Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:30 pm, June 8th, 2018 - 23 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Not sure what Willie Jackson was thinking getting noted wanker Alan Duff along to Shanan Halbert’s gig but of course the Trump-like dinosaur did not fail to deliver some controversy.
Duff is like a demented bully kid who no doubt will be sitting in the corner crying crocodile tears tonight.
The key takeaway from this article anyway is:
Give Labour a chance? Being a fucking idiot and damaging them by association is not giving them a chance, it is is deliberate sabotage.
Alan Duff, the biggest ego in New Zealand (and that is saying something), needs to be put out to pasture, immediately.
Can’t help thinking Duff’s own Jake the Muss would beat his creator to a bloody pulp in very short time had they ever met.
What’s more, doesn’t National party voting Alan Duff totally channel Jake the Muss by threatening people in an outside-a-pub situation?
Having been so irrelevant in the last 20 years, it’s like he want to relaunch his career by imitating characters in his own books!
Interesting move rolling out Alan Duff an ex National Party supporter.
It was an idiot move. He’s that unhinged even the Nats never used him.
Janet Wilson. Says everything twice. Twice. Absolutely everything. She says it all twice. All of it.
In reply to the meme at the top of this post:
A better analogy would be someone taking over your twitter and forcing you to post “God hates fags” memes. Why would you force someone to do something that is against their personal values?
A more balanced view here…
Because when you are offering services to the public, personal ‘values’ dont come into it.
And do they have a detailed checklist of their other customers to check that their is something about their life that isnt a fit ?
Considering lots of churches dont allow divorced couples to remarry and consider its a sin against ‘traditional marriage’ , does that too meet the grade for buying a wedding cake.
Does a couple have children out of wedlock and want their names on the cake, as that could be a sin too, so no wedding cake for you as that might mean you condone them in their sin of fornication.
And we could move on from wedding cakes to other types of services…. or we could say discrimination for services to the public is not allowed and If wedding cakes are a problem in that …
Dont F….ing make cakes anymore .
Why would you want something so important and personal, like a wedding cake, made by someone who hates you?
Personally I think all these fundamentalist cake makers are doing the world a favour announcing their prejudice.
It’s like “When Nature Says Stay Away’.
Your analogy doesn’t make sense. People go on twitter for the very purpose of expressing their opinion and they are not supplying a product for sale.
Would you think it OK for someone to refuse service based on ‘race’? How would that be different?
Fantastic comment by “ChineseKiwi” on a highly misleading Youtube video about NZ
https://is.gd/h5ERhu
My reply was thus:
+100% Ropata
Ropata, you are so right.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-06/senate-probe-exposes-obamas-secret-iran-deal-sidestep-sanctions
“Seemingly not satisfied with airlifting billions in US taxpayer cash on pallets to Tehran, AP reports that the Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so.”
Deputy Labour Leader apologizes to National Party woman who was bothering him at a meeting the other day, having grown up in a house full of woman, sometimes they do get a bit irrational and get on your nerves. She obviously pushed him too far.
Maybe she wasn’t listening or didn’t understand what he said ?
At least he apologized.
This was the woman who wanted dihydrogen monoxide banned which was a hoax at Otago University ?
The same one, back in 2009.
Worse than dihydrogen monoxide is a molecule which is both an acid and a base at the same time. It is very corrosive, and polluting, having an ability to dissolve and carry with it a vast array of nasty chemicals..
It’s called hydrogen hydroxide.
Ah yes…the ex Play School presenter and anti drugs campaigner.
Hook line and sinker it was too….
But it’s been an MP for how long what has it achieved, but I suppose it’s able to meet party funding KPIs from all the “development” in it’s electorate.
Edit – dihydrogen monoxide was in 2007 and Wiki says it was ACT on campus doing…. at least they are good for something
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacqui_Dean
Lol
Jeanette Fitzsimmons fell for that too. Made a huge deal about it
Way to legitimise calling women hysterical.
Gee- calling women chubby, trout or hysterical seems to be all OK with the men on this site.
But its OK – she was a bit irrational and deserved it huh?
Not sure you are going to get too much traction with your false snowflake outrage. Keep trying though, it’s entertaining.
And you guys keep up taking about women like that.
And watch fewer and fewer of them comment here.
“having grown up in a house full of woman, sometimes they do get a bit irrational and get on your nerves. She obviously pushed him too far.”
Having grown up in a world of humans, (unfortunately including a cohort of arrogant, sexist men), this comment is almost expected but not excused. I’m obviously pushing.