The Leader of the Free World…..or so we are lead to believe, tells us “America can be defined in a single word”…here it is, straight from the horses mouth….
[note: Joe Biden has a lifelong speech impediment that included stuttering. The word he was about to say is ‘possibilities’ – weka]
I've heard many of Bidens's speechs over the years and stuttering is a very minor issue for him. It's the 'other issue' – I'm not sure if he's quite up to Shadbolt's level yet but getting very very close.
imo, that tweet and video is ageist bullshit. If Biden is struggling because he is elderly, then you cannot demonstrate that in sound bite vid and implication.
If he has dementia, likewise.
Elderly people process information and spatial awareness differently than younger people. Doesn't mean they can't think or function.
The ancient Egyptians use to have a test of a Pharaoh's fitness to rule in their 30th year – he had to run a distance within a set time.
PS Biden would beat Trump over any distance in terms of mobility. I mention this because Hu Jintao could barely walk by himself. Reagan had issues during his second term as to ability to handle concentration (stay awake) for long periods.
Biden has a combination of historic speech impediment and aging (part processing his thoughts cogently and part information overload from all those years on Capitol Hill) – that would tend to compound the problem on the communication side.
When confronted with cheap shots by lazy thinkers who judge a lifelong speech impediment as a sure sign of cognitive decline to suit their Trumpian populist propaganda narrative it is never hard to counter it with blissful facts:
Much moaning is not on-topic per se but a sign (symptom) of people under pressure. Another example is people snapping at others over trivial things that is generally uncalled for, out of proportion, and out of character. Unfortunately, it does have a contagious element as it spreads itself like a virus. Here on TS most seem to be fairly immune to it – the Mods can isolate & quarantine the super-spreaders aka concern trolls when necessary, but this is a last resort measure as it conflicts with freedoms that we hold high here.
Now look here Adrian, are you suggesting that someone whose mental powers are declining shouldn't have access to the nuclear codes?
Cos thats just ageist and cognitive deficit shaming .So what if he says his son Beau died in the Iraq war.He just misspoke, thats all, no reflection on the man who holds the fate of the world in his hands.
Mr Kruger reiterates Te Urewera is no longer a National Park. And rebuilding those huts? Yeah, good luck with that. Given the move back to nature so beloved by Greenies and Maori; in principle anyway, my guess is huts are a thing of the past. So it'll probably be back to the future with tents.
Why not go on Freecycle and ask for one free. Then contact Tuhoe to find out the real picture? Or you could ask them about bivvys.
Best to practice putting the tent up before you leave. Te Urewera, contrary to what some seem to imply, is not a 'walk in the park'. Apart from round the lake(which has its moments), climbing Panekiri, and the trip to Lake Ruapani it can be bush whacking and not country for the unprepared.
Apart from walking in to Maungapohatu I have not done any of the tracks from the Ruatahuna/Waimana northern end. In my day these were serious difficult tracks used by hunters and possum trappers.
All the while when visiting in those days you were aware that it was someone's home. People lived in the area when it was a National Park. This is an important difference to many other NZ National parks.
Have we all got so entitled that this means nothing now?
Family anecdote 'Children of the mist' was what Elsdon Best called them and Maungapohatu sums this up.
Maungapōhatu is the sacred mountain of Ngāi Tūhoe. In times long ago, when gods walked the earth and men possessed strange powers, there lived a woman called Hine-pūkohu-rangi, the personification of mist and fog. Her younger sister was Hine-wai, the personification of light, misty rain. It was Hine-pūkohu-rangi who enticed Te Maunga (the mountain) to earth. From their union came Pōtiki I, the ancestor of Ngā Pōtiki, one of the tribes occupying the land before the arrival of the Mataatua canoe. And so Tūhoe claim they are descended from their environment: the rugged bush ranges of the Urewera and the white mist clouds that cover them. '
My family farmed up close to the boundary of Tuhoe country and my grandfather said they were aptly named as 'children of the mist' just appearing, seemingly from no-where. A tribute to their bush skills/directions.
Yes….horses are the thing. My Uncle had a block behind Ohuka and he and my Aunt used to ride across country with children doubled up to visit grandparents. My grandmother used to sew the clothes for the little ones, my cousins. then they would ride back. You think it looks far away but much closer to go overland than into Wairoa, out the Napier Road then up past Raupunga.
Going up the Horomanga would have been great, far bit of river walking for you and the horse…..
Walked up from Taneatua to Ruatahuna, camping all the way, years ago, then spent 2 days trying to hitch out of Ruatahuna, eventually getting the NZ Railways bus on its once a week route along SH38. I don't like to see DOC huts being removed and not being replaced, but it should be pointed out that the back country hut system in NZ remains unique. Many other well known tramping/hiking trails around the world you just camp wherever you can, whatever the weather throws at you.
So the open mike 24/10 is there – and the link is in the comments, but the OP 24/10 does not show on the homepage which is stuck on 21/10 is because you are all on holiday?
"Clearly, that was an unwarranted assumption. New Zealand’s education system – once celebrated as one of the most successful in the world – is in free-fall. By all the recognised international comparators, we are failing – and failing fast. So bad have things become that it is increasingly difficult to find a sufficient number of willing and able participants to make our international test-results robust enough, statistically, to stand comparison. In a telling sign of the times, this dearth of suitable participants is being presented by some school principals as a signal that it is time for New Zealand to abandon international comparisons altogether."
Are 'National Standards' (partly) to blame?
Your guess is probably as good as mine, in principle anyway
Study raises concerns about National Standards [28 Nov 2013]
NZ Principals' Federation president Phil Harding said: "[The report is] confirmation [that] all the dire warnings and the negative consequences of this national standards policy are coming true.
"The only fix is a dramatic re-think of the policy. We've now got a high-stakes model … this is damaging the New Zealand education system and it's no better than a national test."
A spokeswoman for Minister of Education Hekia Parata said she would not be able to comment as she had not read the report.
National Standards 2016: Retrospective Insights, Continuing Uncertainties and New Questions
New Zealand’s National Standards policy has been deeply controversial in the education sector, especially amongst primary teachers and principals. This article provides a view of the National Standards from their introduction up until 2016, nearly a decade after they were first mooted.
National Standards The Principals’ Federation has for some time been outspoken about its concerns and the risks its members see in the Government’s National Standards Policy. To this end it joined in the Forum hosted by the New Zealand Educational Institute in November 2009.
The forum believes that national standards represent considerable risk to student learning and identified various themes and actions. In support of members around the country and those regional associations who wish to share their initiatives, the NZPF has made this page available as a resource to all.
I agree that it's virtually impossible to separate out National Standards as possible cause for dropping educational levels – from all of the other potential causes.
The actual data seems to show virtually a flat-line in student achievement during the period when National Standards were implemented.
For what it's worth, the national data shows virtually no change in the proportions of students at or above national standards so far – flat at 78 per cent in reading, 75 per cent in maths and 71 per cent in writing in each of the past three years for which data has been published.
National Standards had zero impact (it was, after all a measurement tool – not a teaching one)
National standards improvements offset declines in student achievement due to other causes.
Teachers were deliberately undermining National Standards by inflating results (see article link for the 'poor quality' of the data reported)
National Standards needed a generation to embed in (changing teacher practice is a lot harder and takes a lot longer than changing reporting practices).
Having had a child going through Primary school during the period when National Standards were implemented and then removed – I can say that my experience was that communication over a child's progress was enormously better, when teachers were required to report against National Standards.
Once that requirement was removed – school 'reports' went back to meaningless jargon – and I was literally told that a child who was clearly struggling with Maths was 'trucking along in his maths group'
[NB: this was poor teaching, rather than inability – a tutor soon brought him up to speed, and he achieves at, or slightly above his peer group at secondary school. My issue with the teacher/school wasn't the poor teaching (well, it was, but that's another story), it was that they apparently *didn't even see there was a problem*]
This article from 2016 seems to indicate that having to report to the MoE on kids not achieving, made schools focus greater attention on those kids.
And, of course, teachers and principals hated National Standards – it made it possible to compare the results achieved by individual teachers and schools. (Comparing the average achievement rate for a class at the beginning of the year, with the average rate at the end of the year – tells you whether that teacher is making a significant difference, is average, or performs worse than average. You can even be more nuanced – and look at the individual or group improvement rates – e.g. Is this teacher good at bringing up kids to average level, but doesn't extend the high achievers, or the other way around.)
And, of course, teachers and principals hated National Standards…
If that's the case, then 'National Standards' operated under a severe handicap. It does beg the question – why would the Gnats enact policy they knew would be "hated" by those charged with implementing it – seems a tad sadistic to me.
There is renewed interest in studying sadism as a personality trait. Sadism joins with subclinical psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism to form the so-called “dark tetrad” of personality.
I wonder what proportion of Kiwi MPs (of any political flavour) with children sent/send them to private schools – 'worked for me'? Education eh – what a business!
In NZ we have the post-code lottery for schooling as well as health. If you live in a wealthy area your local school is likely to approach private schools for quality of education (think of the high ratings of Epsom Girls Grammar or Auckland Grammar in Auckland – I'm sure you can plug in the names of the rich area schools in your home town).
Overseas (UK for example) MPs on both sides of the house routinely send their kids to private schools.
Hmm. If you're only ever going to make changes which are supported by the teachers unions, then you run into difficulty make any hard choices at all.
ATM, my personal belief is that the Ministry of Education (which has a much greater influence on teaching in NZ, than any government does) – has experienced pedagogical capture by a particular educational philosophy. To the extent where they ignore all contrary evidence (dropping ed stds are just one measure).
I don't know how (if this is indeed the case) that any government can turn this around. Let alone turn it around easily.
Hmm. If you’re only ever going to make changes which are supported by the teachers unions, then you run into difficulty make any hard choices at all.
Hmm – maybe just make some changes which are supported by unions?
I don't know how (if this is indeed the case) that any government can turn this around. Let alone turn it around easily.
"Pedagogical capture" notwithstanding, MoE's strategies have changed, are changing, and will change. We can, however, be certain that there will be no education(al) ‘fix’, easy or otherwise, while our parliamentary representatives treat NZ education as a political football.
Might help if Government politicians and MoE staff listened more to the collective voice of the teaching profession. One can only hope that any future NAct government will be less ideologically inclined to ignoring unions than the previous one…
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Interpreting Hekia Parata’s legacy [1 May 2017]
It is tempting to suggest that 2012, her annus horribilis, was a turning point and after that things improved. But although the depths of the PR disasters of that year weren’t ever plumbed again, Parata never gained the full trust of teachers. She continued to pursue an agenda that was completely out of step with school leaders, education academics and the teacher unions.
'Not remembering the past' could soon be a new NCEA course
You tell me….. After the litany of 'failures' under National you recited – I'd have expected to see a comparable positive storm of success under Labour – who, clearly, have no interest in upsetting the powerful teacher unions.
Really, we have to stop blaming 'Covid' for everything. They had 2 Covid-free years to set policy in place (because, clearly they had spent the previous 9 years in opposition honing their education policy /sarc/ – and knew exactly what they were going to use to replace National Standards)
And, while Covid lockdowns had an impact – it was greatest on the very young (the kids just starting school – who might just as well not have bothered), and the kids in their final NCEA years – who needed to cover specific material to a specific level (and, some of whom, had little or no access to online classes for a variety of reasons). Not to say that other kids weren't affected – but those were the critical areas.
If Covid lockdowns were such a major limiting factor on learning – then we should have seen a great chasm between the achievement results of kids in Auckland (who experienced more than double the number of lockdown days), and the kids in the rest of NZ – South Island in particular. I have yet to see any evidence of this.
Note that reducing the qualifying level for NCEA (as was done in 2020 and (for some areas) in 2021) – doesn't actually prepare kids for the next level. You still need to know Year 12 chemistry, if you want to be successful in doing Year 13 chemistry.
Hang on – you told me “education has been such a success story under Labour” (@4:20 pm)??
After the litany of 'failures' under National you recited –
I provided ~10 links (to data and the opinions of others) in response to comments in this thread – but "litany"? Still, "Perception is Reality" for some, including the reality that The Standard is a left-leaning blog.
What’s your political ‘angle’?
We come from a variety of backgrounds and our political views don’t always match up but it’d be fair to say that all of us share a commitment to the values and principles that underpin the broad labour movement and we hope that perspective will come through strongly as you read the blog.
"What is your political angle?" – good question, eh?
I'd have expected to see a comparable positive storm of success under Labour – who, clearly, have no interest in upsetting the powerful teacher unions.
Bizarre comment for a respectful centrist to make, imho. Why on earth would anyeffective Government be interested in upsetting a large group of public servants? It might prove difficult to make a case for NZ right-wing political parties being supportive of "powerful" worker (cf. taxpayer) unions, but why would they be interested in upsetting unions? Ideology?
As for expecting a "positive storm of success under Labour", that comment seems a tad hyperbolic for a centrist, but I'm biased.
If Covid lockdowns were such a major limiting factor on learning…
If NZ's Covid response wasn't "a major limiting factor on learning", then that would be an excellent outcome (imho) – the key word in "I have yet to see any evidence of this." is 'yet' – time will tell.
NCEA exam attendance was down in regions affected (most) by lockdowns (i.e. Northland, Waikato, Auckland) in 2021. Annual Report came out in May this year, IIRC.
"Make changes supported by the teacher unions' and "Pedagogical capture" raises pertinent points.
It's reasonable to say that the place of schooling and teachers in our society has changed remarkably over the past 70 years. (No doubt in a time frame people in forums such as this could understand.) I'm not talking just about the changes technological and curricular.
Was a time when there was a thing called 'country service' which saw the mass of teachers trained having to teach in identified country schools. The flow of teachers in and out of communities the length and breadth of the country assuredly had significant impact. Go there for two years, maybe meet a future spouse, become part of the local drama or rugby club, coach or organise kid's sports teams. Then likely move on.
Along with that was a system of teachers being 'graded' by Departmental inspectors on a three year cycle. It was an 'appointments and promotions' scheme, hierarchical, giving currency for those deemed capable to move 'up the ladder.' Accommodating those elements were many hundreds of small schools, one teacher, two, or three or four and so on.
After being an 'ordinary' teacher the masses aspiring to be head teachers served in small schools, trying to prove their worth, improving their grading and hoping to go onto some school bigger. Someone from Northland might transfer to Taranaki or Southland or Hawkes Bay with the system being national.
In their schools teachers tried to prove their worth, experimented, went to courses trying to pick up new ideas and put them into practice. Most consequentially, those who were aspiring to be headmasters/headmistresses were at the chalkface and running a school dealing with every child and their learning from (as it was) primer one to form two. They served apprenticeships in learning how kids learn, steps along the way, and dealing with the ebb and flow of humans on learning journeys.
The apprenticeship necessarily too was in teachers learning who they were themselves and their place in communities. And vice versa. ‘The teacher is right’ easily became part of a societal norm.
Lifeblood flowed through the countrywide veins of our schools. As the structural elements changed the nature of the business of training teachers and the expectations and demands on those in the business changed. The nature of the beasts in charge changed. The demands on them changed and so what they expect of their charges.
At it’s best learning is a magic event, a series of them, and should be that. We want altruistic, creative, demanding, challenging, personable, inspiring people in the job.
The job though, with it’s fear and tight underpants accountability demands drones. The managers, the principals need ticks in boxes not magic. And generations of parents are playing that same game. ‘The teacher is right?’ “Only if they see it like I see it.”
Changes supported by teacher unions? Teacher unions have no chance of seeing the most essential changes made. And those necessary ones won't be proposed from elsewhere where the lowest of low trust models rule.
Teacher unions have no chance of seeing the most essential changes made. And those necessary ones won't be proposed from elsewhere where the lowest of low trust models rule.
The other syndrome is one we find in many of the richest democracies in Europe, the United States, and East Asia, where trust in government has plummeted in recent years. In these circumstances, citizens overestimate the extent of corruption because it is constantly sensationalized by an increasingly fragmented and competitive media, including especially social media. Moreover, intense political polarization—driven by highly ideological and partisan voices on social media and crystallized into self-reinforcing echo chambers of agreement—makes it hard to pass legislation to address the major problems.
Simply reducing corruption or increasing transparency will not in itself restore trust in government. We must find ways to reduce political polarization, reduce bad information and incivility in cyberspace, and enable government to function more effectively again.
They were certainly introduced by National, in 2010. However they were scrapped, as one of their first actions, by Labour, in the person of Hipkins, who gleefully announced that they were being dumped in 2017.
It seems a great deal more likely that the scrapping of National Standards then is more likely to be responsible for the recent collapse in pupil's results than the fact that they were brought in long before the current 14 year olds were anywhere near school.
National Standards ended [12 December 2017]
“Starting in 2018, schools will no longer be compelled to report annually on National Standards to the Ministry of Education. The process was little more than a compliance exercise and was a major distraction to schools. There are better ways to build a nationwide picture.”
The National Standards 'tap' was turned on in 2010, and turned off in 2018 – the effects of eight years of National Standards are still flowing through schools.
NZ's education 'system' seems severely damaged – schooling is increasingly unattractive to pupils, and it's difficult to attract and retain any teachers, let alone those who might regard teaching as a calling. The pandemic hasn't helped either.
Interfering politicians must take some responsibility for this – education is too important to the future of Aotearoa New Zealand for it to continue to be a partisan political football, imho.
However, it's difficult to actually attribute any educational failure to National Standards – given that all of the measures showed that educational measures (reading, writing maths) remained pretty much static while National Standards were in place. [That's not, of course, the outcome that the Government wanted, but it's the one they got]
I can think of no learning impact which would have been invisible in any measure while NS were in place, only to become apparent when they were removed. Can you?
You mean "pretty much static", or "invisible",, as in "pretty legal"?
See Figure 6 on page 16 of this report [PDF], available from the NZI website.
National Standards 2016: Retrospective Insights, Continuing Uncertainties and New Questions [2017]
Looking back from 2016 perhaps the most concerning thing about the National Standards experience is how little genuine commitment there was on the part of the National‐led Government to assess the pros and cons of the Standards and respond accordingly. The ‘Cautionary Tale’ book discusses numerous other instances where evidence that casts doubt on the National Standards was ignored or dismissed by Ministers of Education and senior policymakers of the National‐led Government or where evidence has not been sought in the first place.
Standards and the professor [6 Feb 2010]
So it came as a shock when Hattie returned from a six-month study tour in the United States last July to tell the Herald that he was deeply concerned about the direction the Government's policy had taken and worried that it could set back education 50 years.
"50 years"! Surely you must be joking, Professor Hattie.
The actual data seems to show virtually a flat-line in student achievement during the period when National Standards were implemented.
For what it's worth, the national data shows virtually no change in the proportions of students at or above national standards so far – flat at 78 per cent in reading, 75 per cent in maths and 71 per cent in writing in each of the past three years for which data has been published.
This was from 2016. The original data (sadly) appears to have been removed from the MoE website.
Given that the latest PISA ratings are from 2018 – all we have to compare against are the reported 'test' results from the new NCEA reading/writing/maths curriculum – which had …. poor …. pass rates. This is a base-level competency test – which all students sitting NCEA level 1 should have been able to (on paper) pass. Students were selected to sit the test paper on an opt in/out basis – and schools would certainly have encouraged able students to do so (less able ones, might well have been encouraged to wait a year, to improve their pass-chances); so students sitting are highly likely to have skewed to the higher end of the academic range – which makes the pass-rates even more dismal.
This is the same John Hattie who supports performance pay for teachers, and increased class sizes (I certainly don't agree with the latter) as well as saying the the critical factor in low income households isn't money, but low parental expectations.
I've read his visible learning book – and absolutely agree that a major critical factor for effective learning is specific, targeted, timely feedback – from teacher to child – which is almost entirely missing from our education system [Based on my experience as a parent, and shared conversations with friends who are both parents and teachers]
His point has always been that measurement is pointless unless you are going to do *something* with the information.
Interestingly the report you quote (Briar Lipson), supports my argument for the pedagogical capture that I believe MoE and the NZ teaching profession has experienced; and is highly critical of their lack of willingness to review the failures in their approach.
"However, despite at least 15 years of decline, and a total failure to raise equity, New Zealand’s educational establishment keeps doubling down on child-centred orthodoxy."
Repairing the generational damage of this failed idea will take a coordinated effort. For many New Zealand educators, child-centred orthodoxy is like the air they breathe. It has redefined not only how to teach students, but even the purpose of school.
She also advocates for an evidence-based approach to education (including, ironically, some form of 'nationalized assessments') – p. 112.
A very interesting report indeed, I would agree with the majority of her recommendations – thank you for drawing it to my attention.
The original data (sadly) appears to have been removed from the MoE website.
That's a shame. Still, since you're familiar with "PISA ratings", and have read Briar Lipson's NZI report, perhaps you could comment on the trends illustrated in Figure 6 on page 16 of Lipson's report [PDF]. To my eye it looks as if the PISA scores for Maths, Science and Reading all decrease relatively sharply between 2009 and 2012, with further smaller decreases in the 2015 and 2018.
It's not, however, all bad news – that same graph shows that between 2009 and 2017 the percentage of school leavers with NCEA Level 2 or higher increased from 70% to nearly 80%.
Lipson summarises the constrasting trends thus:
While the NCEA paints an illusion of rising standards, students’ scores in the most basic areas have been dropping relentlessly.
One might say that treating education as a business was bound to improve apparent student achievement, but I couldn't possibly comment.
Lipson is no fan of teacher unions (this is an NZI report), and views National Standards (2010 – 2017) as a means of ensuring accountability:
For reasons like these, teachers’ unions have long resisted more accountability in education. In fact, the Primary teachers’ union, the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI), successfully campaigned in 2018 to remove National Standards.
Accountability is important, but it seems to me that the National Standards initiative as it was implemented was always going to prove incompatible with a high-trust model of teacher-led education.
Maybe it comes down to certain political tribes simple not valuing education.
Your argument about 14 yr old's not being subjected to National Standards is flawed, as the standards were abolished 4 yrs ago they had spent the first five years within that system.
My partner formerly a secondary schoolteacher long moaned about pupils arriving in that system barely unable to read, she always complained about primary teachers not doing their job. She is now involved in basic literacy and numeracy assessments, can you imagine any 14 yr old not being able to understand any times tables, but this is what assessment is showing and at a private Christian school to boot.
Yes, they spent the first 5 years in the system. During that time – the reported standards were consistent (flat, without improvement, but not dropping).
Unless you can think of a way that the damage could have been caused – but remained invisible – until National Standards were removed…..
Times tables haven't been taught in primary schools (at least not as part of the state curriculum) for at least the last 15 years. The old days of the class chanting 3 x 7 = 21; 3 x 8 = 24 – are long gone. Maths teaching is 'student-led' (as is the rest of the curriculum) and focuses on number strategies (rather than teaching a standard way to solve a problem). While this is a successful approach for kids who have mathematical minds – and enjoy number games ; it is (observationally) a poor strategy for kids who *don't* think that way – and would benefit more from a 'this is how to solve the problem' approach. Many get confused, and then withdraw from maths with the 'I can't do it' approach. [NB: from discussion with my kid's tutor, she spends at least the first 6 months with any kid, convincing them that they *can* do it]
Again, observationally, very few primary teachers either enjoy or are good at teaching maths (there are exceptions) – and it's often a 'pro forma' excercise – rather than the enjoyment that I see in teaching in other areas.
This is troubling to say the least. Not to mention the high truency levels. I wonder how Jan Tinettis adds to get kids back into the classroom are going.?
a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 has the reserve status revoked.
(3)
The fee simple estate in the establishment land vests in Te Urewera and is held under, and in accordance with, this Act.
this Act is the Te Urewera Act 2014
The continued non-acceptance of this basic fact seems to indicate that there is a mass happening of 'old man yells at cloud' (anger at things they cannot control) affecting among others, the race scared, those taking Stuff as gospel.
Does this idea of landowners apply to all people? Some owners of high country land have removed musterers huts that also functioned as huts for others/trampers. Does the shock horror apply to them also? Or does it only apply to Maori & specifically Te Urewera and Tuhoe?
(My bro in law has been involved with use of these musterers huts over the years working with owners/lessees to make them safe. Over recent years many have been broken into/wrecked – not by trampers in need of a safe haven but by 4WD people (not the clubs) but the yobbo ones)
4WD may not be able to make it to the hinterland huts but they sure can make a mess on the margins.
Title of what? Outrage by locals who wilfully continue to misunderstand the current situation? My heart bleeds, it really does.
Your Facebook like response is difficult to respond to.
If Tuhoe has control of its land then what it does on its land is surely up to it. All of this would have been done under a management plan and with the knowledge of the board that has 3 DOC reps on it.
'Old man yells at cloud' refers to the continued non acceptance of the existence of the legislation. Acceptance or even a reading and undestanding of the legislation would lessen this.
Is there such yelling when other management functions sich as pest control are undertaken?
what's your point Pat? Please explain, because I've read your two comments twice and I don't get it.
Shanreagh was using the meme of old man yelling at clouds to point the people who don't seem to understand that the area is no longer a national park and hasn't been for a long time, but are angry about it.
'old man yells at cloud' is a pejorative expression against those disapproving of something they cannot impact…..and the case of Te Urewera it is not applicable for the simple reason there is every potential to impact that which is causing disapproval.
Te Urewera Act (2014) is an Act of Parliament that didnt apply prior to that date and can be as easily rescinded or modified by any subsequent Parliament…and as we know public pressure has been known to move politicians …in democracies.
Democracy is not immutable, that is the domain of theocracies and autocracies
Prior to 1860 it was land owned and occupied by Tuhoe since time immemorial. After 1864, I think, it was taken by the Crown, confiscated, in the terms of the time, for an act that Tuhoe had no part in. In 1954 this land was taken further away by the declaration of National Park status. Tuhoe were not consulted on this.
When I say 'taken further away' to take land out of a national park involves an Act of Parliament and even had there been a will to return Te Urewera direct from the NP this would not have seen the light of day. If it had been taken up we would have had the unconscionable action of this being politicised/polarised on party grounds. So the delivery of a right and just solution would have been subject to a political whim.
The investigations are correctly apolitical through the Waitangi Tribunal. Identifying the redress options are also correctly apolitical. The financial options are correctly political as it involves $$$$ from the Govt of NZ. The finalising of the settlement by an Act of parliament is correctly political as we do not want a settlement overturned without great thought.
The Te Urewera act sets up a Board. There is no time limit on that.
Is it just this land you have a problem with or are/were you similarly concerned with the many other Treaty Settlements such as Ngai Tahu, Tainui, Sealord. Why this one in particular?
'Claims to the Waitangi Tribunal are allegations that the Crown has breached the Treaty of Waitangi by particular actions, inactions, laws, or policies and that Māori have suffered prejudice (harmful effects) as a result.
Link to the Whakatohea claim. This contains in language we can understand what the deprivation of land from Maori can mean. This is what I mean when I say that while all of the settlements are written in good clear English, some are lyrical in the language as well. it is this combination that makes them so readable. Having had an involvement on the land side way down food chain I know that great care is taken with the language with many of those involved across many depts being given the chance to say ‘does this say what we mean it to say?’
In 2010 – when Tuhoi (including the same leader now quoted) were angling for the transfer of the management from DoC – they made unequivocal statements that public access would not be infringed in any way.
Chief negotiator Tamati Kruger told the Herald yesterday that Tuhoe had given assurances to the Government that access to some of New Zealand's most rugged and beautiful tracks, Lakes Waikaremoana and Waikareiti "would not be compromised in any way".
"The public access that is available now will not be limited or diminished in any way – what changes is that Tuhoe now owns that area but the public's interests does not change."
I think applying a lityle pressure on Mr Kruger is not a bad thing,he made a deal he needs to honor it,for the sake of co governess deals to follow if nothing else.
Any comments on the conservation disaster that has resulted from TUT management?
Any comments on the conservation disaster that has resulted from the dominant culture's management of the whole country?
Because if we're going down that track, of critiquing Tūhoe's management, and I see no reason not to other than it's rude and hypocritical, then I'll point to the politics that you support as having a massively detrimental impact on nature eg the loss of biodiversity from industrial dairying.
The reason I'm pointing that out is that there are real and deep differences in world view and values here, and imo that's the stuff we should be wrangling with. It's easy enough to point a finger at any Iwi and the things we don't like, but we're a bit slower to point the finger at Pākehā. Maybe we should look at what the underlying values are and why each set is driving what it is.
Comparing the conservation results in Te Urewera before and after the change in ownership.
This is not me, saying it's a disaster; it's respected conservation professionals – many who have dedicated a large portion of their life to making a difference in this area.
I already knew about this issue. My point here is the narrative you are weaving here about Tūhoe and its ability to manage things properly. I'm suggesting we dig deeper and look at the conflict of values. I think the time has passed for just writing of Māori and enforcing Pākehā values.
Interestingly, the removal of the huts is also opposed by Tuhoe locals (presumably part of the hunters who used them for shelter)
The move has sparked anger from some Tūhoe locals like Paki Nikora.
"The lack of consultation has been terrible," Nikora told Newshub.
Nikora is one of 8000 people who've signed a petition calling for it to stop. He's been using the huts since the 1960s for hunting and tramping and said there's been no proper communication with the community on the matter.
There is a quantitative difference between the removal of the odd DoC hut (unless you can link to a source which shows a systematic pattern of large scale removal) – and the proposal to remove more than 50 from Te Urewera.
I also note that DoC go to significant lengths to work with community groups for upkeep and maintenance of remote huts, which primarily benefit their group.
a commenter on TS expressing their opinion that Tūhoe have control of the land, and that this means it is up to them how they manage it.
a statement from the chair of the governing board of the legal structure Tūhoe were required to have by the Crown as part of the settlement process. He says that Te Urewera is no longer a national park and they will do things differently. I read this as meaning that Māori have their own thinking about management that is different from the Crown's ideas about National Parks. This doesn't surprise me, there are clear cultural differences between Māori and Pākehā on conservation and management of nature.
What I'm not seeing is
it's our land and we can do what we want – tough luck if what we want to do, doesn't suit the public.
although I can see how some might choose to interpret it that way. I am curious if you believe that Iwi should have a consultation process with Tauiwi (or the Crown, or New Zealanders generally) about what they do with the land returned to them under treaty settlements. And if so, what is the rationale?
My memory is that DOC removed back country huts in the 80s or 90s without consulting the public, and it did piss a lot of people off. It wasn't the odd hut, it was DOC going through and removing the ones they didn't want to keep and it was systematic. Have a feeling that groups intervened, not sure how many were saved.
If it's the number of huts in Te Urewera that is bothering you, rather than it being Māori doing it not DOC, then I'd like to see an audit of the condition and usage of the huts being removed. Fifty huts seems a very large number for the area. Were DOC keeping them all in good condition? Who was using them?
Which isn't to say there isn't a place for critiquing what is happening. I think it's useful to tease out what the objections are specifically, and look at to what extent this is an objection of transfer of power from the dominant culture to Māori, and if so, that's a different conversation than issues about huts.
I am curious if you believe that Iwi should have a consultation process with Tauiwi (or the Crown, or New Zealanders generally) about what they do with the land returned to them under treaty settlements. And if so, what is the rationale?
Apparently TUT don't even have a consultation process with Tuhoe living close by – referencing the quote above.
DOC are not allowed (by TUT) to do any maintenance in Te Urewera – that is all controlled by TUT – that was a big part of the stoush which saw access to Lake Waikaremoana closed for months.
My understanding is that these huts are 'shelter-from-the-elements' huts used by hunters (they're not camping venues). As such, they will be predominantly used by local (or regional) hunters – not tourists or backpackers. Apparently Tuhoe among them.
Some may view the 2014 Act as a recent wrong 'not making a right', whereas to others (me included) it's about righting wrongs. Personally, I would have preferred the land to remain a National Park (sans mining thank-you very much), but NZ's population is growing.
As Sacha says access is different from maintaining old and now unserviceable huts.
Before many of these huts were built you packed in and out.
I think we need to give Tuhoe time to establish and not automatically assume the worst as many nay sayers are doing.
I don't think Tuhoe have said what you have said they are saying but in point of fact it their land, vested in the board, it is no longer NP. We may not have an automatic right of access (I don't know) or huts but then we don't have an automatic right of access or to huts to many other properties in NZ do we?
If the land was illegally taken from someone do we, as the taker ie the Crown as the Treaty partner, have a unilateral right to impose conditions on its return? No we don't. The Crown has broached ideas and Tuhoe has agreed and the two are working through the Board. So in fact we as those that the Crown worked on behalf of have the ability.
If the public don't have an inbuilt right what is the matter of trust? Is it that arguments over huts may derail other Treaty claims? If so I don't think so as those working in the field will not let irrelevant matters derail the working they are doing to investigate.
Is it that the current Govt will lose trust? Generally these claims and investigations are apolitical as they should be.
So is the trust lost from people who don't know the background, can't be bothered to know the background? If so I agree that perhaps greater publicity about the role of Treaty Settlements, the two partners may be useful but then perhaps not.
People will just continue to follow and believe click bait, ill researched articles in MSM. That is where MSM gets its raison d'etre from. Regrettably this will give people a reason to grumble about anti Maaari this or anti Mowri (depending on your Europeanised pronunciation).
There does seem to be a bit of a bow wave building up where Maori issues are a convenient whipping boy. Winston Peters and his silly 'apartheid' comments seems to be grabbing this wholeheartedly.
We may not have an automatic right of access (I don't know) or huts but then we don't have an automatic right of access or to huts to many other properties in NZ do we?
When DOC created the great walks, they introduced a rule that you couldn't free camp along the tracks any more. Because obviously at that point, making money was a new priority. This was loss of pre-existing access. Admittedly it was before the internet, but I don't remember that the same kind of animosity as gets directed a Māori (even allowing for the large degree of antipathy towards DOC from certain parts of society).
The 'trust' that is lost is between the public statements of a lead negotiator before the transfer of Te Urewera, and the public statements and actions of the same individual as a member of the trust board afterwards.
With co-governance on the table – not just for Treaty settlements, but in a raft of areas (including 3 waters) this kind of situation means that people are much less likely to trust iwi statements about their intentions.
Would you ever vote for another National Park to move into iwi ownership?
Would you ever vote for another National Park to move into iwi ownership?
I might if there was a guarantee that mining couldn't happen on/under the land. But the question is off imo, because it's going to depend on which park, and what Iwi reps and others are saying. Or are you saying that all Māori are liars?
Why would we ever vote on this? It is supposed to be an apolitical process designed to right wrongs? It has worked through both Labour and National Governments.
It so happens that the land that was taken from Tuhoe, for no reason and then had a another land alienation (to NP) put on top while it was still in public ownership. If this was proven to be the case in another situation I would have no hesitation in supporting a return of land taken unjustly to Maori from whom it was taken.
As I said above I am struggling to think of another NP where the fact situation mirrors Tuhoe and where the original people are still living on the land.
Are you able to name other NPs where the original owners, from time immemorial have lived on the land right through its time as a NP?
I have forgotten nothing. However, most New Zealanders don't know what's being done behind their backs on both sides of the fence, regardless of rights and wrongs. These issues are hiving off in unexpected ways:
I'm asking you to explain in your own words what *you mean. Links are good, but they're there to back up commenter's points and arguments. The reason for this is that we can't expect people to read a whole article and parse what is in someone's mind. It's on the person making the comment to explain.
For instance, removal of the huts is clearly not behind people's backs, because it's in the public domain that this is being done. So what did you mean exactly?
Sub groups of Tuhoe have gone behind, or moved forward, ( take your pick) with hut removal without consultation with either the public or other Tuhoe.
Also I know personally of people who have been assaulted and threatened. I seriously suggest you do not visit this area because Tuhoe are a law unto themselves. They dislike Pakehas, and they call other Maori tribes 'Brown Pakeha.''It's so sad because this area is one of the last in NZ that harks back to a time of the Moa and pre European. It is so beautiful.
Unfortunately things wont’ be getting better anytime soon.
If the people have gone there with the entitled and incorrect views that have been exhibited here on TS I am not surprised they have not received a warm welcome.
Had your friends contacted Tuhoe before arriving? You know how some people like to have a warning of the arrival of others, you know being polite and all that. Finding out if it was possible, where, what cost etc?
It is a beautiful place and it is also someone's home and it also does not belong to us.
Even if you or your friends made contact and asked now about it and if you had the time from now on asked if you could give them a hand, no obligation, with anything.
It cannot be easy hosting this event with a smallish permanent population and with many living away from home.
In this way you will get to be better informed, do something to help people, have fun, get to know others.
There is a strategy to rid the area of western influences
We remove the western influences and their imprint within Te Urewera. We regrow the belief in ourselves, and that our care practices by Tūhoe hands and hearts will lead the way.
and
We treasure our indigenous ecological systems and biodiversity through significantly reducing key existing pressures, enabling Te Urewera to a natural state of balance.
And even if it [wide public consultation] were, and it isn’t, ‘consultation’ is becoming a euphemism for ‘listen to me and alleviate all my concerns or this is a farce and I’ll moan & complain till the cows come home’. I’d like to think that it is foundational to democracy to agree to disagree throughout each and every process as well regarding all outcomes.
We are heading into a future with no defining constitutional references.
NZ doesn't have a written constitution, so do you mean that our current conventions that are the basis of an unwritten constitution are changing to not having any? Please give examples, with evidence.
In the link provided you will notice some legal rulings have been made and legal oversight and jurisdiction established. But nothing is happening. Obviously our ''current conventions'' have no teeth. Maori are now able to thumb their nose at the law because of Maori Tikanga.
This is a very poor example of some thing, far be it for me to say racial profiling about 'Maaris' and it does nothing to bolster your argument.
If I was running your argument I would be looking at the threat to our Westminster system of Government posed by the Sovereign Citizens movement. These people, given their head have the ability to turn our style of Govt on its head and bingo we are all back being ruled under Admiralty law and the law of the Sea and Discovery. No thanks I prefer the system that the Ngati Wikitorias have given us at Waitangi in 1840.
Treaty settlements have been part of NZ life since the Waitomo Caves and Sealord Fisheries claims. There were large settled claims for Tainui and Ngai Tahu in the mid 90s……so at least 25 years.
It does not take much of a sense of right and wrong to concede that taking someone's land as punishment for something they did not do and then compounding this wrong by further alienating under a National Park status is offensive. Yet this is what happened to Tuhoe.
The need to meet and learn from Treaty of Waitangi Claims has been a feature of both Labour and National Govts with Rt Hon Sir Doug Graham being an enthusiastic supporter. He speaks on YouTube below.
Ngai Tahu have had settlement payments before. I can't find my notes but they had received four payments historicaly leading up to the present if I remember correctly:
''The first settlements:
Other inquiries and commissions followed. All commented on the misery and poverty that Ngāi Tahu endured after the land sales of the mid-19th century. A 1920–21 commission of inquiry suggested they should be paid compensation of £354,000, but no immediate action was taken. In 1928 the first Ngāi Tahu Trust Board was set up, with a meeting the following year to help identify the beneficiaries of the proposed compensation.
''It was not until 1944 that the first Labour government passed the Ngāi Tahu Claim Settlement Act. This awarded Ngāi Tahu £300,000, payable at a rate of £10,000 a year for 30 years. This was less than the recommended £354,000 of the royal commission, whose findings had always been contested by Ngāi Tahu. Nevertheless, the act was passed with the intention of making £300,000 a full and final settlement of the Ngāi Tahu claim. In 1946, legislation reconstituted the Ngāi Tahu Māori Trust Board, which enabled the funds to be administered.''
''Treaty settlements have been part of NZ life since the Waitomo Caves and Sealord Fisheries claims. There were large settled claims for Tainui and Ngai Tahu in the mid 90s……so at least 25 years.''
”It was not until 1944 that the first Labour government passed the Ngāi Tahu Claim Settlement Act. This awarded Ngāi Tahu £300,000, payable at a rate of £10,000 a year for 30 years. This was less than the recommended £354,000 of the royal commission, whose findings had always been contested by Ngāi Tahu. Nevertheless, the act was passed with the intention of making £300,000 a full and final settlement of the Ngāi Tahu claim.”
As I said before there have been other historical payments. One I believe was for 27,000 pounds. Plus, I believe(?) Ngai Tahu will receive payments in perpetuity.
”Two iwi have quietly been paid huge top-ups, totalling $370 million, to their supposed "full and final" Treaty of Waitangi settlements.”
Waikato-Tainui received $190m and the South Island's Ngāi Tahu $180m – more than they originally settled for in 1995 and 1998, respectively.
The Government made the payments on December 15 without any public announcement, but they were discovered by Stuff and confirmed by the Office of Treaty Settlements this week.
A source in the Labour-led Government said some ministers were unhappy that every time a Treaty settlement was achieved, another 33 cents in the dollar had to be paid to the two tribes.”
Like I said: There is no way we as a country can move forward with with this type of stuff going on.
But in the case of Ngai Tahu, I do have a problem. It has a contestable history that is different to the one portrayed in the media. And when some Labour MPs have a problem with Ngai Tahu, you know for sure we all have a problem.
Where can all this lead. Here's just one peripheral outcome using Australia as an example.
Like I said: There is no way we as a country can move forward with with this type of stuff going on.
What type of stuff? You were asked to clarify and you didn't.
Let me see if I can guess: you believe that treaty settlements should be full and final? and that if we don't do that, then something terrible will happen.
Can you please confirm if this is what you believe, and then say what the terrible thing is? I/m sure you think you are being clear, but it's really not.
1- Legal uncertainties around settlements and their outcomes. Different tribes being treated differently re settlement outcomes.
2- The public being increasingly ostracized by Maori/ Maori organisations around land rights and co governance.
3- Secretive government agreements behind the backs of the public. Or agreements not explained properly and signalled properly to the public.
4- Uncertainty around legal obligations/ rights regarding things Maori. Eg Maori health.
5- Racist legal rulings the allow Maori offenders to have a cultural report presented during criminal trials with judges able to take such a report into consideration.
6- A real pissed off public. The outcome of that will be apparent at the next election. Only for the public to become pissed off with the next government. No government will be able to fix all this supposed Maori stuff.''
7- Average Maori who just want to get on with life having to suffer discrimination because racists tar all Maori with the same brush fuelled by a media who sensationalise some stories, and don't report on others. Have you heard the word Maori associated with 'ram raids?'
My point is there is no coherent way forward as a country. The treaty settlement issue is all over the place. Maori, like The Maori Party, really want separate state within a state. Pakeha have had enough, especially the ones who cannot wrap their heads around the fact that Maori will no longer be out of sight and mind. Maori can't agree amongst themselves over a variety of issues, so they can't move forward as a people. All these issues are now being magnified by the times we live in, especially economic wise.
And, yes, settlements must be final. But they never will be because some Maori are claiming modern grievances?
You may be thinking I'm a sad and pessimistic. Not true, I'm only pessimistic about the future of our country. There is no future. I would love to here your argument ''That there is a future for Aotearoa?''
Like I said: There is no way we as a country can move forward with with this type of stuff going on.
mean?
What is the 'stuff'? payments for unfair Crown actions is that 'stuff'? Does this view only apply to Maori or do we include other payments for 'stuff' such as unfair imprisonment etc. Or are you able to accept payment of $$$ to people wrongly accused of a crime by the Crown but you cannot accept payment of land and $$$ where the payment is because the Crown wronged an iwi?
If you had read the background to the Ngai Tahu claim you would have realised that it is all not as black and white re earlier claims.
In which case, what were effectively read as 'promises' by both Tuhoe and the Government/DoC – that Te Urewera would be effectively retained as a National Park (even though the ownership had changed) were, at best naive and at worst profoundly dishonest.
I think to do yourself justice you will need to link to these promises.
Also please read through their website. Some of the stuff that has been raised here on TS is borderline lacking in honesty because it is from someone's 'friend' or I remember reading . Best to get info from the horse's mouth as it were. Slight Tuhoe pun here.
Neither the legislation nor the Treaty Settlement documents say anything about it remaining as a de facto NP. In fact the legislation clearly and specifically removes references to NP Act, Reserves Act and Land Act as modifiers on the ability to do what is needed, as assessed by Tuhoe on the land.
Chief negotiator Tamati Kruger told the Herald yesterday that Tuhoe had given assurances to the Government that access to some of New Zealand's most rugged and beautiful tracks, Lakes Waikaremoana and Waikareiti "would not be compromised in any way".
"The public access that is available now will not be limited or diminished in any way – what changes is that Tuhoe now owns that area but the public's interests does not change."
Here's Chris Finlayson on the subject (note that this is after Key flat-out refused to transfer 'ownership' of Te Urewera to Tuhoe)
Chris Finlayson said the new structure will allow the historical, cultural and spiritual connection between Te Urewera and Tuhoe to be fully recognised for the first time, while the biodiversity of the area is protected and enhanced and public access is guaranteed for all New Zealanders.
He said while Tuhoe would take an increasing role in management over time, that did not mean that the tribe is getting ownership through the back door.
The minister said he is happy to leave the ultimate question of ownership of the park to future generations to decide.
Please note, that there was zero discussion at the time that this was intended to be a transfer into private ownership or into exclusive control of Tuhoe. The expressed intention at the time was partnership (what has later been come to be called co-governance).
Things are happening and will happen in the future. No-one really expects Te Urewera to be operated as a mirror copy of a national park. Things will happen in their own time and to the timetable of Tuhoe.
Please also read the aims etc for Te Urewera that I linked to earlier I don't mind linking to them again, it's no skin off my nose.
Do you not see the disconnect between the reporting at the time, and the legislation to which you keep linking?
Do you expect ordinary Kiwis to read legislation? Really?
TUT aims are all post facto – i.e. they were not published prior to the legislation being passed. And are – as I've pointed out – in conflict with public assurances made by the lead negotiator (same person as is currently fronting for the TUT board)
Well it is the legislation that is used to guide the actions from 2014 on. Prior to 2014 when it was a National Park it was legislation that guided administrators. Land administrators would not look for guidance on land management from newspapers. Newspaper reports add colour, explanations that may or may not be correct but would not be relied on for legal guidance.
I am not reading that there was any commitment to keeping Te Urewera just exactly as it was when it was a NP. Everyone who had knowledge of how lands handed over to iwi as part of Treaty settlements would be naive to think that the land would remain exactly as it was.
From what I can see from looking at the press material it was access that was talked about at the time. Reading the website there is nothing there to suggest access is constrained. Huts do not equal access.
What I can see from reading the management plans is that there is a plan to remove old and unsafe huts. There seems to be a plan also to bring the admin down to a number that could be competently managed, to not spread themselves (the workcrew) too widely and thinly.
Many NZers read legislation. Every public servant that works in a Govt Dept reads 'their' legislation. Every accountant and accounts administrator reads tax legislation, HR practitioners look at the Health & Safety in Employment Act and legislation about Employment contracts etc, Health administrators read the health & disabilities act. Citizens Advice Bureau staff read legislation. You would be surprised at how many NZers read legislation in the course of their jobs & interest and would find no great hardship in looking at treaty legislation.
As I have said before the Treaty legislation is a particularly clear type of legislation.
Other people would go directly to the Tuhoe site to get the advice from that on what the plans are. Both legislation and management plans are better sites to gather info from than newspapers.
Maori had no obligation to parade their plans before settlement. They knew they would have legislation that would guide them, and that they had to abide by, a board with reps from conservation and management plans to guide day to day, year to year work.
I am willing to let people have a go, they now have had land and mana restored. I suggest it would be a good idea for others to do so too.
Even by contacting Tuhoe, going to their festival rather than moaning from a distance, visiting packing in and out if need be, going on the close at hand walks.
I have seen an unpleasant and anti-Maori side over this thread.
I have seen people who are unwilling to let go their prejudices, who rely utterly on MSM and on sniping from a distance.
This weekend is the 80th anniversary of the battle of El Alamein. This WW2 desert battle was one where NZ troops featured against the Nazis…..Rommel. The Maori Battalion played a distinguished role in this battle. I had a father who fought alongside them & Australians in this particular battle against fascism. Maori fought so all of us as NZers could live our lives gently and peacefully.
Maori are not the enemy.
Please learn to live with them gently, respectfully and peacefully. Please learn discernment in what you read. Newspapers/media are here to make money, they do this by exploiting and click baiting. Go to the source rather than let it be interpreted for you.
It involves land taken under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act something could happen to Pakeha. The occupants refuse to move. The occupants seem to identify as Maori. Thye have fought a case against removal to the maori Land court and lost.
Please, what is the point of link other than the race of the people involved? Or is it just blatant smearing and diverting?
This case does not bolster your claim:
We are heading into a future with no defining constitutional references.
It seems to have worked well with the Police doing their job, with the person against whom the orders being taken having the chance to have the case looked at. All this in a country where we have operated very well using the Westminster system of justice.
You are missing the point. Everything, when its comes to our laws, seems to have flexibility when it comes to Maoridom for a number of reasons:
1- Organisations and government departments are unsure of their legal footing with regards to their actions. Especially as these departments have solid indoctrination processes into Maori Tikanga.
2- The Police are loathed to deal with things Maori for fear of public condemnation, woke condemnation, the Race Relations Office and Maori condemnation. Apologies to all who didn't make the list.
3- UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. What does this mean for our laws?
''Please, what is the point of link other than the race of the people involved? Or is it just blatant smearing and diverting?''
''Nicholas and his wife do not recognise the Crown’s authority to take the family land''
''The local hapū has “unqualified sovereign jurisdiction” over the land, the signs say, and kaitiaki (guardians) “reserve the … right to remove any … aliens at any time.''
“All presumed claims of title or right in and over our whenua … are not recognised and thus have no validity.”
''When Nicholas was first served with an eviction notice in 2020, dozens of people – including gang members, activists, lawyers and politicians – descended on the land, vowing to stop the eviction, claiming it was Māori ancestral land.''
''Stuff revealed in 2018 that a police iwi liaison officer had got into hot water with her bosses for writing an opinion – later used by Nicholas in his appeals – that the land was Māori land.''
Shanreagh, I take a global approach. You should, too. This type of rhetoric is happening right across New Zealand. I think a Nat/ ACT government will bring things to a head.
So I stand by my original assertion:
We are heading into a future with no defining constitutional references.
Ok, what say I say the things that the Nicholas family says about their land, about my own land. I am a a criminal and I want no rates or planning. I am free to say it. I am free to assert what ever I like.
So I get convicted of a crime where the proceeds of crown recovery act applies. I still assert.
If however I lost a court case involving the land that is where my freedom to do whatever legal things on my land ends. I can continue occupy as some have done when subject to a mortgagee sale. I might even try my luck, if I was mad enough with the sovereign citizens mob. Basically a range of illegal or outside the state options exist.
The point is that it is not a specifically Maori thing to do all or any of these things.
I loathe the mindset that says it is just because Maori people are involved that they have special rights or do this or that and 'woe is me'. As I said before these people seem to have done a pretty good job of using all of the avenues our Westminster system of govt has given them. They have used the rules that Pakeha brought. Not with any success mind. Now they are asserting their right by staying. Occupations have been around for years.
I forsee a skirmish. It could easily have been a Pakeha facing this act.
The thought of a Nact govt makes shivers run up and down my spine. We have our people here we devise our own solutions. We have a Westminster based system of Govt, lets keep that working as it should.
Can we extend that agreeing to have differing opinions to Tuhoe and its ongoing management of Te Urewera.
That would be a big step forward.
It would mean instead of grumbling that things are not exactly the same as before 2014 we allow Tuhoe to have and implement its own plans for Te Urewera.
Some of these plans we may like others not so much.
Nothing. Boris didn't have the numbers (and both Sunak and Boris knew that was the case).
Much like the various contenders in our political parties who 'have a go' when a leadership contest happens – but quickly pull out when it's evident they don't have the support.
If you know you don't have the support, then going ahead with a bid for leadership is simply an exercise in humiliation – not many people are actually into public self-flagellation.
It could be eight hours that we work here,
Eight hours for to sleep,
Eight hours with the family and the company you keep
Today is Labour Day, it commemorates the struggle to define a work day as an eight hour stretch. Samuel Parnell is credited with forcing the issue in Aotearoa New Zealand as early as 1840. Labour day was first officially celebrated in 1890 and an elderly Parnell was able to attend the celebrations. The day itself is often seen as just another holiday but it also offers us the time to reflect on the philosophy behind worker struggles of history and their continued relevance today.
Very good Arkie. I am certainly grateful……though through the excesses of the neo-lib reforms it was difficult to maintain an 8 hour workday and even now in some places one is thought to be a good worker if you work longer than 8 hours unpaid. Sucked in to this for a period of time through from the 1980s……
In one workplace we decided to leave after 8 hours, but what happens when we get home, what do we do was the cry? Over that time the work got done, and many of us had gardens as we had never had before……, others did exercise. We were all much more productive as human beings, as people.
And while some harbour hopes that such long-established drugs will be free of the conflicts of interest often alleged of large traditional pharmaceutical companies, this is not automatically valid. All pharmacological health treatments are invented, produced and marketed by someone who is likely to have personal and financial interest in its widespread use.
A financial interest is the least of our worries. As we've found out, if a pharmacological health treatment can capture our media, government, and most industries then something is very, very wrong.
Australia sees rough weather and headwinds as it sets to announce its budget tomorrow.
We have responsibly gone through the budget, line-by-line, and identified savings, or re-prioritisations, where we can to begin the task of budget repair or pay for new government priorities," she said.
It is believed $3.6 billion will be saved through the government reducing its spending on external contractors, advertising, travel and legal expenses, while $2 billion in grants promised by the former government will be cancelled.
Also learning from the mistakes from the UK were markets in the form of bond vigilantes will punish fiscal imprudence.Australia will still carry on with the Morrison tax cuts ( costing the budget 250b over 10 years) whilst hoping for revenue increases whilst mining revenues start to contract on risks of global recession.
left Lynn a note in the back end. Have turned the feed off. Can you see where to deleted the individual feeds? Not sure I want to press too many buttons.
Rob MacCulloch writes – Can’t remember the last book by a Kiwi author you read? Think the NZ government should spend less on the arts in favor of helping the homeless? If so, as far as Newsroom is concerned, you probably deserve to be called a cultural ignoramus ...
Eric Crampton writes – Grudges are bad. Better to move on. But it can be fun to keep a couple of really trivial ones, so you’re not tempted to have other ones. For example, because of the rootkit fiasco of 2005, no Sony products in our household. ...
A new report warns an estimated third of the adult population have unmet need for health care.Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāHere’s the six key things I learned about Aotaroa’s political economy this week around housing, climate and poverty:Politics - Three opinion polls confirmed support for PM Christopher Luxon ...
Today is May the fourth. Which was just a regular day when my mother took me to see the newly released Star Wars at the Odeon in Rotorua. The queue was right around the corner. Some years later this day became known as Star Wars Day, the date being a ...
Buzz from the Beehive Much more media attention is being paid to something Winston Peters said about former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr than to a speech he delivered to the New Zealand China Council. One word is missing from the speech: AUKUS. But AUKUS loomed large in his considerations ...
Is the economy in another long stagnation? If so, why?This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be ...
The annual list of who's been bribing our politicians is out, and journalists will no doubt be poring over it to find the juiciest and dirtiest bribes. The government's fast-track invite list is likely to be a particular focus, and we already know of one company on the list which ...
In the weeks after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Southern Israel I wrote about the possible 2nd, 3rd and even 4th order effects of the conflict. These included new fronts being opened in the West Bank (with Hamas), Golan … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – It is one of the oldest truisms that there is never a good time for MPs to get a pay rise. This week’s announcement of pay raises of around 2.8% backdated to last October could hardly have come at a worse time, with the ...
David Farrar writes – Newshub reports: Newshub can reveal a fresh allegation of intimidation against Green MP Julie-Anne Genter. Genter is subject to a disciplinary process for aggressively waving a book in the face of National Minister Matt Doocey in the House – but it’s not the first time ...
The Treasury has published a paper today on the global productivity slowdown and how it is playing out in New Zealand: The productivity slowdown: implications for the Treasury’s forecasts and projections. The Treasury Paper examines recent trends in productivity and the potential drivers of the slowdown. Productivity for the whole economy ...
Winston Peters’ comments about former Australian foreign minister look set to be an ongoing headache for both him and Luxon. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for subscribers features co-hosts and , along with regular guests on Gaza and ...
These puppet strings don't pull themselvesYou're thinking thoughts from someone elseHow much time do you think you have?Are you prepared for what comes next?The debating chamber can be a trying place for an opposition MP. What with the person in charge, the speaker, typically being an MP from the governing ...
The land around Lyme Regis, where Meryl Streep once stood, in a hood, on the Cobb, is falling into the sea.MerylThe land around Lyme Regis, around the Cobb that made it rich, has always been falling slowly but surely into the sea. Read more ...
Buzz from the Beehive Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters was bound to win headlines when he set out his thinking about AUKUS in his speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. The headlines became bigger when – during an interview on RNZ’s Morning Report today – he criticised ...
The Post reports on how the government is refusing to release its advice on its corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law, instead using the "soon to be publicly available" refusal ground to hide it until after select committee submissions on the bill have closed. Fast-track Minister Chris Bishop's excuse? “It's not ...
As pressure on it grows, the livestock industry’s approach to the transition to Net Zero is increasingly being compared to that of fossil fuel interests. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / Getty ImagesTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above ...
The New Zealand Herald reports – Stats NZ has offered a voluntary redundancy scheme to all of its workers as a way to give staff some control over their “future” amidst widespread job losses in the public sector. In an update to staff this morning, seen by the Herald, Statistics New Zealand ...
On Werewolf/Scoop, I usually do two long form political columns a week. From now on, there will be an extra column each week about music and movies. But first, some late-breaking political events:The rise in unemployment numbers for the March quarter was bigger than expected – and especially sharp ...
David Farrar writes – The Herald reports: TVNZ says it is dealing with about 50 formal complaints over its coverage of the latest 1News-Verian political poll, with some viewers – as well as the Prime Minister and a former senior Labour MP – critical of the tone of the 6pm report. ...
Muriel Newman writes – When Meridian Energy was seeking resource consents for a West Coast hydro dam proposal in 2010, local Maori “strenuously” objected, claiming their mana was inextricably linked to ‘their’ river and could be damaged. After receiving a financial payment from the company, however, the Ngai Tahu ...
Alwyn Poole writes – “An SEP,’ he said, ‘is something that we can’t see, or don’t see, or our brain doesn’t let us see, because we think that it’s somebody else’s problem. That’s what SEP means. Somebody Else’s Problem. The brain just edits it out, it’s like a ...
Our trust in our political institutions is fast eroding, according to a Maxim Institute discussion paper, Shaky Foundations: Why our democracy needs trust. The paper – released today – raises concerns about declining trust in New Zealand’s political institutions and democratic processes, and the role that the overuse of Parliamentary urgency ...
This article was prepared for publication yesterday. More ministerial announcements have been posted on the government’s official website since it was written. We will report on these later today …. Buzz from the BeehiveThere we were, thinking the environment is in trouble, when along came Jones. Shane Jones. ...
New Zealand now has the fourth most depressed construction sector in the world behind China, Qatar and Hong Kong. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 8:46am on Thursday, May 2:The Lead: ...
Hi,I am just going to state something very obvious: American police are fucking crazy.That was a photo gracing the New York Times this morning, showing New York City police “entering Columbia University last night after receiving a request from the school.”Apparently in America, protesting the deaths of tens of thousands ...
Winston Peters’ much anticipated foreign policy speech last night was a work of two halves. Much of it was a standard “boilerplate” Foreign Ministry overview of the state of the world. There was some hardening up of rhetoric with talk of “benign” becoming “malign” and old truths giving way to ...
Graham Adams assesses the fallout of the Cass Review — The press release last Thursday from the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls didn’t make the mainstream news in New Zealand but it really should have. The startling title of Reem Alsalem’s statement — “Implementation of ‘Cass ...
This open-for-business, under-new-management cliché-pockmarked government of Christopher Luxon is not the thing of beauty he imagines it to be. It is not the powerful expression of the will of the people that he asserts it to be. It is not a soaring eagle, it is a malodorous vulture. This newest poll should make ...
The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”.As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
Holding On To The Present:The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
Stuck In The Middle With You:As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
Buzz from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example. This shows National down ...
It Takes A Train To Cry:Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
Chris Trotter writes – New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy.Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
You make people evil to punish the paststuck inside a sequel with a rotating castThe following photos haven’t been generated with AI, or modified in any way. They are flesh and blood, human beings. On the left is Galatea Young, a young mum, and her daughter Fiadh who has Angelman ...
The Government is again adding to New Zealand’s growing unemployment, this time cutting jobs at the agencies responsible for urban development and growing much needed housing stock. ...
With Minister Karen Chhour indicating in the House today that she either doesn’t know or care about the frontline cuts she’s making to Oranga Tamariki, we risk seeing more and more of our children falling through the cracks. ...
The Labour Party is saddened to learn of the death of Sir Robert Martin, a globally renowned disability advocate who led the way for disability rights both in New Zealand and internationally. ...
Labour is calling for the Government to urgently rethink its coalition commitment to restart live animal exports, Labour animal welfare spokesperson Rachel Boyack said. ...
Today’s Financial Stability Report has once again highlighted that poverty and deep inequality are political choices - and this Government is choosing to make them worse. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to do more for our households in most need as unemployment rises and the cost of living crisis endures. ...
Unemployment is on the rise and it’s only going to get worse under this Government, Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. Stats NZ figures show the unemployment rate grew to 4.3 percent in the March quarter from 4 percent in the December quarter. “This is the second rise in unemployment ...
The New Zealand Labour Party welcomes the entering into force of the European Union and New Zealand free trade agreement. This agreement opens the door for a huge increase in trade opportunities with a market of 450 million people who are high value discerning consumers of New Zealand goods and ...
The National-led Government continues its fiscal jiggery pokery with its Pharmac announcement today, Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says. “The government has increased Pharmac funding but conceded it will only make minimal increases in access to medicine”, said Ayesha Verrall “This is far from the bold promises made to fund ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters discussed the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and enhanced cooperation in the Pacific with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock during her first official visit to New Zealand today. "New Zealand and Germany enjoy shared interests and values, including the rule of law, democracy, respect for the international system ...
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop today released his decision on four recommendations referred to him by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, opening the door to housing growth in the area. The Council’s Plan Change 92 allows more homes to be built in existing and new ...
Thank you, John McKinnon and the New Zealand China Council for the invitation to speak to you today. Thank you too, all members of the China Council. Your effort has played an essential role in helping to build, shape, and grow a balanced and resilient relationship between our two ...
The Government is modernising insurance law to better protect Kiwis and provide security in the event of a disaster, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “These reforms are long overdue. New Zealand’s insurance law is complicated and dated, some of which is more than 100 years old. ...
The coalition Government is refreshing its approach to supporting pay equity claims as time-limited funding for the Pay Equity Taskforce comes to an end, Public Service Minister Nicola Willis says. “Three years ago, the then-government introduced changes to the Equal Pay Act to support pay equity bargaining. The changes were ...
Structured literacy will change the way New Zealand children learn to read - improving achievement and setting students up for success, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “Being able to read and write is a fundamental life skill that too many young people are missing out on. Recent data shows that ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay says Canada’s refusal to comply in full with a CPTPP trade dispute ruling in our favour over dairy trade is cynical and New Zealand has no intention of backing down. Mr McClay said he has asked for urgent legal advice in respect of our ‘next move’ ...
The rights of our children and young people will be enhanced by changes the coalition Government will make to strengthen oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, including restoring a single Children’s Commissioner. “The Government is committed to delivering better public services that care for our most at-risk young people and ...
The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
Good evening – Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us. ...
From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
By Patrick Decloitre, RNZ Pacific correspondent French Pacific desk A women’s union in New Caledonia has staged a sit-in protest this week to support senior Kanak indigenous journalist Thérèse Waia, who works for public broadcaster Nouvelle-Calédonie la Première, after a smear attack by critics. The peaceful demonstration was held on ...
New Zealand Food Safety is monitoring overseas recalls of Indian packaged spice products manufactured by MDH and Everest due to concerns over a cancer-causing pesticide. ...
By Stephen Wright and Stefan Armbruster of BenarNews Fiji’s ranking in a global press freedom index has jumped into the top tier of countries with free or mostly free media after its government last year repealed a draconian law that threatened journalists with prison for doing their jobs. Fiji’s improvement ...
We might be in Invercargill but all anyone can talk about is Gore. Specifically, Salford Street. That’s where three-year-old Lachlan Jones lived, south of the centre of town, between the A&P Showgrounds and the Mataura River. Roughly 1.2 km away from the single level home he lived in with his ...
MONDAY I lined up the latest round of civil servants from city hall against the wall, and signalled for the firing squad to drop their rifles. I stepped up onto a wooden crate to look at the office workers in the eye. But that didn’t feel right, so I found ...
Keen hiker and second-year MSc student Liam Hewson wears two hats when he’s in the great outdoors. “The scientist in me appreciates nature and goes, ‘Oh, there’s that thing and there’s another thing,’ but then the tramper and the outdoorsy person in me thinks, ‘Cool bush.’” Born and bred in ...
After a long and illustrious career as a goal kicker, Dan Carter’s favourite way to unwind is… kicking goals. Why can’t he get enough of it? And what it’s like to watch him do it for an hour straight? A semicircle of people wielding cameras and phones has formed in ...
Dame Susan Devoy takes us through her life in television, including late night ER debriefs, her proudest CTI moment and the show she watches in secret. Quite aside from her four world champion squash titles, Dame Susan Devoy will likely go down in history as one of the best Celebrity ...
Hera Lindsay Bird reveals the best places in Ōtepoti to score more for your apocalypse-prep book hoard.Sometimes I get the feeling I’ve been killed in a car crash, and this second half of my life is just the brain unspooling itself, like one of those episodes of a hospital ...
ThreeNow’s new murder mystery series takes us on a dark, damp journey into the Australian wilderness.This is an excerpt from our weekly pop culture newsletter Rec Room. Sign up here. High Country is ThreeNow’s new Australian eight-part crime drama, set in a remote part of the Victorian highlands. It tells ...
Introducing a new way to read The Spinoff every weekend. After nearly 10 years of being an online magazine, we’re finally embracing the weekend liftout. Despite our best efforts to convince you otherwise, writers and editors at The Spinoff don’t work weekend. It is through the sheer power of technology ...
Tip one: let yourself be nurtured by this big old man. Tip two: don’t ask him to adopt you. So, you’ve arrived at your first session with a new therapist. He tells you to make yourself comfortable and you opt for the tweed armchair, hoping it makes you look like ...
I didn’t know books could open you back up; that there were books that stayed with you, where reading was like a chemical event. I knew nothing.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand.Not too long ago, I was listening to the American ...
Former Olympic swimmer James Magnussen has already started training for the Enhanced games, though says he won’t start taking performance enhancing substances until about nine months out from the competition. The Australian world champion was the first athlete to be announced by Enhanced, but he says the organisation has had ...
Everyone thinks he’s dead. Every day they expect his body to be washed up along the coast. Most likely up Karitane way, the way the tide’s running. But nobody’ll be too surprised if his body’s never found. Even in death he wouldn’t have wished for such attention. He would have ...
Council members voted 21 to 4 in favour of Ahluwalia returning to the Laucala campus following a much-awaited meeting in Vanuatu this week. It comes as USP and its two unions — the Association of the University of the South Pacific Staff (AUSPS) and the Administration and Support Staff Union ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nicola Henry, Professor & Australian Research Council Future Fellow, Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University Shutterstock Following an emergency meeting of the National Cabinet this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced a raft of measures to tackle the problem ...
Analysis - A poll showing the opposition is more popular than the government raises questions, politicians go through their 'trial by pay rise' and a Green MP loses her cool in the debating chamber. ...
The entire stretch of Tokomaru Bay on the East Coast will be subject to a joint customary marine title for two hapū, and extending up to four miles out to sea. A High Court judge has found the two groups, who during the case settled a dispute over boundaries for ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Hall, Lecturer, Media & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University A longstanding feud between TikTok and Universal Music Group seems to have finally reached an end, with both parties signing a deal that will see Universal-backed music returned to the social media ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Siobhan O’Dean, Postdoctoral Research Associate, The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney After several highly publicised alleged murders of women in Australia, the Albanese government this week pledged more than A$925 million over five years ...
Political parties have now fully disclosed the donations they received last year - with National getting more than double the cash of any other party. ...
A Pacific regionalism expert has called out New Zealand's Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters for withholding information from the public on AUKUS military pact. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Richard de Grijs, Professor of Astrophysics, Macquarie University Bruno Scramgnon/Pexels All systems are “go” for tonight’s launch of China’s next step in a carefully planned lunar exploration program. Placed on top of a powerful Long March 5 rocket, the Chang’e 6 ...
National returned a massive donation the day after a Newsroom story linked the donors to a property being investigated for operating unlawfully as a migrant workers’ hostel. The party’s 2023 donation filings, released on Friday, show it returned a $200,000 donation from Buen Holdings on August 23. That was the ...
Pacific Media Watch New Zealand has slumped to an unprecedented 19th place in the annual Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index survey released today on World Press Freedom Day — May 3. This was a drop of six places from 13th last year when it slipped out of its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joshua Black, Political Historian and Administrator Officer, Australian Historical Association, Australian National University Australia has had its fair share of public record-keeping controversies in recent years. Some have been mere farce, as in the case of two formerly government-owned filing cabinets (containing ...
Heavenly Culture, World Peace, Restoration of Light (HWPL), a United Nations-affiliated organization dedicated to fostering peace through civilian-led initiatives, has issued a statement in response to the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. ...
A poem by Tessa Keenan, from AUP New Poets 10. Mātou These days we are a photograph; one of a farm strewn with cows that used to be bright harakeke or swamp. The kids point at it and say the sun sits behind a smudge (left by someone at Christmas); ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan (Faber & Faber, $25)The masterful Irish writer ...
Marriage and civil union statistics record the number of marriages and civil unions registered in New Zealand each year, and divorce statistics record the number of divorces granted in New Zealand each year. Key facts Marriages and civil unions In ...
Marriage and civil union statistics record the number of marriages and civil unions registered in New Zealand each year, and divorce statistics record the number of divorces granted in New Zealand each year. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Lennon Y.C. Chang, Associate Professor of Cyber Risk and Policy, Deakin University Taiwan stands out as a beacon of democracy, innovation and resilience in an increasingly autocratic region. But this is under growing threat. In recent years, China has used a variety ...
In this excerpt from her new memoir, Dame Susan Devoy remembers her turn as star contestant on the 2022 season of Celebrity Treasure Island. The most anxious time of every day was pre-elimination, when you knew this could be your final day on the show. I felt such contradictory emotions, ...
A week that began in triumph ended in an all-too-familiar disaster for the Green Party. Duncan Greive asks if there’s something in the mission that breaks its best and brightest. A long, strange week for the Green party began with a fantastic poll result. On one level this is hardly ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific journalist Vanuatu’s former prime minister and opposition MP Ishmael Kalsakau has stepped down — just two days after he confirmed he was the rightful opposition leader. Kalsakau, MP for Port Vila, confirmed to ABC’s Pacific Beat, and the Vanuatu Daily Post on Thursday that he ...
What’s to blame for the coalition’s choppy start? Six months in, and the mojo meter is in the doldrums. A new poll would put National out of power and sees its leader, Chris Luxon, sliding in popularity. How much is it about policy, how much coalition management and a perception ...
The striking report goes far beyond the proposed repeal of the Oranga Tamariki Act’s Treaty of Waitangi provision, and its impact should be felt far beyond the unique circumstances of the claim it addresses. Earlier this week, the Waitangi Tribunal released an interim report on the government’s proposed repeal of ...
The world has been experiencing a productivity slowdown, from which New Zealand has not been exempt. COVID-19 temporarily boosted labour productivity, but more recently, productivity has retreated. The overall trend since 2007 has been one of slow productivity ...
What’s more wasteful than spending $315k on syrup and machine maintenance? Trying to drum up a controversy about it.Cast your mind back to the pre-pandemic idylls of 2019. A “rat” was a disgusting rodent and not a self-administered plague test; the sixth Labour government was in power; and the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Professor of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Monash University Ken stocker/Shutterstock In the wake of numerous killings of women allegedly by men’s violence in 2024, thousands of Australians have joined rallies across the country to demand action ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Henry Cutler, Professor and Director, Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University Oleg Ivanov IL/Shutterstock Waiting times for public hospital elective surgery have been in the news ahead of this year’s federal budget. That’s the type of non-emergency surgery ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Konstantine Panegyres, McKenzie Postdoctoral Fellow, Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne Amna Artist/Shutterstock One of the earliest descriptions of someone with cancer comes from the fourth century BC. Satyrus, tyrant of the city of Heracleia on the Black Sea, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Rose, Professor of Sustainable Future Transport, University of Sydney LanaElcova/Shutterstock Electric vehicles are often seen as the panacea to cutting emissions – and air pollution – from transport. Is this view correct? Yes – but only once uptake accelerates. Despite the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Giselle Natassia Woodley, Researcher and Phd Candidate, Edith Cowan University There is widespread agreement Australia needs to do better when it comes to gender-based violence. Anger and frustration at the numbers of women being killed saw national rallies over the weekend and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Graham, Lecturer in Economics, University of Sydney Mark and Anna Photography/Shutterstock As home ownership moves further out of reach for many Australians, “rentvesting” is being touted as a lifesaver. Rentvesting is the practice of renting one property to live ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sukhmani Khorana, Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, UNSW Sydney Netflix The new season of Heartbreak High is garnering mixed reviews. Critics are writing about the racy story lines, comparing it to other coming-of-age series about teenage relationships and ...
Bob Carr intends to launch legal action against Winston Peters and Julie Anne Genter is facing a second allegation of bullying. Both sucked the air out of an announcement on education, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in ...
In 1995, Sally Clark went out on her own in a bold and unorthodox attempt to join an illustrious group of equestrian riders conquering the world. In the days of glovebox road maps, brick cell phones, and the hit song How Bizarre, Clark refused to follow Sir Mark Todd, Blyth ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ben Beaglehole, Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago niphon/Getty Images The number of people accessing medication for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Aotearoa New Zealand increased significantly between 2006 and 2022. But the disorder is still under-diagnosed and ...
To celebrate the start of New Zealand music month, we look back at the best local tuneage that managed to weasel its way into Hollywood productions. There’s nothing quite like the thrilling zap of recognition when New Zealand weasels its way into a glamorous Hollywood production. Crack open a Tui ...
People trust other people more than institutions. So how can the media gain that trust through journalists without losing what’s important about the institution? Anna Rawhiti-Connell reflects on two years of curating the news for The Bulletin.Amonth ago, armed cops descended on my neighbourhood as calls to “lock your ...
Opinion: PFAS – per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances – are a class of thousands of man-made chemicals used widely in everyday consumer items such as textiles, packaging, and cookware, popular for their water, grease and stain-repellent properties. However, the very properties that make PFAS so attractive to manufacturers are also what ...
NONFICTION 1 The Last Secret Agent by Pippa Latour & Jude Dobson (Allen & Unwin, $37.99)’ This is the hottest book in New Zealand, number one with a bullet in its first week, selling more than any overseas title, and demand is so huge that it’s already been reprinted. A ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 3 May appeared first on Newsroom. ...
The Leader of the Free World…..or so we are lead to believe, tells us “America can be defined in a single word”…here it is, straight from the horses mouth….
[note: Joe Biden has a lifelong speech impediment that included stuttering. The word he was about to say is ‘possibilities’ – weka]
If he were the Cognitive Genius his predecessor was it would've come out much easier.
Trump: "America can be defined in a single word, 'Mine."
disability shaming, charming. I’m guessing it’s ageism as well.
For those interested,
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/joe-biden-stutter/
I've heard many of Bidens's speechs over the years and stuttering is a very minor issue for him. It's the 'other issue' – I'm not sure if he's quite up to Shadbolt's level yet but getting very very close.
https://twitter.com/KeaweWong/status/1583825475285106688?cxt=HHwWgICqiZu48PorAAAA
Here's the fuller clip of Biden. Sounds like a stutter to me.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5010607/user-clip-america-nation-defined-single-word
imo, that tweet and video is ageist bullshit. If Biden is struggling because he is elderly, then you cannot demonstrate that in sound bite vid and implication.
If he has dementia, likewise.
Elderly people process information and spatial awareness differently than younger people. Doesn't mean they can't think or function.
The ancient Egyptians use to have a test of a Pharaoh's fitness to rule in their 30th year – he had to run a distance within a set time.
PS Biden would beat Trump over any distance in terms of mobility. I mention this because Hu Jintao could barely walk by himself. Reagan had issues during his second term as to ability to handle concentration (stay awake) for long periods.
Biden has a combination of historic speech impediment and aging (part processing his thoughts cogently and part information overload from all those years on Capitol Hill) – that would tend to compound the problem on the communication side.
Remember Winston Peters 'resting his eyes'….
When confronted with cheap shots by lazy thinkers who judge a lifelong speech impediment as a sure sign of cognitive decline to suit their
Trumpianpopulist propaganda narrative it is never hard to counter it with blissful facts:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stutterers#Politicians
Or with informative and even historically fairly accurate quality entertainment:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_King%27s_Speech
Good grief ageism, pot shots at disability, cheap and nasty shots at Maaris. What are we on about. This is a snarky horrible thread.
It is Labour Day. We are lucky to have had it for long and to have forward thinkers. doers. change-ers from way back when.
Can we emulate those people? It is better than falling prey to the Moaning Minnie Virus that still seems to have us in its clutches.
I thought it was linked pathologically to the Covid virus when this moaning became fulsome. But it seem to have come in coincidently.
Much moaning is not on-topic per se but a sign (symptom) of people under pressure. Another example is people snapping at others over trivial things that is generally uncalled for, out of proportion, and out of character. Unfortunately, it does have a contagious element as it spreads itself like a virus. Here on TS most seem to be fairly immune to it – the Mods can isolate & quarantine the super-spreaders aka concern trolls when necessary, but this is a last resort measure as it conflicts with freedoms that we hold high here.
Now look here Adrian, are you suggesting that someone whose mental powers are declining shouldn't have access to the nuclear codes?
Cos thats just ageist and cognitive deficit shaming .So what if he says his son Beau died in the Iraq war.He just misspoke, thats all, no reflection on the man who holds the fate of the world in his hands.
Mr Kruger reiterates Te Urewera is no longer a National Park. And rebuilding those huts? Yeah, good luck with that. Given the move back to nature so beloved by Greenies and Maori; in principle anyway, my guess is huts are a thing of the past. So it'll probably be back to the future with tents.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2022/10/removal-of-te-urewera-huts-sparks-outrage-from-locals.html
What is the Māori word for “tent”? Just asking, for a freedom-camping friend who wants to book one.
Why not go on Freecycle and ask for one free. Then contact Tuhoe to find out the real picture? Or you could ask them about bivvys.
Best to practice putting the tent up before you leave. Te Urewera, contrary to what some seem to imply, is not a 'walk in the park'. Apart from round the lake(which has its moments), climbing Panekiri, and the trip to Lake Ruapani it can be bush whacking and not country for the unprepared.
Apart from walking in to Maungapohatu I have not done any of the tracks from the Ruatahuna/Waimana northern end. In my day these were serious difficult tracks used by hunters and possum trappers.
https://www.nzonscreen.com/title/marae-diy-maungapohatu-marae-2015
https://www.nzonscreen.com/title/heartland-ruatahuna-1995
https://www.nzonscreen.com/title/loading-docs-the-road-to-whakarae-2014
https://www.nzonscreen.com/title/kai-time-on-the-road-best-of-2012
All the while when visiting in those days you were aware that it was someone's home. People lived in the area when it was a National Park. This is an important difference to many other NZ National parks.
Have we all got so entitled that this means nothing now?
Family anecdote 'Children of the mist' was what Elsdon Best called them and Maungapohatu sums this up.
Maungapōhatu is the sacred mountain of Ngāi Tūhoe. In times long ago, when gods walked the earth and men possessed strange powers, there lived a woman called Hine-pūkohu-rangi, the personification of mist and fog. Her younger sister was Hine-wai, the personification of light, misty rain. It was Hine-pūkohu-rangi who enticed Te Maunga (the mountain) to earth. From their union came Pōtiki I, the ancestor of Ngā Pōtiki, one of the tribes occupying the land before the arrival of the Mataatua canoe. And so Tūhoe claim they are descended from their environment: the rugged bush ranges of the Urewera and the white mist clouds that cover them. '
My family farmed up close to the boundary of Tuhoe country and my grandfather said they were aptly named as 'children of the mist' just appearing, seemingly from no-where. A tribute to their bush skills/directions.
Nice,I spent my early child hood on the toe of te uruwera, rode my horse up the horomanga to midway hut a couple of times before I was 11.
Yes….horses are the thing. My Uncle had a block behind Ohuka and he and my Aunt used to ride across country with children doubled up to visit grandparents. My grandmother used to sew the clothes for the little ones, my cousins. then they would ride back. You think it looks far away but much closer to go overland than into Wairoa, out the Napier Road then up past Raupunga.
Going up the Horomanga would have been great, far bit of river walking for you and the horse…..
Walked up from Taneatua to Ruatahuna, camping all the way, years ago, then spent 2 days trying to hitch out of Ruatahuna, eventually getting the NZ Railways bus on its once a week route along SH38. I don't like to see DOC huts being removed and not being replaced, but it should be pointed out that the back country hut system in NZ remains unique. Many other well known tramping/hiking trails around the world you just camp wherever you can, whatever the weather throws at you.
Is there a reason why the home page seems stuck on 21/10?
we're on holiday.
So the open mike 24/10 is there – and the link is in the comments, but the OP 24/10 does not show on the homepage which is stuck on 21/10 is because you are all on holiday?
pretty much. Don't know what happened yesterday, three posts ended up at the top of the page, including the old OM.
I fixed it earlier, try quitting and reopening your browser.
Ah, ok then. It was just weird.
It is just fun to read the Standard while i am at work.
It is Groundhog Day today, which is a Public Holiday in NZ.
The decline extends past energy
"Clearly, that was an unwarranted assumption. New Zealand’s education system – once celebrated as one of the most successful in the world – is in free-fall. By all the recognised international comparators, we are failing – and failing fast. So bad have things become that it is increasingly difficult to find a sufficient number of willing and able participants to make our international test-results robust enough, statistically, to stand comparison. In a telling sign of the times, this dearth of suitable participants is being presented by some school principals as a signal that it is time for New Zealand to abandon international comparisons altogether."
https://www.interest.co.nz/public-policy/118136/chris-trotter-says-scarcely-believable-tale-professional-failure-across-new
We can add our health system to the growing list.
Real world consequences of resource scarcity.
You can blame "National Standards" for this result, educationalists said this would happen when introduced by National ten or so years ago.
How so, PN?
Are 'National Standards' (partly) to blame?
Your guess is probably as good as mine, in principle anyway
https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/NZCER%20National%20Standards%20Report.pdf
I agree that it's virtually impossible to separate out National Standards as possible cause for dropping educational levels – from all of the other potential causes.
The actual data seems to show virtually a flat-line in student achievement during the period when National Standards were implemented.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/national-standards-are-they-working/TYGFLYLBS343WSLYAZOQAFHGEM/
This could mean a lot of things, e.g.:
Having had a child going through Primary school during the period when National Standards were implemented and then removed – I can say that my experience was that communication over a child's progress was enormously better, when teachers were required to report against National Standards.
Once that requirement was removed – school 'reports' went back to meaningless jargon – and I was literally told that a child who was clearly struggling with Maths was 'trucking along in his maths group'
[NB: this was poor teaching, rather than inability – a tutor soon brought him up to speed, and he achieves at, or slightly above his peer group at secondary school. My issue with the teacher/school wasn't the poor teaching (well, it was, but that's another story), it was that they apparently *didn't even see there was a problem*]
This article from 2016 seems to indicate that having to report to the MoE on kids not achieving, made schools focus greater attention on those kids.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/national-standards-are-they-working/TYGFLYLBS343WSLYAZOQAFHGEM/
And, of course, teachers and principals hated National Standards – it made it possible to compare the results achieved by individual teachers and schools. (Comparing the average achievement rate for a class at the beginning of the year, with the average rate at the end of the year – tells you whether that teacher is making a significant difference, is average, or performs worse than average. You can even be more nuanced – and look at the individual or group improvement rates – e.g. Is this teacher good at bringing up kids to average level, but doesn't extend the high achievers, or the other way around.)
If that's the case, then 'National Standards' operated under a severe handicap. It does beg the question – why would the Gnats enact policy they knew would be "hated" by those charged with implementing it – seems a tad sadistic to me.
I wonder what proportion of Kiwi MPs (of any political flavour) with children sent/send them to private schools – 'worked for me'? Education eh – what a business!
Probably not a vast number.
In NZ we have the post-code lottery for schooling as well as health. If you live in a wealthy area your local school is likely to approach private schools for quality of education (think of the high ratings of Epsom Girls Grammar or Auckland Grammar in Auckland – I'm sure you can plug in the names of the rich area schools in your home town).
Overseas (UK for example) MPs on both sides of the house routinely send their kids to private schools.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7490373/Labour-Party-high-flyers-accused-blind-hypocrisy.html
Probably not – then again, probably above average.
Given that we'll never know (MP's families are off limits for good reasons) – speculation seems rather futile.
Futile maybe, but there's no such thing as a stupid question – at least that's what I was taught, and what I taught in turn.
Let’s adopt a bipartisan (left – respectful centrist) consensus –
probably not below average.
Hmm. If you're only ever going to make changes which are supported by the teachers unions, then you run into difficulty make any hard choices at all.
ATM, my personal belief is that the Ministry of Education (which has a much greater influence on teaching in NZ, than any government does) – has experienced pedagogical capture by a particular educational philosophy. To the extent where they ignore all contrary evidence (dropping ed stds are just one measure).
I don't know how (if this is indeed the case) that any government can turn this around. Let alone turn it around easily.
Hmm – maybe just make some changes which are supported by unions?
"Pedagogical capture" notwithstanding, MoE's strategies have changed, are changing, and will change. We can, however, be certain that there will be no education(al) ‘fix’, easy or otherwise, while our parliamentary representatives treat NZ education as a political football.
Might help if Government politicians and MoE staff listened more to the collective voice of the teaching profession. One can only hope that any future NAct government will be less ideologically inclined to ignoring unions than the previous one…
'Not remembering the past' could soon be a new NCEA course
And education has been such a success story under Labour, of course….
Has it? And whaddaya think about this ‘pandemic’ – bloody Labour.
You tell me….. After the litany of 'failures' under National you recited – I'd have expected to see a comparable positive storm of success under Labour – who, clearly, have no interest in upsetting the powerful teacher unions.
Really, we have to stop blaming 'Covid' for everything. They had 2 Covid-free years to set policy in place (because, clearly they had spent the previous 9 years in opposition honing their education policy /sarc/ – and knew exactly what they were going to use to replace National Standards)
And, while Covid lockdowns had an impact – it was greatest on the very young (the kids just starting school – who might just as well not have bothered), and the kids in their final NCEA years – who needed to cover specific material to a specific level (and, some of whom, had little or no access to online classes for a variety of reasons). Not to say that other kids weren't affected – but those were the critical areas.
If Covid lockdowns were such a major limiting factor on learning – then we should have seen a great chasm between the achievement results of kids in Auckland (who experienced more than double the number of lockdown days), and the kids in the rest of NZ – South Island in particular. I have yet to see any evidence of this.
Note that reducing the qualifying level for NCEA (as was done in 2020 and (for some areas) in 2021) – doesn't actually prepare kids for the next level. You still need to know Year 12 chemistry, if you want to be successful in doing Year 13 chemistry.
You tell me…
Hang on – you told me “education has been such a success story under Labour” (@4:20 pm)??
I provided ~10 links (to data and the opinions of others) in response to comments in this thread – but "litany"? Still, "Perception is Reality" for some, including the reality that The Standard is a left-leaning blog.
"What is your political angle?" – good question, eh?
Bizarre comment for a respectful centrist to make, imho. Why on earth would any effective Government be interested in upsetting a large group of public servants? It might prove difficult to make a case for NZ right-wing political parties being supportive of "powerful" worker (cf. taxpayer) unions, but why would they be interested in upsetting unions? Ideology?
As for expecting a "positive storm of success under Labour", that comment seems a tad hyperbolic for a centrist, but I'm biased.
If NZ's Covid response wasn't "a major limiting factor on learning", then that would be an excellent outcome (imho) – the key word in "I have yet to see any evidence of this." is 'yet' – time will tell.
https://ero.govt.nz/our-research/learning-in-a-covid-19-world-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-pacific-learners
NCEA exam attendance was down in regions affected (most) by lockdowns (i.e. Northland, Waikato, Auckland) in 2021. Annual Report came out in May this year, IIRC.
"Make changes supported by the teacher unions' and "Pedagogical capture" raises pertinent points.
It's reasonable to say that the place of schooling and teachers in our society has changed remarkably over the past 70 years. (No doubt in a time frame people in forums such as this could understand.) I'm not talking just about the changes technological and curricular.
Was a time when there was a thing called 'country service' which saw the mass of teachers trained having to teach in identified country schools. The flow of teachers in and out of communities the length and breadth of the country assuredly had significant impact. Go there for two years, maybe meet a future spouse, become part of the local drama or rugby club, coach or organise kid's sports teams. Then likely move on.
Along with that was a system of teachers being 'graded' by Departmental inspectors on a three year cycle. It was an 'appointments and promotions' scheme, hierarchical, giving currency for those deemed capable to move 'up the ladder.' Accommodating those elements were many hundreds of small schools, one teacher, two, or three or four and so on.
After being an 'ordinary' teacher the masses aspiring to be head teachers served in small schools, trying to prove their worth, improving their grading and hoping to go onto some school bigger. Someone from Northland might transfer to Taranaki or Southland or Hawkes Bay with the system being national.
In their schools teachers tried to prove their worth, experimented, went to courses trying to pick up new ideas and put them into practice. Most consequentially, those who were aspiring to be headmasters/headmistresses were at the chalkface and running a school dealing with every child and their learning from (as it was) primer one to form two. They served apprenticeships in learning how kids learn, steps along the way, and dealing with the ebb and flow of humans on learning journeys.
The apprenticeship necessarily too was in teachers learning who they were themselves and their place in communities. And vice versa. ‘The teacher is right’ easily became part of a societal norm.
Lifeblood flowed through the countrywide veins of our schools. As the structural elements changed the nature of the business of training teachers and the expectations and demands on those in the business changed. The nature of the beasts in charge changed. The demands on them changed and so what they expect of their charges.
At it’s best learning is a magic event, a series of them, and should be that. We want altruistic, creative, demanding, challenging, personable, inspiring people in the job.
The job though, with it’s fear and tight underpants accountability demands drones. The managers, the principals need ticks in boxes not magic. And generations of parents are playing that same game. ‘The teacher is right?’ “Only if they see it like I see it.”
Changes supported by teacher unions? Teacher unions have no chance of seeing the most essential changes made. And those necessary ones won't be proposed from elsewhere where the lowest of low trust models rule.
Great comment – sadly, for the most part low-truss models rule
https://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Leadership-development/Professional-information/Leadership-capability-framework/High-trust-relationships
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/471711/te-aorerekura-aiming-for-high-trust-funding-model
They were certainly introduced by National, in 2010. However they were scrapped, as one of their first actions, by Labour, in the person of Hipkins, who gleefully announced that they were being dumped in 2017.
It seems a great deal more likely that the scrapping of National Standards then is more likely to be responsible for the recent collapse in pupil's results than the fact that they were brought in long before the current 14 year olds were anywhere near school.
The National Standards 'tap' was turned on in 2010, and turned off in 2018 – the effects of eight years of National Standards are still flowing through schools.
NZ's education 'system' seems severely damaged – schooling is increasingly unattractive to pupils, and it's difficult to attract and retain any teachers, let alone those who might regard teaching as a calling. The pandemic hasn't helped either.
Interfering politicians must take some responsibility for this – education is too important to the future of Aotearoa New Zealand for it to continue to be a partisan political football, imho.
However, it's difficult to actually attribute any educational failure to National Standards – given that all of the measures showed that educational measures (reading, writing maths) remained pretty much static while National Standards were in place. [That's not, of course, the outcome that the Government wanted, but it's the one they got]
I can think of no learning impact which would have been invisible in any measure while NS were in place, only to become apparent when they were removed. Can you?
You mean "pretty much static", or "invisible",, as in "pretty legal"?
See Figure 6 on page 16 of this report [PDF], available from the NZI website.
https://longwortheducation.co.nz/2017/10/27/now-what-recovering-from-the-standards-era/
Why don't (can't?) we learn from history
https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/education/about/research/documents/assessment-for-success-in-primary-schools-(1998).pdf
"50 years"! Surely you must be joking, Professor Hattie.
You seem to have ignored this quote from above….
The actual data seems to show virtually a flat-line in student achievement during the period when National Standards were implemented.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/national-standards-are-they-working/TYGFLYLBS343WSLYAZOQAFHGEM/
This was from 2016. The original data (sadly) appears to have been removed from the MoE website.
Given that the latest PISA ratings are from 2018 – all we have to compare against are the reported 'test' results from the new NCEA reading/writing/maths curriculum – which had …. poor …. pass rates. This is a base-level competency test – which all students sitting NCEA level 1 should have been able to (on paper) pass. Students were selected to sit the test paper on an opt in/out basis – and schools would certainly have encouraged able students to do so (less able ones, might well have been encouraged to wait a year, to improve their pass-chances); so students sitting are highly likely to have skewed to the higher end of the academic range – which makes the pass-rates even more dismal.
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA2207/S00128/two-thirds-of-students-fail-ncea-pilot.htm
This is the same John Hattie who supports performance pay for teachers, and increased class sizes (I certainly don't agree with the latter) as well as saying the the critical factor in low income households isn't money, but low parental expectations.
I've read his visible learning book – and absolutely agree that a major critical factor for effective learning is specific, targeted, timely feedback – from teacher to child – which is almost entirely missing from our education system [Based on my experience as a parent, and shared conversations with friends who are both parents and teachers]
His point has always been that measurement is pointless unless you are going to do *something* with the information.
Interestingly the report you quote (Briar Lipson), supports my argument for the pedagogical capture that I believe MoE and the NZ teaching profession has experienced; and is highly critical of their lack of willingness to review the failures in their approach.
She also advocates for an evidence-based approach to education (including, ironically, some form of 'nationalized assessments') – p. 112.
A very interesting report indeed, I would agree with the majority of her recommendations – thank you for drawing it to my attention.
That's a shame. Still, since you're familiar with "PISA ratings", and have read Briar Lipson's NZI report, perhaps you could comment on the trends illustrated in Figure 6 on page 16 of Lipson's report [PDF]. To my eye it looks as if the PISA scores for Maths, Science and Reading all decrease relatively sharply between 2009 and 2012, with further smaller decreases in the 2015 and 2018.
It's not, however, all bad news – that same graph shows that between 2009 and 2017 the percentage of school leavers with NCEA Level 2 or higher increased from 70% to nearly 80%.
Lipson summarises the constrasting trends thus:
One might say that treating education as a business was bound to improve apparent student achievement, but I couldn't possibly comment.
Lipson is no fan of teacher unions (this is an NZI report), and views National Standards (2010 – 2017) as a means of ensuring accountability:
Accountability is important, but it seems to me that the National Standards initiative as it was implemented was always going to prove incompatible with a high-trust model of teacher-led education.
Maybe it comes down to certain political tribes simple not valuing education.
Your argument about 14 yr old's not being subjected to National Standards is flawed, as the standards were abolished 4 yrs ago they had spent the first five years within that system.
My partner formerly a secondary schoolteacher long moaned about pupils arriving in that system barely unable to read, she always complained about primary teachers not doing their job. She is now involved in basic literacy and numeracy assessments, can you imagine any 14 yr old not being able to understand any times tables, but this is what assessment is showing and at a private Christian school to boot.
Yes, they spent the first 5 years in the system. During that time – the reported standards were consistent (flat, without improvement, but not dropping).
Unless you can think of a way that the damage could have been caused – but remained invisible – until National Standards were removed…..
Times tables haven't been taught in primary schools (at least not as part of the state curriculum) for at least the last 15 years. The old days of the class chanting 3 x 7 = 21; 3 x 8 = 24 – are long gone. Maths teaching is 'student-led' (as is the rest of the curriculum) and focuses on number strategies (rather than teaching a standard way to solve a problem). While this is a successful approach for kids who have mathematical minds – and enjoy number games ; it is (observationally) a poor strategy for kids who *don't* think that way – and would benefit more from a 'this is how to solve the problem' approach. Many get confused, and then withdraw from maths with the 'I can't do it' approach. [NB: from discussion with my kid's tutor, she spends at least the first 6 months with any kid, convincing them that they *can* do it]
Again, observationally, very few primary teachers either enjoy or are good at teaching maths (there are exceptions) – and it's often a 'pro forma' excercise – rather than the enjoyment that I see in teaching in other areas.
Yup. That's why I didn't go teaching here when I returned from Korea – I have standards.
This is troubling to say the least. Not to mention the high truency levels. I wonder how Jan Tinettis adds to get kids back into the classroom are going.?
And Mr Kruger is correct, you forget this.
A quick look at the legislation Te Urewera Act 2014 would have removed all doubt.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2014/0051/latest/DLM6183707.html
12Vesting of Te Urewera establishment land
(1)
Te Urewera establishment land ceases to be vested in the Crown.
(2)
Any part of the establishment land that is—
(a)
a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987 ceases to be a conservation area:
(b)
Crown land under the Land Act 1948 ceases to be Crown land:
(c)
a national park under the National Parks Act 1980 ceases to be a national park:
(d)
a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 has the reserve status revoked.
(3)
The fee simple estate in the establishment land vests in Te Urewera and is held under, and in accordance with, this Act.
this Act is the Te Urewera Act 2014
The continued non-acceptance of this basic fact seems to indicate that there is a mass happening of 'old man yells at cloud' (anger at things they cannot control) affecting among others, the race scared, those taking Stuff as gospel.
Does this idea of landowners apply to all people? Some owners of high country land have removed musterers huts that also functioned as huts for others/trampers. Does the shock horror apply to them also? Or does it only apply to Maori & specifically Te Urewera and Tuhoe?
(My bro in law has been involved with use of these musterers huts over the years working with owners/lessees to make them safe. Over recent years many have been broken into/wrecked – not by trampers in need of a safe haven but by 4WD people (not the clubs) but the yobbo ones)
4WD may not be able to make it to the hinterland huts but they sure can make a mess on the margins.
Tuhoe are working to achieve status under this
https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/resrecfiles/WCC1_REC_036_THE_WORLD_NETWORK_OF_BIOSPHERE_RESERV.pdf
The 'fact' of the Te Urewera Act 2014 is not however "old man yells at cloud"….the clue is in the title.
Title of what? Outrage by locals who wilfully continue to misunderstand the current situation? My heart bleeds, it really does.
Your Facebook like response is difficult to respond to.
If Tuhoe has control of its land then what it does on its land is surely up to it. All of this would have been done under a management plan and with the knowledge of the board that has 3 DOC reps on it.
'Old man yells at cloud' refers to the continued non acceptance of the existence of the legislation. Acceptance or even a reading and undestanding of the legislation would lessen this.
Is there such yelling when other management functions sich as pest control are undertaken?
The title of the Act.
The 'fact' is prior to 2014 it was not a 'fact' and there is no guarantee that it will remain (or modified) into the future,
That is the 'fact' of a democratic system…especially when the 'yelling' becomes sufficient.
Of course we may not remain a democracy.
what's your point Pat? Please explain, because I've read your two comments twice and I don't get it.
Shanreagh was using the meme of old man yelling at clouds to point the people who don't seem to understand that the area is no longer a national park and hasn't been for a long time, but are angry about it.
Thank you Weka…that is it exactly and much more succinctly than I could have put it!
The point is quite simple.
'old man yells at cloud' is a pejorative expression against those disapproving of something they cannot impact…..and the case of Te Urewera it is not applicable for the simple reason there is every potential to impact that which is causing disapproval.
Te Urewera Act (2014) is an Act of Parliament that didnt apply prior to that date and can be as easily rescinded or modified by any subsequent Parliament…and as we know public pressure has been known to move politicians …in democracies.
Democracy is not immutable, that is the domain of theocracies and autocracies
You have lost me.
Prior to 1860 it was land owned and occupied by Tuhoe since time immemorial. After 1864, I think, it was taken by the Crown, confiscated, in the terms of the time, for an act that Tuhoe had no part in. In 1954 this land was taken further away by the declaration of National Park status. Tuhoe were not consulted on this.
When I say 'taken further away' to take land out of a national park involves an Act of Parliament and even had there been a will to return Te Urewera direct from the NP this would not have seen the light of day. If it had been taken up we would have had the unconscionable action of this being politicised/polarised on party grounds. So the delivery of a right and just solution would have been subject to a political whim.
The investigations are correctly apolitical through the Waitangi Tribunal. Identifying the redress options are also correctly apolitical. The financial options are correctly political as it involves $$$$ from the Govt of NZ. The finalising of the settlement by an Act of parliament is correctly political as we do not want a settlement overturned without great thought.
The Te Urewera act sets up a Board. There is no time limit on that.
Is it just this land you have a problem with or are/were you similarly concerned with the many other Treaty Settlements such as Ngai Tahu, Tainui, Sealord. Why this one in particular?
'Claims to the Waitangi Tribunal are allegations that the Crown has breached the Treaty of Waitangi by particular actions, inactions, laws, or policies and that Māori have suffered prejudice (harmful effects) as a result.
https://www.govt.nz/browse/history-culture-and-heritage/treaty-of-waitangi-claims/settling-historical-treaty-of-waitangi-claims/
https://waitangitribunal.govt.nz/about-waitangi-tribunal/past-present-future-of-waitangi-tribunal/
https://www.parliament.nz/mi/get-involved/features/working-to-put-things-right-settling-treaty-of-waitangi-claims/
https://www.govt.nz/browse/history-culture-and-heritage/treaty-settlements/find-a-treaty-settlement/
Some recent claims
https://www.govt.nz/browse/history-culture-and-heritage/treaty-settlements/recent-treaty-settlements/
Link to the Whakatohea claim. This contains in language we can understand what the deprivation of land from Maori can mean. This is what I mean when I say that while all of the settlements are written in good clear English, some are lyrical in the language as well. it is this combination that makes them so readable. Having had an involvement on the land side way down food chain I know that great care is taken with the language with many of those involved across many depts being given the chance to say ‘does this say what we mean it to say?’
https://www.govt.nz/assets/Documents/OTS/Whakatohea/Whakatohea-deed-of-settlement-historical-claims-23-Dec-2021.pdf
In 2010 – when Tuhoi (including the same leader now quoted) were angling for the transfer of the management from DoC – they made unequivocal statements that public access would not be infringed in any way.
Now, the statement is – it's our land and we can do what we want – tough luck if what we want to do, doesn't suit the public.
There is a matter of public trust, here.
Access to a place is not the same as buildings there.
"The public access that is available now will not be limited or diminished
I would say removing huts is diminishing the experience
I agree. Removal of huts is a significant change. But we're not just talking about huts.
You do understand lefties don't have to blindly back everything Maōri do
I do. I also understand that people don't have to kneejerk react against Māori having power.
I think applying a lityle pressure on Mr Kruger is not a bad thing,he made a deal he needs to honor it,for the sake of co governess deals to follow if nothing else.
No problem with that. I've been saying critique is valid. I'm more objecting to the ways the objecting is being done by some.
(I don't know what the deal was though, I'm just going off what people are presenting here. I'll guess it wasn't his deal, but the Iwi's legal arm).
I'd interpret "not diminished in any way" to include the retention of the existing infrastructure (tracks, huts, etc.).
Huts aren't the only issue. Access to the park has also been closed for substantial periods of time – while TUT were arguing with DoC.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300456239/lake-waikaremoana-and-its-great-walk-have-been-closed-for-months-as-thoe-say-the-relationship-with-the-crown-has-failed
It's open again now – after a very significant public outcry.
Any comments on the conservation disaster that has resulted from TUT management?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/300535889/pest-control-efforts-in-te-urewera-have-changed–some-conservationists-worry-about-the-fate-of-native-species
Any comments on the conservation disaster that has resulted from the dominant culture's management of the whole country?
Because if we're going down that track, of critiquing Tūhoe's management, and I see no reason not to other than it's rude and hypocritical, then I'll point to the politics that you support as having a massively detrimental impact on nature eg the loss of biodiversity from industrial dairying.
The reason I'm pointing that out is that there are real and deep differences in world view and values here, and imo that's the stuff we should be wrangling with. It's easy enough to point a finger at any Iwi and the things we don't like, but we're a bit slower to point the finger at Pākehā. Maybe we should look at what the underlying values are and why each set is driving what it is.
Comparing the conservation results in Te Urewera before and after the change in ownership.
This is not me, saying it's a disaster; it's respected conservation professionals – many who have dedicated a large portion of their life to making a difference in this area.
Apart from the link you have already posted who are the other professionals.
I already knew about this issue. My point here is the narrative you are weaving here about Tūhoe and its ability to manage things properly. I'm suggesting we dig deeper and look at the conflict of values. I think the time has passed for just writing of Māori and enforcing Pākehā values.
Please link to where either Tūhoe or Kruger have said this. Or own it as your beliefs about the situation.
I'll also point out that when DOC have removed huts from the conservation estate, they also didn't ask the public. What's the difference?
I was reflecting back the comment made by Shanreagh
"If Tuhoe has control of its land then what it does on its land is surely up to it. "
However, statement from Kruger.
Interestingly, the removal of the huts is also opposed by Tuhoe locals (presumably part of the hunters who used them for shelter)
There is a quantitative difference between the removal of the odd DoC hut (unless you can link to a source which shows a systematic pattern of large scale removal) – and the proposal to remove more than 50 from Te Urewera.
I also note that DoC go to significant lengths to work with community groups for upkeep and maintenance of remote huts, which primarily benefit their group.
https://www.remotehuts.co.nz/about-us.html
thanks. What I see is,
What I'm not seeing is
although I can see how some might choose to interpret it that way. I am curious if you believe that Iwi should have a consultation process with Tauiwi (or the Crown, or New Zealanders generally) about what they do with the land returned to them under treaty settlements. And if so, what is the rationale?
My memory is that DOC removed back country huts in the 80s or 90s without consulting the public, and it did piss a lot of people off. It wasn't the odd hut, it was DOC going through and removing the ones they didn't want to keep and it was systematic. Have a feeling that groups intervened, not sure how many were saved.
If it's the number of huts in Te Urewera that is bothering you, rather than it being Māori doing it not DOC, then I'd like to see an audit of the condition and usage of the huts being removed. Fifty huts seems a very large number for the area. Were DOC keeping them all in good condition? Who was using them?
Which isn't to say there isn't a place for critiquing what is happening. I think it's useful to tease out what the objections are specifically, and look at to what extent this is an objection of transfer of power from the dominant culture to Māori, and if so, that's a different conversation than issues about huts.
Apparently TUT don't even have a consultation process with Tuhoe living close by – referencing the quote above.
DOC are not allowed (by TUT) to do any maintenance in Te Urewera – that is all controlled by TUT – that was a big part of the stoush which saw access to Lake Waikaremoana closed for months.
My understanding is that these huts are 'shelter-from-the-elements' huts used by hunters (they're not camping venues). As such, they will be predominantly used by local (or regional) hunters – not tourists or backpackers. Apparently Tuhoe among them.
Some may view the 2014 Act as a recent wrong 'not making a right', whereas to others (me included) it's about righting wrongs. Personally, I would have preferred the land to remain a National Park (sans mining thank-you very much), but NZ's population is growing.
https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/interactive/maori-land-1860-2000
As Sacha says access is different from maintaining old and now unserviceable huts.
Before many of these huts were built you packed in and out.
I think we need to give Tuhoe time to establish and not automatically assume the worst as many nay sayers are doing.
I don't think Tuhoe have said what you have said they are saying but in point of fact it their land, vested in the board, it is no longer NP. We may not have an automatic right of access (I don't know) or huts but then we don't have an automatic right of access or to huts to many other properties in NZ do we?
If the land was illegally taken from someone do we, as the taker ie the Crown as the Treaty partner, have a unilateral right to impose conditions on its return? No we don't. The Crown has broached ideas and Tuhoe has agreed and the two are working through the Board. So in fact we as those that the Crown worked on behalf of have the ability.
If the public don't have an inbuilt right what is the matter of trust? Is it that arguments over huts may derail other Treaty claims? If so I don't think so as those working in the field will not let irrelevant matters derail the working they are doing to investigate.
Is it that the current Govt will lose trust? Generally these claims and investigations are apolitical as they should be.
So is the trust lost from people who don't know the background, can't be bothered to know the background? If so I agree that perhaps greater publicity about the role of Treaty Settlements, the two partners may be useful but then perhaps not.
People will just continue to follow and believe click bait, ill researched articles in MSM. That is where MSM gets its raison d'etre from. Regrettably this will give people a reason to grumble about anti Maaari this or anti Mowri (depending on your Europeanised pronunciation).
There does seem to be a bit of a bow wave building up where Maori issues are a convenient whipping boy. Winston Peters and his silly 'apartheid' comments seems to be grabbing this wholeheartedly.
When DOC created the great walks, they introduced a rule that you couldn't free camp along the tracks any more. Because obviously at that point, making money was a new priority. This was loss of pre-existing access. Admittedly it was before the internet, but I don't remember that the same kind of animosity as gets directed a Māori (even allowing for the large degree of antipathy towards DOC from certain parts of society).
The 'trust' that is lost is between the public statements of a lead negotiator before the transfer of Te Urewera, and the public statements and actions of the same individual as a member of the trust board afterwards.
With co-governance on the table – not just for Treaty settlements, but in a raft of areas (including 3 waters) this kind of situation means that people are much less likely to trust iwi statements about their intentions.
Would you ever vote for another National Park to move into iwi ownership?
I might if there was a guarantee that mining couldn't happen on/under the land. But the question is off imo, because it's going to depend on which park, and what Iwi reps and others are saying. Or are you saying that all Māori are liars?
Why would we ever vote on this? It is supposed to be an apolitical process designed to right wrongs? It has worked through both Labour and National Governments.
It so happens that the land that was taken from Tuhoe, for no reason and then had a another land alienation (to NP) put on top while it was still in public ownership. If this was proven to be the case in another situation I would have no hesitation in supporting a return of land taken unjustly to Maori from whom it was taken.
As I said above I am struggling to think of another NP where the fact situation mirrors Tuhoe and where the original people are still living on the land.
Are you able to name other NPs where the original owners, from time immemorial have lived on the land right through its time as a NP?
I have forgotten nothing. However, most New Zealanders don't know what's being done behind their backs on both sides of the fence, regardless of rights and wrongs. These issues are hiving off in unexpected ways:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/300710974/the-waterfront-property-that-comes-with-a-gang-boss
We are heading into a future with no defining constitutional references.
what's being done behind people's backs in regards to Te Urewera? Be specific.
I posted this link above.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2022/10/removal-of-te-urewera-huts-sparks-outrage-from-locals.html
I'm asking you to explain in your own words what *you mean. Links are good, but they're there to back up commenter's points and arguments. The reason for this is that we can't expect people to read a whole article and parse what is in someone's mind. It's on the person making the comment to explain.
For instance, removal of the huts is clearly not behind people's backs, because it's in the public domain that this is being done. So what did you mean exactly?
Sub groups of Tuhoe have gone behind, or moved forward, ( take your pick) with hut removal without consultation with either the public or other Tuhoe.
Also I know personally of people who have been assaulted and threatened. I seriously suggest you do not visit this area because Tuhoe are a law unto themselves. They dislike Pakehas, and they call other Maori tribes 'Brown Pakeha.''It's so sad because this area is one of the last in NZ that harks back to a time of the Moa and pre European. It is so beautiful.
Unfortunately things wont’ be getting better anytime soon.
https://waateanews.com/2021/12/23/tuhoe-leader-faces-fresh-challenge/
If the people have gone there with the entitled and incorrect views that have been exhibited here on TS I am not surprised they have not received a warm welcome.
Had your friends contacted Tuhoe before arriving? You know how some people like to have a warning of the arrival of others, you know being polite and all that. Finding out if it was possible, where, what cost etc?
It is a beautiful place and it is also someone's home and it also does not belong to us.
X Socialist if you follow the links you will see that Tuhoe are having another of their festivals in 2023.
Why not find out a bit more about this and encourage your friends to do so too.
https://www.facebook.com/tuhoeahurei2022/
Even if you or your friends made contact and asked now about it and if you had the time from now on asked if you could give them a hand, no obligation, with anything.
It cannot be easy hosting this event with a smallish permanent population and with many living away from home.
In this way you will get to be better informed, do something to help people, have fun, get to know others.
I can't argue with any of this.
There is a strategy to rid the area of western influences
We remove the western influences and their imprint within Te Urewera. We regrow the belief in ourselves, and that our care practices by Tūhoe hands and hearts will lead the way.
and
We treasure our indigenous ecological systems and biodiversity through significantly reducing key existing pressures, enabling Te Urewera to a natural state of balance.
The board membership
https://www.ngaituhoe.iwi.nz/meet-the-te-urewera-board
Having worked with at least two of these people in times gone past I think the Board is well served with its people.
A pressure would be the constant upkeep of huts that are either not needed in terms of Tuhoe vision for the future or past their use by date.
Who says 'consultation' is part of how Tūhoe want to steward this land?
Exactly. It is not a public institution where consultation on its functions are enshrined in legislation or practice.
In fact Tuhoe did consult in 2017 and got many good ideas and presumably these are still being worked through.
And even if it [wide public consultation] were, and it isn’t, ‘consultation’ is becoming a euphemism for ‘listen to me and alleviate all my concerns or this is a farce and I’ll moan & complain till the cows come home’. I’d like to think that it is foundational to democracy to agree to disagree throughout each and every process as well regarding all outcomes.
Well said Incognito.
NZ doesn't have a written constitution, so do you mean that our current conventions that are the basis of an unwritten constitution are changing to not having any? Please give examples, with evidence.
In the link provided you will notice some legal rulings have been made and legal oversight and jurisdiction established. But nothing is happening. Obviously our ''current conventions'' have no teeth. Maori are now able to thumb their nose at the law because of Maori Tikanga.
Can you see any way forward as a nation?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/300710974/the-waterfront-property-that-comes-with-a-gang-boss
This is a very poor example of some thing, far be it for me to say racial profiling about 'Maaris' and it does nothing to bolster your argument.
If I was running your argument I would be looking at the threat to our Westminster system of Government posed by the Sovereign Citizens movement. These people, given their head have the ability to turn our style of Govt on its head and bingo we are all back being ruled under Admiralty law and the law of the Sea and Discovery. No thanks I prefer the system that the Ngati Wikitorias have given us at Waitangi in 1840.
Behind their backs…….you are joking of course!
The Treaty of Waitangi Act was enacted in 1975.
Treaty settlements have been part of NZ life since the Waitomo Caves and Sealord Fisheries claims. There were large settled claims for Tainui and Ngai Tahu in the mid 90s……so at least 25 years.
https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/research-papers/document/00PlibC5191/historical-treaty-settlements
ToW claims are between the two Treaty partners
1 The Maori group
2 the Crown for and on behalf of the people of NZ
It does not take much of a sense of right and wrong to concede that taking someone's land as punishment for something they did not do and then compounding this wrong by further alienating under a National Park status is offensive. Yet this is what happened to Tuhoe.
The need to meet and learn from Treaty of Waitangi Claims has been a feature of both Labour and National Govts with Rt Hon Sir Doug Graham being an enthusiastic supporter. He speaks on YouTube below.
Ngai Tahu have had settlement payments before. I can't find my notes but they had received four payments historicaly leading up to the present if I remember correctly:
''The first settlements:
Other inquiries and commissions followed. All commented on the misery and poverty that Ngāi Tahu endured after the land sales of the mid-19th century. A 1920–21 commission of inquiry suggested they should be paid compensation of £354,000, but no immediate action was taken. In 1928 the first Ngāi Tahu Trust Board was set up, with a meeting the following year to help identify the beneficiaries of the proposed compensation.
''It was not until 1944 that the first Labour government passed the Ngāi Tahu Claim Settlement Act. This awarded Ngāi Tahu £300,000, payable at a rate of £10,000 a year for 30 years. This was less than the recommended £354,000 of the royal commission, whose findings had always been contested by Ngāi Tahu. Nevertheless, the act was passed with the intention of making £300,000 a full and final settlement of the Ngāi Tahu claim. In 1946, legislation reconstituted the Ngāi Tahu Māori Trust Board, which enabled the funds to be administered.''
https://teara.govt.nz/en/ngai-tahu/page-8
Of course.
Your point?
''Treaty settlements have been part of NZ life since the Waitomo Caves and Sealord Fisheries claims. There were large settled claims for Tainui and Ngai Tahu in the mid 90s……so at least 25 years.''
”It was not until 1944 that the first Labour government passed the Ngāi Tahu Claim Settlement Act. This awarded Ngāi Tahu £300,000, payable at a rate of £10,000 a year for 30 years. This was less than the recommended £354,000 of the royal commission, whose findings had always been contested by Ngāi Tahu. Nevertheless, the act was passed with the intention of making £300,000 a full and final settlement of the Ngāi Tahu claim.”
As I said before there have been other historical payments. One I believe was for 27,000 pounds. Plus, I believe(?) Ngai Tahu will receive payments in perpetuity.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/100542696/ngi-tahu-and-tainui-receive-370-million-in-treaty-payment-topups-with-more-to-come
”Two iwi have quietly been paid huge top-ups, totalling $370 million, to their supposed "full and final" Treaty of Waitangi settlements.”
Waikato-Tainui received $190m and the South Island's Ngāi Tahu $180m – more than they originally settled for in 1995 and 1998, respectively.
The Government made the payments on December 15 without any public announcement, but they were discovered by Stuff and confirmed by the Office of Treaty Settlements this week.
A source in the Labour-led Government said some ministers were unhappy that every time a Treaty settlement was achieved, another 33 cents in the dollar had to be paid to the two tribes.”
Like I said: There is no way we as a country can move forward with with this type of stuff going on.
Ok, so the Maoris are bleeding us dry while we appropriate their culture for our own commercial gain.
Pay for intellectual property, you cheapskate.
A weak and cheap reply. I have no problem paying reparation. In fact parts of my family were involved with the Ngāti Pāhauwera settlement.
https://www.govt.nz/browse/history-culture-and-heritage/treaty-settlements/find-a-treaty-settlement/ngati-pahauwera/ngati-pahauwera-deed-of-settlement-summary/
But in the case of Ngai Tahu, I do have a problem. It has a contestable history that is different to the one portrayed in the media. And when some Labour MPs have a problem with Ngai Tahu, you know for sure we all have a problem.
Where can all this lead. Here's just one peripheral outcome using Australia as an example.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/sport/477202/netball-australia-loses-sponsor
What type of stuff? You were asked to clarify and you didn't.
Let me see if I can guess: you believe that treaty settlements should be full and final? and that if we don't do that, then something terrible will happen.
Can you please confirm if this is what you believe, and then say what the terrible thing is? I/m sure you think you are being clear, but it's really not.
1- Legal uncertainties around settlements and their outcomes. Different tribes being treated differently re settlement outcomes.
2- The public being increasingly ostracized by Maori/ Maori organisations around land rights and co governance.
3- Secretive government agreements behind the backs of the public. Or agreements not explained properly and signalled properly to the public.
4- Uncertainty around legal obligations/ rights regarding things Maori. Eg Maori health.
5- Racist legal rulings the allow Maori offenders to have a cultural report presented during criminal trials with judges able to take such a report into consideration.
6- A real pissed off public. The outcome of that will be apparent at the next election. Only for the public to become pissed off with the next government. No government will be able to fix all this supposed Maori stuff.''
7- Average Maori who just want to get on with life having to suffer discrimination because racists tar all Maori with the same brush fuelled by a media who sensationalise some stories, and don't report on others. Have you heard the word Maori associated with 'ram raids?'
My point is there is no coherent way forward as a country. The treaty settlement issue is all over the place. Maori, like The Maori Party, really want separate state within a state. Pakeha have had enough, especially the ones who cannot wrap their heads around the fact that Maori will no longer be out of sight and mind. Maori can't agree amongst themselves over a variety of issues, so they can't move forward as a people. All these issues are now being magnified by the times we live in, especially economic wise.
And, yes, settlements must be final. But they never will be because some Maori are claiming modern grievances?
You may be thinking I'm a sad and pessimistic. Not true, I'm only pessimistic about the future of our country. There is no future. I would love to here your argument ''That there is a future for Aotearoa?''
Yeah, non-Maori are in constant agreement on every issue. Is that how they are able to move forward as a people?
/sarc.
Again your point?
What does
mean?
What is the 'stuff'? payments for unfair Crown actions is that 'stuff'? Does this view only apply to Maori or do we include other payments for 'stuff' such as unfair imprisonment etc. Or are you able to accept payment of $$$ to people wrongly accused of a crime by the Crown but you cannot accept payment of land and $$$ where the payment is because the Crown wronged an iwi?
If you had read the background to the Ngai Tahu claim you would have realised that it is all not as black and white re earlier claims.
In which case, what were effectively read as 'promises' by both Tuhoe and the Government/DoC – that Te Urewera would be effectively retained as a National Park (even though the ownership had changed) were, at best naive and at worst profoundly dishonest.
I think to do yourself justice you will need to link to these promises.
Also please read through their website. Some of the stuff that has been raised here on TS is borderline lacking in honesty because it is from someone's 'friend' or I remember reading . Best to get info from the horse's mouth as it were. Slight Tuhoe pun here.
https://www.ngaituhoe.iwi.nz/
Neither the legislation nor the Treaty Settlement documents say anything about it remaining as a de facto NP. In fact the legislation clearly and specifically removes references to NP Act, Reserves Act and Land Act as modifiers on the ability to do what is needed, as assessed by Tuhoe on the land.
Quotes as already provided above
Here's Chris Finlayson on the subject (note that this is after Key flat-out refused to transfer 'ownership' of Te Urewera to Tuhoe)
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/115593/tuhoe-agrees-$170m-deal-with-crown
Please note, that there was zero discussion at the time that this was intended to be a transfer into private ownership or into exclusive control of Tuhoe. The expressed intention at the time was partnership (what has later been come to be called co-governance).
Have you not read the legislation?
Things are happening and will happen in the future. No-one really expects Te Urewera to be operated as a mirror copy of a national park. Things will happen in their own time and to the timetable of Tuhoe.
Please also read the aims etc for Te Urewera that I linked to earlier I don't mind linking to them again, it's no skin off my nose.
https://www.ngaituhoe.iwi.nz/tut
https://www.ngaituhoe.iwi.nz/annual-plan-bringing-the-blueprint-to-life
Do you not see the disconnect between the reporting at the time, and the legislation to which you keep linking?
Do you expect ordinary Kiwis to read legislation? Really?
TUT aims are all post facto – i.e. they were not published prior to the legislation being passed. And are – as I've pointed out – in conflict with public assurances made by the lead negotiator (same person as is currently fronting for the TUT board)
You snooze, you lose.
Well it is the legislation that is used to guide the actions from 2014 on. Prior to 2014 when it was a National Park it was legislation that guided administrators. Land administrators would not look for guidance on land management from newspapers. Newspaper reports add colour, explanations that may or may not be correct but would not be relied on for legal guidance.
I am not reading that there was any commitment to keeping Te Urewera just exactly as it was when it was a NP. Everyone who had knowledge of how lands handed over to iwi as part of Treaty settlements would be naive to think that the land would remain exactly as it was.
From what I can see from looking at the press material it was access that was talked about at the time. Reading the website there is nothing there to suggest access is constrained. Huts do not equal access.
What I can see from reading the management plans is that there is a plan to remove old and unsafe huts. There seems to be a plan also to bring the admin down to a number that could be competently managed, to not spread themselves (the workcrew) too widely and thinly.
Many NZers read legislation. Every public servant that works in a Govt Dept reads 'their' legislation. Every accountant and accounts administrator reads tax legislation, HR practitioners look at the Health & Safety in Employment Act and legislation about Employment contracts etc, Health administrators read the health & disabilities act. Citizens Advice Bureau staff read legislation. You would be surprised at how many NZers read legislation in the course of their jobs & interest and would find no great hardship in looking at treaty legislation.
As I have said before the Treaty legislation is a particularly clear type of legislation.
Other people would go directly to the Tuhoe site to get the advice from that on what the plans are. Both legislation and management plans are better sites to gather info from than newspapers.
Maori had no obligation to parade their plans before settlement. They knew they would have legislation that would guide them, and that they had to abide by, a board with reps from conservation and management plans to guide day to day, year to year work.
I am willing to let people have a go, they now have had land and mana restored. I suggest it would be a good idea for others to do so too.
Even by contacting Tuhoe, going to their festival rather than moaning from a distance, visiting packing in and out if need be, going on the close at hand walks.
I have seen an unpleasant and anti-Maori side over this thread.
I have seen people who are unwilling to let go their prejudices, who rely utterly on MSM and on sniping from a distance.
This weekend is the 80th anniversary of the battle of El Alamein. This WW2 desert battle was one where NZ troops featured against the Nazis…..Rommel. The Maori Battalion played a distinguished role in this battle. I had a father who fought alongside them & Australians in this particular battle against fascism. Maori fought so all of us as NZers could live our lives gently and peacefully.
Maori are not the enemy.
Please learn to live with them gently, respectfully and peacefully. Please learn discernment in what you read. Newspapers/media are here to make money, they do this by exploiting and click baiting. Go to the source rather than let it be interpreted for you.
This actually is a specious linking.
This has nothing to do with a Treaty claim.
It involves land taken under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act something could happen to Pakeha. The occupants refuse to move. The occupants seem to identify as Maori. Thye have fought a case against removal to the maori Land court and lost.
Please, what is the point of link other than the race of the people involved? Or is it just blatant smearing and diverting?
This case does not bolster your claim:
It seems to have worked well with the Police doing their job, with the person against whom the orders being taken having the chance to have the case looked at. All this in a country where we have operated very well using the Westminster system of justice.
You are missing the point. Everything, when its comes to our laws, seems to have flexibility when it comes to Maoridom for a number of reasons:
1- Organisations and government departments are unsure of their legal footing with regards to their actions. Especially as these departments have solid indoctrination processes into Maori Tikanga.
2- The Police are loathed to deal with things Maori for fear of public condemnation, woke condemnation, the Race Relations Office and Maori condemnation. Apologies to all who didn't make the list.
3- UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. What does this mean for our laws?
''Please, what is the point of link other than the race of the people involved? Or is it just blatant smearing and diverting?''
''Nicholas and his wife do not recognise the Crown’s authority to take the family land''
''The local hapū has “unqualified sovereign jurisdiction” over the land, the signs say, and kaitiaki (guardians) “reserve the … right to remove any … aliens at any time.''
“All presumed claims of title or right in and over our whenua … are not recognised and thus have no validity.”
''When Nicholas was first served with an eviction notice in 2020, dozens of people – including gang members, activists, lawyers and politicians – descended on the land, vowing to stop the eviction, claiming it was Māori ancestral land.''
''Stuff revealed in 2018 that a police iwi liaison officer had got into hot water with her bosses for writing an opinion – later used by Nicholas in his appeals – that the land was Māori land.''
Shanreagh, I take a global approach. You should, too. This type of rhetoric is happening right across New Zealand. I think a Nat/ ACT government will bring things to a head.
So I stand by my original assertion:
We are heading into a future with no defining constitutional references.
Ok, what say I say the things that the Nicholas family says about their land, about my own land. I am a a criminal and I want no rates or planning. I am free to say it. I am free to assert what ever I like.
So I get convicted of a crime where the proceeds of crown recovery act applies. I still assert.
If however I lost a court case involving the land that is where my freedom to do whatever legal things on my land ends. I can continue occupy as some have done when subject to a mortgagee sale. I might even try my luck, if I was mad enough with the sovereign citizens mob. Basically a range of illegal or outside the state options exist.
The point is that it is not a specifically Maori thing to do all or any of these things.
I loathe the mindset that says it is just because Maori people are involved that they have special rights or do this or that and 'woe is me'. As I said before these people seem to have done a pretty good job of using all of the avenues our Westminster system of govt has given them. They have used the rules that Pakeha brought. Not with any success mind. Now they are asserting their right by staying. Occupations have been around for years.
I forsee a skirmish. It could easily have been a Pakeha facing this act.
The thought of a Nact govt makes shivers run up and down my spine. We have our people here we devise our own solutions. We have a Westminster based system of Govt, lets keep that working as it should.
I will leave things as they are – two differing opinions. People can make their own minds up. If however you want a reply, I will provide one.
Can we extend that agreeing to have differing opinions to Tuhoe and its ongoing management of Te Urewera.
That would be a big step forward.
It would mean instead of grumbling that things are not exactly the same as before 2014 we allow Tuhoe to have and implement its own plans for Te Urewera.
Some of these plans we may like others not so much.
Boris has withdrawn from his tilt at the UK Conservative leadership.
At this state, looks like a shoo-in for Sunak. I don't think that Mordaunt – has even passed the 100 supporters threshold.
https://7news.com.au/politics/world-politics/boris-johnson-withdraws-candidacy-to-become-uk-prime-minister-again-after-liz-truss-resignation-c-8639178
One wonders how much it cost Sunak to get boris to pull out?
Nothing. Boris didn't have the numbers (and both Sunak and Boris knew that was the case).
Much like the various contenders in our political parties who 'have a go' when a leadership contest happens – but quickly pull out when it's evident they don't have the support.
If you know you don't have the support, then going ahead with a bid for leadership is simply an exercise in humiliation – not many people are actually into public self-flagellation.
Today is Labour Day, it commemorates the struggle to define a work day as an eight hour stretch. Samuel Parnell is credited with forcing the issue in Aotearoa New Zealand as early as 1840. Labour day was first officially celebrated in 1890 and an elderly Parnell was able to attend the celebrations. The day itself is often seen as just another holiday but it also offers us the time to reflect on the philosophy behind worker struggles of history and their continued relevance today.
Very good Arkie. I am certainly grateful……though through the excesses of the neo-lib reforms it was difficult to maintain an 8 hour workday and even now in some places one is thought to be a good worker if you work longer than 8 hours unpaid. Sucked in to this for a period of time through from the 1980s……
In one workplace we decided to leave after 8 hours, but what happens when we get home, what do we do was the cry? Over that time the work got done, and many of us had gardens as we had never had before……, others did exercise. We were all much more productive as human beings, as people.
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/stigma-in-drug-research-holding-back-new-therapies
Ouch! Such inconvenient fact; the truth does hurt, sometimes.
A financial interest is the least of our worries. As we've found out, if a pharmacological health treatment can capture our media, government, and most industries then something is very, very wrong.
Why is that “very, very wrong”? You’ve explained nothing.
Australia sees rough weather and headwinds as it sets to announce its budget tomorrow.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-24/carparks-scrapped-road-upgrades-delayed-budget/101567982
Also learning from the mistakes from the UK were markets in the form of bond vigilantes will punish fiscal imprudence.Australia will still carry on with the Morrison tax cuts ( costing the budget 250b over 10 years) whilst hoping for revenue increases whilst mining revenues start to contract on risks of global recession.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-24/liz-truss-could-teach-jim-chalmers-tax-cuts/101567770
What is happening on the feeds? It looks like. Closing the Gap, Tracey Sharp is spamming the site
Looks like her site has been hacked.
You/we can turn off the feed if necessary …
left Lynn a note in the back end. Have turned the feed off. Can you see where to deleted the individual feeds? Not sure I want to press too many buttons.
Under Feed Items you can select and move to Trash 🙂