Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
5:30 pm, May 9th, 2017 - 39 comments
Categories: Daily review -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
Just a clown singing Pinball Wizard, to the tune of Folsom Prison Blues, of course.
I just saw Minister Jonathan Coleman rubbishing a petition presented about mental health. Not because of the issue but because some of the people giving it were well-known protestors or somesuch.
Does that mean, using the same logic, that every single thing he says or does can be rubbished by people because they think he is an arsehole?
What do people with mental health issues actually want? what do they think is lacking in the current way we approach mental health?
Resources/staff, but of course your question is purely rhetorical and is supposed to insinuate something along the lines of, “what do these crazies want and why should we give it to them if they’re crazy?”
Base as ever.
+1
Oh I don’t know, proactive rather than reactive service, more acute beds, closer community supervision, timely intervention to head off potentially fatal crises……things like that.
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/otorohanga-family-attack-mothers-fears-mentally-ill-son-brewing-in-days-before-her-fatal-stabbing
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/81644071/mental-illness-of-son-behind-killing-of-helen-silverwood-in-wellington
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/78366259/Questions-over-care-of-mentally-ill-woman-who-stabbed-Wellington-man-to-death
@BM Here is just one example of what people with mental health issues have complaints about,
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/health/news/article.cfm?c_id=204&objectid=11735319ppointment.
Go down to the coal face BM for a month or so – experience front line how the responders and the unwell cope with diminished resources and too many people sick for the resources that are available. You are heartless and a jerk.
BM you obviously know nothing about mental health do you. So I think you should do some homework instead of putting weak naive comments like this on this forum
“Does that mean, using the same logic, that every single thing he says or does can be rubbished by people because they think he is an arsehole?”
It would seem to be the case
They think he is an asshole because the decisions he makes are so appalling and he then tries to suggest that mental health care should be denied to left wingers.
Yes Pete. That is exactly what it means.
Fuck Me! What a day!
An open letter signed by over 12,000 people has been handed over to MPs, calling for an urgent review of the mental health system.
“However Health Minister Jonathan Coleman has shut down the idea, saying the group behind the letter, Action Station, is a left-wing anti-government group.”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/330422/mental-health-review-letter-signed-by-over-12,000
Whanganui MP Chester Borrows, who has been found not guilty of careless driving causing injury at a protest, says his driving was “completely reasonable” given the circumstances.
The minister, who was in the car with Mr Borrows, said she was aware of an aggressive social media post targeting her and feared a sex toy would be thrown at her.
“I think I was probably most expecting that they would throw the sex toy at the car and I didn’t really want a photo or to be in the news with this thing near me.”
Solid Energy CEO Tony King says he’s disappointed no one has been held to account”
And states that” it’s about the willingness to accept risk”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/checkpoint/audio/201843229/solid-energy-ceo-on-safety-accountability-and-video-of-pike-river
FFS! Like most I get up in the morning and accept risk!
Did Helen Clark, or Hillary consider that….(Ed), or Neil Armstrong or Yuri Gagarin, or VALENTINA TERESHKOVA, and or so many others who accept, and manage that as all part of their daily life!
Fuck Me! What a day!
An open letter signed by over 12,000 people has been handed over to MPs, calling for an urgent review of the mental health system.
“However Health Minister Jonathan Coleman has shut down the idea, saying the group behind the letter, Action Station, is a left-wing anti-government group.”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/330422/mental-health-review-letter-signed-by-over-12,000
Whanganui MP Chester Borrows, who has been found not guilty of careless driving causing injury at a protest, says his driving was “completely reasonable” given the circumstances.
The minister, who was in the car with Mr Borrows, said she was aware of an aggressive social media post targeting her and feared a sex toy would be thrown at her.
“I think I was probably most expecting that they would throw the sex toy at the car and I didn’t really want a photo or to be in the news with this thing near me.”
Solid Energy CEO Tony King says he’s disappointed no one has been held to account”
And states that” it’s about the willingness to accept risk”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/checkpoint/audio/201843229/solid-energy-ceo-on-safety-accountability-and-video-of-pike-river
FFS! Like most I get up in the morning and accept risk!
Did Helen Clark, or Hillary consider that….( Ed) or Neil Armstrong or Yuri Gagarin, or VALENTINA TERESHKOVA
http://rocket-women.com/2015/06/valentinas-day-celebrating-the-day-valentina-tereshkova-became-the-first-woman-in-space/
Can the women who got hit by Coleman’s car take him to court?
For what – its been proven that he was not guilty of careless driving.
Yes she can. The civil test (balance of probabilities) is less onerous than the criminal test (beyond reasonable doubt).
What would be the “charge” be? would they be able to take a civil case for a criminal charge that they have been found not guilty of?
Or do they have to come up with a seperate “charge”?
Whatever james .Coleman would deny any charge.
Well of course he would – he was not guilty. Would ‘you’ not deny a charge esp if you had previously been found not guilty?
But I was serious on the question – I dont know how the system works for civil action.
Except that he really did do what he was charged with as the video shows.
What we’re seeing here is a typical misapplication if the law that happens everyday as some people get off charges because of who they are while others get the book thrown at them because of the colour of their skin.
The courts have found him not guilty of what he was charged with.
He did something (as did the protesters) – but he expressly did not do what he was “charged with” because he was found not guilty of it.
Read what I said again.
I did – you should as well:
“Except that he really did do what he was charged with …”
No he was charged with ‘careless driving’. And he has been found not guilty of that – so therefor he didnt do what he was charged with.
The fact that you disagree with the decision without having in the court and heard all the evidence just shows you have a predetermined result that you wanted. Hard luck.
If I understand the verdict, he carefully drove into people because he was afraid of a dildo, and this was right and proper.
Sigh.
heh, you wouldn’t read about it! Time to replace the crown car fleet with dildo proof glass.
Breaking news, crown car gear sticks to be replaced due to close similarities with a sex toy security threat.
And indeed a leftie who tweeted a article with the headline about “a little bit of sexual abuse never heart anybody” – then a photo of the dildo with Paula Bennets name on it and the caption “your’e next bitch”.
then the guy is there at the protest with a dildo gave no reason for concern at all?
Well, not enough to run someone over, in my opinion. although the courts disagreed. Oh well, so it goes.
BTW, just because I think burrows is a cock doesn’t mean I think that some protestors can’t be massive cocks, too. I just reckon that phallusphobia is a memorable excuse for running someone over.
Assualt with a vehicle.
J C. Paula didn’t want really want photo or to be in the news with this thing near me ? I Understand the sex toy said that –typo I suspect.
Quote ex RNZ… http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/330392/deputy-pm-takes-stand-at-borrows-trial
But yer I could understand the reluctance…
Kids these days…telling it like it is.
https://twitter.com/PresidentShow/status/861279966536896512
Shame it was only a Trump impersonator.
http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/05/video-of-girl-calling-trump-a-disgrace-is-a-fake.html
To lighten the load John Key appears in first Air Nu Zillind video:
https://youtu.be/vIOrQi8vJJo
That deserves a post of its own …
Take your pick, theres a plethora of material now on youtube.
Kiwis’ private debts put the country at risk
Where we’re headed, especially under a National government, is towards a massive meltdown of the economy due to private individuals being too far in debt but we shouldn’t just blame National for this as it was 4th labour that brought in the ideology that causes such bubbles and 5th Labour continued it.
You should look at the looming crisis in the US around student loans, and what they doing with them. I wonder if they are on sell the debt here in NZ as well, probably as they desperate for profits – even if it undermines economics and peoples lives.
Shouldn’t Ireland just have let the banks fail. That would cause far less long term damage, surely. No use just selling out your country so it can be looted for decades by the IMF.
Yes they should have and the NZ govt should have let all the finance companies and banks lose as well.
The rich, who would have lost everything if the banks had failed, wouldn’t allow that to happen and the politicians work to what the rich want and so entire countries get placed into hock to keep the rich rich.
It’s good for the rich who get the money that they loaned out back – not so good for everyone else.