Daily review 16/05/2022

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, May 16th, 2022 - 25 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

25 comments on “Daily review 16/05/2022 ”

  1. Chris T 1

    Well let's face it. It has to be talked about.

    Budget today. Probably one of the most boring in history.

    Apart from trying to get where all these expensive EV's are supposed to come from.

  2. ianmac 2

    Clear sky tonight and newly risen Moon was a partial eclipse here in Marlborough. Expected full eclipse from Auckland.

    • In Vino 2.1

      In Hamilton, I happened to wander outside at the right moment and also noticed a beautiful rising moon. Did not know about the eclipse thing, just thought it wasn't quite full. Beautiful to see.

    • Robert Guyton 3.1

      What immediate actions, pat, do you think should have been announced instead?

      • pat 3.1.1

        Anything would be better than nothing, which is essentially what this provides….but some concrete proposal to electrify rail, specific energy projects, land use designation, a sinking lid on oil imports….there is no end of possibilities.

        We waste yet more time we already dont have….and we will continue to do so.

        • Robert Guyton 3.1.1.1

          Are you channelling Lucksy, pat?

          The Southland Times asked me what I thought 🙂

          "Environment Southland councillor Robert Guyton said it was very encouraging to see such wide-reaching policies put forward, and believed Southland was in an “amazing” position to transform its industries in line with the plan.

          “We have vast amounts of land, good rainfall and quite a few less people than other regions … we're quite innovative, Southland people … we’re in a good place to transform,” he said.

          The creation of the Environment Southland Climate Change subcommittee, for example, was a promising sign for the region.

          “The new climate change committee is extremely important … these issues are being actively addressed, I am extremely proud of it.”

          However, the Emissions Reduction Plan was largely proposals and pathways forward, Guyton said, and he was mindful that some industries such as agriculture may push back against implementing proposed regulations.

          “We have to hope they go ahead,” he said."

          (Fact is, I said a whole lot more that didn't make the cut 🙂

          https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/128657180/emissions-reduction-plan-too-much-too-soon-for-ev-sales

          • pat 3.1.1.1.1

            Who the hell is Lucksy?

            • Robert Guyton 3.1.1.1.1.1

              Luxon. He likes the money offered to agriculture and some other thing, but generally whined about the rest of it. Probably because he has a better, bigger-brained idea that hard-working New Zealand not busy feeding at the bottom, will love!

      • MickeyBoyle 3.1.2

        If we were actually serious about climate change.

        A reduction in herd size

        A ban on fossil fuel powered cars

        A limit on domestic pets

        A genuine debate about our population size

        We would be refusing to trade with countries who are not committed to reducing emissions

        Our leaders wouldn't be flying across the world to give commencement speeches

        We would ban fire places from all new builds and promote clean heating options as well as integrated solar and water collection being required

        We would put a stop to all fossil fuel extraction

        We would fully subsidize public transport

        All public buildings and industrial sites to move away from fossil fuel heating

        Etc…

        This proposal from the Government and their support partners is insipid nonsense that will achieve nothing tangible and is frankly just a load of nonsense.

        • Peter 3.1.2.1

          "Our leaders wouldn't be flying across the world to give commencement speeches."

          I just looked to see who is flying across the world right now. Our leaders should set the example. If they convinced millions of others to not fly those planes wouldn't take off.

          http://www.flightradar24.com/44.22,34.29/5

        • Cricklewood 3.1.2.2

          If we were truly serious we would do something about the 1 percent who are responsible for vast emmisions. Private Jets… Super yachts… Helicopters… Massive consumption.

          • MickeyBoyle 3.1.2.2.1

            It’s clear we aren’t that serious then, are we?

            • Cricklewood 3.1.2.2.1.1

              Nope, to give an example… someone I do work for from time to time has two Teslas, solar on the roof etc nice people but they're very smug about how green they are. Not counting of course the twice yearly overseas holidays, popping over to Sydney for the weekend, the helicopter ride to Waiheke for lunch and all the other consumption they can afford.

              Meanwhile my Ute (work vehicle) is seen as a climate killer but as a 45 hour a week wage shmuck with one vehicle who seldom goes on holiday my total emissions are a heck of lot lower in total.

              Kinda feels to me that some of the EV subsidies are just a form of greenwashing for the wealthy paid for by the unwashed masses.

  3. joe90 4

    From the first case announced to a million in three days. This is going to be fucking awful.

    https://twitter.com/AFP/status/1526056183899258880

  4. Anne 6

    An embarrassment for the Ministry for the Environment but you've got to see the funny side:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300589895/ministry-for-the-environment-posts-blah-blah-blah-in-outline-of-emissions-tool

    • Belladonna 6.1

      Agree – that's really LOL funny (or perhaps it's just my sense of humour)

  5. joe90 7

    Who woulda thunk it…

    /

    Whipsawing markets and faltering assets have shocked the nascent crypto market. Now US, UK regulators say they’ve uncovered a Ponzi scheme

    International tax officials have identified more than 50 leads to potential crypto tax crimes that may lead to official investigations in the coming weeks, including one case that could be a $1 billion Ponzi scheme.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tax-investigators-identify-potential-1-billion-crypto-ponzi-scheme-reports-say-11652547208