S92A: Opportunists jumping on bandwagons

Written By: - Date published: 2:00 pm, March 16th, 2009 - 78 comments
Categories: activism - Tags: , , , , , ,

Internet Blackout

Internet Blackout

It is always interesting watching people and organizations jumping on bandwagons of popular movements. In the case of the section 92A of the new Copyright Act, there was a genuine movement by the denizens of the local net and artist communities that we participated in.

Over the weekend Disk Smith Electronics did exactly that by having a sale promoted as a blackout. Of course they didn’t bother to acknowledge the original, and I’m now expecting to see other retailers follow suit. In the same vein Rodney Hide of ACT did the same thing at the ACT party conference. This is in his usual populist vein that has transformed the ACT party from one of principle to one that is more distinguished by its clowning.

For instance Hide’s clowning around with electoral law by wearing a jacket with an ACT logo and having one of his minions complain about it. That eventually wound up in the hands of the police after the electoral commission found that his supporters claim that he’d breached electoral law.

Copycat

Copycat

The reason that Hide probably opportunistically added a call to dump S92A to his conference speech was that the work towards a code of conduct has been stalled. TelstraClear announced a few days before Hide that they were pulling out of the Telecommunications Carriers’ Forum (TCF) attempt to get a workable code of conduct.

The reason for the TelstraClear decision was

It is not our role to make bad legislation work,” he says. “The industry had no input into section 92A. [The draft code] is bad for our customers. Customers and businesses have spoken via blogs and petitions and also directly to us. We have listened and we have agreed.

hide-in-yellow-jacket

Publicity seeker

I think that is unlikely. It is more likely that the blackout and the publicity surrounding it provided a convenient excuse to avoid talking about the costs of running an effective code of conduct system. It is in everyones best interests to establish a faster and cheaper system for maintaining a workable copyright regime in NZ that does not depend on the technical illiterates of courts and parliament to control. Because of the nature of the programming communities and the internet, decisions have to be made by informed people in short periods of time in a summary justice system. These can subsequently be checked on appeal to the courts if required. The question with S92A is who does that summary justice and who pays for it.

RIANZ appears to have been the primary culprit in causing the TCF’s initiatives to fail by short-sighted adherence to the narrow and immediate interests of their members. They appear to have been moderating their position recently. So TelstraClear appear to have decided to attempt to derail the process instead. This was promptly hailed by both InternetNZ and Creative Freedom NZ as the death of s92a. However neither had any suggestion about what would be a suitable process for handling the real problem of the ineffectual control of copyright violations. Matthew Holloway unhelpfully said

The Creative Freedom Foundation wants a reasonable balance between the rights of artists and everyone else. That is why we urge the Government to repeal the law altogether.

Duh! How exactly? At present it looks like he is intent on destroying something without having any useful ideas about what to put in its place, and I cannot find much on their site about alternatives. That is also grandstanding – just like Rodney Hide. While InternetNZ piously wants to continue with developing a code of conduct. They appear to not realize that without the force of legislation behind it, it is a meaningless gesture.

It has been clear for some time that what would be required is an independent adjudication process backed by legislation. The network users don’t trust the ‘rights’ holders to not do false accusations or even what is possible on the network. We also don’t trust the ISP’s to know what a copyright looks like – it would require a lot for a netmonkey who has the power of supply to to suddenly become proficient in copyright law.

It is properly the role of the government to act between the diverse interests of groups in society. Hopefully Simon Power will recognize the spoiler efforts by narrow sectional interests later this month. At present his stance is

Ms Curran raised the issue in Parliament on Thursday but Mr Power said he was not going to pre-judge the negotiations and would wait for the deadline.

In the meantime the TCF should continue their efforts to get a workable code of conduct. This is a unique opportunity to get a workable regime for copyright and the net in NZ. In the end what is required is a balance between the workability of the net and finding a workable solution to the types of piracy that destroyed the sales of Siones Wedding. The current system acts as a brake on investment in creativity in NZ.

Kudo’s goes to the TCF and to Clare Curran for continuing efforts to get this process to work. Brickbats to RIANZ, TelstraClear, InternetNZ, and Creative Freedom NZ as being good at destroying the process and bloody useless at suggesstions to build a good working copyright regime. Then of course there are the grandstanders wanting to jump on the bandwagon – they are clowns.

78 comments on “S92A: Opportunists jumping on bandwagons ”

  1. Andrew 1

    I think it’s a bit of a stretch to say Dick Smith copied that particular campaign. The idea of a ‘blackout’ is hardly new. You wouldn’t say the S92A protest stole the idea from the Rugby Union after they ran city-wide ‘Blackouts’ around All Black tests.

    I realise you’re trying to say that ‘all’ these people are ironically copying it in an attempt to criticise Rodney Hide. But why not just criticise Rodney (and Telstra) for grandstanding on the issue after the fact?

    • lprent 1.1

      It is my opinion, especially after getting their promo in the mail. Never saw the rugby campaign.

      I think I managed to have a go at almost everyone in this post apart from those who appear to actually be doing something constructive. It isn’t something I’ve noticed Rodney ever doing. However that wasn’t the focus of the post.

      What was were the appalling lack of interest by sectional interests to get something that would work in preventing something like the Sione’s Wedding pirating. I don’t think highly of the s92a. However I don’t see anything else that is a realistic attempt to fix the problem either.

      • Con 1.1.1

        I think I managed to have a go at almost everyone in this post apart from those who appear to actually be doing something constructive.

        Not particularly fair criticism IMHO. Actually the Creative Freedom Foundation do have constructive suggestions (expanding the scope of “Fair Dealing”) but it seems unless they support reform which increases restriction (i.e. reform in the other direction), their suggestions don’t appear “constructive” in your eyes.

        For the record, what kind of legal reform would actually prevent the pirating of Sione’s Wedding, in your opinion?

        • lprent 1.1.1.1

          Making it easy to suspend or shutdown accounts that are transferring it. Making it easy to block overseas IP’s that are transfering it into NZ.

          But only doing it after independently establishing that there is a breach of copyright in progress (which is what is lacking at present).

          The trick with that is for someone to be able to establish a claim in a reasonable timeframe, ie hours. It is pointless trying to do something that requires days or months (ie courts) because the transfers would have been done by then.

          The reason why it would work is because there is a limited market for the film, ie largely within NZ, so the usual problems are not an issue.

          Now tell me what solutions you have?

          DRM basically sucks and does nasty things to my machine whenever it is used. Because of the source (post-production) for SW wouldn’t have worked anyway

          • Con 1.1.1.1.1

            Making it easy to suspend or shutdown accounts that are transferring it. Making it easy to block overseas IP’s that are transfering it into NZ.

            But only doing it after independently establishing that there is a breach of copyright in progress (which is what is lacking at present).

            The trick with that is for someone to be able to establish a claim in a reasonable timeframe, ie hours. It is pointless trying to do something that requires days or months (ie courts) because the transfers would have been done by then.

            Frankly I don’t believe this is correct at all.

            Let’s say I start downloading a torrent of Sione’s Wedding. You are the © holder and you have a few hours to stop me. You could discover the torrent yourself using a torrent search engine, and you could join it and get access to the IP numbers of the peers involved. You would then match my IP number against the netblock of my (NZ) ISP.

            Now you need someone else to “independently” verify this. I imagine some govt agency could run a torrent spying service that would do this. You could just add the torrent through a web-interface and it could track me down too, then they could notify the ISP and require them to cut me off.

            You also have to prove to the independent agency that the torrent actually contains your movie, and that you are the © holder, and that the allegedly pirated file is not actually in some way “fair dealing” (e.g. some kind of parody or maybe a review containing extracts from the movie. Or I may have some special © exemption such as apply to the Foundation of the Blind, or …).

            You also have to deal with the issue that I myself may be an ISP. I may not be responsible personally. I may be a school or the corporate body of an apartment building. I may be an internet cafe, or a newbie with an open WiFi connection. You may have to notify me and ask me to cut off my downstream user. My downstream user may also be an ISP…

            Even if you can do all this, you may have cut me off without due cause. I may not have known the movie I downloaded was © at all. I may have been entirely innocent.

            Finally, would such a system actually solve the problem? No, because you would have to find all the torrents … you would have to actively troll all the world’s darknets and file-sharing havens. You would have to (illegally!) download and decrypt a whole lot of encrypted files (almost none of which would contain your © material), just in case they did contain your © material. In the process, you’d leave yourself open to being cut off by the people whose © you were infringing.

            In short, I think it’s a fool’s errand. The task is simply hopeless. There is no technically viable “final solution”. And any legal reform which purports to “solve” the problem is pissing in the wind.

            I know a lot of people throw up their hands at this and say “there must be a solution”. My response is: “why must there?”

            People say “if piracy can’t be defeated by technical means, then how will © holders monetize the fruits of their labour?”. Well, that’s a good question, but it’s not a reason why there “must be” a technical solution. From the point of view of the © holders it’s a reason why a technical solution is desirable, but if wishes were horses …

  2. Tim Ellis 2

    Interesting post LP. Don’t you think it’s fair to say that everyone in the Labour Party who started protesting about the legislation after the election (such as Clare Curran) but who remained uncannily silent when Judith Tizard was the Minister, are guilty of the same offence?

    I don’t think I saw anything from Jordan Carter until much after the election about his vehement opposition to the Bill, but I might be mistaken.

    • lprent 2.1

      Same problem with me. Unfortunately this act was passed in the dying days of the last parliament, when everyone who is interested in politics was focused on the election. The usual post-election ennui + the xmas break were sufficient to allow the lack of an agreed code of conduct to slip through towards the implementation date.

      For that matter I could easily dig back and show your lack of interest until long after the election.

      That all said. The issue that s92a was trying to address remains. The really daft thing is that I still cannot think of a better solution than legislation allowing enforcement of a code of conduct. The courts are simply too slow as a avenue.

      For once I think that the NACT government actually did something reasonable in delaying it.

      • Tim Ellis 2.1.1

        I don’t actually have strong views on the legislation LP. I’m just saying that you can hardly go about complaining that Rodney Hide and others are jumping on the bandwagon while so too is the Labour Party.

        • lprent 2.1.1.1

          Clare Curran is the only really visible one in Labour – she has been working to try and figure out a solution. She is also prepared for this round to fail, and so is preparing the groundwork for looking for a solution afterwards.

          Wodney has no solutions and has done no work – in short he is grandstanding. When I see him do some work on this, I’ll happily tell the world.

  3. Con 3

    In the end what is required is a balance between the workability of the net and finding a workable solution to the types of piracy that destroyed the sales of Siones Wedding.

    I thought the problem with Sione’s Wedding was DVD piracy – were they also hit by internet-based piracy?

    • lprent 3.1

      Both from what I understand.

      • Joseph 3.1.1

        Just speculating here, but overall it just seems like bad idea to make Siones Wedding as a profit venture for a studio.

        Small group of appeal, specifically Pacific Islanders, moreso, this group seems to be concentrated in Auckland and where DVD pirating is actively known to be going on.

        I like how Siones Wedding is one of the only examples provided in New Zealand as an argument for copyright legislation.

        • Felix 3.1.1.1

          Small group of appeal, specifically Pacific Islanders

          I wouldn’t have thought so. Why do you say that?

          • Matthew Holloway 3.1.1.1.1

            I remember reading from the movie makers that they they considered Pacific Islanders to be a major group of people who would be interested and therefore that the illegal selling of copies within those communities did a disproportionate harm.

            I suppose that a “small group of appeal” might be overstating it a bit but I remember them saying that it was a major group of interest, or something like that.

            I think the movie had mainstream appeal too 🙂

  4. Schwule 4

    test

  5. You wouldn’t haven’t known this, but it is unfair to paint Rodney as having just started to engage on this issue.

    I spoke to him about this issue around a month ago – prior to the high profile blackout. Rodney told me that he though the law was daft, it should go, and he was putting a paper up to Cabinet in his role as Regulatory Responsibility Minister advocating it fails good regulatory tests, and should go.

    Now again this was *before* the blackout campaign.

    I was surprised that Rodney never publicised his opposition until last weekend, but I presume he was trying to persuade his Ministerial colleagues, and they tend to react better if you are lobbying them quietly, rather than via the media.

    So on this issue Rodney has been actually working away behind the scenes, more focused on getting a good result than gaining publicity for himself. Hence I think your post is very unfair.

    But I realise you would have been unaware of this, as Rodney had not publicised his previous efforts.

    I won’t get into the wider issues you raise, but as someone who has followed the TCF code in great detail, you show a lack of understanding of what it will do if you think in any way it would affect what happened to Sione’s Wedding. Action under the code takes at least three to four months – not a few hours.

    • lprent 5.1

      With Rodney, in public it was the first I’d ever heard from him on the subject (and I couldn’t find anything on google either). By the sound of it including what you have said, he knows what he is against, but has no idea what he is for. So the remainder of my comments stand.

      I gathered that the TCF proposals were a bit lackadaisical. However I was under the impression (?illusion) that there was a procedure for known issues and codecs. For instance mp3’s, avi’s, mpeg, etc.
      http://www.tcf.org.nz/news/a6a902ba-3214-4b5f-85e4-c6678f9ca31c.html

      The Draft Code includes a pre-approval regime whereby Copyright Holders can have their evidence collection methodologies assessed. If their methodology is confirmed as meeting a standard that would be acceptable to a court, then they will become a Pre-Approved Copyright Holder, and their notices will be processed preferentially. Pre-Approved Copyright Holders will be required to abide by a code of practice and their status will be reviewed if their privileges are abused.

      The Draft Code includes reserve provisions that enable an ISP to move directly to issue a Final Warning if it is apparent (to the required standard of evidence) that a User is engaged in significant copyright breaches or is abusing the Counter-Notice procedure.

      Besides a code of conduct is not something set in stone. It is something that should get revised regularly to cope with changes in the technology..

      My major beefs with the S92A is that the timescale for setting up the code of conduct was grossly inadequate, similarly there was no funding procedure for an adjudicator position and nothing in the act to support that sort of a police force. The idea that ISP’s were capable of the type of judgments required was ludicrous, as was the idea that the content providers should exercise the judgment. I’ve been using the example of a request from the National party in 2007 not to use an image of John Key on this site for copyright reasons to show how fraught the decision making will be.

      In any case what we are looking at is the difference between having something in place, and having nothing in place.

      I’m afraid that I have zero faith in NACT being capable of putting anything in place of any value. In my opinion it would require an outlay of finance to police it as well as the legal framework to make its decisions acceptable to the courts. We have the latter at present, but not the former.

      From their philosophical base, National would tend to look for a industry body. The problem here is what industry? Well there are many industries that get involved in this decision. TCF is just one part of the IT/network. As are the rights holders – but those are fragmented as well. The procedures for text copyright would probably be entirely different again. In any case this would require a legal base so that the courts took cognizance of their decisions – because every decision is somewhat arbitrary.

      So my question stands – if not s92a and a usable code of conduct, then what?

      At present I see nothing much around in public (which is where I look) answering that question. Care to proffer your ideas?

  6. Well I think 92A starts with the wrong premise – that the appropriate response to copyright infringement should be an ISP forced to terminate an Internet account. This has been rejected by Germany, Canada, the UK etc etc as inappropriate.

    What is needed is a notice and notice regime for complaints about hosting or downloading copyright infringing material. In 90% of the cases the notice and notice regime would work. In the small minority of cases where there is a dispute, some tribunal needs to rule on the dispute. If a user was found to have been breaking the law, then current AUPs of ISPs would give them the authority to disconnect the customer if they so desired.

  7. peteremcc 7

    What dpf said, plus Heather Roy has spoke about it (and put out a press release) weeks ago.

  8. Feel free to ask me for comment if you’d like

    “How exactly? At present it looks like he is intent on destroying something without having any useful ideas about what to put in its place, and I cannot find much on their site about alternatives.”

    Nonsense.

    Your story was posted on March 16th. Since late December (weeks after we launched) we’ve been advocating an independent adjudicator, a Copyright Tribunal, to resolve disputes. We discussed this to Clare Curran days before her initial announcement. This is not to say that we influenced her opinion but it does point out that we’ve been working on positive alternatives. In early January we posted several stories about it and in late January we opened the idea up for discussion on our forum in the ‘Possible Goals’ subforum.

    On January 30th we published a letter to Hon Stephen Joyce and Hon Chris Finlayson (who were speaking in the media about this) in which we suggested positive alternatives such as an independent adjudicator and a notice-and-notice model. QUOTE: “The issue that some artists and large industry groups feel that the courts are beyond them (or “impractical and ridiculous” in the words of RIANZ) is obviously a problem for justice in New Zealand. A notice-and-notice model (where the ISP passes on letters by copyright holders) allows artists to fine those who might be breaking the law and yet retains the onus on accusers to make their case, and – if courts aren’t adequate – then what has often be suggested is a specialised copyright court, perhaps as an extension of the Copyright Tribunal.”

    You didn’t ask me for comment and I don’t think you researched your statements.

    Yesterday we launched the What About Us video series where artists talk about Section 92A and Section 92C

    http://creativefreedom.org.nz/whataboutus.html

    You will notice that halfway down that page there are some fairly detailed positive suggestions on alternatives. We put a summary of these 3 points in our press release and this was written before I saw your story.

    Look, we really need good copyright law and we’re working hard on this. We don’t get paid for this — my wife and I are working in our spare time trying to represent artists. Please don’t describe us in the way you have. We’re not malicious — we’re trying to fix this thing.

    If you have any future stories or if want to talk this over you can reach me on 021 02963595. There’s no bad feelings about your story (it’s clearly wrong but there’s no point quibbling over that) and if you do want to talk this stuff over I’m available.

    Thanks,

    • Also, you should know that we’ve been working with lawyers on translating those 3 points into legalese in order to try and reach cross-party agreement.

      • And another thing (!),

        Although the CFF as an organisation are new I’ve talked to Judith Tizard several times about this over several years. As you’re naming me I’d like to make it clear that I in particular did not arrive recently to this debate.

    • Further,

      Half of our TCF submission was about urging the TCF to talk to the government 3 changes immediately needed in the law, Section 92A. The other half was about positive suggestions to the Code itself.

  9. Juha 9

    Lynn, we already have laws to deal with copyright issues. The Law Society, MED, reams of public submissions, you name it, have all pointed this out and said we don’t need another one, especially a law that allows a third party to interfere with a contract between an ISP and a customer, without due process (yes, going to court).

    S92A was removed by the Select Committee for this reason, but reinserted by Tizard with a SOP.

    Often, copyright cases aren’t clear-cut “I have the rights” ones either. Judge Harvey says that around a third are thrown out after the rights holder has failed to prove that s/he/it is the copyright holder.

    However, I’m pretty sure that you’re violating DSE’s intellectual property rights and trademark by republishing their logo, presumably without asking them for permission. Would you like them to issue a S92C notice to you for this? Or are you just going to take it down now?

    I really didn’t think you of all people would support a bad law that can be easily abused.

  10. “Same problem with me. Unfortunately this act was passed in the dying days of the last parliament, when everyone who is interested in politics was focused on the election.”

    Right. But many other people involved in opposing Labour’s changes to the Copyright Act have been doing so for several years. More often than not these folks are putting a lot of personal effort and time into participating in what were supposed to be the democratic process. And Labour were well aware of all these issues well before the election.

    For example:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY_ExvX6OPU

    You seem to have taken a leaf out of Judith Tizard’s book and decided to insult all those who you disagree with or with whom you are not politically aligned.

    When I previously commented on this site about the issue I suggested that you did not make it a party political issue. The issue isn’t one that fits into a neat political definitions.

  11. Lynn – I think this post is deeply wrong-headed and I am surprised and disappointed at the argument that you make.

    A number of points. We convened workshops in Auckland and Wellington in 2006 as part of the consultations the government was then making on copyright: they were attended by ISPs, rights holders, lawyers, the public, academics – lots of interests. The aim was to help get more informed discussion about the issue and guide the law into a sensible path.

    The Copyright Amendment Act was passed in April 2008. We thought we had done our job at InternetNZ: we made strong submissions to the effect that the idea of disconnecting someone was bad law, a disproportionate remedy, would not serve the incentive effects its proponents claimed, and needed to go. The Select Ctte pulled it, and the Government only pushed it back in by SOP at the last minute.

    In so doing they put in a poorly worded clause that left lots of ambiguity, and that critically failed to connect this obligation on ISPs to terminate users accounts to the safe harbour protections from liability when they did so.

    Ever since then we have been consistent: section 92A is bad law and needs to be repealed. It is simply not true to state that InternetNZ is some kind of johnny-come-lately on this issue, as demonstrated by the above.

    We have continued to participate in the TCF working party to draw up a code precisely because we were worried this bad law would be brought into force, and some kind of code of practice might provide a policy that the courts could find “reasonable”. That’s not pious, it’s pragmatic and sensible, given our aim to try and keep the Internet open and uncaptureable.

    Now, we have a situation where for reasons known to TelstraClear and explained by them, they won’t allow the TCF to administer a code. Some kind of code might be cobbled together but it won’t have an institutional home, and cannot work as it was intended.

    The onus then goes back on the Government, who are responsible for the law, to work with the community through whatever process it chooses to pass more workable law. Or, to leave it, broken as it is, and see what happens. That is their choice.

    What is NOT reasonable is to ask us and others who care deeply about this issue to suddenly whip out some alternative proposal. Copyright law is a delicate balancing of rights and responsibilities. It cannot and should not be written by one side of the debate, and we would argue that nor can it be used to protect old business models whose days have passed.

    What we’re clear about is that 92A is an affront: it is the wrong remedy and it can’t be implemented in a reasonable way.

    InternetNZ and no doubt the others would be prepared to sit down to have a proper conversation about what kinds of business models can work in an environment where the Internet allows perfect, free, instant digital replication of creative content. That is the heart of progress on this issue.

    Making ISPs unpaid police, within a confused legal tack-on that seeks to take people’s Internet off them – that’s just not good enough.

    And finally, Tim. One of the strange things about being both a political activist and a professional is that you have to find a balance. It was clear that as a Labour Party candidate I was not in a position to speak out about a law I regard as absurd. I had many chances to raise my point of view out of the public eye, and I did.

    I’m very comfortable with InternetNZ’s position on this issue and I support it whole-heartedly. Labour’s position is changing and that is good, and I am pleased to see Clare Curran is holding a round table on these very issues next week to try and learn more.

    • Tim Ellis 11.1

      My apologies to you Jordan I overlooked your professional relationship with InternetNZ.

      Now that Section 92A is no longer Labour Party policy, what are your feelings about Judith Tizard continuing to argue in favour of what you’ve described as “an affront”?

  12. Wearing my Labour member hat: I’m very happy to have a robust debate with anyone about anything.

    • Tim Ellis 12.1

      Well evidently you’re not, Jordan, otherwise you would have taken a stand before the election.

  13. Juha 13

    And dammit, to echo Jordan, I’ve been banging on about the copyright nonsense for years now, Lynn. Your post was wrong right from the start, in other words.

  14. Vik Olliver 14

    Is this a good point to mention that the TCF represents less than 1% of ISPs as defined in the act? Or that a tiny minority of rights holders are talking with a tiny fraction of the ISPs to discuss a matter that affects all rights holders, all ISPs, establishes a process of guilt by accusation, has the media companies wanting to be judge and jury, establishes a disproportionate punishment, and does not represent the users? I thought so.

    Vik :v)

  15. lprent 15

    For the s92a issue. Let me say that I’m the late comer to this specific debate. Of course I have been pointing out for a decade or so exactly what the problems are going to be with digital technology and copyright to various politicians. Also how ineffective most recourse’s and law changes are likely to be.

    My actual issue with all this is that it took over 2 years to get the current copyright bill in place and a damn site longer with people saying that it was useless. The likelihood is that it will take another decade before anything else gets introduced (if we’re lucky). That means that the existing problem remains the same. There is no effective protection for clear cut cases of copyright violation where a persistent offender ignores complaints.

    There is a problem with the current solution of enforcing the current copyright regime for persistent offenders. The problem is called the courts.

    By the time that they hear a civil case, typically two years have gone by (as I can testify). Even a contested criminal case will probably take at least a year in my experience (all those cases that the police have lost to Rochelle).

    By that time… The technology has changed. The net has changed. The machines have changed. Probably the offender is offshore. The result of the case is a forlorn look at the past. The money has been made or lost already. It is pointless for everyone apart from the lawyers and their bank accounts (as I can also testify).

    Injunctions are expensive (ask DPF) and take time as well. If you had to get an injunction against every individual that pirates a MP3 or video, then you have effectively lost any profit margin.

    Notice-notice is effectively what we have now. Over the years there have been a number of times that the ISPs or domain people have contacted me about something or another for one site or another. Sometimes people contact without going through the ISP’s. If I simply ignored it then the complainant would have to cough up for an expensive injunction. It is good for most people, but it really just provides a opportunity for anyone willing to ignore them.

    That provides a real disincentive for people (like my partner) who make thievable content. There is no profit in what she does (documentaries) as it is. Widespread pirating would ensure that there are only costs. That means in the long run that the only way to make money out of the content she is involved with is to ensure that digital versions are never released. It is a pity that everything is digital – only requires one person…. Nett long-term effect – content will not get produced if it costs anything, like going where climate change is happening. So there will be no documentaries that are not simply navel gazing.

    Now the point is that we can probably all recognize blantant copyright violations. There are other cases where the copyright is more ambiguous (like the DSE logo above). It actually doesn’t take much (if there is a big fast stick) to decide if there is a prima facie case. This is the role that the police take in our criminal system.

    As has been pointed out by Juha, we actually have enough laws on copyright. What we don’t have is an effective enforcement because the courts are useless after the fact with the current digital tech.

    What is required is some kind of ‘police’ to establish a prima facie case and take preventative action. They can (like the police) hear the views from both parties and make a decision in close to real time and take the appropriate action. That would have deterrent effect. Otherwise why bother with having any copyright law at all? It is completely ineffective because there is no real deterrent.

    The real question is where do we get the ‘police’ from and how do you make room for their powers inside the law – that was the rationale behind s92a from what I could see. But the ISP’s are not the right place to put a ‘police’ force in (and the police have enough issues with handling technology as it is). I’d actually describe them as pretty useless from what I’ve seen. This leaves the various organisations that have legal powers – things like the SPCA as a model.

    This post was basically a bit of a stir to say: “Now that the s92a is effectively dead, that is still not where the issue ends. Where do we go to from here?”. What I see is a lot of people concentrating on killing s92a (especially the actions of RIANZ). What I don’t see is any plan for putting something better in place that is likely to be effective. What I see is a lot of suggestions that are likely to be ineffective because they have nothing in them that is likely to operate as a deterrent.

    Juha: The DSE graphic here is a case in point about the vagaries of copyright law. This was embedded in an e-mail that DSE sent to me. There was no copyright notice that I saw. It’d be pretty easy to argue that they gave me a gift and I shared that. That was specifically the reason that I put it into the post to illustrate the point.

    • Rick Shera 15.1

      Even the rightsholders admit that notice and notice will work in 70-90% of the cases and it is the strategy that has just been recommended in the UK. We also all know that hardcore infringers are not going to be caught out by any termination policy and will only respond to potential criminal or civil court action. Marry up those two facts and the benefits that internet connectivity brings and notice and notice starts to sound like a viable alternative. I’m sure if you asked any policy maker whether a policy which worked in 70-90% of the cases was worth it and where there were existing laws to catch the rest, you’d get a nod.

    • “Injunctions are expensive (ask DPF) and take time as well. If you had to get an injunction against every individual that pirates a MP3 or video, then you have effectively lost any profit margin.”

      The S92A TCF policy won’t prevent this (it takes months) and S92A is not dead (unless you know something I don’t).

      If you’re going to talk about me or the CFF in the future please feel free to contact me. You now have my details.

      Regards,

  16. The Sione’s Wedding example used as justification in this context is only a marginal step better than the widely reported FUD being put about with the video store petition. In fact, the very article that you linked to makes it clear that infringement of Sione’s Wedding was NOT an internet issue.

    “South Pacific Pictures managing director John Barnett backs anti-piracy moves – he lost out dearly from pirated copies of the movie Sione’s Wedding – though not on the internet.”

    Funny though, for good reason, in an offline World, we don’t expect Otara Market (where DVD copies of Sione’s Wedding were sold) to police and shut down alleged copyright infringers. It seems that this new fangled internet thingy is so dangerous that we must have different rules than those which seem logical and fair in an offline World.

    One other point – the TCF code is effectively an arrangement which will suit telco ISPs (not the vast number of ISPs under the definition in the Act) and 2 or 3 rights holder representative organisations. It is very useful for that purpose but it will do nothing for everyone else and is completely misrepresented as a cure for the ills of s92A (or in fact the rest of s92, which is equally as bad). DPF, CFF, Jordan Carter and others of us who have been at this for a (very) long time, have already offered solutions and it is time that those were looked at seriously, without the s92A sword of Damocles tainting any debate.

  17. lprent 17

    The point about the TCF proposal is that it had a prima facie case built in. That just required a body to make a judgment on the basis of the results of a notice. But it required the equivalent of a police force. The ISP’s aren’t the right body – I wouldn’t trust them to agree on a standard behaviour, they are too competitive.

    What was required was a paid body that could make judgment decisions (ie the police) in real time and take the appropriate action. Waiting for a decision in a ‘court’ (including the ‘copyright court’ or the TCF procedure) was too ineffective in that it provided no deterrent effect.

    As poor as S92A was, it provided room for that. The opportunity was not taken up, in my opinion, because people didn’t want to talk about paying for it.

    I suspect that nothing much will happen now for at least 5 years

    • Rick Shera 17.1

      @ lprent – you said “What was required was a paid body that could make judgment decisions (ie the police) in real time and take the appropriate action. Waiting for a decision in a ‘court’ (including the ‘copyright court’ or the TCF procedure) was too ineffective in that it provided no deterrent effect.

      As poor as S92A was, it provided room for that. The opportunity was not taken up, in my opinion, because people didn’t want to talk about paying for it.”

      Sorry, but that is also unacceptable to film and TV rightsholders, who are suing iiNet in he Australian Federal Court for doing just that (iiNet’s policy was simply to refer allegations to the police). It certainly was not what Judith Tizard had in mind when she re-introduced s92A at the behest of the related New Zealand rightsholders either. And, it is hard to see the logic behind introducing a law which is aimed at forcing ISPs to receive allegations and then send them to the police when rightsholders can already do that themselves and seem perfectly capable of taking action against flagrant infringers if they so wish (e.g., the Auckland internet cafe owner).

      Conversely, if you have ever tried to get the police involved in a civil copyright infringement issue you will know that that is no easy task since, understandably, they feel that they have more serious matters to focus their scarce resources on.

      Finally, you seem prepared to accept that all copyright cases are susceptible to “real time” adjudication. As Juha and others have pointed out above, that is simply not correct. For example, we have no lesser authority than Judge David Harvey in his TCF submission pointing out that some 30% of copyright actions fail through lack of proof of the basic elements of the infringement and that does not even cover fair dealing defences etc. I am surprised that you and others seem so willing to run roughshod over the presumption of innocence.

      • lprent 17.1.1

        I didn’t say the ‘police’. If you read my comments then you’d have seen that I have very low expectations of them. As I do of the ISP’s.

        What I said was we should have a police style of body that is capable of making judgments as to if there was a prima facie case, and then take the immediate appropriate action. There was room in S92A for that. It can then be argued out in whatever the appropriate forum is.

        If you you had read my comments, you’d have seen that I’m aware of the disputed copyright problem – look at my comments on the DSE logo. However this is normal for a police body to handle as well. They are expected to collect evidence and decide what action should be taken. One of those actions is to pass the decision to the appropriate ‘court’.

        I’d point out that we don’t expect our police to be lawyers or to even know the law well. They have to know what happens in the majority of the types of cases that they handle. The same applies around the net.

  18. Brenda 18

    You said:

    At present it looks like [Matt of Creative Freedom] is intent on destroying something without having any useful ideas about what to put in its place, and I cannot find much on their site about alternatives.

    This simply isn’t true.

    The Creative Freedom Foundation were one of the first to publicly adovocate for an easily accessible adjudicator specialising in copyright infringement.

    CFF submited (and encouraged their members to make submission) to the Law Commission, asking for the juristiction of the existing Copyright Tribunal to be expanded beyond licensing disputes.

    • Brenda, good point. We also provided analysis a forum on the TCF submission, and encouraged people to contribute feedback. We asked people to contact Simon Power to express their concern about this law. We have been doing a lot to help fix this mess.

      This is a more nuanced effort than you would hear here however at The Standard.

      Really Lynn, you should modify your story or stand behind it.

      • lprent 18.1.1

        Nope, I think that there was an opportunity squandered. I do not think that it will be feasible to have a similar opportunity for at least 5 years and probably closer to a decade.

        People focused too much on the deficiencies of S92A and insufficiently on its potential to define a framework. The biggest single problem with S92A was the teeny small timeframe to come up with a framework with such a diverse group.

        • Matthew Holloway 18.1.1.1

          Lynn “nope” isn’t good enough. Your statements about me and the CFF are factually wrong.

          Contact Clare Curran herself if you want to hear how we’ve been recommending due process, or I’ve given you at least a dozen of examples that can be verified online that refute what you say. If you actually believe what you’re writing then again please feel free to contact me on 021 02963595 to discuss any of the examples of positive suggestions and replacement models that I and others have posted in this thread.

          Your final desperate defence of your article that some mythical “people” are insufficiently focusing on replacements is a cop-out.

          We’ve been working very hard on this. You owe me and the CFF an apology.

    • lprent 18.2

      Brenda, that may be the case about the adjudicator. However I’m arguing that is not going to be sufficient.

      What the process needs to be viable is some kind of ‘police’ who can take evidence and make immediate decisions about a prima facia case and take immediate appropiate action.

      That costs (as does the adjudicator). So when I look at the discussions I look for the discussion about money. I can’t see any. If people aren’t willing to talk about who pays for anything, then politically it is unlikely to happen.

      Incidentially this is the problem with S92A as it is worded and why I opposed it going ahead without a code of conduct without a reapportion of the costs. It effectively threw all of the cost onto the ISP’s who have no expertise or incentive to do a good job in this area.

      • The TCF policy does talk about who pays, and we even mentioned this in our submission to the TCF.

        As far as prima facie decisions we have infact advocated for this (mainly due to compromised machines, as 25% of computers are, that may need to be immediately restricted). This could be a function of the tribunal and this is what we have advocated.

      • Brenda 18.2.2

        You’re still accusing CFF of being “intent on destroying something without having any useful ideas about what to put in its place”…

        You are saying that advocating a copyright adjudicator be established isn’t “useful arguments”. CFF have had this position since at least December.

        meanwhile you also claim “It has been clear for some time that what would be required is an independent adjudication process backed by legislation.”

        you don’t make sense – and you owe an apology to the CFF.

  19. Brenda 19

    lprent said:

    What was were the appalling lack of interest by sectional interests to get something that would work in preventing something like the Sione’s Wedding pirating. I don’t think highly of the s92a. However I don’t see anything else that is a realistic attempt to fix the problem either.

    Sione’s wedding was leaked by someone with access to a preview copy, and sold on physical disks at an auckland market — Judith Tizard often heralds this as something that interent disconnections can somehow solve, when there was no internet involved in the sorry incident.

    • lprent 19.1

      Yes, that was when the Net was slow as. It is a bit faster now. In the next incident of its type, you’ll find it on a streaming server pretty damn fast. Now look ahead to that FTTH (100MBit+)….

      There is still no effective deterrent to people just pouring it out from a streaming server from offshore. Stopping people from wanting to receive it is.

      That is a real disincentive for people to create content. all it requires is a in-progress DVD to go astray.

      • Yes but you wrote the “types of piracy that destroyed the sales of Siones Wedding” when it’s known that the type of piracy that destroyed Siones Wedding wasn’t to do with the net.

        Stand behind what you wrote or modify it. At the very least you’ll probably find that the relief of cognitive dissonance makes it worthwhile Lynn.

        • illuminatedtiger 19.1.1.1

          Matthew Holloway:

          Piracy didn’t destroy Siones Wedding – it grossed very well at the box office.

        • lprent 19.1.1.2

          Don’t look solely into the past. Technology changes *fast*. I’m a programmer and I spend about 25-30% of my time simply keeping up. Any expectation that a lawyer or a judge or a politician would be capable of understanding what is likely to happen over the next 10 years in my area is nonsensical. In programming it isn’t a matter of if something is possible usually, it is a matter of if you want to write it.

          If you are going to put a law or legal process in place around the tech area then it should be flexible enough to handle what happens in 10 years – not what happened 5 years ago. That means that the legal basis will be general, and will have some kind of internal adaptability. That is what S92A offered, an opportunity for the people in the Net and the rights holders to define what the process should be. They singularly failed to do that.

          • Brenda 19.1.1.2.1

            So, in order to prevent what happened to Sione’s wedding (a box office success) we need to do what exactly?

  20. Quentin 20

    My actual issue with all this is that it took over 2 years to get the current copyright bill in place and a damn site longer with people saying that it was useless.

    In fact it is way longer than that! The process started in 2001 with an MED paper, and there was probably discussion even before that.

  21. I think this story has shown exactly who is jumping on the bandwagon.

    • Ha, please note the Window title of the page, “S92A: Opportunists jumping on bandwagons at The Standard”

      • lprent 21.1.1

        Reread the article..

        The opportunism part was mainly referring to Rodney Hide and DSE. The rest of the post was my opinion about the lack of progress this month in getting a workable regime out of S92A. It included my ideas on what kinds of things should be on the way forward.

        What I said about you was that you were grandstanding. Rather than continuing to work for a solution, you’d given up without saying what you thought a viable alternative was. That still stands.

        For all of your display of hurt feelings here, I haven’t seen you say one thing that looks like a focus on the future.

        Are you even interested in building a way of making copyright workable this century? At present it doesn’t look that way to me from what I’ve seen.

        • Matthew Holloway 21.1.1.1

          “What I said about you was that you were grandstanding. Rather than continuing to work for a solution, you’d given up without saying what you thought a viable alternative was. That still stands.”

          Nonsense. You have heard at least a dozen examples of positive suggestions in this thread.

          When the CFF suggest tribunals since December (which you apparently agree with), along with giving them sanctions such as fines and disconnection to allow proportionate punishment, as well talking about the difference between ‘CSPs’ (conventional ISPs) and this laws definition of an ISPs and how the costs associated with identifying customers is different (CSPs can corroborate evidence whereas ISPs typically cannot and so the data forensics approach must be quite different) and how this affects the design of a replacement law then you have no legitimate argument left that the CFF aren’t trying to fix this.

          It’s ok to be wrong, just fix your story. The current wording is completely misleading. I don’t dislike you Lynn, just please fix this. Again – you can phone me to talk this over. I’m quite pleasant, I assure you 🙂

          I do have my feelings hurt by your article. I’m not apologising for that, but I think that you should.

          • lprent 21.1.1.1.1

            I’m a programmer. That means when I look at a problem, I look at all of the possibilities and figure out how to close them. In some ways it is very close to legal reasoning.

            In the design role I get very sensitive about closed and open scenarios. The former is where you can see all of the possibilities usually because you control the environment. The latter is where you put a process in place that handles the exceptions, including those you haven’t thought of yet – that is the case with the digital age and copyright.

            Most of the solutions I’ve seen so far don’t handle the future increases in speed and the future abilities of reproduction in the networks and code running on it. I think that S92A was an attempt by technophobes to put in a legal framework to set up a process to control the problem. Because the legislation was not particularly prescriptive that left a lot of room for future enhancement. For one reason or another (mostly lack of time) that opportunity to build that process was not taken up by either the rights holders or the network operators.

            I consider that announcing that the process of putting a process in place was dead before the deadline was daft, bearing in mind that there appears to be no other coherent plan to address the underlying problem of enforcing copyright. I think it would have been better to have looked for more time to bring the recalcitrant to the table, or proceeded on without them.

            Announcing the death of S92A it did was further entrench the status quo of copyright law. Because bearing in mind the fuss over this section, who is going to be brave enough politically to work towards and alternate solution. The status quo is unacceptable, however I suspect that what S92A has done has stopped anything significant being done about copyright violations for another decade.

            So no, I won’t apologize for having my opinion.

            I am however grateful for your leadership on stopping the legislation going forward without a workable code of conduct. That would have been probably more of a disaster. However that is largely a negative rather than a positive contribution.

            You’ll probably see me more on this issue. For instance I’ll be heading down to wellington on tuesday for the meeting Clare Curran is putting together.

          • Matthew Holloway 21.1.1.1.2

            lprent,

            I’m a programmer too. You can find my software used by most government agencies, included in Debian/Ubuntu Linux, and so on. I do a lot of work with publishers. I’ve worked on the Egov Web Guidelines (now called the Web Standards) to do with disabled people accessing the internet, and I write a lot of proprietary software as well as open source. I’m also a graphic designer and I designed most of the CFF site.

            I understand what you mean about the analytical mindset that you get from programming. Law does need to consider the off-by-one errors too 😉

            We have certainly included or addressed issues such as the increases in network/comp speed (Eg. things like onion routing/Tor becoming more widely used, mesh networks) in what we’ve been saying.

            There’s no need for this nonsense any more. You really should change your story. Your description of me and the CFF is completely wrong.

            We probably have a lot in common. Again, if you want to learn who you’re talking to just give me a call. I’m not a jerk, I assure you — if you’re in wellington some time I’ll even buy you a coffee.

            Just clean up your mess would you? Please.

    • lprent 21.2

      Don’t be stupid. I’ve been talking about this stuff for almost 30 years. Since the first time I started playing with networks and programming at Waikato in 1980. I’m also s student of history and science fiction. The various law course I’ve taken and having to put up with my ex going through law school have given me an appreciation of the legal systems and how far they lag behind reality. Being heavily involved in political groups for the last 30 years gives me an idea of the political realities.

      If you want to live in fantasy land, then I can’t stop you…

  22. Juha 22

    Lynn, let me get this straight… you say that because the court system in your opinion is too slow, we should delegate the enforcement of the law to private agencies who don’t even pretend to be objective and who are affiliated to overseas interests.

    Is there anything else that could be “speeded up” in a similar manner? Private police forces perhaps, who are entitled to act as judge, jury and executioner? This is how RIAA in the US operates – it “detects infringement”, sues whoever for massive amounts of money because the law there allows it, even though the song in question is only worth $1.99, and then offers a settlement. In any other language, that’s called extortion.

    You need to step back and think about what you’re so fervently agitating for. Again, I’m really surprised that you’ve taken this position.

    • lprent 22.1

      Nope – who would trust RIANZ or something like BSA.

      For its own self-defense the local net should help set up a body to maintain a respect for copyright on the net. Effectively something recognized in the law in the same way that organizations like the SPCA are in their own area. That they are able to take immediate action on prima facia infractions, bring criminal charges against offenders, or put to adjudication for matters that are unclear.

      As far as I’m concerned the current state where copyright is effectively a dead letter where the net is concerned is pointless. Either we get rid of copyright or we enforce it on the net.

      If agreed as a code of conduct that was feasible under S92A.

      The question in my mind is how to fund such a ‘police’ force.

      BTW: good to hear from you again.. Must be 10 years plus..

  23. Are you even interested in building a way of making copyright workable this century? At present it doesn’t look that way to me from what I’ve seen.

    Well, maybe you should do some more “seeing” before you pretend to write authoritatively on the subject. The inaccuracies and misrepresentations in your article have been pointed out enough times by many who are not jonny come latelys to the debate.

    This includes your ill-tempered attack on Rodney Hide. I am not a natural constituent of ACT but it would be fair to say that Hide has been involved in the use and advocacy of FOSS for many years and that he should take the position he has on Copyright is no surprise at all.

    • lprent 23.1

      Yes he may have been – as DPF noted above – I haven’t seen it.

      To date I haven’t seen him come up with any suggestions about how to bring copyright law into the 21st century.

      It is no effort to be negative about something (the trolls around here display that routinely). It is a lot harder to come up with workable suggestions. Even harder to push them through to workable form.

      I haven’t noticed a strong tendency of Hide or ACT to do either of the latter two.

  24. What I said about you was that you were grandstanding. Rather than continuing to work for a solution, you’d given up without saying what you thought a viable alternative was. That still stands.

    Lynn, that’s both inaccurate and unfair to Matthew. I’ve been impressed by his approach, and accusing him of “grandstanding” is absurd. I’ve tried to work out where you’re coming from here and I’m stumped.

    • lprent 24.1

      Perhaps I’m wrong. I don’t know the guy, so I have to go on is what I can see on the net.

      But disposing of an S92A with all its flaws without having some idea of how to how to proceed to get a workable copyright regime on the net seems pointless to me.

      Anyway – gotta go out.. I’ll see where this gets to later.

  25. But disposing of an S92A with all its flaws without having some idea of how to how to proceed to get a workable copyright regime on the net seems pointless to me.

    Well, no. Not really. It’s bad law, pure and simple.

    However, many of those who oppose it do have alternative solution – I know the CFF, InternerNZ, ISPs and many others have already been putting them forward. Once again, however, you chose to imply that they don’t. That’s disingenuous, at best.

    Personally my solution diverges from many of the above advocates. Speaking as a significant holder of Copyright assets, I would like to see some real economic analysis on just how broken Copyright legislation *actually* is and on how broken the rest of the economy becomes if we chose to break the Internet at the behest of RIANZ and their friends. I’d quite like MED to do their job, just for once. Then maybe we can have a discussion about whether legislation changes are required.

  26. lprent 26

    What powers do the MED have?

    Copyright law is probably OK as far as I can see. The enforcement of copyright and remedies available is pathetic.

    Copyright depended implicitly on the means of production being constrained – ie there being barriers to entry.

    In another but related context Dancer put up a post about it (and copied the article rather than linking to it!) –
    Death knell for print media? a few days ago with an article from The American. As the author of the article pointed out the blogs depend on content from the print and other media. So what is happening is a tragedy of the commons problem. How can people make a living creatively if they are in an environment that provides no protection for the fruits of their effort?

    The copyright legislation is broken because there is no effective route to enforcement in a timely and relatively cheap manner. The current law pretty much means that the rights holders have to pay for all of the enforcement (or rely on institutions like the police who have no significant expertise). The costs of remedy may (and probably will) exceed the costs of producing the content or any profit from it.

    What I’m saying is that these proposals (those I can see) do not appear to me to be effective because they do not operate in the same time frame as the people who violate copyright in a digital age. This is a problem that is going to get a lot worse because the way that the technology is trending is to make it easier and easier to reproduce more things and always at lower costs.

    What I see generally is people trying to fix problems of the past, and not looking forward to developing a framework for the future. I think that a greater risk to the internet is finding that there is insufficient content quality because it is impossible to make a living at it. Sort of what has been happening to TV – who watches it anymore?

    • “What I’m saying is that these proposals (those I can see) do not appear to me to be effective because they do not operate in the same time frame as the people who violate copyright in a digital age.”

      This isn’t true. Our proposal does infact describe the necessity of prima facie decisions. And what you’re now saying is quite different to that of your article.

      Please fix your story.

  27. Copyright law is probably OK as far as I can see

    and

    The copyright legislation is broken

    Make up your mind.

    The problem with your argument (apart from lack of consistency) is that whilst you demand immediate resolution for alleged infringement this demand is inconsistent with the rights of those who might be accused of infringement.

    If you want funding for better enforcement of existing law, then lobby for that. Don’t try and make up the shortfall by creating bad law which contains all sorts of horrible side effects.

  28. lprent 28

    Ummm I see that you ignored my question about any powers that the MED has.. Was that just a diversion?

    There is a difference between defining what transgresses the law and the provisions for implementation of the law (ie remedies). The first is probably ok in the copyright act. The second is pretty useless because in a lot of cases the cost of protecting copyright in a digital age is likely to be more than any revenue. That effectively makes the provisions of the act largely worthless against people who refuse to change behavior.

    Since both are mainly embedded in the same act, there is no inconsistency. In your latter quote you carefully left off the ‘because’ part of the statement which tends to place you as a idiot with a selective quoting fetish.

    If you want funding for better enforcement of existing law, then lobby for that.

    What I’m interested in is having a body that is able to enforce copyright protection. In the absence of a enforcement body set up under s92a there is nowhere to apply funding to. As someone further up the post comments noted, the police have bugger all interest, and also have limited jurisdiction.

    So your statement is meaningless, as is the rest of your comment

    • Con 28.1

      What I’m interested in is having a body that is able to enforce copyright protection.

      You seem to be after a body that can enforce copyright in real time. That is not going to happen. It’s just not. It’s a fond hope and nothing more. So you have this unrealistic desire, and anyone who doesn’t share it you therefore see as “grandstanding”, “pointless”, etc.

  29. Ummm I see that you ignored my question about any powers that the MED has. Was that just a diversion?

    MED has plenty powers, they even seem to be setting themselves up to be an enforcement agency for ACTA.

    However, what I said was:

    I would like to see some real economic analysis on just how broken Copyright legislation *actually* is and on how broken the rest of the economy becomes if we chose to break the Internet at the behest of RIANZ and their friends. I’d quite like MED to do their job

    For a department packed full of, er, economists, they seem to do sod all in the field of economic research which one would think is a pre-requisit for giving advice to Ministers.

    So your statement is meaningless, as is the rest of your comment

    Ta.

  30. …and my phone had just ran out of batteries. Sorry about that.

    I do hope it’s clear now that when you wrote “it looks like he is intent on destroying something without having any useful ideas about what to put in its place, and I cannot find much on their site about alternatives. That is also grandstanding” was entirely wrong.

    We seem to agree on 99% of a solution so I don’t see the need for this kind of talk. We need to fix this law and considering we agree on most of it let’s just work together, eh?

    • lprent 30.1

      Yeah and Telecom managed to get my server ADSL back on line…

      So the mail server is catching up and I’m reconfiguring from the jury rigs that I’ve been forced to use for the last week. Plus a *long* discussion about a contract. Looks like I’ll have to get back to work again..

      I’ll write an update after I get that done… You want to write a guest post?

  31. We just announced this today, ‘CFF announce aims to help Fix Section 92’

    http://creativefreedom.org.nz/story.html?id=235

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Learning From Brexit
    Whether Britain leaving the European Union was right or wrong, good or bad is for the Brits to decide. But there are lessons about international trade to be learned from Brexit, especially as it is very unusual for an economy to break so completely from its major training partner.In Econ101 ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    8 hours ago
  • Bernard’s Chorus for Friday, July 12
    TL;DR: My top six things to note around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so on the morning of Friday, July 12 are: Read more ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    13 hours ago
  • Hot Damn! It's The Soggy Bottom Boys!
    Good morning lovely people, and welcome to another weekly review. One which saw the our Prime Minister in Washington, running around with all the decorum of Augustus Gloop with a golden ticket, seeking photo opportunities with anyone willing to shake his hand.Image: G News.He had his technique down to overcome ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    16 hours ago
  • When an independent expert / advisory group is anything but ..
    OPINION: Yesterday, 1News reported that the Government's "independent" advisory group had recommended Kiwirail offload its ferries to another entity.Except this wasn't entirely new news at all, besides that it came formally from Nicola Willis’s advisory team.TVNZ is under significant cost pressure, and earlier this year, after expressing strong discontent with ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    16 hours ago
  • The Kākā’s Pick 'n' Mix for Friday, July 12
    Photo by Alexander Schimmeck on UnsplashTL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 9:00 am on Friday, July 12 are:Scoop: Ministerial group advises KiwiRail no longer run Cook Strait ferries 1News’ Julia RodenNews: ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    16 hours ago
  • Weekly Roundup 12-July-2024
    Kia ora and welcome to another Friday roundup, in which we pull together some of the links and stories that caught our eye this week. Feel free to add more in the comments! The week in Greater Auckland On Monday, Scott delivered a delicious disquisition on donut cities, ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    17 hours ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Friday, July 12
    Photo by Dominik Scythe on UnsplashTL;DR: The top six announcements, rulings, reports, surveys, statistics and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the day to 6:00 am on Friday, July 11 are:Climate: Transport Minister Simeon Brown said in a release the Government's plan to reverse New ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    19 hours ago
  • The Hoon around the week to July 12
    TL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers features co-hosts and talking with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent talking about the National-ACT-NZ First Government’s climate strategy ‘pamphlet’, its watering down of Clean Car Standards and its general lack of coherence;University of Otago Foreign Relations Professor ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    19 hours ago
  • Casey Costello strikes again
    Summary: A track record of deception is becoming evident in the Government’s Coalition alliance. Ministers across all parties have been found to either lie without contrite, and/or act unlawfully and unreasonably. The rails are coming off quicker than a marshmallow induced fantasy train ride as the conductors throw caution to ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    1 day ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #28 2024
    Open access notables Antarctic Bottom Water Warming, Freshening, and Contraction in the Eastern Bellingshausen Basin, Johnson et al., Geophysical Research Letters Cold winds blowing over polynyas (areas of ice-free water) on the Antarctic continental shelf create sea ice, forming very cold and somewhat salty, hence very dense, waters. These dense ...
    1 day ago
  • We're back! Join us for the weekly Hoon on YouTube Live
    Photo by Mathias Elle on UnsplashWe’re back after a three-week mid-winter break. I needed a rest, but back into it. We’re still with the ‘new’ day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when we have our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Climate Change: National’s gas fantasy
    Yesterday the government released the advice on its proposal to repeal the offshore fossil gas exploration ban, including a Climate Implications of Policy Assessment statement, Cabinet paper, and Regulatory Impact Statement. I spent some time looking at these last night, and the short version is that the government's plan is ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • A criminal minister
    RNZ reports that cancer minister Casey Costello has been reprimanded and forced to apologise by the Ombudsman for acting "contrary to law" in her handling of an OIA request: Associate Health Minister Casey Costello has been severely reprimanded by the Chief Ombudsman and forced to apologise for trying to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 day ago
  • Gordon Campbell on Luxon in the NATO pressure cooker
    New Zealand is one of six countries invited as onlookers to this week’s NATO summit in Washington. As such, PM Christopher Luxon will be made aware of the pressure on the 32 NATO member states (a) to increase their Defence spending (b) to become less militarily dependent on the US ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    2 days ago
  • Bernard’s Dawn Chorus for Thursday July 11
    TL;DR: My top six things to note around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so on the morning of July 11 are:Climate: Climate Change Minister Simon Watts issued the National-ACT-NZ First Coalition Government’s climate strategy yesterday, including a three-page document with five bullet ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • By George! Splendid streets take shape down south
    The revitalisation of Auckland city centre, especially around Wynyard Quarter, Te Komititanga, and Queen Street, is top of mind for Greater Auckland readers – but other cities around Aotearoa New Zealandare installing people-friendly streets. This guest post by Jessica de Heij, who grew up in the Netherlands and is an ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    2 days ago
  • Bernard's Pick 'n' Mix for Thursday, July 11
    TL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:30 am on July 11 are:Scoop: NZ First Minister acted 'contrary to law’. Casey Costello has been severely reprimanded by the Chief Ombudsman and forced ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Thursday, July 11
    TL;DR: The top six announcements, rulings, reports, surveys, statistics and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the day to 6:00 am on Thursday, July 11 are:Economy: Te Pūtea Matua The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) announced its Monetary Policy Committee decided to hold the ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Farmers’ revenge meets Green resistance
    If there was one issue that united farmers in opposition to the Labour Government, it was the battle of the waterways between farmers and Environment Minister David Parker. Parker won the first round with his 2020 National Policy Standard on Freshwater Management (NPSFM) which imposed tough new standards on waterways ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • Personal Reflections: 10th July
    Please note: This is a personal reflection and does not refer to politics. These entries are not sent to subscribers.Text within this block will maintain its original spacing when publishedHubris and Pride Out of the fire and into the frying pan? Swimming with the big sharks Tonight, I am excited. ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    2 days ago
  • Oh Vienna
    Nothing can warm your heart like the sight of your daughter stepping off a train. Mary-Margaret arrived on Saturday to ride with us to Vienna.You know your way around a bike? the guy at the hire shop asks her. Yep. She’s ridden them on rail trails, Auckland’s mean streets, commutes ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: New Zealand forges deeper ties with NATO
    Christopher Luxon is finding his foreign policy feet. Now eight months into the job, New Zealand’s Prime Minister is in Washington DC this week to attend the NATO summit. It is the third year in a row that Wellington has been invited to the annual gathering of the North Atlantic ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    2 days ago
  • Climate Change: National’s carbon capture fantasy
    As the climate crisis has grown worse, the tactics of the polluting industries have shifted. From denying climate change, they then moved on to pushing "carbon capture" - dumping their emissions underground rather than in the atmosphere. It's a PR scam, intended to prolong the life of the industry we ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Harsh Truths.
    The Way We Were: An indelible mark was left upon a whole generation of New Zealanders by the Great Depression and World War II; an impression that not only permitted men and women of all classes and races to perceive the need to work together for the common good, but also ...
    2 days ago
  • Explainer: Simeon Brown's CCUS Announcement
    Sources for the data and research:Peter Milne: Time’s up on Gorgon’s five years of carbon storage failureSimon Holmes a Court: "Does best CCS power station in world provide model for Australia?" Chris Vanderstock: "The truth about Carbon Capture and Storage"   "Sunk Costs": documenting CCS's failure to meet every, single, target, ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    3 days ago
  • The Kiwirail Interislander saga continues
    This morning, 1 News is reporting that the cancellation of the i-Rex ferries has so far cost taxpayers $484 million.That's almost half a billion dollars. That could probably fund thousands of new doctors, maybe complete a few hospital rebuilds, or how about money for our experienced police so they don’t ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    3 days ago
  • Bernard’s Chorus for Wednesday, July 10
    As foreshadowed in legislation passed quietly under urgency just before Christmas, the Transport Minister has personally watered down standards for car imports in a way expected to add millions of tonnes to our climate emissions Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My top six things to note around housing, climate ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • Christopher Luxon's business acumen
    It’s April, and the relatively new Prime Minister of New Zealand is on his first overseas mission to South East Asia.Christopher Luxon walks into the room. A warm smile on his face. A hand extended to his counterpart.“We are open for business,” he says confidently. “New Zealand is under new ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    3 days ago
  • Meet New Zealand's Russell Brand?
    Hi,There is an all too common story within the guru community, and we see it play out again and again. The end is nearly always the same — a trail of victims and confusion left in the guru’s wake.As seen in the recent case of Russell Brand, the guru simply ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    3 days ago
  • Why is the Government flooring it on unsafe speeds?
    Feedback closes midnight Thursday 11 July, on the draft speed-setting rule. See our previous post on the subject for details, and guidance on having your say. Among other things, it proposes to raise speeds in cities back up to a universal 50km/h (with no option of 30km/h), and will restrict safe ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    3 days ago
  • American Boy
    Take me on a trip, I'd like to go some dayTake me to New York, I'd love to see LAI really want to come kick it with youYou'll be my American boy…Love letters straight from the heart. Hmm, I think that’s a different tune, but that’s where we’ll begin. With ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • Bernard's Pick 'n' Mix for Wednesday, July 10
    Photo by Jannis Brandt on UnsplashTL;DR: My pick of the top six links elsewhere around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so to 7:00 am are:Investigation: Benefitting from the misery of others. Over 40% of emergency housing funding went to a concentrated group ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Wednesday, July 10
    Photo by Mr Cup / Fabien Barral on UnsplashTL;DR: The top six announcements, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the day to 6:30 am on Wednesday, July 10 are:Climate: Minister for Transport Simeon Brown announced changes to the Clean Car Importer Standard that ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 days ago
  • How rural families are saving thousands with electric vehicles
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Daisy Simmons (Photo credit: Automotive Rhythms / CC BY-NC 2.0) Some people thought Juliana Dockery and her husband Sean were being impractical when they bought an electric vehicle in 2022. Why? Like one in five Americans, they live in a rural area ...
    3 days ago
  • Love to complete it all
    Photo credit: Rob DickinsonThis is my wish for you: Comfort on difficult days, smiles when sadness intrudes, rainbows to follow the clouds, laughter to kiss your lips, sunsets to warm your heart, hugs when spirits sag, beauty for your eyes to see, friendships to brighten your being, faith so that ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    3 days ago
  • Climate Change: What’s left of the Emissions Reduction Plan?
    In 2019, Parliament, in a supposed bipartisan consensus, passed the Zero Carbon Act. The Act established long-term emissions reduction targets, and a cycle of five-yearly budgets and emissions reduction plans to meet them, with monitoring by the independent Climate Change Commission. In theory this was meant to ensure that the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • The President They Have Got.
    “This cannot be real life!” Confronted with the choice of recommitting themselves to the myth of Joe Biden, or believing the evidence of their own eyes, those Americans not already committed to Donald Trump will reach out instinctively for the President they wish they had – blind to the President they ...
    3 days ago
  • Has Progressivism Peaked?
    Let’s Go Crazy! AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) rarks-up the voters of New York’s 16th Congressional District.HAVE WE MOVED past peak progressivism? Across the planet, there are signs that the surge of support for left-wing causes and personalities, exemplified by the election of the democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (AOC) to the US House ...
    3 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Dawn Chorus for July 9
    TL;DR: The top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day are:Labour may be looking at signing up for an Irish style 33% inheritance tax instead of or as well as a capital gains tax;Sam Stubbs has proposed the Government sell ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Mr Luxon goes to Washington.
    Once fastened servile now your getting sharpMoving oh so swiftly with such disarmI pulled the covers over him shoulda' pulled the alarmTurned to my nemesis a fool no fucking godTuesday morning usually provides something to write about with a regular round of interviews for the Prime Minister across Newshub, TVNZ, ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • Kiwirail at Councils Transport & Infrastructure Committee
    Last week at the Council’s Transport and Infrastructure Committee, Kiwirail gave an update about the state of the network and the work they’re doing to get it ready for the opening of the City Rail Link. There were a few aspects that stood out to me so I’ve pulled them ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    4 days ago
  • Bernard's Pick 'n' Mix for Tuesday, July 9
    Photo by City Church Christchurch on UnsplashTL;DR: The top six links elsewhere I’ve spotted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day to 8:00 am are:Scoop: Waipareira Trust political donations probe referred to Charities Registration Board NZ Herald-$$$’s Matt NippertScoop: Migrant whistleblowers speak out after ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • What’s next after Supreme Court curbs regulatory power: More focus on laws’ wording, less on the...
    This article by Robin Kundis Craig, Professor of Law, University of Kansas is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Federal Chevron deference is dead. On June 28, 2024, in a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court overturned the 40-year-old legal tenet that when a federal ...
    4 days ago
  • The folly of retreat in the face of defeat
    Note: This is a long readPolitical discourse on social media taught me that bad faith operators and tactics are not only prevalent, they are widespread and effective.Thanks for reading Mountain Tui! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Their objectives are much narrower than one might imagine.The ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    4 days ago
  • The Parent Zone
    Hi,I am about to wing my way back to New Zealand for the Webworm popup this Saturday in Auckland — can’t wait to see some of you there! In the meantime, I highly recommend the latest pet thread over on the Webworm app. All I’ll say is that readers here ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    4 days ago
  • Tuesday: The Kākā’s Journal of Record for July 9
    Photo by Alex Zaj on UnsplashTL;DR: The top six announcements, speeches, news conferences reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the day to 6:00 am on Tuesday, July 9 are:Politics: Full news conference: 'Please resign', Chloe Swarbrick tells Darleen Tana RNZ VideoPaper: Increasing speed ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Breaking up is so hard to do
    The fundamental weakness of the waka jumping legislation is once again on display, as the Greens seem reluctant to trigger it to remove Darleen Tana from Parliament altogether. Tana has been suspended from the Greens Caucus while it had barrister Rachel Burt investigate allegations that she had been involved in ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    4 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the privatising of state housing provision, by stealth
    Kāinga Ora’s “independent review” was carried out by the same National Party leader whose own administration’s inadequate housing build – and selling of state houses- had caused Kāinga Ora to embark on its crash building programme in the first place. To use a rugby analogy, this situation is exactly like ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    4 days ago
  • “Laser focused on the cost of living crisis”
    Cartoonist credit: Christopher Slane ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    4 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the elections in France, Iran and Britain
    As Werewolf predicted a week ago, it was premature to call Emmanuel Macron’s snap election call “a bitter failure” and “a humiliating defeat” purely on the basis of the first round results. In fact, it is the far-right that has suffered a crushing defeat. It has come in third in ...
    WerewolfBy lyndon
    4 days ago
  • The UK needs proportional representation
    Like a lot of people, I spent Friday watching the UK election. There's the obvious joy at seeing the end of 14 years of Tory chaos, but at the same time the new government does not greatly enthuse me. In order to win over the establishment, Starmer has moved UK ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Bernard's Chorus for Monday, July 8
    TL;DR: Thanks for the break, and now I’m back. These are the top six things I’ve noted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so:Chris Bishop’s pledge to ‘flood the market’ with land to build new houses both out and up remains dependent ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • French Left Wins Big
    Usually I start with some lyrics from the song at the end of the newsletter, to set the mood. But today I’m going to begin with a bit of a plea. About six weeks ago I decided to make more of my writing public with the hope that people would ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Satire: It's great our Prime Minister is so on the ball
    ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    5 days ago
  • This is the real reason David Seymour needs to reinterpret the Treaty of Waitangi
    This is republished from an earlier write upDavid Seymour is part of the ACT Party. He's backed by people like Alan Gibbs, and Koch money. He grew up as a right wing lobbyist - tick tick tick. All cool and fine - we know.What's also been clear is a fervent ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    5 days ago
  • Going for Housing Growth: Filling the housing donut?
    Hot take: it should be affordable to live in Auckland. You may not be surprised to learn I’m not the only one with this hot take. Indeed, the Minister of Housing recently took the notable step of saying house prices should come down, something common wisdom says should be a politically ...
    Greater AucklandBy Scott Caldwell
    5 days ago
  • Bernard's Pick 'n' Mix for Monday July 9
    TL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Monday, July 9, the top six links elsewhere I’ve spotted around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last day or so are:Scoop: Probation officer sacked for snooping is linked to alleged spy Jian Yang. Corrections dismissed Xu Shan over his ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • What has the Government done for you so far?
    List effective 1 July 2024Consumer and household (note: road and car costs are under infrastructure)Cancelled half-price public transport fares for under-25s and free fares for under-13s funding, scrapping the Labour government-era subsidies. The change will not affect pre-existing discounts funded directly by councils.Cut funding for free budgeting services. One third of the ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    5 days ago
  • The Kākā’s Journal of Record for Monday, July 8
    Photo by Amador Loureiro on UnsplashTL;DR: As of 6:00 am on Monday, July 8, the top six announcements, speeches, reports and research around housing, climate and poverty in Aotearoa’s political economy in the last three days were:Local Government Minister Simeon Brown announced the Coalition Government would not be responding to ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • The Kākā’s diary for the week to July 15 and beyond
    TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to July 15 include:PM Christopher Luxon is travelling to Washington this week to attend a NATO meeting running from Tuesday to Thursday. Parliament is not sitting this week.The RBNZ is expected to hold the OCR on ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #27
    A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, June 30, 2024 thru Sat, July 6, 2024. Story of the week Our Story of the Week is brought to us by Dr. Ella Gilbert, a researcher with the British ...
    5 days ago
  • The Great Splintering: Thoughts on the British Election
    I can remember 1997. Even living on the other side of the world, having a Scottish father and Welsh grandfather meant I acquired a childhood knowledge of British politics via family connections (and general geekery). And yes, I inherited the dark legends of that evil folk-devil, Margaret Thatcher. So when ...
    5 days ago
  • 2% royalties for mining? Deal!
    Snapshot postToday, Shane Jones was courageous enough to front Q&A with Jack Tame. Thanks for reading Mountain Tui ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Jack Tame is a bit of a legend. And that’s only because he strikes me as a good journalist i.e. well ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    5 days ago
  • Aotearoa Says – No Diggity.
    Strictly biz, don't play aroundCover much ground, got game by the poundGetting paid is a forteEach and every day, true player wayOne month ago tens of thousands of Kiwis took to the streets to protest against the coalition’s Fast Track legislation. Concerned that it would prioritise some people making a ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • Strangers and others
    For a moment yesterday I thought I might have been trailing my old friend Simon Wilson across the Danube, over cobbled stones, and into the old town square of Linz. Same comfortable riding style, same jacket, same full head of hair, but no, different friend of cycling.There is a kindred ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • Killing the Golden Goose of New Zealand's economy
    IntroductionIn New Zealand, the National party generally retains a reputation of being pro-business and pro-economy.Thanks for reading Mountain Tui ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.The underlying assumption is National are more competent economic managers, and by all accounts Luxon and his team have talked ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    6 days ago
  • Newshub Signs Off
    Wait for the night, for the light at the end of an era'Cause it's love at the end of an eraThe last episode of Newshub, the final instalment of TV3 News, aired last night. Many of us who took the time to watch felt sad and nostalgic looking back over ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    7 days ago
  • The Pharmac Fiasco
    If you don’t understand how things work you make foolish mistakes. To explain how the government got into its cancer drugs muddle, we need to explain first how New Zealand’s pharmaceutical purchasing system works. There is a parallel between Pharmac and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. The Government sets ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    1 week ago
  • An unexpected honour.
    One can take many things as a budge of honour but this was somewhat unexpected. Was it something that I said? See line 3: https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1959715/ ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    1 week ago
  • An Ode to the British Tories
    The legend Jonathan Pie nails it in under 5 minutes. There is more, of course, but his summary is both fair and an outstanding take on the UK Conservative Party’s right wing legacy.Austerity, cuts to the public service, trickle down economics, corruption, policies favouring corporations and the wealthy, underinvesting in ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    1 week ago
  • Knives out for Kāinga Ora
    Note this a longer read.TLDR: Bishop had always intended to shortchange Kāinga Ora and malign the Board and Executive. The $500,000 independent review of Kāinga Ora was anything but, and poses serious ethical issues in both conduct and outcomes. Kāinga Ora had a debt to assset ratio of 0.25 when ...
    Mountain TuiBy Mountain Tui
    1 week ago
  • Something's going to change
    If you’re selling your soul, working all dayOvertime hours for bullshit payNothing’s gonna change if all you do Is wish you could wake up and it not be trueJoin a union, fight for better payJoin a union, brother, organise todayYou’ll see where the problem really liesWhen the union comes around: ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 week ago
  • Weekly Roundup 5-July-2024
    Welcome to the second half of the year! And another roundup of stories that caught our eye over the week. As always, feel free to add anything we’ve missed, in the comments. The fortnight on Greater Auckland Last week was a short week, but nonetheless action-packed: On Monday, ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    1 week ago
  • How the team of 5 million lost the game
    A study of the 2020 election has found that though the swing to Labour was the biggest vote shift in New Zealand for more than a century, it was not structural. Indeed, the fundamental electoral forces that drove the result were not dissimilar to those that had emerged in the ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 week ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #27 2024
    Open access notables Climate-driven deoxygenation of northern lakes, Jansen et al., Nature Climate Change: Oxygen depletion constitutes a major threat to lake ecosystems and the services they provide. Most of the world’s lakes are located >45° N, where accelerated climate warming and elevated carbon loads might severely increase the risk of ...
    1 week ago

  • District Court judges appointed
    Attorney-General Hon Judith Collins today announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges.   The appointees, who will take up their roles in July and August at the Manukau, Rotorua and Invercargill courts, are:   Matthew Nathan Judge Nathan was admitted to bar in New Zealand in 2021, having previously been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Urgent review into Wairoa flood response begins
    Environment Minister, Penny Simmonds today announced the terms of reference for a rapid review into the Wairoa flood response. “The Wairoa community has raised significant concerns about the management of the Wairoa River bar and the impact this had on flooding of properties in the district,” says Ms Simmonds. “The Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • NZDF’s Red Sea deployment extended
    New Zealand has extended its contribution to the US-led coalition working to uphold maritime security in the Red Sea, Defence Minister Judith Collins and Foreign Minister Winston Peters announced today. “The decision to extend this deployment is reflective of the continued need to partner and act in line with New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Government provides support to tackle tax debt and compliance
    New compliance funding in Budget 2024 will ensure Inland Revenue is better equipped to catch individuals who are evading their tax obligations, Revenue Minister Simon Watts says. “New Zealand’s tax debt had risen to almost $7.4 billion by the end of May, an increase of more than 50 per cent since 2022. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Taking action to reduce road cones
    The Coalition Government is taking action to reduce expenditure on road cones and temporary traffic management (TTM) while maintaining the safety of workers and road users, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  Rolling out a new risk-based approach to TTM that will reduce the number of road cones on our roads.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Celebrating 100 years of progress
    Te Arawa Lakes Trust centenary celebrations mark a significant milestone for all the important work done for the lakes, the iwi and for the Bay of Plenty region, says Māori Crown Relations: Te Arawhiti and Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a commemorative event acknowledging 100 years ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Foreign Minister to travel to Korea and Japan
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to the Republic of Korea and Japan next week.    “New Zealand enjoys warm and enduring relationships with both Korea and Japan. Our relationships with these crucial partners is important for New Zealand’s ongoing prosperity and security,” says Mr Peters.    While in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Huge opportunity for educators and students as charter school applications open
    Associate Education Minister David Seymour says today is another important step towards establishing charter schools, with the application process officially opening.  “There has already been significant interest from groups and individuals interested in opening new charter schools or converting existing state schools to charter schools,” says Mr Seymour. “There is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Decreasing gas reserves data highlights need to reverse oil and gas exploration ban
    MBIE’s annual Petroleum Reserves report detailing a 20 per cent reduction in New Zealand’s natural gas reserves shows the need to reverse the oil and gas exploration ban, Energy Minister Simeon Brown says.“Figures released by MBIE show that there has been a 20 per cent reduction in New Zealand’s natural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Providers of military assistance to Russia targeted in new sanctions
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced further sanctions as part of the Government’s ongoing response to Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.    “Russia’s continued illegal war of aggression against Ukraine is a direct and shocking assault on the rules-based order. Our latest round of sanctions targets Russians involved in that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • OECD report shows New Zealand is a red tape state
    Minister for Regulation David Seymour says that the OECD Product Market Regulation Indicators (PMRI) released this morning shows why New Zealanders sorely need regulatory reform. “This shocker result should end any and all doubt that the Government must go to war on red tape and regulation,” says Mr Seymour.  “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government unveils five-point climate strategy
    The coalition Government is proud to announce the launch of its Climate Strategy, a comprehensive and ambitious plan aimed at reducing the impacts of climate change and preparing for its future effects, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “The Strategy is built on five core pillars and underscores the Government’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • National Bowel Screening Programme reaches 2 million life-saving screening kits
    The National Bowel Screening Programme has reached a significant milestone, with two million home bowel screening kits distributed across the country, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti announced today.   “This programme, which began in 2017, has detected 2,495 cancers as of June 2024. A third of these were at an early ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Granny flats popular with all ages
    More than 1,300 people have submitted on the recent proposal to make it easier to build granny flats, RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk say. “The strong response shows how popular the proposal is and how hungry the public is for common sense changes to make ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • $25 million boost for conservation
    Toitū te taiao – our environment endures!  New Zealanders will get to enjoy more of our country’s natural beauty including at Cathedral Cove – Mautohe thanks to a $25 million boost for conservation, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka announced today.  “Te taiao (our environment) is critical for the country’s present and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand increases support for Ukraine
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters have announced a further $16 million of support for Ukraine, as it defends itself against Russia’s illegal invasion. The announcement of further support for Ukraine comes as Prime Minister Luxon attends the NATO Leaders’ Summit in Washington DC. “New Zealand will provide an additional ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Country Kindy to remain open
    Associate Education Minister David Seymour says that Country Kindy in Manawatu will be able to remain open, after being granted a stay from the Ministry of Education for 12 weeks. “When I heard of the decision made last week to shut down Country Kindy I was immediately concerned and asked ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government lifts Indonesian trade cooperation
    New export arrangements signed today by New Zealand and Indonesia will boost two-way trade, Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay and Dr Sahat Manaor Panggabean, Chairman of the Indonesia Quarantine Authority (IQA), signed an updated cooperation arrangement between New Zealand and Indonesia in Auckland today. “The cooperation arrangement paves the way for New Zealand and Indonesia to boost our $3 billion two-way trade and further ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Carbon capture framework to reduce emissions
    A Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) framework has been released by the Coalition Government for consultation, providing an opportunity for industry to reduce net CO2 emissions from gas use and production, Energy Minister Simeon Brown says. “Our Government is committed to reducing red tape and removing barriers to drive investment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Faster consenting with remote inspections
    The Government is progressing a requirement for building consent authorities to use remote inspections as the default approach so building a home is easier and cheaper, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Building anything in New Zealand is too expensive and takes too long. Building costs have increased by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Revision programme presented to Parliament
    A new revision programme enabling the Government to continue the progressive revision of Acts in New Zealand has been presented to Parliament, Attorney-General Judith Collins announced today. “Revision targets our older and outdated or much-amended Acts to make them more accessible and readable without changing their substance,” Ms Collins says. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government aligns Clean Car Importer Standard with Australia to reduce vehicle prices for Kiwis
    The Government will be aligning the Clean Car Importer Standard with Australia in order to provide the vehicle import market with certainty and ease cost of living pressures on Kiwis the next time they need to purchase a vehicle, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“The Government supports the Clean Car Importer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZQA Board appointments
    Education Minister Erica Stanford has today announced three appointments to the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA). Kevin Jenkins has been appointed as the new Chair of the NZQA Board while Bill Moran MNZM has been appointed as the Deputy Chair, replacing Pania Gray who remains on the Board as a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • More support for Wairoa clean-up
    A further $3 million of funding to Wairoa will allow Wairoa District Council to get on with cleaning up household waste and sediment left by last week’s flooding, Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell says.  In Budget 24 the Government provided $10 million to the Hawke’s Bay Region to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Minister thanks outgoing Secretary for Education
    Education Minister Erica Stanford has today thanked the outgoing Secretary for Education. Iona Holsted was appointed in 2016 and has spent eight years in the role after being reappointed in May 2021. Her term comes to an end later this year.  “I acknowledge Iona’s distinguished public service to New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister concludes local government review
    Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has concluded the Future for Local Government Review and confirmed that the Coalition Government will not be responding to the review’s recommendations.“The previous government initiated the review because its Three Waters and resource management reforms would have stripped local government of responsibility for water assets ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Consultation begins on new cancer medicines
    Associate Health Minister for Pharmac David Seymour says today’s announcement that Pharmac is opening consultation on new cancer medicines is great news for Kiwi cancer patients and their families. “As a result of the coalition Government’s $604 million funding boost, consultation is able to start today for the first two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 50 years on, Niue and NZ look to the future
    A half-century after pursuing self-government, Niue can count on New Zealand’s steadfast partnership and support, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters says. “New Zealand and Niue share a unique bond, forged over 50 years of free association,” Mr Peters says. “We are looking forward to working together to continue advancing Niue’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Upgrading system resulting in faster passport processing
    Acting Internal Affairs Minister David Seymour says wait times for passports are reducing, as the Department of Internal Affairs (the Department) reports the highest ever monthly figure for digital uptake in passport applications.  “As of Friday 5 July, the passport application queue has reduced by 34.4 per cent - a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Roads of National Significance moving at pace
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news that the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) is getting on with the Government’s first seven Roads of National Significance (RoNS) projects expected to begin procurement, enabling works and construction in the next three years.   “Delivering on commitments in our coalition agreements, we are moving ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New school for Flat Bush
    The Coalition Government is building for roll growth and easing pressure in Auckland’s school system, by committing to the construction of a new primary school, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. As part of Budget 24’s $456 million injection into school property growth, a new primary school (years 1-6) will be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Dr Shane Reti's speech to Iwi-Maori Partnership Boards, Rotorua
    Dr Shane Reti's speech to Iwi-Maori Partnership Boards, Thursday 4 July 2024    Mānawa maiea te putanga o Matariki Mānawa maiea te ariki o te rangi Mānawa maiea te Mātahi o te tau Celebrate the rising of Matariki Celebrate the rising of the lord of the skies Celebrate the rising ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Announcement of Mental Health Targets and Mental Health and Addiction Community Sector Innovation Fu...
    Kia Ora Koutou, Tena Koutou, Good Morning. Thank you Mahaki Albert for the warm welcome. Thank you, Prime Minister, and thank you everyone for coming today. When I look around the room this morning, I see many of our hard-working mental health and addictions workforce from NGO and Community groups, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Expert panel appointed to review Public Works Act
    An independent expert advisory panel has been appointed to review the Public Works Act to make it easier to build infrastructure, Minister for Land Information Chris Penk has announced.  “The short, sharp review demonstrates the Government’s commitment to progressing critical infrastructure projects and reducing excessive regulatory and legislative barriers, so ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Resources Minister heads to Australia with message – ‘NZ is open for business’
    A trip to Australia next week to meet mining sector operators and investors will signal New Zealand is once again open for business, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The visit is also an opportunity to build relationships with Australian state and federal counterparts and learn from their experiences as New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Prime Minister’s scholarships awarded
    New Zealand’s ability to engage with key trading partners is set to grow further with 20 scholarships awarded for groups to gain education experiences across Asia and Latin America, Tertiary Education and Skills Minister, Penny Simmonds says. Of the 20 scholarships, 12 have been awarded to groups travelling for study ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Next steps for Northwest Rapid Transit underway
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed progress on Northwest Rapid Transit, as the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) confirms next steps on the preferred option, a busway alongside State Highway 16 from Brigham Creek to Auckland City Centre. “The Government is committed to a rapid transit system that will support urban development, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Targets will drive improvement in mental health
    Reflecting the Government’s priority to improve the public services Kiwis rely on, including mental health care, Minister for Mental Health, Matt Doocey has today announced five mental health and addiction targets.  “The targets reflect my priorities to increase access to mental health and addiction support, grow the mental health and addiction ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New fund for mental health services set to open
    The first round of the government’s $10 million Mental Health and Addiction Community Sector Innovation Fund is set to open for applications later this month, Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey says.   “The Fund will support new and innovative initiatives that are focussed on increasing access to better mental health support, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Going for Housing Growth speech
    Speech to the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand - 4 July 202 AcknowledgementsGood morning. Can I acknowledge Jen Baird and the team from REINZ. It’s good to be here with you this morning.IntroductionThis morning I’d like to talk to you about the Coalition Government’s plan to fix our housing crisis and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-07-12T13:21:20+00:00