Don’t let the door hit you on the way out
Written By:
- Date published:
12:27 pm, March 7th, 2020 - 163 comments
Categories: housing, tenants' rights -
Tags: flouncing, landlords, renting, residential tenancies act, tenancy
The government is about to do some long overdue reform of the Residential Tenancies Act. Predictably, the more anti-social among the landlords are not happy.
From Stuff,
Landlords say they plan to sell their properties – or focus solely on the high end of the market – if their ability to end their tenancies with 90 days’ notice is removed.
Specifically, landlords will no longer be able to terminate periodic tenancy agreements for no reason. The government is regulating when a periodic agreement may be ended and the process that needs to be followed.
Hard to see the response from some landlords as anything other than what is known on the internet as a flounce. People making a big announcement about how they’re leaving an online space as if they will be terribly missed. Everyone else usually mocks and cheers.
Landlords selling off properties isn't quite the disincentive they seem to think it is 😂 means first time buyers have a chance to get in the door AND removes poorly maintained homes from rotation. Win win!https://t.co/kkZwrJ3g7L
— Dr Bex (@BexGraham) March 2, 2020
I for one AM DELIGHTED that landlords are finally being held to account for their hoarding of homes and their failure to maintain basic living standards for tenants. Landlord who ALREADY DO THIS will see no difference to their practice.
— Dr Bex (@BexGraham) March 2, 2020
They honestly seem to think that they are solely responsible for housing people 😂😂😂
— Dr Bex (@BexGraham) March 2, 2020
So what’s the government about to do?
Currently, tenants with periodic tenancy agreements can be given a mere 42 days notice to leave if the landlord wants to sell or move into the house. That extends to 90 days if those aren’t the reason but no reason has to be given. This has never been fair on tenants, but now that we have a permanent housing crisis it’s grossly unfair because in many places 3 months is not long enough to find other suitable accommodation.
The reformed RTA will set out clearly the legitimate reasons for termination of a tenancy agreement (and how it should be done). These are the reasons allowable,
- the landlord intends to put property up for sale within 90 days of tenant leaving
- if the property was acquired for business use other than residential rental accommodation
- the landlord intends to do extensive alterations or redevelopment of the property
- the landlord intends to change the use of the property
- the premises are to be demolished
- the landlord is not the property owner and the landlord’s interest ends
- the landlord issues three notices of separate anti-social acts by the tenant within a 90 day period and applies to the Tenancy Tribunal (there are rules around how this must be done)
- the landlord issues three notices of late payment of rent within a 90 day period and applies to the Tenancy Tribunal
- reasons specific to public housing (unspecified in the document but the Bill is here if someone wants to look it up)
- the property is needed for the landlord, their family or an employee to live in
It’s not like landlords will never be able to evict tenants. They will need to follow some clear and reasonable rules, just like other business people in civil society.
Stuff again,
Economist Tony Alexander’s latest quarterly survey showed landlords were not impressed.
“Owners are not just saying they will raise rents to reflect various cost rises, but will actively weed out any existing bad quality tenants they might currently have before the legislation becomes effective and it becomes near impossible to remove them,” he said.
“Once in place many owners plan only selecting proven good tenants. Tenants not in work, tenants with bad credit histories, tenants with young children and, solo mothers, amongst others, will now not be considered.”
So solo mothers, people on benefits, and tenants with young kids are ‘bad quality tenants’. This is not housing for New Zealanders, it’s investment schemes that have to manage stock units (with bigotry thrown in for good measure). If you can’t understand that tenants are humans with a need for a home, then off you fuck and free up the house for someone who can figure out how to run a business that doesn’t dehumanise the people the business serves.
Almost half the investors surveyed said they would be likely or highly likely to sell their properties if the change happened.
“One of our biggest concerns is that investors find the proposals too cumbersome, they sell up, reducing the pool of rental properties and raising rental prices even more,” Norwell said.
“Even the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development’s own regulatory impact statement has said that the proposed changes ‘may increase landlords’ business risks and impact on their profit margins’.”
It’s like they live in a bubble where everything revolves around them. This isn’t so much flounce as implied blackmail, if the landlords were children threatening to throw their toys out of the cot.
Housing is a human right.
Business – including individuals and organisations who are landlords – has a responsibility to respect the human right to adequate housing. If operations have a negative impact on the right to adequate housing business has a responsibility to remedy that negative impact.
If you don’t know how to run your business or investment without being a shit to people, then by all means put your money somewhere else. There are plenty of good landlords out there who will not be negatively affected by this, sell to them.
Meanwhile, the government is taking a range of actions to lessen the impact of the housing crisis, and each individual action and regulatory change needs to be seen in that context.
As for the threat to raise rents, my hope is that once the Labour-led government gets through with the low hanging fruit of regulating tenancy agreements and mandatory rental standards, we can then move on to a conversation about rent control.
The full set of changes to the Residential Tenancies Act can be seen here and here. Summary at the Spinoff. Background on development of the Bill is here.
163 comments on “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out ”
- Comments are now closed
- Comments are now closed
CommentsOpinions
Recent Comments
FeedsPartyGovtMedia
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #47 2024
Open access notables Projected increase in the frequency of extremely active Atlantic hurricane seasons, Lopez et al., Science Advances: Future changes to the year-to-year swings between active and inactive North Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) seasons have received little attention, yet may have great societal implications in areas prone to hurricane ...7 hours ago - Chicken Kiev
Chatting in the supermarket this morning, I found I needed to lunge for the chicken drumsticks.Coping mechanisms: who hasn’t felt a greater need for them lately?When it all gets too much, I turn to demonstrating handy butchery hacks.It wasn’t that she’d said anything wrong, our friend, not at all. We ...10 hours ago - The year is 2024 and it’s 1984
This is written in response to the highly significant open letter from a group of economists that was today addressed to Christopher Luxon. The year is 2024, and it’s 1984. The country is reeling from a record Olympic medal gold haul, while the globe grapples with the choice of the ...11 hours ago - The IPCA has failed
Back in 2022, RNZ took an in-depth look at the "Independent" Police Conduct Authority and its handling of killings by police. These are the most serious test of oversight, and you would expect the police's use of lethal force to receive the most severe scrutiny. But despite the police regularly ...15 hours ago - Thursday 21 November 2024
The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti arrived at Parliament on Tuesday – the size is being debated but estimates range from 42,000 to 100,000. The Prime Minister is defending not attending due to some of the organisers being affiliated with Te Pāti Māori. The national gang patch ban came into force ...15 hours ago - ‘These budget cuts are counter-productive and make no sense’
I spoke to former Productivity Chair Nana this morning about the letter he and a group of other economists sent to PM Christopher Luxon to urge the Government to urgently suspend cuts to spending and investment for the sake of the economy, struggling businesses and the wellbeing of vulnerable ...17 hours ago - ACT’s Astroturfing & A Co-ordinated Attack on Te Pati Māori
Unity on the Streets / Unity at the TableAfter the Hīkoi, all three right wing Coalition leaders came together to push the idea that the 42,000 - 50,000 + strong Hikoi was somehow less potent and brave, and more illegitimate than the energy and crowd displayed.Prime Minister Christopher Luxon 20-November: ...18 hours ago - Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for stabilizing temperatures
This is a re-post from the Climate Brink The world is emitting over 40 gigatons of CO2 per year, contributing to an accelerating warming of the planet. The world needs to cut emissions rapidly to be remotely on track to meet our Paris Agreement goals of limiting warming to well-below 2C, and we ...18 hours ago
- Throwback Thursday: Will “Auckland Transport” Survive?
With Auckland Transport’s future up in the air under Mayor Wayne Brown’s proposed CCO reform, we’ve dug way back into the archives, to unearth this post originally published in March 2010. As you’ll see, many of the debates that were being had when AT was first proposed continue to ...19 hours ago - I Love My Leather Jacket
I wear my leather jacket like a great big hugRadiating charm - a living cloak of luckIt's the only concrete link with an absent friendIt's a symbol I can wear 'till we meet againOr it's a weight around my neck while the owner's freeBoth protector and reminder of mortalityIt's a ...19 hours ago - Economists call on PM to suspend budget cuts for the sake of the economy
Nicola Willis’ budget cuts are under fire from economists for having no clear rationale and worsening the recession. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 21: The news at ...19 hours ago
- The end of policing by consent
National has appointed a new police commissioner. And he explicitly rejects policing by consent: Asked if he subscribed to policing by consent, he said he did not. “I don’t talk about policing by consent. I talk about trust and confidence, and it is fundamentally important that the police have ...1 day ago
- The Treaty Principles Bill: A Who’s Who
David Horatio Waterbed SeymourFringe politician and dweeb transformed successfully by ThinkTank money into a well-oiled soundbite robot.Currently programmed to say: Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Was previously programmed to say:I am a proud libertarian andI am a ...1 day ago - Kinleith mill closure shows need for industrial strategy
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to deliver an economic and industrial strategy for regional manufacturing, rather than just expressing sympathy for job losses, following the announced closure of Kinleith mill in Tokoroa. “The closure Kinleith mill in Tokoroa is not just devastating for ...2 days ago
- 27% of kids going hungry, up from 21% in a year
One in four Kiwi children live in households where food runs out often or sometimes. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, November 20: The lead: The official annual Health Survey found sharp ...2 days ago - Transport modelling is an illusion
This guest post by Tim Adriaansen, an advocate for accessibility and sustainable transport, originally published on LinkedIn and cross posted here with permission. People prefer cars, right? Probably not. Here’s why. Granted, most people in English-speaking countries use a car to get around. This simple reality underpins our transport ...2 days ago
- Young Maori take over
Neither Wellington nor Parliament has ever seen anything like it before. The Police said there were more than 40,000 but however many there were, yesterday’s Hikoi to Parliament was a monumental event. It was almost three times the Foreshore and Seabed martch of 2004 and many,many times bigger than ...2 days ago - Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Aftermath
The euphoria from yesterday’s hikoi may be transitory, but is no less valuable for that. It is pretty rare for the left to feel itself to be in the overwhelming majority, and speaking as the voice of the people. Lest that momentum be lost, the organisers will no doubt be ...2 days ago - Sabin 33 #3 – Solar panels generate too much waste and will overwhelm landfills
On November 1, 2024 we announced the publication of 33 rebuttals based on the report "Rebutting 33 False Claims About Solar, Wind, and Electric Vehicles" written by Matthew Eisenson, Jacob Elkin, Andy Fitch, Matthew Ard, Kaya Sittinger & Samuel Lavine and published by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia ...2 days ago
- What’s the time Mr Seymour?
Mr David Seymour crawling up to the ceilingThe sun don't shine the sun don't shine the sun don't shine at allMamma Pappa say you should go to school, I don't know what forNow that I've grown up and seen the world and all its liesSong: Southside of Bombay"Ake, ake, ake" ...2 days ago - Submit to defend te Tiriti!
The Justice Committee has called for submissions on National's racist and constitutionally radical Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill. Submissions can be made at the link above or by post, and are due by Tuesday, 7 January 2025. But I'd get in quick, in case National grows a spine ...2 days ago
- We need to talk about Kevin
All happy families are alike; each unhappy family has a Drunk Uncle Kevin in there somewhere. If your Kevin is anything like the ones I know, he was getting along happily enough without having to think too much about the Treaty Principles Bill apart from bloody good job, onya guys ...2 days ago - The hikoi
Like everyone else (everyone who wasn't there, anyway), I've spent the morning watching the hikoi march on Parliament. The pictures are astounding: parliament grounds and the surrounding streets are full, and there are still people backed up along Lambton Quay. The police are estimating 35,000 people, and that's a floor ...3 days ago
- Why Govt & NZ Inc should boycott & regulate Facebook
3 days ago - How should we talk about change?
A better world isn’t just possible, it’s desirable. And that’s how we should frame a lot of our conversations around making a greater Auckland. As an example take urban climate action. A climate friendly Auckland: Is free from congestion Enables people to travel how they choose Is filled with ...3 days ago
- AMA + Holiday Webworm Merch!
3 days ago - Discount Code for Webworm Merch!
Hi,So there’s a bunch of new stuff on the Webworm store (www.webworm.store) — just in time for the Holidays. Read more ...3 days ago - Trying to defuse the tension
There were urgent moves yesterday at Parliament to try and defuse the tension building up over ACT’s Treaty Principles Bill. The Bill’s author, ACT leader David Seymour, told reporters that he understood the Justice Select Committee met yesterday to discuss how long it should take to consider submissions on the ...3 days ago
- An Irritable NZ Pawn – David Seymour Admits Treaty Principles Bill will clear the way for deve...
3 days ago - Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Arrival, And Tyler Childers
Politicians like to bang on all about the need to heal society’s racial/economic divisions, but in their actions they’re more keen on stoking those divisions, with the Treaty Principles Bill being the classic example. The Bill seeks to dilute the Crown’s responsibilities to Māori at the same time as it ...3 days ago
- Socially Backwards and Fiscally Forwards: the False Ideological Divide and the “Conservative” Li...
3 days ago - Kaamos: Accepted
I appreciate that A Phuulish Fellow has been fairly quiet recently. That’s a combination of two things – comparatively little in the way of relevant material to discuss (at least until The War of the Rohirrim comes out next month), and my general work on The Secret Non-Fiction Writing Project. ...3 days ago - Here’s how governments could fix their Paris climate commitment failures
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Governments around the world face a conundrum. Virtually none are on track to meet their Paris climate commitments. That includes the United States, which committed to cut its emissions at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 but is only on track for 32-43% cuts ...4 days ago
- Unstoppable.
4 days ago - Katherine Trebeck – An Alternative Economic Narrative
The era of neoliberalism has been destructive on so many levels, with a huge growth in wealth and privilege for the one percent. A hollowing out of the state; fraying of the safety net; inadequate government investment in infrastructure; and continued environmental degradation has resulted in damage on a vast ...4 days ago - In a Manner of Speaking
In a manner of speakingI just want to sayThat I could never forget the wayYou told me everythingBy saying nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me everythingSongwriter: Winston TongNext Tuesday, the subscription price for Nick’s Kōrero will ...4 days ago - Monday 18 November 2024
The NZNO have announced a nationwide strike for December over its pay dispute with Health NZ, who have put a 1 per cent cap on pay rises. The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti and Treaty Principles Bill remain front and centre in the media, with the impacts of the Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke-led ...4 days ago
- Shipley warns Seymour’s bill is ‘inviting civil war’
The divisive Treaty Principles Bill is not just a risk for the National Party, it’s a risk to civil order and unity, warns a National Party grandee. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on ...4 days ago - A clearer network for the City Rail Link?
This post was originally published on Linked In by Nicolas Reid. It is republished here with permission. Auckland is now just a year or so away from having the keystone of its urban rail network complete. As I wrote about here, the City Rail Link will be a literal game changer for ...4 days ago
- National’s support base is wobbling
If ACT leader David Seymour intended the Treaty Principles Bill to drive a wedge into National’s support base, he may well already be succeeding. By midnight on Thursday after the Maori Party haka in Parliament, National MPs were being deluged with emails and messages from their members calling them out ...4 days ago
- 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #46
A listing of 33 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, November 10, 2024 thru Sat, November 16, 2024. Story of the week Our Story of the Week is completely "meta" (no, not that Meta). It's about our exploring how ...4 days ago
- Grifter Eftpos Tamaki at it again
..Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Self-appointed “Bishop” and proto-fascist, Brian Tamaki was at it again on 16 November, blocking Auckland’s southern motorway, SH1.This time, the target of his ire wasn’t the Civil Unions Act; covid lock-downs; mask mandates; or ...4 days ago - Rip up a bill, lead a haka are words to live by
I cannot stop grabbing people by the lapels, or shoulders, or similar, and raving at them about the tiny miracles in my ears.I can hear again! There could not be a more satisfied customer in all the world.In a noisy cafe I am even catching words that Karren cannot, she ...5 days ago - Unintended Consequences
Take the baitYou pay the priceIt's much too lateFor good adviceYou know and I know that our good things' throughBecause there's consequences for what we doConsequences for me and youWriters: Kevin Robert Hayes, David Nagier, Bonnie Adele Hayes.Fallout from the first readingOne News began last night by saying that tens ...6 days ago - Thank you, driver!
Today, Saturday 16th of November, is Auckland Transport’s Bus Driver Appreciation Day! Saturday 16 November marks the third annual Auckland Transport (AT) ‘Bus Driver Appreciation Day’, and this year we are encouraging all of New Zealand to thank their driver or let the bus go first if you are in ...6 days ago
- Totally Normal: Holiday Edition
Hi,If I was to accurately sum up my mental state over the week, I’d just say that I got a huge fright from my own shadow.I’d nipped out for an 11pm neighborhood stroll, just to calm down after a day of stress and screens. The Cure and Fazerdaze’s new record ...6 days ago - We Are Not Listening
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
6 days ago - More lawlessness from National
On Tuesday, sick of government stonewalling, the Waitangi Tribunal issued a rare court order, ordering the Minister of Health to release unredacted documents within 48 hours showing its reasoning for disestablishing Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority. The government's response to the lawful order of a court? Yeah, ...6 days ago
- National’s tyrannical “foreign interference” law
Yesterday, under cover the the biggest political fight of the year, National quietly - covertly, even - introduced anti-foreign interference legislation. The bill is the product of a years-long work-program aimed at countering shit like this and this, and there's unquestionably a need to do something to counter foreign states' ...6 days ago
- The Haka Represents The Best Of Us
A few months ago, I was in an audience watching a Haka-Kapa and as I watched children dance and sing and sway and shout and beat, I couldn’t help but think “The Haka represents the best of us.”Yes, yes - there will be a thousand voices that rush forth to ...7 days ago
- Adding up the climate cost
St Mary’s Bay housing left hanging: Climate risk is systemically underestimated in the climate scenarios used by central banks, and a new report warns 10,000 houses are set to become uninsurable in Aotearoa. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, here’s the top six news items of note in ...7 days ago
- Auckland chafing at Bishop’s housing intensification orders
One of the major problems the Government has in implementing its ‘going for housing growth’ strategy is that it isn’t giving much funding help to councils. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and ...7 days ago - Friday 15 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill continues to dominate political news, with it passing its first reading in the House. Parliament was briefly suspended and Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for 24 hours after leading a haka that was joined by opposition MPs and the public in the gallery. Willie ...7 days ago
- Weekly Roundup 15-November-2024
Happy Friday, welcome to another round-up of interesting stories about what’s happening in Auckland and other cities. Feel free to add your links in the comments! This post, like all our work, is brought to you by a largely volunteer crew and made possible by generous donations from our readers ...7 days ago
- Are We The Waiting?
And screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingAnd screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingForget me nots, second thoughts live in isolationHeads or tails and fairy tales in my mindAre we we are, are we we are the waiting unknownThe rage and love, the ...7 days ago - The Hoon around the week to November 15
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on the latest climate news, including from COP29 this week; on the US Presidential elections, Israel vs Gaza/Iran/Lebanon, Ukraine/Nato vs Russia/North ...7 days ago
- First Tea and Toast, now Milo — why do NZ’s best beverages need so much defending?
Only two months ago, Nicola Willis had to step in to stop Health New Zealand cutting tea and toast for post-birth parents, and now Lester Levy is riding to the rescue with a welcome message for all: our health workers can once again drink Milo, and will no longer need ...1 week ago - Gordon Campbell on the folly of making apologies in a social vacuum.
Day One of the Treaty Principles Bill…and everyone got what they wanted, and did what they liked. Heated words were exchanged. Culturally appropriate acts of outrage were performed. David Seymour got to play the victim card. Willie Jackson got kicked out of class. A comically red-faced Mr Speaker bellowed “Order, ...1 week ago
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #46 2024
Open access notables Microbial solutions must be deployed against climate catastrophe, Peixoto et al., Nature Communications [comment]: The climate crisis is escalating. A multitude of microbe-based solutions have been proposed, and these technologies hold great promise and could be deployed along with other climate mitigation strategies. However, these solutions have ...1 week ago
- The PM gets some extremely valuable legal advice for free
You can pay a great deal of money for the services of a KC. So just what would some peerless legal writing from 40 or so of them be worth, do you reckon?Priceless, that’s what. It’s not even the half of it, but this is my favourite part of the ...1 week ago - D-day for the government
The government's Treaty Principles Bill is up for its first reading today - bought forward in a rush in a desperate effort to avoid the hikoi which is currently marching on Wellington. But the Prime Minister won’t be there for it – he’s literally running away to Peru! But he ...1 week ago
- 97% of submissions did not want no-cause evictions, Trump chooses a Russian spy for US Intelligence ...
Good morning, and I’m sorry I’ve been away for a couple of days.I’ve been focusing on the Hikoi, and also testing out sentiment on the Treaty Principles Bill. It’s complicated, and the Treaty Principles Bill will be debated in the House today. The Government’s own lawyers have told them the ...1 week ago - Government must vote down ACT Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to vote down an ACT Party Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights by making it easier for employers to fire workers. Last week ACT MP Laura Trask’s Employment Relations (Termination of Employment by Agreement) Amendment Bill was ...1 week ago
- Seymour causes thousands of unjustified absences by forcing kids to fight for their rights instead o...
The State would like to remind you that they are in control. They manage your employment prospects, and can destroy the job market you and yours rely on by mass-cancelling construction projects, cutting funding, and firing a good chunk of our public servants. They wield the mechanisms that provide scrutiny ...1 week ago - The Weight of the World
As the weight of the world Hangs on your shoulders The weight of the world Starts to take over again And over again All that you once loved, now you hate So slowly relearn how to meditate To have and to hold And never let go Can you feel it ...1 week ago - Thursday 14 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill is set to have its First Reading in the House today, as the Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti continues. More than 40 KCs have written to the Prime Minister and Attorney-General outlining their “grave concerns” about the substance of the Treaty Principles Bill, while an academic and ...1 week ago
- Trump’s return to White House brings the climate’s ‘find out’ phase closer
As we absorb the news of Trump's victory in the US Presidential election, here’s a wrap compiled just before the result of what it might mean for climate action: The UN Secretary General says the prospective departure of the United States would cripple the Paris Agreement, likening it to the ...1 week ago
- Time and Space in the City Centre
Patrick Reynolds is deputy chair of the City Centre Advisory Panel. The header image is from Walthamstow, London The city centre now has a few stretches of street where the space has been repurposed to a people and place focused design from full time traffic use. These are a great ...1 week ago
- An opportunity for a pro-growth tax switch
As the Hikoi against it swells into the tens of thousands, KCs call on National to kill off ACT’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 14: The ...1 week ago - Dealing to the big Aussie banks
The big question hovering over the Select Committee Inquiry into banking is what the Government will do with its findings. If yesterday’s hearing is anything to go by there is a tidal wave of discontent about the four big Australian Banks crashing through the Committee which may force it to ...1 week ago
- 20 fact briefs published in collaboration with Gigafact!
In April 2024 we announced the (renewed) collaboration between Gigafact and Skeptical Science to create fact briefs, short but credibly sourced summaries that offer “yes/no” answers in response to claims found online. Our initial plan had been to publish one fact brief per week on Saturdays but - as happens ...1 week ago
- Instead of axing the HRC, ACT corruptly installed a racist, transphobic “Gay Human Rights Commissi...
On November 5th, the Spinoff published a very interesting article on Stephen Rainbow, the Human Rights Commission’s latest recruitment, and how he came to get the controversial appointment. Naturally because of the excitement of the US election, it’s flown a little below the radar. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/05-11-2024/i-didnt-get-the-hrc-job-stephen-rainbows-human-rights-commission-appointment-just-got-weirderThe article details evidence of the ...1 week ago - Injustice for torture
Between 1950 and 1993 the New Zealand government tortured and abused up to 250,000 children in residential care facilities. Yesterday, following formal findings from a royal commission, it finally apologised for that abuse. The next step is redress and restitution - compensating the surviving victims for the appalling harm they ...1 week ago
- Voices echo
1 week ago - Hīkoi over the Harbour
Kia mau ra, kia mau raKi te mana motuhakeMe te arohaHold fast, hold fastTo your sovereigntyAnd to love and compassionLyrics: Hīrini Melbourne. “Ngā Iwi E passionately calls for unity among the peoples of the Pacific, a cause deeply cherished by Melbourne himself.”I sat at my desk this morning and thought ...1 week ago
- NZ’s global climate rankings plummet as Govt removes agriculture from ETS
The Government has passed legislation to remove agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) while Aotearoa’s reputation on climate action plummets. ...9 hours ago - Failed boot camp experiment must end
As legislation to set up boot camps passed its first reading, the Green Party urged the Government to abandon this failed policy experiment for the good of our rangatahi. ...10 hours ago
- Gender-affirming care must centre evidence and health needs, not political posturing
The Ministry of Health has today released an evidence brief regarding the use of puberty blockers in gender-affirming healthcare, amid moves by the government to limit access. ...11 hours ago
- Release: National doesn’t care about manufacturing
The National Government is walking away from our manufacturing sector with constant reports of closures and job losses. ...12 hours ago - Release: David Parker speech – Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change
David Parker's speech from the University of Auckland's forum on Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change in September 2024. ...12 hours ago
- Release: Youth mental wellbeing no longer a priority for Child Poverty Minister
Louise Upston has revealed her diminished vision for vulnerable youth against a backdrop of snubbed advice, scrapped priorities, shifted goal posts and thousands more children projected to fall into poverty. ...14 hours ago
- Release: National’s lack of climate action taking NZ backwards
National Government’s backward-looking climate policy has seen New Zealand fall seven places on the Climate Change Performance Index to 41 out of 63 countries measured. ...14 hours ago
- Release: Simple reason for drop in emergency housing
When the Government says it has reduced the number of people in emergency housing, what it means is it is stopping people from accessing it in the first place. ...17 hours ago
- Govt’s child wellbeing strategy ‘shallow and shameful’
The Government is turning its back on children by not only weakening child poverty reduction targets, but also removing child mental wellbeing as a priority focus in their Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy. ...17 hours ago
- Release: A historic win for Samoan communities
Labour warmly welcomes the Restoring Samoan Citizenship Bill as it passes its third reading, before becoming law. ...18 hours ago
- Government plan to reinstate live animal exports a “national disgrace”
The Government has taken a giant step backwards by reinstating live animal exports. ...1 day ago
- Pasifika justice as Member’s Bill passes final reading
Teanau Tuiono’s Member’s Bill, the Citizenship (Western Samoa Restoration) Amendment Bill, has passed its third reading and will become law. ...1 day ago
- Release: Minister of Education thinks New Zealand ends at the Bombay Hills
The Minister of Education has shown complete disregard for rural communities and their school bus routes in Question Time today. ...1 day ago
- Economists sound alarm on Government’s slash-and-burn approach
A group of prominent economists has released an open letter to the Government, raising grave concerns about the far-reaching consequences of its fiscal policy. ...1 day ago
- Release: Smoking numbers up under Costello’s watch
National’s repeal of Labour’s smokefree legislation has taken New Zealand further away from achieving a Smokefree 2025 and a smokefree generation. ...2 days ago
- Release: Call for Palestine recognition by NZ, Australian and Canadian MPs
Parliamentarians from Australia, Canada and New Zealand have written an open letter to their respective Prime Ministers calling on them to recognise Palestine. ...2 days ago
- Justice Select Committee opens floor for Treaty Principles submissions
Today, the Justice Select Committee has decided to officially open submissions for the controversial Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Power of the people on full display as hīkoi approaches Parliament
Today, Hīkoi mō te Tiriti arrived in Wellington, with thousands gathering to march in unity against the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Hypocrisy as Te Whatu Ora contractor bill balloons
Te Whatu Ora’s bill for contracting and consulting staff has ballooned by nearly 20 percent under the National Government, breaking a promise they made during the election campaign to cut contractors. ...4 days ago
- Release: Growing pressure to scrap Section 7AA Repeal Bill
The newly released Section 7AA Repeal Bill's select committee report is further evidence that the Government should scrap it. ...4 days ago
- Government’s move to monetise access to nature a slippery slope
The Green Party is voicing serious concerns over the Government’s proposal to charge for access to public conservation land, released today. ...7 days ago
- Green Party condemns the passage of Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party condemns the passing of the Treaty Principles Bill at first reading, and is clear that the fight is not over. ...1 week ago
- Stand Up for Te Tiriti
Te Tiriti o Waitangi is our country’s founding document. It forms the basis of the relationship between Māori and the Crown – and the Aotearoa New Zealand we live in today. ...1 week ago
- Release: Over 15,000 sign Labour’s open letter to Luxon
As the hīkoi to Parliament continues, Labour has sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in a last-ditch attempt to get him to kill the Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Fast Track Bill threatens environment, climate and reputation
The fast-track legislation passing its second reading in Parliament is another step towards environmental ruin. ...1 week ago
- Greens join King’s Counsel in calling for Treaty Principles Bill to be abandoned
The Prime Minister must answer the call from a group of senior lawyers of the King’s Counsel to abandon the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Chris Hipkins’ apology statement to state and faith-based care survivors
...1 week ago
- Release: Labour formally apologises to state and faith-based care survivors
Labour joins with the Government in unreservedly apologising for the abuse, neglect and trauma including torture in state and faith-based care and for ignoring the voices of survivors for too long. ...1 week ago
- Green Party stands in support of survivors of abuse in care
Today, the Green Party stands alongside the survivors of abuse in state care and faith-based care as the Government issues an historic apology. ...1 week ago
- Green Party calls for conscience vote on Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party has written to the Speaker of the House requesting he enable a personal vote on the Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- Govt move to exclude journalist risks chilling effect
The Green Party is alarmed by the Government’s move to exclude a journalist from covering this week’s apology for the survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care. ...2 weeks ago
- Without action, an apology will be empty air
For tomorrow’s apology to survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care to hold any water, the Government must not pursue the same policies that drove the abuse in the first place. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Concerns remain over tobacco interference
Concerns about the tobacco industry’s ability to interfere in government policy making remain, despite the inability of the Office of the Auditor-General to investigate the Government’s decision to halve the excise tax on heated tobacco products. ...2 weeks ago
- Urgent wake-up call on climate
The Climate Change Commission’s latest advice indicates Aotearoa needs to be stepping up on climate action. ...2 weeks ago
- Green MP’s Meme-ber’s Bill set to save the world
Break out the punchlines and dust off your meme folder: Green Party MP Kahurangi Carter’s Copyright (Parody and Satire) Amendment Bill was pulled from the Ballot yesterday. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Poroporoaki: Ta Robert (Bom) Gillies
Kua hinga te manawa kairākau o Te Rua Tekau Ma Waru Tiwhatiwha te po! Kakarauru i te po! Ka rapuhia kei hea koe kua riro! Haere e te Ika a Whiro ki o tini hoa kua ngaro atu ki te Pō ...2 weeks ago
- Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principles Bill
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principle...
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- NZ must pursue independent foreign policy
The Green Party says the need is greater than ever for Aotearoa New Zealand to pursue an independent foreign policy. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Winston Peters must apologise
The Deputy Prime Minister should apologise to the public servant he named and blamed for something they did not do, and for misusing the rules of Parliament. ...2 weeks ago
- Government action provides Southland farmers more time to meet plan requirements
The Government is taking action to ensure Southland farmers and growers are not affected by unreasonable regional farm plan deadlines, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard say.“Cabinet has agreed to provide more time for farmers and growers to comply with regional rules ...10 hours ago - Bill reaffirms Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending
The Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Bill had its first reading at Parliament today. The Bill reaffirms the Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending, Minister for Children Karen Chhour says. “In recent years we have seen an unacceptable spike in youth offending. “This Bill makes ...11 hours ago
- Critical milestones for earthquake buildings review
Fairer, more sensible rules about managing earthquake risks are a step closer with the passing of legislation and the appointment of an independent chair to provide expert advice, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The Government is committed to reinvigorating our cities and regions to support economic growth, ...11 hours ago
- State of the art radiology machine for Auckland
People in Northland and Auckland will benefit from a new machine for cancer treatment installed at the Regional Cancer and Blood Service at Auckland City Hospital. The MV5 linear accelerator, or LINAC machine, officially opened today targets cancer tumours with pinpoint accuracy. Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says this new, ...11 hours ago
- Foreign Minister to visit Europe
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Europe for high-level talks with France, Germany and the United Kingdom next week. "Since taking office almost a year ago, the Coalition Government has emphasised the importance we place on New Zealand's traditional and likeminded diplomatic and ...12 hours ago
- First arrests made under gang patch ban
Police have made their first arrests under the new gang patch legislation, with two gang members arrested, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “Just before 11 this morning, Police in Wairoa apprehended a gang member for wearing a patch to the supermarket. He has been arrested and will now face enforcement ...13 hours ago
- Better support for victims of sexual violence
The Government is proposing two major changes to name suppression laws that will put the views of victims of sexual violence first, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “We are committed to restoring law and order and these two proposed changes will help ensure the victims of crime are put at ...14 hours ago
- Government moving forward with Regional Deals
Cabinet has agreed to invite all regions to submit proposals for Regional Deals between central and local government that drive economic growth and deliver the infrastructure our country needs, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop say. Inviting all regions to propose a Regional Deal that boosts ...15 hours ago
- MSA pilot participant update
One of the ten young men selected to participate in the Military-Style Academy Pilot has allegedly reoffended. Children’s Minister Karen Chhour is disappointed but says it would be naïve to think that none of these young men would reoffend. “I’m saddened that this young person has not taken this opportunity ...15 hours ago
- Attendance rates increase, again
Associate Education Minister David Seymour says that school attendance is continuing to rise. In Term 3 of 2024 51.3 per cent of students attended school regularly, an increase of 5.3 percentage points from 46 per cent in Term 3 of 2023. “This Government has prioritised student attendance and it is ...17 hours ago
- Improving the lives of young New Zealanders
Ensuring New Zealand is the best place in the world for children and young people is the vision at the heart of the Government’s new Child and Youth Strategy, Child Poverty Reduction Minister Louise Upston says. “Childhood represents a huge opportunity to set people on a positive path towards living ...20 hours ago
- Government continues work to reinstate livestock exports by sea
The Government is reinstating the trade of livestock exports by sea while ensuring the highest standards of animal welfare, says Associate Minister of Agriculture Andrew Hoggard.“The Government will introduce legislation changes to reinstate the trade, enhance oversight, and strengthen requirements for exporters to identify risks and manage the welfare of ...1 day ago
- Speech to the National Quality Forum 2024
Tēnā koutou katoa – it is a pleasure to be here today. I would like to begin by acknowledging the important leadership role you all play in ensuring a quality health system New Zealanders can trust. There is enormous clinical expertise in this room covering a wide range of disciplines. ...2 days ago
- New Zealand’s COP29 National Statement
Tēnā koutou katoa. Mr President, Excellencies, Delegates. New Zealand, and all nations represented here today, are already dealing with the impacts of climate change. Our households, businesses, and economies are bearing the costs of its effects. The choices we make now will shape the severity of these impacts for generations ...2 days ago
- Latest Quarterly Investment Report released
The Government has released its second Quarterly Investment Report (QIR) which shows substantial work still to be done by agencies to improve investment reporting and meet the Government’s expectations, Infrastructure and Acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “New Zealand has significant infrastructure and investment needs. The Government is determined to get ...2 days ago
- New Zealand supporting loss and damage fund
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced New Zealand will contribute NZ$10 million to the new Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage while at the annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan. “New Zealand is joining the global effort to address the significant challenge of responding to ...2 days ago
- Gang crackdown begins at stroke of midnight
The free ride for gangs is over when the clock strikes midnight tonight, with tough new laws officially coming into effect, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Police Minister Mark Mitchell say. “Gang patches will no longer be able to be worn in public. To earn the right to wear a ...2 days ago
- LGFA increases borrowing capacity to support high growth councils
The Government is welcoming the decision by the Local Government Funding Agency to increase access to financing tools for fast growing councils to support greater investment in critical infrastructure, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says.“Communities across the country are facing an infrastructure deficit and significant population growth is projected in ...2 days ago
- Temporary Traffic Management costs revealed
The Government has revealed that over the past three years, the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) has spent an eyewatering $786 million of taxpayers’ money on road cones and temporary traffic management (TTM), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“When I became Minister, I was surprised to learn that that NZTA did ...2 days ago
- Jurisdiction of Disputes Tribunal to double
Legislation that will double the financial jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal from $30,000 to $60,000 has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. “We need to improve court timeliness and access to justice so that Kiwis and get on with their lives. Court delays affect everyone, the ...2 days ago
- Protecting New Zealand from foreign interference
Legislation that will specifically criminalise foreign interference and strengthen espionage offences has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “It is normal and appropriate for states to interact and work to influence one another. This encourages cooperation and can have mutually beneficial outcomes. “However, the reality ...2 days ago
- Significant milestone for Canterbury Road of National Significance
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news that the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board has approved funding towards pre-implementation and early works on the State Highway 1 (SH1) Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance (RoNS). “Reaching this significant milestone is a reflection of our Government’s ...2 days ago
- Health survey results to help drive change
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says findings from the annual Health Survey highlight the need to continue driving better health outcomes for New Zealanders. The New Zealand Health Survey is an annual snapshot of key metrics measured from July 2023 – July 2024. Findings released this morning include: In 2023/24, ...3 days ago
- Final push needed to get to Smokefree 2025
A renewed effort to get people to quit smoking will build on what has worked to date and target the groups who most need support, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said today. “The latest New Zealand Health Survey results show the daily smoking rate at 6.9 per cent and we ...3 days ago
- New diplomatic appointments
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced four new diplomatic appointments. “Our diplomats play an important role in ensuring New Zealand’s interests are maintained and enhanced across the world,” Mr Peters says. “It is a pleasure to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign ...3 days ago
- Next steps for Regulatory Standards Bill
Regulation Minister David Seymour has today announced the next steps in the Government’s plan improve the quality of regulation by opening consultation on a proposed Regulatory Standards Bill. “New Zealand's low wages can be blamed on low productivity, and low productivity can be blamed on poor regulation,” says Mr Seymour. ...3 days ago
- Red Tape Tipline goes live
Minister for Regulation David Seymour has today announced that the Ministry for Regulation’s Red Tape Tipline is now live. “We want to hear about your red tape horror stories. From today, New Zealanders will have a say on how they are regulated through an online portal,” says Mr Seymour. The ...3 days ago
- Youth Parliament 2025 announced
The Minister for Youth Matt Doocey has today announced the eleventh Youth Parliament will be taking place in 2025. “Youth Parliament offers a unique youth development opportunity to young people from across New Zealand to experience the political process and learn about how government works,” says Mr Doocey. “The two-day ...3 days ago
- Police stats show promising change
After nearly a year in Government, Kiwis have seen significant change across law and order with promising early results shown across some Police statistics, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “In August 2023, I told New Zealanders that if they had not started to see a change in public safety within ...4 days ago
- Better coordination of anti-scam efforts
With the launch of Fraud Awareness Week, the Government is committing to new coordination efforts across industry and government to combat online scams, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly says. “Online financial scams are a growing problem for New Zealand. New data released today shows that Kiwis lost nearly ...4 days ago
- Minister to consider 7AA select committee report
Minister for Children Karen Chhour will consider the recommendations made by the Social Services and Community Committee in its report back to Parliament on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill. “I want to thank the people who made submissions and those who appeared before the committee in ...4 days ago
- Defence Minister to attend ASEAN meeting
Defence Minister Judith Collins will this week attend the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus in Vientiane, Laos. “We need to take every opportunity to engage with our international partners, given the increasingly unstable geo-political situation,” Ms Collins says. “New Zealand has a long-standing commitment to this ...4 days ago
- Launching the White Ribbon Ride
The Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence, Karen Chhour, was on hand to wish riders well at the start of the North Island leg of the White Ribbon Ride in Whakatāne this morning. The ride helps mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, ...4 days ago
- Construction to begin on next stage of Papakura to Drury
Construction on the next stage of the SH1 Papakura to Drury project will begin early next month, with the contract for works awarded to Fulton Hogan, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. "SH1 Papakura to Drury is a key project that will drive economic growth and productivity, reduce congestion, and enable people ...6 days ago
- NZ signs trade deal with Costa Rica, Iceland and Switzerland
Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has signed a pioneering trade agreement that prioritises New Zealand’s sustainable exports at a ceremony during APEC in Peru today. “The Agreement on Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS), between Costa Rica, Iceland, and Switzerland was concluded in July of this year and opens up significant ...6 days ago
- Government and iwi work together on aquaculture
Five new Aquaculture Settlement Areas will help ensure Ngāi Tahu shares in the opportunities aquaculture offers for Southland’s economy, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. “The Aquaculture Settlement Areas (ASAs) I’m announcing today set aside space so the Crown and Ngāi Tahu can assess their potential for aquaculture development. ...7 days ago
- Government launches review to ensure electricity market is fit-for-purpose
The terms of reference for a review of the performance of the electricity market have been released. The review, initiated by the Coalition Government during the power crisis in winter will look at whether current regulations and market design support economic growth and access to reliable and affordable electricity, Energy Minister ...7 days ago
- Speech to Social Investment Hui: Jack and his whānau need our help
Kia ora koutou katoa. Nau mai, haere mai, piki mai. Ki te mihi atu ahau, ki te manwhenua nei, Te Atiawa, Ngāti toa rangatira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Thank you, Andy, for your introduction. Let me acknowledge you as the new Chief Executive of the Social Investment ...7 days ago
- Minister of State for Trade heads to Brisbane for PACER Plus meeting
Minister of State for Trade Nicola Grigg has travelled to Australia to attend the PACER Plus Ministers Meeting in Brisbane. “Trade plays a critical role in driving employment, economic growth, and improving the standards of living in the Pacific Region. The Government is strongly committed to supporting Pacific Island countries ...7 days ago
- Proposals to modernise conservation released
Toitū te taiao – Our environment endures The Government is consulting on proposals to modernise New Zealand’s conservation management system, aiming to protect relevant natural areas while supporting sustainable growth in tourism and regional economies, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka says. “Today, the Department of Conservation – Te Papa Atawhai is ...7 days ago
- Grattan on Friday: Marles plays a defensive bat on nuclear as the government rushes to get though la...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Richard Marles is an ambitious man who hasn’t given up the dream of one day reaching the top job. But, despite being deputy prime minister, his profile is much lower than that of Treasurer Jim ...4 hours ago - NEW POLL: Kiwis Overwhelmingly Support MPs’ Expenses Transparency Law Change
62% of respondents support the extension of the OIA to cover MPs’ spending, compared to just 13% opposed and 24% were unsure. ...6 hours ago - The House: Meanwhile, a week of passing law
The political week has been packed with worthy distractions, but all week Parliament has focused on passing new laws. Here are the highlights. ...6 hours ago - The biggest difference between Hīkoi mō te Tiriti and past hīkoi: More support from non-Māori
Analysis - The diversity of voices during the hīkoi was noticeable - from tangata moana to young immigrants to elderly Pākehā from the South Island. ...7 hours ago
- The House: Samoan citizenship restoration – ‘It means we belong to this land’
When the bill to restore NZ citizenship to some Samoans passed this week, Parliament's galleries were full to the brim with members of the community. ...7 hours ago
- More Delays In Action On Use Of Puberty Blockers With Children
Women’s Rights Party Co-leader Jill Ovens says the Ministry has put New Zealand children at risk by continuing to allow “off-label” prescribing of puberty blockers at far higher rates than other similar countries. ...8 hours ago
- Police Minister adamant he wasn’t aware of gang members training at gun clubs
That is despite two papers from police that raised the matter with him. ...9 hours ago
- Shorten declares himself ‘a proud moderate’, saying Australians ‘in the middle’ shouldn’t ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Bill Shorten has declared himself “a proud moderate” in a valedictory speech declaring parliament has the responsibility to ensure the extremes of left and right do not set the terms of political debate. Shorten, ...9 hours ago
- New ‘best practice’ principles for superannuation products are coming. We asked a panel of exper...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matt Garrow, Editorial Web Developer Studio Romantic/Shutterstock We all know how important it is to save enough money for retirement – but what about spending it wisely when we get there? Even for those who have built up a suitable ...9 hours ago
- Government accused of betraying Kiwis’ trust over lack of consultation on live exports
The government has always vowed to reinstate live exports by sea, which was banned by the previous Labour government. ...9 hours ago
- 7 things you can do if you think you sweat too much
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Freeman, Associate Professor of Dermatology, Bond University ERIK Miheyeu/Shutterstock Sweating is our body’s way of cooling down, a bit like an internal air conditioner. When our core temperature rises (because it’s hot outside, or you’re exercising), sweat glands all ...10 hours ago
- Phenergan for under 6s is now banned due to hallucination fears. Here’s what to use instead
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nial Wheate, Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Macquarie University Australia’s drug regulator has issued a safety warning over the medicine Phenergan and related products containing the antihistamine drug promethazine. The Therapeutic Goods Administration said the over-the-counter products should not be given to children ...10 hours ago
- A new stage adaptation of Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs is a delightful homage to theatrical storytelli...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Campbell, Lecturer, Performing Arts, UniSA Creative, University of South Australia Matt Byrne/STCSA Jack Maggs is a delight and a homage to theatrical storytelling in Australia. Based on Peter Carey’s bestselling novel, Jack Maggs follows the ex-convict as he lands ...10 hours ago
- The government has introduced laws for its social media ban. But key details are still missing
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daniel Angus, Professor of Digital Communication, Director of QUT Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology Ron Lach/Pexels The federal government today introduced into parliament legislation for its social media ban for people under 16 years. Communications Minister Michelle ...10 hours ago
- Archives NZ, National Library to cut 27 roles
The Department of Internal Affairs wants to bring the two organisations under the joint leadership of the Chief Archivist and National Librarian. ...10 hours ago
- Gang patch ban: Members warn of potential for violence to ‘erupt’ as new laws enforced
"I can't see this lasting unless they have a budget to lock fullas up in jail which I think is absolutely stupid, really it's ludicrous," Ngavii Pekapo, who set up a Mongrel Mob chapter 54 years ago, says. ...10 hours ago
- ACT leader David Seymour raises doubts about Waikato medical school
Government documents show ACT leader David Seymour told the government he was "dissatisfied" with a cost-benefit analysis. ...11 hours ago
- National’s Erica Stanford allegedly calls Labour’s Jan Tinetti a ‘stupid bitchR...
The Education Minister has apologised in Parliament for her remark. ...11 hours ago
- Labour backs new Police Commissioner – but warns against routine arming
The alternative to policing by consent would be a police state, which New Zealanders don't want, the party says. ...12 hours ago
- Youth on boot camp pilot re-offended five weeks after release
Children's Minister Karen Chhour said while it was disappointing, it would naïve to think none of the participants would lapse. ...13 hours ago
- In photos: People of the hīkoi, and why they marched
Hikoi mō Te Tiriti has come to an end, going down in history as the largest march to Parliament in Aotearoa. ...13 hours ago
- ‘Everything is becoming a culture war’: Jon Ronson on conspiracies and cycleways
Ahead of his appearance in Aotearoa, the acclaimed British journalist, podcaster and documentarian talks to Stewart Sowman-Lund about why people are still fascinated by the fringes. The last place I would expect to find Jon Ronson is relaxing in the countryside. The iconic British journalist and writer is best known ...13 hours ago - Kia kaha Lebanon: NZ media only tell half your story of struggle
The United States has vetoed a UN Security Council ceasefire resolution — for the fourth time — in Israel’s war on Gaza, while Hezbollah demands a complete ceasefire and “protection of Lebanon’s sovereignty” in any deal with Israel. Amid the death and devastation, Joe Hendren reflects on his time in ...14 hours ago
- ‘Deserves a Bafta’: After the Party premieres in the UK to five-star reviews
The acclaimed New Zealand drama has just premiered on TV in the United Kingdom, and the five-star reviews are already flowing in. Six months after it was called a “blistering” “tour de force” by Australian critics, and nearly a year since The Spinoff declared it the best drama New Zealand ...14 hours ago
- Drugs are getting cheaper and easier to find in Aotearoa
New Zealanders are drinking and smoking less, but most other recreational drugs are becoming cheaper, more popular and more available, two new reports show. Two significant new surveys about drugs in Aotearoa were released this week, offering a rare insight into New Zealanders’ choice of substances, which ones are becoming ...14 hours ago
- COP29: ‘climate finance’ for the Pacific is mostly loans, saddling small island nations with mor...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Steven Ratuva, Director, Macmillan Brown Centre for Pacific Studies, University of Canterbury Lenora Qereqeretabua, the deputy speaker of Fiji’s Parliament, at the COP29 climate summit. IISD/ENB/Mike Muzurakis, CC BY-SA As this year’s UN climate summit reaches its final stage of negotiations, Pacific ...15 hours ago
- Review: The magic of Wicked and the curse of corporate greed
The new movie musical is undoubtedly a fun watch, but it’s also proof that bigger isn’t always better, writes Stewart Sowman-Lund. Contains minor spoilers for Wicked. There’s no doubt that Wicked is going to be huge. No other pop culture event this year, save from maybe Charli XCX’s Brat, has ...15 hours ago
- Dame Jacinda Ardern to be given United Nations leadership award
She will get the champion for global change award from the United Nations Foundation at a ceremony in New York tomorrow. ...16 hours ago
- NZ will resume live animal exports – to low demand
Analysis: NZ is lifting what was supposed to be a permanent ban on live animal exports. But it’s not the lucrative industry it once was. The post NZ will resume live animal exports – to low demand appeared first on Newsroom. ...17 hours ago - Financial forms of family violence affect one in seven of us – but the law is lagging
There are calls for New Zealand’s Family Violence Act to name economic harm as a standalone type of violence, rather than a subcategory of psychological abuse, to bring it in line with the United Kingdom and Australia. Economic harm – restricting access to, sabotaging or exploiting another person’s financial resources, ...17 hours ago
- Downside Risks To Treasury’s Economic And Fiscal Forecasts
New Zealand is currently running a structural fiscal deficit, with expenditure exceeding revenue. Economic growth falling short of expectations has been making it harder for the Government to bring the books back into balance. ...17 hours ago
- Science continues to exclude Indigenous communities. Fixing this benefits everyone
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jordan Peter Anthony Pitt, Associate Dean of Indigenous Strategy and Services (Faculty of Science), University of Sydney An enduring challenge facing science around the world is how to best include and engage Indigenous communities. In Australia, for example, 0.5% of Indigenous ...18 hours ago
- Why is cricket so popular on the Indian sub-continent?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vaughan Cruickshank, Senior Lecturer in Health and Physical Education, University of Tasmania Cricket originated in England, but has been spread worldwide by British soldiers and settlers in the past few hundred years. It is now the second most popular sport in ...18 hours ago
- Disinformation and deepfakes played a part in the US election. Australia should expect the same
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Renee Barnes, Associate professor of Journalism, University of the Sunshine Coast Mladen Zivkovic/Shutterstock As America takes stock after Donald Trump’s re-election to the presidency, it’s worth highlighting the AI-generated fake photos, videos and audio shared during the campaign. A slew ...18 hours ago
- Is thunderstorm asthma becoming more common?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kira Morgan Hughes, PhD Candidate in Allergy and Asthma, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University When spring arrives, so do warnings about thunderstorm asthma. But a decade ago, most of us hadn’t heard of it. So where did thunderstorm asthma ...18 hours ago
- Overwhelmed by ever more clothing donations, charities are exporting the problem. Local governments ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Yassie Samie, Postdoctoral Researcher in Fashion and Textiles, RMIT University anna.spoka/Shutterstock What happens to your clothes after you don’t want them any more? Chances are, you will donate them to op shops run by a charity organisation. There are more ...18 hours ago
- Friendly fire: a nuclear push by allies at COP29 poses a sticky problem for Albanese
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland IndustryAndTravel/Shutterstock Prime Minister Anthony Albanese didn’t see this coming. At the global COP29 climate talks in Baku, the Australian government was indirectly criticised by two allies, the United States and the ...18 hours ago
- Nugget Is Dead brings queer love, multiculturalism and Aussie flair to the Christmas movie formula
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Phoebe Hart, Associate Professor, Film Screen & Animation, Queensland University of Technology Julia Firak Stan’s new Christmas film Nugget is Dead is a colourful production that follows the rules of the seasonal genre film to a tee – with an Aussie ...18 hours ago
- Help Me Hera: Should I cut contact with my ex-stepdad?
My parents are finally getting divorced. So why do I feel like my stepdad’s feelings are still my problem? Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nz Dear Hera My parents recently announced their separation. This in itself isn’t a problem. I’ve already gone through this once before in my early childhood, so ...18 hours ago
- New Zealand Drops In Global Ranking On Climate Action
If the government won’t hold polluters to account, then people will. People are increasingly taking to the streets and the courtrooms, putting their bodies on the line to shut down polluting industries. This will only escalate further unless New ...18 hours ago
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Gone in an hour with the return of a tory government. The essential problem incrementalist face, there so called reforms just keep get rolled back.
Just look at the last 40 years – the neverending desires of greed just keeps winning. And the fact the media swung behind landlords so quickly, shows just how long this will last.
It will be waterdown to nothingness, and greed will win again. You can't legislate against greed unless there is political and social will backing it up. I'm just not seeing that.
The answer is simple – the Goverment becomes the largest single landlord in NZ, setting the standard that private landlords have to follow & building a huge real estate asset that's too big for the Nats to even think of privatising.
Yes, it will take some time for the Government to build/buy up sufficient rentals to become the biggest owner of rental properties, but now's a great opportunity to start. With all those whining private landlords exiting the market, there's bargains to be had!
Comrades! Never under-estimate the power of Big Government to do good!
+100 Dean
I have often thought that corporate ownership, whether government or private, would be better than ownership by a lot of 'baby boomers' investing in rental properties in order to save for their retirement. Corporations would have the finance resources to keep properties up to scratch, and also to invest in higher density housing where appropriate. They would also be able to maintain longer tenancies since they would not be under pressure to sell properties 'on retirement' or when those properties were needed for other purposes.
Corporations would still have the right to evict unsatisfactory tenants who failed to pay rents, or damaged their properties; but they would be better placed to absorb any costs due to these sorts of eventualities.
Baby boomers, if they wished to invest in residential property, could purchase shares in such corporations.
housing associations like the peabody estates owned by kiwisaver funds
"If you can’t understand that tenants are humans with a need for a home, then off you fuck and free up the house for someone who can figure out how to run a business that doesn’t dehumanise the people the business serves." !!!!
'off you fuck' Love it Weka
Nice post.
Do you know someone that owns a house they don't live in? I do too. I know lots. Without exception every single one of them wishes to create a warm, dry, secure desirable home for their tenants.
Those that do best do approach their ownership as a business. Managing risk is a major part of operating any business. With demand for rentals at their current levels applicants with children, pets, poor credit history, no job etc don't make it to the viewing stage. Owners can select from a range of applicants that will administer the wear and tear of Tinkerbell on their properties.
Yes, housing is a human right. I don't think it's the responsibility of the Jones across the street from me to provide me with a house.
There are reasons we are seeing a sky-rocketing demand for state houses by infinitely qualified applicants.
We live in times when an application that starts with 'I have 3 children' gets read no further. Our govt is pressing on with the medicine for the evil blood sucking landlord bastards (I've never met one) without being fully prepared for the side-effects.
No, it isn’t. Nobody has an obligation to provide me with a house.
@David Mac"
"Our govt is pressing on with the medicine for the evil blood sucking landlord bastards (I've never met one) without being fully prepared for the side-effects."
David, as Chair of the Tenants Protection Association in Christchurch I can assure you such landlords DO exist. I have met far too many.
If landlords are going to dismiss tenants for daring to have children, or life issues, then they are exactly the people we no longer need in the sector.
The Government has been preparing for an increase in the demand; as have both the faith and the not for profit sectors.
It would help greatly if Government of a bluish persuasion stopped selling off our state houses every time they get elected.
For now, tighter rules around tenancies – which frankly are only about being respectful and responsible business operators – are a good start. Landlords bleating that these are too intrusive remind me of nineteenth century factory owners complaining that it was unfair they had to limit the number of hours a week they could work children to less than 40…
Hi Anthony, good to hear from you. I'm sure your role would attract airings of the track records of the worst of the sector. Given that there are hundreds of thousands of landlords in your region, what percentage of them do you think exploit their tenants in honour of just one more dollar? I know 100s, I don't know a crook one.
Landlords aren't dismissing those that have kids. They love kids but they're choosing the single introverted bookworm 53 year old physiotherapist to live in their house. From a humanity stance, it sucks, from a business stance, I can see why it happens.
Yes Anthony I agree, the government initiatives to improve housing standards have many merits but I'm concerned about pending no roof situations. When I moved to the Far North 10 years ago there were consistently around 100 rentals available North of Whangarei on Trademe. These days, today, 31.
the answer is transfer those assets to our pension funds with 30 40 50 year money there very very stable owners indirectly there us
Landlords say they plan to sell their properties – or focus solely on the high end of the market – if their ability to end their tenancies with 90 days’ notice is removed.
Do they? I'm a landlord and don't recall saying this. They mean "some landlords," and who apart from those individuals cares whether they sell their properties or not? You get the feeling these dumbasses think it's them rather than their properties that are the valuable asset in the rental market.
Agreed.
I always wonder (and continue to wonder after reading the poorly written stuff article) where exactly these surveys come from. Certainly I've never been asked – makes me wonder how strongly the surveyors select people to get the 'right' answers
Since my partner brought her own (slightly worse) apartment and dragged me off to help pay for it, I've been renting out my apartment firstly as airbnb and for a few years now as a yearly tenancy. It is on an annual lease, has a clearly written agreement that the tenants & I worked out
I have no particular issue with any of these rules. They mirror the ones that I have for terminating the tenancy – they just add putting in the Tenancy Tribunal. The act already has facilities for terminating tenancies when there is damage in the property, and periodic inspections.
I also can't get over the fuss that some of these landlords are making about selecting their tenants carefully. They either currently don't take care of their assets or they rely on rapid turnover of tenants. I can’t imagine not selecting tenants for my property, in which I have close to half a million dollars invested, without taking a lot of care about who I allow to rent there.
From the sounds of it, the sooner they remove themselves from the rental market, the more efficiently the market will operate.
the 'I get terrible tenants and can't get rid of them' stuff makes me think some landlords just don't know how to be a landlord. Understanding how to screen applicants, and how the law works in terms of ending a tenancy seem like pretty basic entry level skills.
Which is why property manager are becoming so much more popular now. Still the ruthless professionalism they bring comes at a cost and not just an extra 10% on the rent. They too operate a numbers game and have only so much time and resource to deal with each of a large number of tenants; if you start costing them too much time and effort or look a bit risky in their view, they'll start finding ways to move you on.
Personally I preferred it when we managed our tenancies directly, but moving to Aus forced our hand. One manager is brilliant, the other is awful but we lack choice in that location.
It's not a landlord's responsibility to ensure we all have our human right to a home. In most cases a landlord's primary responsibility is to manage their superannuation policy as best they can, if they fail everyone but the bank loses.
I recently assisted a friend in securing long-term tenants. He settled on an older couple that live in Auckland and stay at his beach-house for 2 nights every 2 weeks.
Is he evil for choosing them? It seemed like a logical business decision.
People are hoarding food at the moment. It's not their responsibility to feed everyone else, but hoarders do tend to get their comeuppance during times of great famine.
There's business logic, and then there's whether something is a dick move.
So logical business decisions are all well and good, but whether there is much of an official restriction on them depends on how much of a dick move these business decisions are.
When your property manager rings you and says "I've got 2 applicants, one a single Mum with 4 kids, lousy credit history, Trademe feedback that is half red faces, has no furniture and wants to move in today. We also got one from the dental assistant that is moving to the district to assist the local dentist."
When it's your place McFlock, do you make the dick move? Who do you choose?
The dick move being addressed by the legislation isn't necessarily picking one over the other (maybe you can't weather the risk to the property, based on some of the reviews), the real dick move is deciding that you can get more off the dental assistant after the single mother has been a tenant for a year so you kick out that family even though they've been perfectly good tenants and paid their rent on time. You might even leave a smiley face review for her, just to placate your conscience at kicking a family out.
The vast majority of landlords will leave a reliable tenant in place, especially one that is obviously settled into the community, rather than risk a new one with all the unknowns they entail. They may well look fine on paper, but you never know how they're going to turn out … or more importantly how long they may stay.
Any incremental gain in rent can be very quickly lost by one tenant who causes problems, lost rent or even just an extended vacancy for a month.
In my view your little whataboutism is a very small part of the problem, by contrast DMac's question is a commonplace scenario and rates a straight answer.
Except the scenario of picking who to rent to has no relevance to the legislative change, which involves kicking people out without cause. So I suppose the vast majority of landlords have no problem with the proposed changes.
Very rarely will a landlord terminate a reliable tenant 'without cause', there is no rational reason to do so.
The contentious provision is the removal of the 90 day termination without necessarily giving cause. Given the relative lack of enforceable responsibilities on tenants and the difficulties in obtaining written evidence in many cases, the ability to move on a troublesome tenant is considered an backstop measure, that while used rarely, is important all the same.
If there was no ability to increase rent within 12 months, unless there was a new tenancy, and the local market was conducive to raising the rent would there not emerge a rational reason to remove a tenant?
Then there is the matter of landlords being able to wield removal power whenever the tenant raised issues with the landlord – which means the two parties are not in an equal relationship.
In general any incremental gain in the rent in these circumstances is just not worth the fuss and risk.
The same with a tenant who raises reasonable problems with the landlord will likely be treated reasonably. After all if it is a genuine maintenance problem then it will need to be dealt with eventually or any subsequent tenant will likely raise the same issue. Again there isn't much motivation to just turn over tenants for no good reason.
Then the legislation is prohibiting something that very rarely happens, and the vast majority of landlords will not be affected. We seem to be disagreeing as to why we are agreeing?
About 3% of tenancies are terminated on the 90 day clause each year; my argument is that most of these the landlord will have an underlying reason.
But as for just 'kicking people out' on a whim … there is little motivation to do this.
So if there's a reason as mentioned in the post, it won't affect landlord or tenant.
Job done, no worries, almost no landlords affected. Just the very few kicking people out without a reason. So no problem with the legislation?
Not at all. In many cases it is difficult if not impossible to gain the evidence needed to take to the Tenancy Tribunal.
In the case of anti-social behaviour the people on the receiving end of it are often very reluctant to write anything down or give formal evidence for fear of further repercussions. They often decide to move on and avoid problems.
The landlord certainly cannot, nor should not, monitor what is going on 24hrs.
Without concrete evidence the problem tenant can simply dispute and deny causing more delays.
The need for three notices within 90 days is also way too short and easily evaded by a tenant who knows exactly how long they have to 'behave' until the clock resets. We once had a problem tenant drag it out for 2 years before we finally resolved matters.
Ah, the "I know it's their fault, but I can't prove it" justification.
Good riddance to it. It was abused by employers, and if it wasn't being abused by landlords there wouldn't be a desire to eliminate it.
There's no call to stop landlords putting it in leases that tenants need to drive green cars (or some other stupid rule). You know why? Because it genuinely doesn't happen.
No. Landlords are not, nor should be, the police. Anti-social behaviour comes in many different forms and gathering formal evidence is not actually our job.
Indeed the legislation requires that we must give tenants 'quiet enjoyment' of their home, something we are particularly careful to do. Snooping about and 'monitoring' stands in total contradiction to this.
The one occasion we had to evict in these circumstances, we lost three other tenants over two years to a female tenant with deteriorating paranoia issues. It took some time to understand what was going on, and never did we have any written evidence … but eventually it was crystal clear what was happening.
And why exactly should the other tenants put up with this?
If you're not doing your job, the good tenants take it to tenancy services to prove you're not doing your job. If they can prove you're not doing your job by not dealing with behaviour X, they can give you that proof and you can prove that X is doing whatever. Problem solved.
In our experience the other tenants on the receiving end will not engage formally because they don't want more repercussions. They're the ones stuck there living next door to the problem with no clear end point as to when it will end or how much worse things might get.
And under the new legislation they’ll be even more certain that nothing will get done, so they’ll cut their losses and move on.
You also seem to have a rather odd view of what ‘our job’ is. We are not police, we are not social workers, we are not there to solve personal problems.
So essentially this is the argument: some tenants don't like other tenants, but can't or won't give actionable reasons why. Therefore, you as landlord should be able to arbitrarily end a tenancy based on your feels as to who you want to leave.
And those feels are only very rarely unfair.
When you get three different tenants in a row all saying much the same thing, plus reports from other non-tenant neighbours, the picture becomes clear. Indeed in our case we had a lot of empathy for the woman involved and let it drag on longer than we should have.
Bear in mind ours was a relatively benign situation, in other cases you're dealing with alarming, unsafe threatening behaviour. The police aren't interested in helping and the Courts don't have a simple process either.
So yes in the end you make a judgement call, go for the 90 day eviction and hope that nothing worse goes wrong in that period. It's a last resort, but an important one.
Yes everyone involved feels it’s unfair, but your diminishing and erasing of the victim’s concerns here is noted.
"Victims concerns".
Which victims? The tenant with declining mental health, or the tenants who want that person kicked out but won't document why?
I'm deliberately withholding all the details we discovered, but there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that her behaviour was not going to be tolerated by most people.
We are not mental health providers, we have no expertise nor facility to do that safely for anyone.
Ironically enough as tenants ourselves, we struck an almost identical situation here in Australia. The scary thing was that being away from home extensively my partner became increasingly concerned for her physical safety (and trust me she’s no snowflake). In this case the property managers and landlord completely kept out of the problem and directed us to the local Court who have a very simple process to deal with it. It was not made into a problem for the landlord to solve.
Eventually the outcome was the same, and the woman involved was moved on.
Here's the thing:
Currently, you reckon that roughly 3% of tenancies are cancelled ostensibly without cause, but really there is cause. That's what lets you satisfy 1 without breaking 3.
But maybe 3 is a naive criterion that breaks down, say, 3% of the time? Fine for most tenants, but not for some on the extremes? If you have multiple unconnected people saying the same thing multiple times, maybe you should put more effort into 1? Both for the neighbours, and for the tenant who is in declining health? Not even with eviction as an objective. Documenting enough yourself so that people who can give that person the help they need know what's going on.
edit: I started my comment before you mentioned yours, blasted asymmetric comms
You aren't going to like this reply, but the hardest lesson we had to learn in this business is to be clear about what our role is; we provide a home and certain legal obligations around this.
Blurring the boundaries and trying to help people with their personal problems always ends badly.
Yeah, so does leaving things up to the whim of capitalists.
You don't need to be a psychologist. But there's a line between that and washing your hands from any interest or responsibility with "Landlords are not, nor should be, the police".
There was nothing 'whim' about this situation; we certainly didn't wake up one Saturday morning, rub our hands with evil glee and ask ourselves which tenant we'd boot this month for the sheer hilariousness of it all.
But in essence both the landlord and the tenant have responsibilities, and when these are breached the necessary trust relationship breaks down and inevitably a clean break is the solution. If nothing is done problems only accumulate and get worse.
Yes as landlords we have a duty of care around the Tenancy Agreement and the commercial contract it creates. But we are not any kind of social service, and if a tenant cannot or will not take responsibility for their end of the agreement, there is very little we can do to effectively help. It’s that simple.
Again, there's a line between the two.
You basically described Marx's theory of alienation perfectly. It's one of his best criticisms of capitalism, imo.
And reality has been very unkind to Marx, his legacy has proven to be one of the most toxic ideas in all of human history.
And like marxism, your idea of how landlords should be the social guardians of their tenants might sound nice on paper, but works out terribly in practice.
Sorry but that's a lesson we learned the hard way.
Marx's solutions were bunk, but he sure described your attitude: personal interest is subsumed to the level at which one can exploit the other.
You complain that the neighbours won't put anything formally, but also that you shouldn't formally check things for yourself because your interest is only financial. Not conducting therapy or social work, mind, simply confirming those things that your other tenants refuse to go on the record about. Because that's not your role as
capitalistlandlord.If you want to discredit Marx's criticisms of capitalism, show me a capitalist he didn't describe.
Again, your ideals about how we should be our tenant's social guardians might sound nice, but in reality every time we tried something like that, it came back to bite us on the arse. I could detail each occasion but I ask you to trust me on this. Unless and until someone is ready to be responsible for their problems, all attempts at 'helping' them are doomed to fail. This is why Marx's solution is bunk.
Besides if you are going to place that extra responsibility onto us, what extra rights do we get in order to effective discharge this? Do we get to routinely audit our tenant's finances? Do we get to specify who they can associate with? (A common cause of problems.) Do we get to put a camera in their property so that we can see what is going on?
All ridiculously intrusive of course and personally I'd never dream of doing anything like this. Our primary responsibility in this respect is written into the Tenancy Act … that we must ensure the tenant's 'quiet enjoyment' of their home. That's the deal and it works perfectly well for 90% of our tenants over the years. They get a home on terms that suit their situation right now, and we get to invest in our future; there is no exploitation here.
🙄
Social guardian, lol.
You insist on going to that extreme to justify the idea that you can't do any investigation yourself if other tenants make an accusation but refuse to go on record.
Well how the hell else are we supposed to 'investigate'? We didn't live on site at the time and all we could go by was the reports of other people who didn’t want to put anything in writing. And doing nothing was not an option.
Your standard of investigation would see us in the sights of the Tenancy Tribunal quick smart and rightly so. As landlords we simply are not allowed to snoop on our tenants.
And if you expect we should support a tenant who, doesn’t pay rent reliably, has an ex who wrecks an expensive sliding door, who harrasses other tenants, who has the drug squad smash the doors down, who steals our chattels and sells them, who blocks the dryer vent deliberately and causes substantial damage to the ceiling, who has five wrecked cars in long grass scattered about … (all not the same tenant obviously), but each time we helped it was seen as a sign of weakness by the tenant to be exploited to the max.
You simply haven’t been on my side of the business and really have NFC. In NZ the Police and Courts are of little help and leave it up to the landlord to sort these matters out, yet the law isn’t much help to us.
You don't need to be a "social guardian" to ask people questions and write things down.
another dick moving is saying in an interview in a national newspaper that solo mothers make bad tenants.
yup
"It's not a landlord's responsibility to ensure we all have our human right to a home"
That's right, it's the government's responsibility. Hence them introducing legislation that makes sure our housing stock is in a fit state and managed properly. What's the problem?
shortages
do you mean that tenants having less rights will prevent shortages?
Isn't your friend creating shortages by renting his spare house out for holiday makers?
It's basically the same argument as with worker pay and conditions: ie, if we increase the minimum wage or improve working conditions, employers will hire fewer people. Sounds vaguely plausible at first glance, then you notice that despite the radically improved pay and conditions over the last 200 years we still have low unemployment.
Yes weka, my friend is contributing towards housing shortages. He believes he is making the best of his circumstances, it's popular, I'm guilty of doing that.
When I say shortages I mean a property manager first looking at the number of children box on an application and if anything other than zero immediately sending back the Dear John form letter. Beneficiaries, dogs, smokers, didn't pay for a phone when they were 17, gangster friends on Facebook.
Right or wrong, property managers/owners are choosing from the other 25 applicants.
I don't get the connection with improving tenants rights. We already have shortages and some landlords already take a bigoted approach, or even just a pragmatic one.
Ten years ago there were 100 rentals available in the Far North, today there are 31. Demand has gone the other way.
Owners used to be able to write investment in their rental off against their income tax due. This simple device improved rentals on the quiet. It's little steps like axing this that have made a rental house a less desirable investment. 10% of Mums and Dads getting out of it would see 1000's of us living in parks. It just takes a little % movement to trend towards the issues that concern me, an Albert Park chocka with tents.
If rental houses were a fantastic thing to get into rents would plummet.
ok, so nothing to do with tenant rights and the topic of the post?
Tenants rights are up against the person holding the keys to the half million dollar asset. Do you want to live in a country where we can say "I demand you hand over those keys now."
Forcing people to do anything is an uphill battle. Far better we create an environment that prompts people to want to address the hurdles we face.
But the legislation isn't going to allow tenants to force landlords to hand over the key, so I really have no idea what you are saying here.
The reason we have this Bill is because landlords were unable to change their practices voluntarily, and in fact have lobbied against improvements for tenants. Social change is often achieved via legislation.
The Greens latched onto the sort of synergy I speak of.
"Landlords, the government will pay half of the costs to insulate your rental property. If your tenant has a Community Services Card, the Government will pay 100% of the cost."
Quality policy with a thrust in the right place for a change.
And they didn't do it in droves!
A lot still whinged about what was then about a $1500 cost and left it until the last minute at which point it cost a lot more.
I suspect this is because they didn't't value their tenants because they viewed them as not worthy of spending any money on.
So if 'housing is a right', exactly whose responsibility is it to provide it?
If the people holding the keys to these half million dollar assets have a pool of applicants so broad they can select a tenant with the footprint of a feather it falls on all of us to see we all have a roof.
Every right comes with an unavoidable and complementary right; then I ask exactly who? The answer 'everyone' simply does not answer the question about the mechanism. Everyone via the state? The market? Santa Claus?
As for your point, I’d argue that for most landlords (especially those who still operate with a mortgage) the margins are so low, that selecting the lowest risk tenants is now a commercial necessity.
Yep, if we all want omelette, we'll need to crack lots more eggs.
My concern is that we're currently on the path to LA sorts of problems and I'm frustrated by facts like the current levels of govt rent assistance could be a hefty % of a mortgage payment.
My parents got their foothold in life because as youngsters the govt assisted them into their own place, not with rent money to feather somebody else's nest.
The underlying problem is that there are relatively few places on earth that are truly desirable to live; either from an economic, social or governmental perspective. Demand for homes in these places will always exceed supply, and price is the least worst mechanism we know of to balance the two.
Unfortunately for some, Auckland just happens to be one of these places.
We have been gravitating to cities for centuries. It's where we go to prosper. As robots rent out, wash and review rental cars for damage we are finding ways to operate our businesses and collect Tua Tua after breakfast.
If you think there is a UBI in our future, why live where the snapper don't jump into the boat and the air wafts carbon monoxide?
We have oodles of fabulous places to live if we're not hunting down an urban $.
Leave it to the market, eh, Redlogix? You have swallowed the cool aid.
So if 'housing is a right', exactly whose responsibility is it to provide it?
Same as every other right – it's our society's responsibility, if necessary via our elected representatives. Hence the existence of state houses.
More to the point, if housing isn't a right, we are collectively saying to homeless people "No-one owes you a place to live, asshole. Find a bridge to sleep under." Let's not be that collective.
So if it is the state's responsibility to provide housing, why would this right not be universal?
Hint … unlike most people here I have lived for a period in a real Soviet era apartment block, and on the basis of this admittedly thin sample, I can't say the experience would be a big vote winner in NZ.
I knew several families, including some close family, who lived in New Zealand State houses. I can tell you for a fact, they were nothing like the Soviet ones.
In fact, ex state houses sell at a premium, especially the older ones.
Decades ago our population was small enough and easy build land still sufficiently cheap that we could build pretty good social housing for a small fraction of the population.
But what happens when the state tries to provide 'equitable' housing for everyone is another story altogether.
Yet another good reason to stop increasing the population by 20% in 16 years, and even less years in future.
And, with 2 million population, state houses were a substantial amount of the total economy at the time.
the current structure is not fit for purpose
So if it is the state's responsibility to provide housing, why would this right not be universal?
It's society's responsibility, not the state's. How we have our society fulfill that right is up to us, and I expect few of us would select the option "govt issues everyone a Soviet-era apartment."
Well yes, but having ruled that admittedly extreme option out, no-one seems to be putting their hand up to detail what they really mean by this feel good phrase 'housing is a right'.
Redlogix. Sophistry. How we can again provide housing for everyone at reasonable prices has been endlessly discussed, here.
I have asked several times now, precisely what do people here mean when they say 'housing is a right'? Exactly how do they think this universal right should be delivered?
We've eliminated the Soviet solution … state apartments for everyone. And we excoriate the market at every turn, so I'm curious as to what people really have in mind when they say this.
I totally agree that any responsible govt should be concerned to see everyone has the opportunity to house themselves, contrary to what you seem to imagine no-one is for poverty and homelessness.
The solution we have at present is the private sector either provides home ownership or rentals for the majority to the population. For those who cannot meet the criteria of the private sector, we have a public social housing sector. All three sectors are struggling to meet demand in an affordable manner.
This suggests that it's not just greedy bastard landlords who are the problem, and that improving the tenant/landlord relationship, with clearer and more enforceable rights and responsibilities on both sides of the business …. while a desirable goal I've spoken to for many years here …. is not going to magically solve all housing problems. Nor somehow assure everyone is delivered a home as a 'right'; language that is both vague and ambiguous. It sounds good as a warm fuzzy idea, but lacks precision or boundaries when it comes to any real implementation.
Too hard.
https://driftglass.blogspot.com/2020/03/have-fun-storming-castle.html
not a bad description of the the problems of a broad based left political movement….ne'er the twain shall meet
All revolutions, from the French one onward, have been catastrophic failures. Their narrow and simple ideologies brought cruelty, devastation and misery to hundreds of millions. Now of course as an informed and capable person you know this fact perfectly well, and that you crave it speaks loudly to your motives.
You've got the wrong end of the stick there, sport.
Apologies … I scanned your link too quickly and conclusion jumped. Although I'm still none the wiser as to what you were saying.
Re the OP; tenancy tribunals and rent controls ain't going to cut it because housing is generational, near thirty years to get anywhere close to realising Savage's utopia, it flourished for twenty and in the past thirty years it's withered and died.
IMO, with a plan. But as driftglass suggests, with the today's catastrophisers v moderates schism, the chances of a plan are near zip.
Well yes that makes good sense. Several decades ago I was probably a bit of a catastrophiser. Now I'm firmly in the moderate camp.
In those two decades I've had the extraordinary privilege to live and work in almost 16 different nations and this has had a deep impact on me. As my career in automation expanded I became aware of what an insanely complex and detailed world we live in, on how it is so dependent on an unthinkable myriad of competencies, resources and sheer ingenuity to function. As an result I look at the built world with different eyes to many people. I see ordinary objects, from the mundane like a glass on the table, to the extraordinarily sophisticated like a cell phone, as the result of almost endless chains of detailed technologies.
This has tilted my view of the world away from simplicity toward complexity as the underlying driver of our modern world. I accept this can all to easily become an excuse for paralysis … the 'too hard' justification for doing as little as possible.
It wasn't the idealogy. It is the fact the revolutions, almost always, end up with the people most prepared to be violent and ruthless, in charge. Just like the fascist coup, supported by the USA, in Bolivia recently.
That, is why we need actual, Democracy.
80% of USA'ians want higher taxes for millionaires and Medicare for all, for example, but they will never be allowed to vote for it in their pretend democracy, that is in reality, an Oligarchy.
And why we will not be allowed to vote, on whether we want to increase the population by millions in the next 40 years, or lose our jobs with "free trade" agreements.
It wasn't the idealogy. It is the fact the revolutions, almost always, end up with the people most prepared to be violent and ruthless, in charge.
Read Gulag Archipeligo again. The violence was there right from the start, baked into the authoritarian nature of the people attracted to the ideology.
pop the bubble to start with and start again would be a start
I suspect more than a few living in cars, on the street or couch surfing, would select "Soviet era apartments" as a better option.
Noting that "Soviet era apartments" were a huge improvement on Tsarist poverty and homelessness.
The vast majority of people everywhere live better lives than the absolute poverty common everywhere 200 years ago; real progress has delivered an unprecedented relative prosperity to the large majority of humanity for the first time in history. So arguing that the Soviets managed better than Tsarist serfdom is a very low barrier to jump over indeed.
The point is that a large number of people in New Zealand have much worse lives than their equivalents in the 50's to the 80's.
A marked failure of the more market, so called, "reforms" since then.
We are, supposedly, so much better off, but we cannot house, feed and look after everyone to the same standard as before. FIFY.
Fair enough, NZ's economic trajectory since WW2 has gone from one of the 10 top richest nations on earth in the 50's (off the back of UK access for farm products) to one of the lower performing OECD nations.
It won't make me popular to say this, but this slide predated the Rogernomic neo-liberalism that so many lefties still point to as the cause of all our evils. It is perhaps better thought of as a ill-begotten response to our declining economy rather than the root cause of it.
The root cause was a variation of the old 'resource curse'; we had tens of millions of sheep to export and this consumed much of our economic enterprise. We failed to develop a diverse and productive economy as say for example Singapore was busy doing. When the EU pulled the rug on us we were left flat-footed for far too long. This plus the old tyranny of distance meant that from the mid-60's until around 2010 NZ was going slowly backward. Exactly as you describe.
As a tangent I think two things have happened to change this picture in the past decade. The internet has greatly mitigated the challenges of isolation, and low cost air travel has close another part of the gap. NZ is now a much more diverse economy, with an unexpectedly thriving manufacturing and tech sector.
And I agree that the hangover of neo-liberalism is still a blight in too many influential corners of our society. But even that is waning as each generation passes.
NZ is now on the cusp of whole new round of opportunity; isolation and a benign climate now work in our favour. Our demographics are still evenly balanced and we still have a relatively trustworthy public and business sector. These are all good things and I believe that over the next two decades NZ will probably do relatively well. As a consequence our housing market should start to re-balance itself toward more supply and an improved affordability similar to what we see in Australia.
The one factor I would like to see govt pay more attention to (and the Australians have done this better than us) is ensuring the capability and capacity of our building industry is promoted and protected. Our building industry has for far too long delivered palpably poor value for money. This and more intelligent management of land and housing density are long term projects that need a decade of govt leadership to set right.
oil shock 1970s compete loss of markets in early 70s bankrupt in 1984 the imf almost arrived muldoon scraped the kirk goverments saving scheme thank national for that.
started in 60s national never thought the market access would ever end and made no effort to diversify away from the uk then the door slamed shut
Yup. Blaming Rogernomics for everything is simplistic and unhelpful; NZ was in trouble well before the Lange govt.
So is blaming the lose of the UK, market. People do not realise how little our economy depended on overseas trade before the 70's oil price rises. Even now it is less than we think.
It is debatable if trade with UK, was even a net benefit. Like now with China, having to accept shoddy manufactured goods in return for produce.
If we were bankrupt in 1984, then we were bankrupt after the last Government. It was a fictional narrative used to justify the disaster capitalism of Rogernomics.
Similarly it wasn't the loss of UK markets that put NZ in the shit, it was the oil price shocks of the 70's. Which Muldoon, for all the other shit he did, was doing what looked like the right thing at the time. Making us less dependent on imported oil.
Your misapprehension is ascribing advances to capitalism, when in fact they are due to social cohesion, co operation and redistribution. The "rule of law, increasing democracy, educating, feeding and keeping healthy entire populations, and more equal opportunities.
I never ascribed all progress to capitalism. Capitalism is merely a form of market economy on speed; it intensifies the power of markets and has been an inextricable component of our societies since the Rennaisance. It does of course need moderating to prevent it from running away into absolute inequality.
This doesn't discount the role of social cohesion that you point to; trustworthiness is fundamental to all things. Low trust societies are always inefficient and tend toward tyranny.
Then there is the pivotal role of science, technology and engineering in producing the core energy transformations which have seen incredible transformations in our lives. 200 years ago 95% of the population worked directly in primary agriculture industry; most people produced only a little more than what was needed to feed themselves. Now the figures are reversed, vast amounts of human labour and creativity are freed up to far more sophisiticated and valuable pursuits.
In my view each of these components has played an identifiable role in the creation of the modern world. Each has it's excesses and necessary limits that must be imposed in order to maintain a balanced, healthy society, but singling out 'capitalism' alone as the cause of all our problems strikes me as a simplistic and narrow ideology.
A little case-history.
Some time ago a couple of my acquaintance bought a house in a city a considerable distance from their own home. The intention was to move up there and perhaps start a boutique B&B. Family circumstances prevented this from happening immediately. so they put tenants in. Said tenants fell in love with the place and wished to acquire it for themselves. An unexpected windfall enabled them to put in a very good offer, which after a short think was accepted (with some regret, but aforementioned family matters had become still more pressing with little sign of relief in sight).
So far, so good. But then … oh dear, the promised deposit was not paid on the due date. Pressure applied via the agents through whom the offer had been made. Payment promised, but never put through. Repeat several times. No deposit, let alone full purchase price.
Two courses of action: (i) take legal action to secure deposit and/or payment for property (a binding contract having been created, after all), or (ii) give tenants real incentive to cough up by giving them notice to quit. (Simply letting things go on as they were was obviously not on. Agent was also keen to secure their cut from the transaction.) Court action was dismissed as too expensive and the outcome too uncertain. So option (ii) it was. And eventually, under that pressure, the tenants caved in and completed the purchase.
I've simplified the details a little, but that was the guts of it. I should add too that the tenants never fell behind with the rent, although they did contravene the "no pets" clause in the rental agreement.
But the thing is: under the proposed legislation, would option (ii) still be available were the same situation to arise again?
That's a curly purchase situation, one of 1000's. Renters with access to funds are shopping for their own place.
"But the thing is: under the proposed legislation, would option (ii) still be available were the same situation to arise again?"
Do you mean could the landlords use the threat of eviction to get results on something unrelated to the tenancy? No. The point of the amendment is to prevent landlords from being able to do things like this.
Shit happens every day and finance falls through. Put the house on the market and sell it to someone else if that's what you want. Or abandon the sale and leave the tenants you have in place.
In this case the necessary trust relationship between landlord and tenant had clearly broken down. Doing nothing was not going to be an option, there would simply be more problems down the road.
Sounds odd that they say legal action was 'uncertain' when there's an agent involved and a 'contract'. Normally that contract would be a standard Sale and Purchase agreement from either ADLS or Realestate Institute, which would be pretty watertight and you default on at your peril.
That this doesn't appear to be the case the whole thing looks a little dodgy, along with using the 90 day provision to force something completely outside the tenancy agreement. Last time I looked there was nothing in a standard tenancy agreement covering the potential sale of the property, or any other commercial transaction, apart from the rental of the property, between tenant and landlord.
But never a good idea to go into business wiht your landlord, or your tenant.
Getting the Slum Lords out is nothing but a good thing…
But if govt is unwilling to have massive social housing stock and with our current population growth we do need to be careful that we don't constrict supply to the point we drive up rents even further.
To make a small point I have a townhouse with a pretty decent sized mortgage in the 5 years or so I've owned it rents have risen so much the same townhouse rents for @ $150 per week more than my mortgage…
The whole housing market is broken and unless we can get supply to out strip population growth in big cities nothing will really change.
I'm sure cheap credit hasn't helped and it for sure isn't healthy that the combo of rising rents and house prices make it damn near impossible to get on the housing ladder without some kind of family assistance to get a deposit together.
It really depends on where you want to live. How about this brand new 3 bed, 2 bath home in a decent suburb for A$420,000
https://www.domain.com.au/16-sligo-street-alfredton-vic-3350-2016042534
The same home anywhere near Auckland would be twice the price. OK so I know you think I'm cheating, but the point is simple, Ballarat is less desirable than Auckland in the minds of most people looking to buy a home, and even though they operate in very similar markets with similar interest rates … the price fundamentally reflects demand vs supply.
Yep which is kinda my point unless we build faster than population growth and the social housing is there to act as a drag on price rise nothing will change. In fact it will get a whole lot worse.
Well governed nations like NZ, with a relatively trustworthy public and business sector, a low population density, low pollution, good enough schools, and a bouyant economy with opportunity will attract people regardless.
Such is the demand that if we were too completely lift all our immigration controls, the population would more than triple within a decade. And those at the bottom of the heap today, would be even more firmly wedged at the bottom of an even bigger heap tomorrow.
Housing is just one part of this story. As a problem it has many dimensions, and no silver bullets. Increasing tenant rights without counter-balancing them with more responsibility is only ever going to be a short-term feel good measure to deal with one small symptom in a bigger picture. But I doubt it will have much positive impact in the longer term.
We don't actually have to accept every man and his dog, from all around the world, being part of the demand.
The posts from Weka on this topic have a loathsome lumpen-Marxist Fight The Power attitude to them.
So let's disabuse ourselves of the "Don't Let The Door …" chippie crap and get some actual facts on the table.
Landlords aren't some tiny scrooge-like elite. There's about 270,000 of us. Our votes go all over the show.
There are about 1.5 million households in New Zealand. Those private landlords own about 550,000 rental properties. You can do your own research about how the remainder are divided up between Council housing, NGO providers, state houses, rent-to-own, Maori communal arrangements, state housing, Council housing, retirement villages, etc.
But roughly of the 4.8 million New Zealanders, about 1.5 million people are tenants. Private landlords are a fraction of that.
So far as I can se, the government hasn't released anything on the scale of the problem it's trying to fix. That ought to be a requirement for a big legislative and regulatory shift against the most important means of anyone in New Zealand getting ahead.
Is it the case from the government, that tends of thousands of people are being unwillingly turfed onto the streets because of low landlord regulation? It would be great to see historical stats on this. And sure, everyone's got an anecdote. Anecdotes make really shit law.
Is the government really able to build enough rental accommodation to actually perform their own duty of care about housing to its citizens? It would be a whole lot better for the government to get its own house – so to speak – in order first by being the provider it ought to be. The waiting list for state housing has exploded to over 14,000 on this governments' watch, and climbing: this government is as bad at housing as they are at transport.
The current average tenancy length is over two years already. Is there any policy research from the government in which this is too long, too short, just right? Not so far as I can see. Just more shit law.
So let's get to the wider problems with the regulation.
The implied contest between right to be housed versus the right to own property isn't going to be solved with the regulation proposed.
This government has done a fair bit in a term about rental housing requirements, including regulating for warmth and damp, and propped up different welfare levels with higher payments all over the shop. Has there been any evaluation on whether that's assisted rental turnover? Not so far as I can see.
Now there's some truths to face.
The first is that much stronger regulations will make landlords ever-choosier. It won't have the effect of supporting the poor. Face it the working class in New Zealand is getting larger, poorer, more returned-from-jail, and sicker. They are not attractive people to have stay for an indefinite period in your second-largest asset. So more landlords will choose with greater scrutiny.
The second is that the state housing deficit for people needing social housing is just massively expanding under this government. In their last year of the term they've announced fresh funding. Great. The new HNZ is gearing up for greater scale – but FFS give them a term to catch their breath before effectively shifting thousands more from private to public rentals. Even in Mangere – that most deprived and proletarian and Labour-dominant of suburbs – two thirds of the homes being built are private, with only a third going to the public sector. And that criticism comes from the hard left, not the right.
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2001/S00019/governments-state-housing-targets-out-of-touch-with-needs.htm
The third is that the Tenancy Tribunal members are notoriously stacked in the landlords favour. Most of them are leftovers from the Clark administration and are completely of the moist-left brigade because the Key government never got round to looking at their appointments. I do like the increase in fines against landlords that are proposed: that's well sufficient to sort out the tiny fraction of toe-rag landlords.
What the new regulations don't set out is any greater duty upon the tenants to look after the place for this indeterminate period of time. If you live in my place commercially, it's because you and I have come to a commercial arrangement, not through a right. You want a right, well here comes the responsibility that comes with it. Landlords, again, will just stipulate conditions and preconditions surveys with a helluva lot more detail.
But the big one is the absence of the Capital Gains Tax. Without it, a house to rent will always the primary way most Kiwis will be able to generate a retirement income or any intergenerational equity to hand down. Plenty of young people now simply buy a house solely for rental, and rent themselves. Owning a rental property is the only way to get ahead in this country – and will be so until there is a government with neither National or Labour leading it. That makes this policy a vote-shifter, and this government runs on too fine a margin to risk that at the election. So that fact is this government is failing to do anything real that would shift the asset class dominance of rental housing.
This government is a fat bunch of hypocrites on housing, and should sort their own compact of rights with its own citizens before it imposes stringent controls on one small class of those citizens.
If you think this post is about landlords as a whole, you either didn't read the post or you didn't understand it. Try rereading the first sentence again.
I rent. My landlords are pretty good. This post isn’t about them /shrug.
The waiting list for state housing has exploded to over 14,000 on this governments' watch, and climbing: this government is as bad at housing as they are at transport.
There are two important thresholds in the housing market; the big one is 'do you qualify for a mortgage'? If so then when the time is right you will likely become a homeowner.
The second lower threshold is 'do you have good enough references to rent in the private sector?' If so then most people will prefer the choice and flexibility of this market.
And if you don't pass over either threshold then we have the public social housing sector as the safety net.
All this works assuming that supply and demand are reasonably balanced in each sector, which they are not. Successive govts have run down the public social housing supply, changes in the rental market are not working toward improving supply, and low interest rates, high demand and a building industry that seems chronically incapable of delivering good value all ensure asset prices keep rising.
There is a toxic stew of reasons why our housing market is not working for everyone, but blaming landlords for all of them, speaks to an endemic resentment.
But the big one is the absence of the Capital Gains Tax.
Short answer, Australia has a CGT and Stamp Duty as well, but Sydney and Melbourne both have the same problems as Auckland. There are many ways to address rising prices, but a CGT always struck me as the weakest.
And, you know what their housing market would be like without a CGT, how?
I can't speak to the Australian CGT effect, but our own government's Tax Working Group concluded last year that
"A Capital Gains Tax (CGT) would have a greater effect on rental property prices than rents, but should lift rental yields", according to the report of the Tax Working Group. Feb 21, 2019
The New Zealand advocacy group Renters United had the same view for the same reason last year:
https://i.stuff.co.nz/business/112124300/tenant-landlord-will-find-another-reason-to-put-rents-up-now
We'll probably never know if it would have had an effect in New Zealand conditions now. But that’s what you get with this government: great at moralizing over other people, weak at taking action that could make make a statistical difference.
The large majority of landlords (as opposed to pure speculators) are doing a buy and hold. We have held all of our property for over 20 years and still have no plan to ever sell. Exactly how would a CGT impact us?
TOP's CCT was a far smarter and more powerful tool to achieve what you have in mind.
You're not immortal, a CGT would eventually be paid.
But the business can carry on as long as my family want's it too.
Sure. But then inter-generational wealth has always raised the issue of estate taxation. It would be easy to set an amount (value of the median property value) above which an estate tax applied.
Well the great thing about TOP's Comprehensive Capital Tax is that it would be collected annually in small amounts. In the case it couldn't be paid (asset rich, cash poor) then it could indeed be postponed until death and effectively become the Estate Tax you have in mind.
TOP's tax ideas seem to me to be an excellent way to make sure most of the housing ends up in the hands of the rich. The opposite of their intentions. CGT is required to broaden the tax base, make it fairer, and make taxation less biased to production and consumption, and more towards taxing wealth and harmful speculation. Not just to dampen the effect the expectation of tax free gains has on housing speculators.
A CGT would raise revenue (broaden the tax base) and provide some of the capacity for an enhanced housing policy.
there borrowing far to much to income to own a home its a bubble that needs to pop
Clearly yours to ACT.
What else is there to go on when data is deliberately not collected?
Probably something to do with poor security of tenancy over the three decades. Pretty clear if children experience housing stress education suffer. But perhaps this is too anecdotal for you?
The only coherent and reasonable point in your comment. Well done!
What an awful, awful country we live in if that is the case. That you believe it is quite astounding and, as expected from a resident of leafy Wanaka, totally out of touch with decent, low-income Kiwis.
If you were ever Left, you could have fooled me.
Ad and I are the type of leftie who don't believe there is much inherent virtue or dignity in poverty and all it's attendant evils. And that includes poverty of spirit.
All you can do is personalize to a commenter. Pretty sad.
Always voted Labour.
You go to the Department of Stats and get them to do their job.
Adding a "probably something" to a no-fact argument makes your stance worse. Even CPAG does better than that.
No, it's only an awful country to the children growing up in poverty in this country – and nothing has shifted better under this government on that score either.
As for your last line, I agree you are easily fooled.
Your comments invite personalisation because you say provocative things in a absolutist style.
Ok, then. Labour's not always been Labour.
Stats have been absent on what makes society tick for some time. Hopeless organisation.
Your comment was heavy on opinion but light on facts too if you'd care to read it again.
Thats not what you said. Feel free to correct what you did say if you are having second thoughts about it.
As for your last line, I just read what's in front of me.
I presume you are referring to people unable to afford (the deposit given mortgages are often cheaper than rent) a family home – so rent one of these but seek to save a deposit for a one bedroom flat (which they can move into when their children leave the family home rental home).
But surely the growth of such a demographic is the reason why government needs to improve both the quality of rental property and the security of tenants.
I would submit that regulating the rental property market on behalf of workers is now the Labour vs capital issue that unions use to represent in the politics of Labour Party. If you do not get that, then you will end up on the other side, with capital, before you realise how and why.
The Government has already added thousands of houses to the State house stock. A marked contrast to National flogging it off, and forcing the poor into Ghettos. Like all major changes it takes time. But it is going in the right direction.
Nothing generates a sense of contagious pride for a family quite like being in a position to be able to say "This place is ours."
Watch that lawn stay trim and give a damn kids prosper.
This is weird.
To say that that those who don't own their house are unable to generate pride in their family and that their kids don't prosper.
Pretty much consigns 50% of the population to the shit heap in you view.
I think you have a very right wing concept of the word pride.
I think your concept of the word sucks.
Disagree. Most of our 50 odd tenants over the years (I'd roughly guess 40 of them) have looked after their home better than we might have. Certainly the inside; the outside tends to get less attention, but then some really make an effort.
Owning property doesn't make you morally superior.
Nor does being a tenant, although that's not obvious from the tenor of some comments here.
What is true though, is that most landlords are people who sacrifice today in the expectation of a better outcome in the future. And in the long run that does tend to be a superior strategy.
I just didn't like the "…lawns stay trim…" wankery.
Sheesh. That's the bit you didn't like?
What about:
Lawns staying trim is a thing tenants can do to encourage kids to prosper. But apparently not owning a home is the thing which condemns them forever…
Yes, I was being flippant.
My point is that our government would be doing much more for our society if $300 a week rent assistance was $300 of a mortgage payment.
I thought it already was part of the AS. Given mortgage is often cheaper (at current mortgage rates) than rent, the real issue is access through the capital gate (having the savings for the deposit).
what you are describing is the sub prime mortgage market….are you sure you wish to go there?
Hi Pat, the sub prime fiasco was on the back of lenders providing mortgages for people unable to make repayments or a high chance of falling into arrears.
The ever escalating government paid rental assistance enables people to lead a life of treading water.
If that same money and anything more the household could afford was directed to a govt guaranteed and facilitated mortgage, even if it took 2 generations, they're a family nibbling away at a better future and not just treading water.
The family's equity and wealth as opposed to a landlord's will grow as the home attracts capital growth.
If the family falter in a major way, wish to hand the keys back, ownership could revert to the govt who can place a fresh assisted owner family in the house based on the house's value of the day.
"the sub prime fiasco was on the back of lenders providing mortgages for people unable to make repayments or a high chance of falling into arrears."
exactly…..how does what you propose differ?
Either way you are providing capital to those without the ability to repay and fueling real estate inflation in the process.
NZ does not have a housing shortage…its has an affordable housing shortage.
Hi Pat, the govt are currently providing many families with $600 for rent each week. With a little bit more of a contribution I feel they could have the ability to service an inter-generational mortgage, pay the rates, maintain and insure the property.
Think you best do some math for you appear to grossly underestimate what such a policy would cost in terms of a proportion of gov revenues never mind the perverse outcomes it would generate.
Currently the Accommodation Supplement costs the gov approx 1.5 billion pa and includes low income households paying mortgages (itself an inflationary and perverse bandaid) and obviously is not meeting its purpose with rising homelessness, housing affordability/availability especially for the lowest quintile.
Yeah ok Pat. I'm not sure you're getting where I'm coming from.
Yes the accom supp, I thought it was 2.2 billion, anyway.
For a family dependent on the government for their income, if their rent is $600 a week the government is paying $600 to a landlord on their behalf.
Yes, I hear what you're saying about such a system further pushing the market-place in undesirable directions.
Do you feel it's impossible to counter those forces?
"Do you feel it's impossible to counter those forces?"
Not in the medium/long term, indeed much of the RBNZs work is aimed towards it but it will take time.
My preference is to assist the RBNZ in its work by substantially increasing appropriate social housing back to the levels last seen in the seventies and I acknowledge the current Gov appears to be making some effort in that direction as opposed to the previous admin which was divesting the public of its housing assets.
Of course there may be a rapid change in affordability should the market crash but sadly those most likely to suffer from such an event are the same ones doing it tough now.
It is important to remember that every resource directed at this problem is a resource unavailable for the myriad of other demands
Yes, a myriad of other demands, but a roof and our health, they're jolly fundamental. Without a roof and our health, education is an unnecessary luxury.
I'm sure you can see the inherit benefits in enabling more to follow the advice I suspect you gave your offspring, it's what my Dad said to me. "Rent for as short a time as you can, even if it's a dogbox in a questionable location, buy as soon as you can."
I do see the inherent benefits and I advised my offspring of such….but the best solution imo is to reduce property values through the removal of the inflationary incentives and the provision of adequate social housing….and that appears politically problematic.
Ha yes Pat, inherent benefits, those ones.
Social housing, yep, lets slide them into Airbnbs on the quiet. Cheaper than the motels by the month now they're into shoulder season and lovely crisp clean linen, wi-fi, power, Netflix, jacuzzi, little bottles of shampoo and conditioner, nice.
Tongue from cheek, it would be comforting to know that there might be some post Winston conspiring re: putting a rocket under creating social housing.
Why be flippant about one of the most serious issues there is? Shelter.
Your take was and is, from your other comments on this thread, to argue home ownership for all because when you don't own a home your kids are left without pride and they don't prosper.
I disagree. The important thing for kids is to be stable and not transient. Increased rates of home ownership helps because families are in one place for longer, so it’s good to encourage low income households into home ownership with shared equity schemes and similar.
But families not owning a home can still bring up great kids if they have a sense of housing security. They even look after the the garden if they feel like the place is theirs to enjoy.
The proposed legislation goes some way to addressing stability of community particularly in high property speculation phases.
The last government belatedly helped protect against surges of speculation with the requirement of tax identity for buyers, and this one has helped protect against future surges of speculation with the foreign buyers ban.
The reform of the RTA is a small part of the work required to change the behaviour of the residential tenancy market from one dominated by amateur landlords only concerned about their own retirement, to one dominated by professionals who run their tenancies as a business and keep their assets in reasonably good shape, and most importantly in the market for the people who need them.
It’s really not fair or socially responsible of you to write off 50% of the population as having no hope of bringing up decent kids simply because they don’t own a title.
The removal of State "rentals for life" is one of the meaner Neo-liberal policies. One of the biggest causes of low educational achievement, apart from being hungry all the time of course, is frequently shifting house, and the consequent shifting schools.
Tossing families out of state houses as soon as they got to a minimal income threshold, has entrenched poverty for many.
Working class who had State houses in the past have often managed to give their kids a good start and break the cycle.
Now, we kick the poor back down, the second their life shows signs of improvement.
Which figures as a lot of people actually profit from poverty.
the best to do would be to turn off the money that supports the houseing market
I have managed 1 to 6 properties for over 10 years. There are certainly tenants that are a continually difficult but whose behaviour doesn’t meet a level that justifies ending their tenancy.
These laws
along with an effectively run tenancy mediation and tribunal system leave me confident that I could terminate the tenancy of someone that deserves that to happen.
People shouldn't work in the rental market unless they have good communication skills and a genuine interest in people. And yes I've met rotten tenants and rotten landlords.
the landlord issues three notices of separate anti-social acts by the tenant within a 90 day period
That's too short. The one time we had to move a tenant on in this circumstance, the behaviour was spread out over almost 2 years. But serious enough to cause three other tenants to move.
Badly behaving tenants are smart enough to quickly learn that if they get a notice, the clock will reset in 90 days and there'll be no consequences.
addressing the 40,000 empty homes in Auckland is well overdue.
How would rents be impacted if not for the 2.5 billion in Govt accommodation supplements?.
addressing the 40,000 empty homes in Auckland is well overdue.
There are many reasons why a house may lie empty and a one-size fits all mandatory seizure and/or forced occupancy is probably not the most elegant solution.
TOP's mostly neglected Comprehensive Capital Tax was the cleanest and most even-handed mechanism I've seen so far. But it was a new idea and therefore far too radical and upsetting for most lefties.
And how many votes would Labour have lost to the right – who would have opposed it as firmly as a CGT (at least a a CGT does not punish the poor for owning their home).
TOP's tax idea is an excellent way of ensuring, over time, that only wealthy people own houses.
CGT, proposed should have been progressive. Not many people think anyone should be paying CGT, for an average family house in the suburbs. Plenty can see why Key should have paid taxes, for the millions in profit, on his one of several "family homes" .
Forty THOUSAND empty potential homes in Auckland – holy shit!
According to this March 2019 report, London has twenty-three thousand empty homes.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/mar/11/empty-homes-england-rises-property
23,000 / 9.0 million is ~ 2,500 empty homes per million Londoners.
40,000 / 1.6 million is ~25,000 empty homes per million Aucklanders.
New Zealand, we have a problem…
A local comparisons is Sydney (23,837 / 5.3 million = 4,500), although Brisbane is higher.
Sell, sell, sell! The more the merrier.
Even better tightly restrict Air BnB so people can live in actual homes rather than motels again.
So I just kicked out a tenant. was a solo mum who I got suckered into. after a few months a partner started living there. didnt mind too much.
a year later late rents, lawns not mown complaints about loud noises. she told our management agency theres no issue as you get your rent eventually.
so we kicked her out. and the house just came back with high levels of meth use.
never again
Your problem wasn't solo Mums. It was letting to a person with a questionable grasp of their life responsibilities. They come in all shapes and sizes.
Who did the meth test?
You're aware of the meth testing scam of a few years ago?
You'll find this useful
https://www.drugfoundation.org.nz/info/meth-houses/