web analytics

Talking down the economy

Written By: - Date published: 11:19 am, May 2nd, 2008 - 57 comments
Categories: economy, election 2008, same old national - Tags: , , ,

National is a party weak on policy. It has had to drop nearly every one of its principled but unpopular policies to get itself in a position to win an election. This raises the question of why someone would vote for National, rather than keep the current lot. One of National’s answers is to claim that New Zealand needs National’s supposedly superior economy management because the economy is going down the toilet. To further this claim, National and its allies need to talk down the economy.

It’s a strategy that National and business have employed in each of the last three election years. Proclaim a coming recession, blame the government, say that only National can save us. Enough repeating of dire economic warnings and the media will pick it up, the public will start to believe the spin, and you might just get the downturn you’re hoping for.  When poor hapless old Bill English tried it in 2002, the economy grew at 5.1%. Don Brash and John Key tried it on again in 2005 but the economy was too resilient and maintained a 2.7% growth rate. Even their gleeful predictions of recession in 2006 only came to two quarters of 0.1% growth in the end.

This year, the economy is facing real difficulties and this has encouraged National to push the ‘recession’s coming, elect us’ line harder (because we led New Zealand during its last two recessions?). Doom and gloom predictions of doubling unemployment are being bandied about by National’s allies. But don’t be fooled, things are not as bad as they would have you believe. Yes, there has been 6% inflation in food, the housing market is static, and petrol is up. But New Zealand is going into this rough patch with record low unemployment, strong wage growth, a mammoth dairy payout, business tax cuts in place, and income tax cuts coming. In fact, the economy is in such good shape that growth accelerated throughout last year and totalled 3.1%. Unemployment is not going to grow substantially because low unemployment is self-reinforcing employers are afraid to let staff go during soft patches in case they can’t get them back when things pick up and lots of people in work means lots of domestic demand.

So, watch National try to talk down the economy as the election approaches, but don’t believe them. It’s just the same old National up to the same old failed trick.

And remember who really has the better record on growth.

(data)

57 comments on “Talking down the economy”

  1. randal 1

    this election so far has been meedia driven to the max. now that the Nats cannot buy the votes one way they are using the other and if that doesn’t work they will find another way of trying to win power for their own agenda…and the meedia is infantilised to boot and are lending their assistance because a) they have been instructed to and b) they always go for the new and improved version of anything without asking any questions…rewind to infantilisation.

  2. What you say about National trying to talk down the Labour-led governments economic performance makes sense. Then again I guess if the shoes was on the other foot then Labour would be doing exactly the same thing. Clearly many economic indicators have improved during the Clark reign though my right bias demands I say “correlation does not prove causation” :-}

    Unfortunately the confidence numbers seem to confirm that individuals and business are not feeling particularly confident about the future and that can not be good for the lefts chances of re-election.

    Roy Morgan consumer confidence here:

    http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2008/01/02/chart-roy-morgan-consumer-confidence/

    National Bank business confidence here:
    http://www.interest.co.nz/ratesblog/index.php/2008/01/02/chart-national-bank-business-own-activity-outlook/

  3. Steve Pierson 3

    randel. why ‘meedia’?

  4. Steven 4

    Well there’s many reasons why I’d vote for National and not Labour if an election was held this afteroon. But I’ll give you one example as I have just returned from the supermarket from my weekly shopping. As a modreate income earner who is severely overtaxed relative to what I get for my taxes and is striving to save ahead under my own steam and without the yoke of the state, I don’t deviate from my fixed $80 p/w spend at the New World. As recently as 6-8 months ago that bought me enough food and supplies to last me a week. Now that same spend will last me about 5 days. As a humble citizen with no political ties, I see a GOVT that couldn’t give a stuff about this issue and the similar horrendous rises in living affecting ordinary kiwis who the Labour movement is supposed to be representing (that’s a great oxymoron that one). This GOVT is weary and is too corrupted by their own selfishness and worldview to continue in office. I’m only the average guy in the street but I tell you that another term in GOVT for Labour will be dettrimental to the future of NZ and its people. Especielly if the Greens are alongside them.

  5. Tane 5

    Steven, what are you suggesting the government should do about international food prices?

    I’m also interested in your claim that you’re ‘severely overtaxed’. I know that’s what National is telling you, but the OECD begs to differ.

  6. Steve Pierson 6

    Why are you catpitalising govt?

    Usually, people would capitalise WEARY CORRUPTED or whatever the National line of the month is at the time.

    Steven. If you have a family, you’ve got tax rebates from Labour (which National opposed) through Working for Families. If you own shares or your own business, you just got a reduction in the corporate tax rate (= bigger profits) which National also voted against. If you’re really on a moderate income, ie between $12 and $15 an hour, you can thank Labour for pushing up the minimum wage every year since it came to office, moving up that wages of not only people on the minimum wage but also people earning a little above that amount.

  7. “As a modreate income earner”

    How many times the median income do you earn?

  8. Phil 8

    Nice use of selective data, Steve – you shopuld get ajob working for the Nats with data like that!

    I note the Wage/Salary data is not in the excel workbook you’ve used as a source. I found your real source anyway (same site different location) and it shows you haven’t adjusted for inflation. In real terms, the rise in average hourly earnings is the same under both Govt’s

    Tane,
    Food price rises have been a recent phenomenom. Non-tradable inflation (influenced by things like govt charges and otehr domestic price pressures) has been consistenly running at about 4% for the last few years – much more than the traded component.

  9. Tane 9

    Thanks Phil, yeah I’m aware of the distinction. But I’m guessing Steven is talking specifically about rising food prices, which are driven by an international market. There’s not a lot the government can do to reduce prices in that area.

  10. Joker 10

    Tane and Steve

    The reality to most New zealanders is that they are feeling the squeeze in their pockets, (actually) watching family, friends and colleagues disappear overseas in greater numbers and feeling more at risk of being victimes of crime.

    By saying “here are some graphs that show you are just imagining it” or “tough luck there is nothing the Government can do about it” is not addressing the very real concerns of the electorate in a very clever way.

  11. I love the claim “that I getting taxed way more than I get out of the tax system”.

    This is archetypical thought train of a neo-liberal. In fact, a majority of taxpayers are required to contribute “more than they consume” simply because in part the progressive tax system covers a lot of bases.

    For example, if you are sick, you get cheap (relative to actual cost) doctors visits. Obviously if you are not sick – you don’t get “full value” of out your tax contribution – just like private health insurance. Sure you might claim, “but I don’t get sick – what about the birth of your children, your own birth, vaccinations – for the most part these are provided free of charge”.
    The state-provider models eliminates the stress from the threat of – “what does my provider cover?”, and refrains from placing higher burdens on the most vulnerable, as they are typically more likely to go without insurance in private-provider models because they simply can’t afford it. Not mention avoids big costs at a time for young families when they are at their most financially vulnerable.

    I have no problem with paying more than I will ever get out, simply because that is a necessary price for living in a politically and socially stable country.

  12. Joker, dont forget there is the filter of mass media between you and ‘most new zealanders’

  13. Steve Pierson 13

    Phil. National’s record on wages is pathetic compared to Labour’s – we’ve provided graph data on it in the past.

    fuller analysis here http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=527

    Joker. i can’t magically make the media do a better job of covering these issues, nor can I magically make the Government adopt policy. What I can do is explain underlying facts. You can choose to ignore them if it suits your prejudices.

  14. Joker 14

    Steve,

    You say “nor can I magically make the Government adopt policy” this implies that you actually believe there are problems that exist that Government policy needs to address.

    However the theme in the presentations of your “underlying facts” always seems to be “no issue here, nothing to see”.

    But you are right I do read this stuff with prejudice. Perhaps the same prejudice you exercise whilst writing them.

  15. randal 15

    hey Steven I hear on the grapevine that Key is going to offer a general wage order of 10%…and its very anal to stick to a predetermined $80 budget…get some variety in your life dude…shall I come round for a baloney slicing party???????

  16. Steve Pierson 16

    joker. no, the opposite prejudice.

    saying ‘I can’t magically make the Government adopt policy’ means just that and nothing more.

    You’re resorting to the old tory line: when the facts don’t suit you say ‘well, no-one cares about the facts’. Ol’ mike is a great one for that, it’s all about perception to him, whether there are actual problems and who really has the best solution doens’t matter – it’s just perception, perception, perception. Anything to get back into power.

  17. Joker 17

    “joker. no, the opposite prejudice”

    Yeah, thats what I was trying to say. Whilst coming here after a long lunch might make me more berligerent it does nothing to make me more comprehendable.

    Anyway the perception stuff only resonates with the electorate if there is some beef behind it.

  18. Steven 18

    I don’t accept your way of thinking. Perhaps you all live under rocks or are rich pricks and are sheltered from everyday living? I’m living under a regime that takes 30-35 percent of my hard earned income and as a single 30 yr old Eurpean male I don’t see a cent of benefit of any of it. I would literally prefer to take it and throw it away in the wind. At the same time my cost of living down here in the real world is rising accross the board everywhere I turn and once this climate change rort kicks in it’s only going to get worse. It’s all very well to quote facts and figures and graphs and data but its what is happening in reality that is the true indicator. I’ll just move to Australia next year if there is no change in the election, I’ve got family there.

  19. Steven – have you considered asking your employer for a pay-rise?

  20. James Kearney 20

    Steven- to be paying 30% tax you would have to be earning $100,000 a year. To pay 35% tax you’d have be earning $200,000.

    I’m not going to even bother with the rest of your comment. You’re just a whinger who has all his facts wrong.

  21. r0b 21

    I don’t see a cent of benefit of any of it.

    Just the education you received, the health system you use, the roads you drive on, the other infrastructure that you use, superannuation when you retire, defence, international trade and relations, that sort of thing.

    You don’t exist as an island, you are part of and nurtured by a cooperative society.

  22. Steven, if you think your ethinic orgins have anything to do with the ammount of tax you shoudl pay, we woudl all welcome you moving to australia. PFO.

  23. Steve Pierson 23

    This is interesting – one can complain bitterly about being over-taxed without actually knowing how much tax one is paying. Steven says he is paying 30-35%, if he doesn’t know how much it is how can he know whether he is ‘overtaxed’ or not? And how much would be not overtaxed?

    Of course, like James points out – you’re not paying 35% income tax until your income is $200,000
    check it out for yourself: First $38,000 at 19.5%, next $22,000 at 30%, any more at 39%.. add it all up, divide by total earnings to get your total percentage tax.

  24. Joker 24

    What about if you chuck GST into the mix?

  25. Tamaki Resident 25

    Steve “I’m living under a regime … I don’t see a cent of benefit of any of it.” – so you’re not living in NZ then?

  26. ‘Steve Pierson
    May 2, 2008 at 3:55 pm
    This is interesting – one can complain bitterly about being over-taxd without actualyl knowing how much tax one is paying. Steven says he is paying 30-35%, if he doenst knwo how much it is how can he know whether he is ‘overtaxed’ or not? And how much would be not overtaxed?

    Of course, like James points out – you’re not paying 35% income tax until your income is $200,000
    check it out for yourself: First $38,000 at 19.5%, next $22,000 at 30%, any more at 39%.. add it all up, divide by total earnings to get your total percentage tax.’

    This is something I have suspected for a long time, I think what he really means is the media has told him hes being taxed too much, and hes just pissed off that he cant buy a ferrari ect.

  27. Tamaki Resident 28

    sorry, Steven not Steve in my comment above.

  28. Steve Pierson 29

    I just ran the numbers: you have to earn over $235,000 a year to pay 35% tax.

    Joker. He’s not talking about GST and you would have to make assumptions about spending in individual cases. But Tane posted a link eariler a link to OECD table on the tax wedge,
    http://www.oecd.org/document/17/0,2340,en_2649_34897_38148433_1_1_1_1,00.html#Table_O_1

  29. roger nome 30

    oh god, where’s David Farrar on this thread? How can he watch every piece of anti-Labour pseudo-economic hysteria he has beaten up ove the last three years be so soundly trounced. It must be very painful for him to read.

  30. Pain is no worries woger nome.Nice pill was it?

  31. randal 32

    steve pierson…meedia? …whine not?

  32. Razorlight 33

    You people need to pull your heads out of the sand. Kiwi’s are hurting. Mortgage rates are high, food prices are high filling the car up is expensive and the one response we hear from the left is …it is still better than if National was in government.

    You may well honestly believe this but you have to realise things are grim out here in the real world.

    I am not blaming Labour for all the things that are wrong. Quite clearly they cannot control Internationa Prices. But blindly harping on that National is bad is falling upon deaf ears. We all know what Labour has done, what we want to know is what they are going to do in the future to get us out of this. Where is the next big bold policy. Something along the lines of of WFF that will help those young couples that are about to find they have negative equity in their homes. I don’t want to see blue v red graphs showing what happened 15 years ago. I want answers for tomorrow.

    National may not be showing any vision either but after nine years I am ready to throw the dice, take a gamble and give them my vote. Times up Labour, lets see if the other team can deliver.

  33. r0b 34

    We all know what Labour has done

    I know what I think are the many good things Labour has done RL – I’ve posted often on it. But I’d be interested in your take. What do you see as the achievements?

  34. Razorlight 35

    rOb. I believe Labour can claim some credit. On their watch unemployment has dropped considerably and I think it would be churlish to say they cannot claim that as an achievment.

    I am also fan of Kiwisaver. I think that will pay dividends in the future.

    WFF has arguably delivered what it set out to do. I think an easier way to provide tax relief to working families is to simply cut their taxes, but hey lets not have that argument.

    So I am not a completely blind. There have been successes.

    But it is also obvious the world economy has been strong for the past decade with cheap credit financing our lifestyles. Those days are now over and I want to know what is Labours plan to get through this economic storm . Simply going on about past succeses and past National governments will not win back the support they have lost in the past 2 years.

  35. r0b 36

    OK Razorlight, a perfectly reasonable perspective.

    You want to know Labour’s plan. I want to know National’s plan. My suggestion is, don’t vote blindly for “change”, vote for the best plan. And by implication don’t vote for anyone that can’t or won’t articulate a plan.

    will not win back the support they have lost in the past 2 years.

    Labour have lost very little support, and it’s important to remember that. What has happened is that opposition has consolidated around one big party (instead of spreading over lots of little parties).

  36. Occasional Observer 37

    Again Steve attempts to use statistics in the most misleading and intellectually corrupt manner, to present a bogus argument.

    Let’s look at the actual data Steve sourced from.

    In Q4 1990, when National came into office, inflation was running at 4.7%. By Q4 1999, when National left office, inflation was running at 1.1%. Inflation is now at 3.5% (well outside the target band), with no sign of reducing in the near future.

    In October 1990, when National came into office, floating mortgage rates were at 15.4%. In November 1999, when Labour came into office, they were at 6.6%. They are now at 10.9%.

    In Q4 1990, GDP was at 0%. That’s right. ZERO. That was when Australia was running at 4.8% GDP growth. In 1999, growth reached 4.3%. Presently, many commentators are predicting that New Zealand is heading towards a recession; others suggest we will merely go through a period of zero growth.

    Throughout the 1990s, household debt servicing costs constituted less than 10% of disposable income, at 8.1% in 1999. Presently, household debt servicing costs is 14.5%. I don’t imagine Steve Pierson has a mortgage, so he’s probably ignorant of the effect of that.

    In 1990, unemployment was continuing a rising trend, going back since the 1970s. That’s right. Until 1990, unemployment had not fallen in a generation. It peaked at 10% in 1991, and dropped to 6.2% in 1999. Labour has continued this trend. It stands alone as the only statistic that will be better when Labour is thrown out of office, than they inherited when they were elected to office.

    Nice try, Steve, but again your statistical illiteracy, and your willingness to present a dishonest argument, gets the better of you.

  37. r0b 38

    OO I don’t have time right now to look at each of your claims individually, but those I have looked at, the quarterly data is so noisy that I don’t think it makes much sense to quote it. That far back we should look at annual rates.

    Picking on quarters allows you to make claims that sound convincing: “Q4 1990, GDP was at 0%. That’s right. ZERO. That was when Australia was running at 4.8% GDP growth. In 1999, growth reached 4.3%.” – but turn out to be totally misleading in full context:
    http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/keygraphs/Fig2.html

    From that one example that I’ve had time to look at it appears to me that it is you, not Steve, that is trying to lie with statistics.

    It stands alone as the only statistic that will be better

    Ahh no. Since the last National government, apart from unemployment down, we have better average GDP growth, numbers on benefits down, crime down, minimum wage up, poverty / childhood poverty rates down, suicide rates down, wage gap with Australia no longer widening, recently increasing personal savings (KiwiSaver) and so on.

  38. randal 39

    some of you people need to realise that New Zealand is not an autarchy and that we live in the real world where we are at the mercy of forces that we cannot control. to suggest that somehow the government does certain things just an only just to annoy YOU is delusional if not paranoid.

  39. higherstandard 40

    True Randal we are not living in autarchy the last time we came even close in recent memory was under Robert Muldoon and from my perspective the present government is only a shade better.

  40. AncientGeek 41

    hs: I find it difficult to see how you can say that.

    For me the defining feature of the Muldoon national government was its fiscal irresponsibility. There is no comparison between a national government that seemed to take pleasure in putting the taxpayers into hock, and a labour one that is fiscally prudent.

  41. r0b 42

    A while back Occasional Observer wrote: Again Steve attempts to use statistics in the most misleading and intellectually corrupt manner, to present a bogus argument.

    As we shall see below this claim is rather ironic, because it is OO, not Steve, that is guilty of these “crimes”. OO’s preferred tool for lying with statistics is to pick points out of noisy quarterly data, and try to draw conclusions from those few points, without looking at the real trends and context. Picking on odd quarters allows OO to make claims that sound convincing, but aren’t.

    Inflation

    In Q4 1990, when National came into office, inflation was running at 4.7%. By Q4 1999, when National left office, inflation was running at 1.1%. Inflation is now at 3.5% (well outside the target band), with no sign of reducing in the near future.

    Let’s have a look at the real trend: http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/keygraphs/Fig1.html
    See how inflation plummets in the early 90’s? Hurrah! Was that the work of the National government? No. It was an effect of the explicit inflation targeting run by the Reserve Bank as mandated by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act – which was passed in 1989 by the Labour government of the time.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_targeting
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Labour_Government_of_New_Zealand
    http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/speeches/2361827.html
    So inflation fell at the start of the 1990s as a result of policies instituted by a Labour government, and with some fluctuation it has remained lowish ever since.

    Mortgages

    In October 1990, when National came into office, floating mortgage rates were at 15.4%. In November 1999, when Labour came into office, they were at 6.6%. They are now at 10.9%.

    Let’s have a look at the real trend: http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/keygraphs/Fig3.html
    Mortgage rates are increasing, it is a problem, but they have only recently begun to approach again the average that they were under National.

    GDP

    In Q4 1990, GDP was at 0%. That’s right. ZERO. That was when Australia was running at 4.8% GDP growth. In 1999, growth reached 4.3%. Presently, many commentators are predicting that New Zealand is heading towards a recession; others suggest we will merely go through a period of zero growth.

    Let’s have a look at the real trend: http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/keygraphs/Fig2.html
    In my opinion no strong case can be made either way here, unless you dishonestly pick just a couple of points in time and try and tell a story about them (which is what you did OO). But the fact (for what it’s worth, and ignoring the deficiencies of GDP as a measure) is that on average growth is slightly higher under Labour (as per Steve’s post).

    Household debt

    Throughout the 1990s, household debt servicing costs constituted less than 10% of disposable income, at 8.1% in 1999. Presently, household debt servicing costs is 14.5%.

    Once again you dishonestly present a couple of data points to make a case which ignores the real trends:
    http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/keygraphs/fig5.html
    Household debt has been increasing steadily since the 90’s. Yes this is a problem that Labour (like the previous National government) has not been successful in addressing. Household savings have also been declining over the same period. Yet paradoxically household net worth has risen from 171 Billion (1990) to 279 Billion (2000) to 526 Billion (2005) to who knows what now (data from Table 2 in the pdf document below). The relationship between these issues is not simple:

    Click to access 2823190.pdf

    However, our work also suggests that much of the decline in the savings rate in recent
    years may be connected with rising household net worth that has occurred due to
    sharp increases in prices for houses and farms. This paper has shown that there are a
    range of channels by which some households have been able to ‘unlock’ wealth on
    their balance sheets and spend it, which will have contributed to the wedge between
    income (as conventionally defined) and consumption. Many of these channels have
    involved an increase in indebtedness by parts of the household sector, which in turn
    has fuelled increased borrowing from overseas. In effect, there have been significant
    transfers of wealth across households and generations. Younger generations are now
    paying for the wealth transfer in the form of reduced housing affordability and higher
    debt levels, or by foregoing homeownership altogether.

    There, now if you want to criticise Labour, do it on the real issues, like the intergenerational transfer of debt (which I think is an outrage). Don’t play stupid games with meaningless snapshots of household debt.

    So then

    So then OO, when you say “Nice try, Steve, but again your statistical illiteracy, and your willingness to present a dishonest argument, gets the better of you” the only proper response is a rather sarcastic laugh. It is you OO who is guilty of these “crimes”.

  42. Occasional Observer 43

    Now, try and be a little bit honest, rob.

    I didn’t pick noisy statistical points in time. I picked the moment when National was elected to office. In many cases, such as GDP figures (which had been -0.2% in the two previous quarters), the numbers were worse than the point at which National was elected.

    I find it fascinating that you claim credit for inflation rates being a legacy of Labour’s reserve bank act (which I actually agree with, in a large part), but you refuse to claim that unemployment in the early 1990s, mortgage rates in the early 1990s, and zero growth in the early 1990s, were not a legacy of the fourth Labour government.

    I didn’t pick statistically noisy points in time–I chose the moment when National was elected, compared to the moment when Labour was elected. Equally, as much as you and Steve Pierson want to come up with spurious averages–discounting the legacy that each of the parties inherited–you are still trying to manipulate figures. National inherited a failing, crippled economy in 1990. The 1990s became a period of considerable prosperity, through strong economic management. The legacy in 1999 was falling unemployment, high growth, consistently low interest rates, strong fiscal management, low inflation, and low household debt servicing costs.

    Now, let’s fast-forward to present day New Zealand. The legacy Labour will leave National in 2008 is again low growth, high interest rates, poor fiscal management, high inflation, and high household debt servicing costs.

    NB: In your last comment, you referred to household debt, and explained that it had been rising for a generation. This is true. But household debt servicing costs haven’t been rising for a generation: they remained static at below 10% of household income throughout the 1990s. Now, household debt servicing costs are dramatically higher than they were in 1999.

  43. randal 44

    more blather to stun the punters with oo. how many more pages cn you waste with info bordering on the imcomprehensible. National must talk down the economy because they cant release any policy. Its in their nature to poor mouth everything anything that is not theirs anyway!

  44. r0b 45

    OO: I didn’t pick statistically noisy points in timeI chose the moment when National was elected, compared to the moment when Labour was elected. Equally, as much as you and Steve Pierson want to come up with spurious averagesdiscounting the legacy that each of the parties inheritedyou are still trying to manipulate figures.

    Are you seriously trying to argue that one off quarterly snapshots from noisy time series (OO) give a clearer picture of performance than 9 year averages (Steve) or the graphs showing trends over time (me)? An average over 9 years is “spurious”? Seriously OO? If you are seriously trying to make such claims then we need proceed no further, because you are a loony.

    Your point about inherited legacies and by implication the (unknown) time after election before the policies of a new government start to have any effect on the slow moving system that is the economy only serve to further reinforce the point that a single quartile measure taken at the moment of election is essentially arbitrary as a measure of long term performance.

    I find it fascinating that you claim credit for inflation rates being a legacy of Labour’s reserve bank act

    I do. One of the very few things their economic approach got right.

    but you refuse to claim that unemployment in the early 1990s, mortgage rates in the early 1990s, and zero growth in the early 1990s, were not a legacy of the fourth Labour government.

    Wrong. I am happy to agree that they were a legacy of the fourth Labour government, see next paragraph.

    National inherited a failing, crippled economy in 1990.

    To a certain extent yes it did. And why? Because the economic policies of the fourth Labour government were right wing policies – they were the policies of the individuals who went on to found ACT. The economy that National inherited in 1990 is a testimony to the failure of right wing economic theory (bizarrely under the flag of a Labour government that was a true Labour government in many other respects, but not economically).

    The 1990s became a period of considerable prosperity, through strong economic management.

    Ahh, bullshit. The 1990’s became a period of increased prosperity for a few at the top of the ladder, and a period of poverty and upheaval for the many at the bottom:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_National_Government_of_New_Zealand

    Richardson’s first budget, delivered in 1991 and named by the media as ‘the mother of all budgets'[1], introduced major cuts in social welfare spending. Unemployment and other benefits were substantially cut, and ‘market rents’ were introduced for state houses, in some cases tripling the rents of low-income people.[1] In combination with the high employment resulting from some of the 1980s reforms, this caused poverty to increase, and foodbanks and soup kitchens appeared in New Zealand for the first time since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

    Soup kitchens for the first time since the great depression = “a period of considerable prosperity”! What planet are you on OO? I’m going to take a wild guess that you live your life at the top of the ladder, and don’t much care about the fate of those at the bottom.

    NB: In your last comment, you referred to household debt, and explained that it had been rising for a generation. This is true. But household debt servicing costs haven’t been rising for a generation: they remained static at below 10% of household income throughout the 1990s. Now, household debt servicing costs are dramatically higher than they were in 1999.

    Indeed they are, and a similar trend is evident in Australia (for data up to 2006), and I agree that this is undesirable. But it’s not like the Labour government is unaware of this fact or trying to hide it – see Cullen’s mentions of this along with other issues:
    http://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/freedom+debt+freedom+prosper
    http://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/economic+outlook+and+savings+challenge
    http://www.beehive.govt.nz/feature/new+zealand+well-placed+deal+global+slowdown
    As discussed in the speeches a major plank of Labour’s plan to deal with this issue is raising levels of household savings through KiwiSaver. Another major factor is of course wage levels, which historically Labour have raised and National have tried to lower (as a cost to business). So tell me OO, what are National’s plans to deal with this issue? Let me guess – is it a tax cut?

    Now, let’s fast-forward to present day New Zealand. The legacy Labour will leave National in 2008 is

    Heh. Pardon me if I insist on the small formality of an election first. If Labour loses, we can discuss the matter of legacies later.

  45. Dean 46

    Rob:

    “Soup kitchens for the first time since the great depression = “a period of considerable prosperity’!”

    I’ve got news for you and I’m afraid it’s all bad – there was never a time since WW2 when there weren’t soup kitchens.

    In your own words, what planet are you on again?

  46. Sa Paulo 47

    I don’t accept your way of thinking. Perhaps you all live under rocks or are rich pricks and are sheltered from everyday living? I’m living under a regime that takes 30-35 percent of my hard earned income and as a single 30 yr old Eurpean male I don’t see a cent of benefit of any of it. I would literally prefer to take it and throw it away in the wind. At the same time my cost of living down here in the real world is rising accross the board everywhere I turn and once this climate change rort kicks in it’s only going to get worse. It’s all very well to quote facts and figures and graphs and data but its what is happening in reality that is the true indicator. I’ll just move to Australia next year if there is no change in the election, I’ve got family there.

    right mate. you’re either a trolling idiot or you actually have your brain directly hooked into an IV drip solution called moronic right wing paranoia.

    I don’t see any benefit from my taxes you say- you should try living in a country with no roads, police force, courts, health service, customs, MAF etc etc…I suppose you have had no schooling either…or perhaps it was there you just didn’t pay any attention.

    climate change rort- credibility= 0

    having lived in Australia so many tories neglect to mention when they do this annual everyone is off to Australia crap is that there are 3 levels of government there that all want your due. Much more government than in New Zealand. And funnily enough, you would have two Labour governments fairly much everywhere you go I think.

    sheesh…I’m sorry if you are genuine. But having recently seen places where the priveleges a 30 yr old kiwi male has as a result of his tax dollars would be a wonderland, I have little sympathy for you. And you are right Aussie may be better, but it might not be. It has its pros and cons too.

  47. Ted 48

    Guys, looks like the BNZ didn’t get the memo re: we’ve never had it better. When they release their monthly confidence survey they do a summary of key industries, this month it was as follows:

    Advertising: “Mixed messages”

    Agriculture: “the effects [of the drought] will linger … sheep and beef poor”

    Car Sales: “Very weak especially for used cars”

    Commercial Real Estate: “Yields rising … Office market firm, retail weak. Second tier market easing the most.”

    Construction: “Worries about what might lie ahead.”

    Finance: “Weak”

    Forestry/Sawmilling: “Bad all around with high cost increases, weakish offshore demand, and slimming down ahead of an expected fall in domestic construction”

    Information Technology: “Steadily weakening in recent months”

    Retailing: “Obvious weakness but with rising costs and staff shortages”

    Tourism: “Signs of weakness against a more competitive US market”

    Transport: “costs rising strongly with driver shortages”

  48. randal 49

    are any of you hungry…no…just dont have the cash to waste on infantilised toys and machines to fill in the spaces left by the last lot of worn out crap that you purchased…go for a walk and smell the roses!

  49. Dave 50

    Steve, you forgot another column

    AVERAGE TAX INCREASE.
    Could you add that in please?

  50. Steve Pierson 51

    Dave. I’d somehow have to take into account the effect of Working for Families – and then the increase in the social wage which is paid for by tax.

    And it would be more sensible to look at the median than the average.

  51. Matthew Pilott 52

    Dave, do you want Steve to mention the tax increase the public voted for in ’99, or the drop in corporate taxes that National voted against in 2007?

    I’m not sure how either would add much to this post.

  52. Phil 53

    The drop in corporate taxes was part of a wider fiscal package which the Nat’s did not support. To pick on one item in a whole range of fiscal proposals is pedantic and anal, Matthew.

  53. Again, I advise everybody to watch
    Money Masters; http://crazyrichguy.wordpress.com/the-money-masters/
    and Money as debt; http://crazyrichguy.wordpress.com/what-is-money/

    Because it makes perfectly clear why voting for John Key and National is like inviting the fox into the hen house.

    John Key was one of only four advisors to Alan Greenspan’s new York federal reserve when they started the housing bubble from 1999 unitll march 2001 and global head for the Forex department of Merrill Lynch.
    Google Merrill lynch for scandals and you will begin to understand where I’m coming from.

    In reaction to a few earlier comments on a comment I made with regards to DU.
    For those of you who think that Depleted Uranium is a tolerable material to use in war I have collected some nice photo’s on my blog.
    For more on DU babies have a google and I advise those who have a weak stomach not to take to close a look at what the NATO and the US occupation force are doing to empty Iraq and Afghanistan and in the near future in Iran as well. 4.5 billion years of radio active contamination spread alover those countries. 4000 tonnes of radio active waste spread out in a fine layer of nano particled dust over Afghanistan and Iraq. A war crime of monstrous proportions and we are complicit. Ignorance is not accepted as an excuse. Remember the Germans: Wir haben es nich gewusst. It took them sixty years to live that one down.
    Oh by the way: our soldiers in Afghanistan will also be contaminated, radioactive dust does not select between the Taliban or innocent civilians or godd soldiers and bad soldiers. They will contaminated and they will contaminate wives, children their houses. They have actually found nano particles of “depleted uranium” on the Nasa space station. It gets in the atmosphere and travels everywhere. This is a crime of truly biblical proportions.
    Educate yourselves

  54. dave 55

    I’d somehow have to take into account the effect of Working for Families – and then the increase in the social wage which is paid for by tax.
    Fair enough , do it – and could you clarify what you mean by ” average unemployment” – is that average dole figures or average beneficiary figures – given that most on the sickness benefit and some invalids beneficiaries should be on the dole – and half the invalids beneficiaries should be on the sickness benefit.

    another table you could put in :
    “Average interest rate increase” to see how that matches with ” average wage increase” Go on.

  55. Steve Pierson 56

    dave. you’re asking for specifics that can’t be applied to the whole population.

    But if you’re so keen to see those figures – go and do it yourself.

    It’s amazing how arrogant you are when you don’t even know how the unemployment rate is measured. Clue – it’s not a function of beneficairy numbers (in fact, most unemployed aren’t on a benefit becuase they’re not unemployed long eneough).

    Try again when you’ve got some nous.

  56. Dave 57

    IM well aware how unemployment is measured, but given your dodgy stats and graphs, you could mean anything but in your definition.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Release of initial list of supported training to aid COVID-19 recovery
    The Targeted Training and Apprenticeships Fund (TTAF) will pay costs of learners of all ages to undertake vocational education and training The fund will target support for areas of study and training that will give learners better employment prospects as New Zealand recovers from COVID-19 Apprentices working in all industries ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago
  • Emission trading reforms another step to meeting climate targets
    The Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will finally start to cut New Zealand’s greenhouse gas pollution as it was originally intended to, because of changes announced today by the Minister for Climate Change, James Shaw. The changes include a limit on the total emissions allowed within the ETS, rules to ensure ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Queen’s Birthday Honours highlights Pacific leadership capability in Aotearoa
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says the Queen’s Birthday 2020 Honours List provides an abundance of examples that Pacific people’s leadership capability is unquestionable in Aotearoa. “The work and the individuals we acknowledge this year highlights the kind of visionary examples and dedicated community leadership that we need ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Govt backing horticulture to succeed
    The Government is backing a new $27 million project aimed at boosting sustainable horticulture production and New Zealand’s COVID-19 recovery efforts, says Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. “Our horticulture sector has long been one of New Zealand’s export star performers, contributing around $6 billion a year to our economy. During and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Applications open for forestry scholarships
    Applications have opened for 2021 Ngā Karahipi Uru Rākau – Forestry Scholarships, which will support more Māori and women to pursue careers in forestry science, says Forestry Minister Shane Jones. “I’m delighted Te Uru Rākau is offering Ngā Karahipi Uru Rākau – Forestry Scholarships for the third year running. These ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Excellent service to nature recognised
    The Queen’s Birthday 2020 Honours List once again highlights the dedication by many to looking after our native plants and wildlife, including incredible work to restore the populations of critically endangered birds says Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage. Anne Richardson of Hororata has been made an Officer of the New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Wetlands and waterways gain from 1BT funding
    The Government will invest $10 million from the One Billion Trees Fund for large-scale planting to provide jobs in communities and improve the environment, Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Forestry Minister Shane Jones have announced. New, more flexible funding criteria for applications will help up to 10 catchment groups plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New fund for women now open
    Organisations that support women are invited to apply to a new $1,000,000 fund as part of the Government’s COVID-19 response. “We know women, and organisations that support women, have been affected by COVID-19. This new money will ensure funding for groups that support women and women’s rights,” said Minister for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Govt supports King Country farmers to lift freshwater quality
    Healthier waterways are front and centre in a new project involving more than 300 King Country sheep, beef and dairy farmers. The Government is investing $844,000 in King Country River Care, a group that helps farmers to lift freshwater quality and farming practice, Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor announced today. “Yesterday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Libraries to help with jobs and community recovery
    A major funding package for libraries will allow them to play a far greater role in supporting their communities and people seeking jobs as part of the economic recovery from COVID-19. “Budget 2020 contains over $60 million of funding to protect library services and to protect jobs,” says Internal Affairs ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Support for arts and music sector recovery
    A jobseekers programme for the creative sector and four new funds have been set up by the Government to help our arts and music industry recover from the blow of COVID-19. Thousands of jobs will be supported through today’s $175 million package in a crucial economic boost to support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Legislative changes to support the wellbeing of veterans and their families
    Minister for Veterans Ron Mark has welcomed the First Reading of a Bill that will make legislative changes to further improve the veterans’ support system.  The Veterans’ Support Amendment Bill No 2, which will amend the Veterans’ Support Act 2014, passed First Reading today. The bill addresses a number of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Christ Church Cathedral – Order in Council
    Views sought on Order in Council to help fast track the reinstatement of the Christ Church Cathedral  The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Hon Poto Williams, will be seeking public written comment, following Cabinet approving the drafting of an Order in Council aimed at fast-tracking the reinstatement of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealanders’ human rights better protected in new Bill
    The law setting out New Zealanders’ basic civil and human rights is today one step towards being strengthened following the first reading of a Bill that requires Parliament to take action if a court says a statute undermines those rights. At present, a senior court can issue a ‘declaration of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Deep concern at Hong Kong national security legislation
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today reiterated the deep concern of the New Zealand Government following confirmation by China’s National People’s Congress of national security legislation relating to Hong Kong. “New Zealand shares the international community’s significant and long-standing stake in Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability,” Mr Peters said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government invests in New Zealand’s cultural recovery
    Thousands of artists and creatives at hundreds of cultural and heritage organisations have been given much-needed support to recover from the impact of COVID-19, Prime Minister and Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Jacinda Ardern announced today. “The cultural sector was amongst the worst hit by the global pandemic,” Jacinda ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Better protection for New Zealand assets during COVID-19 crisis
    Key New Zealand assets will be better protected from being sold to overseas owners in a way contrary to the national interest, with the passage of the Overseas Investment (Urgent Measures) Bill. The Bill, which passed its third reading in Parliament today, also cuts unnecessary red tape to help attract ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Cleaning up our rivers and lakes
    Setting higher health standards at swimming spots Requiring urban waterways to be cleaned up and new protections for urban streams Putting controls on higher-risk farm practices such as winter grazing and feed lots Setting stricter controls on nitrogen pollution and new bottom lines on other measures of waterway health Ensuring ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Record year for diversity on Govt boards
    The Government is on the verge of reaching its target of state sector boards and committees made up of at least 50 percent women, says Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter and Minister for Ethnic Communities Jenny Salesa. For the first time, the Government stocktake measures the number of Māori, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New appointments to the Commerce Commission
    The Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister and Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media Minister, Kris Faafoi, has today announced the appointment of Tristan Gilbertson as the new Telecommunications Commissioner and member of the Commerce Commission. “Mr Gilbertson has considerable experience in the telecommunications industry and a strong reputation amongst his peers,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Historic pay equity settlement imminent for teacher aides
    The Ministry of Education and NZEI Te Riu Roa have agreed to settle the pay equity claim for teacher aides, Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. This will see more than 22,000 teacher aides, mostly women, being valued and paid fairly for the work they do. “Teacher aides are frontline ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt delivers security for construction subcontractors
    Subcontractors will have greater certainty, more cashflow support and job security with new changes to retention payments under the Construction Contracts Act says Minister for Building and Construction, Jenny Salesa. A recent review of the retentions money regime showed that most of the building and construction sector is complying with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Zealand and Singapore reaffirm ties
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong have marked the first anniversary of the New Zealand-Singapore Enhanced Partnership with a virtual Leaders’ Meeting today. The Enhanced Partnership, signed on 17 May 2019, provides the framework for cooperation across the four main areas of trade, defence and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • JOINT STATEMENT BY THE PRIME MINISTERS OF NEW ZEALAND AND THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE ON THE FIRST AN...
    On 17 May 2019, New Zealand and Singapore established an Enhanced Partnership to elevate our relations. The Enhanced Partnership – based on the four pillars of trade and economics, security and defence, science, technology and innovation, and people-to-people links – has seen the long-standing relationship between our countries strengthen over the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government investment supports the acquisition of new Interislander ferries
    State-Owned Enterprises Minister Winston Peters has welcomed KiwiRail’s announcement that it is seeking a preferred shipyard to build two new rail-enabled ferries for the Cook Strait crossing. “This Government is committed to restoring rail to its rightful place in New Zealand. Bigger, better ships, with new technology are yet another ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Better protection for seabirds
    Better protection for seabirds is being put in place with a new National Plan of Action to reduce fishing-related captures, Fisheries Minister Stuart Nash and Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage announced today.   The National Plan of Action for Seabirds 2020 outlines our commitment to reduce fishing-related captures and associated seabird ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Milestone in cash flow support to SMEs
    Almost $1 billion in interest-free loans for small businesses More than 55,000 businesses have applied; 95% approved Average loan approx. $17,300 90% of applications from firms with ten or fewer staff A wide cross-section of businesses have applied, the most common are the construction industry, accommodation providers, professional firms, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government protects kids as smoking in cars ban becomes law
    Thousands of children will have healthier lungs after the Government’s ban on smoking in cars with kids becomes law, says Associate Minister of Health Jenny Salesa. This comes after the third reading of Smoke-free Environments (Prohibiting Smoking in Motor Vehicles Carrying Children) Amendment Bill earlier today. “This law makes it ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Parliament returns to a safe normal
    The special Epidemic Response Committee (ERC) has successfully concluded its role, Leader of the House Chris Hipkins said today. The committee was set up on 25 March by the agreement of Parliament to scrutinise the Government and its actions while keeping people safe during levels 4 and 3 of lockdown. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Foreign Minister makes four diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today announced four diplomatic appointments: New Zealand’s Ambassador to Belgium, High Commissioners to Nauru and Niue, and Ambassador for Counter-Terrorism. “As the world seeks to manage and then recover from COVID-19, our diplomatic and trade networks are more important than ever,” Mr Peters said. “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Bill to counter violent extremism online
    New Zealanders will be better protected from online harm through a Bill introduced to Parliament today, says Internal Affairs Minister Tracey Martin. “The internet brings many benefits to society but can also be used as a weapon to spread harmful and illegal content and that is what this legislation targets,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Mycoplasma bovis eradication reaches two year milestone in good shape
    New Zealand’s world-first plan to eradicate the cattle disease Mycoplasma bovis is on track the latest technical data shows, says Agriculture and Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor. “Two years ago the Government, DairyNZ and Beef + Lamb New Zealand and industry partners made a bold decision to go hard and commit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New payment to support Kiwis through COVID
    Further support for New Zealanders affected by 1-in-100 year global economic shock 12-week payment will support people searching for new work or retraining Work programme on employment insurance to support workers and businesses The Government today announced a new temporary payment to support New Zealanders who lose their jobs due ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • PGF reset helps regional economies
    The Provincial Growth Fund will play a vital role in New Zealand’s post-COVID-19 recovery by creating jobs in shorter timeframes through at least $600 million being refocused on projects with more immediate economic benefits, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. The funding is comprised of repurposed Provincial Growth ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government exempts some home improvements from costly consents
    Government exempts some home improvements from costly consents Homeowners, builders and DIYers will soon have an easier time making basic home improvements as the Government scraps the need for consents for low-risk building work such as sleep-outs, sheds and carports – allowing the construction sector to fire back up quicker ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Concern at introduction of national security legislation for Hong Kong
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says the New Zealand Government has reacted with concern at the introduction of legislation in China’s National People’s Congress relating to national security in Hong Kong.  “We have a strong interest in seeing confidence maintained in the ‘one country, two systems’ principle under which Hong ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Samoa Language Week theme is perfect for the post-COVID-19 journey
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio, says the theme for the 2020 Samoa Language Week is a perfect fit for helping our Pacific communities cope with the unfolding COVID-19 crisis, and to prepare now for the journey ahead as New Zealand focuses on recovery plans and rebuilding New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Adult kakī/black stilt numbers soar
    A nearly 40-year programme to protect one of New Zealand’s most critically endangered birds is paying off, with a record number of adult kakī/black stilt recently recorded living in the wild, the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage announced today. “Thanks to the team effort involved in the Department of Conservation’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Waikato-Tainui settlement story launched on 25th anniversary of Treaty signing
    The story of the Waikato-Tainui Treaty process and its enduring impact on the community is being told with a five-part web story launched today on the 25th anniversary of settlement, announced Associate Arts, Culture and Heritage Minister Carmel Sepuloni. “I am grateful to Waikato-Tainui for allowing us to help capture ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Taita College to benefit from $32 million school redevelopment
    Taita College in the Hutt Valley will be redeveloped to upgrade its ageing classrooms and leaky roofs, Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. “The work is long overdue and will make a lasting difference to the school for generations to come,” Chris Hipkins said. “Too many of our schools are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago