The politics of gun control
Written By:
- Date published:
7:47 am, March 9th, 2020 - 180 comments
Categories: crime, farming, labour, law, law and "order", national, nz first, police, same old national, uncategorized -
Tags:
As we approach the anniversary of the Christchurch massacre you would hope that our politicians had decided to put politics aside and settled on meaningful law changes so that the chances of a deranged shooter killing people on the basis of their religion was reduced.
Regrettably not.
As pointed out by Mark Daalder at Newsroom National wants to change one of the more important elements of the proposed law changes, the test to be applied by the police when determining if someone passed the good character test when seeking a gun licence.
From the article:
In a Supplementary Order Paper submitted on the Government’s Arms Legislation Bill, National’s Police spokesperson Brett Hudson proposes that a test for violent and extremist tendencies should only be applied to people who have been “convicted of an offence under the Human Rights Act 1993 or the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 relating to violent, hateful, or extremist speech or behaviour”.
However, Gun Control NZ’s Nik Green says this would allow many extremists to obtain a firearms license, pointing to the fact that no one in New Zealand has been convicted of such an offense under the Human Rights Act.
Police Minister Stuart Nash said Hudson’s SOP was “very concerning. I do not know why the Nats are not supporting this because it takes guns off gangs and it’s much tougher penalties for gun crime.”
As Daalder points out there have been no convictions under the Human Rights Act that would qualify and convictions under the Harmful Digital Communications Act are difficult to obtain and quite rare.
And the following persons would theoretically not be caught by National’s proposal:
- The Christchurch shooter.
- Philip Arps.
- A young law student who made racist comments about Muslims the day after the atrocity.
- White supremacists generally who don’t have convictions.
In a minority report in the report back of the Bill National said this:
National Party members do not support this bill. We believe it is improperly targeted and that this firearms reform should be focused on genuine criminal activity and gangs.
This bill does not do that. Instead it places greater responsibility, regulation, and costs on individuals and groups who already obey the law.
To the National Party members, the general policy thrust of this bill appears to be predicated on the notion that applying some more rules to people who already follow the law will somehow make people safer. That flies in the face not only of evidence we received on this bill, but also the evidence received by the select committee inquiry into the illegal possession of firearms in 2016/17.
It takes a lot of chutzpah to convert this issue into a tough on gangs issue. The Christchurch shooter was not a patched gang member and would not have been caught by this approach.
The proposed provision which Hudson is addressing is very wide. It says that the Police may (as opposed to shall) find that a person is not a fit and proper person to hold a firearms licence if that person “has been is charged with or has been convicted of an offence in New Zealand or overseas that is punishable by a term of imprisonment (including, but not limited to, an offence involving violence, drugs, or alcohol)”.
People convicted of drunk driving, depositing dangerous litter and petty shoplifting would be caught. But the section says “may” and “fit and proper person” is not defined in the Act. It is something the police may take into account when assessing someone’s suitability for a gun licence and presumably do already. The Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Bill makes it clear that the provision is partial codification of the current fit and proper person requirement.
The essential point must be that gun ownership and usage is not a right. Just like cars guns can do a lot of damage and being granted the privilege to operate one should be subject to rigorous consideration. Of course current charges and convictions of whatever sort should be taken into account. And if they relate to violence or a lack of control on the part of the applicant then they should be given a lot of weight.
It is not just National who are playing politics with the bill. NZ First is also seeking support at the margins of the electorate to justify meddling in what should be a consensus decision.
From Collette Devlin at Stuff:
The Labour party is struggling to get support to pass a new gun law as NZ First continues to dig its heels in.
The Arms Legislation Bill passed its second reading last month but NZ First MP Ron Mark signalled the party was moving away from supporting core aspects of the Bill, saying the caucus had some reservations.
While he would not go into detail, Mark told Stuff this week there was still “a lot of water to go under the bridge right now”.
The bill, which includes a firearms registry, harsher penalties, and a warning system to show if a person is a fit and proper person to hold a firearms licence, had been expected to come back to Parliament this week but has been bumped down the order list.
…
Mark said he was still having “constructive conversations’ with Police Minister Stuart Nash on the issues the party wanted to settle.
The party was looking for a pragmatic way through that protected the rights and privileges of legitimate firearms owners, he told the House last month.
One of those was resolving the question of whether or not police should continue to administer firearms law and a “strong argument” for the need for an arms authority that takes that statutory responsibility.
There were also further conversations to be had around farmers who had problems with pest control and around sporting shooters.
A separate entity being established is bizarre. The police would continue to handle the day to day management of the Act. Why separate obligations? Do we really need another Worksafe?
As for farmers when Federated Farmers say that the ban will not be popular but is needed who would argue to the contrary? Especially when they said “… a clampdown is the responsible path to take to try to ensure we’re never witness to this kind of tragedy on our shores again.”
And I am struggling to understand what the problem for sport shooters is. If it is more red tape for the sort of club that the Christchurch shooter belonged to then let there be more red tape.
If it is that their ability to enter into competitions will be affected as far as I can see the proposed changes do not affect olympic shooting sports.
Gun Control NZ gave this description of what was at stake in its submission on the Bill:
The Regulatory Impact Statement analyses this issue in some depth. Our main comment is that the shooters affected by these changes do not compete in the Olympics or Commonwealth Games. The shooters affected are those who partake in the euphemistically named “Practical Shooting”. “Practical shooting” is better described as combat shooting. Here is a description of practical shooting by Philip Alpers:
11 “Practical” shooting is almost the complete opposite of traditional target shooting sports. Competitors conduct their activities over a “run-and-gun” obstacle course where they face a variety of “real-world” or “practical” shoot/don’t shoot situations, such as firing at the human silhouette of a “hostage-taker” while sparing the “hostage.” Unlike traditional target sports, the weapons used are most often large caliber pistols, assault rifles, and riot shotguns. And although participants use the more innocuous term “practical” when dealing with the general public, among enthusiasts routinely refer to their pastime as “combat” or “tactical” shooting.
In a typical “course of fire,” contestants begin with a rapid draw from a holster, and are then timed as they run, crawl, and sometimes climb through a shoot-’em-up scenario, all while firing at human-scaled head-and-torso targets. Human targets intended to be shot are often referred to as “bad guys.” “No-shoot” targets are often called “hostages.” The highest scores are awarded to “head shots” and “heart shots” because of their heightened lethality, with points awarded for speed of shooting as much as for accuracy.
I do not think the sporting world would be a poorer place if this sort of “sporting” activity was frustrated.
The gun registry is one of the most important of changes. It is hard to understand why National is opposing it given the important contributions it would make to our collective safety.
All in all I am afraid I have no sympathy for the arguments of the gun nuts. There is no right to bear arms. It is a privilege that can and should be regulated for the public good. And NZ First’s and National’s holding up this important reform so they can seek support of those at the margin of public opinion is base.
Parliament should get on with it. And we should aim for a March 15 passage date. The victims of the Christchurch Massacre and their families deserve nothing less.
180 comments on “The politics of gun control ”
- Comments are now closed
- Comments are now closed
CommentsOpinions
Recent Comments
FeedsPartyGovtMedia
- This is bad news
The speech yesterday by Treasury’s Chief Economic Advisor warning that the books are in worse shape than forecasted looks like it’s part of a softening-up process for either more cuts or a longer wait to get back into surplus. The speech was a highly unusual public preview of Treasury’s Half-Yearly ...1 hour ago - Skeptical Science New Research for Week #47 2024
Open access notables Projected increase in the frequency of extremely active Atlantic hurricane seasons, Lopez et al., Science Advances: Future changes to the year-to-year swings between active and inactive North Atlantic tropical cyclone (TC) seasons have received little attention, yet may have great societal implications in areas prone to hurricane ...10 hours ago - Chicken Kiev
Chatting in the supermarket this morning, I found I needed to lunge for the chicken drumsticks.Coping mechanisms: who hasn’t felt a greater need for them lately?When it all gets too much, I turn to demonstrating handy butchery hacks.It wasn’t that she’d said anything wrong, our friend, not at all. We ...13 hours ago - The year is 2024 and it’s 1984
This is written in response to the highly significant open letter from a group of economists that was today addressed to Christopher Luxon. The year is 2024, and it’s 1984. The country is reeling from a record Olympic medal gold haul, while the globe grapples with the choice of the ...14 hours ago - The IPCA has failed
Back in 2022, RNZ took an in-depth look at the "Independent" Police Conduct Authority and its handling of killings by police. These are the most serious test of oversight, and you would expect the police's use of lethal force to receive the most severe scrutiny. But despite the police regularly ...18 hours ago - Thursday 21 November 2024
The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti arrived at Parliament on Tuesday – the size is being debated but estimates range from 42,000 to 100,000. The Prime Minister is defending not attending due to some of the organisers being affiliated with Te Pāti Māori. The national gang patch ban came into force ...18 hours ago - ‘These budget cuts are counter-productive and make no sense’
I spoke to former Productivity Chair Nana this morning about the letter he and a group of other economists sent to PM Christopher Luxon to urge the Government to urgently suspend cuts to spending and investment for the sake of the economy, struggling businesses and the wellbeing of vulnerable ...20 hours ago - ACT’s Astroturfing & A Co-ordinated Attack on Te Pati Māori
Unity on the Streets / Unity at the TableAfter the Hīkoi, all three right wing Coalition leaders came together to push the idea that the 42,000 - 50,000 + strong Hikoi was somehow less potent and brave, and more illegitimate than the energy and crowd displayed.Prime Minister Christopher Luxon 20-November: ...21 hours ago - Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for stabilizing temperatures
This is a re-post from the Climate Brink The world is emitting over 40 gigatons of CO2 per year, contributing to an accelerating warming of the planet. The world needs to cut emissions rapidly to be remotely on track to meet our Paris Agreement goals of limiting warming to well-below 2C, and we ...21 hours ago
- I Love My Leather Jacket
I wear my leather jacket like a great big hugRadiating charm - a living cloak of luckIt's the only concrete link with an absent friendIt's a symbol I can wear 'till we meet againOr it's a weight around my neck while the owner's freeBoth protector and reminder of mortalityIt's a ...22 hours ago - Throwback Thursday: Will “Auckland Transport” Survive?
With Auckland Transport’s future up in the air under Mayor Wayne Brown’s proposed CCO reform, we’ve dug way back into the archives, to unearth this post originally published in March 2010. As you’ll see, many of the debates that were being had when AT was first proposed continue to ...22 hours ago - Economists call on PM to suspend budget cuts for the sake of the economy
Nicola Willis’ budget cuts are under fire from economists for having no clear rationale and worsening the recession. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 21: The news at ...22 hours ago
- The end of policing by consent
National has appointed a new police commissioner. And he explicitly rejects policing by consent: Asked if he subscribed to policing by consent, he said he did not. “I don’t talk about policing by consent. I talk about trust and confidence, and it is fundamentally important that the police have ...2 days ago
- The Treaty Principles Bill: A Who’s Who
David Horatio Waterbed SeymourFringe politician and dweeb transformed successfully by ThinkTank money into a well-oiled soundbite robot.Currently programmed to say: Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Equal rights for all New Zealanders Was previously programmed to say:I am a proud libertarian andI am a ...2 days ago - Kinleith mill closure shows need for industrial strategy
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to deliver an economic and industrial strategy for regional manufacturing, rather than just expressing sympathy for job losses, following the announced closure of Kinleith mill in Tokoroa. “The closure Kinleith mill in Tokoroa is not just devastating for ...2 days ago
- 27% of kids going hungry, up from 21% in a year
One in four Kiwi children live in households where food runs out often or sometimes. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, November 20: The lead: The official annual Health Survey found sharp ...2 days ago - Transport modelling is an illusion
This guest post by Tim Adriaansen, an advocate for accessibility and sustainable transport, originally published on LinkedIn and cross posted here with permission. People prefer cars, right? Probably not. Here’s why. Granted, most people in English-speaking countries use a car to get around. This simple reality underpins our transport ...2 days ago
- Young Maori take over
Neither Wellington nor Parliament has ever seen anything like it before. The Police said there were more than 40,000 but however many there were, yesterday’s Hikoi to Parliament was a monumental event. It was almost three times the Foreshore and Seabed martch of 2004 and many,many times bigger than ...2 days ago
- Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Aftermath
The euphoria from yesterday’s hikoi may be transitory, but is no less valuable for that. It is pretty rare for the left to feel itself to be in the overwhelming majority, and speaking as the voice of the people. Lest that momentum be lost, the organisers will no doubt be ...2 days ago - Sabin 33 #3 – Solar panels generate too much waste and will overwhelm landfills
On November 1, 2024 we announced the publication of 33 rebuttals based on the report "Rebutting 33 False Claims About Solar, Wind, and Electric Vehicles" written by Matthew Eisenson, Jacob Elkin, Andy Fitch, Matthew Ard, Kaya Sittinger & Samuel Lavine and published by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia ...2 days ago
- What’s the time Mr Seymour?
Mr David Seymour crawling up to the ceilingThe sun don't shine the sun don't shine the sun don't shine at allMamma Pappa say you should go to school, I don't know what forNow that I've grown up and seen the world and all its liesSong: Southside of Bombay"Ake, ake, ake" ...2 days ago - Submit to defend te Tiriti!
The Justice Committee has called for submissions on National's racist and constitutionally radical Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill. Submissions can be made at the link above or by post, and are due by Tuesday, 7 January 2025. But I'd get in quick, in case National grows a spine ...3 days ago
- We need to talk about Kevin
All happy families are alike; each unhappy family has a Drunk Uncle Kevin in there somewhere. If your Kevin is anything like the ones I know, he was getting along happily enough without having to think too much about the Treaty Principles Bill apart from bloody good job, onya guys ...3 days ago - The hikoi
Like everyone else (everyone who wasn't there, anyway), I've spent the morning watching the hikoi march on Parliament. The pictures are astounding: parliament grounds and the surrounding streets are full, and there are still people backed up along Lambton Quay. The police are estimating 35,000 people, and that's a floor ...3 days ago
- Why Govt & NZ Inc should boycott & regulate Facebook
3 days ago - How should we talk about change?
A better world isn’t just possible, it’s desirable. And that’s how we should frame a lot of our conversations around making a greater Auckland. As an example take urban climate action. A climate friendly Auckland: Is free from congestion Enables people to travel how they choose Is filled with ...3 days ago
- AMA + Holiday Webworm Merch!
3 days ago - Discount Code for Webworm Merch!
Hi,So there’s a bunch of new stuff on the Webworm store (www.webworm.store) — just in time for the Holidays. Read more ...3 days ago - Trying to defuse the tension
There were urgent moves yesterday at Parliament to try and defuse the tension building up over ACT’s Treaty Principles Bill. The Bill’s author, ACT leader David Seymour, told reporters that he understood the Justice Select Committee met yesterday to discuss how long it should take to consider submissions on the ...3 days ago
- An Irritable NZ Pawn – David Seymour Admits Treaty Principles Bill will clear the way for deve...
3 days ago - Gordon Campbell On The Hikoi Arrival, And Tyler Childers
Politicians like to bang on all about the need to heal society’s racial/economic divisions, but in their actions they’re more keen on stoking those divisions, with the Treaty Principles Bill being the classic example. The Bill seeks to dilute the Crown’s responsibilities to Māori at the same time as it ...3 days ago
- Socially Backwards and Fiscally Forwards: the False Ideological Divide and the “Conservative” Li...
3 days ago - Kaamos: Accepted
I appreciate that A Phuulish Fellow has been fairly quiet recently. That’s a combination of two things – comparatively little in the way of relevant material to discuss (at least until The War of the Rohirrim comes out next month), and my general work on The Secret Non-Fiction Writing Project. ...3 days ago - Here’s how governments could fix their Paris climate commitment failures
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections Governments around the world face a conundrum. Virtually none are on track to meet their Paris climate commitments. That includes the United States, which committed to cut its emissions at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 but is only on track for 32-43% cuts ...4 days ago
- Unstoppable.
4 days ago - Katherine Trebeck – An Alternative Economic Narrative
The era of neoliberalism has been destructive on so many levels, with a huge growth in wealth and privilege for the one percent. A hollowing out of the state; fraying of the safety net; inadequate government investment in infrastructure; and continued environmental degradation has resulted in damage on a vast ...4 days ago - In a Manner of Speaking
In a manner of speakingI just want to sayThat I could never forget the wayYou told me everythingBy saying nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me nothingOh, give me the wordsGive me the wordsThat tell me everythingSongwriter: Winston TongNext Tuesday, the subscription price for Nick’s Kōrero will ...4 days ago - Monday 18 November 2024
The NZNO have announced a nationwide strike for December over its pay dispute with Health NZ, who have put a 1 per cent cap on pay rises. The Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti and Treaty Principles Bill remain front and centre in the media, with the impacts of the Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke-led ...4 days ago
- Shipley warns Seymour’s bill is ‘inviting civil war’
The divisive Treaty Principles Bill is not just a risk for the National Party, it’s a risk to civil order and unity, warns a National Party grandee. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on ...4 days ago - A clearer network for the City Rail Link?
This post was originally published on Linked In by Nicolas Reid. It is republished here with permission. Auckland is now just a year or so away from having the keystone of its urban rail network complete. As I wrote about here, the City Rail Link will be a literal game changer for ...4 days ago
- National’s support base is wobbling
If ACT leader David Seymour intended the Treaty Principles Bill to drive a wedge into National’s support base, he may well already be succeeding. By midnight on Thursday after the Maori Party haka in Parliament, National MPs were being deluged with emails and messages from their members calling them out ...4 days ago
- 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #46
A listing of 33 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, November 10, 2024 thru Sat, November 16, 2024. Story of the week Our Story of the Week is completely "meta" (no, not that Meta). It's about our exploring how ...4 days ago
- Grifter Eftpos Tamaki at it again
..Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Self-appointed “Bishop” and proto-fascist, Brian Tamaki was at it again on 16 November, blocking Auckland’s southern motorway, SH1.This time, the target of his ire wasn’t the Civil Unions Act; covid lock-downs; mask mandates; or ...5 days ago - Rip up a bill, lead a haka are words to live by
I cannot stop grabbing people by the lapels, or shoulders, or similar, and raving at them about the tiny miracles in my ears.I can hear again! There could not be a more satisfied customer in all the world.In a noisy cafe I am even catching words that Karren cannot, she ...5 days ago - Unintended Consequences
Take the baitYou pay the priceIt's much too lateFor good adviceYou know and I know that our good things' throughBecause there's consequences for what we doConsequences for me and youWriters: Kevin Robert Hayes, David Nagier, Bonnie Adele Hayes.Fallout from the first readingOne News began last night by saying that tens ...6 days ago - Thank you, driver!
Today, Saturday 16th of November, is Auckland Transport’s Bus Driver Appreciation Day! Saturday 16 November marks the third annual Auckland Transport (AT) ‘Bus Driver Appreciation Day’, and this year we are encouraging all of New Zealand to thank their driver or let the bus go first if you are in ...6 days ago
- Totally Normal: Holiday Edition
Hi,If I was to accurately sum up my mental state over the week, I’d just say that I got a huge fright from my own shadow.I’d nipped out for an 11pm neighborhood stroll, just to calm down after a day of stress and screens. The Cure and Fazerdaze’s new record ...6 days ago - We Are Not Listening
The current rise of populism challenges the way we think about people’s relationship to the economy.We seem to be entering an era of populism, in which leadership in a democracy is based on preferences of the population which do not seem entirely rational nor serving their longer interests. ...
7 days ago - More lawlessness from National
On Tuesday, sick of government stonewalling, the Waitangi Tribunal issued a rare court order, ordering the Minister of Health to release unredacted documents within 48 hours showing its reasoning for disestablishing Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority. The government's response to the lawful order of a court? Yeah, ...7 days ago
- National’s tyrannical “foreign interference” law
Yesterday, under cover the the biggest political fight of the year, National quietly - covertly, even - introduced anti-foreign interference legislation. The bill is the product of a years-long work-program aimed at countering shit like this and this, and there's unquestionably a need to do something to counter foreign states' ...7 days ago
- The Haka Represents The Best Of Us
A few months ago, I was in an audience watching a Haka-Kapa and as I watched children dance and sing and sway and shout and beat, I couldn’t help but think “The Haka represents the best of us.”Yes, yes - there will be a thousand voices that rush forth to ...7 days ago
- Adding up the climate cost
St Mary’s Bay housing left hanging: Climate risk is systemically underestimated in the climate scenarios used by central banks, and a new report warns 10,000 houses are set to become uninsurable in Aotearoa. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, here’s the top six news items of note in ...7 days ago
- Auckland chafing at Bishop’s housing intensification orders
One of the major problems the Government has in implementing its ‘going for housing growth’ strategy is that it isn’t giving much funding help to councils. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and ...7 days ago - Friday 15 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill continues to dominate political news, with it passing its first reading in the House. Parliament was briefly suspended and Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for 24 hours after leading a haka that was joined by opposition MPs and the public in the gallery. Willie ...7 days ago
- Weekly Roundup 15-November-2024
Happy Friday, welcome to another round-up of interesting stories about what’s happening in Auckland and other cities. Feel free to add your links in the comments! This post, like all our work, is brought to you by a largely volunteer crew and made possible by generous donations from our readers ...7 days ago
- Are We The Waiting?
And screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingAnd screamingAre we we are, are we we are the waitingForget me nots, second thoughts live in isolationHeads or tails and fairy tales in my mindAre we we are, are we we are the waiting unknownThe rage and love, the ...7 days ago - The Hoon around the week to November 15
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with:The Kākā’s climate correspondent on the latest climate news, including from COP29 this week; on the US Presidential elections, Israel vs Gaza/Iran/Lebanon, Ukraine/Nato vs Russia/North ...7 days ago
- First Tea and Toast, now Milo — why do NZ’s best beverages need so much defending?
Only two months ago, Nicola Willis had to step in to stop Health New Zealand cutting tea and toast for post-birth parents, and now Lester Levy is riding to the rescue with a welcome message for all: our health workers can once again drink Milo, and will no longer need ...1 week ago - Gordon Campbell on the folly of making apologies in a social vacuum.
Day One of the Treaty Principles Bill…and everyone got what they wanted, and did what they liked. Heated words were exchanged. Culturally appropriate acts of outrage were performed. David Seymour got to play the victim card. Willie Jackson got kicked out of class. A comically red-faced Mr Speaker bellowed “Order, ...1 week ago
- Skeptical Science New Research for Week #46 2024
Open access notables Microbial solutions must be deployed against climate catastrophe, Peixoto et al., Nature Communications [comment]: The climate crisis is escalating. A multitude of microbe-based solutions have been proposed, and these technologies hold great promise and could be deployed along with other climate mitigation strategies. However, these solutions have ...1 week ago
- The PM gets some extremely valuable legal advice for free
You can pay a great deal of money for the services of a KC. So just what would some peerless legal writing from 40 or so of them be worth, do you reckon?Priceless, that’s what. It’s not even the half of it, but this is my favourite part of the ...1 week ago - D-day for the government
The government's Treaty Principles Bill is up for its first reading today - bought forward in a rush in a desperate effort to avoid the hikoi which is currently marching on Wellington. But the Prime Minister won’t be there for it – he’s literally running away to Peru! But he ...1 week ago
- 97% of submissions did not want no-cause evictions, Trump chooses a Russian spy for US Intelligence ...
Good morning, and I’m sorry I’ve been away for a couple of days.I’ve been focusing on the Hikoi, and also testing out sentiment on the Treaty Principles Bill. It’s complicated, and the Treaty Principles Bill will be debated in the House today. The Government’s own lawyers have told them the ...1 week ago - Government must vote down ACT Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is calling on the Government to vote down an ACT Party Members Bill that would undermine workers’ rights by making it easier for employers to fire workers. Last week ACT MP Laura Trask’s Employment Relations (Termination of Employment by Agreement) Amendment Bill was ...1 week ago
- Seymour causes thousands of unjustified absences by forcing kids to fight for their rights instead o...
The State would like to remind you that they are in control. They manage your employment prospects, and can destroy the job market you and yours rely on by mass-cancelling construction projects, cutting funding, and firing a good chunk of our public servants. They wield the mechanisms that provide scrutiny ...1 week ago - The Weight of the World
As the weight of the world Hangs on your shoulders The weight of the world Starts to take over again And over again All that you once loved, now you hate So slowly relearn how to meditate To have and to hold And never let go Can you feel it ...1 week ago - Thursday 14 November 2024
The Treaty Principles Bill is set to have its First Reading in the House today, as the Hīkoi mō Te Tiriti continues. More than 40 KCs have written to the Prime Minister and Attorney-General outlining their “grave concerns” about the substance of the Treaty Principles Bill, while an academic and ...1 week ago
- Trump’s return to White House brings the climate’s ‘find out’ phase closer
As we absorb the news of Trump's victory in the US Presidential election, here’s a wrap compiled just before the result of what it might mean for climate action: The UN Secretary General says the prospective departure of the United States would cripple the Paris Agreement, likening it to the ...1 week ago
- Time and Space in the City Centre
Patrick Reynolds is deputy chair of the City Centre Advisory Panel. The header image is from Walthamstow, London The city centre now has a few stretches of street where the space has been repurposed to a people and place focused design from full time traffic use. These are a great ...1 week ago
- An opportunity for a pro-growth tax switch
As the Hikoi against it swells into the tens of thousands, KCs call on National to kill off ACT’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. Photo: Getty ImagesKia ora. Long stories short, here’s my top things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, November 14: The ...1 week ago - Dealing to the big Aussie banks
The big question hovering over the Select Committee Inquiry into banking is what the Government will do with its findings. If yesterday’s hearing is anything to go by there is a tidal wave of discontent about the four big Australian Banks crashing through the Committee which may force it to ...1 week ago
- 20 fact briefs published in collaboration with Gigafact!
In April 2024 we announced the (renewed) collaboration between Gigafact and Skeptical Science to create fact briefs, short but credibly sourced summaries that offer “yes/no” answers in response to claims found online. Our initial plan had been to publish one fact brief per week on Saturdays but - as happens ...1 week ago
- Instead of axing the HRC, ACT corruptly installed a racist, transphobic “Gay Human Rights Commissi...
On November 5th, the Spinoff published a very interesting article on Stephen Rainbow, the Human Rights Commission’s latest recruitment, and how he came to get the controversial appointment. Naturally because of the excitement of the US election, it’s flown a little below the radar. https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/05-11-2024/i-didnt-get-the-hrc-job-stephen-rainbows-human-rights-commission-appointment-just-got-weirderThe article details evidence of the ...1 week ago - Injustice for torture
Between 1950 and 1993 the New Zealand government tortured and abused up to 250,000 children in residential care facilities. Yesterday, following formal findings from a royal commission, it finally apologised for that abuse. The next step is redress and restitution - compensating the surviving victims for the appalling harm they ...1 week ago
- Voices echo
1 week ago
- NZ’s global climate rankings plummet as Govt removes agriculture from ETS
The Government has passed legislation to remove agriculture from the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) while Aotearoa’s reputation on climate action plummets. ...12 hours ago - Failed boot camp experiment must end
As legislation to set up boot camps passed its first reading, the Green Party urged the Government to abandon this failed policy experiment for the good of our rangatahi. ...13 hours ago
- Gender-affirming care must centre evidence and health needs, not political posturing
The Ministry of Health has today released an evidence brief regarding the use of puberty blockers in gender-affirming healthcare, amid moves by the government to limit access. ...14 hours ago
- Release: National doesn’t care about manufacturing
The National Government is walking away from our manufacturing sector with constant reports of closures and job losses. ...15 hours ago - Release: David Parker speech – Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change
David Parker's speech from the University of Auckland's forum on Piketty, Inequality and Climate Change in September 2024. ...15 hours ago
- Release: Youth mental wellbeing no longer a priority for Child Poverty Minister
Louise Upston has revealed her diminished vision for vulnerable youth against a backdrop of snubbed advice, scrapped priorities, shifted goal posts and thousands more children projected to fall into poverty. ...17 hours ago
- Release: National’s lack of climate action taking NZ backwards
National Government’s backward-looking climate policy has seen New Zealand fall seven places on the Climate Change Performance Index to 41 out of 63 countries measured. ...17 hours ago
- Release: Simple reason for drop in emergency housing
When the Government says it has reduced the number of people in emergency housing, what it means is it is stopping people from accessing it in the first place. ...20 hours ago
- Govt’s child wellbeing strategy ‘shallow and shameful’
The Government is turning its back on children by not only weakening child poverty reduction targets, but also removing child mental wellbeing as a priority focus in their Child and Youth Wellbeing Strategy. ...20 hours ago
- Release: A historic win for Samoan communities
Labour warmly welcomes the Restoring Samoan Citizenship Bill as it passes its third reading, before becoming law. ...21 hours ago
- Government plan to reinstate live animal exports a “national disgrace”
The Government has taken a giant step backwards by reinstating live animal exports. ...1 day ago
- Pasifika justice as Member’s Bill passes final reading
Teanau Tuiono’s Member’s Bill, the Citizenship (Western Samoa Restoration) Amendment Bill, has passed its third reading and will become law. ...2 days ago
- Release: Minister of Education thinks New Zealand ends at the Bombay Hills
The Minister of Education has shown complete disregard for rural communities and their school bus routes in Question Time today. ...2 days ago
- Economists sound alarm on Government’s slash-and-burn approach
A group of prominent economists has released an open letter to the Government, raising grave concerns about the far-reaching consequences of its fiscal policy. ...2 days ago
- Release: Smoking numbers up under Costello’s watch
National’s repeal of Labour’s smokefree legislation has taken New Zealand further away from achieving a Smokefree 2025 and a smokefree generation. ...2 days ago
- Release: Call for Palestine recognition by NZ, Australian and Canadian MPs
Parliamentarians from Australia, Canada and New Zealand have written an open letter to their respective Prime Ministers calling on them to recognise Palestine. ...2 days ago
- Justice Select Committee opens floor for Treaty Principles submissions
Today, the Justice Select Committee has decided to officially open submissions for the controversial Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Power of the people on full display as hīkoi approaches Parliament
Today, Hīkoi mō te Tiriti arrived in Wellington, with thousands gathering to march in unity against the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...3 days ago
- Hypocrisy as Te Whatu Ora contractor bill balloons
Te Whatu Ora’s bill for contracting and consulting staff has ballooned by nearly 20 percent under the National Government, breaking a promise they made during the election campaign to cut contractors. ...4 days ago
- Release: Growing pressure to scrap Section 7AA Repeal Bill
The newly released Section 7AA Repeal Bill's select committee report is further evidence that the Government should scrap it. ...4 days ago
- Government’s move to monetise access to nature a slippery slope
The Green Party is voicing serious concerns over the Government’s proposal to charge for access to public conservation land, released today. ...7 days ago
- Green Party condemns the passage of Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party condemns the passing of the Treaty Principles Bill at first reading, and is clear that the fight is not over. ...1 week ago
- Stand Up for Te Tiriti
Te Tiriti o Waitangi is our country’s founding document. It forms the basis of the relationship between Māori and the Crown – and the Aotearoa New Zealand we live in today. ...1 week ago
- Release: Over 15,000 sign Labour’s open letter to Luxon
As the hīkoi to Parliament continues, Labour has sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in a last-ditch attempt to get him to kill the Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Fast Track Bill threatens environment, climate and reputation
The fast-track legislation passing its second reading in Parliament is another step towards environmental ruin. ...1 week ago
- Greens join King’s Counsel in calling for Treaty Principles Bill to be abandoned
The Prime Minister must answer the call from a group of senior lawyers of the King’s Counsel to abandon the divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...1 week ago
- Chris Hipkins’ apology statement to state and faith-based care survivors
...1 week ago
- Release: Labour formally apologises to state and faith-based care survivors
Labour joins with the Government in unreservedly apologising for the abuse, neglect and trauma including torture in state and faith-based care and for ignoring the voices of survivors for too long. ...1 week ago
- Green Party stands in support of survivors of abuse in care
Today, the Green Party stands alongside the survivors of abuse in state care and faith-based care as the Government issues an historic apology. ...1 week ago
- Green Party calls for conscience vote on Treaty Principles Bill
The Green Party has written to the Speaker of the House requesting he enable a personal vote on the Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- Govt move to exclude journalist risks chilling effect
The Green Party is alarmed by the Government’s move to exclude a journalist from covering this week’s apology for the survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care. ...2 weeks ago
- Without action, an apology will be empty air
For tomorrow’s apology to survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care to hold any water, the Government must not pursue the same policies that drove the abuse in the first place. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Concerns remain over tobacco interference
Concerns about the tobacco industry’s ability to interfere in government policy making remain, despite the inability of the Office of the Auditor-General to investigate the Government’s decision to halve the excise tax on heated tobacco products. ...2 weeks ago
- Urgent wake-up call on climate
The Climate Change Commission’s latest advice indicates Aotearoa needs to be stepping up on climate action. ...2 weeks ago
- Green MP’s Meme-ber’s Bill set to save the world
Break out the punchlines and dust off your meme folder: Green Party MP Kahurangi Carter’s Copyright (Parody and Satire) Amendment Bill was pulled from the Ballot yesterday. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Poroporoaki: Ta Robert (Bom) Gillies
Kua hinga te manawa kairākau o Te Rua Tekau Ma Waru Tiwhatiwha te po! Kakarauru i te po! Ka rapuhia kei hea koe kua riro! Haere e te Ika a Whiro ki o tini hoa kua ngaro atu ki te Pō ...2 weeks ago
- Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principles Bill
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principle...
The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. ...2 weeks ago
- NZ must pursue independent foreign policy
The Green Party says the need is greater than ever for Aotearoa New Zealand to pursue an independent foreign policy. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Winston Peters must apologise
The Deputy Prime Minister should apologise to the public servant he named and blamed for something they did not do, and for misusing the rules of Parliament. ...2 weeks ago
- Government action provides Southland farmers more time to meet plan requirements
The Government is taking action to ensure Southland farmers and growers are not affected by unreasonable regional farm plan deadlines, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay, Environment Minister Penny Simmonds and Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard say.“Cabinet has agreed to provide more time for farmers and growers to comply with regional rules ...13 hours ago - Bill reaffirms Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending
The Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Bill had its first reading at Parliament today. The Bill reaffirms the Government’s commitment to crack down on serious youth offending, Minister for Children Karen Chhour says. “In recent years we have seen an unacceptable spike in youth offending. “This Bill makes ...14 hours ago
- Critical milestones for earthquake buildings review
Fairer, more sensible rules about managing earthquake risks are a step closer with the passing of legislation and the appointment of an independent chair to provide expert advice, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The Government is committed to reinvigorating our cities and regions to support economic growth, ...14 hours ago
- State of the art radiology machine for Auckland
People in Northland and Auckland will benefit from a new machine for cancer treatment installed at the Regional Cancer and Blood Service at Auckland City Hospital. The MV5 linear accelerator, or LINAC machine, officially opened today targets cancer tumours with pinpoint accuracy. Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says this new, ...14 hours ago
- Foreign Minister to visit Europe
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Europe for high-level talks with France, Germany and the United Kingdom next week. "Since taking office almost a year ago, the Coalition Government has emphasised the importance we place on New Zealand's traditional and likeminded diplomatic and ...15 hours ago
- First arrests made under gang patch ban
Police have made their first arrests under the new gang patch legislation, with two gang members arrested, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “Just before 11 this morning, Police in Wairoa apprehended a gang member for wearing a patch to the supermarket. He has been arrested and will now face enforcement ...16 hours ago
- Better support for victims of sexual violence
The Government is proposing two major changes to name suppression laws that will put the views of victims of sexual violence first, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “We are committed to restoring law and order and these two proposed changes will help ensure the victims of crime are put at ...17 hours ago
- Government moving forward with Regional Deals
Cabinet has agreed to invite all regions to submit proposals for Regional Deals between central and local government that drive economic growth and deliver the infrastructure our country needs, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop say. Inviting all regions to propose a Regional Deal that boosts ...18 hours ago
- MSA pilot participant update
One of the ten young men selected to participate in the Military-Style Academy Pilot has allegedly reoffended. Children’s Minister Karen Chhour is disappointed but says it would be naïve to think that none of these young men would reoffend. “I’m saddened that this young person has not taken this opportunity ...18 hours ago
- Attendance rates increase, again
Associate Education Minister David Seymour says that school attendance is continuing to rise. In Term 3 of 2024 51.3 per cent of students attended school regularly, an increase of 5.3 percentage points from 46 per cent in Term 3 of 2023. “This Government has prioritised student attendance and it is ...20 hours ago
- Improving the lives of young New Zealanders
Ensuring New Zealand is the best place in the world for children and young people is the vision at the heart of the Government’s new Child and Youth Strategy, Child Poverty Reduction Minister Louise Upston says. “Childhood represents a huge opportunity to set people on a positive path towards living ...23 hours ago
- Government continues work to reinstate livestock exports by sea
The Government is reinstating the trade of livestock exports by sea while ensuring the highest standards of animal welfare, says Associate Minister of Agriculture Andrew Hoggard.“The Government will introduce legislation changes to reinstate the trade, enhance oversight, and strengthen requirements for exporters to identify risks and manage the welfare of ...2 days ago
- Speech to the National Quality Forum 2024
Tēnā koutou katoa – it is a pleasure to be here today. I would like to begin by acknowledging the important leadership role you all play in ensuring a quality health system New Zealanders can trust. There is enormous clinical expertise in this room covering a wide range of disciplines. ...2 days ago
- New Zealand’s COP29 National Statement
Tēnā koutou katoa. Mr President, Excellencies, Delegates. New Zealand, and all nations represented here today, are already dealing with the impacts of climate change. Our households, businesses, and economies are bearing the costs of its effects. The choices we make now will shape the severity of these impacts for generations ...2 days ago
- Latest Quarterly Investment Report released
The Government has released its second Quarterly Investment Report (QIR) which shows substantial work still to be done by agencies to improve investment reporting and meet the Government’s expectations, Infrastructure and Acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “New Zealand has significant infrastructure and investment needs. The Government is determined to get ...2 days ago
- New Zealand supporting loss and damage fund
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced New Zealand will contribute NZ$10 million to the new Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage while at the annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) in Baku, Azerbaijan. “New Zealand is joining the global effort to address the significant challenge of responding to ...2 days ago
- Gang crackdown begins at stroke of midnight
The free ride for gangs is over when the clock strikes midnight tonight, with tough new laws officially coming into effect, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Police Minister Mark Mitchell say. “Gang patches will no longer be able to be worn in public. To earn the right to wear a ...2 days ago
- LGFA increases borrowing capacity to support high growth councils
The Government is welcoming the decision by the Local Government Funding Agency to increase access to financing tools for fast growing councils to support greater investment in critical infrastructure, Local Government Minister Simeon Brown says.“Communities across the country are facing an infrastructure deficit and significant population growth is projected in ...2 days ago
- Temporary Traffic Management costs revealed
The Government has revealed that over the past three years, the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) has spent an eyewatering $786 million of taxpayers’ money on road cones and temporary traffic management (TTM), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.“When I became Minister, I was surprised to learn that that NZTA did ...2 days ago
- Jurisdiction of Disputes Tribunal to double
Legislation that will double the financial jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal from $30,000 to $60,000 has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. “We need to improve court timeliness and access to justice so that Kiwis and get on with their lives. Court delays affect everyone, the ...3 days ago
- Protecting New Zealand from foreign interference
Legislation that will specifically criminalise foreign interference and strengthen espionage offences has passed first reading in Parliament today, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “It is normal and appropriate for states to interact and work to influence one another. This encourages cooperation and can have mutually beneficial outcomes. “However, the reality ...3 days ago
- Significant milestone for Canterbury Road of National Significance
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed news that the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board has approved funding towards pre-implementation and early works on the State Highway 1 (SH1) Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance (RoNS). “Reaching this significant milestone is a reflection of our Government’s ...3 days ago
- Health survey results to help drive change
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says findings from the annual Health Survey highlight the need to continue driving better health outcomes for New Zealanders. The New Zealand Health Survey is an annual snapshot of key metrics measured from July 2023 – July 2024. Findings released this morning include: In 2023/24, ...3 days ago
- Final push needed to get to Smokefree 2025
A renewed effort to get people to quit smoking will build on what has worked to date and target the groups who most need support, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello said today. “The latest New Zealand Health Survey results show the daily smoking rate at 6.9 per cent and we ...3 days ago
- New diplomatic appointments
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has announced four new diplomatic appointments. “Our diplomats play an important role in ensuring New Zealand’s interests are maintained and enhanced across the world,” Mr Peters says. “It is a pleasure to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the Ministry of Foreign ...3 days ago
- Next steps for Regulatory Standards Bill
Regulation Minister David Seymour has today announced the next steps in the Government’s plan improve the quality of regulation by opening consultation on a proposed Regulatory Standards Bill. “New Zealand's low wages can be blamed on low productivity, and low productivity can be blamed on poor regulation,” says Mr Seymour. ...3 days ago
- Red Tape Tipline goes live
Minister for Regulation David Seymour has today announced that the Ministry for Regulation’s Red Tape Tipline is now live. “We want to hear about your red tape horror stories. From today, New Zealanders will have a say on how they are regulated through an online portal,” says Mr Seymour. The ...3 days ago
- Youth Parliament 2025 announced
The Minister for Youth Matt Doocey has today announced the eleventh Youth Parliament will be taking place in 2025. “Youth Parliament offers a unique youth development opportunity to young people from across New Zealand to experience the political process and learn about how government works,” says Mr Doocey. “The two-day ...4 days ago
- Police stats show promising change
After nearly a year in Government, Kiwis have seen significant change across law and order with promising early results shown across some Police statistics, says Police Minister Mark Mitchell. “In August 2023, I told New Zealanders that if they had not started to see a change in public safety within ...4 days ago
- Better coordination of anti-scam efforts
With the launch of Fraud Awareness Week, the Government is committing to new coordination efforts across industry and government to combat online scams, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly says. “Online financial scams are a growing problem for New Zealand. New data released today shows that Kiwis lost nearly ...4 days ago
- Minister to consider 7AA select committee report
Minister for Children Karen Chhour will consider the recommendations made by the Social Services and Community Committee in its report back to Parliament on the Oranga Tamariki (Repeal of Section 7AA) Amendment Bill. “I want to thank the people who made submissions and those who appeared before the committee in ...4 days ago
- Defence Minister to attend ASEAN meeting
Defence Minister Judith Collins will this week attend the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defence Ministers’ Meeting-Plus in Vientiane, Laos. “We need to take every opportunity to engage with our international partners, given the increasingly unstable geo-political situation,” Ms Collins says. “New Zealand has a long-standing commitment to this ...4 days ago
- Launching the White Ribbon Ride
The Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual Violence, Karen Chhour, was on hand to wish riders well at the start of the North Island leg of the White Ribbon Ride in Whakatāne this morning. The ride helps mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, ...5 days ago
- Construction to begin on next stage of Papakura to Drury
Construction on the next stage of the SH1 Papakura to Drury project will begin early next month, with the contract for works awarded to Fulton Hogan, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. "SH1 Papakura to Drury is a key project that will drive economic growth and productivity, reduce congestion, and enable people ...6 days ago
- NZ signs trade deal with Costa Rica, Iceland and Switzerland
Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has signed a pioneering trade agreement that prioritises New Zealand’s sustainable exports at a ceremony during APEC in Peru today. “The Agreement on Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS), between Costa Rica, Iceland, and Switzerland was concluded in July of this year and opens up significant ...6 days ago
- Government and iwi work together on aquaculture
Five new Aquaculture Settlement Areas will help ensure Ngāi Tahu shares in the opportunities aquaculture offers for Southland’s economy, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. “The Aquaculture Settlement Areas (ASAs) I’m announcing today set aside space so the Crown and Ngāi Tahu can assess their potential for aquaculture development. ...7 days ago
- Government launches review to ensure electricity market is fit-for-purpose
The terms of reference for a review of the performance of the electricity market have been released. The review, initiated by the Coalition Government during the power crisis in winter will look at whether current regulations and market design support economic growth and access to reliable and affordable electricity, Energy Minister ...7 days ago
- Speech to Social Investment Hui: Jack and his whānau need our help
Kia ora koutou katoa. Nau mai, haere mai, piki mai. Ki te mihi atu ahau, ki te manwhenua nei, Te Atiawa, Ngāti toa rangatira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Thank you, Andy, for your introduction. Let me acknowledge you as the new Chief Executive of the Social Investment ...7 days ago
- Minister of State for Trade heads to Brisbane for PACER Plus meeting
Minister of State for Trade Nicola Grigg has travelled to Australia to attend the PACER Plus Ministers Meeting in Brisbane. “Trade plays a critical role in driving employment, economic growth, and improving the standards of living in the Pacific Region. The Government is strongly committed to supporting Pacific Island countries ...7 days ago
- Proposals to modernise conservation released
Toitū te taiao – Our environment endures The Government is consulting on proposals to modernise New Zealand’s conservation management system, aiming to protect relevant natural areas while supporting sustainable growth in tourism and regional economies, Conservation Minister Tama Potaka says. “Today, the Department of Conservation – Te Papa Atawhai is ...7 days ago
- Government slammed for pushing ahead with boot camps while trial still under way
The coalition has "absolutely no intention of listening to the evidence that comes out of their experiment", Labour MP says. ...27 minutes ago - Smoke and mirrors in heated tobacco debate
Labour claims Government is ‘cherry-picking’ smoking trends data to hide decade-first increase in daily smokers The post Smoke and mirrors in heated tobacco debate appeared first on Newsroom. ...32 minutes ago - Treasury bangs the drum on ‘unsustainable’ superannuation
The Government’s economic adviser is sending a message it doesn’t want to hear – superannuation is increasingly unaffordable The post Treasury bangs the drum on ‘unsustainable’ superannuation appeared first on Newsroom. ...45 minutes ago
- Victims of sex offending welcome shift on name suppression laws
A man abused by a former political figure is "immensely relieved" at a government proposal to end secrecy around sex offenders' identities. ...49 minutes ago
- This week three parties stood together – can they withstand the storm to come?
There is plenty yet to play out, but the next election is at this rate shaping up as trio versus trio, writes Toby Manhire. A subplot of this week’s historic hīkoi mō te Tiriti has been the sight of the three opposition parties presenting a unified front. Te Pāti Māori ...1 hour ago - All 33 malls in Auckland ranked from worst to best
From the low lows of abandon empires to the high highs of a mall done just right. This is the second in the Malls of New Zealand series, where we rank the malls in major centres. Next week: Wellington. A note from the editor: This is the hardest ranking we’ve ...1 hour ago
- The cost of being: A clothes-mad 20-something who walks everywhere
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a 27-year-old apartment-dwelling marketing exec explains her approach to spending and saving. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here. Gender: Female. Age: 27. Ethnicity: Pākehā. Role: Marketing exec at ...1 hour ago
- Burma the flying elephant
After about two and a half years of planning and waiting, New Zealand’s last elephant has moved to her new home at Monarto Safari Park in South Australia.Burma and her “human herd”, that is, her keepers, arrived last week, and she’s settling in well, according to Auckland Zoo’s Andrew Coers.“Something ...1 hour ago
- NZ’s membership of Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance in jeopardy
Senior ministers in the coalition suggested NZ’s membership will be re-evaluated if it restarts offshore oil and gas drilling The post NZ’s membership of Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance in jeopardy appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- Raw Politics: Six months in a leaky Bill
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon did not meet the Treaty Principles Bill hikoi crowd, sees “nothing” of merit in the Act-proposed law but the Parliament his Government dominates will spend six months debating a “divisive” measure.That’s because he has accepted there needs to be “aeration” of people’s views on the Treaty, ...1 hour ago
- Taken to the brink, Govt is now close to selling big Whakapapa ski field
Bidder Whakapapa Holdings walked away from the sales process last year, but says it’s now ‘95% there’ on a purchase agreement – so who blinked first? The post Taken to the brink, Govt is now close to selling big Whakapapa ski field appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 22 November
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp');Got a good quiz question? Send Newsroom your questions.The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 22 November appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- Daily crossword, Friday 22 November
The post Daily crossword, Friday 22 November appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- China likely to strengthen regional relationships in response to another Trump term
Opinion: Recent discussions in Shanghai provide some insight into what’s likely to be on the table The post China likely to strengthen regional relationships in response to another Trump term appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 hour ago
- Nuclear winters know no borders
Opinion: The immediate horror of nuclear weapon explosions – the blinding flash, crushing blast wave, and radioactive inferno – is well documented.But what nuclear-armed nations either don’t grasp or won’t admit, is far more chilling: how their weapons could devastate even countries thousands of kilometres from any mushroom clouds.The collapse ...1 hour ago
- This week’s bestselling books – November 22
FICTION1 Kāwai: Tree of Nourishment by Monty Soutar (David Bateman, $39.99)Sample dialogue, all from one chapter:“That can’t be,” replied Taona doubtfully.“You were right. The pā is unnervingly quiet,” Taona murmured.“The Hākuwai,” Motukia breathed. “Our grandfathers told us they rarely saw the Hākuwai in daylight,” Motukia muttered.“Their fight would have been futile ...1 hour ago
- Watts nears a landmark deal on global carbon trading
A framework for global carbon trading under the Paris Agreement is finally nearing completion at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan after years of halting talks.Climate Change Minister Simon Watts is one of two ministers tasked by the COP29 hosts with landing a long-sought deal on Article 6 of the climate accord, ...1 hour ago
- Grattan on Friday: Marles plays a defensive bat on nuclear as the government rushes to get though la...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Richard Marles is an ambitious man who hasn’t given up the dream of one day reaching the top job. But, despite being deputy prime minister, his profile is much lower than that of Treasurer Jim ...7 hours ago - NEW POLL: Kiwis Overwhelmingly Support MPs’ Expenses Transparency Law Change
62% of respondents support the extension of the OIA to cover MPs’ spending, compared to just 13% opposed and 24% were unsure. ...9 hours ago - The House: Meanwhile, a week of passing law
The political week has been packed with worthy distractions, but all week Parliament has focused on passing new laws. Here are the highlights. ...9 hours ago
- The biggest difference between Hīkoi mō te Tiriti and past hīkoi: More support from non-Māori
Analysis - The diversity of voices during the hīkoi was noticeable - from tangata moana to young immigrants to elderly Pākehā from the South Island. ...10 hours ago
- The House: Samoan citizenship restoration – ‘It means we belong to this land’
When the bill to restore NZ citizenship to some Samoans passed this week, Parliament's galleries were full to the brim with members of the community. ...10 hours ago
- More Delays In Action On Use Of Puberty Blockers With Children
Women’s Rights Party Co-leader Jill Ovens says the Ministry has put New Zealand children at risk by continuing to allow “off-label” prescribing of puberty blockers at far higher rates than other similar countries. ...11 hours ago
- Police Minister adamant he wasn’t aware of gang members training at gun clubs
That is despite two papers from police that raised the matter with him. ...12 hours ago
- Shorten declares himself ‘a proud moderate’, saying Australians ‘in the middle’ shouldn’t ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Bill Shorten has declared himself “a proud moderate” in a valedictory speech declaring parliament has the responsibility to ensure the extremes of left and right do not set the terms of political debate. Shorten, ...12 hours ago
- New ‘best practice’ principles for superannuation products are coming. We asked a panel of exper...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matt Garrow, Editorial Web Developer Studio Romantic/Shutterstock We all know how important it is to save enough money for retirement – but what about spending it wisely when we get there? Even for those who have built up a suitable ...12 hours ago
- Government accused of betraying Kiwis’ trust over lack of consultation on live exports
The government has always vowed to reinstate live exports by sea, which was banned by the previous Labour government. ...12 hours ago
- 7 things you can do if you think you sweat too much
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Freeman, Associate Professor of Dermatology, Bond University ERIK Miheyeu/Shutterstock Sweating is our body’s way of cooling down, a bit like an internal air conditioner. When our core temperature rises (because it’s hot outside, or you’re exercising), sweat glands all ...13 hours ago
- Phenergan for under 6s is now banned due to hallucination fears. Here’s what to use instead
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Nial Wheate, Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Macquarie University Australia’s drug regulator has issued a safety warning over the medicine Phenergan and related products containing the antihistamine drug promethazine. The Therapeutic Goods Administration said the over-the-counter products should not be given to children ...13 hours ago
- A new stage adaptation of Peter Carey’s Jack Maggs is a delightful homage to theatrical storytelli...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Catherine Campbell, Lecturer, Performing Arts, UniSA Creative, University of South Australia Matt Byrne/STCSA Jack Maggs is a delight and a homage to theatrical storytelling in Australia. Based on Peter Carey’s bestselling novel, Jack Maggs follows the ex-convict as he lands ...13 hours ago
- The government has introduced laws for its social media ban. But key details are still missing
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daniel Angus, Professor of Digital Communication, Director of QUT Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology Ron Lach/Pexels The federal government today introduced into parliament legislation for its social media ban for people under 16 years. Communications Minister Michelle ...13 hours ago
- Archives NZ, National Library to cut 27 roles
The Department of Internal Affairs wants to bring the two organisations under the joint leadership of the Chief Archivist and National Librarian. ...13 hours ago
- Gang patch ban: Members warn of potential for violence to ‘erupt’ as new laws enforced
"I can't see this lasting unless they have a budget to lock fullas up in jail which I think is absolutely stupid, really it's ludicrous," Ngavii Pekapo, who set up a Mongrel Mob chapter 54 years ago, says. ...13 hours ago
- ACT leader David Seymour raises doubts about Waikato medical school
Government documents show ACT leader David Seymour told the government he was "dissatisfied" with a cost-benefit analysis. ...14 hours ago
- National’s Erica Stanford allegedly calls Labour’s Jan Tinetti a ‘stupid bitchR...
The Education Minister has apologised in Parliament for her remark. ...14 hours ago
- Labour backs new Police Commissioner – but warns against routine arming
The alternative to policing by consent would be a police state, which New Zealanders don't want, the party says. ...15 hours ago
- Youth on boot camp pilot re-offended five weeks after release
Children's Minister Karen Chhour said while it was disappointing, it would naïve to think none of the participants would lapse. ...16 hours ago
- In photos: People of the hīkoi, and why they marched
Hikoi mō Te Tiriti has come to an end, going down in history as the largest march to Parliament in Aotearoa. ...16 hours ago
- ‘Everything is becoming a culture war’: Jon Ronson on conspiracies and cycleways
Ahead of his appearance in Aotearoa, the acclaimed British journalist, podcaster and documentarian talks to Stewart Sowman-Lund about why people are still fascinated by the fringes. The last place I would expect to find Jon Ronson is relaxing in the countryside. The iconic British journalist and writer is best known ...16 hours ago
- Kia kaha Lebanon: NZ media only tell half your story of struggle
The United States has vetoed a UN Security Council ceasefire resolution — for the fourth time — in Israel’s war on Gaza, while Hezbollah demands a complete ceasefire and “protection of Lebanon’s sovereignty” in any deal with Israel. Amid the death and devastation, Joe Hendren reflects on his time in ...17 hours ago
The server will be getting hardware changes this evening starting at 10pm NZDT.
The site will be off line for some hours.
+100
"A young law student who made anti racist comments about Muslims the day after the atrocity."
You mean "anti-Muslim comments", or "racist comments"
[Right you are. Have corrected – MS]
It's just possible that the Natses want us to be scared.
You have displayed a sublime ignorance of every aspect of this. The proposed bill makes us less safe
You will have to enlighten me Mike. You mean have gun laws like in the US where mass shootings are an extraordinarily regular occurrence?
….open your eyes, and look at why COLFO are opposing this – and be objective: something you have completely overlooked in the tripe you have published….
Still waiting for that list of things I am wrong about.
Act's position is a good place to start:
[long cut an paste deleted]
If you care to go further – David Seymour has a good minority report on the select committee stage of the second tranche. I suggest you go beyond Phillip Alpers and his discredited tripe – lose the sensationalism and bias.
[Nickoli, you are new here, so a few pointers. One is that if you cut and past (or copy exact words) from anywhere you have to provide a link (or reference). Two, please don’t post long tracts of text. Quote a small amount, and then use your own words to explain the relevance (and link). Please also have a read of the Policy and About linked at the top of every page, these give a guideline on how debate works on TS, thanks. – weka]
Tendentious rather than rational.
The sensationalism and bias is coming from the gun, nuts.
It is obvious which approach works.
Japan has tight regulation and control of firearms, and very little gun crime. As did NZ back in the day when all firearms were registered.
The USA has the right to bear arms, which means the people most at risk is the firearms owners, their family, and children's their school mates.
Thing about a register, cops know who was responsible for the firearm thirty days before the crime, or have a burglary/theft report in their hot little hands and were investigating before anything was done with the weapon.
At the moment, they might have a register from the manufacturer, importer, or retailer, which might give you the first owner ten or twenty years ago. A much colder place to start.
Exactly.
Have these people forgotten the "law abiding licenced gun owner" who was shooting at police. Tauranga I think. Where they had no way of finding out the type and number of weapons, he had.
Schrodinger's gun owner: You put the gun owner in a box, and you don't know whether he's a proper person to own a firearm until you open the box and see if he's murdered dozens of people or not.
Oh, it gets weirder and worse. Because of entanglement, when one nutter goes nuts, inevitably another nutter goes even nuttier. This is on full display in the Land of the Gun Nuts.
FFS! What a load of arid nonsense. Who could even think that this sort of diatribe actually addressed the issues of making NZers safer from guns? Oh that's right David Seymour.
There is absolutely nothing in Seymour's rant that bears on the subject. Essentially what he is saying is that people who own weapons or run shooting ranges don't want to act responsibly.
Nickoli: If you aren't simply a dimwitted troll parrot – totally incapable of making your own argument. Point to anything in his statement that doesn't fit my analysis of Seymours’ idiotic blathering and explain (in your own words) why not..
On another post this morning you mentioned the very poor Police record around database security. What makes you think that they'd do any better with a Gun Register? Even if they don't administer it, I have to assume they'd have privileged access to it.
And assuming a leaked copy of this register made it's way into the hands of the gangs or other serious crims, they would now have a shopping list of the address, names and detailed contents of every gun safe in the country.
If I were to get a knock on the door late at night with several masks heavies who knew what guns I had, and required me to hand them over … I'd personally ask them if they wanted a coffee with that while they waited.
To the mention of database security by police. Please refer following link and stats.. I wouldn't be trusting police with holding any kind of database secure…
Regards…
https://nzpca.co.nz/as-arms-bill-hits-parliament-new-corruption-data-exposes-police/
The figures obtained under the Official Information Act released by the Council of Licenced Firearms Owners (COLFO) show that since 2011 Police recorded:
The original press release at scoop is here. It doesn’t say the period covered by the OIA. But if we assume that it about 9 years, then we’re looking at detected 27 unauthorised use per year in a force that probably averaged about 11,000 employees.
It is somewhat less than I’d have expected. I suspect that it compares favourably with something that is private data similar – like the banks or insurance.
That isn’t to say that it couldn’t be improved. However it does rather undercut the COLFCO assertions because I don’t think that they’d get any better on the data privacy anywhere else.
Look at what the third party vendor SAP potentially exposed up doing with a single data breach.
But I guess that the small group of COLFCO/NRA aren’t interested in accurate assessments as in their typical mindless opposition they just don’t want gun shops and arms dealers constrained in their irresponsible pursuit of at least two weapons for every person in NZ without regulation. (which I might add is a deliberate similar assertion to their one about the police data security).
mod note for you above Nickoli.
Who licensed and armed [Deleted] in seven weeks of arrival in NZ without checking referees and happily signed over mail order ammo purchases within that time? NZ Police.
They failed horribly at their job.
The Labour government was in the process of disbanding local police arms offices in favour of a centralized web based system. What an utter disaster that would've been. It's almost like the government was trying to make the system fail…..
You need to explain why I am less safe under the proposed bill?
i don't know much about guns, but for what its worth, the killer of Christchurch was a law abiding gun owner until the day he went for the kill. So would this bill have caught him? Legal gun, legal gun club membership, blahblahblah. I doubt.
As for 'shooting' a target, yeah, one shoots to kill. Be it the bulls eye on a round or a head on a body – human or animal. Otherwise it would literally make no sense, and fwiw the same will be done with Arrow / Bow, or a Crossbow? So you might want to include this too in the regulations.
And still, anything coming from government on how to be aware of these guys in our society? How to maybe spot them and report something that may make one uncomfortable? And yeah, the Police, will they do their job, or will they not. Because i still have yet to hear from anyone in Politics or Media, how our police who is very well equipped to spy on Green peace and animal rights group missed the ball on this completly.
So while some of the regulations proposed seem sensible, registration for one, the rest seems a bid haberdashery, but it again does not address the underlying belly of the beast , namely that you have young mainly white men on this planet that are happy to accumulate weapons – legally i might add – and then go out into places of worship, schools, retreats etc etc etc to kill – and that they seemingly operate globally, with networks, places to meet, training camps and so on and so forth.
Not allowing semi automatic weapons to be purchased is a start. The intelligence and surveillance aspects are things beyond this particular bill.
You can take away a tool, but the intelligence and surveillance ar the most important aspect. Because they failed Mickey, spectacularly failed to pick up this guy and his travels to various known supremacists groups etc etc etc.
So yeah, you can remove one weapon and still achieve fuck all. And the failure of police and intelligence in NZ in this case was never openly discussed, the surge of the white supremacists in NZ was never openly discussed, heck most people would not even be able to state who the shooter was, because literally that was the only thing that was done successfully, the official hiding and disappearing of a white supremacist middle class boy from Australia who came to NZ to kill and no one did a single thing until he had killed 50 people.
Banning a type of weapon is not going to prevent the next massacre if these points are not addressed and preferable this should be happening in the open. But that is not something we do in NZ, decent discussions openly, televised at a decent hour, with specialists, police, polititians and activits from all sides. To bothersome, so lets do something – ban something – and hope everyone forgets about the biggest failure of the police surveillance state and the intelligence surveillance state that essentially let to the killing of 50 people.
Banning the types of weapon that massacre people most efficiently will by definition create an extra point at which the jerk is committing a crime and can be arrested before he starts shooting.
The last crossbow-utilised massacre was well before smokeless powder, if it ever happened.
Hmmm Robin Hood and his merry men against the Sherif of Nottinghams? But then they used long bows.
And it wasn't one dude run amok.
This is a strange thing to say:
"…our politicians had decided to put politics aside…"
People have different views on how to achieve a certain outcome, or to protect the interest of certain people. As you can see all around the world, there is probably nothing more political than gun control.
A majority of our parliament does not currently agree with the proposed bill. For better or worse that's politics
It sounds very much as though the politics of the NRA of the US have manoeuvred their way into NZ's national politics. Obviously, democracy is a system of governance that can be subverted by money, influence and personal connections and the implied claim to being a majority. It no doubt sounded hilarious when a small group of activists used the term Bolshevik (majority) to seize power in Russia last century.
Nothing to do with "the politics of the NRA" – it's got everything to do with dog-whistle politics and the scape-goating of FAL holders who have done nothing wrong – yet are called appalling names by the media and have been persecuted by Nash et.al through no fault of their own…. Lets wait to see what an unencumbered Royal Commission finds about who failed here…. and look forward to your squawking should the government ever seize your property without adequate consultation….or compensation….
You do realise that our murder rate doubled last year because of one law-abiding firearm license holder who up until that day had "done nothing wrong"?
As for the politics of the NRA, maybe NZ gun whingers shouldn't us NRA material when lobbying NZ politicians.And for more direct links, COLFO has an interesting thing in their newsletter in 2016:
See that bit about the NRA visiting us the last time we were changing the law because of some jerk with a gun? Probably pure coincidence /sarc
See the issue with the failings of Police and the false-conflation of last year's murder rate with our existing firearms law?
Also note – the US is a very different jurisdiction with very different issues to NZ – again, you are conflating non-related issues; and ignoring that NZ's law abiding citizens have been treated badly in a knee-jerk reaction from an ignorant parliament – apparently supported by an ignorant public (such as yourself).
One dude doubled our murder rate with weapons obtained under existing firearms law. He murdered more people in one afternoon that the rest of NZ, combined, managed in the previous year. That is why the law needs to be changed.
We restrict some vehicles from our roads because they are too damned dangerous in the wrong hands. Should be the same with firearms.
And if the US and NZ were "very different issues", NZ politicians wouldn't be lobbied with NRA material from the US.
….and again, you are jumping the start line: our existing 1983 Arms Act, if administered properly, would have stopped this. As for propaganda – our current crop of hand-wringers ignored all of the people they sought to villainise (who had been deemed fit & proper and passed vetting that many in parliament wouldn't pass). COLFO isn't advocating for the carte-blanche approach of the US – they are advocating to a fair & reasonable approach – and it's impossible to argue the current bulldozing treatment of existing FAL holders has been fair or reasonable.
So where were all these NZers who reckon the Arms Act wasn't being properly enforced before last march? Where are their letters to MPs, their op-eds, their comments here telling everyone that the police are not doing their job?
I guess they were happy to quietly break the law as long as the cops let them away with it, like speeding drivers who get a pass instead of a ticket.
Now, even if your interpretation is correct, any firearm owner since at least before 1990 has not been properly vetted as a fit person to own a firearm, bolt action .22 up. Obviously, all firearm licenses should be revoked until everone is properly assessed. Would this make you happy?
FIFY
Almost all the guns in "the wrong hands" in New Zealand were obtained from "law abiding licenced owners" which was helped by our ridiculous lack of control over the number and ownership of dangerous weapons. We register cars, why not guns?
Any one who gets angry about being deprived of his penis substitute, sorry, Semi automatic rifle, is obviously not a suitable person to carry a deadly weapon.
golden opportunity here "NATIONAL SOFT ON CRIME" headline for the next six months…
Yeah, National support Australia's right to deport those who fail a character test under sec. 501, yet don't want a character test in domestic firearm legislation.
Dog. Car. Bark.
Now that's a juxtaposition right there…
Blue patches?
Had dragons in 2014, and turbans in 2017, what's this years funding source….
…idiotic statement right there – do you know what the existing 1983 Act states?
I do and I can’t see anything wrong with Graeme’s comment except it might be more accurate to day that National wants a really restricted character test in new bill.
You're missing that there is a strong character test in the existing 1983 Act – one where (if followed correctly) multiple referees are interviewed, (related and non-related), motivation for attaining a license is checked, security is physically examined (before the granting of a license), history of mental health etc is questioned – and this is just for an A-Cat license….the requirements are more stringent for B, C, D (and E before the current crop of politicians disbanded it)….Now tell me you're familiar with the 1983 Act again?
You mean like when I said “… the section says “may” and “fit and proper person” is not defined in the Act. It is something the police may take into account when assessing someone’s suitability for a gun licence and presumably do already. The Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Bill makes it clear that the provision is partial codification of the current fit and proper person requirement.”
I take it you did read the post?
….yet here we have the Police sitting down with gangs for a "cup of tea and a korero" – despite shooting up Taradale, Wairoa, South Auckland – the list goes on…. and our current government's ACTUAL soft on crime approach….
501's are the real issue when it comes gangs, we all know that.
Our PM clearly made that known to scotty from marketing last week.
Cease and be Proud
Winstone is doing his usual big suck up job again. He wants to be friendly with the other loaded gun nutter – namely Simon Bridges. National Voters will hate it.
No normal person wants lethal Arms in the hands of anybody other than a small list of Military Personel and the Police.
Certainly no member of Parliament should be allowed to have or to hold any fire Arm. Nor should they advocate lethal Arms.
But, it is just another Maori effort of throwing a huge spanner in the works. Both Winstone and Simon are showing up their true colours. National voters will be livid.
Let's get rid of Killer Pakeha – and Killer Maori. No Arms. Come to your Senses !
Do it now.
Bjh
Stick to crochet – the ignorance of legitimate hunting, target shooting, sports shooting etc is well beyond your thought capacity.
Ignorance beyond thought capacity?? I am wondering about your own language skills.
Any evidence of extremist views should be a big red flag on any applicant.
The one proposal I don't like is to require licence renewal more often than every ten years. This will add a lot of cost and resource (which means less resource might be available for assessing each application, if there are more of them due to short licence terms).
It would be easy to assess whether licence term is a real issue worthy of using up resources – simply compare offences by licenced holders in the first 5 years of a licence term, against the last 5 years of a licence term. If the latter is higher, then that would support reducing the term length – otherwise just leave it alone.
So put the price of getting a license up to cover the cost. Effectively what you are saying is that gun-owners are currently not paying for the service of getting a license.
User-pays should apply in this situation. I can't see any particular reason why everyone else should subsidise gun-owners.
Use any funds to get more resources for the licensing process.
FFS I’d like to see a WOF on weapons. About a quarter of all rifles I have seen in private hands could do with a service. And anyone who can’t take care of their weapons shouldn’t have them. They should be put in front of an armourer at least every few years.
" So put the price of getting a license up to cover the cost. Effectively what you are saying is that gun-owners are currently not paying for the service of getting a license. "
No, I am saying the licence term might not need reducing – there is a renewal frequency that becomes unnecessary and burdensome – for example, how about renewal (re-vetting, interviews etc) weekly?
User Pays? It sounds appealing but it primarily acts to transfer wealth from the majority to the wealthy (by shifting the cost of services from a progressive tax system, to flat payments applied to anyone wanting to use a service).
Like many things, responsible firearm ownership is a public good (which some will find an unpalatable concept!), with potential for public harm if not managed / controlled properly.
Question:
Do we need to regard a person who has a Lethal Gun, as a Citizen. ?
Should they lose all the rights of a New Zealander. For instance: No Superannuation. No Health Treatment. No Home. No rented home. ? No Banking facility.
Removing gangs and, Lethal gun owners, will go a long way to get rid of persons who have no intention of fulfilling the rights of a New Zealander.
Or do we continue to be bullied by Winston Peters and Simon Bridges!
Thereby accepting control from the gangs and shooters
….You should re-read that statement…. there are plenty of law abiding licensed firearms users… you probably don't hear about them because they don't make the news…. Your neighbour could be one…your doctor…your kids teachers at school….
Drop the paranoia, get out of your echo chamber and actually question the media – their sensationalist and often incorrect statements have coddled your ability to think freely….
…and yet, if the Police had carried out their role and vetted [Deleted] properly (and followed up on concerns raised about both David Gray…and [Deleted] – notice the trend here….); things may have been very different. The Police failed here, and if we were to wait until the outcome of the Royal Commission (un-curtailed by political interference), we would be able to identify an effective way to address any problem – of which there are few if the 1983 Act was administered properly (GCNZ will not admit this, nor debate those who will de-bunk their "statistics" and outright lies). Remember: the politics and political theatre occurred in the "Buy-Back" (read confiscation), constraint on submission time-frames, and the complete disregard for property rights. If the "Buy-Back" was successful, there should be no hurry now – we are all safe, remember? Alas, the second routing of the law-abiding targets exactly them. Nash the slimy weasel is looking to extend the political theatre – and ignore those who are more vetted and qualified on the issue than he is. Don't get angry Stuart – it's unbecoming of a minister.
Do you mean that allowing semi automatic weapons to be readily available will decrease the risk of mass killings? THat's nuts.
No, Police properly completing their legislated role will decrease the risk of ALL killings – not just your sensationalist "mass-killings."
Would Aramoana and Christchurch have happened if Police had fulfilled their role properly? It's a hypothetical, I know, but it's the same argument as your proposing – enjoy your strawman…
Quick question, do you consider the situation in the US in relation to guns is:
(a) Good
(b) Bad?
…None of our business – very different jurisdiction, and not one we would ever emulate. Prior to the Police failings of last year; we had legislation that was world class in terms of balancing legitimate use with personal freedom to pursue legitimate, lawful activity.
I'll leave you with your GCNZ utopian ideals – this is like arguing with a vegan whose thought processes are addled by a false sense of superiority….
Last year showed us that our legislation needed a major rethink. And ignoring the US experience is bizarre. Gun nuts keep talking about the “right”to bear arms. The US shows how bad the consequences of such an approach can get.
"Gun-Nuts" in New Zealand? Please – COLFO, NZDA, GAC etc represent everyday hunters & shooters – none of whom are "second amendment-right-to-bear-arms-Rambo-types" – stop conflating US "gun-culture" with the legitimate and lawful pastimes of thousands of kiwis – who are not responsible for a Police failure….
Hunting and shooting will still be allowed. More dangerous sorts will run the risk of losing their licence or not being granted one. Gun clubs will have to be more organised. Farmers will not be allowed weapons of mass destruction. We will know how many guns there are and who has them. What is so extreme about this?
I see you posted Seymour’s list which is never a good start.
I am more than happy that doctors should be required to provide info on clients. I prefer that gun extremists don’t have guns.
BTW I did read COLFO’s submission. It was like your comments, full of rhetoric but lacking in hard analysis.
Iv got a question, so let’s say a gun register is brought in and firearms owners have all correctly registered there guns , scumbag crim turns up steals the guns I’m guessing the first thing the scumbag will do is file the serial numbers off the gun , so what use is gun registration then if the guns doesn’t have any numbers?
Your saying every gun in NZ will be stolen!?
You do understand that every gun in private hands is required to be stored in a secured gun safe.
With respect Micky, is this not the pot calling the kettle black? Your article is laden with rhetoric, you used the term "gun nut" for crying out loud. Hardly a term you will see in an analytic or statistical report
It is your oppinion and you are entitled to it but I don't see much in the way of hard analysis. You brush on analysis when referring to nationals proposed ammendments(which I admittedly also find so what bizzare), but then resort to posting other (some less than credible) opinions as reference material.
Funny how many of the legitimate hunters, are fine with the new laws.
Maybe they don't like wannabee rambos blazing away with repeaters in the bush, either. Or "law abiding gun owners" selling their old weapons to gangsters on trade me.
And, if gun owner organisations don’t want to be conflated with the US, NRA, stop echoing their “thoughts and prayers” bullshit.
They just send NRA material to NZ MPs, have meetings with the NRA, and get letters of condolence from the NRA when a law-abiding responsible fit and proper gun owner shoots a hundred people in one afternoon.
It takes a lot of chutzpah to convert this issue into a tough on gangs issue. The Christchurch shooter was not a patched gang member and would not have been caught by this approach.
Umm that is the party line (gang crime)
https://twitter.com/Stuart_NashMP/status/1230189428909301760
Nash: nothing but flappy lips and headlines – no substance, no accountability, and a wilful ignorance of facts while misusing statistics.
"All in all I am afraid I have no sympathy for the arguments of the gun nuts. "
The writer had no credibility before making this statement as they sought to use biased examples and obviously had no intention of presenting a balanced article. Then to use derogatory insults and to overlook the real reasons for the frustration with the second tranche shows the writer to be ignorant at best, spreading "hate-speech" at worst – there may be a "gun-nut" living next door to you right now – you probably wouldn't know because they are law abiding and minding their own business….I suggest you do the same unless you want to call for the Police to their jobs properly….
Impossible Gun Guys
The Gun Owners must have made a lot of Money by handing their illegal Arms over to the Police.
But the former owners and gun nutters – are still crying like babies . Why
Bjh
A troll by definition, usually has to be smart enough to play devils advocate and promote arguments that challenge the counter-argument….
Alas, you can't back up your claims with statistics, ignore actual facts, and resort to name calling.
I wish you well in your ignorance.
[I am still waiting for you to list the aspects of the law change that are wrong. Can you hold off with the abuse? Otherwise your privilege will be revoked – MS]
…Refer to COLFO's objections. Your approach in your article shows a wilful disregard for the submissions of ~4,000 or so submitters opposed to the current bill….Surely you've read & understood these concerns before ignoring them completely in such a biased article masquerading as "journalism?"
COLFO's objections?
Where did you list those? Do you mean ACT's objections that you quoted above, or some other list of objections that you haven't bothered linking to?
Was Seymour just parroting the gun lobby group's pr verbatim?
4000, out of 250 thousand! licenced gun owners in New Zealand.
Not really representative.
Just like Seymour whose supporters, without National's gerrymander, would fit in a phone booth.
Nickoli
While I support gun owners rights it seems to me the ownership of semi-automatic weapons should only be the military & maybe the police ? Or is there a legitimate reason for an individual to own a semi-auto gun ? I can't think of one, but you might know ?
Guns can do a lot of damage but a semi auto really raises the risk level if some nutter goes gun feral.
This is a spectacularly unobjective and uneducated point of view on the subject matter. I find it amusing how people on the far side (either side) of the fence quickly lose sight if logic and understanding of the subject and then proceed to spew uneducated waffle as though they have some kind of authority on the subject.
Congratulations on embarrassing yourself.
[We have had a few comments like this. How about you detail your concerns in a rational manner? – MS]
"spew uneducated waffle"? A e – Please reread your second sentence, and don't submit it to a Level One NCEA test, because it meets your own definition.
And I wonder why Nickoli said some insults were 'derogatory' … I have never seen or heard an insult that wasn't.
If language is the mind's instrument of thought, you guys really need to tool up.
What gives me the absolute shits about this, myself and others have been lobbying ever since the Aramoana massacre to elimite automatic weapons.
30 years and one more horrific massacre later, these fucktard Tory politicians are playing games with people lives to score points.
If you can't hunt with a single shot rifle, learn how to shoot better.
If you want to use assault rifles, join the territorials.
If you want the right to bear arms, move to the USA.
Our predictions when gun registration, was abandoned, has happened, and the gun nuts still oppose registration and restrictions on firearms. WTF.
Did David Grey have an automatic weapon?
Semi-automatic weapons – which is what the previous legislation largely outlawed. The registration of firearms is primarily designed for preventing nutters accumulating weapon caches. For instance just a quick perusal of David Grey’s arsenal in wikipedia
and
I think that it is kind of hard to argue that these were weapons that should have been in his hands. All placed there by ‘law abiding gun owners and gunshops’. A group of people who clearly need to be monitored because they are manifestly irresponsible based on past experience.
”manifestly irresponsible based on past experience”
oh really, I’m sure you have the official stats to back that up ?
we both know you do not because the fact of the matter is licensed firearms owners do not commit crime , far more people killed by cars , how will a gun register stop criminals from getting guns ?
what use is a register when criminals grind the numbers off ?
your all talking about the wrong issues , for example some of the 501 deportees some how obtained a firearms licence !!! Where’s the information sharing , why did the police issue them a firearms licence ? One of these pricks sold his crim mates 70 odd guns & if you think a register will ever stop that you are delusional .
Works for Japan.
Puzzled why you even need guns for "combat" style shooting. Paintball, is more fun.
Unless you have Rambo fantasies, I suppose?
I guess I'm sort of an anti-gun gun nut.
The runny-shooty stuff is about balancing physical exertion with precision action at ranges paintballs don't have. Yes, it's modelled on training for killing people, even the winter olympic biathlon, but so are many athletic sports. But then of course it would attract more than its fair share of rambo-wannabes: guns are also power-totems.
Paintball is more mano-y-mano, but less precision (especially after a few paintballs have been launched).
But I also really find the 4d engineering of different guns to be really interesting, and how they've evolved over the last few hundred years especially. Even the detours – the brass-cartridge breechloading shotgun that Napoleon passed on, or the large-calibre air rifle that was in service at the same time as the Brown Bess musket.
The difference between me and the one's bitching that their toys are being taken away is that I recognise the reason we can't have nice things: some people are massive dicks, and if they can't be stopped from doing harm then everyone loses their toys (even the ones who just want to figure out how a rolling block delay actually works in practise). It's why we don't have fire crackers, skyrockets, cars without lights or brakes, or pseudoephedrine.
Gotta admit, I'm puzzled about what kind of fun you got in mind that involves a car without lights or brakes.
Well. When we were teenagers…….
OMG! Not Paradise by the Dashbored Light!
Cheap first car, good runner lol
Nicole McKee is secretary of COLFO and has made various media statements over the past few months. She makes out the organisation is grass roots- looks more like AstroTurf.
Six months ago COLFO www site had-through two international sport shooting associations-direct links to the NRA in US. This connection seems to have been removed on the current iteration of the site. I mention this because it is a common tactic of the gun lobby who often have a vested interest with gun retailers and manufacturers.
If I were a cynic, I would say the NRA might quietly offer advice and resources (even financing) to gun groups in western countries in order to hold off their own domestic firearms regulations, on the basis that a whole bunch of folks have said that if NZ can ban semi-autos after a massacre then the USA can introduce further restrictions. And this would hurt the gun industry.
You write about the politics of gun control. This is of course, a valid and interesting line of enquiry.
Where you will find many commenting have an issue is with your often belittling and apparently biased viewpoint. The article as written proposes that all objections to the bill as written are politicking and takes the default position that the laws are written only with safety in mind and with no political bent or bias.
By definition, setting an arbitrary date(in this case the anniversary of the shooting) to force a law through is politicking. How can you honestly claim otherwise?
Your default position of all regulation is good regulation when it comes to gun control is both impractical and nieve. It fails for one to demonstrate how these things make nz safer (the whole purpose of the law) and also fails to consider the nuances of the laws and how they will alter behaviours in practical application.
For example you say; "And I am struggling to understand what the problem for sport shooters is. If it is more red tape for the sort of club that the Christchurch shooter belonged to then let there be more red tape."
You fail to understand that a. We allready have a comprehensive safety regime for our ranges, hence why we have a spectacular safety record across the board.
And b. That extra compliance and expense will result in many of the smaller ranges being closed. That is the closure of safe and controlled places to shoot. This will undoubtably see an increase in adhoc and public land use which will achieve the exact opposite intent of the law.
So you see while from the outside, better regulation of clubs seems a good idea, but if you look a little deeper you will see that implimenting the law will have the inverse effect. Depending on how the law is interperated I will likely lose access to my local range as I can not attend weekend shoots due to work. There is no Range officer during the week and hence I will not be able to shoot.
So ask yourself, what purpose does all this "red tape" have? Does it make nz safer? Or does it just make it harder for ranges to provide a safe space for legitimate firearms use?
The vast majority of people partaking in various sports in New zealand will never represent at an Olympic level, this is not an argument with any weight. The facts are that we have an extremely rigorous, safe and reliable framework in which to allow practical sports shooters to compete while still severely restricting public access to the firearms involved. Read up on our current b cat rules if you would like to further understand the realities of this process. There is room for reasonable compromise that both enhances public safety and allows the sport to continue.
Further to this, having attended several practical shoots, I can tell you Phillip Alpers description of the competition is fallacious at best and outright dishonest at worst. I suggest should you want to post about how these competitions are undertaken and scored in nz then you may want to speak to someone who actually competes and/or read the rules. They are a friendly and welcoming bunch, they will happily inform you of the reality of the sport. As for the insinuation that shooting a target while moving is somehow more nefarious than shooting a target while standing still, well I just don't buy it.
My own motivation for participating in these events is to keep my marksmanship sharp to ensure I can make good quick and clean killls while hunting. This is best done in an active environment.
There are many more examples of this sort of biased reasoning in your article but in the I terest of brevity I will stop here.
You are well within your right to argue that you believe more firearms control is a good thing. I do however encourage you to seek out more information and present your argument with a better understanding of the culture and application of the firearms here in New Zealand. Conflating us with the American gun culture (somthing Philip alpers seems so keen to do) is sensationalist at best and only hinders reasonable discourse.
Oh and if you really want to encourage reasonable discourse then I suggest you begin by not belittling anyone with an alternate view to yours by branding them a "gun nut."
Why don't you become a range officer?
Is the range run by a committee, is it a club? You could join the committee and raise the issue of changing the rifle range hours to suit non weekend shooters at a meeting. Or ask a committee member to do it for you.
A club usually pays for members to undergo training in order to carry out their duties, like a range officer.
Most clubs are run by volunteers who give freely of their time to help out. Get involved with your local club. Be proactive about what may have to change to abide with the proposed amendments.
I understand what you are saying, Nick. But I think you just have to live with it. I had a parallel situation. I was a small racing boat sailor. On our lake we made people wear buoyancy aids only on windy days where there was risk of violent contact with boom, or capsizing and losing contact with boat. It worked – our club never had a drowning.
But the national authority got all paternal, and, because someone drowned on a big expanse of sea somewhere, brought in the rule that we all had to wear a buoyancy aid at all times. Stupid on our lake, and an uncomfortable encumbrance in light winds.
I obediently complied, but one day I went out, raced, capsized, and was pleasantly surprised when I swam and caught up with my boat twice as fast as usual, got up on the centreboard faster than usual, righted the boat and was rapidly back in action. I felt good about it until after the race, when I recognised my buoyancy aid draped over the back of a chair. I had forgotten to put it on, and should have been disqualified… But because people had drowned in rough, open waters, we had to live under those silly rules, and still do.
I think you are caught in a similar situation. Because some idiotic boofhead killed a whole lot of innocents in Christchurch, and partly because of publicity of the USA's gun problem, public opinion has irrevocably turned, and you normal gun-owners are going to have to tolerate greater red tape and bothersome procedure just to keep doing your thing…
I've been sailing small boats all my life. I cannot imagine a circumstance where you wouldn't wear a lifejacket, unless you can get out and walk.
The "silly rule" probably saved the next person on your lake when they capsized and the boat hit them on the way over.
Similarly strict gun registration, in Japan, means gun killings are very rare.
One workplace accident and we ban or change the cause. 50 people killed with a gun, and we are supposed to do, nothing?
We abandoned strict controls and effective registration, decades ago. After gun lobby influence and a police force that didn't take it seriously.. Gun crime has been increasing ever since.
This is a rediculius over simplified argument. Firearms crime in this country follows violent crime rates. The changes in legislation and management show little to no effect on these rates. The ratios remain fairly constant. The very reason registration was dropped was because it WASN'T effective, and it was full of errors. To claim otherwise is just false.
Similarly firearms crime in Japan follows their overall homicide rate which at .28 per 100k remains one of the lowest in the world. To corralate this with "strict gun registration" is erroneous. They have low numbers of firearms per capita and have low violence rates. Hence have low firearms violence rates. However next on the list is Iceland with roughly one gun for every three people, and still they have low violence rates and almost non existant firearms homicides. Again, despite the high percentage of firearms the homicide/violence rates lead the firearms violence rates.
Now, what do we know for certain correlates with low violence and crime rates? Education, quality of life and employment/prosperity.
Clearly effective regulation plays a part, but evidence shows it is no where near as cut and dry as you make it out to be
Well stated argument Nick.
The confounding aspect of this argument is that it has little to do with conventional left/right wing economic politics. The proper domain to be thinking about this is along the libertarian/authoritarian axis.
As a wild arsed guess I'd imagine that gun owners tend toward the libertarian side of this argument, while most gun control advocates fall onto the other side. Personally I'm conflicted; I can see the need to reasonable limits on gun ownership, and at the same time I'm increasingly aware of a conflation of gun ownership and 'white supremacy nutters' etc that is neither healthy nor helpful and is generating a dangerous politicisation and blowback that will not take us anywhere good.
Not wanting people to get killed is "authoritarian" now?
I would have thought the opposite.
Mind you "Libertarians" seem rather OK with child labour, killing trade unionists,, and bombing people.
I suppose preventing them from doing that, interferes with their, "freedoms".
Mind you "Libertarians" seem rather OK with child labour, killing trade unionists,, and bombing people.
Again the same kind of absurd demonisation that is utterly unhelpful. The vast majority of people of a libertarian inclination (and it exists very much on a spectrum, there are no binary false dichotomies here) believe in no such thing.
And it's precisely the same as when you declared that all ACT party members, or anyone with an interest in the alt-right should be denied gun licences.
Just to be clear, whenever I do the political compass test thing, I've always scored strongly left wing economically, but very middle of the road on the libertarian/authoritarian axis. When you label me 'reborn right winger' you're completely off base.
Iceland. Has gun registration and strict controls.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/iceland-gun-loving-country-no-shooting-murders-2007-n872726
“Icelanders believe the rigorous gun laws on this small, remote volcanic rock can offer lessons to the United States”.
Because registration wasn’t done properly is not an argument against it. It is an argument for it to be done properly.
I agree with you about education and quality of life. However the same people who argue against gun control, tend to be the ones who argue against the state redistribution required.
Read the whole article. It describes how Iceland invests heavily in a proactive education regime that puts a real value on gun ownership; it protects and promotes a positive, disciplined culture that clearly works.
They may well strictly regulate a high threshold to ownership, but they don't demonise them as 'nutters, rambos and white supremacist mass murders'.
You're funny. I clearly distinguish between RFA style gun nuts, Rambo’s and wannabees are a good description, and the silent majority of licenced gun owners. Which I was one of by the way. 22 range shooting.
Even hunted at one stage, but found I have an aversion to killing things, though I still like archery and target shooting. When I have the opportunity. And don’t forget, paintball.
If you want to play with assault rifles, join the territorials.
I don’t think Iceland has been unfortunate enough to have a visiting Australian white supremacist.
I don’t think Iceland has been unfortunate enough to have a visiting Australian white supremacist.
And it would seem that if they did, you would have to hope there would be competent controls in place to prevent him getting hold of an arsenal. Certainly looks so from this article.
But then again, maybe not. If said person was to remain silent about their intentions and not raise any obvious red flags then it's only hindsight bias that says we 'should have spotted him sooner'.
The same "competent controls" for NZ, Labour Greens are trying to enact, that you are doing a , Pete George, against, on this thread.
On the contrary, the Icelandic model looks quite different to the one Labour have introduced. They have put the emphasis on education and instilling a positive, disciplined culture. They're specifically aimed at enabling people to use guns with skill and competency.
The NZ rules by contrast are framed around restrictions, prohibitions and putting in place constraints on gun clubs. Yet in NZ it is the gun clubs who broadly speaking undertake a similar education role that in Iceland the state is doing.
As for doing a Pete George, well frankly I'll take that as a complement. Yes he annoys the crap out of the tribal lefties here, but he does attempt a conversation between the right and the left, and is one of the few voices to consistently do so. In that he has slowly earned my respect over the years.
In Reply to KJT back at 4.02 – I race sailing dinghies – we have never been required to wear the horribly restrictive full life jacket – only the personal buoyancy aid, which, if you are knocked unconscious, will let you float face-down. They are still a bloody nuisance in light conditions, when we have rescue boats looking after us during racing. The 12 foot skiffs managed to get NZYF (now YNZ) dispensation from wearing them at all, given the energetic movements they have to make rushing from trapeze on one side to trapeze on the other side. Racing sailboats have rescue craft on hand, and I have no recollection of any drownings from any sailboats involved in club racing.
And yet I still grudgingly agree to wear the damned buoyancy aid. That is what I was telling Nick. I was telling him he had to grin and bear it as I do.
You did not seem to get the point.
Yes. I raced sailing dinghies, including the last wooden cherub to win a NZ championship. Not while we owned it, unfortunately. Much more bulky vests than they have now, but we still managed to move around. In a boat where you went through the bottom if you didn’t put your feet in the right place, why we didn’t win a championship. My brother put a hole in the boat 16 metres from the finish line.
Like gun safety rules, the rule about wearing life jackets, or flotation vests, exists for good reason.
Not all that long ago, a girl sailing a laser was concussed right in front of us. She is alive because of her lifevest. The patrol boat was several minutes getting to her. There are many other examples, on the coastguard and NZYF, files.
If the changes go ahead as planned I may have to. However many like me won't, and many ranges won't be able to shoulder the extra regulatory burden.
I would much prefer that realistic and practical laws are written, rather than box ticking. If there was a history of unsafe practice and events at ranges I could see the value in changing laws. This isn't the case however, as the current rules and regulations achieve their intended goal. The law change will reduce public safety and as such is not fit for purpose.
The reality is it is hard enough to man the occasional weekend shoot let alone allow for weekday shooting. That is why we have the system we do to allow pre qualified people to use the range at their leisure. It is a system that allows good access and has vigorous controls to ensure safety.
As for "becoming more involved" I don't have the time nor inclination. I am already heavily involved in 2 other clubs being president of one and a teacher at another. Hence I have an acute understanding of the amount of work it takes for these types of clubs to function and how the proposed regulations will make operating to difficult for many of the smaller clubs, to the detriment of both the individual and the greater public
[Letting this through. A perfect example of analysis lacking rhetoric – MS]
MS – Did you miss putting a hyphen between analysis and lacking? I think it would help.
Sorry to emphasise the point MS, but as you wrote it, it reads like it was a great example of analysis, but it had no rhetoric. Is that really what you meant?
Sympathise, Nick – same problems in my sport. We do what we can.
Just can't see what benefits shooting clubs have at all.
However, if a lot of mis-directed bogans and old people want to shoot guns, so be it. But they need to demonstrate that, under their supervision, it is safe.
The one which the Christchurch mass murderer trained at clearly showed those gun clubs need massive regulation if they are to become safe.
Apparently they all sat round the table after a shoot-em-up and discussed what a problem Muslims were…
…what could go wrong.
Shooting clubs and ranges create safe environments for people to shoot practice and learn how to safely use firearms. They are an important tool in ensuring the safe and sensible use of firearms in this country.
The gun clubs are safe, and the historical record shows this. There are allready regulations as to the safe use and operation of said ranges.
An (alleged) isolated group of bigots will not be identified or regulated out of existence by this law. It creates Increased burden of the operators of the range. It will not stop a few bigoted members from discussing their misguided ideals. If you believe otherwise I happy to listen to listen to your reasoning. Although I must admit, your belittling tone leads me to think you won't have much of a reasoned argument.
Remember, it was members of this range that identified and first reported this behavior, and their concerns with the shooter. Firearms owners come from all walks of life, all political spectrums all creeds, races colours and genders. We are not all "misdirected bogans and old people"
Shooting clubs and ranges need a good kick up the bum.
I suspect the operators are part and parcel of the bigoted culture which exists at these clubs (not just the few isolated members as you suggest) .
This legislation will definitely identify and regulate out of existence these bigots which I believe are a large part of the gun culture in New Zealand.
While they might not have perpetrated the mass murder themselves, their culture was the environment from which it was allowed to go unseen.
They need to be more watchful and less bigoted. Here's hoping these laws will ensure that happens.
Please go ahead and post a single piece of evidence that suggests there is a prevelence of bigoted or racist culture in gun clubs or shooting ranges in nz. I'll wait.
After you've done that, please go ahead and post which part of the proposed legislation for clubs and ranges will enable police to identify and subsequently reduce the supposed incidence of bigotry in said clubs. Do they write islamaphobe under interests on their club application form?
None of the things you have described would have stopped the chch shooter. I know several people who had dealings with him. From all accounts I have heard he was quiet, demure, polite and altogether unremarkable. No confederate flags or fanciful conversations to be seen anywhere.
You are welcome to come down to a range for a day's shooting and see for yourself. You will find the vast majority of people quite normal. You might even enjoy yourself.
Nick, the vast majority of NZ Muslims are quite normal – since you seem to know a lot about NZers who belong to gun clubs, what are your reckons as to the number of NZ citizens of the Islamic faith who belong to a gun club?
Let's not take our eyes off the 'ball' here. It takes a ‘village’ to ‘raise’ a gun nut.
Disclaimer: Have never owned a gun; tried target shooting with an air rifle once – wasn’t any good (miserable accuracy) and it just didn’t do anything for me.
Yes thank you. I have several Muslim friends. Not sure what the point is here? I personally don't know many of the Islamic faith who shoot at ranges and clubs, although I generally make a point as to not discuss religion. Again not sure what the point is?
I'm quite sure that like any other cross section of society firearms owners include some bigots. None of the proposed regulation has the requirements to identify nor tackle this though,ddespite what the above commenter asserts.
Whether there’s a “prevelence of bigoted or racist culture in gun clubs or shooting ranges in nz” [sic] is a moot point and a strawman. AFAIK, the gun registration does not specifically target [no pun] gun clubs or shooting ranges per se for that particular reason. However, that’s not to say that there are no clubs where this unsavoury culture does indeed exist and they wouldn’t be the only clubs in NZ, sadly. So, instead of the ‘good’ clubs helping to clean up the ‘industry’, take responsibility, and be good citizens, they whinge and whine till the cows come home, moan about the presumed “intolerable regulatory burden on clubs” as if it is going to kill them (it won’t). The word “burden” was used four times in this context and I’ll assume they’ll vote for NACT hoping for the “bonfire of regulations”. We’re not dealing facts here but with misplaced ‘ideology’ and emotive outbursts and exclamations moonlighting as rhetoric in the hope it will persuade politicians to bend to their will & wishes. And if/when they don’t get their way, they resort to fear mongering, because only they have access to some prescience that mere mortals don’t have, and ‘civil disobedience’. People who act in these immature ways are not fit to carry and use guns of any type IMO. Just saying.
A strawman?
It's not an argument I'm making, it was the (baseless) assertion of the above poster which I replied to.
Thanks but again, I am acutely familiar with the operating of these types of small clubs and I can unequivocally say it will cause closures and removal of access. This is a fact, like it or not.
You can dismiss this as 'fear mongering' if you like but again no single person has actually come close to demonstrating how this particular part of the law makes nz safer than the current regulatory frame work we have. So making life harder for clubs for no increase of safety and with good chances of an inverse effect is a poorly written and constructed law worthy of criticism.
Conversely I challenge that you support it not because it makes the community safer, but because its 'gun control' and you have an emotional attachment to the idea of 'punishing the gun nuts'. This is evident in you belittling tone.
Of course, it was a strawman, and one which you gratefully used to suit your narrative against the whole Bill; I cannot see any red flags in the Bill.
It is a fact that you say it but that does not make it real. I cannot see any proposal in the Bill that justifies this hyperbole. Obviously, you believe it to be true. You have already stated, in absolute terms, that people don’t want to share the burden and thus clubs and ranges will close. Be it as it may, it is a choice people may or may not have to make. If they all think like you, you could well be correct and your ‘wish’ will come true.
In any case, shooting clubs and shooting ranges comprise only section of the Bill.
You predict an ““intolerable regulatory burden on clubs”. You predict “it will cause closures and removal of access”. You predict “good chances of an inverse effect”. You predict that nothing in the Bill will lead to “increase of safety”. That’s quite a few predictions, which you seem to believe, but they are not facts. You dismiss the fear among people in our society. Fear that is real and present. And you have the gall to suggest that this Bill could make things worse!? Yes, I’d call that fear mongering. In any case, it is not constructive criticism of the Bill.
Well, thank you, Dr. Phil, for your insightful analysis. I had no idea why I’d wanted to punish anybody and for what, let alone some gun nuts whom I’ve never met. But hey, if it tickles your fancy. Who do you think I am? The Nanny? The Headmistress? Please, grow up and give me some decent arguments against the Bill or some of the ‘dangerous’ aspects of it. So far, you have been off the mark by a long shot.
Putting aside the fact that guns are designed purely for killing….I'm just trying to get my head around something…
You say you don't actually have time to shoot, except for the odd weekend.
You say don't have time to help out at the club, even though you claim that proposed regs would 'make more work' for the club, and you have an understanding of how a committee works.
Would you rather dismiss any new regulations, even though said regulations were to be put in place in order to prevent death and mass murder?
Are you against the proposed changes because the membership at the gun club is declining and it's proving difficult to ensure current guidelines are being adhered to? What are these current vigorous controls already in place to ensure safety, that you speak of?
Thanks.
Yes, I don't get to shoot as much as I like, I work most weekends so can't attend formal shoots/competitions. The range I am a member of has facility to allow me to use it during the week within daylight hours, provided I pass muster and show a thorough understanding of safe practices during supervised shooting. It is a robust and successful system that facilitates, encourages and ensures people learn safe firearms handling practices, while having good access to a safe shooting facility.
Again, I really do not have the time to commit to another club, as I run a club with over 100 members in a different outdoor pursuit as well as run and teach 3 nights a week at a martial arts school. I am stretched thin allready. My club/range is well established with a good committee and solid membership, so while my access may be restricted the club itself will continue. Many other smaller clubs and ranges however will not be so lucky.
I do not dismiss regulations imposed that will have an evidenced and demonstrable impact on public safety. There are many provisions in this bill I support. However the range regulations are but one example where the mechanics simply will not make us any safer, in fact due to the closure of ranges my belief is it decreases public safety. If you see parts of the range certification laws that will help keep people safe then feel free to point them out. I'm afraid I don't see it. It is safer for people to shoot on an established range than in an adhoc evironment or on public land.
I do get frustrated when pointing this out I get called a gun nut, or bogan or other such belittling term. Also because it is a controversial and emotive subject people are so quick to wholesale adopt/promote and accept measures proposed without allowance for discourse or review. Polititions get legislation wrong all the time, are you so sure that everything in this vast and sweeping bill will achieve the desired outcome?
To operate a range, you must belong to a regulatory body, for example pistol new zealand. The RB has a set of standing rules which you must adhere to in order to maintain your certification. The range must also be inspected and police certified as well as adhere to any local body rules and requirments. As it stands it is a good balance of practical and robust regulation without over burdening costs and red tape. This is evidenced by the excellent safety records observed on the ranges. A record on average far better than that of police and military ranges.
I understand not everyone has the time to read and review laws like this in its entirety. I wouldn't have if I didn't have a vested interest. It's not all rhetoric and gun toting temper tantrums. There are real and demonstrable concerns. Concerns that become marginalised and whitewashed with partisan political oppinion pieces like the artical above.
Thanks for your response Nick.
I did a little reading last night to try and get up to speed, was surprised to find that once a range is certified it doesn't need re-inspecting for five years. IMO that's a mighty long time between inspections.
Guns are designed for one thing, to kill. The proposed changes are to help prevent mass murder and death.
Why are some people so oppossed to the changes? Judging from the comments, most people are thinking only of themselves.
I find that really sad. It's a real shame that some can't see past their own desire to shoot a weapon and look at the bigger picture.
It is an emotive topic, but, I’ve had a gun held to my head by a licensed firearm holder. No way on earth I’d want that happening to someone else.
I’m hopeful that people will start thinking of others rather than themselves.
I cant see the point of labeling people across the board as gun nuts either since its just a put down and theres nothing constructive in it .I think we should take the time to find and make good decisions based on consensus .Theres enough division in society already without adding to it .For myself i just wanna be able to go out an get a bunny or a possum from time to time without it costing me a fortune or being beset with a whole lot of extra rules and regulations . The big baddie in the room is gone the large caliber semi auto is no longer present so personally i cant see what all the drama is about .To me a gun is just a tool for getting food or the occasional unfortunate instance of putting an animal out of its misery but i dont have to hate on those that are passionate about them . Theres even a category of collectible firearms that have never been fired and never will be which increases their value !I recognize my firearms license is a privilege im pretty sure most other gun owners do also
The truth is, had the terrorist [Deleted] used a bomb (instead of guns) like he mentioned in his [Deleted], none of you would be discussing this right now.
None of you would be asking for more bomb "control" — I wonder why??
None of you would be infringing on other people's rights and blaming them for the atrocity.
Including you MickySavage
And I bet, none of you would have much to say about it at all really.
How weird is that.
I'm guessing it's because you can't buy bombs over the counter like the Aussie mass murderer did with his weapons of mass destruction.
With the correct licencing you can in fact buy explosives over the counter, just like firearms.
Is this licensing as easy to get as a gun licence?
Doesn't seem to be. To possess explosives beyond small amounts of gunpowder/smokeless powder you need to "require possession of the substance to carry out your work". For firearms you just need to attend the safety course and some fiddly stuff, you don't have to demonstrate a need. The fit&proper test seems similar, though.
Irrelevant. You claimed you can't buy explosives over the counter. I illustrated you can. Notice how there isn't a rampant problem as we have robust regulatory controls?
Much like how allowing a few sports shooters to possess semi automatics with a robust regulatory framework(say like the current b cat rules which still allow semi auto short arms) poses no noticeable increase in danger to the public but still allows people to continue their chosen sport.
It seems to me truly idiotic to allow people to own guns merely to play games with them. The more guns there are in circulation the greater the risks.
The proposal to take registration off the police is based on the fact that they cannot run the current registration system that we do have
I know because I am on it as a collector and pistol shooter
They consistently get the details wrong every year (Checked 6-monthly) and have sent me two licenses
We used to have universal registration but abandoned it as it became innaccurate and unworkable
I cannot see it working in the future – whether anyone here approves or disapproves roughly 75% of semis have not been handed over
As for this issue being fostered by the NRA in my experience that is incorrect – the opposition to the police agenda and confiscation events has been all homegrown
There never used to be much of a gun lobby in NZ but there is certainly one now
Also more fracturing of the rural/city divide IMO
I am implacably opposed to this legislation and although I have voted Labour in the past I never will again
I'm pretty conflicted on this whole story. I've never owned a gun in my life, and mostly I've tended toward the anti-gun side of the lobby because the US experience is just so horrendous.
Yet a very old friend and my son-in-law are both active gun owners and listening to them I'm hearing pretty much the same story you are giving. The perception is that one terrible event is being exploited to push a broader agenda with no justification. And this has created a lot of pushback; both of them have become politicised over this in a way I’ve never seen before.
Many legal and perfectly law abiding gun owners feel both demonised and intimidated over what is going on. They deeply resent the implication that if they stand up for what they believe are legitimate concerns around gun ownership, they expose themselves to the accusation that somehow they're associating themselves with ChCh and must be potential white supremacist terrorists.
My friend points out that the Police have a terrible record around security of their databases … and that it would only take one bad leak for every serious crim in the country to have a copy of the name, details and contents of every gun safe in the country.
I'm now of the view now that sometimes it's better to let sleeping dogs lie, that Labour's ill-advised reaction to ChCh has set in motion wider events that they do not understand nor can control.
A few assumptions there, Redlogix.
I live and work amongst the sort of people who use guns, for hunting, as farm tools and for target shooting.
I enjoy target shooting myself.
The general view I've heard, is more restrictions on guns are inevitable and necessary.
Hunters are not keen on having a bunch of idiots with buck fever, and a repeater around them, either.
Some, like Nick, above, have issues with some of the detail, but not the general idea of registration and restriction. Hopefully that is worked out in select committee.
Then of course there are, wannabee Rambo's who can be justly described as gun, nuts. We have an example above, in Nicoli.
Personally I have an issue with the idea that Doctors should be reporting on peoples mental health, to the police. Perpetuating the convenient fiction, that mass killers are mentally ill, and not just, arseholes.
I can see that as being a real problem within a small community, given current attitudes. It is hard enough now to get mentally ill men to ask for help. For a start the mentally ill are no more of a risk to the public than anyone else. Sadly, some my be more risk to themselves.
Compulsory reporting of being an entitled racist, misogynistic right wing arsehole would be more effective. Being an ACT member, should disqualify you for a licence, for example😁
The opposition to registration, and restrictions on semi auto's etc, seems mostly from a vocal minority. As I said, there are many more licenced gun owners, than the ones in associations related to the NRA, like COLPA.
Compulsory reporting of being an entitled racist, misogynistic right wing arsehole would be more effective.
This is precisely the kind of solution that is orders of magnitude worse than the problem it's pretending to cure. It's an authoritarian wet dream.
The opposition to registration, and restrictions on semi auto's etc, seems mostly from a vocal minority.
With people like you out there threatening to take their licenses away for merely speaking up … well who can blame the majority for keeping silent.
Who is threatening to take their licences away for speaking up?
My point is there seems to be a great many licenced gun owners, including most of the ones I talk to, who are happy for there to be more restrictive rules on gun ownership. It has little effect on truely "responsible" gun owners.
Just like good landlords aren't bothered, by laws saying that they cannot be arseholes.
Same as an employer and now a manager, I have no problem at all with laws requiring both to act fairly and responsibly. They don't affect me, because I already ensure I do that.
You are OK, for someone who has been mentally ill, to lose their rights, but not someone like the Christchurch shooter?
Who is threatening to take their licences away for speaking up?
You are. The mere fact of being a member of a political party or even just being white and male is now reason to remove their license according to what you write above.
Compulsory reporting of being an entitled racist, misogynistic right wing arsehole would be more effective. Being an ACT member, should disqualify you for a licence, for example
The little smiley at the end really didn't conceal your intent.
Bit of a stretch there Redlogix.
Does being a Bliarite take away your reading comprehension skills?
According to the authoritarian left the all white people are racist and all males are misogynist (at least when they say things you don't agree with). This plus your crystal clear statement that all ACT members should have their gun license removed puts you firmly into the authoritarian camp.
So no I didn't have to stretch much. Just joined the rather obvious dots you laid down.
By that 'logic', many of the "authoritarian left" must be regularly outing themselves as racists and/or misogynists, unless the "authoritarian left" consist solely of women of colour (quelle horreur!), and even women of colour might not be ‘safe‘.
Might the proposed gun control regulations be aspirational, a bit like the anti-smacking legislation? Many people were disheartened, horrified and/or downright stroppy at the prospect that they might not be able to legally beat (their own) children, but the world didn't end. Similarly, some gun addicts are concerned about the effects of the proposed gun controls, but they will still be able to shoot – what's the real problem?
By that logic, many of the authoritarian left; must be regularly outing themselves as racists and/or misogynists
I never said it was logical, but it certainly is the ideology in some circles here. KJT pretty much encapsulated it perfectly.
Similarly, some gun addicts are concerned about the effects of the proposed gun controls, but they will still be able to shoot – what's the real problem?
Most serious gun owners don't really mind restrictions on semi-automatics. That's not the problem.
The real problem is embedded in your comment above … the demonising of legit gun owners as 'nutters', 'rambo's, 'addicts', etc. The real problem is the one I see over and again, give some people a bit of moral authority in the aftermath of a tragedy and they latch onto it to push a wider agenda that has no real justification. Which invites blowback where none existed before.
So that's the real problem – the hurt feelings of 'demonised' gun-owners. No doubt similar to the hurt feelings of those parents unable to wean themselves off a little judicious child beating, or indeed the hurt feelings of ‘demonised‘ smokers. I reckon most NZ gun owners will get past this – it would be worrying if they couldn't.
Yet the left seems more than willing to embrace the 'hurt feelings' of people it embraces as victims.
For example the clearly racist smear 'gammon' is openly tolerated here because it hurts the feelings of older white males, who are ideologically responsible for all the evils in the world.
But woe betide anyone who dares use (even hypothetically) a racist smear about any other group.
The double standard is kind of obvious.
"Yet the left seems more than willing to embrace the 'hurt feelings' of people it embraces as victims."
Maybe I'm guilty of minimising the hurt feelings of NZ gun owners that feel "demonised" (feelings that I don't really understand), yet when I weigh those (perhaps misunderstood) feelings against the afternoon killing of 51 worshippers in NZ, I personally feel comfortable about supporting the proposed gun controls. End of story, for me at least.
As I said above, the underlying pattern is how authoritarians exploit legitimate feelings of horror and revulsion in the aftermath of tragedy, and the moral authority this gives them, to impose broader agendas they could not otherwise achieve.
Like for example openly promoting the idea that any ACT party members should have their gun license removed. Even if said in ‘jest’.
Redlogix has abandoned logix just so he can be a "smartarse".
Must go with being a "born again" right wing apologist.
He knows full well I am the last person to be an “authoritarian”.
@KJT
Then don't say stupid authoritarian things.
Consider this; how would you react to this govt banning the Quran because ISIS used it to justify a vastly greater criminal horror than ChCh? Do you think law abiding Muslims might not object to this?
I don't think people who have expressed a wish to have a head on crash, should be allowed to drive a formula one on the Southern motorway, either!
People who express political persuasions that advocate killing brown people en-masse, should not be allowed weapons.
You can call that an "authoritarian" statement also, if you want.
"exploit legitimate feelings of horror and revulsion in the aftermath of tragedy"
Guessing that as well as "feelings of horror and revulsion", there was also a good deal of disbelief, anger and (later) resignation regarding the "tragedy" of 100 being gunned down in places of worship.
Our individual and collective responses to "tragedy" are things that define us. The responses of some gun owners to the proposed gun controls are defining them – wonder if those responses might also be contributing to the ‘demonisation‘ of the (silent) majority of gun owners. Is it too hopeful to imagine that majority thinking – "Please shut up."
@KJT
People who express political persuasions that advocate killing brown people en-masse, should not be allowed weapons.
Seems reasonable, but does this apply to all ACT party members? Anyone who identifies with the alt-right? Anyone who seems a bit entitled, or a bit racist from time to time? Exactly how do you decide the boundary between a legitimate loyalty to one's ethnic group, and a propensity to mass murder?
And even if you did set up an authority to make such determinations, you can be assured that exactly the kind of people you don't want making these decisions will put themselves forward to make them.
Besides our ChCh murderer never expressed any particular hatred of Muslims as such. Indeed he had traveled extensively in Islamic countries such as Pakistan and expressed how much he enjoyed them. Not exactly a big red flag.
If the feelings of "Horror and revulsion" brings on the gun control legislation, that the researchers who do know what they are talking about, have been advocating for years, that has to be a good thing.
Sorry if some of us feel “horror and revulsion” about mass murder.
Unfortunately the reason why it has to be "rushed" is so that an emotive and dishonest anti gun control lobby, driven by finance and support from companies that profit from selling guns, will again make it watered down and ineffective, when public attention is turned away from the issue.
I notice you didn’t object to an “authority” determining if mentally ill people could own rifles. Even though they are statistically much less likely to Kill other people, as a group, than White supremacists. Very “authoritarian” of you.
@KJT
Even though they are statistically much less likely to Kill other people, as a group, than White supremacists.
Right off the top of my head I can think of at least six mentally ill people who have committed murder in NZ. Two of them with quite personal connections.
That they didn't have a framework for mass murder in mind when they committed their killing isn't very relevant. The idea that mentally ill people are very unlikely to kill strikes me as a tad optimistic, if nothing else they're likely to be more of a threat to themselves than anyone else.
Mental illness is a form of incapacity that is incompatible with gun ownership, for the same reason that it is also defense in law for homicide.
I took out the middle bits to show the slide. KJT's point was rates, not numbers.
How many full-on white supremacists do we have? A few hundred? A few thousand?
How many "mentally ill" people? Hundreds of thousands.
Study after study shows that people with mental health issues are more likely to be victims of violent crime than healthy people, and less likely to be perpetrators of violent crime than healthy people.
@McF
How many full-on white supremacists do we have? A few hundred? A few thousand?
Before the left started conflating gun ownership with white supremacy … probably they could have held an annual convention in a telephone booth. Now I suspect they would need to hire a hall unfortunately.
Study after study shows that people with mental health issues are more likely to be victims of violent crime than healthy people,
True, but some forms of mental illness, schizophrenia in particular, are especially prone to violence of one form or another. Depression and anxiety which are by far the most commonplace illnesses are far more likely to kill themselves than anyone else.
However you care to slice and dice the numbers, if the mental illness is to remain an exonerating plea as a homicide defense, this ipso facto disqualifies them from gun ownership.
No slicing or dicing required. Just attention to what KJT actually wrote about people with mental health problems, which seems to be perfectly plausible:
Even though they are statistically much less likely to Kill other people, as a group, than White supremacists.
In this country n=1. This is not statistics. Even globally n is still less than a few dozen or so.
By contrast I can easily point to a very significant sample of of Muslim extremists who have committed mass murder and worse … all justified by reference to the Quran. Do you think we should ban it?
Seriously? You're pretending white supremacist murders in NZ are "N=1" (nope) and then pulling the Islamic terrorist diversion?
For what? To somehow argue that if WS murders aren't as big a problem as one fuckwit doubling last year's murder rate might indicate, gun owners shouldn't be inconvenienced?
Totally making non-gun owners feel safe around firearm owners, there…
Twenty years ago I was very close to someone murdered. There was clearly an ethnic/religious dimension to it, so I cannot rule out individual cases where this motivation has been present.
But on the political scale we are talking about, I still maintain n=1.
Hopefully it will remain that way and we never get to a sample large enough to draw 'statistical' inferences from.
https://qz.com/1182778/the-far-right-was-responsible-for-the-majority-of-extremist-killings-in-2017/
That is before we go into the right wing extremists supported by the US Government, elsewhere.
Micky is right the issue has been shamefully hijacked by Seymour and Bridges. Seymour quickly did the math and saw the advantage of having a percentage of the 200,000+ licensed firearms owners voting for ACT. It may well if it goes to plan unseat the Coalition and return National to government. If that happens it will be because we haven't taken the ordinary hunter and sports shooter with on the legislation and gone too far with regulation. Yes the ban on centre fire semis was necessary in the circumstances. Yes we do need a register and yes we do need to tighten up on who is a fit and proper person to own what is a lethal weapon. Do we need tighten up on gun clubs? No there is no evidence to suggest they present an issue. And before we force GP's to dob patients in let's consider the implications particularly in rural communities. Are farmers, hunters or sports shooters going to seek help for depression from their GP knowing that if they do the first thing that will happen is that the police will coming to take away their guns?
There is a genuine urban rural divide on firearms in New Zealand You'd be hard pressed to find gun owners in Grey Lynn or the Aro Valley. Out here in the Central Plateau I know very few households where there isn't one either for hunting or pest control. In my rural fire brigade literally every member either owns a gun or their partner does. Yet I don't know anyone I would describe as a gun nut. There was an acceptance of the semi auto ban it made sense. The only person I knew who had one was a professional pest control operator – it makes no difference to them the legislation enables them to continue as before on an E Cat license. But as more and more legislation gets rolled out there is a fear stoked by the ammosexual wing of COLFO and some of the less scrupulous gun gun dealers that the end game of government is to ban all firearms and with nothing being done to counter that argument it is seen as just another assault on rural New Zealand by an urban elite. The last thing I want to do is lose the election because we've imposed legislation we didn't need to to fix a problem we didn't have.
The Threat of Auto Lethal Guns
Various contributors to this ongoing discussion have mentioned the massive number of Guns / Gunowners in New Zealand.
One contributor gave the figure of 250,000 licensed Gun men.
Other contributors carry on scoffing at the Police. For they are held in contempt by the fabulous brilliance of the gun clubbers and their children. "Cops are Stupid". yeah
To me, some of these numbers look unverified. Some gunners maintain that 75% of devastating auto guns remain in the hands of owners.
There is obvious stupidity on the part of Winston and Bridges who mistakenly believe they will gain votes by giving open slather to Gunners. Normal intelligent voters do not want the madness of Auto Massive Guns.
We must eradicate all the persons who cuddle and own, and hide such weaponry.
In my opinion, Parliament will have to deny Citizenship to persons who do not abide by the Law of this Land. Seriously.
A queasy feeling to see the gun lobby doing their work on The Standard. Enough with the wounded innocence and special pleading you Gun–Nuts!
Oh that such energy was put into more deserving social issues of our era!
Tiger Mountain – a comment from ignorance should be ignored…. together with anyone who dismisses the genuine issues faced by legitimate FAL holders as coming from "Gun-Nuts."
If it's not beyond your level of comprehension, I suggest you actually look at why people are upset and some of the genuine issues that they raise….
Comments like your's go a long way to explaining why rural New Zealand will sadly be solidly National come September .
We well and truly have a gun lobby now – financed to the tune of $102 MILLIONS of taxpayers money paid out for the confiscated firearms – many of them old junk bunny guns with magazines only slightly larger than those still allowed.
RESULT!
To: Nikoli
The Gun Lobby has done nothing but abuse people who refuse to allow you the right to use outrageous lethal Arms.
Each one of you who whinge cry like litte children, keep saying we do not know what a gun is. Nonsense.! Abuse yourself – Not the sound normal people of our country.
I for one, will be submitting to Government that Auto Lethal Guns should not be allowed in your hands. – with the exception of a small list of Military Personnel and Police.
Failure of you or your Gun/ Clubbers to accept the Law of New Zealand should result in denied Citizenship – in this Superb Nation of New Zealand.
Observer Tokoroa – triggered (pun intended), and still ignorant: your comment "that Auto Lethal Guns " among others shows your ignorance, and intolerance for those whose view is different to yours. As for stripping citizenship? What is this – kindergarten? Did you get expelled from the sandpit?
Sadly, you don’t follow your own advice. No surprises there; do as I say, not as I do.
You seem upset Maurice
You and John Chapman have divulged that the National Party will be your heroes and will give you deadly gun money next election. Along with the help of mischievous NZ First.
National Voters will not be pleased with you. Nor will the present Government voters be enamoured of your armaments.
Such a small number of NZ people want your deadly dismal bloody auto shooting.
For the record, you will have the Police enforcing the GunLaw upon you without payment – whether you like it or not.
All because you want big killing toys going bang bang. And heaps of Christchurch Copy horrible, deadly Killings.
Observer Tokoroa
QUE?
Your leaps of illogic seem a little strange and a bit deranged …
We all need more HUGGZ
You seem upset Maurice
And abusive.
All because you want to blaze away on big bang bang Auto Guns.
New Zealanders in the main, are not proud of you. Far from it.
All we want to do is HUG you … Can you not be inclusive and sharing
Hi OT
If by "Auto Guns" you mean machine guns/or full autos they are currently and always have been illegal to fire by private citizens in Aotearoa
Collectors collect them sometimes
Semi-Autos are the ones that used to be legal and have now been banned
Hope this helps
" big bang bang Auto Guns" – You're projecting again…. dial back the hysteria, and understand that the person next to you in the supermarket may be a FAL holder – in which case, they have had more interaction with the Police than you, and been deemed fit and proper (as defined by the law) – you present yourself as irrational – based on many of your comments. Our communities should be more concerned of your actions, than the actions of those who continue to abide by the law, while being disappointed at the way we have been treated.
Not expecting a rational response – you've proven yourself incapable….
This sort of thing is why we don't believe in a register
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2020/03/firearms-licences-were-among-personal-details-breached-in-tuia250-security-failure.html
Remember that one of the main reasons that firearms licensees do not wish to be identified publicly (and therefore look a bit dodgy) is that it is so easy to find out where someone lives and then I am on the Mongrel Mob's target list of where they can get guns
The arms act 1983 is claimed by police and their Govt. servants to be past it's use by date, and unfit for purpose. This is true but not for the reasons expressed.
The 1983 act had public safety as its main tenet, and so licenced owners of firearms as fit and proper people, rather than the previous system of the listing the rifles that people owned. Shotguns have never been registered in NZ, even though they have been the weapon of choice for criminals when cut down.
Unfortunately, then as now, police were able to have input into arms legislation which resulted in the inclusion of regulatory offences with reverse onus (guilty until you prove your innocence) clauses, and requiring dealers to keep a register of all firearms sold. These additions made what was an otherwise acceptable piece of legislation, unfit for purpose as it destroyed the legal principle of innocent until proven guilty, and so removed the legal protection afforded all other citizens, but denied those who were licenced firearms owners.
The registration of firearms has never been responsible for the conviction of a murder, except possibly being useful in the framing of Arthur Alan Thomas.
What a firearms registry will do is create jobs. Lots of jobs. A huge bureaucracy will result to write the list, then maintain the list, licence the owners, licence the clubs, inspect the clubs, inspect the owners, write policies, review the policies, and rewrite the policies. Of course the expanded registry will have to have a home and there will be building jobs, and computer supply jobs, and office equipment jobs. Most of all there will be police jobs. Lots of police, herding the law-abiding, making sure that they comply with every regulation. Meanwhile the gangsters will get on with business as usual.