Winnie’s big chance

Written By: - Date published: 9:00 am, April 18th, 2011 - 58 comments
Categories: election 2011, greens, labour, national, nz first, polls, privatisation - Tags:

The TV3 poll has the NACT vs Lab/Green/NZF gap at 22% vs 9% in the latest Roy Morgan. I’ll tend to pay attention to the company that polls every fortnight to the one that polls once in a blue moon. Nevertheless, the story of both polls is the same: Labour struggling to make headway + Nats potentially with a majority = opportunity for Winston Peters.

Phil Goff has allowed his leadership to come into question in the past few weeks. We’re seeing a powerful meme develop that if he can’t lead his party properly, he can’t lead the country. There’s a pretty straightforward solution to that: get a strategy. That means not floundering when events happen but dedicating the run of play by having solid policy announcements flowing and keeping your MPs active with on the ground campaigns, like the stop assets sales campaign, which Goff needs to be hyping.

With Goff looking a bit like Helen Clark did in 1996 (remember, Clark survived three coup attempts in her early years and nearly won in 1996), voters are looking for alternatives to National other than Labour.

I don’t think anyone can argue that National’s agenda or performance have been incredibly popular. On the economy, people (wrongly) believe the government is doing the best it can in a bad situation but they are angry at the bailouts, the favours for mates, and the elitism exemplified by the BMW saga. People are pissed off about the cost of living and falling wages, which National promised to improve. They believe some cuts may be necessary but what is cut matters – see the first in Mike’s series ‘Spending cuts I would like to see‘. And getting further into hock to foreigners through borrowing and asset sales is deeply unpopular. Indeed, National itself tends to rate far more highly than the popularity of its policies and performance – as shown in the Roy Morgan polls by the confidence in government numbers which have dropped nearly 30 points in the past year and a half.

That’s down to a perceived lack of credible alternatives, which means the Greens and New Zealand First need to put their hands up.

The two parties have surprisingly similar platforms: no asset sales, retention of public services, monetary policy reform, and economic sovereignty. People say that Winnie is too indifferent to the environment but remember NZF voted for Labour’s ETS.

With National and ACT determined to embark on a wholesale sell off of Kiwi assets in a second term (and the conversion of a lot of other Crown capital into operating spending) the time has never been better for parties that are resolutely opposed to sales. The Greens and NZF are both excellently positioned for this, Labour less so after they muddied the waters of their own state assets policy for no reason last year.

On top of that, the public has shown itself very wary of electing a single party government. The last time a single party got a majority was in 1951. Mike Smith likes to recount how Labour fell 15% in the 2002 campaign as voters deserted the sure winner looking for parties to control its influence. In 2002, that gave us the UF nutters. In 2011, NZF and the Greens could be the answer. Without any real partners, National is in deep trouble if it can’t poll over about 48% but (TV3 poll notwithstanding) voters are unlikely to vote it a majority. That’s quite a tightrope walk.

A lot will come down to where Peters chooses to stand. Epsom has got to be high on that list. Already he is attracting remarkable attention for his fiery speeches around the country. Standing in a pivotal seat against another party leader, who is also his nemesis, would be media gold.

In essence, I’m coming around the the thesis proposed by ChrisH. That a Labour-led government is a viable possibility but it would be one where Labour is much more one among equals, as should be the way in MMP, rather than a behemoth with a couple of tag-alongs. Labour 33%, Greens 10%, NZF 8% – now that would be interesting!

58 comments on “Winnie’s big chance ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. PeteG 1
    18 April 2011 at 9:08 am

    With National and ACT determined to embark on a wholesale sell off of Kiwi assets in a second term

    That sort of gross overstatement may be a major part of Goff’s and Labour’s credibility problems.

    On top of that, the public has shown itself very wary of electing a single party government.

    I think that inclination will see the vote for National pegged back a bit by election day, but it could be more no votes rather than voting for an alternative.
     
    For Peters to be a credible party vote he needs someone else in his party. No sign of that yet. But there’s definitely a vacuum there for the filling.

    • Colonial Viper 1.1
      18 April 2011 at 9:13 am

      National want to sell Kiwibank.
       
      Kiwibank pisses off Key’s banking mates no end, and especially the Australian bankers who have figured out that Kiwibank is costing them millions in profits every week.

      • idlegus 1.1.1
        18 April 2011 at 3:59 pm

        This may be just my little conspiracy theory, but it seems to me that National are trying to destroy Kiwibank, Kiwibank are at the moment lending out low interest 90% home loans & are borrowing alot of ‘hot money’ to do it, its very risky. And now the closure of the Postshops, but hopefully I’m wrong.

        anti spam – signs

    • mickysavage 1.2
      18 April 2011 at 9:17 am

      With National and ACT determined to embark on a wholesale sell off of Kiwi assets in a second term

      That sort of gross overstatement may be a major part of Goff’s and Labour’s credibility problems.

      Ummm how much proof do you need?   The Nats propose selling off significant parts of our major electricity companies.

      Of course you will reply by saying “oh but we will retain a majority share” but that is frankly bullsh*t.  Once the companies are listed and sold then they become corporate monoliths, are totally incapable of acting for the public good and will spend all of their time maximising short term profits to keep their mostly overseas shareholders engorged on what should be publicly owned and controlled assets.

      • PeteG 1.2.1
        18 April 2011 at 9:53 am

        Ummm how much proof do you need?
        Ummm, how about seeing the sky falling in rather than a few wee clouds floated.
         
        I don’t really care if no power comapnies are part sold, and if they are I doubt it will change much. If people see it as potentially minor they won’t take doom and gloom parties seriously.

        • Lanthanide 1.2.1.1
          18 April 2011 at 10:41 am

          If you think National are ‘floating’ the idea and don’t have any serious intention to follow through on it, then I have a bridge to sell you.

        • felix 1.2.1.2
          18 April 2011 at 11:49 am

          Either Pete George is the only person in NZ who doesn’t know that National firmly believe in selling as much of our asset base as is electorally possible…
           
          … or he’s lying.

          • MrSmith 1.2.1.2.1
            18 April 2011 at 9:25 pm

            Felix In my opinion peteG is a troll that plays his part.
            He or she plays the middle of the road, the not quiet sure, the undecided voter, then every now and then throws in a bit of I’m from down south or I agree with you, but his under (lieing) message is a softly spoken whisper National,national,national!
            I know this person and could very well have been him or her.

  2. Carol 2
    18 April 2011 at 9:16 am

    Yes, I think the Greens and Peters are pointing towards where kiwi thinking may be moving generally in the future:

    The two parties have surprisingly similar platforms: no asset sales, retention of public services, monetary policy reform, and economic sovereignty. People say that Winnie is too indifferent to the environment but remember NZF voted for Labour’s ETS.

    Where I see a difference between NZF & The Greens is that the Green focus is on economic sovereignty, whereas NZF tends to blur that with a general xenophobic, anti-immigration position.  I think it may be difficult to disconnect these 2 issues in the minds of the majority, but think it is important to do so.

    IMO, there’s a big difference between a relatively powerless immigrant (whether from China, other parts of Asia, Europe, the US etc), who aims to become a Kiwi and contribute towards this country in some way, and an overseas-based corporate that aims to exploit NZ and invest here in order to siphon off the profits, leaving NZ the poorer for it.

  3. Peter 3
    18 April 2011 at 9:44 am

    I’m an interested by-stander in all of this, , without any campaign experience, but given the dominance of National is there any merit in NZ First, Greens and Labour promoting their common ground (eg no asset sales) to the electorate?
     

    • The Voice of Reason 3.1
      18 April 2011 at 10:09 am

      Certainly, in my opinion there is, Peter. It is common in Europe, Latin and South America for pre-election blocs to be formed around common policies. This allows voters to choose which bloc they’d prefer and which party within the bloc they will specifically vote for. That is, I would vote Labour knowing that I get a Labour led Government with the Greens and Winnie without the tedious post election negotiations.

      In NZ terms, an explicit undertaking from Labour, the Greens and NZF that they would form the next Government in partnership together would make voting this year really easy. Vote the bloc or vote National.

      • Lanthanide 3.1.1
        18 April 2011 at 10:38 am

        I think if they came out and said “we will form a coalition government around our jointly held belief against asset sales” then it also highlights this as a serious issue to the electorate. It makes it very clear that these parties really see this as a problem with NZ. They can just keep it to these 3 core parties also, and Hone/Maori Party are free to agree with the sentiment, but are not formally included in the bloc pre-election.
         
        They could even get a lot of media airplay on it if they hold a joint press conference of all the leaders of the parties, and announce it to the media at 8am on the day, and set it for 2pm. Much like the media went bananas when Key called the press conference with hints about the election date.

        I guess that could also tar them for people who are pro asset sales – but they would probably be voting National already anyway.

        • PeteG 3.1.1.1
          18 April 2011 at 10:52 am

          That sounds like betting just about everything on one policy, very risky even if you could manage to get the other parties to go along with such a narrow approach.
           
          Don’t confuse assuming “great, here is a clear differentiation between Labour and National that we can campaign on” will flow to the electorate seeing it as a major deciding issue.

          • The Voice of Reason 3.1.1.1.1
            18 April 2011 at 10:59 am

            Where’s the rsk, pete? We already know the majority of Kiwis oppose asset sales and if the 3 parties chime in with additional policies specific to their own voter bases’ wants and needs, there is a good chance of gaining enough ground to win power.

            Oh, wait, now I see the risk you’re worried about.

            • Bright Red 3.1.1.1.1.1
              18 April 2011 at 11:15 am

              I think it’s probably stronger if the three of them all make asset sales a major issue without forming a formal bloc. Because who would the media turn to to talk on behalf of that bloc? Mr Goff.
              Better three strong voices than trying to become one even louder voice.

              • PeteG …
                18 April 2011 at 11:28 am

                That’s not looking likely.
                 
                The Greens are likely to promote their own mix of priorities. They may have a strong message but they have multiple voices, and none that are particulalry strong.
                 
                Peters will smell an opportunity for Peters to regain a presence in parliament. He will do what he thinks will promote Peters. He may see ways of using Labour to help, but don’t rely on too many favours from him, especially if competing for the same protest votes.
                 
                And Labour need a strong voice, they don’t have that now. Actually they need a number of strong voices, leaving everything to a weakly overstating voice puntuatd by the occasioanl outburst of frustration from others is not going resonating.

                • Samuel Hill …
                  18 April 2011 at 11:35 am

                  Well how strong a voice is depends on where you are listening. If you have been watching parliament, you will know that Robertson, Cunliffe, Jones and a few others in Labour DO have strong voices. But for those who only watch the news for 30 minutes a day, you only have Phil Goff, who try as he might will not cause a paradigm shift in this country. If the left are to govern after the election it will be due to NZ First taking votes from National. End. Of. Story.

                  • Rex Widerstrom …
                    18 April 2011 at 3:35 pm

                    Yes, one of the ironies of this situation is that Goff’s personal chances of survival would improve if he made himself less available and insisted someone like Cunliffe or Robertson speak on issues.

                    It’d show Labour as a team, with some strong performers in it, and remind people this isn’t a presidential contest between Goff and Key… because of course it’s in National’s interest to pretend that it is. It’d also – probably paradoxically from the perspective of the Goffice – show Goff as a strong leader, happy to show off a team of whom he’s proud.

                    The only credible way to be unavailable is to be in a place where the TV channels are unlikely to have a crew (and of late, that seems to be pretty much any place below a regional city-sized centre) but that too would help Goff – let people see him face-to-face and not via soundbite.

                    That this isn’t a strategy being followed suggests to me one of three possibilities: either Labour are too stupid to have figured this out; Goff’s ego likes being in the limelight too much to let it go; or the party is so destabilised that the mere conducting of an interview by someone other than the Leader causes the Chicken Littles to think there’s a coup on.

              • Peter …
                18 April 2011 at 11:32 am

                Right now three voices get minimal attention yet for many asset sales are a big issue.
                My original thought was to find more than one area of common ground, foreign investment and oil exploration come to mind.
                I agree with the suggestion that such a ploy would attract MSM interest.  If the Center-Left could show they are already jointly organised it would at least be a change from the usual scenarios.  They know they need each other after the election so the time could be right for the approach taken by other countries as mentioned by VofR.

                • Jim Nald …
                  18 April 2011 at 1:06 pm

                  The bloc approach needs a bit more thinking. An attraction about the bloc approach is that it goes beyond, and is not constrained by, the established or perceived categorisation of left-right politics. The MMP system could make the bloc approach a bit more interesting and not strait-jacketed by traditional left-right polarisation.

              • Anne …
                18 April 2011 at 8:17 pm

                Well said Bright Red.

                I would also hope they did at least confer (in private of course) about the best strategy for each to follow so they don’t end up contradicting one another.  It makes so much sense and between them they could save this country from a potential god-awful mess. Surely that needs to take precedence at this point in time.

      • Monty 3.1.2
        18 April 2011 at 5:41 pm

        The problem is that Goff does not have the leadership not the managerial skills to manage the co-alition of the Damned.  Neither does the public have any faith in Goff’s ability in this department.

        the situation is made worse of course by MPs saying to Journalists that “Goff can take the bullet for the 2011 election loss”  ie Labour have given up on winnig the 2011 election.  Excellent – this will be a walk in the park for he Nats.

        • Jim Nald 3.1.2.1
          18 April 2011 at 5:45 pm

          Fantastic! Nationals can be absolutely confident of winning and count on having the 2011 election already in their pockets.

  4. Josh 4
    18 April 2011 at 10:40 am

    Just thought I’d draw your attention to this interesting column that appeared in the Bay of Plenty Times yesterday: http://www.bayofplentytimes.co.nz/have-your-say/news/winston-peters-ambulance-needed-up-top/3948567/

    Peters’ proposal is very similar to that of Retired Family Court Judge Graeme MacCormick in a 2006 paper, who argued for a ‘universal risk assessment’ program. That seems to be the jist of Peters’ Life Register, and it would appear to be a serious policy proposal.

    • Draco T Bastard 4.1
      18 April 2011 at 4:47 pm

      Capitalism must regain its human face,

      Ah, Winston, capitalism never had a human face – it has always worn the face of the jackal.
       

  5. Penny Bright 5
    18 April 2011 at 10:58 am

    FYI folks – my considered opinion on this matter (which I have just posted on Kiwiblog)
    I’m VERY busy so I’ve just cut and pasted it – is that ok?
    Penny Bright
    Interesting how the NZ Herald’s CHIEF Political Reporter’s analysis of the only poll that matters – an ELECTION result – in this case the recent Botany by-election, plus the election result itself, somewhat differs from these ‘opinion’ polls?
    Botany byelection loss holds silver lining for Labour Party
    By John Armstrong
    5:30 AM Monday Mar 7, 2011
    At last, Phil Goff has something to smile about.
    Exactly why the Labour leader is smiling might not seem immediately obvious given that National’s Jami-Lee Ross won Saturday’s Botany byelection in a canter, securing almost double the number of votes of his Labour counterpart.
    The answer is that everything is relative in politics. Labour did better than it hoped. National did not fare as well as it would have expected.
    …………
    It is questionable, however, how meaningful conclusions drawn from a byelection can be, let alone one as stifled by circumstances as this one.
    Still, the debut of the New Citizen Party and National’s failure to lift its vote would seem to pour cold water on the possibility of National securing a majority alone.
    The complicating factor is Saturday’s abysmally low turnout. However, the non-vote would more likely be weighted in Labour’s favour.
    The 36.6 per cent turnout – half that of a general election – meant both major parties got fewer votes than at the 2008 election. Labour’s vote proved more robust. National’s vote halved from more than 17,000 to just over 8000. In comparison, Labour’s vote fell, but far less dramatically – from around 6500 to just over 4000.
    The net result is: Labour increased its share of the candidate vote in the seat from 21 per cent in 2008 to 28 per cent on Saturday.
    Moreover, it did so in the face of a number of handicaps – notably the party’s candidate, Michael Wood, committing one of politics’ great sins early on by saying he would not win the seat.
    ………………”
    Did ‘the polls’ before the Botany by-election predict the 36% turnout and the MASSIVE ‘no show’ of 9000 (former?) National Party voters?
    DID THEY?
    It’s a fair question isn’t it?
    If I were a Labour Party member (which I am not) – I would ignore these ‘polls’ and keep campaigning on the issues – especially opposition to asset sales.
    It seems that asset sales, especially of electricity assets, is HUGELY unpopular, and despite (shonky?) John Key’s best efforts to make this political ‘goat sh*t’ smell like honey – significant numbers of voters haven’t had a collective frontal lobotomy.
    We have learned that what groups like the NZ Business Round Table are advocating, isn’t usually in the best interests of the majority of the NZ public.
    Big business interests support ‘partial privatisation’, John Key/ National supports ‘partial privatisation’ (oops! the ‘mixed ownership’ model’.
    Phil Goff/Labour thinks ‘partial privatisation is a ‘dumb idea’ – apparently so too do significant numbers of the general public.
    Big business /National carry out a concerted corporate media campaign to help undermine Phil Goff/ Labour?
    Darren Hughes / Phil Goff’s ‘handling’ of the Darren Hughes matter / Damien O’Connor’s ‘undisciplined’ comments/ the PNth intersection anti-asset sale picket ‘beat up’ …. etc.
    I confidently predict that there will be constant ‘picking’ / ‘beat ups’ all through this election campaign, to attempt to undermine support for the main political party – Labour – which opposes what the majority of big business openly want – more privatisation of key public assets.
    Where did we see this before?
    Oh yes, before the 2008 election with the campaign to discredit and undermine Winston Peters and NZ First, so that they wouldn’t make the 5% party vote threshold.
    The aim?
    For National to get enough votes to govern alone.
    Want to see the FACTS and EVIDENCE that I have researched to support my considered opinion?
    http://waterpressure.wordpress.com
    Penny Bright

  6. Samuel Hill 6
    18 April 2011 at 11:09 am

    Greens – Liberal Socialism
    NZ First – Conservative Socialism
    Labour – Confused Socialism

    • Draco T Bastard 6.1
      18 April 2011 at 5:03 pm

      Labour – Confused Socialism

      It appears that I’S has found out Labours problems.

      Until two weeks ago, Pagani was one of Goff’s senior advisors. If this is the quality of advice he was giving – that Labour should just shut up, sit on its hands, and wait its turn like good little careerists – then Labour is well rid of him.

      Apparently, Labours advisers were telling them to be more like National.

  7. Samuel Hill 7
    18 April 2011 at 11:23 am

    In the end this election will be National (and the Maori Party) vs everyone else.

    • Peter 7.1
      18 April 2011 at 11:34 am

      Agreed, so change the narrative which is now being set by Key and the PR media machine.

      • Samuel Hill 7.1.1
        18 April 2011 at 11:43 am

        Winston seems to me to be the only person capable of causing a major vote grab in this election. Its a pity the rest of his party are so anonymous, but perhaps they don’t have anything enlightening to add to the discourse.

        Perhaps the Greens have left the door open to National because they believe they can steal some of National’s environmentally aware voters, who will be convinced that National will win and that giving their vote to the Greens in hope of a National-Green coalition.

        We shall see.

    • Puddleglum 7.2
      18 April 2011 at 11:43 am

      Yes, this is shaping up to be a very polarising election.

      It’s as potentially polarising as the pro-tour/anti-tour groups in 81.

      I imagine, therefore, that in 25 years time John Key won’t be able to remember which side he was on in this election.

      • Samuel Hill 7.2.1
        18 April 2011 at 11:46 am

        Haha! It would appear that there is major (relatively) social disruption in NZ every 30 years.. So this election I would expect some discontent to be exposed!

      • PeteG 7.2.2
        18 April 2011 at 11:53 am

        It’s more likely to be a Rip van Winkle election – National sleep walking to victory, Labour still dreaming of a Hail Mary issue to rescue them, while the electorate yawns.
         
         

        • felix 7.2.2.1
          18 April 2011 at 11:58 am

          OK.
           
          Hey everyone, there’s no point. Just go back to work (if you’re lucky if enough to still have a job) and forget all about it.
           
          Politics is yawn. There’s no point complaining. Nothing makes a difference to anything and everything is under control.

          It’s all just the way it is so keep watching tv and drinking your beer and ignore the growing realisation that something is very very wrong.

          Don’t be a wierdo. If you hear anyone talking about politics, inequality, the economy, social issues or the growing gap between the rich and the poor, please change the subject as quickly as poss. Politics is icky.

          And boring. OK?

          • higherstandard 7.2.2.1.1
            18 April 2011 at 12:53 pm

            Fuck off you bore,  I demand to know what the lotto numbers are and who’s where on the Super15 points table.

          • Zaphod Beeblebrox 7.2.2.1.2
            18 April 2011 at 1:23 pm

            And if you arev poor enough to be manifestly affected by political decisions, you probably don’t vote anyway- so politics is probably irrelevant to most voters.

            Most of the voters who do understand economics and politics probably inhabit blogs like this one- the rest they just want to pay less tax and have fewer poor people in their neighbourhood.

  8. randal 8
    18 April 2011 at 11:52 am

    this government is paying off the electorate at the rate of $3oo,000,000 oer week.
    and the lectiorate is suffering from a form of anomie that has two christmasses this year. i.e. the world cup anfd xmas-woweee.
    Kiwis have not tightened their belts and continue to spend as much as they can because spening is the only rememdy for a boring and pointless existence.
    angle grinders.
    leaf blowers.
    hardly davisons.
    trips to nowhere and back.
    this is the age of infantilism.

    • Samuel Hill 8.1
      18 April 2011 at 12:00 pm

      Well if people were encouraged to think outside the box a bit more, and we weren’t so close minded we might have a bit more creativity and freshness around the place. But no. Milk those cows and dig up those roads. Invest in those shares people. It will all be sweet as! What economic downgrade???

    • higherstandard 8.2
      18 April 2011 at 12:00 pm

      Life is incomplete without at least two LCD TVs for every room in the house and a new car every 24 months.

    • felix 8.3
      18 April 2011 at 12:07 pm

      Cut it out you lot. Drink your beer and wait patiently for the RWC please.

    • dave brown 8.4
      18 April 2011 at 12:47 pm

      Nah its got nothing to do with infants – apart from crocodile tears on infant bashing when the NACTs create the conditions for growing domestic violence.
      Its nothing to do with undeveloped intelligence, or mindless spending. The real cause is capitalist alienation to renders individuals powerless unless they organise collectively to resist and overthrow capitalism.
      Capitalist society is disintegrating. Its what happens when capitalism goes into terminal decline, destroying nature and people, social gaps open up, living standards collapse, the rich rob the poor to survive, peoples fears increase, they start fighting among themselves for expensive bread and fast fibre gladiatorial circuses and bombarded with ‘natural’ disasters and ‘national emergencies’.
      The common ground for survival of the working masses in this country is Smash the NACTS! first and then Smash Capitalism! We can see the beginnings of this in the self-organisation of Christchurch East people to survive their quake and fight the creeping fascism of CERA, and the local iwi and activists fighting drilling off the East Cape. Now we need a nationwide fightback to stop the selling of public assets to pay for bosses bailouts, and the destruction of wages, workers rights and social welfare.
      That’s the difference between a working class in itself which is easily a 2/3rds majority of NZ, but which is composed of isolated competing individuals and a working class for itself that stands up to fight for its collective interest. John Key and the banksters and new gentry are a tiny minority but identify as a ruling class and they will continue to rule until the working class stands up and identifies as a the new ruling class.

      • higherstandard 8.4.1
        18 April 2011 at 12:52 pm

        We must move forward… not backwards, not to the side, not forwards, but always whirling, whirling, whirling towards freedom.

  9. anarcho 9
    18 April 2011 at 1:07 pm

    this thread is beginning to make more and more sense… keep peeling those layers of the ‘spectacle’ away; just what the hell are we doing all day?

  10. Rex Widerstrom 10
    18 April 2011 at 3:48 pm

    <blockquote>the Greens and New Zealand First need to put their hands up.
    The two parties have surprisingly similar platforms</blockquote>

    But very dissimilar modus operandi, particularly in candidate selection and internal accountability; levels of integrity, morality and honesty; calibre of people; and standing in the eyes of most of the public.

    What’s your next piece of advice Eddie? The Salvation Army team up with the ‘Ndrangheta? I mean there’s many similarities: commitment to the redistribtion of wealth, a focus on youth employment, strong religious underpinnings… 😛

    But seriously, the Greens are still seen by many (most?) as “honest brokers” in the political world, a positioning reinforced by their avoidance of formal coalition deals which would have cost them their principles. Diving into the sewer with NZF (because there’s no way NZF can climb out, even if it wanted to) is the worst thing they can do pre-election.

  11. HC 11
    18 April 2011 at 6:44 pm

    Honestly these polls we get from TV3, TVONE and anyone else do need to be treated with a fair bit of caution. I heard today that these pollsters do only make calls to landlines. So what about all the people that do not have a landline, or who are hardly ever at home and out and about?
    I did myself get some calls from market research and other organisations, who wanted to ask me a range of questions. Usually I tell them to get stuffed, because I have not got the time or patience, let alone the interest, in providing them with information about myself.
    So by only relying on people “prepared” to listen, to put up with numerous questions, possibly sitting at home not having that much to do, and having a landline, what kind of people do we talk about?
    They may be disproportionately older people, people with a stable home (house owners), people that are not too busy (e.g. pensioners, semi retired, house wives, people not too busy working their bums off to get bills paid, people who take such research “serious”) and that are possibly more conservative, who bother spending minutes on giving answers.
    They are less likely younger people that are out and about, that exclusively or mainly use cell-phones, that are too busy or indifferent to bother with surveys.
    Hence I feel there is a chance that the surveys tend to have results coming from a rather older, more conservative, more compliant part of the whole populations.
    It is likely that modern day swing voters would not bother much with giving their opinions.
    Yet recent elections have shown that trends can change swiftly, due to a larger and growing proportion of such swing voters changing preferences.
    Bearing this in mind the election may be much more open than these strange and usually Key- and government friendly surveys tend to suggest.

  12. AverageKiwi.com 12
    18 April 2011 at 9:18 pm

    If anyone is really silly enough to believe that National selling our Power companies will not change anything – um, get help, fast!
    It is so obvious what will happen it’s insane.  Imagine you are one of the “Mum and Dad investors” (Keys favourite term, when of course he means his rich business backers) who buys into the shares when offered.  The first twelve months go past, and you get a moderate at best dividend for your shares.  You start thinking about this, as do all the other investors, and realise that by simply putting up power prices by ten percent, suddenly you will start receiving a much healthier dividend.  So, at the next general meeting what do you think is pushed for, and voted on?
    National knows this is exactly what will happen, and already have their answer well rehearsed “Well, we can’t interfere with what investors vote for in a  private company.”
    Wake up sleepy Kiwi voters, a vote for National this election will be the last nail in the coffin that has the plaque “Here lies the New Zealand we once loved”
    Love or hate Winston Peters, New Zealand First will be the one and only party that will be able to stop National’s sell off plans.  It’s in your hands.

  13. Sanctuary 13
    19 April 2011 at 10:00 am

    I am still sticking to my prediction that this election will have tthe lowest turnout on record, down as low as the mid sixty percent. Why? There is little doubt Key is immensely popular with 18-40 year old smug middle class whites whose exposure to politics is minimised to breakfast TV and soundbites emphasising personality driven right wing identity politics. Many of these people are uninterested in politics, so don’t vote, and many who do vote won’t be bothered because a) their uninterest in politics will be exacerbated by the jarring nature of an election campaign so soon after the RWC and b) they’ll assume Key is going to win at a canter so they needn’t bother. National has plenty of money from it’s elite backers, has the white middle class in total lockstep and the media in it’s pocket. Yet strangely, no one is really enthusiastic for Key and co.

    Many Labour supporters who stayed home in 2008 will do so again in 2011. Even more people have slipped into the dispairing embrace of penury, some of whom in their miserable existence of ignorance and poverty probably won’t even know an election is happening.

    The general lack of enthusiasm for Key and disillusionment/lack of credibility of the alternatives will ensure that the undecided voters – around 15-18% at the moment – won’t bother voting. They simply stay undecided.

    This election then will hinge on what percentage of their core vote National and Labour can muster. Labour’s biggest concern therefore has to be the growing disillusionment of it’s activist base with the parties careerist parliamentary elite, who are increasingly perceived as isolated, self-serving and defeatist. Labour won’t have much money this election, so it needs enthusiasm and good organisation to get close.

  14. Jules 14
    19 April 2011 at 5:20 pm

    This about any pre-election deals from NZF.
     No pre-election deals, no nudge-nudge, wink-wink political horse trading before you the voter have spoken.
    Those who argue for pre-election deals are trying to weaken your vote.   They seek to marginalize your role in democracy.   Don’t let them.
    Instead of doing pre-election deals, we will concentrate on the big issues facing New Zealanders.

    And yes – In my opinion,  the issue of state asset sales is going to be the primary issue in this next election.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Anzac Commemorative Address, Buttes New British Cemetery Belgium
    Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service.  It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – NZ National Service, Chunuk Bair
    Distinguished guests -   It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders.   Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, Türkiye
    Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia.   Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • PM announces changes to portfolios
    Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • New catch limits for unique fishery areas
    Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Minister welcomes hydrogen milestone
    Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment Bill
    The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Overseas decommissioning models considered
    Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Release of North Island Severe Weather Event Inquiry
    Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Justice Minister to attend Human Rights Council
    Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order.  “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facility
    Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024
    Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing  At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin    Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho    Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today.    I am delighted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Government to introduce revised Three Strikes law
    The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • New diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions.   “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says.    “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and Somalia
    New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today.   “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho Collective
    Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale.  “It is good ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Supporting better financial outcomes for Kiwis
    The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • Trade relationship with China remains strong
    “China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says.   Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago

  • PM’s South East Asia mission does the business
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

  • $41m to support clean energy in South East Asia
    New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder list
    The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Judicial appointments announced
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in Singapore
    Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa.  The summit is co-hosted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Value of stopbank project proven during cyclone
    A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visit
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul.    “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac Day
    Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr.  The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government commits $20m to Westport flood protection
    The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Taupō takes pole position
    The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Cost of living support for low-income homeowners
    Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners.  “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government backing mussel spat project
    The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government focused on getting people into work
    Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Clean energy key driver to reducing emissions
    The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forward
    The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic Partnership
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Government consults on extending coastal permits for ports
    RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Inflation coming down, but more work to do
    Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • School attendance restored as a priority in health advice
    Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Unnecessary bureaucracy cut in oceans sector
    Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Opinion: It’s time for an arts and creative sector strategy
    I was initially resistant to the idea often suggested to me that the Government should deliver an arts strategy. The whole point of the arts and creativity is that people should do whatever the hell they want, unbound by the dictates of politicians in Wellington. Peter Jackson, Kiri Te Kanawa, Eleanor ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-26T09:16:14+00:00