The state IS running state media. With our taxes. Shut the lot down, then maybe Labour can meet some of its broken promises.
Put up your argument. The label comes with very specific diagnosis.
Rebuilding a major city, sure, but that growth slowed some time ago. Our economy is growing across many sectors, and will continue to in the foreseeable future due to Nationals economic prudence.
You make the mistake of not understanding the disproportionate amount of GST the wealthy pay on discretionary spend.
So you admit the economy is growing, but you think that is down to a shambling government who have told multiple lies, broken multiple promises and are in the process of destroying business confidence.
Neither should they. They are virtually irrelevant.
So you don’t. I thought not.
No choice required. Twyford surely wins for his continuing screw ups over kiwi build.
State owned media is no less biased than private media. The difference is our taxes don’t fund private media. State run media is totally surplus to requirements in a modern society.
There is no need to conflate communism and socialism. In the context of politico/economic systems they share many similarities, but most importantly they share failure and they share repression and murder. In the hundreds of millions. As far as your ...
The ‘communists’ in China have adopted a progression towards a market economy. Funny eh?
You are not very bright.
The only time NZ had the highest standard of living in the world was when it was paid for by mother England. We pay our own way now, and the only reason we can is because we moved towards a market economy.
“But where, in the article, do these two people...“ Who claimed they did? I never claimed they said he lied. But he did lie, and their comments just provide evidence.
“You brought this counter argument into the thread” Indeed, and thanks for acknowledging it is a counter argument. “It never occurs to you that people might not abandon status quo because they fear the unknown. “ Oh people frequently abandon Communism/...
Hand grenades? There are no hand grenades. The last National government inherited and had to navigate an economy going into recession, a GFC, earthquakes, rebuilding a major city, and they still managed to leave the economy in great shape.
Chernobyl?
“Oddly, you didn’t hold back accusing David Clark for “telling porkies” and pretended, bordering on alleged, that this was actually in and taken from the Stuff article. “ The lies are quoted in the article, as I have posted for you. Clearly you have a ...
“Please state clearly, specifically, and, above all, slowly who stated in that article that “that Clark had been telling porkies” “ Why would someone need to? Because you’re in denial. The two lies are documented here: https://thestandard.org.nz/daily-...
Actually you cant. But I can provide evidence of the death toll of c/s regimes. Which is precisely what is being discussed.
None of which relate specifically to capitalism or to its enforcement. And most (perhaps all?) of which could have occurred in c/s states.
I very much doubt the data is correct, but even if it is, National inherited an economic time bomb on 2008, along with a raft of other neglect. Labour have inherited an economy in terrific shape. This governments reviews are about dodging the tough ...
I don’t move goal posts. Your rant is perhaps a sign of resignation?
S/C = socialist/communist. But then you always wriggle Stuart. It’s part of the fun of dialogue with you.
Direct contradictions with Clark. No-one is required to literally say anything. The guys been caught out. But then there’s a number of regular contributors here who must be regretting their claims about Middlemore, seeing as they’ve been show to be a total...
Must be. “Twelve days later however, and Clark is still telling media that the process around Rabindran and Darrow's future is still underway despite them already having their termination letters.” “Earlier this month Stuff revealed the DHB acting chief ...
Read the article. And there have been others. He’s been caught out big time.
S/C regimes tend towards totalitarianism because they need to repress the citizenry. They are by nature repressive regimes, with little tolerance for opposition.
Yes 5 minutes, because communist/socialist regimes seem incapable of functioning without totalitarian oversight. I’ve made that point here recently, thanks for the confirmation.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/health/103249836/middlemore-hospital-what-really-went-down-between-health-minister-and-counties-manukau-dhb So Clark has been telling porkies, eh. Surprise, surprise.
So over one hundred million people didn’t die in Russia and China? As for your calling economic reform ‘repressive’, clearly you need to get out more. Or read some history.
Recent Comments