Written By:
notices and features - Date published:
6:00 am, August 14th, 2023 - 66 comments
Categories: open mike -
Tags:
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
"Labour thinks Hipkins comes off as an every-man, with his endless references to "bread and butter issues" (including two on Sunday). But when he's so obviously making calls based on focus group, he looks like any other cynical career politician."
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/labour-looks-to-govern-by-focus-group
But when he's so obviously making calls based on focus group, he looks like any other cynical career politician."
Now who's being cynical? Mark Daalder no less.
Labour clearly needs better advisors, pollsters and focus groups because noone thinks of Chris bloody hipkins as an everyman or a Kiwi battler lmfao.
People cringe and roll their eyes when he says "boy from the hutt" or "bread and butter" we've seen him for months say "bread and butter" in the same sentence he's ruling out bread and butter economic policies.
Labour are delusional. Hipkins is seen as another Goff, Shearer, Cunliffe, Little… If he was up against a stronger opposition leader, Labour would be polling at 18-23%
I perform three times a week to diverse crowds, between uni, work art, comedy, rich and poor sides of my family, I've never heard anyone, ever say anything nice about Hipkins or Luxon.
Id suggest that anyone who may have considered Hipkins ( and Labour) as representing Kiwi battlers will have had their delusion well and truly debunked
I almost admire the guy.
Richard Harman was impressed. Paywalled, but in the intro he calls Labour's move real clever: https://www.politik.co.nz/labours-very-clever-class-politics/
Poll verification awaits. He seems to see it as a marketing thing. Wedge issue. I'm not the target market so have no informed opinion – other than that it indicated a breach in the wall of neolib doctrine and can thus be interpreted as tacit socialist reversion.
If Labour regains parity with National in the polls, Harman will be proven right. On class analysis it makes sense but few voters self-identify as lower class nowadays. During my sporadic participation onsite here since 2015 I haven't seen even one commentator do so! A cynic would conclude that lower-class folk are incapable of political thought or activism but the 19th century proves that wrong…
that article isn't paywalled.
It was when I tried to read it earlier this morning. I'll re-check & quote more if I get access. No – still unavailable to me. I wonder why you can read it but I can't.
Anyway if there's anything else he wrote that is interesting enough I hope you'll report it here…
they might have a limit on how many posts you can read per month. Try a different device, or browser in incognito mode and/or dump the cookies for the site.
thanks, I'll check out those tips when I get around to it…
Works for me. Research in the article claims this:
The panel on rnz just did a snap poll on this.
69% opposed..31% supported..
" … few voters self-identify as lower class nowadays."
Class consciousness as imported from Britain is almost obsolete except among the die hard Kiwi Tories.
There are many people struggling to make ends meet who will welcome a few extra dollars for fruit and veges regardless of their status. Add the $25 per week WFF and I'm sure the package will go down very well with them.
I believe that the WFF payments aren't even being considered until just before the 2026 election. Can you really get excited by something that certainly won't happen for another three years?
When I heard that being announced I was expecting Chippie to burst into a rendition of the old Hobo song from the 1930's.
In his dulcet tenor I could imagine him singing "There'll be pie in the sky when you die".
By the way, can you provide an example of the "die hard Kiwi Tories." you mention? I can't think of anyone who matches the image.
FACT CHECK
Not true.
The WFF tax credit changes have two components, it begins 1 April 2024 but a threshold adjustment does not occur until 2026.
From 1 April 2024 a $25 a week gain. From 2026, it goes up to a $47 a week gain
https://www.labour.org.nz/news-cost_living_working_families
Thank you. I didn't pick up properly on when it was going to apply apparently.
Only three years to wait for that $47…then..
You are happy with that..?
And April next year for that $25 wff..
And that's not for the poorest…the 160,000+ children of beneficiaries..
There is absolutely nothing for them..not even in 3 yrs…
Where do you think that all rates on the transforming-scale..?
You really are trying to polish a turd… aren't you..?
Why do you have a problem with a clarification as to what Labour Party policy actually is?
You then question the policy and then presume the person who wanted the facts stated, has some ulterior motive.
Yeah, misinformation sucks. As does cheap insult, as to impugning motive.
There is a reason why the Green Party wanted to approach politics with different manner to ….. rather than whatever it is that you are doing.
You shouldn't take things so personally..it isn't about you . .
My fecal reference was directed at anyone saying what a wonderful policy this is..
As I said ..it ain't about you .. it's about this dogs breakfast example of a big policy .
At best it is just more middle class welfare..
Circular reasoning, it's like watching a sheep walking within a circle.
Then to dumb it down, referring to lower income (working poor) families (renting) as middle class.
..listeriosis…
Middle class people spend more on fruit and veg…than do the poorest..
Therefore..they are the main beneficiaries from this chump change policy..
(Circular enough for you..?)
We were discussing the tax credit to the working poor with families … this is the other paddock.
You could always try the man in the mirror, alwyn… You strike me as pretty consistent.
Not being the target market does not exclude [you from] having or forming an informed opinion.
You self-ID as not paying GST on fruit & veg and not being registered as a voter in NZ.
Despite your self-disqualification, you pretend to comment on an article that you, by your own admission, cannot and have not read!?
This reflects your binary & simplistic thinking about opinion polls, especially at this stage of the election campaign and close to the General Election. Moreover, it is unclear what Harman is supposed to be ‘right’ about. In other words, the next poll [?] will ‘prove’ nothing but undoubtedly, this will not stop you from making some comment about it.
Again, you admit your big blanks and yet you continue to fill them with sophistry.
And on and on it goes …
I don't think I've seen anyone on TS say they are lower class. I've seen plenty here who are working class, historically and currently. We’ve also had working class authors.
Your statement above is both ignorant of working class presence on TS (no, your qualifier of 'sporadic' doesn't negate the ignorance). The insinuation that working class people in our lifetime aren't politically active or don't have political analysis is bizarre.
There are also those of us here who live in the underclass.
Dennis twisted Harman’s words or simply filled in the blanks (given that he had not read the actual piece) to create a strawman of his own.
Harman wrote:
I’ve seen plenty of commenters here identifying as working-class or from a strong working-class background. However, this would not have suited DF’s narrative; he prefers to manufacture stuff and then make snide & arrogant remarks.
it's disappointing to see Dennis' change in commenting and it sinking to this level.
I'm intrigued that you're both reading stuff into what I wrote that wasn't my intended meaning but so it goes…
For the record, I emerged into a slot in the social hierarchy that, when I first learnt about it, was defined as lower middle class. Being just a kid, I had no idea what that meant but eventually got the right idea in synch with everyone older. The culture here at the time was imperial (although a purist may prefer post-imperial) although neo-colonial frames it better nowadays.
What it meant in practice for identity formation: my parents brought me up to believe our family couldn't afford some of the good things of life that others boys my age had. They got to see those famous Cecil B DeMille movies in cinemas downtown that I couldn't see due to being too poor.
That gives me an experiential basis upon which to empathise with folks today who can't afford some of the good things of life. Intellectual folks can still call this class consciousness despite the archaic aura the notion evokes in some…
Or you could clarify.
Our local mayor takes a nationwide view of infrastructure policy:
I haven't hitherto been impressed by this guy but must give him credit for specifying Nat/Lab collusion in creating our infrastructure crisis via short-term fixes. Except climate change has precipitated the crisis so folks will blame that instead.
In the ether. Would you expect either National or Labour to pluck it out of the ether and articulate it into prospective legislation? Of course not. Mainstream idiocy rules.
However this conservative mayor has the right idea, and even paralyitic Nats & Labs can transcend their navel-gazing. It could catch on. Some political activist needs to lead from the front and declare a movement for resilient governance in Aotearoa. Even the Greens could do it – would give them credibility as progressives. He closes with the essential collaborative intergenerational pitch:
The weather events last year made a real mess of our roads in the Sounds. The contractors have made a great job of keeping the roads open. Specially impressed with the stretches of hot-mix patching. Only the colour change shows where the seamless joins are made.
Your Mayor sounds like a species of 'Pothole Man' – his delusions are just of a more quotidian nature. Rather than just announcing fancy new stuff, he wants to see that most mystical of things – an "integrated plan" – that also says something about maintaining existing infrastructure. He is right to the extent that most of the fancy new stuff will never be built, because what we have already will be continuously wrecked by climate change and there will be 'no money' for anything else but trying to fix it. But eventually there will be 'no money' for fixing existing stuff either.
Diesel almost $2.30/l and 91 at $3/l and gst adjustment on April fools day next year is what is being offered to assist in this economic crisis that we all households face 🤮if that is as good as it is to gets to be “in it for you” labour has no idea what is happening outside the beltway that they operate within.
I suspect it's more to do with the way they see limits on the budget (ie they don't have any money either) as well as a a conservative positioning on how to win and election.
91 is $2.82 at Pak'n'Save Mt Albert this morning.
91 was $2.61 @ Waitomo Fuel in Bulls this AM.
A full charge of a BYD Atto4 BEV costs $17 and gives 440km and some change real world range.
It's well known that petrol costs get higher the further south, from the northern ports/sans refinery.
From Gaspy Z Silverdale $3.06.90 and $3.03.90 BP connect Silverdale. Those outside Auckland may have forgotten the Regional Fuel tax + GST. and these costs are current that we have to incur the costs TODAY, not wait almost 8 months for any respite from the F&V announcement.
https://www.transport.govt.nz/area-of-interest/revenue/regional-fuel-tax/#:~:text=Regional%20fuel%20tax%20comes%20into,2018%20until%2030%20June%202028.
Has National said they would end the 10 cent regional tax (2018-2028)?
National has no plan to manage inflation, apart from getting rid of the FPA and bringing in even more migrant workers, and be parsimonious on MW increases – all so less reward from economic profit is shared with labour). And also hold down pay levels for state sector workers (as they did 2008-2017) so there is no protection from their policy via tax paid jobs.
Otherwise it's just taking employment factors out the RB orbit, so there are higher levels of unemployment.
On the contrary. I live in Northland and travel to Auckland often.
Fuel prices are cheaper in Auckland so often, that we normally top up in Auckland.
The northern ports – WR/AK/TG ….
Possibly, I would notice Environment pieces on the TV News more..but IMO, there does seem to have been more lately….thought provoking, and even providing some well thought solutions, Newshub.
Of the 6 3-bedroom houses in our patch, 4 have no lawn. Easy care but where does the rain go?
Unfortunately, with the 50mm of topsoil over clay almost universal in NZ housing developments, the ability of grassed areas to drain rainfall is not much better than concrete.
Hi, not sure what part NZ you are. Some areas much more rain than others. If thats the case..probably just goes stormwater. With all the attendant problems. Including ageing/inadequate pipes/infrastructure.
Where I see the Sponge City has great merit. Much better (and more cost effective? ) to incorporate small wetland areas /gardens than majorly replacing old pipes.
As in other link i also very much liked that
It is all possible. We just need to do it. Would be great : )
No links here I note…. an opinion with no supporting data.
I think incrementalism is best used where it is best used…….no need to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Clearly there are times when a steady hand is needed and times when it is not the best approach.
The key is knowing which approach is best. For that we need people who don't have a fixed view 'incrementalism bad' but one that allows consideration of all the options
[TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]
The problem with both being a dick and having a go when you apparently don't understand moderation or kaupapa here, and doing that to someone who is also a moderator, is that you remind them of your own outstanding moderation that you haven't replied to.
To refresh your memory:
1. there is nothing wrong with expressing opinions here and not every opinion needs supporting data.
2. I spend a great deal of time in posts and comments explaining my thinking and providing supporting data
3. please now attend to this moderation. You're in premod until you do.
.https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-09-08-2023/#comment-1964285
Remind you of anything? Around 2014 for instance?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/13/marion-county-record-co-owner-joan-meyer-dies-kansas-police-raid
Oh dear. It didn't take very long for another Labour Party mistake to surface did it?
Was it Robertson or Hipkins who did the costing on their GST proposal and like so often they stuffed it up? Still, what's a quarter of a billion mistake between friends?
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/labour-forced-to-fix-gst-policy-after-240m-hole-found/3SGFFXMX4ZD4LFDZX2RSF47JX4/
1 April 2024 – 1 July 2024 not covered. Then, 1 July 2024 – 31 March 2025 1 July 2025 – 31 March 2026, rather than full years?
What sort of Machiavellian genius would do this? Someone who has ideas for raising revenue to cover this and more? Not all of them publicly ruled out … yet…
(Seymour $30B hole and Peters $20B hole have larger differences to overcome)
From the link posted @9 "Labour said it was only included in the first version of the policy document, which was sent to media before the announcement. It was not in the material that was released publicly after. The error was fixed on Sunday before that announcement, but not all media were advised of it.
“The correct cost of the GST policy has always been accounted for in our fiscals and was discussed in the media conference yesterday,” a spokesperson said.
“References to ‘holes’ or ‘uncosted’ by the Opposition are false.”
Sure. But even if one sticks to the mundane side of it, why send the wrong (exposing the original error) policy document to media before the release?
The explanation is in the quote.
No it aint. There is no explanation given for why the wrong document was sent out to media. Staff error, or deliberate exposure (of an earlier miscalculation in a policy document)?
'it was only included in the first version of the policy document, which was sent to media before the announcement. It was not in the material that was released publicly after. The error was fixed on Sunday before that announcement, but not all media were advised of it'
"Labour said it was only included in the first version of the policy document, which was sent to media before the announcement. It was not in the material that was released publicly after. The error was fixed on Sunday before that announcement, but not all media were advised of it.
“The correct cost of the GST policy has always been accounted for in our fiscals and was discussed in the media conference yesterday,” a spokesperson said.
“References to ‘holes’ or ‘uncosted’ by the Opposition are false.”
But Sir John's digs are undamaged.
/
Chris Turnbull
@EnemyInAState
Hawaii crisis: resident reveals the shocking truth of devastation being ignored by the media: 'There's hundreds, at least 600, if not thousands of people who are dead in the streets, floating in the ocean'
https://twitter.com/EnemyInAState/status/1690849170314170368
I think that John Key's statement on the subject is a great deal better than your own.
"Sir John Key has conveyed profound sorrow regarding the wildfires that are devastating large areas of Maui, a place where his family has owned a home for a decade and a half.
Expressing his sentiments, Key shared, “The situation is incredibly disheartening, as our hearts go out to the island’s inhabitants. The scale of destruction and loss of life is heart-wrenching, and the impact on people’s livelihoods is truly distressing,” as he spoke to Stuff.".
Do you really feel that this tragedy is suitable only for your bitter comments?
https://www.propertynoise.co.nz/sir-john-keys-maui-home-close-to-devastating-fires/
It ain't bitterness, sport, it's a visceral loathing of the smarmy prick.
Big congrats to the New Zealand Over 40 team who just took out First at the World Waka Ama Champs in Samoa a few minutes ago. Shoutout to Bryce.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/300948132/damien-grant-will-national-and-acts-strained-relationship-hurt-their-election-chances
""Act want to put a grenade in education and walk away
According to grant, it'd be nice of reporters dig deep an explained exactly what this means, is privatization?