National use opening of Christchurch Justice Precinct for political purposes

Written By: - Date published: 7:43 am, September 13th, 2017 - 21 comments
Categories: bill english, election 2017, national, Politics, same old national, spin, the praiseworthy and the pitiful - Tags: ,

In the insanity that is this current election campaign the media has missed a rather large story, Bill English breaching the Cabinet Manual’s requirement that the resources of the State not be used for political purposes.  Yesterday there was a grand opening of Christchurch’s Justice Precinct.

And it was done a month before the Christchurch Justice Precinct, a rather large project was ready to be opened.  Clearly rules and understandings to not apply to National.

From Stuff:

Christchurch’s justice and emergency services precinct has officially opened – but the project is not yet complete.

As Prime Minister Bill English and Justice and Courts Minister Amy Adams opened the $300 million yet-to-be finished precinct on Tuam St, construction workers huddled out of sight.

The Ministry of Justice was expected to start operating from the building about mid-October. Agencies would start fitting out their offices after a public open day on Sunday, Adams said.

The area, which has been repeatedly delayed, will house the ministry, police, Department of Corrections, Fire and Emergency New Zealand, St John and Civil Defence.

A Stuff reporter at the opening said the part of the building where the launch was held looked finished, but 100 metres down the path the parking building and some of the emergency services building was incomplete.

See the problem?  National is getting political brownie points for the opening of a building that we all paid for.  Business as usual is somehow virtuous.

And the pointy head constitutionalists have thought about this.  The Cabinet Manual says this:

6.9 In the period immediately before a general election, the government is not bound by the caretaker convention unless the election has resulted from the government losing the confidence of the House (see paragraphs 6.21 – 6.40 for information about the caretaker convention). Successive governments, however, have chosen to restrict their actions to some extent during this time, in recognition of the fact that an election, and therefore potentially a change of government, is imminent.

…

6.11 In practice, restraints have tended to be applied from about three months before the general election is due or from the announcement of the election (if the period between the
announcement of the election and polling day is less than three months).

…

6.15 The State Services Commission publishes guidance on the pre-election period for those agencies in the state services that are subject to the Commissioner’s mandate. The guidance is available on the State Services Commission website, and sets out good practice that may also be useful for other agencies in the state sector. For guidance on the pre-election period, the State Services Commission is available to provide advice on the obligations of agencies and their employees, and the Secretary of the Cabinet is available to provide advice on decision-making.

And this is from the SSC guidance on treatment of the pre election period:

Programme launches and events

Key points

  • Agencies should continue to support Ministers with ‘business as usual’ initiatives during an election period.
  • Particular care is needed around ceremonial events to avoid perceptions of being associated with any political aspects of such events.

There is no blanket restriction on Ministers wishing to launch programmes or initiatives in the lead up to the election. In general, the business of government should continue and State servants should support Ministers with ‘business as usual’ initiatives. However, the nature and timing of high profile ceremonial events (e.g. building openings or award ceremonies) must be carefully considered.

During an election period, there is a risk that public launches and events may take on a ‘party political’ character that would not be evident at other times. This is particularly so when Ministers and/or MPs are involved in the event. In general, State servants should support Ministers as usual, but must be vigilant in avoiding association with any political aspects of such events. Particular care must also be taken with the preparation of supporting material. All agency material must remain strictly impartial and factual to avoid any perceptions of being associated with any party political messages (see ‘advertising campaigns’ directly below).

National know about this rule.  They did their best to open the Waterview Tunnel on June 18, just outside the three month election period.  So what happened?  Why did the Public Service agree to a highly politicised event two weeks from the election?

And we are talking about a $300 million precinct in the middle of a marginal seat.  It seems there was too much for National to refuse.  And so finished or not finished a publicity event had to occur at our expense.

 

21 comments on “National use opening of Christchurch Justice Precinct for political purposes ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. Nick 1
    13 September 2017 at 8:14 am

    They are gifted at deceit.

  2. Don't worry. Be happy 2
    13 September 2017 at 8:31 am

    It will be ok. They will forget they did it soon…..

  3. cleangreen 3
    13 September 2017 at 8:56 am

    Dirty subjugated politics is well and alive, so we hope the MSM is happy they have subjected our Democracy now since they have not even battered an eyelid.

    ‘Carry on nothing to see here.’

    Nothing has changed.

    Vote national out!

  4. Pat 4
    13 September 2017 at 9:01 am

    did anyone expect any different?…..however National have frequently misjudged the mood in ChCh (although this will be playing to a wider audience) and is unlikely to move any voter intentions….a non event, albeit one that highlights their lack of ethics.

  5. Draco T Bastard 5
    13 September 2017 at 1:08 pm

    Just imagine the howls of outrage we’d hear from National if Labour had done this.

  6. alwyn 6
    13 September 2017 at 1:21 pm

    I find it difficult to see, in the quotes you provided that show anything that English shouldn’t have done.

    Your quotes seem to be aimed at any Public Servants involved rather than any politicians.
    eg
    “In general, State servants should support Ministers as usual, but must be vigilant in avoiding association with any political aspects of such events. Particular care must also be taken with the preparation of supporting material. All agency material must remain strictly impartial and factual to avoid any perceptions of being associated with any party political messages “.

    This is all for the guidance of Public Servants, not the Politicians.

    • TootingPopularFront 6.1
      13 September 2017 at 2:58 pm

      Are you suggesting MPs are not public servants? I believe we taxpayers pay their salaries, expenses, accommodation supplements (although some have to pay those back due to breaking the law)…

      • In Vino 6.1.1
        13 September 2017 at 5:20 pm

        Exactly. I clearly remember that in 1970 (my first year of work) Sir Leslie Munroe stood before us, and as an MP proclaimed how proud he was to be a public servant. He was trying to belittle our protests at the poor working conditions his Govt was imposing on us public servants. Get it right, Alwyn.

        • alwyn 6.1.1.1
          13 September 2017 at 6:40 pm

          I’m afraid you seem equally confused then Vino.
          When you write something like ” his Govt was imposing on us public servants” you are clearly NOT regarding him as a public servant. The term “public servant” is clearly only intended for “us” not him.
          What is the word these days? It used to be “Civil Servants” but not many are “Civil” and they don’t “Serve” us very well.

          • In Vino 6.1.1.1.1
            13 September 2017 at 10:25 pm

            He was imposing the term, not I, and it embraced us all. He definitely said public, not civil. I was young, and took a while to see him as the puffed up hypocrite that he was. You appear to be of his ilk.

  7. NZJester 7
    13 September 2017 at 1:59 pm

    National is all about illusion.
    It’s a lot like his visits to those pack houses full of staff. Only there was no one there but the management as the season was not underway yet and there were no real workers there for him to address.

  8. Graeme Axford 8
    13 September 2017 at 2:49 pm

    It won’t worry their Mate Peter Hughes who is the State Services Commissioner…. Why else do you think they might have appointed him to the job… Old boys club going well LOL

  9. mpledger 9
    13 September 2017 at 5:31 pm

    I was kinda surprised when I heard it was “opening” and then the police said they weren’t moving in till next Feb. A strange kind of opening.

    I was also kinda surprised it was all in one pricinct. What if there is another earthquake and this is the site of most damage – everything will get wiped out.

    • Jimmy 9.1
      13 September 2017 at 7:42 pm

      It is a highly resilient building with backup generators, potable water storage, fire supply storage, wastewater holding tanks, base isolation etc. It can go off-grid when all else fails around it.

  10. tc 10
    13 September 2017 at 6:20 pm

    Radio off limits this election is it ? Points for consistency in disregarding electoral guidelines, if nothing national are predictable.

  11. Wayne 11
    13 September 2017 at 6:51 pm

    Shock, horror, the election is mentioned during an election campaign.

    • Stuart Munro 11.1
      13 September 2017 at 7:11 pm

      it’s quite understandable Wayne – we know you Gnats are scurrilous and absolutely desperate. As any party that treats its citizens this badly in a democracy is wont to be.

      Principles are for other people eh.

  12. Tanz 12
    13 September 2017 at 9:07 pm

    Who cares. They arn’t trying to write certain electoral rorts into law.