Is Act buying social media followers?

Written By: - Date published: 8:14 am, April 8th, 2022 - 14 comments
Categories: act, david seymour, Media, social media lolz, spin, you couldn't make this shit up - Tags:

This is awkward.

Hot on the heels of news that Act has recently received a number of significant donations comes news that it may have spent some of these funds on buying social media followers.

From Ireland Hendry-Tennett at Stuff:

ACT leader David Seymour says he hasn’t bought social media followers and is investigating after his Instagram followers jumped by 48,000 in one day.

Data from social media monitoring platform Crowdtangle shows Seymour’s followers increased from 23,800 on Wednesday to 72,600 on Thursday.

The jump was noticed on Twitter with several people questioning what caused it and whether the MP had bought followers.

Many of the new followers looked suspiciously like fake accounts with random numbers and underscores in their names.

But Seymour poured cold water on the suggestions on Thursday tweeting: “We would never buy followers. My team has asked @Meta for an explanation.”

Maybe he is right.  Maybe there is something about him that is attractive to sex bots.  Perhaps sex bots are attracted to holograms.

https://twitter.com/shaneellall/status/1512008563992203267

I suspect that as soon as the main verifier sites can confirm and analyse the data an interesting picture will emerge.

14 comments on “Is Act buying social media followers? ”

  1. Robert Guyton 1

    Does this mean anything?

    • Clive Macann 1.1

      Does this mean anything?

      "this" means "referring to a specific thing"

    • Peter 1.2

      If Act were buying social media followers it would mean something. Surely it would mean they are buying social media followers.

      The whats, whys and wherefores would be the interesting thing. Maybe journalists will question the Act MPs about it.

  2. Tiger Mountain 2

    Another sterling performance from the pre–eminent public self pleasurer of NZ politics!

  3. Anne 3

    I wonder if its occurred to him that the joke is on him.devil

    • Incognito 3.1

      Yes, either Seymour is the victim of a prank (hack) or it was an emotional junior staffer.

  4. Reality 4

    Strange party, strange leader, strange members, strange supporters.

    • tc 4.1

      Dangerous, disingenuous, dog whistling party. Strange it isn't IMO just the rat cunning one should expect from the well resourced right.

      Seymour comes across as a buffoon but that cash buys significant advice and 'influence' as they say which he'll use in his own special way.

  5. Corey Humm 5

    Hahahahahaha.

    Act will be asking for their birth certificates next so they can steal their identities or do they only do that to dead children?

    Maybe Seymour took a helicopter ride with one of them and can't remember?

    Hahaha 😂 buying followers….

  6. DB Brown 6

    Recall Judith Collins was paying for likes.

    https://www.newsroom.co.nz/a-quarter-of-nationals-fb-ad-spend-chasing-likes-for-collins

    The aim seems to be to give the perception of popularity, while it doesn't actually exist.

    Smoke and mirrors, cos their policies and personalities turn people off.

  7. Ian 7

    Seymore is likely to hold the balance of power at the next election .If you havn't figured that out your pretty slow.

    • mickysavage 7.1

      Youre point is? Labour should be ready to do a deal with Act?

    • Barfly 7.2

      Lol so you are a fan of a bloke whose name you can't even spell and you call others slow – priceless

      • DB Brown 7.2.1

        You're? Your?

        Yore when politicians were driven by greater stuff than the likes of their fake & fecklessly fickle followers.