Nope

18 comments on “Nope ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Andre 1

   3 February 2016 at 6:43 am

   Rubio is probably more dangerous than both Trump and Cruz.
   • Lanthanide 1.1

     3 February 2016 at 9:30 am

     Because Rubio’s the only one with an actual chance to win the general election.

     He’ll be the nominee.
     • Nick Nack 1.1.1

       3 February 2016 at 10:45 am

       I agree. And he’ll make a far better President than any of the three Democrat alternatives.
       • Colonial Viper 1.1.1.1

         3 February 2016 at 11:25 am

         If you want wars and more corporate banksterism, yes Rubio is your man.
         • Phil 1.1.1.1.1

           3 February 2016 at 11:29 am

           … and Clinton is your Woman.
       • UncookedSelachimorpha 1.1.1.2

         3 February 2016 at 3:20 pm

         With the exception of Sanders, Clinton (just), O’Malley (even if he has withdrawn) Bernie Sander’s cat and my left butt cheek.
     • Magisterium 1.1.2

       3 February 2016 at 11:58 am

       If Trump is not the nominee he runs as an Independent, splits the nutty right vote, Dems win.
2. millsy 2

   3 February 2016 at 7:01 am

   Any GOP contender is dangerous. Ronald Reagan, Bush I, Eisenhower, Nixon and even possible Bush II would have all been too left wing to win the GOP nomination for 2016. Even George Pataki, who cut taxes and slashed spending, also pushing a privatisation program that included selling off the World Trade Centre (the one that got leveled in 2001) had a push at the nomination last year and was regarded a a moderate.
3. Stuart Munro 3

   3 February 2016 at 7:19 am

   While it’s probably better for America, the set back to cartoonists and comedians of losing the Trump/Palin ticket will be serious.
   • miravox 3.1

     3 February 2016 at 8:03 am

     I’m not convinced it’s better for the US for Trump to be trumped by Cruz

     The Right American Conundrum

     Can’t say conservative American conundrum because we don’t really know if Trump is one – shhh he might be a bit of a New York City Liberal maybe that’s why he lost a few votes and also why the Democrats should be doing all they can to help him win the Republican nomination.
4. Ad 4

   3 February 2016 at 7:45 am

   Which would have a worse go-slow term with Senate and Congress: Cruz, Sanders, Clinton, or Trump?

   Maybe this is the election to lose.
5. gsays 5

   3 February 2016 at 8:06 am

   i think i am out of touch.
   for me the comment worthy result from yestys voting was how close a socialist, no name(till a year ago), senior citizen got to a candidate with massive name recognition, huge war chest and massive experience.

   perhaps the seppos can see you can be socialist without going full blown commie!
   • Kevin 5.1

     3 February 2016 at 10:26 am

     Bernie Sanders seems to have single-handedly made the term ‘socialism’ finally acceptable in the US of A.

     The younger generations are flocking to him in droves.

     Yesterday will have put the shits up Clinton and the DNC and it will be interesting to see how both will counter it. A bit sad really when the best hope for Democrats is an Independent yet the Democrat establishment will attempt to nobble him at every turn.
     • Colonial Viper 5.1.1

       3 February 2016 at 11:28 am

       The term “socialism” was extremely politically popular in the US from the late 19th Century through to the 30s and 40s. Over those decades and the following ones, a deliberate programme of demonizing socialism and the left was implemented.

       True conspiracy theory, that one…
       • Bill 5.1.1.1

         3 February 2016 at 11:52 am

         Shame it was a just a label with no substance though. Bernie Sanders, authentic as he may be, is no socialist. Much of what was termed as socialist, in the US and elsewhere, simply wasn’t socialist.

         The ‘catch-all’ phrases of socialism or communism were used to persecute communists, socialists and anarchists in the west, and through a different play in Bolshevik Russia, to persecute communists, socialists and anarchists there too, but in addition it’s also been used in ‘the west’, to marginalise the idea of statism – easily done seeing as how proponents of statism happily appropriated the terms socialism or communism in spite of their political prescriptions being a million light years away from socialism or communism.

         A case of two birds for one stone as it were.
6. Grim 6

   3 February 2016 at 5:15 pm

   Heidi Cruz… The Council on Foreign Relations, Goldman Sachs

   good god, NWO own all the candidates on both sides.

   Sanders is also suspect, way to much sudden support from all forms of media,
   social media is a tool of oppression.

   Trump is the wildcard, buffoon, boogieman or clever campaigner,
   either way the media is vilifying him, (Rupert Murdoch, Saudi Princes and Georgie boy Soro, strangle bedfellows for SJW and liberals I would have thought)
   the media are dirty, social media controlled, zealots and righteous leftists the usual useful idiots.
   • joe90 6.1

     3 February 2016 at 5:46 pm

     Heidi is special.
     /

     http://gawker.com/rumor-heidi-cruz-is-so-repulsed-by-iowans-she-has-to-s-1756461603
     • Andre 6.1.1

       3 February 2016 at 6:08 pm

       Made the mistake of starting into the comments while drinking a glass of milk. Snorted some out my nose. The kids are now keeping their distance.

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS