Written By:
all_your_base - Date published:
12:11 pm, September 20th, 2007 - 2 comments
Categories: national -
Tags: national
Garth George weighs in on the gold card today in the Herald. While the debate rages about the merits of Winston’s senior card and whether cheaper rinses and jetboat rides are worth all the fuss, I’m tempted to tell my gran what she’s been telling me for years: don’t look a gift-horse in the mouth (unless you’re an Aussie in which case it’s probably wise).
What’s National’s plan for seniors? A return to asset testing for residential care and cuts to Super.
Screw that. I think I’ll have that gold card instead thanks.
A couple of weeks ago we had Key promising “better funding” for aged care through more partnerships with the private sector a mere three months after voting against the largest investment *ever* into the health of older people and hedging on whether “better funding” actually means a return to National’s previous policy of asset testing the elderly. (Hint: it does.)
While Key gets to make the promises English is the man who has to find the cash – and there’s a lot of it tied up in Super. Bill recently told the Herald:
“If you compare ourselves with Australia – and it’s not too much different with any other developed country – we are starting to look pretty heavily committed to retirement income… The Australian pension is tightly income- and asset-tested and at a lower income… Ours is the highest level of the public pension that you will find anywhere, and paid to everybody.”
So, your call gran: lightweight gold card or asset testing and cuts to your Super.
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
all_your_base clarifies the different retirement approaches of Labour and National down to this simple option: “lightweight gold card or asset testing and cuts to your Super”.
Yikes. No wonder most voters have disdain for both Labour and National. I think that almost settles the debate – Labour and National have got stuff all to offer the elderly: a pointless card versus more of the same. What a crappy choice.
Bryce
http://www.liberation.org.nz
Don’t make me set my nana on you Bryce. She’s small but surprisingly strong.