web analytics

Something missing from asset sales debate

Written By: - Date published: 7:28 pm, September 8th, 2012 - 38 comments
Categories: assets, labour, national, Privatisation, uncategorized - Tags:

Something’s missing from Labour’s position on asset sales. It’s what it will do with the partially privatised companies (if the sales do go ahead despite Treaty issues and the dearth of economic rationale)  when  Labour is once more in  government.  I understand why it cannot promise to buy back the shares but why not make the sales less attractive by saying to potential buyers, regarding Mighty River and co, the next Labour led government WILL regulate power prices so  the private sector will NOT profit from higher prices (or by ‘growing prices’ as they say in the industry these days)?

That’s pretty much what Labour did when National privatised ACC (they announced very clearly that renationalising ACC would be one of its first acts, and it was) and that uncertainty did limit the number of overseas insurance companies willing to enter the market.

Am I missing something?  Why is this not Labour policy?

38 comments on “Something missing from asset sales debate ”

  1. pete 1

    David Cunliffe suggested the renationalisation wasn’t off the table (link: http://tvnz.co.nz/q-and-a-news/david-shearer-cuniffe-transcript-4588650).

    I think he copped a bit of flak for that, but signalling strong regulation would be a much more palatable strategy.

    Since strong regulation is going to be necessary, signalling it now will make it much easier to pass in future. Labour will have a powerful mandate if they announce their intentions early. Buyers will be aware of the regulatory risk when they buy, especially if that risk makes it into the prospectus.

    • BernyD 1.1

      It’s like they are waiting for more polls before they decide.
      Strange that they vet the voices before acting on them.
      A simple “I hear you” is all that’s required, it’s not policy making, just standing with people.
      They have all the policy ready to go, the whole party is Civilised, it’s time for us to hear them speak it.

    • Fortran 1.2

      pete

      Labour will not have enough seats to have a mandate on their own, but with the Greens, and Winston parties they will have.
      There is a need to get some agreement underway now, as Key may well call an early General Election over the Maori water affair.

    • Dr Terry 1.3

      David Cunliffe “suggested” . . . “we would not rule out renationalising them . . . We look very hard at that”. Labour is careful not to make any “commitment” to buying anything back. They just would not rule it out!
      On the whole, in this interview, Cunliffe is considerably more specific than Shearer, however. Shearer is noteworthy for “hedging his bets”, with the one exception of a strong statement concerning our troops in Afghanistan.

  2. Colonial Viper 2

    Am I missing something? Why is this not Labour policy?

    Why why why, what could the answer be???

    And not just simply regulating power prices. Also make it clear that the Government will select the majority of the Board of each power company.

  3. Rory 3

    There’s a strong view amongst the rank-and-file that renationalisation should take place, and that we should announce it before the election. A remit to such effect is travelling to Conference in November.

    If the claims run by Labour and KOA coalition are true (i.e. the economic and fiscal benefits of state ownership), then surely it makes economic and fiscal sense to buy these revenue-generating assets back?

    The implication of not doing so suggests that the claims we make to every kiwi who signs the petition are a cynical political stunt devoid of any real commitment to public ownership of the towering heights of the market.

    Clayton Cosgrove, and David Shearer, dismissed renationalisation as a potential policy commitment at the Region 4 conference and in the media; which makes the remit fight at National Conference particularly interesting. Our MPs may regret being so haste to reject what is really a sensible, ideologically consistent, and politically popular policy. They may be forced to change position come December.

  4. RedLogix 4

    Agreed.

    I’ve been thinking this for some time. If it was clearly signalled BEFORE any sale AND the terms that would be imposed … then there can hardly be an objection.

    It’s so obvious that you have to ask why not.

    • Draco T Bastard 4.1

      Because it’s traditional for a government not to fully and immediately undo what the previous government did even when what the previous government did was a) not in the interests of the country and b) against the will of the people. The reasoning is that if any government did that then you’d get tit for tat governing and thus no stability. Meanwhile, whenever the right get into power they do what they want and the next leftish government is effectively prevented from fixing their fuckups which, of course, adds to the growing inequality and general degradation of our society.

      Need more referendums to get off this path into a Banana Republic that the right have got us on.

      • Shaz 4.1.1

        I think regulation rather than renationalisation might be the best hope and the pressing issue for Labour is the TPP, which, if it goes through will limit a new progressive government’s ability to change legislation in case an aggrieved overseas invesvtor – seeing the likelhood of reduced profits triggers an investor states tribunal case through the TPP mechanism to overturn the legislation and / or exact compensation for lost earnings.

        • Dean Reynolds 4.1.1.1

          The obvious solution is that the next Labour/Green govt withdraws from the TPP. It’s delusional to think that membership of the TPP wil bring any benefits to ordinary New Zealanders

          • Colonial Viper 4.1.1.1.1

            The TPP will no doubt be set up to make it prohibitively expensive to withdraw from it. That’s what signing a deal with the devil usually entails.

      • Macro 4.1.2

        Muldoon and the previous govt super scheme spring to mind? _ and yes look what a mess that turned into. 🙁

      • AmaKiwi 4.1.3

        What do call rulers who make their own rules for how they will be re-elected? Dictators.

        We are not even going to have a referendum on the proposed changes to MMP!

        Leading Labour MP’s hate the mention of binding referendums. Which leaves people who campaign for Labour in an awkward position: “My Labour dictator will be better than their dictator. I’m sorry, democracy is not part of our policy.”

  5. Tim 5

    Interesting debate….and I’m just an interloper trawling the various “soshul netwerking” sites, since it seems to be the thing to do – even though any sort of substance is “v-i-r-t-u-a-l” It’s a nice way though o not actually having to smell shit, or even rotting bodies.
    Seems to me though that what is most paramount is to find a way to ensure this cyclical bullsht that’s driven by ideological extremes can come to rest. Swing right, swing left ………swing LOW sweer chariot. Really it’s all fucked up royally!
    Why do we even vote ffs!
    If we are going to even pretend we are a democracy, then we should be looking at ways whereby things like asset sales (supposedly owned by a “public”) cannot enter into the realms of the used-car-salesman, or any other “mouth” with the gift of the gab, but precious little else.

    It’ all a bit of a joke really. But I d see Keys and Joyces and Bennets hanging off the crossmembers of rural lamposts if they continue with all this crap.

    Roll the dice I spose! Let’s see where it falls. Damn sure though a Key or a JoiceJuice or a Bent really haven’t thought too far ahead.

  6. Wayne 6

    Draco, the same principle also applies to centre- right governments. There are many things that Labour does that National does not undo. ACC has not been opened to competition; the ERA was modified, not repealed, just as Labour did not reintroduce compulsory unionism in 2000. Incoming governments always have to work out what has permanently changed and what can be modified. Renationalisation would be a spectacular waste of money for no gain. The Government would be reborrowing, but for New zealanders there would be no change; power prices would not decrease, no-one would get better services. Surely an incoming Labour Government would want to do things that would change peoples lives in some tangible way.

    • Draco T Bastard 6.1

      Draco, the same principle also applies to centre- right governments.

      Yes, but there tends to be a bit of a difference. What NACT do is detrimental to NZ while what the left does generally isn’t (it’s usually repairing the damage that NACT have done). Not being able to undo the detrimental stuff has us, on average, getting worse off.

      ACC has not been opened to competition;

      Yeah but that’s not because they didn’t try. They got in power, said ACC was in the shit and raised fees. A year later with ACC well into surplus it came out that they’d have to raise fees again just so that private insurance companies could compete.

      Renationalisation would be a spectacular waste of money for no gain.

      Renationalisation is the only option that doesn’t continuously make us worse off.

      The Government would be reborrowing,

      The government never needs to borrow which is part of the problem – they keep doing so.

    • Dr Terry 6.2

      “Surely”? Never be too certain!

    • fatty 6.3

      “the ERA was modified, not repealed”

      Why would National want to repeal such a pathetic piece of legislation? Its as if they wrote it themselves

    • felix 6.4

      “Renationalisation would be a spectacular waste of money for no gain. “

      Obviously the “gain” is the ownership and control of our energy infrastructure. Pretty important as we’re at the end of the age of cheap energy and it would be really, really stupid to put ourselves in a position where we have to pay for the profits of overseas owners just so we can use our own energy network.

      As for the cost of re-nationalisation, it needn’t cost a cent if it’s clearly and fairly signaled.

  7. Mikesh 7

    The difficulty Labour has is that it would not be sensible to do or say something that would lower the price that the government receives if the sales go ahead.

    • Anne 7.1

      Why?

      The lower the price the better. It’s right wing ideological claptrap anyway, so if the Left can help it to fail… all well and good!

      • Nick 7.1.1

        Unfortunately the Government is determined to go ahead with these sales regardless. Even though they said they wouldn’t sell them if they couldn’t get a fair price they will need to sell some if not most of the assets they are looking at before the next election to have any credibility amongst their base.

        If Labour could do something to force the price down but not stop the sales then the books are even worse off than if they get sold for a fair / high price.

        Best bet would be to have something effective block the asset sales completely, if they are going ahead anyway then Labour needs to be careful about its position, we don’t want the sales to have gone ahead, be a failure and Labour take the blame prior to the next election. Crosby-Textor would have a field day.

        • felix 7.1.1.1

          “Even though they said they wouldn’t sell them if they couldn’t get a fair price “

          I’ve heard English say this, but I’ve also heard Key say in the house that they’ll sell them regardless of price simply because selling them is the “right thing to do”.

          • Anne 7.1.1.1.1

            I’ve also heard Key say in the house that they’ll sell them regardless of price simply because selling them is the “right thing to do”.

            Yep. Proves my point at 7.1 “Nothing but ideological claptrap.”

            Get in behind the referendum petition folks. The greater the number of signatures, the less likely this govt. can ignore it – despite Key’s bull-shitting rhetoric to the contrary.

            An example of how worried they are about the petition:

            I heard Bill English claim on Q&A this morning – and I quote “the Labour Party is so desperate it’s getting children to sign the petition”. He went on to say “they wouldn’t get away with it because the kids names will be removed… ha ha ha”. But we know that English is a consummate liar from way back.

  8. Raymond A Francis 8

    One reason was that during the 9 years that Labour was running things they regarded the power companies as a cash cow and would be loath to cut even 51% of that payout
    The rumour that they (the MPs) will be buying up large if they come onto the block is just that (a rumour)

    • Colonial Viper 8.1

      One reason was that during the 9 years that Labour was running things they regarded the power companies as a cash cow and would be loath to cut even 51% of that payout

      Indeed. Labour set those companies up to be irresistable to the Tories to sell.

  9. Treetop 9

    I just love it that the asset sales are keeping the Government up at night; their day dreaming (not seeing all the pitfalls) just has to stop.

  10. Wayne 10

    Felix, are you proposing expropriation without compensation, well you know Labour and probably not even the Greens would do that. Mind you Hone would!

    More seriously what does renationalization actually do. Draco says it means regaining control, but it is not lost with the Govt retaining 51%. More importantly it does not change anything for the voters own circumstances, such as bringing down power prices. Programs relevant to voters require tax and benefit changes or jobs and innovation programs, or social, health, education and housing programs. The actual design of course depends on each parties view.

    By the way Draco Labours ERA retained many of the features of the ECA – Labour in 2000 realized there was no going back to the pre 1984 era, and who would want to?

    • Draco T Bastard 10.1

      Draco says it means regaining control, but it is not lost with the Govt retaining 51%.

      More ignorance. Selling off even a small amount limits what the government can do with the assets as the minor shareholders get veto on anything that might decrease their returns thus a loss of control.

      More importantly it does not change anything for the voters own circumstances, such as bringing down power prices.

      Wrong again. It means that taxes are going to have to go up to pay for the loss of income from the power companies. That is definitely a change for the voters.

      By the way Draco Labours ERA retained many of the features of the ECA

      So?

      Labour in 2000 realized there was no going back to the pre 1984 era, and who would want to?

      The 10% to 20% of the population that have shifted into the Precariat since the neo-liberal reforms of the 1980s? You know, the people who no longer have a stable income and who are living below the breadline.

  11. Wayne 11

    Draco, Tell me anything that has happened over the last several years (and I include the Labour Govt) that the SOE’s do to benefit the consumer in a way that is significantly different to other companies. In fact Trust Power seems closer to the Tauranga community that the Power SOE’s seem to be to us as taxpayers.

    You also seem to be ignoring the fact the the sale reduces debt whereas renatinalisation increases it. Now I know that there will be increased income, but also note the Govt only gets the dividends, not the whole company profit, and of course it has to pay the interest on the increased debt.

    Do you think we should we should go back to the sort of economy that existed prior to 1984, which almost had New Zealand being bailed out by the IMF. The system was unsustainable. In any event it is a sterile argument. Those days are gone and no party who can form the core of a New Zealand government believes that form of centralized, highly regulated economy can return. That is why denationalization will not happen.

    • Draco T Bastard 11.1

      Tell me anything that has happened over the last several years (and I include the Labour Govt) that the SOE’s do to benefit the consumer in a way that is significantly different to other companies.

      Well, kept taxes down.

      You also seem to be ignoring the fact the the sale reduces debt whereas renatinalisation increases it.

      I’m not ignoring it. I realise, unlike you, that it will be temporary as the sale of those assets will induce more borrowing.

      Do you think we should we should go back to the sort of economy that existed prior to 1984,

      Nope. I think we should go to one where the government creates the money, not the private banks and where the government provides necessary services such as power because it’s a public good and not because it can make a profit at it. An economy where capitalism exists as a minor, non-critical part of society.

      In any event it is a sterile argument.

      No it’s not no matter how much you would like it to be so. We’re having it now and we’re having it because the reforms that the 4th Labour government brought in and was continued by later governments has just failed as much as the one that existed prior to 1929. The one that existed in 1984 didn’t fail that much which would indicate that it is somewhat better even if still a failure.

  12. Peter 12

    Good article Jenny. I have been wondering this too, to the point at which I wrote a letter to Shearer’s office in an attempt to get answers. Naturally, I didn’t.

    I would just be bold and renationalise the things. That’s the weapon that Labour currently possesses, but yet, it is too afraid to challenge it.

    Even if that isn’t appropriate, some strong policy on how we regulate the power system might come close.

    Not holding my breath though.

  13. Wisdumb 13

    Apart from changing the MOM Act to ensure that the government selected the boards and specified the chairpersons, and strongly regulating prices, as mentioned above by Col. Viper, a Labour govt should reverse some of the other nasties in the MOM Act: make the 51% owned entities subject to the Official Information Act and the Ombudsman Act. There are no doubt others in the fine print that need to be reversed.

    Renationalising should be a long term objective because the entire NZ electricity system needs to be run as a unified system. This would achieve real efficiencies that would match generating capacity with demand, and keep the Transpower side of things in tune with generation – they have quietly been underinvesting a la Telecom to show book profits, I seem to think, There would be no need for such forced manipulations as the exchange of South Island generation capacity and North Island virtual capacity between Meridian and Genesis, the gaming of the network, the construction of excess capacity for competitive reasons but isn’t then used but we have paid for it in falsely high electrictiy prices, the massive bumph competitive spin and PR, and the duplication of head offices, boards chairmen, and so on and so on. And let us not forget Geoff Bertram’s point, the false upvaluation of historically paid for assets to futher ramp up prices.

  14. captain hook 14

    The national government is fixated on the nineties when a huge shift occurred in the world financial markets and apparatus. namely computers where all the dweebs could sit down and anlayse a multibillion dollar business in an afternoon.
    One of the by productrs of this mass delusion was the falsehood that a spot market could be made in power pricing in every and al countries of the world.
    this was of course hopeless nonsense but the current crop of infantilised tory party mavens still beleive it or even if they dont they know they are in the box seat to get their share parcels.
    ungggggggggggghhhhhh.
    what a gang of creeps we have ended up with in control.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Celebrating the Entry Into Force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
    [Opening comments, welcome and thank you to Auckland University etc] It is a great pleasure to be here this afternoon to celebrate such an historic occasion - the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This is a moment many feared would never come, but ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Supporting disabled people to stay connected
    The Government is providing $3 million in one-off seed funding to help disabled people around New Zealand stay connected and access support in their communities, Minister for Disability Issues, Carmel Sepuloni announced today. The funding will allow disability service providers to develop digital and community-based solutions over the next two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Voluntary saliva testing offered to quarantine workers from Monday
    Border workers in quarantine facilities will be offered voluntary daily COVID-19 saliva tests in addition to their regular weekly testing, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. This additional option will be rolled out at the Jet Park Quarantine facility in Auckland starting on Monday 25 January, and then to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    22 hours ago
  • Next steps in firearms buy-back
    The next steps in the Government’s ambitious firearms reform programme to include a three-month buy-back have been announced by Police Minister Poto Williams today.  “The last buy-back and amnesty was unprecedented for New Zealand and was successful in collecting 60,297 firearms, modifying a further 5,630 firearms, and collecting 299,837 prohibited ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • New Public Housing Plan announced
    The Government has released its Public Housing Plan 2021-2024 which outlines the intention of where 8,000 additional public and transitional housing places announced in Budget 2020, will go. “The Government is committed to continuing its public house build programme at pace and scale. The extra 8,000 homes – 6000 public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Prime Minister congratulates President Joe Biden on his inauguration
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated President Joe Biden on his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States of America. “I look forward to building a close relationship with President Biden and working with him on issues that matter to both our countries,” Jacinda Ardern said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Jobs for Nature funding will create training and employment opportunities
    A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Better care for babies with tongue-tie
    Babies born with tongue-tie will be assessed and treated consistently under new guidelines released by the Ministry of Health, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Around 5% to 10% of babies are born with a tongue-tie, or ankyloglossia, in New Zealand each year. At least half can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison over
    The prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison is over, with all remaining prisoners now safely and securely detained, Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis says. The majority of those involved in the event are members of the Mongols and Comancheros. Five of the men are deportees from Australia, with three subject to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Pre-departure COVID-19 test for travellers from the UK and the US from 15 January
    Travellers from the United Kingdom or the United States bound for New Zealand will be required to get a negative test result for COVID-19 before departing, and work is underway to extend the requirement to other long haul flights to New Zealand, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins confirmed today. “The new PCR test requirement, foreshadowed last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago