Daily review 05/07/2024

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, July 5th, 2024 - 7 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

7 comments on “Daily review 05/07/2024 ”

  1. tWig 1

    Here's a suggestion that seems the easiest way to grease Biden's electoral wheels: drop Harris as running mate and pick a strong Presidential candidate instead. Then, when Biden finally (or rapidly) conks out, the electorate can see a strong sucession plan. The Democrats don't lose campaign momentum by fighting an open, close-to-election candidate battle. Biden stays in control. Win-win-win, or at least a quick cleanup of an awful mess.

    • Kat 1.1

      Yes sure that plan crossed Andrew Littles mind back in 2017 as well………not

    • SPC 1.2

      Only if Biden remains credible as a candidate (donor's are questioning this). If not Harris runs as candidate, possibly with Biden as running mate (for the first two years).

      • tWig 1.2.1

        Looks to me as if Harris is a dead duck: she's female (a BIG THING for dominance-game US psyche), she's lacklustre, and she has delivered little obvious output as VP. Otherwise, she would be already propping up Biden's campaign in a visible way. Nah, chuck her.

        Can't really see that there's any Little-Biden comparison. Little did well to acknowledge his lack of star power, but he did appear competent, just not charismatic enough. Little went on to really brush up the Justice system, which is mostly what he wanted to achieve, and he certainly wasn't hindered in this aim by the 2017 government.

        Picking a party leader for an NZ electoral campaign of party politics is very 'little' like candidate selection for US President, no matter how electoral advertising has worked to conflate the two for us. It’s easier for a start, as in no election by party members required, only MP consensus. POTUS also has a defined separate role as Head of State, and isn't chief wrangler of party or coalition elected representatives.

    • joe90 1.3

      I've spent much of my life successfully managing a childhood speech impediment and yet after nearly seventy years, fatigue and especially social anxiety can trigger incidents when I can hardly get a word out. So I'm prepared to give Biden a pass and accept that sometimes he has a bad day where his stutter can be all consuming

      I reckon Biden dropping out would be a huge mistake for Democrats and their chances. GOP legal legions in swing states backed by partisan courts already have lawsuits locked and loaded to keep any replacement off the ballots.

      Biden has a cabinet, he has a VP, and he can resign after winning. Dropping Biden now would be an electoral own goal.

      https://www.notus.org/2024-election/biden-heritage-republicans

      • tWig 1.3.1

        Which is where a better VP candidate than Harris would slide in, without disrupting existing setup pre-election. Make that VP twenty years younger than Trump, and sell the breaking up of the US gerontocracy.

    • Obtrectator 1.4

      I guess we all wait now for the second TV debate (is it still on?) ….

      And although Kamala Harris could undoubtedly be a competent president – and I'd vote for her without hesitation – she'd be a f****g disastrous choice as a candidate.