Did you honestly not see any of this coming during the campaign? Where the hell where were you?
I understand and to a degree agree with your frustration and criticism. However all they are doing is what they promised to do in the campaign. It highlights how bad Labour's campaign was when we couldn't convince people that these promises were bad for ...
Yes I was going to question this clear principle of international law, but you have answered that for me. Thank you
This is a profoundly difficult issue to both understand and reach a resolution on. I genuinely fear what will happen in the coming years as we work through these issues. I understand the interpretation issues. But regardless of what side of that argument ...
Can you clarify your comment. Its abhorrent to those of us on the left. But this was a central plank of their campaign and something Labour and the Greens warned the electorate would happen if National was elected. Why do you think people who voted for ...
I am not sure how she would suffer damage. This was a central policy of both ACT and National. They would only suffer damage if they had broken their promise to repeal it.
No - that would be: He reo motuhake ranei o te reo Maori, nei ra?
Exactly There is a soft compulsion to learn Te Reo in my private oganisation. It is generally accepted and embraced by the staff. We have two one hour tutorials a week. We don't get a bonus. Its part of the job. We shouldn't expect to be paid to learn the ...
Do you think that dropping Te Reo words into English sentences is actually speaking or understanding Te Reo? All you are doing is speaking a unique dialect of English. We are introducing new words to New Zealand English. For example one of the following ...
Its those types of payments that this government will say they have a mandate to reign in. It was what they campaigned against for six years. The argument being that if speaking Te Reo is part of the job, then your salary covers that training (just like it...
Try explaining that to 99% of the population
Net Debt is $8b higher than forecast at the PREFU. Unfortunately this is exactly what National needs to justify what they are about to unleash.
What do you mean he wasn't strong enough to decide? They are not in his party so had no right to decide. He has no control over them other than what was negotiated and agreed in the Coalition Agreements. There is a lot to criticise him about but lets be ...
Winston is doing what Winston does. The Nats hated him when in government last time and when he sided with Labour in 2017. Key and Bridges both refused to ever work with him. He attacked the Nats in a way that got under their skin and was amusing to watch....
I tend to agree with that sentiment that this government is simply an anti Labour government. National don't stand for any great cause. They didn't win off the back of any core policy. Nobody really knows what they want to do. They are there because for ...
I tend to agree. The length of the negotiations does not give us a reason to think that there is a bad deal being struck. The type of deal which is spat out at the end, and whether it provides for a stable government for 3 years is all that matters. I'm ...
That's what I meant by this one being a mirror. You just swap the Greens out for ACT. But I don't get the impression ACT will settle for C/S
A Nat/NZF minority government. Is that even possible? Its certainly possible. It would mirror the 2017 arrangements. I just don't think ACT will allow it. Big disclaimer: I have no idea really. Just an observer, from Raglan.
The other key difference from 2017 is ACT is not willing to walk away from Cabinet like the Greens were in 2017 The Greens agreed to support the government from outside Cabinet to ensure Bill English was not PM. ACT it appears will not concede that ...
MW was stripped of ministerial warrants. AB wasn't a minister so that wasn't an option.
Short answer. One was a Minister, One was not a Minister. Both were entitled to run in their electorates. Both did.
I find it baffling that National has out polled Labour in 5 of the past 6 elections. Why is this the case when National never does a damn thing for the benefit of the country. For me that is a real concern because it is difficult to form a government when ...
My prediction is Nact failing by 1 so your number with Nat giving 1 to Labour. I predict a National NZF minority government with Winston as DP and Foreign Minister. ACT will get two ministers outside of government in consideration for abstaining.
Its been my concern throughout the campaign. The strategy seems to have been setting out reasons why not to vote for National, rather than reason why to vote for Labour, which should simply be look at our record and allow us to keep going with this. It may...
I don't think it will get to that situation. Winston doesn't share power with either ACT or the Greens. Never has, never will. We will have one of two things: a minority Nat NZF government, with C&S support from ACT; or a minority Lab NZ First government ...
Gives us hope though. Thanks
There is no real path to victory for either left or right without Winston's seal of approval. Very depressing state of affairs really.
I think that will be seen as a mistake regardless of the election result. It is is now indisputable that a wealth tax is favoured by the majority. The numbers show that even those voting for right wing parties, want the tax.
Hipkins, the guy that was a senior minister in a Labour/NZF government, 3 years ago, is now realising that NZF are racist? Good grief politics is sinical.
I don't think Parker and Robertson are too far away from the Green tax position. They are aligned on some form of wealth tax. However I don't see either of them sticking around for a term or 2 on the opposition benches so that is the challenge.
In a perverse kind of a way, that may be a silver lining to the election loss. Major tax reform is not only needed, it is wanted by a strong majority of New Zealanders. We won’t see that reform under a Hipkins lead government. The loss of power and ...
Recent Comments