Daily review 30/04/2024

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, April 30th, 2024 - 35 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

35 comments on “Daily review 30/04/2024 ”

  1. observer 1

    Half the country doesn't think the government's leader … is the government's leader. That's extraordinary.

    Poll: Only 51% say Luxon is the decision-maker in coalition govt (1news.co.nz)

    A lot of political commentary is over-thinking. It's not about some detail of policy, good or bad. It's the inescapable, blindingly obvious fact that National picked a guy who isn't up to the job. It's obvious every time he tries to put words together in a sentence, every time he bristles at being asked a question he doesn't like (which is most of them). Seymour and Peters are both much better at politics than he is.

    National could definitely win a second term, but not with Luxon.

    • Anne 1.1

      It would normally be seen as a stupid question, but in light of the perception that Luxon isn't managing the coalition well I can see why they asked it. Problem is, I suspect many of those asked may not have fully understood the question. Therefore I think the result could be seen as an answer to… which of the three they would like to see as leader of the coalition? That being the case ole Sillymor[on] didn't do very well. 😉

  2. SPC 2

    Global supply and green tech rare minerals.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-68896707

  3. alwyn 3

    Oh well. If you prefer your polls from Roy Morgan rather than TV1 the excitement from last night's poll might sag a little.

    Roy Morgan has Nat/ACT/NZF at 53%. Lab/Green/TPP at 43%.

    The left are doing better but are still well behind. Maybe next time. At the moment the Government are still 10 percentage points ahead.

    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/nz-national-voting-intention-april-2024

    • observer 3.1

      Best comparisons are made within pollsters.

      Trend: down for coalition parties. According to all of the pollsters, bar none.

      • Traveller 3.1.1

        In the 20203 election, the right bloc achieved a margin of 11.2% over the left bloc. The margin in the RM is 10%, so that change is within the margin of error (National/ ACT/ NZ First (53%) lead over Labour/ Greens/ Maori (43%) – cut to 10% points in April – Roy Morgan Research).

        I suspect the polls will bounce around for some time yet. This is a government reforming at pace, and there's a lot of political risk in that.

        • observer 3.1.1.1

          They aren't "bouncing around".

          As pointed out on other threads, Luxon's polling is uniquely bad. Compare all other PMs. Google away if you don't believe it.

          Live in denial if you want, but no polls by any polling organisation have any other message.

          • Traveller 3.1.1.1.1

            "They aren't "bouncing around"."

            When 2 polls, within 24 hours, show such different results, then yes they are bouncing around. Luxon has always polled badly in comparison with previous PM's and party leaders, so that's largely irrelevant to current numbers.

            Edit – I did google the post election polls. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_New_Zealand_general_election. Since the election, Labour have fluctuated between 21% and 33%. National were =/below the Verian poll in previous polls in February and December. In both the RM and Verrian polls, Nationals drop since the election is below the margin of error. The polls are volatile, which is entirely expected considering the risks the government are taking.

    • Traveller 4.1

      That's a 'leaked' internal poll. That doesn't make it wrong necessarily, it just makes it of questionable value when looking at trends.

    • Bearded Git 4.2

      Interesting Obs. What none of these polls are predicting is that Winston may finally stand down before the next election-he will be over 81 then. Jones is trying to position himself as a high-profile replacement for NZF but nobody has Winston's charm/mana.

      So all of the polls should probably be read as though NZF get less than 4%.

      • observer 4.2.1

        Safe bet. They have fallen under 5% on all 3 previous occasions they did the deal with Lab/Nat (1999, 2008, 2020).

        That's not surprising. NZF voters are driven by an eclectic and fluid mix of causes or conspiracies, but "let's get Winnie globetrotting" is not one of them.

        • Bearded Git 4.2.1.1

          Good point….and a lot of his supporters will be older people who might not be around at the next election.

      • alwyn 4.2.2

        "Winston may finally stand down before the next election".

        Surely not. Winston has read about the former US Senator Strom Thurmond who reached the age of 100 years and 29 days while still in office! Winston plans to beat that performance and to still be an MP in May 2045.

        Mind you I plan to be around to see it.

        • Bearded Git 4.2.2.1

          smileyhaha….me too.

          But Peters comments on RadioNZ Morning Report this morning show his brain is starting to creak. Not sure he is up to it any more.

  4. Ad 5

    How many of us could hand our pay rise to charity?

    How many of us got pay rises since COVID?

    How high an elite is Luxon actually?

    • Bearded Git 5.1

      With one hand he hands his pay rise to charity. With the other he should be handing the massive tax benefits on his 7 houses that he has granted himself to charity.

      • Phillip urel 5.1.1

        He owns them freehold…

        He only has his capital gains/rental incomes to console him ..

        (Who will end this war on the freehold property owner..?)

    • Tony Veitch 5.2

      I recall another shonkey PM saying he would give his entire salary to charity.

      What I don't recall is seeing any evidence that that actually happened.

      I'll believe Luxon when I see the evidence, not before.