It's all in the OAG report. The possibility of expansion was part of the RFP when they went looking for tenders. Everyone got the same info. Four parties expressed interest but only two tendered. Sorry no cigar on that conspiracy
You know all this for sure do you from the splendid isolation of your urban fringe lifestyle block? Or are you just a fuxkwit? It will be interesting to see the feminists on here's response to your comments.
I wish he'd stop bankrupting the English language and make his nouns and verbs match. "My priority now are the thousands of New Zealanders who can’t buy their own home..." Priority is singular. It needs a singular verb. Looks like he paid as much attention...
Self employed don't as of right.
You are being treated no differently than millions of workers. We have to ask permission to not be at work, otherwise we are deemed to have resigned. In your case you primarily just have to advise not seek permission). we don't get our holidays funded ...
My pay gets stopped if I leave the country for a day. That's the downside of hourly pay rates. If I'm not at work I don't get paid. What makes your situation so special?
No, the primary role of the Vanguard class is strategic deterrance. If you don;t believe me go and check the RN's website. That requires they remain sumberged and undetected. That's why one has always been at sea for the last forty years. They are not ...
you're wrong. This is not about sea power, this is about strategic nuclear capability. The submarines in the article and the tactics they use are very differnet than those used by Nuclear submarines like the Vigilant. Those types of ICBM vessels have next ...
clearly I have no idea what you are talking about
ok take out the want. What exactly have they done, that is so morally repugnant to you, that makes you state this is the fate for them? What is the 'this' you refer to?
"The Scenic Hotel owners will rot in hell for this. " For what? What exactly have they done, that is so morally repugnant to you, that makes you want such a fate for them?
you guys migh be interested in this https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/19/basic-income-finland-low-wages-fewer-jobs
That's not intercompany rivalry coming out there is it mickey? He didn't take a client did he? Interesting he worked for the company that is now representing people who claim to be afghans affected by Operation Burnham. Note he is the Honorary Consul. NZ ...
I thought the best thing in PArliament today was Jacinda's joke in question #2. English had a good one liner in his question from Peters.
This really looks like nothing to do with deprivation in NZ. It looks like a small PI community church have shared some food and one of the preparers has infected the others. That's why there has been no general health alert - if it was in pre-prepared ...
That appears to be the motto of the Labour Research Unit.
you had that impression becasue Andrew Little aided by people like Ropata and others, couldn't be bothered doing proper research. you also were willing to accept their slurs were true because you probably thought they had done their homework. You were ...
There was nothing dodgy here. Are you in the Labour Research Unit? Because your alternative facts are just fake news. You need to read the AG report and understand the mechanics of what went on. The Matavai Hotel is owned by the Govt of Niue. it had ...
He made a very genuine apology in court today and good on him. Par;iamentarians have a huge advantage over the public with almost total freedom of speech in Parliament, with next to no comeback if you are maligned. But they have to use that responsibly and...
He had plenty of time to apologise when the AG report came out. Why do you feel that ordinary citizens don't have the right to defend their reputations while politicians have free reign to trample on them?
Yes but he also has the responsibility to do so within the law. Do you disagree with the auditor general and his apology?
Because under the Geneva conventions it requires an intent to specifically target civilians absent any military objective. That's why you haven't seen tens of thousands of soldiers paraded in front of the courts over the decades for bad aim or targeting ...
No I think it is Andrew Little as he said on rnz this week that it appeared that any civilian deaths appeared to be a mistake and nothing leapt out indicating war crimes
Really? You think an apology and an offer of $100k in damages is the result of vexatiousness? I suggest you get a new dictionary
No it was on attack ads and hate speech, which is not dissimilar from the current context imo.
Smells can also be highly misleading as you point out. Rather than shrieking something is dead and rotting under the bed you should first investigate that it's not your own sweaty socks. Guess which option Andrew chose
They didn't. The money went to the govt of Niue. That's why Little is in court. The same sloppy attention to detail you're showing. He pointed to the wrong village same as some other newsworthy individuals.
That's strange Roy because only a month ago you upticked an idea of taking people to court on charges of hate speech. So you want to criminalise people just because they hurt someone else's feelings?
there's a big campaign on particulalry in Auckland. That's probably why rates halved overall in 2015 compared to the previous two years. There was a slight rebound in 2016. It's unusual how sticky it is in the PI community.
did anyone here think that Jordan Williams suffered any reputation loss as a result of Colin Craig's action? I know I didn't but I don't rate him highly at all so there was nowehre to fall. A jury might ask, What have the Haggemans done wrong to deserve ...
yes they do. How did Jordan Williams get his money out of Colin Craig?
Recent Comments