets do not include personal items, motor vehicle for private use, or the home you live in.)

    Accommodation Supplement estimate from 1 April 2018

    You may not qualify as your combined cash and non-cash assets of $17,000.00 are over the limit.
    __________________________________________

    (That was trying as a couple with 1 child earning a combined $700 weekly and paying $450 per week in rent. What a joke)

    I wonder if Kiwisaver counts as cash or non-cash assets.

  12. indiana 12

    “Labour claims that “The 50% of New Zealanders on the lowest incomes get just 20% of the money from National’s Budget tax cuts”.

    They again prove that they don’t know how to explain the tax system effectively…this is better example to use:
    https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/the-tax-system-explained-in-beer/

    • Craig H 12.1

      The problem with simplified examples like that one is that macroeconomics doesn’t work that way, and also that we have massive net migration, so the risk of 10% of the tax base disappearing is negligible.

      • indiana 12.1.1

        Is the issue that the example is simplified, or that Labour cannot understand how the tax system works by trying to say that the low income earners get an unfair portion of the tax cut. Are the facts in the example not clear enough? If you earn a low wage you will be taxed less than person that earns a high wage. When tax cuts come, purely based on the proportion of tax paid, low income earners will not get the same as high income earners. That’s the problem with the meme that is being pushed.

        • mordecai 12.1.1.1

          Labour don’t understand much at all.

          “Someone on $20,000 a year has their tax drop from $2,520 to $2,100 – a 17% decrease. Someone on $100,000 a year has their tax drop from $23,920 to $22,860 – a 4% decrease.”

          This budget disproportionately favours low income earners. And rightly so.

          • indiana 12.1.1.1.1

            Agree 100% but commentators here see it this way, the 17% decrease only amounts to $420 less tax, where as the 4% decrease amounts to $1060. And that’s not fair…boo hoo! that National government’s budget favours the rich! Little will be brought down by his economic keyboard warriors.

            • greywarshark 12.1.1.1.1.1

              The difference between you Gnashional supporters and Labour is that Labour is looking at the matter from a distribution point of view, now a mathematical equation. A flat percentage of as base will always result in less money from a low base, and more money from a high base.

              It is a matter of relieving poverty and relieving low income people from tax that reduces money needed for basic living costs. For better off people part or most of their tax will come from their discretionary money, their living costs are intact and they feel taxation limiting their holiday spending, their choice of car, their wish for new chattels instead of secondhand.

              • mordecai

                “The difference between you Gnashional supporters and Labour is that Labour is looking at the matter from a distribution point of view, now a mathematical equation. ”
                Bollocks. Labour’s 2008 tax cuts “gave someone on $20,000 an $1,130 tax cut and someone on $100,000 would have got $2,870. Yes Labour’s 2008 tax cuts package would have given a three times larger tax cut to someone on $100,000 than National’s 2017 package does.”
                (Credit to David Farrar).

  13. Kevin 13

    The fact that we have things like Accommodation Supplements and Working For Families shows what a failure our society has become.

    • Craig H 13.1

      Winston’s point that a minimum wage increase of $3 an hour with appropriate support for businesses would have achieved all of the same goals while costing the government bugger all extra speaks volumes.

  14. Keith 14

    Grant Robertson reaction to the budget worry’s me, yet again. To me he was criticising it because, well, he has to. There was no real analysis, no thought and definitely no passion to his line.

    Listening to his interview on RNZ the question I was left asking was why bother voting Labour? He thinks the housing supplement rise is a good thing, not the bleeding obvious reality that has missed Grant that it will simply inflate rent and make no difference to those struggling.

    He was similarly in agreement with an number of other initiatives. He took this crock at its National Party intended face value.

    No arguing that a tax cut was wrong or unaffordable which it is, simply it was poorly targeted.

    Then his argument as to why the budget is not so good is purely semantics, dancing around of a pin. Nothing I heard from him said to me Labour would do that much different, just a bit different.

    Very uninspiring stuff Grant! It was like saying driving a red car is more sensible than driving a blue car. You do not present an alternative to me, just the same old shit.

    • Craig H 14.1

      Well, building 100,000 houses and a stack of state houses will be a different way of approaching the Accommodation Supplement. Maybe he should have said that, but core Labour policy is already there.

  15. Wayne 15

    Health has gone up 5.5% in just the next year, so way above inflation.

    Anyway Labour says they would have spent everything on health, education and housing, maybe infrastructure as well. that is their major difference to National.

    But that also means they can’t seriously complain about the inadequacy of the tax threshold and WFF package, when their alternative on these things is zero.

    In any event the Greens and NZF have voted for the tax threshold and WFF package, so it is locked in for next year. Where does Labour go when their alternative budget has been already been negated by their potential coalition partners?

    In addition the Labour/Green Budget Responsibility Rules essentially bind them to a budget with total spending more or less the size of the current budget.

    These latter two points mean the budget is a resounding success for National. The election now gets fought on their terms.

    It is virtually impossible for Labour to argue the budget is for the rich. That simply sounds and indeed is ridiculous.

    So if there is a change of government, it won’t be as a result of the budget.” Time for a change” also looks a bit lame when Labour looks bereft of fresh ideas.

  16. “Time for a change” also looks a bit lame…” – Wayne

    Sounds like a powerful rallying cry to me!

    • mordecai 16.1

      Not when we have one of the strongest performing economies on the planet.

      • Robert Guyton 16.1.1

        And one of the most threatened environments on the planet, mordecai. “Strongest economy” = most rapidly collapsing environments.

        Hurrah! Eh?

        • mordecai 16.1.1.1

          Are you seriously arguing the NZ environment is “one of the most threatened environments on the planet”?
          Have you ever been outside of NZ?

  17. newsense 18

    More Michael Wood marking Paula Bennett please

  18. Jeremy 19

    Surely any tax cut that does anything apart from move the lowest threshold up, or reduce the lowest threshold rate will favour higher income earners.

    If Labour and the Greens aren’t prepared to state that this is the only way in which they’d entertain tax cuts, then I think they should keep their powder dry for when National looks to align all the top rates at 28%, or drop the company tax rate, etc. They risk being the parties that cried wolf too often otherwise.

    • RedLogix 19.1

      Precisely. Why is it that none of the Opposition parties seem to be able to clearly articulate the fact that in terms of total taxation New Zealand is already one of the most lightly taxed nations in the OECD? From memory only Mexico rates lower.

  19. Lara 20

    I’m paying close to 50% of my income on tax. Most weeks I put more aside for tax than I am able to save for myself.

    I’m leaving NZ as soon as possible. So that during my most productive years I can save and get ahead.

    • RedLogix 20.1

      Given the top tax rate on PAYE income over $70,000 is only 33% … I call bullshit on your assertion as you laid it out.

      The problem with New Zealand is the low incomes, not the high tax rates.

    • Jeremy 20.2

      Are you including GST, petrol taxes, duties, etc?

      I don’t think anyone would be paying much above 40% when everything is factored in.

      • RedLogix 20.2.1

        Take a look at this page:

        https://taxfoundation.org/comparison-tax-burden-labor-oecd-2016/

        Total tax burden in New Zealand (especially when you include provision for retirement income) is right at the bottom of the OECD.

      • Nick 20.2.2

        GST is not your money in the first place.
        We account it, but it is considered outside the normal financial transactions.

        Sure, it feels onerous, but you should account your income on the net profit of your business, not on the fiscal ebb and flow of payments. Beyond that, you are only paying a total of about 18% over the first $48,000, so either your corporate income is massive, or you are still way below 50% in direct taxes.

        BTW it is impossible to get to 50%, but maybe it shouldn’t be for the top earners.

        The only way to get people out of the poverty trap is not just to pay them more (payments which are too easily absorbed in rising rates), but to make more of the things we HAVE to spend money on free, or at least much cheaper. Lunch for all in schools or free doctor and dentist visits for all, could be a couple of examples. And to make many things they might wish to take part in, in an attractive society, available without an impossible financial barrier. Public tennis courts and enhanced access to our National Parks as examples.

        The idea is to maximise the amount of discretionary money in each pocket. And to make those provisions universal to save on admin, then to pay for it with more progressive tax structures as used to be the case on more egalitarian times.

        • Lara 20.2.2.1

          Oh FFS, I bloody well know what my tax rate is. And my accountant minimises it, but there’s a limit to what I can legally do.

          Yeah, my income is very good. Still leaving.

          Trying to get ahead after divorce, retraining and starting a business… watching property prices rocket ahead and not being able to buy without a massive mortgage….

          Say whatever you like Kiwi’s. I’m off ASAP.

    • red-blooded 20.3

      Well, you make your own decisions, Lara. It seems to me that if you’re paying that much tax you must be earning pretty damn well, though – already “ahead”, so to speak. I’m not sure it’s even possible to pay that much when the top tax bracket (which only applies to earnings over about $70 000) is 33%. And the rates for business are even lower, so the “almost 50%” claim seems a bit of a stretch.

      As for your reply about GST, petrol taxes etc, I assume that you use the NZ roads, the subsidised primary healthcare and free hospital systems, accept the protection of the NZ police force…? Did you think these things were actually free to provide? Who (if not you) did you expect to pay for them?

      And of course the problem is that many people with your approach then return in their less productive years, and – having opted out of contributing to the NZ state through taxes as earners – then cost the rest of us for their care and support in their old age. They may “save and get ahead”, but they are still happy to accept support in terms of healthcare and home services in their later years, forgetting that the money they accumulated in their savings accounts has left a hole that others have had to fill.

      • Lara 20.3.1

        You’ve made some unacknowledged assumptions in your comment.

        First, yeah, I’m earning a lot ATM, but you’re assuming I’m “ahead”. Income at any one point in time does not necessarily mean I’m “ahead” nor does it mean it will continue on a stable nor upwards trajectory.

        You also appear to be assuming I’ll be absent for my “most productive” years. Yet you have zero idea of how old I am, nor how many years I’ve already contributed to NZ.

        Your assumptions are wrong. And I have no interest in correcting you.

  20. Muttonbird 21

    National just spent $6B on a sticking plaster because they found, through internal polling, that their own voters were getting restless about rising inequality in this country.

    National = no vision.

  21. Treetop 22

    Thank you for the info, I have printed out the new changes.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Protect seamounts and ban bottom trawling right now
    The Green Party is renewing its call for Minister for the Environment, David Parker to immediately ban bottom trawling on seamounts. ...
    3 hours ago
  • Building Auckland’s transport future
    We’re making sure Auckland has the infrastructure it needs for the future, so Aucklanders can get around safely and efficiently as our biggest city grows. The new, linked-up transport system we’re building will include partially tunnelled light rail between the CBD and the airport, as well as another Waitematā Harbour ...
    5 hours ago
  • Build Auckland light rail for benefit of everyone
    The Government’s decision on light rail in Auckland is the first step towards building the climate friendly, accessible city our communities deserve. ...
    6 hours ago
  • Put our most vulnerable first
    Don’t forget whānau and communities most at risk, says the Green Party, as the Government lays out its three-phase plan for Omicron. ...
    2 days ago
  • Boosting our immunity against Omicron
    With Omicron in the community, it’s vital we all do our bit to help to slow the spread, keep each other safe and protect our health system. One of the most important ways we can reduce the risk of Omicron is to get a booster dose as soon as we’re ...
    2 days ago
  • Equitable response to Omicron vital
    The Green Party supports the Government’s decision to move Aotearoa New Zealand to traffic light level Red at 11.59pm tonight, but says its success will depend on the support that is made available to the most vulnerable. ...
    5 days ago
  • How we’re preparing for Omicron
    As countries around the world experience Omicron outbreaks, we’re taking steps now to ensure we’re as prepared as possible and our communities are protected. ...
    1 week ago
  • What’s Labour achieved so far?
    Quite a bit! This Government was elected to take on the toughest issues facing Aotearoa – and that’s what we’re doing. Since the start of the pandemic, protecting lives and livelihoods has been a priority, but we’ve also made progress on long-term challenges, to deliver a future the next generation ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Tackling the big issues in 2022
    This year, keeping Kiwis safe from COVID will remain a key priority of the Government – but we’re also pushing ahead on some of New Zealand’s biggest long-term challenges. In 2022, we’re working to get more Kiwis into homes, reduce emissions, lift children out of poverty, and ensure people get ...
    2 weeks ago

  • Tupu Tai graduation-It’s time to step up
    Greetings: Kia orana, talofa lava, Noa’ia e mauri, malo e lelei, taloha ni, fakaalofa lahi atu, ni sa bula vinaka, talofa, kia ora, tena koutou katoa.  I would love to begin by acknowledging everyone here in attendance, especially the families and friends of the 2021/22 Tupu Tai cohort, and those ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Building and shaping a city: Future-proofing Auckland transport infrastructure
    The Government is bringing Auckland’s transport infrastructure into the future by moving forward with an additional Waitematā Harbour crossing, progressing light rail from Auckland’s CBD to the airport, and creating a linked-up rapid transport network as part of a 30-year plan. Key decisions on additional Waitematā Harbour crossing to be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Penguin rehab and native forest restoration get helping hand
    A long-running penguin rehab facility which has been hard hit by the tourism downturn, and work to restore native forest habitats in the Catlins are being supported through Jobs for Nature funding, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. Otago’s Penguin Place and The Hokonui Rūnanga Catlins Biodiversity Project will receive combined ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Resilient economy reflected in Crown accounts
    The Government’s financial accounts continue to reflect a resilient economy that has performed better than expected and puts the country in a strong position to respond to Omicron, Grant Robertson said. The Crown Accounts for the five months to the end of November were more favourable than forecast in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government announces three phase public health response to Omicron
    Reducing isolation period for cases and close contacts at Phase Two and Three to 10 and seven days Definition of close contact required to isolate changes to household or household like contacts at Phase Three Increased use of rapid antigen tests with test to return policy put in place for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Ambassador to Thailand announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Jonathan Kings as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to Thailand. “Aotearoa New Zealand has a long-standing relationship with Thailand, celebrating the 65th anniversary of diplomatic representation between our countries in 2021. We also share much in common at regional and multilateral levels ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government’s Family Package continues to deliver for New Zealanders
    The Families Package helped around 330,000 families in its first year - more than half of all families with children in NZ These families received an estimated $55 per week more from Families Package payments in 2018/19 than in 2017/18, on average Families Package increases to the maximum possible Accommodation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand retains top spot in global anti-corruption rankings
    Justice Minister Kris Faafoi has welcomed news of New Zealand’s ongoing position as top in the world anti-corruption rankings. The 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index released by global anti-corruption organisation, Transparency International, ranks New Zealand first equal with Denmark and Finland, with a score of 88 out of 100. “This is an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Testing improvements see New Zealand well prepared for Omicron
    New Zealand’s PCR testing capacity can be increased by nearly 20,000 tests per day to deal with a surge in cases as part of our wider COVID-19 testing strategy, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall said. “We have continued to adapt our public health response to safeguard the health ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • 5,000 portable air cleaners for schools on their way
    As schools are preparing to return, Education Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 5,000 air cleaners have been ordered for New Zealand schools. “As we know, along with vaccination, testing, good hygiene and physical distancing, good ventilation is important in minimising the risk of airborne transmission of the virus that causes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand to move to Red from 11.59pm today
    All of New Zealand will move to the Red setting of the Covid Protection Framework (CPF) at 11:59pm today as Omicron is potentially now transmitting in the community, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says. “Nine COVID-19 cases reported yesterday in the Nelson/Marlborough region are now confirmed as Omicron, and a further ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Mandatory boosters for key workforces progressing well
    More than 5,785 (82%) border workers eligible for a booster vaccination at 6 months have received it so far, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. “That’s a really strong uptake considering we announced the requirement the week before Christmas, but we need to continue this momentum,” Chris Hipkins said. “We ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ to move to Red
    Nine COVID-19 cases reported yesterday in the Nelson/Marlborough region have now been confirmed as the Omicron variant, and a further case from the same household was confirmed late yesterday. These cases are in a single family that flew to Auckland on 13 January to attend a wedding and other events ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand to provide further help for Tonga
    Aotearoa New Zealand is giving an additional $2 million in humanitarian funding for Tonga as the country recovers from a volcanic eruption and tsunami last weekend, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. This brings Aotearoa New Zealand’s contribution to $3 million. “This support will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Quarterly benefit numbers show highest number of exits into work
    The Government’s strong focus on supporting more people into work is reflected in benefit figures released today which show a year-on-year fall of around 21,300 people receiving a main benefit in the December 2021 quarter, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni said. “Our response to COVID has helped ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Northland to move to Orange, NZ prepared for Omicron 
    Northland to move to Orange Rest of New Zealand stays at Orange in preparedness for Omicron All of New Zealand to move into Red in the event of Omicron community outbreak – no use of lockdowns Govt planning well advanced – new case management, close contact definition and testing rules ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • RNZAF C-130 Hercules flight departs for Tonga as Navy vessels draw nearer to Tongatapu
    A Royal New Zealand Air Force C-130 Hercules has departed Base Auckland Whenuapai for Tonga carrying aid supplies, as the New Zealand aid effort ramps up, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “The aircraft is carrying humanitarian aid and disaster relief supplies, including water ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand prepared to send support to Tonga
    New Zealand is ready to assist Tonga in its recovery from Saturday night’s undersea eruption and tsunami, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “Following the successful surveillance and reconnaissance flight of a New Zealand P-3K2 Orion on Monday, imagery and details have been sent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Aotearoa New Zealand stands ready to assist people of Tonga
    The thoughts of New Zealanders are with the people of Tonga following yesterday’s undersea volcanic eruption and subsequent tsunami waves, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta says. “Damage assessments are under way and New Zealand has formally offered to provide assistance to Tonga,” said Nanaia Mahuta. New Zealand has made an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Record high of new homes consented continues
    In the year ended November 2021, 48,522 new homes were consented, up 26 per cent from the November 2020 year. In November 2021, 4,688 new dwellings were consented. Auckland’s new homes consented numbers rose 25 per cent in the last year. Annual figures for the last nine months show more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Report trumpets scope for ice cream exports
    Latest research into our premium ice cream industry suggests exporters could find new buyers in valuable overseas markets as consumers increasingly look for tip top quality in food. Economic Development Minister Stuart Nash has released a new report for the Food and Beverage Information Project. The project is run by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Honouring the legacy of legendary kaumātua Muriwai Ihakara
    Associate Minister for Arts, Culture, and Heritage Kiri Allan expressed her great sadness and deepest condolences at the passing of esteemed kaumātua, Muriwai Ihakara. “Muriwai’s passing is not only a loss for the wider creative sector but for all of Aotearoa New Zealand. The country has lost a much beloved ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Have your say on proposed changes to make drinking water safer
    Associate Minister for the Environment Kiri Allan is urging all New Zealanders to give feedback on proposed changes aimed at making drinking water safer. “The current regulations are not fit for purpose and don’t offer enough protection, particularly for those whose water comes from smaller supplies,” Kiri Allan said. “This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Planting the seeds for rewarding careers
    A boost in funding for a number of Jobs for Nature initiatives across Canterbury will provide sustainable employment opportunities for more than 70 people, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “The six projects are diverse, ranging from establishing coastline trapping in Kaikōura, to setting up a native plant nursery, restoration planting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago