Written By:
all_your_base - Date published:
12:21 pm, October 8th, 2007 - 2 comments
Categories: iraq -
Tags: iraq
Perhaps spurred on by General Petraeus’ claim to Congress last month that civilian deaths in Iraq were down 45% since December last year, the debate about the official civilian death toll in Iraq seems to have intensified.
Several groups – including MoveOn.org who recently ran the ad pictured – have accused the military of publishing misleading figures showing a downward trend in deaths. They claim that the formula the military uses is rigged to minimise the death count.
Apparently the NY Times reported recently that according to anonymous military sources, car bombs don’t count and assassinations only count if you’re shot in the back of the head — not the front.
Clark Hoyt, also of the Times has investigated these claims and has filed this report. In it he’s able to verify:
Back-of-the-head, front-of-the-head is not a distinction the military uses to count victims of sectarian violence. The military’s manual for measuring sectarian violence… says that civilians “shot anywhere in the head” are counted.
Hoyt does agree though that debate about the figures is warranted and that whatever they tell us about month to month movements in the death toll, overall “it isn’t a pretty picture”.
So there’s legitimate disagreement about the body count but nobody except John Key seems to be denying there’s a war going on.
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
“nobody except John Key seems to be denying there’s a war going on”.
John Key is rather odd about all this. But worse, the Labour Government is totally mute about the tragedy. Millions of lives have been ruined or ended by this so-called ‘humanitarian intervention’, and Helen Clark refuse to allow any criticism of the on-going war. Rather than criticise, in fact Clark even sent troops to the war. When are Labour going to apologise? When is The Standard ever going to have the Government up on their support for the War on Terror?
Bryce
http://www.liberation.org.nz