Bigot’s Billboard
Written By:
- Date published:
8:58 am, October 2nd, 2018 - 284 comments
Categories: accountability, class war, community democracy, health, science, scoundrels -
Tags: health, vaccination
Anti-science group WAVESnz have paid for a huge billboard on Auckland’s Southern motorway attacking children’s right to be healthy.
The billboard, near the off ramp to Middlemore hospital, is intended to scare young parents off from vaccinating their children. Curiously, it appears to be pitched at fathers rather than mothers.
The image is of a tattooed man holding a baby. The tattoo, which has a generic Polynesian motif, also contains English words that may refer to fatherhood. At a guess, the folk at WAVESnz think that Polynesian and Maori men have control over their women, so it’s best to target them. This is a cynical switch from this group, whose website is generously illustrated with photos of happy white folk.
Dr Grant Jacobs has a terrific critique of the damage this billboard is intended to do on his Code for Life blog. It’s well worth a read.
And Emma Espiner is using Twitter to organise against ignorance here.
The Advertising Standards Authority regulates billboards. You can lay a formal complaint here.
In general, the anti-vaxx billboard is misleading, which is a breach in itself. However, if you are minded to contact the ASA, you might point out that the billboard breaches the ‘Special Duty of Care’ in the code that covers advertising that impacts children.
Specifically, advertisers that use children have a responsibility to ensure advertising is not likely to result in physical, mental or moral harm.
It only takes a few minutes to fill in the ASA complaint form and help end ignorance. Do it for the kids, OK?
UPDATE: Ad-Vantage Media director Duncan Harris has said the billboard would be removed on Tuesday afternoon.
Immunisation Advisory Centre research director Dr Helen Petousis-Harris says on the Stuff website that the billboard perpetuated the myth there are concealed issues with what’s in vaccines, which was absolutely misleading.
Petousis-Harris said the billboard had the potential to impact public health. She also noted its placement in south Auckland targets vulnerable communities who “bear the biggest burden of these infectious diseases”.
“[For] people who are already a little bit hesitant or might have some concerns, this has the capacity to reinforce those ideas and make them nervous … they’re the ones who will be most impacted by this kind of messaging”.
Thanks to all TS readers who took the time to email the ASA. Quick, effective activism. We need more of that.
284 comments on “Bigot’s Billboard ”
- Comments are now closed
- Comments are now closed
CommentsOpinions
Recent Comments
FeedsPartyGovtMedia
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #47 2024
Open access notables Projected increase in the frequency of extremely active Atlantic hurricane seasons, Lopez et al., Science Advances: Future changes to the year-to-year swings between active and inactive North Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) seasons have received little attention, yet may have great societal implications in areas prone to hurricane ...5 hours ago - Chicken Kiev
Chatting in the supermarket this morning, I found I needed to lunge for the chicken drumsticks.Coping mechanisms: who hasn’t felt a greater need for them lately?When it all gets too much, I turn to demonstrating handy butchery hacks.It wasn’t that she’d said anything wrong, our friend, not at all. We ...8 hours ago - The year is 2024 and it’s 1984
This is written in response to the highly significant open letter from a group of economists that was today addressed to Christopher Luxon. The year is 2024, and it’s 1984. The country is reeling from a record Olympic medal gold haul, while the globe grapples with the choice of the ...9 hours ago - The IPCA has failed
Back in 2022, RNZ took an in-depth look at the "Independent" Police Conduct Authority and its handling of killings by police. These are the most serious test of oversight, and you would expect the police's use of lethal force to receive the most severe scrutiny. But despite the police regularly ...13 hours ago - Thursday 21 November 2024
The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti arrived at Parliament on Tuesday – the size is being debated but estimates range from 42,000 to 100,000. The Prime Minister is defending not attending due to some of the organisers being affiliated with Te Pāti Māori. The national gang patch ban came into force ...13 hours ago - ‘These budget cuts are counter-productive and make no sense’
I spoke to former Productivity Chair Nana this morning about the letter he and a group of other economists sent to PM Christopher Luxon to urge the Government to urgently suspend cuts to spending and investment for the sake of the economy, struggling businesses and the wellbeing of vulnerable ...15 hours ago - ACT’s Astroturfing & A Co-ordinated Attack on Te Pati Māori
Unity on the Streets / Unity at the TableAfter the Hīkoi, all three right wing Coalition leaders came together to push the idea that the 42,000 - 50,000 + strong Hikoi was somehow less potent and brave, and more illegitimate than the energy and crowd displayed.Prime Minister Christopher Luxon 20-November: ...16 hours ago - Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for stabilizing temperatures
This is a re-post from the Climate Brink The world is emitting over 40 gigatons of CO2 per year, contributing to an accelerating warming of the planet. The world needs to cut emissions rapidly to be remotely on track to meet our Paris Agreement goals of limiting warming to well-below 2C, and we ...16 hours ago
- I Love My Leather Jacket
I wear my leather jacket like a great big hugRadiating charm - a living cloak of luckIt's the only concrete link with an absent friendIt's a symbol I can wear 'till we meet againOr it's a weight around my neck while the owner's freeBoth protector and reminder of mortalityIt's a ...17 hours ago - Throwback Thursday: Will “Auckland Transport” Survive?
With Auckland Transport’s future up in the air under Mayor Wayne Brown’s proposed CCO reform, we’ve dug way back into the archives, to unearth this post originally published in March 2010. As you’ll see, many of the debates that were being had when AT was first proposed continue to ...17 hours ago - Economists call on PM to suspend budget cuts for the sake of the economy
Nicola Willis’ budget cuts are under fire from economists for having no clear rationale and worsening the recession. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 21: The news at ...18 hours ago
- The end of policing by consent
National has appointed a new police commissioner. And he explicitly rejects policing by consent: Asked if he subscribed to policing by consent, he said he did not. “I don’t talk about policing by consent. I talk about trust and confidence, and it is fundamentally important that the police have ...1 day ago
- The Treaty Principles Bill: A Who’s Who
David Horatio Waterbed SeymourFringe politician and dweeb transformed successfully by ThinkTank money into a well-oiled soundbite robot.Currently programmed to say: Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Was previously programmed to say:I am a proud libertarian andI am a ...1 day ago - Kinleith mill closure shows need for industrial strategy
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to deliver an economic and industrial strategy for regional manufacturing, rather than just expressing sympathy for job losses, following the announced closure of Kinleith mill in Tokoroa. “The closure Kinleith mill in Tokoroa is not just devastating for ...1 day ago
- 27% of kids going hungry, up from 21% in a year
One in four Kiwi children live in households where food runs out often or sometimes. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, November 20: The lead: The official annual Health Survey found sharp ...2 days ago - Transport modelling is an illusion
This guest post by Tim Adriaansen, an advocate for accessibility and sustainable transport, originally published on LinkedIn and cross posted here with permission. People prefer cars, right? Probably not. Here’s why. Granted, most people in English-speaking countries use a car to get around. This simple reality underpins our transport ...2 days ago
- Young Maori take over
Neither Wellington nor Parliament has ever seen anything like it before. The Police said there were more than 40,000 but however many there were, yesterday’s Hikoi to Parliament was a monumental event. It was almost three times the Foreshore and Seabed martch of 2004 and many,many times bigger than ...2 days ago - Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Aftermath
The euphoria from yesterday’s hikoi may be transitory, but is no less valuable for that. It is pretty rare for the left to feel itself to be in the overwhelming majority, and speaking as the voice of the people. Lest that momentum be lost, the organisers will no doubt be ...2 days ago - Sabin 33 #3 – Solar panels generate too much waste and will overwhelm landfills
On November 1, 2024 we announced the publication of 33 rebuttals based on the report "Rebutting 33 False Claims About Solar, Wind, and Electric Vehicles" written by Matthew Eisenson, Jacob Elkin, Andy Fitch, Matthew Ard, Kaya Sittinger & Samuel Lavine and published by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia ...2 days ago
- What’s the time Mr Seymour?
Mr David Seymour crawling up to the ceilingThe sun don't shine the sun don't shine the sun don't shine at allMamma Pappa say you should go to school, I don't know what forNow that I've grown up and seen the world and all its liesSong: Southside of Bombay"Ake, ake, ake" ...2 days ago - Submit to defend te Tiriti!
The Justice Committee has called for submissions on National's racist and constitutionally radical Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill. Submissions can be made at the link above or by post, and are due by Tuesday, 7 January 2025. But I'd get in quick, in case National grows a spine ...2 days ago
- We need to talk about Kevin
All happy families are alike; each unhappy family has a Drunk Uncle Kevin in there somewhere. If your Kevin is anything like the ones I know, he was getting along happily enough without having to think too much about the Treaty Principles Bill apart from bloody good job, onya guys ...2 days ago - The hikoi
Like everyone else (everyone who wasn't there, anyway), I've spent the morning watching the hikoi march on Parliament. The pictures are astounding: parliament grounds and the surrounding streets are full, and there are still people backed up along Lambton Quay. The police are estimating 35,000 people, and that's a floor ...2 days ago
- Why Govt & NZ Inc should boycott & regulate Facebook
3 days ago - How should we talk about change?
A better world isn’t just possible, it’s desirable. And that’s how we should frame a lot of our conversations around making a greater Auckland. As an example take urban climate action. A climate friendly Auckland: Is free from congestion Enables people to travel how they choose Is filled with ...3 days ago
- AMA + Holiday Webworm Merch!
3 days ago - Discount Code for Webworm Merch!
Hi,So there’s a bunch of new stuff on the Webworm store (www.webworm.store) — just in time for the Holidays. Read more ...3 days ago - Trying to defuse the tension
There were urgent moves yesterday at Parliament to try and defuse the tension building up over ACT’s Treaty Principles Bill. The Bill’s author, ACT leader David Seymour, told reporters that he understood the Justice Select Committee met yesterday to discuss how long it should take to consider submissions on the ...3 days ago
- An Irritable NZ Pawn – David Seymour Admits Treaty Principles Bill will clear the way for deve...
3 days ago - Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Arrival, And Tyler Childers
Politicians like to bang on all about the need to heal society’s racial/economic divisions, but in their actions they’re more keen on stoking those divisions, with the Treaty Principles Bill being the classic example. The Bill seeks to dilute the Crown’s responsibilities to Māori at the same time as it ...3 days ago
- Socially Backwards and Fiscally Forwards: the False Ideological Divide and the “Conservative” Li...
3 days ago - Kaamos: Accepted
I appreciate that A Phuulish Fellow has been fairly quiet recently. That’s a combination of two things – comparatively little in the way of relevant material to discuss (at least until The War of the Rohirrim comes out next month), and my general work on The Secret Non-Fiction Writing Project. ...3 days ago - Here’s how governments could fix their Paris climate commitment failures
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Governments around the world face a conundrum. Virtually none are on track to meet their Paris climate commitments. That includes the United States, which committed to cut its emissions at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 but is only on track for 32-43% cuts ...3 days ago
- Unstoppable.
3 days ago - Katherine Trebeck – An Alternative Economic Narrative
The era of neoliberalism has been destructive on so many levels, with a huge growth in wealth and privilege for the one percent. A hollowing out of the state; fraying of the safety net; inadequate government investment in infrastructure; and continued environmental degradation has resulted in damage on a vast ...4 days ago - In a Manner of Speaking
In a manner of speakingI just want to sayThat I could never forget the wayYou told me everythingBy saying nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me everythingSongwriter: Winston TongNext Tuesday, the subscription price for Nick’s Kōrero will ...4 days ago - Monday 18 November 2024
The NZNO have announced a nationwide strike for December over its pay dispute with Health NZ, who have put a 1 per cent cap on pay rises. The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti and Treaty Principles Bill remain front and centre in the media, with the impacts of the Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke-led ...4 days ago
- Shipley warns Seymour’s bill is ‘inviting civil war’
The divisive Treaty Principles Bill is not just a risk for the National Party, it’s a risk to civil order and unity, warns a National Party grandee. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on ...4 days ago - A clearer network for the City Rail Link?
This post was originally published on Linked In by Nicolas Reid. It is republished here with permission. Auckland is now just a year or so away from having the keystone of its urban rail network complete. As I wrote about here, the City Rail Link will be a literal game changer for ...4 days ago
- National’s support base is wobbling
If ACT leader David Seymour intended the Treaty Principles Bill to drive a wedge into National’s support base, he may well already be succeeding. By midnight on Thursday after the Maori Party haka in Parliament, National MPs were being deluged with emails and messages from their members calling them out ...4 days ago
- 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #46
A listing of 33 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, November 10, 2024 thru Sat, November 16, 2024. Story of the week Our Story of the Week is completely "meta" (no, not that Meta). It's about our exploring how ...4 days ago
- Grifter Eftpos Tamaki at it again
..Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Self-appointed “Bishop” and proto-fascist, Brian Tamaki was at it again on 16 November, blocking Auckland’s southern motorway, SH1.This time, the target of his ire wasn’t the Civil Unions Act; covid lock-downs; mask mandates; or ...4 days ago - Rip up a bill, lead a haka are words to live by
I cannot stop grabbing people by the lapels, or shoulders, or similar, and raving at them about the tiny miracles in my ears.I can hear again! There could not be a more satisfied customer in all the world.In a noisy cafe I am even catching words that Karren cannot, she ...5 days ago - Unintended Consequences
Take the baitYou pay the priceIt's much too lateFor good adviceYou know and I know that our good things' throughBecause there's consequences for what we doConsequences for me and youWriters: Kevin Robert Hayes, David Nagier, Bonnie Adele Hayes.Fallout from the first readingOne News began last night by saying that tens ...6 days ago - Thank you, driver!
Today, Saturday 16th of November, is Auckland Transport’s Bus Driver Appreciation Day! Saturday 16 November marks the third annual Auckland Transport (AT) ‘Bus Driver Appreciation Day’, and this year we are encouraging all of New Zealand to thank their driver or let the bus go first if you are in ...6 days ago
- Totally Normal: Holiday Edition
Hi,If I was to accurately sum up my mental state over the week, I’d just say that I got a huge fright from my own shadow.I’d nipped out for an 11pm neighborhood stroll, just to calm down after a day of stress and screens. The Cure and Fazerdaze’s new record ...6 days ago - We Are Not Listening
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
6 days ago - More lawlessness from National
On Tuesday, sick of government stonewalling, the Waitangi Tribunal issued a rare court order, ordering the Minister of Health to release unredacted documents within 48 hours showing its reasoning for disestablishing Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority. The government's response to the lawful order of a court? Yeah, ...6 days ago
- National’s tyrannical “foreign interference” law
Yesterday, under cover the the biggest political fight of the year, National quietly - covertly, even - introduced anti-foreign interference legislation. The bill is the product of a years-long work-program aimed at countering shit like this and this, and there's unquestionably a need to do something to counter foreign states' ...6 days ago
- The Haka Represents The Best Of Us
A few months ago, I was in an audience watching a Haka-Kapa and as I watched children dance and sing and sway and shout and beat, I couldn’t help but think “The Haka represents the best of us.”Yes, yes - there will be a thousand voices that rush forth to ...7 days ago
- Adding up the climate cost
St Mary’s Bay housing left hanging: Climate risk is systemically underestimated in the climate scenarios used by central banks, and a new report warns 10,000 houses are set to become uninsurable in Aotearoa. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, here’s the top six news items of note in ...7 days ago
- Auckland chafing at Bishop’s housing intensification orders
One of the major problems the Government has in implementing its ‘going for housing growth’ strategy is that it isn’t giving much funding help to councils. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and ...7 days ago - Friday 15 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill continues to dominate political news, with it passing its first reading in the House. Parliament was briefly suspended and Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for 24 hours after leading a haka that was joined by opposition MPs and the public in the gallery. Willie ...7 days ago
- Weekly Roundup 15-November-2024
Happy Friday, welcome to another round-up of interesting stories about what’s happening in Auckland and other cities. Feel free to add your links in the comments! This post, like all our work, is brought to you by a largely volunteer crew and made possible by generous donations from our readers ...7 days ago
- Are We The Waiting?
And screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingAnd screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingForget me nots, second thoughts live in isolationHeads or tails and fairy tales in my mindAre we we are, are we we are the waiting unknownThe rage and love, the ...7 days ago - The Hoon around the week to November 15
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on the latest climate news, including from COP29 this week; on the US Presidential elections, Israel vs Gaza/Iran/Lebanon, Ukraine/Nato vs Russia/North ...7 days ago
- First Tea and Toast, now Milo — why do NZ’s best beverages need so much defending?
Only two months ago, Nicola Willis had to step in to stop Health New Zealand cutting tea and toast for post-birth parents, and now Lester Levy is riding to the rescue with a welcome message for all: our health workers can once again drink Milo, and will no longer need ...7 days ago - Gordon Campbell on the folly of making apologies in a social vacuum.
Day One of the Treaty Principles Bill…and everyone got what they wanted, and did what they liked. Heated words were exchanged. Culturally appropriate acts of outrage were performed. David Seymour got to play the victim card. Willie Jackson got kicked out of class. A comically red-faced Mr Speaker bellowed “Order, ...1 week ago
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #46 2024
Open access notables Microbial solutions must be deployed against climate catastrophe, Peixoto et al., Nature Communications [comment]: The climate crisis is escalating. A multitude of microbe-based solutions have been proposed, and these technologies hold great promise and could be deployed along with other climate mitigation strategies. However, these solutions have ...1 week ago
- The PM gets some extremely valuable legal advice for free
You can pay a great deal of money for the services of a KC. So just what would some peerless legal writing from 40 or so of them be worth, do you reckon?Priceless, that’s what. It’s not even the half of it, but this is my favourite part of the ...1 week ago - D-day for the government
The government's Treaty Principles Bill is up for its first reading today - bought forward in a rush in a desperate effort to avoid the hikoi which is currently marching on Wellington. But the Prime Minister won’t be there for it – he’s literally running away to Peru! But he ...1 week ago
- 97% of submissions did not want no-cause evictions, Trump chooses a Russian spy for US Intelligence ...
Good morning, and I’m sorry I’ve been away for a couple of days.I’ve been focusing on the Hikoi, and also testing out sentiment on the Treaty Principles Bill. It’s complicated, and the Treaty Principles Bill will be debated in the House today. The Government’s own lawyers have told them the ...1 week ago - Government must vote down ACT Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to vote down an ACT Party Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights by making it easier for employers to fire workers. Last week ACT MP Laura Trask’s Employment Relations (Termination of Employment by Agreement) Amendment Bill was ...1 week ago
- Seymour causes thousands of unjustified absences by forcing kids to fight for their rights instead o...
The State would like to remind you that they are in control. They manage your employment prospects, and can destroy the job market you and yours rely on by mass-cancelling construction projects, cutting funding, and firing a good chunk of our public servants. They wield the mechanisms that provide scrutiny ...1 week ago - The Weight of the World
As the weight of the world Hangs on your shoulders The weight of the world Starts to take over again And over again All that you once loved, now you hate So slowly relearn how to meditate To have and to hold And never let go Can you feel it ...1 week ago - Thursday 14 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill is set to have its First Reading in the House today, as the Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti continues. More than 40 KCs have written to the Prime Minister and Attorney-General outlining their “grave concerns” about the substance of the Treaty Principles Bill, while an academic and ...1 week ago
- Trump’s return to White House brings the climate’s ‘find out’ phase closer
As we absorb the news of Trump's victory in the US Presidential election, here’s a wrap compiled just before the result of what it might mean for climate action: The UN Secretary General says the prospective departure of the United States would cripple the Paris Agreement, likening it to the ...1 week ago
- Time and Space in the City Centre
Patrick Reynolds is deputy chair of the City Centre Advisory Panel. The header image is from Walthamstow, London The city centre now has a few stretches of street where the space has been repurposed to a people and place focused design from full time traffic use. These are a great ...1 week ago
- An opportunity for a pro-growth tax switch
As the Hikoi against it swells into the tens of thousands, KCs call on National to kill off ACT’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 14: The ...1 week ago - Dealing to the big Aussie banks
The big question hovering over the Select Committee Inquiry into banking is what the Government will do with its findings. If yesterday’s hearing is anything to go by there is a tidal wave of discontent about the four big Australian Banks crashing through the Committee which may force it to ...1 week ago
- 20 fact briefs published in collaboration with Gigafact!
In April 2024 we announced the (renewed) collaboration between Gigafact and Skeptical Science to create fact briefs, short but credibly sourced summaries that offer “yes/no” answers in response to claims found online. Our initial plan had been to publish one fact brief per week on Saturdays but - as happens ...1 week ago
- Instead of axing the HRC, ACT corruptly installed a racist, transphobic “Gay Human Rights Commissi...
On November 5th, the Spinoff published a very interesting article on Stephen Rainbow, the Human Rights Commission’s latest recruitment, and how he came to get the controversial appointment. Naturally because of the excitement of the US election, it’s flown a little below the radar. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/05-11-2024/i-didnt-get-the-hrc-job-stephen-rainbows-human-rights-commission-appointment-just-got-weirderThe article details evidence of the ...1 week ago - Injustice for torture
Between 1950 and 1993 the New Zealand government tortured and abused up to 250,000 children in residential care facilities. Yesterday, following formal findings from a royal commission, it finally apologised for that abuse. The next step is redress and restitution - compensating the surviving victims for the appalling harm they ...1 week ago
- Voices echo
1 week ago - Hīkoi over the Harbour
Kia mau ra, kia mau raKi te mana motuhakeMe te arohaHold fast, hold fastTo your sovereigntyAnd to love and compassionLyrics: Hīrini Melbourne. “Ngā Iwi E passionately calls for unity among the peoples of the Pacific, a cause deeply cherished by Melbourne himself.”I sat at my desk this morning and thought ...1 week ago
- NZ’s global climate rankings plummet as Govt removes agriculture from ETS
The Government has passed legislation to remove agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) while Aotearoa’s reputation on climate action plummets. ...7 hours ago - Failed boot camp experiment must end
As legislation to set up boot camps passed its first reading, the Green Party urged the Government to abandon this failed policy experiment for the good of our rangatahi. ...8 hours ago
- Gender-affirming care must centre evidence and health needs, not political posturing
The Ministry of Health has today released an evidence brief regarding the use of puberty blockers in gender-affirming healthcare, amid moves by the government to limit access. ...9 hours ago
- Release: National doesn’t care about manufacturing
The National Government is walking away from our manufacturing sector with constant reports of closures and job losses. ...10 hours ago - Release: David Parker speech – Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change
David Parker's speech from the University of Auckland's forum on Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change in September 2024. ...10 hours ago
- Release: Youth mental wellbeing no longer a priority for Child Poverty Minister
Louise Upston has revealed her diminished vision for vulnerable youth against a backdrop of snubbed advice, scrapped priorities, shifted goal posts and thousands more children projected to fall into poverty. ...12 hours ago
- Release: National’s lack of climate action taking NZ backwards
National Government’s backward-looking climate policy has seen New Zealand fall seven places on the Climate Change Performance Index to 41 out of 63 countries measured. ...12 hours ago
- Release: Simple reason for drop in emergency housing
When the Government says it has reduced the number of people in emergency housing, what it means is it is stopping people from accessing it in the first place. ...15 hours ago
- Govt’s child wellbeing strategy ‘shallow and shameful’
The Government is turning its back on children by not only weakening child poverty reduction targets, but also removing child mental wellbeing as a priority focus in their Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy. ...15 hours ago
- Release: A historic win for Samoan communities
Labour warmly welcomes the Restoring Samoan Citizenship Bill as it passes its third reading, before becoming law. ...16 hours ago
- Government plan to reinstate live animal exports a “national disgrace”
The Government has taken a giant step backwards by reinstating live animal exports. ...1 day ago
- Pasifika justice as Member’s Bill passes final reading
Teanau Tuiono’s Member’s Bill, the Citizenship (Western Samoa Restoration) Amendment Bill, has passed its third reading and will become law. ...1 day ago
- Release: Minister of Education thinks New Zealand ends at the Bombay Hills
The Minister of Education has shown complete disregard for rural communities and their school bus routes in Question Time today. ...1 day ago
- Economists sound alarm on Government’s slash-and-burn approach
A group of prominent economists has released an open letter to the Government, raising grave concerns about the far-reaching consequences of its fiscal policy. ...1 day ago
- Release: Smoking numbers up under Costello’s watch
National’s repeal of Labour’s smokefree legislation has taken New Zealand further away from achieving a Smokefree 2025 and a smokefree generation. ...2 days ago
- Release: Call for Palestine recognition by NZ, Australian and Canadian MPs
Parliamentarians from Australia, Canada and New Zealand have written an open letter to their respective Prime Ministers calling on them to recognise Palestine. ...2 days ago
- Justice Select Committee opens floor for Treaty Principles submissions
Today, the Justice Select Committee has decided to officially open submissions for the controversial Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Power of the people on full display as hīkoi approaches Parliament
Today, Hīkoi mō te Tiriti arrived in Wellington, with thousands gathering to march in unity against the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Hypocrisy as Te Whatu Ora contractor bill balloons
Te Whatu Ora’s bill for contracting and consulting staff has ballooned by nearly 20 percent under the National Government, breaking a promise they made during the election campaign to cut contractors. ...4 days ago
- Release: Growing pressure to scrap Section 7AA Repeal Bill
The newly released Section 7AA Repeal Bill's select committee report is further evidence that the Government should scrap it. ...4 days ago
- Government’s move to monetise access to nature a slippery slope
The Green Party is voicing serious concerns over the Government’s proposal to charge for access to public conservation land, released today. ...7 days ago
- Green Party condemns the passage of Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party condemns the passing of the Treaty Principles Bill at first reading, and is clear that the fight is not over. ...1 week ago
- Stand Up for Te Tiriti
Te Tiriti o Waitangi is our country’s founding document. It forms the basis of the relationship between Māori and the Crown – and the Aotearoa New Zealand we live in today. ...1 week ago
- Release: Over 15,000 sign Labour’s open letter to Luxon
As the hīkoi to Parliament continues, Labour has sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in a last-ditch attempt to get him to kill the Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Fast Track Bill threatens environment, climate and reputation
The fast-track legislation passing its second reading in Parliament is another step towards environmental ruin. ...1 week ago
- Greens join King’s Counsel in calling for Treaty Principles Bill to be abandoned
The Prime Minister must answer the call from a group of senior lawyers of the King’s Counsel to abandon the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Chris Hipkins’ apology statement to state and faith-based care survivors
...1 week ago
- Release: Labour formally apologises to state and faith-based care survivors
Labour joins with the Government in unreservedly apologising for the abuse, neglect and trauma including torture in state and faith-based care and for ignoring the voices of survivors for too long. ...1 week ago
- Green Party stands in support of survivors of abuse in care
Today, the Green Party stands alongside the survivors of abuse in state care and faith-based care as the Government issues an historic apology. ...1 week ago
- Green Party calls for conscience vote on Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party has written to the Speaker of the House requesting he enable a personal vote on the Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Govt move to exclude journalist risks chilling effect
The Green Party is alarmed by the Government’s move to exclude a journalist from covering this week’s apology for the survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care. ...1 week ago
- Without action, an apology will be empty air
For tomorrow’s apology to survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care to hold any water, the Government must not pursue the same policies that drove the abuse in the first place. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Concerns remain over tobacco interference
Concerns about the tobacco industry’s ability to interfere in government policy making remain, despite the inability of the Office of the Auditor-General to investigate the Government’s decision to halve the excise tax on heated tobacco products. ...2 weeks ago
- Urgent wake-up call on climate
The Climate Change Commission’s latest advice indicates Aotearoa needs to be stepping up on climate action. ...2 weeks ago
- Green MP’s Meme-ber’s Bill set to save the world
Break out the punchlines and dust off your meme folder: Green Party MP Kahurangi Carter’s Copyright (Parody and Satire) Amendment Bill was pulled from the Ballot yesterday. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Poroporoaki: Ta Robert (Bom) Gillies
Kua hinga te manawa kairākau o Te Rua Tekau Ma Waru Tiwhatiwha te po! Kakarauru i te po! Ka rapuhia kei hea koe kua riro! Haere e te Ika a Whiro ki o tini hoa kua ngaro atu ki te Pō ...2 weeks ago
- Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principles Bill
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principle...
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- NZ must pursue independent foreign policy
The Green Party says the need is greater than ever for Aotearoa New Zealand to pursue an independent foreign policy. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Winston Peters must apologise
The Deputy Prime Minister should apologise to the public servant he named and blamed for something they did not do, and for misusing the rules of Parliament. ...2 weeks ago
- Government action provides Southland farmers more time to meet plan requirements
The Government is taking action to ensure Southland farmers and growers are not affected by unreasonable regional farm plan deadlines, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard say.“Cabinet has agreed to provide more time for farmers and growers to comply with regional rules ...8 hours ago - Bill reaffirms Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending
The Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Bill had its first reading at Parliament today. The Bill reaffirms the Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending, Minister for Children Karen Chhour says. “In recent years we have seen an unacceptable spike in youth offending. “This Bill makes ...9 hours ago
- Critical milestones for earthquake buildings review
Fairer, more sensible rules about managing earthquake risks are a step closer with the passing of legislation and the appointment of an independent chair to provide expert advice, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The Government is committed to reinvigorating our cities and regions to support economic growth, ...9 hours ago
- State of the art radiology machine for Auckland
People in Northland and Auckland will benefit from a new machine for cancer treatment installed at the Regional Cancer and Blood Service at Auckland City Hospital. The MV5 linear accelerator, or LINAC machine, officially opened today targets cancer tumours with pinpoint accuracy. Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says this new, ...10 hours ago
- Foreign Minister to visit Europe
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Europe for high-level talks with France, Germany and the United Kingdom next week. "Since taking office almost a year ago, the Coalition Government has emphasised the importance we place on New Zealand's traditional and likeminded diplomatic and ...10 hours ago
- First arrests made under gang patch ban
Police have made their first arrests under the new gang patch legislation, with two gang members arrested, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “Just before 11 this morning, Police in Wairoa apprehended a gang member for wearing a patch to the supermarket. He has been arrested and will now face enforcement ...11 hours ago
- Better support for victims of sexual violence
The Government is proposing two major changes to name suppression laws that will put the views of victims of sexual violence first, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “We are committed to restoring law and order and these two proposed changes will help ensure the victims of crime are put at ...12 hours ago
- Government moving forward with Regional Deals
Cabinet has agreed to invite all regions to submit proposals for Regional Deals between central and local government that drive economic growth and deliver the infrastructure our country needs, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop say. Inviting all regions to propose a Regional Deal that boosts ...13 hours ago
- MSA pilot participant update
One of the ten young men selected to participate in the Military-Style Academy Pilot has allegedly reoffended. Children’s Minister Karen Chhour is disappointed but says it would be naïve to think that none of these young men would reoffend. “I’m saddened that this young person has not taken this opportunity ...13 hours ago
- Attendance rates increase, again
Associate Education Minister David Seymour says that school attendance is continuing to rise. In Term 3 of 2024 51.3 per cent of students attended school regularly, an increase of 5.3 percentage points from 46 per cent in Term 3 of 2023. “This Government has prioritised student attendance and it is ...15 hours ago
- Improving the lives of young New Zealanders
Ensuring New Zealand is the best place in the world for children and young people is the vision at the heart of the Government’s new Child and Youth Strategy, Child Poverty Reduction Minister Louise Upston says. “Childhood represents a huge opportunity to set people on a positive path towards living ...18 hours ago
- Government continues work to reinstate livestock exports by sea
The Government is reinstating the trade of livestock exports by sea while ensuring the highest standards of animal welfare, says Associate Minister of Agriculture Andrew Hoggard.“The Government will introduce legislation changes to reinstate the trade, enhance oversight, and strengthen requirements for exporters to identify risks and manage the welfare of ...1 day ago
- Speech to the National Quality Forum 2024
Tēnā koutou katoa – it is a pleasure to be here today. I would like to begin by acknowledging the important leadership role you all play in ensuring a quality health system New Zealanders can trust. There is enormous clinical expertise in this room covering a wide range of disciplines. ...2 days ago
- New Zealand’s COP29 National Statement
Tēnā koutou katoa. Mr President, Excellencies, Delegates. New Zealand, and all nations represented here today, are already dealing with the impacts of climate change. Our households, businesses, and economies are bearing the costs of its effects. The choices we make now will shape the severity of these impacts for generations ...2 days ago
- Latest Quarterly Investment Report released
The Government has released its second Quarterly Investment Report (QIR) which shows substantial work still to be done by agencies to improve investment reporting and meet the Government’s expectations, Infrastructure and Acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “New Zealand has significant infrastructure and investment needs. The Government is determined to get ...2 days ago
- New Zealand supporting loss and damage fund
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced New Zealand will contribute NZ$10 million to the new Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage while at the annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan. “New Zealand is joining the global effort to address the significant challenge of responding to ...2 days ago
- Gang crackdown begins at stroke of midnight
The free ride for gangs is over when the clock strikes midnight tonight, with tough new laws officially coming into effect, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Police Minister Mark Mitchell say. “Gang patches will no longer be able to be worn in public. To earn the right to wear a ...2 days ago
- LGFA increases borrowing capacity to support high growth councils
The Government is welcoming the decision by the Local Government Funding Agency to increase access to financing tools for fast growing councils to support greater investment in critical infrastructure, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says.“Communities across the country are facing an infrastructure deficit and significant population growth is projected in ...2 days ago
- Temporary Traffic Management costs revealed
The Government has revealed that over the past three years, the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) has spent an eyewatering $786 million of taxpayers’ money on road cones and temporary traffic management (TTM), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“When I became Minister, I was surprised to learn that that NZTA did ...2 days ago
- Jurisdiction of Disputes Tribunal to double
Legislation that will double the financial jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal from $30,000 to $60,000 has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. “We need to improve court timeliness and access to justice so that Kiwis and get on with their lives. Court delays affect everyone, the ...2 days ago
- Protecting New Zealand from foreign interference
Legislation that will specifically criminalise foreign interference and strengthen espionage offences has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “It is normal and appropriate for states to interact and work to influence one another. This encourages cooperation and can have mutually beneficial outcomes. “However, the reality ...2 days ago
- Significant milestone for Canterbury Road of National Significance
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news that the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board has approved funding towards pre-implementation and early works on the State Highway 1 (SH1) Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance (RoNS). “Reaching this significant milestone is a reflection of our Government’s ...2 days ago
- Health survey results to help drive change
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says findings from the annual Health Survey highlight the need to continue driving better health outcomes for New Zealanders. The New Zealand Health Survey is an annual snapshot of key metrics measured from July 2023 – July 2024. Findings released this morning include: In 2023/24, ...2 days ago
- Final push needed to get to Smokefree 2025
A renewed effort to get people to quit smoking will build on what has worked to date and target the groups who most need support, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said today. “The latest New Zealand Health Survey results show the daily smoking rate at 6.9 per cent and we ...2 days ago
- New diplomatic appointments
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced four new diplomatic appointments. “Our diplomats play an important role in ensuring New Zealand’s interests are maintained and enhanced across the world,” Mr Peters says. “It is a pleasure to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign ...3 days ago
- Next steps for Regulatory Standards Bill
Regulation Minister David Seymour has today announced the next steps in the Government’s plan improve the quality of regulation by opening consultation on a proposed Regulatory Standards Bill. “New Zealand's low wages can be blamed on low productivity, and low productivity can be blamed on poor regulation,” says Mr Seymour. ...3 days ago
- Red Tape Tipline goes live
Minister for Regulation David Seymour has today announced that the Ministry for Regulation’s Red Tape Tipline is now live. “We want to hear about your red tape horror stories. From today, New Zealanders will have a say on how they are regulated through an online portal,” says Mr Seymour. The ...3 days ago
- Youth Parliament 2025 announced
The Minister for Youth Matt Doocey has today announced the eleventh Youth Parliament will be taking place in 2025. “Youth Parliament offers a unique youth development opportunity to young people from across New Zealand to experience the political process and learn about how government works,” says Mr Doocey. “The two-day ...3 days ago
- Police stats show promising change
After nearly a year in Government, Kiwis have seen significant change across law and order with promising early results shown across some Police statistics, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “In August 2023, I told New Zealanders that if they had not started to see a change in public safety within ...3 days ago
- Better coordination of anti-scam efforts
With the launch of Fraud Awareness Week, the Government is committing to new coordination efforts across industry and government to combat online scams, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly says. “Online financial scams are a growing problem for New Zealand. New data released today shows that Kiwis lost nearly ...4 days ago
- Minister to consider 7AA select committee report
Minister for Children Karen Chhour will consider the recommendations made by the Social Services and Community Committee in its report back to Parliament on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill. “I want to thank the people who made submissions and those who appeared before the committee in ...4 days ago
- Defence Minister to attend ASEAN meeting
Defence Minister Judith Collins will this week attend the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus in Vientiane, Laos. “We need to take every opportunity to engage with our international partners, given the increasingly unstable geo-political situation,” Ms Collins says. “New Zealand has a long-standing commitment to this ...4 days ago
- Launching the White Ribbon Ride
The Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence, Karen Chhour, was on hand to wish riders well at the start of the North Island leg of the White Ribbon Ride in Whakatāne this morning. The ride helps mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, ...4 days ago
- Construction to begin on next stage of Papakura to Drury
Construction on the next stage of the SH1 Papakura to Drury project will begin early next month, with the contract for works awarded to Fulton Hogan, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. "SH1 Papakura to Drury is a key project that will drive economic growth and productivity, reduce congestion, and enable people ...6 days ago
- NZ signs trade deal with Costa Rica, Iceland and Switzerland
Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has signed a pioneering trade agreement that prioritises New Zealand’s sustainable exports at a ceremony during APEC in Peru today. “The Agreement on Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS), between Costa Rica, Iceland, and Switzerland was concluded in July of this year and opens up significant ...6 days ago
- Government and iwi work together on aquaculture
Five new Aquaculture Settlement Areas will help ensure Ngāi Tahu shares in the opportunities aquaculture offers for Southland’s economy, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. “The Aquaculture Settlement Areas (ASAs) I’m announcing today set aside space so the Crown and Ngāi Tahu can assess their potential for aquaculture development. ...6 days ago
- Government launches review to ensure electricity market is fit-for-purpose
The terms of reference for a review of the performance of the electricity market have been released. The review, initiated by the Coalition Government during the power crisis in winter will look at whether current regulations and market design support economic growth and access to reliable and affordable electricity, Energy Minister ...7 days ago
- Speech to Social Investment Hui: Jack and his whānau need our help
Kia ora koutou katoa. Nau mai, haere mai, piki mai. Ki te mihi atu ahau, ki te manwhenua nei, Te Atiawa, Ngāti toa rangatira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Thank you, Andy, for your introduction. Let me acknowledge you as the new Chief Executive of the Social Investment ...7 days ago
- Minister of State for Trade heads to Brisbane for PACER Plus meeting
Minister of State for Trade Nicola Grigg has travelled to Australia to attend the PACER Plus Ministers Meeting in Brisbane. “Trade plays a critical role in driving employment, economic growth, and improving the standards of living in the Pacific Region. The Government is strongly committed to supporting Pacific Island countries ...7 days ago
- Proposals to modernise conservation released
Toitū te taiao – Our environment endures The Government is consulting on proposals to modernise New Zealand’s conservation management system, aiming to protect relevant natural areas while supporting sustainable growth in tourism and regional economies, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka says. “Today, the Department of Conservation – Te Papa Atawhai is ...7 days ago
- Grattan on Friday: Marles plays a defensive bat on nuclear as the government rushes to get though la...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Richard Marles is an ambitious man who hasn’t given up the dream of one day reaching the top job. But, despite being deputy prime minister, his profile is much lower than that of Treasurer Jim ...2 hours ago - NEW POLL: Kiwis Overwhelmingly Support MPs’ Expenses Transparency Law Change
62% of respondents support the extension of the OIA to cover MPs’ spending, compared to just 13% opposed and 24% were unsure. ...4 hours ago - The House: Meanwhile, a week of passing law
The political week has been packed with worthy distractions, but all week Parliament has focused on passing new laws. Here are the highlights. ...4 hours ago - The biggest difference between Hīkoi mō te Tiriti and past hīkoi: More support from non-Māori
Analysis - The diversity of voices during the hīkoi was noticeable - from tangata moana to young immigrants to elderly Pākehā from the South Island. ...5 hours ago
- The House: Samoan citizenship restoration – ‘It means we belong to this land’
When the bill to restore NZ citizenship to some Samoans passed this week, Parliament's galleries were full to the brim with members of the community. ...6 hours ago
- More Delays In Action On Use Of Puberty Blockers With Children
Women’s Rights Party Co-leader Jill Ovens says the Ministry has put New Zealand children at risk by continuing to allow “off-label” prescribing of puberty blockers at far higher rates than other similar countries. ...6 hours ago
- Police Minister adamant he wasn’t aware of gang members training at gun clubs
That is despite two papers from police that raised the matter with him. ...7 hours ago
- Shorten declares himself ‘a proud moderate’, saying Australians ‘in the middle’ shouldn’t ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Bill Shorten has declared himself “a proud moderate” in a valedictory speech declaring parliament has the responsibility to ensure the extremes of left and right do not set the terms of political debate. Shorten, ...7 hours ago
- New ‘best practice’ principles for superannuation products are coming. We asked a panel of exper...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matt Garrow, Editorial Web Developer Studio Romantic/Shutterstock We all know how important it is to save enough money for retirement – but what about spending it wisely when we get there? Even for those who have built up a suitable ...7 hours ago
- Government accused of betraying Kiwis’ trust over lack of consultation on live exports
The government has always vowed to reinstate live exports by sea, which was banned by the previous Labour government. ...8 hours ago
- 7 things you can do if you think you sweat too much
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Freeman, Associate Professor of Dermatology, Bond University ERIK Miheyeu/Shutterstock Sweating is our body’s way of cooling down, a bit like an internal air conditioner. When our core temperature rises (because it’s hot outside, or you’re exercising), sweat glands all ...8 hours ago
- Phenergan for under 6s is now banned due to hallucination fears. Here’s what to use instead
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nial Wheate, Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Macquarie University Australia’s drug regulator has issued a safety warning over the medicine Phenergan and related products containing the antihistamine drug promethazine. The Therapeutic Goods Administration said the over-the-counter products should not be given to children ...8 hours ago
- A new stage adaptation of Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs is a delightful homage to theatrical storytelli...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Campbell, Lecturer, Performing Arts, UniSA Creative, University of South Australia Matt Byrne/STCSA Jack Maggs is a delight and a homage to theatrical storytelling in Australia. Based on Peter Carey’s bestselling novel, Jack Maggs follows the ex-convict as he lands ...8 hours ago
- The government has introduced laws for its social media ban. But key details are still missing
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daniel Angus, Professor of Digital Communication, Director of QUT Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology Ron Lach/Pexels The federal government today introduced into parliament legislation for its social media ban for people under 16 years. Communications Minister Michelle ...8 hours ago
- Archives NZ, National Library to cut 27 roles
The Department of Internal Affairs wants to bring the two organisations under the joint leadership of the Chief Archivist and National Librarian. ...8 hours ago
- Gang patch ban: Members warn of potential for violence to ‘erupt’ as new laws enforced
"I can't see this lasting unless they have a budget to lock fullas up in jail which I think is absolutely stupid, really it's ludicrous," Ngavii Pekapo, who set up a Mongrel Mob chapter 54 years ago, says. ...8 hours ago
- ACT leader David Seymour raises doubts about Waikato medical school
Government documents show ACT leader David Seymour told the government he was "dissatisfied" with a cost-benefit analysis. ...9 hours ago
- National’s Erica Stanford allegedly calls Labour’s Jan Tinetti a ‘stupid bitchR...
The Education Minister has apologised in Parliament for her remark. ...9 hours ago
- Labour backs new Police Commissioner – but warns against routine arming
The alternative to policing by consent would be a police state, which New Zealanders don't want, the party says. ...10 hours ago
- Youth on boot camp pilot re-offended five weeks after release
Children's Minister Karen Chhour said while it was disappointing, it would naïve to think none of the participants would lapse. ...11 hours ago
- In photos: People of the hīkoi, and why they marched
Hikoi mō Te Tiriti has come to an end, going down in history as the largest march to Parliament in Aotearoa. ...11 hours ago
- ‘Everything is becoming a culture war’: Jon Ronson on conspiracies and cycleways
Ahead of his appearance in Aotearoa, the acclaimed British journalist, podcaster and documentarian talks to Stewart Sowman-Lund about why people are still fascinated by the fringes. The last place I would expect to find Jon Ronson is relaxing in the countryside. The iconic British journalist and writer is best known ...11 hours ago - Kia kaha Lebanon: NZ media only tell half your story of struggle
The United States has vetoed a UN Security Council ceasefire resolution — for the fourth time — in Israel’s war on Gaza, while Hezbollah demands a complete ceasefire and “protection of Lebanon’s sovereignty” in any deal with Israel. Amid the death and devastation, Joe Hendren reflects on his time in ...12 hours ago
- ‘Deserves a Bafta’: After the Party premieres in the UK to five-star reviews
The acclaimed New Zealand drama has just premiered on TV in the United Kingdom, and the five-star reviews are already flowing in. Six months after it was called a “blistering” “tour de force” by Australian critics, and nearly a year since The Spinoff declared it the best drama New Zealand ...12 hours ago
- Drugs are getting cheaper and easier to find in Aotearoa
New Zealanders are drinking and smoking less, but most other recreational drugs are becoming cheaper, more popular and more available, two new reports show. Two significant new surveys about drugs in Aotearoa were released this week, offering a rare insight into New Zealanders’ choice of substances, which ones are becoming ...12 hours ago
- COP29: ‘climate finance’ for the Pacific is mostly loans, saddling small island nations with mor...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Steven Ratuva, Director, Macmillan Brown Centre for Pacific Studies, University of Canterbury Lenora Qereqeretabua, the deputy speaker of Fiji’s Parliament, at the COP29 climate summit. IISD/ENB/Mike Muzurakis, CC BY-SA As this year’s UN climate summit reaches its final stage of negotiations, Pacific ...13 hours ago
- Review: The magic of Wicked and the curse of corporate greed
The new movie musical is undoubtedly a fun watch, but it’s also proof that bigger isn’t always better, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund. Contains minor spoilers for Wicked. There’s no doubt that Wicked is going to be huge. No other pop culture event this year, save from maybe Charli XCX’s Brat, has ...13 hours ago
- Dame Jacinda Ardern to be given United Nations leadership award
She will get the champion for global change award from the United Nations Foundation at a ceremony in New York tomorrow. ...14 hours ago
- NZ will resume live animal exports – to low demand
Analysis: NZ is lifting what was supposed to be a permanent ban on live animal exports. But it’s not the lucrative industry it once was. The post NZ will resume live animal exports – to low demand appeared first on Newsroom. ...15 hours ago - Financial forms of family violence affect one in seven of us – but the law is lagging
There are calls for New Zealand’s Family Violence Act to name economic harm as a standalone type of violence, rather than a subcategory of psychological abuse, to bring it in line with the United Kingdom and Australia. Economic harm – restricting access to, sabotaging or exploiting another person’s financial resources, ...15 hours ago
- Downside Risks To Treasury’s Economic And Fiscal Forecasts
New Zealand is currently running a structural fiscal deficit, with expenditure exceeding revenue. Economic growth falling short of expectations has been making it harder for the Government to bring the books back into balance. ...15 hours ago
- Science continues to exclude Indigenous communities. Fixing this benefits everyone
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jordan Peter Anthony Pitt, Associate Dean of Indigenous Strategy and Services (Faculty of Science), University of Sydney An enduring challenge facing science around the world is how to best include and engage Indigenous communities. In Australia, for example, 0.5% of Indigenous ...16 hours ago
- Why is cricket so popular on the Indian sub-continent?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vaughan Cruickshank, Senior Lecturer in Health and Physical Education, University of Tasmania Cricket originated in England, but has been spread worldwide by British soldiers and settlers in the past few hundred years. It is now the second most popular sport in ...16 hours ago
- Disinformation and deepfakes played a part in the US election. Australia should expect the same
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Renee Barnes, Associate professor of Journalism, University of the Sunshine Coast Mladen Zivkovic/Shutterstock As America takes stock after Donald Trump’s re-election to the presidency, it’s worth highlighting the AI-generated fake photos, videos and audio shared during the campaign. A slew ...16 hours ago
- Is thunderstorm asthma becoming more common?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kira Morgan Hughes, PhD Candidate in Allergy and Asthma, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University When spring arrives, so do warnings about thunderstorm asthma. But a decade ago, most of us hadn’t heard of it. So where did thunderstorm asthma ...16 hours ago
- Overwhelmed by ever more clothing donations, charities are exporting the problem. Local governments ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Yassie Samie, Postdoctoral Researcher in Fashion and Textiles, RMIT University anna.spoka/Shutterstock What happens to your clothes after you don’t want them any more? Chances are, you will donate them to op shops run by a charity organisation. There are more ...16 hours ago
- Friendly fire: a nuclear push by allies at COP29 poses a sticky problem for Albanese
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland IndustryAndTravel/Shutterstock Prime Minister Anthony Albanese didn’t see this coming. At the global COP29 climate talks in Baku, the Australian government was indirectly criticised by two allies, the United States and the ...16 hours ago
- Nugget Is Dead brings queer love, multiculturalism and Aussie flair to the Christmas movie formula
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Phoebe Hart, Associate Professor, Film Screen & Animation, Queensland University of Technology Julia Firak Stan’s new Christmas film Nugget is Dead is a colourful production that follows the rules of the seasonal genre film to a tee – with an Aussie ...16 hours ago
- Help Me Hera: Should I cut contact with my ex-stepdad?
My parents are finally getting divorced. So why do I feel like my stepdad’s feelings are still my problem? Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nz Dear Hera My parents recently announced their separation. This in itself isn’t a problem. I’ve already gone through this once before in my early childhood, so ...16 hours ago
- New Zealand Drops In Global Ranking On Climate Action
If the government won’t hold polluters to account, then people will. People are increasingly taking to the streets and the courtrooms, putting their bodies on the line to shut down polluting industries. This will only escalate further unless New ...16 hours ago
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
You need to add a 1080 square…
Because 1080 is somehow associated with vaccines used for humans!?
No because the anti-1080 crowd are organised and work in almost an identical way.
Fair enough, but let’s save some squares for other anti-science crowds such as anti-fluoride campaigners, climate change deniers, proponents of coffee enemas, and people who lap up goop.
The essential feature of science is that it must withstand rational review.
A program claiming it will eradicate predators by 2050 by aerial pellet drops would be deceiving itself if it weren’t merely deceiving the public – they lose effectiveness as target populations fall. Short of saturation levels that will eliminate all the birds as well, this final solution simply won’t work – which makes a lot of the arguments advanced in its favour moot.
While we’re talking about manipulative PR, the campaign for 1080 involved very aggressive lobbying on the Coast – to the point that councils overruled dissent in favour of the poison operation owners and their PR flack.
The reporting of the poisoned Indian family up north, initially reported as possible botulism poisoning, did not match the presentation of botulism at all – but it was a perfect fit for 1080. Never mentioned or investigated in the media.
When I want my forests air dropped with a persistent poison I’ll let you know. And the science, contrary to DOC assertions, is far from settled. Science is concerned with truth and this Key era policy was never about birds – it’s a subsidy to Gnat supporters.
Not all decisions are based on science alone and nor should they.
I thought 1080 breaks down in the environment!?
It is metabolized until it is exhausted. It interrupts the Krebs cycle so that consuming organisms stop producing ATP for cellular function. Its downstream killing capacity is scary for dog owners (dogs being more susceptible for some reason), because they are inclined to eat carrion. We do have native carrion eaters however – I’ve seen plenty of hawks eating roadkill, and presumably they’ll eat other carrion, possibly fatally. Wekas are pretty omnivorous too.
This seems to be a balanced and well-informed link on the matter:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/discussion-new-zealand-conservation-issues-around-1080-geoff-booth/
On the contrary…..
This seems to be a balanced and well-informed link/s on the matter:
https://civicanalysis.wordpress.com/2018/09/27/1080-when-fake-news-trumps-facts-our-debate-is-poisoned/
https://thespinoff.co.nz/society/18-09-2018/separating-fact-from-fiction-in-the-1080-debate/
http://www.1080facts.co.nz/
“unfortunately, like the anti-vaccination lobby, the vociferous and vigorous anti-1080 crowd will maintain their vehemence. They will continue to reinforce each other’s views and carry on bombarding the public. No number of independent reports nor any amount of unbiased information will sway them!”
https://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/editorial/1080-debate-should-die-will-not
The ODT article is low level, emotive and borderline illiterate in context and content…
It jumps around, employs belittling tactics, minimising and dismissive while appealing to various authorities, while referencing independent , unbiased reports without citation…as if independent and unbias can exist in such space…
It is a mirror article which can be found targetting the so called ‘anti vaxxers’… even managing to smear the two dastardly groups into a single amorphous blob…
No wonder people can’t form a coherent view if this is the level at which they onboard information…
Give up 1/2, you have successfully made a fool of yourself, “playing the man, not the ball when the facts are against you, giving “evidence which is not credible to anyone who knows even a smidgen about science, chemistry and statistics (Correlation is not causation), and showing an appalling level of creduality.
Much like most of the anti-science lobby.
Hang on, the waxing poetically is an outlet obviously sorely needed.
Coming from someone who openly states…
Not vaccinating is child abuse…
You’re so far out of your lane you don’t even realise it…
Anti science…tell me…what does that mean to you?…
Go ahead…
Refusing to vaccinate your children, when there is no good reason not to, such as a compromised immune system, exposes them to several nasty and potentially debilitating or lethal diseases.
If that does not meet the definition of child abuse, what does?
Do you make your kids play on a busy road?
It obviously meets a defination in your own mind, kjt…but that’s as far as it goes…and no…that’s not anti science…
You have no idea what youre actually talking about…it is beyond you…you’ve illustrated that in no uncertain terms…
It’s likely I’m exacerbating your mental limitations…and I’ve not even gone into second gear…
I’ll leave you to the pit of ignorance you seem only too pleased to reside in…
[Time for you to have a cuppa and a lie down, One Two. No more comments on this post, please. TRP]
Acknowledged…
Ironic you’ve singled one of my comments out…given whats going on in here…
But as I’ve said…you know what you’re doing…
Perhaps you can write about tolerance and encourage genuine discourse…even though you have extreme bias on this subject…
The bar needs to be raised…censorship is not the way to do it…not of my comment…wider landscape eh…opportunities need to be fostered…not shut down through fear or predjudice…
Rather selective don’t you think …..?
There were several other sources referenced… yet you Only choose to select One! ..
“No wonder people can’t form a coherent view if this is the level at which they onboard information…” (Your quote by the way)
Give up 1/2, you have successfully made a fool of yourself, “playing the man, not the ball when the facts are against you, giving “evidence which is not credible to anyone who knows even a smidgen about science, chemistry and statistics (Correlation is not causation), and showing an appalling level of credulity.
Much like most of the anti-science lobby.
Well your first link certainly fits the criteria to be posted on a bigot’s billboard – it’s not informed by anything but a desire to slander the anti 1080 crowd. No evidence of either qualifications or experience.
The Spinoff article is likewise a shallow rant that is incapable of acknowledging there are problems with 1080 – as there will be with any pest destruction choice – it argues necessity instead of balance of benefits and drawbacks, and is accordingly frankly, weak.
“1080 facts” is a PR production for the 1080 manufacturers – and is thus less than credibly balanced – an RT quality source.
You’d have to do better than that – were rational argument your object.
“1080 facts” does not appear to be funded by 1080 manufacturers, nor do any seem to be members of the trust behind it.
http://www.1080facts.co.nz/our-supporters.html
Having said that, I think the LinkedIn article from SM is fairly balanced too.
I wouldn’t count on it – there’s been some very dirty pool from their PR folk. I’ll get back to you on this.
“unfortunately, like the anti-vaccination lobby, the vociferous and vigorous anti-1080 crowd will maintain their vehemence. They will continue to reinforce each other’s views and carry on bombarding the public. No number of independent reports nor any amount of unbiased information will sway them!”
Ad infinitum ….
“He tried to explain himself and the uses and benefits of 1080 poisons, before acknowledging it was unlikely he’d have any luck convincing them of anything today.”
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/366297/environment-minister-david-parker-has-a-run-in-with-1080-protesters
So I’m not allowed to go out and meet my friends – you expect me to stay in and educate the lying out of control civil servants who are wantonly poisoning our wildlife.
Fuck you you disingenuous piece of shit.
You didn’t read the link which I left for a more responsible commenter.
The short answer is the same as it’s always been for environmentalists in NZ – collect the evidence and publish it and rub it in the lying government authority’s faces until they are obliged to start acting in good faith.
That means collecting the dead birds after every drop and prosecuting DOC until they clean up their act. It’s not so different from what we had to do to deter 245T spraying – we’ve all been down this road before, and we won.
The only mistake was in expecting that a Green conservation minister would be more honest.
“Stuart Munro …
3 October 2018 at 10:55 pm
So I’m not allowed to go out and meet my friends – you expect me to stay in and educate the lying out of control civil servants who are wantonly poisoning our wildlife.
Fuck you you disingenuous piece of shit.
You didn’t read the link which I left for a more responsible commenter.
The short answer is the same as it’s always been for environmentalists in NZ – collect the evidence and publish it and rub it in the lying government authority’s faces until they are obliged to start acting in good faith.
That means collecting the dead birds after every drop and prosecuting DOC until they clean up their act. It’s not so different from what we had to do to deter 245T spraying – we’ve all been down this road before, and we won.
The only mistake was in expecting that a Green conservation minister would be more honest.”
” So I’m not allowed to go out and meet my friends”
– Fuck you you disingenuous piece of shit.”
Hmmm…. OK then. With friends like that …. Stay off the Beer!
“Stay off the beer”
How about, you patronizing piece of poo, you just stay away altogether?
Here you are, sticking your unattractive nose into other people’s business, repeating the polemics and appeals to authority that have lost you the 1080 argument, as if you had set out to prove Kuhn’s thesis singlehandedly.
It’s not as if you understand the links you posted.
Your passion would be admirable if only you were conscientious enough to go out and learn the facts of the matter.
But you’re not – You’re a lazy fool. Which would be fine, but we’re trying to discuss a serious issue here.
Why are they targeting Pacific people? How is it to their advantage?
I know it’s been a problem overseas (American Somalis) but I don’t understand what the end point is.
https://www.statnews.com/2017/05/08/measles-vaccines-somali/
They are Targeting perceived ignorance
The messaging is possibly related to the Samoan babies who died recently…
But unless those who commissioned the billboard provide context, it is not obvious…
Similar billboards have been appearing in other cities elsewhere…
The language and use of n*zi symbols by the author is symptomatic of the low level of attack minded ‘discussion’ around the subject which has been had in Nz…
Yep I think they are using and exploiting the horrific baby deaths recently. Very sick to do that imo.
Hi, One Two. The swastika appears in a image from an anti-vaxxer who claims vaccination is akin to the holocaust. That’s how low the level of understanding goes with these folk.
More here: https://medium.com/@kevinmadden/the-bigotry-of-anti-vaxx-rhetoric-1162127e4aad
Thanks for the clarification, TRP…
Mandatory and/or forced medication was practiced during the war…
The discussion globally has moved on significantly from the scare tactics used at either extremes of the debate…
Focussing on those groups/individuals who are interested in ensuring polarisation of any discussion…only serves to miss the mark…
If the discussion in NZ had moved on from scare tactics, this billboard wouldn’t exist.
There is no mandatory vaccination in New Zealand, therefore the Nazi analogy is invalid. Plus the Nazis performed horrible experiments, rather than applying benign public health measures.
The Nuremberg Code was a direct result of medical experimentation, and gave us the right to refuse any medical intervention, for any reason. The current vaccination schedule in its entirety has NOT been rigorously tested, which amounts to experimental medicine. Feel free to show me the solid body of safety evidence on the current schedule as delivered, and I’ll rethink that.
The truth is that we do not know how widespread the “collateral damage” is, because those stats are not being reliably and universally gathered. Vaccine uptake alone does NOT automatically equate to good Public Health, only a full, thorough, long term investigation of all illness including chronic illness in the population would tell us that and reveal the possible trade-off between benign, self-limiting childhood illness and the chronic illnesses known to be caused by vaccines (see ASIA or Shoenfeld’s Syndrome for instance)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24620624
There is nothing about chicken pox that good old vitamin C can’t remedy, and yet this vaccine is now compulsory in Australia, in order to receive various benefits and kindy access in some states. Baffling to those of my generation who know how mild chicken pox is if treated correctly. Also proposed for NZ. We know the acellular pertussis vaccines are an abject failure at containing whooping cough, however well-intentioned- this according to the government’s own stats.
Meanwhile, independent Science does manage to get published, raising serious concerns about vaccine safety, especially vaccines in the number and frequency currently given to babies and small children. This Italian paper is one among growing numbers of researchers able to explain the mechanisms behind the brain inflammation that some vaccine recipients experience.
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/vaccines-and-neuroinflammation.pdf
Or this letter from a long international list of concerned PhDs, doctors, lawyers and citizen advocacy groups.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/policy-safeguards/open-letter-from-international-organisations-to-the-who-on-the-issue-of-vaccine-safety/
Vaccine injury testimonials are mounting as the already-bloated childhood schedule grows with, mandatory and coercive vaccination laws are being pushed globally, including in Australia and NZ, driven by vested interests, and the entire news media has been hijacked by industry sponsorship…
…and yet it’s being implied that the growing numbers of vaccine questioners or at least those questioning current vaccination policy, driven to put up these billboards because no one in government is listening, are the Nazis, and they get called “bigots” or “unscientific” and pilloried with other names? Pot, kettle and very very black! The billboard a neutral question about the untested ingredients of vaccine like aluminium and human and animal protein, which are listed nt he CDC website and are showing up in the emerging medical literature as problematic for some people.
Yet anyone who so much as utters a critical peep about a vaccine product, including doctors, industry whistleblower scientists, PhDs, lawyers who have represented the vaccine injured in the USA, parents and celebrities who have lost kids to vaccines is labelled an “anti-vaxxer”? Give me a break, you’d have to be blind or naive to see that there isn’t a problem with that polarisation!
How about some evidence. Instead of a long list of people who reckon…..
We know vaccines can cause harm. So can peanuts and strawberries.
The chances of harm are minuscule compared with the harm diseases like measles, polio, chickenpox etc can cause. Even smallpox and TB are on their way back, thanks to poverty and anti vaccers.
Evidence…go get it…you were given the leads…
So you don’t force feed people food products…but medications are ok to do just that…
Poverty is an issue you are correct about that…vaccines do not come into why poverty leads to poor health…nor should they be part of a discussion about health at all…
TB – The BCG vaccine was discontinued in NZ many years ago…why…because the vaccine was recalled…
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/7150980/Recall-stops-NZ-tuberculosis-vaccinations
Simple reading material…go get it…
TB vaccine was not ineffective.
TB vaccination was discontinued because it wasn’t necessary. Because it worked.
Stop repeating total bullshit. We went from wards full of “consumptives” to almost eradicated when vaccination started.
The TB vaccine saved lives. The early part of last century had a lot of TB tragedies. My grandfather’s first wife died of TB. My uncle was taken from her arms at birth so he wouldn’t catch it. My aunt died separated from her family in a TB sanitorium aged five. This is what vaccines prevent. The anti vaxxers live in a bubble lacking both scientific and historical knowledge.
Arse. Routine use was discontinued because it lowered tuberculosis rates in the population, but high risk groups are still being vaccinated.
https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/tuberculosis/resumption-bcg-vaccination-following-vaccine-shortage
Don’t feed 1/2 a brain facts. His brain cells will get scrambled.
In confirming my comment regarding effectiveness…because it was and still is, ineffective…
See link below about the lack of effectiveness for your reading…
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950406/
If you read that entire paper – TB vaccine is effective in children, but more variable in adults. Various reasons for this are discussed, as is future research to improve TB vaccines.
Take home story – vaccinate against TB. Research better TB vaccines for the future.
The reduction in TB in NZ was only partially due to vaccination – the discovery of antibiotics that can treat the disease played a major role, as did other public health measures. Good summary in this PhD thesis here:
Seeking the prize of eradication: a social history of tuberculosis in New Zealand from world War Two to the 1970s
Poverty is a significant risk for TB – something NZ should be worried about.
Why would you ‘think’ I’ve not read the full documents?
Why could you not interpret my response to J90, clearly stating that his cheap attempted gotcha serves only to affirm my statement regarding ineffectiveness….
That has gone right over you too…given your comments and the links you post on this subject…it is entirely unsurprising…
The only cogent statement you’ve made in all the comments is about poverty related disease…which is a serious issue…
But totally unrelated to vaccination if genuinely reduced in appropriate measures…
See if you can figure out why…
Your assertion that a tuberculosis vaccine was discontinued because the vaccine was ineffective is unsupported claptrap.
But hidden meaning meditates on precious miracles, eh.
/
From memory the BCG vaccine has been shown to prevent miliary TB in the lung, and also TB meningitis, and is more useful and effective in neonates and young children. Thus it is no longer given in 13-14 year olds routinely, as it is less effective by that age.
Tell that to the parents who have lost a child due to vaccination. Oh that’s right, if your child has a reaction to peanuts the doctor will tell you not to give your child peanuts. If your child has a reaction to penicillin the doctor will say your child must not have penicillin. If your child has a reaction (or dies) due to a vaccination the doctor will probably tell you it’s just a coincidence!
People with underlying conditions that may make vaccination dangerous are warned by Doctors as a routine. Including conditions such as asthma and inherited immune deficiency.
I was asked about any underlying conditions by the nurse and doctor who vaccinated my children.
It, admittedly was an issue when the public health nurse used to immunize entire school classes in one hit.
Without refuting all those ‘reckons’, take the statement on chickenpox for example:
“There is nothing about chicken pox that good old vitamin C can’t remedy, and yet this vaccine is now compulsory in Australia, in order to receive various benefits and kindy access in some states. Baffling to those of my generation who know how mild chicken pox is if treated correctly.”
Actual Facts:
“Chickenpox is normally a mild disease. But it can be serious and can lead to complications or death, especially in high-risk people. Complications include:
Bacterial infections of the skin, soft tissues, bones, joints or bloodstream (sepsis)
Dehydration
Pneumonia
Inflammation of the brain (encephalitis)
Toxic shock syndrome
Reye’s syndrome for people who take aspirin during chickenpox
” (Mayo Clinic)
“Since immunization the number of infections in the United States has decreased nearly 90%. In 2015 chickenpox resulted in 6,400 deaths globally …. Death occurs in about 1 per 60,000 cases”
(wikipedia)
BTW. I have had shingles which is a common complication of chicken pox. I wish the vaccine had been available when I was young. I was very close to going blind.
Antivaxxers draw a lot of support from (and thus they target for recruitment) communities of evangelical religious faith. Such communities often believe strongly in the healing power of prayer (“if I vaccinate I’m saying I distrust God!”).
Evangelical churches also believe strongly in a god who is an active participant in the affairs of the world. That predisposes believers to a worldview in which there are unseen forces at work in the world. From there it’s a short conceptual step to “shadow conspiracy big pharma!!1”
Our society’s concept of religious tolerance also means that antivaxxers from religious communities aren’t subject to the criticism that the secular antivax nutters are.
“I won’t vaccinate my kids because I read it’s bad on Facebook” <– reaction: you're an idiot
"I won't vaccinate my kids because my church says it's bad" <– reaction: oh well, we must respect people's religious beliefs
Evangelical churchgoers are also conditioned to accept the notion of donations in the form of tithing. If the antivaxxers can piggyback on Pasifika communities' religious faith, that's a big new donor pool.
“Antivaxxers draw a lot of support from (and thus they target for recruitment) communities of evangelical religious faith.”
The proportion of people I know in the evangelical community who oppose vaccination are about the same as that from outside of that community.
“Such communities often believe strongly in the healing power of prayer (“if I vaccinate I’m saying I distrust God!”).”
True. And that often God just let’s human beings get on and do good science.
“Evangelical churches also believe strongly in a god who is an active participant in the affairs of the world. ”
Indeed, but rather than that lead to conspiracy delusions about big pharma, most evangelicals I know understand that God being an active participant can mean He has given us an intelligence to develop life saving medical interventions.
You must be a laugh at parties, polling people about religion and vaccination wherever you go. What are your current sample sizes for respondents in each group?
Oh come on McFlock, I’m sure the circles you mix in engage in discussion about topical issues of the day?
yeah but I don’t tabulate the results and nor do I pretend that the sample size is large enough to make sweeping statements comparing two different populations.
Nor do I. It was an informed opinion. Note the words “I know” and “about”.
However if you want something more scientific, try this http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/07/majorities-in-all-major-religious-groups-support-requiring-childhood-vaccination/.
That (albeit from the US) seems to support my informed opinion over that of SHG.
lol
First of all, that survey isn’t about opposing vaccination.
Secondly, white evangelicals are twice as likely to say parental choice than other religious groups, and “unaffiliated” is only about 20% of the US population.
So does that match your statement about proportion of what you weren’t even talking about initially?
“First of all, that survey isn’t about opposing vaccination.”
If you support vaccination, you are unlikely to also oppose it.
“Secondly, white evangelicals are twice as likely to say parental choice than other religious groups, and “unaffiliated” is only about 20% of the US population. So does that match your statement about proportion of what you weren’t even talking about initially?”
76% of white evangelicals say that parents should be required to vaccinate. 78% of unaffiliated claim the same opinion. As far as it goes, that supports my opinion “The proportion of people I know in the evangelical community who oppose vaccination are about the same as that from outside of that community”, and that is confirmed in the author combining these two groups in the paragraph that begins “White evangelical Protestants and religiously unaffiliated people are somewhat less likely…”
“requiring childhood vaccination to attend school” is also different from supporting vaccination in your personal case but leaving it up to parental choice.
less likely than whom? answer: other people not in the evangelical movement.
“Unaffiliated” counts as about 1/4 to 1/3 of the “not evangelical” group. Which was at about half the unaffiliated/evangelical rate.
So by your own survey, people outside of the evangelical community have a total proportion of at most 2/3 that of the evangelical community. 2/3 of something is not “about the same” as that something.
““requiring childhood vaccination to attend school” is also different from supporting vaccination in your personal case but leaving it up to parental choice.”
1. SHG referred to “I” and “My”, but I have been careful to speak about support of vaccination more generally. In terms of my own comments, your point is irrelevant.
2. If you support a requirement for children to be vaccinated to attend school, it is not a stretch to suggest you support vacination.
“less likely than whom? answer: other people not in the evangelical movement.”
You seem not to understand the classifications. There will be many in the other religious groups who are also evangelicals, which is why I compared the ‘evangelicals’ group with ‘non-affiliated’ group.
“So by your own survey, people outside of the evangelical community have a total proportion of at most 2/3 that of the evangelical community. 2/3 of something is not “about the same” as that something.”
76% of white evangelicals support vaccination.
78% of non-affiliated’s support vaccination.
(The proportion of the other classifications who are evangelicals is unknown).
1: read the research question again.
2: If everybody who opposes school-required vaccination supports the principle of vaccination and just thinks that parents know enough to pick and choose from the schedule for whatever reason, your point is completely unrelated to the survey you linked to.
Good luck with that :”Evangelicalism (/ˌiːvænˈdʒɛlɪkəlɪzəm, ˌɛvæn-, -ən/), evangelical Christianity, or evangelical Protestantism,[a] is a worldwide, transdenominational movement within Protestant Christianity “
So you conveniently, but inappropriately, excluded over half the survey respondents in order to support your claim.
Did you have fun picking cherries?
“1: read the research question again.”
I read it right the first time. You seem to have missed the comparison I made, and perhaps misunderstood the composition of the other groups.
“2: If everybody who opposes school-required vaccination supports the principle of vaccination and just thinks that parents know enough to pick and choose from the schedule for whatever reason, your point is completely unrelated to the survey you linked to.”
You are confused between support and opposition. The survey measures support for school required vaccination. Those who oppose vaccination are hardly likely to support school reuired vaccinations.
“Good luck with that”
Did you read the study? One group is called “Black Protestant”, and is distinguished from “White Evangelicals”. 1 in 3 US Evangelicals are estimated to to be people of colour. (https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2017/september/1-in-3-american-evangelicals-person-of-color-prri-atlas.html). Do you think there are no evangelical Catholics?
“So you conveniently, but inappropriately, excluded over half the survey respondents in order to support your claim.”
No, I didn’t. I compared two groups whose constituents can be compared based on SHG’s post.
Your confusion comes from not understanding that the sum total of evangelicals in the US don’t fit into a category called “White Evangelicals”. Once you understand that, you will see that comparing the two categories I did makes perfect sense. And that calling the other Christian groups ‘non-evangelical’ makes no sense.
People who oppose school-required vaccinations do not necessarily oppose vaccination in principle.
People who are “unaffiliated” are a subset of people who are not evangelical. If your definition of evangelical is the same as the Pew research groupings, then “white evangelical” is a subset of “evangelical”.
If we ignore the other religious groupings as you did, then at best all your link says is that the proportion of of an unkown proportion of evangelicals who oppose school-required vaccinations is about the same as the proportion of an unknown proportion of non-evangelicals. Which might not even be related to your claims about supporting or opposing vaccination at all.
Thanks for the profound observation /sarc
“People who oppose school-required vaccinations do not necessarily oppose vaccination in principle.”
The survey was not about what people oppose, it was about whether or not people support school-required vaccination.
“People who are “unaffiliated” are a subset of people who are not evangelical. If your definition of evangelical is the same as the Pew research groupings, then “white evangelical” is a subset of “evangelical”.
Yes, a subset. Of the other Christian groups, some will be evangelical. As we don’t know the proportion that are evangelical, it is a nonsense to include them in either grouping. Which is why I compared “white evangelicals” with “non-affiliated” – two groups we know are distinct.
“If we ignore the other religious groupings as you did, then at best all your link says is that the proportion of of an unkown proportion of evangelicals who oppose school-required vaccinations is about the same as the proportion of an unknown proportion of non-evangelicals. Which might not even be related to your claims about supporting or opposing vaccination at all.”
No, if we ignore the other groups we know the relationship between “white evangelicals” and “non-affiliated”.
And to make my original point again:
“An overwhelming majority of Americans (82%) support requiring all healthy schoolchildren to be vaccinated for measles, mumps and rubella.”
http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/02/02/vast-majority-of-americans-say-benefits-of-childhood-vaccines-outweigh-risks/
The original Pew reference (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/07/majorities-in-all-major-religious-groups-support-requiring-childhood-vaccination/) states 76% of evangelicals support school-required vaccinations. 82%. 76%. That’s close enough to support the point I was making in response to SHG.
cf:
And yet you brought up the survey.
But let us continue:
But according to you neither group is representative of either the entire evangelical community or everyone else. Which means it can’t support any claim about evenagelicals vs non-evangelicals.
which is irrelevant to claims about “evangelicals” vs “nopn-evangelicals”. And yet you still brought it up.
lol no. Your original point was
So your original point was about what people oppose, not about whether or not people support school-required vaccination.
lols
“But according to you neither group is representative of either the entire evangelical community or everyone else.”
No, that isn’t what I said. The “white evangelicals” are a subset of all evangelicals. The “non-affiliated” are a subset of non-evangelicals. So both are to some degree representative of those wider populations.
“which is irrelevant to claims about “evangelicals” vs “nopn-evangelicals”.”
No it isn’t. We know “White Evangelicals” are a subset of Evangelicals. We know “Non-Affiliated” are a subset of non evangelicals.
“Your original point was ‘The proportion of people I know in the evangelical community who oppose vaccination are about the same as that from outside of that community.'”
Correct. Those who do not oppose support. The survey states “Respondents who did not give an answer are not shown”.
“So your original point was about what people oppose, not about whether or not people support school-required vaccination.”
The survey only consists of oppose/support. There are no ‘undecideds’. But you’d know that if you had read it.
lol you argued yourself in circles and you know it. To back up an assertion you pulled out of your arse you cherry-picked a comparison of possibly/probably (as they weren’t randomly selected) unrepresentative samples from a survey that was different to what you originally said, as you so helpfully outlined at the top of your previous comment.
You’re a joke.
“you argued yourself in circles and you know it.”
No, I argued consistently from the information in the survey results. I understand a little more than you about the wider Christian community, that’s all. It seems you were unaware that not all evangelicals identify as “White Evangelical Protestants”.
“To back up an assertion you pulled out of your arse you cherry-picked a comparison of possibly/probably (as they weren’t randomly selected) unrepresentative samples from a survey that was different to what you originally said, as you so helpfully outlined at the top of your previous comment.”
So you really didn’t read the survey?
The partial results from the survey that was irrelevant to your original point.
You know nothing.
“The partial results from the survey that was irrelevant to your original point.”
The support for vaccination among the population identifying as evangelicals was roughly the same as among those not identifying as evangelicals. It was also roughly the same as the general population illustrated by the second reference. You seem to be trying to deflect from not understanding that the other categories will include evangelicals.
The support for school-required vaccination among a non-randomly selected subset of the population identifying as evangelicals was roughly the same as among a similarly non-randomly selected subset of those not identifying as evangelicals.
Fixed it for you.
It’s actually possible that the survey you’re investing sooo much adamantium on is a crappier indicator of evangelical vs non-evangelical attitudes to vaccination than the anec-arse-data you initially came out with.
“It’s actually possible that the survey you’re investing sooo much adamantium on is a crappier indicator of evangelical vs non-evangelical attitudes to vaccination than the anec-arse-data you initially came out with.”
Only if you totally misunderstand it. Clearly you were unaware that not all evangelicals identify as “White Evangelical Protestants”. That probably didn’t help.
The survey was not about what people oppose, it was about whether or not people support school-required vaccination. Whereas your claim was about whether people opposed vaccination, not even a school requirement for it.
“The survey was not about what people oppose, it was about whether or not people support school-required vaccination. ”
I know.
“Whereas your claim was about whether people opposed vaccination, not even a school requirement for it.”
The survey records only two opinions, support, oppose. If the respondents don’t oppose, they support. If a respondent supports school-required vaccination, they are hardly likely to oppose vaccinations in general.
But if they oppose school-required vaccination, they might still support vaccines as well as other people’s choices to not support vaccines.
And you don’t know what proportion of the people who oppose school-required vaccination also oppose vaccination as a choice, nor do you know what proportion of non-white evangelical groups are evangelicals.
You know nothing, Jon Shadrach
“And you don’t know what proportion of the people who oppose school-required vaccination also oppose vaccination as a choice, nor do you know what proportion of non-white evangelical groups are evangelicals.”
Which is precisely why I used the two groups whose constituency we better understand. Well done McFlock. You get there in the end.
But neither group reflects the populations you made your original claims about.
If A, then B(1)
If A, then not C
If C, then B(2)
If C, then not A
If B, then A or C
(B(1) + B(2)) = B
evangelical = A+B(1)
non-evangelical = C+B(2)
Therefore:
comparisons between subsets of groups are not the same as comparisons between the groups you mentioned in your original claim you fucking moron.
“But neither group reflects the populations you made your original claims about.”
Wrong. “White Evangelicals” are a subset of evangelicals. “Non-Affiliated” are a subset of non-evangelicals.
The National Party Caucus is a subset of “current New Zealand Members of Parliament”.
Do there attitudes mirror the attitudes of the current parliament? No.
“The National Party Caucus is a subset of “current New Zealand Members of Parliament”.
Do there attitudes mirror the attitudes of the current parliament? No.”
Do their attitudes mirror the National Party? Well most likely, yes.
You see when you understand ow the subset works, you get there eventually.
Because white evangelical protestants are the elected representatives of all evangelicals… /sarc
How do you orbit comprehension so closely without actually hitting it?
“Because white evangelical protestants are the elected representatives of all evangelicals… ”
White evangelicals are not ‘elected’. They are a subset (your word) of all evangelicals.
as opposed to the nat caucus, who are elected by the wider nat membership.
You really do love pretending that apples are lumps of coal.
“as opposed to the nat caucus, who are elected by the wider nat membership.”
Yes. They are, as it were, a subset of the wider national membership.
(I’m not sure about your obsession with the National caucus though!)
White evangelicals are not elected. They are a subset of all evangelicals.
Your circles are closing in on you!
The nat caucus is elected and paid to represent the wider group. So yes, it should reflect the wider group.
White evangelicals represent nobody but themselves. That group ws chosen with a systematic bias and no requirement to represent the wider group. Your assumptions are flawed. Your comprehension is incomplete. Your confidence is unwarranted.
Your persistence is impressive, though. You are the Franklin Expedition of demographic analysis.
“The nat caucus is elected and paid to represent the wider group. So yes, it should reflect the wider group.”
Agreed. Although ‘represent’ and ‘are representative of’ are different things. In the context of a survey, we would be more interested in whether or not they are ‘representative’.
“White evangelicals represent nobody but themselves.”
White evangelicals are a subset of all evangelicals, and therefore are representative of that group.
“That group ws chosen with a systematic bias and no requirement to represent the wider group.”
That group is a subset of all evangelicals. The group ‘white evangelicals’ appear to just be that, white evangelicals.
“Your persistence is impressive, though.”
It’s simply a matter of a passion to help you understand.
And nat caucus members are a subset of all MPs, but are not representative of that group.
Pedophiles are a subset of humanity, but they’re not representative of humanity.
Terrorists are a subset of pretty much every religion, but they’re not representative of any religion.
Arseholes are a subset of “organs in the human body”, but the only human body that is adequately represented by its arsehole is yours.
“And nat caucus members are a subset of all MPs, but are not representative of that group.”
Well they are on some things. But not as much as white evangelicals are representative of all evangelicals.
“Pedophiles are a subset of humanity, but they’re not representative of humanity.”
No, they are representative of pedophiles.
“Terrorists are a subset of pretty much every religion”
or not…https://www.army.gov.au/our-future/blog/strategy/non-religious-radicalisation-the-selfie-generation-of-terrorists.
“but they’re not representative of any religion.”
That depends on the religion.
“Arseholes are a subset of “organs in the human body”, but the only human body that is adequately represented by its arsehole is yours.”
I would think that is physically impossible. And likely an attempt to move the conversation into some fairly weird areas.
So some subsets are representative of the larger group solely because they are subsets of that group, but other subsets are only representatives of themselves and not the larger group even though they are subsets of that group.
You’re an idiot.
“So some subsets are representative of the larger group solely because they are subsets of that group, but other subsets are only representatives of themselves and not the larger group even though they are subsets of that group.”
You are confused.
White evangelicals are a subset of evangelicals, and can be considered representative of all evangelicals. Not ‘represent’ (although they may), be ‘representative of’.
By focusing on National MP’s, pedophiles and assorted body pats, you have become very confused.
Nah, they just illustrate the point that your idea that white evangelicals must be representative of all evangelicals because they’re a subset of that group doesn’t apply to subsets of other groups, therefore the mere fact of being a subset in no way means that a subset is representative of the larger group and your idea is fucking stupid.
“…they just illustrate the point that your idea that white evangelicals must be representative of all evangelicals because they’re a subset of that group doesn’t apply to subsets of other groups…”
But it can! That’s the point! Next time you take a call from a polling organization, ask yourself the question, why me?
It can, but it might not.
Whereas you took the position that a subset must be representative of its wider group, for example (my italics):
Do you understand the difference between “can” and “must”?
They might be representative of other evangelicals, but you have no way of knowing that. It’s just an assumption you made to pretend that a cherry-picked example from an unrelated survey supports your position about evangelical (as a whole group) attitudes to vaccination (as a principle, not just as a requirement for school attendance).
“They might be representative of other evangelicals, but you have no way of knowing that. ”
Actually the sample size represented by ‘white evangelicals’ is large enough to well and truly be representative. 2 in 3 evangelicals in the US are not people of colour (https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2017/september/1-in-3-american-evangelicals-person-of-color-prri-atlas.html). 2 in 3 McFlock. Would you consider that statistically significant enough to be considered representative?
Any reputable one.
Firstly, it’s a systematic bias rather than randomised selection.
Secondly, you’ve said that evangelicals aren’t restricted to protestants. So “white evangelical protestants” are still a subset of “white evangelicals”.
Thirdly, it’s not a survey of two thirds of the evangelical population, it’s a probably-representative sample (appropriately randomised and weighted) of a maybe-representative subset (white evangelical protestant) of a maybe-representative subset (white evangelical of all denominations) of a population (all evangelicals). Gotta love those compounding errors.
“Firstly, it’s a systematic bias rather than randomised selection.”
I asked you “Would you consider that statistically significant enough to be considered representative?” Clearly now you do (“…it’s a probably-representative sample” etc).
“Secondly, you’ve said that evangelicals aren’t restricted to protestants.”
Did I? I’ve had a quick look through the comments and could only find these :
“Clearly you were unaware that not all evangelicals identify as “White Evangelical Protestants”.”
https://thestandard.org.nz/bigots-billboard/#comment-1531310
“There will be many in the other religious groups who are also evangelicals, which is why I compared the ‘evangelicals’ group with ‘non-affiliated’ group.”
https://thestandard.org.nz/bigots-billboard/#comment-1531159
I’m not sure of the proportion of Catholics who are ‘evangelical’. Some say none, in the true sense of evangelicalism https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/07/15/what-it-means-that-mike-pence-called-himself-an-evangelical-catholic/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0fdbfe5a4ea5. But again my view is you just understand the distinctions.
“Thirdly, it’s not a survey of two thirds of the evangelical population, it’s a probably-representative sample (appropriately randomised and weighted) of a maybe-representative subset (white evangelical protestant) of a maybe-representative subset (white evangelical of all denominations) of a population (all evangelicals).”
So, you concede ‘probably’? Good, because…
1. 76% of white evangelicals say that parents should be required to vaccinate.
2. White evangelicals represent 2/3’s of all protestant evangelicals, so as a subset they are representative of all protestant evangelicals.
So unless the proportion of Catholics who are evangelical is significant (and I suggest it can’t be as Pew doesn’t allocate this group a separate status), ‘white evangelicals’ is a representative sample of all evangelicals.
You really can’t fucking read, can you.
All I said was that the survey sample of white evangelical protestants was “probably representative” of all white evangelical protestants. And that WEPs were a “maybe-representative subset” of white evangelicals of all denominations.
“Maybe”. Not “probably”.
You are such a fucking moron I barely skimmed the rest of your comment. Re-read what I wrote more carefully, then try again. I might get back to you tomorrow. If your stupidity no longer hurts my brain.
“Maybe”. Not “probably”.
You said ‘probably’, ‘maybe’, ‘maybe’. Your getting there.
“You are such a fucking moron I barely skimmed the rest of your comment.”
Well you’ve been following me around this thread since this one https://thestandard.org.nz/bigots-billboard/#comment-1531077, which was 2 days and 8 hours ago. During that time, you’ve posted 23 times, and all you’ve achieved is to show you don’t have a clue about the actual groups in the survey! Who is the moron?
Don’t bother trying to get your head around my response.
You’re the moron.
Pulling words from one clause and applying them to the subject of another clause as you did is stupid, dishonest, and the hallmark of a right royal piece of shit.
But you won’t read this comment as the insult it is. You’ll grab two words out of it and claim victory.
So can i take it that these commenters above are well informed on the ingredents used in making up vaccines and have come to an informed opinion that they pose no risk?
So can i take it that these commenters above are well informed on the ingredents used in making up vaccines and have come to an informed opinion that they pose no risk?
Begging the question, trollfail. Nothing has “no risk”. Water has non-zero risk.
So your answer to my question would be “No I am ignorant of the ingredents used to make up vaccines”…Thats one! Anyone else?
So your answer to my question would be “No I am ignorant of the ingredents used to make up vaccines”…Thats one! Anyone else?
You’re not very good at this are you?
Xanthe I am not ignorant of what’s in vaccines or all the peer reviews.
You need to go to a doctor and challenge their knowledge.
After billions of doses very few people have had any reaction or damaging side effects.
You would have more chance of winning lotto than suffering any harmful side effects.
Life is full of risk. No ones’s claiming there’s zero risk in vaccines, but that risk is lower than the risk in the diseases they prevent.
https://sciblogs.co.nz/code-for-life/2018/10/02/vaccines-and-risk-on-auckland-motorway-billboard/
And that makes Two !
Whoopie, I get Two spelt with an upper case T, I’m special.
To be pedantic, I can’t be two because you specifically stated
“So can i take it that these commenters above … have come to an informed opinion that they pose no risk?”
I hadn’t commented above so cannot be one of that group.
I was commenting on your ridiculous claim that some people might come to an informed opinion that they pose NO risk (my emphasis).
For the record, I’m quite happy to accept the advice of others who are familiar with the details, in my case my wife who is a medical doctor and whose competence I trust in preference to some anonymous raver on the internet.
I have looked at the statistics and am satisfied the risks are less than unvaccinated people face.
Xanthe I am completely informed about the make up of all the vaccines on the NZ schedule and recommend everyone is vaccinated unless there is a medical reason whereby they are unable.
Agreed SM.
Very good !…… Now we are discussing the content of the billboard instead of just trashing its authors
Can i take it that your knowlege of vaccines includes culture, transport, and preservatives used?
What would be the medical conditions that would counterindicate vaccination?
All of those vary according to the specific vaccine. That’s why each one comes with its own information sheet, and often a contraindication checklist (been a while since my last tetanus shot, but the flu one my workplace does every year has a checklist).
Do you not read the information provided? It’s all there. It’s called “informed consent”.
That is what people go to medical school to learn. I would not for a minute think that I could replace that knowlege with a browse through Google.
Stunned Mullet. Can you provide any links to a) what Amorphous Hydroxyphosphate Sulphate is and, b) any studies of its safety?
You missed out the “aluminium”…
jumping to (b), all vaccines are rigorously tested for safety, including vaccines that contain AAHS.
http://www.immune.org.nz/vaccines/vaccine-safety/safety-monitoring
Personally I think vaccines are great for me and for >99.9% (the number extra 9’s subject to on-going collection of data on adverse reactions) of the population, both vaccinated and unvaccinated.
Merck aren’t helping their cause by naming an aluminium-based adjuvant “Amorphous hydroxyphosphate sulfate” (AHPS).
Here’s a link to a PDF of a 2013 review paper that includes an introduction to the development and use of mineral-based adjuvants. Information on AHPS begins on page 252. This paper contains very little information on the safety of mineral adjuvants in humans, although some of the references might be relevant. The small numbers of adverse reactions (over a period of decades) would suggest that the medical benefits far outweigh the costs.
http://elfosscientiae.cigb.edu.cu/PDFs/Biotecnol%20Apl/2013/30/4/BA003004RV250-256.pdf
In about one in twenty car accidents it is more risky to have a seatbelt on, than not. The other 19 or so, out of twenty the seatbelt saves people from death or injury.
I wear a seatbelt.
In about one, in many hundreds of thousands of cases, it is more harmful to be vaccinated.
In something like one in a thousand, it is more harmful NOT to be vaccinated.
I’ll take the vaccine.
Well put. A good illustration.
Balance of risk is the principle here. Much safer to be vaccinated.
https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/A_E/Comparisons-of-the-effects-of-diseases-and-the-side-effects-of-vaccines
Got my tetanus booster the other day – great! Mild swelling in my shoulder for a couple of days….compared to risk of severe illness and 10% mortality rate if I get tetanus.
“…have come to an informed opinion that they pose no risk?”
Yeah they have no risk as proven over and over and over and over again.
Next…
🙂
One of the Kennedy’s has made a cult following out of claiming heavy metals in vaccines were killing people without any peer reviewed scientific evidence
So after 50 years of these vaccinations billions of doses no harmful side effects.
Because of the bad publicity from the anti vax cult vaccine makers got rid of the minute and stable molecules that contained mercury which was locked up in a compound and did no damage and in fact kept the vaccines more stable during storage and dispensing was removed.
So the antivaxxers can’t say their are heavy metals in vaccines they were removed in 2000 even though after about 20 billion doses+ and many 100’s of millions of lives saved.
These cultists are being enabled by Trump.
Any chance someone could post a full picture of the billboard, suitable for including in an ASA complaint (for those of us who cannot take our own photo there)?
There’s a photo on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/auckland/comments/9kexqt/antivax_billboard_on_display_in_south_auckland/
Thanks, I have made a complaint. That billboard is a disgraceful attack on the health of children, although I expect motivated by willful ignorance, rather than outright malice.
What did you write in your complaint?
Your comments indicate a high level of ignorance…
You have an opportunity to show that you are neither ignorant…nor projecting…
Post the complaint…
I was going to post it, but that would allow my identification here by cross reference.
Happy to hear where I am being ignorant.
What ‘evidence’ did you provide in the complaint to back-up your opinion…
That billboard is a disgraceful attack on the health of children
How so…in your opinion…without the emotive language…
Because when vaccination rates lower, children get sick and sometimes die.
The science actually shows there are risks, so to call WAVES anti-science does yourself no favours. Many people have died throughout history due to vaccination and they have actually spread disease and many recalled. Don’t throw your toys out the cot due to a billboard.
When my son was vaccinated he started preferring to play Mario Kart in mirror mode, why did science not warn me that this would happen, BIG PHARMA 1080 CHEMTRAILS CONSPIRACY!!1
When my son was vaccinated, he went from verbal to non-verbal for over six months. The surgery, (at the time the only method of recording possible side effects) did not consider this worth noting.
He – like his mother – would be considered to be on the spectrum, so no comment on whether that was bad timing or a side effect. But it is a comment on the reluctance of medical professionals to even record the possibility.
… I should add, at that time.
How is he now?
I take it he hasn’t had TB, or german measles to affect his partners baby, polio, shingles, tetanus, gone deaf from measles……….?
Your comment is off track, to what I posted. Which was a comment on the reluctance of our personal medical provider to note any change in behaviour that may or may not have been due to the vaccination.
If I thought you had a personal interest in my son’s health – why would you? – I might have answered your somewhat facetious question.
My son has severe autism and seemed to have a bad reaction to a vaccine at nine months, but I think he had autism anyway. However it has plagued his Dad’s mind for years. I know how sad it is Molly to wonder about these things. Best wishes to you and take care, Delia.
Not facetious. All of these things he didn’t get because of vaccination. Not just his, but the vaccination of people around him.
Rates of autism are the same, regardless of whether a child is vaccinated, or not.
Looking at Autism organizational around the world they strongly come out against the antivax brigade.
All research has shown Autism is genetic and the fact his mother is.
Autism starts being diagnosed at the same time as childhood vaccinations .
That the only way Autism can transferred is through genetics.
Autism just doesn’t happen.
all research has shown autism is genetic ..
No, ALL research has show no such outcome..
Not thinking the comment through are you…
If it is genetic, there is nothing that can be done to prevent it…no environmental factors could be a contributer…nothing can be done to improve the epidemic of autism…just a failure of human genone/dna creating massive brain damage in young human beings…
Because ALL research has shown it is genetic…
Come on…you can do better…surely?
Science also looks at the other side: the number of lives saved.
Which, compared to your “many”, is “lots”.
Tens of Millions died or were seriously debilitated, before vaccinations.
Just dropping this off.
http://www.stonekettle.com/2018/08/critical-path.html
Required reading. Jim Wright has ‘hit it out of the park’ with that one Joe.
You don’t have to destroy America, when Americans are willing to do it for you.
This and the overwhelming deluge of outrage culture, nasty zero-sum identity games, and post-modern ‘the truth is not the truth’ relativism … are all modes of undermining attack that will clearly end badly for us.
The advent of nuclear weapons rendered large-scale conventional war obsolete; yet the West continues to arm itself to fight WW2. Our opponents shifted to alternative battle-fronts, the economic and moral, with quite remarkable success it would seem.
Lovely.
Would imagine they are targeting Maori as they have the lowest vaccination rate apart from “Other” in the stats and they want to keep it that way.
Start with the controlling the most who don’t then work on the ones that do.
(Probably didn’t explain that very well)
The difference between Māori vaccination rates and all NZ children on their own is barely worth targeting in a campaign like this.
However, the billboards may be aimed at increasing distrust of health providers who encourage vaccination, which is worrying. There’s been a lot of work gone into improving preventative health services, like vaccination, for families that mainstream GP practices have trouble reaching.
I was going by the 3 monthly figures on the govt website
This link is the latest one from up till July which has Maori on 85% at age 5 to European 91%
This is a spreadsheet download link, not dodgy
https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/pages/immunisation-tier-1-stats-3-month-period-11jul18.xlsx
Agree totally with your last paragraph
Ah, I see… Thanks
Your observation is definitely relevant in terms of the Auckland DHBs.
Maybe it’s worth looking at what’s being immunised against, and go from there?
Going through the “National Immunisation Schedule“, it strikes me that some of the stuff being immunised against isn’t exactly life threatening or seriously debilitating for most of those likely to be affected.
That aside, improve the bloody information being given out!
This is from the schedule under Haemophilis Infuenzae type b (hib)
Hib was once the most common cause of life-threatening bacterial infection in children under 5 years old. Before the vaccine, 1 in every 350 children had the disease before they were 5 years old.
How life threatening?
Hib most often leads to: meningitis, an infection of the membranes that cover the brain and spinal cord
epiglottitis, an infection and swelling in the throat that blocks the breathing passages.
Yeah, but how often? And are we talking about “most often” in terms of most of the 1 in 350 will get those secondary infections, or is it the case that most who get some complication (secondary infection) will have those complications as opposed to other possible complications?
About 1 in 20 patients with meningitis dies and 1 in 3 survivors has permanent brain or nerve damage. About 1 in 100 patients with epiglottitis dies.
And those strike me as high percentages, but of the 1 in 350 children who caught the disease, how many developed meningitis or epiglottitis?
Before anyone jumps on me one way or the other, I’m not throwing up Hibs as some example of something that should just be allowed to occur, but only as an example of the bullshit level of information that lays itself open to claims of being somewhat alarmist.
1 in 350 was where meaningful information that could be weighed up began and ended with that Hibs literature. After that, prejudice and fear get played in a way that can easily suggest that if your child is one of the 350, then your child will get meningitis and/or epiglottitis, meaning that your child, if infected with Hibs, will have a 1 in 20 or 1 in 100 chance of dying.
If informed consent is an idea behind patient treatment (and I believe it is) then how about information that’s actually informative?
Bill
I suspect there is a lot that parents don’t know. How many have heard the name Hannah Poling? She is the child whose vaccinations, according to various doctors, led to her autism-like condition. Her parents will be paid millions of dollars in compo over the course of her life time.
Court Clarifies: Hannah Poling case “does not afford any support to the notion that vaccinations can contribute to the causation of autism
Plus
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0802904
and
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hannah_Poling
She is the child whose vaccinations, according to various doctors, led to her autism-like condition
That’s not what the ruling says:
https://lbrbblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/hooker-vaccine-court.pdf
SHG
I said various doctors have said that her vaccinations “resulted” in her autism-like condition. You are welcome to disagree with medical experts.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/
Medical experts at odds with the rest of their profession and observed evidence?
Good good.
It was evidence that convinced experts that Poling was brain damaged. And the authorities agreed that vaccines had resulted in her injuries.
“What’s unique about Hannah’s case is that for the first time federal authorities have conceded a connection between her autistic symptoms and the vaccines she received, though the connection is by no means simple. A panel of medical evaluators at the Department of Health and Human Services concluded that Hannah had been injured by vaccines — and recommended that her family be compensated for the injuries. The panel said that Hannah had an underlying cellular disorder that was aggravated by the vaccines, causing brain damage with features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).“
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1721109,00.html
Of course you are missing the point. Parents should be fully informed about vaccines before they decide whether to vaccinate their kids. Do you believe in informed consent?
I note that you’re the one linking to mass-media popsci articles rather than either the actual judgements or medical research.
As for informed consent, every single drug and vaccine comes with copious amounts of information. Your decade-old misinformation isn’t needed.
One case in many billions of doses.
Many 100’s of millions of lives saved.
It’s like terrorism scare people with 1bad outcome.
Thanks Bill. I’ve been in this discussion more time than I care to count on TS.
We have part-vaccinated our children, and did not go ahead with all the vaccinations on the schedule, in part because the information provided by the Ministry of the benefits of the vaccine did not seem to be well constructed, or justify the administering of a medication.
As mentioned, the Gardasil programme was particularly worrisome, as the survival rate for cervical cancer improves radically with the practice of regular smears, and it is reasonable to predict that many would let the regularity drop with the assumption that they are now protected. The incidence of cervical cancer developing from other HPV’s that are were not mentioned in the campaign, was also not given.
The use of ‘anti-vaxxers’ is one that usually precludes any open discussion on the schedule of vaccinations currently promoted by the Ministry. So, well done for taking it on.
We have part-vaccinated our children, and did not go ahead with all the vaccinations on the schedule
Trivia: you now have something in common with WhaleOil and his wife, who posted to his blog that they follow this course after “doing their research”
Did you even read my comment? The level of discussion here on this topic is reduced to name calling and little else.
Trivial, indeed.
Aren’t you lucky you can write your sarky little comment. Yes us with disabled children do have fears about vaccinations. I am a registered nurse and am pretty conventional..I have a very conventional nurse friend whose son was damaged by a vaccine. So do spare us your sarcasm, which is you cleaving to a point of view without accepting that all of us are entitled to our own point of view to.
You do understand that your own child being disabled gives you no greater authority or knowledge than anyone else?
My own child is disabled but I don’t go around using it as some claim to superior positioning in a discussion. In fact it has no bearing on facts that can be presented.
Because 170 kids a year with influenza isn’t enough?
What’s this crap you saying McFlock? You trying to have a go?
Hib isn’t influenza. And my comment was about the quality of the information on offer – not whether any given jab should be taken up or not taken up.
I notice that after 5 hours, only one comment out of about ten or so (Molly’s) was an actual response to my initial comment. Which is fucking ridiculous.
.
Ok, fair enough.
I will rephrase:”Because 170 kids a year with Hib isn’t enough?”
Here is all the information any rational non-specialist needs: incidence in a non-vaccinated population (170/year), list of contraindications (provided to parents), possible side effects (as above), and a reasonable belief that the ministry of health wouldn’t put a vaccine on the schedule if it was going to cause a larger burden of disease than it prevents (stating the fucking obvious).
Anything else is pure ego unless you’re a microbiologist or a chemist. And even then it’s a goddamned conceit.
So, I don’t know where you’re getting the 170 per year number from (I’ll assume it’s a calculation from 1 in 350).
The bad shit that has the potential to cause death hits some unstated proportion of that 170 (or 1 in 350), and I can’t understand why that number isn’t posted in the literature.
Informed consent is a conceit? ffs.
I’m not anti-vaccination, which I’m only stating because it seems like yet another case of an exchange being thrown into stupidly unhelpful terms of “black and white”.
Nowhere have I even so much as hinted that vaccines are irresponsible.
That said, tere have been “bad” medicines put to market often enough, and “bullshit” medicine sold to governments off the back of scare tactics (eg – from memory “everyone” scampered to H5N1 vaccine stocks a few years back (2005?), that would likely have been ineffective, but that McCain(?) made out like a bandit from due to having shares in the manufacturing company)
Correction on the Avian Flu hysteria. It was Rumsfeld.
60k births a year, quick math divided that by 350. Yes, it’s “under 5”, but then you have the birth rate by five so same result.
And death isn’t the only bad thing that happens. Even getting it means another 170 health service contacts per year. Those don’t magic into existence, health services are prioritised. People aren’t sitting around just in case a bubby gets sick. There’s almost always something to do, and applying care in one direction deprives it from another.
Informed consent is necessary. That’s why everything they need is already handed to people on a plate. Pretending someone can make an informed choice on any medical treatment in greater detail than I outlined above is a conceit.
I never said the process of research and medical advice was perfect. It isn’t. Just as no pilot of a plane is perfect. But pretending to know what ingredients in any medical treatment do based purely on google and facebook? That’s a conceit equivalent to pretending you know better than the pilot about what to do in any given situation. I take half a dozen pills a day. The doc says they’re for this or that, but do I fucking know what they specifically are or how they work? Bullshit. I just make sure the pharmacist gives me the right ones in the right measures, and take them as advised. It’s why I’m still alive (if the lack of spontaneous bleeding is anything to go by).
Sometimes the smart move is to just sit the fuck down, buckle up, and read the magazine. Tell the cabin crew if the wing catches fire, but screaming “the plane might crash” helps nobody.
You either didn’t read my initial comment before jumping in, or are commenting in spite of what I wrote.
I haven’t said a thing about “ingredients” (so don’t know why you’re going down that track). I haven’t said anything about safety of vaccination (so don’t know why your going down that track). Neither have I laid claim to any whiz bang level of medical knowledge (so don’t know why you’re going down that track either).
Oh. The M5N1 vaccine was probably going to be “less than effective” because of mutation. That’s the whole thing about flu. It changes. (Hardly whiz bang knowledge or anything “based on google and facebook” 🙄 )
Anyway. My point was about the quality of the information on offer. As I commented, the linked literature does not give information on how many children who get infected with hib go on to develop more serious conditions, or break those more serious conditions down, or say how many have no discernible symptoms.
And since vaccination is largely a numbers game, and since informed consent supposedly sits fairly near the centre of medical ethics in this country, I can see no reason as to why that further breakdown isn’t given.
That you would be happy to be treated on the basis of a doctor’s say so and a sum total of infections is fine, but that doesn’t mean a thing in terms of the bigger picture of informed consent.
Whereas fixating on more serious complications is a perfect example of why going beyond the criteria I initally outlined under the guise of “informed consent” is an excellent example of misunderstanding the concept entirely.
Why isn’t 170 kids a year with Hib enough of a reason to get kids vaccinated if there are no contraindications?
Why isn’t 170 kids a year with Hib enough of a reason to get kids vaccinated if there are no contraindications?
I’m going to cut and paste from my initial comment, okay?
Before anyone jumps on me one way or the other, I’m not throwing up Hibs as some example of something that should just be allowed to occur, but only as an example of the bullshit level of information that lays itself open to claims of being somewhat alarmist.
I’m not familiar with “bullshit level of information” as a technical term. Does that mean “insufficient level of information from which to make an informed decision”, or does it mean something known only to yourself?
That h5n1 vaccine wasn’t available at such short notice as it takes time to develop and make them safe.
Tamiflu is an immunity booster more along the lines of hiv medicines which at the time was the only thing available
With more research it proved to only give a mild boost to the immunity system.
Now if you have had a flu jab you are immunised from the h5n1 flu although it Could mutate and scientists are researching mutations so they can have vaccines ready for an epidemic.
Ebola scientists developed a vaccine in short time to prevent more outbreaks but in war torn south Sudan Ebola has broken out again.
But keeping it contained in a war zone could turn out very bad for everybody.
Are you suggesting that an ordinary flu jab does provide protection against the “bird-flu”?
If so, I wouldn’t mind a link for that, thank you.
I’m all for free speech but damned if groups like WAVE make want to rethink that..
Also you may or not be interested but DDT has been linked to autism
https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/a-banned-pesticide-still-present-in-the-environment-has-been-further-linked-to-autism/
And as everyone knows DDT has been scientifically proven to be completely safe time and time again /sark/
No. It was scientifically proven to be unsafe, just like tobacco.
I have a friend who is a anti 1080 anti vaxxer. I’ve taken a break from her on facebook and unfollowed her. It’s unfortunately the only way.
The Advertising Standards Authority really shouldn’t need complaints in cases like this. The billboard is obviously lying by implication and causing fear and doubt in the population and thus the advertiser should automatically be fined about $10m.
Reminds me of the scaremongering that took place when the MeNZB vaccine was being rolled out. Disgraceful. Of course it wasn’t a lobby group but the Health Ministry which did the scaremongering.
That’s the whole problem with this debate Ross, it seems to be an all out war where everyone is fighting from an emotional base. I too have noted the surprising tactics of the Ministry who act like the don’t actually have the science on their side and have to frighten people into using vaccines. As a parent it’s incredibly hard to wade your way through this nonsense.
I know people get pushed to extremes in this debate (just like the 1080 issue) but in my experience its the pro vaccine people who have the most trouble keeping their emotions out of it. This posting is no better with the comment that the people from Waves think Polynesian and Maori men and women have control over their women so they should direct advertising at them. This is clearly a prejudiced guess on Te Reo Putake’s behalf and tells us more about his hatred for anti-vaxxers than it does about anything else.
How I wish I could find some people who could talk about this issue calmly.
You are so right. I wish I had seen your comment before I posted.
Aaron, it certainly appears there is no appetite to allow public discourse…not in a meaningful sense…
I’m not referring to this site…which is a microcosm of the confused ‘left’…
As a species, we are being deprived…looking at this article and most of the comments…willingly deprived, while actively depriving others of benefits which could develop from genuine and open public discourse…
TRP has a chequered history on this subject, and if you go back far enough you can see a lack of time invested to understand some of the core issues he rallys openly against on other subjects…
Don’t be disheartened by the level of commentary…it is irrelevant to the wider landscape…
I’m usually a part of the confused left but am surprised to find everyone else has suddenly lost their caution around issues where Big Pharma is making billions of dollars
Big Pharma often behaves unethically and I personally am totally against the private profit model for medicine development. But that does not mean that vaccines do not work. Vaccine safety and efficacy has been demonstrated repeatedly by entities outside big pharma, and this can be seen in publicly available datasets.
In fact vaccines are not a big part of pharmaceutical sales, e.g. vaccines made up only around 1.82% of Big Pharma revenues in 2013.
Big pharma makes the most money where vaccination doesn’t work.
So called “cough and cold medicines”, for one!
Once the phrase “anti-vaxxers” was coined, it appeared the level of discussion dropped considerably. It implies that all parents who make the choice to not vaccinate are anti-medical and anti-science, and so deserve only lambasting and not attention, or addressing of concerns.
I suspect many who use the phrase have done little in the way of research themselves, and rely on the assurances of others to take the supposedly moral high ground.
Unfortunately labelling people in the way you describe is all too often used to attempt to belittle and silence opposing opinion. (BTW I am pro-vaccination).
I did wonder for a moment if “Bigot’s Billboard” was being proposed as a new name for TS
We’d be sued by Whaleoil for ‘passing off’.
LOL
every disease is a result of the environment and the ability of the biota to resist viral and bacteriological assaults from known and unknown sources.
taking a stand for one cause or another is usually ignorance or boredom.
I am so weary of the bigots. Not the people who posted the billboard but the bigots who immediately jump in and label everyone. Anti-vax = anti-science bad/anti-vax = done the research and well informed good, pro-vax = scientific reasoning good/pro-vax = brainwashed and ignorant bad.
Neither is true and neither is conducive to good information or good science. Given that vaccination is a choice and that choice requires informed consent maybe we should be looking at the dissenting voices as well as the Health Ministry stuff and asking what and why instead of being immediately dismissive. Who knows we might all learn something.
“We should all stop wearing seatbelts, because in one out of thousands of car accidents, an occupant drowned because they couldn’t undo the seatbelt”.
That is what almost all anti-vaccination arguments amount to!
Usually they’re not even that good.
That argument, plus “dose insensitivity”. e.g. ‘1 molecule of mercury is as dangerous / does the same thing, as 10 grams of mercury’.
Read the BMJ/lancet
Mayo clinic.
Both say extensive research has been done on any relation to Autism no evidence so far.
Lance O’Sullivan’s take is excellent. Anti-science people love to say there should be “debate”, including “debate” about proven nonsense.
To frame anti-vaccine rhetoric as ‘debate’ is dangerous and wrong
Has Lance heard of Hannah Poling? I bet he has but I suspect he doesn’t believe in informed consent.
His approach was idiotic, and dismissive of any concerns of those who ask questions.
He would’ve had more influence if he had sat through the movie, and then got up to talk after the movie had finished, and said why he disagreed with certain parts. He is after all, dealing with adults.
The link you have given to an article that refers to Andrew Wakefield, is worth looking at. The BMJ article itself does not refer to a link between vaccines and autism, it relates to a study that was done with children with developmental disorders – including those on the autism spectrum – and related gastro disorders.
For anyone familiar with those on the spectrum, this would be a recognisable link. Coincidentally, when looking in FAS for a friend, the gastro issues are the same. Whether there is an impact on neurological disorders by an inability to successfully digest nutrition, is an interesting topic.
AFAIK, he implemented a study on the possible link between vaccines and gastro disorders at the request of parents. But as that work was never to the point of publication, the BMJ removed the initial article. But I am relying on an ever aging memory and my research into this topic was well over fifteen years ago so I could be wrong. I do recall that Brian Deer was involved in the backlash, and though a journalist by trade, was instrumental in ensuring that any study into the link between vaccines and autism outside of the pharmaceutical industry would fail to be suggested, let alone get funding.
To be clear.
Andrew Wakefield is a fraudster who invented data, conducted unethical research and was correctly struck off the medical register. He did publish his findings – in the Lancet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wakefield
As is common in science, important findings are confirmed by other studies. But in the case of Wakefield – his results could not be replicated by other researchers. Since then, strong studies have debunked his supposed link between autism and vaccines convincingly. e.g.
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science-news/no-mmr-autism-link-large-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-kids
“In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Bryan King, director of the Seattle Children’s Autism Center, writes:
“Taken together, some dozen studies have now shown that the age of onset of ASD does not differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, the severity or course of ASD does not differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and now the risk of ASD recurrence in families does not differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.”
To be clear. The link posted by the previous commentor, linked to the pulled BMJ article which was not a study on autism and vaccines, but was a study on the incidence of gastro disorders for children with developmental delays.
If you can’t be bothered looking at the initial link provided by someone else, which I commented on. Then don’t bother.
If I am mistaken about the only pulled BMJ study, post a link to the study that was completed and published that Wakefield undertook to link autism with vaccination. AFAIK it never went ahead. The article and the link do not match.
I was simply pointing out the failure of the article to link what was written to their linked source. The censure of Wakefield does not negate the study, but resulted in the pull of it from the journal.
Sorry, just read your answer about the initial Lancet article.
Which is where it was originally published. But I still think that is a duplicate of the above linked study in the BMJ.
I am concerned that both sides need to be accurate in this discussion because it is worth it. The stuff article, when reporting Wakefield’s controversy and censure over autism and vaccines, should not be linking to a study that does not mention vaccines. It is substandard reporting.
Been a while, and I’m concerned I might be overegging the omelette, so I’ve gone and looked for the original retracted Lancet article. The reference to the vaccinations is there …“Onset of behavioural symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in eight of the 12 children, with measles infection in one child, and otitis media in another. “. So, the reporting and methodology due refer to vaccinations, as a matter of course, and as other commenters have mentioned.
There are some indications that children with both FAS and on the spectrum, have better progress when they are able to absorb nutrients from their diet better. If medication – vaccinations or not – interfere with that absorption, then that interruption of the digestion of foods may present to parents as causation, when it is not.
I’m well past the age where I have to consider this issue now, but it would be interesting to look into studies where this link – sans vaccinations – has been investigated.
Personally, I found the link between developmental disorders interesting, because it reflected my own experience with diet preferences and being on the spectrum, which was repeated many years later with my son. Later on, it was also of interest, because as a respite carer for a child with FAS, there were similar gastro issues.
Molly.
Thank you, and huge respect for at least trying to bring some… balance…into a topic that seems to assume extremism from both sides.
Your comments about Lance O’Sullivan are spot on.
He trashed the feelings of local mothers who are very real grounds to believe that their children’s severe disability was due to an adverse effect of routine vaccination.
He treated these mothers like ignorant fools. These children were, prior to becoming very ill after a vaccination, for all intents and purposes ‘normal’ and meeting milestones.
I have spoken with some of these mothers.
He failed as doctor.
Because he chose to break the paramount rule…listen to your patient.
Kia kaha Molly.
I am stuck on my phone and it’s difficult to comment, but you have my support.
His approach is based on science and proven fact.
Wakefield was exposed as a fraud.
Billboard is being removed.
Good timing:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/02/boy-dies-of-polio-in-first-fatal-case-in-papua-new-guinea-outbreak
Not for the kid, sadly.
But it is a reminder of what the issue is about: sick and dead children.
What is really unfortunate – thanks to vaccination, polio could be permanently eradicated from the world, if these last few places can be cleared of it.
Wasn’t that long ago we had polio epidemics – and closed schools as a result – here in NZ. My father was one who got it, and was fortunate to escape with only a shortened leg.
A history of what polio did here in NZ, before vaccines eliminated it – hundreds were killed:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12034351
My mother has suffered all her life from polio side effects. Several of her friends, died.
I’ve seen the effects of german measles on children for one.
Part of the problem is younger people have had no experience, of the diseases that vaccination prevents.
Mumps, chicken pox, measles and the rest are pretty serious things to wish on a child. Even if they recover fully.
It is child abuse not to vaccinate. The weird thing is that many who are against vaccines, would be horrified at parents who inflicted the same level of risk, or suffering on children by any other means.
it is child abuse not to vaccinate
You need to slow down… stop and think about what you’re saying….because it is one of the most serious logical fallacies a human being can believe …against other human beings
That you have made the statement signals you’re damaged state….more than your comments already had…
The ‘weird thing’…is you seem to be totally unaware of just how ignorant one must be to hold such a position…
My mother survived post war tuberculosis but lost a lung and spent the rest of her life afflicted with all manner of respiratory problems.
Between 1949 and 1956 polio epidemics claimed over 200 lives. Two of my extended family contracted the disease and both remain disabled, one seriously, the other not so bad.
People were terrified and myself and my siblings were quarantined and almost completely isolated until my parents upped stakes and moved to an isolated rural community where we were quarantined, again, for several months.
During those years my brother contracted pertussis and to this day he has respiratory problems.
But hey, the prospect of a life long disability is a risk worth taking because ….
And 1/2 thinks that people who want to prevent a repeat of all that are, “damaged”.
Indeed.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/aug/20/low-mmr-uptake-blamed-for-surge-in-measles-cases-across-europe
And Nz has the piss taken out if it again…while ‘progressives’ congratulate eachother for the ‘successful activism’…
There is nothing to be pleased about with any aspect of the billboard saga…
The levels are getting lower…while perversely people believe they’re ‘doing the right thing’…
“NZ” is merely a fanciful construct of the collective cosnciousness…
Zeitgeist…
is merely a shroud over the doors of perception…
…Mockery is merely a combobulation of confusion and desire…
Liberate yourself from your ignorance….
12 levels in NZ have gone up to one of the highest recent out brake of measles was amongst JW’s who don’t believe in modern medicine.
The levels of what people are capable of operating at…was what I referred.
An epidemic of low level, incoherent thinking….
Ill not address the thousands of medical professionals globally who clearly do ‘believe’ in modern medicine…yet openly seek to share knowledge despite being up against a world leader in corrupted industry…
Never stop seeking to learn and grow…most of all…never stop seeking to develop approaches to interpreting the world around you…
Vaccines are abit of russian roulette for the individual as they are an artificial immunity as opposed to a holistic immunity.
In the absence of holistic immunity, they may be life saving but they can also take a toll on people’s general wellbeing after that i have seen. It is an artificial cocktail (with disease) being injected into the blood after all that has been in practise a very short time in the evolutionary pattern of human biology – not enough respect is given to that in hysteria against anti-vaxers. As often, the one size fits cookie cutter approach and model should be tempered in such issues. Holistic immunity is also a socio/economic area, so it is a very complicated overall issue.
The middle ground is that they could be used in moderation perhaps within non judgemental individual choice to potential trade offs that people are willing to make, one way or another for their peace of mind.
Yeah, that sentence proves that you’re talking out your arse.
Perhaps, or perhaps not…
Individual experiences are not a political democracy.
Exactly. I really wish both sides would back off on the aggro. (Something I’m avoiding wherever possible these days.)
Personally I had the usual childhood vaccinations and I’m exceedingly grateful that I was too young to have been around when polio was at it’s peak. In general I take KJT’s approach on this; vaccinations are not risk-free but are on average the best bet we have at present.
Truly we’ve forgotten what it’s like to live in a world stalked by terrible mass plagues and diseases; we should be more grateful.
At the same time my own immunity did not play out as it should have. In my 30’s I was working at a tough job that required me to be on call 12/14 days, 24 hrs. Over a number of years the erratic hours and stress (related to a toxic supervisor) meant that four years running I came down with a severe dose of measles, mumps, chickenpox and would you bloody believe rubella! The doctor really was surprised.
Then there was the year I was off work 3 months with mono, and another awful period with giardia (carelessness on my part). Then came the migraines, every second Saturday for almost 20 years.
As individuals we are complex and unique; our health and genetics are very difficult to understand. Our health sciences work well enough on an aggregate population level, but have a long way to go before we can target the individual in an optimum way.
Well said DTB the best vaccination for Stupidity is a good education system.
Trump has roused anti vax supporters Trump can barely read.
He has to have pictures drawn to explain what’s going on.
Those with only high school or less will believe in these voodoo antivax scare tactics.
My choice is peer reviewed science published in the BMJ.
Now how many doses of Vaccine have been administered many billions given most of the world’s population has been vaccinated and many multiple times.
Many hundreds of millions of lives saved.
Lack of refrigeration or not strictly following the correct times of doses is the very rare bad side effects.
Vaxxers jump on these rare occurrences and blow it up into a conspiracy theory.
Artificial immunity WTF does that mean
You are bonkers if you think that’s how your immunity works.
Our immune systems are triggered to recognize the incursion which sends a message to our immune system to grow the antibodies to fight the incursion.
It’s our antibodies that do the work they aren’t artificial as your pathetic argument shows your level of education must have finished at primary school.
No Tricledrown…it is you whose understanding is below an adequate level to participate in this discussion…
Clearly you don’t understand what an adjuvent is..or it’s purpose/impact….or why life long immunity it not possible through vaccination…
Whole cell immunity…look it up before projecting naked ignorance at others …
“Many health authorities complain about vaccine hesitancy, but fail to reassure the public by providing the safety data they request. All over the world, millions of people have signed petitions demanding more safety, transparency and independent research, but decision makers chose fast-tracking instead. To restore confidence lost, we insist that before any kind of recommendation or authorisation is issued, ALL vaccines pre-qualified or recommended by the WHO will be submitted to:
• Extensive clinical trials conducted by bodies’ independent from the manufacturers
• Middle- and long-term studies on efficiency and safety, not ‘days’.
• Tests for carcinogenic properties
• Tests around fertility issues
• Tests on pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and the developing foetus
• Mutagenic effects (changes induced in the DNA)
• Tests for effects on the neurological system and development of the brain
• Real inert placebo testing, which is almost never done on vaccines
We also insist that the WHO should provide studies on:
• Adjuvants and preservatives such as aluminium and mercury and their bioaccumulation
• Other toxic material used, such as polysorbate, Tween 80, formaldehyde etc
• Vaccine safety and the age of vaccine administration
• The impact of full vaccine schedules on the global health of a population
• The comparison of vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations in global health terms
• Viral transmission of people recently vaccinated with live virus vaccine such as measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, influenza or oral polio vaccine for example.
In particular, we ask that the use of combined vaccines and the same-day administration of multiple vaccines be thoroughly investigated. Figures from India show that the numbers of deaths within three days following vaccination doubled when using a Pentavalent (5-in-one) vaccine rather than a triple DTP vaccine. It is projected that this change will cause between 7020 and 8190 deaths each year in infants in India14. It furthers appears that in confidential periodic safety reports of the hexavalent Infanrix polio vaccine submitted to the EMA, the manufacturer GSK has deleted a number of death cases between reports. 15”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/policy-safeguards/open-letter-from-international-organisations-to-the-who-on-the-issue-of-vaccine-safety/
https://msfaccess.org/msf-statement-who-roadmap-access-2019-2023-comprehensive-support-access-medicines-and-vaccines
Vaccination has now been in use for over a century. I think any more than a minimal proportion of adverse effects would have become apparent by now.
Meanwhile, millions of people have been saved from debilitating and deadly diseases.
Unlike my mother, who still has injuries from polio in the 1940’s.
Update on RNZ:
https://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/checkpoint/audio/2018665071/immunologist-slams-anti-vaccine-billboard-as-almost-organised-terrorism
Many of us have varying degrees of fear of flying.
We’re about 9 times more likely to die in a car crash.
The odds of dying in an air crash are about the same as being stabbed to death by our Grandmothers.
I see this vaccination thing in a similar light. Pack up our emotions, place our feelings aside and….
…numbers don’t lie. Jab your kid.
It is only an unreasonable fear until it happens and for the thousands of NZ families living with vaccine reactions, it is not unreasonable. In this instance, the numbers are unreliable. We simply don’t how many children are reacting as it is frequently dismissed and not reported.
Thousands. Even the anti-vac sites have only managed to find tens.
Fran, you’re saying there are 1000’s of NZ families wrestling with it and that we don’t know how many NZ families are wrestling with it.
Yes, some people die in air crashes. Rarotonga is well worth the risk.
We know through the official reporting system that there are indeed thousands of NZ parents whose children have reacted adversely to vaccines but we don’t know the full extent of reactions as not every reaction is reported.
It is easy to be flippant about the risk until it is your child, then not so much fun.
How do you know?
We can pull suspected adverse reaction reports from the system (i.e. someone got a jab and then something bad happened that might have been due to the vaccine being administered properly with due regard to contraindications), but your claim was specific that thousands of families in NZ are dealing with reactions to vaccines. So all of those reactions would be serious and confirmed as caused by the vaccine.
Take your time with links.
John Frazer- 35 years experience says…
The ingredients of vaccines are just bits of the virus, bits of the bacteria. So it’s like getting the infection without actually getting sick. That’s all that’s in a vaccine.
And people accept that level as being ‘good enough’ …
It’s not..
It’s good enough for me, I don’t care what’s in it because accurate numbers don’t lie.
The numbers say “Stop smoking Dave”. I don’t need to look at cigarette ingredients through a microscope, be a respiratory specialist nor seek 100 second opinions.
What numbers are you referring to…repeatedly without a reference?
Good enough for you…that’s fine, we have different levels of acceptable standards….jab your own kid…
Don’t suggest others should follow your opinion…
That’s exactly what you did…realised or not…
“I don’t care what’s in it”…David Mac
The statistics that should be driving our decisions.
I’m not going to point to a specific set of numbers, I’m talking about the poll of polls, the overwhelming statistical information from unrelated credible sources. The mean of all the data collected, the numbers.
But hey, cool, smoke around your kid if you must.
We’ve had this discussion before, David…
You’re making all sorts of claims about the numbers driving ‘our’ decisions…and pushing that outwards….but you won’t or can’t back it up…. sweet as bro….that’s your level….
Smoking around kids…nah…again that’s your low level transference…
“Our decisions”…. nah…your decisions and other people’s decisions…
Make your own…keep your low level ignorance away from other people…you’ve shown not to be up on basics previously…
And you’re clearly not trying to onboard more information….
Cool…that’s your decision…
+111
Exactly. And the numerous trials that show vaccines are safe and effective – used vaccines that contain all ‘that stuff’ we are supposed to be concerned about. And the vaccines were still clearly safe and effective.
What more to know?
An expression toxicologists sometimes use, which has application here:
“The dose makes the poison”
For the majority of people that’s all that’s needed. Knowing more than that is useless as most have no idea what to do with the knowledge. If you want more go and get a degree, a masters and then a doctorate in immunology and the production of vaccines.
Most parents take their role as caretaker and decision maker for their children very seriously. If the discussion regarding any aspect of childcare or health degenerates into name calling without preamble or open discussion, then the online discussion often degenerates into polar opposites, as we see here.
I am surprised that there is apparently little thought given to the different vaccines in this discussion. Just a blanket approval of all vaccinations on the schedule, and any deviation is “anti-vax”. A couple of commenters have tried to make that distinction, but have been shot down.
If you are someone who has absolute faith in the MoH, and those that make the decisions, then you are in a comfortable place. Perhaps asking yourself why others do not, may give you a better result in terms of discussing such emotive issues such as vaccinations.
Hi Molly…
Your comments on many subjects you author here are always well considered and articulate….IMO
When the majority who associate as ‘left’, who vociferously defend womans rights, feminisim while deriding ‘rape culture’, ‘patriarchy’ and openly question corporate capitalism on every level….
But then tacitly and openly support an industry outed as one of the most abusive, misogynistic, fraudulant and monied with lobbyists more numerous than the war machine and with a history equally as violent…while claiming ‘science’….
There are only a few primary reasons why people choose to take such an incoherant approach to their personal capacity…
And then throw that at others in such a way as to deprive all involved an opportunity to share, listen and develop..
Why would such behaviour be deemed internally acceptable given the access to information sources in recent times….it comes over a a deliberate act of interference…
I don’t have “absolute faith” in the MoH.
But I do know they pay people much better qualified than me to assess massive volumes of international medical data and research in order to identify the health costs and benefits of all sorts of stuff. Not just trial reports, but collated data from international organisations, predicting which strains are likely to be an issue, assessing NZ risk factors, and looking at the likely burden of disease and its effects on the rest of the health system.
There’s no way in hell that I, personally, could replicate that to even a smidgen of reliability compared to them.
I just trust them more than I trust online communities of people. Job interviews weed out so many unsuitable people.
I have a friend who has been through hellish health for the last decade because of the cursory research given to the implantation of surgical mesh before it became a commonplace surgical method to treat uterine prolapse.
The recent decision to stop use, IMO was only the result of many damaged people continuing to ask for answers from the MoH. Many surgeons refused to listen to their post-op patients, and gave many the impression that they were unbalanced for thinking something was wrong.
As for vaccinations, the Gardasil programme at a cost of $165 million is one that I have issue with. Primarily because the main protection against the development of cervical cancer is regular smears, and the delivery of the vaccine is efficacious against only several of the HPV.
My concern is: that after receiving the vaccine, many would choose to forego regular smears – because this is a normal human reaction. As there are HPV’s not eliminated by the vaccine that can result in cancer, those regular smears are still required. So – where is the financial benefit to MoH?
The benefit of eliminating some HPV’s at a cost of $190/dose for three doses, could have been spent in investing into much better screening and access to regular smears. When able to, I pay the extra $25 my surgery charges for a better smear process. $600 would have done that for 24 years for each person vaccinated. Women’s health seems to be an aspect of healthcare that still requires public advocacy for improvement.
I would appreciate your view on this particular vaccine, McFlock. As despite bringing up this particular vaccine campaign many times, it has never been calmly discussed.
Again, with respect to your friend, modern medicine (and its attached bureaucracy) isn’t perfect by any means (and quite shitty sometimes). And yes, some surgeons are still dickheads. Looking at any single treatment option might show a glorious success, a disturbing failure, or even just a poor response time to recall, implementation, or improvement.
But it’s still better overall than I could reasonably be. There have even been some “could do better” situations in my own treatment regime, although nothing close to your friend’s level. Treatments for condition A that aggravated condition B, that sort of thing. But when I started doing my own pain management, I ended up doubling down on NSAIDs – not the smartest move. So my doc and associated referrals are still well ahead on points from my own stupid efforts, and I think that applies generally across the population.
As for Gardasil, the NZ vaccine roughly covers 90% of the virus variants that cause 90% of the cancers with >90% efficacy. So that’s 50 deaths per year down to 15 if screening levels are maintained. Cervical screening has been associated with a 60% decline in mortality, so that means w/o screening or vaccination we’d face 125 deaths a year. So the worst case of your scenario (vaccination w/o screening) still lowers the 50 deaths a year from just screening down to 34 for just vaccination. It was a fair question, though, and I suspect that if I knew the right database or search engine syntax there’d be a business case online going through those considerations (and more). Unless they pressed the “commercially sensitive” button. Dunno.
Financially, I’m not sure your copayment would cover the full cost of your “better” smear. And of course we’d also deduct the treatments costs of HPV-related conditions like genital warts as well as cancers (prevention is better than treatment/cure).
I appreciate your reply McFlock, and understand your point about individual circumstance, but I was relating it more from a systematic refusal to make changes or insist on existing procedures due to a medical profession that insisted nothing was wrong despite patient feedback.
I also appreciate you taking the time to talk specifically about Gardasil, but I still have a concern relating to the natural human tendency to avoid unpleasant requirements such as smears, and as you mention “So that’s 50 deaths per year down to 15 if screening levels are maintained.” Do we have any evidence to show that this is the case?
The fatality rates refer to the current screening programme coverage, but I can’t find any references to those who developed untreatable cervical cancer, and information on whether they did so as one of those who underwent regular cervical smears or not. To me, that is an important distinction.
Another less prioritised question would relate to the other 10% of HPV not eradicated by the vaccine. Are they more or less aggressive than what has been removed? Once again, I couldn’t find that information on your link, and but believe it is important to emphasise not just the efficacy of eradication, but the lack of it for other pre-cancer HPV indicators, if that would improve the continuation of regular smears (histological or HPV).
I am supposed to be working on other tasks at the moment, but I did take some time to look for some Gardasil 9 safety research that was undertaken, and found a study that relates to the efficacy of that vaccine. The study cohort was young women aged 16-26, who were considered free of the noted HPVs, six years after the initial dose. Given that the average age of cervical cancer is 45 years, and the likelihood increases with an increased number of sexual partners, this limitation, while necessary for providing “clean” baselines for pre-existing conditions and minimal numbers of sexual partners, does not seem to have been compared to a similar cohort of non-vaccinated population. And I would think a long-term study would be necessary to follow these women up to the age when cervical cancer would be most likely to emerge, before assurance that eradication of those particular HPV’s at that age, would be effective. Furthermore, for what period are these vaccines effective, will they need booster shots over their adult lives?
Again, McFlock. Thanks for taking the time. This is the type of information I look for when considering any medication or medical procedure for my family, and often the literature provided at public level does not do so.
(The 2008 projected cost of 165 million for a possible reduction in fatalities of 35/year seems quite high, and assumes no other investment in HPV vaccines has taken place, which I would not think is the case given the continuation of the vaccination programme since that time and the extension of it to all persons under the age of 18 – including males).
Just another comment about how studies are conducted. After having a Stage 2 DCIS surgically removed from my left breast, the surgeon somewhat mistakenly thought to reassure me that I will be pleased with my prognosis when attending breast cancer support groups, as it was very unlikely that particular growth would result in cancer. While happy about the outcome, rather than the imagined scenario, which implies a complete lack of empathy for other patients, I was glad to get the all clear, and go onto the yearly monitoring that was prescribed.
A couple of months after surgery, I was given an appointment by the Auckland oncology department and when I attended they suggested that I had been chosen to participate in a clinical trial that would investigate the success of six weeks of daily radiotherapy. After asking whether this was a change to the result of my surgery, the oncologist answered no. Which means that my prognosis remained at about 95-99% of no cancer development. So, I was offered the opportunity to disrupt my life for six weeks, and undergo the effects of radiotherapy, and travel for up to two hours each way, in order to have the same outcome that I already possessed. As I regretfully declined, it occurred to me that I would have contributed to the positive benefits of the trial, without any receiving any individual positive benefit. I don’t know what size the trial cohort was going to be, but I would think that it would skew results. And I wasn’t asked if they could follow up my ongoing results in order to compare with a similar patient who would undergo the radiotherapy. Which I would have been happy to do.
Sorry, missed that comment earlier.
Normally those sorts of trials are a “double-blind”, which means you don’t know whether you were treated and the researchers don’t know who was treated until all the data is in. This means you don’t get the placebo effect of actually being healthier because you think you’re receiving treatment, and the clinicians can’t skew your response by their behaviour or subconsciously skew the results as they record them.
So if you were in the control (non-treated) group you would still have gone in for radiology appointments, everything would have been the same, except that when the machine goes “bing” there’s no radiation coming out. And nobody knows whether you were in the treatment group or not except the radiologist, and they wouldn’t know whether you were participant 12 or participant 57.
On the flipside, your records will still be useful, but for population-based research rather than an experiment like the one you describe. They won’t be presented to researchers in such a way anyone can say “oh, that’s Molly”, but researchers with a specialty in some particular area routinely order collections of medical records to compare prevalence, treatment options, and relative outcomes.
It’s sort of a research triad – population-based medicine provides correlation but not causal links, case studies and trials/experiments focus on possible causes and solutions with greater precision, while lab work and models (things that are similar to human cases in a very specific way) help people understand the bases for causes and solutions.
Any system has lags in feedback loops, but I suspect that the mesh problem was made worse by surgeons and sexism. The medical sector is trying to get out of the ultra-hierarchical mode it was in, because deference to authority kills people (pilot/copilot relationships are a similar situation). Attitude change is often a generational problem, though, and I suspect a certain personality type aids surgeons being able to cut people up and still remain vaguely sane. Sexism-wise, I’ve noticed anecdotally that some clinicians and specialists don’t take female organ issues very seriously – sometimes the system itself. A friend of mine has some uterine issues, always getting referred by her gyno but permanently on the waiting list. Discomfort during sex isn’t points-worthy unless it interferes with the relationship – i.e. until it interferes with her husband’s sex life. Sigh.
Sorry about the 60%, I forgot to include the anchor in the link:
But the financial costs aren’t just cervical cancer deaths, but the full spectrum of HPV outcomes. The usual tool for bureaucrats is to looks at “Quality-Adjusted Life Years”, and compare the cost of vaccines+screening against the costs of doing nothing or something else.
Your link was interesting, and there was a link on that page to a descriptive study that looked at several trials on HPV vaccines that wasn’t behind a paywall. While that study said it was too soon to look at cervical cancer itself, it could look at precancerous lesions etc.
As you say, longer term monitoring is (always) required, but then we have a dilemma: if we can see that in the medium (decade) term it is highly effective against precursors to cancers and we know the risk of adverse reactions is slight (also in the studies), do we hold back for the results of life-course studies to come in 50 years later? How is that rational or ethical? If it was the other way around and large numbers of people who received a treatment started getting precancerous lesions, they’d stop the trials.
And bear in mind, we’ve barely scratched the surface of available research on one specific intervention. At some point you just have to hope that someone did the math. And then you need a certain amount of faith in the supply chain so that what you get is what you ordered.
I take half a dozen pills a day, all me jabs, occasionally go to physio or suchlike, and have regular blood tests that tick sooo many boxes on the forms. If I spent a day with each potential treatment on the research backburner, I’d never get anything else done. I prefer to do the things that make me need the pills, lol.
” I prefer to do the things that make me need the pills, lol.”
… that is something I really can’t argue with…
I just saw on facebook a restaurant that does deep-fried battered bacon bites.
My life expectancy just plummetted 🙂
” Just a blanket approval of all vaccinations on the schedule,”
Each individual vaccine is separately tested for safety and efficacy, and monitored after introduction.
I know why they don’t – it’s because they’re ignorant schmucks who think their ignorance is better than the knowledge that the doctors have.
I know why they don’t
No Draco…they’re not All ignorant…including the countless number of medical professionals who have degress/masters/doctorates you hold in such high regard…
Your KNOWING comment is an example of projecting ignorance….
I am as skeptical about the morals of pharmaceutical companies as the next person.
However, vaccination predates “Big Pharma”.
I am comfortable about the motives of the New Zealand medical profession.
Aspirin also predates “Big Pharma” but how is this an argument that they can be trusted to make good or the best decisions in the public interest? They wield enormous decision power and hold most of the cards.
“I am comfortable about the motives of the New Zealand medical profession.”
So if you are trying to persuade someone, speak to them on the assumption that that are not at your level of comfort, and ask them why instead of requiring them to address it from your perspective.
I have difficulty with people who counter overwhelming evidence of the effectiveness and success of vaccination, with, “I know someone whose child got autism after their vaccinations” or “there are a couple of people who died or got ill after being vaccinated, somewhere”, of hundreds of millions of vaccinations over a century. Or “thousands” of children have been injured by vaccines in NZ”. There was a public outcry over a thalidomide babies, including from health professionals. You think the same people would cover things up if “thousands” of vaccination injuries were occurring.
No one who reads the science will argue that vaccination is totally risk free.
I have every sympathy for the few people whose children have been harmed by vaccines, just as I have for anyone whose child is harmed. There is nothing worse.
However, for every disease that is eradicated by vaccination, there is another we can take off the schedule. So, even the, small, risk from that vaccine is removed, forever.
When I was a child there were many people around showing the effects of polio, German measles, mumps, TB and the rest. No longer. And we no longer have to vaccinate against TB, Polio and small pox, because vaccination, worked.
Part of the problem is that most research is hidden behind paywalls, in journals, and not easily available to the public.
Which should not be the case for publicly funded research.
Leaving the public having to rely on “journalists”, who often simply read New Scientist or the equivalent, and have no training in critical interpretation of science, and people who have often biased, “axes to grind”.
I don’t have a prob with vacs,… saves a lot of lives, prob is when certain types get involved,… I’m thinking of the alleged WHO’s involvement with the spread of the AIDS virus,- plausible denial, ofc… medicine has become politicized over the last century, started with the paid for scientific reports and the emergence of the large drug company’s,…they are powerful lobby groups.
Remember back when butter was the evil , and margarine was being pushed as the answer in the 1970’s?
Now the worm has turned and butter is the angel and margarine is the devils advocate.
And so it goes.
These scientific ‘reports’,… are often tailored for a certain profitable result,… as for vaccines,… on the whole they have saved a lot of lives. Now malaria kills more per annum than AIDS. And a simple comfort of basic painkillers could even save lives for malaria,… along with simple political initiatives such as draining of swamp areas… providing employment…
I believe in combining the wisdom of the old and the new.
There aint no silver bullet.
David Allan Coe- If that ain’t country – YouTube
Precisely. A lot more humility all round and some honest listening from both sides would be way more use than this kind of brain-bashing post.
The only truth I’m sure of is that in the wider scheme of things we’re all ignorant about pretty much everything. 🙂
TRP,
I wouldn’t be citing Helen Pertousis-Harris. I commented on her blog last year when she was advocating censorship of a documentary proposed to be shown. I said:
Helen has no training as a medical doctor, but the arrogance is apparent. She is one of the reasons, I suspect, that some parents choose not to vaccinate.
https://sciblogs.co.nz/diplomaticimmunity/2017/05/24/in-defence-of-the-tamariki/
After receiving an unhelpful and somewhat patronising respone from Pertousis Harris, I said:
That last question has never been answered.
“TRP, I wouldn’t be citing Helen Pertousis-Harris.”
I didn’t, as far as I can tell. But I probably should have given her obvious credibility.
From her bio:
Dr Helen Petousis-Harris blogs about vaccines and vaccination. Her background is predominantly biological sciences, and she did her PhD in Vaccinology, specifically around vaccine reactions.
She worked at the Immunisation Advisory Centre at the University of Auckland between 1998 and 2018 where she has developed a passion for all things vaccine. Currently Helen has an appointment as a Senior Lecturer in the Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care and her teaching is largely around vaccination.
Her research focuses on a number of aspects of vaccines and vaccination but in particular vaccine effectiveness and vaccines safety. She is a member of the World Health Organisation Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) and the Brighton Collaboration Science Board.
Thanks TRP. She has said there are serious risks with the MMR vaccine. I didn’t see that comment in the Stuff article or your comments.
You’re over egging it and putting your own reading on her words, Ross. She has calmly outlined in a blog post the few already identified risks there are with the MMR vaccine. She does not say that there are “serious risks” at all. Most medicines have potential side effects or are contra-indicated for a minority of patients. That doen’t mean the medicines are fundamentally bad.
https://healthcentral.nz/how-safe-is-the-mmr-vaccine/
You’re attempting to reason with a fanatic, Te Reo. Good luck to you.
Thanks, Morrissey. Ross has put his point of view in several comments on this post and he’s done so without going completely OTT. Likewise, the responses to his comments have been reasoned and reasonable. So all good, as far as I can see.
She does indeed say there are serious risks and I provided you with a link at 28. She details what those risks are. However in the Stuff article she says:
“The chemicals in vaccines – just like in our mother’s breast milk – are in minuscule amounts and pose no safety risk whatsoever to humans and animals in those quantities, with the exception of course of an allergic reaction.”
No mention of the risks. She appears untrustworthy.
No she doesn’t, Ross. Those are your words, not hers.
TRP
She does say there are “serious risks” with the MMR vaccine. I can’t help it if you are not prepared to read what she’s written. From the link at 28:
“Rare adverse events associated with MMR vaccine: Temporary low platelet count about 1/30,000; convulsion associated with a fever about 1-2 per million doses, Encephalitis less than 1 per million, infection free meningitis about 1 per 800,000 to 1 per million, and anaphylaxis 1 per million.
Yes there are some rare but serious risks.“
But in the Stuff article HPH is comparing vaccines to mother’s milk. 🙂
Thank you for quoting the full sentence instead of plucking out the two words that support your otherwise thin argument. As I said earlier, you are over egging it.
The key point is that the risks are rare. The MMR vaccine is safe, except for a small and easily identified minority of patients. Just like every other medicine, and, yes, mother’s milk.
Mother’s milk has resulted in brain damage and autism like conditions? Well I never.
If WAVEnz or whatever they are called had gone with “Vaccine expert says there are serious risks attached to MMR vaccine and that some people should not be vaccinated”, they would have been on safe ground.
Reading articles on blogs by HPH provide an insight to the mind of an abusive bully…similar in tone to this article by TRP…not quite as aggressive as TRP, but then HPH is a ‘medical professional…
Her belittling and abusive writing style should be the first red flag by anyone who cites her as ‘expert reference’…
You know you don’t have to read my work, right? Nor do you have to comment on it.
And if you are going to comment, which is welcome, try to avoid accusing the author and an actual subject matter specialist of bullying simply because they’re capable of putting up a rational argument that you cannot refute.
Generally, accusing authors of bullying does not end well. I suggest you refresh yourself on the site policy regarding abusing authors and restrain yourself before I, or another mod, go down the educational ban route.
Rational arguments which I can’t refute…yes I absolutely can…and moreso people far better placed than you or I have refuted…and are refuting…every day…around the world….like it or not…it’s happening…and against one the most corrupted industrys in history…
I was not accusing you of anything…It is my interpretation of the tone you write in (articles and comments style )on….
I’m in a very good position to provide opinion of my own interpretation of yours, and HpH articles….it may not be how you intend to be interprered when you write…but that is how it comes across to me…
Using highly emotive language and words, even when mirroring or quoting back….begs interpretation of various ranges….
You’re an experienced author…you write in various tones on different subjects around some blogs….you know what you’re doing…
In my opinion, of course…
However, according to HPH, there are “serious risks” attached to the MMR vaccine and some people should not be vaccinated.
Yes, parents are routinely given such information. Example below from Auckland Regional Public Health Service.
When I got my tetanus jab the other week, the nurse asked various questions to check I was not one of the few who should not be vaccinated.
http://www.arphs.govt.nz/Portals/0/Health%20Information/Communicable%20Disease/Measles/Fact%20Sheets/Facts%20sheets%202011/October%202011%20fact%20sheets/Immunisation%20with%20MMR%20Vaccine%20-%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf
You’re using the narrow parameters of the questions you were asked, for a vaccine which doesn’t protect against a virus, hence your immune system can’t actually form any defence …not at all…
Your limited understanding would not enable you to understand the questions which should be asked of you…or the questions which you should ask back…
And you’re saying that based on your personal insufficient experience is evidence that parents are routinely given such information…
Inadadequate and incomplete information…
Fun fact; during the 1956 polio epidemic, Elvis had himself vaccinated on The Ed Sullivan Show.
Within 6 months, the US immunisation level for polio went from 0.6% to over 80%.
Dr Ben Goldacre, author of ‘Bad Science’ (2009), and ‘Bad Pharma: How Medicine is Broken, and How We Can Fix It’ (2013), is not shy when it comes to naming and shaming bad medical and corporate behaviours.
IMO he talks a lot of sense here (had forgotten that vaccination is a centuries-old treatment, and has faced opposition since its inception):
https://www.badscience.net/2013/04/how-vaccine-scares-respect-local-cultural-boundaries/#more-2871