Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
9:05 am, July 16th, 2010 - 7 comments
Categories: Media -
Tags: journalism, University of Auckland
Journalism’s future at stake
Is serious journalism dying? Was it in any good it the first place? What must be done to ensure its survival?
These are some of the questions to be tackled at The University of Auckland’s forthcoming Winter Lecture series on ‘The end(s) of journalism’.
The six-lecture series will examine the decline in serious journalism brought about by digital convergence, media proliferation, fragmented audiences and the global recession.
It will look at the long-term implications of these developments, given how vital the media are to democratic deliberation. Alternative technological possibilities, programming forms and funding alternatives will be canvassed.
Academics from the University’s Departments of Political Studies, Film, Television and Media Studies, and MÄori Studies will present the lectures along with Colin Peacock, presenter of Mediawatch on Radio New Zealand National and Gavin Ellis, former editor-in-chief of the New Zealand Herald.
The lunchtime series begins on 20 July with a lecture illuminating journalism’s present predicament and prospects by returning to its roots. Subsequent lectures will consider the current state of New Zealand journalism, the MÄori presence in media stories, citizen journalism on the internet, news satire, and the near-term future of serious journalism.
‘The media in forms old and new affect everyone, and play a key role in supporting democratic purposes,’ says series organiser, Dr Joe Atkinson. ‘This is a timely series in a period of extreme upheaval for traditional media and the lectures will be of wide general interest.’
Further information: www.auckland.ac.nz/winter, phone (09) 373 7599 ext 876
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
the media has always been the tool of its owners and they make the rules. it belongs to them.
when we look at the manques and parvenus currently inhabiting the mediaverse in New Zealand we see a crop of ignorant little upstarts who got shoulder tapped because basically they were compliant to the wishes of the proprietors.
apart from the fact that their main accomplishment is an ability to do shorthand they have no other real qualifications at all except a burning desire to get a scoop and no scruples about how they obtain it.
they know everything and what they dont know doesnt matter.
sad buut true.
Shorthand?! 😯
The manques and parvenus have digital recorders these days randal. Possibly even typewriters. Or those keyboardy thingos 😀
You’re right though. And the owners must certainly bear the bulk of the blame. Sadly, though, so must the Polytechnics who run journalism “schools”. What they teach is crap, and the people they hire to teach it, well… I may run into some of them occasionally so I’ll bite my tongue.
One (now retired) grandee of Wellington Polytech’s course couldn’t, in the old days, even calculate how many words filled a column. The poor typesetters were regularly left with 30 metres of expensive overset lying on their floor after she’d submitted her copy for the one page of writing she still had published each issue of a certain title. She’d just ramble on and let the subs worry about making sense of it. And she was teaching the new crop.
I’ve long had a policy of preferencing polytech journalism grads last, preferring to look for a keen but un”trained” self-starter I can mentor and thus ensure I don’t have to ger them to un-learn most of what they were taught before they become productive.
I worked in newspapers for 25 years. Newspaper owners in NZ have no reason to interfere in a paper’s news coverage, they simply employe as editors toadies who know what is expected of them without being asked.
There is a code of ethics journalists are supposed to adhere to, but I doubt many of them have ever read it. Interestingly, the code was written by the NZ Journalists Union, the employers were asked to sign up to it and declined.
Are any of the speakers working journalists in a daily newsroom?
I hope John Campbell is there to lead the way.
It’s all in the programme at the link. But, to help you out, here are some of the media workers involved in the lecture series:
Not exactly people currently working in a daily newsroom, but there is some good and relevant experience in the industry there. And are working journalists, in the current context, likely to be the most enlightening speakers on the subject?