web analytics

The Unitary Plan: Rodney’s Dream

Written By: - Date published: 1:45 pm, August 7th, 2016 - 59 comments
Categories: auckland supercity, local government, national/act government, political alternatives, Politics - Tags: , , , ,

Rodney Hide must be sleeping well, because Auckland’s proposed Unitary Plan will deliver all he and his NACT patrons ever hoped for.

For decades, the Auckland Region has been a motley collection of badly led and bickering councils that have allowed strategy and development at local and regional level be dominated by greedy developers, incompetent or disempowered planners and borderline corrupt practices.

Hide’s reforms transformed this into one badly led and bickering council but changed little else. Meaningful new powers that addressed issues such as urban development powers, revenue shortfalls, speculation, land-banking and a lack of coherent strategy were absent.

In case of the unlikely event that unity and purpose should ever emerge in the Council, the core operations were structured into Council Controlled Organisations (CCO’s), out of reach of democratic control and accountability and run by independent technocrats (you’ll see a pattern emerge here).

However, a crucial power that remained with the elected Council was planning – effectively a veto given its lack of consensus. This defined the constraints that even the CCO’s must work within, thus constraining developers and land-bankers with public opinion (democracy) and red tape (quality), both of which hindered headlong intensification and sprawl (profit). NACT donors and supporters remained unimpressed!

Clearly something had to be done! Rather than risk the prominent factions, e.g. ‘millennial’, ‘boomer’,‘nimby’ or even the ‘homeless’ (ie. all voters) finding common ground (politics) in their desire for high quality intensification (via, say, a democratically accountable Urban Development Authority that could clarify a regional strategy and be self-funded by capturing the rise in value due to re-zoning), the solution must be deregulation, slashing red tape.

Over-regulation should not be confused with over-administration. Auckland has long been badly administered, but insufficient, poor quality and ‘light-handed’ regulation produced the stock of leaky buildings that remain largely unacknowledged as the key contributor to the current urgency of Auckland’s housing crisis. If the buildings were not leaky and the builders now focused on new building rather that repairs, many more dwellings would have been built over the last decade. Similarly, our dire development outcomes compared to other cities stem from under, not over, regulation, badly administered or not.

Nonetheless, for NACT the only solution was clear – the one so beloved by neoliberalism. Inefficient democracy should be supplanted by unaccountable ‘independent’ technocrats, best qualified to make the right decisions (if you think about it, There Is No Alternative). ‘Independent experts’ have been long used by council (planning decisions) and Government (Rebstock) to safely deliver predetermined outcomes.

Such a process avoided scrutiny of the Plan’s strategic assumptions and the National Government’s role therein (eg. tax, regional, population and migration policies, or lack thereof). It could also be guaranteed to turn the process into a zero-sum game, polarizing interest groups and co-opting some into supporting illogical positions (Gen Zero?). Those most affected by the housing crisis played no role at all.

Neither Nelson St’s low quality slums nor ad hoc infill of leafy suburbs are necessary components of high quality intensification. Clearly, many alternatives are available. All seem to agree with the intensification of transport hubs. Given appropriate Council powers, the shortage of housing can be addressed with some large, visionary but discrete projects. These do not require adopting the proposed plan and its philosophy in its entirety.

Ultimately, the effect of the ‘Independent Hearings Panel’ has been to magnify Auckland’s (and New Zealand’s) democratic deficit, exaggerate the sense of crisis and emphasise our lack of vision. It’s made some key players happy (developers, speculators, land bankers and Gen Zero), but offers little that hasn’t failed elsewhere or in Auckland previously.

The Panel’s findings can be distilled to one universal prescription – deregulation – which will further enrich NACT’s mates but is certainly not going to produce a liveable city for the 21st Century. Simply, deregulation got us into this mess in the first place and its further pursuit will be a disaster.

The Council should reject the Plan in its current form, cherrypick those aspects consistent with a democratic and liveable city and sheet home the responsibility for the lack of a coherent strategy to those that created the mess. Wake up, Rodney!

Concerned of Auckland

59 comments on “The Unitary Plan: Rodney’s Dream ”

  1. AmaKiwi 1

    Excellent post.

    • rod 1.1

      Perhaps Rodney Hide was in charge of the so called independent panel. Who were all these people, does any one know? I think everyone should know thier names in the name of transparency. Anyone?

      • dukeofurl 1.1.1

        The were all appointed by the national government, not even a 50:50 mix of Auckland- Government but ALL

        • George Lane 1.1.1.1

          How could a panel appointed by the people who vote on the original plan, the revised plan and the final plan be independent lol?

      • George Lane 1.1.2

        Judge Kirkpatrick was the head of the panel.

        • rod 1.1.2.1

          @ GL. Judge Kirkpatrick wast he head of the panel.

          Well, that’s one, what are the names of the rest of them. I think Aucklanders are entitled to know who the authors of Auckland’s destiny are. Waiting. waiting.

  2. save nz 2

    Great post.

    Interesting to find out that the ‘independent’ commissioners were appointed by the National Government. You have to wonder how they can be independent when the government told them what to do and said they would take over if they didn’t.

    Like the Supercity all over again, but probably worse as has much worse ramifications for Aucklander’s.

    The whole unitary plan is a scam because it was all run through lobby groups anyway giving ‘evidence’ – nobody actually examines this ‘evidence’ and the ‘experts’ are all planners and lawyers paid for by rich lobby groups to get their way in the plan. The National government has already publicly decided the outcome.

    Many examples of this happening in Auckland and the fight is not to provide more housing, but make more money in most cases. People were eyeing up the unitary plan to weaken heritage for a long time.
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11299361

    Europe has many systems in place to protect heritage and surprisingly places like the UK still manage to house millions of people, have extremely tight planning rules, while not wrecking their cities and destroying Heritage. Have not heard of leaky buildings hitting their city, surprise surprise.

    The other issues, is that the unitary plan is so difficult to understand for most people (and the council website is very unfriendly with very difficult user interfaces) is that is by it’s nature of complexity not democratic, let alone by dismissing homeowners who do disagree, as though that is an acceptable reason to disenfranchise people.

    Cities are about who want’s to live in them. It is a foolish to override how people want to live, demolish and lower standards to developers who have done a terrible job so far, for a theoretical model of maybe. If you don’t have a solution for a problem, (housing affordability, climate change and transport) then don’t make it worse by pandering to the worst offenders and pretending the market will fix it all.

    The market is designed to make a profit, not to create healthy societies or cities.

    • George Lane 2.1

      “Cities are about who want’s to live in them. It is a foolish to override how people want to live”

      Good thing the Unitary Plan allows me, who wants to live in Auckland, to live in an apartment building, really.

  3. Sanctuary 3

    This post will have the upper lips curling over amongst the hipsters at transportblog…

    • AmaKiwi 3.1

      They stole our city.

      It belongs to us. We want it back. ALL of it!

      • mosa 3.1.1

        And while they are at it our country too. Now would be good.

        • save nz 3.1.1.1

          They will put on their ripped hipster jeans and complain, loudly!

          The fact that affordability was taken out, does not seem to faze them, so sure that the market will provide affordability…

          Love how the Natz have completely sold that message of more houses somehow will provide cheaper houses… less property rights and deregulation will provide cheaper houses.. less heritage and less trees will deliver a hipster a house, etc

          • Draco T Bastard 3.1.1.1.1

            I’m pretty sure that you’ll find that property rights are being strengthened. This will lead to more poverty and higher profits for the 1%.

    • save nz 3.2

      There is also a very good post about another factor in our unitary plan, the demand side such as importing in so many migrants for ‘essential skills’.

      Surprise surprise Sky City needed 40 migrant chefs in 2014, but also surprise surprise wages have decreased in this job and all the other ‘essential skills shortages’.

      “If we compare the rates being paid chefs in 2007 and 2013 we see that there was a real wage decline for every category over those years. The rates paid in the surveys of April 2007 and April 2013. I then adjust the 2007 rate by the 16% inflation that occurred over those years and find the rate should have been significantly higher just to match price increases. Real wages had declined. The minimum wage increased 22% over the same period.”

      http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/08/07/must-read-migration-chefs-and-essential-skills/

      People need to link to low wages, unusual essential skills in the migrant category (like chefs) bought in to keep wages down and workers rights down and the shortages of housing and transport problems that are feeding through from artificial low wages, artificial house increases and the blow outs and in real terms cut backs in social spending like health and education.

      BTW, in no way am I blaming migrants for this, it is a clear government policy and neoliberal agenda to keep wages down and destroy social welfare. (I mean how do you afford social welfare if you are importing people in on wages lower than the cost of living and need government top ups).

    • Sacha 3.3

      heh. hipsters don’t wear cardigans.

    • Sookie 3.4

      I’m not a hipster, but I am curling my lip at this NIMBY hand wringing bollocks that seems to confuse leaky buildings (Building Act, structural integrity of buildings) with district planning (RMA, environmental effects of growth). The AUP is balanced and as readable as it can possibly be for the layperson (I like the two page fact sheets for each key issue). The AUP is not going to result in leaky buildings. Shame it doesnt have an affordable housing component but its hard to force that issue using the RMA.

      • Sacha 3.4.1

        This plan was never going to make up for all sorts of other bad govt-level policy decisions either. Only one part of the jigsaw.

      • save nz 3.4.2

        The link Sookie is National government intervention in the building industry to remove the tantalised timber rules on building so the developers could ‘save’ money and help their friends get their new cladding systems through BRANDZ as well as have private operators ‘approving’ things, who conveniently went bankrupt afterwards. Systems that proved impossible to keep water out for any length of time. Now the National government has ‘intervened’ to ‘help’ push through unitary plan rules in record timeframes with their special ‘independent commissioners’ to solve the ‘housing crisis’ with more deregulation of rules and further power to council officials who are not known for their competence in the building sector.

  4. George Lane 4

    Yes, the IHP was furiously undemocratic. It allowed submissions from anyone who cared enough to make one and then considered them on the merits of their argument. Obviously the IHP should have only considered arguments on the basis of their opposition to housing types that the author doesn’t approve of. Heaven forbid that people actually be allowed to build enough housing so that hard working Aucklanders be able to actually afford a house in the city they call home.

    • save nz 4.1

      How many Kiwis can afford $800,000 plus George Lane – on local wages?

      We all got to ‘consult’ on the super city too, and the 24 hour spying and TPP (or was that cancelled completely).

      Surprisingly most people do not think they were listened to and the process was a farce.

      • George Lane 4.1.1

        I know right. Housing will be so expensive if we don’t pass the unitary plan that it will become a privilege for the very wealthy!

        Luckily, even if we make the most conservative assumptions possible and ignore all of the housing that HNZ wants to develop and sell, almost half of all houses will still be under 800k, far cheaper than the average new home today. Plus, t is likely that houses will be even cheaper than the worst case scenario that the media has jumped on.

        http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/310075/$800k-homes-behind-the-headlines

        • save nz 4.1.1.1

          Actually George 2 years ago people could buy a 3 bedroom freehold place on 500m section for $350,000 in many parts of Auckland. Pray tell how now were are talking $800,000 and even cheaper with the Governments interventions in Auckland?

          We had cheap houses two years ago FFS! We had the old plan, more amenity and still had vastly cheaper houses?

          What went wrong?

    • Draco T Bastard 4.2

      It allowed submissions from anyone who cared enough to make one and then considered them on the merits of their argument.

      Yes, a completely undemocratic way of going about it. For it to be democratic we actually need everyone to participate and not just a few people out to steer the city in the way that will make them the most money.

      • George Lane 4.2.1

        Yeah, all of those people who submitted to enforce ridiculously restrictive zoning in order to keep the property bubble going could have really unfairly skewed the results.

        Luckily the IHP found those submissions to have no basis in reality and in fact be an attempted money grab by a property owning class at the expense of less well off New Zealanders. The IHP placed far more emphasis on the submissions of residents and charities who wanted affordable housing for all New Zealanders to make up for the unfortunate lack of those voices in the conversation.

        The tragic lack of participation in our democratic process is a great shame and I, for one, am glad that our democratic institutions are starting to account for this by reducing the weight given to the opinion of monied interests.

  5. One Anonymous Bloke 5

    The problems caused by adherence to “market theory”, “Neoliberalism”, “the high trust model” – call it what you will – will only be solved by abandoning the theory.

    A lot is made of “market forces”, and yet we hear very little about the fact that government accounts for approximately 33% of the economy, and is therefore one of the strongest forces in the market.

    According to the theory, this is terrible.

    The theory is wrong.

    • srylands 5.1

      No the theory is correct. It is simply not practiced in New Zealand so has never been tested.

      • One Anonymous Bloke 5.1.1

        It’s been practiced in Somalia, and for sixty thousand years of human history before that.

        It makes a great play of how things “would be” and pays no attention to actual conditions on Earth.

        Not to mention Augusto Pinochet and the crackhead, Rand.

      • Draco T Bastard 5.1.2

        No it’s not. It’s based upon false assumptions and thus its conclusions are also false.

        What has been implemented across the world has inevitably brought about worse results. This is especially true in NZ.

      • One Anonymous Bloke 5.1.3

        PS: I note that you did not challenge my summation of the dogma.

      • Stuart Munro 5.1.4

        Your belief system has the Popperian flaw.

      • ropata 5.1.5

        You seem to have forgotten about a few minor glitches in the so-called “free market” in 1929, 1987, 2000, and 2008
        http://www.thebubblebubble.com/historic-crashes/

    • George Lane 5.2

      Desperately need the government to build homes in several cities, but especially Auckland.

      At least this plan allows the government to build a lot when they eventually get off their asses (or are replaces by a competent government).

  6. Keith 6

    Whether quite by reckless intent or design National have got to more or less bypass the Resource Management Act. We are mostly getting incredibly intense housing, wiped out heritage housing pre 1940 and got no say in this all because the National Party will not turn off the immigration tap and deal to investors/speculators.

    To quote Mike Treen courtesy of The Daily Blog, “In the 2014/15 year MBIE issued 170,814 temporary work visas as well as 84,856 student visas” and “There are at least 150,000 people here working on some sort of temporary visa at any one time”.

    Now to me and any basic logic National are firmly behind the whole cluster fuck. They could do something meaningful and direct to take the pressure off Auckland but bereft of any growth stratergy National throw Aucklanders and New Zealand under the debt bus and sell us off to the highest bidder.

    • George Lane 6.1

      “more or less bypass the Resource Management Act”

      By asking the council to wrote a document that they are required to write under the RMA which will be enforced through the RMA and was assessed against the RMA?

      “We are mostly getting incredibly intense housing,”

      The only way this is true is if you consider the MHS to be ‘incredibly intense’ but two storey houses with less than 50% coverage and large setbacks to adjoining property are anything but incredibly intense.

      “wiped out heritage housing pre 1940”

      a) the plan doesn’t wipe out houses, it allows demolition in some cases.
      b) Heritage houses are still protected, the recommended plan simply removes blanket protection from anything built before 1944 and applies protection only to heritage buildings.

      “got no say in this”

      There were two rounds of submissions, both times over 10,000 people submitted. Further to this submitters could go to the IHP and present their case in more detail and it is subject to appeal.

      “the National Party will not turn off the immigration tap and deal to investors/speculators”

      Hitting the nail on the head. National refuse to act, but the council are acting.

      • Anne 6.1.1

        National refuse to act, but the council are acting.

        Is that one of the reasons NAct have it in for the Auckland City Council?

        Thanks George Lane for sharing your bountiful knowledge.

        As a point of interest, I used to know Rodney Hide 20 plus years ago. I recall a heated conversation I had with him about Auckland and why we needed to preserve our heritage buildings. It came about because he was advocating that all pre-WW2 buildings/houses should be razed to the ground and replaced with modern buildings. This was the mid-1990s when the ‘leaky building’ craze was at the height of its popularity. It’s hard to imagine what a god-awful mess we would be in today if he had got his way. Fortunately it was 10 plus years before he acquired ministerial power and given carte blanche (by John Key) to ignore all the recommendations of the Housing Commission set up by the previous government and create this monstrosity called the Supercity.

        It’s an interesting historical portrayal of Rodney Hide’s hollow mindset that is so prevalent among the neoliberal set including John Key. They certainly seem lacking in some vital brain substance which would allow them to see beyond the end of their greedy noses.

        • George Lane 6.1.1.1

          It’s just a confused mess. NACT basically built the city because they thought that North Shore, Isthmus, and East Auckland rich white Aucklanders would shoo in their guy John Banks, forgetting that Auckland is a labour city (even when the usual labour supporters don’t vote). Now they are salty that their roadsfest dream for Auckland has been rejected by Aucklanders in two consecutive local elections.

          It’s funny that the current ACT MP and senior Labour MPs are so against the unitary plan when really it’s one of the few things they should both support. Reduction in ‘council red tape’ for act, far more housing built in a housing affordability crisis that is really badly affecting the people labour are supposed to care about.

          Labour are a confused mess at the moment, trying beat Key at Key’s game of responding solely to the polls. They jump the gun and take all the flak in the media then get no credit when the government eventually changes their mind. It’s a shame because there is a building anti-Key sentiment and his ministers are largely horrendous, all that Labour need to do is to appeal to the traditional base and get them out on election day, moderate and extreme righties will not go out to vote for National with the growing sentiment against him and swap to NZ First or Conservatives if they vote at all. Voila Labour Greens 2017.

          That’s my take anyway.

          • Sacha 6.1.1.1.1

            “there is a building anti-Key sentiment and his ministers are largely horrendous”

            Yet Labour in particular have largely focused only on the PM, not his incompetent underlings. For 8 years now. Geniuses.

          • Anne 6.1.1.1.2

            all that Labour need to do is to appeal to the traditional base and get them out on election day…

            Those of us on the inside of the tent are doing our best to encourage them and bit by bit they’re getting there – or to be more correct getting back to their roots. Not as fast as we would like but it is happening.

    • Lloyd 6.2

      Keith, your comment “we are getting incredibly intense housing, wiped out heritage housing pre 1940” is a massive blurring of reality. The density possible under the Unitary Plan is not much greater than the density under the existing plans, and in some places even less dense. Yes the pre-1940 heritage rules have been chucked out, but that doesn’t mean that all the pre-1940 houses in Auckland will be knocked down next year.
      No one seems to point out that rates are really cheap in Auckland, especially for business property.
      Increasing rates might reduce demand for speculative house buying.

      • save nz 6.2.1

        Yes but in many cases there is rules to allow 2.5m building to the boundary. That is the height of many of the one story houses in NZ. So people can put up a concrete wall/buildings all around their boundary and block all their poorer neighbours light and privacy. Good luck getting a solar panel working with the sun being cut off. While a neighbour dominating the boundary might be great for terrace housing etc in new development areas which are designed to be blocked on two sides, it becomes a train wreck of amenity applied next to most single story housing that makes up most of Auckland. A lot of the time it is not even to provide denser housing but bigger (read more expensive) houses. So someone gets a massive house and each neighbour gets their sun, light and privacy cut off. Already happening.

        That poor planning approach is what sunk the CBD for 20 years, when someone was allowed to build a sky scraper 2 cm next to another Sky caper blocking the existing sky scraper. Who wants to buy when you could have your apartment amenity wiped out?

        In the UK, there is no way you could get away with what planners do in NZ.

        By all means build apartments, but build them on main routes with transport or in new subdivisions – someone putting up a McMansion next to a villa and bungalows which is the main NZ stock in Auckland, starts looking pretty poxy, let alone future proofing for climate change and allowing for sunlight.

        Yep the rich person building is happy, but the two neighbours who don’t have the money to change their house is cast into the shade and into some sort of walled community.

  7. Wayne 7

    Concerned of Auckland (whoever you are)

    As soon as you described the Unitary Plan as the result of neo-liberalism, being the favorite insult of the left, your critique lost most of its force, at least for me.

    In fact you seem to have forgotten the single Council, including CCO’s comes from the Royal Commission. Rodney’s influence was not nearly as great as you imagine. I was on the relevant committees so I know how the debates evolved.

    Once we had a single city, a Unitary Plan would inevitably follow, and its creation has involved a huge amount of consultation. The process provided plenty of input from anyone interested.

    In fact the UP appears to be quite balanced with some intensification and some outward growth.

    Sure we can all find some fault. I am personally not that keen on 5 story apartments on Williamson Ave in Belmont, but I don’t think they will basically destroy the character of Belmont/Bayswater. So not a good enough reason to say “no” to the Unitary Plan and all its evil works.

    So for me too much hyperventilating in the article, not enough balance. No acknowledgment of the newer style of development such as Hobsonville, where the planners and developers have worked hard to get best practice, which are clear pointers to future large scale developments.

    The various groups and people supporting the UP are not stupid, neither are they dupes.

    So I hope the Council supports the UP, maybe with a few caveats such as minimum apartment size.

    • Sacha 7.1

      “Rodney’s influence was not nearly as great as you imagine.”

      Quite. Almost like John Carter did nothing.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 7.2

      I missed the part where having essential services run by unaccountable partisan cronies is a fundamental aspect of good decision making. That said, an unaccountable partisan crony would hardly be expected to grasp that simple concept, eh, crony.

    • framu 7.3

      “In fact you seem to have forgotten the single Council, including CCO’s comes from the Royal Commission. ”

      wayne – ive heard that rodders then binned every single recommendation from the RC when he designed the super city. Yes or no?

      it sounds like your playing semantics – again

  8. Wayne 8

    framu,

    It is not as I recollect it. The broad thrust of the recommendations was accepted. Specifically a single Council, with an empowered mayor, with most of the power at the Council level, rather than Local Boards. But there were many changes in detail, some of which were significant, but many were not.

    As I recall the major changes were on the precise boundaries of the city, mostly to the south (not going all the way to the Waikato) and some changes on the CCO’s mostly being the process of the initial appointments. A key change was that the Councillors being geographically based rather than elected at large, which was a really unpopular recommendation of the Royal Commission.

    One issue we spent a lot of time on was establishment of the Maori Council, rather than 2 directly elected Maori Councillors. This was at Rodney’s insistence. Also it was agreed there should be less power for the Mayor and more power with the Councillors as a whole (the elected body).

    One of the major changes was the process for developing the Unitary Plan, with Independent Commissioners, with the Chair being a Environment Court Judge. The Independent Commissioners having the principal role rather than Councillors and Council officials. This was to ensure that the plan would be fresh, and not just a re-hashed combination of the seven preceding plans, though inevitably the Unitary Plan does reflect the precursor plans.

    For instance most of Bayswater seems to follow the old North Shore plan, except for much higher density around Belmont. As I noted I personally think 5 stories is too much (3 would be better), but the UP will achieve higher density on the main route, However, provided Lake Rd is upgraded it will work well enough, and provide a wider range of housing options. On average I would expect the apartments to be cheaper than townhouses or single dwellings.

    • framu 8.1

      “The broad thrust of the recommendations was accepted. – But there were many changes in detail, some of which were significant, but many were not.”

      yeah – and you know its the detail that matters

      like i said – i think your playing semantics

    • Sacha 8.2

      with most of the power at the Council level, rather than Local Boards

      That is one of the major departures from what the Royal Commission recommended. Their vision was a governing body dedicated to the needs of the region, alongside strong local governance focused on each place.

      Instead we got the same parochial plonkeurs at the top who regard their neighbourhood as a local fiefdom, with few genuine decisions or budgets delegated to local boards.

      • Wayne 8.2.1

        By and large this recommendation of the RC was accepted. The RC wanted a strong central council and this was accepted. But there were some changes around the detail of the Local Boards. They ended up with somewhat fewer powers than the RC recommended. But as I understand it the Council has devolved some powers to the Local Boards, so the current balance is probably quite close to what the RC envisaged.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 8.2.1.1

          Let’s ask a less self-interested observer. Chapman Tripp summarised the discrepancies:

          Commission recommendations

          Government decisions

          23 Auckland Councillors

          – 10 elected at large- 10 elected through wards- 3 Māori representatives

          20 Auckland councillors

          – 8 elected at large- 12 elected through wards- No dedicated Māori seats

          Move to a four-year term

          Three-yearly term to be retained

          A Minister for Auckland

          No Minister for Auckland

          Permanent Cabinet Committee for Auckland

          Temporary Cabinet Committee for Auckland, led by Hide as Local Government Minister, to oversee the transition to the new structure

          6 local councils at the second tier

          20 to 30 community boards at the second tier, each of which will be named after its local community. The boards will comprise 125 to 150 members in total.

          3 community boards

          Significantly, the boards will not be able to raise their own revenue or hire staff. They will be able to develop operational policies for local issues e.g. dog control, liquor licensing and graffiti control.

          It would have been better to let the community boards oversee the transition and put Rodney Hide in charge of graffiti control. Until he proved himself manifestly incapable of that too.

        • Vice versa 8.2.1.2

          Didn’t the Royal Commission recommend four subcities?

  9. save nz 9

    Welcome to chaos. Remember this poor guy.. Duplex demolition dispute leads to plans to build new house

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/78903829/Duplex-demolition-dispute-leads-to-plans-to-build-new-house

    “After speaking to a lawyer, Alwahb said legal action to stop the demolition was likely to be unsuccessful.

    “You can do a [court] injunction but in the end of the day they might just get the go ahead and start anyway.”

    So the legal advice given to this guy is that this is all ok and he is nnow forced to re model his own house to fix up and fit in with his neighbours. That costs money that he has to find as well as increasing the overall cost of the housing stock in that area with the ‘improvements’ he is now forced to make and with the other house.

    Welcome to more of this bizarre situations and larger, more controversial and expensive housing with the new unitary plan changes.

    And don’t forget this lovely neighbour, and the Wellington planners that approved it sarc.

    Dispute over multi-million-dollar view blocking fence is off to the High Court

    https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/dispute-over-multi-million-dollar-view-blocking-fence-is-off-to-the-high-court-q14727

  10. Ad 10

    The proposed Unitary Plan is exactly what Auckland needed.

    Because it is fully consistent with the Auckland Plan (with its tens of thousands of public input), and has been developed over two electoral terms, it is one of the best mandated agreements New Zealand has ever had.

    This post just shows the author to have a really bad case of wanting everything to happen, but nothing to happen. Slagging it off by pointing to Nelson Street and leaky homes is flat dumb.

    The Unitary Plan is not going to cure poverty, Iraq, or cancer. But it has landed in the public remarkably well. In terms of politics, if Auckland Council pass it in the next few weeks, the IHP have staved off Council being fired by the government and having commissioners brought in. No one will be able to blame the IHP if the government still steps in.

    The Panel have done what the Council failed to do, and provide a plan that is good for public transport, good for greater density, good for housing growth, and good for democracy.

    That’s more than Auckland has ever had in its entire existence.

    • Vice versa 10.1

      When sausage flats first took off, they created unsatisfactory living conditions. People demanded controls to prevent their worst excesses. And planning aimed to provide liveable accommodation. Gen Zero has many good ideas about congestion. But I suspect they may prove to be wrong in thinking that the market will deliver reasonable quality affordable homes for families. We may get more dwellings. But there will be major social problems to address. Most people I know have felt alienated by the IHP process and the powerful lobbyists. They have lost confidence in the process and the likely outcomes. They are concerned that GZ has become one eyed about single issue and is ignoring a broad range of other important issues. Let’s hope they remain as vigorous in the next ten years to maintain quality building and amenity standards that meet the needs of families with young kids.

  11. Ad 11

    Auckland Council officials are proposing 14 or 15 major policy reversals in the Council papers for debate:

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11689523

    They had better be incredibly, earth-shatteringly important to stop the smooth passage of the proposed plan.

    Minister Smith’s pen-holding hand will be quivering with excitement at any chance to crush them and send in the Commissioners.

  12. Wayne 12

    From the news report it seemed to be overall acceptance but with some caveats. One of them was the balance of up or out. That might lead to some pretty forthright negotiations. The others that were reported were what I would expect.

    • Sacha 12.1

      “One of them was the balance of up or out.”

      Explicitness of that, yes.

      “The others that were reported were what I would expect.”

      Same, so far.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Initial Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission report shows progress
    Health Minister Andrew Little welcomes the Initial Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission’s assessment that transformation of New Zealand’s approach to mental health and addiction is underway. “This is an important step in the Government’s work to provide better and equitable mental health and wellbeing outcomes for all people in New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Over $300m returned to COVID-hit travellers
    The Government’s Consumer Travel Reimbursement Scheme has helped return over $352 million of refunds and credits to New Zealanders who had overseas travel cancelled due to COVID-19, Consumer Affairs Minister David Clark says. “Working with the travel sector, we are helping New Zealanders retrieve the money owed to them by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Hundreds more schools join free lunches programme
    An additional 88,000 students in 322 schools and kura across the country have started the school year with a regular lunch on the menu, thanks to the Government’s Ka Ora, Ka Ako Healthy School Lunches programme. They join 42,000 students already receiving weekday lunches under the scheme, which launched last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Govt’s balanced economic approach reflected in Crown accounts
    New Zealand’s economic recovery has again been reflected in the Government’s books, which are in better shape than expected. The Crown accounts for the seven months to the end of January 2021 were better than forecast in the Half Year Economic and Fiscal Update (HYEFU). The operating balance before gains ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Over half of border workforce receive first vaccinations
    More than half of New Zealand’s estimated 12,000 border workforce have now received their first vaccinations, as a third batch of vaccines arrive in the country, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. As of midnight Tuesday, a total of 9,431 people had received their first doses. More than 70 percent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Boost in funding to deliver jobs while restoring Central Otago’s lakes and waterways
    The Government is significantly increasing its investment in restoring Central Otago’s waterways while at the same time delivering jobs to the region hard-hit by the economic impact of Covid-19, says Land Information Minister, Damien O’Connor.   Mr O’Connor says two new community projects under the Jobs for Nature funding programme will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Next stage of COVID-19 support for business and workers
    The Government has confirmed details of COVID-19 support for business and workers following the increased alert levels due to a resurgence of the virus over the weekend. Following two new community cases of COVID-19, Auckland moved to Alert Level 3 and the rest of New Zealand moved to Alert Level ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt committed to hosting Rugby World Cup
    The Government remains committed to hosting the Women’s Rugby World Cup in New Zealand in 2022 should a decision be made by World Rugby this weekend to postpone this year’s tournament. World Rugby is recommending the event be postponed until next year due to COVID-19, with a final decision to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Support Available for Communities affected by COVID-19
    Community and social service support providers have again swung into action to help people and families affected by the current COVID-19 alert levels. “The Government recognises that in many instances social service, community, iwi and Whānau Ora organisations are best placed to provide vital support to the communities impacted by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Govt announces review into PHARMAC
    The Government is following through on an election promise to conduct an independent review into PHARMAC, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Health Minister Andrew Little announced today. The Review will focus on two areas: How well PHARMAC performs against its current objectives and whether and how its performance against these ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Impressive response to DOC scholarship programme
    Some of the country’s most forward-thinking early-career conservationists are among recipients of a new scholarship aimed at supporting a new generation of biodiversity champions, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. The Department of Conservation (DOC) has awarded one-year postgraduate research scholarships of $15,000 to ten Masters students in the natural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Speech to ANZLF Virtual Indigenous Business Trade and Connections Event
    I acknowledge our whānau overseas, joining us from Te Whenua Moemoeā, and I wish to pay respects to their elders past, present, and emerging. Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you all today. I am very pleased to be part of the conversation on Indigenous business, and part ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Main benefits to increase in line with wages
    Social Development and Employment Minister Carmel Sepuloni announced today that main benefits will increase by 3.1 percent on 1 April, in line with the rise in the average wage. The Government announced changes to the annual adjustment of main benefits in Budget 2019, indexing main benefit increases to the average ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Deed of Settlement signed with Ngāti Maru (Taranaki)
    A Deed of Settlement has been signed between Ngāti Maru and the Crown settling the iwi’s historical Treaty of Waitangi claims, Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Andrew Little announced today. The Ngāti Maru rohe is centred on the inland Waitara River valley, east to the Whanganui River and its ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Support in place for people connected to Auckland COVID-19 cases
    With a suite of Government income support packages available, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni is encouraging people, and businesses, connected to the recent Auckland COVID-19 cases to check the Work and Income website if they’ve been impacted by the need to self-isolate. “If you are required to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Statement on passing of former PNG PM Sir Michael Somare
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has expressed her condolences at the passing of long-serving former Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea, Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare. “Our thoughts are with Lady Veronica Somare and family, Prime Minister James Marape and the people of Papua New Guinea during this time of great ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to the National Māori Housing Conference 2021
    E te tī, e te tā  Tēnei te mihi maioha ki a koutou  Ki te whenua e takoto nei  Ki te rangi e tū iho nei  Ki a tātou e tau nei  Tēnā tātou.  It’s great to be with you today, along with some of the ministerial housing team; Hon Peeni Henare, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Drone project to aid protection of Māui dolphin
    The Government is backing a new project to use drone technology to transform our understanding and protection of the Māui dolphin, Aotearoa’s most endangered dolphin.    “The project is just one part of the Government’s plan to save the Māui dolphin. We are committed to protecting this treasure,” Oceans and Fisheries ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New water regulator board announced as major Government reform moves forward
    Major water reform has taken a step closer with the appointment of the inaugural board of the Taumata Arowai water services regulator, Hon Nanaia Mahuta says. Former Director General of Health and respected public health specialist Dame Karen Poutasi will chair the inaugural board of Crown agency Taumata Arowai. “Dame ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • North Auckland gets public transport upgrade
    The newly completed Hibiscus Coast Bus Station will help people make better transport choices to help ease congestion and benefit the environment, Transport Minister Michael Wood and Auckland Mayor Phil Goff said today. Michael Wood and Phil Goff officially opened the Hibiscus Coast Bus Station which sits just off the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Supporting work to protect Northland reserve
    New funding announced by Conservation Minister Kiri Allan today will provide work and help protect the unique values of Northland’s Te Ārai Nature Reserve for future generations. Te Ārai is culturally important to Te Aupōuri as the last resting place of the spirits before they depart to Te Rerenga Wairua. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Critical step to new housing deal for Pacific communities
      Today the Government has taken a key step to support Pacific people to becoming Community Housing providers, says the Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio. “This will be great news for Pacific communities with the decision to provide Pacific Financial Capability Grant funding and a tender process to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Consultation opens on proposed Bay of Islands marine mammal sanctuary
    Conservation Minister Kiri Allan is encouraging New Zealanders to have their say on a proposed marine mammal sanctuary to address the rapid decline of bottlenose dolphins in Te Pēwhairangi, the Bay of Islands. The proposal, developed jointly with Ngā Hapū o te Pēwhairangi, would protect all marine mammals of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Three District Court Judges appointed
    Attorney-General David Parker today announced the appointment of three new District Court Judges.    Two of the appointees will take up their roles on 1 April, replacing sitting Judges who have reached retirement age.     Kirsten Lummis, lawyer of Auckland has been appointed as a District Court Judge with jury jurisdiction to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government announces list of life-shortening conditions guaranteeing early KiwiSaver access
    Government announces list of life-shortening conditions guaranteeing early KiwiSaver access The Government changed the KiwiSaver rules in 2019 so people with life-shortening congenital conditions can withdraw their savings early The four conditions guaranteed early access are – down syndrome, cerebral palsy, Huntington’s disease and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder An alternative ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Reserve Bank to take account of housing in decision making
    The Reserve Bank is now required to consider the impact on housing when making monetary and financial policy decisions, Grant Robertson announced today. Changes have been made to the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee’s remit requiring it to take into account government policy relating to more sustainable house prices, while working ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Investment to reduce cochlear implant waitlist
    The Labour Government will invest $6 million for 70 additional adult cochlear implants this year to significantly reduce the historical waitlist, Health Minister Andrew Little says. “Cochlear implants are life changing for kiwis who suffer from severe hearing loss. As well as improving an individual’s hearing, they open doors to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Māori wards Bill passes third reading
    The Local Electoral (Māori Wards and Māori Constituencies) Amendment Bill passed its third reading today and will become law, Minister of Local Government Hon Nanaia Mahuta says. “This is a significant step forward for Māori representation in local government. We know how important it is to have diversity around ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government delivers 1,000 more transitional housing places
    The Government has added 1,000 more transitional housing places as promised under the Aotearoa New Zealand Homelessness Action Plan (HAP), launched one year ago. Minister of Housing Megan Woods says the milestone supports the Government’s priority to ensure every New Zealander has warm, dry, secure housing. “Transitional housing provides people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Second batch of Pfizer/BioNTech doses arrives safely – as the first vaccinations take place in the...
    A second batch of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines arrived safely yesterday at Auckland International Airport, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. “This shipment contained about 76,000 doses, and follows our first shipment of 60,000 doses that arrived last week. We expect further shipments of vaccine over the coming weeks,” Chris Hipkins said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • $18 million for creative spaces to make arts more accessible
    The Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Carmel Sepuloni has today announced $18 million to support creative spaces. Creative spaces are places in the community where people with mental health needs, disabled people, and those looking for social connection, are welcomed and supported to practice and participate in the arts ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Moriori Claims Settlement Bill passes first reading
    Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Minister Andrew Little today welcomed Moriori to Parliament to witness the first reading of the Moriori Claims Settlement Bill. “This bill is the culmination of years of dedication and hard work from all the parties involved. “I am delighted to reach this significant milestone today,” Andrew ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government action reduces child poverty
    22,400 fewer children experiencing material hardship 45,400 fewer children in low income households on after-housing costs measure After-housing costs target achieved a year ahead of schedule Government action has seen child poverty reduce against all nine official measures compared to the baseline year, Prime Minister and Minister for Child Poverty ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Entries open for the 2021 Prime Minister’s Education Excellence Awards
    It’s time to recognise the outstanding work early learning services, kōhanga reo, schools and kura do to support children and young people to succeed, Minister of Education Chris Hipkins says. The 2021 Prime Minister’s Education Excellence Awards are now open through until April 16. “The past year has reminded us ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Jobs for Nature benefits three projects
    Three new Jobs for Nature projects will help nature thrive in the Bay of Plenty and keep local people in work says Conservation Minister Kiri Allan. “Up to 30 people will be employed in the projects, which are aimed at boosting local conservation efforts, enhancing some of the region’s most ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Improvements to the Holidays Act on the way
    The Government has accepted all of the Holidays Act Taskforce’s recommended changes, which will provide certainty to employers and help employees receive their leave entitlements, Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Michael Wood announced today. Michael Wood said the Government established the Holidays Act Taskforce to help address challenges with the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • NZ’s credit rating lifted as economy recovers
    The Government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and faster than expected economic recovery has been acknowledged in today’s credit rating upgrade. Credit ratings agency Standard & Poor’s (S&P) today raised New Zealand’s local currency credit rating to AAA with a stable outlook. This follows Fitch reaffirming its AA+ rating last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Speech to National Remembrance Service on the 10th anniversary of the Christchurch earthquake
    Tena koutou e nga Maata Waka Ngai Tuahuriri, Ngai Tahu whanui, Tena koutou. Nau mai whakatau mai ki tenei ra maumahara i te Ru Whenua Apiti hono tatai hono, Te hunga mate ki te hunga mate Apiti hono tatai hono, Te hunga ora ki te hunga ora Tena koutou, Tena ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government reaffirms urgent commitment to ban harmful conversion practices
    The Minister of Justice has reaffirmed the Government’s urgent commitment, as stated in its 2020 Election Manifesto, to ban conversion practices in New Zealand by this time next year. “The Government has work underway to develop policy which will bring legislation to Parliament by the middle of this year and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New creative service aims to benefit 1,000 peoples’ careers
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage and Social Development Hon Carmel Sepuloni today launched a new Creative Careers Service, which is expected to support up to 1,000 creatives, across three regions over the next two years. The new service builds on the most successful aspects of the former Pathways to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago