Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:48 am, October 24th, 2016 - 31 comments
Categories: us politics, you couldn't make this shit up -
Tags: donald trump, hillary clinton, US election
This week we are trialling something new. In order to free up Open Mike and Daily Review for other conversations we are asking that all discussion, posting of links etc on the US election goes in the daily dedicated thread rather than OM or DR.
The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).
There will continue to be author-written posts on the US election as well, usual rules apply there too.
Did the Democrats conspire with the Republicans deep within the Deep State to enable them to put up the only candidate who could possibly lose to Hillary Clinton?
Remind me again, who are the Deep State? Skulls and Bones? The Illuminati? The lizard-people?
In any case it’s a stunning triple-double-bluff for the secret rulers to put up one of their own as the spoiler.
Deep State is The Man.
That’s all we’ll ever know. đ
Oh no!
Not a man again!
Why does everything have to be blamed on a fucked up chauvinist narrow minded shouting violent dumbo man!?
Oh well, that’s life
The case for Clinton.
https://medium.com/@milobela/the-leftist-case-for-clinton-c5de3dfd8a67#.9pfmkkp19
Paul Krugman too, makes that case. Brief excerpt:
thereâs one thing Mrs. Clinton brought to this campaign that no establishment Republican could have matched: She truly cares about her signature issues, and believes in the solutions sheâs pushing.
I know, weâre supposed to see her as coldly ambitious and calculating, and on some issues â like macroeconomics â she does sound a bit bloodless, even when she clearly understands the subject and is talking good sense. But when sheâs talking about womenâs rights, or racial injustice, or support for families, her commitment, even passion, are obvious. Sheâs genuine, in a way nobody in the other party can be.
So letâs dispel with this fiction that Hillary Clinton is only where she is through a random stroke of good luck. Sheâs a formidable figure, and has been all along.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/21/opinion/why-hillary-wins.html?_r=0
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/paul-krugman-the-real-reason-clinton-is-winning-is-not-what-the-pundits-tell-you/
The third debate.
Hilarious!
Nice. Once again Trump proves to be beyond parody – hard to see much difference between Baldwin’s imitation and the real deal. Johnny Depp’s more in depth effort is also pretty spectacular.
After years of interfering and manipulating the outcome of other countries general elections and democratic processes the Americans are clearly unhappy when it happens to them.
With possible Russian interference in the presidential campaign and Hillary clearly outraged at this “political interference” in Americas democratic process it is clearly uncomfortable for her and the establishment that a foreign power is undermining the mother of democracy and Americans right to a safe vote without (foreign) political interference.
Its ok to manipulate Americans from within their country that’s perfectly acceptable and when necessary to further their own influence, a foreign state and its citizens.
They are to arrogant to realise that as unpleasant as the Russian actions have been that it is never acceptable to distort the democratic process and outcomes of other sovereign states in favour of their own foreign policy objectives.
Mosa , in the latest Wikileaks barrage there is the proof that the Democrats have conspired to push the anti Russia line. Those stupid yanks are going into “Mc Carthyism 2”. There is no proof that the Russians did the hacking… just good old ott American propaganda doing ‘ overtime ‘ again.
no evidence of russian interferance . so far a lot of inuendo and “experts suggest” but beyond that nothing.
apart from that I support your drift here. America has an abysmal record of upholding democracy globally
Ya reckon.
Time zones my friend. catches a lot of people unawares.
Some in the northern hemisphere dont even realise the southern hemisphere has different seasons to them.
RT has an entirely different excuse.
Just been following that up, both RT and wikileaks now saying that emails were released before the wikitweet and RT simply tweeted as soon as they saw the release on wikileaks. Which seems a reasonable story.
Catherine Austin Fitts coined the term “Shriek-o-meter” to express the herd of MSM swarm attacks on individuals. How fitting!
She says she hasn’t heard the Shriek-o-meter louder than the recent attacks against Trump.
That’s strange your link disappeared ASW, here it is , though with this: “..If you look at the inhumanity rolling down on the average family, whether itâs heavy schedules of vaccines that cause autism….” crap she could be going off the “Shriek-o-meter” herself.
Here’s a more rational argument for voting for Trump
The sense of entitlement is strong in this one.
Eric may wish to sharpen up when it comes to posing for selfies.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/302425-eric-trump-poses-with-woman-in-anti-trump-shirt
Indeed. The leopard doesn’t look very pleased… or alive.
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2308096.1438190981!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_750/hunt30n-8-web.jpg
Or the rest:
http://www.gossipextra.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Trump-hunting-composite.jpg
I know what I’d do with his fucking knife.
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2308095.1438190980!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/hunt30n-9-web.jpg
Naomi Klein and Glenn Greenwald discussing the ethics of Wikileaks’ Podesta emails:
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/10/20/naomi-klein-and-glenn-greenwald-tackle-ethics-wikileaks-podesta-emails
Klein wondered whether The Intercept might be betraying some of its core principalsâmost prominently, its privacy advocacyâby not taking note of the moral issues raised by such indiscriminate email dumps.
“Personal emailsâand there’s all kinds of personal stuff in these emailsâthis sort of indiscriminate dump is precisely what Snowden was trying to protect us from,” Klein said. “That’s why I wanted to talk with you about it, because I think we need to continuously reassert that principle.”
“Certainly Podesta is a very powerful person, and he will be more powerful after Hillary Clinton is elected, if she’s elected, and it looks like she will be,” Klein added.
“But I’m concerned about the subjectivity of who gets defined as sufficiently powerful to lose their privacy
Their discussion is also published as a podcast:
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/naomi_klein_criticizes_glenn_greenwalds_20161019
Interesting brief historical backgrounder on the Electoral College system if you’re a politics tragic.
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/presidential-campaign/302230-the-electoral-college-back-in-the-spotlight
Good link Andre.
Just curious not tragic.
“Just curious not tragic.”
I keep trying to tell myself that too, but it doesn’t take…
They’re not going away.
In case you missed it (easy to do when nobody on MSM will touch this) here is the best piece of investigative reporting of the 2016 election.
This is James O’Keefe, possibly the next target for political assassination or at least an extensive IRS audit, undercovering violence incited at Trump rallies. The DNC hired people to do it, with Hillary’s knowledge.
Naasty + worthy of the tag, “you couldn’t make this shit up”.
You’re only about the fifth person to post that, starting from several days ago.
Thx for posting @Asleep… I hadn’t seen it before
Giving people the opportunity to be themselves isn’t inciting anything.
Asking people to assault protestors and promising to pay the legal fees definitely is