John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
I am sure you find it all very interesting, and will have great fun finding some way to blame John Key for the gentleman’s failings.
However. Is it not true that John Key had left the company before this fellow became the CEO?
Prior to becoming President of the firm in 2001 O’Neal was never responsible for any part of the company that included John Key’s bailiwick. He may, as president been Key’s titular superior but it could not have been for more than a few months.
Key became an MP in 2002. O’Neal became the CEO in 2003. Your numbers really don’t line up do they?
Perhaps you should consider a more reasonable proposition. The company failed because they lost their most competent people. People like John Key for example.
Or do you prefer conspiracies?
But the thing I am commenting on is this statement.
“There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.”
How do you work out that John Key was his protégé?
Sure O’Neal was incompetent. That is hardly a rare trait though is it?
However while John Key worked there they did very well, as you will probably agree. As you say “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”. Key however wasn’t there when they went downhill and your first sentence is irrelevant to him
“John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board …”
Key didn’t work under O’Neal except, possibly for a few months, while O’Neal was first in the President’s job. By the time he was CEO and Chairman of the Board Key was long gone.
I don’t see where I have got it wrong as you seem to imply.
As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001 http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.
He entered Parliament in July 2002.
O’Neal became CEO and Chairman in 2003.
In your words “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”
The problems seem to be after Key left the firm.
What part of the timeline do you think is wrong?
“As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001 http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.”
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
The Unilever man happens to be correct about taxing sugar, if nothing else. There’s no point in taxing sucrose while at the same time publishing dietary guidelines that recommend an obesity-generating diet consisting largely of other kinds of sugar or near-sugar, and having doctors, journalists, politicians and others constantly refer to the obesity-generating stuff by the misnomer “healthy food.” A sugar tax would be like putting a bandage on someone who’s cut an artery.
Meh. If ISDS were such a trump card, we’d have more to fear from tobacco companies overturning taxes on tobacco than we would about a non-existent tax on sucrose.
you mean like tobacco companies using deals with Asia and the Ukraine to sue the Australian government (and small, poor nations) about plain packaging laws?
Tobacco is different to sugar – tobacco is addictive, so a core chunk of users will simply pay more regardless of tax rate, to a certain degree. Doesn’t hugely impact the profit margin until they get really high or are used with other measures like quit support services.
Packaging is what affects sales. It reminds addicts trying to quit, and also affects market share.
Taxes on sugar is different, because cost is a major factor in food choices and production costs.
A reasonable run down from a left wing perspective of the year since Syriza gained power in Greece . I believe it pretty much happened as I predicted it would.
The lost sheep
By all means please keep us informed about the latest happenings in Greece. It is true one can be diverted from things that should be watched and followed. The world is coming apart under our fingers and people like yourself who make sure that they keep up with developments and pass that information on to the other interested people are of great, inestimable value.
I am a strong believer in the value of learning from mistakes wherever they occur, and thus avoiding repeating them ourselves. IMO opinion that is the way to prevent the world from falling apart.
A year on, the Syriza party is faithfully implementing the austerity policies that it once decried. It has been purged of its left wing and Tsipras has jettisoned his radicalism to stay in power at all costs.
Yep, the capitalists moved in and undemocratically imposed their ideas upon the Greeks. That’s what happens when we have dictatorships running things.
Syriza needed to default, drop out of the European Union and go back to their own currency. Anything else was going to have them doing what the capitalists told them.
The big boys have taken over its to late democracy has been unsurped.
Funnily enough Latent Smith has been pushing the same lines.
Saying that Key changing the flag and signing the TPPa is turning us into an outpost where we loose our sovereignty.
Sorry but its to late.
We are one of the last to fall into line.
Why doesn’t Andrew Little just SAY that Labour opposes the whole of the TPP?? He did not sound like a positive Leader just now, talking to Guyon Espiner. I felt very disappointed.
Why?
A caucus that includes Shearer and Goff and a party that never has renounced neo-liberalism.
Simple solutions.
Vote for a different party.
And communicate to the Labour leadership why you will not vote for them.
If they don’t stand against the TPP, they will stand against nothing.
I agree that if Little supports the TPP, he should be honest.
I think, though, that he is more conflicted than that.
He knows that the majority of Labour supporters are against the TPP and he also knows that the power brokers in the caucus are for it.
And so you end up with a debacle of an interview with Espiner.
Labour stands for very little if it can’t summon up the courage to vociferously oppose the TPP.
It is not just the power brokers in caucus, it is also the power of what Key calls “the club” that invites caution. It looks to me as if Little reckons he is more likely to prove successful in challenging particular issues within the agreement than he would be if he came out against the whole thing. You can point to Winny of course, as someone who has taken a stand against the whole thing, but Winny is not likely to come under such strong pressure from the big players, and his view expresses a long term stance that everyone knows about.
One reason we need a nonaligned left wing movement in this country is so that we can at least start to turn ourselves into a force whose endorsement or rejection of politicians is able to make a difference. The UK left has Corbyn in part because they had the People’s Assembly to put their weight behind him. Without such movements, politicians are at the mercy of the powerful like the rest of us.
You can’t because we’re all different, some people have the drive, some people are willing to sacrifice the short term for the long, some are born privileged and some are born with everything they need to succeed (some do and most don’t which is interesting…)
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Pure communism ends up being totalitarian just like capitalism.
A balance between them is the best outcome.
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
Humans are not civilized on the whole we just behave as nature behaves the strongest and fitest survive.
Because we have harnessed our envirment we think we are civilized but no we carry on behaving in a competitive way like in the rest of nature.
You are part of that competitive urge trying to push your tangent that everybody must be equal but no where in nature has that succeeded.
No where in human nature has that succeeded.
Show me some examples.
Utopian thinking just like the laissez faire brigade!
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
We happen to be intelligent and thus can over-ride our instincts but it must be learned. Of course, the greed and anti-social aspects of capitalism also have to be learned.
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Actually, it’s always worked before – then capitalism comes along and destroys what’s been built up.
Show me some examples.
I can show you 5000 years of collapse caused by capitalist systems including the USSR. China is about to join it. Thing is, that same 5000 years of collapse by capitalism is also joined with 5000 years of societies being built up via communism/socialism.
Societies simply do not work under competitive stresses.
I agree with you BM. A little bit of clarity goes a long way. Even if it’s not what you want to hear. There is nothing worse than listening to a stuttering ,stammering, waffling attempt at an answer that says beggar all. It’s like he’s trying to have a bob each way. Not sounding strong at all.
bloody good question…they must have a reason for this shambles…..but I’m buggered if I can see it…..this undermines Littles presentation of a gov in waiting
The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall and Andrew Little knows this but because Nationals pushing it hard and because most of Labours supporters don’t want it he has to walk a very precarious tightrope of placating his supporters while still leaving the door slightly ajar
So you have him bagging the TPPA and hinting that Labour will take NZ out of it which his supporters like but still not categorically stating that’s what he’ll do so he has an out when Labour gain power and the TPPA stays
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not in and Andrew Little (and probably a great deal of Labour) know this
Hence his stopping short of actually stating Labour will withdraw NZ from the TPPA which you’d think he’d say because it would please the people on the left
OK I’ll ask the question in a different way.
Can you provide some evidence that the positive outweigh the negatives for the TPP?
Evidence please, not opinion.
LOL
Well if you believe that rubbish you will believe anything?
Independent analysis say otherwise. Like a 0.2% increase in GDP per annum. You regard that as significant?
Tell me how many fairies are at the bottom of your garden?
I’m not wanting to make excuses but I’ve run out of plutonium and as well know plutonium is what is required to make the nuclear reaction to produce the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor
I tell you what as soon as I source some (or can predict where lightning is going to hit) I’ll jump in my time machine, go the future (because the TPPA hasn’t happened yet so its a tad difficult to produce something that hasn’t happened yet) and get you the evidence that will satisfy one and all
If the NZ economy will be worse off as a result if being in the TPPA then it should be a no brained to simply leave the agreement. This is what Little should have stated but didn’t for some reason.
I’m sure you know this, but situations change over time.
– Would NZ be better off if the TPP wasn’t happening?
– Would NZ be better off if TPP existed in a different form?
– Now that it does exist would NZ be better of if the country was sidelined?
My view is it trade agreements generally can be either good or bad. The TPP in its current form is bad for NZ. However, it would be difficult for NZ to be the only one in the Pacific region not signing.
– NZ can be worse off than now with the agreement, and
– worse off than now if NZ is the only Pacific rim country left out.
I guess Little is mulling over his own set of conundrums and working out strategies to address them.
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not
No we won’t as the studies have clearly shown. We going to be losing jobs and being forced to be a resources supplier to the powerful nations which means an increase in poverty and stagnation of our economy and society.
I’m not sure if Andrew could have said anything differently. The bottom line is that a Labour led government will vote down any attempt by corporate or foreign governments to interfere with our sovereign democratic decision making.
“The bottom line is that a Labour led government …….. ”
Really?
You managed to get that out of the drivel that Little was uttering?
I have heard more sense from the gurgling of a six month old baby that I heard from Little on morning report.
Surely there is someone in the Labour party who can do better than the current leader? Is it time to try Mallard?
Yes, he could have said it differently. He could have said:
“In government, we plan to legislate against selling land to foreigners. If that puts us in breach of the TPPA, then we will need to re-negotiate the TPPA. If we can’t re-negotiate, we will simply leave it”.
Seems like a reasonable thing to say to me. Of course National would immediately say that Labour are trying to sabotage the future of NZ etc.
guys, I do not want to keep repeating this again. Important sections of the Labour caucus are pro-TPPA.
Andrew Little’s statements have to reflect that, or his time as Leader is over.
As an experienced lawyer, Little knows exactly what he is communicating and how clear/unclear he wants it to be, and where he wants lots of ambiguity in his statements and arguments for future wiggle room.
“competent people who are not lawyers”
Half of Little’s problem is that he IS a lawyer.
He is trying so hard to avoid saying something he wouldn’t be able to wriggle out of that he ends up saying nothing intelligent at all.
Anyone else remember the 1985 Tom Paxton album?
“One million lawyers and other disasters” .
With the independent analysis of the TPP pointing to the prospect of an very minor and insignificant increase in GDP, the potential (as in all FTA) of the loss of jobs in our economy, the restrictions on Intellectual property, the inability to control foreign investment and the loss of sovereignty, the dangers imposed across all countries on the loss of indigenous rights (in complete contravention of the UNDIR), and the resultant dumbing down of our economic structure to one of resource supply, to say nothing of the surreptitious attack on The Treaty of Waitangi, our Nations founding Document, and the effect it will have on our ability to buy our medicines, one has to wonder just what it is that makes this so called “Deal” so attractive to Labour?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
I don’t wonder about it, I’m sure that’s exactly what they’re doing.
The reason Little cannot be up front and oppose the TPPA is because the US have put a gun to everyone’s head.
You are either for, or against us.
John Key has made this clear to Little, so what is he to do. When Key talks about his top draw, these are some of the things he is talking about.
Look at how frantically South Korea is trying to join the party after they missed the boat. They have China as their biggest trading partner, they hate Japan with an intensity you cannot believe, and the US only slightly less. They already have FTAs with 75% of the world’s GDP. Why would they want to join, but to be “on the right side”.
And then there is Taiwan. Same thing, but different of course.
Who hs been left out of the TTP and the TTIP?
The BRICS, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Turkey from within the top 20 countries in the world by GDP (assuming Euro as one country).
Then look at Carter’s words on TPP, and Obama during SOTU speech. The primary reason for the TTP and TTIP is to declare economic and possibly military war on the BRICS attacking the USD through trying to steal the world’s reserve currency.
Unfortunately, whether or not you like it, Little is not bigger than these powers.
That is why the TPP will be shoved down your throat, whether you like it or not.
Smart politics, NZF will take votes off natz and labour by saying it how it is and whilst I am no big fan of winnie he sticks to his guns which voters identify with.
Watch the natz go hard again on NZF as winnie could see shonky bog off back to bankstaland by galvanising the swinging dissaffected masses toward NZF
Winnie could also give two fingers to the left and go with National
He won’t and he’ll probably still get his knighthood. If there’s a politician anywhere that deserves a knighthood it would be Winston simply for hanging the fuck in there 😈
” he’ll probably still get his knighthood”
Is this another policy flip-flop that Little is proposing? Is he going to swing around and start supporting knighthoods. My, my. What will “she who must be obeyed” in New York have to say?
Just for curiosity’s sake – does anyone know what happened with John Key’s invitation on Waitangi Day 2014 for Joel Bristow, or other representative of the deepsea drilling protestors to go to Wellington and have their minds changed?
Another interesting graph.
Democracy is helped when there is a competent media.
Democracy is helped when there is a healthy economy that benefits everyone, not just the 0.0001%.
Well yes I concede I could have written that better. I guess a better way of putting it would be instead to say that some on here are starting to see that maybe the problem with Labour are predominantly internal
It seemed to me that some on here would prefer to make excuses for Labours poor performance rather then look within
You would say that, because the war a tory really likes to see is one where the workers fight each other and the tories collect profits from both sides.
The historical lesson you want us to forget is united we stand, divided we fall.
Well I can’t spoken for everyone on the right but for me I want to see Labour improve and this is why:
At the moment National is coasting along very middle of the road, don’t scare the horses because it doesn’t have to do anything to win, it doesn’t have to do anything that might upset some of the demographics
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
NZ need Labour to be strong so that National can come up with some policy because at the moment Nationals coasting
Holy crap PR I basically agree with what you are saying here.
(Having said that I believe that Labour is now culturally and organisationally incapable of improving. I currently rate a 50/50 chance that they will get less than 25% in 2017).
Well I say Labour but really I just use them because they’re the biggest left wing party in NZ at the moment
I’m taking the rough estimate in NZ that to get into power under MMP 35% is the bare minimum you’d be looking at and even then that opens you up to some massive amounts of horse trading
Yep, a 35% election result for Labour will leave Winnie grinning from ear to ear. (Especially as an election result that high for Labour suggests that the Greens will fall to 10% or less).
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
If National tried anything other than Labour-lite they’d lose. As John Banks said:If I wear my policy on my sleeve, I won’t get elected.
The same truly does apply to National. If their MPs and supporters got the policies that they truly want then they’d never get elected.
The real problem that we have is that Labour is trying to be National while wearing red.
PR, the problem for the right is partially as you describe, but the other factor is the failure of ACT.
Everyone in the beltway rates young whatsisname, and he’s amiable enough, but he can’t shift them polls.
His decision to not take a cabinet role is part of it all too. Got praised by the likes of DPF et al, but really, he’s opting to have less influence.
the politics around why that decision is made is the politics that supporters of a more active Right wing government need to get to grips with.
Given:
National has swallowed all of the right bar ACT’s rump and whoever the hell it is that votes for Colin Craig,
and the widely accepted general icompetence of the Labour party
and the personal liekability of their leader,
why aren’t they doing more?
you claim that it’s down to Labour sucking and not giving them udeas to rail agin, but that doesn;t really hold a lot of water (it holds some, but not much)
Labour, for all their faults, have produced ideas in oppo, they then abandon them after losing an election, or watch National roll out weaker versions to placate the electorate. (this is a net huge plus for the left as national is giving the concepts of the policy a big old tick for further development).
My point is, that of you want National to not be Labour light, the right needs to get a threat to National from the right happening. At the moment, the ‘right wing’ is either completely smitten with National and not seeing sense, or this is as far right wing as the NZ electorate gets.
I have to admit I’m surprised that Act hasn’t managed to rise in the polls, I thought they might be around 3-4% by now
Whereas I’m amazed that anyone still votes Act. They’ve had their heyday back in the 1980s and everyone now knows that their policies do too much damage. It’s why National still put on the mask of being Labour-lite.
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
The internal problems of Labour mean that a white middle aged professional centrist candidate cannot be selected without the allegiance of the many factions within Labour who are so unlike the general public. The quality of Labour candidates is thus vastly inferior to the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. Being put on the list is no guarantee of a seat. Andrew Little just scraped into parliament after the specials. At least he will feel safer as long as he remains leader. It will only get worse for Labour as the deselection campaigns get underway. Their low poll of 2014 is not their nadir. Those votes will go in all directions but clearly many are drifting to support National.
“On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer”
Only one wee problem with that. We can’t all be “rich” can we.
The top 5% are earning more than the bottom 50%, and actually society is not structured to have a lot of “rich”.
You right wingers are a greedy self serving bunch, and you know what, eventually the low income and those in the middle (the aspirational ‘hope we get some too’) will wake up to the sham that Key is selling and realise it.
Good God – the first thing key did was give $100 a week to the top 10%, and sold that the rest can have $10 or so. Nice fucking scam. 7 years on they are trying to move the poor out of Auckland with $3000 payments to regions with no jobs, as a way of dealing with the housing crisis.
What a total sham.
You right wing wankers don’t give one iota for this in retail, gas stations, cleaners, bus drivers, you WANT them all to get fuck all so you have have it all.
Fisiani – your nasty greedy tone and posts post after post stand you out above almost all of the horrid rightees
On this we agree, some people don’t want to be rich because they’re happy with what they have, some aren’t born lucky enough to have the advantages to become but then some aren’t born with the drive to become rich and some don’t want to pay the cost of becoming rich
Becoming rich is largely a choice, for some its easier and for others its harder but its still a choice
+1. Well said, appleboy. My jaw simply dropped at these two sentences: There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money. On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
30% is a hell of a big percentage to be kicked to the kerb and spat on. And as for 70% wanting to be richer, since when has “git rich” expressed the highest human aspiration? Oh for one of those old-fashioned right wingers who thought they owned the copyright on decency – I might not agree with them but at least I could respect the fact that their view involved a conception of the greater good.
Who is kicking to the kerb and spitting on??????
How can you possibly read that into my words.
i was not even being disparaging. do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money. If so what percentage do you reckon it is?
do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money.
Such people exist of course – just not on the Left. And they’ll take from the poor faster than they’ll take from the rich. Just have to watch National’s attacks on beneficiaries to see that.
Draco let me quote you what the Finance Minister said in the House.
Hon BILL ENGLISH: Our tax and transfer system is highly redistributive, and the number of people paying income tax is surprisingly small. The lowest-income 43 percent of households currently receive more in income support than they pay in income tax. The 1.3 million households with incomes under $110,000 a year collectively pay no net tax—that is, their total income support payments match their combined income tax. The top 10 percent of households contribute over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers—over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers. This system is highly redistributive and we believe it is fair.
The rich give a fair share to the poor – which part of the quote is hard to understand or do you think their contribution should be even more than 70%.
as for attacks on beneficiaries , What part of “The biggest rise in benefits in a generation” constitute attack.
Instead of slogans can you explain why you think the rich do not give to the poor when clearly they do and how raising benefits is an attack. It’s like I’ve wandered into an asylum.
No they don’t, the rich steal from the poor. That’s how capitalism works and it’s worked that way for thousands of years. It’s what causes it to always fail.
Draco stop using slogans and simply answer the question. Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of taxI if so why and how much.
I would like to see you explain, in non-disparaging terms, the difference between your 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money and the 70% who want the chance to be richer. Both want to be richer, by your account, and both must get money from somewhere if they are to do so.
Here’s how I see it: I think that the current system privileges wealth extractors over wealth creators. The latter might just lead to the tide that raises all boats, the former certainly does not. The eagerness of the already wealthy to get their claws on state infrastructure that comes with a guaranteed cash flow is one example of what I mean by wealth extractor – nothing of is value added, but an existing cash flow is diverted toward a privately owned pocket. Being privately owned, this piece of infrastructure then becomes answerable to the shareholder (so the wealthy) over the public good. The 30% under such conditions are the victims of this form of economic extraction, being removed from consideration by the public-to-private transference and in no position to defend themselves.
No it’s not – it’s a statement of fact. National’s slogans, which you come on here repeating such as the BS about people being envious of the rich, aren’t connected to reality.
You want to get rid of the rich.
Yes.
Like in Cambodia?. Like in North Korea or like in Albania?
None of those got rid of their rich which is why they’re still capitalist in form, structure and oppression.
The thing is, if fisi’s little 30% social experiment were imposed on NZ, as I’m sure it would be, next claim would be 50%. In America the hopeless poor are about 60%.
It’s like Bill English’s 5% structural unemployment, once he instituted it it became the lower baseline, and unemployment varied above it.
Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive then Labours, I will admit there are some in National that have reached for use by date and then some
For some time now Labour has been picking candidates in accordance with where its own internal logic, internal factions and internal culture currently sit – but which results in a serious mismatch with what the electorate is looking for.
I remember reading that in the 1970s UK Labour still had very many MPs from coal mining and trades/shop floor backgrounds.
Today there are almost none, instead, Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured.
“Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured”.
Oxford grads in the Labour party are hardly new, and Eton isn’t that uncommon
Since 1935 there have been 11 leaders of the party.
Of these 6 went to Oxford. Attlee, Gaitskell, Wilson, Foot, Blair and Miliband.
What has happened in British Labour in the same as in the Conservative party there and the New Zealand Labour Party.
Their candidates go through student politics, get a job working in an MP’s or a Party office, may work for a Cabinet Minister, find an electorate and go into Parliament. Many of them have never held a normal job in their life.
It happens a bit with National but not quite as much. Paula Bennett is one example.
You are looking back a long way with that comment PR.
“Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive”
A gender neutral version of the 1972 National Party campaign slogan.
“Man for man, the stronger team”.
That one, although the shambles of the later Kirk/Rowling Governments showed that it was probably true, didn’t work out too well in the campaign did it?
I wonder if Winston has set up an electorate office yet, and if he has, has he ever visited it?
Anyone here live in the electorate and have you ever seen him at a public function?
Some are starting to realise that Labour were relevant when working people were hard done by. Those days are gone and so the need to support Labour is diminishing year by year.
National’s bringing them back.
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
DTB There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
And they all vote National.
Can’t speak for all, but there seems an insatiable attraction for more, for bigger, amongst people who have acquired wealth and they are wedded to it ‘to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or worse’…ad infinitum.
Fisi I think you are right Labour aren’t sure where their support base is especially after Roger Douglas took them hard right even further right than National?
That figure does not include gst or corporate taxes poor pay more GST than the rich or corporates who shift the cost GST back to the customers.
Or go on overseas trips operate Swiss bank accounts or don’t pay any tax like like google Facebook Amazon etc.
Fisanal a paid spin doctor of the right.
Employers not paying a living wage are being subsidized by the socold wealthier earners.
The speculators are being subsidized by those on higher declared incomes.
The corporate tax evaders are also being subsidized.
Pollutors the same.
The debt financier’s who Bill English has borrowed $80 billion+ for election bribes for his parties tax cuts are being subsidized $5.8 billion a year.
A weak Labour won’t be able to cobble together a government, Labour needs to be reasonably strong and if the Greens ever want to get into parliament then Labour need to be really strong
Numbers really, the left are on what 40% at the moment so if Labour crumble its not really going to attract any votes from the right so the total percentage isn’t to increase all that much
But if you have a strong party, a party that can convince people it can lead then that’s what will attract non-voters to vote for them (and swing voters of course)
A few parties that show that they can work together can, and will, get votes. The problem we’ve been having is that, Labour especially, the parties on the Left have been attacking each other rather than working together.
Yes they might be able to get some swing votes and maybe even from the missing million but I’m thinking Labour doesn’t want to cut the pie any smaller then it needs to
If the left were composed of several competitive small parties without one being clearly dominant, there would need to be a lot of pre-election co-operation to avoid splintered left votes in electorates. If National won enough extra electorates due to fragmented “left” votes, then it could end up with enough overhang to skew the proportionality of Parliament. It’s very unlikely now, but as there get to be fewer list seats and more electorate seats as the population increases, it becomes more possible.
True but they could always work together. And then, once they have power, change electorate voting to preferential voting. This would allow all parties to put up candidates with the most preferred winning rather than the one with the most votes which is often a significant minority.
@Andre.
Your proposal is theoretically possible but it looks extremely unlikely.
In practice the National Party would have to win at least 61 of the 64 electorates they contest.
Surely there are going to be at least 4 Labour MPs who could win one of the General electorates?
By the way the number of electorate seats doesn’t go up just because the population increases. It goes up only if the percentage increase in the North Island, or in the Maori roll, goes up faster than the rate of growth in the South Island. That is because the South Island is guaranteed 16 general electorates.
Another example of the TPPA as being more of a trade restrictions agreement than a free trade agreement: the NZ Library Association’s standing committee on copyright is concerned about the impacts of making copyright provisions more restrictive. Apart from concerns about underestimation of the cost to NZ of the additional restrictions, there’s this about the prospect of over-hasty legislation:
In particular, bringing New Zealand law into line with US law could prove problematic if provisions favouring rights holders (such as extension of term) are adopted, but exemptions that US law affords are not also adopted. However, because there will not be sufficient time for MBIE to extensively consider the effects of broadly-worded exemptions, it is more likely that any exemptions will be narrow in wording and limited in effect.
In other words, the nett effect could be that we end up with all the draconian proscriptions of US copyright law but few of the exemptions, making us even more restrictive than the US.
The above quote is from an email, so no link – however, you can obtain more info from the committee by writing to copyright@lianza.org.nz.
“– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?”
Oh dear. It shows how irrelevant the Green Party is, doesn’t it.
I gather they had a speech today. Even people who follow politics quite closely, like yourself, didn’t know about it.
I wonder how many people went to it. Outside of Green MPs and party staffers of course who would have been conscripted.
Anyone here go to the speech? That is anyone not on the public payroll as a Green staffer or MP.
Did anyone hear Stephen Franks’s bumptious and
ignorant performance on Jim Mora’s program yesterday? The Panel, RNZ National, Monday 25 January 2016
Jim Mora, Stephen Franks, Josie Pagani
There seems to be no code of behavior in place at Radio New Zealand. Some years ago, Bomber Bradbury was banned from this program for the crime of criticizing the Prime Minister’s loutish and irresponsible behavior in parliament. Yet Franks, whose disrespectful and contemptuous behavior is far worse, continues to be a guest.
This afternoon, Franks was frothing with indignation about state house tenants who have the cheek to complain about substandard conditions. His rage extended to the afternoon’s first guest, Otago University Professor Michael Baker; Franks treated him with derision, referring to him repeatedly as “these guys”, in between his frequent imprecations of state house tenants.
Luckily for Franks, the other guest was not the superior Dita Di Boni, who has firmly put him in his place in the past, but the giggling Josie Pagani.
OMG! Morrissey – I don’t know how you do it!
Listening to both Franks and Pagani!
It would make me want to spew.
The so called “Panel” is an appalling programme – hosted by a sanctimonious prick and has not merit what so ever. A complete waste of space-time continuum.
Putin is corrupt, says US Treasury
Russian President Vladimir Putin during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Antalya, Turkey, November 15, 2015. Michael Klimentyev/RIA Novosti
The US Treasury has told a BBC investigation that it considers Russian President Vladimir Putin to be corrupt.
For those of you who are taking a responsible approach to social drinking
by choosing the very refreshing low alcohol “citrus” beers.
If you are on Statins, you should be aware that the “citrus” apparently includes grapefruit juice.
I suspect there is another reason that is much more relevant.
I think he has found that he is quite unemployable outside of Parliament. To be blunt there is probably no-one who will give him a job. This is the only way he has any chance of retaining the lifestyle to which he has become accustomed.
I’d say you’re on the money there alwyn.
Also goes a long way in explaining why it’s so hard to get rid of old Labour mps.
I reckon the Labour party should make a rule where the maximum term for a Mp is 4 terms with a clause that this time period can be extended by the party membership vote only.
That way you’d be able to ditch the leeches like Mallard or the unpopular ones like Cunllife but keep the ones performing well.
What a great pseudonym you chose.
Marty “The film depicts thirty-six hours in the life of the main character: 34 year-old, bug-eyed Marty”
and Mars.
That’s of course the Mars Bar. The one that is full of nuts.
I disagree grey. bm sows seeds of discord – some subtle, some obvious. I think right wing solutions are hopeless and I do agree that a few left wing suggestions may be unworkable in our current system.
I don’t think Cunliffe can be bothered with all that shit again, he will concentrate on being a politican, the media crucified him. He is too intelligent to waste his energy on another leadership battle. Let Robertson take the shit from the Tory MSM media aka Mike Hoskings and Paul Henry.
it’s not just ego – it’s ability. And Cunliffe has it in spades. Problem is though, Cunliffe is not as cunning on the playing field as GR2020 is. He has also been in the beltway a bit too long now.
Briar’s 2015 film A Place to Call Home provides a revealing examination of New Zealand’s state housing situation.
The documentary tells the stories of two women who share the same passionate values and deep concern for the vulnerable and often voiceless members of their respective communities.
Ironically, they find themselves in a tug of war where the creation of a much needed community housing project in the Far North is dependent on the dismantling of another equally valuable and deeply entrenched community in Glen Innes, Auckland.
A Place to Call Home is raw and brave and explores a topic that is extremely relevant in today’s environment of unaffordable housing and social reforms.
_________________________________
For the public record – I believe that State (and Council) housing is PUBLIC, and ‘social housing’ is PRIVATE.
I oppose the privatisation of STATE (and COUNCIL) housing by (private) ‘social housing’ providers.
I support the directly-affected State tenants in their fight to STOP the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
Unlike the Co-Convenor of the Child Poverty Action Group, and Salvation Army employee Alan Johnson, who supports the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
The euthanasia submissions. If you care about people and them having a right to decide when to die when they are terminally ill or in pain without much life to enjoy and wish to disembark in their own time while they can still smile at others and enjoy knowing them, then please follow the guide below and support quality euthanasia. Submissions finish on MONDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2016 AND CAN GO IN UNTIL 23.59.
(Remember 1/2 is the anniversary of various provinces so perhaps do it the day before in case you want to be out and about enjoying life.)
The first article, and it’s photo look just like Labour’s fish and chip brigade of the 1980s http://www.michaelbassett.co.nz/archive_fc80.htm
The second story is a disgrace. The Eagles deserve much more than that. They should get at least as much as Obama will get for his Presidential Library. At least people will still listen to The Eagles. Can you imagine anyone reading through a hundred million pages of the Obama archives?
Clinton’s isn’t quite as extreme but it is definitely close.
There are probably some earlier ones that are more restrained.
ps. I was only joking about the Eagles getting more taxpayer money than the Obama Library. He is going to have to find a lot of generous donors who will put up the money. On the other hand the Eagles aren’t going to get any money either.
Congratulations to Bill English on his eighth year of miserable and unrelenting economic failure. If we must have crazed far-right governments from time to time the least we must ask is that the useless assholes learn to balance the books.
He wasn’t a complete failure, don’t forget the “surplus” last year and the generous tax payer funded entitlement to live in his wifes property for the last 7/8 years, yes he’s done very well for himself.
(sarc)
Balancing the books will be the task of the next non National govt to take power, this is the historical cycle NZ has followed for decades.
There are too many “sheeple” and not enough real people like most of those who contribute to ts.
Why does the Left always insist on a Budget Surplus as a sign of economic competence?
Are you really daring English to go down the road of slashing Government spending and enforcing austerity through the nation?
Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.
Hey CV
“Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.”
You have a funny definition of a surplus and how it should be derived, the scenario which you adamantly describe is the one which English used to produce the surplus he boasted about, but normal surpluses are usually a result of a well run economy where the money is plowed back into the pockets of many, one of the criteria for a well run, healthy economy is near full employment, not increasing unemployment, for which is the current situation.
During the Clark years, the Govt then was contributing 40c of every dollar spent in NZ and a surplus every year and very low unemployment , Key swore to get that down to 20c and now look where we are today.
The economic and social policies of the Key govt will only result in massive increases in debt as they have failed to achieve the basic fundamentals of a well run economy and one of the main failures is the deliberately high unemployment.
Under the Clark govt you saw considerable redistribution of wealth from the haves to the havenots, we now have the exact opposite (redistribution from the havenots to the haves) and the exact opposite result, the proof of this is there now for every one to see, increasing poverty, extreme wealth, and high unemployment and a deficit and a massive increasing debt.
From your analysis above, I certainly wouldn’t take any advice from you as a financial adviser.
Jim Mora claims ACT’s leader is “cogent”; sadly for him,
neither of today’s guests is stupid enough to endorse that provocation. The Panel, RNZ National, Tuesday 26 January 2016
Jim Mora, Mai Chen, Bernard Hickey
Today’s Panelists are several notches higher on the intelligence scale than yesterday’s dire offering [1], but the major problem persists: it’s the same host. About 4:15, after the long and tedious introductions have finally come to an end, the host decides to make the first of his glib and shallow statements for the day….
JIM MORA:[affecting a serious tone] The ACT leader David Seymour makes the point, and it seems to be a cogent one, when he says “Those who grumble about a lack of a capital gains tax should look at the ten least affordable markets in the Demographia Survey. All of them except Auckland are there despite having a capital gains tax.”
Mai Chen doesn’t even bother to snort in derision, but her fellow guest manages to say, in an exquisitely indirect way, that David Seymour is an ignoramus….
BERNARD HICKEY: Hmmmm. The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.
The rest of the program, unfortunately, seems to be as dire and as determinedly trivial as ever. Mora has just attempted to manipulate his guests into saying something disrespectful about Kanye West; neither of them indulged him. He should have tried it yesterday: Stephen Franks would have launched into an insane racist fugue for five minutes.
“The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.”
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It is Hickey saying I don’t like that example he came up with. He hasn’t the slightest idea of the facts but he’ll try and deflect attention.
He even admits he hasn’t the faintest idea what he is talking about when he admits “which we don’t know”. All that means is HE doesn’t know.
Hickey was never one to let his ignorance get in the way of his political bias.
It’s saying it in an arch and subtle manner. Every listener—including your good self—would have understood quite clearly that Hickey has no respect for ACT’s risible “leader”.
Proof Alwyn you have no credibilify other than being a proffessional whinger for the far right.Bernard Hickey goes against what most big banks economist commentary because big banks just want a speculative market that loads every one up with debt.
NZ govt debt stands at $120 billion and rising at $ 27 million per day.
I am for full and open discussion on economic matters
“a proffessional whinger for the far right”?
No I’m not a professional when I comment here. I am merely trying to bring some knowledge to the ignorant. A very hard task with some of them though.
Seriously?
On the day it breaks that one of those bludging beneficiaries off the pension is a veteran whose benefit they cut because of a trespass arrest, you bastards are gloating about it?
Just a comment from someone who is sick of this country being dealt to by Mr Key and his crony capitalist mates.
Can you stop getting sucked in by the lies in relation to income and tax paid, ie the top 10% of earners pay 70% of the tax.
It’s the top 10% of the wealthy that pay next to no tax you need to focus on.
I am sick of Fisiani and others spreading the lie that (implied) the wealthiest 10% pay 70% of the tax.
It is a lie and stamp it out.
The wealthiest 10% pay far less than 10% of all the tax.
A leading American critic of the Trans Pacific Partnership, Lori Wallach, said New Zealand should not rush into the TPP because there were not the numbers to pass it in the United States Congress.
It was not a done deal and could yet become a “5000-page doorstop.”
She could not understand why the New Zealand Government was pushing the deal so strongly as it was not a done deal.
It had very little upside for New Zealand and enormous downsides, she told a meeting of about 1000 at the Auckland Town Hall tonight.
Yet New Zealand had been one of the most enthusiastic.
“So I thought it was really important to dig out of the snow and come and say ‘guys this is far from a done deal and your Government is trying to run you guys towards a cliff.
“This is no done deal – this is likely to be an undone deal. ”
New Zealand might change its laws to meet the terms of an agreement that might never get finished.
“And you’ll have screwed yourselves over by passing that law,” she said.
“So for God’s sake don’t go rushing into this because in all likelihood it ain’t going to happen.”
Lori Wallach is the director of the Washington-based Public Citizen Global Trade Watch Group and tonight began a speaking tour with Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey against the TPP.
She suggested that discontent in the United States on issues such as the period of exclusivity for biologic drugs or barring tobacco companies from investor-state dispute settlement could be changed in side-letters between the US and other countries.
That was how binding changes could be made to an agreement without opening up the text for renegotiation.
She also said the investor-dispute settlement (ISDS) rules were an enormous risk.
She disputed the New Zealand Government’s claim that ISDS – allowing disputes to be settled by private tribunal – would not attract cases.
While the US has had 50 agreements with ISDS and had had hardly any challenges over 50 years, there were now more than 50 a year. And under TPP – an agreement of 12 countries – it would double its exposure with 9500 new corporations from TPP countries being a possible new threat.
And while New Zealand had had no ISDS cases taken against it, it could face exposure to 1608 United States companies – and the US was the most litigious country in the world.
“This is brand new liability. So when your Government says ‘we’ve never been sued,’ I say ‘hold on to your wallet and your tax dollars because if TPPA happens, it is just a matter of time.”
“A propaganda exercise”
Jane Kelsey, New Zealand’s leading campaigner against TPP over the five years it was negotiated, took her place at the lectern with a stuffed toy – a “dead rat” she has called Tim, after former Trade Minister Tim Grose has talked of New Zealand having to swallow dead rats.
She said the national interest analysis on the TPP released today by the Government was “devoid of any independent insight” because it was drafted by the officials who negotiated the agreement.
“It is nothing more than a propaganda exercise,” she said.
She said the $2.7 billion estimated increase in gdp by 2030 would be, on current growth rates, a mere 0.9 per cent of gdp in 2030.
Next Thursday the Trade Minister of the TPP countries would sign the deal – but that was the end of it.
The national interest assessment would be presented to the House and legislation drafted – but it could not come into force for at least two years.
“We need to make our voices heard from that for at least the next two years.”
Politicians from Labour, the Greens, New Zealand First and the Maori Party spoke as well.
Grant Robertson: Agreement undermines NZ’s sovereignty
Labour finance spokesman Grant Robertson the Government had undertaken a “secretive, exclusory, unaccountable process driven by the galactic ego and arrogance of Tim Groser.”
He quoted from the national interest analysis the sentence he said identified the source of Labour’s objection.
“The agreement places new limitations on Government’s ability to modify New Zealand’s policy settings to ensure they are appropriate for our domestic circumstances.”
“That is the nub of the problem here,” he said. It undermined sovereign rights.
It could, for example, prevent a Government legislation to get proper public broadcasting.
He said the agreement undermined New Zealand’s sovereignty and while there were modest economic benefits from TPP “you cannot put a price on our democratic and constitutional freedoms to make our own law.”
“It’s about power
Greens’ co-leader Metiria Turei said the point of the TPP was “to take power away from democratically elected Government, to give it to multinational corporations” and where their interests clashed with the interests of New Zealand, the investors interests would come out on top. “It’s not about trade; it’s about power.”
Marama Fox: Issue unifying for Kiwis
Maori Party co-leader Marama Fox said the issue had been unifying because now people might understand how Maori felt to have lost their sovereign rights.
“We have been fighting this fight for 175 years.”
The party objected to the Government having the power in the TPP to interpret what rights were under the Treaty of Waitangi.
There had been an irrational fear in New Zealand that if you give Maori more rights it would take away others’ rights, or that Maori “might do to us what we have done to them.”
“”That is wrong. We want to live in a country where we recognise our duality of nationhood, that we are here as partners.”
“Undermining NZ business”
New Zealand First’s Fletcher Tabuteau claimed that New Zealand First had been the most vocal against the TPP and the most consistent.
He said ISDS would give multi-national corporates an unfair advantage over New Zealand companies in New Zealand because only they would have access to ISDS.
He suggested that minimum wage measures or environmental laws passed by the Government could trigger the ISDS and let overseas companies sue the Government but New Zealand companies would have to “like it and lump it.”
“It will undermine New Zealand business into the future.”
He said National still had the numbers to approve the national interest analysis but opponents of the TPP needed to talk to National MPs.
“Some of those National MPs must fold under your pressure.”
Lori Wallach has public meetings planned in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin.
Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
Holding On To The Present:The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
Stuck In The Middle With You:As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
Buzz from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example. This shows National down ...
It Takes A Train To Cry:Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
Chris Trotter writes – New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is ...
Luxon will no doubt put a brave face on it, but there is no escaping the pressure this latest poll will put on him and the government. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political ...
This is a re-post from The Climate Brink by Andrew Dessler In the wake of any unusual weather event, someone inevitably asks, “Did climate change cause this?” In the most literal sense, that answer is almost always no. Climate change is never the sole cause of hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, or ...
Something odd happened yesterday, and I’d love to know if there’s more to it. If there was something which preempted what happened, or if it was simply a throwaway line in response to a journalist.Yesterday David Seymour was asked at a press conference what the process would be if the ...
Hi,From time to time, I want to bring Webworm into the real world. We did it last year with the Jurassic Park event in New Zealand — which was a lot of fun!And so on Saturday May 11th, in Los Angeles, I am hosting a lil’ Webworm pop-up! I’ve been ...
Education Minister Erica Standford yesterday unveiled a fundamental reform of the way our school pupils are taught. She would not exactly say so, but she is all but dismantling the so-called “inquiry” “feel good” method of teaching, which has ruled in our classrooms since a major review of the New ...
Exactly where are we seriously going with this government and its policies? That is, apart from following what may as well be a Truss-Lite approach on the purported economic “plan“, and Victorian-era regression when it comes to social policy.Oh it’ll work this time of course, we’re basically assured, “the ...
Hey Uncle Dave, When the Poms joined the EEC, I wasn't one of those defeatists who said, Well, that’s it for the dairy job. And I was right, eh? The Chinese can’t get enough of our milk powder and eventually, the Poms came to their senses and backed up the ute ...
Polling shows that Wellington Mayor Tory Whanau has the lowest approval rating of any mayor in the country. Siting at -12 per cent, the proportion of constituents who disapprove of her performance outweighs those who give her the thumbs up. This negative rating is higher than for any other mayor ...
Buzz from the Beehive Pharmac has been given a financial transfusion and a new chair to oversee its spending in the pharmaceutical business. Associate Health Minister David Seymour described the funding for Pharmac as “its largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff”. ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its ...
TL;DR: Here’s my top 10 ‘pick ‘n’ mix of links to news, analysis and opinion articles as of 10:10am on Monday, April 29:Scoop: The children's ward at Rotorua Hospital will be missing a third of its beds as winter hits because Te Whatu Ora halted an upgrade partway through to ...
span class=”dropcap”>As hideous as David Seymour can be, it is worth keeping in mind occasionally that there are even worse political figures (and regimes) out there. Iran for instance, is about to execute the country’s leading hip hop musician Toomaj Salehi, for writing and performing raps that “corrupt” the nation’s ...
Yesterday marked 10 years since the first electric train carried passengers in Auckland so it’s a good time to look back at it and the impact it has had. A brief history The first proposals for rail electrification in Auckland came in the 1920’s alongside the plans for earlier ...
Right now, in Aotearoa-NZ, our ‘animal spirits’ are darkening towards a winter of discontent, thanks at least partly to a chorus of negative comments and actions from the Government Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on ...
You make people evil to punish the paststuck inside a sequel with a rotating castThe following photos haven’t been generated with AI, or modified in any way. They are flesh and blood, human beings. On the left is Galatea Young, a young mum, and her daughter Fiadh who has Angelman ...
April has been a quiet month at A Phuulish Fellow. I have had an exceptionally good reading month, and a decently productive writing month – for original fiction, anyway – but not much has caught my eye that suggested a blog article. It has been vaguely frustrating, to be honest. ...
A listing of 31 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 21, 2024 thru Sat, April 27, 2024. Story of the week Anthropogenic climate change may be the ultimate shaggy dog story— but with a twist, because here ...
Hi,I spent about a year on Webworm reporting on an abusive megachurch called Arise, and it made me want to stab my eyes out with a fork.I don’t regret that reporting in 2022 and 2023 — I am proud of it — but it made me angry.Over three main stories ...
The new Victoria University Vice-Chancellor decided to have a forum at the university about free speech and academic freedom as it is obviously a topical issue, and the Government is looking at legislating some carrots or sticks for universities to uphold their obligations under the Education and Training Act. They ...
Do you remember when Melania Trump got caught out using a speech that sounded awfully like one Michelle Obama had given? Uncannily so.Well it turns out that Abraham Lincoln is to Winston Peters as Michelle was to Melania. With the ANZAC speech Uncle Winston gave at Gallipoli having much in ...
She was born 25 years ago today in North Shore hospital. Her eyes were closed tightly shut, her mouth was silently moving. The whole theatre was all quiet intensity as they marked her a 2 on the APGAR test. A one-minute eternity later, she was an 8. The universe was ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. This fact brief was written by Sue Bin Park in collaboration with members from our Skeptical Science team. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is Antarctica gaining land ice? ...
Images of US students (and others) protesting and setting up tent cities on US university campuses have been broadcast world wide and clearly demonstrate the growing rifts in US society caused by US policy toward Israel and Israel’s prosecution of … Continue reading → ...
Barrie Saunders writes – Dear Paul As the new Minister of Media and Communications, you will be inundated with heaps of free advice and special pleading, all in the national interest of course. For what it’s worth here is my assessment: Traditional broadcasting free to air content through ...
Many criticisms are being made of the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill, including by this writer. But as with everything in politics, every story has two sides, and both deserve attention. It’s important to understand what the Government is trying to achieve and its arguments for such a bold reform. ...
Peter Dunne writes – The great nineteenth British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, once observed that “the first essential for a Prime Minister is to be a good butcher.” When a later British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, sacked a third of his Cabinet in July 1962, in what became ...
Ele Ludemann writes – New Zealanders had the OECD’s second highest tax increase last year: New Zealanders faced the second-biggest tax raises in the developed world last year, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says. The intergovernmental agency said the average change in personal income tax ...
We all know something’s not right with our elections. The spread of misinformation, people being targeted with soundbites and emotional triggers that ignore the facts, even the truth, and influence their votes.The use of technology to produce deep fakes. How can you tell if something is real or not? Can ...
This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Simon Clark. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). This year you will be lied to! Simon Clark helps prebunk some misleading statements you'll hear about climate. The video includes ...
It is all very well cutting the backrooms of public agencies but it may compromise the frontlines. One of the frustrations of the Productivity Commission’s 2017 review of universities is that while it observed that their non-academic staff were increasing faster than their academic staff, it did not bother to ...
Buzz from the Beehive Two speeches delivered by Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters at Anzac Day ceremonies in Turkey are the only new posts on the government’s official website since the PM announced his Cabinet shake-up. In one of the speeches, Peters stated the obvious: we live in a troubled ...
1. Which of these would you not expect to read in The Waikato Invader?a. Luxon is here to do business, don’t you worry about thatb. Mr KPI expects results, and you better believe itc. This decisive man of action is getting me all hot and excitedd. Melissa Lee is how ...
…it has a restricted jurisdiction which must not be abused: it is not an inquisitionNOTE – this article was published before the High Court ruled that Karen Chhour does not have to appear before the Waitangi Tribunal Gary Judd writes – The High Court ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – One of reasons Oranga Tamariki exists is to prevent child neglect. But could the organisation itself be guilty of the same?Oranga Tamariki’s statistics show a decrease in the number and age of children in care. “There are less children ...
David Farrar writes: Graeme Edgeler wrote in 2017: In the first five years after three strikes came into effect 5248 offenders received a ‘first strike’ (that is, a “stage-1 conviction” under the three strikes sentencing regime), and 68 offenders received a ‘second strike’. In the five years prior to ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has surprised everyone with his ruthlessness in sacking two of his ministers from their crucial portfolios. Removing ministers for poor performance after only five months in the job just doesn’t normally happen in politics. That’s refreshing and will be extremely ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the two days to 6:06am on Thursday, April 25:Politics: PM Christopher Luxon has set up a dual standard for ministerial competence by demoting two National Cabinet ministers while leaving also-struggling ...
Hi,Today I mainly want to share some of your thoughts about the recent piece I wrote about success and failure, and the forces that seemingly guide our lives. But first, a quick bit of housekeeping: I am doing a Webworm popup in Los Angeles on Saturday May 11 at 2pm. ...
It is hard to see what Melissa Lee might have done to “save” the media. National went into the election with no public media policy and appears not to have developed one subsequently. Lee claimed that she had prepared a policy paper before the election but it had been decided ...
Open access notablesIce acceleration and rotation in the Greenland Ice Sheet interior in recent decades, Løkkegaard et al., Communications Earth & Environment:In the past two decades, mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet has accelerated, partly due to the speedup of glaciers. However, uncertainty in speed derived from satellite products ...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...
Mr Bombastic:Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi, and Mema Paremata mō Tāmaki-Makaurau, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, will travel to the Gold Coast to strengthen ties with Māori in Australia next week (15-21 April). The visit, in the lead-up to the 9th Australian National Kapa haka Festival, will be an opportunity for both ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
A new report on protecting journalism and democracy in New Zealand recommends a levy be charged on global platforms like Facebook and Google to fund media firms undertaking public interest reporting. It also calls for the reinstatement of a powerful Broadcasting Commission to distribute public funding for journalism and other ...
On International Workers' Day, also known as May Day, the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi and the wider union movement are celebrating the proud history of the labour movement during a tough time for working people. ...
From bills to beards, a walk through the former Green co-leader’s time in politics. After close to a decade in politics, James Shaw is preparing to bid farewell to parliament. Tonight will see the former minister deliver his valedictory address, certain to be a speech filled with Shaw’s trademark wit ...
Two months ago, MPs unanimously voted to give themselves a week off in Efeso Collins’ honour. On Tuesday, most were too busy to give even an hour of their time. The day Fa’anānā Efeso Collins died, parliament felt different. In a building that operates at a breakneck pace, everyone stopped ...
India’s election involves hundreds of millions of people and is a months-long affair. Here’s how voting works and what’s at stake.The biggest-ever election in world history started on April 19, with more than 10% of the world’s population eligible to vote. Elections in India, the world’s most populous country ...
Comment: Journalists are very good at telling other people’s stories, but they fall well short when writing about their own profession. Perhaps that is why it is so undervalued. Every successive poll on the public’s attitude toward journalism is more alarming than the last. In the last month we have ...
Opinion: A young Māori woman and her Pacific partner arrive at their local hospital by ambulance. She has gone into labour at just under 24 weeks, but the couple haven’t recognised the symptoms – and don’t know the risks of premature birth for their baby. By the time they arrive, ...
Behind closed doors, NZ First will be arguing fiercely against any watering down of the ministerial decision-making powers in the Bill The post Bishop backtracks after fast-track backlash appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Emotional scenes played out in the Invercargill courthouse on the first two days of the coronial inquest into the death of Gore toddler Lachlan Jones, in which the boy’s mother was accused of disposing of her son’s body. The second season of Newsroom’s award-nominated podcast The Boy in the Water ...
Opinion: The impression from the carpark is very inviting. The area is well fenced but barred so there is easy visibility of loved ones. Inside, the spaces are welcoming and clean and staff are friendly and clearly comfortable. I am greeted by ‘Kim’. She has worked here for three years, ...
After the Christchurch earthquake, the then-national civil defence boss compared his experience to “putting a team on the rugby field who have never ever played together before”. Now, eight years later – and following a damning inquiry into the emergency response of cyclones Gabrielle, Hale and the Auckland anniversary weekend floods – ...
“I had just come off the end of a major robbery case which I had been working on for six months when I got a call on the afternoon of September 1, 1992, that some remains had been found at a building site in Devonport, so I drove over with ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 1 May appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Asia Pacific Report A Pacific civil society alliance has condemned French neocolonial policies in Kanaky New Caledonia, saying Paris is set on “maintaining the status quo” and denying the indigenous Kanak people their inalienable right to self-determination. The Pacific Regional Non-Governmental Organisations (PRNGOs) Alliance, representing some 15 groups, said in ...
Koi Tū New Zealand cannot sit back and see the collapse of its Fourth Estate, the director of Koi Tū: The Centre for Informed Futures, Sir Peter Gluckman, says in the foreword of a paper published today. The paper, “If not journalists, then who?” paints a picture of an industry ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Foreign investment proposals with implications for Australia’s strategic or economic security will face tougher scrutiny, under a policy overhaul to be announced by Treasurer Jim Chalmers on Wednesday. At the same time, the government ...
A Waitangi Tribunal inquiry report has warned government that a repeal of Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act could cause harm to children in care. ...
The Treasury has published today three new papers covering government consumption multipliers, automatic stabilisers and the impacts of global shocks on New Zealand’s economy. ...
Asia Pacific Report The Pacific state of Hawai’i’s House of Representatives has joined the state’s Senate in calling for a ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza, becoming the first state to pass such a resolution, reports Hawaii News Now. In March, the Senate passed a ceasefire resolution with a 24–1 ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Ferrie, A/Prof, UTS Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Research and ARC DECRA Fellow, University of Technology Sydney PsiQuantum The Australian government has announced a pledge of approximately A$940 million (US$617 million) to PsiQuantum, a quantum computing start-up company based in Silicon Valley. Half ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Hunter Bennett, Lecturer in Exercise Science, University of South Australia Cameron Prins/Shutterstock If you spend a lot of time exploring fitness content online, you might have come across the concept of heart rate zones. Heart rate zone training has become more ...
SPECIAL REPORT:By Eugene Doyle He is the most popular Palestinian leader alive today — and yet few people in the West even know his name. Absolutely no one in Gaza or the West Bank does not know him. That difference speaks volumes about who dominates the media narrative that ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Will McCallum, PhD Candidate – School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University Earlier this year, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of not supporting Operation Sovereign Borders – the military-led border security operation that has “closed Australia’s borders ...
By Melyne Baroi in Port Moresby A Papua New Guinea MP, Peter Isoaimo, who had been ousted by the National Court in an alleged bribery case, has been reinstated by the Supreme Court on appeal. A three-member Supreme Court bench found that the National Court had erred in finding that ...
Publisher Chris Holdaway reflects on the unique project of collecting the work of the late, terrific poet Schaeffer Lemalu. One of the nice things you can do as a truly independent publisher is to make the books that writers want to make, whatever they happen to be. That’s how I’ve ...
Those profiled in the stamp series served on overseas deployments from 1995 onwards, and all have been awarded theNew Zealand Operational Service Medal. ...
Last night’s dismal poll result for the coalition government shows the limits of trying to govern as an opposition, argues Joel MacManus. There’s a quote from the American political activist Barbara Deming: “Vengeance is not the point; change is. But the trouble is that in most people’s minds, the thought ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Shireen Morris, Associate Professor and Director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University Law School, Macquarie University Leonid Andronov/Shutterstock Foreign interference in Australian democracy poses a growing risk to our national sovereignty. It refers to coercive, corrupt or ...
A defendant charged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has pleaded guilty to four charges of obtaining by deception in relation to a mortgage fraud scheme. Sentencing has been scheduled for 14 August 2024. ...
What to say when pesky journalists ask gotcha questions like ‘can you name a single book you’ve ever read?’ and ‘did you read it, or did you just see the movie?’This week, Act Party arts spokesperson Todd Stephenson foolishly agreed to an interview with Newsroom’s Steve Braunias regarding his ...
Explainer - What will a ban on cellphones in schools achieve? Can students use them during lunch breaks? And what happens if you need to contact your child? ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jodi Rowley, Curator, Amphibian & Reptile Conservation Biology, Australian Museum, UNSW Sydney Jodi Rowley, CC BY-NC-ND In winter 2021, Australia’s frogs started dropping dead. People began posting images of dead frogs on social media. Unable to travel to investigate the deaths ...
In the year ended March 2024, 0.4 percent of home transfers were to people who didn’t hold New Zealand citizenship or a resident visa, according to figures released by Stats NZ today. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Wasay Majid, Research Assistant , University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau New Zealand’s accommodation supplement scheme is facing scrutiny, with Social Development Minister Louise Upston recently saying “there is merit in considering whether the current settings are fair and sustainable long-term”. The ...
By Koroi Hawkins, RNZ Pacific editor The first prime ministerial candidate has been announced in Solomon Islands and it is not Manasseh Sogavare. The man of the hour is Jeremiah Manele, the MP for Hograno/Kia/Havulei constituency in Isabel Province, who served as minister of foreign affairs in the last government. ...
Protesting the removal of bins by leaving piles of your dog’s shit for others to deal with doesn’t make you a hero – it’s precious and entitled behaviour. You haven’t truly lived until you’ve stood on the shoreline of Auckland’s Cheltenham beach, desperately trying to scoop increasingly liquid dog shit ...
Analysis - Christopher Luxon will be alert to the factors driving the dire polling, but won't be waving the white flag just yet, RNZ political editor Jo Moir writes. ...
Writer, teacher and academic Vincent O’Sullivan died on Sunday 28 April. Here we gather tributes from friends, colleagues, and students who remember his extraordinary contributions. I went down to the garage tonight. There was a bird shrieking out in the bush, in the dark, maybe a kākā. Miraculously, through the ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a burnt-out corporate escapee explains how she gets by ‘working as little as possible’. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.Gender: Female Age: 31 Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: Contractor in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Schmidt, Professor of Chemistry, UNSW Sydney Albert Russ / Shutterstock The icebreaker of many a barbeque conversation is something like “what do you do for a crust?” “I teach chemistry at university,” is what we usually reply. Then silence. Our ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Asher Flynn, Associate Professor of Criminology, Monash University Shutterstock Sexual harassment is often considered to be a person-to-person act, but new research shows Australians are also experiencing and perpetrating workplace harassment in large numbers through technology. Our latest study shows one ...
A petition signed by more than 16,500 people, demanding the government take stronger action to halt the genocide of Palestinians by the State of Israel, is being presented to the House of Representatives today by Hon Phil Twyford. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Burnett, Honorary Associate Professor, ANU College of Law, Australian National University jenmartin/Shutterstock April has been a bad month for the Australian environment. The Great Barrier Reef was hit, yet again, by intense coral bleaching. And Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek delayed ...
Winston Peters might not give a ‘rat’s derriere’ about last night’s poll, but it revealed the unusual absence of a honeymoon period and little payoff for the government’s action plan approach, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marco de Jong, Lecturer, Law School, Auckland University of Technology Getty Images Details released by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet under the Official Information Act reveal New Zealand officials have been considering involvement in AUKUS from the outset. ...
The government's treatment of Māori raised eyebrows, with countries saying New Zealand needed to do more to reduce health, education and justice inequities. ...
The age of criminal responsibility was one of numerous human rights issues raised during Aotearoa New Zealand’s UPR. Other key themes were racism and discrimination, the disproportionate representation of Māori in prison, and to uphold the UN Declaration ...
In a sitdown interview ahead of his final day at Parliament this week, the former Green Party co-leader tells RNZ about his lowest point during 2017's rough election campaign. ...
Is the fringe radio station really in a financial crisis, or is it just running a hyped-up donation drive? Fringe internet radio station Reality Check Radio was launched by the anti-vaccine mandates group Voices for Freedom in March 2023. For the next year, it undertook probably the most aggressive promotional ...
Above the Fold: On Monday, the biggest Māori screen production company faced down the biggest funder of Māori content at the High Court. It was an incredibly tense moment – then, just as quickly, it resolved. Duncan Greive breaks down a strange day in the screen sector.Yesterday morning, Māori ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 30 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
He currently serves on the board of Alcoa.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_O%27Neal
10 Gaffes by Doomed CEOs on http://www.usnews.com
https://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/profile-full/article/stan-oneal/
An article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch was one of an estimated 50000 expunged from certain Google searches.
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-searc...
There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.
http://deeperweb.com/results.php?cx=%21004415538554621685521%3Avgwa9iznfuo&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Stanley+O%27Neal%22+%27merrill+Lynch%22&as_qdr=
More relevant references ..
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15768986
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/…/ns/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-walk-out-m/
http://www.motherjones.com/…/last-hired-first-fired-merrill-lynchs-black-ceo-had- it-coming
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-search. htmldealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/one-view-of-merrill-lynchs-fall/
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/31/subprime-suspect
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2010/11/financial-crisis-excerpt-201011
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/75-most-powerful-blacks-on…/2/
https://hbr.org/product/Stanley-O-Neal…Merrill/…/405029-PDF-ENG
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/…/five-years-later-where-are-they-now
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-merrill-lynch-and-the-right-to-be-forgotten -2014-7
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/business/09magic.html
I am sure you find it all very interesting, and will have great fun finding some way to blame John Key for the gentleman’s failings.
However. Is it not true that John Key had left the company before this fellow became the CEO?
Prior to becoming President of the firm in 2001 O’Neal was never responsible for any part of the company that included John Key’s bailiwick. He may, as president been Key’s titular superior but it could not have been for more than a few months.
Key became an MP in 2002. O’Neal became the CEO in 2003. Your numbers really don’t line up do they?
Perhaps you should consider a more reasonable proposition. The company failed because they lost their most competent people. People like John Key for example.
Or do you prefer conspiracies?
With respect, you are incorrect. You confuse General Motors with Merrill.
It is relevant to NZ due to his current membership of Alcoa. He is a significant player in our economy.
Why was an article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch expunged from certain Google searches ?
But the thing I am commenting on is this statement.
“There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.”
How do you work out that John Key was his protégé?
Sure O’Neal was incompetent. That is hardly a rare trait though is it?
However while John Key worked there they did very well, as you will probably agree. As you say “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”. Key however wasn’t there when they went downhill and your first sentence is irrelevant to him
“John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board …”
Key didn’t work under O’Neal except, possibly for a few months, while O’Neal was first in the President’s job. By the time he was CEO and Chairman of the Board Key was long gone.
With respect, I think you should check your timeline.
I don’t see where I have got it wrong as you seem to imply.
As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.
He entered Parliament in July 2002.
O’Neal became CEO and Chairman in 2003.
In your words “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”
The problems seem to be after Key left the firm.
What part of the timeline do you think is wrong?
“As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.”
That sounds right.
The man behind John Key.
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
He currently serves on the board of Alcoa.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_O%27Neal
10 Gaffes by Doomed CEOs on http://www.usnews.com
https://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/profile-full/article/stan-oneal/
An article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch was one of an estimated 50000 expunged from certain Google searches.
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-searc...
There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.
http://deeperweb.com/results.php?cx=%21004415538554621685521%3Avgwa9iznfuo&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Stanley+O%27Neal%22+%27merrill+Lynch%22&as_qdr=
More relevant references ..
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15768986
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/…/ns/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-walk-out-m/
http://www.motherjones.com/…/last-hired-first-fired-merrill-lynchs-black-ceo-had- it-coming
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-search. htmldealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/one-view-of-merrill-lynchs-fall/
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/31/subprime-suspect
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2010/11/financial-crisis-excerpt-201011
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/75-most-powerful-blacks-on…/2/
https://hbr.org/product/Stanley-O-Neal…Merrill/…/405029-PDF-ENG
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/…/five-years-later-where-are-they-now
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-merrill-lynch-and-the-right-to-be-forgotten -2014-7
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/business/09magic.html
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jan/25/unilever-boss-warns-uk-against-sugar-tax
ISDS anyone?
+1
sugar taxes……More fuel for the ISDS industry
http://corporateeurope.org/trade/2012/11/chapter-5-speculating-injustice-third-party-funding-investment-disputes
The Unilever man happens to be correct about taxing sugar, if nothing else. There’s no point in taxing sucrose while at the same time publishing dietary guidelines that recommend an obesity-generating diet consisting largely of other kinds of sugar or near-sugar, and having doctors, journalists, politicians and others constantly refer to the obesity-generating stuff by the misnomer “healthy food.” A sugar tax would be like putting a bandage on someone who’s cut an artery.
that debate would barely rate a mention in an ISDS hearing I would suggest
Meh. If ISDS were such a trump card, we’d have more to fear from tobacco companies overturning taxes on tobacco than we would about a non-existent tax on sucrose.
you mean like tobacco companies using deals with Asia and the Ukraine to sue the Australian government (and small, poor nations) about plain packaging laws?
No, not like that. Any instances of tobacco companies successfully using ISDS to overturn excise duty on tobacco?
Tobacco is different to sugar – tobacco is addictive, so a core chunk of users will simply pay more regardless of tax rate, to a certain degree. Doesn’t hugely impact the profit margin until they get really high or are used with other measures like quit support services.
Packaging is what affects sales. It reminds addicts trying to quit, and also affects market share.
Taxes on sugar is different, because cost is a major factor in food choices and production costs.
A reasonable run down from a left wing perspective of the year since Syriza gained power in Greece . I believe it pretty much happened as I predicted it would.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/25/one-year-on-syriza-radicalism-power-euro-alexis-tsipras
Apologies but forgot the link.
No surprise that the Socialists here seem to have lost interest in Greece….
Equally predictable, over in Venezuela the Socialist response to the continuing collapse of their policies is to use it as a pretext to subvert democracy.
A darker scenario than Greece…just a matter of time before guns become part of the ‘solution’…
http://www.wsj.com/articles/venezuela-congress-rejects-maduros-economic-plan-1453503298
The lost sheep
By all means please keep us informed about the latest happenings in Greece. It is true one can be diverted from things that should be watched and followed. The world is coming apart under our fingers and people like yourself who make sure that they keep up with developments and pass that information on to the other interested people are of great, inestimable value.
Thank you Greywarshark.
I am a strong believer in the value of learning from mistakes wherever they occur, and thus avoiding repeating them ourselves. IMO opinion that is the way to prevent the world from falling apart.
Gosman, how is your reading programme going? Have you even started yet?
Yep, the capitalists moved in and undemocratically imposed their ideas upon the Greeks. That’s what happens when we have dictatorships running things.
Syriza needed to default, drop out of the European Union and go back to their own currency. Anything else was going to have them doing what the capitalists told them.
The big boys have taken over its to late democracy has been unsurped.
Funnily enough Latent Smith has been pushing the same lines.
Saying that Key changing the flag and signing the TPPa is turning us into an outpost where we loose our sovereignty.
Sorry but its to late.
We are one of the last to fall into line.
Why doesn’t Andrew Little just SAY that Labour opposes the whole of the TPP?? He did not sound like a positive Leader just now, talking to Guyon Espiner. I felt very disappointed.
Why?
A caucus that includes Shearer and Goff and a party that never has renounced neo-liberalism.
Simple solutions.
Vote for a different party.
And communicate to the Labour leadership why you will not vote for them.
If they don’t stand against the TPP, they will stand against nothing.
Because he supports the TPPA, but many Labour voters don’t.
Bit of a dilemma really, maybe he needs to be honest and explain to his supporters why he is pro TPPA.
I agree that if Little supports the TPP, he should be honest.
I think, though, that he is more conflicted than that.
He knows that the majority of Labour supporters are against the TPP and he also knows that the power brokers in the caucus are for it.
And so you end up with a debacle of an interview with Espiner.
Labour stands for very little if it can’t summon up the courage to vociferously oppose the TPP.
It is not just the power brokers in caucus, it is also the power of what Key calls “the club” that invites caution. It looks to me as if Little reckons he is more likely to prove successful in challenging particular issues within the agreement than he would be if he came out against the whole thing. You can point to Winny of course, as someone who has taken a stand against the whole thing, but Winny is not likely to come under such strong pressure from the big players, and his view expresses a long term stance that everyone knows about.
One reason we need a nonaligned left wing movement in this country is so that we can at least start to turn ourselves into a force whose endorsement or rejection of politicians is able to make a difference. The UK left has Corbyn in part because they had the People’s Assembly to put their weight behind him. Without such movements, politicians are at the mercy of the powerful like the rest of us.
+1
We really do need to get rid of the rich and prevent them rising again.
You can’t because we’re all different, some people have the drive, some people are willing to sacrifice the short term for the long, some are born privileged and some are born with everything they need to succeed (some do and most don’t which is interesting…)
Nor should we for that matter
We’re all different but equal in those differences.
Besides, rich people aren’t rich because they’re different but because they’re stealing from everyone else.
So the rich people that’re on this site (and I’ll bet theres more than a few) are rich because they steal from others?
dude you really need to get some perspective
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Pure communism ends up being totalitarian just like capitalism.
A balance between them is the best outcome.
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
Humans are not civilized on the whole we just behave as nature behaves the strongest and fitest survive.
Because we have harnessed our envirment we think we are civilized but no we carry on behaving in a competitive way like in the rest of nature.
You are part of that competitive urge trying to push your tangent that everybody must be equal but no where in nature has that succeeded.
No where in human nature has that succeeded.
Show me some examples.
Utopian thinking just like the laissez faire brigade!
We happen to be intelligent and thus can over-ride our instincts but it must be learned. Of course, the greed and anti-social aspects of capitalism also have to be learned.
Actually, it’s always worked before – then capitalism comes along and destroys what’s been built up.
I can show you 5000 years of collapse caused by capitalist systems including the USSR. China is about to join it. Thing is, that same 5000 years of collapse by capitalism is also joined with 5000 years of societies being built up via communism/socialism.
Societies simply do not work under competitive stresses.
I agree with you BM. A little bit of clarity goes a long way. Even if it’s not what you want to hear. There is nothing worse than listening to a stuttering ,stammering, waffling attempt at an answer that says beggar all. It’s like he’s trying to have a bob each way. Not sounding strong at all.
bloody good question…they must have a reason for this shambles…..but I’m buggered if I can see it…..this undermines Littles presentation of a gov in waiting
The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall and Andrew Little knows this but because Nationals pushing it hard and because most of Labours supporters don’t want it he has to walk a very precarious tightrope of placating his supporters while still leaving the door slightly ajar
So you have him bagging the TPPA and hinting that Labour will take NZ out of it which his supporters like but still not categorically stating that’s what he’ll do so he has an out when Labour gain power and the TPPA stays
‘The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall ‘
How?
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not in and Andrew Little (and probably a great deal of Labour) know this
Hence his stopping short of actually stating Labour will withdraw NZ from the TPPA which you’d think he’d say because it would please the people on the left
‘Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA ‘
How?
Dull
OK I’ll ask the question in a different way.
Can you provide some evidence that the positive outweigh the negatives for the TPP?
Evidence please, not opinion.
I’m not sure how you expect me to provide evidence of something that hasn’t happened yet but I’ll go with this
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1510/S00065/tpp-delivers-significant-benefits-for-nz.htm
a press release from grosser?
its like youve stopped trying 🙂
Ahhh, faith based. Once again.
LOL
Well if you believe that rubbish you will believe anything?
Independent analysis say otherwise. Like a 0.2% increase in GDP per annum. You regard that as significant?
Tell me how many fairies are at the bottom of your garden?
I’m not wanting to make excuses but I’ve run out of plutonium and as well know plutonium is what is required to make the nuclear reaction to produce the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor
I tell you what as soon as I source some (or can predict where lightning is going to hit) I’ll jump in my time machine, go the future (because the TPPA hasn’t happened yet so its a tad difficult to produce something that hasn’t happened yet) and get you the evidence that will satisfy one and all
Sound good?
“the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor”
didnt that get an upgrade to a recyclables fuel capacitor? 🙂
So it’s simply your uninformed, opinion
The timeline got distorted
And your opinion of this by Simon Terry, Executive Director of The Sustainability Council
The environment under TPPA
https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/ep4-environment.pdf
And this by Barry Coates, Rod Oram, Dr Geoff Bertram and Professor Tim Hazledine
The economics of the TPPA
https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/ep5-economics.pdf
If the NZ economy will be worse off as a result if being in the TPPA then it should be a no brained to simply leave the agreement. This is what Little should have stated but didn’t for some reason.
I agree with you.
And the NZ economy will not benefit.
World Bank Report: TPP Will Bring Negligible Economic Benefit
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160119/09463933377/more-realistic-modelling-tpps-effects-predicts-450000-us-jobs-lost-gdp-contraction.shtml
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160112/07433333306/world-bank-report-tpp-will-bring-negligible-economic-benefit-to-us-canada-australia.shtml
Except Little doesn’t agree as he wont come out and state that the Labour party will leave the agreement if they are in power after the next election.
The amount of growth in GDP from TPPA i oops .2%s (0.7%)
The growth of debt is 10.3% pa of GDP!!!!
I’m sure you know this, but situations change over time.
– Would NZ be better off if the TPP wasn’t happening?
– Would NZ be better off if TPP existed in a different form?
– Now that it does exist would NZ be better of if the country was sidelined?
My view is it trade agreements generally can be either good or bad. The TPP in its current form is bad for NZ. However, it would be difficult for NZ to be the only one in the Pacific region not signing.
– NZ can be worse off than now with the agreement, and
– worse off than now if NZ is the only Pacific rim country left out.
I guess Little is mulling over his own set of conundrums and working out strategies to address them.
No we won’t as the studies have clearly shown. We going to be losing jobs and being forced to be a resources supplier to the powerful nations which means an increase in poverty and stagnation of our economy and society.
so you’ll bend over for the corporates for $40p.a (in 2030)?…I think that is what is known as a cheap date
Yeah, it was really lame of him.
I’m not sure if Andrew could have said anything differently. The bottom line is that a Labour led government will vote down any attempt by corporate or foreign governments to interfere with our sovereign democratic decision making.
Problem is, they do not get to ‘vote’ on that at all. Last year’s general election was where they needed to pull their socks up. Too late now.
“The bottom line is that a Labour led government …….. ”
Really?
You managed to get that out of the drivel that Little was uttering?
I have heard more sense from the gurgling of a six month old baby that I heard from Little on morning report.
Surely there is someone in the Labour party who can do better than the current leader? Is it time to try Mallard?
Just because you never heard what you wanted to hear, doesn’t mean nothing of value was said.
Alwyn “heard” exactly what they wanted to hear, which is to say they weren’t in fact listening at all.
Yes, he could have said it differently. He could have said:
“In government, we plan to legislate against selling land to foreigners. If that puts us in breach of the TPPA, then we will need to re-negotiate the TPPA. If we can’t re-negotiate, we will simply leave it”.
Seems like a reasonable thing to say to me. Of course National would immediately say that Labour are trying to sabotage the future of NZ etc.
Exactly. The guy needs strong competent people who are not lawyers to coach him on making clear statements rather than eternal fence-sitting waffle.
That interview is infuriating. Little is trying to argue for being partially pregnant. Dolt.
guys, I do not want to keep repeating this again. Important sections of the Labour caucus are pro-TPPA.
Andrew Little’s statements have to reflect that, or his time as Leader is over.
As an experienced lawyer, Little knows exactly what he is communicating and how clear/unclear he wants it to be, and where he wants lots of ambiguity in his statements and arguments for future wiggle room.
TL/DR Labour is no longer fit for purpose.
“competent people who are not lawyers”
Half of Little’s problem is that he IS a lawyer.
He is trying so hard to avoid saying something he wouldn’t be able to wriggle out of that he ends up saying nothing intelligent at all.
Anyone else remember the 1985 Tom Paxton album?
“One million lawyers and other disasters” .
Because he and the Labour caucus actually believe in the TPPA and FTAs in general.
Because several significant Labour MPs are pro-TPPA and pro-US/anglo imperial strategy.
Shearer, I guess?
With the independent analysis of the TPP pointing to the prospect of an very minor and insignificant increase in GDP, the potential (as in all FTA) of the loss of jobs in our economy, the restrictions on Intellectual property, the inability to control foreign investment and the loss of sovereignty, the dangers imposed across all countries on the loss of indigenous rights (in complete contravention of the UNDIR), and the resultant dumbing down of our economic structure to one of resource supply, to say nothing of the surreptitious attack on The Treaty of Waitangi, our Nations founding Document, and the effect it will have on our ability to buy our medicines, one has to wonder just what it is that makes this so called “Deal” so attractive to Labour?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
I don’t wonder about it, I’m sure that’s exactly what they’re doing.
If he does that he will be in the shit with Aunty Helen!!!
The reason Little cannot be up front and oppose the TPPA is because the US have put a gun to everyone’s head.
You are either for, or against us.
John Key has made this clear to Little, so what is he to do. When Key talks about his top draw, these are some of the things he is talking about.
Look at how frantically South Korea is trying to join the party after they missed the boat. They have China as their biggest trading partner, they hate Japan with an intensity you cannot believe, and the US only slightly less. They already have FTAs with 75% of the world’s GDP. Why would they want to join, but to be “on the right side”.
And then there is Taiwan. Same thing, but different of course.
Who hs been left out of the TTP and the TTIP?
The BRICS, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Turkey from within the top 20 countries in the world by GDP (assuming Euro as one country).
Then look at Carter’s words on TPP, and Obama during SOTU speech. The primary reason for the TTP and TTIP is to declare economic and possibly military war on the BRICS attacking the USD through trying to steal the world’s reserve currency.
Unfortunately, whether or not you like it, Little is not bigger than these powers.
That is why the TPP will be shoved down your throat, whether you like it or not.
I disagree with Winston Peters on some things, but at least he’s staunch on the TPP>
Smart politics, NZF will take votes off natz and labour by saying it how it is and whilst I am no big fan of winnie he sticks to his guns which voters identify with.
Watch the natz go hard again on NZF as winnie could see shonky bog off back to bankstaland by galvanising the swinging dissaffected masses toward NZF
Winnie could also give two fingers to the left and go with National and get his knighthood
National could also go with Act, Peter Dunne and the MP and not even bother Winnie
He won’t and he’ll probably still get his knighthood. If there’s a politician anywhere that deserves a knighthood it would be Winston simply for hanging the fuck in there 😈
Yep. And successfully returning back to political life after being stabbed in the back and left for dead by National.
” he’ll probably still get his knighthood”
Is this another policy flip-flop that Little is proposing? Is he going to swing around and start supporting knighthoods. My, my. What will “she who must be obeyed” in New York have to say?
Knighthoods are meaningless in NZ these days we give them away to criminals.
Sir Michael Cullen?
touche.
close another post shop?
Why would you associate what I say with what Labour or Andrew Little support? I’m not a Labour supporter.
And, no, I don’t support the monarchy or the psychopathic awards system that we have.
Just for curiosity’s sake – does anyone know what happened with John Key’s invitation on Waitangi Day 2014 for Joel Bristow, or other representative of the deepsea drilling protestors to go to Wellington and have their minds changed?
I have’t seen the PM out protesting
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/RM-Labour.png
Very interesting graph. Obviously not predictive but disconcerting. Democracy is helped when there is a competent opposition.
Another interesting graph.
Democracy is helped when there is a competent media.
Democracy is helped when there is a healthy economy that benefits everyone, not just the 0.0001%.
https://hitlersingleptystate.wikispaces.com/file/view/image14.gif/295733426/image14.gif
Democracy is dead in NZ we are operating under an elected Dictatorship at present?
I’m heartened that slowly, ever so slowly some people on here are coming to see that the problem with the left in NZ isn’t solely John Keys fault
Says a troll to a troll….
You’re not amusing enough to be considered a troll
you think you’re amusing?
No but then I don’t think I’m a troll either
Another suffering from SPS perhaps?
That is amusing .
A bridge to far.
“I’m heartened that slowly, ever so slowly some people on here are coming to see that the problem with the left in NZ isn’t solely John Keys fault”
This is a “straw man” argument. Nobody claims that the left’s problems are John Key’s fault.
But he is still a piss-poor PM.
Well yes I concede I could have written that better. I guess a better way of putting it would be instead to say that some on here are starting to see that maybe the problem with Labour are predominantly internal
It seemed to me that some on here would prefer to make excuses for Labours poor performance rather then look within
CV a notable exception of course
You would say that, because the war a tory really likes to see is one where the workers fight each other and the tories collect profits from both sides.
The historical lesson you want us to forget is united we stand, divided we fall.
That’s just a little grandiose don’t you think
I’d say that McFlock was spot on. The Tories are here to try and split the Left apart so that they can win.
Well I can’t spoken for everyone on the right but for me I want to see Labour improve and this is why:
At the moment National is coasting along very middle of the road, don’t scare the horses because it doesn’t have to do anything to win, it doesn’t have to do anything that might upset some of the demographics
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
NZ need Labour to be strong so that National can come up with some policy because at the moment Nationals coasting
Holy crap PR I basically agree with what you are saying here.
(Having said that I believe that Labour is now culturally and organisationally incapable of improving. I currently rate a 50/50 chance that they will get less than 25% in 2017).
Well I say Labour but really I just use them because they’re the biggest left wing party in NZ at the moment
I’m taking the rough estimate in NZ that to get into power under MMP 35% is the bare minimum you’d be looking at and even then that opens you up to some massive amounts of horse trading
Yep, a 35% election result for Labour will leave Winnie grinning from ear to ear. (Especially as an election result that high for Labour suggests that the Greens will fall to 10% or less).
HC CV PR OK!
It’d make for interesting times as it sounds like based on that Labour would still need both the Greens and Winston
It’d be time for the Greens to demand some concessions I reckon
If National tried anything other than Labour-lite they’d lose. As John Banks said: If I wear my policy on my sleeve, I won’t get elected.
The same truly does apply to National. If their MPs and supporters got the policies that they truly want then they’d never get elected.
The real problem that we have is that Labour is trying to be National while wearing red.
Desperate times call for desperate measures but at the moment National doesn’t have to worry
PR, the problem for the right is partially as you describe, but the other factor is the failure of ACT.
Everyone in the beltway rates young whatsisname, and he’s amiable enough, but he can’t shift them polls.
His decision to not take a cabinet role is part of it all too. Got praised by the likes of DPF et al, but really, he’s opting to have less influence.
the politics around why that decision is made is the politics that supporters of a more active Right wing government need to get to grips with.
Given:
National has swallowed all of the right bar ACT’s rump and whoever the hell it is that votes for Colin Craig,
and the widely accepted general icompetence of the Labour party
and the personal liekability of their leader,
why aren’t they doing more?
you claim that it’s down to Labour sucking and not giving them udeas to rail agin, but that doesn;t really hold a lot of water (it holds some, but not much)
Labour, for all their faults, have produced ideas in oppo, they then abandon them after losing an election, or watch National roll out weaker versions to placate the electorate. (this is a net huge plus for the left as national is giving the concepts of the policy a big old tick for further development).
My point is, that of you want National to not be Labour light, the right needs to get a threat to National from the right happening. At the moment, the ‘right wing’ is either completely smitten with National and not seeing sense, or this is as far right wing as the NZ electorate gets.
I have to admit I’m surprised that Act hasn’t managed to rise in the polls, I thought they might be around 3-4% by now
But yes I see your point
Whereas I’m amazed that anyone still votes Act. They’ve had their heyday back in the 1980s and everyone now knows that their policies do too much damage. It’s why National still put on the mask of being Labour-lite.
Some are starting to realise that Labour were relevant when working people were hard done by. Those days are gone and so the need to support Labour is diminishing year by year.
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/RM-Labour.png
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
The internal problems of Labour mean that a white middle aged professional centrist candidate cannot be selected without the allegiance of the many factions within Labour who are so unlike the general public. The quality of Labour candidates is thus vastly inferior to the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. Being put on the list is no guarantee of a seat. Andrew Little just scraped into parliament after the specials. At least he will feel safer as long as he remains leader. It will only get worse for Labour as the deselection campaigns get underway. Their low poll of 2014 is not their nadir. Those votes will go in all directions but clearly many are drifting to support National.
“On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer”
Only one wee problem with that. We can’t all be “rich” can we.
The top 5% are earning more than the bottom 50%, and actually society is not structured to have a lot of “rich”.
You right wingers are a greedy self serving bunch, and you know what, eventually the low income and those in the middle (the aspirational ‘hope we get some too’) will wake up to the sham that Key is selling and realise it.
Good God – the first thing key did was give $100 a week to the top 10%, and sold that the rest can have $10 or so. Nice fucking scam. 7 years on they are trying to move the poor out of Auckland with $3000 payments to regions with no jobs, as a way of dealing with the housing crisis.
What a total sham.
You right wing wankers don’t give one iota for this in retail, gas stations, cleaners, bus drivers, you WANT them all to get fuck all so you have have it all.
Fisiani – your nasty greedy tone and posts post after post stand you out above almost all of the horrid rightees
^ This!
Well said.
+1
+2, go Appleboy!
We can’t all be “rich” can we
On this we agree, some people don’t want to be rich because they’re happy with what they have, some aren’t born lucky enough to have the advantages to become but then some aren’t born with the drive to become rich and some don’t want to pay the cost of becoming rich
Becoming rich is largely a choice, for some its easier and for others its harder but its still a choice
We can all be rich if we define wealth in human ways rather than sociopathic ones.
Fair enough, we’re all free to define rich for ourselves
Yes, we are, but that doesn’t make it real.
heh
I recently heard an alternative definition to “billionaire”: someone who has improved the lives of a billion people, even in some little way.
Interesting goal to go for. Much better than just getting a billion bucks.
If that’s what makes you happy then by all means go for it
The day I need moral guidance or encouragement from you would be a very interesting day indeed.
I have no problem with people becoming rich, as long as they don’t create a system where other people become poor as a means for them to become rich.
+1. Well said, appleboy. My jaw simply dropped at these two sentences: There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money. On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
30% is a hell of a big percentage to be kicked to the kerb and spat on. And as for 70% wanting to be richer, since when has “git rich” expressed the highest human aspiration? Oh for one of those old-fashioned right wingers who thought they owned the copyright on decency – I might not agree with them but at least I could respect the fact that their view involved a conception of the greater good.
That 30% of the adult population is pretty much the same 30% which has given up on voting and participating in our political system.
Not a coincidence, I suspect.
Who is kicking to the kerb and spitting on??????
How can you possibly read that into my words.
i was not even being disparaging. do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money. If so what percentage do you reckon it is?
Such people exist of course – just not on the Left. And they’ll take from the poor faster than they’ll take from the rich. Just have to watch National’s attacks on beneficiaries to see that.
Draco let me quote you what the Finance Minister said in the House.
Hon BILL ENGLISH: Our tax and transfer system is highly redistributive, and the number of people paying income tax is surprisingly small. The lowest-income 43 percent of households currently receive more in income support than they pay in income tax. The 1.3 million households with incomes under $110,000 a year collectively pay no net tax—that is, their total income support payments match their combined income tax. The top 10 percent of households contribute over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers—over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers. This system is highly redistributive and we believe it is fair.
The rich give a fair share to the poor – which part of the quote is hard to understand or do you think their contribution should be even more than 70%.
as for attacks on beneficiaries , What part of “The biggest rise in benefits in a generation” constitute attack.
Instead of slogans can you explain why you think the rich do not give to the poor when clearly they do and how raising benefits is an attack. It’s like I’ve wandered into an asylum.
No they don’t, the rich steal from the poor. That’s how capitalism works and it’s worked that way for thousands of years. It’s what causes it to always fail.
Watch the video
Draco stop using slogans and simply answer the question. Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of taxI if so why and how much.
I’m not using slogans – you are as you usually do because you really don’t understand what’s happening.
We have to get rid of the rich. That’s not just about income but also about ownership.
I would like to see you explain, in non-disparaging terms, the difference between your 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money and the 70% who want the chance to be richer. Both want to be richer, by your account, and both must get money from somewhere if they are to do so.
Here’s how I see it: I think that the current system privileges wealth extractors over wealth creators. The latter might just lead to the tide that raises all boats, the former certainly does not. The eagerness of the already wealthy to get their claws on state infrastructure that comes with a guaranteed cash flow is one example of what I mean by wealth extractor – nothing of is value added, but an existing cash flow is diverted toward a privately owned pocket. Being privately owned, this piece of infrastructure then becomes answerable to the shareholder (so the wealthy) over the public good. The 30% under such conditions are the victims of this form of economic extraction, being removed from consideration by the public-to-private transference and in no position to defend themselves.
Draco
the rich steal from the poor IS a slogan.
You want to get rid of the rich. Like in Cambodia?. Like in North Korea or like in Albania?
No it’s not – it’s a statement of fact. National’s slogans, which you come on here repeating such as the BS about people being envious of the rich, aren’t connected to reality.
Yes.
None of those got rid of their rich which is why they’re still capitalist in form, structure and oppression.
“Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of tax…”
Is that the top 10 percent of of people who declare all their income, or the top 10 percent who accumulate the money?
Can’t answer the question if the definitions aren’t clear.
The thing is, if fisi’s little 30% social experiment were imposed on NZ, as I’m sure it would be, next claim would be 50%. In America the hopeless poor are about 60%.
It’s like Bill English’s 5% structural unemployment, once he instituted it it became the lower baseline, and unemployment varied above it.
“the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. ”
Hilarious. Wastes of space like Melissa Lee would appreciate your faith.
Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive then Labours, I will admit there are some in National that have reached for use by date and then some
For some time now Labour has been picking candidates in accordance with where its own internal logic, internal factions and internal culture currently sit – but which results in a serious mismatch with what the electorate is looking for.
I remember reading that in the 1970s UK Labour still had very many MPs from coal mining and trades/shop floor backgrounds.
Today there are almost none, instead, Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured.
“Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured”.
Oxford grads in the Labour party are hardly new, and Eton isn’t that uncommon
Since 1935 there have been 11 leaders of the party.
Of these 6 went to Oxford. Attlee, Gaitskell, Wilson, Foot, Blair and Miliband.
What has happened in British Labour in the same as in the Conservative party there and the New Zealand Labour Party.
Their candidates go through student politics, get a job working in an MP’s or a Party office, may work for a Cabinet Minister, find an electorate and go into Parliament. Many of them have never held a normal job in their life.
It happens a bit with National but not quite as much. Paula Bennett is one example.
Those rich advantaged kids have reversed the film named Eating the Rich to eaton’ the poor!
You are looking back a long way with that comment PR.
“Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive”
A gender neutral version of the 1972 National Party campaign slogan.
“Man for man, the stronger team”.
That one, although the shambles of the later Kirk/Rowling Governments showed that it was probably true, didn’t work out too well in the campaign did it?
National’s line up is almost entirely corrupt.
Thinking about it I suppose that could be considered fairly impressive.
I don’t know mate – any shambles with Brownlee involved in it is a pretty hopeless mess.
Un-PC – ‘a not-so-pretty hopeless mass.
Mustn’t mention electorates like northland, eh…
I wonder if Winston has set up an electorate office yet, and if he has, has he ever visited it?
Anyone here live in the electorate and have you ever seen him at a public function?
Awww, you can’t google it yourself and find the electorate office in Kerikeri?
Anyway, I was referring to the previous Northland MP, one of the “high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National”.
National’s bringing them back.
And they all vote National.
It’s just another point where reality contradicts the delusional beliefs of the right-wing.
DTB
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
And they all vote National.
Can’t speak for all, but there seems an insatiable attraction for more, for bigger, amongst people who have acquired wealth and they are wedded to it ‘to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or worse’…ad infinitum.
They are wannabe John Keys
Fisi I think you are right Labour aren’t sure where their support base is especially after Roger Douglas took them hard right even further right than National?
That figure does not include gst or corporate taxes poor pay more GST than the rich or corporates who shift the cost GST back to the customers.
Or go on overseas trips operate Swiss bank accounts or don’t pay any tax like like google Facebook Amazon etc.
Fisanal a paid spin doctor of the right.
Employers not paying a living wage are being subsidized by the socold wealthier earners.
The speculators are being subsidized by those on higher declared incomes.
The corporate tax evaders are also being subsidized.
Pollutors the same.
The debt financier’s who Bill English has borrowed $80 billion+ for election bribes for his parties tax cuts are being subsidized $5.8 billion a year.
Labour is not the whole opposition. You may have heard of this thing called MMP.
A weak Labour won’t be able to cobble together a government, Labour needs to be reasonably strong and if the Greens ever want to get into parliament then Labour need to be really strong
Nope. Time for the Left to give up on Labour and vote either Greens, Mana or IP.
Ok then but its still the same, there needs to be at least one strong left wing party
Why?
Numbers really, the left are on what 40% at the moment so if Labour crumble its not really going to attract any votes from the right so the total percentage isn’t to increase all that much
But if you have a strong party, a party that can convince people it can lead then that’s what will attract non-voters to vote for them (and swing voters of course)
That’s illogical BS.
A few parties that show that they can work together can, and will, get votes. The problem we’ve been having is that, Labour especially, the parties on the Left have been attacking each other rather than working together.
Yes they might be able to get some swing votes and maybe even from the missing million but I’m thinking Labour doesn’t want to cut the pie any smaller then it needs to
Short sighted though that may be
Electorate seats.
If the left were composed of several competitive small parties without one being clearly dominant, there would need to be a lot of pre-election co-operation to avoid splintered left votes in electorates. If National won enough extra electorates due to fragmented “left” votes, then it could end up with enough overhang to skew the proportionality of Parliament. It’s very unlikely now, but as there get to be fewer list seats and more electorate seats as the population increases, it becomes more possible.
True but they could always work together. And then, once they have power, change electorate voting to preferential voting. This would allow all parties to put up candidates with the most preferred winning rather than the one with the most votes which is often a significant minority.
@Andre.
Your proposal is theoretically possible but it looks extremely unlikely.
In practice the National Party would have to win at least 61 of the 64 electorates they contest.
Surely there are going to be at least 4 Labour MPs who could win one of the General electorates?
By the way the number of electorate seats doesn’t go up just because the population increases. It goes up only if the percentage increase in the North Island, or in the Maori roll, goes up faster than the rate of growth in the South Island. That is because the South Island is guaranteed 16 general electorates.
Another example of the TPPA as being more of a trade restrictions agreement than a free trade agreement: the NZ Library Association’s standing committee on copyright is concerned about the impacts of making copyright provisions more restrictive. Apart from concerns about underestimation of the cost to NZ of the additional restrictions, there’s this about the prospect of over-hasty legislation:
In particular, bringing New Zealand law into line with US law could prove problematic if provisions favouring rights holders (such as extension of term) are adopted, but exemptions that US law affords are not also adopted. However, because there will not be sufficient time for MBIE to extensively consider the effects of broadly-worded exemptions, it is more likely that any exemptions will be narrow in wording and limited in effect.
In other words, the nett effect could be that we end up with all the draconian proscriptions of US copyright law but few of the exemptions, making us even more restrictive than the US.
The above quote is from an email, so no link – however, you can obtain more info from the committee by writing to copyright@lianza.org.nz.
They are quite correct – NZ lacks exemptions for things like satire and parody, let alone other aspects of fair use.
Let’s buy a little piece of heaven and donate it to NZ
https://givealittle.co.nz/project/abeltasmanbeach2016
Eyes and ears open for the start of the political year here.
– Winston Peters’ opening speech for the year tonight
– Post-Cabinet signals this afternoon
– Prime Minister’s first big speech, in Auckland tomorrow afternoon
– Labour Party’s first big speech on Saturday
– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?
Anyway, let the games begin.
TPP Auckland meeting and livestream tonight 😉
Rod Oram on TPP: Well worth the listen!
“Business commentator Rod Oram on the recently available New Zealand research papers on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, and New Zealand’s role in the TPPA.”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/201786811/business-commentator-rod-oram
“– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?”
Oh dear. It shows how irrelevant the Green Party is, doesn’t it.
I gather they had a speech today. Even people who follow politics quite closely, like yourself, didn’t know about it.
I wonder how many people went to it. Outside of Green MPs and party staffers of course who would have been conscripted.
Anyone here go to the speech? That is anyone not on the public payroll as a Green staffer or MP.
Did anyone hear Stephen Franks’s bumptious and
ignorant performance on Jim Mora’s program yesterday?
The Panel, RNZ National, Monday 25 January 2016
Jim Mora, Stephen Franks, Josie Pagani
There seems to be no code of behavior in place at Radio New Zealand. Some years ago, Bomber Bradbury was banned from this program for the crime of criticizing the Prime Minister’s loutish and irresponsible behavior in parliament. Yet Franks, whose disrespectful and contemptuous behavior is far worse, continues to be a guest.
This afternoon, Franks was frothing with indignation about state house tenants who have the cheek to complain about substandard conditions. His rage extended to the afternoon’s first guest, Otago University Professor Michael Baker; Franks treated him with derision, referring to him repeatedly as “these guys”, in between his frequent imprecations of state house tenants.
Luckily for Franks, the other guest was not the superior Dita Di Boni, who has firmly put him in his place in the past, but the giggling Josie Pagani.
I really haven’t got the heart to transcribe Franks’s nonsense today, but aficionados of bad radio and cranky shouting should click on this link…..
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/thepanel/20160125
OMG! Morrissey – I don’t know how you do it!
Listening to both Franks and Pagani!
It would make me want to spew.
The so called “Panel” is an appalling programme – hosted by a sanctimonious prick and has not merit what so ever. A complete waste of space-time continuum.
Evidently Paula put the boot into the PI’s yesterday.
He’s an angry fellow and his stroke is well overdue, but he had a point about incomplete/selective surveys. Still an utter dick though.
Latest news heading on Radionz.
Putin is corrupt, says US Treasury
Russian President Vladimir Putin during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Antalya, Turkey, November 15, 2015. Michael Klimentyev/RIA Novosti
The US Treasury has told a BBC investigation that it considers Russian President Vladimir Putin to be corrupt.
‘Pot meet kettle.’
For those of you who are taking a responsible approach to social drinking
by choosing the very refreshing low alcohol “citrus” beers.
If you are on Statins, you should be aware that the “citrus” apparently includes grapefruit juice.
Well now, this is interesting
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11579449
He indicated he was hoping for redemption within caucus. “Politics is a rollercoaster. You know that and I’ve been around long enough to know that.”
Could be Cunliffe v Robertson 2 (or is that 3?) after the next election…
I suspect there is another reason that is much more relevant.
I think he has found that he is quite unemployable outside of Parliament. To be blunt there is probably no-one who will give him a job. This is the only way he has any chance of retaining the lifestyle to which he has become accustomed.
I’d say you’re on the money there alwyn.
Also goes a long way in explaining why it’s so hard to get rid of old Labour mps.
I reckon the Labour party should make a rule where the maximum term for a Mp is 4 terms with a clause that this time period can be extended by the party membership vote only.
That way you’d be able to ditch the leeches like Mallard or the unpopular ones like Cunllife but keep the ones performing well.
3 moneykeys in a row – all typing to create a dictionary – so cute
What a great pseudonym you chose.
Marty “The film depicts thirty-six hours in the life of the main character: 34 year-old, bug-eyed Marty”
and Mars.
That’s of course the Mars Bar. The one that is full of nuts.
ka boom! well done alwyn comedy genius – well pretty good – sorta dated ha ha – nah – hey at least you had a go
But BM might have a sensible suggestion there Marty. Not all left suggestions are workable, and not all right ones are hopeless.
I disagree grey. bm sows seeds of discord – some subtle, some obvious. I think right wing solutions are hopeless and I do agree that a few left wing suggestions may be unworkable in our current system.
I don’t think Cunliffe can be bothered with all that shit again, he will concentrate on being a politican, the media crucified him. He is too intelligent to waste his energy on another leadership battle. Let Robertson take the shit from the Tory MSM media aka Mike Hoskings and Paul Henry.
I don’t think the ego of the Cunliffe will settle for merely being an electorate MP, I think the Cunliffe has his sights set higher
it’s not just ego – it’s ability. And Cunliffe has it in spades. Problem is though, Cunliffe is not as cunning on the playing field as GR2020 is. He has also been in the beltway a bit too long now.
LOL 😈
Serves him right
Know about this?
Screening tomorrow night in Auckland:
http://www.aucklandlibraries.govt.nz/EN/Events/Events/Pages/aplacetocallhomescreening.aspx
Briar’s 2015 film A Place to Call Home provides a revealing examination of New Zealand’s state housing situation.
The documentary tells the stories of two women who share the same passionate values and deep concern for the vulnerable and often voiceless members of their respective communities.
Ironically, they find themselves in a tug of war where the creation of a much needed community housing project in the Far North is dependent on the dismantling of another equally valuable and deeply entrenched community in Glen Innes, Auckland.
A Place to Call Home is raw and brave and explores a topic that is extremely relevant in today’s environment of unaffordable housing and social reforms.
_________________________________
For the public record – I believe that State (and Council) housing is PUBLIC, and ‘social housing’ is PRIVATE.
I oppose the privatisation of STATE (and COUNCIL) housing by (private) ‘social housing’ providers.
I support the directly-affected State tenants in their fight to STOP the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
Unlike the Co-Convenor of the Child Poverty Action Group, and Salvation Army employee Alan Johnson, who supports the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
How do I know this?
Because he told me to my face.
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption / anti-privatisation Whistle-blower’
2016 Auckland Mayoral candidate.
Penny Bright
2016 Auckland Mayoral candidate.
Weekly Economics Podcast – Inequality
https://soundcloud.com/weeklyeconomicspodcast/inequality
The euthanasia submissions. If you care about people and them having a right to decide when to die when they are terminally ill or in pain without much life to enjoy and wish to disembark in their own time while they can still smile at others and enjoy knowing them, then please follow the guide below and support quality euthanasia. Submissions finish on MONDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2016 AND CAN GO IN UNTIL 23.59.
(Remember 1/2 is the anniversary of various provinces so perhaps do it the day before in case you want to be out and about enjoying life.)
Euthanasia submission end Jan –
http://www.ves.org.nz/news/3520054
and
you can remind yourself of Lecretia’s Seales wishes.
http://lecretia.org/you-can-help
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/76243294/euthanasia-debate-the-international-context
You know, it’s still too damn hard to make a submission to a select committee. You’d think that they were making it so as to dissuade people.
So I was looking at this
http://www.theonion.com/article/marxists-apartment-a-microcosm-of-why-marxism-does-1382
but then I scrolled a bit more and this was even funnier
http://www.theonion.com/article/congress-allocates-90-million-protect-remaining-ea-52210
(Save Kenny!)
The first article, and it’s photo look just like Labour’s fish and chip brigade of the 1980s
http://www.michaelbassett.co.nz/archive_fc80.htm
The second story is a disgrace. The Eagles deserve much more than that. They should get at least as much as Obama will get for his Presidential Library. At least people will still listen to The Eagles. Can you imagine anyone reading through a hundred million pages of the Obama archives?
I prefer Kenny Loggins to The Eagles, at least his songs were fun and you don’t hear third-rate buskers at markets murdering his songs
That’s not really the point of a Presidential ‘Library’.
No a Presidential Library is MEANT to be a repository of documents but they have become a cross between a library and a theme park.
Have a look at some of the things in Reagan’s one.
Air Force I is there (well an old one)
There is a Ronald Reagan Pub
They have got a Presidential motorcade.
and a President’s helicopter.
http://www.reaganfoundation.org/DETAILS_F.ASPX?P=LM2023EAF1&H1=3&H2=7&LM=LIBRARYANDMUSEUM&ARGS_A=CMS&ARGS_B=34&ARGSB=N&TX=18&SW=18
They also have temporary exhibits including one on American Football
http://www.reaganfoundation.org/details_f.aspx?p=LM2024ETEX&h1=0&h2=0&lm=libraryandmuseum&args_a=cms&args_b=35&argsb=N&tx=3171&sw=3171
Clinton’s isn’t quite as extreme but it is definitely close.
There are probably some earlier ones that are more restrained.
ps. I was only joking about the Eagles getting more taxpayer money than the Obama Library. He is going to have to find a lot of generous donors who will put up the money. On the other hand the Eagles aren’t going to get any money either.
More evidence that luck is the arbiter of business success.
Suck it up, wingnuts.
And?
weren’t you the one upthread saying being rich is a choice?
Congratulations to Bill English on his eighth year of miserable and unrelenting economic failure. If we must have crazed far-right governments from time to time the least we must ask is that the useless assholes learn to balance the books.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/64004654/Budget-deficit-worse-than-forecast
@stuart
He wasn’t a complete failure, don’t forget the “surplus” last year and the generous tax payer funded entitlement to live in his wifes property for the last 7/8 years, yes he’s done very well for himself.
(sarc)
Balancing the books will be the task of the next non National govt to take power, this is the historical cycle NZ has followed for decades.
There are too many “sheeple” and not enough real people like most of those who contribute to ts.
Why does the Left always insist on a Budget Surplus as a sign of economic competence?
Are you really daring English to go down the road of slashing Government spending and enforcing austerity through the nation?
Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.
Why would you encourage that?
Hey CV
“Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.”
You have a funny definition of a surplus and how it should be derived, the scenario which you adamantly describe is the one which English used to produce the surplus he boasted about, but normal surpluses are usually a result of a well run economy where the money is plowed back into the pockets of many, one of the criteria for a well run, healthy economy is near full employment, not increasing unemployment, for which is the current situation.
During the Clark years, the Govt then was contributing 40c of every dollar spent in NZ and a surplus every year and very low unemployment , Key swore to get that down to 20c and now look where we are today.
The economic and social policies of the Key govt will only result in massive increases in debt as they have failed to achieve the basic fundamentals of a well run economy and one of the main failures is the deliberately high unemployment.
Under the Clark govt you saw considerable redistribution of wealth from the haves to the havenots, we now have the exact opposite (redistribution from the havenots to the haves) and the exact opposite result, the proof of this is there now for every one to see, increasing poverty, extreme wealth, and high unemployment and a deficit and a massive increasing debt.
From your analysis above, I certainly wouldn’t take any advice from you as a financial adviser.
Jim Mora claims ACT’s leader is “cogent”; sadly for him,
neither of today’s guests is stupid enough to endorse that provocation.
The Panel, RNZ National, Tuesday 26 January 2016
Jim Mora, Mai Chen, Bernard Hickey
Today’s Panelists are several notches higher on the intelligence scale than yesterday’s dire offering [1], but the major problem persists: it’s the same host. About 4:15, after the long and tedious introductions have finally come to an end, the host decides to make the first of his glib and shallow statements for the day….
JIM MORA: [affecting a serious tone] The ACT leader David Seymour makes the point, and it seems to be a cogent one, when he says “Those who grumble about a lack of a capital gains tax should look at the ten least affordable markets in the Demographia Survey. All of them except Auckland are there despite having a capital gains tax.”
Mai Chen doesn’t even bother to snort in derision, but her fellow guest manages to say, in an exquisitely indirect way, that David Seymour is an ignoramus….
BERNARD HICKEY: Hmmmm. The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.
The rest of the program, unfortunately, seems to be as dire and as determinedly trivial as ever. Mora has just attempted to manipulate his guests into saying something disrespectful about Kanye West; neither of them indulged him. He should have tried it yesterday: Stephen Franks would have launched into an insane racist fugue for five minutes.
[1] http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-26012016/#comment-1123541
What Hickey actually said, and you quote it was
“The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.”
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It is Hickey saying I don’t like that example he came up with. He hasn’t the slightest idea of the facts but he’ll try and deflect attention.
He even admits he hasn’t the faintest idea what he is talking about when he admits “which we don’t know”. All that means is HE doesn’t know.
Hickey was never one to let his ignorance get in the way of his political bias.
David Seymour can’t even park a car properly so I’m not sure what you expect him to know about the housing crisis.
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It’s saying it in an arch and subtle manner. Every listener—including your good self—would have understood quite clearly that Hickey has no respect for ACT’s risible “leader”.
Hickey has no respect for anyone except Hickey.
So what? Hickey is just a hack journalist isn’t he.
?
Bernard Hickey is a solid financial commentator and a serious journalist.
I would say he had been a serious journalist, but that was a fair while ago.
His financial commentary is pretty risible though.
Proof Alwyn you have no credibilify other than being a proffessional whinger for the far right.Bernard Hickey goes against what most big banks economist commentary because big banks just want a speculative market that loads every one up with debt.
NZ govt debt stands at $120 billion and rising at $ 27 million per day.
I am for full and open discussion on economic matters
“a proffessional whinger for the far right”?
No I’m not a professional when I comment here. I am merely trying to bring some knowledge to the ignorant. A very hard task with some of them though.
Did you hear Jordan Williams on the Panel today?
His intervention was of the sort that usually gets you to transcribe Mora’s dismal show!
I missed it, Paul, but I’m sure I know exactly what he said.
And…. shouldn’t he have been carrying Whaleoil’s bags somewhere instead of making a fool of himself on radio?
https://www.national.org.nz/news/news/media-releases/detail/2016/01/21/Benefit-numbers-continue-steady-yearly-decline Some great news for some of the poorest in society
Seriously?
On the day it breaks that one of those bludging beneficiaries off the pension is a veteran whose benefit they cut because of a trespass arrest, you bastards are gloating about it?
Just a comment from someone who is sick of this country being dealt to by Mr Key and his crony capitalist mates.
Can you stop getting sucked in by the lies in relation to income and tax paid, ie the top 10% of earners pay 70% of the tax.
It’s the top 10% of the wealthy that pay next to no tax you need to focus on.
I am sick of Fisiani and others spreading the lie that (implied) the wealthiest 10% pay 70% of the tax.
It is a lie and stamp it out.
The wealthiest 10% pay far less than 10% of all the tax.
Don’t rush into TPP, US critics tells Kiwis
A leading American critic of the Trans Pacific Partnership, Lori Wallach, said New Zealand should not rush into the TPP because there were not the numbers to pass it in the United States Congress.
It was not a done deal and could yet become a “5000-page doorstop.”
She could not understand why the New Zealand Government was pushing the deal so strongly as it was not a done deal.
It had very little upside for New Zealand and enormous downsides, she told a meeting of about 1000 at the Auckland Town Hall tonight.
Yet New Zealand had been one of the most enthusiastic.
“So I thought it was really important to dig out of the snow and come and say ‘guys this is far from a done deal and your Government is trying to run you guys towards a cliff.
“This is no done deal – this is likely to be an undone deal. ”
New Zealand might change its laws to meet the terms of an agreement that might never get finished.
“And you’ll have screwed yourselves over by passing that law,” she said.
“So for God’s sake don’t go rushing into this because in all likelihood it ain’t going to happen.”
Lori Wallach is the director of the Washington-based Public Citizen Global Trade Watch Group and tonight began a speaking tour with Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey against the TPP.
She suggested that discontent in the United States on issues such as the period of exclusivity for biologic drugs or barring tobacco companies from investor-state dispute settlement could be changed in side-letters between the US and other countries.
That was how binding changes could be made to an agreement without opening up the text for renegotiation.
She also said the investor-dispute settlement (ISDS) rules were an enormous risk.
She disputed the New Zealand Government’s claim that ISDS – allowing disputes to be settled by private tribunal – would not attract cases.
While the US has had 50 agreements with ISDS and had had hardly any challenges over 50 years, there were now more than 50 a year. And under TPP – an agreement of 12 countries – it would double its exposure with 9500 new corporations from TPP countries being a possible new threat.
And while New Zealand had had no ISDS cases taken against it, it could face exposure to 1608 United States companies – and the US was the most litigious country in the world.
“This is brand new liability. So when your Government says ‘we’ve never been sued,’ I say ‘hold on to your wallet and your tax dollars because if TPPA happens, it is just a matter of time.”
“A propaganda exercise”
Jane Kelsey, New Zealand’s leading campaigner against TPP over the five years it was negotiated, took her place at the lectern with a stuffed toy – a “dead rat” she has called Tim, after former Trade Minister Tim Grose has talked of New Zealand having to swallow dead rats.
She said the national interest analysis on the TPP released today by the Government was “devoid of any independent insight” because it was drafted by the officials who negotiated the agreement.
“It is nothing more than a propaganda exercise,” she said.
She said the $2.7 billion estimated increase in gdp by 2030 would be, on current growth rates, a mere 0.9 per cent of gdp in 2030.
Next Thursday the Trade Minister of the TPP countries would sign the deal – but that was the end of it.
The national interest assessment would be presented to the House and legislation drafted – but it could not come into force for at least two years.
“We need to make our voices heard from that for at least the next two years.”
Politicians from Labour, the Greens, New Zealand First and the Maori Party spoke as well.
Grant Robertson: Agreement undermines NZ’s sovereignty
Labour finance spokesman Grant Robertson the Government had undertaken a “secretive, exclusory, unaccountable process driven by the galactic ego and arrogance of Tim Groser.”
He quoted from the national interest analysis the sentence he said identified the source of Labour’s objection.
“The agreement places new limitations on Government’s ability to modify New Zealand’s policy settings to ensure they are appropriate for our domestic circumstances.”
“That is the nub of the problem here,” he said. It undermined sovereign rights.
It could, for example, prevent a Government legislation to get proper public broadcasting.
He said the agreement undermined New Zealand’s sovereignty and while there were modest economic benefits from TPP “you cannot put a price on our democratic and constitutional freedoms to make our own law.”
“It’s about power
Greens’ co-leader Metiria Turei said the point of the TPP was “to take power away from democratically elected Government, to give it to multinational corporations” and where their interests clashed with the interests of New Zealand, the investors interests would come out on top. “It’s not about trade; it’s about power.”
Marama Fox: Issue unifying for Kiwis
Maori Party co-leader Marama Fox said the issue had been unifying because now people might understand how Maori felt to have lost their sovereign rights.
“We have been fighting this fight for 175 years.”
The party objected to the Government having the power in the TPP to interpret what rights were under the Treaty of Waitangi.
There had been an irrational fear in New Zealand that if you give Maori more rights it would take away others’ rights, or that Maori “might do to us what we have done to them.”
“”That is wrong. We want to live in a country where we recognise our duality of nationhood, that we are here as partners.”
“Undermining NZ business”
New Zealand First’s Fletcher Tabuteau claimed that New Zealand First had been the most vocal against the TPP and the most consistent.
He said ISDS would give multi-national corporates an unfair advantage over New Zealand companies in New Zealand because only they would have access to ISDS.
He suggested that minimum wage measures or environmental laws passed by the Government could trigger the ISDS and let overseas companies sue the Government but New Zealand companies would have to “like it and lump it.”
“It will undermine New Zealand business into the future.”
He said National still had the numbers to approve the national interest analysis but opponents of the TPP needed to talk to National MPs.
“Some of those National MPs must fold under your pressure.”
Lori Wallach has public meetings planned in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin.
– NZ Herald
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11580056