Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, February 2nd, 2010 - 18 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
https://player.vimeo.com/api/player.jsShe chooses poems for composers and performers including William Ricketts and Brooke Singer. We film Ricketts reflecting on Mansfield’s poem, A Sunset on a ...
https://player.vimeo.com/api/player.jsKatherine Mansfield left New Zealand when she was 19 years old and died at the age of 34.In her short life she became our most famous short story writer, acquiring an international reputation for her stories, poetry, letters, journals and reviews. Biographies on Mansfield have been translated into 51 ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
I just heard Tolley on Morning Report.
Apparently current testing is more than adequate and the information held concerning children is already quite detailed. She also said that the tests conducted by schools would remain different but the results standardised, somehow.
Instead of introducing a new testing regime why don’t they just invite parents to ask teachers what the current results are?
As a parent I have never had problems finding out what my children’s reading ages were.
National scraps another left wing success. Pull down the fence at the top of the cliff and put the ambulance at the bottom National says.
Sorry wrong link. This is the one
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10623537
So, instead of considering the costs of incarceration + crime impacts from each of the youths who’ve gone through, instead Powers is basing the C/B ratio off short term costs? It’s a bit hypocritical of Powers, given he keeps trumpeting long-term benefits as a reason the current white elephant transport projects he’s pushing.
National prefer more crime as it’s easier to control people through fear.
Most interesting thing about this is the Power has blatantly lied about the costs. His own department puts them at more like $170,000 per graduate.
With the profit motive now infesting the Justice system, what incentive do the foreign owners have in reducing their “market”? Or, maybe, someone can point to a business model where the ultimate objective is to eliminate its core product.
Yet more embarrassing revelations about shonky practices at the IPCC:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10623534
How will the warmists spin this latest egregious error?
[we’ll say that a few isolated problems with a few claims does nothing to undermine the massive body of evidence that human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are changing the world’s climate]
Perfection would be great, stuff ups almost inevitable. Funny how the coldists rely on isolated incidents to reaffirm their rigidly held world view while at the same time they denigrate all of the remaining science no matter how solid it is.
Hey is that the North Pole and South Pole disappearing?
‘Hey is that the North Pole and South Pole disappearing?”
Ten bucks says that comment will be used as proof in the next IPCC report.
Except of courses there’s a small mountain of research on ice loss from both areas.
Then again, it is lukas…
/shrug
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_14303473
It’s Rodney Hide kinda town. (Taxpayer Bill of Rights)
Yep, and a National one and neither of them understand that.
Rather good arrticle and related radio programme on the Beeb website on why people vote against their own self interests. It’s hooked to the US voter’s antipathy toward healthcare reform, but it has some points that seem rather relevant to the NZ scene, particularly as to how Labour will need to position themselves before the next election.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8474611.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111068/Revealed-the-racy-novel-written-by-the-worlds-most-powerful-climate-scientist.html
No, that’s not a reference to Pachauri’s best known work of fiction – the award-winning 2007 IPCC Report.
It’s a reference to his other oeuvre – a smutty novel.
Hard to distinguish between the two, really
The good ole “smear” tactic – ignore the science and attack the person so as to detract from the idiocy of the denialists’ own pseudo-science and attempt to fill the airwaves with seedy distractions. Won’t work. The science is in, the Earth is warming, your children will suffer and spit on your grave.
hard to attack the science when there’s none evident – the only thing commonly in evidence about the IPCC is their ability to pass off opinion as fact.
meanwhile – National Ltdâ„¢ further enhances New Zealand’s 100% Pure image by missing the first Copenhagen deadline.
Good ole King John The Clueless of Charmalot – watta guy!