Good point.
Again that is just your opinion. You wouldn't know what a lot of the public thinks. It is not about 'whtaboutism'. National may have? National did have a similar campaign in 2009. Instead of wasting time making up pointless assumptions, you could have just...
How can you form any opinion on it if you can't remember National's energy-efficient campaign? I put a link to the article at 2.3.
The polls are basically neck and neck. Luxon is still tanking.
So that means in 2009, the National govt thought that people were too stupid to work it out for themselves, so they spent $4 million on a campaign to educate New Zealanders on energy efficiency.
Or maybe just desperate. National's fast & furious attempt was a bit of a flop. "AI era: Regulation required" https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/486951/ai-era-regulation-required-to-protect-workers-council-of-trade-unions-says New Strategy marks next step...
Lol agree.
Energy efficient light bulbs and shower heads are commonplace now. Labour was right.
bwaghorn
"former Energy and Resources Minister Gerry Brownlee in 2009 announced a television campaign to help Kiwis increase energy efficiency. It cost $4 million" https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/05/government-s-campaign-suggesting-shorter-showers-to-...
Both? "the council issued a statement to Newsroom in Parry's name confirming it had paid $413,000 in severance payments to around 20 staff between 2005 and 2022" "in late 2007 Parry made a surprise visit to the London home of one of the complainants, ...
"One of the men at the centre of the stand-off at Gore District Council was given a two-year contract extension just two days before the new council was elected" https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/487413/questions-over-timing-of-gore-council-chief-...
Hunters don't need assault weapons. So what is the problem with having a gun register and tighter gun control laws? If you are a law-abiding citizen, it should not be a problem, right?
Weka.
Yes, true that.
That's your opinion.
But National are not saying what they would do instead, they are saying they it will repeal the Labour's removal of a $5 charge on medicine prescriptions if elected. "Dropping the $5 prescription charge: Many people seem confused about this. It’s aims to ...
Regardless of your spin, Pharmac is now able to fund a lot more drugs under Labour than what they could prior.
Already answered you.
Pharmac is being properly funded under Labour.
The Labour govt are doing that. "we have increased funding to Pharmac by 51 percent since 2017" 03.30 https://ondemand.parliament.nz/parliament-tv-on-demand/?itemId=232984
Apparently enrolments were declining prior to the introduction of fees free. There is an eligibility criteria https://www.feesfree.govt.nz/eligibility-criteria/ 200,000 kiwis are in apprenticeships and for those who took the opportunity thanks to fees free...
Darien.
Disagree. Fees free is about reducing student debt and to take some pressure off students and it is doing that.
Just accept the fact that Jacinda was still most preferred PM. Key and Clark never faced the level of crises that Jacinda had. Different political landscape back then, also SM wasn't much of a thing either. Didn't realize that you were genuinely ...
Again that's hypocritical, you were proved wrong. It is normal for incumbents to have a slump in the polls mid term. That is a fact. Ardern remained most preferred PM until she resigned, banging on about 2008 doesn't change that fact. Unlike Key, Luxon is ...
Hypocritical, that's what you're doing.
And round and round we go. That's just your opinion. Cherry picking? Lol that's rich coming from you! You claimed I made stuff up, without sourcing. Proved you wrong. Your question "Where was Ardern again, at the beginning of the 2023 election year"? ...
Recent Comments