Social bonds negotiations collapse

65 comments on “Social bonds negotiations collapse ”

• Comments are now closed

1. One Anonymous Bloke 1

   6 July 2016 at 8:48 am

   Obviously the solution is to have government departments and SOEs invest in the scheme, and this time next year, we’ll all be millionaires.
2. vto 2

   6 July 2016 at 8:55 am

   lol bill english

   what a thicko

   bill needs to get out in the real world

   so many right wing extremists live in frikkin’ la-la-land
   • Draco T Bastard 2.1

     6 July 2016 at 12:18 pm

     so many right wing extremists live in frikkin’ la-la-land

     Every single National and Act member hold that their beliefs are real contrary to the facts. This is pure delusional thinking and it’s what causing the massive financial and social collapse of our society.
     • KJT 2.1.1

       6 July 2016 at 12:44 pm

       I agree not all are crooks.

       Some truely have a religious belief in the “free market”.

       Some are well aware that it can make them rich.
       • Macro 2.1.1.1

         6 July 2016 at 3:41 pm

         The Temples of the Hidden Hand are full of worshipers and followers every day from 8am till late at night. This is the new true religion and many delight in its bounteous gifts.
       • Macro 2.1.1.2

         6 July 2016 at 3:41 pm

         The Temples of the Hidden Hand are full of worshipers and followers every day from 8am till late at night. This is the new true religion and many delight in its bounteous gifts.
     • Anno1701 2.1.2

       7 July 2016 at 12:58 pm

       “beliefs are real contrary to the facts”

       its like some kind of weird cargo cult really

       but “john frum” aint ever coming…..
   • M. Gray 2.2

     6 July 2016 at 2:25 pm

     Bill needs to learn how to speak proper English he mutters and mumbles a lot.
     I suppose when your telling so many porkies its hard to remember what and when you said what
   • Chris 2.3

     6 July 2016 at 5:12 pm

     Like his brother on The Nation this week.
3. One Anonymous Bloke 3

   6 July 2016 at 8:58 am

   The best thing is, the National Party will keep degrading New Zealand’s mental health. Here’s the economic case model:

   1. Attack the mental health of New Zealanders.
   2. Invest in social bonds.
   3. Profit!!!

   This is going to be huge!
   • leftie 3.1

     6 July 2016 at 9:24 am

     Exactly. That’s why National stopped government funding to organisations like Lifeline, wasn’t it?

     “Last year it lost government contracts and has had to cut a third of its staff. It said appeals for government and private funding have failed.”

     <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/307597/lifeline-counselling-service-may-have-to-close
     • Descendant Of Sssmith 3.1.1

       6 July 2016 at 11:54 pm

       And hey it’s only co-incidence that the company, Homecare Medical, who got these contracts is chaired by Roger Sowry.
4. vto 4

   6 July 2016 at 9:10 am

   lol

   make money out of social problems

   lol

   like bankers spend so much of their lives concerned with social problems

   lol

   like social problems are resolved by the demands of self-interest

   lol

   like bill english has common sense

   lol

   too funny
   • Chris 4.1

     7 July 2016 at 12:04 am

     Money is already being made out of social problems. Has been happening for a long time now. The same arrangement the power companies operate under.
5. Greg 5

   6 July 2016 at 9:19 am

   Typical Tory policy, to take away state capital while socializing the cost.

   quote,
   Some territorial local authorities will have increasing difficulty in maintaining service levels for an ageing and possibly dwindling population, not to mention burgeoning numbers of visitors and tourists,” it said.

   http://www.interest.co.nz/opinion/70999/bernard-hickey-looks-what-depopulation-means-new-zealands-regions-and-eventually
6. The Chairman 6

   6 July 2016 at 9:34 am

   “Bill English says the government has learnt lessons from the break-down of its first social bonds negotiations.”

   And the lessons learnt were what exactly? It seems he wasn’t asked.
   • One Anonymous Bloke 6.1

     6 July 2016 at 9:51 am

     More bribes needed.
     • Draco T Bastard 6.1.1

       6 July 2016 at 12:25 pm

       Yep, got to guarantee super-profits before the greedy arseholes will ‘invest’. It will, of course, prove to be more economical for the government simply to do it but then National’s donors won’t get their hands in the governments cookie jar.
   • M. Gray 6.2

     6 July 2016 at 2:30 pm

     What do you expect with our current media he is a media bully like the rest of his colleagues he can’t stand to be challenged or questioned like he is above that. Who does he think he is. He will go down in history as one of the weakest ever Ministers of finances we have ever had and JK one of the weakest PM’s Jenny Shipley would be the weakest.
7. shorts 7

   6 July 2016 at 10:16 am

   How the hell could the work they’ve done have cost 1.6 Million?
   • Greg 7.1

     6 July 2016 at 10:28 am

     the same way defense contractors make profits from war:

     http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/20/windfalls-war-contractors-with-spotty-records-made-billions-off-afghanistan.html
     • dukeofurl 7.1.1

       6 July 2016 at 10:36 am

       Those are not providing financal services, they are doing boots on ground etc.
       War has always made money – for a few
   • M. Gray 7.2

     6 July 2016 at 2:33 pm

     They have wasted millions of our taxes on some of their stupid pet projects they don’t care wise up NZers vote for a fairer government not one that looks after a few
   • Sacha 7.3

     6 July 2016 at 2:54 pm

     The same way it cost us $100m to sell state power companies. Troughers in suits.
8. Pasupial 8

   6 July 2016 at 10:26 am

   Frank Macskasy did a great post a couple of weeks ago about the systematic underfunding of CYF in preparation for NAct’s social bondage. He particularly focused on this Nation interview (but the whole is certainly worth reading for its meticulous research and context):

   Lisa Owen: “But one of the concerns is that there is a risk of cherry-picking. You know, if you have a private provider, are they only going to take the easier kids? Because we know… The Nation’s been told of a situation this week where a private provider wouldn’t take a particular child because they said the case was just too tough… Will you stop that happening? … So will they lose their contract if they keep refusing to take tougher cases? … one of the major concerns is that the too-hard basket will still be full and it will be CYF who deals with those people.”

   Tolley’s reply was like a bombshell – and one that Lisa Owen apparently did not pick up on. In terms that were unusually unequivocal for a politician, the Minister announced the impending demise of Child Youth and Family (CYF);

   Anne Tolley: “Well, CYF is gone. You know, it’s finished. It’s gone. It hasn’t worked and we’re changing, so we’re now going to a system that works with children from prevention right through to transition.”

   http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/06/26/tdb-exclusive-investigation-cyf-the-hollowing-out-of-a-state-agency/
   • Greg 8.1

     6 July 2016 at 10:32 am

     It begs the question of why politicians will never make great plumbers,
     when they cant fix problems that they created in the first place…

     they should have Einsteins definition of insantity printed on a plaque on their desk or on their wall.

     http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins133991.html
   • maninthemiddle 8.2

     6 July 2016 at 12:41 pm

     CYF’s problems date to well before National came to power. Macskasy is a conspiracy theorist, with little understanding of what has made CYFS ‘tick’ for decades.
     • KJT 8.2.1

       6 July 2016 at 12:45 pm

       CYF’s has been dysfunctional for decades.

       Since National they have failed completely.
     • M. Gray 8.2.2

       6 July 2016 at 2:41 pm

       Stop blaming the previous govt this lot have been in how many years now and they have created a mess unprecedented divisiveness and relative poverty everywhere in our country. And our debt has increased ten fold and we have sold some assets for what. And Max Bradfords promises of power competition bringing us lower power bills has hairs on it like everything the pnats touch they have been lying for 8 years now and it continues until the next election and NZers need to get some Guts and get rid of this lot.
       • maninthemiddle 8.2.2.1

         7 July 2016 at 10:34 pm

         That’s not going to happen, and the reason is simple. This government inherited an economy going into recession before the GFC, a decade of deficits, and poor quality government spending. CYFS workload has nothing to do with this (or any previous) governments economic policies; it is related to piss poor family structures, an overly PC approach to naming the real problems, and the sheer and utter scummery of some families.
         • Pasupial 8.2.2.1.1

           7 July 2016 at 11:29 pm

           man
           After that rant it is clear that is you and not Macskasy who is a; “a conspiracy theorist”.

           The decade of deficits only began when Key’s government took control of the treasury. But you evidently prefer to consult your own delusions rather than examine the evidence, let alone cite it.

           http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/economic_indicators/NationalAccounts/long-term-data-series/government.aspx
           • maninthemiddle 8.2.2.1.1.1

             9 July 2016 at 1:57 pm

             “The decade of deficits only began when Key’s government took control of the treasury. ” National inherited a decade of deficits from Labours economic mismanagement. But you knew that eh?

             http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10536181
             • Draco T Bastard …

               9 July 2016 at 2:11 pm

               National inherited a decade of deficits from Labours economic mismanagement.

               No they didn’t. That is, as a matter of fact, an outright lie. We’ve had a decade of deficits solely due to National’s economic mismanagement and sabotage.

               And I’m not even in favour of surpluses as they actually cause recessions.
               • maninthemiddle …

                 9 July 2016 at 2:24 pm

                 Read this http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10536181.

                 You’r either ignorant or lying.
9. KJT 9

   6 July 2016 at 12:40 pm

   One thing you can be sure of.

   If it has failed elsewhere it has been tried, National will do it.

   However. Has it failed under National’s terms?

   Charter schools in the USA have been hugely successful in making private providers rich on tax payer dollars.

   Similarly with private prisons.

   And public/private partnerships in building infrastructure/hospitals etc in the UK.

   If you take the indication of success as how many lucrative private positions/business opportunities politicians get after leaving parliament, they have been a huge success.
   • maninthemiddle 9.1

     6 July 2016 at 12:43 pm

     Charter schools have been very successful at improving educational outcomes, and now we’re seeing that in NZ. Bring on more, I say.
     • KJT 9.1.1

       6 July 2016 at 12:50 pm

       Where.

       On average they have been no better than State schools, despite costing much more.

       In other words, simply resourcing State schools properly would have given much better outcomes for many more children at less cost.

       As well as taking funding which we could have used to improve State schools.

       Imagine what Tikipunga High Schools special needs classes could have done with the same Teacher/Pupil ratio as the much touted, and failing, military style academy in Whangarei.
       • Greg 9.1.1.1

         6 July 2016 at 1:23 pm

         Charter schools creating doctors, etc=0

         whats the cost so far 80k per child,
         can someone do the math,
       • maninthemiddle 9.1.1.2

         7 July 2016 at 10:22 pm

         “despite costing much more.”
         No, they don’t. Charter schools costs less to set up, and less to run in the long run.

         “simply resourcing State schools properly would have given much better outcomes for many more children at less cost.”
         False. You information is simply incorrect, so it’s hardly surprising your conclusions are bs.
         • Draco T Bastard 9.1.1.2.1

           7 July 2016 at 10:39 pm

           No, they don’t.

           Yes they do.

           You information is simply incorrect

           No, he’s giving facts, it’s you who’re making stuff up. Probably because your ideology has been proven false yet again.
           • maninthemiddle 9.1.1.2.1.1

             9 July 2016 at 1:59 pm

             Your link is to previously discredited opinion pieces, based on new Partnership schools without full rolls. Compare like for like, as any intelligent person does, and you’ll see I’m right. Cherry pick, the way the left does, and you can continue to live an illusion.
             • Draco T Bastard …

               9 July 2016 at 2:07 pm

               previously discredited opinion pieces

               [citation needed]

               Although I suspect that the ‘discrediting’ was done by DPF on his blog with no factual backing.
               • maninthemiddle …

                 9 July 2016 at 2:26 pm

                 http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/Initiatives/Partnership-schools/StatePartnershipSchoolsFunding.pdf

                 Why don’t you do some reading, some genuine research, for yourself?
     • dv 9.1.2

       6 July 2016 at 12:56 pm

       What charter school you are you sending you children to SM?
     • Macro 9.1.3

       6 July 2016 at 3:47 pm

       Charter schools have been very successful at improving educational outcomes, and now we’re seeing that in NZ. Bring on more, I say.

       🙄
     • mpledger 9.1.4

       6 July 2016 at 9:20 pm

       If your idea of success is buying farmland with tax dollars and getting to keep it than Charter School have been a massive success. If your idea of success is of kids getting qualifications and staying in school then no.
       • maninthemiddle 9.1.4.1

         7 July 2016 at 10:25 pm

         Then you haven’t kept up. The ERO reviews and other assessments of the current Partnership Schools are very good. Do some research, rather than spout the leftist dogma you are being fed.
         • KJT 9.1.4.1.1

           7 July 2016 at 10:58 pm

           Bloody well should be, after costing 5 times as much per student and cherry picking who they Teach.
           • maninthemiddle 9.1.4.1.1.1

             9 July 2016 at 2:01 pm

             Rubbish. Piss off and do some homework.
             http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/Initiatives/Partnership-schools/StatePartnershipSchoolsFunding.pdf
     • Anno1701 9.1.5

       7 July 2016 at 1:25 pm

       “Charter schools have been very successful at improving educational outcomes”

       thats funny , from what i have seen they have been an abject/expensive failure

       ill have some of what maninthemiddle is smoking please !
       • KJT 9.1.5.1

         7 July 2016 at 1:43 pm

         No point giving references to all the extensive evidence, from around the world, of the failure of privatising education.

         Like all good right wing “Authoritarian followers

         maninthemiddle

         Will simply ignore it.
         • maninthemiddle 9.1.5.1.1

           7 July 2016 at 10:28 pm

           Education has been ‘privatised’ for centuries, long before the state became involved.
           • KJT 9.1.5.1.1.1

             7 July 2016 at 11:01 pm

             Only for those who could pay a fortune.

             Note the countries with the best educational outcomes do not have private schools.
             • maninthemiddle …

               9 July 2016 at 1:52 pm

               Wrong. On both points. Private citizens have funded education for the poor for centuries, as they have health care.
           • KJT 9.1.5.1.1.2

             8 July 2016 at 10:07 am

             Keep up to date.

             Just had another fail.

             And all have been found to be expelling any students which are hard to teach.
       • maninthemiddle 9.1.5.2

         7 July 2016 at 10:26 pm

         You need to read more. One partnership school failed, which is proof of their accountability. The rest are successfully educating students the state system had failed.
         • KJT 9.1.5.2.1

           7 July 2016 at 10:59 pm

           Keep up to date.

           Just had another fail.

           And all have been found to be expelling any students which are hard to teach.
           • maninthemiddle 9.1.5.2.1.1

             9 July 2016 at 1:53 pm

             Nonsense. Do you really think telling lies is going to win you the debate?
             • Draco T Bastard …

               9 July 2016 at 2:03 pm

               He’s not telling lies.
               • maninthemiddle …

                 9 July 2016 at 2:27 pm

                 Yes, he is. One partnership school with high expulsion rates doesn’t justify claiming “all have been found to be expelling any students which are hard to teach”.

                 Oh, and BTW, don’t take anything the PPTA say as gospel…they are hugely invested in brining down partnership schools for ideological reasons alone. Here’s a far more balanced report http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/305379/govt-told-to-hold-charter-school-to-account.
       • maninthemiddle 9.1.5.3

         9 July 2016 at 2:06 pm

         The ideological opposition to Partnership Schools is hilarious. Introduce an innovative, evidence based model, with significant overseas success, giving parents choice and targeting at risk kids, and the left oppose it because their cosy little union dominated jobs are at risk. Always good for a laugh. Meanwhile, more kids get a terrific education they weren’t getting in the public system.
10. Peter 10

    6 July 2016 at 2:21 pm

    Why do National pursue such policies? To provide opportunities for individuals to profit from the government sector.

    Placing resources in private hands is always the underlying agenda of the Right. This recent article suggests that will be a post-Brexit agenda of the conservatives:

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/04/disaster-capitalism-tory-right-brexit-roll-back-state
11. UncookedSelachimorpha 11

    6 July 2016 at 4:00 pm

    The belief that profit is the *only* effective or understandable motivation for any action is utter garbage. Remember when delivering a public service was considered a worthwhile and honourable endeavour in its own right? Used to be the case, but I don’t think the nats could even understand the concept.

    Social bonds for mental health services are a shameful disgrace.
12. Richardrawshark 12

    6 July 2016 at 5:02 pm

    The only thing that will fix this National catastrophe is a change of government.

    Seriously a change of government is required because this is not the only thing they are failing on. This in an unbiased point of view is pretty hard to spot a positive on on outcomes or performance.

    Their behaviour is a separate issue and that’s pretty bad as well.

    At the end of the day as our current PM would say.

    I don’t agree with this government. On much, if at all.
13. whateva next? 13

    6 July 2016 at 5:43 pm

    White man behind a desk makes more sense than any of our government, (one again) he explains”social bonds” perfectly:
    https://youtu.be/naqdZWjgak0

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS