Open mike 28/11/2021

114 comments on “Open mike 28/11/2021 ”

• Comments are now closed

1. SPC 1

   28 November 2021 at 7:22 am

   The Herald has been looking at the hole the government has been digging for itself by not meeting standards expected of responsible landlords.

   https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/kainga-ora-the-human-cost-of-living-next-to-neighbours-from-hell/F6EAATWTSTH2ORNM7ED3U3M5FY/

   Exempting tenants from accountability has a parallel with another extreme policy, its deal with National to let developers ignore urban planning rules.
   • Gezza 1.1

     28 November 2021 at 7:53 am

     From the link:

     “At the heart of the problem is a government policy to “sustain tenancies” rather than turfing people out on to the street. It has resulted in just three Kāinga Ora evictions since the Labour Government came to power in September 2017.

     Those who endure the consequences are going without sleep, suffering severe stress and mental anguish, with some seeking court-ordered restraining orders for protection, and others selling their homes to escape.

     The policy has been panned by political opponents, who say it breaches the Government’s legal responsibilities as a landlord to ensure its state housing tenants are safe and free from being terrorised by other Kāinga Ora clients.

     The policy also emboldens rotten apples and lets them off the hook, National claims.

     The Tenancy Tribunal has ruled the no eviction stance is at odds with the state’s legal obligations, ordering Kāinga Ora to pay thousands of dollars to affected claimants.

     There is now talk of a class action to hold the Government to account and there is no shortage of people keen to sign up.”
     ……………………………….

     A good investigative reporter article, well worth the read. A classic case of Labour academic woolly wishful thinking that if you are just nicer to horrible people, they’ll be nice back.

     And, typically, no Plan B.
     • Treetop 1.1.1

       28 November 2021 at 8:54 am

       Being intimidated and harassed by the tenants of a property also happens in private rentals. The cost of a private rental adds to the daily stress so people head for the bottle or drug. When off your face the ugly you is shown or waiting for the next fix as small stuff will set you off.

       In a lot of cases it is the drugs, alcohol and homes that people grew up in with violence, physical , sexual and verbal abuse, alcohol and drugs.

       One problem property affects the whole street. Those on the anti social property know that they can get away with a lot, often it is the people who they bring to the property which also increases the bad behaviour.

       Semi detached rural properties are required, drug and alcohol rehab, education on what the boundaries of being a neighbour is. Counselling to understand the damage that occurred in the childhood home.
       • Gezza 1.1.1.1

         28 November 2021 at 9:45 am

         Yes. I think you’ve nailed the core problems & the solutions.

         Do you see this Labour government doing these things, implementing these harm & harassment mitigations, & underlying problem solutions?

         I’m afraid I don’t.

         I actually think they’d be more likely to have occurred under Bill English / Whanau Ora & the targeted spending he envisaged for dealing with specific people & whanau who were identified as in most need of comprehensive state-funded help & deliver a return of less needed social spending on them in the future.

         Saying such things here is not likely to be popular tho. ☹️
         • Tricledrown 1.1.1.1.1

           28 November 2021 at 12:48 pm

           Yeah right Gezza National paid lip service setting up Whanau Ora to fail by under funding .

           Labour has thrown a lot more money at Whanau Ora.

           But with lack of stable housing intergenerational violence and neglect it is bound to fail. And as a former front line voluntary worker its pissing into the wind raking water uphill a former Social Worker told me over 40 years ago.

           Nothing has changed in that time.

           Social Workers don't last long in this failing system they get burned out very quickly compounding the problem.

           It's not going to be fixed until direct intervention takes place.

           That it is putting social workers into the families in a stable housing situation.The family Court's and child protection are not making any difference but have contributed to making it worse.

           The Canterbury University research project of having live in Social Workers had a 72% success rate of turning dysfunctional, violent drugs including alcohol, gang families .It only took 6 months of intensive intervention,fixing communication,discipline,budgeting,getting rid of losers out of influencing families,keeping drugs including alcohol out. It cost $72,000 per intervention.That sounds like a lot ,but these families are million dollar plus welfare,crime.education failures that can cost multi millions.

           It's time for this trial to be expanded into the community.

           That's not happening any time soon so the band aid solutions continue and continue to fail.

           So instead of building more houses we will be building more Prison's finishing schools for criminals to gain their PHD's in crime and failure.
           • Gezza 1.1.1.1.1.1

             28 November 2021 at 3:33 pm

             Labour has thrown a lot more money at Whanau Ora.

             Labour’s too good at “throwing money” into problem areas. It’s shite at getting value out of that hastily flung money in terms of improved outcomes, because its Ministers are so inexperienced they allow themselves to be confused, diverted & hamstrung by overwhelming departmental inertia.

             Look at what they threw at Mental Health, just as one example. Results? No improvements at all, in fact Covid’s reportedly making the lack of mental health services deliver even worse MH statistics.

             …getting rid of losers out of influencing families,keeping drugs including alcohol out.

             Wonder how they did that? Do you know? When did this project actually start?
           • Puckish Rogue 1.1.1.1.1.2

             28 November 2021 at 8:09 pm

             Labour want a 30% reduction in the prison population over 15 years
             • weston …

               28 November 2021 at 8:45 pm

               And you see that as a bad thing do u PR ?
               • Puckish Rogue …

                 28 November 2021 at 9:02 pm

                 Depends.

                 Lowering the prison population because less people are committing crimes = good

                 Lowering the prison population because people that should be sent to prison but aren't = bad
                 • weston …

                   28 November 2021 at 9:32 pm

                   What improvements would you make to the system if you could hold sway …not including bringing back the rack etc
                   • Puckish Rogue …

                     28 November 2021 at 9:45 pm

                     First off you have to reach these people before they're born

                     Go to any unit and you'll see any amount of guys in there with older family members already in prison

                     Actively target these families with all manner of support networks required

                     As an example the average prisoner will be/have

                     1. Poorly educated with probable learning disabilities, not necessarily dumb but basically never went to for very long

                     2. Mental health issues and/or addictions

                     3. Lack of empathy. They are the single most important person in the world, not their kids, not their families, them.

                     They start off not seeing Plunket or other health services

                     Do poorly at school

                     Have…chaotic home lives

                     Have no real job prospects nor even want a job

                     Yet prison is where its supposed to sort them out?

                     No. It needs to happen before they get to prison, when they're young.
                   • Gezza …

                     28 November 2021 at 10:19 pm

                     @ Pucky

                     That’s the approach Bill Emglish wanted to take.

                     Evidence based, targeted funding to those most in need of the full range of support & remedial.

                     Because he called it Social Investment the woke & the stupid & the Opposition at the tiime sneered, derided, & shouted it down, not bothering to work out that it didn’t mean rewarding execs & shareholders of private companies providing contracted services.

                     It meant getting a social return on the investment of that targeted funding. Turning broken families & individuals around. Giving them better education – even if just basic literacy & numeracy, tools many still lack. Teaching them saleable, useful skills, creating more choices for them, more options for their future that included becoming increasingly more financially independent & better socially connected , more skilled, more secure in themselves as contributing members of the societies they live in.
                   • Puckish Rogue []

                     28 November 2021 at 10:56 pm

                     Would have been good to see it implemented
                   • Gezza …

                     28 November 2021 at 10:23 pm

                     🙄 Bill English
                     * Evidence based, targeted funding to those most in need of the full range of support & remedial *services.
             • mac1 …

               28 November 2021 at 9:23 pm

               At the moment, about 8400 inmates, including pre-trial, in a population of just over 5 million, 164 per 100,000. In 2035, predicted population 5.3 million.

               Will that population in 2035 include more or fewer of the age which most often ends up in prison, as our population ages?

               Does the target figure include pre-trial detainees? Are home detention figures included?
               • Puckish Rogue …

                 28 November 2021 at 9:49 pm

                 Not sure about the pre-trial but home d doesn't count, only those in prison I believe (but who really knows with a government)
                 • weston …

                   28 November 2021 at 10:00 pm

                   So school then is that what you,re saying ?
                   • Puckish Rogue …

                     28 November 2021 at 10:18 pm

                     One part of it but there is no quick fix, there is no one thing

                     Take a crim, remove their addictions, teach them functional literacy and then what?

                     Return them to the same family, same community that produced them and then be surprised when they reoffend?
                   • Gezza …

                     28 November 2021 at 10:28 pm

                     Return them to the same family, same community that produced them and then be surprised when they reoffend?

                     Exactly. Bill English’s Social Investment policy aimed to break that cycle by changing the famiily & background to which they were returning & (unsurprisingly) reoffending again because nothing which caused them to be anti-social & /or criminal offenders had changed.
           • pat 1.1.1.1.1.3

             28 November 2021 at 9:05 pm

             When was that Canterbury trial project run?
         • Treetop 1.1.1.1.2

           28 November 2021 at 4:53 pm

           I wrote a long reply and it did not post.

           Government works in silos when it comes to addressing the cause of difficult behaviour due to waiting times and not having the specialist support. The welfare of children is my priority as there are no bad kids just bad parenting.

           The worst tenants require some sort of new tenancy conditions clearly stated which cover harassment, intimidation and unlawful use of the property. Tenancy education classes and refuge support services for the person who signed the lease as they could be being intimidated by the new partner and their mates. OT needs to step up and place children in a safe environment away from adults who are incapable of looking after their self.

           I have seen it that once you provide a skip bin people clean up and this is self rewarding. Then provide a vegie box with quick growing plants, either the plants die or the person nurtures them. People need purpose.
         • Puckish Rogue 1.1.1.1.3

           28 November 2021 at 10:38 pm

           It was a good idea, would have been interesting to see it implemented
       • Gezza 1.1.1.2

         28 November 2021 at 9:55 am

         I would add, it’s been 14 years now since I retired from the Public Service, so I don’t know if departmental Policy policy & Operational policy are still developed in the same way.

         But we used to have to do a Strategic Risk Analysis (using a well-respected Risk Assessment Tool – the RAT) of all new policies, looking at what could go wrong across multiple areas identified as to be impacted by the proposed policy change. You had to identify what risk mitigation or elimination strategies would be employed were the foreseeable problems to arise after implementation.

         I’d love to see the Risk Assessment for this “sustain tenancies” policy – if there ever was one.
         • Patricia Bremner 1.1.1.2.1

           28 November 2021 at 12:11 pm

           The covid ruling of "no evictions during lock down' has contributed imo.

           Plus housing all the homeless during and after lock down. With people 'home' all day and night, these problems are magnified. (Though some cases look like 'benign' neglect by the Minister not responding to cases .)

           We have not since World War two had such problems of people having to accommodate others and/or stand lengthy separations. Stress and anxiety is at a very high level after 2 years of covid rules.

           Covid has laid bare the inequities and their horrible outcomes. Many of those inequities began with Meth and lowered "job seeker" benefits plus cruel penalties, when people lost homes for very minor infringements. That pendulum has swung too far in some cases.

           Those trying to find systems to work for such disparate individuals have a hard unrewarding task, as one leader said "some have meth as their main need and they are selfish with it." It would be unfair to say those same Public servants are not looking at outcomes, just they are trying to meet all needs and failing another group.

           RATs are many in these covid times, and the PM commented "These are hard times to plan" . Now we have a new strain for the Government to worry about.
       • Anker 1.1.1.3

         28 November 2021 at 10:30 am

         Treetop private landlords are less likely to take on problematic tenants as they can chose from the best of the best tenants (you know the one who have glowing references, no pets are scrub up well etc).

         Social housing and motels are used to house people in extreme need, who likely wouldn't stand a chance in the private rental market.

         I am not saying tenants in private rentals or even home owners can be shitty neighbors.
         • Treetop 1.1.1.3.1

           28 November 2021 at 5:06 pm

           Kainga Ora numbers would be higher. I had across the street class A addicts who had a lot of guests, roaming dogs, screaming domestics. Neighbours on either side (shared main wall), were too scared to complain. The rent usually becomes too much so they get kicked out. Person who signed the lease was great with her kid for 18 months until the rent ballooned and due to desperation she took in a boarder. She got hooked on drugs and she lost the control of her home.
           • Gezza 1.1.1.3.1.1

             28 November 2021 at 7:12 pm

             Why don't TV1 & TV3 have proper investigative journos looking at this kind of scenario that flows on directly from rent increases going so high they go beyond someone responsible's ability to pay.

             In that one example you cite there, Treetop, the collateral damage of unintended / unforeseen consequences (aka blowback) is so immense that no ordinary person would ever have expected that outcome.

             But you do. Why isn't Sunday, starring Miriama Kamo, covering this kind of nightmare – instead of many of the soft fluffy magazine-style snippets it features
             • Treetop …

               28 November 2021 at 10:11 pm

               When the wrong person gets in the door of a vulnerable mum she is at risk of being abused and manipulated and thinks the rent will be halved having a flat mate or a boarder's portion of the rent will pay the rent. A cycle of abuse starts, then Kainga Ora eventually find the mum an affordable rental but her self esteem is so low and the wrong type exploit her further.

               To not see that outcome, the people not seeing it have not got the right people doing the blowback.

               How do the government think a single mum can afford to pay $370 pw?
               • Gezza …

                 28 November 2021 at 10:38 pm

                 The answer to that one is that they aren’t living on the benefit or in a low-wage job so they have NFI of the stress and struggles of those who live from benefit paycheck to paycheck & have nothing left over when something breaks or they encounter a sudden unexpected financial burden.

                 Short answer: The university-educated policy wonks are all far too well paid & too distant from their “clients” to know or really care.

                 This is where a Minister with community connections, intelligence, & a bit of steel up their spine can make all the difference. Rejecting policy papers that don’t tackle the problems they should already be well versed in. Too many of them seem to just read departmental briefing papers.

                 They need to read relevant werking gruppe reports & also to get out & about & and find out for themselves what & where the problems are. Imo.
             • gsays …

               29 November 2021 at 7:46 am

               " Why isn't Sunday, starring Miriama Kamo, covering this kind of nightmare – instead of many of the soft fluffy magazine-style snippets it features"

               From Sunday's blurb Kamo says; "Our journalists are the country’s finest. I’m proud to work alongside them and to be a part of bringing their stories to the nation. They are trusted practitioners who fearlessly hold power to account, who make change in the lives of New Zealanders, and who help shape our country’s narrative and identity.”

               https://www.tvnz.co.nz/shows/sunday/the-team/miriama-kamo

               Maybe stories about poor people, gangs and inequality don't fit with Audi's (principle sponsor) brand image.

               Also, the "flagship current affairs programme" is there first and foremost to keep eyeballs on the screen for the advertisements.

               That is how chief executives get paid.
               • Gezza …

                 29 November 2021 at 8:46 am

                 Exactly, gsays. It’s not really about in depth examinations of significant national & international current affairs, it’s about catering to the widest audience – hence the relatively short duration of multiple “stories”.

                 It’s not to say they don’t sometimes have items covering significant issues, particularly in Kiwiland, but they are nearly always too short, have an “angle” rather than a neutral presentation, & are too “once over lightly”.

                 TV journalism in Kiwiland is nowadays mostly of rubbish quality, compared to, say, the 70s, 80s, & 90s, maybe some parts of the 2000s. ☹️
                 • gsays …

                   29 November 2021 at 9:06 am

                   It has gotten to the point where we will have to support the journalism we want directly eg donation or subscription.

                   While also not coming off all Tory with grievances about our 'tax payer $' going towards TVNZ & RNZ
           • RedLogix 1.1.1.3.1.2

             28 November 2021 at 10:52 pm

             She got hooked on drugs and she lost the control of her home.

             Stories like that make my guts churn.
       • McFlock 1.1.1.4

         28 November 2021 at 3:43 pm

         The semi detached rural still leaves them with a connected neighbour.

         I don't see any "good" solution – hiffing them from tenancies of last resort puts them on the street, with the kids, and that will make everyone more difficult to locate and help. Taking the kids away for being bad neighbours might be a bit much, too.

         Putting them all together makes a slum, and that's before looking at different gang affiliations folks might have.

         Leaving them there can torment the neighbours.

         Damned if I have any solutions.
         • weka 1.1.1.4.1

           28 November 2021 at 4:23 pm

           permaculture would say find the solutions at each site rather than trying to design generic ones that can be enforced from the top down.

           Is the problem anti-social behaviour? Is it socio-economics? The effects of colonisation? Trauma? Patterns of thinking that are hard to change because of all the above plus drugs and alcohol and violence?

           What do the people behaving badly actually need?
           • Treetop 1.1.1.4.1.1

             28 November 2021 at 5:36 pm

             It comes down to loss of personal control or being controlled. The injustices of life, not being nurtured with love, economic pressure, violence, addictions and not having a purpose or the opportunity to reach your potential.
         • Treetop 1.1.1.4.2

           28 November 2021 at 5:14 pm

           Semi detached rural is not suitable for children due to being unsafe. I needed to clarify semi detached rural. A property which has no neighbours too close.
           • McFlock 1.1.1.4.2.1

             28 November 2021 at 5:31 pm

             So you mean a fully detached house on a large section?

             Sounds idyllic, especially for kids.
             • Treetop …

               28 November 2021 at 5:43 pm

               This has nurtured many in the past. A smaller dwelling depends on where it is placed.

               Has squash em in housing created some of the problems for people who need more space to sort their shit out?
               • McFlock …

                 28 November 2021 at 5:56 pm

                 dunno, but as soon as folks figure out they can go from an apartment to a detached country home if they act badly…
                 • Treetop …

                   28 November 2021 at 6:52 pm

                   The detached country home is what is suitable. Just like how some individual health services are more expensive due to the need. It is as much a health need as a housing need.

                   I would not just leave a person there without addressing the issues which put them there.
                 • weka …

                   2 December 2021 at 11:17 pm

                   Isn't that John Key's story?
                   • McFlock …

                     3 December 2021 at 3:57 pm

                     lol that got a chuckle
     • Anker 1.1.2

       28 November 2021 at 10:41 am

       "Sustaining tenancies, but not if they were the neighbours of the politicians or bureacrats who came up with this policy (whoever they are) ……….

       Its utter cruelty towards the decent tennants, all of whom will be social disadvantaged. What a way to treat these people. Shameful.

       And those anti social tenants should be kicked out. They need to know the consequences of their actions…….The what about their children arguement doesn't really stack up either. What these people are modelling to their kids is I can be a real a….hole to other people and get away with it.

       Its naive to think that people who induge in nasty anti social behaviour will suddently change if we show them "kindness". These people have deeply entrenched problems that there are absolutely no quck fixes to. Moreover I would bet that there are no signs of these people wanting to change "I have been a real b…d to my neighbors, and I realize I feel bad about that. I will get counselling".

       Meanwhile they get away with terrorizing vulnerable people, making their life miserable.

       Whoever is responsible for this policy lacks empathy
       • Puckish Rogue 1.1.2.1

         28 November 2021 at 8:12 pm

         100% agreed
     • swordfish 1.1.3

       28 November 2021 at 1:12 pm

       I'll be looking at signing up on behalf of my Parents … currently in the process of outlining their situation to Thorn Law, the law firm concerned.

       Over the past two years, I’ve speculated here & elsewhere on social media that it’s a widespread situation as Kianga Ora appears to almost exclusively allocate social housing to deeply dysfunctional (read ruthlessly violent & anti-social) people with “complex needs”. I guessed that, like my Parents (90 & 91 yo), they’d be elderly enduring enormous suffering throughout the Country … and so it turns out …

       Absolute Fucking Scandal.
       • Anker 1.1.3.1

         28 November 2021 at 5:44 pm

         great stuff Swordfish. I wish you all the very best with the legal action.

         It is an absolute fucking scandal.

         I think the reality is there is some people we can't help and a significant part of that is they don't want help. Not the whole picture. Your parents neighbour doesn't sound like he has kids, but if he did, that would be an unsafe environment for those kids.

         I say evict this neirbour. Its not as if the house is going to stay empty because there are only 2 people on waiting list for a state house and neither of them in Whangarei. Would be interested to hear any updates.
         • swordfish 1.1.3.1.1

           29 November 2021 at 6:35 pm

           .

           Thanks for your moral support, Anker … really appreciate it.

           He does indeed have kids … & they are pretty clearly turning into / aping their Parents … very sad to see. They were last seen around 10 weeks ago, there for just a couple of hours in the morning … from the moment they arrived just a constant stream of "Fucks" & "Fuck Offs" shouted outside & slamming front door repeatedly … exactly like both of their parents … really dysfunctional family. Can see quite clearly how it becomes intergenerational.

           But a real shame … the son seems to be about 11, the daughter around 6 or 7.
           • Anker 1.1.3.1.1.1

             29 November 2021 at 7:41 pm

             God that is disturbing Swordfish (the kids). And those who say we have to keep these people there because of the kids, no, no, no.

             If the Govt is serious about the problem of anti social people, then give them a state house, but with conditions. 2 or 3 at the most strikes and you are out. So clear expectations of how to treat the neigbourhood. No loud noise after 9pm, no abusive or threatening behaviour etc etc. And all the blahing on about what to do we these people. Well I don't care too much about them. I do about your parents and all the others who have put up with these sorts of neighbours. Perhaps if they don't behave they do get sent to a country complex with others of their ilk. It might be really bad for them, but its terrbile for decent tenants. These people can then get a get out of jail card with good behaviour………….I mean really its like basic parenting. If the kids don't behave, they get the "naughty seat".

             I do believe there are some people who can't be rehabilitated. Someone mention sending in social workers, but I am not sure what they would do.
           • Anker 1.1.3.1.1.2

             30 November 2021 at 12:23 pm

             In solidarity Swordfish, I have just left a comment on The Daily Blog where Pat O'Dea has written a column "No more evictions"I suggestion he read your piece about your elderly parents and also challenged him to live in a State house for two weeks next to these anti social tenants (of course a challenge that is not possible, but I did hope he might put himself in the shoes of people whose lives are blighted by these tenants).

             I also wished the tenants all the best with their legal action.

             And yes of course these kids would be apeing their parents.

             Social workers sent around to spell out the rules and offer a course on emotion regulation and respecting others. Totally up to the anti social people whether or not they take it, but they are out very quickly if their behaviour doesn't improve. Sad for their kids of course, but we can't solve every problem.
             • swordfish …

               30 November 2021 at 1:31 pm

               .

               Thanks, Anker.

               Had a quick read of O'Dea … typifies the Woke & their fellow travellers … pre-determined abstract theoretical views on good vs bad demographics, divorced from reality … & hence paternalistic romanticisation of entire social groups … for all the Intersectional talk of Lived Experience, there is, in fact, zero interest in judging each individual case on its merits through empirical observation [unless it adheres to the pre-determined precepts of Critical Theory] …

               … well, apart from supplementing his abstract views of eternally innocent & virtuous social housing tenants across the board with an assumption that his own experience is typical / universal … it seems he's had just a couple of relatively minor noise, behaviour issues from social housing neighbours over the years … and apparently has decided that this must be not just the norm but in fact the universal experience.

               Kids of the Prick nextdoor to my Parents have largely lived elsewhere with their mother ….. (many major borderline-violent confrontations between he [tenant] & her [estranged former partner] over the last 4 years, Parents often woken by them) ….. an extra source of stress … but kids were there around 30-40% of the time through 2018 / 19 … then hardly there at all in 2020, then on and off this year. They never settled at night … often screaming & stomping tantrums at 2am / 3am / 4 am a few metres away from my Parents on other side of non-soundproof dividing-wall … and often transported there in early hours of morning !!! (like I say deeply dysfunctional family) so were another source of stress & sleep deprivation.

               Although he was largely OK with his kids, there were more than a few exceptions where he inflicted violent intimidation on one or both … usually through the early hours of the morning … my Parents worried for their safety.

               One of the key reasons the daughter hated being there … often screaming to her mother {dropping her off] that she didn’t want to go in.
               • Anker …

                 30 November 2021 at 4:33 pm

                 'Predetermind abstract theoretical views about good versus bad divorced from reality". How well you put it.

                 I am a member of the Labour Party who have adopted this type of idealogy. What can be done?
                 • swordfish …

                   1 December 2021 at 4:35 pm

                   .

                   Cheers, Anker (& also Hetzer below).

                   Left a comment on O'Dea's Daily Blog post this morning … but hasn't been published yet (possibly never) … so I might as well stick it here … as you can see, I'm rapidly losing patience with these people:

                   You casually assume your situation – "isolated and infrequent" behaviour – is somehow the universal experience … you're wrong … and, like the blindingly dogmatic Middle / Upper-Middle Woke, your really quite callous core demand in this post (ludicrously dressed up as some sort of moral purity) represents a clear & present danger to innocent people, low income people & elderly people living next to these violent anti-socials … it's a form of narcissism = ostentatious moral posturing while simultaneously enabling elder abuse & supporting a kind of State-sanctioned domestic terror (both of which you seek to obfuscate because they don't fit into your pre-determined ideological dogma).

                   The way I'm feeling at the moment … I'd happily see you forced to live with my elderly Parents' nightmare … & have armed guards making sure you didn't leave for a year. Same goes for HNZ Senior Managers, certain Cabinet Ministers & the casually sadistic Woke enablers.

                   You / they need to be parachuted into social housing on the other side of a dividing-wall from all the relentless violent intimidation & extreme anti-social behaviour that results in severe sleep deprivation, constant high stress & all the dire health consequences that inevitably follow … you think you're one of the Good Guys but you've actually drifted into borderline-Sadist territory, prioritising your own prestige enhancement among your little cadre of clueless ideologues.

                   Let's be clear, people like you are the antithesis of the genuine Left.

                   If you want to create a Kiwi version of Britain's crumbling Red Wall then you're going the right way about it … you're doing your rhetorical little bit to destroy the lives of lifelong Labour / Alliance / Green voters.
                   • Anker …

                     1 December 2021 at 5:17 pm

                     Thanks Swordfish. I hope he publishes it, but he probably won't. At least he will have read it.

                     I have had a few comments to make on the post. The usual "well what would you do with these people". While I did make some suggestions, at one point I said "I'd evict them". That's all I said.

                     Somehow we think we have to solve these peoples unsolvable problems. One person suggested counselling and I almost said "you have to be f…g joking", but refrained.

                     I don't know of anyone in your parents situation, but it takes very little effort to empathize with the nightmare they and others are experiencing, how it could be fixed so easily and what an outrage it it is. I do feel very angry about it.

                     I am equally angry with Labour and Greens about the gender ideology bills, because I think gender ideology is just that an ideology and the party seems to be completely captured by it. You may not share my view of it and that is o.k.

                     As a member of the Labour Party (just)I am not sure what to do really
                 • swordfish …

                   2 December 2021 at 11:51 am

                   .

                   I am equally angry with Labour and Greens about the gender ideology bills

                   Yeah, of course one The Standard's former authors along with her Green MP boss have been central to these campaigns.

                   Queer Theory zealots, hopelessly immersed in all the esoteric fantasies of 1960s French Postmodernist dogma associated in particular with Derrida & Foucault [albeit acquiring these ideas second-hand … unlikely they've actually read any of this from the original sources]. They're much more likely to have been influenced by the more recent application (& quite often mangling) of these theories by Judith Butler, Gayle Rubin, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick & others.

                   It's probably the most Year Zero of the various branches of Critical Theory in terms of its attempts to destroy all social norms & more generally the foundations of liberal democratic society. A kind of Permanent Cultural Revolution with all the never-ending social mayhem that that entails.

                   Anything associated with the normal, the commonplace, the majority, anything that is widely-accepted or can be categorized – in fact any sort of stability whatsoever – is deemed inherently "oppressive" & hence must be disrupted, subverted, dismantled. It's particularly keen, of course, on destroying social binaries … esp around biological sex, gender, sexuality. Hence their Blank Slatism fantasies & so on.

                   There's a rational middle-ground between Sex Essentialists & Queer Theory/Gender activists.

                   With Gender activists, & more generally Woke Critical Theory cultists, we're talking about inflexible dogmatists who've deluded themselves they're some sort of intellectual-cultural elite that exclusively possesses morality & wisdom … whereas in reality they've developed a highly dubious moral compass & have zero understanding of complex reality, not least because most appear relatively divorced from day-to-day society.

                   It's no surprise that this sort of elitist little cult, prioritising esoteric whims over cold hard material reality, attracts those from more financially privileged backgrounds … high decile single-sex schools have so much to answer for … they tend to create these Walking-Talking Horror Stories.
                   • Anker …

                     2 December 2021 at 10:16 pm

                     Thanks Swordfish. You put that very well.

                     I am a left winger from way back, but gender ideology first drew my attention to cancel culture and the shut down of debate.

                     I am a second wave feminist and I know it is not possible to change your sex. I have enormous concerns about the affirmation only approach and the medical transition of children.

                     Its good to know of other people on the Standard who see what is really going on.
                   • RedLogix …

                     2 December 2021 at 10:35 pm

                     Very colorfully written swordfish.
                   • weka …

                     2 December 2021 at 11:24 pm

                     … in terms of its attempts to destroy all social norms & more generally the foundations of liberal democratic society

                     I'm curious what you see as their desired outcome of this (the theorists) ie what they believe their end goal is.
               • Hetzer …

                 30 November 2021 at 5:00 pm

                 It must be absolute misery for your poor parents Swordfish. Such human excrement should be kept well away from civil society. We all know the issues of gangs and drugs and that your parents are suffering the end result of that is awful
   • Anker 1.2

     28 November 2021 at 10:27 am

     The urban planning things seems a cheap way to try and solve the housing crisis. It has to potential to pit neighbours against neighbours and to create a shitty landscape from an archetectural point of view.
     • Treetop 1.2.1

       28 November 2021 at 5:57 pm

       There would be a correlation between neighbour friction and the size of a property.
2. Dennis Frank 2

   28 November 2021 at 8:16 am

   On Tuesday, the New Zealand government enshrined in law a treaty between Moriori and the Crown, which includes an NZ$18m (£9.3m) settlement, the return of land, and an apology acknowledging the wrongs Moriori have suffered since the arrival of Māori and Europeans to their shores. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/26/long-fight-for-justice-ends-as-new-zealand-treaty-recognises-moriori-people

   Solomon’s ancestors began the fight for justice long before him, but he has been instrumental in moving a settlement forward. For nearly 40 years, he has led the fight for reparation, first filing a claim on behalf of the imi (tribe) in 1988, which culminated in this week’s bill being passed.

   Moriori had a pacifist philosophy which chief Nunuku-Whenua introduced to his people around the 16th century. The covenant of peace banned rank, violence and warfare. The imi lived undisturbed for many centuries until their first contact with European settlers in 1791, who arrived on the HMS Chatham, bringing with them diseases and the start of a new colonial era.

   “In late 1835, about 900 people of two mainland Māori tribes sailed on a British ship to Rēkohu … the newcomers were welcomed and fed by Moriori in accordance with tikane Moriori (Moriori custom). Some Moriori wanted to resist the invaders, but the elders…urged the people to obey Nunuku’s law of peace … Upon returning to their villages they were attacked, and many were killed. Māori accounts put the number of Moriori killed in 1835–36 at about 300, or about one-sixth of the population. Those Moriori who survived the invasion were enslaved and forced to do manual labour,” the official account of Moriori history states.

   Imi?? I thought it was a typo but no, it's state-sanctioned terminology. Moriori language must transpose imi for iwi. See section 2 here:

   https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2020/0238/latest/LMS238062.html

   An excellent succinct summary of our history! Note how the settler govt exercised native admin via recognising slavery as the traditional Maori prerogative. Such de facto creation of third-class citizenry seems quite innovative (section 3).

   Particularly noteworthy are the consequences delineated in Section 5. Ownership produced by conquest as state policy integrated pakeha & maori trad political practice.

   I see no evidence that the treaty signed by this govt includes an apology from the two offensive Taranaki tribes to the Moriori for that 1830s genocide. Put that alongside the apparent failure of the Waikato tribes to apologise for their earlier genocide in Taranaki, and various other maori genocides around the country in different eras. I suppose it's technically possible that apologies have been made without any subsequent media reportage to inform us of such occurrences. More likely, nobody feels apologies for genocide are necessary, since genocide is traditional.

   Moriori ought to be honoured for pioneering peaceful coexistence in Aotearoa, long before Te Whiti got the idea. I doubt I'll live to see that, but rectifying historical injustice does actually need to be done properly. Tokenism is insufficient.
   • Gezza 2.1

     28 November 2021 at 8:32 am

     Yes, that’s something that has intrigued me. The Crown has – rightly – acknowledged its outrageous, oppressive, suppressive behaviours toward “rebellious” resisters & innocent Māori & offered it unreserved apologies in Treaty Settlements.

     But I never see or hear anything about Māori warring on & enslaving other iwi/nations, & driving some iwi completely out of their traditional nga rohe, as occurred in – and following – the Nga Puhi-inspired Musket Wars.

     One sees occasional multi-iwi disputes arising over settlement claims where more than one hapu or iwi claims for recompense for the same parcel of land. But I don’t know, where these claims are the result of iwi taua invasions & land stealing, whether the affected iwi sort out any muru/utu/compensation & expression & acceptance of apologies between themselves post the official Crown Settlement.
     • In Vino 2.1.1

       28 November 2021 at 7:56 pm

       I agree, Dennis and Gezza. I have heard Maori accept the 'Right of Conquest' for pre Treaty of Waitangi events, but it seems that apologies and compensation apply only to post-treaty things.

       This does seem a bit dodgy on pure moral grounds. Letter of the law rather than spirit of the law?
     • RedLogix 2.1.2

       28 November 2021 at 8:15 pm

       The case of the Seven Tenths Trust always struck me as very peculiar:

       Wakatū owners are descendants of the chiefs and families of these hapū that belong to four tribes, Ngāti Koata, Ngāti Rārua, Ngāti Tama and Te Ātiawa. Our ancestors travelled from Kāwhia and North Taranaki to conquer the region (Te Tau Ihu) between 1828 and 1834.

       What is not mentioned is that they slaughtered all the peoples already living there. Just a decade before the ToW.

       But according to the wookies – only white people are capable of wrong.
       • In Vino 2.1.2.1

         28 November 2021 at 9:53 pm

         That is the power of the treaty, it seems, Maori 'conquer' hundreds of people pre-treaty, but Pakeha 'massacre' people post-treaty.
         • Puckish Rogue 2.1.2.1.1

           28 November 2021 at 10:02 pm

           Could everyone on this thread please make their way over to this re-education centre…
         • RedLogix 2.1.2.1.2

           28 November 2021 at 10:12 pm

           I don't have any objection to telling the whole of NZ's history. Unless we can come to terms with our past and repudiate it's errors we will remain entangled with it's ghosts.

           But the moment you see that history being selectively re-written, you know some other agenda is in play.
         • In Vino 2.1.2.1.3

           28 November 2021 at 10:20 pm

           Just to clarify – I regard the invasion of the Waikato and Parihaka, etc, as despicable breaches of the Treaty, and agree with belated (if inadequate) compensation for the descendants of those wronged.

           But I am a teacher of language, and I struggle to accept the wording which pretends that pre-treaty Maori never committed any offences themselves, and that offences happened only after the treaty was signed.

           I also struggle to understand why sometimes in the late stages of the NZ wars in the South of the North Island there were as many Kupapa as British colonial troops repressing the local tribes.

           To me there seems to be an obvious imbalance in terminology.
           • RedLogix 2.1.2.1.3.1

             28 November 2021 at 10:50 pm

             Ah yes – you touch on another verboten topic – that almost always alongside British colonial troops were Maori from other iwi playing an often vital role in crushing their own former enemies.
       • swordfish 2.1.2.2

         29 November 2021 at 7:34 pm

         .

         Yep, if you want truly brutal genocidal violence … you'd need to head back to the Musket Wars .. three decades of horrendous massacres, at least 20k dead (vs about 2k in the New Zealand Wars), tens of thousands enslaved, some really brutal torture, cannibalism, massive upheaval, iwi massacred, others permanently driven from their nga rohe.

         Bears zero relationship to the Woke's highly paternalistic 'Noble Savage' Romanticisation of pre-1840 Māori as some kind of peace-loving flower-power San Francisco Hippies.

         The brutal inter-tribal warfare that dare not speak its name among polite Woke society.

         And, no, that doesn’t remotely justify what happened after 1840 … but it’s important to highlight the bullshit double standards, the sheer hypocrisy & the Peter Pan fantasy world that sits right at the heart of Critical Theory / ID Politics and its on-going application in New Zealand.
3. Blazer 3

   28 November 2021 at 8:53 am

   Govts have used the 'we don't have the data'..excuse….here is the…data.

   Mega Landlords: Over 22,100 homes owned by small group of very large investors | Stuff.co.nz
   • Dennis Frank 3.1

     28 November 2021 at 11:38 am

     Good to see that graph. It provides the basis for class analysis of investors. Let's pretend there are still leftists who can do that. As a non-leftist, I'll provide this simulation to help them:

     Class A: 10,254 own more than 50 dwellings

     Class B: 11,944 own between 21 & 50

     Class C: 96,107 own between 6 & 20

     Class D: 264,366 own between 3 & 5 dwellings

     Class E: 223,051 own 1 or 2 dwellings

     So we immediately see that the legendary mum and dad investors are a minority of the investor class as a whole, ranked only 5th in the hierarchy. The five sub-classes are accompanied by business owners as capitalist vested interests in Aotearoa, and it would probably be pc to include iwi too.
     • mac1 3.1.1

       28 November 2021 at 1:56 pm

       Dennis, you might want to look at the figures referenced by Blazer again.

       My reading of the graph in Blazer's reference is that 10, 254 houses are owned by owners of more than 50 houses (about 205 or fewer owners that works out as). Another 11944 owned by owners of 20-50 houses which makes between 239 and 597 owners.

       According to you, investor owned houses would total between 2.3 and 4.6 million houses when there are 1.8 dwellings in NZ according to the census.

       Read correctly, there are some 625,000 houses owned by investors and that leaves some 1.2 million owned by the occupant. The census says that 64% of NZ homes are owned by their occupants.
       • McFlock 3.1.1.1

         28 November 2021 at 3:24 pm

         Well, owned by one of their occupants, at least.

         Over half of NZers don't own the dwelling they live in (p34).
         • mac1 3.1.1.1.1

           28 November 2021 at 5:01 pm

           McFlock, I read p 34. How do we reconcile the two figures? One based on census figures of more than just 2018 btw and one based on your reference? Genuinely at a loss here……
           • McFlock 3.1.1.1.1.1

             28 November 2021 at 5:17 pm

             Two different measures.

             Census is how many houses had an owner-occupier.

             The housing report had that measure earlier in the publication, but the p34 measure is how many people actually own the home they live in.

             So lots of people rent out the spare room, have a boarder (or several) boarders.

             But let it be known that we're a nation of renters, now. And this will only get more concentrated unless the housing market takes a dive.
             • mac1 …

               28 November 2021 at 5:55 pm

               Thanks. 🙂
       • Dennis Frank 3.1.1.2

         28 November 2021 at 4:49 pm

         Okay, I did take another look. Perhaps different interpretations of the graph are produced by the non-equivalence of investors & humans that Valocity used? When dwellings are co-owned the maths gets too murky for me!

         Regardless, those five classes of ownership are wealth-generated, right? So the differential analysis does produce accurate relativity between classes.
         • mac1 3.1.1.2.1

           28 November 2021 at 5:52 pm

           The graph titled "Homes owned by investors by portfolio size" referred to the number of homes owned by investors who owned certain numbers of properties. For example, 10254 houses owned by investors each owning at least 50 houses, so at most 200 investors.

           I don't doubt that mum and dad investors are over emphasised. The article states,"The analysis, which cross-referenced names on roughly 1.7 million publicly available property titles, shows investors with up to two properties only own just over a third of investment properties."

           The study referenced by Blazer also said, as McFlock also stated from another source,"Investors are shown to now own more properties than either first home buyers or single homeowners.

           Although the difference is slight – a difference of 15,638 homes – it’s a reversal of 2015 when first home buyers owned 78,086 more properties than investors."
   • gsays 3.2

     28 November 2021 at 2:07 pm

     Thanks for the link Blazer.

     I look forward to the day that a multi-home owner is as common as a slave owner.

     However, looking to a Parliament of landlords isn't where the solution lies.
4. Foreign waka 4

   28 November 2021 at 11:04 am

   Does anybody really think that the parliamentarians will change anything? Really?

   We wonder why families can't get a roof over their head, drug addicts, aggressive renters of Kāinga Ora properties are not moved on? I doubt that our leaders will give them a roof over their heads.

   It would take some extraordinary guts to end this, almost hero status really.

   We are governed by the same type of people as the elite that earns 70 x a workers income and find they are under paid. Meanwhile all that rort is financed via debt (shall I mention 16 Billion dollars?). Good luck to us then.

   https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2020/08/the-number-of-properties-owned-by-new-zealand-mps-revealed.html
   • Koff 4.1

     28 November 2021 at 11:40 am

     Yep… and you would think that hundreds of thousands of the disenfranchised and homeless would be out on the streets protesting the obscene inequities portrayed by that data linked to by Blazer in 3 above rather than protesting so called freedom restrictions by public health orders or against government's timid efforts to combat climate change or cleaning up rivers. (not implying that the same cohort of people are involved of course)
5. Reality 5

   28 November 2021 at 11:20 am

   After the barrage of business people and National and Act attacking MIQ, and wanting to be rid of it, they may have been wanting its demise prematurely. Covid Omicron taking off round the world in the last two days sounds very serious and hopefully Jacinda and her advisers will continue to be very cautious about further relaxation of the borders.

   Jim Bolger's appearance on Q&A harks back to a time when National was mostly made up of people who were decent citizens to say the least. Looking back over the last few years to the sleazy, unlikable types National took on board, it would be hoped they can select better candidates and party members. No Mervs or Michelles.
   • Patricia Bremner 5.1

     28 November 2021 at 12:38 pm

     They need to look at the selectors. RATs.
6. Anker 6

   28 November 2021 at 1:20 pm

   https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/11/27/sweden-trans-kids-suffered-injuries-as-a-result-of-puberty-blockers/

   “They just pause puberty, give time to work things out”. Yeah right.
   • RedLogix 6.1

     28 November 2021 at 7:28 pm

     I've taken the time to read up on the puberty blockers recently – unmitigated child abuse.

     By the medical establishment.
     • Anker 6.1.1

       28 November 2021 at 7:44 pm

       Agree. Children's bodies are being mutilated by an experiemental treatment that countries such as Sweedon and Finland are rolling back. 22,000 de-transitioners and counting.
   • Puckish Rogue 6.2

     28 November 2021 at 8:17 pm

     The insanity just keeps on coming
7. swordfish 7

   28 November 2021 at 2:42 pm

   .

   Kāinga Ora Scandal

   Brief outline of my Parents' experience (though it doesn't even remotely encapsulate the full enormity … it's a multifacted nightmare that goes beyond the prolonged violent intimidation):

   Kianga Ora Scandal: My Parents Situation (sub-zero-politics.blogspot.com)
   • Shanreagh 7.1

     28 November 2021 at 6:06 pm

     Horrifying situation.

     I'm believer that spelling matters and in this case the spelling of Te Reo matters. Is there a way that you can do a global correct to Kainga Ora all the way through?

     Also somewhere there is 'entires' that perhaps is 'entries?
     • Shanreagh 7.1.1

       28 November 2021 at 6:21 pm

       Sounds as though some suggestions for Kainga Ora would not go amiss.

       Perhaps KO needs to sell the other side of this duplex unit where one side is in private ownership. Use the funds to invest in another building for social housing.

       They could also look to see if there are other instances of one in private/one still in public ownership that are causing problems and work out a plan to sell these as well.

       It is called managing the portfolio. I am sure that a private landlord who found that one of their units were becoming a mecca for troublemakers because of whatever they would be cashing in and reinvesting in another place.

       Your parents' neighbouring tenant sounds as if there are mental health issues (perhaps drug or alcohol induced) that seem to be running rampant and not being dealt with. Nobody should be expected to put up with this.
   • Puckish Rogue 7.2

     28 November 2021 at 8:26 pm

     That's damn rough, it's not right
   • RedLogix 7.3

     28 November 2021 at 8:45 pm

     I'm genuinely curious if you have had any response from your local MP?
8. Herodotus 8

   28 November 2021 at 3:19 pm

   COP26 so now we don’t need to take responsiblility for our CO2 reduction commitments ? and just feed off others doing better by buying credits. No wonder the nuclear free moment of our time is NOT that important. Would it not be more beneficial if we all achieved our reductions as a min. and those that over achieve to contribute even less CO2 ?
   https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2021/11/study-finds-nz-could-buy-carbon-reduction-credits-more-cheaply-than-domestic-action.html
   • bwaghorn 8.1

     28 November 2021 at 4:19 pm

     Have you seen where massive forest clearance has been going on in brazil for mining gold , the same brazil were going to by our credits from supposedly!!!
     • Herodotus 8.1.1

       28 November 2021 at 5:36 pm

       Yes and this area this area is referred to the lungs of earth and along with man made deforestation we had also forest fires doing their bit.🤯 I could say that their are too many vested interests and applying arbitrage to achieve a financial gain with no tangible benefit to the environment or climate. Just juggling the numbers !!!

       https://ourworldindata.org/deforestation

       https://www.businessinsider.com.au/amazon-fires-satellite-images-map-of-rainforest-blazes-2019-8?r=US&IR=T

       https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145988/tracking-amazon-deforestation-from-above
       • RedLogix 8.1.1.1

         28 November 2021 at 8:32 pm

         Those links really speak to a complex picture – while Brazil may be at one stage of deforestation – other nations are seeing increases in forest cover. Overall the total is not changing all that much.
         • Koff 8.1.1.1.1

           28 November 2021 at 9:19 pm

           I respect worldindata but if you have a close look at some of those forest cover stats they look very dodgy. Almost all the Eastern European stats show huge increases in native forest cover. I really can't believe that Malaysia's has increased either. Haven't any way of verifying the figures unfortunately.
           • RedLogix 8.1.1.1.1.1

             28 November 2021 at 9:45 pm

             Good skeptical thinking there ! What I think is happening – and this comes from other sources I don't have the time to track back down at the moment – is that in Eastern Europe at least there has been a substantial reduction in farming. Especially as populations age and agriculture becomes more land efficient – the unused farms revert back to forest reasonably quickly.

             I can't speak precisely to Malaysia, but it's actually a very developed and rapidly urbanising society – again as people escape poverty and move off the land – it reverts to forest as at least one possibility. This doesn't gainsay the horrible practise of palm oil plantations – but that's another issue.

             That link to the deforestation story is really quite interesting and well worth some time reading. Brazil is indeed a mess and the erosion of the Amazon should be resisted – but the bigger picture isn't hopeless either.
             • Koff …

               28 November 2021 at 10:51 pm

               Mongabay's data seems quite different. Australia's forest loss is particularly depressing – very noticeable west of the Divide in Qld.
9. Gezza 9

   28 November 2021 at 4:22 pm

   Been gently raining here at Pookden Manor since about 1 pm. Southerly breeze so gentle it doesn’t even really exist. 😀

   Are you there, mary? Wildlife clip from a sunnier day:
   • RedLogix 9.1

     28 November 2021 at 7:04 pm

     Just got back from 6 months in WA to our spot in Moreton Bay QLD. We're renting a tiny little unit about 15min drive from downtown Brisbane. But out the back is a 200 acre wilderness that's teeming with wildlife. So we just went for a walk and in a 2hr period we spotted:

     Multitudes of ducks, herons, bitterns, water dragons, sea eagles, spoonbills, white herons, a flock of pelicans, and one snake.

     The only downside is that if you sit down to enjoy a view, you immediately become the subject of a tug-of-war between ants size of small mice and mosquitos you could mistake for dragon-flies.
     • Gezza 9.1.1

       28 November 2021 at 7:29 pm

       .
       https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_water_dragon

       They sounded intriguing 😀
   • mary_a 9.2

     28 November 2021 at 7:06 pm

     Cheers Gezza. So serene and calming to watch.
     • Gezza 9.2.1

       28 November 2021 at 7:22 pm

       Watching that scene, I remember that day well now, mary. It was an amazingly relaxing & fulfilling day. One of the best I’ve had just being at one with the natural world in my backyard, so to speak.

       Being calm, moving very little, talking gently to the birds, waterbirds & eels.
       Quite magic.

       The Creator, whoever they were or are, did a fantastic job of creation.
       • In Vino 9.2.1.1

         28 November 2021 at 10:23 pm

         I suspect that they all evolved brilliantly, Gezza.
         • Gezza 9.2.1.1.1

           28 November 2021 at 11:14 pm

           Their (and our) DNA says they did precisely that, & therein lies the fantastic job that the creator did.

           No one has yet explained:

           1. The origin of the Big Bang
           2. The origin of that first spark of life that made the first cell divide, reproduce, continue doing so, & grow the organism.
           • In Vino 9.2.1.1.1.1

             28 November 2021 at 11:52 pm

             Nor, of course, has anyone explained the origins of those origins..
             • Gezza …

               29 November 2021 at 12:49 am

               The endless loop. The inevitable flaw in the Christian 8 Muslim apologetics debates. They argue that their Abrahamic God has to exist because everything in the universe has to have had an ultimate cause. To which the atheist response, naturally, is "So who or what caused God?" To which the apologists reply: "God is outside the universe" (or "God is both outside & inside the universe"). "He always was & always will be."

               These things are easy to say but actually rather difficult to get your head around, so I don't bother. Our universe just looks designed to me. With layer upon layer of complexity. I suspect it had one or more designers. That's all.
10. SPC 10

    28 November 2021 at 5:07 pm

    From mu, right past nu and xi and onto omicron.

    I suppose we should be grateful that we avoided the nu xi land variants down under.

    With the multiple mutations of the spike protein naming the variant after the letter most suitable for a transformer character was apt. But surely they are now at risk of running out of letters.
11. Dennis Frank 11

    28 November 2021 at 6:42 pm

    Richard Harman, editor of the Politik website and former "Chief TVNZ Political Correspondent", told Jim Mora & listeners this morning how Judith Collins made history:

    "She's the first major New Zealand political party leader to have a successful vote of no confidence passed in them, certainly since the Second World War and I would think stretching back before that."

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=2018822361

    So we ought to give her credit for this remarkable success. Put it on the cv, Jude! Maybe Swordfish will relish the research challenge of establishing how far back the actual precedent lies – presuming there even is one. If not, she really has made history!
    • mary_a 11.1

      28 November 2021 at 7:10 pm

      Jude's greatest political achievement
12. In Vino 12

    28 November 2021 at 8:49 pm

    I see that Judith has backed Luxon because he is "highly intelligent'.

    I am left with the question, "How would she know this?"

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS