Written By:
- Date published:
11:23 am, October 4th, 2024 - 12 comments
Categories: Christopher Luxon, health, nz first -
Tags:
The details of the mysterious papers that Casey Costello relied on to overrule Official advice on decision to cut taxes on Heated Tobacco Products so that Philip Morris could get a $216 million tax cut have been disclosed.
The papers do not support Costello’s claim about them. And they call into question her suitability to be a Minister.
From Russell Palmer at Radio New Zealand:
The Associate Health Minister Casey Costello’s “independent advice” on heated tobacco products is five articles that are either about different products, outdated, or only offer weak support for her view.
The five documents are not decisive on the benefits of the products.
They include:
- A 190-page report from Royal College of Physicians in the UK, published in 2016 that does not specifically mention heated tobacco products
- An article from the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) in 2022, suggesting HTPs may help with smoking cessation, but the benefits are reduced if HTPs are used as a replacement for less-harmful vaping, and warns it could encourage non-smokers to use tobacco or lead former smokers to relapse
- A 2016 article (IJERPH) indicating the use of a different tobacco product, Snus, ‘appears to facilitate’ smoking cessation in Sweden
- A 2020 article (IJERPH) about smoking patterns in Japan – where nicotine vaping is not used – showing cigarette sales decreased after the introduction of Heated Tobacco Products
The final article was a comment piece published in the Lancet.
A more recent report from the Royal College of Physicians also says the tobacco industry’s claims heated tobacco products are less harmful than cigarettes is “not yet supported by independent evidence”.
The 2022 article also highlights that while substantial research has been devoted to nicotine vaping products, “much less is known about HTPs”.
“Better information is needed to more precisely define the health risks of HTPs compared to cigarettes and NVPs, the relative appeal of HTPs to consumers, and the likelihood of later transitioning to smoking or quitting all products,” it states.
Labour’s Ayesha Verrall has gone on the offensive. Again from Radio New Zealand:
Labour’s Ayesha Verrall told RNZ it showed Costello could not be trusted, and should be sacked.
“There are many things that Ministers are expected by Cabinets to have worked out for themselves, and when they put assurances in paper to Cabinet about the work they have done to justify the paper they’re bringing, that will be taken on trust by their colleagues.
“What the minister has shown here is that her assurance cannot be trusted, and that comes back to Christopher Luxon. Is he going to accept someone who basically prints some junk off the internet as a justification for a $216 million tax cut, being part of his Cabinet?”
I am still shaking my head about this. From what I can tell Costello’s highest qualification was obtained at Police College. Medical science is really detailed and contested and there is nothing to suggest that she has the Intellectual rigour to properly analyse what she is reading. And she has racist tendancies as shown by her support for Hobson’s Pledge. There is an inverse correltation between intelligence and holding racist beliefs.
Her level of intellectual rigour is such that she does not appear to appreciate that her judgment is inferior to that of people who spend their professional lives keeping on top of the literature. And she was willing to bypass them and exclude them from her decision making.
And even if there is merit in using HTPs to reduce smoking there is no guarantee that the way she has done it will actually make the products cheaper or more accessible. Philip Morris could just pocket the extra profit.
This highlights Christopher Luxon’s lax control over his ministers not to mention the very poor quality of Ministers that he has. If this was Helen Clark’s Government Costello would be out.
Should that be 'have been disclosed' rather than 'have not been disclosed'?
[Oops. Now corrected – MS]
PM Baldrick Luxon is playing “I know nothink…” because he lacks courage, is not well suited to politics, and yet knows exactly what will happen if Mrs Costello is sacked–Winston will be at his door…carrying a (figurative) baseball bat with spikes…
Remember when Clare Curran got relentlessly hounded for alleged diary discrepancies for one pathetic meeting with a media figure? Nothing compared to what this Minister has been up to, arrogantly securing millions for her Tobacco mates and potentially endangering thousands of NZ peoples health, in a very unsophisticated way.
Too easy..
.
@drayeshaverrall
Costello’s bid for a $216M tax break for Philip Morris was approved by Cabinet, but it turns out the only evidence she had was a bunch of irrelevant papers and an op ed.
Time to break out the epidemiology PhD and Costello’s so called “independent advice” … cracks knuckles. đ§”1/8
https://xcancel.com/drayeshaverrall/status/1841745561697059310
Whenever someone says "they did their own research" an alarm bell rings inside my head.
Big Tobacco Farm funded research?
Wot really happened:
A Phillip Morris executive called Costello – "Look, we've got a shed load of these HTP which are not moving. How about giving a bit of an incentive for
mugspeople to buy them?"Costello – "Will do, I'll persuade Luxon to offer a tax break, he's a sucker for any line of non-reasoning which doesn't affect his bottom line. If nothing else, you'll make a tidy bit on the side, and I know you'll remember me when I 'retire' from politics."
Political commentators: "Where is the evidence on which you based this tax break?"
Costello to emotional junior staffer: "Quickly, search the internet for anything that backs up my position!"
And the rest, as they say, is history!
Was Minister Costello ever asked when she did this research, even down to the individual papers/reports, especially when compared to the timeline of her decision-making process?
In other words, what actual evidence influenced her decision/s?
Was she asked what reports and evidence was she offered or made aware of, before the decision being made, that she did not read?
Does this explain why she initially refused to show these papers /reports? She’d not read them and needed time to amass some ‘evidence’?
An unsavoury situation. It is a digital world now, Governments and Parliamentary political parties have procedures and things like Cabinet Manuals and so on. So unless you are delivering a ransom note or something, random pieces of paper do not cut it in serious politics.
Mrs Costello’s document handling practices are apparently under review by the Parliamentary Archivist. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/528429/chief-ombudsman-criticises-costello-over-withholding-tobacco-documents
I can't see her lasting until Christmas tbh.
Ordinarily I would agree with you. But we are in strange times.
If we had a leader with a hint of a spine, some political nous and ability to read the room, she'd be gone. But we've got Luxon.
If she was a National MP, she would have probably been booted from Cabinet.
But she isn't. And under our Luxon who clearly was willing to give up nearly everything to be PM, she may hang on.
Time will tell I guess. Probably even Peters is finding her to be an embarrassment. So, might be quicker than what you think.
Corruption Costello is clearly not fit to be a Minister (or an MP). But like Seymour, McKee, Jones etc she knows under this corrupt coalition with it's shallow, incompetent PM she and they are untouchable.
Unless the pressure builds to cancer drug funding levels.