After the Nats have poached and heavily diluted some of the major Labour policies I feel it would be a political suicide for Labour to go forward into the election campaign with the policy of raising the retirement age. That’s something that the Nats will be scaremongering the general public with in the election campaign, and a certain put off for many of would-be Labour voters.
The accent should be on eliminating child poverty, raising benefits, creating jobs, better housing, protecting the environment etc etc, everything that Nats are NOT even bothered with.
Just my humble opinion, of course.
Lolz, and we are back to the super discussion again, i would have put the question to David Cunliffe in His post the other day, But, to point out what i see as the affordability of superannuation going forward in terms of what GDP in terms of dollars will be in 30 years time based upon the GDP growth in dollar terms for the previous thirty years,(ie going back to 1980), would have taken a comment half a kilometer long,
The debate the other day on Open Mike on the same subject where i pointed out that IF the numbers of those collecting super in the next 30 years will double,(the ACT position), THEN, GDP in dollar terms would have to double in that 30 year period, my projection based on the past 30 years of GDP growth in dollar terms has it doing near enough to achieving that doubling,(with a shortfall in the Government’s tax and spend of that GDP in dollar terms of $150 million dollars annually, a mere pfft in terms of that spend),and that takes no account of the monies currently being earned by the Cullen fund,
However, Lprent with a counter view points out that while that cohort of over 65’s doubles statistics show that the number of those paying taxes drops dramatically which brings into the discussion a valid point that i had not up to that point thought about,
At present the immigration figures are showing those population projections to be incorrect, BUT, this may or may not be a temporary blip where immigration is up a third of its projected rise,
SO, while sticking to my projection that GDP in dollar terms will have doubled in 30 years time as it did in the previous 30 years, as how many hundred thousand taxpayers fled the country, i have to insert a large TAIHO into my thinking around the affordability of superannuation based upon the estimation that the numbers of taxpayers will also fall as the numbers of superannuants rises,
What we need do tho is carefully consider the history of both tax cuts and the raising of the age of superannuation, first we had Sir Roger,(spit), Douglas tax cuts, then we had cuts to superannuation via raising the age of entitlement, Next, Working For Families, followed BY, tax cuts,
All of that simply looks to me that we are taking from the aged to give to the middle class and the rich, take out tax cuts, working for families and tax cuts and what have you got, affordable superannuation perhaps….
Too complex. Also, once you strip out the financial sector casinos, real global GDP is flat to declining IMO, and it will get worse over the next 10 years as resource and energy depletion bites harder and harder.
A far simpler response is: why can NZ happily afford foreign banks and corporates stripping us out of $10B a year, but somehow we can’t afford NZ super?
Also – note that Labour has left the door open to raising the super age up OVER 67. My belief is that they have examined UK etc raising it to 70 and they think that they WILL go there at some stage.
“..A far simpler response is: why can NZ happily afford foreign banks and corporates stripping us out of $10B a year, but somehow we can’t afford NZ super?..”
A far simpler response is: why can NZ happily afford foreign banks and corporates stripping us out of $10B a year, but somehow we can’t afford NZ super?
We can’t. Interestingly enough Piketty makes that point (not overtly though) as he points out that countries with large foreign ownership are poorer than they should be.
Also – note that Labour has left the door open to raising the super age up OVER 67. My belief is that they have examined UK etc raising it to 70 and they think that they WILL go there at some stage.
Yep, wouldn’t be surprised. Still, a UBI would allow those that wish to work on to do so while also allowing those that don’t/can’t to ‘retire’.
Too complex CV, what is so complex about the above that it cannot be understood, its fairly simple to project the past 30 years of GDP in dollar terms onto the next 30 years as an estimate of what that GDP growth will be,(what other means is there??? a crystal ball perhaps),
Lprent’s point made the other day in a discussion on the same topic is also valid with a question mark over the accuracy or other of population projections,
i am amused by talk of resource and energy depletion because IF such depletion were to become a fact then superannuation AND everything else Government does using the current financial system is definitely unaffordable,
As far as following the leader goes up to the age of 70 for superannuation goes i think that that’s a ‘given’, as i point out above, tax cuts, raising the age of entitlement, working for families, tax cuts again,simply transfers the monies that were there from the aged to the middle class and the rich which would in my opinion more than suggest that super at 60 was affordable all the time,
Politically i am still doing a head scratch, even as a government i fail to see how Labour can change the Legislation without the support of a gleeful National which again in my opinion can only be seen as a request from Labour to become a permanent Party of 20%…
its fairly simple to project the past 30 years of GDP in dollar terms onto the next 30 years as an estimate of what that GDP growth will be
What kind of estimate is that? Is it an estimate which understands that there has been a massive secular change in the nature of the economy and the next 30 years is going to be unbelievably harder than the last 30 years?
In the late 1990’s the price of a barrel of oil, the energy source which our entire civilisation depends upon like a cokehead depends on his next hit of coke to get up out of bed, was US$15/barrel. A typical NZ worker could, using a weeks take home pay, buy say 30 barrels of crude oil.
Today Brent is quoted at US$105/barrel and a typical NZ worker can buy just 5-6 barrels of crude oil using a weeks take home pay.
The message being – as the energy our entire global civilisation runs on becomes unaffordable, things are going to change, for the worse, for most people. Trying to use the last 30 years of “growth” to estimate what is going to happen in this new environment – that’s not going to work.
CV, i will get back to this, BUT, you simply fail to understand what i said in my first comment,
My calculation of GDP growth from the past 30 years spanned 1980 to 2012, so YES that calculation of GDP growth in dollar terms took into account the rising cost of oil, the switch from sheep farming to dairy, the share-market crash of 1989, and any other catastrophe you can think of real or imagined that occurred in those three decades…
My question again is by what other device is there to measure expected GDP, growth or otherwise, its either the historical record or a crystal ball, with all due respect you appear to be using the crystal ball…
I would argue that trying to measure expected GDP for the next thirty years is a fools errand whether you’re using historical records or a crystal ball. Economies are not something like climate that can be so readily projected.
Really Mac, what exactly is unreliable about it, i dont predict steady GDP growth at all, i simply say that across a 3 decade period GDP will double in dollar terms,
Oil costs are a red herring please shove them some place the sun don’t shine, across a 30 year time-scale the song, titled in this case GDP growth remains much the same, does just that…
Mac, masturbating here at the Standard is at the least unseemly, you should really indulge your propensity in a quiet private space, IF you think i am wrong in my use of the data from multi decades of economic growth then fucking prove it otherwise fuck off and wah wah wah in someone else’s ear,
Best read the reply to that plonker you have in the tag team with you tonight first tho i would suggest…
So when you say “double in 30 years”, your margin for error is at least 65% of the original value, possibly before you even include inflation (of which a large factor is energy costs, i.e. oil)?
Looking at my GDP link, in the last 30 years real GDP doubled. In the 30 years before that, it trebled.
With that amount of variation, in 30 years time it might treble again or be flat.
Pfft ”read the link you put up”, Pfft again, The Treasury’s story of the NZ economy for 10 year olds, perfect for your level of intelligence obviously,
Oh and your last wee smidgen of an argument, no matter where in the time series you measure from across any 30 year period GDP in terms of dollars has at least doubled,
In no 30 year period in the data series has GDP flatlined, no matter which year you begin the measurement, SO, your argument is spurious.
That is a Fact, introducing the notion into the debate that the economy might flatline is a red herring, a diversion, a strawman, the nit scratching of an idea of one determined to win an argument based on nothing but ”you thunk it”…
oh, and even besides all that, by your logic (65% off is good enough), you’d claim that your “doubled in 30 years” prediction came true if it only increased by a third in that time.
IF child my figures were 65% off on the negative side you would have some sort of point to make,(i would gauge that my figures in dollar terms for GDP are 20% off at most on the positive side where my data series starts at 1954 and ends at 1974, only a 20 year period),
What you can’t grasp, possibly because your dunces cap is jammed elsewhere other than on your swede, is the difference in there being higher growth, ie positive, across any particular comparison of thirty year periods than a doubling,
If across any thirty year comparison the GDP growth was not at least doubled you would have a point to make, even in the simpletons graph of your link, can you see a period where GDP growth flatlined,
In no 30 year period in the data series has GDP flatlined, no matter which year you begin the measurement, SO, your argument is spurious.
Oh, indeed, for average zero growth over 30 years it would require a true calamity, something Mayan/Rapanui/Carthaginian in scale. In it’s very short existence NZ has never faced a calamity that bad.
But then we’d need something like massive climate change, resource depletion, and maybe a pandemic caused by mass refugee mobilisation, for a calamity to have such long term devastation. I don’t think a triple king-hit like that is particularly likely, but it’s within some folks’ actual sciencey predictions.
But have fun pulling shit numbers out of your arse.
And it’s amazing that people still view increases in GDP as a relentlessly positive thing. Higher GDP means more resource usage. Building more prisons increases GDP. Leveraging the financial sector to create more debt, more derivatives and more asset bubbles increases GDP.
I mean, WTF.
If the Left cannot communicate a vision of what kind of society and economy it is going to build for the nation it will be left with nothing more than trying to sell in the same language of the neoliberal right.
”Please provide data”, actually Gallstone, just this once i will humor you, if you consider that my calculations so far are wrong, then i would suggest that it is YOU who should get off of His wanking arse and prove such instead of sitting there going poo poo and ”please provide data” like the massah boss you imagine your self to be,
GDP by Volume:
1954 = 20.59
1984 =53.79
Doubled and then some, in terms of dollars, ok,
GDP in Billions/Dollars
1954 =$2.415
1974* =$5.300
*this data series for GDP growth in billions of dollars stopped in 1974.
Prove the point Gallstone, both by volume and by billions of dollars between the years 1954 and 1984 it is more than obvious that just like in the years 1980 to 2012 GDP at least doubled in both data sets,
i have produced the data for the years 1980 to 2012 previously here at the Standard, if you want to look, be my guest, go fetch,
The source for the data 1954–1984 and 1954–1974* =
i would show you the relevant GNI figures where in 1949 you can times the 1.101 billions by 10 and be 10 odd billion off the 1979 figure then times the 1979 figure by 10 and be that same 10 odd billion off of the 2009 figures but i don’t want to confuse someone that i consder probably has trouble standing upright in anything but the gentlest of breezes…
Oh good god. That’s genuinely so bad I don’t know where to start. There are so many assumptions and underlying issues (McFlock covered a few) that I just can’t even follow why you think this works. There so much variation that your “model” doesn’t take into account and the numbers themselves hardly form a pattern in of itself without the margin of error, lack of taking into account inflation, so on.
And once again, you just throw out a chorus of personal attacks to hide the fragility of the argument.
I tell you what, Bad. You believe what you want, kid. I won’t be responding. Someone slap me if I do.
Agree about the stripping out of money and we need to stop it ASAP – we have massive foreign debts to repay as well as super education etc, etc.
As far as raising the super age and making kiwisaver compulsory I really don’t think these are things for one shot electioneering promises. We need a rational look at the effects of these policies who wins and loses and how we balance them against other economic needs. And how to future proof them against further right wing governments.
And lastly if this is likely to lose the elction then don’t. Otherwise there will be no super ever for anybody or anything else for that matter.
The current Labour hierarchy are willing to sacrifice 2% to 3% of the votes in order to be seen as “fiscally responsible”. IMO it is electoral suicide. Making people stay in the work force longer when there is already too little employment for them.
National will start making hay on this during the TV debates; their polling will have told them that Labour supporters hate the policy.
CV Too true. Don’t need a crystal ball. They are thinking like 1980’s twerps. They dropped us into it then and even if they get elected it will just be a case of equality amongst the masses, spreading the unhappiness further than before so the olders can suffer too. Instead of concentrating on holding the costs down for super, with ideas coming from the mature interested as well as academics and specialists. It would be good if Labour could investigate what ideas socially advanced academics have produced and countries considered.
Labour has become a Party that sees people as problems to be administered to I think. Instead of the idea once held, that people were active participants building the country and their lives. Now they are dropouts, low productivity units, deadbeat dads and feckless mothers.
This housing idea, where is the innovative self-help thing of the past, I’m thinking sweat equity schemes. Why can’t unemployed men and women be interviewed for skills suitable to join teams building simple houses for themselves and others, with a registered builder with teaching ability in charge of each team. Those who have the ability could go straight into the job of making a home for themselves and short-cutting an official apprenticeship. There could be cul de sac developments with a common garden ready to cope with the hard times ahead. Houses built around a square with a shared playpark with each house having an entry gate. Kilburn in London had this design in some of its planning.
As for the middle aged and future old age pension needs and the age going to 67 and probably 70 which I am sure the deadheads in Labour are considering. First stop elevating it by calling it superannuation which is gentrifying it. It is a pension, something that is a boon, to be proud of not to be ashamed of – a proper part of a modern society. (A rose by any other name, smells as sweet.)
One of my relations has had an eventful life and is still reasonably young. First husband abandoned her with two wee children in Oz. Husband died. She remarried to widower with children in NZ. Brought the lot up well. Got sick, virus killed a kidney, kept control of condition, took antibiotics for a year till hospital rostered her for removing the dead tissue. Looking after family all the time, fairly tired and unwell then.
Husband got cancer, prolonged life spending all their savings on expensive imported drug, till government helped. He died. She has to work but with irregular hours in retail and on roster that she accesses on computer which system sometimes fails then she drives to workplace to see if she is to work that day. Hours fluctuate. Sometimes she works late, gets up at 4 am cleans for 2 hours, and has a short break then starts work at 9 am at other job. Can only just survive. Helps her children and grandchildren, and ailing mother. She will be worn out by 65.
It’s not only men in physical work who work hard and need to retire. And single people who don’t have the advantage of another wage from a partner, and another person to share the jobs of household management with, they can have difficulties. If they are women they may have been on low wages all their lives, possibly 70 to 80 per cent of what men of the same age receive.
+100…and another winner for Labour would be to STOP legislation allowing foreigners buying up traditional New Zealand houses!…this would be a winner for Labour!..(it will be a winner for Winnie and the Greens)
….NACT and their wealthy mates rather than STOP this artificial shortage of housing due to allowing foreigners to buy( which amounts to betrayal against New Zealanders ) ….wants young New Zealanders and returning New Zealanders and those is state houses in prime positions….to be artificially costed out of the traditional housing market and forced into yet to be built trashy new high rises in new subdivisions
…NACT and their wealthy mates want ordinary New Zealanders relegated to the new slums while foreigners and their wealthy mates buy New Zealand heritage housing and ancestral homes built on the work and taxes of their forebears….its a disgrace!
( it is not allowed elsewhere in other countries around the world)
I think we need to stop calling welfare “benefits”. We need to change both how people see people on welfare and how the people on welfare see themselves. We need to see the funding going to welfare as an investment in our countries future that over time will produce positive results.
Of course, that’s going to mean changing “unemployment” to education. People should either be in formal employment or training. There should be no unemployment with people shifting between jobs should be classified as shifting between jobs and not unemployed.
“I think we need to stop calling welfare “benefits”.
Ain’t that the truth! +100
Ekshly calling them benifits is nothing further from a truth.
(I would comment further, but right about now I’m trying to cope with a Mora – that nicest, most magnanimos man on Earth – all of a sudden feigning concern because some recidivist has copped an outrageoud fine of $15K). They don’t seem to like it when the defendant is one of their ilk. I wonder if the guy got legal aid too!
Thank Christ there’s now only one hour of the nicest man of Earth. Poor man! – give him a Subway Egg Roll
“The accent should be on eliminating child poverty, raising benefits, creating jobs, better housing, protecting the environment etc etc, everything that Nats are NOT even bothered with.”
Would you not get this result (sort of) by recommending everyone vote Greens/Mana? Then since a small percentage of those who promise to do so would actually do so, you’d have a chance of a coalition that held Labour to the “traditional” (sort of) values they once stood for? Not that I encourage anyone to vote. It’s a bit sad reading stuff here about people wishing Labour would miraculously morph into something other than what they’ve careful and purposely become over the past few decades. All within months of an election. Illusions die hard, hope even harder, but it looks like red or blue pill time.
Personally, I’d recommend people do nothing, don’t vote. With luck the National party will be re-interred, with an added ACT element – the best chaos factor I could hope for – and then finally people would have the last of the stupid colonial/aspirational/feudal/entitlement attitudes beaten the hell out of them, they’ll see themselves as the fucking animals they are and have to decide to continue to be so, or really truly take a first hand interest in each other as humans. Let’s be honest, no one on this site is going to feel any real pain, just the theoretical/sympathetic kind. I’m close enough to the line I could become homeless under that sort of regime, but I still have an internet connection, how poor am I really? Most of the others commenting here sounds like they come from a nice and comfy place to me, employers, self employed, some even openly admit it. We’ll get over it, the “collateral damage” and such, just like our heroes in Labour got over Rogernomics and the like.
The Labour Party isn’t the solution to NZ’s problems, change the leader all you like, demand harder or softer lines on this or that policy, split hairs and put this or that off till after this or that. No difference. Until people get hit with reality it’s all hot air. It’s the system that’s screwed, the way people relate to each other, they way people believe themselves to be, or worse, believe they could be.
Don’t wail too much for the real poor. Right now they are surviving under worse conditions than those that make the papers or pop songs. They’re good at surviving, better at it than you or me, better people than you or me. If they died of disease or starvation, or suicide, or in pain from lack of medical attention, they’d die better people than you or me. They’re there because we believe in a broken system. First easy step for everyone here to help the poor? Stop thinking Labour is coming on a big fucking white horse. They are big fucking white whores.
Oh there’s a big difference between Labour and National alright, and while myself, being one of the poor you claim do not comment here am not enamored of large amounts of Labour policy, Personally there is one HUGE difference,
Under Labour i do not expect nor receive sweet FA above the miserable amount that makes up the calculation of inflation on the dollar amount of my benefit(long-term), i expect to then get left alone to cope the best i can without having the ”rug” whipped out from under my feet, ie, Labour is unlikely to send some muppet with a doctors degree along to tell me i am now fit for work when previously 3,4, or 5 of them in the past ten years have stamped my file ”Fucked”,
National of course will happily do this, changing the rules continually leaving every beneficiary in my position, and there are 10’s of 1000’s of us, continually looking over our shoulders wondering (a) when the doctors in charge will get round to us with their ”new” rules, or (b), a real fucking loony in the form of a Nick Smith will find us ”undeserving” to be housed in affordable conditions, and if He will start this ”progrom” upon those over 60 and those wheelchair bound,(which i am neither of), then He sure as hell will gleefully toss my arse out into the street,
As for your plea for us not to vote, i will use the short form of conversation to describe my feelings, FUCK OFF dickwad that idea is just DUMB…
“Personally, I’d recommend people do nothing, don’t vote.”
And look what happened last time Aux, in 2011, when we had our poorest turnout in decades, life only got worse for so many people.
I’m not coming from a nice comfy place that you speak of above – although I do have a good house to live in, that’s all, and that could be gone soon, my circumstances are that fragile – my outcomes could be completely different under a different govt from this one so why on earth would I not vote? Why would I abstain from voting when there is a chance things can improve? I’d have to be a sadist not to vote.
You may view our system as broken and that we need a complete societal collapse to wake us up but there’s not many of us who have the luxury of imagining that scenario. We have to do real things like agitate, demonstrate and VOTE.
What we do have is the benefit of the MMP system and we can vote for the people that represent us, (and you refer the Greens and Mana above) I don’t think people are assuming that Labour will automatically solve all our problems.
Would you really prefer a complete disaster via a Nat coalition getting back in for another three years over a return to at least some semblance of sanity via a Left coalition?
Furthermore Aux, consider those who might be reading your comment are have come to our country to live, to escape a regime they were living under where they couldn’t vote because they lived under a military dictatorship, or can only vote in sham elections, or they lost loved ones who died fighting for the right to a vote and to live in a fully functioning democracy.
Life is more shit for them than for us and they would probably feel quite cynical towards those who suggest people don’t vote when they have the opportunity to participate in the legitimate choosing of their government. I think your statement is a little bit “first world problems” perhaps.
Ya know bad, one thing that really gets my goat, more than river bank/beneath the bridge dwellers is those that for a variety of reasons say “don’t vote”.
Aux’s reason is that a non vote will push a disaster upon us that he/she believes will “wake the people” and a fairer system will be restored. That is some fanciful dream. And if the last six years experience hasn’t “awakened the people” then we are so stupid as to have “The I.Q of a fence post” to quote Tom Waits.
Other reasons you hear are “You can’t trust politicians” or “They’re as bad as each other” – That last sentence is reserved for those that haven’t twigged on to the fact that we left our FPP voting system behind ages ago.
It’s just petulant self indulgent talk – they see political people and parties as not living up to their unrealistic expectations, so they dismiss them.
Again well put Rosie, one thing the commenter above did get right is our ability on the bottom of the financial heap to adjust, to make ends meet, having done so again with this National government having a go at me through the ”tax switch” doesn’t make me any happier,
the disaster the commenter above talks of largely ocurs out of sight and therefor out of mind, (i don’t ‘know’ if the kids down the street are going to school hungry and i am hardly going to ask their mum such questions),
The disaster of the current politics doesn’t occur in any one year, in the vein of death by a thousand cuts such disasters occur over multi-generations cleverly hisden with the averaged or mediumed figures for incomes and costs of housing,
In many respects it is the disaster of a slow motion holocaust,(and i don’t use the terms lightly), i seen an article, i think in the Herald, the other day which pointed out the suicidal tendencies imposed upon those who are made unemployed,(i was surprised that this still occurs), this holocaust has been occurring across a 40 year time span as apposed to the 4–5 years of the real one,
Lolz i think i said enough in the above comment about the ”do not vote” idea, if anything should be compulsory in this world my opinion is that participating in Democracy once every 3 years should be…
Well said Rosie. All I would add is that the “All politicians lie, so you’d be naive to trust them” line gets used by the RWNJs a lot. It benefits Key and co to spread that one about, since it muddies the waters. That way when they are caught out in this week’s lying BS dodgy dealing, a large number of 6 o’clock news watchers will just shrug their shoulders and their eyes will glaze over a little more.
Anyone who thinks not voting is an option is a first class moron who doesn’t understand how democracy works and presumably wants another term for National
Proposing to raise the retirement age is the one policy that is so bad it makes me seriously question why Labour would want to lose this election. Are they so scared of Mana and Green having any influence that they would rather leave the governing benches with NAct?
There will be ample time for reflection and reports on super after the election, the urgent matter is getting out the vote and denying John Phillip Shonkey a further term. It is vital that the Labour Party drops the earnest, brownie points approach to super. These tory swine play for keeps, send Key back to Hawaii first.
Key knows what the bourgeois economists and funds are saying about the affordability of super. His line is about opportunism not integrity given that he has lied about so many other things. Why this apparent outbreak of wanting to be trusted on his word? There are votes in it. Thousands of late 50s early 60s people will vote National on keeping super at 65. Partly because of the lack of a UBI and the realities of a low wage economy and battling WINZ.
Labour just needs to say anyone that genuinely needs super from 60 on for health, financial or personal reasons can get it upon application, and those that don’t can go on a sliding schedule till they do.
Thousands of late 50s early 60s people will vote National on keeping super at 65. Partly because of the lack of a UBI and the realities of a low wage economy and battling WINZ.
Thousands of those above 65 who won’t be affected by Labour’s plans, absolutely hate the idea of raising the super age on their own children and grand children, and vote against Labour – or stay at home from the polls.
They can, of course, vote for Mana, Greens or Alliance even. As far as I know, there’s only two parties suggesting raising the retirement age – Labour and Act and that latter should tell Labour just how bad that policy is.
To reverse their position would make Labour look untrustworthy and voters will just think, “do they think we’re stupid?, they’ll do it anyway once they get elected”.
Really, dumb stuff from the red team.
Super is one of those policies you deal with on the way out, not on the way in.
Key has little stomach for genuine cross party handling of super so it would indicate status quo for a while longer but what the hell, climate change will make super rather irrelevant anyway, but not before September 20.
You may have hit on an answer Tiger. Labour could announce a policy on Superannuation thus:
“When in Government Labour Greens will enter into cross party talks to determine a forward path to protect the integrity of Superannuation.
All Parties will participate with an open agenda.
Any refusal to participate in good faith will be regarded as an insult to present and to future Superannuants.”
Mr Key exPM will respond how?
Key has stated National is not touching super, why would he want to enter into some sort of
“bi-partisan/multi-party group/’commission’? ”
The way Key probably thinks is that you shouldn’t have to work beyond 65, instead of forcing people to spend very waking second of their life working, try and grow the economy so people can still retire at 65 and the country can still afford it.
“instead of forcing people to spend very waking second of their life working, try and grow the economy so people can still retire at 65 and the country can still afford it.”
i doubt that fits into keys world view in even a tiny way – hes neocon from top to toe
one idea weve chucked about at home is based around the idea that raising the retirement age also locks younger people out of the workforce (potentially)
so – our idea went,
if they raise the age for getting super you could still receive it at 65 with no penalty or reduction, on the condition you did x amount of hours (10? 20?) of voluntary work either with an existing org or with the ability to start your own. (Bearing in mind the voluntary work doesnt need to be physical work – it could be mentoring, helping out with basic office work etc etc)
The “mens shed” projects come to mind here
this way we would not straight away financially penalise workers who have had very physical jobs, put more money and/or resources into local communities, give charities (existing or yet to be created) some much needed help and free up some positions in the job force. It would probably have physical and mental health benefits for the retiree in there as well
its just a lose idea and it wouldnt work for everyone, plus im sure theres problems with it that i havent seen yet
@BM..”To reverse their position would make Labour look untrustworthy and voters will just think, “do they think we’re stupid?”
on the contrary …voters will think Labour has listened to the people and bowed to their will and made a sensible decision…many Labour people are worn out at 65 and need that super at the younger age( especially Polynesian men who die at a younger age)…
… better to pay for the 65 super by axing some of those new motorways…which we dont need anyway
Poor BM…….he’s hoping like hell Labour DOESN’T change tack on the super age. So like the rusty old right wing bugle he is he squawks on about genies and bottles. Squawking to himself again like some emeritus professor of self soothing. Blowhard Man. Still uses Brylcreem.
With compulsory kiwisaver Labour can drop the vote loosing idea of raising the retirement age .
As kiwisaver is guaranteed payment at 65.
What KiwiSaver? Oh you mean the KiwiSaver which relies on you having employment for life, and which relies on the international financial casino giving you back your money when you retire?
“which relies on the international financial casino giving you back your money when you retire?”
yep. Maybe people should think about why they don’t like to invest in the sharemarkets (i.e. they don’t trust the arseholes which operate in it) yet are happy to pile it into Kiwisaver which invests in sharemarkets. Answer – people don’t think enough. Watch for the whole lot to go up in smoke in the future ….
Wall St stole billions from US pension funds and 401K plans over the last 5 years, with the help of their accomplices the credit ratings agencies who marked the junk which was being sold on as “AAA”.
It’s a major reason why so many of these worker retirement schemes are now “underfunded.”
Throughout history mankind seems to have always tried for the money for nothing that comes from interest and shareholding. People don’t seem to realise that that money still comes from work and use of resources.
And of course, for those people who decide that maybe they don’t trust Kiwisaver and want to save for their own retirement in other ways, perhaps getting creative?
Oh, Labour will just force them to contribute to the fund unless you fall into what we regard as being allowed to be exempt.
comment@whoar..ed:..gee..!..guess what..?..the british tories also have a cash-for-access ‘cabinet-club’…who’dathunkit..?..eh..? – paid-for dinners-with-the-p.m. – and all..)
..the stench of tory-corruption..both here and there…
Laugh out loud material this morning on RadioNZ National as that radio station makes a grovelling abject apology for its treatment of Winston Peters yesterday,
Twice so far this morning they have broadcast the same apology to Peters, i am not sure who the voice doing the ”grovel” is but Winston should have insisted that ‘the spinner’ Espiner was forced to personally grovel on air…
…….. “a serious departure from RNZ standards” ……. “should not have been aired” ….. etc
Do you think Espiner will get the message that it’s not all about him and his ego?
yes i really enjoyed hearing those apologies ….but i still think the pants should be sued off Espiner et al…it was a serious attempt by National Radio to knee cap Winston Peters and undermine his credibility
…the NACTs have tried and done it before …it makes anything Peters says thereafter seem like lies or hypocrisy….when in fact Winston Peters is one of John Key /NACTS most able and effective critics…both in the House and out in public
Radio New Zealand has done damage to a very effective opposition politician and imo more than an apology is required!
Espiner knew very well that Horan’s accusations were highly likely to be motivated by malice …but he encouraged them instead of stopping him …he broadcasted them to the nation with energy and support….at very least Espiner shopuld go and be replaced by a better journalist
Agreed – Espiner has ruined Morning Report! His wheedling, whiny voice and needling and vindictive manner are a disgrace and so off-putting! And how long did it take him to destroy the goodwill and esteem that Geoff Robinson had built up over decades for that show?? About 5 minutes!
Anybody who incurs a high level of risk of a big suck out of an employer’s bank account should be shown the door shouldn’t they? Surely his contract provides for termination if he brings a big legal case down on the employer through his own possible inadequacy??
Or is termination only for litttle people doing little things.
“you can’t make much difference to migration numbers ” Bill English
The housing boom has meant good profits for many New Zealand companies supplying
materials and building services, but it implies investors would rather invest in their country’s
homes rather than its businesses (Bollard 2005). The high returns for property has attracted
finance and reduced the capital available for productive investment (Moody, 2006). The
consequence is investment is going in to industries with limited capacity to increase per capita
incomes. For example, real estate and building are domestically bound and do not have the
market potential of export industries. They also have less opportunity to increase productivity
through new processes and products. The irony is, as these sectors grow, they have incurred
skills shortages which in turn has increased demand for skilled immigrants. The Department
of Statistics ‘Long Term Skill Shortage List’ of 28/3/2006 includes carpenter/joiner, plumber,
electricians, fitter and turners, fitter welders; all indicative of a nation building its
construction/property sector.
There is a danger that a sector of the economy is being augmented that is totally reliant on a
small domestic economy. Not only do these industries have limited potential for per-capita
growth but ‘deriving growth via factor inputs such as labour places pressure on infrastructure
such as transport and land supply, and ultimately have a further negative impact on growth
(ARC 2005). Finally, as the sector gets larger, it gains in lobbying/political strength and can
lobby for immigration regardless if it is the best interests of the economy as a whole. This
could be seen in Canada where the development industry has lobbied hard for high sustained
immigration levels (Ley and Tutchener 2001).
Dr Greg Clydesdale Growing Pains
National must know it is vulnerable hear, it’s all in this treasury report.
you are a free thinker phillip….an artisan…just that not everyone appreciates your art …but i like it ( i cant understand why people get uptight about dots)
Language and communicate does evolve, yes. And just like in evolution itself, some times a style/gene emerges that no one thinks has a benefit and it quickly dies.
More than 90 per cent of rental properties in a nationwide survey have failed a ”warrant of fitness” (WOF) check.
About 140 rentals across Christchurch, Auckland, Tauranga, Wellington and Dunedin were given the once-over by home assessment experts earlier this year…
… About 94 per cent of the 144 houses inspected did not pass at least one of the 31 checklist items, but the majority failed on only a handful.
The trial found 36 per cent would pass all of the draft WOF criteria with “just a few minor and inexpensive fixes”, such as installing smoke alarms or adjusting hot-water temperatures.
The WOF looked at weather tightness, insulation, ventilation, lighting, heating, the condition of appliances and general building safety.
It looks as if this is something good landlords could manage without too much fuss.
Paulus (2,355 comments) says:
May 16th, 2014 at 8:38 am
What a pity Guyon Espiner is this morning – he was pathetic trying to show his true socialist colours.
It was funny to listen to his reverse questions beginning “Don’t you think……” to find that the people he was trying to influence said the opposite of what he was trying to get them to say. Rather sad really as I am sure he is very well paid.
Mind you his voice pitch is too high – he need lessons – should try Linda Clark as she obviously has time on her hands, and she can teach him to use his voice properly – forgetting what she says though.
I really think that despite his best intentions his use of the language is very poor – I am sure he is educated, but not in the use of English language.
Susi Ferguson is better but she goes off at a tangent too often trying to put her views together. Susi – stick to the subject.
Furthermore, if we look at the historical record, it does not appear that capital mobility has been the primary factor promoting convergence of rich and poor nations. None of the Asian countries that have moved closer to the developed countries of the West in recent years has benefited from large foreign investments, whether it be Japan, South Korea or Taiwan and more recently China. In essence, all of these countries themselves financed the necessary investments in physical capital and, even more, in human capital, which the latest research holds to be the key to long-term growth.Conversely, countries owned by other countries, whether in the colonial period or in Africa today, have been less successful, most notably because they have tended to specialize in areas without much prospect of future development and because they have been subject to chronic political instability.
Piketty, Capital in 21st Century.
All of that comes after he points out that countries with massive foreign ownership have incomes below their productivity. So, there you have it – foreign ownership is bad for a country and isn’t needed anyway. It causes poverty and specialisation (can anyone say ‘farming’?) which reduces development.
I was reading discussions yesterday about foreigners buying houses where free trade was invoked. That lead me to a speech in the House of Commons where the Conservative speaker said that the foriegn investors “financed” the countries building. There has to be something wrong when a country can’t pay for it’s own land a construction. http://economicsnz.blogspot.co.nz/2014/04/bad-economics-and-contemptible-politics.html
Buildings in a country are always built using local material. This means that the foreign currency doesn’t pay for anything. All that needs to be done is the government to create the money and spend it on the collection of the resources, the processing of the resources and then the building of the buildings.
This money would then be taken out of the economy via taxes and charges. Absolutely no need for foreign currency at all.
Tax debt totals $6 billion, while welfare debt is about $1b
Tax debtors get off more lightly. Inland Revenue is more likely to negotiate with debtors and collect core tax, and write off penalties and interest.
Between July 1, 2011, and June 2012, Inland Revenue wrote off nearly 50 per cent of interest and penalties applied to overdue tax, amounting to $374 million.
It wrote off $435m in core debt, reflecting 11.6 per cent of collectable debt.
MSD wrote off $8.7m in core debt, or 2.1 per cent of collectable debt.
This government is giving the rich a lot more that the $1.2b in tax cuts. It is letting them off on paying all their taxes!
Well put, i believe that there is also a ”novel” means in play at the moment where those in ”Bizz” via the tax lawyers have been given a ”new tool” with which to legally?? avoid payments of due taxation,
The current 800 million dollar shortfall in the projected tax rate would more than suggest this, although the prior sacking of half the staff from inland revenue’s provincial offices cannot be totally discounted as the precursor to a large amount of this avoidance of payment of due taxation,(hopefully the next Government bolsters those employment numbers immediately upon election),
Considering the sloth at which it has taken various governments to address the ability of those owning rental properties to write off income including wages against losses they incur on such properties it will probably be a decade at least befor the current ”new” rort is discovered,(but it is being looked for),
A faster route to such a discovery would i suggest,(tongue in cheek), involve someone like SSLands, who gives the appearance of being a minor bean-counter for a firm of tax lawyers, a surgical operating dolly, straps, wiring, and a device that conveys electrical charge,
Mr Speaker – if a budget is about how we set out our priorities and outline the financial strategies to achieve those priorities, then we must be strong enough to identify the important ones, courageous enough to allocate the money needed to achieve them, and then unwavering in our determination to realise them. Those priorities define what kind of society it is we want, and the resources we dedicate to them in a budget are an expression of our commitment to achieving them.
Yeah well received here from Hone, a stark contrast to the speech of the Maori Party leader who incredibly claimed responsibility for the previous Labour/Green home insulation policy,(such an insult put my tv on the endangered species list and my blood pressure on the danger line),
Flavell, soon to be unseated we pray, started His budget speech with a bout of me me me me….
Drinnan says TV3 has buckled somewhat re-using Linda Clark as an election commentator. He agrees she should be more up front up the political clients she works for. But isn’t that the same for Hooton, and not to mention some right wing bloggers used as political commentators?
‘I don’t work for any political clients’…. only a select few.
‘I don’t work for any political clients’….solely individuals who wish to make profit at all costs….and if this involves donating and spending a whole lot of time lobbying (read ‘wining and dining’) with members of the two parties that most supports their self interest….this doesn’t make them ‘political’ …this makes them ‘following their self interest’ …this is simply ‘business people’ following ‘common business practices’.
You just dismissed a whole lot of people who have no political clout, conduct no political activity apart from them perhaps voting once every 3 years by your comment there and there are a whole lot of people in that category.
Exceltium’s speciality is engaging with the political process – at central and local government level and right across the political spectrum – to assist commercial clients in achieving their commercial objectives.
What is this statement saying Matty. You don’t work (just sit and collect money for nothing) or you don’t have any political clients?? If you have no political clients why do you find us here so attractive for airing your views? We are your hobby??
If you are interested, I put this comment on Whaleoil in response to his request for political commentators to say which politicians or political parties they work for:
I have been doing political commentary since 2004 mainly on Radio New Zealand, RadioLIVE, the Sunday Star Times and the NBR.
I do not receive any money from any political party or politicians.
Things that some might believe are relevant in terms of disclosure (none of which have ever been secret) are:
From 1991-1998, I was employed in the Beehive during the term of the last National Government and was paid by Ministerial Services.
In 1999, I assisted the Super 2000 Taskforce set up by Prime Minister Jenny Shipley to advise on superannuation policy.
In 2000, I assisted the Department of Labour promote Margaret Wilson’s Employment Relations Bill to the business community.
In 2003, I had expenses associated with organising a press conference for Don Brash refunded by Parliamentary Services (but was not paid for my time).
In 2004 (successfully) and 2007 (unsuccessfully) I worked for a group called Action Hobson which contested the Hobson ward of the old Auckland City Council. I was paid out of donations.
In 2005, I did one-off leaders’ debate training for Rodney Hide, playing John Campbell, and was paid by Parliamentary Services (I think – it could have been the Act Party itself).
In 2007, my staff and I worked on Willie & JT’s unsuccessful mayoral campaigns
(can’t remember if we were paid or if it was pro bono – probably a bit of
both).
In 2009, I worked for Don Brash’s 2025 Taskforce in releasing its report and was
paid by the Treasury.
In 2011, my company and I worked for the Independent Maori Statutory Board of the Auckland Council, in its dispute with the Council over funding.
In 2012, my company and I worked for the Maori Economic Development Panel in releasing its report and was paid by TPK.
In 2012-13, my company and I worked for the Christchurch Central Development Unit on a number of projects.
I have also done work in Mongolia for people associated with the then Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party and the Mongolian Green Party.
I am pretty sure this is all where politicians might be involved directly or indirectly as clients.
In addition, I try to avoid writing or talking about anything related to private sector issues I am working on. For example, I never wrote anything about UFB or the proposed carpark tax as a commentator, even when these were highly topical. If I do address anything I am working on, I either mention this in the column or conversation or put a formal disclosure at the end. I neglected to do this once in a column about the ETS and Richard Harman’s The Nation did me over on TV3, which was fair enough.
I don’t like this whole thing going on with the media and rules around politics re TVNZ requiring their workers to not belong to a political party.
This is a democracy FFS – and if workers are disallowed from being active in politics on some level outside their working hours – this is a political stance in itself. It is a requirement that journalists are disengaged from their democracy.
While I see this is a way of a media outlet protecting itself and its workers from being accused of bias, isn’t it better – in a democracy – to disclose all connections – such as being involved with any potentially political organisation (for example ‘The Tax Payers Union’) – rather than requiring no outside activities from these people?
Isn’t it better that the general public are allowed to know what stance the reporter has, rather than having it covered up by such a draconian requirement. Does this requirement require that the journalist has no connection to organisations such as ‘the Taxpayers Union’ too?
Neutrality in journalists isn’t the way to go – it is an unrealistic expectation – isn’t it better to accept that and have a balance of left-wing and right-wing journalists/political commentators?
This reminds me of the way Christmas has been cancelled in this country. We could have Christian, Muslim, Maori, Chinese, Indian etc celebrations. Or we can cancel the lot. Cancelling the lot is a religious stance of non-religiousness/non spirituality. Same with the political issue and journalists. This is turning into a non-political requirement from members of a democracy.
I don’t think it is just about people declaring their direct political involvement in parties, etc., but being upfront about their underlying values and general political views.
I mostly object to the concept of “belonging” to a political party. Damn strange way of expressing what happens in my opinion.
I’m a member of the Labour party. I’m also probably one of its more frequent and effective critics, especially of its parliamentary wing. I get told that rather too frequently sometimes.
But I’d be surprised if anyone inside the Labour party thinks that I’m their property. Especially since I also donate to and help out the Greens, and actively try to get lefties from across the spectrum to get involved with any political party in anyway that they feel like.
I often rather suspect that a lot of the politicos in political parties would prefer that I didn’t get interested in them and what they are doing. In much the same way that many commentators here would often prefer that I didn’t take and interest in them. Being a bit of a sarcastic pain interested in slicing and dicing through bullshit appears to be deeply embedded in my nature.
But as a general principle, I’d agree with you. In my experience experienced members of political parties are usually more critical of the party that they are members of than “independents”. For a starter most people are involved because they want to help change where that party is heading. Otherwise why bother being a member.
It really shows National to be weak and antidemocratic with their recent activity of taking out any potential left-leaning commentary from the mainstream media.
National appear to believe that it is not suitable to have people with left-wing views commenting on politics. It is also clear that they don’t mind those of right-wing views on TV, or they would be complaining about the many who are right-wing on TV.
I can see why they are doing this, both their ideology and position is weak. If they have anyone sharing left-wing views on the mainstream media it will be a landslide to the left in this year’s election.
The only chance the right-wing have (and I would posit ever have) of winning the election is hiding the reality of what their ideological stance is and where their stupid bloody policies lead.
National’s aim is clearly to keep people misinformed by imbalanced reporting. That is the only way they can win because they haven’t got any decent arguments to counter the left’s narrative, so they are trying to shut it down completely. Nice one National.
The people supporting parties who take such measures to shut out opposing views are either simple fools or dictatorial fools who want to destroy democratic processes and prefer a dictatorship because that is what they are getting by supporting this government. Note: either way they are fools because they are undermining the system that they are benefitting the most from.
This is a nasty little piece in the Manawatu Standard. Against the Labour Party. And based on the idea that big unions are should be regarded as corporations and on the same level and standing as business corporations. So when it comes to the wealthy 1-10% giving NACTs donations, the 90% also-rans trying to achieve cohesion and representation and fund it is equal?
So, with a nice farming practical back to the land title – Deals keep the grassroots tilled
says LIAM HEHIR on 12 May 2014. (He is a lawyer, surprise, specialising in – Property
Business, Intellectual property, Rural – surprise?) No doubt he knows which dairy farm his butter comes from. Or indeed, if moving with the times, his olive oil.
I can reveal that a network of highly organised corporations have gained influence over one of our political parties. They give this party thousands of dollars – and there is no doubt they get their money’s worth.
For instance, the corporations in question have privileged party connections. As hard as it is to believe, they actually have a direct hand in choosing the party leader. Less directly, a high number of party MPs and organisers used to work for them.
The party regularly proposes legislation that furthers the goals of these corporations…..
Yes, the role and influence of unions over the Labour Party is truly disturbing.
Of course, you probably shouldn’t expect the TV3 news team to express any alarm over this. I also wouldn’t hold my breath while waiting for John Campbell to demand which Labour Party figures met with which union bosses (and what was discussed and what promises were made).
Another thing you can’t expect is a meaningful distinction as to why the matter is different to the National Party talking to businessmen, receiving donations from them and meeting with them at fundraising events.
it shouldnt surprise anyone cos its all public record. the act board chooses its candidates with no public disclosure of how those decisions are made. national does theirs in secret.
liam must be struggling to know who to vote for, but i suspect he is in colin craigs camp.
Anonymous activists broke into [Redacted]’s Tinakori Road apartment when he was in Auckland with his boyfriend. We photocopied documents relating to his and his wife’s messy divorce and employment proceedings with the GCSB. We copied the hard disks of his laptop. We have a mass of documents relating to the GCSB’s spying on Japan, Indonesia, and Middle Eastern Countries and people of a MIddle Eastern origin in New Zealand as well. We also have evidence of the GCSB monitoring Chinese commercial interests on behalf of the United States.
Evidence:
[Redacted] was caught by his wife fucking men when stationed to the NSA
NZ spied on Japan re the IWC
More to come if you can handle it Danyl, or maybe I should seek another outlet?
I see Radio New Zealand had to apologize to Winston Peters this morning. That slimy little whinger gluon whatshisname had broadcasted an entirley unsubstantiated slander against Winston without checking the facts.
Is this the “NEW” Radio New Zealand. We just so busy sucking up to National party that we can do what we like now?
Captain Hook Is that a rhetorical question? Radionz obviously doesn’t consider it can do anything it likes – it read out a full apology. But it wasn’t Gluon that did so, it was a female voice. Was it Gluon that did the interview with Winston Peters? I remember the content and the part about whether Winston was allowed to own part of a racehorse.
I don’t remember which part and Whinny bucked and kicked in a fair and defensive way. But Winston is a lawyer and can handle the legals unto the party of the third and fourth part and good on him for socking it to them.
ianmac
I thought that the table that I have pointed to below was an interesting run through of politicians in 2013 summarised in an incisive way.
Go into Google and search under the words – denis o’rourke Maori gangs
then scroll to second page, look for Roll Call 2013 – Trans Tasman Newsletter –
That will bring up the very personal take on each pollie which sounds realistic. For Darien Fenton = there was a rating of 3 out of 10 I think. In many ways she embodies Labour’s problems.
Her main portfolio is transport and you rarely
hear her talking about it. Not cabinet material
For Piketty and George, the bottom line, both moral and economic, is to socialize “rent” — rent, that is, not in the colloquial sense but in the economic sense of income disconnected from productivity.
It’s an attractive vision: an egalitarian, productive society, purged of parasitical rent-seeking through the expedient of well-aimed taxes.
Alas, Piketty’s global wealth tax and George’s single tax suffer from the same defect, and it’s not political impracticality — after all, George nearly got himself elected mayor of New York City in 1886.
It’s the inherent difficulty of separating the productive, untaxed component of the return on land or capital from the unproductive, taxed part.
Clear in the pages of a treatise, the distinction is murkier in practice. The market price of a vacant lot can reflect potential productive uses, as well as the risk a buyer takes by betting on them. A similar analysis applies to the rate of return on capital.
As a result, it’s hard to devise a tax on wealth that raises a significant amount of revenue but doesn’t discourage at least some socially beneficial saving or entrepreneurship. The potential for adverse unintended consequences — economic and political — is greater than Piketty seems to realize.
I think the difficulty with land tax is political. I brought it up once and someone said “I paid for that” (I paid for my house and by implication the capital gains) or that will cost me.. I don’t want that. People don’t see the (long term) big picture.
John Key rejected a land tax as “the value of everyone’s property would fall’ … and the banks would suffer?
‘ Key also questioned opposition claims the wealthy weren’t paying enough tax, saying the top 2% of taxpayers pay 22% of all personal tax, and 12% of households pay 76% of all net tax.
The question should be widened to HOW much of the income is received by the 2% and the 12% of the households?
To me the modern policeman looks like a school boy?
Key has never had to face and angry crowd. He was bravely always hidden somewhere else.
During the last election his daily itinerary was never published. Instead he would always pop up surrounded only by his supporters.
This year?
‘”Maybe at the margin it has become slightly less unequal.”
One small sentence for Key – one great leap for the peoples’ interests.
NEWSFLASH!
The National party’s narrative is crumbling. Key cannot even say that the inequality is not widening. He has to qualify it, so he is not caught out, which he would be if he didn’t.
Hahahahahahahahahahaha
The right-wing narrative is crumbling, folks.
The right-wing narrative is crumbling
The right-wing narrative is crumbling
The right-wing narrative is crumbling
Well done to all of you who have worked toward the uncovering of the smoke and mirrors that National depend on. Your efforts are starting to show. Keep up the good work.
Well, in his garbled way, Key was saying it’s become more unequal if you compare the top and bottom centiles. But he ws treating it more dismissively than it warrants. Taking the mean or median income shows little difference in the last couple of decades.
But there is a danger that long term struggles on the lowest centile means it gets harder and harder to u=improve one’s situation. Meanwhile more wealth, in terms of assets, property ownership etc, is accumulating with those on the highest incomes.
Then there’s the negative impacts on society of a big inequality gap.
+1
English needs to be hauled over the coals for his latest back flip. He blew his arse that the belt tightening was over and employee’s can rightfully expect decent pay rises this year;
So one would assume he would lead by example by giving decent payrises to public and state sector workers. Instead he stated on tv news tonight that SOE workers won’t be getting bugger all. So it’s all snake oil by this idiot, I know there are strongly unionised workers that have their collective agreements to settle soon. And these workers will rightfully hold English to account by being forced to withdraw the only bargaining tool they have ‘their sweat & toil’ so industrial action is inevitable.
I really hope the Left back Nationwide protests and get tens of thousands of workers out in the main centers. The CTU and all disgruntled workers need to get proactive in this regard. All opposition party’s must stand up and be counted.
BM is right. Labour turning around and saying that we’re backtracking on Super makes them look foolish and untrustworthy. They’ve staked a very clear position on this issue.
Thursday morning Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced his support for a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United and McCutcheon, the two Supreme Court decisions allowing big money nearly unlimited influence in politics.
Will be interesting to see how that goes. See if the people of the US can dis-empower the oligarchy.
After a hiatus of over four months Selwyn Manning and I finally got it together to re-start the “A View from Afar” podcast series. We shall see how we go but aim to do 2 episodes per month if possible. … Continue reading → ...
In 2008, the UK Parliament passed the Climate Change Act 2008. The law established a system of targets, budgets, and plans, with inbuilt accountability mechanisms; the aim was to break the cycle of empty promises and replace it with actual progress towards emissions reduction. The law was passed with near-universal ...
Buzz from the Beehive Local Water Done Well – let’s be blunt – is a silly name, but the first big initiative to put it into practice has gone done well. This success is reflected in the headline on an RNZ report:District mayors welcome Auckland’s new water deal with ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate ConnectionsA farmworker cleans the solar panels of a solar water pump in the village of Jagadhri, Haryana Country, India. (Photo credit: Prashanth Vishwanathan/ IWMI) Decisions made in India over the next few years will play a key role in global ...
Lindsay Mitchell writes – The Children’s Minister, Karen Chhour, intends to repeal Section 7AA from the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 because it creates conflict between claimed Crown Treaty obligations and the child’s best interests. In her words, “Oranga Tamariki’s governing principles and its act should be colour ...
Geoffrey Miller writes – The gloves are off. That might seem to be the undertone of surprisingly tough talk from New Zealand’s foreign and trade ministers. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, may be facing legal action after making allegations about former Australian foreign minister Bob Carr on Radio New Zealand. ...
Brian Easton writes – This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be (I will report on them ...
TL;DR:Winston Peters is reported to have won a budget increase for MFAT. David Seymour wanted his Ministry of Regulation to be three times bigger than the Productivity Commission. Simeon Brown is appointing a Crown Monitor to Watercare to protect the Claytons Crown Guarantee he had to give ratings agencies ...
The gloves are off. That might seem to be the undertone of surprisingly tough talk from New Zealand’s foreign and trade ministers. Winston Peters, the foreign minister, may be facing legal action after making allegations about former Australian foreign minister Bob Carr on Radio New Zealand. Carr had made highly ...
I could be a florist'Round the corner from Rye LaneI'll be giving daisies to craziesBut, baby, I'll wrap you up real safe Oh, I can give you flowers At the end of every dayFor the center of your table, a rainbowIn case you have people 'round to stay Depending on ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to May 12 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Finance Minister Nicola Willis will give a pre-budget speech on Thursday.Parliament sits from Question Time at 2pm on ...
The price of the foreign affairs “reset” is now becoming apparent, with Defence set to get a funding boost in the Budget. Finance Minister Nicola Willis has confirmed that it will be one of the few votes, apart from Health and Education and possibly Police, which will get an increase ...
A listing of 26 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 28, 2024 thru Sat, May 4, 2024. Story of the week "It’s straight out of Big Tobacco’s playbook. In fact, research by John Cook and his colleagues ...
Yesterday I received come lovely feedback following my Star Wars themed newsletter. A few people mentioned they’d enjoyed reading the personal part at the beginning.I often begin newsletters with some memories, or general thoughts, before commencing the main topic. This hopefully sets the mood and provides some context in which ...
April 30 was going to be the day we’d be calling Mum from London to wish her a happy birthday. Then it became the day we would be going to St. Paul's at Evensong to remember her. The aim of the cathedral builders was to find a way to make their ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Can’t remember the last book by a Kiwi author you read? Think the NZ government should spend less on the arts in favor of helping the homeless? If so, as far as Newsroom is concerned, you probably deserve to be called a cultural ignoramus ...
Eric Crampton writes – Grudges are bad. Better to move on. But it can be fun to keep a couple of really trivial ones, so you’re not tempted to have other ones. For example, because of the rootkit fiasco of 2005, no Sony products in our household. ...
A new report warns an estimated third of the adult population have unmet need for health care.Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāHere’s the six key things I learned about Aotaroa’s political economy this week around housing, climate and poverty:Politics - Three opinion polls confirmed support for PM Christopher Luxon ...
Today is May the fourth. Which was just a regular day when my mother took me to see the newly released Star Wars at the Odeon in Rotorua. The queue was right around the corner. Some years later this day became known as Star Wars Day, the date being a ...
Buzz from the Beehive Much more media attention is being paid to something Winston Peters said about former Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr than to a speech he delivered to the New Zealand China Council. One word is missing from the speech: AUKUS. But AUKUS loomed large in his considerations ...
Is the economy in another long stagnation? If so, why?This is about the time that the Treasury will be locking up its economic forecasts to be published in the 2024 Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) on budget day, 30 May. I am not privy to what they will be ...
The annual list of who's been bribing our politicians is out, and journalists will no doubt be poring over it to find the juiciest and dirtiest bribes. The government's fast-track invite list is likely to be a particular focus, and we already know of one company on the list which ...
In the weeks after the October 7 Hamas attacks on Southern Israel I wrote about the possible 2nd, 3rd and even 4th order effects of the conflict. These included new fronts being opened in the West Bank (with Hamas), Golan … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – It is one of the oldest truisms that there is never a good time for MPs to get a pay rise. This week’s announcement of pay raises of around 2.8% backdated to last October could hardly have come at a worse time, with the ...
David Farrar writes – Newshub reports: Newshub can reveal a fresh allegation of intimidation against Green MP Julie-Anne Genter. Genter is subject to a disciplinary process for aggressively waving a book in the face of National Minister Matt Doocey in the House – but it’s not the first time ...
The Treasury has published a paper today on the global productivity slowdown and how it is playing out in New Zealand: The productivity slowdown: implications for the Treasury’s forecasts and projections. The Treasury Paper examines recent trends in productivity and the potential drivers of the slowdown. Productivity for the whole economy ...
Winston Peters’ comments about former Australian foreign minister look set to be an ongoing headache for both him and Luxon. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The podcast above of the weekly ‘hoon’ webinar for subscribers features co-hosts and , along with regular guests on Gaza and ...
These puppet strings don't pull themselvesYou're thinking thoughts from someone elseHow much time do you think you have?Are you prepared for what comes next?The debating chamber can be a trying place for an opposition MP. What with the person in charge, the speaker, typically being an MP from the governing ...
The land around Lyme Regis, where Meryl Streep once stood, in a hood, on the Cobb, is falling into the sea.MerylThe land around Lyme Regis, around the Cobb that made it rich, has always been falling slowly but surely into the sea. Read more ...
Buzz from the Beehive Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters was bound to win headlines when he set out his thinking about AUKUS in his speech to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. The headlines became bigger when – during an interview on RNZ’s Morning Report today – he criticised ...
The Post reports on how the government is refusing to release its advice on its corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law, instead using the "soon to be publicly available" refusal ground to hide it until after select committee submissions on the bill have closed. Fast-track Minister Chris Bishop's excuse? “It's not ...
As pressure on it grows, the livestock industry’s approach to the transition to Net Zero is increasingly being compared to that of fossil fuel interests. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / Getty ImagesTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above ...
The New Zealand Herald reports – Stats NZ has offered a voluntary redundancy scheme to all of its workers as a way to give staff some control over their “future” amidst widespread job losses in the public sector. In an update to staff this morning, seen by the Herald, Statistics New Zealand ...
On Werewolf/Scoop, I usually do two long form political columns a week. From now on, there will be an extra column each week about music and movies. But first, some late-breaking political events:The rise in unemployment numbers for the March quarter was bigger than expected – and especially sharp ...
David Farrar writes – The Herald reports: TVNZ says it is dealing with about 50 formal complaints over its coverage of the latest 1News-Verian political poll, with some viewers – as well as the Prime Minister and a former senior Labour MP – critical of the tone of the 6pm report. ...
Muriel Newman writes – When Meridian Energy was seeking resource consents for a West Coast hydro dam proposal in 2010, local Maori “strenuously” objected, claiming their mana was inextricably linked to ‘their’ river and could be damaged. After receiving a financial payment from the company, however, the Ngai Tahu ...
Alwyn Poole writes – “An SEP,’ he said, ‘is something that we can’t see, or don’t see, or our brain doesn’t let us see, because we think that it’s somebody else’s problem. That’s what SEP means. Somebody Else’s Problem. The brain just edits it out, it’s like a ...
Our trust in our political institutions is fast eroding, according to a Maxim Institute discussion paper, Shaky Foundations: Why our democracy needs trust. The paper – released today – raises concerns about declining trust in New Zealand’s political institutions and democratic processes, and the role that the overuse of Parliamentary urgency ...
This article was prepared for publication yesterday. More ministerial announcements have been posted on the government’s official website since it was written. We will report on these later today …. Buzz from the BeehiveThere we were, thinking the environment is in trouble, when along came Jones. Shane Jones. ...
New Zealand now has the fourth most depressed construction sector in the world behind China, Qatar and Hong Kong. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 8:46am on Thursday, May 2:The Lead: ...
Hi,I am just going to state something very obvious: American police are fucking crazy.That was a photo gracing the New York Times this morning, showing New York City police “entering Columbia University last night after receiving a request from the school.”Apparently in America, protesting the deaths of tens of thousands ...
Winston Peters’ much anticipated foreign policy speech last night was a work of two halves. Much of it was a standard “boilerplate” Foreign Ministry overview of the state of the world. There was some hardening up of rhetoric with talk of “benign” becoming “malign” and old truths giving way to ...
Graham Adams assesses the fallout of the Cass Review — The press release last Thursday from the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls didn’t make the mainstream news in New Zealand but it really should have. The startling title of Reem Alsalem’s statement — “Implementation of ‘Cass ...
This open-for-business, under-new-management cliché-pockmarked government of Christopher Luxon is not the thing of beauty he imagines it to be. It is not the powerful expression of the will of the people that he asserts it to be. It is not a soaring eagle, it is a malodorous vulture. This newest poll should make ...
The latest labour market statistics, showing a rise in unemployment. There are now 134,000 unemployed - 14,000 more than when the National government took office. Which is I guess what happens when the Reserve Bank causes a recession in an effort to Keep Wages Low. The previous government saw a ...
Three opinion polls have been released in the last two days, all showing that the new government is failing to hold their popular support. The usual honeymoon experienced during the first year of a first term government is entirely absent. The political mood is still gloomy and discontented, mainly due ...
National's Finance Minister once met a poor person.A scornful interview with National's finance guru who knows next to nothing about economics or people.There might have been something a bit familiar if that was the headline I’d gone with today. It would of course have been in tribute to the article ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – Throughout the pandemic, the new Vice-Chancellor-of-Otago-University-on-$629,000 per annum-Can-you-believe-it-and-Former-Finance-Minister Grant Robertson repeated the mantra over and over that he saved “lives and livelihoods”.As we update how this claim is faring over the course of time, the facts are increasingly speaking differently. NZ ...
Chris Trotter writes – IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in acknowledgement of electoral victory: “We’ll govern for all New Zealanders.” On the face of it, the pledge is a strange one. Why would any political leader govern in ways that advantaged the huge ...
Bryce Edwards writes – The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill ...
TL;DR: These are the six things that stood out to me in news and commentary on Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 10:06am on Wednesday, May 1:The Lead: Business confidence fell across the board in April, falling in some areas to levels last seen during the lockdowns because of a collapse in ...
Over the past 36 hours, Christopher Luxon has been dong his best to portray the centre-right’s plummeting poll numbers as a mark of virtue. Allegedly, the negative verdicts are the result of hard economic times, and of a government bravely set out on a perilous rescue mission from which not ...
Auckland Transport have started rolling out new HOP card readers around the network and over the next three months, all of them on buses, at train stations and ferry wharves will be replaced. The change itself is not that remarkable, with the new readers looking similar to what is already ...
Completed reads for April: The Difference Engine, by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling Carnival of Saints, by George Herman The Snow Spider, by Jenny Nimmo Emlyn’s Moon, by Jenny Nimmo The Chestnut Soldier, by Jenny Nimmo Death Comes As the End, by Agatha Christie Lord of the Flies, by ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Have a story to share about St Paul’s, but today just picturesPopular novels written at this desk by a young man who managed to bootstrap himself out of father’s imprisonment and his own young life in a workhouse Read more ...
The list of former National Party Ministers being given plum and important roles got longer this week with the appointment of former Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett as the chair of Pharmac. The Christopher Luxon-led Government has now made key appointments to Bill English, Simon Bridges, Steven Joyce, Roger Sowry, ...
Newsroom has a story today about National's (fortunately failed) effort to disestablish the newly-created Inspector-General of Defence. The creation of this agency was the key recommendation of the Inquiry into Operation Burnham, and a vital means of restoring credibility and social licence to an agency which had been caught lying ...
Holding On To The Present:The moment a political movement arises that attacks the whole idea of social progress, and announces its intention to wind back the hands of History’s clock, then democracy, along with its unwritten rules, is in mortal danger.IT’S A COMMONPLACE of political speeches, especially those delivered in ...
Stuck In The Middle With You:As Christopher Luxon feels the hot breath of Act’s and NZ First’s extremists on the back of his neck and, as he reckons with the damage their policies are already inflicting upon a country he’s described as “fragile”, is there not some merit in reaching out ...
The unpopular coalition government is currently rushing to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act. The clause is Oranga Tamariki's Treaty clause, and was inserted after its systematic stealing of Māori children became a public scandal and resulted in physical resistance to further abductions. The clause created clear obligations ...
Buzz from the Beehive The government’s official website – which Point of Order monitors daily – not for the first time has nothing much to say today about political happenings that are grabbing media headlines. It makes no mention of the latest 1News-Verian poll, for example. This shows National down ...
It Takes A Train To Cry:Surely, there is nothing lonelier in all this world than the long wail of a distant steam locomotive on a cold Winter’s night.AS A CHILD, I would lie awake in my grandfather’s house and listen to the traffic. The big wooden house was only a ...
Packing A Punch: The election of the present government, including in its ranks politicians dedicated to reasserting the rights of the legislature in shaping and determining the future of Māori and Pakeha in New Zealand, should have alerted the judiciary – including its anomalous appendage, the Waitangi Tribunal – that its ...
Dead Woman Walking: New Zealand’s media industry had been moving steadily towards disaster for all the years Melissa Lee had been National’s media and communications policy spokesperson, and yet, when the crisis finally broke, on her watch, she had nothing intelligent to offer. Christopher Luxon is a patient man - but he’s not ...
Chris Trotter writes – New Zealand politics is remarkably easy-going: dangerously so, one might even say. With the notable exception of John Key’s flat ruling-out of the NZ First Party in 2008, all parties capable of clearing MMP’s five-percent threshold, or winning one or more electorate seats, tend ...
Ministers must front up about which projects it will push through under its Fast Track Approvals legislation, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
The Government is again adding to New Zealand’s growing unemployment, this time cutting jobs at the agencies responsible for urban development and growing much needed housing stock. ...
With Minister Karen Chhour indicating in the House today that she either doesn’t know or care about the frontline cuts she’s making to Oranga Tamariki, we risk seeing more and more of our children falling through the cracks. ...
The Labour Party is saddened to learn of the death of Sir Robert Martin, a globally renowned disability advocate who led the way for disability rights both in New Zealand and internationally. ...
Labour is calling for the Government to urgently rethink its coalition commitment to restart live animal exports, Labour animal welfare spokesperson Rachel Boyack said. ...
Today’s Financial Stability Report has once again highlighted that poverty and deep inequality are political choices - and this Government is choosing to make them worse. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to do more for our households in most need as unemployment rises and the cost of living crisis endures. ...
Unemployment is on the rise and it’s only going to get worse under this Government, Labour finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. Stats NZ figures show the unemployment rate grew to 4.3 percent in the March quarter from 4 percent in the December quarter. “This is the second rise in unemployment ...
The New Zealand Labour Party welcomes the entering into force of the European Union and New Zealand free trade agreement. This agreement opens the door for a huge increase in trade opportunities with a market of 450 million people who are high value discerning consumers of New Zealand goods and ...
The National-led Government continues its fiscal jiggery pokery with its Pharmac announcement today, Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says. “The government has increased Pharmac funding but conceded it will only make minimal increases in access to medicine”, said Ayesha Verrall “This is far from the bold promises made to fund ...
This afternoon’s interim Waitangi Tribunal report must be taken seriously as it affects our most vulnerable children, Labour children’s spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime. ...
Te Pāti Māori are demanding the New Zealand Government support an international independent investigation into mass graves that have been uncovered at two hospitals on the Gaza strip, following weeks of assault by Israeli troops. Among the 392 bodies that have been recovered, are children and elderly civilians. Many of ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
Tonight’s court decision to overturn the summons of the Children’s Minister has enabled the Crown to continue making decisions about Māori without evidence, says Te Pāti Māori spokesperson for Children, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi. “The judicial system has this evening told the nation that this government can do whatever they want when ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The government's decision to reintroduce Three Strikes is a destructive and ineffective piece of law-making that will only exacerbate an inherently biased and racist criminal justice system, said Te Pāti Māori Justice Spokesperson, Tākuta Ferris, today. During the time Three Strikes was in place in Aotearoa, Māori and Pasifika received ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Te Pāti Māori is disgusted at the confirmation that hundreds are set to lose their jobs at Oranga Tamariki, and the disestablishment of the Treaty Response Unit. “This act of absolute carelessness and out of touch decision making is committing tamariki to state abuse.” Said Te Pāti Māori Oranga Tamariki ...
Six tertiary students have been selected to work on NASA projects in the US through a New Zealand Space Scholarship, Space Minister Judith Collins announced today. “This is a fantastic opportunity for these talented students. They will undertake internships at NASA’s Ames Research Center or its Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), where ...
New Zealanders will be safer because of a $1.9 billion investment in more frontline Corrections officers, more support for offenders to turn away from crime, and more prison capacity, Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell says. “Our Government said we would crack down on crime. We promised to restore law and order, ...
The OECD’s latest report on New Zealand reinforces the importance of bringing Government spending under control, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The OECD conducts country surveys every two years to review its members’ economic policies. The 2024 New Zealand survey was presented in Wellington today by OECD Chief Economist Clare Lombardelli. ...
The Government has delivered on its election promise to provide a financially sustainable model for Auckland under its Local Water Done Well plan. The plan, which has been unanimously endorsed by Auckland Council’s Governing Body, will see Aucklanders avoid the previously projected 25.8 per cent water rates increases while retaining ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters discussed the need for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and enhanced cooperation in the Pacific with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock during her first official visit to New Zealand today. "New Zealand and Germany enjoy shared interests and values, including the rule of law, democracy, respect for the international system ...
The Minister Responsible for RMA Reform, Chris Bishop today released his decision on four recommendations referred to him by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, opening the door to housing growth in the area. The Council’s Plan Change 92 allows more homes to be built in existing and new ...
Thank you, John McKinnon and the New Zealand China Council for the invitation to speak to you today. Thank you too, all members of the China Council. Your effort has played an essential role in helping to build, shape, and grow a balanced and resilient relationship between our two ...
The Government is modernising insurance law to better protect Kiwis and provide security in the event of a disaster, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly announced today. “These reforms are long overdue. New Zealand’s insurance law is complicated and dated, some of which is more than 100 years old. ...
The coalition Government is refreshing its approach to supporting pay equity claims as time-limited funding for the Pay Equity Taskforce comes to an end, Public Service Minister Nicola Willis says. “Three years ago, the then-government introduced changes to the Equal Pay Act to support pay equity bargaining. The changes were ...
Structured literacy will change the way New Zealand children learn to read - improving achievement and setting students up for success, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “Being able to read and write is a fundamental life skill that too many young people are missing out on. Recent data shows that ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay says Canada’s refusal to comply in full with a CPTPP trade dispute ruling in our favour over dairy trade is cynical and New Zealand has no intention of backing down. Mr McClay said he has asked for urgent legal advice in respect of our ‘next move’ ...
The rights of our children and young people will be enhanced by changes the coalition Government will make to strengthen oversight of the Oranga Tamariki system, including restoring a single Children’s Commissioner. “The Government is committed to delivering better public services that care for our most at-risk young people and ...
The Government is making it easier for minor changes to be made to a building consent so building a home is easier and more affordable, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on making it easier and cheaper to build homes so we can ...
New Zealand lost a true legend when internationally renowned disability advocate Sir Robert Martin (KNZM) passed away at his home in Whanganui last night, Disabilities Issues Minister Louise Upston says. “Our Government’s thoughts are with his wife Lynda, family and community, those he has worked with, the disability community in ...
Good evening – Before discussing the challenges and opportunities facing New Zealand’s foreign policy, we’d like to first acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs. You have contributed to debates about New Zealand foreign policy over a long period of time, and we thank you for hosting us. ...
From today, passengers travelling internationally from Auckland Airport will be able to keep laptops and liquids in their carry-on bags for security screening thanks to new technology, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Creating a more efficient and seamless travel experience is important for holidaymakers and businesses, enabling faster movement through ...
People with an interest in the health of Northland’s marine ecosystems are invited to a public meeting to discuss how to deal with kina barrens, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones will lead the discussion, which will take place on Friday, 10 May, at Awanui Hotel in ...
Kiwi exporters are $100 million better off today with the NZ EU FTA entering into force says Trade Minister Todd McClay. “This is all part of our plan to grow the economy. New Zealand's prosperity depends on international trade, making up 60 per cent of the country’s total economic activity. ...
There are heartening signs that the extractive sector is once again becoming an attractive prospect for investors and a source of economic prosperity for New Zealand, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The beginnings of a resurgence in extractive industries are apparent in media reports of the sector in the past ...
The return of the historic Ō-Rākau battle site to the descendants of those who fought there moved one step closer today with the first reading of Te Pire mō Ō-Rākau, Te Pae o Maumahara / The Ō-Rākau Remembrance Bill. The Bill will entrust the 9.7-hectare battle site, five kilometres west ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has announced 25 new high-speed EV charging hubs along key routes between major urban centres and outlined the Government’s plan to supercharge New Zealand’s EV infrastructure. The hubs will each have several chargers and be capable of charging at least four – and up to 10 ...
The coalition Government will not proceed with the previous Government’s plans to regulate residential property managers, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “I have written to the Chairperson of the Social Services and Community Committee to inform him that the Government does not intend to support the Residential Property Managers Bill ...
The Government has announced an independent review into the disability support system funded by the Ministry of Disabled People – Whaikaha. Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston says the review will look at what can be done to strengthen the long-term sustainability of Disability Support Services to provide disabled people and ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has attended the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva and outlined the Government’s plan to restore law and order. “Speaking to the United Nations Human Rights Council provided us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while responding to issues and ...
The Government and Rotorua Lakes Council are committed to working closely together to end the use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua. Associate Minister of Housing (Social Housing) Tama Potaka says the Government remains committed to ending the long-term use of contracted emergency housing motels in Rotorua by the ...
Trade Minister Todd McClay heads overseas today for high-level trade talks in the Gulf region, and a key OECD meeting in Paris. Mr McClay will travel to Riyadh to meet with counterparts from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). “New Zealand’s goods and services exports to the Gulf region ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford has outlined six education priorities to deliver a world-leading education system that sets Kiwi kids up for future success. “I’m putting ambition, achievement and outcomes at the heart of our education system. I want every child to be inspired and engaged in their learning so they ...
The new NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) App is a secure ‘one stop shop’ to provide the services drivers need, Transport Minister Simeon Brown and Digitising Government Minister Judith Collins say. “The NZTA App will enable an easier way for Kiwis to pay for Vehicle Registration and Road User Charges (RUC). ...
Whānau with tamariki growing up in emergency housing motels will be prioritised for social housing starting this week, says Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka. “Giving these whānau a better opportunity to build healthy stable lives for themselves and future generations is an essential part of the Government’s goal of reducing ...
Racing Minister Winston Peters has paid tribute to an icon of the industry with the recent passing of Dave O’Sullivan (OBE). “Our sympathies are with the O’Sullivan family with the sad news of Dave O’Sullivan’s recent passing,” Mr Peters says. “His contribution to racing, initially as a jockey and then ...
Assalaamu alaikum, greetings to you all. Eid Mubarak, everyone! I want to extend my warmest wishes to you and everyone celebrating this joyous occasion. It is a pleasure to be here. I have enjoyed Eid celebrations at Parliament before, but this is my first time joining you as the Minister ...
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced Pharmac’s largest ever budget of $6.294 billion over four years, fixing a $1.774 billion fiscal cliff. “Access to medicines is a crucial part of many Kiwis’ lives. We’ve committed to a budget allocation of $1.774 billion over four years so Kiwis are ...
Hon Paula Bennett has been appointed as member and chair of the Pharmac board, Associate Health Minister David Seymour announced today. "Pharmac is a critical part of New Zealand's health system and plays a significant role in ensuring that Kiwis have the best possible access to medicines,” says Mr Seymour. ...
Hundreds of New Zealand families affected by Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) will benefit from a new Government focus on prevention and treatment, says Health Minister Dr Shane Reti. “We know FASD is a leading cause of preventable intellectual and neurodevelopmental disability in New Zealand,” Dr Reti says. “Every day, ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones today attended the official opening of Kaikohe’s new $14.7 million sports complex. “The completion of the Kaikohe Multi Sports Complex is a fantastic achievement for the Far North,” Mr Jones says. “This facility not only fulfils a long-held dream for local athletes, but also creates ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters’ engagements in Türkiye this week underlined the importance of diplomacy to meet growing global challenges. “Returning to the Gallipoli Peninsula to represent New Zealand at Anzac commemorations was a sombre reminder of the critical importance of diplomacy for de-escalating conflicts and easing tensions,” Mr Peters ...
Ambassador Millar, Burgemeester, Vandepitte, Excellencies, military representatives, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen – good morning and welcome to this sacred Anzac Day dawn service. It is an honour to be here on behalf of the Government and people of New Zealand at Buttes New British Cemetery, Polygon Wood – a deeply ...
Distinguished guests - It is an honour to return once again to this site which, as the resting place for so many of our war-dead, has become a sacred place for generations of New Zealanders. Our presence here and at the other special spaces of Gallipoli is made ...
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
This episode of A View From Afar was recorded LIVE on May 6, 2024 (NZST) which is Sunday evening, May 5, 2024 at 8:30pm (USEST). In an analytical essay titled ‘A moment of friction’ political scientist Dr Paul Buchanan wrote how we are living within a decisive moment ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alison Taylor, Assistant Professor, Bond University Metro Goldwyn Mayer Pictures At the crux of the critical response to Luca Guadagnino’s new movie Challengers is one word: “sexy”. The film charts a love triangle between three up-and-coming tennis players: Tashi (Zendaya), ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jenny Stewart, Professor of Public Policy, ADFA Canberra, UNSW Sydney For years, First Nations people have been telling governments they want to be listened to. In particular, they want more ownership of the programs and services that are supposed to help them. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Why do trees have bark? Julien, age 6, Melbourne. This is a great question, Julien. We are so familiar with bark on trees, that most of us ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anthony Nasser, Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy, University of Technology Sydney PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is an important ligament in the knee. It runs from the thigh bone (femur) to the shin bone (tibia) and helps stabilise ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne I covered the May 2 United Kingdom local government elections for The Poll Bludger. The Blackpool South parliamentary byelection was also held, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Deanna Grant-Smith, Professor of Management, University of the Sunshine Coast The federal government has announced a “Commonwealth Prac Payment” to support selected groups of students doing mandatory work placements. Those who are studying to be a teacher, nurse, midwife or social ...
We round up everything coming to streaming services this week, including Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+, Apple TV+, ThreeNow, Neon and TVNZ+. If you love a dark comedy: Bodkin (Netflix, May 9)An English podcaster, an Irish podcaster and American podcaster walk into a pub and…make a TV show? ...
By Eleisha Foon, RNZ Pacific senior journalist A Pacific regionalism academic has called out New Zealand’s Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters for withholding information from the public on AUKUS and says the security deal “raises serious questions for the Pacific region”. Auckland University of Technology academic Dr Marco de Jong ...
How worried should we be about the cloud? This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. I currently have a few thousand unread emails languishing in my inbox, mostly old marketing newsletters and piles of unread science journal press releases. I have a similar number ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nuurrianti Jalli, Assistant Professor of Communication Studies College of Arts and Sciences Department of Languages, Literature, and Communication Studies, Northern State University Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Southeast Asian governments not only have to deal with the virus but also with the false ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Murakami Wood, Professor of Critical Surveillance and Securities Studies, L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa The skyline of Riyadh, the capital and largest city of the Kingdom of Saudia Arabia.(Shutterstock) There is a long history of planned city building by both governments ...
The LIVE Recording of A View from Afar podcast will begin today at 12:45pm May 6, 2024 (NZST) which is Sunday evening, 8:30pm (USEST). In an analytical essay titled ‘A moment of friction’ political scientist Dr Paul Buchanan wrote how we are living within a decisive moment of ...
The Boil Up’s Lucinda Bennett considers the oyster – from freshness to pearls to the joy of shucking your own. This is an excerpt from our weekly food newsletter, The Boil Up. In Carmen Maria Machado’s short story ‘Eight Bites’, a woman begins her last supper before bariatric surgery with “a cavalcade ...
Asia Pacific Report A group of 65 Auckland University academics have written an open letter to vice-chancellor Dawn Freshwater criticising the institution’s stance over students protesting in solidarity with Palestine. They have called on her administration to “support” the students who were denied permission to establish an “overnight encampment” by ...
The Student Volunteer Army is on the march, generating approximately 1.6 million hours of volunteering from roughly 35,000 secondary school students in just five years. For Rebekah Brown, the pathway to volunteering started with her singing coach. With a passion for the arts, the suggestion to volunteer at Acting Antics, ...
Keeping up with online communication can be exhausting, so Fran Barclay enlisted the help of Meta’s new ‘intelligent assistant’ to respond to all her messages. Could her mates tell the difference? For centuries, technology has ruled the ways in which we communicate. From the dawn of written language, to the ...
Jamie Arbuckle, a councillor who has become an member of parliament, says he has settled into having two roles so comfortably he's going to keep both pay cheques. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Luis Gómez Romero, Senior Lecturer in Human Rights, Constitutional Law and Legal Theory, University of Wollongong Fifty years ago, Australian feminist Anne Summers denounced “the ideology of sexism” governing over so many women’s lives. Unfortunately, sexism is as lethal today as it ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jose Antonio Lara-Hernandez, Senior Researcher in Architecture, Auckland University of Technology Getty Images The COVID-19 pandemic and the hybrid work patterns it fostered have changed the way we think about office space, and central business districts in general. While fears ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dale Boccabella, Associate Professor of Taxation Law, UNSW Sydney There’s a good reason your local volunteer-run netball club doesn’t pay tax. In Australia, various nonprofit organisations are exempt from paying income tax, including those that do charitable work, such as churches. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Marina Deller, Casual Academic, Creative Writing and English Literature, Flinders University NetflixComedy is opening up spaces for silences to be broken and trauma stories to be told. In 2018, Hannah Gadsby started a revolution with Nanette, asking audiences to rethink ...
The workplace can be a minefield of bad comms and passive aggression. Kinksters can help you navigate it. A friend and colleague recently gave me a compliment I loved. They told me I’d always been good at emotional communication and making people feel comfortable. “But I feel like it’s really ...
Even if some students are now just texting on their laptops. Stewart Sowman-Lund writes in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. ...
Councils from Horowhenua, Kāpiti, Wairarapa, the Hutt Valley, Porirua and Wellington City will meet this Friday to work together on a plan for a Greater Wellington region water deal. ...
Renowned musician, advocate, and proud born and raised daughter of Tauranga, Ria Hall, is announcing her candidacy for Mayor of Tauranga and Pāpāmoa Ward for the upcoming election on July 20th. ...
The new Aotearoa histories curriculum is rich with potential. There’s still work to be done, but the education minister’s criticisms about ‘balance’ miss the mark, argues primary school teacher Jessie Moss. In 2015, Ōtorohanga College students presented to parliament a petition signed by more than 10,000 people calling for a ...
For too long our so-called national bird has maintained its stranglehold on the economy of regional New Zealand. Thanks to the fast track legislation, we will have our revenge. Theories abound on what ails New Zealand’s economy. National leader Chris Luxon has posited that we’re negative, wet, whiny, and inward-looking; ...
Late one afternoon in March 1860 a man in a thin green velveteen jacket and a wide-awake hat arrived on foot at a sheep station named Glenmark, about 65 kilometres north of Christchurch. The man was in his mid-fifties but he looked older. Several people who met him that day ...
If building one of Auckland’s possible waterfront stadiums was funded privately, it would need to hold a sold-out Ed Sherran concert every weekday for 25 years. That’s Rob Hamlin’s finding – he’s a senior marketing lecturer at the University of Otago. “It’s not going to happen; forget about it,” he ...
Comment: The debate over the future relationship between news and social media is bringing us closer to a long-overdue reckoning. Social media isn’t trying to kill journalism, because social media has never really cared about journalism. Social media is resolutely in the attention business. News propels some attention — perhaps ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A,DIV,A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Monday 6 May appeared first on Newsroom. ...
For the past 12 years, Georgia-Rose Brown has balanced on the brink of making an Olympic Games – but always landed gracefully on the wrong side. Reaching the Olympics is a dream the gymnast has harboured since she was a six-year-old; a dream that would dwindle every four years, yet ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra A new Commonwealth Prac Payment will provide students with $319.50 a week when they are on clinical and professional placements. The payment will be means tested and start from July 1 next year, which ...
Asia Pacific Report About 500 people honoured Palestinian journalists in the heart of the New Zealand city of Auckland today for their brave coverage of Israel’s War on Gaza, now in its seventh month with almost 35,000 people killed, mostly women and children. Marking the annual May 3 World Press ...
The Government Communications Security Bureau denies hosting a foreign spying capability flagged by the watchdog, differentiating it from the system recently criticised. ...
RNZ News A group of academic staff at New Zealand’s largest university have expressed concern at the administration’s move to block a protest encampment that was planned to take place on campus calling for support for the rights of Palestinians. This week, the University of Auckland warned that while it ...
Genterwocky After a hard days marching, Sir Doocey calls in at the Village Tavern For a pint of ale and a pork pie. The grim villagers stare at him. “Do not be travelling on the forest road,” warns a crusty old beak. “And why is that, antique peasant?” Grins Sir ...
Political conferences after a party returns to power are usually a chance for some healthy, even unhealthy backslapping. Yet National Party president Sylvia Wood’s address to its mainland representatives on Saturday hardly contained the unalloyed delight that one might have expected following National’s escape from the wilderness of opposition. Yes, ...
Comment: Almost half the world is voting in national elections this year and artificial intelligence is the elephant in the room. There are genuine fears AI-generated or AI-edited deepfakes will potentially manipulate election outcomes not just in the US and UK, but critically in countries such as India. For that ...
Ahead of the reality franchise’s return to New Zealand, allow us to introduce the eight brides and grooms. Chuck on a veil and tie back your man bun, because it’s time to say “I do” to a new season of Married at First Sight NZ. The reality TV “social experiment” ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Norton, Professor in the Practice of Higher Education Policy, Australian National University Every year on June 1, student debt in Australia is indexed to inflation. In 2023, high inflation pushed the indexation rate to 7.1%, the highest since 1990. This ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Changes in the May 14 budget will cut the student debt of more than three million people, wiping more than $3 billion from what people owe. The government will cap the HELP indexation rate ...
Asia Pacific Report The prosecutor’s office at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has appealed for an end to what it calls intimidation of its staff, saying such threats could constitute an offence against the “administration of justice” by the world’s permanent war crimes court. The Hague-based office of ICC Prosecutor ...
By Patrick Decloitre, RNZ Pacific correspondent French Pacific desk A women’s union in New Caledonia has staged a sit-in protest this week to support senior Kanak indigenous journalist Thérèse Waia, who works for public broadcaster Nouvelle-Calédonie la Première, after a smear attack by critics. The peaceful demonstration was held on ...
New Zealand Food Safety is monitoring overseas recalls of Indian packaged spice products manufactured by MDH and Everest due to concerns over a cancer-causing pesticide. ...
By Stephen Wright and Stefan Armbruster of BenarNews Fiji’s ranking in a global press freedom index has jumped into the top tier of countries with free or mostly free media after its government last year repealed a draconian law that threatened journalists with prison for doing their jobs. Fiji’s improvement ...
We might be in Invercargill but all anyone can talk about is Gore. Specifically, Salford Street. That’s where three-year-old Lachlan Jones lived, south of the centre of town, between the A&P Showgrounds and the Mataura River. Roughly 1.2 km away from the single level home he lived in with his ...
MONDAY I lined up the latest round of civil servants from city hall against the wall, and signalled for the firing squad to drop their rifles. I stepped up onto a wooden crate to look at the office workers in the eye. But that didn’t feel right, so I found ...
Keen hiker and second-year MSc student Liam Hewson wears two hats when he’s in the great outdoors. “The scientist in me appreciates nature and goes, ‘Oh, there’s that thing and there’s another thing,’ but then the tramper and the outdoorsy person in me thinks, ‘Cool bush.’” Born and bred in ...
After a long and illustrious career as a goal kicker, Dan Carter’s favourite way to unwind is… kicking goals. Why can’t he get enough of it? And what it’s like to watch him do it for an hour straight? A semicircle of people wielding cameras and phones has formed in ...
After the Nats have poached and heavily diluted some of the major Labour policies I feel it would be a political suicide for Labour to go forward into the election campaign with the policy of raising the retirement age. That’s something that the Nats will be scaremongering the general public with in the election campaign, and a certain put off for many of would-be Labour voters.
The accent should be on eliminating child poverty, raising benefits, creating jobs, better housing, protecting the environment etc etc, everything that Nats are NOT even bothered with.
Just my humble opinion, of course.
+100
Lolz, and we are back to the super discussion again, i would have put the question to David Cunliffe in His post the other day, But, to point out what i see as the affordability of superannuation going forward in terms of what GDP in terms of dollars will be in 30 years time based upon the GDP growth in dollar terms for the previous thirty years,(ie going back to 1980), would have taken a comment half a kilometer long,
The debate the other day on Open Mike on the same subject where i pointed out that IF the numbers of those collecting super in the next 30 years will double,(the ACT position), THEN, GDP in dollar terms would have to double in that 30 year period, my projection based on the past 30 years of GDP growth in dollar terms has it doing near enough to achieving that doubling,(with a shortfall in the Government’s tax and spend of that GDP in dollar terms of $150 million dollars annually, a mere pfft in terms of that spend),and that takes no account of the monies currently being earned by the Cullen fund,
However, Lprent with a counter view points out that while that cohort of over 65’s doubles statistics show that the number of those paying taxes drops dramatically which brings into the discussion a valid point that i had not up to that point thought about,
At present the immigration figures are showing those population projections to be incorrect, BUT, this may or may not be a temporary blip where immigration is up a third of its projected rise,
SO, while sticking to my projection that GDP in dollar terms will have doubled in 30 years time as it did in the previous 30 years, as how many hundred thousand taxpayers fled the country, i have to insert a large TAIHO into my thinking around the affordability of superannuation based upon the estimation that the numbers of taxpayers will also fall as the numbers of superannuants rises,
What we need do tho is carefully consider the history of both tax cuts and the raising of the age of superannuation, first we had Sir Roger,(spit), Douglas tax cuts, then we had cuts to superannuation via raising the age of entitlement, Next, Working For Families, followed BY, tax cuts,
All of that simply looks to me that we are taking from the aged to give to the middle class and the rich, take out tax cuts, working for families and tax cuts and what have you got, affordable superannuation perhaps….
Too complex. Also, once you strip out the financial sector casinos, real global GDP is flat to declining IMO, and it will get worse over the next 10 years as resource and energy depletion bites harder and harder.
A far simpler response is: why can NZ happily afford foreign banks and corporates stripping us out of $10B a year, but somehow we can’t afford NZ super?
Also – note that Labour has left the door open to raising the super age up OVER 67. My belief is that they have examined UK etc raising it to 70 and they think that they WILL go there at some stage.
“..A far simpler response is: why can NZ happily afford foreign banks and corporates stripping us out of $10B a year, but somehow we can’t afford NZ super?..”
..+ 1..
+100 philip ure ….something needs to be done about foreign banks and New Zealand wealth flowing out of the country!!!
We can’t. Interestingly enough Piketty makes that point (not overtly though) as he points out that countries with large foreign ownership are poorer than they should be.
Yep, wouldn’t be surprised. Still, a UBI would allow those that wish to work on to do so while also allowing those that don’t/can’t to ‘retire’.
Too complex CV, what is so complex about the above that it cannot be understood, its fairly simple to project the past 30 years of GDP in dollar terms onto the next 30 years as an estimate of what that GDP growth will be,(what other means is there??? a crystal ball perhaps),
Lprent’s point made the other day in a discussion on the same topic is also valid with a question mark over the accuracy or other of population projections,
i am amused by talk of resource and energy depletion because IF such depletion were to become a fact then superannuation AND everything else Government does using the current financial system is definitely unaffordable,
As far as following the leader goes up to the age of 70 for superannuation goes i think that that’s a ‘given’, as i point out above, tax cuts, raising the age of entitlement, working for families, tax cuts again,simply transfers the monies that were there from the aged to the middle class and the rich which would in my opinion more than suggest that super at 60 was affordable all the time,
Politically i am still doing a head scratch, even as a government i fail to see how Labour can change the Legislation without the support of a gleeful National which again in my opinion can only be seen as a request from Labour to become a permanent Party of 20%…
What kind of estimate is that? Is it an estimate which understands that there has been a massive secular change in the nature of the economy and the next 30 years is going to be unbelievably harder than the last 30 years?
In the late 1990’s the price of a barrel of oil, the energy source which our entire civilisation depends upon like a cokehead depends on his next hit of coke to get up out of bed, was US$15/barrel. A typical NZ worker could, using a weeks take home pay, buy say 30 barrels of crude oil.
Today Brent is quoted at US$105/barrel and a typical NZ worker can buy just 5-6 barrels of crude oil using a weeks take home pay.
The message being – as the energy our entire global civilisation runs on becomes unaffordable, things are going to change, for the worse, for most people. Trying to use the last 30 years of “growth” to estimate what is going to happen in this new environment – that’s not going to work.
CV, i will get back to this, BUT, you simply fail to understand what i said in my first comment,
My calculation of GDP growth from the past 30 years spanned 1980 to 2012, so YES that calculation of GDP growth in dollar terms took into account the rising cost of oil, the switch from sheep farming to dairy, the share-market crash of 1989, and any other catastrophe you can think of real or imagined that occurred in those three decades…
My question again is by what other device is there to measure expected GDP, growth or otherwise, its either the historical record or a crystal ball, with all due respect you appear to be using the crystal ball…
I would argue that trying to measure expected GDP for the next thirty years is a fools errand whether you’re using historical records or a crystal ball. Economies are not something like climate that can be so readily projected.
Gallstone, ”you would argue” and then you fail abjectly to produce that argument except to say ”you thunk it therefor it is so”,
Feel free to lift your knuckles off of the pavement wont you…
And someone using your methodology in 1972 would have predicted steady GDP increases and minimal oil costs.
Like most economic models, your prediction is unreliable.
Really Mac, what exactly is unreliable about it, i dont predict steady GDP growth at all, i simply say that across a 3 decade period GDP will double in dollar terms,
Oil costs are a red herring please shove them some place the sun don’t shine, across a 30 year time-scale the song, titled in this case GDP growth remains much the same, does just that…
so you’re not making short term predictions, but think your long term prediction will be accurate.
riiight.
Mac, masturbating here at the Standard is at the least unseemly, you should really indulge your propensity in a quiet private space, IF you think i am wrong in my use of the data from multi decades of economic growth then fucking prove it otherwise fuck off and wah wah wah in someone else’s ear,
Best read the reply to that plonker you have in the tag team with you tonight first tho i would suggest…
your link was bust.
So when you say “double in 30 years”, your margin for error is at least 65% of the original value, possibly before you even include inflation (of which a large factor is energy costs, i.e. oil)?
Looking at my GDP link, in the last 30 years real GDP doubled. In the 30 years before that, it trebled.
With that amount of variation, in 30 years time it might treble again or be flat.
Pfft ”read the link you put up”, Pfft again, The Treasury’s story of the NZ economy for 10 year olds, perfect for your level of intelligence obviously,
The link again,
http://www.econstats.com/ifs/NorGSc_OAC_2_m.htm
Your childrens squiggles are just that, try looking through whole data series…
easy source for the graphs, oh conceited one.
Unlike your link, which again returns a 404 error in firefox.
Oh and your last wee smidgen of an argument, no matter where in the time series you measure from across any 30 year period GDP in terms of dollars has at least doubled,
In no 30 year period in the data series has GDP flatlined, no matter which year you begin the measurement, SO, your argument is spurious.
That is a Fact, introducing the notion into the debate that the economy might flatline is a red herring, a diversion, a strawman, the nit scratching of an idea of one determined to win an argument based on nothing but ”you thunk it”…
oh, and even besides all that, by your logic (65% off is good enough), you’d claim that your “doubled in 30 years” prediction came true if it only increased by a third in that time.
Positively Delphic.
IF child my figures were 65% off on the negative side you would have some sort of point to make,(i would gauge that my figures in dollar terms for GDP are 20% off at most on the positive side where my data series starts at 1954 and ends at 1974, only a 20 year period),
What you can’t grasp, possibly because your dunces cap is jammed elsewhere other than on your swede, is the difference in there being higher growth, ie positive, across any particular comparison of thirty year periods than a doubling,
If across any thirty year comparison the GDP growth was not at least doubled you would have a point to make, even in the simpletons graph of your link, can you see a period where GDP growth flatlined,
Didn’t think so, goodnight…
Oh, indeed, for average zero growth over 30 years it would require a true calamity, something Mayan/Rapanui/Carthaginian in scale. In it’s very short existence NZ has never faced a calamity that bad.
But then we’d need something like massive climate change, resource depletion, and maybe a pandemic caused by mass refugee mobilisation, for a calamity to have such long term devastation. I don’t think a triple king-hit like that is particularly likely, but it’s within some folks’ actual sciencey predictions.
But have fun pulling shit numbers out of your arse.
StatsNZ infoshare long term data series:
Rankin (1990) – GNP, 1910/11 prices, calendar year
1902 105.2
1932 185.6
Greasley and Oxley (2008) – index, 1939 = 100
1904 48
1934 90
SNB – Statistics New Zealand official series – 1991/92 prices
1970 48,845
2000 92,742
So take those 3 points and stick them up your arse – you need to refuel your economic prediction device.
And it’s amazing that people still view increases in GDP as a relentlessly positive thing. Higher GDP means more resource usage. Building more prisons increases GDP. Leveraging the financial sector to create more debt, more derivatives and more asset bubbles increases GDP.
I mean, WTF.
If the Left cannot communicate a vision of what kind of society and economy it is going to build for the nation it will be left with nothing more than trying to sell in the same language of the neoliberal right.
Please provide data showing that your modeling has merit. Perhaps from using 1952-1982 records to forecast growth for 1982-2012.
Until you have proven some proof that your projection has merit, it’s not worth the time to try and take it seriously.
”Please provide data”, actually Gallstone, just this once i will humor you, if you consider that my calculations so far are wrong, then i would suggest that it is YOU who should get off of His wanking arse and prove such instead of sitting there going poo poo and ”please provide data” like the massah boss you imagine your self to be,
GDP by Volume:
1954 = 20.59
1984 =53.79
Doubled and then some, in terms of dollars, ok,
GDP in Billions/Dollars
1954 =$2.415
1974* =$5.300
*this data series for GDP growth in billions of dollars stopped in 1974.
Prove the point Gallstone, both by volume and by billions of dollars between the years 1954 and 1984 it is more than obvious that just like in the years 1980 to 2012 GDP at least doubled in both data sets,
i have produced the data for the years 1980 to 2012 previously here at the Standard, if you want to look, be my guest, go fetch,
The source for the data 1954–1984 and 1954–1974* =
http://www.econstats.com/ifs/norosc_oac_2_m.htm
i would show you the relevant GNI figures where in 1949 you can times the 1.101 billions by 10 and be 10 odd billion off the 1979 figure then times the 1979 figure by 10 and be that same 10 odd billion off of the 2009 figures but i don’t want to confuse someone that i consder probably has trouble standing upright in anything but the gentlest of breezes…
Oh good god. That’s genuinely so bad I don’t know where to start. There are so many assumptions and underlying issues (McFlock covered a few) that I just can’t even follow why you think this works. There so much variation that your “model” doesn’t take into account and the numbers themselves hardly form a pattern in of itself without the margin of error, lack of taking into account inflation, so on.
And once again, you just throw out a chorus of personal attacks to hide the fragility of the argument.
I tell you what, Bad. You believe what you want, kid. I won’t be responding. Someone slap me if I do.
Agree about the stripping out of money and we need to stop it ASAP – we have massive foreign debts to repay as well as super education etc, etc.
As far as raising the super age and making kiwisaver compulsory I really don’t think these are things for one shot electioneering promises. We need a rational look at the effects of these policies who wins and loses and how we balance them against other economic needs. And how to future proof them against further right wing governments.
And lastly if this is likely to lose the elction then don’t. Otherwise there will be no super ever for anybody or anything else for that matter.
The current Labour hierarchy are willing to sacrifice 2% to 3% of the votes in order to be seen as “fiscally responsible”. IMO it is electoral suicide. Making people stay in the work force longer when there is already too little employment for them.
National will start making hay on this during the TV debates; their polling will have told them that Labour supporters hate the policy.
+100 CV…they will be very foolish to raise the age of super higher than that of the NACTS
CV Too true. Don’t need a crystal ball. They are thinking like 1980’s twerps. They dropped us into it then and even if they get elected it will just be a case of equality amongst the masses, spreading the unhappiness further than before so the olders can suffer too. Instead of concentrating on holding the costs down for super, with ideas coming from the mature interested as well as academics and specialists. It would be good if Labour could investigate what ideas socially advanced academics have produced and countries considered.
Labour has become a Party that sees people as problems to be administered to I think. Instead of the idea once held, that people were active participants building the country and their lives. Now they are dropouts, low productivity units, deadbeat dads and feckless mothers.
This housing idea, where is the innovative self-help thing of the past, I’m thinking sweat equity schemes. Why can’t unemployed men and women be interviewed for skills suitable to join teams building simple houses for themselves and others, with a registered builder with teaching ability in charge of each team. Those who have the ability could go straight into the job of making a home for themselves and short-cutting an official apprenticeship. There could be cul de sac developments with a common garden ready to cope with the hard times ahead. Houses built around a square with a shared playpark with each house having an entry gate. Kilburn in London had this design in some of its planning.
As for the middle aged and future old age pension needs and the age going to 67 and probably 70 which I am sure the deadheads in Labour are considering. First stop elevating it by calling it superannuation which is gentrifying it. It is a pension, something that is a boon, to be proud of not to be ashamed of – a proper part of a modern society. (A rose by any other name, smells as sweet.)
One of my relations has had an eventful life and is still reasonably young. First husband abandoned her with two wee children in Oz. Husband died. She remarried to widower with children in NZ. Brought the lot up well. Got sick, virus killed a kidney, kept control of condition, took antibiotics for a year till hospital rostered her for removing the dead tissue. Looking after family all the time, fairly tired and unwell then.
Husband got cancer, prolonged life spending all their savings on expensive imported drug, till government helped. He died. She has to work but with irregular hours in retail and on roster that she accesses on computer which system sometimes fails then she drives to workplace to see if she is to work that day. Hours fluctuate. Sometimes she works late, gets up at 4 am cleans for 2 hours, and has a short break then starts work at 9 am at other job. Can only just survive. Helps her children and grandchildren, and ailing mother. She will be worn out by 65.
It’s not only men in physical work who work hard and need to retire. And single people who don’t have the advantage of another wage from a partner, and another person to share the jobs of household management with, they can have difficulties. If they are women they may have been on low wages all their lives, possibly 70 to 80 per cent of what men of the same age receive.
+100…and another winner for Labour would be to STOP legislation allowing foreigners buying up traditional New Zealand houses!…this would be a winner for Labour!..(it will be a winner for Winnie and the Greens)
….NACT and their wealthy mates rather than STOP this artificial shortage of housing due to allowing foreigners to buy( which amounts to betrayal against New Zealanders ) ….wants young New Zealanders and returning New Zealanders and those is state houses in prime positions….to be artificially costed out of the traditional housing market and forced into yet to be built trashy new high rises in new subdivisions
…NACT and their wealthy mates want ordinary New Zealanders relegated to the new slums while foreigners and their wealthy mates buy New Zealand heritage housing and ancestral homes built on the work and taxes of their forebears….its a disgrace!
( it is not allowed elsewhere in other countries around the world)
I think we need to stop calling welfare “benefits”. We need to change both how people see people on welfare and how the people on welfare see themselves. We need to see the funding going to welfare as an investment in our countries future that over time will produce positive results.
Of course, that’s going to mean changing “unemployment” to education. People should either be in formal employment or training. There should be no unemployment with people shifting between jobs should be classified as shifting between jobs and not unemployed.
“I think we need to stop calling welfare “benefits”.
Ain’t that the truth! +100
Ekshly calling them benifits is nothing further from a truth.
(I would comment further, but right about now I’m trying to cope with a Mora – that nicest, most magnanimos man on Earth – all of a sudden feigning concern because some recidivist has copped an outrageoud fine of $15K). They don’t seem to like it when the defendant is one of their ilk. I wonder if the guy got legal aid too!
Thank Christ there’s now only one hour of the nicest man of Earth. Poor man! – give him a Subway Egg Roll
“The accent should be on eliminating child poverty, raising benefits, creating jobs, better housing, protecting the environment etc etc, everything that Nats are NOT even bothered with.”
Would you not get this result (sort of) by recommending everyone vote Greens/Mana? Then since a small percentage of those who promise to do so would actually do so, you’d have a chance of a coalition that held Labour to the “traditional” (sort of) values they once stood for? Not that I encourage anyone to vote. It’s a bit sad reading stuff here about people wishing Labour would miraculously morph into something other than what they’ve careful and purposely become over the past few decades. All within months of an election. Illusions die hard, hope even harder, but it looks like red or blue pill time.
Personally, I’d recommend people do nothing, don’t vote. With luck the National party will be re-interred, with an added ACT element – the best chaos factor I could hope for – and then finally people would have the last of the stupid colonial/aspirational/feudal/entitlement attitudes beaten the hell out of them, they’ll see themselves as the fucking animals they are and have to decide to continue to be so, or really truly take a first hand interest in each other as humans. Let’s be honest, no one on this site is going to feel any real pain, just the theoretical/sympathetic kind. I’m close enough to the line I could become homeless under that sort of regime, but I still have an internet connection, how poor am I really? Most of the others commenting here sounds like they come from a nice and comfy place to me, employers, self employed, some even openly admit it. We’ll get over it, the “collateral damage” and such, just like our heroes in Labour got over Rogernomics and the like.
The Labour Party isn’t the solution to NZ’s problems, change the leader all you like, demand harder or softer lines on this or that policy, split hairs and put this or that off till after this or that. No difference. Until people get hit with reality it’s all hot air. It’s the system that’s screwed, the way people relate to each other, they way people believe themselves to be, or worse, believe they could be.
Don’t wail too much for the real poor. Right now they are surviving under worse conditions than those that make the papers or pop songs. They’re good at surviving, better at it than you or me, better people than you or me. If they died of disease or starvation, or suicide, or in pain from lack of medical attention, they’d die better people than you or me. They’re there because we believe in a broken system. First easy step for everyone here to help the poor? Stop thinking Labour is coming on a big fucking white horse. They are big fucking white whores.
@ aux..well said/argued..!
..my memory of the appearance here by cunnliffe..
..was that he offered not a word of concern/solution for the poorest/worst-off..
..it was just all the same old same old arbeit macht frei..
..(a school-breakfast bandaid here and there doesn’t really cut it/won’t really change much..
..we all know that..)
..if he has addressed this question elsewhere..i wd appreciate it being pointed out to me..
tho’ i totally reject yr call to ‘not vote.
..that is just dumb..dumb..dumb..
..not least because we have mmp..
..so if you want those sort of policies..
..get off yr arse and go and help those that are fighting to right those wrongs..
..those that have those policies..
..eh..?
Oh there’s a big difference between Labour and National alright, and while myself, being one of the poor you claim do not comment here am not enamored of large amounts of Labour policy, Personally there is one HUGE difference,
Under Labour i do not expect nor receive sweet FA above the miserable amount that makes up the calculation of inflation on the dollar amount of my benefit(long-term), i expect to then get left alone to cope the best i can without having the ”rug” whipped out from under my feet, ie, Labour is unlikely to send some muppet with a doctors degree along to tell me i am now fit for work when previously 3,4, or 5 of them in the past ten years have stamped my file ”Fucked”,
National of course will happily do this, changing the rules continually leaving every beneficiary in my position, and there are 10’s of 1000’s of us, continually looking over our shoulders wondering (a) when the doctors in charge will get round to us with their ”new” rules, or (b), a real fucking loony in the form of a Nick Smith will find us ”undeserving” to be housed in affordable conditions, and if He will start this ”progrom” upon those over 60 and those wheelchair bound,(which i am neither of), then He sure as hell will gleefully toss my arse out into the street,
As for your plea for us not to vote, i will use the short form of conversation to describe my feelings, FUCK OFF dickwad that idea is just DUMB…
Oooh stop saying things I agree with, it’s undermining the foundation of my universe
“Personally, I’d recommend people do nothing, don’t vote.”
And look what happened last time Aux, in 2011, when we had our poorest turnout in decades, life only got worse for so many people.
I’m not coming from a nice comfy place that you speak of above – although I do have a good house to live in, that’s all, and that could be gone soon, my circumstances are that fragile – my outcomes could be completely different under a different govt from this one so why on earth would I not vote? Why would I abstain from voting when there is a chance things can improve? I’d have to be a sadist not to vote.
You may view our system as broken and that we need a complete societal collapse to wake us up but there’s not many of us who have the luxury of imagining that scenario. We have to do real things like agitate, demonstrate and VOTE.
What we do have is the benefit of the MMP system and we can vote for the people that represent us, (and you refer the Greens and Mana above) I don’t think people are assuming that Labour will automatically solve all our problems.
Would you really prefer a complete disaster via a Nat coalition getting back in for another three years over a return to at least some semblance of sanity via a Left coalition?
Furthermore Aux, consider those who might be reading your comment are have come to our country to live, to escape a regime they were living under where they couldn’t vote because they lived under a military dictatorship, or can only vote in sham elections, or they lost loved ones who died fighting for the right to a vote and to live in a fully functioning democracy.
Life is more shit for them than for us and they would probably feel quite cynical towards those who suggest people don’t vote when they have the opportunity to participate in the legitimate choosing of their government. I think your statement is a little bit “first world problems” perhaps.
Well put Rosie, a far nicer riposte than i could manage…
Ya know bad, one thing that really gets my goat, more than river bank/beneath the bridge dwellers is those that for a variety of reasons say “don’t vote”.
Aux’s reason is that a non vote will push a disaster upon us that he/she believes will “wake the people” and a fairer system will be restored. That is some fanciful dream. And if the last six years experience hasn’t “awakened the people” then we are so stupid as to have “The I.Q of a fence post” to quote Tom Waits.
Other reasons you hear are “You can’t trust politicians” or “They’re as bad as each other” – That last sentence is reserved for those that haven’t twigged on to the fact that we left our FPP voting system behind ages ago.
It’s just petulant self indulgent talk – they see political people and parties as not living up to their unrealistic expectations, so they dismiss them.
Again well put Rosie, one thing the commenter above did get right is our ability on the bottom of the financial heap to adjust, to make ends meet, having done so again with this National government having a go at me through the ”tax switch” doesn’t make me any happier,
the disaster the commenter above talks of largely ocurs out of sight and therefor out of mind, (i don’t ‘know’ if the kids down the street are going to school hungry and i am hardly going to ask their mum such questions),
The disaster of the current politics doesn’t occur in any one year, in the vein of death by a thousand cuts such disasters occur over multi-generations cleverly hisden with the averaged or mediumed figures for incomes and costs of housing,
In many respects it is the disaster of a slow motion holocaust,(and i don’t use the terms lightly), i seen an article, i think in the Herald, the other day which pointed out the suicidal tendencies imposed upon those who are made unemployed,(i was surprised that this still occurs), this holocaust has been occurring across a 40 year time span as apposed to the 4–5 years of the real one,
Lolz i think i said enough in the above comment about the ”do not vote” idea, if anything should be compulsory in this world my opinion is that participating in Democracy once every 3 years should be…
Well said Rosie. All I would add is that the “All politicians lie, so you’d be naive to trust them” line gets used by the RWNJs a lot. It benefits Key and co to spread that one about, since it muddies the waters. That way when they are caught out in this week’s lying BS dodgy dealing, a large number of 6 o’clock news watchers will just shrug their shoulders and their eyes will glaze over a little more.
Anyone who thinks not voting is an option is a first class moron who doesn’t understand how democracy works and presumably wants another term for National
Aux-you could vote Mana or Green. The Left has 3 genuine choices at this election.
Proposing to raise the retirement age is the one policy that is so bad it makes me seriously question why Labour would want to lose this election. Are they so scared of Mana and Green having any influence that they would rather leave the governing benches with NAct?
@amrite..+ 1..
..and what really puzzles me about this one..
..is the general agreement that no actual changes have to be made until further down the road..
..so really..now we are just arguing the toss over the idea/problem/possible solutions..
..(with one strong argument being that we don’t even have a ‘problem’..plus..trying to predict now..how things will be in 30 yrs +..
..no risks of error there..!..eh..?..)
..so i ask..why the fuck are labour ‘choosing’ to die in the ditch..over what can only be a vote-killing policy..?
..when by any measure..they don’t need to..?
..what kind of madness is this..?
..i would really like to hear the ‘official’ answer to that question..
..eh..?
There will be ample time for reflection and reports on super after the election, the urgent matter is getting out the vote and denying John Phillip Shonkey a further term. It is vital that the Labour Party drops the earnest, brownie points approach to super. These tory swine play for keeps, send Key back to Hawaii first.
Key knows what the bourgeois economists and funds are saying about the affordability of super. His line is about opportunism not integrity given that he has lied about so many other things. Why this apparent outbreak of wanting to be trusted on his word? There are votes in it. Thousands of late 50s early 60s people will vote National on keeping super at 65. Partly because of the lack of a UBI and the realities of a low wage economy and battling WINZ.
Labour just needs to say anyone that genuinely needs super from 60 on for health, financial or personal reasons can get it upon application, and those that don’t can go on a sliding schedule till they do.
Thousands of those above 65 who won’t be affected by Labour’s plans, absolutely hate the idea of raising the super age on their own children and grand children, and vote against Labour – or stay at home from the polls.
They can, of course, vote for Mana, Greens or Alliance even. As far as I know, there’s only two parties suggesting raising the retirement age – Labour and Act and that latter should tell Labour just how bad that policy is.
If we have a UBI we don’t need super at all.
And we would be able to turn much of the benefit surveillance money going into WINZ into true amenities for parents and children.
With compulsory kiwisaver Labour can drop the vote loosing idea of raising the retirement age .
As kiwisaver is guaranteed payment at 65.
It’s too late, the Genie is out of the bottle.
To reverse their position would make Labour look untrustworthy and voters will just think, “do they think we’re stupid?, they’ll do it anyway once they get elected”.
Really, dumb stuff from the red team.
Super is one of those policies you deal with on the way out, not on the way in.
“..It’s too late, the Genie is out of the bottle…”
..it could still be saved..
..labour could take the high-ground..and announce a bi-partisan/multi-party group/’commission’? to be set up post-election..
..to achieve consensus on the issue..(blah!..blah..!..blah..!..)
..to develop an agreed course of action before the ’17 election..(blah..!..blah..!..blah..!..)
..surely that wouldn’t be too hard to sell to the electorate..?
exactly, aka known as kicking for touch…
Key has little stomach for genuine cross party handling of super so it would indicate status quo for a while longer but what the hell, climate change will make super rather irrelevant anyway, but not before September 20.
“..climate change will make super rather irrelevant anyway, but not before September 20…”
..+ 1..
You may have hit on an answer Tiger. Labour could announce a policy on Superannuation thus:
“When in Government Labour Greens will enter into cross party talks to determine a forward path to protect the integrity of Superannuation.
All Parties will participate with an open agenda.
Any refusal to participate in good faith will be regarded as an insult to present and to future Superannuants.”
Mr Key exPM will respond how?
shit ianmac..and there was me thinking it was ‘my’ ‘answer’..
..eh..?
..not that it really matters..the ‘ends’ matter more than the ‘means’..
..but..y’know..!
Why would National want to do that?
Key has stated National is not touching super, why would he want to enter into some sort of
“bi-partisan/multi-party group/’commission’? ”
The way Key probably thinks is that you shouldn’t have to work beyond 65, instead of forcing people to spend very waking second of their life working, try and grow the economy so people can still retire at 65 and the country can still afford it.
This raising the retirement age is bollocks.
“instead of forcing people to spend very waking second of their life working, try and grow the economy so people can still retire at 65 and the country can still afford it.”
i doubt that fits into keys world view in even a tiny way – hes neocon from top to toe
one idea weve chucked about at home is based around the idea that raising the retirement age also locks younger people out of the workforce (potentially)
so – our idea went,
if they raise the age for getting super you could still receive it at 65 with no penalty or reduction, on the condition you did x amount of hours (10? 20?) of voluntary work either with an existing org or with the ability to start your own. (Bearing in mind the voluntary work doesnt need to be physical work – it could be mentoring, helping out with basic office work etc etc)
The “mens shed” projects come to mind here
this way we would not straight away financially penalise workers who have had very physical jobs, put more money and/or resources into local communities, give charities (existing or yet to be created) some much needed help and free up some positions in the job force. It would probably have physical and mental health benefits for the retiree in there as well
its just a lose idea and it wouldnt work for everyone, plus im sure theres problems with it that i havent seen yet
@BM..”To reverse their position would make Labour look untrustworthy and voters will just think, “do they think we’re stupid?”
on the contrary …voters will think Labour has listened to the people and bowed to their will and made a sensible decision…many Labour people are worn out at 65 and need that super at the younger age( especially Polynesian men who die at a younger age)…
… better to pay for the 65 super by axing some of those new motorways…which we dont need anyway
I have to disagree, this is an election plank, not some idea which has been thrown out there for feed back.
To suddenly turn around and can it, makes Labour look incompetent as well as untrustworthy, they’ve really put themselves in a bad position.
Also out of the pan and into the fire if Labour floats the idea of canning the road upgrades.
People love the new roads, touch those at your peril.
Poor BM…….he’s hoping like hell Labour DOESN’T change tack on the super age. So like the rusty old right wing bugle he is he squawks on about genies and bottles. Squawking to himself again like some emeritus professor of self soothing. Blowhard Man. Still uses Brylcreem.
What KiwiSaver? Oh you mean the KiwiSaver which relies on you having employment for life, and which relies on the international financial casino giving you back your money when you retire?
Pull the other one mate.
“which relies on the international financial casino giving you back your money when you retire?”
yep. Maybe people should think about why they don’t like to invest in the sharemarkets (i.e. they don’t trust the arseholes which operate in it) yet are happy to pile it into Kiwisaver which invests in sharemarkets. Answer – people don’t think enough. Watch for the whole lot to go up in smoke in the future ….
Wall St stole billions from US pension funds and 401K plans over the last 5 years, with the help of their accomplices the credit ratings agencies who marked the junk which was being sold on as “AAA”.
It’s a major reason why so many of these worker retirement schemes are now “underfunded.”
We don’t seem to fucking learn in this country.
Throughout history mankind seems to have always tried for the money for nothing that comes from interest and shareholding. People don’t seem to realise that that money still comes from work and use of resources.
Yes absolutely and that is it. plus ca change I am afraid ….
And of course, for those people who decide that maybe they don’t trust Kiwisaver and want to save for their own retirement in other ways, perhaps getting creative?
Oh, Labour will just force them to contribute to the fund unless you fall into what we regard as being allowed to be exempt.
Nice.
comment@whoar..ed:..gee..!..guess what..?..the british tories also have a cash-for-access ‘cabinet-club’…who’dathunkit..?..eh..? – paid-for dinners-with-the-p.m. – and all..)
..the stench of tory-corruption..both here and there…
http://whoar.co.nz/2014/ed-gee-guess-what-the-british-tories-also-have-a-cash-for-access-cabinet-club-whodathunkit-eh/
grant roberston was very good on tv1 breakfast..
..a lucid/intelligent critique of the budget..
Ditto on Radio Active this morning with Alistair Thompson.
Laugh out loud material this morning on RadioNZ National as that radio station makes a grovelling abject apology for its treatment of Winston Peters yesterday,
Twice so far this morning they have broadcast the same apology to Peters, i am not sure who the voice doing the ”grovel” is but Winston should have insisted that ‘the spinner’ Espiner was forced to personally grovel on air…
Missed it, damn, that weasel E’spinner is aural pollution, what a pest.
He crowds and jabs opposition interviewees but gives plenty of space to the torys along with a hot towel and backrub by the sounds of it.
Apology to Peters – mp3
http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/mnr/mnr-20140516-0747-apology_to_winston_peters-048.mp3
and how about that horan..?
..what a fucken joke he is..eh..?
..he is clearly trying to do a shane who?…
..spraying his way out the door…
…….. “a serious departure from RNZ standards” ……. “should not have been aired” ….. etc
Do you think Espiner will get the message that it’s not all about him and his ego?
Somehow I doubt it.
yes i really enjoyed hearing those apologies ….but i still think the pants should be sued off Espiner et al…it was a serious attempt by National Radio to knee cap Winston Peters and undermine his credibility
…the NACTs have tried and done it before …it makes anything Peters says thereafter seem like lies or hypocrisy….when in fact Winston Peters is one of John Key /NACTS most able and effective critics…both in the House and out in public
Radio New Zealand has done damage to a very effective opposition politician and imo more than an apology is required!
Espiner knew very well that Horan’s accusations were highly likely to be motivated by malice …but he encouraged them instead of stopping him …he broadcasted them to the nation with energy and support….at very least Espiner shopuld go and be replaced by a better journalist
Agreed – Espiner has ruined Morning Report! His wheedling, whiny voice and needling and vindictive manner are a disgrace and so off-putting! And how long did it take him to destroy the goodwill and esteem that Geoff Robinson had built up over decades for that show?? About 5 minutes!
and im sick to death of him acting like gower in his interviews
“yes i really enjoyed hearing those apologies”
Even more fun if you imagine every word being spoken verbatim by Peters. Because that’s exactly what happened.
Anybody who incurs a high level of risk of a big suck out of an employer’s bank account should be shown the door shouldn’t they? Surely his contract provides for termination if he brings a big legal case down on the employer through his own possible inadequacy??
Or is termination only for litttle people doing little things.
“you can’t make much difference to migration numbers ” Bill English
Dr Greg Clydesdale Growing Pains
National must know it is vulnerable hear, it’s all in this treasury report.
am i the only one who can’t be bothered reading ‘bricks/blocks’ of words any more..?
Don’t you be complaining about badly formatted hard to read comments
Lolz Phillip just done a Pot meets Kettle…
heh..!..i take yr point of view…
…no phillip you just belong to a club with very low membership…
…white space…
……has its place……
……but online is just……
…………a waste…………
it really amuses/fascinates me how people seem to get so engaged/enraged over not using capital-letters ..
..and the like..
..they seem to have no awareness of the history/evolution of how we communicate..
..how ‘norms’ become antiquities/curiousities..(think ‘bricks/blocks’..)
..(and anyway..can i help it if someone broke into my house and superglued the caps-lock on my computer..?
..it means i can’t shout at anyone..any more..)
you are a free thinker phillip….an artisan…just that not everyone appreciates your art …but i like it ( i cant understand why people get uptight about dots)
chrs chooky..
i cant understand why people get uptight about dots
I am, because they should be in three’s…
My tutor at ATI National School of Printing in the 1980’s, Mr Frew, would have been most unhappy seeing them in two’s.
Jeez, you used super-glue when you could easily have used a simple registry edit instead?
And after all that, it appears your shift key still works.
Language and communicate does evolve, yes. And just like in evolution itself, some times a style/gene emerges that no one thinks has a benefit and it quickly dies.
Like yours, I guess.
i have to say i am cheered how so many now double-space sentences/paragraphs..
..it was pretty lonely there for awhile..
..(it’s like going vegan/plant-based..there are more and more of us..every day..eh..?..
..the future is ours..eh..?..
..y’know..!..i look at my compatriots..showing the physical outcomes from a life of animal flesh/fat/bye-products/booze..
..rattling as they walk..from all the pills they take each day to counter the effects of those diet/lifestyle outcomes..
..and i know that they are the dinosaurs..
..and anyone out there reading this that is young..
..you should really take that on board..eh..?
..you have a choice of two very different lives..
..it’s like ciggy-smoking..
..we now know that it fucks us up..
..we no longer have any excuses..
..yr futures of either joy or misery..
..are entirely in yr own hands..)
too long-not reading it phillip
what a strange ‘git’ you are there..
..bearded git..
..but seeing as you won’t read this..eh..?
..you won’t even know my opinion..
..shine on..!..y.c.d..!..eh..?
TM +1
It’s good to see some progress on establishing rental warant of fitness criteria.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/home-property/10047615/Rentals-across-NZ-fail-warrant-of-fitness
It looks as if this is something good landlords could manage without too much fuss.
Kiwiblog GD
Piketty, Capital in 21st Century.
All of that comes after he points out that countries with massive foreign ownership have incomes below their productivity. So, there you have it – foreign ownership is bad for a country and isn’t needed anyway. It causes poverty and specialisation (can anyone say ‘farming’?) which reduces development.
I was reading discussions yesterday about foreigners buying houses where free trade was invoked. That lead me to a speech in the House of Commons where the Conservative speaker said that the foriegn investors “financed” the countries building. There has to be something wrong when a country can’t pay for it’s own land a construction.
http://economicsnz.blogspot.co.nz/2014/04/bad-economics-and-contemptible-politics.html
Buildings in a country are always built using local material. This means that the foreign currency doesn’t pay for anything. All that needs to be done is the government to create the money and spend it on the collection of the resources, the processing of the resources and then the building of the buildings.
This money would then be taken out of the economy via taxes and charges. Absolutely no need for foreign currency at all.
This applies to everything in the country.
Tax debt totals $6 billion, while welfare debt is about $1b
Tax debtors get off more lightly. Inland Revenue is more likely to negotiate with debtors and collect core tax, and write off penalties and interest.
Between July 1, 2011, and June 2012, Inland Revenue wrote off nearly 50 per cent of interest and penalties applied to overdue tax, amounting to $374 million.
It wrote off $435m in core debt, reflecting 11.6 per cent of collectable debt.
MSD wrote off $8.7m in core debt, or 2.1 per cent of collectable debt.
This government is giving the rich a lot more that the $1.2b in tax cuts. It is letting them off on paying all their taxes!
http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/9037828/Welfare-debt-tackled-more-than-tax-fraud
Got to keep the troublemaking underclass suppressed and oppressed somehows…
Well put, i believe that there is also a ”novel” means in play at the moment where those in ”Bizz” via the tax lawyers have been given a ”new tool” with which to legally?? avoid payments of due taxation,
The current 800 million dollar shortfall in the projected tax rate would more than suggest this, although the prior sacking of half the staff from inland revenue’s provincial offices cannot be totally discounted as the precursor to a large amount of this avoidance of payment of due taxation,(hopefully the next Government bolsters those employment numbers immediately upon election),
Considering the sloth at which it has taken various governments to address the ability of those owning rental properties to write off income including wages against losses they incur on such properties it will probably be a decade at least befor the current ”new” rort is discovered,(but it is being looked for),
A faster route to such a discovery would i suggest,(tongue in cheek), involve someone like SSLands, who gives the appearance of being a minor bean-counter for a firm of tax lawyers, a surgical operating dolly, straps, wiring, and a device that conveys electrical charge,
Lolz, i can say no more…
Hone’s post budget speech is impressive, and leaves you in no doubt as to where he stands:
http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2014/05/16/hone-harawiras-budget-speech-last-night/
Mr Speaker – if a budget is about how we set out our priorities and outline the financial strategies to achieve those priorities, then we must be strong enough to identify the important ones, courageous enough to allocate the money needed to achieve them, and then unwavering in our determination to realise them. Those priorities define what kind of society it is we want, and the resources we dedicate to them in a budget are an expression of our commitment to achieving them.
Yeah well received here from Hone, a stark contrast to the speech of the Maori Party leader who incredibly claimed responsibility for the previous Labour/Green home insulation policy,(such an insult put my tv on the endangered species list and my blood pressure on the danger line),
Flavell, soon to be unseated we pray, started His budget speech with a bout of me me me me….
nats and now maori party claiming greens programme..
absolute power corrupts…
Darien Fenton leaving at the election and also Rajen Prasad…. now that’s a real loss of talent. rats sinking ship….
Drinnan says TV3 has buckled somewhat re-using Linda Clark as an election commentator. He agrees she should be more up front up the political clients she works for. But isn’t that the same for Hooton, and not to mention some right wing bloggers used as political commentators?
I don’t work for any political clients.
‘I don’t work for any political clients’…. only a select few.
‘I don’t work for any political clients’….solely individuals who wish to make profit at all costs….and if this involves donating and spending a whole lot of time lobbying (read ‘wining and dining’) with members of the two parties that most supports their self interest….this doesn’t make them ‘political’ …this makes them ‘following their self interest’ …this is simply ‘business people’ following ‘common business practices’.
None of your clients have any professional, career or business interest in NZ politics?
I think once you start including anything beyond actual political clients, you freeze out the whole of the country.
You just dismissed a whole lot of people who have no political clout, conduct no political activity apart from them perhaps voting once every 3 years by your comment there and there are a whole lot of people in that category.
Hahahahahahaha !
But the explicit aim of your organization is political lobbying – IE you aim to represent people to intervene in political processes in order to achieve political aims to their liking and/or benefit.
does that extend to others in your business/es and what is your definition of “political” in your statement?
What is this statement saying Matty. You don’t work (just sit and collect money for nothing) or you don’t have any political clients?? If you have no political clients why do you find us here so attractive for airing your views? We are your hobby??
Yes, The Standard is one of my hobbies.
If you are interested, I put this comment on Whaleoil in response to his request for political commentators to say which politicians or political parties they work for:
I have been doing political commentary since 2004 mainly on Radio New Zealand, RadioLIVE, the Sunday Star Times and the NBR.
I do not receive any money from any political party or politicians.
Things that some might believe are relevant in terms of disclosure (none of which have ever been secret) are:
From 1991-1998, I was employed in the Beehive during the term of the last National Government and was paid by Ministerial Services.
In 1999, I assisted the Super 2000 Taskforce set up by Prime Minister Jenny Shipley to advise on superannuation policy.
In 2000, I assisted the Department of Labour promote Margaret Wilson’s Employment Relations Bill to the business community.
In 2003, I had expenses associated with organising a press conference for Don Brash refunded by Parliamentary Services (but was not paid for my time).
In 2004 (successfully) and 2007 (unsuccessfully) I worked for a group called Action Hobson which contested the Hobson ward of the old Auckland City Council. I was paid out of donations.
In 2005, I did one-off leaders’ debate training for Rodney Hide, playing John Campbell, and was paid by Parliamentary Services (I think – it could have been the Act Party itself).
In 2007, my staff and I worked on Willie & JT’s unsuccessful mayoral campaigns
(can’t remember if we were paid or if it was pro bono – probably a bit of
both).
In 2009, I worked for Don Brash’s 2025 Taskforce in releasing its report and was
paid by the Treasury.
In 2011, my company and I worked for the Independent Maori Statutory Board of the Auckland Council, in its dispute with the Council over funding.
In 2012, my company and I worked for the Maori Economic Development Panel in releasing its report and was paid by TPK.
In 2012-13, my company and I worked for the Christchurch Central Development Unit on a number of projects.
I have also done work in Mongolia for people associated with the then Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party and the Mongolian Green Party.
I am pretty sure this is all where politicians might be involved directly or indirectly as clients.
In addition, I try to avoid writing or talking about anything related to private sector issues I am working on. For example, I never wrote anything about UFB or the proposed carpark tax as a commentator, even when these were highly topical. If I do address anything I am working on, I either mention this in the column or conversation or put a formal disclosure at the end. I neglected to do this once in a column about the ETS and Richard Harman’s The Nation did me over on TV3, which was fair enough.
On a somewhat related note.
I don’t like this whole thing going on with the media and rules around politics re TVNZ requiring their workers to not belong to a political party.
This is a democracy FFS – and if workers are disallowed from being active in politics on some level outside their working hours – this is a political stance in itself. It is a requirement that journalists are disengaged from their democracy.
While I see this is a way of a media outlet protecting itself and its workers from being accused of bias, isn’t it better – in a democracy – to disclose all connections – such as being involved with any potentially political organisation (for example ‘The Tax Payers Union’) – rather than requiring no outside activities from these people?
Isn’t it better that the general public are allowed to know what stance the reporter has, rather than having it covered up by such a draconian requirement. Does this requirement require that the journalist has no connection to organisations such as ‘the Taxpayers Union’ too?
Neutrality in journalists isn’t the way to go – it is an unrealistic expectation – isn’t it better to accept that and have a balance of left-wing and right-wing journalists/political commentators?
This reminds me of the way Christmas has been cancelled in this country. We could have Christian, Muslim, Maori, Chinese, Indian etc celebrations. Or we can cancel the lot. Cancelling the lot is a religious stance of non-religiousness/non spirituality. Same with the political issue and journalists. This is turning into a non-political requirement from members of a democracy.
Yep. Agree with that, bl.
I don’t think it is just about people declaring their direct political involvement in parties, etc., but being upfront about their underlying values and general political views.
the idea that if you dont belong to a party you are less likely to take a jaundiced view is silly.
has paul henry stated he belongs to no political party? mike hosking? if they dont, my point stands. if they do, why hide it?
I mostly object to the concept of “belonging” to a political party. Damn strange way of expressing what happens in my opinion.
I’m a member of the Labour party. I’m also probably one of its more frequent and effective critics, especially of its parliamentary wing. I get told that rather too frequently sometimes.
But I’d be surprised if anyone inside the Labour party thinks that I’m their property. Especially since I also donate to and help out the Greens, and actively try to get lefties from across the spectrum to get involved with any political party in anyway that they feel like.
I often rather suspect that a lot of the politicos in political parties would prefer that I didn’t get interested in them and what they are doing. In much the same way that many commentators here would often prefer that I didn’t take and interest in them. Being a bit of a sarcastic pain interested in slicing and dicing through bullshit appears to be deeply embedded in my nature.
But as a general principle, I’d agree with you. In my experience experienced members of political parties are usually more critical of the party that they are members of than “independents”. For a starter most people are involved because they want to help change where that party is heading. Otherwise why bother being a member.
drinnan talks absolute shite in that column..
..i posted a comment there saying as much..and for why..
..i doubt it will get thru..
He responded to my tweet
if she stands aside why does she have to give any details?
Hmm…another thought…
It really shows National to be weak and antidemocratic with their recent activity of taking out any potential left-leaning commentary from the mainstream media.
National appear to believe that it is not suitable to have people with left-wing views commenting on politics. It is also clear that they don’t mind those of right-wing views on TV, or they would be complaining about the many who are right-wing on TV.
I can see why they are doing this, both their ideology and position is weak. If they have anyone sharing left-wing views on the mainstream media it will be a landslide to the left in this year’s election.
The only chance the right-wing have (and I would posit ever have) of winning the election is hiding the reality of what their ideological stance is and where their stupid bloody policies lead.
National’s aim is clearly to keep people misinformed by imbalanced reporting. That is the only way they can win because they haven’t got any decent arguments to counter the left’s narrative, so they are trying to shut it down completely. Nice one National.
The people supporting parties who take such measures to shut out opposing views are either simple fools or dictatorial fools who want to destroy democratic processes and prefer a dictatorship because that is what they are getting by supporting this government. Note: either way they are fools because they are undermining the system that they are benefitting the most from.
and tv3 will run a tracker for the first twenty seconds of the paul henry show stating he stood as a national party candidate in 1999.
This is a nasty little piece in the Manawatu Standard. Against the Labour Party. And based on the idea that big unions are should be regarded as corporations and on the same level and standing as business corporations. So when it comes to the wealthy 1-10% giving NACTs donations, the 90% also-rans trying to achieve cohesion and representation and fund it is equal?
So, with a nice farming practical back to the land title – Deals keep the grassroots tilled
says LIAM HEHIR on 12 May 2014. (He is a lawyer, surprise, specialising in – Property
Business, Intellectual property, Rural – surprise?) No doubt he knows which dairy farm his butter comes from. Or indeed, if moving with the times, his olive oil.
I can reveal that a network of highly organised corporations have gained influence over one of our political parties. They give this party thousands of dollars – and there is no doubt they get their money’s worth.
For instance, the corporations in question have privileged party connections. As hard as it is to believe, they actually have a direct hand in choosing the party leader. Less directly, a high number of party MPs and organisers used to work for them.
The party regularly proposes legislation that furthers the goals of these corporations…..
Yes, the role and influence of unions over the Labour Party is truly disturbing.
Of course, you probably shouldn’t expect the TV3 news team to express any alarm over this. I also wouldn’t hold my breath while waiting for John Campbell to demand which Labour Party figures met with which union bosses (and what was discussed and what promises were made).
Another thing you can’t expect is a meaningful distinction as to why the matter is different to the National Party talking to businessmen, receiving donations from them and meeting with them at fundraising events.
Possibly worth complaining and then reporting to the Press council.
it shouldnt surprise anyone cos its all public record. the act board chooses its candidates with no public disclosure of how those decisions are made. national does theirs in secret.
liam must be struggling to know who to vote for, but i suspect he is in colin craigs camp.
This is bizarre:
http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2014/05/16/they-write-comments/
From the discussion thread in a previous post:
Anonymous activists broke into [Redacted]’s Tinakori Road apartment when he was in Auckland with his boyfriend. We photocopied documents relating to his and his wife’s messy divorce and employment proceedings with the GCSB. We copied the hard disks of his laptop. We have a mass of documents relating to the GCSB’s spying on Japan, Indonesia, and Middle Eastern Countries and people of a MIddle Eastern origin in New Zealand as well. We also have evidence of the GCSB monitoring Chinese commercial interests on behalf of the United States.
Evidence:
[Redacted] was caught by his wife fucking men when stationed to the NSA
NZ spied on Japan re the IWC
More to come if you can handle it Danyl, or maybe I should seek another outlet?
Anonymous
Much more to come; much more
I can’t handle it. Go bug Andrea Vance.
Smells completely like a set up.
I see Radio New Zealand had to apologize to Winston Peters this morning. That slimy little whinger gluon whatshisname had broadcasted an entirley unsubstantiated slander against Winston without checking the facts.
Is this the “NEW” Radio New Zealand. We just so busy sucking up to National party that we can do what we like now?
Captain Hook Is that a rhetorical question? Radionz obviously doesn’t consider it can do anything it likes – it read out a full apology. But it wasn’t Gluon that did so, it was a female voice. Was it Gluon that did the interview with Winston Peters? I remember the content and the part about whether Winston was allowed to own part of a racehorse.
I don’t remember which part and Whinny bucked and kicked in a fair and defensive way. But Winston is a lawyer and can handle the legals unto the party of the third and fourth part and good on him for socking it to them.
Darien Fenton will not be seeking re-election.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11256117
Interesting, lets see if Labour use this as an opportunity to bump Kelvin Davis up the list…
ianmac
I thought that the table that I have pointed to below was an interesting run through of politicians in 2013 summarised in an incisive way.
Go into Google and search under the words – denis o’rourke Maori gangs
then scroll to second page, look for Roll Call 2013 – Trans Tasman Newsletter –
That will bring up the very personal take on each pollie which sounds realistic. For Darien Fenton = there was a rating of 3 out of 10 I think.
In many ways she embodies Labour’s problems.
Her main portfolio is transport and you rarely
hear her talking about it. Not cabinet material
This is the home page – http://transtasman.co.nz/home/
Picketty has more in common with George than Marx
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-lane-thomas-piketty-identifies-an-important-ill-of-capitalism-but-not-its-cure/2014/05/14/257d3b16-db82-11e3-8009-71de85b9c527_story.html
I think the difficulty with land tax is political. I brought it up once and someone said “I paid for that” (I paid for my house and by implication the capital gains) or that will cost me.. I don’t want that. People don’t see the (long term) big picture.
John Key rejected a land tax as “the value of everyone’s property would fall’ … and the banks would suffer?
@ jh
Thanks for the link, that article explains the issue in an easy to understand way.
From Key at Sky City
‘ Key also questioned opposition claims the wealthy weren’t paying enough tax, saying the top 2% of taxpayers pay 22% of all personal tax, and 12% of households pay 76% of all net tax.
The question should be widened to HOW much of the income is received by the 2% and the 12% of the households?
…Or how many people are on the lowest tax rate and how many of them live on or below the poverty threshold.
Exactly – the reason that the wealthy pay so much tax is because they have grabbed so much of the nation’s income.
If John Key wants everyone else to pay more tax – challenge him to raise the minimum wage to $16/hr.
And here Key speaks gibberish
less is more.
VOCAL PROTEST OVER POST BUDGET KEY’S SPEECH
http://www.3news.co.nz/Vocal-protests-outside-post-Budget-speech/tabid/1607/articleID/344511/Default.aspx
To me the modern policeman looks like a school boy?
Key has never had to face and angry crowd. He was bravely always hidden somewhere else.
During the last election his daily itinerary was never published. Instead he would always pop up surrounded only by his supporters.
This year?
‘”Maybe at the margin it has become slightly less unequal.”
One small sentence for Key – one great leap for the peoples’ interests.
NEWSFLASH!
The National party’s narrative is crumbling. Key cannot even say that the inequality is not widening. He has to qualify it, so he is not caught out, which he would be if he didn’t.
Hahahahahahahahahahaha
The right-wing narrative is crumbling, folks.
The right-wing narrative is crumbling
The right-wing narrative is crumbling
The right-wing narrative is crumbling
Well done to all of you who have worked toward the uncovering of the smoke and mirrors that National depend on. Your efforts are starting to show. Keep up the good work.
Well, in his garbled way, Key was saying it’s become more unequal if you compare the top and bottom centiles. But he ws treating it more dismissively than it warrants. Taking the mean or median income shows little difference in the last couple of decades.
But there is a danger that long term struggles on the lowest centile means it gets harder and harder to u=improve one’s situation. Meanwhile more wealth, in terms of assets, property ownership etc, is accumulating with those on the highest incomes.
Then there’s the negative impacts on society of a big inequality gap.
Nothing to be complacent, or dismissive, about.
“But there is a danger that long term struggles on the lowest centile means it gets harder and harder to u=improve one’s situation”
I hope we all agree that is no longer theory,
for a growing number it is the only reality they know.
and yes, [them], other countries are worse off than we are!
besides, I am not talking about NZ alone
and then he rolled the dice…
“The question should be widened to HOW much of the income is received by the 2% and the 12% of the households?”
It would be lovely if a journalist would ask him this question. Or, horror of horrors, know the answer already and put it to him…
+1
English needs to be hauled over the coals for his latest back flip. He blew his arse that the belt tightening was over and employee’s can rightfully expect decent pay rises this year;
http://i.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9664436/English-backs-boost-in-wages
So one would assume he would lead by example by giving decent payrises to public and state sector workers. Instead he stated on tv news tonight that SOE workers won’t be getting bugger all. So it’s all snake oil by this idiot, I know there are strongly unionised workers that have their collective agreements to settle soon. And these workers will rightfully hold English to account by being forced to withdraw the only bargaining tool they have ‘their sweat & toil’ so industrial action is inevitable.
I really hope the Left back Nationwide protests and get tens of thousands of workers out in the main centers. The CTU and all disgruntled workers need to get proactive in this regard. All opposition party’s must stand up and be counted.
Watch out Richie McCaw, after maligning both David Beckham and Benji Marshall word has it Key will have a go at you next..
No, I’m pretty sure that National is still trying to interest McCaw in standing as a candidate at some stage.
Raising taxes on the rich would go against the oligarchic principles our nation was founded on
Got to love the Onion
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-15/fact-or-fiction-should-we-raise-taxes-rich-redistribute-wealth
BM is right. Labour turning around and saying that we’re backtracking on Super makes them look foolish and untrustworthy. They’ve staked a very clear position on this issue.
Nah, Labour’s position is flexible.
It’s National who have taken the “hell or highwater, my job on the line” stance.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-dining-club-secretively-channels-hundreds-of-thousands-of-pounds-of-funding-by-anonymous-wealthy-donors-9380723.html
same old
This isn’t:
Will be interesting to see how that goes. See if the people of the US can dis-empower the oligarchy.