The impact of this argument was far-reaching. Economic thought strengthened this influence by associating the expression “tragedy of the commons” and the image of the pasture with analogous but more sophisticated scenarios in microeconomics and the economy of “externalities.”
One of the reasons for the appeal of Hardin’s analysis, at least at first, was its “either-or” conclusion. It can be cited both by partisans of government intervention and by those who favor an open market. However, with the rise of neoliberalism as a school of thought and a sociopolitical force, the “tragedy of the commons” was rapidly reduced to an argument in favor of private ownership.
Yet the term designates something else entirely: the institutions through which communities around the world have managed—and continue to manage—shared resources, often quite sustainably. This can mean pastureland, but also forests, fields, peat bogs, wetlands, etc., that are in many cases vital to their survival.
The “Tragedy of the Commons” denies the effectiveness of these organizations, associating good management only with the state or with privatization.
Those organisations could be termed ‘the state’ as they’re actually the community and the community is the nation.
It’s part of the language used over the last few decades to divorce people from the community and it’s done it’s job well. Even progressives are disinclined to trust ‘the state’ despite it being a natural democracy.
And one other thing we should be well aware of now is the very real physical limits that the environment has. Malthus was right. just need to look at our waterways to understand that.
Hey DTB, I saw this today, sort of relates to how a community of people can successfully farm a ‘commons’ outside of a capitalist paradigm, even without EU subsidies, which usually go to big farm enterprises. I thought it might be of interest.
Rachel Stewart has written an excellent article in the Herald today. Readers of this paper will find her writing unsettling as she spells out the situation we are facing honestly without any sugar coated message.
It is an article every New Zealander should read.
Rachel Stewart writes passionately about the state of the world in January 2018.
I quote her.
“Knowing it’s happening, and feeling empowered to do anything about it are two different things. While, arguably, many scientists now believe humanity may only have another 100 years – my view is that’s ridiculously optimistic – the fact remains that we’re taking out every living species on Earth at an alarming rate, including ourselves.
If you stay with that thought, and let it sink in, how does it make you feel? I can tell you how it affects me.
Waves of grief wash in and out like the tide.”
She goes onto explain that grief before asking her readers where they are placed regarding catastrophic climate change.
Rachel writes the following .
“Your stage of grief may be entirely non-existent. You may be busy with whatever your deal is – consumption, capitalism, cows, cars, Christ. None of which changes what’s coming. (Pro tip: It’s not the Second Coming).
Or you’re busy bargaining, or being angry, or even denying there’s a problem at all. You may even be stuck in depression.
My stage of grief is acceptance. That doesn’t mean all hope is lost, or that I will give up trying to change things. You never know. Miracles can happen.”
This is the most important issue facing the world.
I am at the same stage of grief as Rachel on the whole , although I’m also prone to depression about it. Like Rachel, I don’t believe all hope is lost but I agree with her that there is little time left.
a question for you James…..given the weight of evidence presented by those who study the various fields involved what makes you believe that it is “all bumkin”?
I am at the grief stage of despondency – too many people not looking at the bigger picture. Parliamentary politics locked into appealing to the comfortable middle classes, and not willing to risk rocking the boat.
“All the old ways of doing things must either be stripped away and rethought, over and over and again, or it will be done for us. We’ll have no choice.”
Not strictly true – the Swedish investigation has been discontinued because there’s no chance of him being “formally notified” of the charges (final stage before Swedish arrest). Part of discontinuance was withdrawing the arrest warrant. Should he leave the embassy, all of a sudden he’s approachable again and the investigation can be reactivated, and another warrant issued.
Basically, it’s still hanging over his head until the statute of limitations runs out. The Swedes just aren’t spending money on it.
Sticking to the environmental theme, the evidence continues to stack up against dairy farming, as the health of our lakes suffers. More North Island lakes are graded bad than good.
If everyone in the world stopped eating meat, it would make a massive difference to the carbon footprint of humankind.
If people are alienated by that statement, tough luck .
It’s an inconvenient fact for carnivores.
On a separate point, if we stopped dairy on an industrial level , reduced the cow herd by 80% and stopped pumping fertiliser into the soil that leached into our waterways, we would be on our way to turning around the state of our waterways.
If everyone in the world stopped eating meat, it would make a massive difference to the carbon footprint of humankind.
…
It’s an inconvenient fact for carnivores.
Likewise, if everyone in the world stopped eating cropped plant material, it would make a massive difference to the carbon footprint of humankind. It’s an inconvenient fact for vegans. There is a huge number of similarly true but pointless and irrelevant statements one could make, but most of us don’t feel inclined to make them. Could you perhaps learn something from that?
Starving the education and health system of funding to defend the human rights of universal benefits to a privileged middle class with the health and professions to continue in work ….
Meanwhile people too sick to work do not get ACC and people remain on Invalids Benefits receiving less money than those over 65 in full-time employment … human rights for whom?
Labour cannot afford to do anything about it while paying out the billions in super to those still working.
And given we cannot afford a UI at the current super level, we have to target more to those in need by transferring resources currently given to those who do not need it.
And that also includes mental health, DHB funding etc. We are facing a situation of rising health care costs for the aged we are struggling to cope with (Pharmac constraints, tech in the hospitals) while paying people in good health and well-paid employment super.
Will Labour propose a CGT to provide funding for health and education, or will it bow to (rightist and media) pressure to lower other tax rates, so government is no better funded?
Can we sop paying super to people past 65 who are still working? The idea of working on after 65 gives some a false sense of superiority ‘I’m still working, not living off the state, when I have abilities and the will to work.’ They don’t think further – that they are taking a senior job that should go to someone else, and then allow further rises for people down the ladder to better- paying positions.
Another thing that could be done is announce that everyone who is receiving a state benefit is expected to do at least three hours work a week as a volunteer, at something suitable for their talents and useful to the good of the community and perhaps the local Council can advertise what needs doing and when the next working party is being formed. And what is available to fill the three-hour slot for those who can’t find anything through the Volunteer Centres.
Then someone over 65 wanting to keep working can do so, for nothing, and receive super, or instead earn the ordinary salary, pay tax and stay on doing the work that he or she really likes, or where they are still needed.
And one other thing that should be immediately reversed!! I hear from beneficiaries that they are told that they can’t do any volunteer work, the simplistic thought coming from the frightful people at WINZ or their contractors being – that if they can do volunteer work they should be in paid work, one or the other. Can someone who knows about WINZ and its dark arts advise if this is The Rule that everyone is told, I would appreciate authoritative confirmation?
For the years I was receiving Super and working, my tax was effectively paying for it. Has there ever been an analysis whereby the tax from Superannuants has been offset against the cost, or would that be far to complex to achieve? There is, of course, also very little administration cost compared to ACC or any of the other benefits because no one has to sweat the small stuff
I agree with your first sentence. However the second one doesn’t seem to match New Zealand History.
Tell me, where is my memory at fault?
Labour, in Kirks day, introduced something that was very similar to KiwiSaver. If you didn’t earn very much in your life you weren’t going to get much in your retirement. Rather like the Singapore system where you get people in their eighties having to keep working till they drop.
National, under Muldoon, brought in a very generous universal scheme. Everyone got it at 80% of the average wage at 60.
Labour, under Lange, cut the age back to 65, reduced the level of the pension and means tested it by a heavy surcharge on their income tax for recipients.
National, under Bolger, returned it to universality, albeit not as fast as they promised. They left the 65 age and the reduced level of the super. They did have an excuse for the delay in that the then Labour Government had left the Government accounts in a disastrous shape and had lied about it.
Labour, under Clark, left things the same way as at the end of the Bolger era.
National, under Key left things unchanged as well.
Labour, while in Opposition proposed increasing the age of eligibility. That went down like a cup of cold sick.
Now perhaps you can explain why you think it is National that attacks people’s rights? It looks a great deal more like a Labour predilection.
I certainly had one flaw in my memory. I thought it was the Lange Government that increased the age. According to your link they were going to do it but not until after 2000. It was Bolger who brought it in earlier.
I think on the rest, and particularly on the subject of effective Universality, I was generally accurate.
I can only plead in mitigation that I wasn’t living in NZ in the early 90’s.
Personally I don’t see age change as a breach of universali8ty.
National were not innocent on rate changes (National first in the late 70″s). And then there was Shipley’s proposed end to the net average wage connection. But then again not a breach of universality.
Surtax, negatively impacting on those who save, is unfair and only explained by budgetary crisis.
“age change as a breach of universali8ty”.
No it isn’t. What is unfair is the rapidness with which they made the change. Labour’s would have been fair. So is the change that English was proposing at the election. Giving more than 10 years notice of starting the change gives people under 50 time to adjust their plans and people over 50 wouldn’t have been affected. National’s 1990’s change was implemented far to fast.
Sorry you went to the trouble of typing up all that material that’s entirely irrelevant to the point I’m making. The National Party’s attacks on the human rights of beneficiaries are well documented, not least by the NZ Law Society.
Removing universal entitlement to Super would simply add another group of people the National Party would victimise.
Daft comment. You mean that having a 10 hour per week job means that you don’t need super? Or a 20 hour job pw. Or an 80 hour pw? Or doing voluntary work? Or caring for a distressed parent?
Your simple minded idea simply doesn’t consider edge conditions. It certainly doesn’t consider the costs of administering all of the daft exceptions that you’d want to add into it.
The current costs of the universal superannuation system that last time I looked at were just a few percent. The costs of the dole using exactly the kinds of mindless stupid exceptions that you want to impose, supposably in the name of simplicity and common sense, will push the admin costs up to 30% or more of the value.
Effectively to save a few dollars, you’d impose a fortune of costs on taxpayers. That is really stupid.
And for what? The only thing that is certain as you get older is that things change – often rapidly. Superannuation is as much a transition buffer between working and not being able to work as it is a living support.
Knowing the dedication and skill of moneyed people to avoid taxation, I am sure, BM, that many could easily defeat an attempt to exclude them from receiving super.
Why not instead appeal to their well known and developed sense of social responsibility and ask them to forgo their entitlement by returning it to the State coffers?
Seriously, universality does avoid the injustice of such behaviour as avoidance, and also reduces the state’s bureaucratic burden by not having to decide who is eligible for super. How much paperwork to decide who is eligible amongst super annuitants who are projected to number 1.1 million in 2031?
Better that such a bureaucracy be used to minimise tax avoidance and evasion which costs NZ annually between $1.5 and $7 billion.
Remember, too, that those who are earning whilst still receiving super (I am one of them) pay taxation on those earnings, on top of super which is itself subject to taxation.
And then you ignore that fact that many rich people are avoiding taxes to the tune of between 1.5 to 7 billion dollars. Those people will still be claiming NZSuper but there’s no way to catch them.
The following quote encapsulates an opposing view to your statement “I can’t really see significant costs in means testing for super.”
“One of the main benefits of a universal, unconditional welfare payment would be the removal of virtually all of the costly means testing bureaucracy from the welfare system.”
It goes on. “Another benefit would be the near complete elimination of welfare fraud, which would free up teams of fraud investigators to go after much bigger fish such as tax-dodgers and organised crime networks.”
While these quotes are from an article on a universal basic income, the arguments are the same for either UBI or universal superannuation.
There are many articles which agree with the notion of significant bureaucratic cost in administering means tested benefits.
You suggest that, for people who are already on high incomes
“Why not instead appeal to their well known and developed sense of social responsibility and ask them to forgo their entitlement by returning it to the State coffers?”.
The chances of that happening are very slim. About the only person I know who refuses to take the Super is Bob Jones.
Jim Anderton has recently been lauded in this blog. Jim certainly didn’t refuse to take the money. In 2009 Matt McCarten pointed out the Anderton, along with Roger Douglas, were collecting an MPs pay, Parliamentary Super AND National Super. I can’t find a link but I remember Anderton saying, when asked if he would take National Super, that he would because he was entitled to it.
As Matt said
“Winners: Roger Douglas and Jim Anderton. Both collect national superannuation, their parliamentary pensions as well as a full MP salary. Their best decade was the 1980s and they’re so old they are allowed to triple dip”. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10617480
He may have said he would give the MP pay to charity but that was about as likely, and impossible to enforce, as was finding out what happened to the $158,000 that Winston clung to and never did return to the Crown.
Trivia question. Can anyone identify a single charity that got a cent of that money?
Alwyn, as I said, ‘seriously’. I’m sorry you missed my irony.
On the topic of not receiving emolument, can anyone identify the destination of John Key’s salary which he said he would donate to charity in whole or in part?
I did realise you didn’t mean it seriously.
My experience of most MPs I have had dealings with is that they will take anything they can get. Oddly enough Stephen Joyce is one of the few who stand out as having made no attempt to get everything he could.
Most of them are, of course riding a gravy train to a standard of living that they could never otherwise have envisaged. There have been a few, such as John Key, Phillip Burdon and Bob Clarkson for whom the money was pocket change but they are few and far between.
As far as any donations Key may have made to charity, how would I know? To find out you would have to have access to his tax file.
The amount he was proposing to donate does seem to have been exaggerated of course. The most I can find him saying is
“”I already donate a good part of the pay I receive as Leader of the Opposition to charities and other good causes. I will continue that practice should I become Prime Minister,” Key, above, told Sunday News.” which was followed by
“Key wouldn’t elaborate on what charities he supported, nor how large a portion of his salary he donated. He said his “personal decision” was not something he wanted publicised”
I see that you have linked to exactly the same story that I did immediately before you.
“snap”.
If you read the story, or what I have quoted from it I think you would have to agree that you are exaggerating just as much as the paper was when you say “all the parliamentary salary that John Key said he was giving away”
What’s that “all” bit?
I wouldn’t use words like “weasel” or “slippery”.
At least if I was going to I would have to use them about every competent politician.
They all talk that way. Hadn’t you noticed?
That was the mistake Blip used to make. He would look at something Key said and read into it what he “wanted” Key to have said. Then he would call it a lie.
All the politicians who are good at their job are exactly the same.
Do you believe that Little has promised that there will be a manned entry of the Pike River Mine that will recover any remains? He did last year when he was leader but he is learning his trade at last and he hasn’t actually done so since the election. Shall I talk about him being a “slippery weasel”? By your standards I assume you think I must.
My goodness.
As Yoda in Star Wars would say.
“The Key Derangement Syndrome is strong in that one”.
Give it away. What he did with his own money was surely his own business? Besides he retired about a year ago. Give it away and get yourself a life.
By the way, he didn’t say “a large part”. He says “a good part”. There is a difference you know.
To DTB.
I never said that Anderton should tell us who he donated money to. After all, Parker beat him and he was only able to continue his triple-dipping and not move onto the quadruple dipping stage. It was his taking so many helpings of the cake that I found a little odd.
John Key never did that did he? He merely collected the single taxpayer payment to which he was entitled. What he chose to do with it was his own business.
I merely pointed out that Anderton wouldn’t be bound by any such promises or actually be able to be checked on them.
That, me young fella, is exactly what I said about our former PM John Key.
I never said that Anderton should tell us who he donated money to.
It was implied in your phrasing that he should if he said he would. Which would also apply to John Key who did say that he gave a portion of his PMs salary to charity – but you never demanded that he prove it.
It was his taking so many helpings of the cake that I found a little odd.
I don’t recall that you thought it odd that Bill English helped himself to similar helpings of cake.
Have you ever heard of a cost benefit analysis? As someone who affects business savvy you should at least pay lip service to the concept.
At the higher end, the estimated cost of some environmental externalities surpasses the 2012 dairy export revenue of NZ$11.6 billion and almost reaches the combined export revenue and dairy’s contribution to Gross Domestic Product in 2010 of NZ$5 billion.
Dairy farms can be converted to other uses and still provide economic opportunities and jobs. Not that you give a toss about unemployed people anyway.
Apparently local workers are ‘hopeless and on drugs’ anyway according to Bill English so we need to factor in the costs of subsidising the percentage of “47,310” workers into migrant workers on minimum wages to help keep the farms going which should not be considered real jobs but fake jobs – they are taking local jobs away but increasing the amount of tax payer services needed like schools and hospitals and roads and job subsidies like working for families and ACC if there is an accident.
Look I’m not a dairy cheerleader.
But facts are facts, we need the money and jobs dairy creates.
Most of NZ’s small towns rely on dairy without dairy the majority would financially collapse.
Even though Ardern said “climate change is my generations Nuclear Free moment”, this government won’t do a thing about dairy, it needs the money, so it’s business as usual for the foreseeable future.
PS: “Dairy farms can be converted to other uses and still provide economic opportunities and jobs. Not that you give a toss about unemployed people anyway.”
Since you so obviously didn’t understand this the first time around.
forestry, honey, tourism, horticulture, wine… sheep, other stock that require less water…. dairy requires enormous amounts of water as well as many farmers are reliant on fertilisers to keep the grass rich enough for dairy.
Dairy farms could also be going organic but apparently although Fonterra charges consumers more for organic milk they don’t pay the farmers any or much more for organic milk.
Hmm. We need the money and jobs dairy (and whatever else) creates if we want to carry on doing things within the broad sweep of how we have done things.
But if that’s our focus and success, then that pesky global warming is going to total the whole shebang pretty soon.
My contention is that business, finance, politicians and policy makers are bent on taking capitalism as far as it will go – ie, to the end.
On a kind of side note, of all the official reports on “possible future scenarios” I’m aware of, there isn’t a single one devoted to how we might re-arrange our affairs in order to avoid catastrophic warming. Not one.
Everything’s devoted to how things might change or look once the skewers of warming are piercing through (and how the imagined resulting situations might be managed).
“My contention is that business, finance, politicians and policy makers are bent on taking capitalism as far as it will go – ie, to the end.”
I agree with you. Too many vested interests , too much ignorance, too much selfishness, too little imagination, too little willingness to make sacrifices.
In the 1940s people rationed their food and made do with a lot of creature comforts to win the war against Nazism.
In the 2010s, we should be again on a war footing to counter and mitigate against climate change. But 35 years of neoliberalism has had its effect. There is not the sense of society there was in the 1940s. Many people are no longer willing to make sacrifices. They won’t go without their flash Ute. They won’t go without their barbecue. They won’t go without their boat.
Like Rachel Stewart, with humans the way they presently are, I am pessimistic about our ability to change in time.
But facts are facts, we need the money and jobs dairy creates.
That’s not a fact. We actually don’t need the money that dairy brings in. In fact, we’d probably be producing more jobs and a better, more developed economy if we didn’t have it.
Oh, goodness. Driving to Wanaka (again) this summer, I was (again) appalled at how we irrigate such dry land for bloody milk cows! How about turning this vast land of dry area into one big solar panel farm? Better for the environment, higher paying jobs (Up skill!) and a hell of a lot more water for us to drink. And we will soon need these water and cry for our stupidity at wasting them on a product humans don’t even need.
The list of products humans don’t even need is enormous and includes most of the food that non-dairy fanatics eat. By all means complain about unsustainable dairy farming in Canterbury and Otago, but:
O, reason not the need! Our basest beggars
Are in the poorest thing superfluous.
Allow not nature more than nature needs,
Man’s life’s as cheap as beast’s.
The thing that still does my head in the most about the destructive environmental impacts on our waterways of intensifying dairying is how predictable it was, yet National did nothing about it. National won with a clear policy goal of doubling the value of our primary exports. Nothing wrong with that as a goal, our wealth is built on it. The environmental consequences of that should have been obvious to most purblind Tory, and the National government could and should have easily managed and mitigated the dairy explosion with careful governance and guidance.
Instead, they adopted a antediluvian, colonial attitude to our environment and under the doctrine that wasn’t so much Laissez-faire as lazy indifference gave carte blanche for big dairy to behave like 19th century robber barons who wrecked the environment while they ran interference for them by obstructing the truth, lying to the public, denialism and suppression of evidence.
it was a disgraceful throw back to the worst excesses of 19th century settler culture and it’s attitude the environment has no intrinsic value is it can’t be monetised.
Guys like Nick Smith should be in jail for the willful dissembling that allowed this unmanaged catastrophe to emerge in our waterways.
A competent government of people who actually care about their own country (as opposed to one led by a dilletante Hawaiin based millionaire) and a clear goal of doubling the value of our exports could have let us have our cake and eat it as well.
The Scandinavian nations would cause even more whinging from BM
“In order to raise a lot of income tax revenue, income tax rates in Scandinavian countries are rather high except for in Norway. Denmark’s top marginal effective income tax rate is 60.4 percent. Sweden’s is 56.4 percent. Norway’s top marginal tax rate is 39 percent.”
Add more brackets and make rates above $70k higher. No reason why anyone earning over $70k can’t afford to pay more tax. I know I can and will have no issue with it.
And while doing that, make sure you look at companies and trusts tax rates so that those will not turn into a loophole. And this is coming from a business owner.
We all might need to think about our consumerism culture because of it but I think it a worthy “price” to pay.
Apparently starting salary for police is $70k but nobody seems to think they are rich – the tax rates are ludicrous and the problem is that the politicians get so many freebies on top of their salaries they are blind to what a high wage should be and what normal people pay for transport and housing. We have Bill’s low wage economy to thank as well for the ‘low’ high wage bracket in NZ.
Though by NZ incomes it’s $20,000 per year more than half the working population earn.
Median wage by latest data is just under $50,000.
That’s just working people.
To those on minimum wage, benefits, super and in insecure employment they might very well see $70,000 as rich.
So on one hand we have lots of people calling themselves middle class who earn less than $70,000 and live from payday to payday, have little or no savings and a mortgage – and on the other hand we have lots of people saying $70,000 ain’t rich.
This is one of the fundamental problems. The working class have been suckered into thinking they are the middle class, into thinking that tax cuts were pay increases and that getting help with their mortgage, their childcare, their raising children etc is what they deserve for their virtuous hard work.
Fact is they are working class but don’t want to admit it.
It used to be that the middle class had 5 servants or less. For a more modern definition there is this US one:
“Middle class” is a tricky concept. Depending on where you live, you can feel middle class earning as much as $250,000 a year — about five times the US median income of $52,250 from the same time period. In this analysis, Pew defined middle class households as those earning 67%-200% of a state’s median income.
or this UK one:
The upper middle class grew to 29.4% of the population in 2014, up from 12.9% in 1979, according to a new Urban Institute report. It defines this group as having household income of between $100,000 and $350,000 for a three-person family.
Fact is there’s more working class in this country than we want to admit and they’ve been thoroughly divided and conquered. It’s even worse when you look at it from a racial perspective with Maori sidelined even more.
The middle class who really aren’t a just an accident or illness away from facing the reality of their impoverishment.
If we actually developed our economy we wouldn’t have any need for exporting dairy. Considering how destructive dairy farming is we should probably develop our economy from the 18th century failed ideal that National insists that we maintain.
Descendant Of Sssmith’s opening post provides an informed basis for development of policy in this and other limited common resource areas of the economy.
It’s not dairy farming or waterways, but dairy farming within constraints. Based on herd limits/footprint appropriate for the area (to protect the resource or to enable recovery).
As Rachel Stewart says , “For some mid-week comedy, this is beyond funny. ”
‘This’ referring to a piece of propaganda on behalf of the industrial farming lobby that Stuff published today.
Stuff is owned by banks and the financial industry.
Farmers are massively in debt to banks because they converted to dairy.
Which came first: the alt-right or the social-justice movement? Will Donald Trump eventually be toppled by leftist activism, or will such activism guarantee his second term in office? Is Katie Hopkins right to describe herself as the creation of her enemies, as the ‘monster’ to the liberal-left’s Dr Frankenstein? Do attempts to shut down free speech on university campuses prevent the dissemination of extremist views, or make such views more likely to gain traction?
It’s a circular pattern that appears to be accelerating, largely thanks to the nuance-free arena of social media. As politics becomes more polarised, each side is resorting to increasingly distorted caricatures of the other.
I see that a lot in New Zealand political discussions online.
This leaves us in a quandary. More than ever, we are in need of frank discussion about the issues that matter most. But with figures on all sides of the political spectrum so determined to double down on their alienating and ad hominem strategies, the possibility of debate is seriously curtailed.
It’s an attitude that is entirely self-defeating.
Yes, but people keep repeating the same behaviours.
In these precarious times, we should be aspiring to a form of political discourse that is at once nuanced and open-minded. Instead, we are likely to see greater degrees of polarisation. Herbert Spencer opens his First Principles (1862) by reminding us that ‘when passing judgment on the opinions of others’, we should be willing to concede that even an erroneous proposition contains ‘a nucleus of reality’.
For those of us who wish to remedy our degraded culture of political debate, this might be a good place to start.
Should we bother to try to remedy our degraded culture of political debate?
I don’t think it’s just the left that indulge in self destructive political behaviour, it’s apparent across the spectrum. It seems to dominate social media – and political blogs. There are no easy or obvious solutions to deliberate disruption and harassment.
Should we just accept that political forums are toxic environments? I think it’s better here than it used to be but we all have a lot of room for improvement.
Allow me an analogy I would give is between the British Suffragists and the Suffragettes a century ago.
Suffragists were the great and vast numbers of women (and some men) who advocated peacefully for reform in the British parliament, organised massive marches across the country on London, and during WW1 integrated themselves so well into the the medical and other establishments that they gained massive credibility for their cause for full civic engagement.
Suffragettes were few, far more militant, dangerous, controversial, and really got the media attention.
Both the angry and mild forms were necessary to alter society for good. Their different kinds of engagement, for different kinds of activism, were necessary.
I’ve heard plenty of complaints on here about “why can’t we be nice to each other?” Please. This is a contest.
How is it possible to be nice to people who are wilfully destroying the planet?
We have 10 years to rid the world of neoliberal capitalism.
Or we are gone.
There is no nice way to say that.
And sudden change is not nice.
Strictly speaking “neoliberalism” died the day the World Bank and IMF repudiated it. It still shuffles around like a zombie, moaning (think Don Brash) and eating right wing brains, but it just doesn’t have the institutional heft of old.
If you feel that passionately about things, my direct challenge to you is this, Ed:
Sell everything you own, distribute everything other than an airline ticket to the poor, and get on the next flight to join a frontline activist group for the rest of your life.
No need to be a keyboard warrior anymore worrying about whether to be polite or alter structures from within.
There are plenty of militant or hard core groups that will take you.
Well, Ad. That is as close to a knee-jerk response to a complex situation as I’ve ever heard. Ed, is looking answers for systematic change, and you “challenge” him to make individual life changes, without addressing his call.
Sounds very similar to the “how can you be an environmentalist and … drive a car, use a computer, use plastic….” trope endlessly meted out by those would have no wish to engage honestly.
“I’ve heard plenty of complaints on here about “why can’t we be nice to each other?” Please. This is a contest.”
What contest?
I don’t need discussions to be nice. But the topic if approached directly is not about the people making the points, it is about the arguments they make.
I don’t choose to participate in your contest. Like other commenters, I’m getting a bit tired of this pointless point scoring, and would prefer threads to stay on topic.
Ed, I am sure, can stand up for himself and stop feeling quite so depressed about the state of the world., if Ed takes action.
There is real point scoring to do. Molly. The points in the contest are for power. We went through that contest last year in that thing called an election. That occurred as a result of people acting rather than just complaining about the world. As a result of that contest power changed massively.
i choose to participate in that contest. As I have for a fair bit.
If you continue to frame the problems as contests, then you create an adversarial discussion.
I don’t care if the solution is proposed by someone who might self-identify as right, if the solution is effective. The contest is not “won” by a right-winger, it is a problem solved.
The election last year was not a contest. It was an indication of the effect of the level and quality of political discourse and engagement in this country.
Oh horse shit Molly.
Last year’s election was spectacularly damaging to the reputations of dozens of careers, because there was quite a lot at stake. Left and right threw everything they could at each other, and it was still really very polite compared to almost any other advanced democracy in the world.
You may well want space for conflict-free discussion, but since that is obviously not what Ed was seeking, give him some advice yourself on this:
“How is it possible to be nice to people who are wilfully destroying the planet?
We have 10 years to rid the world of neoliberal capitalism.
Or we are gone.
There is no nice way to say that.
And sudden change is not nice.”
“Last year’s election was spectacularly damaging to the reputations of dozens of careers, because there was quite a lot at stake. Left and right threw everything they could at each other, and it was still really very polite compared to almost any other advanced democracy in the world. “
Probably why my estimation of many of the contestants was lowered. And why my personal jubilation at a change of government was muted.
Just because this is the political approach that excites you, and makes you believe that it is the one true way, doesn’t mean that it holds true for all of us.
I don’t have the need for a softly-softly approach. But while you are talking high-level contests of reputation, and competition you often seem to absolve those same people of making any kind of significant change, and advocate for incremental changes.
It is this apologetic approach within a system, where we have winners and losers, that you seem to accept without review.
Ed, doesn’t, and is looking for answers. I don’t have any to give him, but can engage with you to get a better understanding of why change doesn’t often come from within, and you might be prepared to consider that not all the voting public and those engaged in local politics think alike.
Yes, I accept the democratic system that we have in New Zealand.
There you go. You’re not in that frame of mind from your own “estimation”.
You stepped in to save Ed, and you have nothing to offer him at all. Poor discourse.
Ed just needs something positive and bold to do to stop him mithering about the world. That is the answer he needs, so I told him.
You want to engage: bring some facts, and some clarity about what is at stake. Don’t just crap on about whether you like the kind of discursive process you are encountering.
You accept the democratic system in NZ. So does everyone.
That doesn’t mean that there are not failings within it. The bill regarding waka-jumping is in part a recognition of that.
I have concerns regarding the rights of non-citizens to vote, the level of votes required for representation, the use of electorates to give a party more than its voters’ share in parliament.
The systematic change that Ed asks for are going to come from grassroots pressure, but it will enacted and reinforced (or rejected) by those in power. Both discussions are valid.
“You stepped in to save Ed, and you have nothing to offer him at all. Poor discourse.
Ed just needs something positive and bold to do to stop him mithering about the world. That is the answer he needs, so I told him.”
I don’t need to save Ed, he will work out what his personal response is, in his own time. And you didn’t give him the answer he needs. How arrogant of you to suggest this.
I saw an instance of borderline bullying going on, and tried to bring the conversation back on track, in case it was my perspective rather than your comment that was incorrect.
“You want to engage: bring some facts, and some clarity about what is at stake. Don’t just crap on about whether you like the kind of discursive process you are encountering.”
I do bring facts to the table about the issues Ed raises, but usually as a response to posts when time and home situation permits. You have brought nothing to this thread except a requirement for both Ed and I to behave or respond in a certain way before you listen.
I have found ( as you are now discovering) that putting forwards arguments that are not in accordance with the thinking of some results in quite a bit of verbal abuse and an aggressive attempt to shut the discussion down.
Not good .
Whereas in your case, Ed, you got served for the illegibility of your comments. Nice to see you taking that constructive criticism on board.
I note that your aversion to abuse goes missing whenever it’s time to call people right wing climate denying trolls because they don’t happen to agree with your rhetoric.
Sure is. But I prefer that to disingenuous passive-agressive put-downs like “I find it quite disheartening to witness such blinkered thinking.” At least it’s honest.
The planet isn’t facing any crisis – what happens to us (whether “us” Homo Sapiens or “us” the currently existing set of species in play) is irrelevant to it. 1,000,000 years from now there’ll be a then-existing set of species in existence that won’t give a rat’s ass about what happened to the ones existing now, and grieving over that strikes me as singularly pointless.
None of which is to suggest we shouldn’t stop fucking ourselves and all the other current species over and come up with something better – but that has nothing to do with grief.
By the way @Molly (somewhere above)….do you happen to have noticed the holier-than-thou, supercilious comments on yesterday and today’s Open Mike?
Whether directed at Ed or others, it’s bloody depressing.
It’s not unlike a Harry Enfield sketch on ‘I’m CONSIDERABLY richer than you’ – except that it’s a ‘I’m considerably more intelligent’, OR I’m CONSIDERABLY more ‘left’, OR CONSIDERABLY more astute, well read, and thoroughly literate and numerate than ye’.
In fact I’m so far up my own arse it’s difficult to consider the possibility of an alternative view. I’m so fucking gorgeous there are hordes fawning all over me!
So far this week, The teensiest eensiest bit of humility seems to have left The Standard, and it seems something is in the 50% pure water.
Thanks Once was Tim.
I also bumped into ‘I’m CONSIDERABLY more ‘accurate with speech marks.’
As a response to a post endeavouring to start a conversation about climate change, it is bloody depressing.
Yes, OnceWasTim, I found it bloody depressing too. For me ‘The Standard’ is an invaluable community of left-wing commentators, and a lifeline living, as I do, in a small conservative town.
I’ve learnt so much and am in awe of how some people are able to express themselves. But not all of us are as articulate, and it can be intimidating to comment on here.
I love Ed’s comments. He may get his format wrong, but his heart is in the right place. I notice that you don’t pick on Eco Maori for ‘wrong’ grammar.
I don’t comment as much but still a regular and avid reader, and there does appear to be a change in tone and manner.
Usually, by the time I read, some other regular has already pointed out the issue, and I don’t feel the need to join in when the point has already been made.
In this case, I thought I’d enter into the dialogue. Luckily, I had to go for a few hours and will be heading back out momentarily, so I can offset the exchange with fresh air and time.
If Ed were to accept Ad’s challenge, and “do it”, that would decrease the diversity of left-leaning PoVs presented on this site.
If s/he does accept Ad’s good-natured (?) challenge (the “keyboard warrior” jibe is a bit of a giveaway), then maybe s/he would consider posting updates here.
I value Ed’s comments almost as much as those of AOB, PM, Ad, LPrent et al., so would be disappointed if the current concerted effort to hound him/her off this site is successful.
There may be some relevant history that fully justifies such targeting, but it has many hallmarks of bullying behaviour. Is there substantially more to it than some here not wanting to read Ed’s PoV?
I am going to refer to Rachel Stewart ‘s discussion about grief this morning in her article.
I asked people to ask at what stage of grief they are at.
James denied there was a crisis. It was ‘bumkin’ .
Carolyn said he was at the stage of ‘despondency’
I sense quite a few of the posters in this site would fit in the category Rachel Stewart described as. “you’re busy bargaining, or being angry, or even denying there’s a problem at all. You may even be stuck in depression.”
Whatever stage they are at, my posting concerns about the various crises we are facing ( climate, resources, extinction) usually bump into a lot of flak, not just from deniers such as James, but others on ithis site, who seem unwilling to confront the issue head on.
Discussing the antics of Trump and the behaviour of National MPs seems a more urgent priority.
A year ago when a Whanganui mother-of-four decided to opt out of grocery spending for 12 months few people believed she could do it. But 365 days down the track and a zero dollar food bill is only the beginning.
Yes, Ed, I know she says it. I’m wondering what’s the factual basis. Perhaps it could be justified by the dairy herd increasing by 69% between 1994 and 2015.
The problem is that some people are so hung up on cow pollution but seem blind to the people and business pollution, that is way higher.
Example more people more poos and wastewater and housing and food and water and transport needed and less biodiversity and nature. NZ neoliberal’s drive for more people has a polluting cost. James Hardie for example and the amount of trucks that drive around Auckland connected to the building boom (that doesn’t seem to house local people in the budget they can afford) .
Waterways and beaches around Auckland are polluted. It’s not the cows. Apparently warnings are out for Lake Taupo polluted by some accident with waster water. Cows are only one part of the equation, to our declining water quality issues.
Cows are a major part.
Most of our rivers are in the country.
That’s not to deny the issues with urban waterways, but the vast majority of waterways are in rural areas.
Sure politics is a contest, and it should be keenly contested. It’s not a matter of ‘being nice to each other’.
But it should be a matter of enabling and allowing debate on different policies and actions and social issues (robustly) while respecting that others can have different and equally valid ideas, or of disproving false claims without resorting to personal attacks or attempts at discrediting thing one disagrees with or wants to suppress.
Most MPs manage this most of the time beyond question time and the media spotlight.
Squabbling like children will achieve little if anything. More mature debate will make a healthier and more effective democracy.
I think we’re just in a bit of a vacuum for a month or so until more draft legislation comes out and starts hitting the media for us to chew over. So it will all be a bit formless here until the new Parliamentary year begins. I think the editorial control here is reasonably good overall. And of course the authorial quality is just fantastic! 😉
“I think we’re just in a bit of a vacuum for a month or so until more draft legislation comes out and starts hitting the media for us to chew over. So it will all be a bit formless here until the new Parliamentary year begins.”
So…in the absence of anything meatier to sink your teeth into, you exorcise your boredom by taking bites out of other commentors?
Social media being destructive to balance in political discourse and the left being self destructive are two different issues.
PS Right wing policy is destructive to adequate funding of government and therefore respect for the commonwealth in society – it and modern social media have something in common.
Anyone quoting Schumpeter with approval is a bit far right to be a credible critic of the left. The article is pitifully biased – it makes a nod at the alt-right as a prelude to a sustained tirade against the left. For the author to retain a shred of credibility he would need to include an equivalent dissection of the alt-right.
“For the author to retain a shred of credibility he would need to include an equivalent dissection of the alt-right.”
Why?
By your logic any criticism of the right here would need to have would need to include ‘an equivalent dissection’ of the left to have any credibility. That would be ridiculous.
One of the many ways of trying to squash discussion is claiming an argument is not credible or a point is not worthy of discussion because it is not comprehensively balanced (an impossible demand).
Your logic is impeccable. Politics however is not a logic based pursuit is it?
The path you’re on will of course see you comprehensively shat on by both the left and right, so I hope you have the tenacity to tolerate it all.
I think I’ve linked to this before, but it’s my take on all this online politics aggro and why I’ve determined to happily free myself from it:
” see you comprehensively shat on by both the left and right’
You mean by a small minority, generally the more extremes, of the left and the right, who don’t represent the views or the behaviour of the vast majority?
I think that many people are put of an involvement in politic debate due to the high risk of personal attack or pointless and petty point scoring.
Those actively involved in politics could do a service to democracy by encouraging decent robust debate, but social media seems to have worked against rather than for that happening. Due to the actions of a small minority.
I agree it is a small minority of the total number of people who view social media pages who almost inevitably set the agenda and tone.
Nonetheless politics is ultimately a contest of ideas, so eliminating this competitive aspect is neither possible or even desirable. At the same time constructive political action demands mutual trust and a unity of purpose, which is impossible when personalities and emotional confrontations dominate.
I’ve always supported a competitive contest of ideas, that’s an important (essential) part of a healthy democracy.
We get that to an extent, but it is often overwhelmed by attempted contests of attrition, which rarely benefit anyone to any lasting extent. Whale Oil is an extreme example in New Zealand of attritional attack politics, but far from the only dirty political activist.
“Whale Oil is an extreme example in New Zealand of attritional attack politics, but far from the only dirty political activist.”
Can you name another, Pete?
“Weren’t David Farrar, Jordan Williams and Simon Lusk named in Nicky Hager’s book?”
And Pete’s blogger pal, Keeping Stock, Whanganui church elder and early-childhood businessman.
Actually, as usual Robert’s put his finger precisely on the issue at hand here. In your latest foray into disingenuous concern-trolling (comment 5), you faux-generously conceded that you “don’t think it’s just the left that indulge in self destructive political behaviour,” but asked (the concern-trolling bit): “Should we just accept that political forums are toxic environments?”
Robert’s invited you to list the egregious WhaleOil-equivalent toxic environments on the left that you’re concern-trolling about on this thread, but suddenly you’re all coy and retreating being “not as bad as WhaleOil” being a poor measure of success. Well, yes, we know it is, we’re just waiting for you to make your case for these left-wing “toxic environments.” How about if you put up or shut up?
Your assertion is a blithe attempt to dispense with any pretense of objectivity – yet it is this very pretense of objectivity that the author marshals against the left that he wishes to criticize.
This is the kind of insincerity we expect from the extreme right, an inconsistency in applying standards.
I’m not making an impossible demand, merely one you do not choose to attempt because objective comparisons of left and right bias would not further your frankly dubious assertions.
Let’s hear your critique of the alt-right, and we will consider the merits of your critique of the left.
Let’s hear your objective conparisons and critiques of the hard right, the centre right, the centre, the centre right and the hard right before you lecture someone else on inconsistency in applying standards and insincerity.
I write about a wide range of things including been critical of the alt-right, but don’t see any reason why i should include everything in a single blog comment. No one else does, including you.
It’s just a lazy lame attempt by you to discredit sources rather than debate the issues raised.
You post an attack article titled “On the Self-destructive Left” on a moderate left leaning site and try to pretend that you are not simply being abusive.
You yourself made the claim that you criticize the alt-right, but your refusal to demonstrate it confirms your well-established reputation for insincerity.
“Stupid” in your terms evidently means not falling for your tissues of nonsense.
From where I’m sitting right now Stuart, I can see PG’s point. There are a couple of aspects to this.
One is simple in-group bias and preference. The fact is we accept and tolerate worse bad behaviour from people we perceive as being ‘on our side’, than we do from those we consider to be the opposition.
The other is more subtle; that in my experience the left and the right do toxic behaviour differently from each other. They don’t use the same tactics and it’s wrong to suggest they’re just as bad as each other. That’s a false equivalence that just kicks dust in everyone’s eyes.
Let’s put it this way, if a Martian was to spend a week reading first WhaleOil and then The Standard, I doubt at the end he/she would declare one to be an unmitigated sewer of all filth, and the other pure light and reasoned sweetness. In all likelihood our Martian would find sad aspects to both … each with it’s own shadings.
Of course I can’t vouch for PG’s motives here; but keep in mind that sometimes those you thought to be enemies will tell you truths your friends will not.
@ Redlogix PG and I know each other well – he’s been so desperate (and so irrelevant) as to run attack articles on me on his site.
Why was he here today? To discuss a real issue, or to damn the left with a shallow, biased critique?
Although his article paid lip service to condemning the excesses of the alt right, that was really only a rhetorical flourish to lend a pretense of even-handedness to what was actually a crude assault.
His hope was presumably that casual readers might swallow his aspersions and defend his freedom to assert his views here in one of the very few left tolerant sites still operating.
I don’t believe that his views of ‘left dysfunction’ are either sound or edifying. He may be capable of forming worthwhile opinions on other matters, but rarely does so.
We should just accept that political forums are toxic environments. That’s because of the partisan self-centred thick who have the opportunity to use them.
It’s a sort of unrecognised splurge world. Think of it as the Donald Trump tweet world being Tangimoana and political discussions online as being the Universe.
I’m going on my own topic. These neo liberal whom like to quote all the bad stats of Maori and Pacific Islands people. They say we are bad carers well in my view the state is the mother and father of the people they rule over. The people that have been running the state should look in a mirror and admite that they ______up as being mother and father YOU are suppose to treat all the children the same discipline us all the same make sure they have a happy healthy future teach us give us all the same opportunity. Not make policy’s that takeaway from the many and gives to the 1% not have impunity for the 1% as this makes the 1% do whatever they want and they know that won’t be held to account
For there bad behaviour so they think there behaviour is OK. But if this behaviour is OK why do everything in there power to hide this bad behaviour they know there is crap. All THE GOVERNMENTS OF OUR WORLD SOCIETY should try there best to be good parents as that is what a government is a parents to the people. They should put all there children future first and not money.
Ka kite ano
The state unevenly subsidises mothers and fathers, and children, and currently does a pretty shabby job of even that. The current NZ government might make a few improvements.
My parents were Andertonites. My dad was his election campaign manager in Sydenham (later Wigram) when Jim Anderton was a Labour MP and then when he established the NLP and Alliance and they followed him out of the Alliance into the Progressives, although they never went back to the LP with him.
Jim was very kind and thoughtful when my mother was dying of cancer in 2011.
On a personal level, I think he was a genuine, kind and generous person.
But he was also a major political figure, and his career there is much more open to critique.
He certainly more principle than any other Labour MP during the period of the 4th Labour but he sided with Labour over the invasion of Afghanistan, something which led to the loss of thousands of Afghani lives and is still wreaking havoc on that country.
A tribute to Jim Anderton by former fellow ChCh MP and one-time Press gallery journo and Marlborough Express Editor, Brendon Burns. It has a Marlborough angle since Burns is once again a Marlburian and Anderton as Minister for Regional Development put money into the Wine Institute and the Omaka Aviation Museum.
An occasion when I am totally in agreement with Keith Locke. I never thought that it was going to happen.
I guess this is an example of Gell-Mann’s principle in Quantum Mechanics.
“Gell-Mann’s principle states that unless a process is expressly forbidden there is a non-zero probability that it will occur”.
Now that the funders of Breitbart have their tax cut, time to take the reigns of the alt-right media – make it obvious that “drain the swamp” was just a play to win votes to restore the GOP to power.
I like the reporting of Glenn Greenwald, he does some nice cut through. Like this one about facebook once again bowing down to the state, this time deleting accounts of Palestinians and opponents of the USA. All the time letting the facebook pages of our world tyrants keep rolling.
I’ve taken the time a year back to visit the similar Sundrop facility just south of Port Augusta, and these solar thermal plants really do have the look of the future. I’ve no sense of whether solar PV or solar thermal will ultimately be the dominant technology, but each has it’s merits. The big plus with solar thermal for the moment is it’s inherent energy storage capacity, something which has to added on to solar pv with batteries or pumped hydro.
The way the tower literally glows an intense white, brighter than the sun, is quite a sight.
The article says it will or can provide just under 4% of SAs electrical needs. 20% of energy use is electrical and much of the rest needs to be switched (mostly) from fossil.
Allowing a generous 20% of energy needs to come from non-electrical sources, SA needs to expand its generating capacity by a factor of 4.
So (I think I’m right in saying) 100 of those solar thermal units would do the trick.
One plant cost $650 million and construction takes about two years.
Assuming lots of upskilling, availability of materials/sites and what not, 100 plants could be built in the space of (I dunno) a couple of decades say? At a cost of $65 billion.
Maybe 50 plants alongside other non-carbon energy sources?
That’s for a population of 1.7million.
As I keep saying and will keep on saying, the task of avoiding very dangerous or catastrophic warming is huge.
Especially scroll down to the image showing how Australian sunshine could potentially supply the entire world with electricity. (Of course you wouldn’t do it like that, but it gives a sense of the possibilities.)
increases in energy demand (all things being equal) being the obvious one.
So divide that 34% from wind down to bring it to the percentage of very conservative future requirements that entail multiplying capacity by about 4x.
And then factor in x,y and z (whatever they may be).
Then acknowledge that if we say it’s not do-able, we should be doing whatever we can to get as close to achieving it as is possible.
The technical know-how is there (engineering community etc), and the acknowledgement of the need is there (scientific community etc)…and the road block is all the clowns, jokers and arse wipes who make it their business to manage and control our (society’s) business.
Not one government or business community nor financial community is getting off its managerial, short term, profit driven arse to make so much as a start on any of it. And they’ve been sitting on their fucking chuffs for 30 years now and spinning us bullshit off the back of pointless “declarations of intent” or whatever latest “accord” they signed.
Putting the details aside, I can’t see any option short of burning the fuckrs down and getting on with it.
And yet by next month they will be the centre of attention again in NZ and most people will, yet again, be hanging on their every pontification and platitude.
I mostly agree Bill. From where we sit in NZ right now there is not a lot to be optimistic about. Yet here is one state in Australia that has smashed a breach in that road block:
In six short weeks, the South Australian Government has signed three very important contracts that underwrite their energy transition. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Turnbull has the temerity to label the SA Government’s efforts as “ideology and idiocy in equal measure”, all the while trying to herd a cabal of confused backbenchers with coal fetishes to arrive at a much needed and overdue federal energy policy.
From my first link above.
And even then the Federal govt aren’t complete idiots and have managed to put $2b into upgrading the Snowy Hydro scheme:
I’d argue there are quite a few regional initiatives like SA’s that have the potential to tip the game much faster than we expect. And especially there is a whole new generation of engineers and industry people who work with reality for a living and are just itching to get their hands on all this new technology.
Witness AGL blatantly defying the Federal govt who wanted them to spend $1b to extend the life of the old Liddell coal power station by just five years. AGL just said no:
Consider this … in the past decade the total new coal power generation that has been built in Australia = Zero. I’m willing to bet it will stay that way … all new generation will be renewable and as more of the old plants reach end of life, this process will only accelerate.
Bearing in mind we have about 20 years to hit zero carbon from energy (absolute zero, not net zero), then that acceleration had better be something like flicking straight into warp drive from a standing start.
Replacing coal with gas isn’t it. (Your second link)
And waiting for old plant to hit the end of its shelf life isn’t it either. (Though China just pulled the plug on a pile of coal fired stations regardless, so…)
And just to add, any plant operating on notions of carbon capture (whether the fuel is fossil or bio) isn’t it either.
The 1.7 million people living in SA may have a state govt that’s willing to make a nod. Is it enough in the scheme of things though? Will SA hit zero carbon from energy in the time we have?
And if not, (because they’ll have done the projections, right? /sarc) what’s the current plan in operation that ensures a massive decrease in energy consumption, such that in conjunction with building necessary plant, SA sits at zero by about 2040 – 2045?
Excellent post with that link Ka pai Redlogic.
I think they are wasting money on fusion. The money would be better invested in renewable energy tidal currents wind solar thermal solar thermal power hydro power as back up power for the solar plants.
As with any thing that is critical to OUR society I would have my eggs in many
Kiti baskets . We are in renewable energy utopia US kiwis most of us just don’t know this fact clear sky’s mountains sea volcanics we are the envy of the world. And the rest of the world will laugh at us if we don’t utilise these precious resources to benefit all the people of NEW ZEALAND. Other countries that freeze for 4 to 6 months of the year are streeks ahead of us now we have the knowledge we have developed thermal power its just the political interfance leading us down the path that big money wants us to take letts get this environmently friendly economy pumping. Kia kaha
It is great to read your knowledgable and thoughtful comments eco maori, you really get around the topics for someone who is battling so much with everyday problems. If we all could keep up as you try to, and me also, I think NZ people could be a force to be reckoned with.
Don”t worry about ECO MAORI greywarshark I have heaps of energy Mana and Thunder to keep up the good cause for Papatuanukus health and equality for all.
You know the sandflys attacks on my good character in the end just added to my Mana thanks to thestandard and the good people who posted there views here Ka pai
The sandflys are still following me but now they are keeping there distance they are scared now and they should be .The reason I used eco as a 2 person some mite have guessed my motive well It was subliminal massaging .I was posting eco alot to encourage OUR people to become environmentally friendly. The sandflys will be looking for some tissues soon
Ka kite ano
Stories of dodgy landlords.
Just another area of NZ life damaged by neoliberalism.
A lack of strict enforceable regulations sees the rich exploit the poor and vulnerable.
In so many areas of life, New Zealand is a wretched place.
If Rachel Stewart ‘s article wasn’t enough of a dose of reality for you, then there’s this.
“President Donald Trump is preparing for a “showdown” with North Korea as the US draws closer to nuclear war with the rogue state, a retired US general has warned.
Former US Vice-Chief of Staff Jack Keane told Fox News that Trump has pledged to “take care” of Kim Jong-un’s ruthless regime.
He warns that the US is “absolutely” at its closest it has ever been to war with North Korea.”
On Sunday, after her holiday , HdpA sat at her computer and wrote an article bemoaning people’s outrage at things. It was titled “A resolution for the world – park the outrage .”
Today , after her holiday , Rachel Stewart sat at her computer and wrote an article explaining why most species on this planet faced oblivion. It was titled “I got the end-of-humanity blues.”
So should I park my outrage at the prospect of the end of humanity and life as we know it on this planet? Or just conclude that HdpA is a vacuous and useless journalist.
Dude has a crack at unpacking the Fusion GPS testimony released by Dianne Feinstein.
Alright, I've blistered through the entire Fusion GPS transcript. All 300+ pages of it.No matter how this thread turns out, just remember: it was better than reading that maddening tome from end to end.Grab a beverage… and off we go.1/— The Hoarse Whisperer (@HoarseWisperer) January 10, 2018
Yea team. This from an Economist newsletter I get each morning.
Perhaps we can look up at the sky tomorrow without have our pictures taken.
What an incredible waste of money.
“An American spy satellite worth billions of dollars has been written off after it failed to reach orbit. The super-secret mission, code-named Zuma, launched aboard a SpaceX rocket on Sunday. However, interpreting the scant details provided by both SpaceX and spooks about the failure, it seems the satellite did not separate from the rocket properly.”
From the name I suppose it was intended to spy on South Africa though.
Given that the primary function of spying is to keep violence to a minimum, it might actually be money well spent, considering the costs of eg: the drone program.
When you put it that way you are probably right, at least if it is intended to do what you suggest.
I wonder how many tens of billions the drone program costs each year?
I doubt if it is in the hundreds but it is almost certainly far more than this single satellite cost.
On the other hand Zuma was probably intended to do traffic counts around competitors to “The Donalds” hotels. That is what you do if you are POTUS isn’t it?
It seems to be so sensitive that it probably was named by a random syllable generator – like the British Operation Barras in Sierra Leone.
Alternatively, google tells me that “Zuma” is the name of a chain of Japanese restaurants and also a game that involves stopping balls hitting a skull.
“O the truly tragic irony – reading Rachel Stewart’s column in today’s Herald (hard copy, Diz) and on the opposite page is an ad for the Singapore Grand Prix…”
This video includes conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Climate change is everywhere. And when something's everywhere it can feel like it's nowhere. So how do we get our heads ...
Its a law like gravity: whenever a right-wing government is elected, they start attacking democracy. And now, after talking to their Republican and Tory and Fidesz chums at the International Democracy Union forum in Wellington, National is doing it here, announcing plans to remove election-day enrolment. Or, to put it ...
Yesterday Winston Peters focussed his attention on the important matter at hand. Tweeting. Like the former, and quite possibly next, orange POTUS, from whom he takes much of his political strategy, Winston is an avid X’er.His message didn’t resemble an historic address this time. In fact it was more reminiscent ...
Buzz from the Beehive A significant decline in natural gas production has given Resources Minister Shane Jones an opportunity to reiterate his enthusiasm for the mining and burning of coal. For good measure, he has praised an announcement from Genesis Energy that it will resume importing coal. He and Energy ...
“Follow the money” is the classic directive to journalists trying to understand where power and influence lie in society. In terms of uncovering who influences various New Zealand political parties and governments, it therefore pays to look at who is funding them. The political parties are legally obliged to make ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Here is my subjective ranking on a “most-left” to “most-right” scale of most of our major NZ Universities, with some anecdotal (and at times amusing) evidence to back up the claim.Extreme Left Auckland University of TechnologyEvidenceThe ...
Eric Crampton writes – I hadn’t thought about this one until a helpful email showed up in my inbox.It’s pretty obvious that income tax thresholds should automatically index with inflation – whether to anchor the thresholds in percentiles of the income distribution, or to anchor against a real ...
Jacqui Van Der Kaay writes – Parliament’s speaker had no option but to refer Green MP Julie Anne Genter to the Privileges Committee for her behaviour in the House last Wednesday evening. The incident, in which she crossed the floor to wave a book and yell at National ...
Gary Judd writes – The Dean of the law school at the Auckland University of Technology is someone called Khylee Quince. I have been sent her social media posting in which she has, over the LawNews headline “Senior King’s Counsel files complaint about compulsory tikanga Maori studies for ...
Cleo Paskal writes – WASHINGTON, D.C.: ‘Many of us have received phone calls from [the opposing camp] telling them if they join the camp they will be given projects for their wards and $300,000 [around US$35,000] each’, says former Malaita Premier Daniel Suidani. The elections in Solomon Islands aren’t ...
With hindsight, it was inevitable that (a) Hamas would agree to the ceasefire deal brokered by Egypt and Qatar and that ( b) Israel would then immediately launch attacks on Rafah, regardless. We might have hoped the concessions made by Hamas would cause Israel to desist from slaughtering thousands more ...
Placards and mourners outside the Kilbirnie Mosque following the Christchurch terror attack: MSD has terminated the Kaiwhakaoranga service, which has been used by 415 families since the attacks. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The Government’s pledge to only cut ‘back office’ staff rather than ‘frontline’ services is on increasingly shaky ground, with ...
There’s been a few smaller public transport announcements over the last week or so that I thought I’d cover in a single post. Fareshare I’ve long called for Auckland Transport to offer a way to enable employer-subsidised public transport options. The need for this took on even more importance ...
Parliament’s speaker had no option but to refer Green MP Julie Anne Genter to the Privileges Committee for her behaviour in the House last Wednesday evening. The incident, in which she crossed the floor to wave a book and yell at National Minister Matt Doocey, reflects poorly on Genter and ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Who likes being sneered at? Nobody. Worse yet, when the sneerer has their facts all wrong, and might well be an idiot.The sneer in question is The adults are in charge now, and it is a sneer offered in retort to criticism of this new Government, no matter how well ...
When in government, Labour pushed to extend the Parliamentary term to four years, to reduce accountability and our ability to vote out a bad government. And now, they're trying to do it through the member's ballot, with a Four-Year Parliamentary Term Legislation Bill. The bill at least requires a referendum ...
A ballot for a single Member's Bill was held today, and the following bill was drawn: Public Works (Prohibition of Compulsory Acquisition of Māori Land) Amendment Bill (Hūhana Lyndon) The bill would prevent the government from stealing Māori land in breach of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It ...
Simeon Brown, alongside Wayne Brown, is favouring a political figleaf now in exchange for loading up tens of millions in extra interest costs on Auckland ratepayers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s is pushing back hard at suggestions from Local Government Minister Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown ...
Buzz from the Beehive One headline-grabber from the Beehive yesterday was the OECD’s advice that the government must bring the Budget deficit under control or face higher interest rates. Another was the announcement of a $1.9 billion “investment” in Corrections over the next four years. In the best interests of ...
Chris Trotter writes – Had Zheng He’s fleet sailed east, not west, in the early Fifteenth Century, how different our world would be. There is little reason to suppose that the sea-going junks of the Ming Dynasty, among the largest and most sophisticated sailing vessels ever constructed, would have failed ...
David Farrar writes – Two articles give a useful contrast in balance. Both seek to be neutral explainer articles. This one in the Herald on Social Investment covers the pros and cons nicely. It links to critical pieces and talks about aspects that failed and aspects that are more ...
The tikanga regulations will compel law students to be taught that a system which does not conform with the rule of law is nevertheless law which should be observed and applied…Gary Judd KC writes – I have made a complaint to Parliament’s Regulation ...
The future of Te Huia, the train between Hamilton and Auckland, has been getting a lot of attention recently as current funding for it is only in place till the end of June. The government initially agreed to a five year trial, through to April 2026, but that was subject ...
TL;DR: Hamas has just agreed to Israel’s ceasefire plan. Nelson hospital’s rebuild has been cut back to save money. The OECD suggests New Zealand break up network monopolies, including in electricity. PM Christopher Luxon’s news conference on a prison expansion announcement last night was his messiest yet.Here’s my top six ...
A homicide in Ponsonby, a manhunt with a killer on the run. The nation’s leader stands before a press conference reassuring a frightened nation that he’ll sort it out, he’ll keep them safe, he’ll build some new prison spaces.Sorry what? There’s a scary dude on the run with a gun ...
Hi,I know it’s been awhile since there’s been any Webworm merch — and today that all changes!Over the last four months, I’ve been working with New Zealand artist Jess Johnson to create a series of t-shirts, caps and stickers that are infused with Webworm DNA — and as of right ...
The OECD’s chief economist yesterday laid it on the line for the new Government: bring the deficit under control or face higher Reserve Bank interest rates for longer. And to bring the deficit under control, she meant not borrowing for tax cuts. But there was more. Without policy changes—introducing a ...
After a hiatus of over four months Selwyn Manning and I finally got it together to re-start the “A View from Afar” podcast series. We shall see how we go but aim to do 2 episodes per month if possible. … Continue reading → ...
In 2008, the UK Parliament passed the Climate Change Act 2008. The law established a system of targets, budgets, and plans, with inbuilt accountability mechanisms; the aim was to break the cycle of empty promises and replace it with actual progress towards emissions reduction. The law was passed with near-universal ...
Buzz from the Beehive Local Water Done Well – let’s be blunt – is a silly name, but the first big initiative to put it into practice has gone done well. This success is reflected in the headline on an RNZ report:District mayors welcome Auckland’s new water deal with ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate ConnectionsA farmworker cleans the solar panels of a solar water pump in the village of Jagadhri, Haryana Country, India. (Photo credit: Prashanth Vishwanathan/ IWMI) Decisions made in India over the next few years will play a key role in global ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – The Children’s Minister, Karen Chhour, intends to repeal Section 7AA from the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 because it creates conflict between claimed Crown Treaty obligations and the child’s best interests. In her words, “Oranga Tamariki’s governing principles and its act should be colour ...
Geoffrey Miller writes – The gloves are off. That might seem to be the undertone of surprisingly tough talk from New Zealand’s foreign and trade ministers. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, may be facing legal action after making allegations about former Australian foreign minister Bob Carr on Radio New Zealand. ...
Brian Easton writes – This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be (I will report on them ...
TL;DR:Winston Peters is reported to have won a budget increase for MFAT. David Seymour wanted his Ministry of Regulation to be three times bigger than the Productivity Commission. Simeon Brown is appointing a Crown Monitor to Watercare to protect the Claytons Crown Guarantee he had to give ratings agencies ...
The gloves are off. That might seem to be the undertone of surprisingly tough talk from New Zealand’s foreign and trade ministers. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, may be facing legal action after making allegations about former Australian foreign minister Bob Carr on Radio New Zealand. Carr had made highly ...
I could be a florist'Round the corner from Rye LaneI'll be giving daisies to craziesBut, baby, I'll wrap you up real safe Oh, I can give you flowers At the end of every dayFor the center of your table, a rainbowIn case you have people 'round to stay Depending on ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to May 12 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Finance Minister Nicola Willis will give a pre-budget speech on Thursday.Parliament sits from Question Time at 2pm on ...
The price of the foreign affairs “reset” is now becoming apparent, with Defence set to get a funding boost in the Budget. Finance Minister Nicola Willis has confirmed that it will be one of the few votes, apart from Health and Education and possibly Police, which will get an increase ...
A listing of 26 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 28, 2024 thru Sat, May 4, 2024. Story of the week "It’s straight out of Big Tobacco’s playbook. In fact, research by John Cook and his colleagues ...
Yesterday I received come lovely feedback following my Star Wars themed newsletter. A few people mentioned they’d enjoyed reading the personal part at the beginning.I often begin newsletters with some memories, or general thoughts, before commencing the main topic. This hopefully sets the mood and provides some context in which ...
April 30 was going to be the day we’d be calling Mum from London to wish her a happy birthday. Then it became the day we would be going to St. Paul's at Evensong to remember her. The aim of the cathedral builders was to find a way to make their ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Can’t remember the last book by a Kiwi author you read? Think the NZ government should spend less on the arts in favor of helping the homeless? If so, as far as Newsroom is concerned, you probably deserve to be called a cultural ignoramus ...
Eric Crampton writes – Grudges are bad. Better to move on. But it can be fun to keep a couple of really trivial ones, so you’re not tempted to have other ones. For example, because of the rootkit fiasco of 2005, no Sony products in our household. ...
A new report warns an estimated third of the adult population have unmet need for health care.Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāHere’s the six key things I learned about Aotaroa’s political economy this week around housing, climate and poverty:Politics - Three opinion polls confirmed support for PM Christopher Luxon ...
Today is May the fourth. Which was just a regular day when my mother took me to see the newly released Star Wars at the Odeon in Rotorua. The queue was right around the corner. Some years later this day became known as Star Wars Day, the date being a ...
Buzz from the Beehive Much more media attention is being paid to something Winston Peters said about former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr than to a speech he delivered to the New Zealand China Council. One word is missing from the speech: AUKUS. But AUKUS loomed large in his considerations ...
Is the economy in another long stagnation? If so, why?This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be ...
The annual list of who's been bribing our politicians is out, and journalists will no doubt be poring over it to find the juiciest and dirtiest bribes. The government's fast-track invite list is likely to be a particular focus, and we already know of one company on the list which ...
In the weeks after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Southern Israel I wrote about the possible 2nd, 3rd and even 4th order effects of the conflict. These included new fronts being opened in the West Bank (with Hamas), Golan … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – It is one of the oldest truisms that there is never a good time for MPs to get a pay rise. This week’s announcement of pay raises of around 2.8% backdated to last October could hardly have come at a worse time, with the ...
David Farrar writes – Newshub reports: Newshub can reveal a fresh allegation of intimidation against Green MP Julie-Anne Genter. Genter is subject to a disciplinary process for aggressively waving a book in the face of National Minister Matt Doocey in the House – but it’s not the first time ...
The Treasury has published a paper today on the global productivity slowdown and how it is playing out in New Zealand: The productivity slowdown: implications for the Treasury’s forecasts and projections. The Treasury Paper examines recent trends in productivity and the potential drivers of the slowdown. Productivity for the whole economy ...
Winston Peters’ comments about former Australian foreign minister look set to be an ongoing headache for both him and Luxon. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for subscribers features co-hosts and , along with regular guests on Gaza and ...
These puppet strings don't pull themselvesYou're thinking thoughts from someone elseHow much time do you think you have?Are you prepared for what comes next?The debating chamber can be a trying place for an opposition MP. What with the person in charge, the speaker, typically being an MP from the governing ...
The land around Lyme Regis, where Meryl Streep once stood, in a hood, on the Cobb, is falling into the sea.MerylThe land around Lyme Regis, around the Cobb that made it rich, has always been falling slowly but surely into the sea. Read more ...
Photo by Jari Hytönen on UnsplashIt’s that new day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when and I co-host our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm. Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream for our chat about the week’s news ...
Buzz from the Beehive Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters was bound to win headlines when he set out his thinking about AUKUS in his speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. The headlines became bigger when – during an interview on RNZ’s Morning Report today – he criticised ...
The Post reports on how the government is refusing to release its advice on its corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law, instead using the "soon to be publicly available" refusal ground to hide it until after select committee submissions on the bill have closed. Fast-track Minister Chris Bishop's excuse? “It's not ...
As pressure on it grows, the livestock industry’s approach to the transition to Net Zero is increasingly being compared to that of fossil fuel interests. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / Getty ImagesTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above ...
The New Zealand Herald reports – Stats NZ has offered a voluntary redundancy scheme to all of its workers as a way to give staff some control over their “future” amidst widespread job losses in the public sector. In an update to staff this morning, seen by the Herald, Statistics New Zealand ...
On Werewolf/Scoop, I usually do two long form political columns a week. From now on, there will be an extra column each week about music and movies. But first, some late-breaking political events:The rise in unemployment numbers for the March quarter was bigger than expected – and especially sharp ...
David Farrar writes – The Herald reports: TVNZ says it is dealing with about 50 formal complaints over its coverage of the latest 1News-Verian political poll, with some viewers – as well as the Prime Minister and a former senior Labour MP – critical of the tone of the 6pm report. ...
Muriel Newman writes – When Meridian Energy was seeking resource consents for a West Coast hydro dam proposal in 2010, local Maori “strenuously” objected, claiming their mana was inextricably linked to ‘their’ river and could be damaged. After receiving a financial payment from the company, however, the Ngai Tahu ...
The Green Party is welcoming the announcement by the Minister Responsible for RMA Reform Chris Bishop to approve most of the Wellington City Council’s District Plan recommendations. ...
David Seymour has failed to get the sweeping cuts he wanted to the free and healthy school lunch programme, Labour education spokesperson Jan Tinetti said. ...
Hon Willie Jackson has been invited by the Oxford Union to debate the motion “This House Believes British Museums are not Very British’ on May 23rd. ...
Green Party MP Hūhana Lyndon says her Public Works (Prohibition of Compulsory Acquisition of Māori Land) Amendment Bill is an opportunity to right some past wrongs around the alienation of Māori land. ...
A senior, highly respected King’s Counsel with decades of experience in our law courts, Gary Judd KC, has filed a complaint about compulsory tikanga Māori studies for law students - highlighting the utter depths of absurdity this woke cultural madness has taken our society. The tikanga regulations will compel law ...
The Government needs to be clear with the people of the Nelson Marlborough region about the changes it is considering for the Nelson Hospital rebuild, Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said. ...
Ministers must front up about which projects it will push through under its Fast Track Approvals legislation, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
The Government is again adding to New Zealand’s growing unemployment, this time cutting jobs at the agencies responsible for urban development and growing much needed housing stock. ...
With Minister Karen Chhour indicating in the House today that she either doesn’t know or care about the frontline cuts she’s making to Oranga Tamariki, we risk seeing more and more of our children falling through the cracks. ...
The Labour Party is saddened to learn of the death of Sir Robert Martin, a globally renowned disability advocate who led the way for disability rights both in New Zealand and internationally. ...
Labour is calling for the Government to urgently rethink its coalition commitment to restart live animal exports, Labour animal welfare spokesperson Rachel Boyack said. ...
Today’s Financial Stability Report has once again highlighted that poverty and deep inequality are political choices - and this Government is choosing to make them worse. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to do more for our households in most need as unemployment rises and the cost of living crisis endures. ...
Unemployment is on the rise and it’s only going to get worse under this Government, Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. Stats NZ figures show the unemployment rate grew to 4.3 percent in the March quarter from 4 percent in the December quarter. “This is the second rise in unemployment ...
The New Zealand Labour Party welcomes the entering into force of the European Union and New Zealand free trade agreement. This agreement opens the door for a huge increase in trade opportunities with a market of 450 million people who are high value discerning consumers of New Zealand goods and ...
The National-led Government continues its fiscal jiggery pokery with its Pharmac announcement today, Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says. “The government has increased Pharmac funding but conceded it will only make minimal increases in access to medicine”, said Ayesha Verrall “This is far from the bold promises made to fund ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
Your Excellency Ambassador Meredith, Members of the Diplomatic Corps and Ambassadors from European Union Member States, Ministerial colleagues, Members of Parliament, and other distinguished guests, Thank you everyone for joining us. Ladies and gentlemen - In diplomacy, we often speak of ‘close’ and ‘long-standing’ relations. ...
The Therapeutic Products Act (TPA) will be repealed this year so that a better regime can be put in place to provide New Zealanders safe and timely access to medicines, medical devices and health products, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello announced today. “The medicines and products we are talking about ...
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop, today released his decision on twenty recommendations referred to him by the Wellington City Council relating to its Intensification Planning Instrument, after the Council rejected those recommendations of the Independent Hearings Panel and made alternative recommendations. “Wellington notified its District Plan on ...
Rape Awareness Week (6-10 May) is an important opportunity to acknowledge the continued effort required by government and communities to ensure that all New Zealanders can live free from violence, say Ministers Karen Chhour and Louise Upston. “With 1 in 3 women and 1 in 8 men experiencing sexual violence ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour has today announced that the Government will be delivering a more efficient Healthy School Lunches Programme, saving taxpayers approximately $107 million a year compared to how Labour funded it, by embracing innovation and commercial expertise. “We are delivering on our commitment to treat taxpayers’ money ...
New research on the impacts of extreme weather on coastal marine habitats in Tairāwhiti and Hawke’s Bay will help fishery managers plan for and respond to any future events, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. A report released today on research by Niwa on behalf of Fisheries New Zealand ...
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Winston Peters will lead a broad political delegation on a five-stop Pacific tour next week to strengthen New Zealand’s engagement with the region. The delegation will visit Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, New Caledonia, and Tuvalu. “New Zealand has deep and ...
There has been a material decline in gas production according to figures released today by the Gas Industry Co. Figures released by the Gas Industry Company show that there was a 12.5 per cent reduction in gas production during 2023, and a 27.8 per cent reduction in gas production in the ...
Defence Minister Judith Collins tonight announced the recipients of the Minister of Defence Awards of Excellence for Industry, saying they all contribute to New Zealanders’ security and wellbeing. “Congratulations to this year’s recipients, whose innovative products and services play a critical role in the delivery of New Zealand’s defence capabilities, ...
Welcome to you all - it is a pleasure to be here this evening.I would like to start by thanking Greg Lowe, Chair of the New Zealand Defence Industry Advisory Council, for co-hosting this reception with me. This evening is about recognising businesses from across New Zealand and overseas who in ...
It is a pleasure to be speaking to you as the Minister for Digitising Government. I would like to thank Akolade for the invitation to address this Summit, and to acknowledge the great effort you are making to grow New Zealand’s digital future. Today, we stand at the cusp of ...
New Zealand is urging both Israel and Hamas to agree to an immediate ceasefire to avoid the further humanitarian catastrophe that military action in Rafah would unleash, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “The immense suffering in Gaza cannot be allowed to worsen further. Both sides have a responsibility to ...
A new online data dashboard released today as part of the Government’s school attendance action plan makes more timely daily attendance data available to the public and parents, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. The interactive dashboard will be updated once a week to show a national average of how ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced Rosemary Banks will be New Zealand’s next Ambassador to the United States of America. “Our relationship with the United States is crucial for New Zealand in strategic, security and economic terms,” Mr Peters says. “New Zealand and the United States have a ...
The Government is considering creating a new tier of minerals permitting that will make it easier for hobby miners to prospect for gold. “New Zealand was built on gold, it’s in our DNA. Our gold deposits, particularly in regions such as Otago and the West Coast have always attracted fortune-hunters. ...
Minister for Trade Todd McClay today announced that New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will commence negotiations on a free trade agreement (FTA). Minister McClay met with his counterpart UAE Trade Minister Dr Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi in Dubai, where they announced the launch of negotiations on a ...
New Zealand Sign Language Week is an excellent opportunity for all Kiwis to give the language a go, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. This week (May 6 to 12) is New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL) Week. The theme is “an Aotearoa where anyone can sign anywhere” and aims to ...
Six tertiary students have been selected to work on NASA projects in the US through a New Zealand Space Scholarship, Space Minister Judith Collins announced today. “This is a fantastic opportunity for these talented students. They will undertake internships at NASA’s Ames Research Center or its Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), where ...
New Zealanders will be safer because of a $1.9 billion investment in more frontline Corrections officers, more support for offenders to turn away from crime, and more prison capacity, Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell says. “Our Government said we would crack down on crime. We promised to restore law and order, ...
The OECD’s latest report on New Zealand reinforces the importance of bringing Government spending under control, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The OECD conducts country surveys every two years to review its members’ economic policies. The 2024 New Zealand survey was presented in Wellington today by OECD Chief Economist Clare Lombardelli. ...
The Government has delivered on its election promise to provide a financially sustainable model for Auckland under its Local Water Done Well plan. The plan, which has been unanimously endorsed by Auckland Council’s Governing Body, will see Aucklanders avoid the previously projected 25.8 per cent water rates increases while retaining ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters discussed the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and enhanced cooperation in the Pacific with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock during her first official visit to New Zealand today. "New Zealand and Germany enjoy shared interests and values, including the rule of law, democracy, respect for the international system ...
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop today released his decision on four recommendations referred to him by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, opening the door to housing growth in the area. The Council’s Plan Change 92 allows more homes to be built in existing and new ...
Thank you, John McKinnon and the New Zealand China Council for the invitation to speak to you today. Thank you too, all members of the China Council. Your effort has played an essential role in helping to build, shape, and grow a balanced and resilient relationship between our two ...
The Government is modernising insurance law to better protect Kiwis and provide security in the event of a disaster, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “These reforms are long overdue. New Zealand’s insurance law is complicated and dated, some of which is more than 100 years old. ...
The coalition Government is refreshing its approach to supporting pay equity claims as time-limited funding for the Pay Equity Taskforce comes to an end, Public Service Minister Nicola Willis says. “Three years ago, the then-government introduced changes to the Equal Pay Act to support pay equity bargaining. The changes were ...
Structured literacy will change the way New Zealand children learn to read - improving achievement and setting students up for success, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “Being able to read and write is a fundamental life skill that too many young people are missing out on. Recent data shows that ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay says Canada’s refusal to comply in full with a CPTPP trade dispute ruling in our favour over dairy trade is cynical and New Zealand has no intention of backing down. Mr McClay said he has asked for urgent legal advice in respect of our ‘next move’ ...
The rights of our children and young people will be enhanced by changes the coalition Government will make to strengthen oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, including restoring a single Children’s Commissioner. “The Government is committed to delivering better public services that care for our most at-risk young people and ...
The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
Good evening – Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us. ...
From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The Albanese government is talking up the crucial role of gas as a transition fuel “through to 2050 and beyond”. In a gas strategy to be released on Thursday, the government envisages the fuel’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Next week the government will again next try to get its legislation through to deal with non-citizens who won’t cooperate with efforts to deport them. The bill, which the opposition and crossbench refused to rush ...
A long-term project that will set out an alternative vision for Aotearoa that looks beyond the narrow confines of the policy straight jacket adopted by successive governments. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Bree Hurst, Associate Professor, Faculty of Business and Law, QUT, Queensland University of Technology TK Kurikawa/Shutterstock A much-awaited report into Coles and Woolworths has found what many customers have long believed – Australia’s big supermarkets engage in price gouging. What started ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daniel Ghezelbash, Associate Professor and Deputy Director, Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, UNSW Law & Justice, UNSW Sydney The Albanese government wanted to avoid an inquiry into its migration amendment bill. The report, handed down yesterday by a senate committee that ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joo-Cheong Tham, Professor, Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne Lobbying is at the heart of government. Who has access to and influence over key government officials shapes the decisions governments make – and how they make them. The ability to influence ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Myfany Turpin, Associate Professor, Ethnomusicology, Linguistics and Ethnobiology, University of Sydney The act representing Australia at this year’s Eurovision contest has sadly not qualified for the grand final. Yet for Zaachariaha Fielding and Michael Ross, the duo that makes up Electric Fields, ...
In announcing changes to the school lunches programme, David Seymour said kids would no longer be served ‘woke’ foods. To clear up any confusion, The Spinoff has compiled a guide to the wokeness levels of some common food items. Apple = NOT WOKE Avocado = WOKE Avocado, smashed = EVEN ...
The Minister Responsible for GCSB and the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security have been notified of this review, and have been provided a finalised Terms of Reference. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Minglu Chen, Senior Lecturer, Government and International Relations, University of Sydney Robert Way/Shutterstock As the past few years have illustrated so clearly, the Australia-China relationship is complicated. As such, it is crucial for Australians to develop a more nuanced understanding of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mariana Campbell, Research Lecturer, Conservation, Charles Darwin University Marilyn Connell Australian freshwater turtles are facing an alarming trend. Almost half of these species are listed as vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered. The Mary River turtle (Elusor macrurus) is one of Australia’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Debbie Passey, Digital Health Research Fellow, The University of Melbourne Algorithms have become integral to our lives. From social media apps to Netflix, algorithms learn your preferences and prioritise the content you are shown. Google Maps and artificial intelligence are nothing without ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Josephine Barbaro, Associate Professor, Principal Research Fellow, Psychologist, La Trobe University Unsplash We’ve come a long way in terms of understanding that everyone thinks, interacts and experiences the world differently. In the past, autistic people, people with attention deficit hyperactive disorder ...
PNG Post-Courier Papua New Guinea’s deputy opposition leader James Nomane has accused the government of “reckless economic management” that has forced devaluation to manage loan repayments in foreign currency and placate the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Prime Minister James Marape “must stop lying to the people of Papua New Guinea”, ...
Welcome to The Spinoff Bookseller Confessional, in which we get to know Aotearoa’s booksellers. This week: Jane Arthur, author of Brown Bird, and former bookseller at Good Books.The book I wish I’d writtenI have been working on not comparing myself to others. On accepting that what I can ...
The final decision on the Wellington District Plan makes it official: High-density housing is legal across most of Wellington. Housing minister Chris Bishop has announced his decision on the Wellington District Plan, approving a series of amendments to radically upzone most of Wellington, allowing tens of thousands of new townhouses ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards – Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. “Follow the money” is the classic directive to journalists trying to understand where power and influence lie in society. In terms of uncovering who influences various New Zealand political parties and governments, it therefore pays to ...
RNZ News As Israel presses ahead with strikes in Rafah and seizing the Rafah crossing from Egypt, aid agencies are sounding the alarm of a “catastrophic humanitarian situation”. Rafah was “significant” because it was the only part in Gaza that had not been terribly damaged by the conflict, United Nations ...
With funding set to be scrapped for the Hamilton-Auckland commuter train, Te Huia enthusiast Georgie Dansey argues for it to be thrown a lifeline. It’s 5.45am and the chain of my crappy old bike falls off slugging up the one hill in Hamilton. I contemplate yeeting the bike into the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anna Cooke, Honorary Fellow, School of the Environment, The University of Queensland We feel ecological grief when we lose places, species or ecosystems we value and love. These losses are a growing threat to mental health and wellbeing globally. We all see ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Shauna Brail, Associate Professor, Institute for Management & Innovation, University of Toronto A shift to hybrid and remote work continues to affect worker presence in Toronto’s downtown.(Shutterstock) Downtown Toronto, the core of Canada’s largest city, continues to reel from the lingering ...
Responding to an Auditor-General's report slamming failures in the administration of the 2023 General Election, Taxpayers’ Union Policy and Public Affairs Manager, James Ross, said: ...
Productivity apps now make up a big chunk of the software market. But do they work? And why do they all have AI integrations?Despite being firmly on the record as a physical planner fan, I sometimes dream of something better than my pretty diary and its scrawled, ugly, interior ...
The Taxpayers’ Union says the Beehive need to lead by example, following reports of more than $50,000 spent upgrading video conferencing equipment and furniture in the Prime Minister’s office. Taxpayers’ Union Campaign Manager, Connor Molloy, ...
An objective list of the 50 most powerful people in New Zealand, as judged by the Spinoff Editorial Board. It’s power list season, baby, and we want in on the action. Sure, there’s the rich list and the powerful “c-suite” list and the young people with power (hmmm) but here, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Thalia Anthony, Professor of Law, University of Technology Sydney ShutterstockThis article contains information on deaths in custody and the names of deceased people, and describes ongoing colonial violence towards Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. First Nations people in Australia ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alex Simpson, Senior Lecturer in Criminology, Macquarie University Netflix Baby Reindeer’s phenomenal success has much to do with its writer and lead, Richard Gadd, who plays Donny in a tender semi-autobiographical account of sexual abuse, harassment and stalking. Gadd’s story has ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Collins, Laureate Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Newcastle KarolinaGrabowska/Pexels If you didn’t have food allergies as a child, is it possible to develop them as an adult? The short answer is yes. But the reasons why are much ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Paul Moon, Professor of History, Auckland University of Technology Ans Westra, self-portrait, c. 1963. National Library ref AWM-0705-F They try but invariably fail – those writers who believe they are capable of encapsulating in prose or verse the essence of ...
Stewart Sowman-Lund looks at the growing concern around the world in this extract from The Bulletin. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. What’s all this? When Covid-19 arrived on our shores in early 2020, some argued we were too slow, or crucially, ill-prepared for a pandemic. So ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Franco Montalto, Professor of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering and Director, Sustainable Water Resource Engineering Laboratory, Drexel University Water runs into a storm drain in a Los Angeles alley on Aug. 19, 2023, during Tropical Storm Hilary.Citizen of the Planet/Universal Images ...
The inquest into the death of Gore toddler Lachlan Jones has turned up a new witness who says he saw two teenagers and a small child in a high vis vest in the area where the boy’s body was found the day he died. Lachie’s body was discovered face up ...
Stories from the tenancy trenches, featuring spider infestations, cupboard rats and same-sex discrimination. Lucy’s brother was living in a damp 1930s building in Mt Eden where “he had to tie the cupboard doors closed so the rats didn’t get in”. Although he shared custody of his six-year-old son, his property ...
Simeon Brown, Chris Luxon, and Wayne Brown climbed into a hole and announced a plan to solve Auckland’s water woes. This is how it’ll work. New Zealand’s pipes are munted. They’re cracked and leaking, and struggling to handle all the extra poos excreted by our rising population. It’s a big, ...
Wellington long jumper Phoebe Edwards is back and she’s having fun again. Until this year, Edwards, a top athlete in her teens, had never competed as a senior athlete in New Zealand. In March, the 26-year-old won a national long jump title in a lifetime best of 6.28m after ...
After replacing a fifth of their caucus in just four months, the Greens’ opportunity to reset, reshuffle and refocus on the Government is quickly slipping away The post Persistent Green Party scandals delay caucus reset appeared first on Newsroom. ...
I knew Taika Waititi quite well when he was a kid. His mother lived in a tall narrow house in Aro St, and my youngest sister had a similar house two doors along. They were both single mums, they each had a son aged seven. Taika and my nephew Stepan ...
Opinion: “As time passes, knowledge of the circumstances of the August 2016 outbreak will fade and its immediate impact will be lost.” This statement is from the 2017 report of the Official Inquiry into the Havelock North campylobacteriosis outbreak. The then National-led government established the inquiry after the outbreak left ...
Opinion: Nicholas Khoo looks at two key points in the high-stakes foreign policy pact debate – and asks if NZ can engage with as little drama as possible. The post Where to next for the Aukus ruckus? appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 8 May appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Opinion: ‘Reference-class forecasting’ is at the heart of improving pricing a project and identifying the expected timeframe but it doesn’t appear to be in use here The post ‘Think fast and act slowly’ is failing big projects appeared first on Newsroom. ...
What do a sombrero in Argentina and cognitive driving tests have in common? Don’t worry, we’re not setting up a bad joke. Hinengaro Clinic dementia clinician Gregory Winkelman has the answer on today’s episode of The Detail. “We ask a patient’s spouse or son or daughter: If you went to ...
ANALYSIS:By Olli Hellmann, University of Waikato When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day today on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also to mark a defining event for national identity. The battle of Gallipoli against ...
By Robin Martin, RNZ News reporter A New Zealand local authority, Whanganui District Council, has passed a motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, condemnation of all acts of violence and terror against civilians on both sides of the conflict and the immediate return of hostages. It comes as ...
Asia Pacific Report The Aotearoa chapter of the Women’s International league for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) has appealed to the New Zealand government to call out Israel over the “cruel and barbaric use of force” in Gaza and demand a permanent ceasefire. The league’s open letter was sent to Prime ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The Albanese government will invest $566 million over a decade on data, maps and other tools to promote exploration and development in Australia’s resources industry. The project will fund “the first comprehensive map of what’s ...
Asia Pacific Report Following an open letter by Auckland University academics speaking out in support of their students’ right to protest against the genocidal Israeli war on Gaza, a group of academics at Otago University have today also called on New Zealand academic institutions to “repair colonial violence” and end ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Linda J. Graham, Professor and Director of the Centre for Inclusive Education, Queensland University of Technology Ryan Tauss/ Unsplash, CC BY Two male students have been expelled from a Melbourne private school for their involvement in a list ranking female students. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University The Reserve Bank is now assuming Australians will see no interest rate cuts this year – and quite possibly none before the next federal election, due next May. That’s ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Hayward, Emeritus Professor of Public Policy, RMIT University The Victorian budget offered more of the same on Tuesday, with the only change being how the budget papers were packaged. The usual shrink wrap was gone, hinting at savings in the pages ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra The Coalition is demanding extensive amendments to the government’s legislation targeting non-citizens who refuse to co-operate with their removal. In a dissenting report to the senate inquiry into the legislation, the Coalition says it ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vanita Yadav, Senior Research Fellow, Urban Transformations Research Centre, Western Sydney University Brett Boardman/Belvoir The complex and grappling issue of violence against women takes centre stage in the soul-stirring solo dance drama Nayika: A Dancing Girl. During a dinner conversation ...
Came across these interesting thoughts on “The tragedy of the commons”.
https://news.cnrs.fr/opinions/debunking-the-tragedy-of-the-commons?utm_content=bufferdbbf0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
The impact of this argument was far-reaching. Economic thought strengthened this influence by associating the expression “tragedy of the commons” and the image of the pasture with analogous but more sophisticated scenarios in microeconomics and the economy of “externalities.”
One of the reasons for the appeal of Hardin’s analysis, at least at first, was its “either-or” conclusion. It can be cited both by partisans of government intervention and by those who favor an open market. However, with the rise of neoliberalism as a school of thought and a sociopolitical force, the “tragedy of the commons” was rapidly reduced to an argument in favor of private ownership.
Then there was China’s one child policy and to come their renewable energy power grid for the Belt project.
For us a population policy within renewable energy constraint.
Those organisations could be termed ‘the state’ as they’re actually the community and the community is the nation.
It’s part of the language used over the last few decades to divorce people from the community and it’s done it’s job well. Even progressives are disinclined to trust ‘the state’ despite it being a natural democracy.
And one other thing we should be well aware of now is the very real physical limits that the environment has. Malthus was right. just need to look at our waterways to understand that.
Hey DTB, I saw this today, sort of relates to how a community of people can successfully farm a ‘commons’ outside of a capitalist paradigm, even without EU subsidies, which usually go to big farm enterprises. I thought it might be of interest.
https://www.politico.eu/article/flemish-farmer-busts-conventional-wisdom-on-eu-farm-policy/
Rachel Stewart has written an excellent article in the Herald today. Readers of this paper will find her writing unsettling as she spells out the situation we are facing honestly without any sugar coated message.
It is an article every New Zealander should read.
Rachel Stewart writes passionately about the state of the world in January 2018.
I quote her.
“Knowing it’s happening, and feeling empowered to do anything about it are two different things. While, arguably, many scientists now believe humanity may only have another 100 years – my view is that’s ridiculously optimistic – the fact remains that we’re taking out every living species on Earth at an alarming rate, including ourselves.
If you stay with that thought, and let it sink in, how does it make you feel? I can tell you how it affects me.
Waves of grief wash in and out like the tide.”
She goes onto explain that grief before asking her readers where they are placed regarding catastrophic climate change.
Rachel writes the following .
“Your stage of grief may be entirely non-existent. You may be busy with whatever your deal is – consumption, capitalism, cows, cars, Christ. None of which changes what’s coming. (Pro tip: It’s not the Second Coming).
Or you’re busy bargaining, or being angry, or even denying there’s a problem at all. You may even be stuck in depression.
My stage of grief is acceptance. That doesn’t mean all hope is lost, or that I will give up trying to change things. You never know. Miracles can happen.”
This is the most important issue facing the world.
I am at the same stage of grief as Rachel on the whole , although I’m also prone to depression about it. Like Rachel, I don’t believe all hope is lost but I agree with her that there is little time left.
What stage of grief are you at?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/headlines.cfm?c_id=1
Ok. Credit where credit is due – good on you for taking on the feedback from yesterday – well written post.
What stage of grief are you at?
Not in grief at all – personally I think its all bumkin – but I know a lot on here disagree, which is why I don’t normally comment on it.
a question for you James…..given the weight of evidence presented by those who study the various fields involved what makes you believe that it is “all bumkin”?
I have my reasons – but not really bothered to post them – which is why I don’t comment on climate change Post.
When you realise you were wrong, spare a thought for the people who systematically lied to you.
Species extinction – bumpkin?
Another question for you James – should that be bunkum as in nonsense or bumpkin as in an unsophisticated person from the countryside?
“Bumkin”
From which movie did you learn that word, James: “Deliverence” or “Wizard of Oz”?
Good comment, Ed.
I am at the grief stage of despondency – too many people not looking at the bigger picture. Parliamentary politics locked into appealing to the comfortable middle classes, and not willing to risk rocking the boat.
As Rachel points out,
“All the old ways of doing things must either be stripped away and rethought, over and over and again, or it will be done for us. We’ll have no choice.”
Rachel Stewart: I got the end-of-humanity blues
Correct link.
Thank you.
What was the last question you begged?
It refers to the types of grief Rachel Stewart describes regarding the crises facing the planet.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11972330
This will be interesting. Assange could be looking for a new home.
If they give Assange the boot – will he end up in the US to face charges as he fears?
Personally I think it’s right that he faces the charges that are leveled at him.
The only charge he’s facing relates to breach of bail conditions – unless the US has a sealed indictment waiting.
“unless the US has a sealed indictment waiting”.
I guess we wont know until he starts walking around.
Not strictly true – the Swedish investigation has been discontinued because there’s no chance of him being “formally notified” of the charges (final stage before Swedish arrest). Part of discontinuance was withdrawing the arrest warrant. Should he leave the embassy, all of a sudden he’s approachable again and the investigation can be reactivated, and another warrant issued.
Basically, it’s still hanging over his head until the statute of limitations runs out. The Swedes just aren’t spending money on it.
“Personally I think it’s right that he faces the charges that are leveled at him.”
Well surprise surprise.
I note you often start posting very early. Don’t you like sleeping in? Or does your wife shove you out of bed because you wont shut up about the bbq.
Nah. Tories have to sleep with one eye open, lest their dearest friends steal all their property…
Nice!
Beef flatulence.
Sticking to the environmental theme, the evidence continues to stack up against dairy farming, as the health of our lakes suffers. More North Island lakes are graded bad than good.
We have a choice. Dairy farming or our waterways.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11972055
https://www.lawa.org.nz/
https://www.lawa.org.nz/explore-data/lakes/
More accurately, the choice is between current dairy farming scale and practice and our waterways.
Ed finds that particular distinction inconvenient for his ideological agenda.
The ideology of caring for systematic changes to save our planet?
Proud to have that ideology.
Your continual conflation of ideas about sustainability and animal rights do no favour for environmental progress but rather just alienate people.
If everyone in the world stopped eating meat, it would make a massive difference to the carbon footprint of humankind.
If people are alienated by that statement, tough luck .
It’s an inconvenient fact for carnivores.
On a separate point, if we stopped dairy on an industrial level , reduced the cow herd by 80% and stopped pumping fertiliser into the soil that leached into our waterways, we would be on our way to turning around the state of our waterways.
If everyone in the world stopped eating meat, it would make a massive difference to the carbon footprint of humankind.
…
It’s an inconvenient fact for carnivores.
Likewise, if everyone in the world stopped eating cropped plant material, it would make a massive difference to the carbon footprint of humankind. It’s an inconvenient fact for vegans. There is a huge number of similarly true but pointless and irrelevant statements one could make, but most of us don’t feel inclined to make them. Could you perhaps learn something from that?
One meat-free day a week is perhaps the kernel of truth in Ed’s belief.
We have a choice. Dairy farming or huge cuts to social welfare/health/education and all the other services the government provides.
We provide $4B pa to people over 65 still working.
Yeah, that’s bollocks, if you want to keep working then you don’t need super.
Until Peters fucks off and dies, anything around super is off limits
Nah, universal benefits should stay universal. That way it’s much harder for the National Party to attack human rights.
Starving the education and health system of funding to defend the human rights of universal benefits to a privileged middle class with the health and professions to continue in work ….
Meanwhile people too sick to work do not get ACC and people remain on Invalids Benefits receiving less money than those over 65 in full-time employment … human rights for whom?
You’re missing the point. The National Party already victimises the groups you mention. Why expose more people to the abusers?
They treat people like shit. That is an argument for defending those people (with eg: a UBI), not increasing their numbers.
Labour cannot afford to do anything about it while paying out the billions in super to those still working.
And given we cannot afford a UI at the current super level, we have to target more to those in need by transferring resources currently given to those who do not need it.
And that also includes mental health, DHB funding etc. We are facing a situation of rising health care costs for the aged we are struggling to cope with (Pharmac constraints, tech in the hospitals) while paying people in good health and well-paid employment super.
Or, rather than accept the austerity rhetoric of ‘living within our means’, increase revenue instead. For example with a cgt.
Mental health outcomes are driven in a large part by the GINI. Reducing the GINI need not involve government spending, eg: wage increases.
Throwing people into the pit with the National Party isn’t a solution.
Will Labour propose a CGT to provide funding for health and education, or will it bow to (rightist and media) pressure to lower other tax rates, so government is no better funded?
Yes, it will do one of those things, or perhaps some third thing I haven’t thought of.
You don’t approve of ultimate fighting then?
I not only approve of it, I endorse it, but “footages like this are very rare.”
The government can always afford all the resources in the country.
Can we sop paying super to people past 65 who are still working? The idea of working on after 65 gives some a false sense of superiority ‘I’m still working, not living off the state, when I have abilities and the will to work.’ They don’t think further – that they are taking a senior job that should go to someone else, and then allow further rises for people down the ladder to better- paying positions.
Another thing that could be done is announce that everyone who is receiving a state benefit is expected to do at least three hours work a week as a volunteer, at something suitable for their talents and useful to the good of the community and perhaps the local Council can advertise what needs doing and when the next working party is being formed. And what is available to fill the three-hour slot for those who can’t find anything through the Volunteer Centres.
Then someone over 65 wanting to keep working can do so, for nothing, and receive super, or instead earn the ordinary salary, pay tax and stay on doing the work that he or she really likes, or where they are still needed.
And one other thing that should be immediately reversed!! I hear from beneficiaries that they are told that they can’t do any volunteer work, the simplistic thought coming from the frightful people at WINZ or their contractors being – that if they can do volunteer work they should be in paid work, one or the other. Can someone who knows about WINZ and its dark arts advise if this is The Rule that everyone is told, I would appreciate authoritative confirmation?
For the years I was receiving Super and working, my tax was effectively paying for it. Has there ever been an analysis whereby the tax from Superannuants has been offset against the cost, or would that be far to complex to achieve? There is, of course, also very little administration cost compared to ACC or any of the other benefits because no one has to sweat the small stuff
So at age 64 you paid tax and at age 65 you received a 100% tax credit in the form of super.
Aren’t there people doing all sorts of things to get 100% (or as close to as possible) tax credits?
A good thing about that is that it keeps accountants and tax lawyers in work.
So you got your tax refunded just because of your age? So ridiculous.
I agree. It’s a ridiculous argument and you should be ridiculed for making it.
Not so much as you should be for your attempts at humour.
In my heart I know I’m funny.
Lt. Hauk.
Abused,, you mean? Such fun!!
Where did you come across Lt Hauk Oab? I looked up google and it seems Norwegian and game-playing.
Good Morning Vietnam.
Yeah keep the admin cost low and recover more by lifting the tax rates is the simplest solution.
Lift benefits to the same rate as it once was.
I agree with your first sentence. However the second one doesn’t seem to match New Zealand History.
Tell me, where is my memory at fault?
Labour, in Kirks day, introduced something that was very similar to KiwiSaver. If you didn’t earn very much in your life you weren’t going to get much in your retirement. Rather like the Singapore system where you get people in their eighties having to keep working till they drop.
National, under Muldoon, brought in a very generous universal scheme. Everyone got it at 80% of the average wage at 60.
Labour, under Lange, cut the age back to 65, reduced the level of the pension and means tested it by a heavy surcharge on their income tax for recipients.
National, under Bolger, returned it to universality, albeit not as fast as they promised. They left the 65 age and the reduced level of the super. They did have an excuse for the delay in that the then Labour Government had left the Government accounts in a disastrous shape and had lied about it.
Labour, under Clark, left things the same way as at the end of the Bolger era.
National, under Key left things unchanged as well.
Labour, while in Opposition proposed increasing the age of eligibility. That went down like a cup of cold sick.
Now perhaps you can explain why you think it is National that attacks people’s rights? It looks a great deal more like a Labour predilection.
Another version of history.
https://www.goodreturns.co.nz/article/976486067/super-history-understanding-recent-changes.html
I certainly had one flaw in my memory. I thought it was the Lange Government that increased the age. According to your link they were going to do it but not until after 2000. It was Bolger who brought it in earlier.
I think on the rest, and particularly on the subject of effective Universality, I was generally accurate.
I can only plead in mitigation that I wasn’t living in NZ in the early 90’s.
Personally I don’t see age change as a breach of universali8ty.
National were not innocent on rate changes (National first in the late 70″s). And then there was Shipley’s proposed end to the net average wage connection. But then again not a breach of universality.
Surtax, negatively impacting on those who save, is unfair and only explained by budgetary crisis.
“age change as a breach of universali8ty”.
No it isn’t. What is unfair is the rapidness with which they made the change. Labour’s would have been fair. So is the change that English was proposing at the election. Giving more than 10 years notice of starting the change gives people under 50 time to adjust their plans and people over 50 wouldn’t have been affected. National’s 1990’s change was implemented far to fast.
Sorry you went to the trouble of typing up all that material that’s entirely irrelevant to the point I’m making. The National Party’s attacks on the human rights of beneficiaries are well documented, not least by the NZ Law Society.
Removing universal entitlement to Super would simply add another group of people the National Party would victimise.
Universal provision to those who had retired from full-time work
is a valid form of it.
National attack beneficiaries rights but not those of the retired. That’s what all their welfare reforms were.
Daft comment. You mean that having a 10 hour per week job means that you don’t need super? Or a 20 hour job pw. Or an 80 hour pw? Or doing voluntary work? Or caring for a distressed parent?
Your simple minded idea simply doesn’t consider edge conditions. It certainly doesn’t consider the costs of administering all of the daft exceptions that you’d want to add into it.
The current costs of the universal superannuation system that last time I looked at were just a few percent. The costs of the dole using exactly the kinds of mindless stupid exceptions that you want to impose, supposably in the name of simplicity and common sense, will push the admin costs up to 30% or more of the value.
Effectively to save a few dollars, you’d impose a fortune of costs on taxpayers. That is really stupid.
And for what? The only thing that is certain as you get older is that things change – often rapidly. Superannuation is as much a transition buffer between working and not being able to work as it is a living support.
It will be $5B pa in a few years. It is a rising level of the total super pay out.
Admin costs … nah no.
Just adds another layer of bureaucracy and the opportunity for WINZ harassment. Weekly income checks and “overpayments” reported as “fraud”.
Knowing the dedication and skill of moneyed people to avoid taxation, I am sure, BM, that many could easily defeat an attempt to exclude them from receiving super.
Why not instead appeal to their well known and developed sense of social responsibility and ask them to forgo their entitlement by returning it to the State coffers?
Seriously, universality does avoid the injustice of such behaviour as avoidance, and also reduces the state’s bureaucratic burden by not having to decide who is eligible for super. How much paperwork to decide who is eligible amongst super annuitants who are projected to number 1.1 million in 2031?
Better that such a bureaucracy be used to minimise tax avoidance and evasion which costs NZ annually between $1.5 and $7 billion.
Remember, too, that those who are earning whilst still receiving super (I am one of them) pay taxation on those earnings, on top of super which is itself subject to taxation.
Do you actually need your super payment?
Yes, BM. I am very part-time.
Thanks for responding. Could you address the points I made about in favour of universality and the bureaucratic cost of means-testing.
bureaucratic cost of means-testing.
I can’t really see significant costs in means testing for super.
If you’re working you’ll be paying PAYE, the information on your income is all there.
Social welfare can ask the IRD for your tax records and from there work out whatever you’d be entitled to.
And then you ignore that fact that many rich people are avoiding taxes to the tune of between 1.5 to 7 billion dollars. Those people will still be claiming NZSuper but there’s no way to catch them.
This article addresses your concerns.
https://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2013/jan/14/means-testing-benefits-not-efficient-fair
The following quote encapsulates an opposing view to your statement “I can’t really see significant costs in means testing for super.”
“One of the main benefits of a universal, unconditional welfare payment would be the removal of virtually all of the costly means testing bureaucracy from the welfare system.”
It goes on. “Another benefit would be the near complete elimination of welfare fraud, which would free up teams of fraud investigators to go after much bigger fish such as tax-dodgers and organised crime networks.”
While these quotes are from an article on a universal basic income, the arguments are the same for either UBI or universal superannuation.
There are many articles which agree with the notion of significant bureaucratic cost in administering means tested benefits.
As I say, 1.1 million of us (hopefully) in 2031!
You suggest that, for people who are already on high incomes
“Why not instead appeal to their well known and developed sense of social responsibility and ask them to forgo their entitlement by returning it to the State coffers?”.
The chances of that happening are very slim. About the only person I know who refuses to take the Super is Bob Jones.
Jim Anderton has recently been lauded in this blog. Jim certainly didn’t refuse to take the money. In 2009 Matt McCarten pointed out the Anderton, along with Roger Douglas, were collecting an MPs pay, Parliamentary Super AND National Super. I can’t find a link but I remember Anderton saying, when asked if he would take National Super, that he would because he was entitled to it.
As Matt said
“Winners: Roger Douglas and Jim Anderton. Both collect national superannuation, their parliamentary pensions as well as a full MP salary. Their best decade was the 1980s and they’re so old they are allowed to triple dip”.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10617480
The following year, when Jim planned to run for Christchurch Mayor, he even said he would quadruple-dip. He would stay as an MP even if he was elected Mayor.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/3674184/Jim-Anderton-won-t-give-up-seat-if-elected-mayor
He may have said he would give the MP pay to charity but that was about as likely, and impossible to enforce, as was finding out what happened to the $158,000 that Winston clung to and never did return to the Crown.
Trivia question. Can anyone identify a single charity that got a cent of that money?
Alwyn, as I said, ‘seriously’. I’m sorry you missed my irony.
On the topic of not receiving emolument, can anyone identify the destination of John Key’s salary which he said he would donate to charity in whole or in part?
I did realise you didn’t mean it seriously.
My experience of most MPs I have had dealings with is that they will take anything they can get. Oddly enough Stephen Joyce is one of the few who stand out as having made no attempt to get everything he could.
Most of them are, of course riding a gravy train to a standard of living that they could never otherwise have envisaged. There have been a few, such as John Key, Phillip Burdon and Bob Clarkson for whom the money was pocket change but they are few and far between.
As far as any donations Key may have made to charity, how would I know? To find out you would have to have access to his tax file.
The amount he was proposing to donate does seem to have been exaggerated of course. The most I can find him saying is
“”I already donate a good part of the pay I receive as Leader of the Opposition to charities and other good causes. I will continue that practice should I become Prime Minister,” Key, above, told Sunday News.” which was followed by
“Key wouldn’t elaborate on what charities he supported, nor how large a portion of his salary he donated. He said his “personal decision” was not something he wanted publicised”
The Sunday News of course put on a headline.
“Key pledges PM’s salary to charity” and made that into an enormous front page headline. Have a look at this link and see just how enormous, and false, the headline was.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/573560/Key-pledges-PMs-salary-to-charity
Can any one do the same of all the parliamentary salary that John Key said he was giving away?
Excluding the National Party ‘charity’ of course.
I see that you have linked to exactly the same story that I did immediately before you.
“snap”.
If you read the story, or what I have quoted from it I think you would have to agree that you are exaggerating just as much as the paper was when you say “all the parliamentary salary that John Key said he was giving away”
What’s that “all” bit?
“a good part of the pay”
Typical weasel words from Key.
He was very slippery wasn’t he?
I wouldn’t use words like “weasel” or “slippery”.
At least if I was going to I would have to use them about every competent politician.
They all talk that way. Hadn’t you noticed?
That was the mistake Blip used to make. He would look at something Key said and read into it what he “wanted” Key to have said. Then he would call it a lie.
All the politicians who are good at their job are exactly the same.
Do you believe that Little has promised that there will be a manned entry of the Pike River Mine that will recover any remains? He did last year when he was leader but he is learning his trade at last and he hasn’t actually done so since the election. Shall I talk about him being a “slippery weasel”? By your standards I assume you think I must.
Key was particularly slippery.
Exactly as asked. A detailed breakdown of all the charities that John Key says he paid a large part of his parliamentary salary to.
My goodness.
As Yoda in Star Wars would say.
“The Key Derangement Syndrome is strong in that one”.
Give it away. What he did with his own money was surely his own business? Besides he retired about a year ago. Give it away and get yourself a life.
By the way, he didn’t say “a large part”. He says “a good part”. There is a difference you know.
People have long memories.
They don’t forget traitors.
One year is nothing.
We haven’t forgotten Douglas.
34 years ago.
He’s the one who who said he would do so and so he should have backed up what he said. He never has.
And then you brought it up when demanding the same info about Jim Anderton:
But for John Key it’s now solely about it being his choice?
The hypocrisy is strong in you.
Thanks, Draco T.
I actually missed the little irony there, where Alwyn refused to see that Key’s goose sauce might not be different from Anderton’s gander garnish.
Well spotted. You stated that with some relish.
To DTB.
I never said that Anderton should tell us who he donated money to. After all, Parker beat him and he was only able to continue his triple-dipping and not move onto the quadruple dipping stage. It was his taking so many helpings of the cake that I found a little odd.
John Key never did that did he? He merely collected the single taxpayer payment to which he was entitled. What he chose to do with it was his own business.
I merely pointed out that Anderton wouldn’t be bound by any such promises or actually be able to be checked on them.
That, me young fella, is exactly what I said about our former PM John Key.
It was implied in your phrasing that he should if he said he would. Which would also apply to John Key who did say that he gave a portion of his PMs salary to charity – but you never demanded that he prove it.
I don’t recall that you thought it odd that Bill English helped himself to similar helpings of cake.
Drivel. Dairy farming currently accounts for about 3.5% of gdp. The costs of filthy waterways continue to mount up.
13.4 billion in export revenue.
Employs 47,310 people.
Have you ever heard of a cost benefit analysis? As someone who affects business savvy you should at least pay lip service to the concept.
Dairy farms can be converted to other uses and still provide economic opportunities and jobs. Not that you give a toss about unemployed people anyway.
Apparently local workers are ‘hopeless and on drugs’ anyway according to Bill English so we need to factor in the costs of subsidising the percentage of “47,310” workers into migrant workers on minimum wages to help keep the farms going which should not be considered real jobs but fake jobs – they are taking local jobs away but increasing the amount of tax payer services needed like schools and hospitals and roads and job subsidies like working for families and ACC if there is an accident.
We have a choice. Dairy farming or huge cuts to social welfare/health/education and all the other services the government provides.
False dichotomy. We provided high levels of public service before over-intensive dairying and could continue to provide them without it.
Look I’m not a dairy cheerleader.
But facts are facts, we need the money and jobs dairy creates.
Most of NZ’s small towns rely on dairy without dairy the majority would financially collapse.
Even though Ardern said “climate change is my generations Nuclear Free moment”, this government won’t do a thing about dairy, it needs the money, so it’s business as usual for the foreseeable future.
Dairy breathes a huge sigh of relief that the wooden, sweaty cheerleader has finally put down his pom-poms.
PS: “Dairy farms can be converted to other uses and still provide economic opportunities and jobs. Not that you give a toss about unemployed people anyway.”
Since you so obviously didn’t understand this the first time around.
Dairy farms can be converted to other uses and still provide economic opportunities and jobs
Who’s going to pay for the conversion? and to what? and why would any dairy farmer want to?
Is it difficult, getting through life without an imagination?
No idea then? just more left-wing fantasy land drivel.
Will you be ok?
Dairy farmers found converting to kiwi fruit production in the 1970s very easy when they were told the returns were better.
But of course they’ve no incentive presently, because they aren’t being made to pay for the pollution they’re creating.
forestry, honey, tourism, horticulture, wine… sheep, other stock that require less water…. dairy requires enormous amounts of water as well as many farmers are reliant on fertilisers to keep the grass rich enough for dairy.
Dairy farms could also be going organic but apparently although Fonterra charges consumers more for organic milk they don’t pay the farmers any or much more for organic milk.
Hmm. We need the money and jobs dairy (and whatever else) creates if we want to carry on doing things within the broad sweep of how we have done things.
But if that’s our focus and success, then that pesky global warming is going to total the whole shebang pretty soon.
Difficult choice, eh?
Do you see anything changing under this current government?
I don’t
No.
My contention is that business, finance, politicians and policy makers are bent on taking capitalism as far as it will go – ie, to the end.
On a kind of side note, of all the official reports on “possible future scenarios” I’m aware of, there isn’t a single one devoted to how we might re-arrange our affairs in order to avoid catastrophic warming. Not one.
Everything’s devoted to how things might change or look once the skewers of warming are piercing through (and how the imagined resulting situations might be managed).
“My contention is that business, finance, politicians and policy makers are bent on taking capitalism as far as it will go – ie, to the end.”
I agree with you. Too many vested interests , too much ignorance, too much selfishness, too little imagination, too little willingness to make sacrifices.
In the 1940s people rationed their food and made do with a lot of creature comforts to win the war against Nazism.
In the 2010s, we should be again on a war footing to counter and mitigate against climate change. But 35 years of neoliberalism has had its effect. There is not the sense of society there was in the 1940s. Many people are no longer willing to make sacrifices. They won’t go without their flash Ute. They won’t go without their barbecue. They won’t go without their boat.
Like Rachel Stewart, with humans the way they presently are, I am pessimistic about our ability to change in time.
That’s not a fact. We actually don’t need the money that dairy brings in. In fact, we’d probably be producing more jobs and a better, more developed economy if we didn’t have it.
Spot on.
Oh, goodness. Driving to Wanaka (again) this summer, I was (again) appalled at how we irrigate such dry land for bloody milk cows! How about turning this vast land of dry area into one big solar panel farm? Better for the environment, higher paying jobs (Up skill!) and a hell of a lot more water for us to drink. And we will soon need these water and cry for our stupidity at wasting them on a product humans don’t even need.
Regarding the rather obscene greening of the region you’ll get support from this group….http://mackenzieguardians.co.nz/about/
….but I suspect they will not take kindly to PV panels either.
Remember this campaign?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Hayes
…a product humans don’t even need.
The list of products humans don’t even need is enormous and includes most of the food that non-dairy fanatics eat. By all means complain about unsustainable dairy farming in Canterbury and Otago, but:
O, reason not the need! Our basest beggars
Are in the poorest thing superfluous.
Allow not nature more than nature needs,
Man’s life’s as cheap as beast’s.
The thing that still does my head in the most about the destructive environmental impacts on our waterways of intensifying dairying is how predictable it was, yet National did nothing about it. National won with a clear policy goal of doubling the value of our primary exports. Nothing wrong with that as a goal, our wealth is built on it. The environmental consequences of that should have been obvious to most purblind Tory, and the National government could and should have easily managed and mitigated the dairy explosion with careful governance and guidance.
Instead, they adopted a antediluvian, colonial attitude to our environment and under the doctrine that wasn’t so much Laissez-faire as lazy indifference gave carte blanche for big dairy to behave like 19th century robber barons who wrecked the environment while they ran interference for them by obstructing the truth, lying to the public, denialism and suppression of evidence.
it was a disgraceful throw back to the worst excesses of 19th century settler culture and it’s attitude the environment has no intrinsic value is it can’t be monetised.
Guys like Nick Smith should be in jail for the willful dissembling that allowed this unmanaged catastrophe to emerge in our waterways.
A competent government of people who actually care about their own country (as opposed to one led by a dilletante Hawaiin based millionaire) and a clear goal of doubling the value of our exports could have let us have our cake and eat it as well.
Instead we got the arrogant assholes of National.
We should set up a People’s Court.
As you say, Nick Smith should be on trial.
As should Richardson, Douglas, Fay, Richwhite.
These people sold, stole and shat on our country.
There should be serious consequences for them.
Govt does not need to raise or borrow one cent to pay of social services or infrastructure. ..
“We have a choice. Dairy farming or huge cuts to social welfare/health/education and all the other services the government provides.”
Or, tax the rich.
Who do you define as rich?
Depends, but in this case one could look at top income brackets. It’s really not that hard BM.
Repealing the tax cuts of 2010 would be a good start.
The top income bracket starts at $70000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_New_Zealand
I don’t consider someone who earns 70k rich.
It can be changed.
And tax rates can be raised.
So who do you define as rich Ed?
Do you think more income brackets need to be added? or is 70k richpricksville in your eyes?
Wealth is not just a salary.
People can have a lot of assets as well.
Who do you define as rich bm?’
It seems to be taxing your mind a lot.
Many nations have a higher top income tax rate than ours. And those nations have a CGT.
The thing is at what rate it comes in.
I would love to see a comparison of nation state – stats showing the percentage of taxpayers in the top tax bracket.
This takes out the distortion for differing income levels.
Top income tax rate in Germany (that Socialist basket-case): 45%. Can you imagine the cry-baby whining from BM et al? Worth it for that alone.
The Scandinavian nations would cause even more whinging from BM
“In order to raise a lot of income tax revenue, income tax rates in Scandinavian countries are rather high except for in Norway. Denmark’s top marginal effective income tax rate is 60.4 percent. Sweden’s is 56.4 percent. Norway’s top marginal tax rate is 39 percent.”
https://taxfoundation.org/how-scandinavian-countries-pay-their-government-spending/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tax_rates
Funny that.
Seems to be a strong connection between being an OECD country with high levels of social welfare and a high tax rate.
New Zealand fits in with countries with more wretched social support.
The rich and the multinational corporations are really taking the Mickey.
Wake up New Zealand.
There’s more to life than having a good rugby team.
Add more brackets and make rates above $70k higher. No reason why anyone earning over $70k can’t afford to pay more tax. I know I can and will have no issue with it.
And while doing that, make sure you look at companies and trusts tax rates so that those will not turn into a loophole. And this is coming from a business owner.
We all might need to think about our consumerism culture because of it but I think it a worthy “price” to pay.
Apparently starting salary for police is $70k but nobody seems to think they are rich – the tax rates are ludicrous and the problem is that the politicians get so many freebies on top of their salaries they are blind to what a high wage should be and what normal people pay for transport and housing. We have Bill’s low wage economy to thank as well for the ‘low’ high wage bracket in NZ.
Though by NZ incomes it’s $20,000 per year more than half the working population earn.
Median wage by latest data is just under $50,000.
That’s just working people.
To those on minimum wage, benefits, super and in insecure employment they might very well see $70,000 as rich.
So on one hand we have lots of people calling themselves middle class who earn less than $70,000 and live from payday to payday, have little or no savings and a mortgage – and on the other hand we have lots of people saying $70,000 ain’t rich.
This is one of the fundamental problems. The working class have been suckered into thinking they are the middle class, into thinking that tax cuts were pay increases and that getting help with their mortgage, their childcare, their raising children etc is what they deserve for their virtuous hard work.
Fact is they are working class but don’t want to admit it.
It used to be that the middle class had 5 servants or less. For a more modern definition there is this US one:
“Middle class” is a tricky concept. Depending on where you live, you can feel middle class earning as much as $250,000 a year — about five times the US median income of $52,250 from the same time period. In this analysis, Pew defined middle class households as those earning 67%-200% of a state’s median income.
or this UK one:
The upper middle class grew to 29.4% of the population in 2014, up from 12.9% in 1979, according to a new Urban Institute report. It defines this group as having household income of between $100,000 and $350,000 for a three-person family.
Fact is there’s more working class in this country than we want to admit and they’ve been thoroughly divided and conquered. It’s even worse when you look at it from a racial perspective with Maori sidelined even more.
The middle class who really aren’t a just an accident or illness away from facing the reality of their impoverishment.
Wrong. Dairy farming doesn’t really that much.
If we actually developed our economy we wouldn’t have any need for exporting dairy. Considering how destructive dairy farming is we should probably develop our economy from the 18th century failed ideal that National insists that we maintain.
Descendant Of Sssmith’s opening post provides an informed basis for development of policy in this and other limited common resource areas of the economy.
It’s not dairy farming or waterways, but dairy farming within constraints. Based on herd limits/footprint appropriate for the area (to protect the resource or to enable recovery).
Rachel Stewart reckons we need to reduce the dairy herd by 80%
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11648542
The extent, not uniform for each region, would depend somewhat on ambition for waterway recovery and the waterway purity standard goal.
For economic reasons some would phase in the ambition.
IMO we should offer farmers interest free loans (repaid when the farm is sold) so they can afford to invest to meet farm environment standards.
People’s reckons and $4 will get you a cup of coffee.
And she’s probably right but I’d like to see some scientific research on it. Of course, we should decrease the herd by 50% to start with.
As Rachel Stewart says , “For some mid-week comedy, this is beyond funny. ”
‘This’ referring to a piece of propaganda on behalf of the industrial farming lobby that Stuff published today.
Stuff is owned by banks and the financial industry.
Farmers are massively in debt to banks because they converted to dairy.
https://t.co/wMaZpHppNY?amp=1
An interesting post by Andrew Doyle (Spiked-Online): ON THE SELF-DESTRUCTIVE LEFT
I see that a lot in New Zealand political discussions online.
Yes, but people keep repeating the same behaviours.
Should we bother to try to remedy our degraded culture of political debate?
I don’t think it’s just the left that indulge in self destructive political behaviour, it’s apparent across the spectrum. It seems to dominate social media – and political blogs. There are no easy or obvious solutions to deliberate disruption and harassment.
Should we just accept that political forums are toxic environments? I think it’s better here than it used to be but we all have a lot of room for improvement.
You found an article in which someone shares your opinion. Thanks for your concern.
Should we just accept that political forums are toxic environments?
Nope. Fortunately, moderators and commenters here are quick to respond to disingenuous concern-trolling of the kind you peddle.
Allow me an analogy I would give is between the British Suffragists and the Suffragettes a century ago.
Suffragists were the great and vast numbers of women (and some men) who advocated peacefully for reform in the British parliament, organised massive marches across the country on London, and during WW1 integrated themselves so well into the the medical and other establishments that they gained massive credibility for their cause for full civic engagement.
Suffragettes were few, far more militant, dangerous, controversial, and really got the media attention.
Both the angry and mild forms were necessary to alter society for good. Their different kinds of engagement, for different kinds of activism, were necessary.
I’ve heard plenty of complaints on here about “why can’t we be nice to each other?” Please. This is a contest.
How is it possible to be nice to people who are wilfully destroying the planet?
We have 10 years to rid the world of neoliberal capitalism.
Or we are gone.
There is no nice way to say that.
And sudden change is not nice.
Strictly speaking “neoliberalism” died the day the World Bank and IMF repudiated it. It still shuffles around like a zombie, moaning (think Don Brash) and eating right wing brains, but it just doesn’t have the institutional heft of old.
What would you describe the system presently operating in NZ?
The policies of the late 80d and early 90s still seem firmly in place.
Where do you think it’s doing the moaning and shuffling?
If you feel that passionately about things, my direct challenge to you is this, Ed:
Sell everything you own, distribute everything other than an airline ticket to the poor, and get on the next flight to join a frontline activist group for the rest of your life.
No need to be a keyboard warrior anymore worrying about whether to be polite or alter structures from within.
There are plenty of militant or hard core groups that will take you.
Do it.
Well, Ad. That is as close to a knee-jerk response to a complex situation as I’ve ever heard. Ed, is looking answers for systematic change, and you “challenge” him to make individual life changes, without addressing his call.
Sounds very similar to the “how can you be an environmentalist and … drive a car, use a computer, use plastic….” trope endlessly meted out by those would have no wish to engage honestly.
“I’ve heard plenty of complaints on here about “why can’t we be nice to each other?” Please. This is a contest.”
What contest?
I don’t need discussions to be nice. But the topic if approached directly is not about the people making the points, it is about the arguments they make.
I don’t choose to participate in your contest. Like other commenters, I’m getting a bit tired of this pointless point scoring, and would prefer threads to stay on topic.
Ed, I am sure, can stand up for himself and stop feeling quite so depressed about the state of the world., if Ed takes action.
There is real point scoring to do. Molly. The points in the contest are for power. We went through that contest last year in that thing called an election. That occurred as a result of people acting rather than just complaining about the world. As a result of that contest power changed massively.
i choose to participate in that contest. As I have for a fair bit.
If you continue to frame the problems as contests, then you create an adversarial discussion.
I don’t care if the solution is proposed by someone who might self-identify as right, if the solution is effective. The contest is not “won” by a right-winger, it is a problem solved.
The election last year was not a contest. It was an indication of the effect of the level and quality of political discourse and engagement in this country.
It always is.
Oh horse shit Molly.
Last year’s election was spectacularly damaging to the reputations of dozens of careers, because there was quite a lot at stake. Left and right threw everything they could at each other, and it was still really very polite compared to almost any other advanced democracy in the world.
You may well want space for conflict-free discussion, but since that is obviously not what Ed was seeking, give him some advice yourself on this:
“How is it possible to be nice to people who are wilfully destroying the planet?
We have 10 years to rid the world of neoliberal capitalism.
Or we are gone.
There is no nice way to say that.
And sudden change is not nice.”
“Last year’s election was spectacularly damaging to the reputations of dozens of careers, because there was quite a lot at stake. Left and right threw everything they could at each other, and it was still really very polite compared to almost any other advanced democracy in the world. “
Probably why my estimation of many of the contestants was lowered. And why my personal jubilation at a change of government was muted.
Just because this is the political approach that excites you, and makes you believe that it is the one true way, doesn’t mean that it holds true for all of us.
I don’t have the need for a softly-softly approach. But while you are talking high-level contests of reputation, and competition you often seem to absolve those same people of making any kind of significant change, and advocate for incremental changes.
It is this apologetic approach within a system, where we have winners and losers, that you seem to accept without review.
Ed, doesn’t, and is looking for answers. I don’t have any to give him, but can engage with you to get a better understanding of why change doesn’t often come from within, and you might be prepared to consider that not all the voting public and those engaged in local politics think alike.
Yes, I accept the democratic system that we have in New Zealand.
There you go. You’re not in that frame of mind from your own “estimation”.
You stepped in to save Ed, and you have nothing to offer him at all. Poor discourse.
Ed just needs something positive and bold to do to stop him mithering about the world. That is the answer he needs, so I told him.
You want to engage: bring some facts, and some clarity about what is at stake. Don’t just crap on about whether you like the kind of discursive process you are encountering.
You accept the democratic system in NZ. So does everyone.
That doesn’t mean that there are not failings within it. The bill regarding waka-jumping is in part a recognition of that.
I have concerns regarding the rights of non-citizens to vote, the level of votes required for representation, the use of electorates to give a party more than its voters’ share in parliament.
The systematic change that Ed asks for are going to come from grassroots pressure, but it will enacted and reinforced (or rejected) by those in power. Both discussions are valid.
“You stepped in to save Ed, and you have nothing to offer him at all. Poor discourse.
Ed just needs something positive and bold to do to stop him mithering about the world. That is the answer he needs, so I told him.”
I don’t need to save Ed, he will work out what his personal response is, in his own time. And you didn’t give him the answer he needs. How arrogant of you to suggest this.
I saw an instance of borderline bullying going on, and tried to bring the conversation back on track, in case it was my perspective rather than your comment that was incorrect.
“You want to engage: bring some facts, and some clarity about what is at stake. Don’t just crap on about whether you like the kind of discursive process you are encountering.”
I do bring facts to the table about the issues Ed raises, but usually as a response to posts when time and home situation permits. You have brought nothing to this thread except a requirement for both Ed and I to behave or respond in a certain way before you listen.
Tough.
I have found ( as you are now discovering) that putting forwards arguments that are not in accordance with the thinking of some results in quite a bit of verbal abuse and an aggressive attempt to shut the discussion down.
Not good .
Whereas in your case, Ed, you got served for the illegibility of your comments. Nice to see you taking that constructive criticism on board.
I note that your aversion to abuse goes missing whenever it’s time to call people right wing climate denying trolls because they don’t happen to agree with your rhetoric.
A lot of posters said they understood what I was saying.
But, hey, as Drowsy said, you think you’re considerably more intelligent than me.
I do call James and others trolls, yes. They are on this site to divert and distract conversation. They don’t want the issues discussed.
Now the issue.
The crises are Planet is facing – extinction, climate change, the depletion of resources.
What is your stage of grief?
OAB and Psycho Milt are too closed minded to look at an issue like this.
I find it quite disheartening to witness such blinkered thinking.
…and that’s just one example of your personal abuse.
And now you’re insulting me with your fatuous attempt to explain what’s in my mind. Again.
So don’t piss in my pocket and tell me it’s raining, bud.
What an unpleasant turn of phrase.
What stage of grief are you at regarding the crises facing the planet?
Yes, smears based on other people’s state of mind are a nasty Stalinist trick, aren’t they.
I vacillate between acceptance and cold rage. Having a firm grasp on the scientific basics doesn’t help much.
Thank you for your answer.
What an unpleasant turn of phrase.
Sure is. But I prefer that to disingenuous passive-agressive put-downs like “I find it quite disheartening to witness such blinkered thinking.” At least it’s honest.
PM, what stage of grief are you at regarding the crises facing the planet?
The planet isn’t facing any crisis – what happens to us (whether “us” Homo Sapiens or “us” the currently existing set of species in play) is irrelevant to it. 1,000,000 years from now there’ll be a then-existing set of species in existence that won’t give a rat’s ass about what happened to the ones existing now, and grieving over that strikes me as singularly pointless.
None of which is to suggest we shouldn’t stop fucking ourselves and all the other current species over and come up with something better – but that has nothing to do with grief.
By the way @Molly (somewhere above)….do you happen to have noticed the holier-than-thou, supercilious comments on yesterday and today’s Open Mike?
Whether directed at Ed or others, it’s bloody depressing.
It’s not unlike a Harry Enfield sketch on ‘I’m CONSIDERABLY richer than you’ – except that it’s a ‘I’m considerably more intelligent’, OR I’m CONSIDERABLY more ‘left’, OR CONSIDERABLY more astute, well read, and thoroughly literate and numerate than ye’.
In fact I’m so far up my own arse it’s difficult to consider the possibility of an alternative view. I’m so fucking gorgeous there are hordes fawning all over me!
So far this week, The teensiest eensiest bit of humility seems to have left The Standard, and it seems something is in the 50% pure water.
Thanks Once was Tim.
I also bumped into ‘I’m CONSIDERABLY more ‘accurate with speech marks.’
As a response to a post endeavouring to start a conversation about climate change, it is bloody depressing.
Yes, OnceWasTim, I found it bloody depressing too. For me ‘The Standard’ is an invaluable community of left-wing commentators, and a lifeline living, as I do, in a small conservative town.
I’ve learnt so much and am in awe of how some people are able to express themselves. But not all of us are as articulate, and it can be intimidating to comment on here.
I love Ed’s comments. He may get his format wrong, but his heart is in the right place. I notice that you don’t pick on Eco Maori for ‘wrong’ grammar.
Hi OnceWasTim,
I don’t comment as much but still a regular and avid reader, and there does appear to be a change in tone and manner.
Usually, by the time I read, some other regular has already pointed out the issue, and I don’t feel the need to join in when the point has already been made.
In this case, I thought I’d enter into the dialogue. Luckily, I had to go for a few hours and will be heading back out momentarily, so I can offset the exchange with fresh air and time.
Thanks Molly
We need systemic change as you correctly say.
I like what Molly said.
Umm Ad, did you just break the law via the, Terrorism Suppression Act 2002?
If Ed were to accept Ad’s challenge, and “do it”, that would decrease the diversity of left-leaning PoVs presented on this site.
If s/he does accept Ad’s good-natured (?) challenge (the “keyboard warrior” jibe is a bit of a giveaway), then maybe s/he would consider posting updates here.
I value Ed’s comments almost as much as those of AOB, PM, Ad, LPrent et al., so would be disappointed if the current concerted effort to hound him/her off this site is successful.
There may be some relevant history that fully justifies such targeting, but it has many hallmarks of bullying behaviour. Is there substantially more to it than some here not wanting to read Ed’s PoV?
Thank you Drowsy M.,Kran
I am going to refer to Rachel Stewart ‘s discussion about grief this morning in her article.
I asked people to ask at what stage of grief they are at.
James denied there was a crisis. It was ‘bumkin’ .
Carolyn said he was at the stage of ‘despondency’
I sense quite a few of the posters in this site would fit in the category Rachel Stewart described as. “you’re busy bargaining, or being angry, or even denying there’s a problem at all. You may even be stuck in depression.”
Whatever stage they are at, my posting concerns about the various crises we are facing ( climate, resources, extinction) usually bump into a lot of flak, not just from deniers such as James, but others on ithis site, who seem unwilling to confront the issue head on.
Discussing the antics of Trump and the behaviour of National MPs seems a more urgent priority.
Rachel Stewart is a keyboard warrior as well, Ad.
Do you recommend she also join an activist group?
Would do her good for sure.
What sell everything as you suggest, get on a plane etc…
That’s a silly proposition.
Nope, Jesus recommended it a few thousand years ago – using pretty much the same words – and started the greatest movement the world has seen.
Apart from the plane thing.
He would have just kept a pair of sandals.
Yeah, but he ended up being crucified, and then reborn and baptised as a frog, and got crucified all over again 🙂
And a lot of his followers accumulated wealth rather than gave it away.
OK then, try this instead.
What is your view of Rachel Stewart’s article?
I think she is pretty much spot on.
Do you?
Why/why not?
Rachel Stewart usually is. I’d like to see the basis of her 80% figure given that Mike Joy says it should be 33%.
Still what would he know, it says on Facebook that he betrayed us 🙄
Here are links to articles referring to 80% cut.
Can’t see reference to her source for this number.
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/kerre-mcivor-and-mark-dye-afternoons/rachel-stewart-why-dairy-herds-must-be-culled/
http://www2.nzherald.co.nz/the-country/news/article.cfm?c_id=16&objectid=11648542
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/81691372/rachel-stewart–the-woman-who-turned-on-her-own-tribe
Yes, Ed, I know she says it. I’m wondering what’s the factual basis. Perhaps it could be justified by the dairy herd increasing by 69% between 1994 and 2015.
The problem is that some people are so hung up on cow pollution but seem blind to the people and business pollution, that is way higher.
Example more people more poos and wastewater and housing and food and water and transport needed and less biodiversity and nature. NZ neoliberal’s drive for more people has a polluting cost. James Hardie for example and the amount of trucks that drive around Auckland connected to the building boom (that doesn’t seem to house local people in the budget they can afford) .
The problem with cows is methane and the fertiliser put on land.
Waterways and beaches around Auckland are polluted. It’s not the cows. Apparently warnings are out for Lake Taupo polluted by some accident with waster water. Cows are only one part of the equation, to our declining water quality issues.
Cows are a major part.
Most of our rivers are in the country.
That’s not to deny the issues with urban waterways, but the vast majority of waterways are in rural areas.
The vast majority of cities are in rural areas.
@Ad
Sure politics is a contest, and it should be keenly contested. It’s not a matter of ‘being nice to each other’.
But it should be a matter of enabling and allowing debate on different policies and actions and social issues (robustly) while respecting that others can have different and equally valid ideas, or of disproving false claims without resorting to personal attacks or attempts at discrediting thing one disagrees with or wants to suppress.
Most MPs manage this most of the time beyond question time and the media spotlight.
Squabbling like children will achieve little if anything. More mature debate will make a healthier and more effective democracy.
“Squabbling like children will achieve little if anything. More mature debate will make a healthier and more effective democracy.”
I agree with what you say Pete George.
However, I disagree with what you often do. (Acknowledging a healthy hypocritical dose of irony myself there. But trying to make a point.)
I think we’re just in a bit of a vacuum for a month or so until more draft legislation comes out and starts hitting the media for us to chew over. So it will all be a bit formless here until the new Parliamentary year begins. I think the editorial control here is reasonably good overall. And of course the authorial quality is just fantastic! 😉
“I think we’re just in a bit of a vacuum for a month or so until more draft legislation comes out and starts hitting the media for us to chew over. So it will all be a bit formless here until the new Parliamentary year begins.”
So…in the absence of anything meatier to sink your teeth into, you exorcise your boredom by taking bites out of other commentors?
“I bully because I’m bored.”
How adolescent.
Plenty to write about.
Which I do.
Step up yourself and do a whole post Rosemary.
Social media being destructive to balance in political discourse and the left being self destructive are two different issues.
PS Right wing policy is destructive to adequate funding of government and therefore respect for the commonwealth in society – it and modern social media have something in common.
Interesting comment. A link to the cited/quoted original article would be welcome 😉
What exactly do you mean by or understand to be a “toxic environment” in this context?
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/on-the-self-destructive-left/20727
Anyone quoting Schumpeter with approval is a bit far right to be a credible critic of the left. The article is pitifully biased – it makes a nod at the alt-right as a prelude to a sustained tirade against the left. For the author to retain a shred of credibility he would need to include an equivalent dissection of the alt-right.
“For the author to retain a shred of credibility he would need to include an equivalent dissection of the alt-right.”
Why?
By your logic any criticism of the right here would need to have would need to include ‘an equivalent dissection’ of the left to have any credibility. That would be ridiculous.
One of the many ways of trying to squash discussion is claiming an argument is not credible or a point is not worthy of discussion because it is not comprehensively balanced (an impossible demand).
Your logic is impeccable. Politics however is not a logic based pursuit is it?
The path you’re on will of course see you comprehensively shat on by both the left and right, so I hope you have the tenacity to tolerate it all.
I think I’ve linked to this before, but it’s my take on all this online politics aggro and why I’ve determined to happily free myself from it:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/29/vortex-online-political-debate-arguments-trump-brexit
” see you comprehensively shat on by both the left and right’
You mean by a small minority, generally the more extremes, of the left and the right, who don’t represent the views or the behaviour of the vast majority?
I think that many people are put of an involvement in politic debate due to the high risk of personal attack or pointless and petty point scoring.
Those actively involved in politics could do a service to democracy by encouraging decent robust debate, but social media seems to have worked against rather than for that happening. Due to the actions of a small minority.
I agree it is a small minority of the total number of people who view social media pages who almost inevitably set the agenda and tone.
Nonetheless politics is ultimately a contest of ideas, so eliminating this competitive aspect is neither possible or even desirable. At the same time constructive political action demands mutual trust and a unity of purpose, which is impossible when personalities and emotional confrontations dominate.
So yeah, I’m kinda over it.
I’ve always supported a competitive contest of ideas, that’s an important (essential) part of a healthy democracy.
We get that to an extent, but it is often overwhelmed by attempted contests of attrition, which rarely benefit anyone to any lasting extent. Whale Oil is an extreme example in New Zealand of attritional attack politics, but far from the only dirty political activist.
“Whale Oil is an extreme example in New Zealand of attritional attack politics, but far from the only dirty political activist.”
Can you name another, Pete?
Weren’t David Farrar, Jordan Williams and Simon Lusk named in Nicky Hager’s book?
Yes but Pete’s implying that there’s as many from the Left and they’re just as bad .
We shall look forward to him naming them.
He means the Penguin of course.
“Weren’t David Farrar, Jordan Williams and Simon Lusk named in Nicky Hager’s book?”
And Pete’s blogger pal, Keeping Stock, Whanganui church elder and early-childhood businessman.
He isn’t answering.
Just another smear.
“Can you name another, Pete?”
You stir up dirt at times Robert, but at the mild end of the scale.
“but Pete’s implying that there’s as many from the Left and they’re just as bad ”
I haven’t implied that, you’re making things up again.
“And Pete’s blogger pal, Keeping Stock”
You’re making things up, I’ve had more to do with you online than Keeping Stock.
Is this deliberate dirt from you Robert?
“Can you name another, Pete?”
I could. Some will have to wait until the courts allow.
There’s some commenters here and at Kiwiblog who seem to think that playing dirty will achieve something. They generally discredit themselves.
Twitter can be a dirty place to discuss politics, that’s well known. It’s not uncommon to see people quitting because of the toxic environment.
There’s a lot of dirt scattered across Facebook, some examples are publicised.
It’s not always left versus right, blue on blue and red on red (particularly) are common.
But ‘not as bad as Whale Oil’ is a diversion (which is another common tactic).
Actually, as usual Robert’s put his finger precisely on the issue at hand here. In your latest foray into disingenuous concern-trolling (comment 5), you faux-generously conceded that you “don’t think it’s just the left that indulge in self destructive political behaviour,” but asked (the concern-trolling bit): “Should we just accept that political forums are toxic environments?”
Robert’s invited you to list the egregious WhaleOil-equivalent toxic environments on the left that you’re concern-trolling about on this thread, but suddenly you’re all coy and retreating being “not as bad as WhaleOil” being a poor measure of success. Well, yes, we know it is, we’re just waiting for you to make your case for these left-wing “toxic environments.” How about if you put up or shut up?
Your assertion is a blithe attempt to dispense with any pretense of objectivity – yet it is this very pretense of objectivity that the author marshals against the left that he wishes to criticize.
This is the kind of insincerity we expect from the extreme right, an inconsistency in applying standards.
I’m not making an impossible demand, merely one you do not choose to attempt because objective comparisons of left and right bias would not further your frankly dubious assertions.
Let’s hear your critique of the alt-right, and we will consider the merits of your critique of the left.
Let’s hear your objective conparisons and critiques of the hard right, the centre right, the centre, the centre right and the hard right before you lecture someone else on inconsistency in applying standards and insincerity.
I write about a wide range of things including been critical of the alt-right, but don’t see any reason why i should include everything in a single blog comment. No one else does, including you.
It’s just a lazy lame attempt by you to discredit sources rather than debate the issues raised.
You didn’t raise any issues Pete (you never do).
You waived in a far-right smear and left it at that.
“I write about a wide range of things including been critical of the alt-right”
So it should be simplicity itself for you to summarise your major objections to them. If you are not merely being disingenuous.
You’re being diversionary or stupid.
Whereas you are simply lying.
You post an attack article titled “On the Self-destructive Left” on a moderate left leaning site and try to pretend that you are not simply being abusive.
You yourself made the claim that you criticize the alt-right, but your refusal to demonstrate it confirms your well-established reputation for insincerity.
“Stupid” in your terms evidently means not falling for your tissues of nonsense.
From where I’m sitting right now Stuart, I can see PG’s point. There are a couple of aspects to this.
One is simple in-group bias and preference. The fact is we accept and tolerate worse bad behaviour from people we perceive as being ‘on our side’, than we do from those we consider to be the opposition.
The other is more subtle; that in my experience the left and the right do toxic behaviour differently from each other. They don’t use the same tactics and it’s wrong to suggest they’re just as bad as each other. That’s a false equivalence that just kicks dust in everyone’s eyes.
Let’s put it this way, if a Martian was to spend a week reading first WhaleOil and then The Standard, I doubt at the end he/she would declare one to be an unmitigated sewer of all filth, and the other pure light and reasoned sweetness. In all likelihood our Martian would find sad aspects to both … each with it’s own shadings.
Of course I can’t vouch for PG’s motives here; but keep in mind that sometimes those you thought to be enemies will tell you truths your friends will not.
@ Redlogix PG and I know each other well – he’s been so desperate (and so irrelevant) as to run attack articles on me on his site.
Why was he here today? To discuss a real issue, or to damn the left with a shallow, biased critique?
Although his article paid lip service to condemning the excesses of the alt right, that was really only a rhetorical flourish to lend a pretense of even-handedness to what was actually a crude assault.
His hope was presumably that casual readers might swallow his aspersions and defend his freedom to assert his views here in one of the very few left tolerant sites still operating.
I don’t believe that his views of ‘left dysfunction’ are either sound or edifying. He may be capable of forming worthwhile opinions on other matters, but rarely does so.
We should just accept that political forums are toxic environments. That’s because of the partisan self-centred thick who have the opportunity to use them.
It’s a sort of unrecognised splurge world. Think of it as the Donald Trump tweet world being Tangimoana and political discussions online as being the Universe.
I’m going on my own topic. These neo liberal whom like to quote all the bad stats of Maori and Pacific Islands people. They say we are bad carers well in my view the state is the mother and father of the people they rule over. The people that have been running the state should look in a mirror and admite that they ______up as being mother and father YOU are suppose to treat all the children the same discipline us all the same make sure they have a happy healthy future teach us give us all the same opportunity. Not make policy’s that takeaway from the many and gives to the 1% not have impunity for the 1% as this makes the 1% do whatever they want and they know that won’t be held to account
For there bad behaviour so they think there behaviour is OK. But if this behaviour is OK why do everything in there power to hide this bad behaviour they know there is crap. All THE GOVERNMENTS OF OUR WORLD SOCIETY should try there best to be good parents as that is what a government is a parents to the people. They should put all there children future first and not money.
Ka kite ano
The state is not your mother and father.
The state is not anyone’s mother and father.
The state unevenly subsidises mothers and fathers, and children, and currently does a pretty shabby job of even that. The current NZ government might make a few improvements.
The state is a machine.
Don’t be confusing actual parents with the state.
But you get Eco’s point don’t you AD?
My parents were Andertonites. My dad was his election campaign manager in Sydenham (later Wigram) when Jim Anderton was a Labour MP and then when he established the NLP and Alliance and they followed him out of the Alliance into the Progressives, although they never went back to the LP with him.
Jim was very kind and thoughtful when my mother was dying of cancer in 2011.
On a personal level, I think he was a genuine, kind and generous person.
But he was also a major political figure, and his career there is much more open to critique.
He certainly more principle than any other Labour MP during the period of the 4th Labour but he sided with Labour over the invasion of Afghanistan, something which led to the loss of thousands of Afghani lives and is still wreaking havoc on that country.
https://rdln.wordpress.com/2018/01/09/jim-anderton-1938-2018-new-zealands-last-social-democrat/
A tribute to Jim Anderton by former fellow ChCh MP and one-time Press gallery journo and Marlborough Express Editor, Brendon Burns. It has a Marlborough angle since Burns is once again a Marlburian and Anderton as Minister for Regional Development put money into the Wine Institute and the Omaka Aviation Museum.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/100424061/jim-anderton-leaves-lasting-legacy-in-marlborough
+100 great tribute to his regional development work.
And a reminder that this government must continue this work.
An occasion when I am totally in agreement with Keith Locke. I never thought that it was going to happen.
I guess this is an example of Gell-Mann’s principle in Quantum Mechanics.
“Gell-Mann’s principle states that unless a process is expressly forbidden there is a non-zero probability that it will occur”.
Keith is objecting to the Waka jumping bill. As he suggests the Green Party could have been still-born if it had applied when the Party started as an independent group and left the Alliance.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11971853
Funny how wingnuts will now leap to the defence of list MPs, considering that at other times you bemoan their right to be in Parliament at all.
Your “agreement” is conditional on political expediency.
Sic transit gloria alt-right mundi:
Steve Bannon leaves as Chair of Breitbart.
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/368166-steve-bannon-stepping-down-from-breitbart
Now that the funders of Breitbart have their tax cut, time to take the reigns of the alt-right media – make it obvious that “drain the swamp” was just a play to win votes to restore the GOP to power.
Extraordinarily successful.
Really hard to see a alt-left Breitbart arising.
We have more dignity (while we lose).
I like the reporting of Glenn Greenwald, he does some nice cut through. Like this one about facebook once again bowing down to the state, this time deleting accounts of Palestinians and opponents of the USA. All the time letting the facebook pages of our world tyrants keep rolling.
https://theintercept.com/2017/12/30/facebook-says-it-is-deleting-accounts-at-the-direction-of-the-u-s-and-israeli-governments/
For those organising in 2018 – here is a few reasons not to organise on facebook,
https://libcom.org/news/few-reasons-not-organise-facebook-30122017
Was nodding in agreement right up til the final paragraph.
We don’t need ‘independent’ social media platforms. We need to get out and slam up posters, pass out leaflets, talk, meet and organise.
Stickers – I like stickers.
Chalk on pavement.
And yes, talk, talk, talk.
Very interesting.
A brilliant development … literally:
http://reneweconomy.com.au/aurora-what-you-should-know-about-port-augustas-solar-power-tower-86715/
I’ve taken the time a year back to visit the similar Sundrop facility just south of Port Augusta, and these solar thermal plants really do have the look of the future. I’ve no sense of whether solar PV or solar thermal will ultimately be the dominant technology, but each has it’s merits. The big plus with solar thermal for the moment is it’s inherent energy storage capacity, something which has to added on to solar pv with batteries or pumped hydro.
The way the tower literally glows an intense white, brighter than the sun, is quite a sight.
Back of the envelope….
The article says it will or can provide just under 4% of SAs electrical needs. 20% of energy use is electrical and much of the rest needs to be switched (mostly) from fossil.
Allowing a generous 20% of energy needs to come from non-electrical sources, SA needs to expand its generating capacity by a factor of 4.
So (I think I’m right in saying) 100 of those solar thermal units would do the trick.
One plant cost $650 million and construction takes about two years.
Assuming lots of upskilling, availability of materials/sites and what not, 100 plants could be built in the space of (I dunno) a couple of decades say? At a cost of $65 billion.
Maybe 50 plants alongside other non-carbon energy sources?
That’s for a population of 1.7million.
As I keep saying and will keep on saying, the task of avoiding very dangerous or catastrophic warming is huge.
Your envelope is missing the fact that wind power already accounts for a total of 34% of total generation in SA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_South_Australia
I agree the task is huge, but not monumentally impossible either.
Here’s another take on it:
https://theconversation.com/the-norths-future-is-electrifying-powering-asia-with-renewables-17286
Especially scroll down to the image showing how Australian sunshine could potentially supply the entire world with electricity. (Of course you wouldn’t do it like that, but it gives a sense of the possibilities.)
There was a fair number of things I missed 🙂
increases in energy demand (all things being equal) being the obvious one.
So divide that 34% from wind down to bring it to the percentage of very conservative future requirements that entail multiplying capacity by about 4x.
And then factor in x,y and z (whatever they may be).
Then acknowledge that if we say it’s not do-able, we should be doing whatever we can to get as close to achieving it as is possible.
The technical know-how is there (engineering community etc), and the acknowledgement of the need is there (scientific community etc)…and the road block is all the clowns, jokers and arse wipes who make it their business to manage and control our (society’s) business.
Not one government or business community nor financial community is getting off its managerial, short term, profit driven arse to make so much as a start on any of it. And they’ve been sitting on their fucking chuffs for 30 years now and spinning us bullshit off the back of pointless “declarations of intent” or whatever latest “accord” they signed.
Putting the details aside, I can’t see any option short of burning the fuckrs down and getting on with it.
And yet by next month they will be the centre of attention again in NZ and most people will, yet again, be hanging on their every pontification and platitude.
And that being the case, we’s fucked.
I mostly agree Bill. From where we sit in NZ right now there is not a lot to be optimistic about. Yet here is one state in Australia that has smashed a breach in that road block:
From my first link above.
And even then the Federal govt aren’t complete idiots and have managed to put $2b into upgrading the Snowy Hydro scheme:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-16/snowy-hydro-expansion-federal-government-could-go-it-alone/8360366
I’d argue there are quite a few regional initiatives like SA’s that have the potential to tip the game much faster than we expect. And especially there is a whole new generation of engineers and industry people who work with reality for a living and are just itching to get their hands on all this new technology.
Witness AGL blatantly defying the Federal govt who wanted them to spend $1b to extend the life of the old Liddell coal power station by just five years. AGL just said no:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-19/agl-liddell-coal-power-station-could-be-replaced-by-hydro-or-gas/8960880
Consider this … in the past decade the total new coal power generation that has been built in Australia = Zero. I’m willing to bet it will stay that way … all new generation will be renewable and as more of the old plants reach end of life, this process will only accelerate.
Bearing in mind we have about 20 years to hit zero carbon from energy (absolute zero, not net zero), then that acceleration had better be something like flicking straight into warp drive from a standing start.
Replacing coal with gas isn’t it. (Your second link)
And waiting for old plant to hit the end of its shelf life isn’t it either. (Though China just pulled the plug on a pile of coal fired stations regardless, so…)
And just to add, any plant operating on notions of carbon capture (whether the fuel is fossil or bio) isn’t it either.
The 1.7 million people living in SA may have a state govt that’s willing to make a nod. Is it enough in the scheme of things though? Will SA hit zero carbon from energy in the time we have?
And if not, (because they’ll have done the projections, right? /sarc) what’s the current plan in operation that ensures a massive decrease in energy consumption, such that in conjunction with building necessary plant, SA sits at zero by about 2040 – 2045?
Isn’t there also a problem with rare earth minerals?
There was, and now there isn’t.
A finite resource is still a finite resource, no matter what happens to the economics.
Excellent post with that link Ka pai Redlogic.
I think they are wasting money on fusion. The money would be better invested in renewable energy tidal currents wind solar thermal solar thermal power hydro power as back up power for the solar plants.
As with any thing that is critical to OUR society I would have my eggs in many
Kiti baskets . We are in renewable energy utopia US kiwis most of us just don’t know this fact clear sky’s mountains sea volcanics we are the envy of the world. And the rest of the world will laugh at us if we don’t utilise these precious resources to benefit all the people of NEW ZEALAND. Other countries that freeze for 4 to 6 months of the year are streeks ahead of us now we have the knowledge we have developed thermal power its just the political interfance leading us down the path that big money wants us to take letts get this environmently friendly economy pumping. Kia kaha
It is great to read your knowledgable and thoughtful comments eco maori, you really get around the topics for someone who is battling so much with everyday problems. If we all could keep up as you try to, and me also, I think NZ people could be a force to be reckoned with.
Don”t worry about ECO MAORI greywarshark I have heaps of energy Mana and Thunder to keep up the good cause for Papatuanukus health and equality for all.
You know the sandflys attacks on my good character in the end just added to my Mana thanks to thestandard and the good people who posted there views here Ka pai
The sandflys are still following me but now they are keeping there distance they are scared now and they should be .The reason I used eco as a 2 person some mite have guessed my motive well It was subliminal massaging .I was posting eco alot to encourage OUR people to become environmentally friendly. The sandflys will be looking for some tissues soon
Ka kite ano
Some music I like listening to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J161D6GuJ8c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J161D6GuJ8c
Stories of dodgy landlords.
Just another area of NZ life damaged by neoliberalism.
A lack of strict enforceable regulations sees the rich exploit the poor and vulnerable.
In so many areas of life, New Zealand is a wretched place.
http://thewireless.co.nz/articles/how-much-has-your-rent-gone-up-this-year
Jim Anderton’s Funeral tomorrow, Thursday 11 Jan at 2 pm will be open to the public and will also be streamed live on You Tube, according to the ODT.
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/jim-andertons-funeral-tomorrow-open-public
This is the link for the live stream on You Tube
thanks, will put up a post.
If Rachel Stewart ‘s article wasn’t enough of a dose of reality for you, then there’s this.
“President Donald Trump is preparing for a “showdown” with North Korea as the US draws closer to nuclear war with the rogue state, a retired US general has warned.
Former US Vice-Chief of Staff Jack Keane told Fox News that Trump has pledged to “take care” of Kim Jong-un’s ruthless regime.
He warns that the US is “absolutely” at its closest it has ever been to war with North Korea.”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11972483
On Sunday, after her holiday , HdpA sat at her computer and wrote an article bemoaning people’s outrage at things. It was titled “A resolution for the world – park the outrage .”
Today , after her holiday , Rachel Stewart sat at her computer and wrote an article explaining why most species on this planet faced oblivion. It was titled “I got the end-of-humanity blues.”
So should I park my outrage at the prospect of the end of humanity and life as we know it on this planet? Or just conclude that HdpA is a vacuous and useless journalist.
Do whatever you want Ed.
Personally I find it wise not to take my lead from any journalist.
Dude has a crack at unpacking the Fusion GPS testimony released by Dianne Feinstein.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/950897678640132096.html
Thanks for posting this Joe. I got through the 300 – odd pages this morning and this is a great summation.
The Republican questions are only worth reading if you need an excuse to take a shower.
Yea team. This from an Economist newsletter I get each morning.
Perhaps we can look up at the sky tomorrow without have our pictures taken.
What an incredible waste of money.
“An American spy satellite worth billions of dollars has been written off after it failed to reach orbit. The super-secret mission, code-named Zuma, launched aboard a SpaceX rocket on Sunday. However, interpreting the scant details provided by both SpaceX and spooks about the failure, it seems the satellite did not separate from the rocket properly.”
From the name I suppose it was intended to spy on South Africa though.
“A waste of money”.
Given that the primary function of spying is to keep violence to a minimum, it might actually be money well spent, considering the costs of eg: the drone program.
When you put it that way you are probably right, at least if it is intended to do what you suggest.
I wonder how many tens of billions the drone program costs each year?
I doubt if it is in the hundreds but it is almost certainly far more than this single satellite cost.
On the other hand Zuma was probably intended to do traffic counts around competitors to “The Donalds” hotels. That is what you do if you are POTUS isn’t it?
It seems to be so sensitive that it probably was named by a random syllable generator – like the British Operation Barras in Sierra Leone.
Alternatively, google tells me that “Zuma” is the name of a chain of Japanese restaurants and also a game that involves stopping balls hitting a skull.
Whatever it was… pricey firework…
It’s time to stop the cruelty of rodeo’s
https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2018/01/08/the-liberal-agenda-protest-the-whangarei-rodeo-direct-animal-action/
Jennifer Ward on Twitter
“O the truly tragic irony – reading Rachel Stewart’s column in today’s Herald (hard copy, Diz) and on the opposite page is an ad for the Singapore Grand Prix…”