Tax Justice Aotearoa starts campaign in support of CGT

Written By: - Date published: 7:46 am, April 8th, 2019 - 168 comments
Categories: capital gains, class war, tax - Tags:

Tax Justice Aotearoa has started a public campaign in support of a capital gains tax.  It is a coalition of various trade unions, churches and community groups.  

Its reason for being is described in this passage:

Tax Justice Aotearoa NZ seeks a fairer society through tax reform. We represent the growing number of people who wish to see greater transparency, equality and fairness in national and global tax systems. Founded in August 2018 and linked with the global Tax Justice Network, we provide analysis, ideas and information to create an informed dialogue about how tax builds societies where all people flourish.

There is a petition that you can sign.



168 comments on “Tax Justice Aotearoa starts campaign in support of CGT ”

  1. mikesh 1

    A non sequitur has no place in advertising.

  2. vto 2

    I think it is pretty simple…

    if there is to be no capital gains tax
    then there must be no income gains tax

    f&$k them

    one of us earns a measly $22/hour and pays tax on it
    while a family member walks away with $22 million and pays no tax on it

    how the f&%k does that work?

    • WeTheBleeple 2.1

      Same. Paying tax all my life. Family member owned and traded dozens of houses got to be a multimillionaire and didn’t pay tax. Same with businesses he’d pad out and flick for profit.

      Where’s the fairness in that? I worked just as hard and even harder.

      As for the grotesque earnings of corporations, we need legislation – NOT IRD investigating ways to retrieve tax earnings… Make them pay up or get out. All of them.

      Everyone pays tax, or nobody pays tax. Anything else is bullshit.

      • infused 2.1.1

        It’s people like you who are so full of shit. And VTO above.

        If you have family members selling ‘dozens’ of houses, they will be paying tax. If they are not, then it’s illegal.

        Same with businesses huh? Give me some evidence of SMBs walking away with shit tons of non-taxed earnings.

        As for you working harder? Give me a fucking break.

        • WeTheBleeple

          It was a simple scheme to climb into thirty odd years ago when he started. A house is used to leverage a loan for another house that leverages a loan for… you guessed it, another house… And these are mostly rentals you hold em and fold em as the market climbs which has pretty much been the trajectory because of the ease of loans against ‘surety’.

          It was a free for all till the flipping laws came in recently. It’s still a free for all in some regards but that’s what’s under question.

          Business flipping is similar, buy it, pimp it out (strip it down make it look hot), sell out.

          How much?

          “This is what it shows: In the year to June 2017, if the average holding time for the lower quartile sales was 10 years (some will be longer, some shorter), then the 10 year capital gain on those sales was about $1.8 billion.

          But the numbers are very much larger for owner-occupiers. For the same timeframe (the year to June 2017) owner-occupiers who sold realised $7.9 billion in gains, avoiding more than $2.6 billion in taxes.”

  3. cleangreen 3

    VTO that is sensible logic you speak.

    So there should be a low tax for anyone on a low wage income economy and a high tax on those with ‘excessive incomes’.

    That is fair.

    • mikesh 3.1

      There is nothing logical about comparing “apples” with “pears”. Capital gain is not income.

      • vto 3.1.1

        yes it is

        money is money, no matter how you come into it

        • cleangreen


          No capital gains are ‘income silly, it is the same as ‘speculative hedging”

          Are you smoking to much pot and cant think clearly?

      • McFlock 3.1.2

        ho ho ho ho ho
        Your mind powers will not work on me, boy!

        Capital gains are indeed the income we are looking for… to tax 😛

      • Incognito 3.1.3

        What is Capital Gain

        Capital gain is a rise in the value of a capital asset (investment or real estate) that gives it a higher worth than the purchase price. The gain is not realized until the asset is sold. A capital gain may be short-term (one year or less) or long-term (more than one year) and must be claimed on income taxes.

        What is Income

        Income is money that an individual or business receives in exchange for providing a good or service or through investing capital.

        Ergo, Capital Gain = Income


        • SHG

          your logic is awful.

          capital gain is increase in value
          increase in value is not money
          all income is money
          ergo capital gain is not income

          • Incognito

            This is the key part, from the quote:

            The gain is not realized until the asset is sold.

            At that moment, “capital gain” becomes “money” becomes “income” becomes “taxable”.


  4. solkta 4

    Capital gain is not income.

    Of course it is income. People wouldn’t attempt to make a capital gain otherwise.

    • Andre 4.1

      Capital gain is income at the moment it’s actually realised.

      Up until the moment the asset is sold and and the capital gain realised, the capital gain is a hypothetical construct. Which is why Cullen’s Foreign Investment Fund tax and Moggie’s proposed Comprehensive Capital Tax are deeply flawed and irritating as fuck to deal with.

      • mikesh 4.1.1

        A capital gain and the sale of a property are separate events. Saying that one “realises a capital gain” is simply playing with words.

        • Andre

          Ok, personal example. In 1987 I paid approximately 1.2 times New Zealand’s then median income for a part-interest in a property. Last year the property was sold and my share came out to approximately 11 times New Zealand’s median income.

          Before buying the property, I had 1.2x the median income as easy cash and no property. Now after selling the property I have 11x the median income as easy cash and no property. How on earth can that extra 9.8x the median income I now have not be considered income?

          Particularly when I could have just let that money sit in interest earning accounts and re-invest the interest (on which I would have paid tax), and it would now be worth maybe 4x the median income.

          • patricia bremner

            Excellent example Andre.

          • mikesh

            Well, bully for you. I assume you also had some income during that period, otherwise how did you survive.

            • Andre

              You have yet to explain why that capital gain I realised is not income.

              And thanks for your concern, yes that property was just part of my financial affairs. The point of detailing it here isn’t to brag about how well I’m doing, it’s to illustrate how capital gains becomes income and should be taxed as such.

              FWIW, as a US citizen, I’m still liable for US tax even though I’m resident in NZ. So that means I’m about to pay a six-figure tax bill to the US solely on the basis of that capital gain, even it was the NZ government that made that gain possible and the US had nothing whatsoever to do with it. However, if NZ had a CGT, then the NZ government would have taken a fair cut, and because of tax-reciprocity arrangements the US probably wouldn’t get much if any of it.

              • mikesh

                It doesn’t actually “explain” anything. It just tells us what happened. Saying that you made some income is just your interpretation of those events. I would have said that you sold an asset for what it was worth (so no profit), but that the value of that asset was influenced by capital gain, which couldn’t be taxed because it was bound up in the asset.

                Your interpretation shows the danger of simplistic thinking.

                • Andre

                  My time has value. When I sell 40 hours of my time to someone that wants my technical expertise, I have just sold an asset for what it is worth (so no profit). After all, there’s plenty of other things I could do with that time that I value just as much as earning money.

                  Why should selling one kind of asset (my time) be taxed, while selling a different kind of asset not be taxed?

                  • mikesh

                    When you sold your time you produced something. Capital gain produces nothing. That’s the difference. Income needs to be supported by production. It would be rather silly to say that the community’s income has increased without a corresponding increase in production. Government wants a share in the community’s production, which is why they tax income and not capital gain.

                    • Andre

                      Yet a significant part of that capital gain was due to improvements made to the property. Made using time from some of the part owners that was unpaid at the time. So the capital gain is partly deferred payment for time put into improving the property. Why should that be untaxed?

                      Whether or not income is due to producing something is a bizarre basis for deciding whether it should be taxed. Indeed, I would guess most people would say that producing something is more valuable to society than doing nothing useful. So we should encourage producing things by taxing income from producing things at a lower rate and taxing income derived from doing nothing productive at a higher rate.

                      Furthermore, a lot of jobs today are frankly bullshit jobs that produce nothing, and nobody would be worse off if those jobs disappeared (except those who get their income from doing those jobs). Should income earned at those bullshit jobs be tax-free because they produce nothing?

                    • KJT

                      Even more reason to tax capital gains, which is unearned and causes an economically dysfunctional allocation of investment/effort, rather than taxing earnings from productive work, which we want to encourage.

                    • mikesh

                      If the gain is due to work done then to that extent it is not a capital gain. Unpaid labour should be taxed if it is paid indirectly by an increase in the value of an asset. A gain of this type is really a markup rather than a capital gain. It is no different from the markup added to a can of baked beans by a supermarket owner before offering it for sale

                    • mikesh

                      Bullshit jobs don’t invalidate the theory. They are indication that the operation of the economy itself is not perfect.

                    • KJT


                      It doesn’t matter what the definition is in the study of economics, 101.

                      We are talking about the real world, here.

                      The economics that reflect reality, understand that capital gains, and the effect of finance, are not simple transfers. Divorced from productivity.

              • Paul Campbell

                Yes this happens to me too – I lived in the US for 20 years and still have to file taxes there – there’s a tax agreement between the two countries where you don’t pay tax twice, but you do pay the difference between the tax rates in one in the other, with 0% CGT in NZ I pay 20% in the US, I’d much rather pay that money in NZ.

                Remember that in almost every other western country a CGT is a LOWER tax – for example in the US capital gains are nominally taxed at your marginal rate unless you meet a minimum investment time – long term capital gains are taxed at a lower rate called the “CGT” rate, short term ones (house flipping for example, or day trading) is not.

                Tax fairness is an important reason for having a CGT, but there are other reasons, in NZ we invest too little money in new businesses because of the tax advantages of real-estate investment – long term our economy will be better off if we invest in our own businesses rather than having them bought by Aussie pension funds

        • ankerawshark

          Call it what you will Mikesh, but its time to tax it……………….

    • mikesh 4.2

      It is true that “money is money” – how could it be otherwise. However not all money is income.

      • solkta 4.2.1

        It is only considered not to be income by fuckwits who don’t want to pay tax on it.

        • cleangreen

          100% solkta and Alana.

          Mikesh is really screwed up in the head.

          Any ‘speculation’ produces profit is a taxable income period.

          This is a global position used for taxation.

          Only a handful don’t think this way and Mikesh is one of them.

        • new view

          Solkta If it turns out that the cost of it cancels out any benefits would you still want it. If you do then it’s envy tax and only a fuck wit would keep pursuing that.

        • mikesh

          If you have a brain then I would suggest you use it, instead of calling those of us who do use their brains fuckwits.

          • KJT

            Those who produce semantic sophistry, to avoid tax on gains, at the expense of those who earn their money with hard work, may not be idiots, but the are being disingenuous.

            • mikesh

              It is those who call capital gain “income” who are employing “semantic sophistry”. I have given concrete reasons in various parts of this thread why capital gain is not income.

              • Shadrach

                And I’m impressed with your patience, but you are arguing against mindless, entrenched ideology. Meanwhile, NZ’ers have given both fingers to this stupid idea.

                • Drowsy M. Kram

                  But not “stupid” for every country.

                  Such a wealthy country, Norway – why do they have a 27% CGT (excluding sale of the principle home)?


                  • Shadrach

                    It takes a particular form of stupidity to run that argument.

                    Norway have a flat personal income tax rate of 23%, in addition to a tax threshold surtax. You have to be earning the equivalent of around NZ$100,000 (K598,050) before your tax rate goes above 26%. Their corporate tax rate is 23%, considerably lower than ours. Their VAT ‘general rate’ is 25%.

                    So sure…let’s run a considerably lower personal tax rates for people earning $100k, lower business tax rates and a much higher GST rate. Then you can have your CGT.

                    • KJT

                      And a State share of the economy over 60%, 41% of GDP is from tax revenues, which they paid for by keeping income earning assets in State hands. And a CGT,

                      If idiots like you hadn’t sold or stolen every tax payer built income earning asset the New Zealand Government owned, we could, like Norway, kept our social supports and infrastructure, without extra tax.

                      As usual Shadrach, you are looking from the wrong angle.

                    • Shadrach


                      Oh the burn! KJT advocating an economic system that survives partly on fossil fuel revenues. 12% of GDP and over one third of exports!

                    • UncookedSelachimorpha

                      Tax in Norway is 41%of gdp, in Nz only 32%.

                      Your characterisation of Norway as having low tax on income and companies is incorrect, they have taxes in addition to the basic rates. Plus a wealth tax.


                    • Shadrach

                      “Your characterisation of Norway as having low tax on income and companies is incorrect,”
                      I didn’t characterise it as any such thing. I was highlighting the cherry picking contortions required to argue for a CGT based on Norway’s economic success. Like all successful economies, Norway doesn’t have a single bullet. Mind you, their substantial oil revenues help. No doubt those using Norway to support their pro CGT arguments will have to reassess their opposition to fossil fuels.

                  • SHG

                    Yes we should be like Norway, with their massive state exploitation of fossil fuel resources… and whale killing

                    yep. surefire vote-winners there

                    • UncookedSelachimorpha

                      Other Scandanavian (and certain other continental European) countries lack both those things, have high tax and high government spending, and have much better social outcomes than NZ, UK etc.

                      It is more a cultural outlook, than simply luck of oil wealth.

                      Remember – “sharing is caring”

                • KJT

                  Chicago school economics is not mindless entrenched idiocy?

                  You have already blown your credibility, Shadrach.

                  • Shadrach

                    The arguments presented here for a CGT are mindless ideology. That’s why outside your own echo chamber so few people buy your bs.

                    • KJT

                      Just the majority of successful economies in the world, that have a CGT.

                      “Capital gains are not income”. Tui add.

                      Reality has thoroughly debunked the Chicago school and Neo-Liberal economics.

                      Try to keep up.

                    • Shadrach

                      “Just the majority of successful economies in the world, that have a CGT.”

                      So what? See my comments above about Norway. They have a CGT. And a 25% VAT. Are you advocating for that too? And a 23% business tax rate? I’ll bet you’re not. And I’ll bet you’re totally ignorant about the tax systems of all those other economies.

                    • KJT

                      As are you about real life economics.

                      But, just like your blinkered view of Israel, i don’t expect any relation to reality in any of your statements.

                    • Shadrach

                      Are you advocating for a 25% GST? A 23% business tax rate? Anytime you’re cornered you run away from answering KJT.

                    • KJT

                      Cornered in your fevered imagination.

                      With rules you make up yourself.

                      You must have been fun to play chess with. Making up your own imaginary rules as you go along.

                    • Shadrach

                      Are you advocating for a 25% GST? A 23% business tax rate? Or having 12% of GDP and over one third of exports in oil?

                      You’ve been caught out cherry picking KJT. It’s as simple as that.

      • patricia bremner 4.2.2

        True mikesh. “not all money is income”
        Then it is wealth, and I believe we should also tax wealth as they do in most countries.

        • mikesh

          Realised capital gain is only a small part of wealth. There may be something to be said for taxing all wealth, but taxing the part represented by capital seems unfair.

        • ankerawshark

          Patricia 100 ++++

      • mikesh 4.2.3

        I call it what it is. And it’s not income so taxing it seems inappropriate.

        • Wensleydale

          If it’s not income, Michael, what is it? Cheese? A goat? A Fijian holiday for two at a five-star resort?

          • mikesh

            It’s capital. What else. I suggest you learn the difference between capital and income.

            • Wensleydale

              I would, but I’m far too busy riding my goat around Fiji and eating cheese.

            • KJT

              Only an economics definition. The effect. Someone has more money, is the same.

              • SHG

                That’s like saying “murder is only a legal definition”. It’s kinda important.

                • KJT

                  It is more like the distinction between murder and manslaughter.

                  Both result in a corpse.

                  BTW. Economists do not agree on the definitions of income, and CGT.

                  For a long time the role of banking was down played in most economics, considered as a facilitator of transfers, which played no real role in productivity. Keynes, exploded that one.

    • mikeshI 4.3

      MMost people invest in assets for the rental income they provide. Capital gain is serendipitous.

      • mikesh 4.3.1

        I apologise for using the pseudonym “mikeshl”. That was a typo.

      • KJT 4.3.2

        Bull. Certainly not those investing in Auckland houses.

        And from the screams from federated fuckwits, many farmers are not investing in a farming business. They are be farming capital gains. They even publicly, if inadvertently, admitted it

        • mikesh

          They can’t live on capital gains. They must be earning income as well, otherwise how are they able to survive.

          • KJT

            There is a family next door to me, living on the capital gains from their Auckland house.

            So. Next piece of theoretical bull.

      • Andre 4.3.3

        Yes, that is what their accountants have coached them to say in order to evade New Zealand tax law.

  5. Alana 5

    When Sam Morgan sold Trademe for $700 million he paid no tax; but a salary earner would pay tax. Where is the justice in that? Simply tax all income.

    • mikesh 5.1

      Sam sold a business worth $700,000 for $ 700,000. There is no profit in that.

      • vto 5.1.1

        you like your semantics eh mikesh…

        of course there is profit when he increased its value from $0 to $700m – that is the profit.

        look mikesh – if you think there should be no tax on capital gains, that is fine. Just as long as there is no tax on income gains as well.

        Problem sorted.

        • mikeshI

          Income comes from using our resources to produce goods and services. The cash connection arises only because we usually sell our products for cash. The justification for income tax arises from the fact that the government needs us to use some of our resources to in the provision of public goods. Capital gain is not based on the provision of goods and services.

          • mikesh

            See my comment at 4.3.1.

          • vto

            semantics is all you have … and semantics from only very recent history as well…

            “The justification for income tax arises from the fact that the government needs us to use some of our resources to in the provision of public goods.”

            You do realise of course that government never used to tax income at all, and only taxed capital, usually through land and others taxes? Try a bigger and longer picture than just recent neoliberalism mikesh, it will provide more cred.

            And just to repeat from post above;;….

            “one of us earns a measly $22/hour and pays tax on it
            while a family member walks away with $22 million and pays no tax on it

            how the f&%k does that work?”

            How does that work mikesh? In a local community? Where you expect the cleaner to clean the capitalist’s big home and pay tax on that cleaning income, while the capitalist makes truckloads more money and pays no tax? Do you want to live in a community with such growing resentment of the people on the hill? Where the divide becomes ever greater? Where that resentment turns to anger then to hate?

            It is completely unbalanced mikesh. One of our family earns $22 per hour and pays tax on every cent, while another walks away with $22million and pays nothing.

            If you think that is fair then you can get f%#ked

            • mikesh

              Yes. I would certainly agree with land taxes as a substitute for CGT, or even as a substitute for income tax. I have never made a secret of my liking for land taxes.

              The person who has walked away with 22 million has handed over an asset worth that much. So you may as well get fucked as well if you don’t think that’s fair. Better you ask yourself how she finished up with an asset worth that much in the first place place.

              • McFlock

                But if she produced nothing to walk away with $22mil more than what she paid for it (i.e. the capital gain), then she finished up with it by producing nothing. Why not taxt that $22mil? It’s not like she earned it.

                • mikesh

                  But it’s not like the rest of us have a claim on it either.

                  • McFlock

                    Of course we do, as a nation. That magical income suddenly appeared because of the conditions and infrastructure developed by the nation. As an example, for the past fifteen years residential investors have been profiting off government mismanagement of the housing market.

          • vto

            if no capital gains tax
            then no income gains tax

        • mikesh

          The person who purchased the site paid $700,000 because he expected the site to produce sufficient future income to justify that price. However since tax will be paid on that future income, why would you wish to tax the capital gain as well?

          • McFlock

            I work 30 hrs a week. If I got a second job for ten hours a week, the government taxes that income stream as well.

            And it was $700,000,000.

          • KJT

            Bull. Again.

            No. Because they expect muggins who pay taxes, to improve services and pay for extra people, to drive demand, so that someone else will pay $1400 000. in a few years.

            If the buyer was paying for future ongoing income, the asset price would reflect what it could earn.

            Farm and house prices are far higher than any future earnings, apart from capital gains, can justify.

        • mikesh

          There is justfication for income tax inasmuch as the government needs to divert part of the community’s productive resource to it’s own use. Capital gain is not supported by use of productive resources.

          • vto

            what on earth does that last sentence mean?

            • mikesh

              It means that capital gain is not supported by productive activity. The asset is still the same as it was when first purchased.

              • Stuart Munro.

                The lack of productivity suggests that capital income should be taxed more than productive income – having failed to do so goes some way to explaining NZ’s lackluster productivity growth over the last few decades.

                • mikesh

                  I would certainly like to see unearned income taxed more heavily. But when I mention “unearned income” I mean the income derived from the employment of capital e.g. rent and interest. Capital gain is not in itself income. I’m referring to what are sometimes called “coupon clipping” activities.

                  • Stuart Munro.

                    Yes it is, which is why most countries tax it.

                    Your argument is very like the NRA one going around, that the recent shooting was not conducted with MSSA. They might not have met the quibbling legal definition, but in practical terms, they emphatically were MSSA. And in the same way, capital gains are income, and no practical person will deny it – only hopeful monsters dedicated to a lifetime of tax evasion even try.

                    • mikesh

                      Keynes said something about “practical people” regurgitating the ideas of some defunct economist.

                    • KJT

                      As you regurgitate the economic theory that couldn’t predict the GFC.
                      In fact they believed that it was impossible.
                      Because their models had become more and more divorced from reality.

                      I prescribe a course of behavioral economics.

                    • mikesh

                      Actually, the economist whose theories I most subscribe to is Michael Hudson. Hudson was one of the few economists who did predict the GFC. However, that has nothing to do with this particular issue.

                      In your case I prescribe a course in taxology.

                    • KJT

                      Actually did.
                      Along with Managerial Economics, Business accounting, including tax law and practice, BTW, Teaching, Engineering, Environmental technology and others, like building and another trade, along the way. I get bored easily.

                      If we are going to play this game.

                      And, i prefer these people.

                      However everyone from Marx and Smith to Chang, King, Steglitz, Robert Reich, have useful insights.

                      The Chicago school, Friedman and Von Mises etc are notable for elegant theory, which fits in with the promotion of wealthy interests, but bear no resemblance to reality.

                  • Capital gain is not in itself income.

                    My salary is not in itself income.

                    Weird – it’s almost like asserting it doesn’t actually make it so…

              • KJT

                With money that requires those of us who do produce something, to work more to pay it back.

                Capital gains take from everyone to make a few wealthy.

                There is absolutely no reason why they should escape tax,.

                And very good economic efficiency reasons why they should be taxed.

                Which is why most countries, do.

                • mikesh

                  Capital gains take from nobody (exept perhaps from the purchaser of the asset).
                  Capital gains may make a few wealthy but they don’t take from anybody, apart from the purchaser of an asset I suppose.
                  Capital owners pay tax on the income yield from their assets – and pay tax.
                  Capital gains taxes are inefficient since reducing people’s capital reduces their capacity to earn income.
                  The capital gains taxes that other countries collect seem pretty inefectual.

                  • KJT

                    “Capital gains take from nobody”.

                    As businesses have to pay higher interest because of the risk incurred by high asset prices.

                    Farmers go bust, pollute, or run the land down, because the prices they have to pay for land, are too many multiples more than farm earnings.

                    The extra roads, services and infrastructure we pay for, for extra people, so capital gains earners can keep making more money.

                    The rise in interest rates to try and keep housing inflation down. Which hurts businesses, and householders with existing mortgages, alike.

                    Take from nobody. My fucking arse.

                    • mikesh

                      The purchaser of an asset pays for any capital gain built into that asset. Nobody else is involved in the transaction.

                      As far as all that other stuff that you mention is concerned, you’re dreaming if you think a capital gains tax will remedy any of it.

                      I wish you would leave your “fucking arse” alone and start using your brain instead.

                    • KJT

                      It won’t fix it alone, but will certainly help.

                    • KJT

                      You are technically correct on your separation of capital gains, and income. If we take the strict economics definition.

                      There are economists that agree it should be taxed, however. In fact we already do. It is just that some forms escape. Often by lying to the IRD, about intentions.

                      However we are talking about the real world effects here.

                      To say that capital gains have no effect on real world distribution of wealth and income, with no effects on anyone apart from buyers and sellers, is just a self serving nonsense,

  6. Ad 7

    Pretty damn late for a government sock puppet to arrive, months after the launch, and well after everyone on talkback has chewed it up to cat-sick constituency.

    Hopefully they have compelling spokespeople who can tilt this.

    The near-silence from our Minister of Finance is a deafening lesson in leadership.

    • ianmac 7.1

      Don’t you think Ad that this might be a good time? National has hammered the possible negatives for a long time. Now would be a good time for the positives to appear as later this month the Tax Plan proper will be published by the Government. Maybe poor old Simon will have to retract his Eyeore behaviour.

      • Ad 7.1.1

        A lot of unnecessary damage has been done by the government refusing to front or even run defence for Cullen.

        This is the signature Finance policy of this government. Yet there has been a complete lack of detectable advocacy strategy or comms strategy from them about it.

        So this government wants to kill CGT completely or water it down to near immateriality.

        This is further demonstrated by the government choosing to go into an election with it – twice.

        The sweet spot they are aiming for is negligible political effect, with maximised income into the government coffers.

        Everything else is smoke.

    • Anne 7.2

      He’ll be keeping his trap shut as much as he can until after he’s delivered his budget.

      Anything he says between now and then will be distorted, misquoted and misinterpreted by the Nats and their media acolytes. Duncan Garner will be in his element and so will the Hosk and the other fellow whose name escapes me at the mo. 😉

      Oh yes, Hooton.

  7. A 8

    Capital gains is one of the few ways I can see of getting ahead. The very last thing this country needs is more tax.

    • vto 8.1

      It’s not more tax you egg, it’s the same amount


    • tc 8.2

      Classic rwnj I’ll informed meme parroted ad naseum.

    • AB 8.3

      “Capital gains is one of the few ways I can see of getting ahead”
      Yes – in a country of mostly modest wages, it is. That’s why rental properties are so popular among the middle class. The issue is that, by definition, it’s not a form of “getting ahead” that is available to all. If we all owned rentals, who would we rent them to?
      In reality therefore, some people’s “getting ahead” depends on others “staying behind” – and there is no justice or humanity in that.

    • ankerawshark 8.4

      A if you make money on your property you will still get ahead. You will just pay some tax on it that’s all

    • mikesh 8.5

      It is more tax. I assume the person paying for the capital gain, namely the purchaser of the asset, will not be receiving an appropriate rebate.

      • McFlock 8.5.1

        No, because they’ll purchase at a price for which they would expect their own capital gain.

        • mikesh

          However they are paying with tax paid income though the capital gain produces no ” real” income. So if a CGT is paid as well then more tax is being paid.

          • vto

            no mikesh, the amount of tax pulled out of the economy will remain the same at around 35% of GDP. Various other tax rates are intended to be amended to ensure the mix remains at 35%.

            There will be no more tax.

            • mikesh

              Probably. But the need to reduce other taxes in order to equalize the tax take proves my point.

          • McFlock

            They only pay the CGT if they get a “real” gain from selling it. So they’re paying tax on all their income, rather than getting income from capital gains tax-free.

            Otherwise they don’t get a capital gain, do they.

          • mikesh

            I probably didn’t word that very well. I should have said that a capital gain is just an increase in the value of an asset. (Real) income comes about through the production of additional goods and services available for purchase by the community.

            • KJT

              Still sophistry.

              Looks like income, feels like income and in many cases, swapped by forgoing income, to avoid taxes.

              The arguments against CGT, basically boil down to “I shouldn’t have to pay tax on my investement income, even though you pay tax on yours, because I am special!”

              • mikesh

                Sophistry? Not st all. How can a capital gain be income when it is simply an increase in the value of a asset. You can’t spend it since it is tied up in the asset itself. You can’t knock off a chimney from your rental property an use it to purchase a pair of shoes.

                • KJT

                  There are whole towns full of retired farmers living off capital gains.

                  Can’t live on my Kiwi saver until I am 65 either.
                  Why am I taxed on the interest?

                  Pull the other one.

                  • mikesh

                    I don’t think they are “earning” any capital gains after they have sold their farms and retired. When they were “earning” capital gains they couldn’t spend them, so those gains were not taxable. Even when those gains were “realised” they didn’t suddenly become income.

                    • KJT

                      You still haven’t advanced any credible reasons why capital gains shouldn’t be taxed, apart from, “they are not income”.

                    • mikesh []

                      Actually, I have given other reasons. The duplication of tax is one that springs to mind. I think I have also mentioned the discounted future income argument, though maybe on some other post. I halvel also mentioned the unfairness of taxing CG while leaving other capital untaxed (including unrealised capital gain). I have been somewhat remiss though in not pointing out the TWG’s contention that CGT will do little to alleviate inequality.

                    • KJT

                      When I am “earning” Kiwi saver, i can’t spend it either, but I am sure as hell paying tax on the gains.

                    • KJT

                      Duplication of tax applies to any investment.
                      Doesn’t protect me from paying tax on shares and Kiwi saver earnings, however.

                      Discounted future income fails, when land is sold for so many multiples of future income, that no possible business income from it can repay the sale price. The price level is driven by the expectation of future capital gains. It is a ponzi scheme, but one that seriously skews investment, to our economic detriment.

                      I think the tax working group is not correct in saying CGT, won’t reduce inequality. Housing is one of the prime causes of poverty in New Zealand. Anything which helps reduce the expectation, of tax free capital gains returns on housing, slows the rise in housing costs.

                    • mikesh

                      “Duplication of tax applies to any investment”. So does CGT apparently.

                      Even if the expectation of capital gain drives up prices, discounted future income is still a factor. In any case CGT is not the way to deal with the problem since it will change very. You need to get rid of capital gain in the first place.

                      I can’t speak for the TWG. I’m just reporting what they said, and I assume they know what they are talking about.

            • Psycho Milt

              Yeah, good luck explaining to the IRD that your income wasn’t actually “real” income because you spent all your work time blathering at people on blog comments threads instead of producing additional goods and services like you were being paid for. It’s hard to picture that being a successful gambit…

  8. Tuppence Shrewsbury 9

    The problem with this campaign is it’s obvious that justice isn’t on the organisers minds.

    if they wanted tax justice, they’d advocate for a CGT that matched company, trust and top level tax rates while lowering all tax bands according to how much tax was brought in by the new tax.

    this bunch of work shy whingers have openly said it’s about wealthier people paying more on capital gains AND more on income so those less well off can pay less. That’s punitive and self interested.

    So really they are no better than the greedy capital owners who reduce income to pathetic levels to avoid paying their fair share of tax.

    • vto 9.1

      what a pile of horse dung

      At the moment the capital owners can make money by capital gain and pay no tax at all, while someone slaving on $20 per hour pays tax on everything.

      This CGT re-adjustment isn’t punitive and self-interested – this re-adjustment is rectifying what is already punitive and self-interested against the workers who currently pay all the tax while the lazy, bludging capital owners pay nothing.

      The capital owners need to stop bludging off the workers

      • Tuppence Shrewsbury 9.1.1

        Thanks for completely misunderstanding my comment. in your normal turgidly uncomprehending way you’ve completely missed the point that I wasn’t criticising a CGT.

        I was criticising this group for their blatant self interest and bull shit posturing on “Justice”

        I’m in favour of a CGT. I’m not in favour of these morons being the public organisational voice of championing for CGT as the wider electorate is rightly suspicious of any group that has to name itself after a virtue they have no control over.

        When you see a car dealer who has named themselves honest john, do you automatically believe they are actually honest?

        I also don’t see how lumping in a desired increase in income tax against “high” earners is “Justice” because this group represent people who don’t earn that much.

        • KJT

          Sorry to bust your bubble, but I pay CGT, now, and will definitely be paying more if the top tax rate goes up.

          Unlike some, i think it is fair to pay my share of the price, of living in a functioning civilized country.

          High income earners have had considerable tax cuts since the 80’s, while those on low income, have had tax increases and welfare cuts, as well as deteriorating state services. Justice means reversing some of this.

          “Trickle down”doesn’t work.

      • ankerawshark 9.1.2

        vto “what a pile of horse dung” . 100%

      • makesh 9.1.3

        I don’t think ” lazy, bludging capital owners” pay no tax. Their assets must be yielding income on which they are paying tax. If those assets are not earning income for their owners then applying Gareth Morgan’s RFRM tax would be a better way of dealing with them. In their case such a tax would be more lucrative for the government.

    • cleangreen 9.2

      Tuppence Shrewsbury – produces biggest pile of horse dung ever here.

  9. WeTheBleeple 10

    Reading the Herald comments it seems fear, group think and ignorance are driving opposition.

    The whole “it takes from the hard working and gives to the lazy” is a stupid and blatant lie.

    Public education is sorely needed, and reporters should declare their conflicts of interest or stop stirring the pot.

    • mac1 10.1

      But those so-called hard-working people who gain income from selling properties have to call themselves hard-working because otherwise they’d have to acknowledge that their income is hardly hard-earned, but rather is unearned income.

      Then they’d have to admit that they were the lazy ones. It’s all about self-justification and greed.

      Yeah, they’ll say. You’re just practising the politics of envy. That’s their best defence. That, or ‘virtue-signalling’, which is what my parents would have called practising what is moral, and right.

      Tax ’em, and punish the bludging tax-dodgers, and late payers, who already cost this country billions.

      • infused 10.1.1

        you idiots understand its more than just housing, right? It shows your prejudice.

        • mac1

          Income is income.

          I am prejudiced against people earning income?

        • Graeme

          Yeah, ALL income from the sale of any asset (except the family home) will be treated the same and be taxable.

          Rather than now where someone can say they have no intention of selling the asset (cross my heart and promise to god etc etc) and the asset magically becomes un-taxable. The current tax “exemption” on income from capital gains is predicated on a deceit and I don’t see how that is fair or honest.

          And if the business plan relies on a capital gain to turn a profit, then the intention is to sell and therefore taxable even under the current rules.

      • Stuart Munro. 10.1.2

        You won’t get that view in the Harold – real estate is a pretty big advertiser.

    • Wensleydale 10.2

      You need to take into account the sorts of people who routinely read Granny Herald. Especially given the sorts of people who routinely write for Granny Herald.

      • cleangreen 10.2.1


        Those who read ‘Granny Herald’ are sadly brainwashed fools as the herald is a corporate rag not worth the cost of toilet paper.

        Best keep distance from this right wing rag.

        ‘Scoop’ is a far more honest educator of public affairs.

  10. timeforacupoftea 11

    Capital Gains TAX is all over – can’t see it going through now as Taxlcinda’s baby Neve wants to keep her nanny employed.

    • Drowsy M. Kram 11.1

      Given that the 4th Labour Government introduced a 10% GST, and then increased it to 12.5% (in 1989), and that the last hike (to 15%) occurred October 2010 (“to pay for income tax cuts by the [5th] National Government“), maybe it’s time for another increase.

      In order to raise government revenue to meet the increasing costs of social security/welfare, health, education etc., the government is considering increasing taxes. Which would you prefer: a CGT, or 17.5% GST?

      Problem is that each year there’s less money to go around the 50% least wealthy NZers, but they still need enough to live, if we want to be considered a developed country.

      • timeforacupoftea 11.1.1

        I would go without !
        I would like to see it go further such as 20% GST

        First $20,000 earned income tax free thereafter $20,000 and above $20,000 earned to $150,000 income tax 40% from $150,000 to as much as you want to earn $65% tax.

        GST on everything,
        You buy a House, Farm, Car etc 20% GST would be applied.
        Remove cash and move into electronic transactions only.

        Remove all excise tax’s booze fuel etc

        GST on everything ( barn the above ) and no claiming back GST for business or anyone.
        Same TAX rates for Business repeat : ( First $20,000 earned income tax free thereafter $20,000 and above $20,000 earned to $150,000 earned income tax 40% from $150,000 to as much as you want to earn $65% tax. )

  11. Ian 12

    This capital gains tax fiasco is just a diversion for David Parker to stick the boot into dairy farmers as we rescue your sorry arses once again.

    • Your heroic efforts to farm capital gains at the expense of our waterways goes woefully unrecognised by the nation, totes.

    • KJT 12.2

      We need CGT, to pay for drought relief, irrigation schemes, nitrate treatment for water, MB, unemployment from “Free trade” deals to suit farmers, income support for your underpaid farm workers, and all the other times we have “rescued your sorry arses, again”.

  12. UncookedSelachimorpha 13

    Great to see an organisation promoting a view that is opposed to the interests of extreme wealth – normally extreme wealth does all the talking in our society.

    I support any tax change that works against the extreme inequality that exists in NZ, and the proposed (fairly crippled) CGT is a small step in the right direction.

    The key thought for these discussions should always be that the poorest 40% own 3% of the nation’s wealth, while the richest 10% own 60% of the wealth. We need to change that.

    • Drowsy M. Kram 13.1

      Completely agree with this.

    • mikesh 13.2

      A CGT would actually be counterproductive since, once it is introduced, the PTB will say “problem solved” and no further action will then be taken to alleviate inequality. This, I have always thought, is the main problem with CGT. It gives rise to sort of Gresham’s law situation, and seems to get in the way of more effective approaches.

      • UncookedSelachimorpha 13.2.1

        “A CGT would actually be counterproductive since, once it is introduced, the PTB will say “problem solved” and no further action will then be taken to alleviate inequality”

        You could actually say that about any single step to reduce inequality.

        But I agree that this CGT is only going to address inequality slightly, and other approaches are needed as well – and if this is the best the Tax working Group and Coalition can come up with, it is pretty pathetic (and shows they aren’t much bothered by current inequality in NZ).

        The fact the extremely wealthy in NZ are so opposed to the CGT suggests it probably has some merit.

  13. mikesh 14

    “You could actually say that about any single step to reduce inequality.”
    No. I don’t think you can. It goes without saying that building more houses, state houses in particular, would be more effective: though of course there is a limit to how many houses can be built in a short space of time. However, reigning in bank lending could also be very effective. RBNZ seems unwilling to do much at the moment to reduce lending into the housing market for fear of bringing about a collapse, but if it were up to me I would impose a high reserve ratio on the banks, perhaps as much as 100%, and I would have no qualms about collapsing the housing market. I would even consider forcing the banks to write off some of the debt of recent purchasers who found themselves under water : though of course such measures would have to subject to means testing.
    Radical? Perhaps. But I wouldn’t be messing around with a namby pampy CGT

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • CRL costs money but also provides huge benefits
    The City Rail Link has been in the headlines a bit recently so I thought I’d look at some of them. First up, yesterday the NZ Herald ran this piece about the ongoing costs of the CRL. Auckland ratepayers will be saddled with an estimated bill of $220 million each ...
    2 hours ago
  • And I don't want the world to see us.
    Is this the most shambolic government in the history of New Zealand? Given that parliament hasn’t even opened they’ve managed quite a list of achievements to date.The Smokefree debacle trading lives for tax cuts, the Trumpian claims of bribery in the Media, an International award for indifference, and today the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 hours ago
  • Cooking the books
    Finance Minister Nicola Willis late yesterday stopped only slightly short of accusing her predecessor Grant Robertson of cooking the books. She complained that the Half Yearly Economic and Fiscal Update (HYEFU), due to be made public on December 20, would show “fiscal cliffs” that would amount to “billions of ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 hours ago
  • Most people don’t realize how much progress we’ve made on climate change
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections The year was 2015. ‘Uptown Funk’ with Bruno Mars was at the top of the music charts. Jurassic World was the most popular new movie in theaters. And decades of futility in international climate negotiations was about to come to an end in ...
    13 hours ago
  • Of Parliamentary Oaths and Clive Boonham
    As a heads-up, I am not one of those people who stay awake at night thinking about weird Culture War nonsense. At least so far as the current Maori/Constitutional arrangements go. In fact, I actually consider it the least important issue facing the day to day lives of New ...
    14 hours ago
  • Bearing True Allegiance?
    Strong Words: “We do not consent, we do not surrender, we do not cede, we do not submit; we, the indigenous, are rising. We do not buy into the colonial fictions this House is built upon. Te Pāti Māori pledges allegiance to our mokopuna, our whenua, and Te Tiriti o ...
    17 hours ago
  • You cannot be serious
    Some days it feels like the only thing to say is: Seriously? No, really. Seriously?OneSomeone has used their health department access to share data about vaccinations and patients, and inform the world that New Zealanders have been dying in their hundreds of thousands from the evil vaccine. This of course is pure ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    17 hours ago
  • A promise kept: govt pulls the plug on Lake Onslow scheme – but this saving of $16bn is denounced...
    Buzz from the Beehive After $21.8 million was spent on investigations, the plug has been pulled on the Lake Onslow pumped-hydro electricity scheme, The scheme –  that technically could have solved New Zealand’s looming energy shortage, according to its champions – was a key part of the defeated Labour government’s ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    18 hours ago
  • CHRIS TROTTER: The Maori Party and Oath of Allegiance
    If those elected to the Māori Seats refuse to take them, then what possible reason could the country have for retaining them?   Chris Trotter writes – Christmas is fast approaching, which, as it does every year, means gearing up for an abstruse general knowledge question. “Who was ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    19 hours ago
  • BRIAN EASTON:  Forward to 2017
    The coalition party agreements are mainly about returning to 2017 when National lost power. They show commonalities but also some serious divergencies. Brian Easton writes The two coalition agreements – one National and ACT, the other National and New Zealand First – are more than policy documents. ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    21 hours ago
  • Climate Change: Fossils
    When the new government promised to allow new offshore oil and gas exploration, they were warned that there would be international criticism and reputational damage. Naturally, they arrogantly denied any possibility that that would happen. And then they finally turned up at COP, to criticism from Palau, and a "fossil ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    22 hours ago
  • GEOFFREY MILLER:  NZ’s foreign policy resets on AUKUS, Gaza and Ukraine
    Geoffrey Miller writes – New Zealand’s international relations are under new management. And Winston Peters, the new foreign minister, is already setting a change agenda. As expected, this includes a more pro-US positioning when it comes to the Pacific – where Peters will be picking up where he ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    22 hours ago
  • Gordon Campbell on the government’s smokefree laws debacle
    The most charitable explanation for National’s behaviour over the smokefree legislation is that they have dutifully fulfilled the wishes of the Big Tobacco lobby and then cast around – incompetently, as it turns out – for excuses that might sell this health policy U-turn to the public. The less charitable ...
    23 hours ago
  • Top 10 links at 10 am for Monday, December 4
    As Deb Te Kawa writes in an op-ed, the new Government seems to have immediately bought itself fights with just about everyone. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Here’s my pick of the top 10 news and analysis links elsewhere as of 10 am on Monday December 4, including:Palau’s President ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    24 hours ago
  • Be Honest.
    Let’s begin today by thinking about job interviews.During my career in Software Development I must have interviewed hundreds of people, hired at least a hundred, but few stick in the memory.I remember one guy who was so laid back he was practically horizontal, leaning back in his chair until his ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 day ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: New Zealand’s foreign policy resets on AUKUS, Gaza and Ukraine
    New Zealand’s international relations are under new management. And Winston Peters, the new foreign minister, is already setting a change agenda. As expected, this includes a more pro-US positioning when it comes to the Pacific – where Peters will be picking up where he left off. Peters sought to align ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    1 day ago
  • Auckland rail tunnel the world’s most expensive
    Auckland’s city rail link is the most expensive rail project in the world per km, and the CRL boss has described the cost of infrastructure construction in Aotearoa as a crisis. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The 3.5 km City Rail Link (CRL) tunnel under Auckland’s CBD has cost ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • First big test coming
    The first big test of the new Government’s approach to Treaty matters is likely to be seen in the return of the Resource Management Act. RMA Minister Chris Bishop has confirmed that he intends to introduce legislation to repeal Labour’s recently passed Natural and Built Environments Act and its ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    1 day ago
  • The Song of Saqua: Volume III
    Time to revisit something I haven’t covered in a while: the D&D campaign, with Saqua the aquatic half-vampire. Last seen in July: The delay is understandable, once one realises that the interim saw our DM come down with a life-threatening medical situation. They have since survived to make ...
    1 day ago
  • Chris Bishop: Smokin’
    Yes. Correct. It was an election result. And now we are the elected government. ...
    My ThinksBy boonman
    2 days ago
  • 2023 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #48
    A chronological listing of news and opinion articles posted on the Skeptical Science  Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Nov 26, 2023 thru Dec 2, 2023. Story of the Week CO2 readings from Mauna Loa show failure to combat climate change Daily atmospheric carbon dioxide data from Hawaiian volcano more ...
    2 days ago
  • Affirmative Action.
    Affirmative Action was a key theme at this election, although I don’t recall anyone using those particular words during the campaign.They’re positive words, and the way the topic was talked about was anything but. It certainly wasn’t a campaign of saying that Affirmative Action was a good thing, but that, ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • 100 days of something
    It was at the end of the Foxton straights, at the end of 1978, at 100km/h, that someone tried to grab me from behind on my Yamaha.They seemed to be yanking my backpack. My first thought was outrage. My second was: but how? Where have they come from? And my ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    2 days ago
  • Look who’s stepped up to champion Winston
    There’s no news to be gleaned from the government’s official website today  – it contains nothing more than the message about the site being under maintenance. The time this maintenance job is taking and the costs being incurred have us musing on the government’s commitment to an assault on inflation. ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago
  • What's The Story?
    Don’t you sometimes wish they’d just tell the truth? No matter how abhorrent or ugly, just straight up tell us the truth?C’mon guys, what you’re doing is bad enough anyway, pretending you’re not is only adding insult to injury.Instead of all this bollocks about the Smokefree changes being to do ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    3 days ago
  • The longest of weeks
    Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.Friday Under New Management Week in review, quiz style1. Which of these best describes Aotearoa?a. Progressive nation, proud of its egalitarian spirit and belief in a fair go b. Best little country on the planet c. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Suggested sessions of EGU24 to submit abstracts to
    Like earlier this year, members from our team will be involved with next year's General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU). The conference will take place on premise in Vienna as well as online from April 14 to 19, 2024. The session catalog has been available since November 1 ...
    4 days ago
  • Under New Management
    1. Which of these best describes Aotearoa?a. Progressive nation, proud of its egalitarian spirit and belief in a fair go b. Best little country on the planet c. Under New Management 2. Which of these best describes the 100 days of action announced this week by the new government?a. Petulantb. Simplistic and wrongheaded c. ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 days ago
  • While we wait patiently, our new Minister of Education is up and going with a 100-day action plan
    Sorry to say, the government’s official website is still out of action. When Point of Order paid its daily visit, the message was the same as it has been for the past week: Site under maintenance is currently under maintenance. We will be back shortly. Thank you for your ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • DAVID FARRAR: Hysterical bullshit
    Radio NZ reports: Te Pāti Māori’s co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer has accused the new government of “deliberate .. systemic genocide” over its policies to roll back the smokefree policy and the Māori Health Authority. The left love hysterical language. If you oppose racial quotas in laws, you are a racist. And now if you sack ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #48 2023
    Open access notables From this week's government/NGO section, longitudinal data is gold and Leisorowitz, Maibachi et al. continue to mine ore from the US public with Climate Change in the American Mind: Politics & Policy, Fall 2023: Drawing on a representative sample of the U.S. adult population, the authors describe how registered ...
    4 days ago
  • ELE LUDEMANN: It wasn’t just $55 million
    Ele Ludemann writes –  Winston Peters reckons media outlets were bribed by the $55 million Public Interest Journalism Fund. He is not the first to make such an accusation. Last year, the Platform outlined conditions media signed up to in return for funds from the PJIF: . . . ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 1-December-2023
    Wow, it’s December already, and it’s a Friday. So here are few things that caught our attention recently. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt covered the new government’s coalition agreements and what they mean for transport. On Tuesday Matt looked at AT’s plans for fare increases ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    4 days ago
  • Shane MacGowan Is Gone.
    Late 1996, The Dogs Bollix, Tamaki Makaurau.I’m at the front of the bar yelling my order to the bartender, jostling with other thirsty punters on a Friday night, keen to piss their wages up against a wall letting loose. The black stuff, long luscious pints of creamy goodness. Back down ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    4 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to Dec 1
    Nicola Willis, Chris Bishop and other National, ACT and NZ First MPs applaud the signing of the coalition agreements, which included the reversal of anti-smoking measures while accelerating tax cuts for landlords. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • 2023 More Reading: November (+ Writing Update)
    Completed reads for November: A Modern Utopia, by H.G. Wells The Vampire (poem), by Heinrich August Ossenfelder The Corpus Hermeticum The Corpus Hermeticum is Mead’s translation. Now, this is indeed a very quiet month for reading. But there is a reason for that… You see, ...
    4 days ago
  • Forward to 2017
    The coalition party agreements are mainly about returning to 2017 when National lost power. They show commonalities but also some serious divergencies.The two coalition agreements – one National and ACT, the other National and New Zealand First – are more than policy documents. They also describe the processes of the ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    5 days ago
  • Questions a nine year old might ask the new Prime Minister
    First QuestionYou’re going to crack down on people ram-raiding dairies, because you say hard-working dairy owners shouldn’t have to worry about getting ram-raided.But once the chemist shops have pseudoephedrine in them again, they're going to get ram-raided all the time. Do chemists not work as hard as dairy owners?Second QuestionYou ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • Questions a nine year old might ask the new Prime Minister
    First QuestionYou’re going to crack down on people ram-raiding dairies, because you say hard-working dairy owners shouldn’t have to worry about getting ram-raided.But once the chemist shops have pseudoephedrine in them again, they're going to get ram-raided all the time. Do chemists not work as hard as dairy owners?Second QuestionYou ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    5 days ago
  • Finally
    Henry Kissinger is finally dead. Good fucking riddance. While Americans loved him, he was a war criminal, responsible for most of the atrocities of the final quarter of the twentieth century. Cambodia. Bangladesh. Chile. East Timor. All Kissinger. Because of these crimes, Americans revere him as a "statesman" (which says ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Government in a hurry – Luxon lists 49 priorities in 100-day plan while Peters pledges to strength...
    Buzz from the Beehive Yes, ministers in the new government are delivering speeches and releasing press statements. But the message on the government’s official website was the same as it has been for the past several days, when Point of Order went looking for news from the Beehive that had ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago
  • DAVID FARRAR: Luxon is absolutely right
    David Farrar writes  –  1 News reports: Christopher Luxon says he was told by some Kiwis on the campaign trail they “didn’t know” the difference between Waka Kotahi, Te Pūkenga and Te Whatu Ora. Speaking to Breakfast, the incoming prime minister said having English first on government agencies will “make sure” ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • Top 10 at 10 am for Thursday, Nov 30
    There are fears that mooted changes to building consent liability could end up driving the building industry into an uninsured hole. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Here’s my pick of the top 10 news and analysis links elsewhere as of 10 am on Thursday, November 30, including:The new Government’s ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on how climate change threatens cricket‘s future
    Well that didn’t last long, did it? Mere days after taking on what he called the “awesome responsibility” of being Prime Minister, M Christopher Luxon has started blaming everyone else, and complaining that he has inherited “economic vandalism on an unprecedented scale” – which is how most of us are ...
    5 days ago
  • We need to talk about Tory.
    The first I knew of the news about Tory Whanau was when a tweet came up in my feed.The sort of tweet that makes you question humanity, or at least why you bother with Twitter. Which is increasingly a cesspit of vile inhabitants who lurk spreading negativity, hate, and every ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Dangling Transport Solutions
    Cable Cars, Gondolas, Ropeways and Aerial Trams are all names for essentially the same technology and the world’s biggest maker of them are here to sell them as an public transport solution. Stuff reports: Austrian cable car company Doppelmayr has launched its case for adding aerial cable cars to New ...
    5 days ago
  • November AMA
    Hi,It’s been awhile since I’ve done an Ask-Me-Anything on here, so today’s the day. Ask anything you like in the comments section, and I’ll be checking in today and tomorrow to answer.Leave a commentNext week I’ll be giving away a bunch of these Mister Organ blu-rays for readers in New ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    5 days ago
  • National’s early moves adding to cost of living pressure
    The cost of living grind continues, and the economic and inflation honeymoon is over before it began. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: PM Christopher Luxon unveiled his 100 day plan yesterday with an avowed focus of reducing cost-of-living pressures, but his Government’s initial moves and promises are actually elevating ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Backwards to the future
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has confirmed that it will be back to the future on planning legislation. This will be just one of a number of moves which will see the new government go backwards as it repeals and cost-cuts its way into power. They will completely repeal one ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • New initiatives in science and technology could point the way ahead for Luxon government
    As the new government settles into the Beehive, expectations are high that it can sort out some  of  the  economic issues  confronting  New Zealand. It may take time for some new  ministers to get to grips with the range of their portfolio work and responsibilities before they can launch the  changes that  ...
    Point of OrderBy tutere44
    6 days ago
  • Treaty pledge to secure funding is contentious – but is Peters being pursued by a lynch mob after ...
    TV3 political editor Jenna Lynch was among the corps of political reporters who bridled, when Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters told them what he thinks of them (which is not much). She was unabashed about letting her audience know she had bridled. More usefully, she drew attention to something which ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago
  • How long does this last?
    I have a clear memory of every election since 1969 in this plucky little nation of ours. I swear I cannot recall a single one where the question being asked repeatedly in the first week of the new government was: how long do you reckon they’ll last? And that includes all ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    6 days ago
  • National’s giveaway politics
    We already know that national plans to boost smoking rates to collect more tobacco tax so they can give huge tax-cuts to mega-landlords. But this morning that policy got even more obscene - because it turns out that the tax cut is retrospective: Residential landlords will be able to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • CHRIS TROTTER: Who’s driving the right-wing bus?
    Who’s At The Wheel? The electorate’s message, as aggregated in the polling booths on 14 October, turned out to be a conservative political agenda stronger than anything New Zealand has seen in five decades. In 1975, Bill Rowling was run over by just one bus, with Rob Muldoon at the wheel. In 2023, ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago
  • GRAHAM ADAMS:  Media knives flashing for Luxon’s government
    The fear and loathing among legacy journalists is astonishing Graham Adams writes – No one is going to die wondering how some of the nation’s most influential journalists personally view the new National-led government. It has become abundantly clear within a few days of the coalition agreements ...
    Point of OrderBy gadams1000
    6 days ago
  • Top 10 news links for Wednesday, Nov 29
    TL;DR: Here’s my pick of top 10 news links elsewhere for Wednesday November 29, including:The early return of interest deductibility for landlords could see rebates paid on previous taxes and the cost increase to $3 billion from National’s initial estimate of $2.1 billion, CTU Economist Craig Renney estimated here last ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • Smokefree Fallout and a High Profile Resignation.
    The day after being sworn in the new cabinet met yesterday, to enjoy their honeymoon phase. You remember, that period after a new government takes power where the country, and the media, are optimistic about them, because they haven’t had a chance to stuff anything about yet.Sadly the nuptials complete ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    6 days ago
  • As Cabinet revs up, building plans go on hold
    Wellington Council hoardings proclaim its preparations for population growth, but around the country councils are putting things on hold in the absence of clear funding pathways for infrastructure, and despite exploding migrant numbers. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Cabinet meets in earnest today to consider the new Government’s 100-day ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    6 days ago
  • National takes over infrastructure
    Though New Zealand First may have had ambitions to run the infrastructure portfolios, National would seem to have ended up firmly in control of them.  POLITIK has obtained a private memo to members of Infrastructure NZ yesterday, which shows that the peak organisation for infrastructure sees  National MPs Chris ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    6 days ago
  • At a glance – Evidence for global warming
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    7 days ago
  • Who’s Driving The Right-Wing Bus?
    Who’s At The Wheel? The electorate’s message, as aggregated in the polling booths on 14 October, turned out to be a conservative political agenda stronger than anything New Zealand has seen in five decades. In 1975, Bill Rowling was run over by just one bus, with Rob Muldoon at the wheel. In ...
    7 days ago
  • Sanity break
    Cheers to reader Deane for this quote from Breakfast TV today:Chloe Swarbrick to Brook van Velden re the coalition agreement: “... an unhinged grab-bag of hot takes from your drunk uncle at Christmas”Cheers also to actual Prime Minister of a country Christopher Luxon for dorking up his swearing-in vows.But that's enough ...
    More than a fieldingBy David Slack
    7 days ago
  • Sanity break
    Cheers to reader Deane for this quote from Breakfast TV today:Chloe Swarbrick to Brook van Velden re the coalition agreement: “... an unhinged grab-bag of hot takes from your drunk uncle at Christmas”Cheers also to actual Prime Minister of a country Christopher Luxon for dorking up his swearing-in vows.But that's enough ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    7 days ago
  • National’s murderous smoking policy
    One of the big underlying problems in our political system is the prevalence of short-term thinking, most usually seen in the periodic massive infrastructure failures at a local government level caused by them skimping on maintenance to Keep Rates Low. But the new government has given us a new example, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • NZ has a chance to rise again as our new government gets spending under control
    New Zealand has  a chance  to  rise  again. Under the  previous  government, the  number of New Zealanders below the poverty line was increasing  year by year. The Luxon-led government  must reverse that trend – and set about stabilising  the  pillars  of the economy. After the  mismanagement  of the outgoing government created   huge ...
    Point of OrderBy tutere44
    7 days ago
  • KARL DU FRESNE: Media and the new government
    Two articles by Karl du Fresne bring media coverage of the new government into considerations.  He writes –    Tuesday, November 28, 2023 The left-wing media needed a line of attack, and they found one The left-wing media pack wasted no time identifying the new government’s weakest point. Seething over ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    7 days ago
  • PHILIP CRUMP:  Team of rivals – a CEO approach to government leadership
    The work begins Philip Crump wrote this article ahead of the new government being sworn in yesterday – Later today the new National-led coalition government will be sworn in, and the hard work begins. At the core of government will be three men – each a leader ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    7 days ago
  • Black Friday
    As everyone who watches television or is on the mailing list for any of our major stores will confirm, “Black Friday” has become the longest running commercial extravaganza and celebration in our history. Although its origins are obscure (presumably dreamt up by American salesmen a few years ago), it has ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    7 days ago
  • In Defense of the Media.
    Yesterday the Ministers in the next government were sworn in by our Governor General. A day of tradition and ceremony, of decorum and respect. Usually.But yesterday Winston Peters, the incoming Deputy Prime Minister, and Foreign Minister, of our nation used it, as he did with the signing of the coalition ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    7 days ago
  • Top 10 news links at 10 am for Tuesday, Nov 28
    Nicola Willis’ first move was ‘spilling the tea’ on what she called the ‘sobering’ state of the nation’s books, but she had better be able to back that up in the HYEFU. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Here’s my pick of top 10 news links elsewhere at 10 am ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    7 days ago
  • PT use up but fare increases coming
    Yesterday Auckland Transport were celebrating, as the most recent Sunday was the busiest Sunday they’ve ever had. That’s a great outcome and I’m sure the ...
    1 week ago
  • The very opposite of social investment
    Nicola Willis (in blue) at the signing of the coalition agreement, before being sworn in as both Finance Minister and Social Investment Minister. National’s plan to unwind anti-smoking measures will benefit her in the first role, but how does it stack up from a social investment viewpoint? Photo: Lynn Grieveson ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 week ago
  • Giving Tuesday
    For the first time "in history" we decided to jump on the "Giving Tuesday" bandwagon in order to make you aware of the options you have to contribute to our work! Projects supported by Skeptical Science Inc. Skeptical Science Skeptical Science is an all-volunteer organization but ...
    1 week ago
  • Let's open the books with Nicotine Willis
    Let’s say it’s 1984,and there's a dreary little nation at the bottom of the Pacific whose name rhymes with New Zealand,and they've just had an election.Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, will you look at the state of these books we’ve opened,cries the incoming government, will you look at all this mountain ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Stopping oil
    National is promising to bring back offshore oil and gas drilling. Naturally, the Greens have organised a petition campaign to try and stop them. You should sign it - every little bit helps, and as the struggle over mining conservation land showed, even National can be deterred if enough people ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago

  • New Zealand welcomes European Parliament vote on the NZ-EU Free Trade Agreement
    A significant milestone in ratifying the NZ-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was reached last night, with 524 of the 705 member European Parliament voting in favour to approve the agreement. “I’m delighted to hear of the successful vote to approve the NZ-EU FTA in the European Parliament overnight. This is ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Further humanitarian support for Gaza, the West Bank and Israel
    The Government is contributing a further $5 million to support the response to urgent humanitarian needs in Gaza, the West Bank and Israel, bringing New Zealand’s total contribution to the humanitarian response so far to $10 million. “New Zealand is deeply saddened by the loss of civilian life and the ...
    2 weeks ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2023-12-04T20:43:18+00:00