If those were the only two available outcomes, yes
"i just wonder how many with left wing sympathies will be getting a file or a bigger file (nicky hager), cos historically that is how National uses this kind of power." The number is (at worst) the same as, or (at best) less than the number had Labour's ...
Thank you
"There is only one correct interpretation of the sentence" Nope there's only one that you've managed to grasp - I've explained the other for you twice now, let's see if three's a charm: If minarch is a man, and has a cock, and he writes about "people" ...
You can't really just *claim* someone is wrong though, you kinda have to *show* it by pointing out the flaws in their reasoning You know, like I just did when I demonstrated how you'd misinterpreted minarch's comment
But Al1en, you haven't demonstrated any homophobia hint: even if minarch *was* talking about gay sex (and there's nothing in his comment that suggests he was) he'd still essentially be saying that gay sex is none of his business
Sure Maybe try reading things twice before you reply-off-the-handle Please refer to 2/ not all "people" are men
Does yours not have a warning label? Check under the balls
I think I can clear that up for you Al1en 1/ minarch is writing as a man, in possession of a cock, and when he refers to people putting "other mens cocks" into their bodies he is referring to cocks other than his own (because he does have an interest in ...
The lack of definitions is a concern, but I disagree that the difference is cosmetic It's the difference between having something to hold a minister answerable for and not having it
Brett, I've been missing you The tr*lls here now are appalling Not up to your standard at all Love, felix
If you forget homosexuality - which shouldn't be difficult as it was never implied - the similarities abound re: using drugs/cocks -Easy source of pleasure -What you do with them is no-one else's business -Always keep them away from children -Be very ...
Have a look at the changes noted under 4IB (3), (a) vs (aa) These are the changes Labour inserted, and which everyone here seems unaware of http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2014/0001/latest/DLM6316050.html
Clark's govt was the first Labour govt post-neoliberalism, let's hope the next one has learned from the mistakes
So you'd rather "the guy you hired for protection" refused to negotiate and you get no wages? Because like it or not, that was the other available option Also, forget the 24/48 hr thing - you're right, it's irrelevant, the important thing is that now they ...
No-one cares what you think, creepy pr guy
Paul, you forgot to add number 8 to your list: Do all that, then watch National pass the bill they were definitely going to pass anyway, which allowed more spying on more people for more reasons than the one we have now You're castigating Labour for doing ...
You mean apart from Kevin Hague, David Clendon, and Kennedy Graham, all of whom speak quite a lot? Also, can anyone translate the latin?
As far as I can tell, ACT pretty much believe in the divine right of kings
The most significant is to limit the new powers to terrorism-related spying only
If it wasn't deliberate it was a bloody good fluke
So in the house today, David Seymour, a man who was installed in Parliament *only* because of an anti-democratic dirty deal, was giving shit to list MPs who are in parliament because people actually *voted* for their party, because apparently he's a proper...
Do your own work, fucko :roll:
Hey kids! Christmas candy canes for sale!
Don't be too hard on Labour over this Key was going to pass it with or without Labour, and at least with Labour there have been some improvements to the bill which wouldn't have been possible without Labour's support It's a case of bad vs worse, and we got...
Because you're a creepy PR guy who only comes here to spread lies and undermine the labour movement, that's why
"I am interested that you equate someone who supports socialism with someone who supports the most extreme state violence." It's not that PR (chris73, banned for three years) thinks socialism is that extreme, it's more that he doesn't think apartheid is ...
I see Carrick Graham is still paying Slater to post under his name: http://donotlink.com/http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/12/kevin-hagues-creepy-stalking-katherine-rich-logic-problem/
...and never has.
Yeah you probably shouldn't have. But you did, and look at you now.
If Ambrose had wanted to secretly record the conversation, it's not difficult to do it at a distance with the right equipment. Given that he presumably has access to such equipment, leaving a mic on the table (ffs) in plain view is reasonable evidence that...
Recent Comments