John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
I am sure you find it all very interesting, and will have great fun finding some way to blame John Key for the gentleman’s failings.
However. Is it not true that John Key had left the company before this fellow became the CEO?
Prior to becoming President of the firm in 2001 O’Neal was never responsible for any part of the company that included John Key’s bailiwick. He may, as president been Key’s titular superior but it could not have been for more than a few months.
Key became an MP in 2002. O’Neal became the CEO in 2003. Your numbers really don’t line up do they?
Perhaps you should consider a more reasonable proposition. The company failed because they lost their most competent people. People like John Key for example.
Or do you prefer conspiracies?
But the thing I am commenting on is this statement.
“There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.”
How do you work out that John Key was his protégé?
Sure O’Neal was incompetent. That is hardly a rare trait though is it?
However while John Key worked there they did very well, as you will probably agree. As you say “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”. Key however wasn’t there when they went downhill and your first sentence is irrelevant to him
“John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board …”
Key didn’t work under O’Neal except, possibly for a few months, while O’Neal was first in the President’s job. By the time he was CEO and Chairman of the Board Key was long gone.
I don’t see where I have got it wrong as you seem to imply.
As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001 http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.
He entered Parliament in July 2002.
O’Neal became CEO and Chairman in 2003.
In your words “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”
The problems seem to be after Key left the firm.
What part of the timeline do you think is wrong?
“As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001 http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.”
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
The Unilever man happens to be correct about taxing sugar, if nothing else. There’s no point in taxing sucrose while at the same time publishing dietary guidelines that recommend an obesity-generating diet consisting largely of other kinds of sugar or near-sugar, and having doctors, journalists, politicians and others constantly refer to the obesity-generating stuff by the misnomer “healthy food.” A sugar tax would be like putting a bandage on someone who’s cut an artery.
Meh. If ISDS were such a trump card, we’d have more to fear from tobacco companies overturning taxes on tobacco than we would about a non-existent tax on sucrose.
you mean like tobacco companies using deals with Asia and the Ukraine to sue the Australian government (and small, poor nations) about plain packaging laws?
Tobacco is different to sugar – tobacco is addictive, so a core chunk of users will simply pay more regardless of tax rate, to a certain degree. Doesn’t hugely impact the profit margin until they get really high or are used with other measures like quit support services.
Packaging is what affects sales. It reminds addicts trying to quit, and also affects market share.
Taxes on sugar is different, because cost is a major factor in food choices and production costs.
A reasonable run down from a left wing perspective of the year since Syriza gained power in Greece . I believe it pretty much happened as I predicted it would.
The lost sheep
By all means please keep us informed about the latest happenings in Greece. It is true one can be diverted from things that should be watched and followed. The world is coming apart under our fingers and people like yourself who make sure that they keep up with developments and pass that information on to the other interested people are of great, inestimable value.
I am a strong believer in the value of learning from mistakes wherever they occur, and thus avoiding repeating them ourselves. IMO opinion that is the way to prevent the world from falling apart.
A year on, the Syriza party is faithfully implementing the austerity policies that it once decried. It has been purged of its left wing and Tsipras has jettisoned his radicalism to stay in power at all costs.
Yep, the capitalists moved in and undemocratically imposed their ideas upon the Greeks. That’s what happens when we have dictatorships running things.
Syriza needed to default, drop out of the European Union and go back to their own currency. Anything else was going to have them doing what the capitalists told them.
The big boys have taken over its to late democracy has been unsurped.
Funnily enough Latent Smith has been pushing the same lines.
Saying that Key changing the flag and signing the TPPa is turning us into an outpost where we loose our sovereignty.
Sorry but its to late.
We are one of the last to fall into line.
Why doesn’t Andrew Little just SAY that Labour opposes the whole of the TPP?? He did not sound like a positive Leader just now, talking to Guyon Espiner. I felt very disappointed.
Why?
A caucus that includes Shearer and Goff and a party that never has renounced neo-liberalism.
Simple solutions.
Vote for a different party.
And communicate to the Labour leadership why you will not vote for them.
If they don’t stand against the TPP, they will stand against nothing.
I agree that if Little supports the TPP, he should be honest.
I think, though, that he is more conflicted than that.
He knows that the majority of Labour supporters are against the TPP and he also knows that the power brokers in the caucus are for it.
And so you end up with a debacle of an interview with Espiner.
Labour stands for very little if it can’t summon up the courage to vociferously oppose the TPP.
It is not just the power brokers in caucus, it is also the power of what Key calls “the club” that invites caution. It looks to me as if Little reckons he is more likely to prove successful in challenging particular issues within the agreement than he would be if he came out against the whole thing. You can point to Winny of course, as someone who has taken a stand against the whole thing, but Winny is not likely to come under such strong pressure from the big players, and his view expresses a long term stance that everyone knows about.
One reason we need a nonaligned left wing movement in this country is so that we can at least start to turn ourselves into a force whose endorsement or rejection of politicians is able to make a difference. The UK left has Corbyn in part because they had the People’s Assembly to put their weight behind him. Without such movements, politicians are at the mercy of the powerful like the rest of us.
You can’t because we’re all different, some people have the drive, some people are willing to sacrifice the short term for the long, some are born privileged and some are born with everything they need to succeed (some do and most don’t which is interesting…)
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Pure communism ends up being totalitarian just like capitalism.
A balance between them is the best outcome.
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
Humans are not civilized on the whole we just behave as nature behaves the strongest and fitest survive.
Because we have harnessed our envirment we think we are civilized but no we carry on behaving in a competitive way like in the rest of nature.
You are part of that competitive urge trying to push your tangent that everybody must be equal but no where in nature has that succeeded.
No where in human nature has that succeeded.
Show me some examples.
Utopian thinking just like the laissez faire brigade!
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
We happen to be intelligent and thus can over-ride our instincts but it must be learned. Of course, the greed and anti-social aspects of capitalism also have to be learned.
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Actually, it’s always worked before – then capitalism comes along and destroys what’s been built up.
Show me some examples.
I can show you 5000 years of collapse caused by capitalist systems including the USSR. China is about to join it. Thing is, that same 5000 years of collapse by capitalism is also joined with 5000 years of societies being built up via communism/socialism.
Societies simply do not work under competitive stresses.
I agree with you BM. A little bit of clarity goes a long way. Even if it’s not what you want to hear. There is nothing worse than listening to a stuttering ,stammering, waffling attempt at an answer that says beggar all. It’s like he’s trying to have a bob each way. Not sounding strong at all.
bloody good question…they must have a reason for this shambles…..but I’m buggered if I can see it…..this undermines Littles presentation of a gov in waiting
The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall and Andrew Little knows this but because Nationals pushing it hard and because most of Labours supporters don’t want it he has to walk a very precarious tightrope of placating his supporters while still leaving the door slightly ajar
So you have him bagging the TPPA and hinting that Labour will take NZ out of it which his supporters like but still not categorically stating that’s what he’ll do so he has an out when Labour gain power and the TPPA stays
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not in and Andrew Little (and probably a great deal of Labour) know this
Hence his stopping short of actually stating Labour will withdraw NZ from the TPPA which you’d think he’d say because it would please the people on the left
OK I’ll ask the question in a different way.
Can you provide some evidence that the positive outweigh the negatives for the TPP?
Evidence please, not opinion.
LOL
Well if you believe that rubbish you will believe anything?
Independent analysis say otherwise. Like a 0.2% increase in GDP per annum. You regard that as significant?
Tell me how many fairies are at the bottom of your garden?
I’m not wanting to make excuses but I’ve run out of plutonium and as well know plutonium is what is required to make the nuclear reaction to produce the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor
I tell you what as soon as I source some (or can predict where lightning is going to hit) I’ll jump in my time machine, go the future (because the TPPA hasn’t happened yet so its a tad difficult to produce something that hasn’t happened yet) and get you the evidence that will satisfy one and all
If the NZ economy will be worse off as a result if being in the TPPA then it should be a no brained to simply leave the agreement. This is what Little should have stated but didn’t for some reason.
I’m sure you know this, but situations change over time.
– Would NZ be better off if the TPP wasn’t happening?
– Would NZ be better off if TPP existed in a different form?
– Now that it does exist would NZ be better of if the country was sidelined?
My view is it trade agreements generally can be either good or bad. The TPP in its current form is bad for NZ. However, it would be difficult for NZ to be the only one in the Pacific region not signing.
– NZ can be worse off than now with the agreement, and
– worse off than now if NZ is the only Pacific rim country left out.
I guess Little is mulling over his own set of conundrums and working out strategies to address them.
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not
No we won’t as the studies have clearly shown. We going to be losing jobs and being forced to be a resources supplier to the powerful nations which means an increase in poverty and stagnation of our economy and society.
I’m not sure if Andrew could have said anything differently. The bottom line is that a Labour led government will vote down any attempt by corporate or foreign governments to interfere with our sovereign democratic decision making.
“The bottom line is that a Labour led government …….. ”
Really?
You managed to get that out of the drivel that Little was uttering?
I have heard more sense from the gurgling of a six month old baby that I heard from Little on morning report.
Surely there is someone in the Labour party who can do better than the current leader? Is it time to try Mallard?
Yes, he could have said it differently. He could have said:
“In government, we plan to legislate against selling land to foreigners. If that puts us in breach of the TPPA, then we will need to re-negotiate the TPPA. If we can’t re-negotiate, we will simply leave it”.
Seems like a reasonable thing to say to me. Of course National would immediately say that Labour are trying to sabotage the future of NZ etc.
guys, I do not want to keep repeating this again. Important sections of the Labour caucus are pro-TPPA.
Andrew Little’s statements have to reflect that, or his time as Leader is over.
As an experienced lawyer, Little knows exactly what he is communicating and how clear/unclear he wants it to be, and where he wants lots of ambiguity in his statements and arguments for future wiggle room.
“competent people who are not lawyers”
Half of Little’s problem is that he IS a lawyer.
He is trying so hard to avoid saying something he wouldn’t be able to wriggle out of that he ends up saying nothing intelligent at all.
Anyone else remember the 1985 Tom Paxton album?
“One million lawyers and other disasters” .
With the independent analysis of the TPP pointing to the prospect of an very minor and insignificant increase in GDP, the potential (as in all FTA) of the loss of jobs in our economy, the restrictions on Intellectual property, the inability to control foreign investment and the loss of sovereignty, the dangers imposed across all countries on the loss of indigenous rights (in complete contravention of the UNDIR), and the resultant dumbing down of our economic structure to one of resource supply, to say nothing of the surreptitious attack on The Treaty of Waitangi, our Nations founding Document, and the effect it will have on our ability to buy our medicines, one has to wonder just what it is that makes this so called “Deal” so attractive to Labour?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
I don’t wonder about it, I’m sure that’s exactly what they’re doing.
The reason Little cannot be up front and oppose the TPPA is because the US have put a gun to everyone’s head.
You are either for, or against us.
John Key has made this clear to Little, so what is he to do. When Key talks about his top draw, these are some of the things he is talking about.
Look at how frantically South Korea is trying to join the party after they missed the boat. They have China as their biggest trading partner, they hate Japan with an intensity you cannot believe, and the US only slightly less. They already have FTAs with 75% of the world’s GDP. Why would they want to join, but to be “on the right side”.
And then there is Taiwan. Same thing, but different of course.
Who hs been left out of the TTP and the TTIP?
The BRICS, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Turkey from within the top 20 countries in the world by GDP (assuming Euro as one country).
Then look at Carter’s words on TPP, and Obama during SOTU speech. The primary reason for the TTP and TTIP is to declare economic and possibly military war on the BRICS attacking the USD through trying to steal the world’s reserve currency.
Unfortunately, whether or not you like it, Little is not bigger than these powers.
That is why the TPP will be shoved down your throat, whether you like it or not.
Smart politics, NZF will take votes off natz and labour by saying it how it is and whilst I am no big fan of winnie he sticks to his guns which voters identify with.
Watch the natz go hard again on NZF as winnie could see shonky bog off back to bankstaland by galvanising the swinging dissaffected masses toward NZF
Winnie could also give two fingers to the left and go with National
He won’t and he’ll probably still get his knighthood. If there’s a politician anywhere that deserves a knighthood it would be Winston simply for hanging the fuck in there 😈
” he’ll probably still get his knighthood”
Is this another policy flip-flop that Little is proposing? Is he going to swing around and start supporting knighthoods. My, my. What will “she who must be obeyed” in New York have to say?
Just for curiosity’s sake – does anyone know what happened with John Key’s invitation on Waitangi Day 2014 for Joel Bristow, or other representative of the deepsea drilling protestors to go to Wellington and have their minds changed?
Another interesting graph.
Democracy is helped when there is a competent media.
Democracy is helped when there is a healthy economy that benefits everyone, not just the 0.0001%.
Well yes I concede I could have written that better. I guess a better way of putting it would be instead to say that some on here are starting to see that maybe the problem with Labour are predominantly internal
It seemed to me that some on here would prefer to make excuses for Labours poor performance rather then look within
You would say that, because the war a tory really likes to see is one where the workers fight each other and the tories collect profits from both sides.
The historical lesson you want us to forget is united we stand, divided we fall.
Well I can’t spoken for everyone on the right but for me I want to see Labour improve and this is why:
At the moment National is coasting along very middle of the road, don’t scare the horses because it doesn’t have to do anything to win, it doesn’t have to do anything that might upset some of the demographics
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
NZ need Labour to be strong so that National can come up with some policy because at the moment Nationals coasting
Holy crap PR I basically agree with what you are saying here.
(Having said that I believe that Labour is now culturally and organisationally incapable of improving. I currently rate a 50/50 chance that they will get less than 25% in 2017).
Well I say Labour but really I just use them because they’re the biggest left wing party in NZ at the moment
I’m taking the rough estimate in NZ that to get into power under MMP 35% is the bare minimum you’d be looking at and even then that opens you up to some massive amounts of horse trading
Yep, a 35% election result for Labour will leave Winnie grinning from ear to ear. (Especially as an election result that high for Labour suggests that the Greens will fall to 10% or less).
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
If National tried anything other than Labour-lite they’d lose. As John Banks said:If I wear my policy on my sleeve, I won’t get elected.
The same truly does apply to National. If their MPs and supporters got the policies that they truly want then they’d never get elected.
The real problem that we have is that Labour is trying to be National while wearing red.
PR, the problem for the right is partially as you describe, but the other factor is the failure of ACT.
Everyone in the beltway rates young whatsisname, and he’s amiable enough, but he can’t shift them polls.
His decision to not take a cabinet role is part of it all too. Got praised by the likes of DPF et al, but really, he’s opting to have less influence.
the politics around why that decision is made is the politics that supporters of a more active Right wing government need to get to grips with.
Given:
National has swallowed all of the right bar ACT’s rump and whoever the hell it is that votes for Colin Craig,
and the widely accepted general icompetence of the Labour party
and the personal liekability of their leader,
why aren’t they doing more?
you claim that it’s down to Labour sucking and not giving them udeas to rail agin, but that doesn;t really hold a lot of water (it holds some, but not much)
Labour, for all their faults, have produced ideas in oppo, they then abandon them after losing an election, or watch National roll out weaker versions to placate the electorate. (this is a net huge plus for the left as national is giving the concepts of the policy a big old tick for further development).
My point is, that of you want National to not be Labour light, the right needs to get a threat to National from the right happening. At the moment, the ‘right wing’ is either completely smitten with National and not seeing sense, or this is as far right wing as the NZ electorate gets.
I have to admit I’m surprised that Act hasn’t managed to rise in the polls, I thought they might be around 3-4% by now
Whereas I’m amazed that anyone still votes Act. They’ve had their heyday back in the 1980s and everyone now knows that their policies do too much damage. It’s why National still put on the mask of being Labour-lite.
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
The internal problems of Labour mean that a white middle aged professional centrist candidate cannot be selected without the allegiance of the many factions within Labour who are so unlike the general public. The quality of Labour candidates is thus vastly inferior to the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. Being put on the list is no guarantee of a seat. Andrew Little just scraped into parliament after the specials. At least he will feel safer as long as he remains leader. It will only get worse for Labour as the deselection campaigns get underway. Their low poll of 2014 is not their nadir. Those votes will go in all directions but clearly many are drifting to support National.
“On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer”
Only one wee problem with that. We can’t all be “rich” can we.
The top 5% are earning more than the bottom 50%, and actually society is not structured to have a lot of “rich”.
You right wingers are a greedy self serving bunch, and you know what, eventually the low income and those in the middle (the aspirational ‘hope we get some too’) will wake up to the sham that Key is selling and realise it.
Good God – the first thing key did was give $100 a week to the top 10%, and sold that the rest can have $10 or so. Nice fucking scam. 7 years on they are trying to move the poor out of Auckland with $3000 payments to regions with no jobs, as a way of dealing with the housing crisis.
What a total sham.
You right wing wankers don’t give one iota for this in retail, gas stations, cleaners, bus drivers, you WANT them all to get fuck all so you have have it all.
Fisiani – your nasty greedy tone and posts post after post stand you out above almost all of the horrid rightees
On this we agree, some people don’t want to be rich because they’re happy with what they have, some aren’t born lucky enough to have the advantages to become but then some aren’t born with the drive to become rich and some don’t want to pay the cost of becoming rich
Becoming rich is largely a choice, for some its easier and for others its harder but its still a choice
+1. Well said, appleboy. My jaw simply dropped at these two sentences: There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money. On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
30% is a hell of a big percentage to be kicked to the kerb and spat on. And as for 70% wanting to be richer, since when has “git rich” expressed the highest human aspiration? Oh for one of those old-fashioned right wingers who thought they owned the copyright on decency – I might not agree with them but at least I could respect the fact that their view involved a conception of the greater good.
Who is kicking to the kerb and spitting on??????
How can you possibly read that into my words.
i was not even being disparaging. do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money. If so what percentage do you reckon it is?
do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money.
Such people exist of course – just not on the Left. And they’ll take from the poor faster than they’ll take from the rich. Just have to watch National’s attacks on beneficiaries to see that.
Draco let me quote you what the Finance Minister said in the House.
Hon BILL ENGLISH: Our tax and transfer system is highly redistributive, and the number of people paying income tax is surprisingly small. The lowest-income 43 percent of households currently receive more in income support than they pay in income tax. The 1.3 million households with incomes under $110,000 a year collectively pay no net tax—that is, their total income support payments match their combined income tax. The top 10 percent of households contribute over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers—over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers. This system is highly redistributive and we believe it is fair.
The rich give a fair share to the poor – which part of the quote is hard to understand or do you think their contribution should be even more than 70%.
as for attacks on beneficiaries , What part of “The biggest rise in benefits in a generation” constitute attack.
Instead of slogans can you explain why you think the rich do not give to the poor when clearly they do and how raising benefits is an attack. It’s like I’ve wandered into an asylum.
No they don’t, the rich steal from the poor. That’s how capitalism works and it’s worked that way for thousands of years. It’s what causes it to always fail.
Draco stop using slogans and simply answer the question. Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of taxI if so why and how much.
I would like to see you explain, in non-disparaging terms, the difference between your 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money and the 70% who want the chance to be richer. Both want to be richer, by your account, and both must get money from somewhere if they are to do so.
Here’s how I see it: I think that the current system privileges wealth extractors over wealth creators. The latter might just lead to the tide that raises all boats, the former certainly does not. The eagerness of the already wealthy to get their claws on state infrastructure that comes with a guaranteed cash flow is one example of what I mean by wealth extractor – nothing of is value added, but an existing cash flow is diverted toward a privately owned pocket. Being privately owned, this piece of infrastructure then becomes answerable to the shareholder (so the wealthy) over the public good. The 30% under such conditions are the victims of this form of economic extraction, being removed from consideration by the public-to-private transference and in no position to defend themselves.
No it’s not – it’s a statement of fact. National’s slogans, which you come on here repeating such as the BS about people being envious of the rich, aren’t connected to reality.
You want to get rid of the rich.
Yes.
Like in Cambodia?. Like in North Korea or like in Albania?
None of those got rid of their rich which is why they’re still capitalist in form, structure and oppression.
The thing is, if fisi’s little 30% social experiment were imposed on NZ, as I’m sure it would be, next claim would be 50%. In America the hopeless poor are about 60%.
It’s like Bill English’s 5% structural unemployment, once he instituted it it became the lower baseline, and unemployment varied above it.
Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive then Labours, I will admit there are some in National that have reached for use by date and then some
For some time now Labour has been picking candidates in accordance with where its own internal logic, internal factions and internal culture currently sit – but which results in a serious mismatch with what the electorate is looking for.
I remember reading that in the 1970s UK Labour still had very many MPs from coal mining and trades/shop floor backgrounds.
Today there are almost none, instead, Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured.
“Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured”.
Oxford grads in the Labour party are hardly new, and Eton isn’t that uncommon
Since 1935 there have been 11 leaders of the party.
Of these 6 went to Oxford. Attlee, Gaitskell, Wilson, Foot, Blair and Miliband.
What has happened in British Labour in the same as in the Conservative party there and the New Zealand Labour Party.
Their candidates go through student politics, get a job working in an MP’s or a Party office, may work for a Cabinet Minister, find an electorate and go into Parliament. Many of them have never held a normal job in their life.
It happens a bit with National but not quite as much. Paula Bennett is one example.
You are looking back a long way with that comment PR.
“Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive”
A gender neutral version of the 1972 National Party campaign slogan.
“Man for man, the stronger team”.
That one, although the shambles of the later Kirk/Rowling Governments showed that it was probably true, didn’t work out too well in the campaign did it?
I wonder if Winston has set up an electorate office yet, and if he has, has he ever visited it?
Anyone here live in the electorate and have you ever seen him at a public function?
Some are starting to realise that Labour were relevant when working people were hard done by. Those days are gone and so the need to support Labour is diminishing year by year.
National’s bringing them back.
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
DTB There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
And they all vote National.
Can’t speak for all, but there seems an insatiable attraction for more, for bigger, amongst people who have acquired wealth and they are wedded to it ‘to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or worse’…ad infinitum.
Fisi I think you are right Labour aren’t sure where their support base is especially after Roger Douglas took them hard right even further right than National?
That figure does not include gst or corporate taxes poor pay more GST than the rich or corporates who shift the cost GST back to the customers.
Or go on overseas trips operate Swiss bank accounts or don’t pay any tax like like google Facebook Amazon etc.
Fisanal a paid spin doctor of the right.
Employers not paying a living wage are being subsidized by the socold wealthier earners.
The speculators are being subsidized by those on higher declared incomes.
The corporate tax evaders are also being subsidized.
Pollutors the same.
The debt financier’s who Bill English has borrowed $80 billion+ for election bribes for his parties tax cuts are being subsidized $5.8 billion a year.
A weak Labour won’t be able to cobble together a government, Labour needs to be reasonably strong and if the Greens ever want to get into parliament then Labour need to be really strong
Numbers really, the left are on what 40% at the moment so if Labour crumble its not really going to attract any votes from the right so the total percentage isn’t to increase all that much
But if you have a strong party, a party that can convince people it can lead then that’s what will attract non-voters to vote for them (and swing voters of course)
A few parties that show that they can work together can, and will, get votes. The problem we’ve been having is that, Labour especially, the parties on the Left have been attacking each other rather than working together.
Yes they might be able to get some swing votes and maybe even from the missing million but I’m thinking Labour doesn’t want to cut the pie any smaller then it needs to
If the left were composed of several competitive small parties without one being clearly dominant, there would need to be a lot of pre-election co-operation to avoid splintered left votes in electorates. If National won enough extra electorates due to fragmented “left” votes, then it could end up with enough overhang to skew the proportionality of Parliament. It’s very unlikely now, but as there get to be fewer list seats and more electorate seats as the population increases, it becomes more possible.
True but they could always work together. And then, once they have power, change electorate voting to preferential voting. This would allow all parties to put up candidates with the most preferred winning rather than the one with the most votes which is often a significant minority.
@Andre.
Your proposal is theoretically possible but it looks extremely unlikely.
In practice the National Party would have to win at least 61 of the 64 electorates they contest.
Surely there are going to be at least 4 Labour MPs who could win one of the General electorates?
By the way the number of electorate seats doesn’t go up just because the population increases. It goes up only if the percentage increase in the North Island, or in the Maori roll, goes up faster than the rate of growth in the South Island. That is because the South Island is guaranteed 16 general electorates.
Another example of the TPPA as being more of a trade restrictions agreement than a free trade agreement: the NZ Library Association’s standing committee on copyright is concerned about the impacts of making copyright provisions more restrictive. Apart from concerns about underestimation of the cost to NZ of the additional restrictions, there’s this about the prospect of over-hasty legislation:
In particular, bringing New Zealand law into line with US law could prove problematic if provisions favouring rights holders (such as extension of term) are adopted, but exemptions that US law affords are not also adopted. However, because there will not be sufficient time for MBIE to extensively consider the effects of broadly-worded exemptions, it is more likely that any exemptions will be narrow in wording and limited in effect.
In other words, the nett effect could be that we end up with all the draconian proscriptions of US copyright law but few of the exemptions, making us even more restrictive than the US.
The above quote is from an email, so no link – however, you can obtain more info from the committee by writing to copyright@lianza.org.nz.
“– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?”
Oh dear. It shows how irrelevant the Green Party is, doesn’t it.
I gather they had a speech today. Even people who follow politics quite closely, like yourself, didn’t know about it.
I wonder how many people went to it. Outside of Green MPs and party staffers of course who would have been conscripted.
Anyone here go to the speech? That is anyone not on the public payroll as a Green staffer or MP.
Did anyone hear Stephen Franks’s bumptious and
ignorant performance on Jim Mora’s program yesterday? The Panel, RNZ National, Monday 25 January 2016
Jim Mora, Stephen Franks, Josie Pagani
There seems to be no code of behavior in place at Radio New Zealand. Some years ago, Bomber Bradbury was banned from this program for the crime of criticizing the Prime Minister’s loutish and irresponsible behavior in parliament. Yet Franks, whose disrespectful and contemptuous behavior is far worse, continues to be a guest.
This afternoon, Franks was frothing with indignation about state house tenants who have the cheek to complain about substandard conditions. His rage extended to the afternoon’s first guest, Otago University Professor Michael Baker; Franks treated him with derision, referring to him repeatedly as “these guys”, in between his frequent imprecations of state house tenants.
Luckily for Franks, the other guest was not the superior Dita Di Boni, who has firmly put him in his place in the past, but the giggling Josie Pagani.
OMG! Morrissey – I don’t know how you do it!
Listening to both Franks and Pagani!
It would make me want to spew.
The so called “Panel” is an appalling programme – hosted by a sanctimonious prick and has not merit what so ever. A complete waste of space-time continuum.
Putin is corrupt, says US Treasury
Russian President Vladimir Putin during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Antalya, Turkey, November 15, 2015. Michael Klimentyev/RIA Novosti
The US Treasury has told a BBC investigation that it considers Russian President Vladimir Putin to be corrupt.
For those of you who are taking a responsible approach to social drinking
by choosing the very refreshing low alcohol “citrus” beers.
If you are on Statins, you should be aware that the “citrus” apparently includes grapefruit juice.
I suspect there is another reason that is much more relevant.
I think he has found that he is quite unemployable outside of Parliament. To be blunt there is probably no-one who will give him a job. This is the only way he has any chance of retaining the lifestyle to which he has become accustomed.
I’d say you’re on the money there alwyn.
Also goes a long way in explaining why it’s so hard to get rid of old Labour mps.
I reckon the Labour party should make a rule where the maximum term for a Mp is 4 terms with a clause that this time period can be extended by the party membership vote only.
That way you’d be able to ditch the leeches like Mallard or the unpopular ones like Cunllife but keep the ones performing well.
What a great pseudonym you chose.
Marty “The film depicts thirty-six hours in the life of the main character: 34 year-old, bug-eyed Marty”
and Mars.
That’s of course the Mars Bar. The one that is full of nuts.
I disagree grey. bm sows seeds of discord – some subtle, some obvious. I think right wing solutions are hopeless and I do agree that a few left wing suggestions may be unworkable in our current system.
I don’t think Cunliffe can be bothered with all that shit again, he will concentrate on being a politican, the media crucified him. He is too intelligent to waste his energy on another leadership battle. Let Robertson take the shit from the Tory MSM media aka Mike Hoskings and Paul Henry.
it’s not just ego – it’s ability. And Cunliffe has it in spades. Problem is though, Cunliffe is not as cunning on the playing field as GR2020 is. He has also been in the beltway a bit too long now.
Briar’s 2015 film A Place to Call Home provides a revealing examination of New Zealand’s state housing situation.
The documentary tells the stories of two women who share the same passionate values and deep concern for the vulnerable and often voiceless members of their respective communities.
Ironically, they find themselves in a tug of war where the creation of a much needed community housing project in the Far North is dependent on the dismantling of another equally valuable and deeply entrenched community in Glen Innes, Auckland.
A Place to Call Home is raw and brave and explores a topic that is extremely relevant in today’s environment of unaffordable housing and social reforms.
_________________________________
For the public record – I believe that State (and Council) housing is PUBLIC, and ‘social housing’ is PRIVATE.
I oppose the privatisation of STATE (and COUNCIL) housing by (private) ‘social housing’ providers.
I support the directly-affected State tenants in their fight to STOP the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
Unlike the Co-Convenor of the Child Poverty Action Group, and Salvation Army employee Alan Johnson, who supports the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
The euthanasia submissions. If you care about people and them having a right to decide when to die when they are terminally ill or in pain without much life to enjoy and wish to disembark in their own time while they can still smile at others and enjoy knowing them, then please follow the guide below and support quality euthanasia. Submissions finish on MONDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2016 AND CAN GO IN UNTIL 23.59.
(Remember 1/2 is the anniversary of various provinces so perhaps do it the day before in case you want to be out and about enjoying life.)
The first article, and it’s photo look just like Labour’s fish and chip brigade of the 1980s http://www.michaelbassett.co.nz/archive_fc80.htm
The second story is a disgrace. The Eagles deserve much more than that. They should get at least as much as Obama will get for his Presidential Library. At least people will still listen to The Eagles. Can you imagine anyone reading through a hundred million pages of the Obama archives?
Clinton’s isn’t quite as extreme but it is definitely close.
There are probably some earlier ones that are more restrained.
ps. I was only joking about the Eagles getting more taxpayer money than the Obama Library. He is going to have to find a lot of generous donors who will put up the money. On the other hand the Eagles aren’t going to get any money either.
Congratulations to Bill English on his eighth year of miserable and unrelenting economic failure. If we must have crazed far-right governments from time to time the least we must ask is that the useless assholes learn to balance the books.
He wasn’t a complete failure, don’t forget the “surplus” last year and the generous tax payer funded entitlement to live in his wifes property for the last 7/8 years, yes he’s done very well for himself.
(sarc)
Balancing the books will be the task of the next non National govt to take power, this is the historical cycle NZ has followed for decades.
There are too many “sheeple” and not enough real people like most of those who contribute to ts.
Why does the Left always insist on a Budget Surplus as a sign of economic competence?
Are you really daring English to go down the road of slashing Government spending and enforcing austerity through the nation?
Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.
Hey CV
“Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.”
You have a funny definition of a surplus and how it should be derived, the scenario which you adamantly describe is the one which English used to produce the surplus he boasted about, but normal surpluses are usually a result of a well run economy where the money is plowed back into the pockets of many, one of the criteria for a well run, healthy economy is near full employment, not increasing unemployment, for which is the current situation.
During the Clark years, the Govt then was contributing 40c of every dollar spent in NZ and a surplus every year and very low unemployment , Key swore to get that down to 20c and now look where we are today.
The economic and social policies of the Key govt will only result in massive increases in debt as they have failed to achieve the basic fundamentals of a well run economy and one of the main failures is the deliberately high unemployment.
Under the Clark govt you saw considerable redistribution of wealth from the haves to the havenots, we now have the exact opposite (redistribution from the havenots to the haves) and the exact opposite result, the proof of this is there now for every one to see, increasing poverty, extreme wealth, and high unemployment and a deficit and a massive increasing debt.
From your analysis above, I certainly wouldn’t take any advice from you as a financial adviser.
Jim Mora claims ACT’s leader is “cogent”; sadly for him,
neither of today’s guests is stupid enough to endorse that provocation. The Panel, RNZ National, Tuesday 26 January 2016
Jim Mora, Mai Chen, Bernard Hickey
Today’s Panelists are several notches higher on the intelligence scale than yesterday’s dire offering [1], but the major problem persists: it’s the same host. About 4:15, after the long and tedious introductions have finally come to an end, the host decides to make the first of his glib and shallow statements for the day….
JIM MORA:[affecting a serious tone] The ACT leader David Seymour makes the point, and it seems to be a cogent one, when he says “Those who grumble about a lack of a capital gains tax should look at the ten least affordable markets in the Demographia Survey. All of them except Auckland are there despite having a capital gains tax.”
Mai Chen doesn’t even bother to snort in derision, but her fellow guest manages to say, in an exquisitely indirect way, that David Seymour is an ignoramus….
BERNARD HICKEY: Hmmmm. The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.
The rest of the program, unfortunately, seems to be as dire and as determinedly trivial as ever. Mora has just attempted to manipulate his guests into saying something disrespectful about Kanye West; neither of them indulged him. He should have tried it yesterday: Stephen Franks would have launched into an insane racist fugue for five minutes.
“The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.”
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It is Hickey saying I don’t like that example he came up with. He hasn’t the slightest idea of the facts but he’ll try and deflect attention.
He even admits he hasn’t the faintest idea what he is talking about when he admits “which we don’t know”. All that means is HE doesn’t know.
Hickey was never one to let his ignorance get in the way of his political bias.
It’s saying it in an arch and subtle manner. Every listener—including your good self—would have understood quite clearly that Hickey has no respect for ACT’s risible “leader”.
Proof Alwyn you have no credibilify other than being a proffessional whinger for the far right.Bernard Hickey goes against what most big banks economist commentary because big banks just want a speculative market that loads every one up with debt.
NZ govt debt stands at $120 billion and rising at $ 27 million per day.
I am for full and open discussion on economic matters
“a proffessional whinger for the far right”?
No I’m not a professional when I comment here. I am merely trying to bring some knowledge to the ignorant. A very hard task with some of them though.
Seriously?
On the day it breaks that one of those bludging beneficiaries off the pension is a veteran whose benefit they cut because of a trespass arrest, you bastards are gloating about it?
Just a comment from someone who is sick of this country being dealt to by Mr Key and his crony capitalist mates.
Can you stop getting sucked in by the lies in relation to income and tax paid, ie the top 10% of earners pay 70% of the tax.
It’s the top 10% of the wealthy that pay next to no tax you need to focus on.
I am sick of Fisiani and others spreading the lie that (implied) the wealthiest 10% pay 70% of the tax.
It is a lie and stamp it out.
The wealthiest 10% pay far less than 10% of all the tax.
A leading American critic of the Trans Pacific Partnership, Lori Wallach, said New Zealand should not rush into the TPP because there were not the numbers to pass it in the United States Congress.
It was not a done deal and could yet become a “5000-page doorstop.”
She could not understand why the New Zealand Government was pushing the deal so strongly as it was not a done deal.
It had very little upside for New Zealand and enormous downsides, she told a meeting of about 1000 at the Auckland Town Hall tonight.
Yet New Zealand had been one of the most enthusiastic.
“So I thought it was really important to dig out of the snow and come and say ‘guys this is far from a done deal and your Government is trying to run you guys towards a cliff.
“This is no done deal – this is likely to be an undone deal. ”
New Zealand might change its laws to meet the terms of an agreement that might never get finished.
“And you’ll have screwed yourselves over by passing that law,” she said.
“So for God’s sake don’t go rushing into this because in all likelihood it ain’t going to happen.”
Lori Wallach is the director of the Washington-based Public Citizen Global Trade Watch Group and tonight began a speaking tour with Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey against the TPP.
She suggested that discontent in the United States on issues such as the period of exclusivity for biologic drugs or barring tobacco companies from investor-state dispute settlement could be changed in side-letters between the US and other countries.
That was how binding changes could be made to an agreement without opening up the text for renegotiation.
She also said the investor-dispute settlement (ISDS) rules were an enormous risk.
She disputed the New Zealand Government’s claim that ISDS – allowing disputes to be settled by private tribunal – would not attract cases.
While the US has had 50 agreements with ISDS and had had hardly any challenges over 50 years, there were now more than 50 a year. And under TPP – an agreement of 12 countries – it would double its exposure with 9500 new corporations from TPP countries being a possible new threat.
And while New Zealand had had no ISDS cases taken against it, it could face exposure to 1608 United States companies – and the US was the most litigious country in the world.
“This is brand new liability. So when your Government says ‘we’ve never been sued,’ I say ‘hold on to your wallet and your tax dollars because if TPPA happens, it is just a matter of time.”
“A propaganda exercise”
Jane Kelsey, New Zealand’s leading campaigner against TPP over the five years it was negotiated, took her place at the lectern with a stuffed toy – a “dead rat” she has called Tim, after former Trade Minister Tim Grose has talked of New Zealand having to swallow dead rats.
She said the national interest analysis on the TPP released today by the Government was “devoid of any independent insight” because it was drafted by the officials who negotiated the agreement.
“It is nothing more than a propaganda exercise,” she said.
She said the $2.7 billion estimated increase in gdp by 2030 would be, on current growth rates, a mere 0.9 per cent of gdp in 2030.
Next Thursday the Trade Minister of the TPP countries would sign the deal – but that was the end of it.
The national interest assessment would be presented to the House and legislation drafted – but it could not come into force for at least two years.
“We need to make our voices heard from that for at least the next two years.”
Politicians from Labour, the Greens, New Zealand First and the Maori Party spoke as well.
Grant Robertson: Agreement undermines NZ’s sovereignty
Labour finance spokesman Grant Robertson the Government had undertaken a “secretive, exclusory, unaccountable process driven by the galactic ego and arrogance of Tim Groser.”
He quoted from the national interest analysis the sentence he said identified the source of Labour’s objection.
“The agreement places new limitations on Government’s ability to modify New Zealand’s policy settings to ensure they are appropriate for our domestic circumstances.”
“That is the nub of the problem here,” he said. It undermined sovereign rights.
It could, for example, prevent a Government legislation to get proper public broadcasting.
He said the agreement undermined New Zealand’s sovereignty and while there were modest economic benefits from TPP “you cannot put a price on our democratic and constitutional freedoms to make our own law.”
“It’s about power
Greens’ co-leader Metiria Turei said the point of the TPP was “to take power away from democratically elected Government, to give it to multinational corporations” and where their interests clashed with the interests of New Zealand, the investors interests would come out on top. “It’s not about trade; it’s about power.”
Marama Fox: Issue unifying for Kiwis
Maori Party co-leader Marama Fox said the issue had been unifying because now people might understand how Maori felt to have lost their sovereign rights.
“We have been fighting this fight for 175 years.”
The party objected to the Government having the power in the TPP to interpret what rights were under the Treaty of Waitangi.
There had been an irrational fear in New Zealand that if you give Maori more rights it would take away others’ rights, or that Maori “might do to us what we have done to them.”
“”That is wrong. We want to live in a country where we recognise our duality of nationhood, that we are here as partners.”
“Undermining NZ business”
New Zealand First’s Fletcher Tabuteau claimed that New Zealand First had been the most vocal against the TPP and the most consistent.
He said ISDS would give multi-national corporates an unfair advantage over New Zealand companies in New Zealand because only they would have access to ISDS.
He suggested that minimum wage measures or environmental laws passed by the Government could trigger the ISDS and let overseas companies sue the Government but New Zealand companies would have to “like it and lump it.”
“It will undermine New Zealand business into the future.”
He said National still had the numbers to approve the national interest analysis but opponents of the TPP needed to talk to National MPs.
“Some of those National MPs must fold under your pressure.”
Lori Wallach has public meetings planned in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin.
Has anybody else noticed Cameron Slater still obsessing over Jacinda Ardern? The disgraced Whale Oil blogger seems to have made it his life’s mission to shadow the former Prime Minister of New Zealand like some unhinged stalker lurking in the digital bushes.The man’s obsession with Ardern isn't just unhealthy...it’s downright ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is climate change a net benefit for society? Human-caused climate change has been a net detriment to society as measured by loss of ...
When the National Party hastily announced its “Local Water Done Well” policy, they touted it as the great saviour of New Zealand’s crumbling water infrastructure. But as time goes by it's looking more and more like a planning and fiscal lame duck...and one that’s going to cost ratepayers far more ...
Donald Trump, the orange-hued oligarch, is back at it again, wielding tariffs like a mob boss swinging a lead pipe. His latest economic edict; slapping hefty tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada, has the stench of a protectionist shakedown, cooked up in the fevered minds of his sycophantic ...
In the week of Australia’s 3 May election, ASPI will release Agenda for Change 2025: preparedness and resilience in an uncertain world, a report promoting public debate and understanding on issues of strategic importance to ...
One pill makes you largerAnd one pill makes you smallAnd the ones that mother gives youDon't do anything at allGo ask AliceWhen she's ten feet tallSongwriter: Grace Wing Slick.Morena, all, and a happy Bicycle Day to you.Today is an unofficial celebration of the dawning of the psychedelic era, commemorating the ...
It’s only been a few months since the Hollywood fires tore through Los Angeles, leaving a trail of devastation, numerous deaths, over 10,000 homes reduced to rubble, and a once glorious film industry on its knees. The Palisades and Eaton fires, fueled by climate-driven dry winds, didn’t just burn houses; ...
Four eighty-year-old books which are still vitally relevant today. Between 1942 and 1945, four refugees from Vienna each published a ground-breaking – seminal – book.* They left their country after Austria was taken over by fascists in 1934 and by Nazi Germany in 1938. Previously they had lived in ‘Red ...
Good Friday, 18th April, 2025: I can at last unveil the Secret Non-Fiction Project. The first complete Latin-to-English translation of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola’s twelve-book Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem (Disputations Against Divinatory Astrology). Amounting to some 174,000 words, total. Some context is probably in order. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) ...
National MP Hamish Campbell's pathetic attempt to downplay his deep ties to and involvement in the Two by Twos...a secretive religious sect under FBI and NZ Police investigation for child sexual abuse...isn’t just a misstep; it’s a calculated lie that insults the intelligence of every Kiwi voter.Campbell’s claim of being ...
New Zealand First’s Shane Jones has long styled himself as the “Prince of the Provinces,” a champion of regional development and economic growth. But beneath the bluster lies a troubling pattern of behaviour that reeks of cronyism and corruption, undermining the very democracy he claims to serve. Recent revelations and ...
Give me one reason to stay hereAnd I'll turn right back aroundGive me one reason to stay hereAnd I'll turn right back aroundSaid I don't want to leave you lonelyYou got to make me change my mindSongwriters: Tracy Chapman.Morena, and Happy Easter, whether that means to you. Hot cross buns, ...
New Zealand’s housing crisis is a sad indictment on the failures of right wing neoliberalism, and the National Party, under Chris Luxon’s shaky leadership, is trying to simply ignore it. The numbers don’t lie: Census data from 2023 revealed 112,496 Kiwis were severely housing deprived...couch-surfing, car-sleeping, or roughing it on ...
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with regular and special guests, including: on a global survey of over 3,000 economists and scientists showing a significant divide in views on green growth; and ...
Simeon Brown, the National Party’s poster child for hubris, consistently over-promises and under-delivers. His track record...marked by policy flip-flops and a dismissive attitude toward expert advice, reveals a politician driven by personal ambition rather than evidence. From transport to health, Brown’s focus seems fixed on protecting National's image, not addressing ...
Open access notables Recent intensified riverine CO2 emission across the Northern Hemisphere permafrost region, Mu et al., Nature Communications:Global warming causes permafrost thawing, transferring large amounts of soil carbon into rivers, which inevitably accelerates riverine CO2 release. However, temporally and spatially explicit variations of riverine CO2 emissions remain unclear, limiting the ...
Once a venomous thorn in New Zealand’s blogosphere, Cathy Odgers, aka Cactus Kate, has slunk into the shadows, her once-sharp quills dulled by the fallout of Dirty Politics.The dishonest attack-blogger, alongside her vile accomplices such as Cameron Slater, were key players in the National Party’s sordid smear campaigns, exposed by Nicky ...
Once upon a time, not so long ago, those who talked of Australian sovereign capability, especially in the technology sector, were generally considered an amusing group of eccentrics. After all, technology ecosystems are global and ...
The ACT Party leader’s latest pet project is bleeding taxpayers dry, with $10 million funneled into seven charter schools for just 215 students. That’s a jaw-dropping $46,500 per student, compared to roughly $9,000 per head in state schools.You’d think Seymour would’ve learned from the last charter school fiasco, but apparently, ...
India navigated relations with the United States quite skilfully during the first Trump administration, better than many other US allies did. Doing so a second time will be more difficult, but India’s strategic awareness and ...
The NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi is concerned for low-income workers given new data released by Stats NZ that shows inflation was 2.5% for the year to March 2025, rising from 2.2% in December last year. “The prices of things that people can’t avoid are rising – meaning inflation is rising ...
Last week, the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment recommended that forestry be removed from the Emissions Trading Scheme. Its an unfortunate but necessary move, required to prevent the ETS's total collapse in a decade or so. So naturally, National has told him to fuck off, and that they won't be ...
China’s recent naval circumnavigation of Australia has highlighted a pressing need to defend Australia’s air and sea approaches more effectively. Potent as nuclear submarines are, the first Australian boats under AUKUS are at least seven ...
In yesterday’s post I tried to present the Reserve Bank Funding Agreement for 2025-30, as approved by the Minister of Finance and the Bank’s Board, in the context of the previous agreement, and the variation to that agreement signed up to by Grant Robertson a few weeks before the last ...
Australia’s bid to co-host the 31st international climate negotiations (COP31) with Pacific island countries in late 2026 is directly in our national interest. But success will require consultation with the Pacific. For that reason, no ...
Old and outdated buildings being demolished at Wellington Hospital in 2018. The new infrastructure being funded today will not be sufficient for future population size and some will not be built by 2035. File photo: Lynn GrievesonLong stories short from our political economy on Thursday, April 17:Simeon Brown has unveiled ...
The introduction of AI in workplaces can create significant health and safety risks for workers (such as intensification of work, and extreme surveillance) which can significantly impact workers’ mental and physical wellbeing. It is critical that unions and workers are involved in any decision to introduce AI so that ...
Donald Trump’s return to the White House and aggressive posturing is undermining global diplomacy, and New Zealand must stand firm in rejecting his reckless, fascist-driven policies that are dragging the world toward chaos.As a nation with a proud history of peacekeeping and principled foreign policy, we should limit our role ...
Sunday marks three months since Donald Trump’s inauguration as US president. What a ride: the style rude, language raucous, and the results rogue. Beyond manners, rudeness matters because tone signals intent as well as personality. ...
There are any number of reasons why anyone thinking of heading to the United States for a holiday should think twice. They would be giving their money to a totalitarian state where political dissenters are being rounded up and imprisoned here and here, where universities are having their funds for ...
Taiwan has an inadvertent, rarely acknowledged role in global affairs: it’s a kind of sponge, soaking up much of China’s political, military and diplomatic efforts. Taiwan soaks up Chinese power of persuasion and coercion that ...
The Ukraine war has been called the bloodiest conflict since World War II. As of July 2024, 10,000 women were serving in frontline combat roles. Try telling them—from the safety of an Australian lounge room—they ...
Following Canadian authorities’ discovery of a Chinese information operation targeting their country’s election, Australians, too, should beware such risks. In fact, there are already signs that Beijing is interfering in campaigning for the Australian election ...
This video includes personal musings and conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). From "founder" of Tesla and the OG rocket man with SpaceX, and rebranding twitter as X, Musk has ...
Back in February 2024, a rat infestation attracted a fair few headlines in the South Dunedin Countdown supermarket. Today, the rats struck again. They took out the Otago-Southland region’s internet connection. https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360656230/internet-outage-hits-otago-and-southland Strictly, it was just a coincidence – rats decided to gnaw through one fibre cable, while some hapless ...
I came in this morning after doing some chores and looked quickly at Twitter before unpacking the groceries. Someone was retweeting a Radio NZ story with the headline “Reserve Bank’s budget to be slashed by 25%”. Wow, I thought, the Minister of Finance has really delivered this time. And then ...
So, having teased it last week, Andrew Little has announced he will run for mayor of Wellington. On RNZ, he's saying its all about services - "fixing the pipes, making public transport cheaper, investing in parks, swimming pools and libraries, and developing more housing". Meanwhile, to the readers of the ...
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming, 1921ALL OVER THE WORLD, devout Christians will be reaching for their bibles, reading and re-reading Revelation 13:16-17. For the benefit of all you non-Christians out there, these are the verses describing ...
Give me what I want, what I really, really want: And what India really wants from New Zealand isn’t butter or cheese, but a radical relaxation of the rules controlling Indian immigration.WHAT DOES INDIA WANT from New Zealand? Not our dairy products, that’s for sure, it’s got plenty of those. ...
In the week of Australia’s 3 May election, ASPI will release Agenda for Change 2025: preparedness and resilience in an uncertain world, a report promoting public debate and understanding on issues of strategic importance to ...
Yesterday, 5,500 senior doctors across Aotearoa New Zealand voted overwhelmingly to strike for a day.This is the first time in New Zealand ASMS members have taken strike action for 24 hours.They are asking the government tofund them and account for resource shortfalls.Vacancies are critical - 45-50% in some regions.The ...
For years and years and years, David Seymour and his posse of deluded neoliberals have been preaching their “tough on crime” gospel to voters. Harsher sentences! More police! Lock ‘em up! Throw away the key. But when it comes to their own, namely former Act Party president Tim Jago, a ...
Judith Collins is a seasoned master at political hypocrisy. As New Zealand’s Defence Minister, she's recently been banging the war drum, announcing a jaw-dropping $12 billion boost to the defence budget over the next four years, all while the coalition of chaos cries poor over housing, health, and education.Apparently, there’s ...
I’m on the London Overground watching what the phones people are holding are doing to their faces: The man-bun guy who could not be less impressed by what he's seeing but cannot stop reading; the woman who's impatient for a response; the one who’s frowning; the one who’s puzzled; the ...
You don't have no prescriptionYou don't have to take no pillsYou don't have no prescriptionAnd baby don't have to take no pillsIf you come to see meDoctor Brown will cure your ills.Songwriters: Waymon Glasco.Dr Luxon. Image: David and Grok.First, they came for the Bottom FeedersAnd I did not speak outBecause ...
The Health Minister says the striking doctors already “well remunerated,” and are “walking away from” and “hurting” their patients. File photo: Lynn GrievesonLong stories short from our political economy on Wednesday, April 16:Simeon Brown has attacked1 doctors striking for more than a 1.5% pay rise as already “well remunerated,” even ...
The time is ripe for Australia and South Korea to strengthen cooperation in space, through embarking on joint projects and initiatives that offer practical outcomes for both countries. This is the finding of a new ...
Hi,When Trump raised tariffs against China to 145%, he destined many small businesses to annihilation. The Daily podcast captured the mass chaos by zooming in and talking to one person, Beth Benike, a small-business owner who will likely lose her home very soon.She pointed out that no, she wasn’t surprised ...
National’s handling of inflation and the cost-of-living crisis is an utter shambles and a gutless betrayal of every Kiwi scraping by. The Coalition of Chaos Ministers strut around preaching about how effective their policies are, but really all they're doing is perpetuating a cruel and sick joke of undelivered promises, ...
Most people wouldn't have heard of a little worm like Rhys Williams, a so-called businessman and former NZ First member, who has recently been unmasked as the venomous troll behind a relentless online campaign targeting Green Party MP Benjamin Doyle.According to reports, Williams has been slinging mud at Doyle under ...
Illustration credit: Jonathan McHugh (New Statesman)The other day, a subscriber said they were unsubscribing because they needed “some good news”.I empathised. Don’t we all.I skimmed a NZME article about the impacts of tariffs this morning with analysis from Kiwibank’s Jarrod Kerr. Kerr, their Chief Economist, suggested another recession is the ...
Let’s assume, as prudence demands we assume, that the United States will not at any predictable time go back to being its old, reliable self. This means its allies must be prepared indefinitely to lean ...
Over the last three rather tumultuous US trade policy weeks, I’ve read these four books. I started with Irwin (whose book had sat on my pile for years, consulted from time to time but not read) in a week of lots of flights and hanging around airports/hotels, and then one ...
Indonesia could do without an increase in military spending that the Ministry of Defence is proposing. The country has more pressing issues, including public welfare and human rights. Moreover, the transparency and accountability to justify ...
Former Hutt City councillor Chris Milne has slithered back into the spotlight, not as a principled dissenter, but as a vindictive puppeteer of digital venom. The revelations from a recent court case paint a damning portrait of a man whose departure from Hutt City Council in 2022 was merely the ...
That's the conclusion of a report into security risks against Green MP Benjamin Doyle, in the wake of Winston Peters' waging a homophobic hate-campaign against them: GRC’s report said a “hostility network” of politicians, commentators, conspiracy theorists, alternative media outlets and those opposed to the rainbow community had produced ...
That's the conclusion of a report into security risks against Green MP Benjamin Doyle, in the wake of Winston Peters' waging a homophobic hate-campaign against them: GRC’s report said a “hostility network” of politicians, commentators, conspiracy theorists, alternative media outlets and those opposed to the rainbow community had produced ...
National Party MP Hamish Campbell’s ties to the secretive Two By Twos "church" raises serious questions that are not being answered. This shadowy group, currently being investigated by the FBI for numerous cases of child abuse, hides behind a facade of faith while Campbell dodges scrutiny, claiming it’s a “private ...
National Party MP Hamish Campbell’s ties to the secretive Two By Twos "church" raises serious questions that are not being answered. This shadowy group, currently being investigated by the FBI for numerous cases of child abuse, hides behind a facade of faith while Campbell dodges scrutiny, claiming it’s a “private ...
The economy is not doing what it was supposed to when PM Christopher Luxon said in January it was ‘going for growth.’ Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short from our political economy on Tuesday, April 15:New Zealand’s economic recovery is stalling, according to business surveys, retail spending and ...
This is a guest post by Lewis Creed, managing editor of the University of Auckland student publication Craccum, which is currently running a campaign for a safer Symonds Street in the wake of a horrific recent crash.The post has two parts: 1) Craccum’s original call for safety (6 ...
NZCTU President Richard Wagstaff has published an opinion piece which makes the case for a different approach to economic development, as proposed in the CTU’s Aotearoa Reimagined programme. The number of people studying to become teachers has jumped after several years of low enrolment. The coalition has directed Health New ...
The growth of China’s AI industry gives it great influence over emerging technologies. That creates security risks for countries using those technologies. So, Australia must foster its own domestic AI industry to protect its interests. ...
Unfortunately we have another National Party government in power at the moment, and as a consequence, another economic dumpster fire taking hold. Inflation’s hurting Kiwis, and instead of providing relief, National is fiddling while wallets burn.Prime Minister Chris Luxon's response is a tired remix of tax cuts for the rich ...
Girls who are boys who like boys to be girlsWho do boys like they're girls, who do girls like they're boysAlways should be someone you really loveSongwriters: Damon Albarn / Graham Leslie Coxon / Alexander Rowntree David / Alexander James Steven.Last month, I wrote about the Birds and Bees being ...
Australia needs to reevaluate its security priorities and establish a more dynamic regulatory framework for cybersecurity. To advance in this area, it can learn from Britain’s Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, which presents a compelling ...
Deputy PM Winston Peters likes nothing more than to portray himself as the only wise old head while everyone else is losing theirs. Yet this time, his “old master” routine isn’t working. What global trade is experiencing is more than the usual swings and roundabouts of market sentiment. President Donald ...
President Trump’s hopes of ending the war in Ukraine seemed more driven by ego than realistic analysis. Professor Vladimir Brovkin’s latest video above highlights the internal conflicts within the USA, Russia, Europe, and Ukraine, which are currently hindering peace talks and clarity. Brovkin pointed out major contradictions within ...
In the cesspool that is often New Zealand’s online political discourse, few figures wield their influence as destructively as Ani O’Brien. Masquerading as a champion of free speech and women’s rights, O’Brien’s campaigns are a masterclass in bad faith, built on a foundation of lies, selective outrage, and a knack ...
The international challenge confronting Australia today is unparalleled, at least since the 1940s. It requires what the late Brendan Sargeant, a defence analyst, called strategic imagination. We need more than shrewd economic manoeuvring and a ...
This year's General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU) will take place as a fully hybrid conference in both Vienna and online from April 27 to May 2. This year, I'll join the event on site in Vienna for the full week and I've already picked several sessions I plan ...
Here’s a book that looks not in at China but out from China. David Daokui Li’s China’s World View: Demystifying China to Prevent Global Conflict is a refreshing offering in that Li is very much ...
The New Zealand National Party has long mastered the art of crafting messaging that resonates with a large number of desperate, often white middle-class, voters. From their 2023 campaign mantra of “getting our country back on track” to promises of economic revival, safer streets, and better education, their rhetoric paints ...
A global contest of ideas is underway, and democracy as an ideal is at stake. Democracies must respond by lifting support for public service media with an international footprint. With the recent decision by the ...
It is almost six weeks since the shock announcement early on the afternoon of Wednesday 5 March that the Governor of the Reserve Bank, Adrian Orr, was resigning effective 31 March, and that in fact he had already left and an acting Governor was already in place. Orr had been ...
After stonewalling requests for information on boot camps, the Government has now offered up a blog post right before Easter weekend rather than provide clarity on the pilot. ...
More people could be harmed if Minister for Mental Health Matt Doocey does not guarantee to protect patients and workers as the Police withdraw from supporting mental health call outs. ...
The Green Party recognises the extension of visa allowances for our Pacific whānau as a step in the right direction but continues to call for a Pacific Visa Waiver. ...
The Government yesterday released its annual child poverty statistics, and by its own admission, more tamariki across Aotearoa are now living in material hardship. ...
Today, Te Pāti Māori join the motu in celebration as the Treaty Principles Bill is voted down at its second reading. “From the beginning, this Bill was never welcome in this House,” said Te Pāti Māori Co-Leader, Rawiri Waititi. “Our response to the first reading was one of protest: protesting ...
The Green Party is proud to have voted down the Coalition Government’s Treaty Principles Bill, an archaic piece of legislation that sought to attack the nation’s founding agreement. ...
A Member’s Bill in the name of Green Party MP Julie Anne Genter which aims to stop coal mining, the Crown Minerals (Prohibition of Mining) Amendment Bill, has been pulled from Parliament’s ‘biscuit tin’ today. ...
Labour MP Kieran McAnulty’s Members Bill to make the law simpler and fairer for businesses operating on Easter, Anzac and Christmas Days has passed its first reading after a conscience vote in Parliament. ...
Nicola Willis continues to sit on her hands amid a global economic crisis, leaving the Reserve Bank to act for New Zealanders who are worried about their jobs, mortgages, and KiwiSaver. ...
Today, the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill has passed its third and final reading, but there is one more stage before it becomes law. The Governor-General must give their ‘Royal assent’ for any bill to become legally enforceable. This means that, even if a bill gets voted ...
Abortion care at Whakatāne Hospital has been quietly shelved, with patients told they will likely have to travel more than an hour to Tauranga to get the treatment they need. ...
Thousands of New Zealanders’ submissions are missing from the official parliamentary record because the National-dominated Justice Select Committee has rushed work on the Treaty Principles Bill. ...
Today’s announcement of 10 percent tariffs for New Zealand goods entering the United States is disappointing for exporters and consumers alike, with the long-lasting impact on prices and inflation still unknown. ...
The National Government’s choices have contributed to a slow-down in the building sector, as thousands of people have lost their jobs in construction. ...
Willie Apiata’s decision to hand over his Victoria Cross to the Minister for Veterans is a powerful and selfless act, made on behalf of all those who have served our country. ...
The Privileges Committee has denied fundamental rights to Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, Rawiri Waititi and Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, breaching their own standing orders, breaching principles of natural justice, and highlighting systemic prejudice and discrimination within our parliamentary processes. The three MPs were summoned to the privileges committee following their performance of a haka ...
April 1 used to be a day when workers could count on a pay rise with stronger support for those doing it tough, but that’s not the case under this Government. ...
Winston Peters is shopping for smaller ferries after Nicola Willis torpedoed the original deal, which would have delivered new rail enabled ferries next year. ...
The Government should work with other countries to press the Myanmar military regime to stop its bombing campaign especially while the country recovers from the devastating earthquake. ...
Protesters are occupying the site of a proposed fast-tracked coal mine on the Denniston Plateau, near Westport. The 70-strong group, organised by climate activism group 350Aotearoa, says this is just the first of a series of protest actions they are prepared to take against the mining company, Bathurst Resources Ltd., if ...
In an art world context, photography has evolved significantly over the years pushing boundaries in both technique and concept. No longer the poor cousin of painting, but still much more affordable thanks to photographs being sold in numbered editions, an art photograph doesn’t merely capture a moment—artists use the medium ...
Last year, 20,000 observations of Christchurch species were made during the annual City Nature Challenge, a way for anyone to get involved in biodiversity. It’s back again this month. Even in suburbia, even on grey autumn weekends, there is biodiversity. You just need the time to look for it: to ...
Asia Pacific Report Peaceful protesters in Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest city Auckland held an Easter prayer vigil honouring Palestinian political prisoners and the sacrifice of thousands of innocent lives as relentless Israeli bombing of displaced Gazans in tents killed at least 92 people in two days. Organisers of the rally ...
ANALYSIS:By Ben Bohane This week Cambodia marks the 50th anniversary of the fall of Phnom Penh to the murderous Khmer Rouge, and Vietnam celebrates the fall of Saigon to North Vietnamese forces in April 1975. They are being commemorated very differently; after all, there’s nothing to celebrate in Cambodia. ...
By Gujari Singh in Washington The Trump administration has issued a new executive order opening up vast swathes of protected ocean to commercial exploitation, including areas within the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument. It allows commercial fishing in areas long considered off-limits due to their ecological significance — despite ...
New Zealand commemoration lead John McLeod said a small team, including members of the NZDF and the NZ Embassy, assisted in the covering up of remains that were exposed. ...
This Bill is a great opportunity to improve our system of government across all levels. Let’s make sure we get it right and give the public a say on a simple and enduring solution. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rob Nicholls, Senior Research Associate in Media and Communications, University of Sydney Tech giant Google has just suffered another legal blow in the United States, losing a landmark antitrust case. This follows on from the company’s loss in a similar case last ...
Paddy GowerAmanda Luxon. I mean what can you say. Easter is a good time to publish my latest reckons at Stuff because without exaggeration or making too much of things, Amanda Luxon walks among us like Jesus but probably with better shoes.Jesus healed. How good is that? It’s really good, ...
How can an afternoon be long when it starts at one o’clock and finishes at half past three? Beauden thought about that as he stood at the back of the classroom and looked through the large window to the upper grounds where his colleague Monty Spiers was taking a phys ed ...
Alex Casey delves into the enduring success of The Artist’s Way, a self-help book beloved by everyone from retirees to famous rappers. On the video call, my mum is gesticulating so wildly while recounting all her recent creative endeavours that she knocks her cup of tea over a work-in-progress jigsaw ...
Feijoa scholar Kate Evans reviews the dish everybody raves about at Metro’s 2024 restaurant of the year, Forest. People have been telling me I need to try the deep-fried feijoa dessert at Forest for about three years now. I’m embarrassed it took me this long, but it takes a lot ...
Chef, author and reality television judge Colin Fassnidge takes us through his life in television. Colin Fassnidge is a huge television fan. He watches every blockbuster TV series the moment it drops and scores every single show on his Instagram account. It’s a habit that recently caught the attention of ...
Why are shops on Parnell Road allowed to open on Easter Sunday? It’s all thanks to an obsolete rule from the 1970s that’s been ‘frozen in time’.Originally published in 2023.Under our current trading laws, most stores are required to stay closed on Good Friday and Easter Sunday (along ...
Yael Shochat, chef-owner of Auckland restaurant Ima Cuisine, shares the recipe for her hot cross buns – regularly voted among the best in the city.Originally published in 2019.HOT CROSS BUNSMakes 12You may use equal weights of pre-ground spices, but you’ll get a much better flavour if ...
Gràinne Moss knows she can’t tackle the final leg of one of the world’s toughest swimming challenges alone.In her quest to complete the Oceans Seven marathon challenge, 38 years after she began, she’s enlisted the help of two remarkable women – one barely out of her teens, and the other ...
By Susana Leiataua, RNZ National presenter There are calls for greater transparency about what the HMNZS Manawanui was doing before it sank in Samoa last October — including whether the New Zealand warship was performing specific security for King Charles and Queen Camilla. The Manawanui grounded on the reef off ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Labor increased its lead again in a YouGov poll, but Freshwater put the party ahead by just 50.3–49.7. This article also covers ...
ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on April 18, 2025. Labor’s poll surge continues in YouGov, but they’re barely ahead in FreshwaterSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and ...
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington.AUCKLAND1 Sunrise on the Reaping by Suzanne Collins (Scholastic, $30) Haymitch’s Hunger Games. 2 Careless People: A ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Labor increased their lead again in a YouGov poll, but Freshwater put them ahead by just 50.3–49.7. This article also covers the ...
A new poem by Tusiata Avia. How to make a terrorist First make a whistling sound which is the sound of a bomb just before it lands on a house. Then make an exploding sound which is the sound of the bomb which kills a father, decapitates a mother, roasts ...
The top-rated Scrabble players in the country go head-to-head this Easter weekend. Watch games live from 9.30am on the stream below.How does it all work?The Masters is different to most Scrabble tournaments in that it’s invitational, open only to the top-rated players in the country. The ...
Books editor Claire Mabey appraises all the Austen-adapted films from 1990 onwards to separate the delightful from the duds.For the purists, read our ranking of Jane Austen’s novels here.It is a truth universally acknowledged that not everything is created equal. Since 1990 there have been 12 attempts to ...
To arrive through the heavy red door of Margot in Newtown is to be invited to the best dinner party in town, hosted by the best friends you haven’t yet made. Table Service is a column about food and hospitality in Wellington, written by Nick Iles.Hospitality is a term ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp');Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions.The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 18 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
NONFICTION1 No Words for This by Ali Mau (HarperCollins, $39.99)A free copy of the author’s new memoir was up for grabs in last week’s giveaway contest. Readers were asked to share their feelings about Mau, a former broadcaster and one of the most powerful figures in the New Zealand #metoo ...
Analysis: The announcement last week that Colossal Biosciences in the USA had “de-extincted” the dire wolf, which was last seen 13,000 years ago, was reported worldwide.The three wolf pups generated equal parts fascination and widespread scientific criticism. But is this actually de-extinction, and what are the implications for the potential ...
We recommend the best – and longest – television series to watch this holiday weekend. As the Easter holiday weekend descends and the weather turns a little grim, many of us will turn to the trusty old television for comfort and entertainment. If you’re lucky, you’ll have some time over ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gode Bola, Lecturer in Hydrology, University of Kinshasa The April 2025 flooding disaster in Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo, wasn’t just about intense rainfall. It was a symptom of recent land use change which has occurred rapidly in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Peter Dutton, now seriously on the back foot, has made an extraordinarily big “aspirational” commitment at the back end of this campaign. He says he wants to see a move to indexing personal income ...
Essay by Keith Rankin. Operation Gomorrah may have been the most cynical event of World War Two (WW2). Not only did the name fully convey the intent of the war crimes about to be committed, it, also represented the single biggest 24-hour murder toll for the European war that I ...
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
He currently serves on the board of Alcoa.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_O%27Neal
10 Gaffes by Doomed CEOs on http://www.usnews.com
https://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/profile-full/article/stan-oneal/
An article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch was one of an estimated 50000 expunged from certain Google searches.
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-searc...
There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.
http://deeperweb.com/results.php?cx=%21004415538554621685521%3Avgwa9iznfuo&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Stanley+O%27Neal%22+%27merrill+Lynch%22&as_qdr=
More relevant references ..
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15768986
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/…/ns/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-walk-out-m/
http://www.motherjones.com/…/last-hired-first-fired-merrill-lynchs-black-ceo-had- it-coming
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-search. htmldealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/one-view-of-merrill-lynchs-fall/
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/31/subprime-suspect
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2010/11/financial-crisis-excerpt-201011
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/75-most-powerful-blacks-on…/2/
https://hbr.org/product/Stanley-O-Neal…Merrill/…/405029-PDF-ENG
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/…/five-years-later-where-are-they-now
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-merrill-lynch-and-the-right-to-be-forgotten -2014-7
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/business/09magic.html
I am sure you find it all very interesting, and will have great fun finding some way to blame John Key for the gentleman’s failings.
However. Is it not true that John Key had left the company before this fellow became the CEO?
Prior to becoming President of the firm in 2001 O’Neal was never responsible for any part of the company that included John Key’s bailiwick. He may, as president been Key’s titular superior but it could not have been for more than a few months.
Key became an MP in 2002. O’Neal became the CEO in 2003. Your numbers really don’t line up do they?
Perhaps you should consider a more reasonable proposition. The company failed because they lost their most competent people. People like John Key for example.
Or do you prefer conspiracies?
With respect, you are incorrect. You confuse General Motors with Merrill.
It is relevant to NZ due to his current membership of Alcoa. He is a significant player in our economy.
Why was an article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch expunged from certain Google searches ?
But the thing I am commenting on is this statement.
“There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.”
How do you work out that John Key was his protégé?
Sure O’Neal was incompetent. That is hardly a rare trait though is it?
However while John Key worked there they did very well, as you will probably agree. As you say “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”. Key however wasn’t there when they went downhill and your first sentence is irrelevant to him
“John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board …”
Key didn’t work under O’Neal except, possibly for a few months, while O’Neal was first in the President’s job. By the time he was CEO and Chairman of the Board Key was long gone.
With respect, I think you should check your timeline.
I don’t see where I have got it wrong as you seem to imply.
As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.
He entered Parliament in July 2002.
O’Neal became CEO and Chairman in 2003.
In your words “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”
The problems seem to be after Key left the firm.
What part of the timeline do you think is wrong?
“As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.”
That sounds right.
The man behind John Key.
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
He currently serves on the board of Alcoa.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_O%27Neal
10 Gaffes by Doomed CEOs on http://www.usnews.com
https://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/profile-full/article/stan-oneal/
An article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch was one of an estimated 50000 expunged from certain Google searches.
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-searc...
There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.
http://deeperweb.com/results.php?cx=%21004415538554621685521%3Avgwa9iznfuo&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Stanley+O%27Neal%22+%27merrill+Lynch%22&as_qdr=
More relevant references ..
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15768986
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/…/ns/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-walk-out-m/
http://www.motherjones.com/…/last-hired-first-fired-merrill-lynchs-black-ceo-had- it-coming
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-search. htmldealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/one-view-of-merrill-lynchs-fall/
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/31/subprime-suspect
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2010/11/financial-crisis-excerpt-201011
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/75-most-powerful-blacks-on…/2/
https://hbr.org/product/Stanley-O-Neal…Merrill/…/405029-PDF-ENG
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/…/five-years-later-where-are-they-now
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-merrill-lynch-and-the-right-to-be-forgotten -2014-7
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/business/09magic.html
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jan/25/unilever-boss-warns-uk-against-sugar-tax
ISDS anyone?
+1
sugar taxes……More fuel for the ISDS industry
http://corporateeurope.org/trade/2012/11/chapter-5-speculating-injustice-third-party-funding-investment-disputes
The Unilever man happens to be correct about taxing sugar, if nothing else. There’s no point in taxing sucrose while at the same time publishing dietary guidelines that recommend an obesity-generating diet consisting largely of other kinds of sugar or near-sugar, and having doctors, journalists, politicians and others constantly refer to the obesity-generating stuff by the misnomer “healthy food.” A sugar tax would be like putting a bandage on someone who’s cut an artery.
that debate would barely rate a mention in an ISDS hearing I would suggest
Meh. If ISDS were such a trump card, we’d have more to fear from tobacco companies overturning taxes on tobacco than we would about a non-existent tax on sucrose.
you mean like tobacco companies using deals with Asia and the Ukraine to sue the Australian government (and small, poor nations) about plain packaging laws?
No, not like that. Any instances of tobacco companies successfully using ISDS to overturn excise duty on tobacco?
Tobacco is different to sugar – tobacco is addictive, so a core chunk of users will simply pay more regardless of tax rate, to a certain degree. Doesn’t hugely impact the profit margin until they get really high or are used with other measures like quit support services.
Packaging is what affects sales. It reminds addicts trying to quit, and also affects market share.
Taxes on sugar is different, because cost is a major factor in food choices and production costs.
A reasonable run down from a left wing perspective of the year since Syriza gained power in Greece . I believe it pretty much happened as I predicted it would.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/25/one-year-on-syriza-radicalism-power-euro-alexis-tsipras
Apologies but forgot the link.
No surprise that the Socialists here seem to have lost interest in Greece….
Equally predictable, over in Venezuela the Socialist response to the continuing collapse of their policies is to use it as a pretext to subvert democracy.
A darker scenario than Greece…just a matter of time before guns become part of the ‘solution’…
http://www.wsj.com/articles/venezuela-congress-rejects-maduros-economic-plan-1453503298
The lost sheep
By all means please keep us informed about the latest happenings in Greece. It is true one can be diverted from things that should be watched and followed. The world is coming apart under our fingers and people like yourself who make sure that they keep up with developments and pass that information on to the other interested people are of great, inestimable value.
Thank you Greywarshark.
I am a strong believer in the value of learning from mistakes wherever they occur, and thus avoiding repeating them ourselves. IMO opinion that is the way to prevent the world from falling apart.
Gosman, how is your reading programme going? Have you even started yet?
Yep, the capitalists moved in and undemocratically imposed their ideas upon the Greeks. That’s what happens when we have dictatorships running things.
Syriza needed to default, drop out of the European Union and go back to their own currency. Anything else was going to have them doing what the capitalists told them.
The big boys have taken over its to late democracy has been unsurped.
Funnily enough Latent Smith has been pushing the same lines.
Saying that Key changing the flag and signing the TPPa is turning us into an outpost where we loose our sovereignty.
Sorry but its to late.
We are one of the last to fall into line.
Why doesn’t Andrew Little just SAY that Labour opposes the whole of the TPP?? He did not sound like a positive Leader just now, talking to Guyon Espiner. I felt very disappointed.
Why?
A caucus that includes Shearer and Goff and a party that never has renounced neo-liberalism.
Simple solutions.
Vote for a different party.
And communicate to the Labour leadership why you will not vote for them.
If they don’t stand against the TPP, they will stand against nothing.
Because he supports the TPPA, but many Labour voters don’t.
Bit of a dilemma really, maybe he needs to be honest and explain to his supporters why he is pro TPPA.
I agree that if Little supports the TPP, he should be honest.
I think, though, that he is more conflicted than that.
He knows that the majority of Labour supporters are against the TPP and he also knows that the power brokers in the caucus are for it.
And so you end up with a debacle of an interview with Espiner.
Labour stands for very little if it can’t summon up the courage to vociferously oppose the TPP.
It is not just the power brokers in caucus, it is also the power of what Key calls “the club” that invites caution. It looks to me as if Little reckons he is more likely to prove successful in challenging particular issues within the agreement than he would be if he came out against the whole thing. You can point to Winny of course, as someone who has taken a stand against the whole thing, but Winny is not likely to come under such strong pressure from the big players, and his view expresses a long term stance that everyone knows about.
One reason we need a nonaligned left wing movement in this country is so that we can at least start to turn ourselves into a force whose endorsement or rejection of politicians is able to make a difference. The UK left has Corbyn in part because they had the People’s Assembly to put their weight behind him. Without such movements, politicians are at the mercy of the powerful like the rest of us.
+1
We really do need to get rid of the rich and prevent them rising again.
You can’t because we’re all different, some people have the drive, some people are willing to sacrifice the short term for the long, some are born privileged and some are born with everything they need to succeed (some do and most don’t which is interesting…)
Nor should we for that matter
We’re all different but equal in those differences.
Besides, rich people aren’t rich because they’re different but because they’re stealing from everyone else.
So the rich people that’re on this site (and I’ll bet theres more than a few) are rich because they steal from others?
dude you really need to get some perspective
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Pure communism ends up being totalitarian just like capitalism.
A balance between them is the best outcome.
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
Humans are not civilized on the whole we just behave as nature behaves the strongest and fitest survive.
Because we have harnessed our envirment we think we are civilized but no we carry on behaving in a competitive way like in the rest of nature.
You are part of that competitive urge trying to push your tangent that everybody must be equal but no where in nature has that succeeded.
No where in human nature has that succeeded.
Show me some examples.
Utopian thinking just like the laissez faire brigade!
We happen to be intelligent and thus can over-ride our instincts but it must be learned. Of course, the greed and anti-social aspects of capitalism also have to be learned.
Actually, it’s always worked before – then capitalism comes along and destroys what’s been built up.
I can show you 5000 years of collapse caused by capitalist systems including the USSR. China is about to join it. Thing is, that same 5000 years of collapse by capitalism is also joined with 5000 years of societies being built up via communism/socialism.
Societies simply do not work under competitive stresses.
I agree with you BM. A little bit of clarity goes a long way. Even if it’s not what you want to hear. There is nothing worse than listening to a stuttering ,stammering, waffling attempt at an answer that says beggar all. It’s like he’s trying to have a bob each way. Not sounding strong at all.
bloody good question…they must have a reason for this shambles…..but I’m buggered if I can see it…..this undermines Littles presentation of a gov in waiting
The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall and Andrew Little knows this but because Nationals pushing it hard and because most of Labours supporters don’t want it he has to walk a very precarious tightrope of placating his supporters while still leaving the door slightly ajar
So you have him bagging the TPPA and hinting that Labour will take NZ out of it which his supporters like but still not categorically stating that’s what he’ll do so he has an out when Labour gain power and the TPPA stays
‘The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall ‘
How?
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not in and Andrew Little (and probably a great deal of Labour) know this
Hence his stopping short of actually stating Labour will withdraw NZ from the TPPA which you’d think he’d say because it would please the people on the left
‘Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA ‘
How?
Dull
OK I’ll ask the question in a different way.
Can you provide some evidence that the positive outweigh the negatives for the TPP?
Evidence please, not opinion.
I’m not sure how you expect me to provide evidence of something that hasn’t happened yet but I’ll go with this
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1510/S00065/tpp-delivers-significant-benefits-for-nz.htm
a press release from grosser?
its like youve stopped trying 🙂
Ahhh, faith based. Once again.
LOL
Well if you believe that rubbish you will believe anything?
Independent analysis say otherwise. Like a 0.2% increase in GDP per annum. You regard that as significant?
Tell me how many fairies are at the bottom of your garden?
I’m not wanting to make excuses but I’ve run out of plutonium and as well know plutonium is what is required to make the nuclear reaction to produce the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor
I tell you what as soon as I source some (or can predict where lightning is going to hit) I’ll jump in my time machine, go the future (because the TPPA hasn’t happened yet so its a tad difficult to produce something that hasn’t happened yet) and get you the evidence that will satisfy one and all
Sound good?
“the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor”
didnt that get an upgrade to a recyclables fuel capacitor? 🙂
So it’s simply your uninformed, opinion
The timeline got distorted
And your opinion of this by Simon Terry, Executive Director of The Sustainability Council
The environment under TPPA
https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/ep4-environment.pdf
And this by Barry Coates, Rod Oram, Dr Geoff Bertram and Professor Tim Hazledine
The economics of the TPPA
https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/ep5-economics.pdf
If the NZ economy will be worse off as a result if being in the TPPA then it should be a no brained to simply leave the agreement. This is what Little should have stated but didn’t for some reason.
I agree with you.
And the NZ economy will not benefit.
World Bank Report: TPP Will Bring Negligible Economic Benefit
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160119/09463933377/more-realistic-modelling-tpps-effects-predicts-450000-us-jobs-lost-gdp-contraction.shtml
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160112/07433333306/world-bank-report-tpp-will-bring-negligible-economic-benefit-to-us-canada-australia.shtml
Except Little doesn’t agree as he wont come out and state that the Labour party will leave the agreement if they are in power after the next election.
The amount of growth in GDP from TPPA i oops .2%s (0.7%)
The growth of debt is 10.3% pa of GDP!!!!
I’m sure you know this, but situations change over time.
– Would NZ be better off if the TPP wasn’t happening?
– Would NZ be better off if TPP existed in a different form?
– Now that it does exist would NZ be better of if the country was sidelined?
My view is it trade agreements generally can be either good or bad. The TPP in its current form is bad for NZ. However, it would be difficult for NZ to be the only one in the Pacific region not signing.
– NZ can be worse off than now with the agreement, and
– worse off than now if NZ is the only Pacific rim country left out.
I guess Little is mulling over his own set of conundrums and working out strategies to address them.
No we won’t as the studies have clearly shown. We going to be losing jobs and being forced to be a resources supplier to the powerful nations which means an increase in poverty and stagnation of our economy and society.
so you’ll bend over for the corporates for $40p.a (in 2030)?…I think that is what is known as a cheap date
Yeah, it was really lame of him.
I’m not sure if Andrew could have said anything differently. The bottom line is that a Labour led government will vote down any attempt by corporate or foreign governments to interfere with our sovereign democratic decision making.
Problem is, they do not get to ‘vote’ on that at all. Last year’s general election was where they needed to pull their socks up. Too late now.
“The bottom line is that a Labour led government …….. ”
Really?
You managed to get that out of the drivel that Little was uttering?
I have heard more sense from the gurgling of a six month old baby that I heard from Little on morning report.
Surely there is someone in the Labour party who can do better than the current leader? Is it time to try Mallard?
Just because you never heard what you wanted to hear, doesn’t mean nothing of value was said.
Alwyn “heard” exactly what they wanted to hear, which is to say they weren’t in fact listening at all.
Yes, he could have said it differently. He could have said:
“In government, we plan to legislate against selling land to foreigners. If that puts us in breach of the TPPA, then we will need to re-negotiate the TPPA. If we can’t re-negotiate, we will simply leave it”.
Seems like a reasonable thing to say to me. Of course National would immediately say that Labour are trying to sabotage the future of NZ etc.
Exactly. The guy needs strong competent people who are not lawyers to coach him on making clear statements rather than eternal fence-sitting waffle.
That interview is infuriating. Little is trying to argue for being partially pregnant. Dolt.
guys, I do not want to keep repeating this again. Important sections of the Labour caucus are pro-TPPA.
Andrew Little’s statements have to reflect that, or his time as Leader is over.
As an experienced lawyer, Little knows exactly what he is communicating and how clear/unclear he wants it to be, and where he wants lots of ambiguity in his statements and arguments for future wiggle room.
TL/DR Labour is no longer fit for purpose.
“competent people who are not lawyers”
Half of Little’s problem is that he IS a lawyer.
He is trying so hard to avoid saying something he wouldn’t be able to wriggle out of that he ends up saying nothing intelligent at all.
Anyone else remember the 1985 Tom Paxton album?
“One million lawyers and other disasters” .
Because he and the Labour caucus actually believe in the TPPA and FTAs in general.
Because several significant Labour MPs are pro-TPPA and pro-US/anglo imperial strategy.
Shearer, I guess?
With the independent analysis of the TPP pointing to the prospect of an very minor and insignificant increase in GDP, the potential (as in all FTA) of the loss of jobs in our economy, the restrictions on Intellectual property, the inability to control foreign investment and the loss of sovereignty, the dangers imposed across all countries on the loss of indigenous rights (in complete contravention of the UNDIR), and the resultant dumbing down of our economic structure to one of resource supply, to say nothing of the surreptitious attack on The Treaty of Waitangi, our Nations founding Document, and the effect it will have on our ability to buy our medicines, one has to wonder just what it is that makes this so called “Deal” so attractive to Labour?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
I don’t wonder about it, I’m sure that’s exactly what they’re doing.
If he does that he will be in the shit with Aunty Helen!!!
The reason Little cannot be up front and oppose the TPPA is because the US have put a gun to everyone’s head.
You are either for, or against us.
John Key has made this clear to Little, so what is he to do. When Key talks about his top draw, these are some of the things he is talking about.
Look at how frantically South Korea is trying to join the party after they missed the boat. They have China as their biggest trading partner, they hate Japan with an intensity you cannot believe, and the US only slightly less. They already have FTAs with 75% of the world’s GDP. Why would they want to join, but to be “on the right side”.
And then there is Taiwan. Same thing, but different of course.
Who hs been left out of the TTP and the TTIP?
The BRICS, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Turkey from within the top 20 countries in the world by GDP (assuming Euro as one country).
Then look at Carter’s words on TPP, and Obama during SOTU speech. The primary reason for the TTP and TTIP is to declare economic and possibly military war on the BRICS attacking the USD through trying to steal the world’s reserve currency.
Unfortunately, whether or not you like it, Little is not bigger than these powers.
That is why the TPP will be shoved down your throat, whether you like it or not.
I disagree with Winston Peters on some things, but at least he’s staunch on the TPP>
Smart politics, NZF will take votes off natz and labour by saying it how it is and whilst I am no big fan of winnie he sticks to his guns which voters identify with.
Watch the natz go hard again on NZF as winnie could see shonky bog off back to bankstaland by galvanising the swinging dissaffected masses toward NZF
Winnie could also give two fingers to the left and go with National and get his knighthood
National could also go with Act, Peter Dunne and the MP and not even bother Winnie
He won’t and he’ll probably still get his knighthood. If there’s a politician anywhere that deserves a knighthood it would be Winston simply for hanging the fuck in there 😈
Yep. And successfully returning back to political life after being stabbed in the back and left for dead by National.
” he’ll probably still get his knighthood”
Is this another policy flip-flop that Little is proposing? Is he going to swing around and start supporting knighthoods. My, my. What will “she who must be obeyed” in New York have to say?
Knighthoods are meaningless in NZ these days we give them away to criminals.
Sir Michael Cullen?
touche.
close another post shop?
Why would you associate what I say with what Labour or Andrew Little support? I’m not a Labour supporter.
And, no, I don’t support the monarchy or the psychopathic awards system that we have.
Just for curiosity’s sake – does anyone know what happened with John Key’s invitation on Waitangi Day 2014 for Joel Bristow, or other representative of the deepsea drilling protestors to go to Wellington and have their minds changed?
I have’t seen the PM out protesting
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/RM-Labour.png
Very interesting graph. Obviously not predictive but disconcerting. Democracy is helped when there is a competent opposition.
Another interesting graph.
Democracy is helped when there is a competent media.
Democracy is helped when there is a healthy economy that benefits everyone, not just the 0.0001%.
https://hitlersingleptystate.wikispaces.com/file/view/image14.gif/295733426/image14.gif
Democracy is dead in NZ we are operating under an elected Dictatorship at present?
I’m heartened that slowly, ever so slowly some people on here are coming to see that the problem with the left in NZ isn’t solely John Keys fault
Says a troll to a troll….
You’re not amusing enough to be considered a troll
you think you’re amusing?
No but then I don’t think I’m a troll either
Another suffering from SPS perhaps?
That is amusing .
A bridge to far.
“I’m heartened that slowly, ever so slowly some people on here are coming to see that the problem with the left in NZ isn’t solely John Keys fault”
This is a “straw man” argument. Nobody claims that the left’s problems are John Key’s fault.
But he is still a piss-poor PM.
Well yes I concede I could have written that better. I guess a better way of putting it would be instead to say that some on here are starting to see that maybe the problem with Labour are predominantly internal
It seemed to me that some on here would prefer to make excuses for Labours poor performance rather then look within
CV a notable exception of course
You would say that, because the war a tory really likes to see is one where the workers fight each other and the tories collect profits from both sides.
The historical lesson you want us to forget is united we stand, divided we fall.
That’s just a little grandiose don’t you think
I’d say that McFlock was spot on. The Tories are here to try and split the Left apart so that they can win.
Well I can’t spoken for everyone on the right but for me I want to see Labour improve and this is why:
At the moment National is coasting along very middle of the road, don’t scare the horses because it doesn’t have to do anything to win, it doesn’t have to do anything that might upset some of the demographics
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
NZ need Labour to be strong so that National can come up with some policy because at the moment Nationals coasting
Holy crap PR I basically agree with what you are saying here.
(Having said that I believe that Labour is now culturally and organisationally incapable of improving. I currently rate a 50/50 chance that they will get less than 25% in 2017).
Well I say Labour but really I just use them because they’re the biggest left wing party in NZ at the moment
I’m taking the rough estimate in NZ that to get into power under MMP 35% is the bare minimum you’d be looking at and even then that opens you up to some massive amounts of horse trading
Yep, a 35% election result for Labour will leave Winnie grinning from ear to ear. (Especially as an election result that high for Labour suggests that the Greens will fall to 10% or less).
HC CV PR OK!
It’d make for interesting times as it sounds like based on that Labour would still need both the Greens and Winston
It’d be time for the Greens to demand some concessions I reckon
If National tried anything other than Labour-lite they’d lose. As John Banks said: If I wear my policy on my sleeve, I won’t get elected.
The same truly does apply to National. If their MPs and supporters got the policies that they truly want then they’d never get elected.
The real problem that we have is that Labour is trying to be National while wearing red.
Desperate times call for desperate measures but at the moment National doesn’t have to worry
PR, the problem for the right is partially as you describe, but the other factor is the failure of ACT.
Everyone in the beltway rates young whatsisname, and he’s amiable enough, but he can’t shift them polls.
His decision to not take a cabinet role is part of it all too. Got praised by the likes of DPF et al, but really, he’s opting to have less influence.
the politics around why that decision is made is the politics that supporters of a more active Right wing government need to get to grips with.
Given:
National has swallowed all of the right bar ACT’s rump and whoever the hell it is that votes for Colin Craig,
and the widely accepted general icompetence of the Labour party
and the personal liekability of their leader,
why aren’t they doing more?
you claim that it’s down to Labour sucking and not giving them udeas to rail agin, but that doesn;t really hold a lot of water (it holds some, but not much)
Labour, for all their faults, have produced ideas in oppo, they then abandon them after losing an election, or watch National roll out weaker versions to placate the electorate. (this is a net huge plus for the left as national is giving the concepts of the policy a big old tick for further development).
My point is, that of you want National to not be Labour light, the right needs to get a threat to National from the right happening. At the moment, the ‘right wing’ is either completely smitten with National and not seeing sense, or this is as far right wing as the NZ electorate gets.
I have to admit I’m surprised that Act hasn’t managed to rise in the polls, I thought they might be around 3-4% by now
But yes I see your point
Whereas I’m amazed that anyone still votes Act. They’ve had their heyday back in the 1980s and everyone now knows that their policies do too much damage. It’s why National still put on the mask of being Labour-lite.
Some are starting to realise that Labour were relevant when working people were hard done by. Those days are gone and so the need to support Labour is diminishing year by year.
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/RM-Labour.png
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
The internal problems of Labour mean that a white middle aged professional centrist candidate cannot be selected without the allegiance of the many factions within Labour who are so unlike the general public. The quality of Labour candidates is thus vastly inferior to the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. Being put on the list is no guarantee of a seat. Andrew Little just scraped into parliament after the specials. At least he will feel safer as long as he remains leader. It will only get worse for Labour as the deselection campaigns get underway. Their low poll of 2014 is not their nadir. Those votes will go in all directions but clearly many are drifting to support National.
“On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer”
Only one wee problem with that. We can’t all be “rich” can we.
The top 5% are earning more than the bottom 50%, and actually society is not structured to have a lot of “rich”.
You right wingers are a greedy self serving bunch, and you know what, eventually the low income and those in the middle (the aspirational ‘hope we get some too’) will wake up to the sham that Key is selling and realise it.
Good God – the first thing key did was give $100 a week to the top 10%, and sold that the rest can have $10 or so. Nice fucking scam. 7 years on they are trying to move the poor out of Auckland with $3000 payments to regions with no jobs, as a way of dealing with the housing crisis.
What a total sham.
You right wing wankers don’t give one iota for this in retail, gas stations, cleaners, bus drivers, you WANT them all to get fuck all so you have have it all.
Fisiani – your nasty greedy tone and posts post after post stand you out above almost all of the horrid rightees
^ This!
Well said.
+1
+2, go Appleboy!
We can’t all be “rich” can we
On this we agree, some people don’t want to be rich because they’re happy with what they have, some aren’t born lucky enough to have the advantages to become but then some aren’t born with the drive to become rich and some don’t want to pay the cost of becoming rich
Becoming rich is largely a choice, for some its easier and for others its harder but its still a choice
We can all be rich if we define wealth in human ways rather than sociopathic ones.
Fair enough, we’re all free to define rich for ourselves
Yes, we are, but that doesn’t make it real.
heh
I recently heard an alternative definition to “billionaire”: someone who has improved the lives of a billion people, even in some little way.
Interesting goal to go for. Much better than just getting a billion bucks.
If that’s what makes you happy then by all means go for it
The day I need moral guidance or encouragement from you would be a very interesting day indeed.
I have no problem with people becoming rich, as long as they don’t create a system where other people become poor as a means for them to become rich.
+1. Well said, appleboy. My jaw simply dropped at these two sentences: There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money. On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
30% is a hell of a big percentage to be kicked to the kerb and spat on. And as for 70% wanting to be richer, since when has “git rich” expressed the highest human aspiration? Oh for one of those old-fashioned right wingers who thought they owned the copyright on decency – I might not agree with them but at least I could respect the fact that their view involved a conception of the greater good.
That 30% of the adult population is pretty much the same 30% which has given up on voting and participating in our political system.
Not a coincidence, I suspect.
Who is kicking to the kerb and spitting on??????
How can you possibly read that into my words.
i was not even being disparaging. do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money. If so what percentage do you reckon it is?
Such people exist of course – just not on the Left. And they’ll take from the poor faster than they’ll take from the rich. Just have to watch National’s attacks on beneficiaries to see that.
Draco let me quote you what the Finance Minister said in the House.
Hon BILL ENGLISH: Our tax and transfer system is highly redistributive, and the number of people paying income tax is surprisingly small. The lowest-income 43 percent of households currently receive more in income support than they pay in income tax. The 1.3 million households with incomes under $110,000 a year collectively pay no net tax—that is, their total income support payments match their combined income tax. The top 10 percent of households contribute over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers—over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers. This system is highly redistributive and we believe it is fair.
The rich give a fair share to the poor – which part of the quote is hard to understand or do you think their contribution should be even more than 70%.
as for attacks on beneficiaries , What part of “The biggest rise in benefits in a generation” constitute attack.
Instead of slogans can you explain why you think the rich do not give to the poor when clearly they do and how raising benefits is an attack. It’s like I’ve wandered into an asylum.
No they don’t, the rich steal from the poor. That’s how capitalism works and it’s worked that way for thousands of years. It’s what causes it to always fail.
Watch the video
Draco stop using slogans and simply answer the question. Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of taxI if so why and how much.
I’m not using slogans – you are as you usually do because you really don’t understand what’s happening.
We have to get rid of the rich. That’s not just about income but also about ownership.
I would like to see you explain, in non-disparaging terms, the difference between your 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money and the 70% who want the chance to be richer. Both want to be richer, by your account, and both must get money from somewhere if they are to do so.
Here’s how I see it: I think that the current system privileges wealth extractors over wealth creators. The latter might just lead to the tide that raises all boats, the former certainly does not. The eagerness of the already wealthy to get their claws on state infrastructure that comes with a guaranteed cash flow is one example of what I mean by wealth extractor – nothing of is value added, but an existing cash flow is diverted toward a privately owned pocket. Being privately owned, this piece of infrastructure then becomes answerable to the shareholder (so the wealthy) over the public good. The 30% under such conditions are the victims of this form of economic extraction, being removed from consideration by the public-to-private transference and in no position to defend themselves.
Draco
the rich steal from the poor IS a slogan.
You want to get rid of the rich. Like in Cambodia?. Like in North Korea or like in Albania?
No it’s not – it’s a statement of fact. National’s slogans, which you come on here repeating such as the BS about people being envious of the rich, aren’t connected to reality.
Yes.
None of those got rid of their rich which is why they’re still capitalist in form, structure and oppression.
“Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of tax…”
Is that the top 10 percent of of people who declare all their income, or the top 10 percent who accumulate the money?
Can’t answer the question if the definitions aren’t clear.
The thing is, if fisi’s little 30% social experiment were imposed on NZ, as I’m sure it would be, next claim would be 50%. In America the hopeless poor are about 60%.
It’s like Bill English’s 5% structural unemployment, once he instituted it it became the lower baseline, and unemployment varied above it.
“the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. ”
Hilarious. Wastes of space like Melissa Lee would appreciate your faith.
Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive then Labours, I will admit there are some in National that have reached for use by date and then some
For some time now Labour has been picking candidates in accordance with where its own internal logic, internal factions and internal culture currently sit – but which results in a serious mismatch with what the electorate is looking for.
I remember reading that in the 1970s UK Labour still had very many MPs from coal mining and trades/shop floor backgrounds.
Today there are almost none, instead, Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured.
“Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured”.
Oxford grads in the Labour party are hardly new, and Eton isn’t that uncommon
Since 1935 there have been 11 leaders of the party.
Of these 6 went to Oxford. Attlee, Gaitskell, Wilson, Foot, Blair and Miliband.
What has happened in British Labour in the same as in the Conservative party there and the New Zealand Labour Party.
Their candidates go through student politics, get a job working in an MP’s or a Party office, may work for a Cabinet Minister, find an electorate and go into Parliament. Many of them have never held a normal job in their life.
It happens a bit with National but not quite as much. Paula Bennett is one example.
Those rich advantaged kids have reversed the film named Eating the Rich to eaton’ the poor!
You are looking back a long way with that comment PR.
“Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive”
A gender neutral version of the 1972 National Party campaign slogan.
“Man for man, the stronger team”.
That one, although the shambles of the later Kirk/Rowling Governments showed that it was probably true, didn’t work out too well in the campaign did it?
National’s line up is almost entirely corrupt.
Thinking about it I suppose that could be considered fairly impressive.
I don’t know mate – any shambles with Brownlee involved in it is a pretty hopeless mess.
Un-PC – ‘a not-so-pretty hopeless mass.
Mustn’t mention electorates like northland, eh…
I wonder if Winston has set up an electorate office yet, and if he has, has he ever visited it?
Anyone here live in the electorate and have you ever seen him at a public function?
Awww, you can’t google it yourself and find the electorate office in Kerikeri?
Anyway, I was referring to the previous Northland MP, one of the “high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National”.
National’s bringing them back.
And they all vote National.
It’s just another point where reality contradicts the delusional beliefs of the right-wing.
DTB
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
And they all vote National.
Can’t speak for all, but there seems an insatiable attraction for more, for bigger, amongst people who have acquired wealth and they are wedded to it ‘to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or worse’…ad infinitum.
They are wannabe John Keys
Fisi I think you are right Labour aren’t sure where their support base is especially after Roger Douglas took them hard right even further right than National?
That figure does not include gst or corporate taxes poor pay more GST than the rich or corporates who shift the cost GST back to the customers.
Or go on overseas trips operate Swiss bank accounts or don’t pay any tax like like google Facebook Amazon etc.
Fisanal a paid spin doctor of the right.
Employers not paying a living wage are being subsidized by the socold wealthier earners.
The speculators are being subsidized by those on higher declared incomes.
The corporate tax evaders are also being subsidized.
Pollutors the same.
The debt financier’s who Bill English has borrowed $80 billion+ for election bribes for his parties tax cuts are being subsidized $5.8 billion a year.
Labour is not the whole opposition. You may have heard of this thing called MMP.
A weak Labour won’t be able to cobble together a government, Labour needs to be reasonably strong and if the Greens ever want to get into parliament then Labour need to be really strong
Nope. Time for the Left to give up on Labour and vote either Greens, Mana or IP.
Ok then but its still the same, there needs to be at least one strong left wing party
Why?
Numbers really, the left are on what 40% at the moment so if Labour crumble its not really going to attract any votes from the right so the total percentage isn’t to increase all that much
But if you have a strong party, a party that can convince people it can lead then that’s what will attract non-voters to vote for them (and swing voters of course)
That’s illogical BS.
A few parties that show that they can work together can, and will, get votes. The problem we’ve been having is that, Labour especially, the parties on the Left have been attacking each other rather than working together.
Yes they might be able to get some swing votes and maybe even from the missing million but I’m thinking Labour doesn’t want to cut the pie any smaller then it needs to
Short sighted though that may be
Electorate seats.
If the left were composed of several competitive small parties without one being clearly dominant, there would need to be a lot of pre-election co-operation to avoid splintered left votes in electorates. If National won enough extra electorates due to fragmented “left” votes, then it could end up with enough overhang to skew the proportionality of Parliament. It’s very unlikely now, but as there get to be fewer list seats and more electorate seats as the population increases, it becomes more possible.
True but they could always work together. And then, once they have power, change electorate voting to preferential voting. This would allow all parties to put up candidates with the most preferred winning rather than the one with the most votes which is often a significant minority.
@Andre.
Your proposal is theoretically possible but it looks extremely unlikely.
In practice the National Party would have to win at least 61 of the 64 electorates they contest.
Surely there are going to be at least 4 Labour MPs who could win one of the General electorates?
By the way the number of electorate seats doesn’t go up just because the population increases. It goes up only if the percentage increase in the North Island, or in the Maori roll, goes up faster than the rate of growth in the South Island. That is because the South Island is guaranteed 16 general electorates.
Another example of the TPPA as being more of a trade restrictions agreement than a free trade agreement: the NZ Library Association’s standing committee on copyright is concerned about the impacts of making copyright provisions more restrictive. Apart from concerns about underestimation of the cost to NZ of the additional restrictions, there’s this about the prospect of over-hasty legislation:
In particular, bringing New Zealand law into line with US law could prove problematic if provisions favouring rights holders (such as extension of term) are adopted, but exemptions that US law affords are not also adopted. However, because there will not be sufficient time for MBIE to extensively consider the effects of broadly-worded exemptions, it is more likely that any exemptions will be narrow in wording and limited in effect.
In other words, the nett effect could be that we end up with all the draconian proscriptions of US copyright law but few of the exemptions, making us even more restrictive than the US.
The above quote is from an email, so no link – however, you can obtain more info from the committee by writing to copyright@lianza.org.nz.
They are quite correct – NZ lacks exemptions for things like satire and parody, let alone other aspects of fair use.
Let’s buy a little piece of heaven and donate it to NZ
https://givealittle.co.nz/project/abeltasmanbeach2016
Eyes and ears open for the start of the political year here.
– Winston Peters’ opening speech for the year tonight
– Post-Cabinet signals this afternoon
– Prime Minister’s first big speech, in Auckland tomorrow afternoon
– Labour Party’s first big speech on Saturday
– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?
Anyway, let the games begin.
TPP Auckland meeting and livestream tonight 😉
Rod Oram on TPP: Well worth the listen!
“Business commentator Rod Oram on the recently available New Zealand research papers on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, and New Zealand’s role in the TPPA.”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/201786811/business-commentator-rod-oram
“– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?”
Oh dear. It shows how irrelevant the Green Party is, doesn’t it.
I gather they had a speech today. Even people who follow politics quite closely, like yourself, didn’t know about it.
I wonder how many people went to it. Outside of Green MPs and party staffers of course who would have been conscripted.
Anyone here go to the speech? That is anyone not on the public payroll as a Green staffer or MP.
Did anyone hear Stephen Franks’s bumptious and
ignorant performance on Jim Mora’s program yesterday?
The Panel, RNZ National, Monday 25 January 2016
Jim Mora, Stephen Franks, Josie Pagani
There seems to be no code of behavior in place at Radio New Zealand. Some years ago, Bomber Bradbury was banned from this program for the crime of criticizing the Prime Minister’s loutish and irresponsible behavior in parliament. Yet Franks, whose disrespectful and contemptuous behavior is far worse, continues to be a guest.
This afternoon, Franks was frothing with indignation about state house tenants who have the cheek to complain about substandard conditions. His rage extended to the afternoon’s first guest, Otago University Professor Michael Baker; Franks treated him with derision, referring to him repeatedly as “these guys”, in between his frequent imprecations of state house tenants.
Luckily for Franks, the other guest was not the superior Dita Di Boni, who has firmly put him in his place in the past, but the giggling Josie Pagani.
I really haven’t got the heart to transcribe Franks’s nonsense today, but aficionados of bad radio and cranky shouting should click on this link…..
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/thepanel/20160125
OMG! Morrissey – I don’t know how you do it!
Listening to both Franks and Pagani!
It would make me want to spew.
The so called “Panel” is an appalling programme – hosted by a sanctimonious prick and has not merit what so ever. A complete waste of space-time continuum.
Evidently Paula put the boot into the PI’s yesterday.
He’s an angry fellow and his stroke is well overdue, but he had a point about incomplete/selective surveys. Still an utter dick though.
Latest news heading on Radionz.
Putin is corrupt, says US Treasury
Russian President Vladimir Putin during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Antalya, Turkey, November 15, 2015. Michael Klimentyev/RIA Novosti
The US Treasury has told a BBC investigation that it considers Russian President Vladimir Putin to be corrupt.
‘Pot meet kettle.’
For those of you who are taking a responsible approach to social drinking
by choosing the very refreshing low alcohol “citrus” beers.
If you are on Statins, you should be aware that the “citrus” apparently includes grapefruit juice.
Well now, this is interesting
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11579449
He indicated he was hoping for redemption within caucus. “Politics is a rollercoaster. You know that and I’ve been around long enough to know that.”
Could be Cunliffe v Robertson 2 (or is that 3?) after the next election…
I suspect there is another reason that is much more relevant.
I think he has found that he is quite unemployable outside of Parliament. To be blunt there is probably no-one who will give him a job. This is the only way he has any chance of retaining the lifestyle to which he has become accustomed.
I’d say you’re on the money there alwyn.
Also goes a long way in explaining why it’s so hard to get rid of old Labour mps.
I reckon the Labour party should make a rule where the maximum term for a Mp is 4 terms with a clause that this time period can be extended by the party membership vote only.
That way you’d be able to ditch the leeches like Mallard or the unpopular ones like Cunllife but keep the ones performing well.
3 moneykeys in a row – all typing to create a dictionary – so cute
What a great pseudonym you chose.
Marty “The film depicts thirty-six hours in the life of the main character: 34 year-old, bug-eyed Marty”
and Mars.
That’s of course the Mars Bar. The one that is full of nuts.
ka boom! well done alwyn comedy genius – well pretty good – sorta dated ha ha – nah – hey at least you had a go
But BM might have a sensible suggestion there Marty. Not all left suggestions are workable, and not all right ones are hopeless.
I disagree grey. bm sows seeds of discord – some subtle, some obvious. I think right wing solutions are hopeless and I do agree that a few left wing suggestions may be unworkable in our current system.
I don’t think Cunliffe can be bothered with all that shit again, he will concentrate on being a politican, the media crucified him. He is too intelligent to waste his energy on another leadership battle. Let Robertson take the shit from the Tory MSM media aka Mike Hoskings and Paul Henry.
I don’t think the ego of the Cunliffe will settle for merely being an electorate MP, I think the Cunliffe has his sights set higher
it’s not just ego – it’s ability. And Cunliffe has it in spades. Problem is though, Cunliffe is not as cunning on the playing field as GR2020 is. He has also been in the beltway a bit too long now.
LOL 😈
Serves him right
Know about this?
Screening tomorrow night in Auckland:
http://www.aucklandlibraries.govt.nz/EN/Events/Events/Pages/aplacetocallhomescreening.aspx
Briar’s 2015 film A Place to Call Home provides a revealing examination of New Zealand’s state housing situation.
The documentary tells the stories of two women who share the same passionate values and deep concern for the vulnerable and often voiceless members of their respective communities.
Ironically, they find themselves in a tug of war where the creation of a much needed community housing project in the Far North is dependent on the dismantling of another equally valuable and deeply entrenched community in Glen Innes, Auckland.
A Place to Call Home is raw and brave and explores a topic that is extremely relevant in today’s environment of unaffordable housing and social reforms.
_________________________________
For the public record – I believe that State (and Council) housing is PUBLIC, and ‘social housing’ is PRIVATE.
I oppose the privatisation of STATE (and COUNCIL) housing by (private) ‘social housing’ providers.
I support the directly-affected State tenants in their fight to STOP the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
Unlike the Co-Convenor of the Child Poverty Action Group, and Salvation Army employee Alan Johnson, who supports the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
How do I know this?
Because he told me to my face.
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption / anti-privatisation Whistle-blower’
2016 Auckland Mayoral candidate.
Penny Bright
2016 Auckland Mayoral candidate.
Weekly Economics Podcast – Inequality
https://soundcloud.com/weeklyeconomicspodcast/inequality
The euthanasia submissions. If you care about people and them having a right to decide when to die when they are terminally ill or in pain without much life to enjoy and wish to disembark in their own time while they can still smile at others and enjoy knowing them, then please follow the guide below and support quality euthanasia. Submissions finish on MONDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2016 AND CAN GO IN UNTIL 23.59.
(Remember 1/2 is the anniversary of various provinces so perhaps do it the day before in case you want to be out and about enjoying life.)
Euthanasia submission end Jan –
http://www.ves.org.nz/news/3520054
and
you can remind yourself of Lecretia’s Seales wishes.
http://lecretia.org/you-can-help
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/76243294/euthanasia-debate-the-international-context
You know, it’s still too damn hard to make a submission to a select committee. You’d think that they were making it so as to dissuade people.
So I was looking at this
http://www.theonion.com/article/marxists-apartment-a-microcosm-of-why-marxism-does-1382
but then I scrolled a bit more and this was even funnier
http://www.theonion.com/article/congress-allocates-90-million-protect-remaining-ea-52210
(Save Kenny!)
The first article, and it’s photo look just like Labour’s fish and chip brigade of the 1980s
http://www.michaelbassett.co.nz/archive_fc80.htm
The second story is a disgrace. The Eagles deserve much more than that. They should get at least as much as Obama will get for his Presidential Library. At least people will still listen to The Eagles. Can you imagine anyone reading through a hundred million pages of the Obama archives?
I prefer Kenny Loggins to The Eagles, at least his songs were fun and you don’t hear third-rate buskers at markets murdering his songs
That’s not really the point of a Presidential ‘Library’.
No a Presidential Library is MEANT to be a repository of documents but they have become a cross between a library and a theme park.
Have a look at some of the things in Reagan’s one.
Air Force I is there (well an old one)
There is a Ronald Reagan Pub
They have got a Presidential motorcade.
and a President’s helicopter.
http://www.reaganfoundation.org/DETAILS_F.ASPX?P=LM2023EAF1&H1=3&H2=7&LM=LIBRARYANDMUSEUM&ARGS_A=CMS&ARGS_B=34&ARGSB=N&TX=18&SW=18
They also have temporary exhibits including one on American Football
http://www.reaganfoundation.org/details_f.aspx?p=LM2024ETEX&h1=0&h2=0&lm=libraryandmuseum&args_a=cms&args_b=35&argsb=N&tx=3171&sw=3171
Clinton’s isn’t quite as extreme but it is definitely close.
There are probably some earlier ones that are more restrained.
ps. I was only joking about the Eagles getting more taxpayer money than the Obama Library. He is going to have to find a lot of generous donors who will put up the money. On the other hand the Eagles aren’t going to get any money either.
More evidence that luck is the arbiter of business success.
Suck it up, wingnuts.
And?
weren’t you the one upthread saying being rich is a choice?
Congratulations to Bill English on his eighth year of miserable and unrelenting economic failure. If we must have crazed far-right governments from time to time the least we must ask is that the useless assholes learn to balance the books.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/64004654/Budget-deficit-worse-than-forecast
@stuart
He wasn’t a complete failure, don’t forget the “surplus” last year and the generous tax payer funded entitlement to live in his wifes property for the last 7/8 years, yes he’s done very well for himself.
(sarc)
Balancing the books will be the task of the next non National govt to take power, this is the historical cycle NZ has followed for decades.
There are too many “sheeple” and not enough real people like most of those who contribute to ts.
Why does the Left always insist on a Budget Surplus as a sign of economic competence?
Are you really daring English to go down the road of slashing Government spending and enforcing austerity through the nation?
Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.
Why would you encourage that?
Hey CV
“Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.”
You have a funny definition of a surplus and how it should be derived, the scenario which you adamantly describe is the one which English used to produce the surplus he boasted about, but normal surpluses are usually a result of a well run economy where the money is plowed back into the pockets of many, one of the criteria for a well run, healthy economy is near full employment, not increasing unemployment, for which is the current situation.
During the Clark years, the Govt then was contributing 40c of every dollar spent in NZ and a surplus every year and very low unemployment , Key swore to get that down to 20c and now look where we are today.
The economic and social policies of the Key govt will only result in massive increases in debt as they have failed to achieve the basic fundamentals of a well run economy and one of the main failures is the deliberately high unemployment.
Under the Clark govt you saw considerable redistribution of wealth from the haves to the havenots, we now have the exact opposite (redistribution from the havenots to the haves) and the exact opposite result, the proof of this is there now for every one to see, increasing poverty, extreme wealth, and high unemployment and a deficit and a massive increasing debt.
From your analysis above, I certainly wouldn’t take any advice from you as a financial adviser.
Jim Mora claims ACT’s leader is “cogent”; sadly for him,
neither of today’s guests is stupid enough to endorse that provocation.
The Panel, RNZ National, Tuesday 26 January 2016
Jim Mora, Mai Chen, Bernard Hickey
Today’s Panelists are several notches higher on the intelligence scale than yesterday’s dire offering [1], but the major problem persists: it’s the same host. About 4:15, after the long and tedious introductions have finally come to an end, the host decides to make the first of his glib and shallow statements for the day….
JIM MORA: [affecting a serious tone] The ACT leader David Seymour makes the point, and it seems to be a cogent one, when he says “Those who grumble about a lack of a capital gains tax should look at the ten least affordable markets in the Demographia Survey. All of them except Auckland are there despite having a capital gains tax.”
Mai Chen doesn’t even bother to snort in derision, but her fellow guest manages to say, in an exquisitely indirect way, that David Seymour is an ignoramus….
BERNARD HICKEY: Hmmmm. The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.
The rest of the program, unfortunately, seems to be as dire and as determinedly trivial as ever. Mora has just attempted to manipulate his guests into saying something disrespectful about Kanye West; neither of them indulged him. He should have tried it yesterday: Stephen Franks would have launched into an insane racist fugue for five minutes.
[1] http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-26012016/#comment-1123541
What Hickey actually said, and you quote it was
“The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.”
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It is Hickey saying I don’t like that example he came up with. He hasn’t the slightest idea of the facts but he’ll try and deflect attention.
He even admits he hasn’t the faintest idea what he is talking about when he admits “which we don’t know”. All that means is HE doesn’t know.
Hickey was never one to let his ignorance get in the way of his political bias.
David Seymour can’t even park a car properly so I’m not sure what you expect him to know about the housing crisis.
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It’s saying it in an arch and subtle manner. Every listener—including your good self—would have understood quite clearly that Hickey has no respect for ACT’s risible “leader”.
Hickey has no respect for anyone except Hickey.
So what? Hickey is just a hack journalist isn’t he.
?
Bernard Hickey is a solid financial commentator and a serious journalist.
I would say he had been a serious journalist, but that was a fair while ago.
His financial commentary is pretty risible though.
Proof Alwyn you have no credibilify other than being a proffessional whinger for the far right.Bernard Hickey goes against what most big banks economist commentary because big banks just want a speculative market that loads every one up with debt.
NZ govt debt stands at $120 billion and rising at $ 27 million per day.
I am for full and open discussion on economic matters
“a proffessional whinger for the far right”?
No I’m not a professional when I comment here. I am merely trying to bring some knowledge to the ignorant. A very hard task with some of them though.
Did you hear Jordan Williams on the Panel today?
His intervention was of the sort that usually gets you to transcribe Mora’s dismal show!
I missed it, Paul, but I’m sure I know exactly what he said.
And…. shouldn’t he have been carrying Whaleoil’s bags somewhere instead of making a fool of himself on radio?
https://www.national.org.nz/news/news/media-releases/detail/2016/01/21/Benefit-numbers-continue-steady-yearly-decline Some great news for some of the poorest in society
Seriously?
On the day it breaks that one of those bludging beneficiaries off the pension is a veteran whose benefit they cut because of a trespass arrest, you bastards are gloating about it?
Just a comment from someone who is sick of this country being dealt to by Mr Key and his crony capitalist mates.
Can you stop getting sucked in by the lies in relation to income and tax paid, ie the top 10% of earners pay 70% of the tax.
It’s the top 10% of the wealthy that pay next to no tax you need to focus on.
I am sick of Fisiani and others spreading the lie that (implied) the wealthiest 10% pay 70% of the tax.
It is a lie and stamp it out.
The wealthiest 10% pay far less than 10% of all the tax.
Don’t rush into TPP, US critics tells Kiwis
A leading American critic of the Trans Pacific Partnership, Lori Wallach, said New Zealand should not rush into the TPP because there were not the numbers to pass it in the United States Congress.
It was not a done deal and could yet become a “5000-page doorstop.”
She could not understand why the New Zealand Government was pushing the deal so strongly as it was not a done deal.
It had very little upside for New Zealand and enormous downsides, she told a meeting of about 1000 at the Auckland Town Hall tonight.
Yet New Zealand had been one of the most enthusiastic.
“So I thought it was really important to dig out of the snow and come and say ‘guys this is far from a done deal and your Government is trying to run you guys towards a cliff.
“This is no done deal – this is likely to be an undone deal. ”
New Zealand might change its laws to meet the terms of an agreement that might never get finished.
“And you’ll have screwed yourselves over by passing that law,” she said.
“So for God’s sake don’t go rushing into this because in all likelihood it ain’t going to happen.”
Lori Wallach is the director of the Washington-based Public Citizen Global Trade Watch Group and tonight began a speaking tour with Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey against the TPP.
She suggested that discontent in the United States on issues such as the period of exclusivity for biologic drugs or barring tobacco companies from investor-state dispute settlement could be changed in side-letters between the US and other countries.
That was how binding changes could be made to an agreement without opening up the text for renegotiation.
She also said the investor-dispute settlement (ISDS) rules were an enormous risk.
She disputed the New Zealand Government’s claim that ISDS – allowing disputes to be settled by private tribunal – would not attract cases.
While the US has had 50 agreements with ISDS and had had hardly any challenges over 50 years, there were now more than 50 a year. And under TPP – an agreement of 12 countries – it would double its exposure with 9500 new corporations from TPP countries being a possible new threat.
And while New Zealand had had no ISDS cases taken against it, it could face exposure to 1608 United States companies – and the US was the most litigious country in the world.
“This is brand new liability. So when your Government says ‘we’ve never been sued,’ I say ‘hold on to your wallet and your tax dollars because if TPPA happens, it is just a matter of time.”
“A propaganda exercise”
Jane Kelsey, New Zealand’s leading campaigner against TPP over the five years it was negotiated, took her place at the lectern with a stuffed toy – a “dead rat” she has called Tim, after former Trade Minister Tim Grose has talked of New Zealand having to swallow dead rats.
She said the national interest analysis on the TPP released today by the Government was “devoid of any independent insight” because it was drafted by the officials who negotiated the agreement.
“It is nothing more than a propaganda exercise,” she said.
She said the $2.7 billion estimated increase in gdp by 2030 would be, on current growth rates, a mere 0.9 per cent of gdp in 2030.
Next Thursday the Trade Minister of the TPP countries would sign the deal – but that was the end of it.
The national interest assessment would be presented to the House and legislation drafted – but it could not come into force for at least two years.
“We need to make our voices heard from that for at least the next two years.”
Politicians from Labour, the Greens, New Zealand First and the Maori Party spoke as well.
Grant Robertson: Agreement undermines NZ’s sovereignty
Labour finance spokesman Grant Robertson the Government had undertaken a “secretive, exclusory, unaccountable process driven by the galactic ego and arrogance of Tim Groser.”
He quoted from the national interest analysis the sentence he said identified the source of Labour’s objection.
“The agreement places new limitations on Government’s ability to modify New Zealand’s policy settings to ensure they are appropriate for our domestic circumstances.”
“That is the nub of the problem here,” he said. It undermined sovereign rights.
It could, for example, prevent a Government legislation to get proper public broadcasting.
He said the agreement undermined New Zealand’s sovereignty and while there were modest economic benefits from TPP “you cannot put a price on our democratic and constitutional freedoms to make our own law.”
“It’s about power
Greens’ co-leader Metiria Turei said the point of the TPP was “to take power away from democratically elected Government, to give it to multinational corporations” and where their interests clashed with the interests of New Zealand, the investors interests would come out on top. “It’s not about trade; it’s about power.”
Marama Fox: Issue unifying for Kiwis
Maori Party co-leader Marama Fox said the issue had been unifying because now people might understand how Maori felt to have lost their sovereign rights.
“We have been fighting this fight for 175 years.”
The party objected to the Government having the power in the TPP to interpret what rights were under the Treaty of Waitangi.
There had been an irrational fear in New Zealand that if you give Maori more rights it would take away others’ rights, or that Maori “might do to us what we have done to them.”
“”That is wrong. We want to live in a country where we recognise our duality of nationhood, that we are here as partners.”
“Undermining NZ business”
New Zealand First’s Fletcher Tabuteau claimed that New Zealand First had been the most vocal against the TPP and the most consistent.
He said ISDS would give multi-national corporates an unfair advantage over New Zealand companies in New Zealand because only they would have access to ISDS.
He suggested that minimum wage measures or environmental laws passed by the Government could trigger the ISDS and let overseas companies sue the Government but New Zealand companies would have to “like it and lump it.”
“It will undermine New Zealand business into the future.”
He said National still had the numbers to approve the national interest analysis but opponents of the TPP needed to talk to National MPs.
“Some of those National MPs must fold under your pressure.”
Lori Wallach has public meetings planned in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin.
– NZ Herald
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11580056