He's always in attack mode. Unfortunately he doesn't care whether he's attacking the opposition, disobedient members of his own party, or members of the public who dare to criticise his government. He's the nastiest little worm nz politics has ever seen, ...
So it addresses a problem that doesn't exist in the one place that it can have an effect but it's real value is in not addressing a problem in another place where it can't have any effect. Dumb and dumber.
"One non-binary/transgender, one female. One must be Maori." That permutation is already covered as it can't consist of anything other than one of the previous two permutations.
"it's only dumb if you think that Māori and women don't deserve good political representation." Nah, it's also dumb if you recognise that the Green Party doesn't have a gender imbalance to address.
"This reeks of a "don't like James Shaw" faction." That's unfair, they'd be just as opposed to any white heterosexual cisgendered man in a leadership role.
"At 5% without Shaw, the people who lose their $165,000 a year are: Ricardo Menendez March Elizabeth Kerekere Teanau Tuiono, and Golriz Gharahman" Well when you put it like that it doesn't seem such a bad result.
Are you now pretending you weren't gullible enough to fall for that obvious bullshit?
It was a satire on youtube, just a blatant lie by the time it got quoted on twitter as if it were real though.
Of course you do realise that's a parody from a youtube voice impersonator called "voiceover shill", right? (10) Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson discuss the myth of the female orgasm - YouTube Like, you wouldn't be so fucking thick as to have read this ...
I dunno. Until I read this post I had no idea what the mask rules are either. It's all become optional outside of central Wellington as far as I can tell.
Why would you want every layer of the public service staffed by people who don't have the wits or the fortitude to refuse to follow stupid orders?
You're still doing it you know.
So many objectionable things that you can't think of a single one to quote without being made to look a fool.
You just provided a near perfect example of the phenomenon downthread, so thanks.
The baseball bats are deliberately both violent and phallic in their symbolism. Charming.
The most interesting thing about Peterson is that none of his critics ever have a problem with anything he actually says.
"Sure. But there is a difference between a progressive protest where a few neo-Nazi types turn up and a reactionary protest where the alt right and far right are neck deep in what is going on. " Pretty strange use of "progressive" and "reactionary" there. ...
It makes sense to include some basic descriptive elements though. eg is 27 years old, of (x) height and weight, is a man, has a beard, may be wearing a dress etc What doesn't make sense is including things in the description that aren't true and won't help...
Incredible isn't it? 2 billion years of sexual reproduction rendered irrelevant in less than a decade.
Or they could just tell the truth and say "a 27 year old male called Isobella"
Each statement adds a little more detail to the previous one, but they all point in the same direction. There is no contradiction between any of them and frankly it seems a little desperate to be looking so hard for one.
Kemara is a violent extremist best known for his involvement in an armed militia intent on pursuing political goals via a rifle barrel. Why anyone would give a damn what he thinks about the appropriate limits of political discourse is a mystery to me. But ...
'Inevitable that the system would operate unjustly': Grounded Kiwis fight against MIQ ends in High Court win - NZ Herald "In her decision, Justice Jillian Mallon found New Zealanders' rights were infringed: "In some instances in a manner that was not ...
Then I guess one can't possibly exist. Thank fuck the brains trust is on the case, keep it up.
What do you mean "without miq"?
Good thing no-one suggested picking them all at once then isn't it.
I don't think it's honest in any way. Quite the opposite in fact, I think you're using it to dishonestly frame your political opponents as anti-human, a tactic which has a less than proud history to say the least.
No I'm saying the sovereign government of a nation is not required to work within the constraints of the commercial air travel sector.
You do realise that "within the resources that were available" hasn't applied since we decided that when a problem is big enough to take seriously we are prepared to literally shut the country down and pay everyone to stay home? So now that the resources ...
Current system is the only way of saving lives Louis?Fucking spare me this nonsense you moron.
Yeah well if you frame every choice as being between unattainable perfection and semi-functional garbage you can make garbage look reasonable every time. But that's your framing, not mine, and it's a dishonest non-sequitur which I wish I could say was ...