Written By:
Mike Smith - Date published:
9:52 pm, August 24th, 2016 - 17 comments
Categories: families, housing, uncategorized -
Tags:
Dr Kate Amore and Rev Tric Malcolm will discuss this issue on Friday 26th August at 5:30pm at Connolly Hall, Wellington. Amore’s research released today shows “As the housing market gets tighter, single people have more flexibility and potentially more options open to them, whereas families with children don’t. People [landlords] are less likely to want them, and they have more requirements of housing,” she said.
People without a home are largely invisible in the debate around housing in New Zealand. It is estimated that there are around 42,000 people moving between temporary and insecure accommodation such as garages, garden sheds, cars and caravan parks. Night shelters, emergency housing, refuges – these are the places where NZ homeless seek some sort of shelter. The people sleeping rough or on the streets are only a fraction of the homeless. It is a problem affecting both urban and rural areas, large cities and small towns. Many of the homeless are young people and include women and their children fleeing domestic violence.
Dr Kate Amore works with He Kainga Oranga/Housing & Health Research Programme at University of Otago, Wellington. She mainly produces national severe housing deprivation (homelessness) statistics, and has researched a variety of homelessness-related issues. Rev Tric Malcolm is the Wellington City Missioner.
Is the discussion being streamed or filmed?
To ask for any work to be done on the place you rent is to invite eviction for being too difficult.
This is particularly difficult for renting families which require a certain level of performance from the house they live in in order to bring up their children to be contributing citizens of the future.
I hardly recognize this country from when I was growing up.
It was sold 32 years ago to global corporate interests.
History will show that a corporate coup d’etat occurred in 1984.
And nor would any generation, it’s called change What is however consistent is oldies and nutty left bleating on about the good old days through rose tinted glasses, and of course then there’s Paul who is a special case
Some change is good.
This isn’t.
And you RWNJ always think that the worst possible societies are always the best which is why you always try to reintroduce them.
While overall families are more vulnerable when renting, it does cut both ways. If as a landlord you have a good family as tenants, if you treat them well they are likely to treat you well and stay with you longer term, precisely because moving on is more difficult for them. As a landlord, changing tenants is a big risk that you want to avoid where possible.
Of course, it’s the landlords who are struggling in New Zealand at the moment.
Like these people.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11571162
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/83271758/Property-developer-slammed-in-Environment-Court-says-he-is-starting-a-revolution-against-housing-bureaucracy
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/72959814/Tenants-Protection-wants-Christchurch-slumlord-Murray-Hill-shut-down
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/83155248/Some-landlords-leave-students-living-in-horror-conditions-advocates-say
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff-nation/assignments/tales-of-life-as-a-tenant/14555552/Suffering-at-the-hands-of-landlords-neglect
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/83422791/humble-queenstown-home-for-rent-at-nearly-1000-a-week
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/regional/283765/there-are-no-dead-rats,-says-queenstown-landlord
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/83470219/trade-me-data-shows-improving-outlook-for-tenants
So true. If you take Lathanide’s point of view the landlord can do no wrong. When it is all about rent seeking. The landlords are winners in this race. Until the property crash comes of course…
No, it’s not my point of view that “landlord[s] can do no wrong”. Perhaps you should read what I actually wrote.
I merely said it cuts both ways. Yes, families are vulnerable.
But the nature of a family, ie having ties to a community, kids going to school, settled job etc, means that they’re more likely to become stable long-term renters than singles are. Landlords like to avoid risk, and taking on a new tenant is pretty much the riskiest common activity for landlords.
Why is it that all the cheap housing is in the hands of landlords?
Indeed, every time a landlord buys a cheap house as a rental they are outbidding some first time homebuyer.
To add insult to injury you just know the rent will be higher than families can actually afford, so the landlord will be benefiting from Government subsidies, like the accommodation supplement.
Even worse is when it’s rented out, ‘not fit for purpose’, and the landlord received the insulation subsidy. Imagine running a business where your product was substandard, and having the taxpayer step in and pay for the improvements that allowed you to up the price???.
To say in the same breath renting families are vulnerable and ‘it cuts both ways’ means you believe landlords are vulnerable too.
Like fuck they are!
Like all landlords, I suspect you have no concept of what life is really like for your underclass tenant families.
Minister of Finance and Minister of Housing Bill English defends his Governments’ response about housing, in the Dominion Post today:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/83499984/bill-english-were-on-track-to-build-85000-new-houses-this-term
but but but I though Labour’s plan to build similar numbers over ten years was impossible? And that was before the Nats even admitted there was a need for more houses.
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/homelessness-rising-dunedin
“This comes as Social Housing Minister Paula Bennett last night said she did not read the University of Otago, Wellington, research because of ”inaccurate” statements made by one of its authors in an accompanying media release.”