The oxymoronic “responsible Minister”

19 comments on “The oxymoronic “responsible Minister” ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Anne 1

   6 May 2013 at 7:48 pm

   Well said Mike Smith.

   I’m sure you remember (as I do) how Muldoon manipulated the SIS for his own ends in the 70s and early 80s. And guess what, Key is on record as saying “Muldoon is the politician he admired the most.”

   Do I trust Key to use the provision wisely and in the interest of fair play and justice? Never, never never!!

   I can think of a few former National Party ministers who would be spinning in their graves at the thought of Key being let loose on the spy agencies. We’ve already seen evidence of his traitorous duplicity in the Hobbit and Dotcom sagas… and the spurious appointment of an old school mate to head the GCSB.
2. BrucetheMoose 2

   6 May 2013 at 9:06 pm

   If the the laws of the land don’t suit your agenda, just change them.
   Worked for Hitler.
   • Te Reo Putake 2.1

     6 May 2013 at 9:18 pm

     Quite. But always worth remembering that the monoballed Austrian corporal used the laws of the land to his advantage, when it suited. He was democratically elected, after all.
   • toad 2.2

     6 May 2013 at 9:47 pm

     Arguably. But let’s not Godwin the thread this early.
     • BrucetheMoose 2.2.1

       6 May 2013 at 11:35 pm

       True, true. However, looking at that photo image, change that suit to brown and pen in the Chaplan mo, well there you go.
3. Vagabundo 3

   6 May 2013 at 9:25 pm

   I wonder what Peters will be asking for in return for supporting this disgusting bill.
   • Clockie 3.1

     6 May 2013 at 9:50 pm

     The smallest of baubles as an earnest of greater things to come..
4. burt 4

   6 May 2013 at 10:20 pm

   Mike

   The partisan party supporters will defend the role of the PM being one with said power and not share your disregard for the man holding the power. Such is party politics, the same man as leader of the opposition and they would hate him. Flag followers are often not the most objective people.
5. Colonial Viper 5

   6 May 2013 at 11:03 pm

   Is it too much for the Labour Party to come out and say simply that it opposes the spying on NZ citizens except in rare and exceptional circumstances which will require either police, Ministerial, or judicial oversight and probably a combination of all three.

   And subject to the OIA within 10 years of such surveillance being initiated.

   Do we need yet another inquiry, review, white paper to tell us what is right.
   • McFlock 5.1

     6 May 2013 at 11:25 pm

     Do we need yet another inquiry, review, white paper to tell us what is right.
     Yes.
     So people know the difference between a judicial warrant, a ministerial warrant, and police authorisation.
     • Colonial Viper 5.1.1

       7 May 2013 at 12:51 am

       So it’s too much for the Labour Party to come out and say simply that it opposes spying on NZ citizens except in rare and exceptional circumstances?
       • McFlock 5.1.1.1

         7 May 2013 at 9:28 am

         I would suggest that no, it’s too little.
         Even john key would have no problem agreeing with that trite statement.

         And every circumstance would be a rare and exceptional circumstance.
         • Colonial Viper 5.1.1.1.1

           7 May 2013 at 9:54 am

           I’ll gladly look forward to the results of the review/inquiry/white paper to see what Labour really thinks about Government spying on NZ citizens and residents then.

           Shucks according to you it might even explain what the difference between Ministerial powers, Judicial powers and Police powers are, if I’m lucky.
           • McFlock 5.1.1.1.1.1

             7 May 2013 at 10:10 am

             don’t get me wrong, I love the action-now, cut-red-tape, anti-thought, sound-bite-size, go-getting cut of your jib. It’s just a bit… shall we say “blunt”?… to apply to the complex issue of the security-liberty compromise.
6. Clockie 6

   7 May 2013 at 12:01 am

   It was a long time ago and I don’t pretend to have a perfect memory of subsequent events, but I remember being part of a large and rowdy protest against the SIS amendment bill in 1977? which ended with listening to several Labour MP’s speaking from the steps of parliament in support of the protest and against the amendment. I don’t recall Labour giving that amendment another mention in the intervening years..

   Always seems to be a different view when you’re in power doesn’t it?
7. RedLogix 7

   7 May 2013 at 7:15 am

   pfffftttt!!!

   If I don’t have an SIS file on me this thick by now, I’ve been wasting my time!
   • Clockie 7.1

     7 May 2013 at 8:09 am

     That’s what they all say until the Gestapo comes for them at 3.00am .. 🙂
8. Ed 8

   7 May 2013 at 8:50 am

   It is clear that that nice Mr Key has had enough of all those bludgers who cheat on their taxes and is determined to attack that hole of about a billion a year of tax cheating by only a hundred or so dishonest individuals. It should be quite efficient to use the resources of government to follow up n their communications with lawyers, accountants and associates in New Zealand and overseas to hugely increase the revenue achieved by government. It would not be efficient to use the GCSB for simple fraud of unemployment etc benefits – and the money from the biggest tax cheats can be used for programmes to get many of them back in work anyway. So of course we can trust that nice Mr Key – its just other people in the future when we won’t need GCSB to assist IRD that we have to be concerned about.

   I wonder how Watson and Hotchins feel about the wholesale license to spy on ourselves . . .
   • tc 8.1

     7 May 2013 at 1:36 pm

     ‘I wonder how Watson and Hotchins feel about the wholesale license to spy on ourselves . . .’

     comfortable as they’re never in NZ and aren’t we the better for it.

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS