Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, September 13th, 2023 - 57 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Rolling polls
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/132914273/stuffs-rolling-poll-a-few-thousand-voters-could-have-a-dramatic-impact
In seats 56-64. It's still on.
The Left's best bet is that the Greens keep rising. They may attract votes from across the spectrum and people who don't usually vote because of climate change-witness the flooding event in Libya now.
There is zero chance that the Greens will "attract votes from across the spectrum".
The GP is proudly and definitively a left wing party – there is no chance their economic policies are going to be attractive to a 'soft' ACT voter.
The rise of the GP in the polls has been at the expense of Labour.
Just as the rise in ACT is at the expense of National (mostly).
The rise of the Greens is good for the left, the decline of Labour relative to National is the problem for a centre-left government.
There are people of the centre and right who may be concerned about NACT on environment and conservation and our global future who have already decided to vote on these issues, and more may yet do so.
There may indeed be centrist voters who are concerned over a National/ACT government. However, they are highly unlikely to move their vote to the GP – and much more likely to move it to Labour (the centre left party).
Claiming that the GP can attract votes from across the political spectrum is a severe case of rose-coloured glasses distorting reality.
They can vote in a centre-left government by voting Labour (now a centre party).
They can indeed. However, they won't be voting Green – which was the contention of the OP.
So Bella you think that Climate Change is only a Left-Wing issue? With respect, I disagree.
That is a venerable contradiction of capitalism–the bosses need physical and intellectual labour–at lowest rates and with compliant workers of course, and one would think, a planet to operate on that is not a burnt out sandpit or under water.
Capitalists also need customers, which intrigues why employers and righties don’t like the basic income concept. At least it would preserve some purchasing power in this time of declining birth rates and AI etc.
Nope. But I think that the socialist economic policies of the GP are a profoundly left-wing platform.
So I am arguing that people with strong CC concerns but fairly centrist in other views might be tempted to ignore/live with their (the Greens) other policies and vote for the Greens on CC policies.
I think you underestimate the social/economic difference of the GP to centrist policies.
It's not that. I've known Act voters who've voted Green. People vote for all sorts of reasons, some understandable, some inexplicable.
The argument here is that people will vote on climate ahead of other issues like economics. For some people economics isn't a major criteria for voting choice.
It's true that the Greens are essentially a left wing party but in reality they are a green party, which shares a lot with the left, but has its own thing going.
To coin a political phrase . . . 'the reality is' the Greens are the only party taking climate change seriously.
Any voter, of whatever political persuasion, if they are at all concerned about the state of the planet, have only one option to vote for!
Well, based on that assumption, 90% of the voting population are unconcerned over the state of the planet.
“Claiming that the GP can attract votes from across the political spectrum is a severe case of rose-coloured glasses”
It sort of is. But in my experience most voters have no real sense of themselves as being on a political spectrum. They certainly could not define the essential characteristics of any particular position on that notional spectrum. I am astonished sometimes to hear people who in terms of their economic interests should be natural 'left' voters say that they think ACT or NZF have some good ideas. Or by having to explain to a relative why Heather du Plessis Allan is right wing.
It's true to say that anyone with the level of political and class consciousness to be self-consciously "right-wing", would never vote Green. But that is not all ‘right’ voters. If it was, there would be permanent stasis – parties would not rise or fall, the concept of the Overton window which describes historical changes in the range of what is thinkable, would barely exist.
I’m not claiming though, that this fact means there is any great hope of a surge in Green votes in the next 4 weeks.
Very well put AB.
Nice try. People hop across the spectrum all the time. If the Brook van Delden can go from Greens to ACT, it can definitely happen the other way.
Nice try. There is a difference between people growing up and changing their political philosophy, and swing voters shifting votes depending on the political climate and the policy platform of the parties within their comfort zone.
There is zero indication that the GP is benefiting from any votes other than the ex-Labour ones. Greens go up, Labour goes down.
short of a graph like this, or some research, it's impossible to know that definitively. That leaves us with anecdata.
Re the Libyan floods Bearded Git
I have a horrible feeling that the aftermath of these events is taken up with panicky rebuilding of the status quo, under urgency , rather than big picture reflection .
We absolutely know we’re in big shit, but the day to day necessities of living have a more pressing urgency .( Get that road fixed I’ve got a filthy mortgage and need to get back to work pronto)
Fair call Francesca but I do think that, compared with say 40 years ago, people's consciousness of CC has massively increased such that it may be influencing the vote of many people now.
Even in the short time since the last election in 2020 my reading is that CC has become a more prominent issue.
I agree.Somehow we have to address climate disaster without disproportionately slamming the poor
Jordan Williams has been debt clocking Luxon on tour and will do so to other parties as well.
On the video he quotes the IMF on our current account deficit
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/09/election-2023-taxpayers-union-says-national-bit-ratty-about-gatecrashed-human-hoarding-event.html
It is true that the IMF wants government spending constraint, and this is related to our current account deficit, but not for anything related to debt (ours is low).
The IMF praised our governments financial rules as to debt limit and spending targets.
It's advice
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/496786/new-zealand-economy-faces-year-or-more-of-tepid-growth-imf-report
Reminder that the Greens wanted a carbon tax not the ETS. Russell Norman speaking about the 2008 ETS legislation,
https://www.greenpeace.org/aotearoa/story/predatory-delay-climate-action-fonterra-dairynz-federated-farmers/
why it matters
https://environment.govt.nz/publications/new-zealands-greenhouse-gas-inventory-1990-2020-snapshot/
Yes. And also why I worry about the ex Fed Farm head…now an ACT candidate (and maybe MP?) Andrew Hoggard. IMO he already has form on Climate Change denial…
And…
To me this was indicative…..
Ethically ? IMO….Riiight.
And a carbon tax was the springboard to a carbon tariff on tradeable goods – to create an incentive to reduce of use of carbon in the global economy market.
It's almost like the people whose kaupapa is understanding environmental systems and how they intersect with human systems knew what needed to be done and had developed the policies for that to be integrated into the political and economic worlds.
And we by and large sidelined them.
Exactly. I have commented previously on this. We can "thank" Winston Peters for the ETS.
Sorry I can't link. On the phone and have a meeting to attend this meeting is morning.
and there are people actually arguing that lefties should vote NZF instead of Labour in order to mitigate the damage Nat would do if they win.
I rate Peters being out of parliament as a high level leftie goal this election. He's done so much damage.
Aye !!
https://thestandard.org.nz/why-new-zealand-first-will-get-back-in/#comment-1964845
Thank you Incog. Was just logging in to provide a link 🙂
“Remember that the Greens wanted a carbon tax not the ETS”
Steve Abel big on this .I sense a change coming in the Greens as far as incrementalism goes .Steve talks about radical ,meaning;from the root ,change in contrast to extremism or incrementalism .
We’ve become used to a helpless inertia from our recent governments, but look what Savage ,Norm Kirk …briefly ..and Lange in the form of Rogernomics (sadly) was able to do .
Degrowth requires the kind of shift in cultural thinking that resulted in the Maori practice of rahui after the easy protein was gone.
It can be done
that's a beautiful comment thanks Francesca.
Is Abel writing online? Can you point me in the right direction?
Not sure
I attended a talk by him last night .So impressive , like Mike Joy in his directness and lack of ego but full of energy and knowledge
that's heartening. He's one of the prime reasons to get out the vote even if we don't win the election.
A number of Steve Abel posts here
https://www.greenpeace.org/aotearoa/author/sabel/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwmICoBhDxARIsABXkXlJAXjGBO1QwDoPTcffOjNycu9jgcfh_XIV1fH-ipaI6bedDCGOJbW4aAi20EALw_wcB
A great singer/songwriter too!
Every regulation will prompt the spivs and wide-boys who infest and distort our economy to find a way of making money by circumventing it, or assisting others to do so. The ETS is terrible because it seems to provide copious opportunities for exactly that.
Luxon did not cover himself in glory on RNZ this morning.
He was asked clearly what he would do as a result of the PREFU, and simply said that "National will release its fiscal position prior to the start of early voting." And stuck with that line.
At least Robertson said they had a plan, there may well be other plans, but they and the ratings agencies were comfortable with that plan.
It felt chillingly like National knew what they were going to do but it was too scary to release to the public.
Yes. Feel a bit sorry for Luxon. He seems to be so inflexible and gets hooked into a negative line and rubbishes any alternative. Even opinions cast by right leaning economists such as Taxpayers Union are rubbish according to Luxon. We should be shouting, "Show me the money."
Even at this stage in the Election Cylcle you might expect clarity.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=2018906693
Don’t be sorry for Luxon. He’s a very intelligent man and nobody forced him to become Leader of the Nats. His ambition trumps his skills though and he has to fake it till he makes it (over the line), which gives the appreance of Dunning-Kruger but I reckon most of it is a deliberate ploy and tactic to hide his real agenda that [it] is all about him. National is stacked with egomaniacs like Luxon and it shows. Once in Government he’ll be rolled so that the ‘razor gang’ can wreak havoc upon NZ – it is déjà vu all over again.
And he will still sleep easy knowing exactly what his party associates did to get elected. What a guy.
Not according to Hooton:
https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2023/09/12/luxon-caught-out-in-back-room-cut-election-lies/
Even John Key who regularly mangled his words was more articulate than Luxton ???
He's lucky the PREFU 2023-2026 forecast was as government friendly as it was.
His real issue is managing the fiscal tightness given the declining revenue from rent and the brightline built into their plan – the now expected (even by them) failure to meet forecasts for foreign buyer tax or the online gambling tax and lack of likelihood of making the cost savings forecast in the manner claimed.
Really, is Luxon covering himself in glory on RNZ this morning of any significance? Any electoral significance?
This late in the piece him obfuscating on RNZ about things like the PREFU, and simply sticking with some meaningless line means what?
And too Robertson saying they had a plan the ratings agencies were comfortable with.
The other day a Fijian rugby winger had to simply capture the bouncing ball and go over to score a try near the end of the game. He blew it. The ball doesn't seem to be bouncing awkwardly for Luxon. There's no opposition up in his face putting him under immense pressure. There are no unusual circumstances. The time clock is running down. A wide gap is obvious on the scoreboard.
The polls are something between scores on the field and punters’ dreams at the TAB with a cacophony of voice-overs from pundits and puppets.
It won't likely change any votes.
It is an indicator of the decision-making we will get from Luxon as Prime Minister.
The bouncing ball is the media being favourable to Luxon et al. They want chaos and change because it sells papers and where do you think some of that 8 million goes to.. overcharged advertising for one. Want proof, I could not find any commentary, let alone a favourable one on thee quite good Prefu story on Stuff yesterday, it’s as if it didn’t happen, and as for John Keys statements that the National overseas house buyers tax was not a goer, only QandA made and issue of it. If it smells like corruption….
I don't know about corruption. That one rings about as true as the $55 million JIF causing corruption.
I'd be more putting it down to laziness and ineptitude from the media on this one. It's just too hard for most of them to get their heads around, let alone have an objective opinion on it. Besides, any journalist that tries to do a decent story gets buried anyway.
Climate emergency? What emergency?
https://www.renews.co.nz/are-we-acting-like-were-in-a-climate-emergency/
There isn't anymore time for inaction. Party vote Green
Agreed. The National (Polluter) Party and ACT will set us back for many many years (after very little progress under Labour). Here a quick overview where each party stands:
Stuff – Climate election survey: See how the parties compare
We have to get our farming, tourism and transport emissions down drastically and rapidly.
Agreed, but how do you do it whole still providing benifits,Healthcare, schooling and all the other nice things those things pay for.
Luxon talking about Grant Robertson. The lowered brows, narrowed eyes and raised upper lip combined are a classic expression of disgust.
I reckon it's Upper Room Luxon talking about Robertson.
April #Nationalnotfittogovern
@KoAprilahau
The face of a jealous panicked incompetent Tory. What Grant has done is show their incompetence. The national and Act wrong again. What a laugh.
https://twitter.com/KoAprilahau/status/1701574971284431343