Key attempts misdirection, blind trust questions remain unanswered

Written By: - Date published: 4:36 pm, May 28th, 2010 - 57 comments
Categories: accountability, Politics - Tags: , ,

John Key has just issued a press release answering questions no one asked. Mr Key says he doesn’t have a beneficial interest in Whitechapel – the ‘key hole’ to seeing his blind trust. But Key doesn’t answer the central question surrounding this issue. Why does Whitechapel clearly seem depict the interests of his so-called ‘blind’ trust?

Key says in his statement:

“The advice from the law firm that established Aldgate, my blind trust, states I don’t have ‘any ownership or other interest in Whitechapel’, and that it is not correct for Mr Hodgson to claim the assets I did own were ‘transferred’ to Whitechapel Ltd.  They were in fact sold to Whitechapel.

“All this means that I have no beneficial interest in Whitechapel Ltd, which is central to Labour’s claims of a conflict of interest.

But that’s not the point. The point is why do Mr Key’s private interests appear to be perfectly visible through Whitechapel, making his trust anything but blind? Labour MP Pete Hodgson says the following in reply to Mr Key’s statement:

Prime Minister John Key’s statement refuting conflict of interest allegations has taken the debate precisely nowhere, Labour MP Pete Hodgson said today.

‘The central question remains ‘How can John Key prove that he could not see into his own blind trust through viewing Whitechapel Limited’,’ Pete Hodgson said.

‘Mr Key’s lawyers have not addressed that question.

‘Incidentally, their advice in paragraph two would seem to suggest that they have a different view of what is meant by ‘blind trust’ than does the Cabinet Manual in paragraph 2.70(f).

If Mr Key’s trust is not blind, which it appears not to be, then serious conflict of interest issues arise. The PM has said nothing so far to clear up that crucial point.

Misdirection is not answering the question.

57 comments on “Key attempts misdirection, blind trust questions remain unanswered ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. Bright Red 1
    28 May 2010 at 4:45 pm

    No-one ever claimed he has a beneficial interest in Whitechapel.

    He has a beneficial interest in Aldgate, Aldgate has the beneficial interest in Whitechapel. It puts a distance between Key and Whitechapel but only as a legal fiction. The reality is what is in Aldgate is in Whitechapel and Key can see what is in Whitechapel.

    • Lanthanide 1.1
      28 May 2010 at 4:51 pm

      Thanks, that finally clears this up for me as I’ve been lost on this issue.

  2. mickysavage 2
    28 May 2010 at 4:49 pm

    Mr Key says he doesn’t have a beneficial interest in Whitechapel

    Possibly not but it appears that he has a beneficial interest in a trust that has a beneficial interest in property which is nominally owned by one company and the shares of that company are owned by another company that his trust may or may not have a beneficial ownership in.

    Talk about misdirection.

    EDIT – probably what Red said I think.

    • Jim Nald 2.1
      28 May 2010 at 4:56 pm

      It may not be blindingly obvious just yet but …. sniff sniff …. it smells fishy.

  3. MikeG 3
    28 May 2010 at 4:55 pm

    I’ve just posted this on the other “Key” thread, so apologies to those who read it twice!

    Key continues to make statements that are on the wrong side of the truth, and the the so-called legal advice does nothing to clear things up.
    1. He says that the shares were ‘sold’ to Whitechapel if so, why did he say a month or so later that he had shares in a vineyard?
    2. He says that he doesn’t know the other shareholders in the vineyard. This at best is not believeable to own 10% of a company with only 10 other shareholders, and not know them! Hard to prove either way I admit, but most people would check out the other shareholders before buying a 10% stakeholding.
    3. The wine is not from the vineyard stated on the label. OK, not a lie, but certainly a mis-representation. Just as well they were not being sold or this would definitely be bigger than paintergate.
    4. The connection between the vineyard that he doesn’t know if he has a share in or not, and the winery that did the bottling, trademark registration etc. Just coincidence?

    • ghostwhowalksnz 3.1
      28 May 2010 at 7:24 pm

      Exactly , you have a minority interest with a small group of shareholders, yet you dont know who they are? ( are they drug dealers , unlikely but you get what I mean)
      Beggars belief that he operates as ‘mum and dad’ investor.

      As for the wine not being from the winery, its semantics as most vineyard based wineries use grapes from other vineyards, whether small or large

    • B Ormsby 3.2
      29 May 2010 at 8:44 am

      John Key does know (at least) one of the other shareholders in the vinyard, because I know one of the shareholders. He is my friend’s boss, and he has told her that he owns said vinyard with John Key.

  4. Santi 4
    28 May 2010 at 5:12 pm

    From the right: I’m fed up with Key. Sack the corrupt PM!

  5. Tigger 5
    28 May 2010 at 5:26 pm

    The lawyer’s letter only makes Key look more shonky. Lawyer’s letters are rarely a good idea when honesty is under fire.

    This should have been saved for any investigation but being released now has only put more fuel in the fire.

    Key’s PR is usually so good. Methinks panic has caused this kneejerk response.

  6. Herodotus 6
    28 May 2010 at 5:30 pm

    I hope this sticks otherwise a few more nails in the coffin RIP Labour. You cannot keep thowing dirt it will stick somewhere either the target or the thrower. Dont forget the Indain women that was closer to Lab than the party let on regarding the Worthy case, was it emails, texts I cannot tell the difference and they were not as juicy as Mr Goff initmate.
    If there was anything of real conflict of interest I would have thought it would have been released a few days before the budget. Especially as on the surface the budget over delivered on the so called short commings Lab was spouting off. i.e Not enough money to the less well off. Well the budget delivered more. Well it did deliver more before we feel the impact of the small print.
    Other wise all we the public will be getting is a Tease and no delivery, we do lose interest after a while and if something or importance arises then it will be missed.

    [lprent: That is a particularly bad example of the stupid troll diversion tactic. Go away for a two week ban. Learn not to do such daft diversions. ]

    • ianmac 6.1
      28 May 2010 at 5:33 pm

      Deflection/diversion Hero? A bit thin old chap.

      • Herodotus 6.1.1
        28 May 2010 at 5:45 pm

        Not at all. Remeber the boy who cried wolfe. He already has used up at least his 1st get out of jail card.
        Next it could be scaled down in that John Key acted according to the law BUT his actions are not moral …
        I just hope that there is a backup plan if we find nothing has been breached. But then the political game will just move on. The players will play and the public will be more dispising of the politicians who never what to progress for the public. This has been seen before this play. butthen I could be wrong and this could be the real thing.

    • mickysavage 6.2
      28 May 2010 at 5:36 pm

      Crosby Textor alert, Crosby Textor alert

      When in trouble do the following:

      1. Bring up the Indian Woman even though she did nothing wrong and Goff acted like a gentleman.
      2. Say it will cost Labour support.
      3. Deny there was a conflict even though the blind would see there was.
      4. Say it is just “Labour being political”
      5. Talk about the Budget.
      6. Talk about anything even if it makes no sense.

  7. tc 7
    28 May 2010 at 5:32 pm

    Whilst I can’t say I follow the detailed legal issues for me and alot of punters it comes down to the reasonableness test i.e. would a self made man just give over millions of his investments and be totally unaware of the composition of what he’s giving over ? Would he be unaware of any changes to the investment portfolio in the ‘blind’ trust ?

    Let’s remember the man is PM and has a far higher duty of care then he’s ever been used to as a dealer and it shows…..vineyards aren’t great investments and any adverse impact on wine consumption effects the value so the conflict is clear in terms of the alcohol excise issue.

    I have no issue with his wealth but a big issue with the influence his investments has on his decisions as PM (Tranzrail, mining shares, a vineyard etc) and yet again he’s lied…..if it’s blind how do you know you have shares in a vineyard sideshow john?…….now watch his msm apologists go into overdrive to help the lying toad out again…..what a disgrace he is.

  8. Bright Red 8
    28 May 2010 at 5:47 pm

    The lawyer’s letter (http://img.scoop.co.nz/media/pdfs/1005/Letter.pdf) says Key is not a trustee of a named beneficiary of Aldgate trust but the Pecuniary interests register says he is. Dodgy.

    The lawyer’s letter also explains that the legal fiction is the other way round than I described. I thought the layers ran Aldgate, which runs Whitechapel. Turns out Whitechapel run Aldgate and holds its assets as trustee. The lawyers run Whitechapel.

    Doesn’t make any substantive difference. And one is still left asking why Whitechapel exists except to make the assets that are in Aldgate open to anyone who looks in Whitechapel.

    The bit about Whitechapel buying the assets at value is obvious, never in question. Anyone who has set up a family trust knows about the legal fiction where you loan the trust the money at zero percent, which it then uses to buy your assets and you forgive the 0% interest debt over time to avoid gift duty.

    • Lanthanide 8.1
      28 May 2010 at 6:20 pm

      Ahh, I wondered how it was possible to transfer large $$ into trusts to avoid gift duty.

      However the lowest threshold is something like $27.5k/year, so wouldn’t this essentially mean that any transfers of say $500k into a trust would take ~18 years to fully clear? That’s quite a long time, and I imagine it could be problematic if you were transferring a few million into one?

      • mickysavage 8.1.1
        28 May 2010 at 6:38 pm

        $27k per person. The Keys could do $54k a year.

        Transferring the asset from one trustee to another trustee does not require gift duty to be paid. This is where the transactions are probably happening and Oh to see the paperwork.

        It should be remembered that there are two law firms involved acting for different entities. There is Ross and Whitney acting for Key and Taylor Grant Tesiram acting for who knows.

        The letter misses the point. The problem is that Key as PM can make decisions that directly benefit a trust which will result in his family getting a pecuniary advantage and he pretty well knows what assets the trust has.

        As MF said the issue is not control of the trust, it is benefiting from Government decisions.

        And Key fails the smell test.

    • Rosy 8.2
      28 May 2010 at 7:54 pm

      I was wondering where the trust got the money to buy his assets, thanks. Maybe this needs explaining to us people who don’t have trusts, otherwise we might believe Key. Heaven forbid!

  9. Craig Glen Eden 9
    28 May 2010 at 6:02 pm

    The reason he cant address the major issues is he has lied and now all he can do is spin, Mickey is spot on I think. On top of that Pete Hodgson is no fool and he will have done his home work he is not prone to the same sloppyness as Mike Williams.
    The way Hodgson has asked specific questions of Key has really set up the inexperienced PM well and truly. Its very clear why all the wingnuts are out in full voice because Key has taken a big hit in the credibility stakes.

  10. Ron 10
    28 May 2010 at 6:13 pm

    He ripped off New Zealanders in the 1980’s and he’s ripping them off now. He’s gotta go.
    captcha: smile

  11. ianmac 11
    28 May 2010 at 7:17 pm

    On TV News tonight Key used the words “transferred” as opposed to “sold”

  12. I dreamed a dream 12
    28 May 2010 at 7:17 pm

    Question: Why is Key not getting legal advice from Crown Law/Solicitor General instead of those private lawyers? This is an issue of public interest in relation to the Prime Minister. So, why is he not getting advice from Crown Law?

    • ghostwhowalksnz 12.1
      28 May 2010 at 7:33 pm

      Its Keys style to bring a document which he then ‘claims absolves him completely’

      Doesnt matter that it is just a legal doughnut, its his peg to hang his hat , and hell repeat it until hes blue in the face.

      English did it with his QCs opinion about his family trust. Trouble was the Auditor general ran her eye over it and demolished the QCs arguement, but then ducked the issue by saying it’ wasnt intentional so was OK’

      Smile and wave a legal document

  13. mickysavage 13
    28 May 2010 at 8:01 pm

    I think I have an understanding of the issue. There is not one trust but two.

    In 2008 Key disclosed the existence of the JP & BI Key Family Trust in the Parliamentary Register of Pecuniary Interests. It is possible that this trust has transferred to the Aldgate Trust its assets.

    I have set out what I think may have happened at http://waitakerenews.blogspot.com/2010/05/can-you-trust-john-key.html

  14. Gooner 14
    28 May 2010 at 8:11 pm

    The point is why do Mr Key’s private interests appear to be perfectly visible through Whitechapel, making his trust anything but blind?

    If they’re “perfectly visible”, what does Whitechapel own?

  15. Gooner 15
    28 May 2010 at 8:30 pm

    Micky, that explanation seems plausible. If it is then Key is vindicated. The directors of Whitechapel make decisions for its beneficiary – probably the trustees of Key’s family trust and Key has no input – he is not a director of Whitechapel and probably not a trustee of his family trust either.

    Story over. Key 1 – Hodgson 0.

    • mickysavage 15.1
      28 May 2010 at 8:39 pm

      Sorry Gooner but I see it entirely differently.

      1. Key has directly or indirectly made decisions that result in a winery and a Dairy Holding Company in which his trust had an interest benefiting.
      2. His family probably benefit from this.
      3. He should have declared an interest before taking part in the decisions.

      No matter how complex you make it Key should have declared an interest. And it seems likely he was a trustee of his family trust.

      Hodgson 2 – Key 0

  16. ianmac 16
    28 May 2010 at 8:54 pm

    Remember that Trevor M asked for replies to written questions regarding conflictsof interest in Cabinet but the reply was in effect no comment. As Mickey Savage says:
    “1. Key has directly or indirectly made decisions that result in a winery and a Dairy Holding Company in which his trust had an interest benefiting.
    2. His family probably benefit from this.
    3. He should have declared an interest before taking part in the decisions.

    No matter how complex you make it Key should have declared an interest. And it seems likely he was a trustee of his family trust.”

  17. Gooner 17
    28 May 2010 at 8:54 pm

    We just don’t know any of that Micky. That’s the real problem and is the reason trusts are set up as you know.

    In terms of Key being a trustee of his family trust, didn’t the companies office show a transfer from John and Bronagh Key and some third party to Whitechapel Limited?

    Just found it – it seems the trustees of hi family trust were him, his wife and Ken Whitney. They owned the shares in Earl of Auckland and Devils Limited et al which were resettled on Aldgate – Whitechapel Ltd.

    Having said that, it certainly seems plausible that Key would make the odd phone call to Pravir Tesiram asking what Whitechapel Ltd is doing.

    • mickysavage 17.1
      28 May 2010 at 9:01 pm

      Gooner

      In terms of Key being a trustee of his family trust, didn’t the companies office show a transfer from John and Bronagh Key and some third party to Whitechapel Limited?

      It did. Usually the transfer is from the trustees, rather than the trust. If Whitney’s name was there it was likely that the trust was involved.

      So should we accept the possibility that our PM may be making decisions that result in his family benefitting?

  18. Gooner 18
    28 May 2010 at 9:15 pm

    Not necessarily Micky because I keep coming back to the fact that since November 2008, after the resettlements, we just don’t know what Whitechapel Limited did with the assets it received, and since then has held on trust for the beneficiaries of the Aldgate Trust – who are probably Key, Key and Whitney, as trustees of the Key family trust.

    Since November 2008, Whitechapel could have sold many assets and bought many more, in NZ or overseas, or wherever, and Key quite properly would not know because he is not a director of Whitechapel, nor is he a shareholder and he is not legally entitled to know as a trustee of his family trust – the likely beneficiary of the Aldgate Trust.

    It sounds confusing I know, but legally quite okay, as the letter from TGT explains.

    • Tigger 18.1
      28 May 2010 at 9:20 pm

      But in 2009 Key claimed ownership of a vineyard. Which the trust owned. So was he just blowing smoke, living in the past or did he know what was happening to his money?

      • The Voice of Reason 18.1.1
        28 May 2010 at 10:16 pm

        I don’t get why he doesn’t say that when talking about the vineyard he was just sparing the wine critic a boring summation of the intricacies of NZ property law and the requirements of the Cabinet Manual. What’s so hard about saying ‘I was chuffed she knew something about me and I simply couldn’t be arsed explaining the situation regarding my assets’?

        I mean, he’s either lied to her or he’s lied to Parliament.

    • mickysavage 18.2
      28 May 2010 at 9:22 pm

      Since November 2008, Whitechapel could have sold many assets and bought many more, in NZ or overseas, or wherever, and Key quite properly would not know because he is not a director of Whitechapel, nor is he a shareholder and he is not legally entitled to know as a trustee of his family trust the likely beneficiary of the Aldgate Trust

      Agreed but Key sees to know that he still had some sort of interest in a Central Otago winery when he gave the wine out.

      It may be legally ok as far as the trust’s lawyers are concerned but in terms of a possible conflict of interest it sucks.

      The basic issue can be expressed simply,

      Should John Key be allowed to make decisions that may benefit his family financially?

      • Anita 18.2.1
        28 May 2010 at 9:36 pm

        Should John Key be allowed to make decisions that may benefit his family financially?

        Yes he should. When a Minister of Health increases the subsidy for GP visits or prescriptions they benefit their own family.

        The test should be about the level of benefit, the relative benefit, the transparency and the honesty.

        • mickysavage 18.2.1.1
          28 May 2010 at 9:42 pm

          Agreed Anita

          A refinement of the question could be

          “Should John Key be allowed to make decisions that may benefit his family financially more than the benefits received by an average Kiwi family?

      • Gooner 18.2.2
        28 May 2010 at 9:38 pm

        No, of course he shouldn’t. And I agree with Tigger – he seems to know a bit of what Whitechapel owns/owned.

    • Anita 18.3
      28 May 2010 at 9:27 pm

      Whitechapel’s stake in Earl of Auckland, Highwater Vineyards and Dairy Investment Fund have always been in the public domain. Anyone could check it in <2 minutes on the companies office website.

      It is also worth noting that those three shareholdings were the Keys’, the shareholding were held together by the trust and no additional shareholdings were added.

      It stretches belief somewhat to imagine that Key had no idea. It is a direct lie for him to say it was impossible for him to know.

    • Michael Foxglove 19.1
      29 May 2010 at 9:54 am

      Tracy Watkins’ piece is about as thick as a plank of wood. Do you think she’s paid to run John Key’s lines for him?

      • Carol 19.1.1
        29 May 2010 at 10:09 am

        Argh. I had about finished typing a reasoned response to Watkin’s Op Ed, when a slip of the finger closed the browser. Her piece is just another bit of MSM myth making. She seems totally (or wilfully?) ablivious of the right’s anti-Clark negative sniping away, long before the elctions. So then Key was able to present himself as being in the realm of “positive politics” while benefitting from both an uncritical MSM, and the legacy of all the negative, personalised whittling away at Clark’s image, and mostly based on far more tenuous evidence than we see so far with the Blind Trust, conflict of interest Key issue.

        How does one get to be such a skewed and very selectively critical op ed political commentator in the MSM?

        anti-spam word – analysis… which is sorely wanting in Watkin’s op ed piece.

    • Armchair Critic 20.1
      29 May 2010 at 10:51 am

      Pete Hodgson summed it up pretty well in just two sentences:
      “The central argument gets lost in the blizzard of red herrings, essentially. The point is that John Key set up a blind trust that isn’t blind.”
      Source: Stuff
      He said in parliament he could not and does not know what is in his trust. So, if he can know, i.e. if he had the ability to know, he lied to parliament. And this lie was told irrespective of whether he knew or not, although there are strong indications he knew something.
      With the lawyer’s letter he is dancing on the head of a pin, and all the MSM can do is comment on how clever a dancer he is. Pathetic, again.

      • Gosman 20.1.1
        29 May 2010 at 12:02 pm

        Do you have a different legal opinion on whether John Key’s blind trust is actually blind?

        If so then please provide some evidence of this so that it can be brought to the attention of the Speaker.

        If not then all you are doing is making unsubstantiated claims of inpropriety. If you like to engage in that sort of politics then be my guest but I won’t be joining you in the gutter anytime soon.

        • Armchair Critic 20.1.1.1
          29 May 2010 at 9:51 pm

          “Do you have a different legal opinion on whether John Key’s blind trust is actually blind?”
          Why, yes Gosman, I do have a differing legal opinion on this very topic. By a mysterious coincidence I happen to keep an eminent QC on a retainer to provide me with advice on matters such as these. So I asked him and he provided a separate and differing legal opinion. And despite the exorbitant costs of keeping this QC on a retainer, I’m happy to publish it for your amusement on a blog site, for free. Destroying my anonymity in the process.
          Seriously – what a stupid question.
          I have an opinion. I’m not a lawyer, but that doesn’t prevent me from having an opinion on legal issues. I provided links in my comment to support my assertions. I support taking the issue about the trust to the privileges committee. Your apparent desperation to divert or shut the topic down are sad.
          In any case, this is not just a legal issue and you should stop pretending that that is all it is.
          The legal opinion from TGT opens up more questions than it closes.
          And in any case, it says exactly what one would expect. I mean, they were hardly going to say Dear Mr Key, sorry we stuffed up the legal stuff around your trust. Of course it is legal, it just doesn’t appear to be blind, like John told parliament it was.
          When TGT issue an opinion that tells everyone that the trust is blind, and convincing and comprehensively explains how it is made blind I’ll have confidence that the PM does not have any conflicts of interest, perceived or otherwise. This may take some time.
          Also, the opinion did not say the PM’s family do not have any kind of interest with the trust. Conflicts of interest, perceived or real, can arise even if a person is not a beneficiary of a trust. When family members are beneficiaries a conflict may still arise. When TGT issue a legal opinion that says the PM’s family have no interest in the trust I’ll have confidence the PM has no conflicts of interest around this trust. Again, this may take some time.

          “If so then please provide some evidence of this so that it can be brought to the attention of the Speaker.”
          Ummm, I’m not an MP, or even a member of a political party. In fact at present if an election were held tomorrow I’d probably vote for “Don’t Know”. Basically, it’s not my job, I jut hope Pete Hodgson keeps up his work. Why the Speaker would give a shit about my opinion is beyond me. But people here, such as yourself, seem to have some minor kind of interest in my opinion, so I’ll stick to expressing it here. If you don’t like it you have plenty of options.

          “If not then all you are doing is making unsubstantiated claims of inpropriety.”
          Well we won’t agree on this one. All claims are unsubstantiated until they are shown to have substance, through some kind of process and analysis. I’d like the claims about the PM’s so-called blind trust examined, the Privileges Committee seems to be a good place. Doncha think?

          “If you like to engage in that sort of politics then be my guest…”
          Thanks, I will.

          “…but I won’t be joining you in the gutter anytime soon.”
          Ah, yes, well a ban does have that effect.
          While I may well be in the gutter, you are arguing from the sewer. You don’t hold the high ground. Tosser.

          • mickysavage 20.1.1.1.1
            29 May 2010 at 10:09 pm

            Well put Armchair.

            You are right. As soon as we can be convinced that Key’s family will definitely not benefit from Government decisions about Excise duties or Canterbury water supply to Dairy farming companies then we can admit we were wrong.

            Until then …

            • Armchair Critic 20.1.1.1.1.1
              29 May 2010 at 10:51 pm

              “Until then ”
              That may take some time…
              No one in the MSM seems to have picked up on the family link. Weird, huh?

  21. darth 21
    2 June 2010 at 1:26 pm

    isn’t it up to you to show that Key can see what his beneficial interest is. you can’t. key wins.

    you can speculate. key can speculate. but only the trustees will know.

    that is a blind trust. QC said so.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Ceasefire agreement needed now: Peters
    New Zealand is urging both Israel and Hamas to agree to an immediate ceasefire to avoid the further humanitarian catastrophe that military action in Rafah would unleash, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “The immense suffering in Gaza cannot be allowed to worsen further. Both sides have a responsibility to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago

  • Daily school attendance data now available
    A new online data dashboard released today as part of the Government’s school attendance action plan makes more timely daily attendance data available to the public and parents, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour.  The interactive dashboard will be updated once a week to show a national average of how ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago

  • Ambassador to United States appointed
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced Rosemary Banks will be New Zealand’s next Ambassador to the United States of America.    “Our relationship with the United States is crucial for New Zealand in strategic, security and economic terms,” Mr Peters says.    “New Zealand and the United States have a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago

  • New permit proposed for recreational gold mining
    The Government is considering creating a new tier of minerals permitting that will make it easier for hobby miners to prospect for gold. “New Zealand was built on gold, it’s in our DNA. Our gold deposits, particularly in regions such as Otago and the West Coast have always attracted fortune-hunters. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago

  • NZ and the UAE launch FTA negotiations
    Minister for Trade Todd McClay today announced that New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will commence negotiations on a free trade agreement (FTA). Minister McClay met with his counterpart UAE Trade Minister Dr Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi in Dubai, where they announced the launch of negotiations on a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago

  • New Zealand Sign Language Week an opportunity for anyone to sign
    New Zealand Sign Language Week is an excellent opportunity for all Kiwis to give the language a go, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. This week (May 6 to 12) is New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL) Week. The theme is “an Aotearoa where anyone can sign anywhere” and aims to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Next stop NASA for New Zealand students
    Six tertiary students have been selected to work on NASA projects in the US through a New Zealand Space Scholarship, Space Minister Judith Collins announced today. “This is a fantastic opportunity for these talented students. They will undertake internships at NASA’s Ames Research Center or its Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), where ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • $1.9 billion investment to keep NZ safe from crime
    New Zealanders will be safer because of a $1.9 billion investment in more frontline Corrections officers, more support for offenders to turn away from crime, and more prison capacity, Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell says. “Our Government said we would crack down on crime. We promised to restore law and order, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • OECD reinforces need to control spending
    The OECD’s latest report on New Zealand reinforces the importance of bringing Government spending under control, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The OECD conducts country surveys every two years to review its members’ economic policies. The 2024 New Zealand survey was presented in Wellington today by OECD Chief Economist Clare Lombardelli.   ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Agreement delivers Local Water Done Well for Auckland
    The Government has delivered on its election promise to provide a financially sustainable model for Auckland under its Local Water Done Well plan. The plan, which has been unanimously endorsed by Auckland Council’s Governing Body, will see Aucklanders avoid the previously projected 25.8 per cent water rates increases while retaining ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Gaza and the Pacific on the agenda with Germany
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters discussed the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and enhanced cooperation in the Pacific with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock during her first official visit to New Zealand today.    "New Zealand and Germany enjoy shared interests and values, including the rule of law, democracy, respect for the international system ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Decision allows for housing growth in Western Bay of Plenty
    The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop today released his decision on four recommendations referred to him by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, opening the door to housing growth in the area. The Council’s Plan Change 92 allows more homes to be built in existing and new ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Speech to New Zealand China Council
    Thank you, John McKinnon and the New Zealand China Council for the invitation to speak to you today.    Thank you too, all members of the China Council. Your effort has played an essential role in helping to build, shape, and grow a balanced and resilient relationship between our two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Modern insurance law will protect Kiwi households
    The Government is modernising insurance law to better protect Kiwis and provide security in the event of a disaster, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “These reforms are long overdue. New Zealand’s insurance law is complicated and dated, some of which is more than 100 years old. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Government recommits to equal pay
    The coalition Government is refreshing its approach to supporting pay equity claims as time-limited funding for the Pay Equity Taskforce comes to an end, Public Service Minister Nicola Willis says.  “Three years ago, the then-government introduced changes to the Equal Pay Act to support pay equity bargaining. The changes were ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Transforming how our children learn to read
    Structured literacy will change the way New Zealand children learn to read - improving achievement and setting students up for success, Education Minister Erica Stanford says.  “Being able to read and write is a fundamental life skill that too many young people are missing out on. Recent data shows that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • NZ not backing down in Canada dairy dispute
    Trade Minister Todd McClay says Canada’s refusal to comply in full with a CPTPP trade dispute ruling in our favour over dairy trade is cynical and New Zealand has no intention of backing down. Mr McClay said he has asked for urgent legal advice in respect of our ‘next move’ ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Stronger oversight for our most vulnerable children
    The rights of our children and young people will be enhanced by changes the coalition Government will make to strengthen oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, including restoring a single Children’s Commissioner. “The Government is committed to delivering better public services that care for our most at-risk young people and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Streamlining Building Consent Changes
    The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says.      “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Minister acknowledges passing of Sir Robert Martin (KNZM)
    New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Speech to New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, Parliament – Annual Lecture: Challenges ...
    Good evening –   Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Accelerating airport security lines
    From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Community hui to talk about kina barrens
    People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Kiwi exporters win as NZ-EU FTA enters into force
    Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Mining resurgence a welcome sign
    There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill passes first reading
    The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government to boost public EV charging network
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure.  The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Residential Property Managers Bill to not progress
    The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Independent review into disability support services
    The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Justice Minister updates UN on law & order plan
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Ending emergency housing motels in Rotorua
    The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Trade Minister travels to Riyadh, OECD, and Dubai
    Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Education priorities focused on lifting achievement
    Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • NZTA App first step towards digital driver licence
    The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say.  “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Supporting whānau out of emergency housing
    Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Tribute to Dave O'Sullivan
    Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Speech – Eid al-Fitr
    Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government saves access to medicines
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff.    “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Pharmac Chair appointed
    Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Taking action on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
    Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says.  “Every day, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-05-07T07:13:11+00:00